Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Arial

Arial is a widely used typeface family designed in 1982 by Robin Nicholas and Patricia Saunders for Monotype . It was initially created for an early laser printer to support high-quality digital typesetting. As a contemporary neo-grotesque design, Arial incorporates more humanist characteristics than many earlier sans-serifs, featuring softer curves, angled terminals, and a fuller treatment of letterforms that convey a friendlier, more approachable tone. This makes it particularly suitable for a broad range of applications, including text setting in reports, presentations, websites, and magazines, where clarity and readability are essential. Arial gained massive popularity after Monotype licensed it to , where it has been bundled as a core font with all versions of Windows since in 1992, as well as in and other software. The family includes numerous weights and styles, from thin to black, with condensed variants like Arial Narrow, offering flexibility for diverse design needs while maintaining metric compatibility with similar typefaces for seamless substitution in digital environments.

Name and Origins

Etymology

The name "Arial" is derived from the English word "aerial," which was adopted as a by the type foundry Monotype to evoke a of lightness and openness, qualities emblematic of the typeface's clean, structure. This linguistic choice reflects the design's emphasis on airy readability and unobtrusive form, aligning with the era's shift toward digital . During its development in 1982, designers Robin Nicholas and Patricia Saunders at Monotype Typography selected "Arial" through an internal naming process aimed at conveying modernity and broad accessibility for emerging computer-based printing systems. The name was initially applied to what had been a working project titled Sonoran Sans, but "Arial" was finalized to better capture the typeface's intended universal appeal and forward-looking aesthetic. Notably, the nomenclature avoids any explicit nod to —a with which Arial shares metric compatibility and stylistic traits—thereby highlighting the designers' focus on an independent identity rooted in innovation rather than imitation.

History

Arial was commissioned in 1982 by Monotype for IBM's 3800-3 laser printer, the first office model capable of 240 dpi , to serve as a metrically compatible alternative to for rendering. The project aimed to enable seamless substitution in printing workflows without requiring costly licenses for the Linotype-owned , which Monotype lacked full rights to distribute digitally at the time. The was designed by Robin Nicholas, then a supervisor in Monotype's Type Drawing Office, and Patricia Saunders, who together led a team of ten to complete the initial hand-drawn artwork that year. Drawing inspiration from Monotype's earlier family, Arial was first released as a font optimized for low-resolution output, initially under the working name "Sonoran Sans" for compatibility. In 1990, Monotype developed a version of Arial, which licensed and bundled as one of four core fonts in (released in 1992), propelling its widespread adoption on personal computers. This inclusion marked version 1.00 of the font, focused on basic Latin support and precise hinting for screen readability. The typeface's evolution continued through corporate changes and technical advancements; in 2006, acquired Linotype GmbH, bringing under the same ownership and facilitating further alignments in digital font libraries. Subsequent updates expanded the family, adding weights, international glyphs, and features to meet evolving software demands. Post-2023 historical reevaluations have spotlighted the business motivations driving Arial's creation, emphasizing 's strategy to offer a functional proxy amid rising digital licensing costs in the early . These analyses highlight how the design avoided legal conflicts—given U.S. law's lack of typeface protection—while prioritizing metric equivalence over aesthetic novelty. In 2025, publications by type historians such as Ulrich Stiehl detailed the technical and legal backstory, revealing IBM-specific adaptations like erased copyright notices in early versions and the deliberate metric matching to PostScript Helvetica variants for printer substitution. These disclosures underscore Arial's role in the transition from analog to digital typography, cementing its legacy as a pragmatic innovation shaped by industry economics.

Design and Characteristics

Core Design Features

Arial is a neo-grotesque characterized by its humanist influences, which include uniform stroke widths along with subtle design elements like open apertures in letters such as 'a', 'c', and 'e', allowing for better distinction between similar forms, and diagonally sheared terminals on strokes that soften the otherwise mechanical appearance, contributing to improved across various sizes and media and a more organic feel compared to strictly geometric designs. A key aspect of Arial's design is its metric compatibility with , ensuring similar , cap height, and character spacing to facilitate seamless substitution in digital without reflow issues. This compatibility stems from its as a functional equivalent for low-resolution output devices, where precise proportions maintain neutral, balanced forms that avoid visual distortion. The features uniform weight distribution across its styles, providing consistent thickness and even spacing that supports clear hierarchy in text and display applications. Arial primarily supports Latin scripts, with glyphs optimized for Western European languages, though extensions include Cyrillic, Greek, and Armenian characters for broader usability. In terms of digital evolution, the font was initially crafted in 1982 for IBM laser printers, but subsequent updates incorporated advanced hinting techniques to improve on-screen rendering at small sizes, ensuring crisp edges and alignment on pixel grids for enhanced legibility in computing environments.

Comparison to Similar Typefaces

Arial shares significant visual resemblances with , another prominent neo-grotesque typeface, including similar proportions, uniform stroke widths, and overall neutral appearance that contributes to their frequent confusion in and contexts. However, subtle design differences distinguish them: the lowercase 'a' in features a distinct tail and a bowl that flows smoothly into the like a backward 's', whereas Arial's 'a' lacks the tail and has a simpler intersection; the stroke endings in are typically horizontal or vertical for a more mechanical look, while Arial employs diagonal terminals on letters like 'c', 'e', 'g', and 's', resulting in softer, more rounded forms and open counters. Additionally, 's 'G' includes a at the bottom of the , absent in Arial, and Arial exhibits an that matches 's, enhancing its on screens despite the fonts sharing the same baseline metrics in many cases. Both typefaces use a double-storey lowercase 'g', but Arial's version aligns with its overall tendency toward simplified, less intricate curves compared to 's more refined detailing. Criticisms of Arial often label it a "Helvetica " due to its by Monotype in specifically to match Helvetica's metrics for with printers and early computer systems, allowing seamless substitution without reflowing text in documents—a practical necessity for Microsoft's Windows platform rather than outright copying of the glyph shapes. This metric , while functional, has fueled typographic disdain, as Arial's design is perceived as a cost-effective lacking Helvetica's elegance and precision, with designers like Mark Simonson describing it as a "scourge" for its ubiquity and perceived inferiority in aesthetic quality. In contrast to , Helvetica's 19th-century predecessor from the , Arial represents a further evolution in the neo-grotesque lineage but with even greater uniformity and reduced idiosyncrasies; features more varied stroke contrasts and characterful details, such as angled 'S' endings and a spurred 'G', which Helvetica smoothed out and Arial simplified further for digital reproduction, making Arial appear more generic and less expressive. Modern alternatives like Google's , released in 2011, diverge from Arial by incorporating a more geometric structure with friendly, open curves optimized for mobile screens, offering a taller , condensed forms for better space efficiency, and enhanced readability metrics that surpass Arial's in user preference studies, positioning as a contemporary successor in the category. Legal and ethical discussions surrounding Arial highlight the blurred line between inspiration and imitation in typeface design, where U.S. protects only the software of fonts, not their visual designs, allowing metric-compatible clones like Arial without infringement—Linotype, Helvetica's owner, pursued no legal action despite similarities. Ethically, however, Arial's creation raises questions of originality, as its deliberate mimicry of Helvetica's metrics and forms is seen by some typographers as opportunistic rather than innovative, though proponents argue it democratized access to a Helvetica-like aesthetic for widespread computing use without the licensing costs. This debate underscores broader industry tensions, where functional necessities like printer compatibility often prioritize utility over distinct artistic contribution.

Distribution and Usage

Inclusion in Software and Systems

Arial has been pre-installed as a core font in since version 3.1, released in 1992, making it one of the original fonts bundled with the operating system to ensure broad for text rendering and document creation. This inclusion continued across subsequent Windows versions, including , where Arial remains a standard system font without significant design alterations since its initial implementation. On macOS, Arial is not a native system font but is installed through applications, providing seamless cross-platform support for users working in mixed environments. In Linux distributions, Arial is available via optional packages such as the Microsoft Core Fonts installer (ttf-mscorefonts-installer on Debian-based systems), allowing users to add it for compatibility with Windows-originated documents. As a default sans-serif typeface, plays a prominent role in through common CSS font stacks, where it serves as a reliable fallback option alongside or the generic sans-serif declaration, ensuring consistent rendering across browsers like , , and . In office productivity suites, such as , Arial has historically been a go-to sans-serif choice for professional documents, though defaults have shifted to fonts like in recent versions; its ubiquity stems from its pre-installation, facilitating easy adoption without additional downloads. This bundling has driven widespread use, with Arial achieving near-universal compatibility—over 98% on Windows and systems—contributing to its prevalence in digital documents and web content throughout the 2020s. Arial's evolution includes enhancements for broader character support, notably through variants like Arial Unicode MS, which expanded glyph coverage to align with standards for international text handling, though Microsoft ceased updates to this specific extension in favor of integrated system improvements. In modern operating systems like , these updates focus on maintenance rather than redesign, preserving Arial's metric compatibility with similar typefaces. No major revisions to the core Arial font family have occurred post-2023, ensuring stability for legacy and new applications alike.

Licensing and Retail Availability

Arial is owned by , which holds the trademark for the through The Monotype Corporation. The font family is licensed to for inclusion in Windows operating systems and applications, permitting free use by end-users within those environments for standard desktop and document creation purposes. However, for advanced applications such as embedding in PDFs or apps, font usage, or commercial embedding outside of Microsoft-licensed software, users must acquire a separate directly from Monotype to comply with rights. Retail versions of Arial are distributed by Monotype and its subsidiary Linotype through platforms like MyFonts, offering professional editions such as the family. These pro variants include extended glyph sets supporting multiple languages and scripts beyond basic Latin characters, enabling broader typographic applications in global design projects. Family packages typically range from individual style purchases starting at $43.99 to comprehensive bundles for desktop, web, and app use, with custom enterprise licensing available for large-scale deployments. Microsoft-specific implementations like Arial Unicode MS extend the font's capabilities for international support, incorporating a vast character set for multilingual text rendering and included with installations. While originally exclusively licensed to , updated versions of Arial Unicode MS are now obtainable directly from Monotype for non-Microsoft contexts. Monotype's (EULA) for Arial strictly prohibits modification of font files, such as editing glyphs or metrics, and restricts redistribution by barring the copying, sharing, or inclusion of font software in third-party products without explicit permission. These terms, treating fonts as , apply to both bundled and retail licenses, with enforcement aimed at preventing unauthorized commercial exploitation. Licensing has sparked debates in developer communities, particularly regarding high costs for commercial use in applications and games, reported up to €20,000 per year as of 2025.

Variants and Extensions

Standard Variants

The standard variants of the Arial typeface family include a comprehensive set of weights ranging from to , providing flexibility for various typographic needs while maintaining the core neo-grotesque design principles. These weights encompass , , Medium, Bold, Extra Bold, and , with matching italic styles available for through Bold to support slanted text applications. The weight serves as the baseline for general text setting, while Bold and offer increased stroke thickness for emphasis and headlines, ensuring consistent proportions across the family. Condensed variants, primarily under the Arial Narrow designation, reduce the width by approximately 25% compared to standard proportions, making them ideal for compact layouts such as tables or sidebars. Available in , Italic, Bold, and Bold Italic styles, these maintain readability at small sizes due to optimized spacing and humanist curve adjustments. For designs requiring a softer, more approachable aesthetic, Arial Rounded introduces blunted terminals and rounded edges, offered in Light, , Bold, and Extra Bold weights to convey friendliness in branding or informal contexts. Arial Monospaced constitutes a fixed-width subfamily tailored for monospaced applications like programming or data alignment, featuring uniform character widths in , Oblique, Bold, and Bold Oblique styles. Across all standard variants, the family supports cross-platform compatibility, notably as a default inclusion in Windows and macOS systems since the early , allowing seamless rendering in applications from word processors to web browsers. OpenType implementations in these variants enable advanced features such as discretionary ligatures for improved letter combinations, old-style fractions for numerical clarity, and tabular figures for aligned data, enhancing professional typesetting without altering the fundamental structure. coverage in the standard set prioritizes Western European languages, encompassing the full Latin character set including diacritics for languages like , , and , to facilitate everyday multilingual use in print and .

Specialized Variants

Arial CE is a specialized variant of the typeface developed to support Central European languages, including characters for , , , and Slovak, among others. This version was supplied with European editions of and can be added to North American versions via the Central European language support package. It extends the standard Latin set with diacritics and letterforms necessary for accurate rendering in these scripts, ensuring in multilingual documents. Similarly, Arial Cyrillic provides dedicated support for Russian and other Cyrillic-based scripts, incorporating the full range of Cyrillic glyphs such as ё, й, and щ, alongside standard Latin characters. Offered as a complete family by Monotype, this variant maintains the neo-grotesque style of the original while optimizing stroke weights and proportions for Cyrillic letterforms to enhance readability in Eastern European contexts. It is particularly useful for bilingual publications and software interfaces requiring seamless integration of Latin and Cyrillic text. Arial Nova represents a significant expansion of the Arial family, introduced in 2015 as part of Windows 10's Pan-European Supplemental Fonts package. This redesign by the Monotype Design Office refines the classic proportions for improved performance in digital and print media, supporting approximately 650 glyphs across Latin, Greek, and Cyrillic scripts. While not primarily focused on mathematical notation, it includes essential symbols compatible with Unicode standards, aiding technical documentation in European languages. Arial Unicode MS is an extended variant commissioned by for international support, featuring over 50,000 glyphs to cover a wide range of scripts and languages beyond Western European ones, including Asian, , and Hebrew characters. It is included with applications and provides comprehensive coverage for global multilingual documents.

Influences in Other Font Families

Arial's design metrics, including its relatively tall x-height and uniform stroke widths optimized for low-resolution screens, laid foundational principles for subsequent Microsoft sans-serif typefaces, establishing a clear lineage in digital typography. Calibri, developed by Lucas de Groot and released in 2007 as part of Microsoft's ClearType font suite, succeeded Times New Roman as the default font in Office applications like PowerPoint and Excel, establishing a new sans-serif standard in the lineage following Arial's neutral design while enhancing on-screen legibility. In 2023, Aptos succeeded Calibri as the default font in Microsoft 365, continuing the evolution of neutral sans-serifs for digital documents. Segoe UI, created by Steve Matteson and introduced with Windows Vista in 2007, further evolved this tradition by improving upon Arial's readability with more open letterforms and variable weights, becoming the standard system font for better user experience across Windows applications. The acquisition of Linotype by Monotype (Arial's developer) in 2006 expanded access to combined typeface libraries, facilitating the creation of hybrid designs that incorporate Arial's metric compatibility with while blending elements from Linotype's catalog. This cross-licensing enabled Monotype to produce updated font families, such as metric-adjusted variants of sans-serifs, ensuring seamless integration in legacy software and print workflows without disrupting established proportions. Arial's clean proportions and high have been adapted in , where similar neutral sans-serifs are favored for their modern, approachable aesthetic in and visual identities. For instance, tech and firms often select typefaces echoing Arial's balanced widths and stroke consistency to convey reliability and simplicity in materials. In web , Arial's influence appears subtly in early releases, where designs like Arimo were engineered for metric compatibility to mimic Arial's layout behavior, supporting consistent rendering across browsers and devices without proprietary licensing constraints.

Open-Source and Free Alternatives

Due to the proprietary nature of Arial and the associated licensing fees imposed by Monotype for its use in open-source software distributions and document embedding, several free and open-source alternatives have been developed to provide metric-compatible substitutes. Liberation Sans, released by Red Hat in 2007 in collaboration with Ascender Corporation, serves as a primary open-source alternative specifically designed for metric compatibility with Arial, ensuring that substituted text maintains identical line lengths and layout fidelity in applications like LibreOffice and Fedora distributions. This font family, licensed under the SIL Open Font License, covers Latin, Greek, and Cyrillic scripts with over 600 glyphs, allowing seamless replacement in proprietary document formats without reflow issues. Arimo, developed by Steve Matteson and distributed via Google Fonts since 2010 as part of the Croscore (Chrome OS Core) font project, offers another freely licensed sans-serif option with proportions and metrics closely aligned to Arial for web and cross-platform use. Available under the SIL Open Font License, Arimo supports extended Latin, Greek, Cyrillic, and Hebrew characters, making it suitable for multilingual web typography while avoiding proprietary embedding costs. In terms of glyph fidelity, both Liberation Sans and Arimo replicate Arial's neutral, humanist characteristics but introduce subtle design refinements, such as more open counters in lowercase letters for improved at small sizes. Regarding rendering performance, Arimo incorporates enhanced hinting instructions that yield superior on-screen clarity compared to Arial, particularly on low-resolution displays, while Liberation Sans provides robust hinting optimized for environments. These alternatives thus enable high-fidelity substitution in open-source contexts without compromising visual consistency.

References

  1. [1]
    Arial Font | Webfont & Desktop | MyFonts
    ### Arial Font Family Summary
  2. [2]
    Arial font family - Typography | Microsoft Learn
    Aug 8, 2025 · Arial is an extremely versatile family of typefaces which can be used with equal success for text setting in reports, presentations, magazines etc.
  3. [3]
    Required Microsoft Fonts - Microsoft Q&A
    May 27, 2025 · Arial (Body CS) is bundled with all versions of Microsoft Windows since Windows 3.1; widely available in Microsoft Office and other programs.
  4. [4]
    Guide to Arial’s History: Inspired Design or Helvetica Copy?
    ### Summary of Arial Name and Related Details
  5. [5]
    Arial - Wiktionary, the free dictionary
    Etymology. Derived from the word aerial, introduced as a trademark by Monotype. Pronunciation. Rhymes: -ɛəɹiəl. Proper noun. English Wikipedia has an ...
  6. [6]
  7. [7]
    Feature | Robin Nicholas - Eye Magazine
    As a type designer, he is most famous for the ubiquitous typeface Arial (1982), originally developed from Monotype Grotesque as a bitmap font for IBM laser ...
  8. [8]
    Arial, the controversial sans serif - Casey Printing
    Sep 13, 2013 · Designed in 1982 for Monotype Typography by a team of ten led by Robin Nicholas and Patricia Saunders, Arial was originally designed for the IBM ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  9. [9]
  10. [10]
    Is Arial a Plagiarism of Helvetica?
    Apr 25, 2024 · From a purely practical standpoint, it would likely be considered one. It clearly and deliberately aped Helvetica and did so without clear attribution.Missing: publications backstory
  11. [11]
    [PDF] The Funny Font Forging Industry - Sanskrit Web
    In later versions of Arial, the erased notice was replaced by this notice: "Contemporary sans serif design, Arial contains more humanist characteristics than ...
  12. [12]
    Font names/aliases - Luc Devroye
    Oct 28, 2025 · Ulrich Stiehl's compilation of type equivalences, as taken from ... Well, this is the original Arial, actually, with the name used on the IBM 3800 ...<|separator|>
  13. [13]
    Arial - Adobe Fonts
    Free delivery 14-day returnsArial is a plain, basic sans serif font with simple lines, designed in 1982. It has a no-nonsense industrial look and is licensed by Microsoft.Missing: MyFonts | Show results with:MyFonts
  14. [14]
  15. [15]
    How To Spot Arial - Mark Simonson Studio
    Feb 21, 2001 · The “a” in Helvetica has a tail; Arial does not. Also, the bowl of the “a” flows into the stem like a backwards “s”; the bowl of Arial's “a” simply intersects ...
  16. [16]
    Arial or Helvetica – Do you spot the difference? - Pimp my Type
    Mar 9, 2021 · Helvetica has a more rectangular appearance and horizontal stroke endings. Arial has more open shapes (C, e) and a diagonal leg at the r and the a has no tail.
  17. [17]
    Arial vs Helvetica - Difference and Comparison - Diffen
    Arial contains more humanist characteristics than Helvetica which is originally Grotesk. The overall treatment of curves is softer and fuller in Arial when ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  18. [18]
    Blue Pencil no. 18—Some history about Arial
    Sep 24, 2011 · Arial was originally called Sonoran Sans during its development but I believe that IBM used the name Arial by the time it was released.
  19. [19]
    The Scourge of Arial - Mark Simonson Studio
    Feb 21, 2001 · The situation today is that Arial has displaced Helvetica as the standard font in practically everything done by nonprofessionals in print ...Missing: publications backstory
  20. [20]
    Arial versus Helvetica - I Love Typography
    Oct 6, 2007 · If Arial is a rip-off of Helvetica, then Helvetica is a rip-off of Akzidenz Grotesk; or we could simply say that they are both rip-offs of ...
  21. [21]
    Roboto - Google Fonts
    Roboto has a dual nature. It has a mechanical skeleton and the forms are largely geometric. At the same time, the font features friendly and open curves.<|separator|>
  22. [22]
    Why are Metric Compatible fonts not copyright infringement?
    Jan 27, 2018 · E.g. the popular Helvetica font was cloned multiple times. Arial is heavily based on Helvetica but differs in a few details. Arial was in ...Missing: criticism | Show results with:criticism
  23. [23]
    Font List Windows 11 - Typography - Microsoft Learn
    Jun 16, 2022 · Introduction. This is a list of fonts that shipped with Windows 11. Your versions numbers may be different if you did not apply Windows updates.Arial font family · Microsoft Sans Serif font family · Calibri font family · Cascadia Code
  24. [24]
    Why Windows Replaces Helvetica with Arial — The Hidden Font ...
    Oct 19, 2025 · Mac computers have Helvetica as a macOS supplied font as well as Arial which is installed by Microsoft Office. For example, here's a ...Missing: via | Show results with:via<|separator|>
  25. [25]
    How to Install Microsoft Fonts on Ubuntu Linux [Easy Way] - It's FOSS
    Times New Roman, Arial, and other such fonts are owned by Microsoft, and they are not open source. Many Linux distributions don't provide proprietary software ...
  26. [26]
    CSS Web Safe Fonts - W3Schools
    Arial is the most widely used font for both online and printed media. Arial is also the default font in Google Docs. Arial is one of the safest web fonts.
  27. [27]
    CSS Font Stack: Web Safe and Web Font Family with HTML and ...
    Sans-serif ; Arial. Win: 99.84%. Mac: 98.74% ; Arial Black. Win: 98.08%. Mac: 96.22% ; Arial Narrow. Win: 88.39%. Mac: 94.77% ; Arial Rounded MT Bold. Win: 59.53%.
  28. [28]
    Arial Unicode MS font family - Typography - Microsoft Learn
    Mar 30, 2022 · We stopped servicing and updating Arial Unicode and no longer install it as part of Office. However, updated versions of the font are available ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  29. [29]
    What happened to the Arial Unicode MS font? - The Old New Thing
    Oct 30, 2018 · When Microsoft included Arial Unicode MS with earlier versions of Office, Microsoft paid a licensing fee to The Monotype Corporation, which ...
  30. [30]
    Do I have to buy license for font while I bought ... - Microsoft Learn
    Mar 14, 2024 · We recommend that you contact the owner of the font, Monotype Corporation, as Arial fonts are not open source or public domain fonts and are ...Arial font license steps and cost associated - Microsoft Q&AAny restriction to use fonts Arial/Arial Black/Arial Narrow?More results from learn.microsoft.com
  31. [31]
    Font licencing for Arial & co. - Unity Discussions
    Mar 4, 2016 · As for the default font (Arial) Unity converts the font to Liberation Sans for builds, so there are no license problems with that one.
  32. [32]
  33. [33]
    Arial Central European - Fonts - dasauge
    Arial Condensed ItalicPackage, Central European. Arial® Narrow CE Italic Package. Fonts.com. Download package… ArialPackage, Central European. Arial® CE Package.Missing: variant | Show results with:variant
  34. [34]
  35. [35]
    Arial Nova font family - Typography | Microsoft Learn
    Mar 30, 2022 · Arial Nova is a subtle redesign of the classic Arial family. It is suitable for document paragraphs and headings. These fonts are designed for European ...Missing: 2019 | Show results with:2019
  36. [36]
    Arial Nova in use - Fonts In Use
    Designed by Monotype Design Office in 2014, based on the original 1982 design by Robin Nicholas and Patricia Saunders.
  37. [37]
    Variable fonts | Monotype Fonts Help Center
    Use the following steps to sync variable font to Monotype Desktop App: Click Sync & Download options icon to sync the required variable font. In Sync to ...
  38. [38]
    sans serif - Recommendation for Helvetica-like font with excellent ...
    Nov 23, 2017 · Must have excellent distinguishability of similar letters like I/l. It should be obvious what letter a glyph represents, even if it stands alone ...<|separator|>
  39. [39]
    Beyond Calibri: Finding Microsoft's next default font
    Apr 28, 2021 · Microsoft already has Arial—which has many attributes from grotesque types preceding Helvetica—and my approach was to design a sans serif which ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  40. [40]
    Fonts - Win32 apps - Microsoft Learn
    Jun 3, 2021 · Segoe UI is an approachable, open, and friendly typeface, and as a result has better readability than Tahoma, Microsoft Sans Serif, and Arial.
  41. [41]
    Fonts and typography - Red Hat brand standards
    To solve this, Red Hat worked with type foundry Ascender Corp. in 2007 to release Liberation Sans as an open source substitute for popular proprietary fonts ...
  42. [42]
    Legal font licensing: Secrets to avoiding pitfalls with fonts. - Monotype
    Legal battles over font licensing make for bad press and more expenses. The campaign must be removed from both physical and digital platforms.Missing: Liberation | Show results with:Liberation
  43. [43]
    Liberation Fonts - Red Hat
    There are three sets, Sans (a substitute for Arial, Albany, Helvetica, Nimbus Sans L, and Bitstream Vera Sans), Serif (a substitute for Times New Roman, ...
  44. [44]
    This is liberation fonts version 1.7 without narrow fonts - GitHub
    The Liberation(tm) Fonts is a font family which aims at metric compatibility with Arial, Times New Roman, and Courier New.
  45. [45]
    Arimo - Google Fonts
    Arimo was designed by Steve Matteson as an innovative, refreshing sans serif design that is metrically compatible with Arial™.
  46. [46]
    Differences - Arial & Liberation Sans - Identifont
    Note that the fonts in the icons shown above represent general examples, not necessarily the two fonts chosen for comparison.Missing: glyph fidelity hinting
  47. [47]
    Liberation fonts and the tricky task of internationalization - LWN.net
    Jun 19, 2012 · The perception among the public is that the commercial fonts are of higher quality than the community-built fonts; a charge likely to rankle ...