Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

2011 Nepal census

The National and Housing 2011 was the eleventh decennial in 's history, conducted by the Central Bureau of Statistics to enumerate the country's total of 26,494,504 as of the official Day on June 22, 2011. Fieldwork spanned June 17 to August 25, 2011, marking the centennial of systematic census-taking in since 1911. The recorded 5,427,302 households, an annual growth rate of 1.35% from the baseline of 23,151,423, and a of approximately 94 males per 100 females, with females comprising 51.5% of the total. It employed a modified methodology supplemented by enumeration in challenging areas, using a short schedule for complete coverage and a long schedule for a 4.2% sample to collect detailed data on demographics, , mother tongue, literacy, marital status, migration, disability, and housing characteristics. Urban residents accounted for 17% of the population (about 4.5 million), concentrated in areas like , while 83% lived rurally, reflecting 's predominantly agrarian and topographically diverse terrain. stood at 65.9% for those aged five and older, with male rates at 75.1% and female at 57.4%, underscoring persistent disparities amid overall progress. The operation faced logistical hurdles in remote Himalayan and regions, compounded by political instability and security issues, yet achieved broad coverage through national funding (98.5%) and a with 40% female enumerators. Key outputs included insights into 's ethnic mosaic—over 100 groups—and socioeconomic shifts, informing policy on development, federal restructuring, and resource allocation in a nation spanning altitudes from 70 to 8,848 meters.

Background and Planning

Historical Context

Nepal's population census tradition originated with the first national enumeration in , conducted through traditional head-counting methods under the Rana regime. This initial effort established a decennial rhythm, with subsequent counts in 1920-1921, 1930-1931, and 1941-1942, though these pre-independence exercises often suffered from incomplete coverage and reliance on administrative records rather than systematic fieldwork. Evidence from historical records indicates potential undercounts in these early phases, attributed to logistical challenges in remote terrains and limited central authority. The shift to modern scientific approaches occurred with the 1952-1954 census, the first to employ enumeration principles and structured questionnaires following Nepal's democratic transition and international assistance from the . This marked a departure from counts, enabling more reliable data on demographics, housing, and migration. Subsequent decennial censuses in 1961, 1971, 1981, 1991, and 2001, overseen by the Central Bureau of Statistics (established in 1959), documented accelerating population growth—from 8.4 million in 1952-1954 to 23.2 million in 2001—driven by high fertility rates and improved survival amid economic development and health interventions. By the early , these censuses had become foundational for national planning, informing and policy amid and ethnic diversity. The , as the eleventh in the series, coincided with the centennial of 's census history and addressed data gaps from the 2001 enumeration, particularly in conflict-affected regions where the Maoist insurgency (1996-2006) had disrupted prior fieldwork.

Preparation and Objectives

The National Population and Housing Census 2011, the eleventh in Nepal's series and marking a century since the first in 1911, was prepared under the Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS) within the National Planning Commission (NPC). Preparatory activities commenced in 2007, supported by the enactment of the Census Act 2011, which provided legal framework for data collection and enforcement. A multi-tiered committee structure oversaw planning, including the Census Steering Committee and National Census Coordination Committee, both chaired by the NPC Vice-Chairman; the Technical Committee, led by the CBS Director General; and district-level coordination committees chaired by Chief District Officers. These bodies coordinated with ministries and statistical agencies to address logistical needs, with technical assistance from UNFPA and UN Volunteers, and a total budget of NPR 2.2 billion allocated for operations spanning 2007/08 to 2012/13. Key preparatory processes included cartographic mapping from 2008 to 2010, utilizing , GPS, and GIS to delineate areas across 3,915 Village Development Committees and municipalities, followed by field verification. Household listing operations occurred in October–November 2010 to establish sampling frames, while a pilot tested methodologies in 11 districts during April–May 2010. programs trained approximately 150 master trainers in January–February 2011, who in turn prepared 80 district officers, 7,900 supervisors, and 30,793 enumerators through phased sessions up to June 2011, emphasizing inclusivity with over 40% female enumerators and representation from diverse castes and ethnicities. Publicity efforts involved media campaigns via television, radio, newspapers, and a dedicated website to build awareness and cooperation. The census's objectives centered on generating benchmark demographic, social, economic, and data to inform national planning, policy formulation, and evaluation of socio-economic conditions and population trends. Specific aims included determining , growth rates, geographic distribution, characteristics, and ethnic composition, and levels, economic activity, prevalence, and structures, thereby providing disaggregated statistics by , , , mother tongue, , and other variables for evidence-based development strategies.

Methodology

Enumeration Approach

The 2011 National Population and Housing of utilized a modified enumeration approach, counting individuals at their usual place of residence—defined as the location where they had lived for six months or longer in the preceding 12 months—while making exceptions for homeless persons, nomadic groups, and those temporarily absent, who were recorded where found on the census reference date of June 22, 2011. This method, adopted consistently since the 1952/54 census, aimed to capture stable residency patterns amid 's rural-urban migration and seasonal mobility, reducing volatility associated with pure counting. Enumeration proceeded via door-to-door visits conducted by approximately 31,000 trained , supervised by 7,900 field officers at a ratio of 1:4 to enhance oversight and data accuracy. Prior to full , a household listing phase mapped and registered structures from May 15 to approximately May 29, 2011, delineating areas (EAs) prepared since 2009. The core ran from June 17 to 27, 2011, covering all 75 districts and ensuring no Village Development Committees or wards were omitted, with independent monitoring to verify completeness. Data instruments included a short-form schedule applied universally for basic and details (complete ) and a long-form schedule for in-depth topics administered to every eighth via , enabling efficient while maintaining comprehensive coverage. Enumerators, recruited locally and trained for 10 days on procedures, concepts, and questionnaires, filled forms by interviewing heads or knowledgeable adults, with responses coded via circling options to minimize errors. Quality controls during fieldwork encompassed spot checks, re-interviews, and supervisory reviews, yielding a net under- rate of 4.0%.

Data Topics and Instruments

The 2011 Nepal National Population and Housing Census employed three primary data collection instruments: a Household Listing Form, Schedule 1 (short form), and Schedule 2 (long form). The Household Listing Form was used in the initial phase to enumerate and map all households within enumeration areas, capturing basic details such as the number of houses and households per structure. Schedule 1 facilitated complete enumeration across the entire , while Schedule 2 targeted a stratified sample of approximately 12.5% of households (using an 8:1 sampling ratio) for expanded inquiries. These instruments were paper-based, administered by trained enumerators during door-to-door visits from November 11 to 25, 2011, with provisions for institutional populations and remote areas. Schedule 1 focused on core and individual attributes essential for benchmark counts. Household-level topics included housing type (e.g., structure materials for walls, , and ), (distinguishing female-headed or female-owned properties for the first time), access to facilities (e.g., water source, , , cooking ), and assets (e.g., radio, television, holdings). Individual-level encompassed name, relationship to household head, , (in completed years), /, mother tongue, , , marital status (categorizing never married, first monogamous marriage, polygamous marriage, or remarriage), (in any language), and current for those aged 5 and above. These topics enabled derivation of basic demographic profiles and housing conditions for the full enumerated of 26,494,504 persons across 6,743,952 . Schedule 2 extended inquiries for sampled households to capture socioeconomic depth. Household topics overlapped with Schedule 1 but added details on agricultural land ownership and production. Individual topics included detailed education (highest level completed and major field of study for those aged 5+), economic activity (occupation, industry, status in employment, months worked in past year, including non-economic household tasks), migration (place of birth, years of residence in current district, reason for migration, and place of residence five years prior), and disability (type and severity for those reporting any impairment). New inclusions addressed demands for granularity, such as sub-caste (thar) identification within ethnic groups and explicit female property rights, reflecting policy priorities for equity analysis without altering core de jure residency definitions. This dual-form approach balanced comprehensive coverage with resource constraints, yielding data on fertility, mortality proxies, and labor force participation from the sample.

Execution

Field Operations

The field operations of the 2011 Nepal National Population and Housing were conducted in two primary phases: household listing and individual . Household listing, carried out primarily by supervisors, occurred from May 15 to June 1, 2011, to identify and map households within enumeration areas, which were typically wards or parts thereof, allocated based on estimated workload. Individual followed from June 17 to June 27, 2011, with June 22 designated as the reference date (sunrise), during which enumerators collected demographic, social, and housing data using paper-based questionnaires. A workforce of approximately 52,000 to 56,000 enumerators and 7,500 to 12,000 supervisors was mobilized, organized hierarchically under district census offices, area census offices, and supervision areas, with a supervisor-to-enumerator ratio of 1:4 to enhance oversight. Recruitment drew heavily from local teachers and community members, emphasizing inclusivity with over 40% of staff comprising women, Janajatis, and Dalits. Training lasted 5 to 10 days for both enumerators and supervisors, conducted in May and early June 2011 by Central Bureau of Statistics officials, covering questionnaire use, mapping, and data collection protocols. Logistical efforts included printing 15 million questionnaires, 60,000 enumerator manuals, and 15,000 supervisor manuals, distributed via to 67 , air-drops to remote areas like Bajhang and Humla, and postal or local administrative channels where necessary. Supervisors performed spot checks on 10% of households, re-interviews, and field verifications, supplemented by independent monitoring from organizations across all 75 . Operations faced logistical hurdles in 's mountainous terrain, including weather disruptions, floods isolating areas, and transportation delays in remote regions, alongside incomplete household lists and occasional respondent reluctance. Political transitions and security concerns in certain wards necessitated adaptive measures, such as extended timelines in affected zones, yet the approach ensured coverage of residents present on day. A subsequent post- survey in September 2011 estimated a net under- rate of 4.0%, informing data adjustments.

Challenges Encountered

The 2011 Nepal census faced significant logistical hurdles due to the country's diverse and challenging topography, including high-altitude Himalayan regions, rugged hills, and remote plains, which complicated enumerator access to isolated settlements requiring extensive trekking and limited transportation options. In particular, conflict-affected areas in the and remote hill districts proved difficult or impossible to reach fully, exacerbating undercoverage risks in these zones. Field operations were further strained by inadequate training of enumerators, many of whom were school teachers with limited preparation for census-specific tasks, leading to inconsistencies in data recording and potential quality lapses. barriers compounded these issues, as local linguistic groups were often not mobilized, resulting in communication gaps between enumerators and respondents in linguistically diverse communities. Ongoing political instability from Nepal's post-civil war transition, including stalled peace processes and weak governance, created security concerns in certain regions, hindering timely enumeration and contributing to incomplete coverage. Management of , , and finances also demanded careful oversight to mitigate delays in material distribution and enumerator deployment across Nepal's 75 . These factors collectively challenged the Central Bureau of Statistics' efforts to maintain during the November 22–25 enumeration period.

Key Results

Total Population and Growth

The National Population and Housing 2011 enumerated a total population of 26,494,504 residents in , comprising 12,849,041 males and 13,645,463 females. This figure represented households across all 75 and 3,915 local units, with enumeration principles applied to capture usual residents. The , conducted primarily from to 25, 2011 (corresponding to Mangsir 1-15 in the , with a reference night of November 10), provided the baseline for demographic planning amid 's post-conflict stabilization. Compared to the 2001 census total of 23,151,423, the 2011 count indicated an intercensal increase of 3,343,081 persons, or a total of 14.45 percent over the decade. The average annual rate decelerated to 1.35 percent, down from 2.25 percent in the 1991-2001 period, reflecting factors such as improved access to , out-migration for employment, and residual effects from the Maoist (1996-2006) that disrupted earlier trends. This slowdown aligned with broader South Asian patterns of declining fertility rates, though Nepal's rate remained above replacement level at approximately 2.4 children per woman during the period. Rural areas accounted for the majority of the at 79.8 percent, but outpaced rural at 2.69 percent annually, driven by to emerging centers.

Demographic Profiles

The 2011 Nepal census recorded a total of 26,494,504, comprising 12,849,041 males and 13,645,463 s. This resulted in a national of 94.2 males per 100 females, reflecting a slight female majority, with areas showing a higher ratio of 104 males per 100 females compared to 92 in rural areas. Age structure data indicated a youthful population, with significant portions in dependency and working-age groups. The population aged 0-14 years totaled 9,248,246 persons (34.9% of the total), the working-age group of 15-64 years numbered 15,563,369 (58.7%), and those aged 65 and over were 1,682,589 (6.3%). This distribution yielded an overall of approximately 70 dependents per 100 persons in the working-age population, calculated as the sum of child (0-14) and elderly (65+) dependents relative to the 15-64 cohort.
Age GroupPopulationPercentage
0-14 years9,248,24634.9%
15-64 years15,563,36958.7%
65+ years1,682,5896.3%
Urbanization remained low, with 4,523,820 persons (17.1%) residing in areas and 21,970,684 (82.9%) in rural areas, underscoring Nepal's predominantly agrarian and patterns. The figure marked a modest increase from prior censuses, driven by migration to centers like Metropolitan City, which housed about 24% of the population.

Ethnic, Caste, and Linguistic Composition

The 2011 Nepal census enumerated the across 125 distinct and ethnic groups, encompassing a diverse array of indigenous nationalities (Janajati), hill-origin castes, -origin castes, communities, and religious minorities such as . This classification relied on self-reported identification, capturing groups from Tibeto-Burman, Indo-Aryan, and other linguistic-cultural stocks, with significant regional concentrations: for instance, hill castes predominant in mountainous and mid-hill regions, while groups like Tharu and cluster in the southern plains. The total enumerated stood at 26,494,504, with no single group exceeding 17% dominance, underscoring Nepal's fragmented ethnic mosaic rather than a monolithic .
RankGroupPopulationPercentage
14,398,05316.6%
2Brahman (Hill)3,226,90312.2%
3Magar1,887,7337.1%
4Tharu1,737,4706.6%
5Tamang1,539,8305.8%
6Newar1,321,9335.0%
71,258,5544.8%
8Musalman (Muslim)1,164,2554.4%
91,054,4584.0%
10620,0042.3%
The above table lists the ten largest groups by population, accounting for approximately 68.8% of the total; smaller groups, including 63 and 15 castes, fill out the remainder, with many numbering under 10,000 individuals. groups like represented occupational castes historically marginalized, while Janajati such as Magar and Tamang highlighted indigenous hill and valley dwellers. Linguistically, the census documented 123 mother tongues, predominantly from Indo-Aryan (majority in and hills) and Sino-Tibetan (prevalent among hill and Himalayan groups) families, with serving as the despite not being universal as a . accounted for 44.6% of mother tongue speakers, concentrated among hill castes, while regional languages like Maithili in the eastern reflected Indo-Aryan influences from neighboring . was common, though the census focused on primary mother tongues, potentially understating secondary usage.
RankLanguage (Mother Tongue)SpeakersPercentage
111,826,95344.6%
2Maithili3,092,53011.7%
3Bhojpuri1,584,9586.0%
4Tharu1,529,8755.8%
5Tamang1,353,3115.1%
6Newari846,5573.2%
7793,4183.0%
8Magar788,5303.0%
9787,8273.0%
10691,5462.6%
This table covers the leading languages, comprising over 87% of reported mother tongues; the diversity, with over 100 smaller languages, aligns with 's ecological and migratory history, though enumeration challenges like dialect may have aggregated some variants.

Socioeconomic Indicators

The 2011 Nepal census revealed significant disparities in rates, with an overall rate of 65.9% for individuals aged 5 and above, reflecting improvements from prior decades but persistent and urban-rural gaps. Males exhibited a rate of 75.1%, compared to 57.4% for females, while areas reported 82.2% versus 62.5% in rural regions. data indicated that (grades 1-5) was the most common level completed among literates, with 6,285,124 individuals, followed by secondary levels. and ethnic variations further highlighted inequities, with higher castes like Newars and Hill Brahmins achieving superior rates, while Madhesi Dalits lagged.
IndicatorOverall (%)Male (%)Female (%)Urban (%)Rural (%)
Literacy (age 5+)65.975.157.482.262.5
Economic activity rates for the population aged 10 and above stood at 54.2%, with 9,929,562 individuals classified as economically active, though this marked a decline from 63.43% in 2001, attributed partly to increased school enrollment and international migration. Of the employed (9,891,098 persons), 66% operated as own-account workers, 27% as employees, and agriculture dominated occupations at 64% of the economically active population, with females more concentrated in this sector (76.61%) than males (54.49%). Unemployment affected 0.80% (164,088 individuals), while informal sector employment comprised approximately 96% of total jobs. Sectoral shifts showed growth in services (24%) and industry (9.5%), signaling gradual diversification beyond agriculture. Household amenities underscored rural-urban divides, with 67.26% of households accessing , 47.78% using piped or for drinking, and 64% relying on for cooking, while LPG usage reached 21.03% nationally but 67.68% in areas. Sanitation access was limited, with 38.17% of households lacking toilets, predominantly in rural settings (95.4% of such cases). ownership was widespread at 85.3%, though structures varied: 58.4% pakki (permanent), 31.0% ardha-pakki (semi-permanent), and 9.5% kachchi (temporary), with regional differences favoring more durable builds in hills over Tarai or mountains. Female-headed households, comprising 25.73%, showed slightly better toilet access (68.0%) than male-headed ones (59.4%). These indicators, drawn from enumeration, informed assessments of disparities, with areas exhibiting higher human metrics.

Dissemination

Publication Timeline

The preliminary results of the 2011 Nepal census, including total households and figures disaggregated by sex and , were released by the Central Bureau of Statistics () in October 2011. These initial findings provided early insights into basic demographic aggregates, derived from rapid data processing post-enumeration, which began immediately after the reference date of June 22, 2011. The national report, encompassing comprehensive tables on distribution, household characteristics, and initial socioeconomic indicators, was published in November 2012. This delay of over a year from preliminary dissemination reflected the time required for full , processing with CSPro software, and compilation across 's administrative units. The report marked the primary official output, confirming a total of 26,494,504. Subsequent analytical publications followed, including district-level and thematic volumes released progressively through 2013, with the multi-volume Population Monograph of Nepal issued in 2014 to provide in-depth interpretations of census data on , , and . These later releases built on the core dataset, incorporating secondary analysis to address policy needs, though they were not part of the initial dissemination phase.

Data Accessibility

The National Population and Housing Census 2011 data were primarily disseminated by Nepal's (CBS, now National Statistics Office) through a series of published reports available in PDF and Excel formats on official websites. The core national report, released in November 2012, provided comprehensive statistical tables on demographics, housing, and socioeconomic characteristics, accessible via the repository. Additional thematic volumes, including district-level and Village Development Committee (VDC)/municipality breakdowns, were hosted on the CBS census portal, allowing downloads of population data reclassified by the post-2015 federal structure, household characteristics, and indicators like and fuel use. Aggregate data were made freely available without registration on the site, covering national, provincial, and subnational levels, though some Excel files required manual extraction for analysis. For deeper analysis, microdata subsets—harmonized samples of individual and household records—became accessible via international platforms like IPUMS International, starting around 2015, with variables on age, ethnicity, migration, and education drawn from the original files. Access to these subsets typically required researchers to and commit to data security protocols to prevent unauthorized use, reflecting standard practices for protecting respondent confidentiality in . The National Statistics Office's catalog further facilitated access to 2011 census documentation and select datasets, including tables on , mortality, and absentee populations, available for download post-2015 as part of efforts to mark the census's . While raw remained restricted to prevent risks, the combination of aggregates and processed subsets supported and studies, though users noted limitations in for certain ethnic or migration variables without custom requests. Overall, dissemination emphasized for summary statistics while gating detailed records through vetted channels.

Criticisms and Controversies

Accuracy and Undercounting Issues

The 2011 Nepal National Population and Housing Census faced scrutiny over its accuracy, particularly regarding undercounting of the resident population, as revealed by the subsequent Post Enumeration Survey (PES) conducted by the National Statistics Office. The PES estimated an overall undercount of 2.58% of the population, equivalent to approximately 800,000 individuals omitted due to enumeration errors. This figure aligned closely with broader PES assessments indicating about 3.5% underenumeration nationwide. Urban areas exhibited higher omission rates, at 2.95%, with reaching 4.42%, attributable to factors such as rapid , informal settlements, and logistical challenges in densely populated zones. Undercounting was particularly pronounced among vulnerable subgroups, including children under five years old, where incomplete household listings and timing discrepancies in enumeration contributed to omissions. Additionally, the census suffered from heavy under-reporting of births in the preceding 12 months, distorting rate estimates derived from the data. These issues stemmed from operational errors, such as incomplete coverage in remote and conflict-affected regions post-Maoist insurgency, dual-phase enumeration (house-listing in 2010 and individual data collection in 2011), and enumerator training gaps, as noted in independent observations by groups. While the Central Bureau of Statistics maintained that the achieved high professional competency, the PES discrepancies highlighted systemic limitations in 's decennial exercises, including reliance on manual verification in rugged terrain and inadequate adjustments for transient populations. Critics, including demographers, argued that such undercounts inflated inter-censal growth rates and skewed socioeconomic indicators, though official reports did not apply PES adjustments to final figures, preserving raw enumeration totals of 26.49 million residents. These findings underscored the need for enhanced methodologies in future to mitigate similar biases.

Ethnic Data Disputes

Indigenous nationalities organizations, including the Nepal Federation of Indigenous Nationalities, contested the 2011 census figures for Janajati populations, alleging deliberate undercounting that reduced their reported share from approximately 39 percent in the 2001 census to 36-37 percent in 2011. They argued that methodological shortcomings, such as insufficient for enumerators from backgrounds and potential biases in self-identification processes, led to misclassification or omission of identities, thereby undermining claims for in federal restructuring and resource allocation. These groups, representing over 50 distinct communities, asserted self-estimates closer to 40 percent or higher based on internal surveys, though such figures lacked independent verification and reflected advocacy interests amid Nepal's transition to ethnic-based . Madhesi communities in the Terai region similarly disputed the census's ethnic breakdown, claiming under-reporting of their population—officially around 20-30 percent depending on inclusion criteria for plains-origin groups like Tharu and —which they estimated at over 33 percent. Madhesi leaders attributed discrepancies to enumerator favoring hill-origin classifications and inadequate outreach in remote areas, exacerbating tensions over citizenship verification and demands for autonomous provinces. Tharu subgroups, in particular, rejected aggregation with broader Madhesi categories, protesting that such lumping diluted their distinct status and affected quota entitlements. The Central Bureau of Statistics maintained that the census employed standardized protocols, including disaggregated self-reporting for 125 /ethnic groups and efforts to include marginalized enumerators, yielding a total of 26,494,504 with no evidence of . Independent observations by , including minority-focused groups, documented localized undercounts—such as in Jhauwa Guthi where national data showed minimal Hill Janajati presence compared to community tallies exceeding 200 individuals—but these were attributed to transitional instability rather than intentional manipulation. Disputes persisted without formal recensus, influencing subsequent political negotiations but highlighting tensions between official and group-specific narratives in 's multiethnic context.

Methodological Shortcomings

The 2011 Nepal census employed a modified method, counting individuals at their usual place of for six months or longer, but faced significant logistical challenges due to the country's diverse , including remote mountainous and hilly regions where transportation and access were limited by threats and political instability following the Maoist insurgency. These factors contributed to incomplete coverage, with a net under- rate of 4.0% confirmed by the post- survey, particularly affecting absent household members totaling 5,423,297 nationwide. Enumerator training was insufficient, often falling short of the planned seven-day program due to inefficient trainers and participant disengagement, leading to inconsistent application of procedures such as visits and proper use of enumeration area maps. Selection of enumerators, many of whom were teachers under time constraints, introduced biases through political and reliance on proxies or assistants, while targets for including women (achieved at approximately 35% versus a 40% goal) and minority nationalities and ethnic groups were not met, potentially skewing representation in . The questionnaire's length, exceeding 50 questions across household and individual schedules, risked respondent fatigue and inaccuracies, compounded by enumerators skipping sensitive identity-related items like sub-caste or due to lack of or ignorance of protocols. Ambiguities in defining "usual place of " further hampered accurate enumeration of migrants and transient populations, resulting in omissions or double-counting, while age data exhibited heaping and inaccuracies indicative of poor reporting quality. Domestic funding covered 98.5% of costs, straining resources for quality controls in a politically transitional context with heightened expectations for inclusive data, ultimately limiting the census's ability to fully mitigate these methodological gaps despite independent monitoring confirming general coverage.

Impact and Applications

Policy and Planning Uses

The 2011 Nepal National Population and Housing provided benchmark demographic, social, and economic data essential for formulation and , enabling the to address across regions, ecological belts, and urban-rural divides. This included detailed breakdowns by , , /, mother tongue, and , which informed equitable to mitigate disparities, such as the concentration of 13,318,705 individuals in the region and varying densities like Kathmandu's 20,289 persons per square kilometer. The data served as a foundational input for the National Planning Commission's periodic plans, supporting targeted interventions in and administrative restructuring following 's political transitions. In sectoral planning, the census facilitated resource prioritization for and programs by highlighting a national rate of 65.9% and a prevalence of 2%, allowing policymakers to direct funds toward underserved rural areas where 95.4% of households lacked toilets. It also underpinned projections from 2011 to 2031, critical for forecasting demands in , , and labor markets, with applications in at district and sub-district levels to guide aid and distribution. Gender-disaggregated data, such as asset at 19.71%, informed policies on economic and management, including strategies for the approximately 2 million absent engaged in foreign . Furthermore, the census data contributed to monitoring progress toward and evaluating program impacts, providing a baseline for , , and social welfare initiatives amid 's urban of 17% (4,523,820 persons). By integrating characteristics like land ownership and holdings, it supported and local governance planning, ensuring alignment with national objectives for . These applications underscored the census's role in causal resource targeting, where empirical metrics directly influenced budgetary decisions to address empirical gaps rather than assumptions.

Long-term Legacy

The 2011 Nepal established a critical demographic for the country's post-2015 federal restructuring, providing granular data on 125 and ethnic groups, 123 languages, and geographic distributions that informed provincial delimitation and fiscal under the new . This enumeration, documenting a total of 26,494,504 with an intercensal growth rate of 1.35% from , enabled evidence-based planning for equitable representation and development in 's seven provinces, mitigating potential conflicts over identity-based claims in debates. As a foundational for (SDGs) implementation, the census supplied baselines for indicators including (59.6% overall, with 67.9% used in some SDG tracking) and metrics, guiding national reviews and progress monitoring through 2020. It facilitated projections for , education, and targets, such as SDG 4 on quality education and SDG 3 on , by highlighting urban-rural disparities and a 8.1% elderly (over 60), which informed policies on demographic shifts and dependency ratios. The census's documentation of absentee populations (approximately 1.9 million, primarily migrants abroad) and negative in 27 shaped long-term labor and policies, contributing to analyses of economic vulnerabilities like slowed and trends observed in the 2021 census ( rate 0.92%). These insights persisted in national planning documents, underscoring migration's role in altering household structures and informing adaptive strategies for amid out-migration pressures.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] National Population and Housing Census 2011 (National Report)
    Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS) is pleased to bring out the final result of the National Population and Housing Census 2011 (NPHC2011). The whole operation ...
  2. [2]
    [PDF] chapter i change in size and growth of population
    Nepal has a long history of census taking. The first population census of Nepal was taken in 1911 and this practice was continued roughly every ten years. ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] NATIONAL POPULATION CENSUS OF NEPAL:
    ➢ A synchronized census was taken in 1961. ➢ After 1961, a census has been taken in every ten years. Population, Census Date and methodology during the 90-year.<|control11|><|separator|>
  4. [4]
    Nepal - National Population Census 1952-1954 - Data Catalog
    Jul 10, 2013 · The first population census of Nepal was taken in 1911 and this practice was continued roughly every ten years. However, there is some evidence ...Identification · Scope · Survey instrument · Data collection
  5. [5]
    Introduction - Census Nepal 2021
    The first population census of Nepal dates back to 1911. However, the first modern population census of Nepal was conducted in 1952/54 and counted a population ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  6. [6]
    Catalog History - National Statistics Office
    Catalog History ; Nepal, National Population Census 1961, 1961, 03/20/2012, 12/18/2013 ; Nepal, National Population Census 1971, 1971, 03/20/2012, 12/18/2013.
  7. [7]
    [PDF] CHAPTER 2 POPULATION SIZE, GROWTH AND DISTRIBUTION
    Nepal has a long history of census taking dating back to the early 19th century. Periodic censuses have been undertaken since 1911 at roughly ten years ...
  8. [8]
    National Population and Housing Census 2011 - UNFPA Nepal
    Jan 1, 2011 · The first population census was conducted in 1911 A.D. (1968 B.S.). However, the census conducted in 1952/54 is considered to be the first ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  9. [9]
    Nepal - National Population and Housing Census 2011, Marks 100 ...
    Dec 11, 2015 · The Population and Housing Census 2011 is the eleventh round of population census history of Nepal. It is also marks 100 years of census taking in Nepal.
  10. [10]
    [PPT] NATIONAL POPULATION CENSUS OF NEPAL
    Altitude ranges from 70 meters to 8,848 meters above sea level. Population 26.4 million (2011), 1.35 % annual growth rate, and population density 180/square km.<|separator|>
  11. [11]
    Nepal - Population and Housing Census 2011 - Data Catalog
    Feb 19, 2014 · The 2011 Nepal National Population and Housing Census covers the following topics: number of house, households, household members by sex, agricultural land ...Missing: findings | Show results with:findings
  12. [12]
    Nepal - National Population and Housing Census 2011, Marks 100 ...
    Dec 11, 2015 · Household Listing Form. Download [PDF, 214.87 KB] · National Population Census 2011 - Nepal · 1. Agricultural land 2. Livestock/Poultry 3.
  13. [13]
    National Population Census 2011 - IPUMS Subset - Microdata Library
    Jul 30, 2025 · Persons and households. UNITS IDENTIFIED: Dwellings: no; Vacant Units: no; Households: yes; Individuals: yes; Group quarters: no.
  14. [14]
    [PDF] National Population and Housing Census 2011, Marks 100 years of ...
    Sep 1, 2016 · Individual Information (Question relating to Individuals), Place of birth, years of staying, reason of staying, place of living before 5 year, ...Missing: findings | Show results with:findings
  15. [15]
    (PDF) Nepal National Population and Housing Census 2011
    The observation of the Population and Housing Census 2011 (PHC 2011) is an initiative of civil society organisations of minorities and social science scholars.
  16. [16]
    Enumeration Approach in Population Census 2011 of Nepal
    Aug 30, 2012 · The census field operation was carried out in two stages: Listing from may 15 to June 1 2011 and Enumeration operation from June 17 to June 27 ...
  17. [17]
    As officials prepare for the census this year, they are hopeful it will ...
    Feb 3, 2021 · Inadequate training and school teachers as enumerators were issues in the past ... During the 2011 census, enumerators were mostly teachers as it ...
  18. [18]
    World Report 2011: Nepal | Human Rights Watch
    Nepal's political and peace processes remained stalled in 2010, resulting in instability, weak governance, and no progress on accountability for human rights ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Managing Population census 2011 of Nepal (Draft)
    Managing Population census 2011 of Nepal ... Dissemination programme were conducted in some selected districts with a purpose of making acquainted with the census ...Missing: objectives | Show results with:objectives
  20. [20]
    As the next population census nears, officials worry over the quality ...
    Dec 14, 2019 · ... Census 2011 report that it had faced challenges in maintaining the quality of data. Officials at the bureau are getting more concerned about ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] National Population and Housing Census 2011 (National Report)
    National Population and Housing Census 2011 (NPHC2011) marks hundred years in the history of population census in Nepal. Nepal has been conducting ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Population Monograph of Nepal
    The National Population Census 2011 has provided a wealth of information that is required to understand various socio-economic and demographic changes that ...
  23. [23]
    UNSD — Demographic and Social Statistics - UN.org.
    More at: http://census.al/default.aspx?lang=en. - Posted 10 October 2011. Nepal releases preliminary results of National Population and Housing Census 2011.
  24. [24]
    National Population and Housing Census 2011 [2068] (National ...
    National Population and Housing Census 2011 [2068] (National Report) ; Published On: November, 2012 ; Author(s)/Publisher(s): © Central Bureau of Statistics, ...
  25. [25]
    Census 2011 - Census Nepal 2021
    Census 2011. Population Classified by New federal structure. Province Level. 01. Population Province Level 2011 (PDF, Excel). District Level ...National Report 2011 (PDF) · Census's Publication and... · Chitwan · Solukhumbu
  26. [26]
    Nepal census undercounted 800k | Nepali Times
    Jul 13, 2023 · The NSO's Post Enumeration Survey reported that 2.58% of the population was omitted during the census due to errors in data collection. The ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Population Situation Analysis of Nepal
    Again, attributed to two reasons, an undercount of the total population, especially of children under five, and as the census enumeration was done at two points ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] WP-16-021 - IIASA PURE
    We used the base year distribution of the population by age and sex directly from the 2011 census reports and estimated various parameters of the core ...Missing: objectives | Show results with:objectives
  29. [29]
    Nepal - IWGIA - International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs
    According to the 2011 census, the indigenous nationalities (Adivasi Janajati) of Nepal comprise 36% of the total population of 26.5 million. However, ...
  30. [30]
    Indigenous Peoples' Concerns In Nepal's 2011 Census - IsumaTV
    The past censuses of Nepal are often termed to be “deliberate undercounting of [indigenous] communities…” and erroneous with omissions and... For the rest ...
  31. [31]
    Indigenous Peoples' Rights Violations in Nepal (CERD Committee)
    The 2011 census, like earlier census, came under strong criticisms from Indigenous Peoples for inaccurate reporting. The census reported decrease in Indigenous ...
  32. [32]
    [PDF] Understanding Nepal╎s Madhesi movement and its future trajectory
    Madhesis and the paradox of their marginalization in Nepal​​ The Madhesis constitute 33 percent of the total population; however, Madhesi leaders have blamed the ...
  33. [33]
    Who are the Madhesis, why are they angry? | Explained News
    Oct 5, 2015 · Those who are referred to as Madhesis number around 56 lakh (2011 Census). Tharus do not like to be called Madhesis, and those of Hill origin ...
  34. [34]
    Coming to one's census - The Kathmandu Post
    Nov 10, 2021 · There is a reason why the number of caste/ethnic groups went up from 60 in 1991 to 125 in 2011.
  35. [35]
    (DOC) Evaluation age data 2011 census - Academia.edu
    These results reveal that reporting of age data are not fairly accurate. On the basis of result information are hardly acceptable and quality is comparatively ...
  36. [36]
    Nepal small area estimation of poverty 2011 - World Bank Documents
    This report presents 2010/11 small-area estimates and maps for Nepal at the 75 district, 967 ilaka and 2344 'target area' level, of poverty incidence, poverty ...
  37. [37]
    [PDF] FEDERALISM - United Nations Development Programme
    (2) Census 2011 should present settlement wise data of each caste/ethnic ... Nepal's Choices in Fiscal Federalism, an unpublished report by Ministry of Local.
  38. [38]
    [PDF] National Review of Sustainable Development Goals
    The 2011 census recorded a population of 26.4 million (CBS 2012) with an annual growth rate of 1.35 percent between 2001 and 2011. About half the population.
  39. [39]
    [PDF] TRACKING PROGRESS ON THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT ...
    The NPC has used the 2011 Census data for the baseline for this indicator, which is 67.9 percent (NPC, 2017a). SDG 6: ENSURE AVAILABILITY AND SUSTAINABLE ...
  40. [40]
    [PDF] National Review of Sustainable Development Goals
    Jun 10, 2020 · Nepal had the last national census in 2011, and prepa- rations are on for the next one to be held in 2021. Similarly, the national living ...
  41. [41]
    Counting the Nepalese | nexus - Blog - IIASA
    Feb 14, 2017 · The census revealed a population that is on the move, a rapidly declining number of births, and a high degree of population heterogeneity ...
  42. [42]
    With a decline in younger population and rising elderly population ...
    Apr 4, 2023 · The annual population growth rate between 2011 and 2021 stood at 0.92% in contrast to the growth rate in 2011 which was 1.35% and against the ...