Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

ASEAN NCAP

The is an independent initiative dedicated to evaluating the safety performance of new passenger vehicles available in the 10 ASEAN member states— Darussalam, , , , , , the Philippines, , , and —through rigorous crash testing and assessment of active and passive safety features. Established in December 2011 as a collaborative effort between the Malaysian Institute of Road Safety Research (MIROS) and Global NCAP, with initial funding from Global NCAP, ASEAN NCAP was launched in response to the United Nations' Decade of Action for Road Safety (2011–2020), aiming to halve global road traffic deaths by promoting higher vehicle safety standards in a region where road fatalities exceed 100,000 annually. The program's primary objectives include elevating occupant protection levels, increasing consumer awareness of vehicle safety, and incentivizing automakers to prioritize advanced safety technologies, thereby fostering a market demand for safer cars across Southeast Asia. ASEAN NCAP operates through a multi-phase , with the current 2021–2025 protocol introducing a single overall star rating (from 0 to 5 stars) based on a points system totaling up to 100 points, with Adult Occupant Protection (AOP; 40 points, 40% weighting across frontal, side, and head protection tests), Child Occupant Protection (; 20 points, 20% including dynamic tests and child restraint systems), Safety Assist Technologies (SAT; 20 points, 20% covering features like autonomous emergency braking and seatbelt reminders), and Motorcyclist Safety (MS; 20 points, 20% to address the high rate of motorcycle-related fatalities in the region). Tests are conducted at MIROS's purpose-built facility in Melaka, , using protocols aligned with global standards such as UN ECE regulations, and results are publicly released to guide consumer choices and influence policy, with nearly 90% of assessed vehicles achieving 4 stars or higher since inception as of 2021. As of 2025, the program has evaluated over 80 models (more than 100 ratings published), driving improvements like mandatory 3-star minimum ratings in some markets and the integration of advanced driver assistance systems. A for 2026-2030 has been outlined to further advance safety assessments.

Overview

Purpose and Objectives

ASEAN NCAP was established in December 2011 as a regional initiative to independently evaluate the crash safety performance of new passenger vehicles available in Southeast Asian markets, drawing inspiration from the methodologies of global NCAP programs such as . This effort responds to the growing demand for safer mobility amid rising vehicle ownership and road traffic risks in the region. The program's core objectives focus on elevating overall vehicle safety standards, heightening consumer awareness of critical safety features like occupant protection systems, and incentivizing automakers to incorporate advanced design improvements in their models sold within countries. By providing transparent, star-based ratings from independent crash tests, ASEAN NCAP aims to foster a competitive market for safer cars, ultimately contributing to lower road fatality rates across the ten member states. ASEAN NCAP particularly emphasizes regional vulnerabilities, including the predominance of motorcycles—which account for over half of road deaths in many Southeast Asian countries—and the disparities in that influence access to advanced safety technologies among member nations. These factors inform tailored assessment protocols that test for interactions with vulnerable road users, such as motorcyclists and pedestrians, to better reflect local crash scenarios. Since its launch, specific goals have included conducting annual assessments of several popular vehicle models to ensure broad market coverage, advocating for mandatory safety labeling at points of sale to empower informed purchasing decisions, and aligning with the United Nations Decade of Action for Road Safety's pillars—especially the safer vehicles component—to support broader efforts in reducing traffic injuries and deaths.

Scope and Coverage

ASEAN NCAP encompasses the 10 member states of the (ASEAN): Darussalam, , , , , , the , , , and . The program evaluates vehicles marketed and sold within these countries to address regional challenges, including high rates of motor vehicle crashes, and to harmonize safety standards across diverse markets. The assessments target new passenger cars and light commercial vehicles, including sedans, hatchbacks, SUVs, MPVs, and that represent significant sales volumes in markets. Heavy commercial vehicles and two-wheelers are not directly tested, but the protocols incorporate evaluations of active safety technologies designed to protect vulnerable road users like motorcyclists. Assessments cover areas such as adult occupant protection and child occupant protection to provide comprehensive safety insights. Manufacturer participation remains voluntary, with ASEAN NCAP selecting high-volume models for testing to influence market demand for safer vehicles. Increasing regulatory linkages are evident, notably in , where a minimum three-star rating is required for vehicles and safety labeling is mandatory for new models. The program emphasizes right-hand drive variants prevalent in countries like , , , and to align with local traffic conditions.

History

Establishment

The ASEAN New Car Assessment Program (ASEAN NCAP) was established through a (MoU) signed on December 8, 2011, between the Malaysian Institute of Road Safety Research (MIROS) and in , , during the FIA Foundation Annual General Assembly. This agreement formalized the collaboration to create an independent vehicle safety rating program tailored for Southeast Asian markets, with serving as a key founding partner providing technical expertise and protocols adapted from global standards. The initiative was spearheaded by the Malaysian government via MIROS to combat the region's escalating crisis, where more than 75,000 people died in road crashes across countries in 2011 alone, alongside numerous long-term injuries. By introducing consumer-oriented crash testing and ratings, ASEAN NCAP aimed to drive automakers toward higher safety standards, aligning with the ' Decade of Action for (2011–2020). The program's first assessments were launched in , focusing on frontal offset crash tests for small family cars and sedans commonly sold in the region. Initial results for seven popular models were published on January 31, 2013, in Melaka, , marking the debut of independent safety evaluations for ASEAN consumers and highlighting variations in occupant protection across tested vehicles. Early operations were centered in , with the secretariat hosted by MIROS in , , which assumed the operational lead for testing and using its crash laboratory facilities. Initial funding was provided by MIROS and , enabling the setup of administrative and technical infrastructure without immediate reliance on broader regional contributions.

Development Phases

The development of ASEAN NCAP has progressed through distinct phases, each introducing refined protocols to address evolving challenges in . Phase 1, spanning 2012 to 2016, established the foundational assessment framework centered on basic crash tests for and occupant protection. The initial protocol emphasized frontal offset deformable barrier tests at 64 km/h, with occupant protection rated on a and occupant protection scored as a percentage, assessing over 30 models from various manufacturers during this period. This phase laid the groundwork for consumer awareness, with early tests like the in 2012 achieving a 4-star rating. Phase 2, from 2017 to 2020, marked a shift toward a unified integrating assist technologies, reflecting the growing availability of active features in the region. The protocol weighted adult occupant protection at 50%, child occupant protection at 25%, and assist technologies at 25%, incorporating side impact tests compliant with UN Regulation 95 as a prerequisite for higher ratings, alongside requirements for and seat belt reminders for 5-star outcomes. Approximately 34 models were evaluated under this phase, expanding the program's scope to include technologies like autonomous emergency braking for car-to-car scenarios. Phase 3, covering 2021 to 2025, adopted a four-pillar structure to better align with ASEAN's high motorcyclist fatality rates, weighting adult occupant protection at 40%, child occupant protection at 20%, safety assist technologies at 20%, and motorcyclist safety at 20%. This iteration introduced dedicated assessments for motorcyclist protection, such as blind spot detection and rear visibility systems, while enhancing child presence detection and head protection technologies from 2023 onward, with over 100 models cumulatively assessed by the end of the phase. The protocol supported advanced tech integration through initiatives like collaborative research events, contributing to broader data sharing among regional partners. Announced in , Phase 4 (2026-2030) builds on prior advancements with enhanced testing to tackle persistent vulnerabilities, maintaining the four-pillar weighting while introducing autonomous emergency braking against motorcycles (6 points) to mitigate collisions with two-wheelers, which account for a significant portion of road deaths. Side impact protocols were toughened by increasing the movable barrier trolley weight to 1,300 kg from 950 kg and adopting the WorldSID for more biofidelic injury assessment. The targets elevating baseline standards toward universal 5-star ratings by 2030, aligning with global goals to halve road fatalities, through expanded partnerships for technology validation and data exchange.

Organizational Structure

Member Organizations

The organizational structure of ASEAN NCAP is centered around a led by the Malaysian Institute of Road Safety Research (MIROS), which serves as the primary coordinator and executor of operations, including crash testing and rating assessments. MIROS, established under the Malaysian Ministry of , oversees day-to-day activities and ensures alignment with regional needs. Global NCAP acts as the technical advisor and international liaison, providing expertise to harmonize ASEAN NCAP protocols with global standards while funding initial phases and supporting ongoing development. The program operates through a steering committee chaired by the Director-General of MIROS, which facilitates governance via annual meetings to review and update assessment protocols, ensuring voluntary coordination across member states. National representatives and supporting organizations from countries contribute input on regional priorities, such as enhanced motorcyclist safety testing, reflecting the high prevalence of motorcycles in . As of 2024, core members total approximately 7-10 entities, including automobile associations and government bodies focused on operational governance rather than funding. Key member organizations include:
  • Malaysian Institute of Road Safety Research (MIROS): Leads secretariat functions, conducts testing at its facilities, and chairs the steering committee.
  • Global New Car Assessment Programme (Global NCAP): Provides technical guidance and ensures international protocol alignment.
  • Automobile Association of Malaysia (AAM): Offers regional insights and supports consumer awareness initiatives.
  • Automobile Association of the Philippines (AAP): Contributes to protocol discussions and promotes safety in the Philippine market.
  • Automobile Association of Singapore (AA Singapore): Provides input on urban safety features relevant to dense traffic environments.
  • Automobile Association of Cambodia (AAC): Represents Cambodian perspectives, emphasizing affordable vehicle safety adaptations.
  • Thailand Automotive Institute (TAI): Assists with technical evaluations and advocates for ASEAN-wide standards in Thailand.
  • Automobile Association of Thailand (AAT): Supports testing collaborations and regional biker safety priorities.
  • Philippine Department of Transportation (DOTr): Participates in forums and provides governmental oversight for Philippine compliance.
  • Indonesian Road Safety Agency (AKSI): Contributes to steering committee discussions on Indonesia-specific road safety challenges.
Delegates from engage in steering committee activities to address country-specific challenges, such as varying and types.

Financial Support Organizations

The primary funding for ASEAN NCAP has been provided by the Malaysian government through budget allocations to the Malaysian Institute of Road Safety Research (MIROS) since the program's in 2011. MIROS, as a under the Ministry of , channels these funds to support core operations, including crash testing and protocol development. Significant grants from and the FIA Foundation have supported the initial setup of ASEAN NCAP and ongoing international testing activities. These international contributions, often channeled through , have enabled the funding of pilot phases, vehicle crash tests, and technical assistance since 2011. Additional grants from organizations such as and the Global Road Safety Facility have further bolstered crash testing efforts. Contributions from other ASEAN governments, such as those in and , support regional assessments through membership in the program and collaborative initiatives. These governments participate via their national road safety authorities, providing in-kind resources and policy alignment to facilitate broader implementation across Southeast Asia. Occasional sponsorships from the have supplemented funding for specific tests, such as Honda Malaysia's provision of a test vehicle in 2012. These targeted contributions help cover costs for individual assessments without altering the program's independence.

Assessment Protocols

Testing Categories

The ASEAN NCAP assessment protocol for 2021-2025 is structured around four key pillars that evaluate safety performance: Adult Occupant Protection (AOP), Child Occupant Protection (), Safety Assist Technologies (), and Motorcyclist Safety (MS). These pillars collectively determine the overall star , with AOP weighted at 40 points (40%), at 20 points (20%), at 20 points (20%), and MS at 20 points (20%), out of a total maximum of 100 points. To achieve a 5-star rating, a must attain at least 80% in AOP, 75% in , 75% in , and 60% in MS; lower star ratings require meeting progressively reduced minimum percentages in each pillar, such as for 1-star: at least 40% in AOP, 30% in , 20% in , and 20% in MS. Adult Occupant Protection focuses on the vehicle's ability to safeguard adult occupants during crashes, primarily through physical crash tests using anthropomorphic . Key assessments include the frontal offset deformable barrier test, which simulates a at 64 km/h with 40% overlap, and side impact tests comprising a moving barrier strike at 50 km/h and a pole side impact at 32 km/h, both employing the WorldSID 50th male to measure injury risks to the head, chest, and . Additionally, Head Protection Technology evaluation assesses side curtain deployment and coverage. These tests emphasize structural integrity and restraint systems like seatbelts and to minimize occupant and injury criteria. Child Occupant Protection evaluates protection for children using child restraint systems (CRS), integrating dynamic crash tests and static installation checks. Dynamic assessments involve frontal and side impact scenarios with Q6 (6-year-old) and Q10 (10-year-old) child dummies secured in ISOFIX-compatible CRS, measuring head, neck, and chest injury metrics during impacts similar to adult tests but scaled for child size. Vehicle-based checks assess ease of CRS installation, including /ISOFIX anchors, top tether points, and i-Size compliance, while child presence detection systems receive bonus points for alerting to unattended children. This pillar prioritizes compatibility and usability to promote correct restraint usage in real-world scenarios. Safety Assist Technologies assesses active safety features designed to prevent or mitigate crashes through advanced assistance systems (ADAS). Core evaluations include Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) for city speeds (up to 50 km/h) and inter-urban scenarios (up to 80 km/h), testing detection and response to vehicles, pedestrians, and cyclists; Lane Support Systems such as Lane Keep Assist (LKA) and Lane Departure Warning (LDW); and Speed Assistance, including (ISA). Other components cover Seatbelt Reminders (SBR) for all seats and Emergency Brake Assist (EBA), with advanced features like rear occupant alerts providing additional scoring opportunities. These technologies aim to reduce in high-risk situations common in traffic. Motorcycle Safety, a distinctive pillar reflecting ASEAN's high motorcycle usage, evaluates vehicle technologies that protect two-wheeled road users from car-related collisions. Primary assessments include AEB performance specifically for detecting and braking for approaching s at various speeds and angles, Blind Spot Detection/Visualization (BSD/BSV) to alert drivers of s in adjacent lanes, and Adaptive Driving Beam (ADB) headlights that avoid dazzling oncoming motorcyclists. Pedestrian protection overlaps here with motorcycle scenarios, and advanced features like rear visualization systems contribute bonus points. This pillar addresses the regional vulnerability of motorcyclists, who account for a significant portion of road fatalities.

Rating System

The ASEAN NCAP rating system aggregates scores from four assessment pillars—Adult Occupant Protection (AOP), Child Occupant Protection (COP), (SA), and Motorcyclist (MS)—to produce an overall score out of 100 points. These pillars are weighted as follows: AOP at 40 points, COP at 20 points, SA at 20 points, and MS at 20 points. The weighted scores from individual tests within each pillar are summed and combined to form the total, providing a holistic measure of safety performance. This overall score is converted into a star rating ranging from 0 to 5 stars, determined by the highest star level for which the vehicle meets the minimum percentage requirements in all pillars. The criteria for each star level are as follows:
Star RatingAOP Minimum Minimum MinimumMS Minimum
5 Stars≥80%≥75%≥75%≥60%
4 Stars≥70%≥60%≥60%≥50%
3 Stars≥60%≥50%≥40%≥40%
2 Stars≥50%≥40%≥30%≥30%
1 Star≥40%≥30%≥20%≥20%
0 StarsBelow 1-star minimaBelow 1-star minimaBelow 1-star minimaBelow 1-star minima
The overall rating is capped by the maximum star rating achievable in any individual pillar based on its performance. Adjustments to scores include penalty points for suboptimal outcomes, such as a deduction of up to 5 points for unstable structural deformation during tests that compromises occupant protection. Conversely, bonus points are granted for exemplary features, including additional credits in the pillar for advanced systems like emergency response technology. These modifiers ensure the rating accurately reflects real-world safety implications. Vehicles are grouped into five comparison classes based on factors like body size and curb weight—typically encompassing small cars, medium cars, large cars, SUVs/MPVs, and pickups—to enable equitable benchmarking among similar models and prevent misleading comparisons between dissimilar vehicle types. Final ratings are published publicly on the , accompanied by comprehensive reports detailing pillar scores, test outcomes, and any applied modifiers. Assessments are conducted on specific model variants, with updates issued for facelifts or specification changes to maintain relevance for consumers in the region. The 2021-2025 protocol is set to be succeeded by the 2026-2030 roadmap as of 2026, maintaining the four-pillar structure with enhanced requirements.

Testing Procedures

Crash Tests

ASEAN NCAP conducts a series of physical tests to evaluate passive occupant protection in new passenger vehicles, focusing on and injury risks during simulated collisions representative of common road accidents in . These tests measure biomechanical responses using anthropomorphic test dummies and assess vehicle structural performance to ensure robust energy absorption and minimal intrusion into the occupant compartment. The frontal offset deformable barrier test is the cornerstone of adult occupant protection assessments. In this test, the vehicle impacts a rigid wall covered with a deformable aluminum barrier at 64 km/h, with 40% of the vehicle's front width overlapping the barrier. Hybrid III 50th percentile male dummies are positioned in the driver and front passenger seats to replicate adult occupants, while child dummies (Q3s for 3-year-olds and Q1.5s for 1.5-year-olds) are used in rear seats with appropriate child restraint systems. Key injury metrics include the (HIC36 ≤ 1000) for head protection and maximum chest deflection of 42 mm for thoracic safety. Structural integrity is evaluated via post-impact intrusion measurements, such as toe-pan and footwell displacement not exceeding 100 mm, to gauge compartment deformation and potential lower limb injuries. Side impact protection is tested using a mobile progressive deformable barrier (MPDB) that strikes the stationary 's side at 50 km/h. The impacting trolley, weighing 950 kg under the 2021-2025 protocol, simulates a colliding and is covered with a honeycomb-faced barrier compliant with ECE Regulation 95. The ES-2re 50th is placed in the , with criteria encompassing (≤1,000), chest viscous criterion (≤1.0 m/s), and abdominal compression (≤90 mm). From the 2026 protocol onward, the trolley mass increases to 1,300 kg to reflect more severe real-world side collisions, enhancing the test's stringency, and the WorldSID 50th will replace the ES-2re for side impact tests. A complementary side test, introduced to address narrow-object impacts like trees or , propels the laterally at 32 km/h into a 254 mm rigid aligned with the driver's B-pillar, using the WorldSID 50th to measure head, , and responses.

Safety Assist Technologies

The Safety Assist Technologies domain in evaluates active safety features designed to prevent collisions and mitigate risks through advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), forming one of the four pillars of the 2021-2025 assessment protocol alongside adult occupant protection, child occupant protection, and motorcyclist safety. This domain emphasizes technologies that detect and respond to potential hazards in real-time, promoting safer driving in diverse road conditions where vulnerable road users like motorcyclists are prevalent. Assessments focus on fitment, performance verification, and scenario-based effectiveness, with a total weighting of 20 points (20% of the overall 100-point score as of 2025). Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) is a core component, tested in city and inter-urban scenarios to assess the system's ability to detect and avoid collisions with vehicles or pedestrians. In city tests, conducted at speeds up to 20 km/h, the system must activate braking to prevent impacts with stationary or slow-moving targets, simulating urban traffic encounters. Inter-urban AEB evaluations occur at speeds up to 80 km/h, targeting moving vehicles or pedestrians in highway-like conditions to ensure reliable detection and response at higher velocities. These tests use instrumented target vehicles and pedestrian dummies to measure activation time, braking force, and avoidance success. Lane Support Systems, including Lane Keep Assist (LKA) and Lane Departure Warning (LDW), are assessed for their effectiveness in maintaining vehicle trajectory on curved roads, addressing common deviation risks in ASEAN's varied . LKA provides corrective input to guide the vehicle back into the lane, while LDW issues auditory or visual alerts for unintentional departures, both evaluated through dynamic track tests simulating bends and straight sections. These systems must operate without excessive intervention and ignore intentional maneuvers signaled by turn indicators. Speed Assistance technologies, such as (), undergo verification to confirm accurate detection and advisory or limiting functions, helping drivers adhere to posted limits in regions with inconsistent enforcement. systems integrate GPS, camera-based , and vehicle speed data to provide warnings or gentle speed reductions, tested across urban and rural speed zones. Scoring in the Safety Assist domain is scenario-based, allocating points for response time, detection accuracy, and avoidance outcomes across multiple test runs, with full points awarded for 100% successful collision avoidance in defined parameters. For instance, AEB city and inter-urban tests contribute up to 6 points combined, lane support systems up to 3 points under advanced SAT, emphasizing practical performance over mere presence. These scores integrate into the overall rating, where strong Safety Assist performance can elevate a vehicle's star level by demonstrating preventive capabilities.

Facilities

Primary Testing Laboratory

The Malaysian Institute of Road Safety Research (MIROS) operates the primary testing laboratory for ASEAN NCAP through its , Comfort, and Compliance Centre (PC3), located in Melaka, . Established in May 2012, the facility was inaugurated with the program's first official test on a , marking a key milestone in regional vehicle safety assessment. Situated at the Akademi Pengangkutan Jalan Malaysia in (also referenced as Air Molek), the PC3 serves as the central hub for conducting core ASEAN NCAP evaluations, focusing on performance and safety technologies tailored to Southeast Asian conditions. The PC3 features a full-scale crash test hall equipped for offset frontal and side impact simulations, utilizing high-speed cameras to capture detailed dynamics at rates exceeding 1,000 frames per second. Adjacent facilities include dedicated laboratories for crash dummy calibration, ensuring precise instrumentation of anthropomorphic test devices used in occupant protection assessments. In November 2024, MIROS PC3 introduced guidelines for electric vehicle crash testing to address battery safety and post-crash hazards. These capabilities support comprehensive testing protocols, with the lab having conducted over 117 crash tests as of 2023, demonstrating a sustained annual output aligned with program demands. Operations at the PC3 encompass vehicle preparation, execution of controlled crashes, high-fidelity , biomechanical , and generation of detailed reports for ASEAN NCAP ratings. As the foundational facility, it handles the majority of the program's physical testing requirements, with engineering teams overseeing sled tests, barrier impacts, and evaluations of advanced driver assistance systems. For instances of high demand, the PC3 coordinates briefly with partners to manage overflow testing, maintaining seamless integration across the ASEAN NCAP network.

International Testing Collaborations

ASEAN NCAP maintains strategic partnerships with international laboratories to supplement its testing capabilities, particularly for complex crash scenarios and advanced safety technologies that require specialized equipment beyond regional facilities. The Automobile Research Institute (JARI) in has been a key collaborator since the program's early phases, conducting collision tests including offset frontal impacts and side impact assessments in line with UN ECE R95 protocols. This partnership, formalized through a 2017 (MoU) between JARI and the Malaysian Institute of Research (MIROS), facilitates and ensures consistent application of ASEAN NCAP protocols. Since the introduction of side impact testing as a mandatory element for higher star ratings in , JARI has supported by performing these evaluations, contributing to comprehensive vehicle assessments for models like the and . Pedestrian protection tests, which evaluate head impact criteria and lower leg injuries, are also integrated into this collaboration to align with global standards while addressing regional priorities. Data from JARI tests is harmonized with 's rating system, enabling reliable cross-verification and enhancing the program's credibility. In parallel, ASEAN NCAP has expanded its collaborations to include the China Automotive Technology and Research Center (CATARC) in , focusing on validations for autonomous emergency braking (AEB) and other safety assist technologies following the 2021 protocol update. CATARC has been involved in ASEAN NCAP validations, particularly for AEB, with capabilities to conduct related testing as per partnerships. A 2025 MoU between MIROS and CATARC further strengthens ties by enhancing capacity and aligning standards for Chinese vehicles exported to . These partnerships provide ASEAN NCAP with access to cutting-edge testing , fostering expertise and cost efficiencies through shared resources. For instance, complex AEB validations at CATARC complement domestic efforts, ensuring a portion of supplementary tests—especially those involving advanced driver assistance systems—are conducted externally while maintaining protocol consistency via biennial MoU renewals. The primary testing at MIROS coordinates these efforts to integrate global inputs seamlessly into regional assessments.

Regional Implementation

Malaysia Regulations

In March 2020, Malaysia implemented mandatory safety labeling for all new passenger vehicles displayed in showrooms, requiring dealers to affix ASEAN NCAP rating labels that detail the star rating and key safety features to enable informed consumer choices. This regulation, enforced by the of Domestic Trade and Affairs (KPDN), aligns with broader efforts to integrate ASEAN NCAP into practices, ensuring transparency in vehicle safety performance across the right-hand drive Malaysian . The Road Transport Department (JPJ) has incorporated ASEAN NCAP ratings into regulations for public and commercial vehicles, mandating a minimum 3-star rating for e-hailing and operators to renew licenses starting in 2021, thereby extending enforcement to government-related and operations in the sector. This policy, part of Malaysia's strategy, prioritizes safer fleets for public use and influences decisions for official vehicles by favoring higher-rated models to meet standards. ASEAN NCAP's integration has driven market incentives through heightened consumer awareness, with ratings significantly shaping purchasing decisions; as of 2021, nearly 90% of assessed vehicles achieved 4 stars or higher, reflecting widespread adoption by manufacturers to capture sales in Malaysia's competitive automotive sector. By , 81% of passenger car models sold in the held 4-star or above ratings, demonstrating the program's role in elevating baseline without direct fiscal rebates but through regulatory and market pressures. The overall impact in includes a marked improvement in vehicle performance, with early 2013 assessments showing an average of around 3-4 stars for popular models like the (3 stars) and (5 stars), progressing to an average exceeding 4 stars by the mid-2020s as manufacturers upgraded features for the right-hand drive specifications tested under ASEAN NCAP protocols. This evolution has contributed to safer roads by influencing over 80% of new vehicle sales to prioritize higher ratings, fostering a cultural shift toward in the Malaysian .

Adoption in Other ASEAN Countries

In Thailand, ASEAN NCAP has been integrated through voluntary safety labeling initiatives supported by the government, with the launch of the ASEAN NCAP Labelling Guideline in February 2019 to promote consumer awareness of vehicle ratings. The Thai Automobile Association contributes to these efforts, and the government incentivizes imports of vehicles achieving 4-star or higher ratings via programs like the ECO CAR scheme, which offers tax benefits for models equipped with stability control and other safety features. In , ASEAN NCAP ratings serve as a key reference in consumer guides and media evaluations of vehicle safety, influencing purchasing decisions for models like the , which earned a 5-star rating in 2023. While no nationwide mandate exists for private sales, policies increasingly reference safety standards, aligning with broader efforts to enhance in a market dominated by imported and locally assembled vehicles. The and have adopted ASEAN NCAP through awareness campaigns led by automobile associations, such as the Automobile Association of the , which promote ratings to educate consumers on occupant protection and advanced safety technologies. Partial integration occurs in fleet procurement for public and corporate use, where higher-rated vehicles like the and are prioritized for their 5-star and 4-star performances, respectively, to reduce operational risks. Adoption lags in economically challenged nations like and , where lower GDP per capita and limited hinder widespread reference to ASEAN NCAP ratings, contributing to higher road fatality rates despite regional assessments. By 2025, however, ASEAN NCAP influences approximately 90% of the regional passenger vehicle through tested models, reflecting growing across several member states. Progress toward uniformity is outlined in the ASEAN NCAP 2021-2025, which prioritizes harmonized protocols, including motorcyclist , to align standards region-wide by the decade's end, building on Malaysia's foundational role in the program's .

Impact and Comparisons

Achievements and Challenges

Since its in 2012, ASEAN NCAP has tested over 100 vehicle models and variants by 2025, covering a significant portion of the Southeast Asian passenger car market and driving incremental enhancements across tested vehicles. The program's average star rating for assessed models has risen notably, from around 2.5 stars in early phases around 2013—marked by frequent zero- and one-star results due to limited features—to approximately 4.2 stars by 2025, reflecting broader adoption of advanced like multiple airbags and (). This progress has influenced safer vehicle designs in the region, with mandatory in since 2018 serving as an example of policy impact. According to UNESCAP reports, these efforts have helped reduce road fatalities through promoted features like seatbelt reminders and pedestrian . Key impacts include manufacturer-led upgrades in response to ratings, exemplified by the 2019 , which earned a five-star with 91.79 points overall, prompting enhancements in side impact protection and child occupant safety across Honda's lineup. Public awareness has also grown through mobile apps, annual awards like the Decade Vehicle Safety Awards in 2021, and media campaigns, empowering consumers to prioritize safety in purchases and pressuring brands to compete on crash performance. Protocol evolutions, such as the 2021-2025 roadmap's emphasis on motorcyclist safety and autonomous emergency braking, have further amplified these gains by aligning tests with regional vulnerabilities like high traffic. In 2025, multiple models including the Mitsubishi Destinator, , and achieved 5-star ratings, demonstrating continued progress. Despite these successes, ASEAN NCAP faces challenges from its largely voluntary nature outside , where participation relies on manufacturer incentives rather than mandates, limiting coverage of low-volume or budget models in less affluent markets. Resource constraints persist in poorer states, including funding shortages for expanded testing and dissemination barriers like English-only reports in multilingual regions. Adapting protocols to , such as electric vehicles (EVs) with high-voltage batteries and partial autonomy, remains a hurdle, as seen in the program's 2024 updates to include EV-specific crash assessments for battery integrity and post-impact hazards, now implemented in 2025 tests. Looking ahead, NCAP aims for a 2030 target where all new cars in the region achieve five-star ratings, supported by the 2026-2030 roadmap's focus on harmonized standards and broader enforcement. This includes intensified efforts to address urban biker crashes, which account for over 70% of road fatalities in , through enhanced vulnerable road user protections and partnerships for integrations.

Comparisons with Global NCAP Programs

ASEAN NCAP differs from in its methodological approach, particularly by incorporating a dedicated Motorcyclist Safety pillar weighted at 20% of the overall score under the 2021-2025 protocol, addressing the region's high usage where riders comprise up to 80% of road users in some countries. In comparison, allocates no standalone weighting to motorcyclist protection; instead, it integrates car-to-motorcyclist scenarios into its Vulnerable Road User and Safety Assist categories, with AEB and lane support tests introduced in 2023 using a specialized at speeds of 30 km/h, 45 km/h, and 60 km/h. ASEAN NCAP's emphasis on this pillar includes evaluations of blind spot detection, pedestrian protection, and advanced rear-view mirrors, tailored to Southeast Asian traffic patterns. ASEAN NCAP also applies lower speed thresholds in AEB testing to reflect regional and driving conditions, such as AEB City scenarios ranging from 10 km/h to 60 km/h for car-to-car rear stationary targets, and Inter-Urban tests up to 60 km/h in updated protocols. , oriented toward European highways, conducts AEB Inter-Urban tests at higher , up to 80 km/h for closing velocity scenarios, emphasizing functionality in faster traffic environments. Compared to Global NCAP programs in Latin America and Africa, ASEAN NCAP maintains a structure with star ratings derived from adult occupant protection (40% weighting), child occupant protection (20%), safety assist technologies (20%), and the unique motorcyclist safety pillar (20%). Global NCAP uses 40% for adult occupant protection, 20% for child occupant protection, and 40% for safety assist technologies. Both share protocols harmonized through Global NCAP's framework, including aligned crash test speeds and dummy usage, but ASEAN NCAP elevates child protection by mandating assessments of locally available child restraint systems and child presence detection systems, contributing to its 20% weighting and reflecting regional family vehicle priorities. Global NCAP's child occupant protocols similarly weigh 20% but focus more broadly on emerging market variations without ASEAN's localized restraint emphasis. In contrast to the U.S.-based IIHS, which does not use star ratings but instead confers Top Safety Pick awards for vehicles earning "Good" ratings across crashworthiness, crash avoidance, and headlight performance categories, ASEAN NCAP employs a 1- to 5-star system for holistic consumer guidance. Following its 2021 protocol update, ASEAN NCAP has amplified ADAS evaluation within a 20% safety assist pillar, testing AEB, lane support, and seatbelt reminders to promote active safety adoption in cost-sensitive markets. IIHS similarly prioritizes ADAS through front crash prevention ratings, but its awards require superior performance in updated side and pedestrian tests post-2021, often favoring premium vehicles over the broader accessibility ASEAN NCAP targets. Regarding outcomes, ASEAN NCAP-rated models, often designed for affordability in emerging economies, typically achieve 0.5- to 1-star lower ratings than equivalents due to structural optimizations for cost rather than maximum rigidity. For instance, the earned a 5-star ASEAN NCAP rating in 2024 with strong child occupant scores, while similar models like the secured 5 stars in 2024 tests, indicating progressive alignment. 2025 data further demonstrates convergence, as multiple vehicles, including several imports, attained 5-star results across both programs amid rising global .

References

  1. [1]
    About Us - ASEAN NCAP v4
    The establishment of ASEAN NCAP in December 2011 marked a new milestone of vehicle safety for the region in response to the United Nations' Decade of Action ...Missing: history objectives system
  2. [2]
    [PDF] The New Car Assessment Program for Southeast Asian Countries
    The ASEAN NCAP was established in December 2011 through a joint effort by Global New Car Assessment. Program (Global NCAP) and Malaysia's Institute of Road ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  3. [3]
    [PDF] asean ncap roadmap 2021-2025
    The objective of the single rating system is also to eradicate confusion among the consumers about the awarded rating as some manufacturers only use the highest ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] ASEAN NCAP Protocol 2021-2025
    Maximum Star Rating. 0. 5. 3. 2. 2. Page 3. Safer Cars for ASEAN Region. G e n e ral ... Slanting = Fitement Rating System. 2026-2030. 50. Page 51. Safer Cars for ...
  5. [5]
    ASEAN NCAP v4
    New Car Assessment Program for Southeast Asian Countries (ASEAN NCAP), a new addition to the NCAP family, is targeted to elevate vehicle safety standards.ResultsOur TestAbout UsContact UsSHIFT 2025
  6. [6]
    Motorcycle ABS Partnership (ASEAN) - Global NCAP
    The rate of road fatalities in the ASEAN region is one of the highest in the world with riders of powered two and three wheelers accounting for the majority of ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] ASEAN NCAP LABELING GUIDELINE
    Jul 5, 2018 · To address the aforementioned issues and concerns, ASEAN NCAP has taken an initiative to introduce the ASEAN NCAP Labeling Guideline in order to ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] ASEAN NCAP 2021-2025
    Oct 5, 2023 · NCAP's role is to provide consumer a realistic and independent assessment on the safety performance of vehicles recently launched in the markets ...
  9. [9]
    FAQS - asean ncap
    ... star. In other words, a 4-star car that has points in the 5-star range performs better in crash test compared to cars in 4-star range. The reason behind ...
  10. [10]
    [PDF] New Car Assessment Programme For Southeast Asia (ASEAN NCAP)
    New Car Assessment Program for Southeast Asia region. (ASEAN NCAP) has been established since 8th December. 2011 in New Delhi, India.Missing: history objectives
  11. [11]
    Safer Cars - Ministry of Transport Malaysia
    The mandatory label which contains information about ASEAN NCAP and also other NCAPs (if any) safety ratings as well as the safety specifications of the car ...
  12. [12]
    [PDF] INTRODUCTION OF ASEAN NCAP - CAREC Program
    Formation of ASEAN NCAP. 8. December 2011: MoU Signing between Global. NCAP and MIROS in New Delhi. Page 9. Safer Cars for ASEAN Region. G e n e ral in q u irie.
  13. [13]
    [PDF] 7 Dec – 9 Dec 2021 - asean ncap
    Dec 9, 2021 · ➢New Car Assessment Program for Southeast Asia region (ASEAN. NCAP) has been established since 8th December 2011 on MOU.<|control11|><|separator|>
  14. [14]
    ASEAN NCAP: Consumer Awareness Of Safety In Southeast Asia ...
    Apr 16, 2013 · ASEAN NCAP wants to give family-focused Asian consumers better information before they buy – and to encourage carmakers to take more care with ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] ASEAN Regional Road Safety Strategy
    progressed in terms of the five pillars outlined in the UN Decade of Action (WHO 2013):. Pillar 1: Institutional framework,. Pillar 2: Safer roads and mobility,.
  16. [16]
    ASEAN NCAP Releases First Independent Crash Test Results For ...
    Jan 31, 2013 · The first crash test results of ASEAN NCAP, the new car assessment programme for South East Asia, were released on 31 January in Melaka Malaysia.
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Automotive Safety in the UN Decade of Action - ESCAP
    Dec 4, 2013 · ASEAN NCAP's first phase tests focussed on the small and sedan passenger car. The results were launched in January 2013 and comprised 7 models ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Transport and Communications Bulletin for Asia and the Pacific
    Jun 24, 2019 · ASEAN NCAP is currently funded by both MIROS and Global NCAP. In ... ASEAN NCAP ROAD MAP 2021-2025, MIROS, Malaysia [Online]. Available.
  19. [19]
    [PDF] New inlay roadmap asian ncap 2025-2030
    Action for Road Safety and Sustainable Development Goals targets,. ASEAN NCAP has developed a single rating system for 2017-2020 by combining three safety ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] SAFER CARS FOR ASEAN REGION - ASEAN NCAP
    Dec 9, 2021 · Its main objective is to promote and enhance vehicle safety standards and rating system in the ASEAN region. The safety assessment initially ...
  21. [21]
    ASEAN NCAP presents 2026-2030 test protocol - WapCar
    Oct 5, 2023 · Summary of changes for 2026 – 2030 ASEAN NCAP test protocol: Side-impact with movable barrier: Increased trolley weight from 950 to 1,300 kg.Missing: phase | Show results with:phase
  22. [22]
    [PDF] SAFER CARS FOR ASEAN REGION - ASEAN NCAP
    ASEAN NCAP is also supported by the membership of. Automobile Associations from Malaysia (AAM), the Philippines (AAP), Singapore (AA Singapore) and. Thailand ...
  23. [23]
    Safer Cars For ASEAN Region - Global NCAP
    Jun 1, 2016 · From a total of 74 ASEAN NCAP ratings, there are about 24 car models that received 5-Star rating, including today's release. This has been a ...Missing: prioritizes | Show results with:prioritizes
  24. [24]
    [PDF] SAFER CARS FOR ASEAN REGION
    Sep 17, 2025 · In this area, car manufacturers are encouraged to introduce a technology that will benefit road users and help prevent road crashes.Missing: objectives | Show results with:objectives
  25. [25]
    ASEAN NCAP holds 7th Automobile Safety Forum in PH
    ... ASEAN NCAP ... Department of Transportation (DOTr) and the ... The Internet's Role in Automobile Safety. ASEAN NCAP © Ruben Manahan IV for Carmudi Philippines ...
  26. [26]
    ASEAN NCAP: Elevating Southeast Asian Safety Standards
    Jul 25, 2025 · Covering countries including Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, Philippines, Singapore, and Vietnam, ASEAN NCAP addresses unique regional challenges ...
  27. [27]
    None
    ### Funding Sources and Budget Usage for ASEAN NCAP
  28. [28]
  29. [29]
    Honda Collaborates With MIROS To Set Up ASEAN NCAP ...
    Nov 7, 2012 · Honda Malaysia recently sponsored a new Honda City for the Malaysian Institute of Road Safety Vehicles (MIROS) to run the ASEAN New Car ...Missing: funding | Show results with:funding
  30. [30]
  31. [31]
  32. [32]
    Results - asean ncap
    This page lists the safety ratings of models assessed by ASEAN NCAP. ASEAN NCAP has developed dedicated test and assessment protocols.<|control11|><|separator|>
  33. [33]
    [PDF] ASEAN NCAP Roadmap 2021-2025 - Updated 31 July 2018
    – ASEAN NCAP is not planning to upgrade the usage to Q6 and Q10 as Euro NCAP until 2025. • New List for Vehicle Based Assessment. – List by November 2018. • ...Missing: scope | Show results with:scope<|control11|><|separator|>
  34. [34]
    malaysian institute of road safety research (miros) - asean ncap
    MALAYSIAN INSTITUTE OF ROAD SAFETY RESEARCH (MIROS). Lot 125-135, Jalan TKS 1, Taman Kajang Sentral, 43000 Kajang, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia.Missing: funding secretariat operational lead
  35. [35]
    They don't make them like they used to? 1993 Proton Wira in NCAP ...
    Aug 8, 2025 · ... Miros PC3 lab. Knowing something in theory is one thing, seeing the ... The same high-speed cameras and lights, the same background ...
  36. [36]
    [PDF] 5522 Kinematics and Injury Analysis of Front and Rear Child Pillion ...
    of Road Safety (MIROS), PC3 Crash Test Laboratory, Melaka Malaysia. The ... Four high-speed cameras were installed at left and right sides of the MC ...
  37. [37]
    Perodua contributes RM1.5m to MIROS' calibration lab
    Jan 13, 2014 · 5 million to renovate MIROS' PC3 lab in Melaka in order to house the latter's crash test dummy calibration equipment. The contribution is ...
  38. [38]
    STARS – Smart Traffic & Road Safety Summit
    Currently, the MIROS PC3 has conducted more than 100 crash tests since May 2012 and it is one of the official crash laboratories for ASEAN NCAP.Missing: facilities | Show results with:facilities
  39. [39]
    Miros, Jari sign MoU on vehicle safety technology transfer
    Oct 7, 2017 · (File pix) Miros has signed a second memorandum of understanding (MoU) with the Japanese Automobile Research Institute (Jari) to enhance ...
  40. [40]
    All-new Honda Civic Awarded 5-Star ASEAN NCAP Safety Rating
    Oct 28, 2021 · The new model received impressive scores of 29.28/32 for Adult Occupant Protection (AOP), 46.72/51 for Child Occupant Protection (COP), and ...
  41. [41]
  42. [42]
    CATARC is Co-Approved for Euro NCAP Crash Test and Pedestrian ...
    CATARC has been accredited by three NCAP organizations and now can execute official crash test according to C-NCAP, ASEAN NCAP and Euro NCAP protocols locally ...Missing: JARI | Show results with:JARI
  43. [43]
    shift 2025 strengthens asean regional collaboration in road safety ...
    Oct 28, 2025 · The awards recognised vehicle models that achieved top safety performance under ASEAN NCAP's 2025 assessments, underscoring ASEAN NCAP's ...Missing: objectives | Show results with:objectives
  44. [44]
    ASEAN NCAP and KPDNHEP mandatory safety rating labels begin ...
    May 18, 2020 · At its introduction, ASEAN NCAP said that the safety rating label will prevent customer confusion due to misleading information and the misuse ...
  45. [45]
    ASEAN NCAP labelling guideline compliance to become ... - bernama
    Feb 12, 2019 · ASEAN NCAP labelling guideline compliance to become compulsory from March 2020.Missing: promote mandatory
  46. [46]
    [PDF] Embedding Automobile Safety Rating in Malaysia's E-Hailing Policy
    May 1, 2021 · One of the notable facts about the safety rating effort is a whopping 90% of the cars are rated minimum 4-star. This means that embedding a ...Missing: pillar | Show results with:pillar
  47. [47]
    ASEAN NCAP first phase results released for eight models tested
    Feb 1, 2013 · Eight car models were subjected to an offset frontal collision test at a closing speed of 64 km/h, yielding the following safety ratings.
  48. [48]
    The Safest Cars in Indonesia According to ASEAN NCAP Standards
    Jan 19, 2024 · The Honda WR-V is one of the safest cars in Indonesia. It has been awarded a 5-star rating by ASEAN NCAP. The WR-V is a compact SUV that ...
  49. [49]
    Honda CR-V and Civic Win Major Awards at the ASEAN NCAP ...
    Honda CR-V and Civic Win Major Awards at the ASEAN NCAP Grand Prix Awards 2024 ; 2024 · Excellence Award · Consistent 5-Star Ratings Across All Models (2021-2023) ...Missing: SAT | Show results with:SAT
  50. [50]
    [PDF] SAFER CARS FOR ASEAN REGION
    In addition to ESC, ABS is also considered in the new rating system under EBA. Based on ASEAN NCAP's observation, ABS fitment rate in certain ASEAN countries is ...Missing: participating | Show results with:participating<|control11|><|separator|>
  51. [51]
    3-5-2: How does NCAP for ASEAN help the region's road safety ...
    Sep 30, 2025 · Figure 2 also indicates a very high number of road deaths for lowincome countries such as Cambodia, Laos, and Myanmar. This supports the "3 ...<|separator|>
  52. [52]
    ASEAN NCAP: 2019 Honda Accord scores five stars
    Dec 2, 2019 · Tested for the sedan vehicle category, the 2019 Honda Accord scored 91.79 points overall, making it eligible for a five-star Asean NCAP rating.
  53. [53]
    ASEAN NCAP introduces EV crash test assessment protocol, public ...
    Nov 14, 2024 · The Malaysian Institute of Road Safety Research (MIROS) has released three new guidelines on electric vehicle safety at its PC3 crash test lab ...Missing: facilities capacity
  54. [54]
    [PDF] MEDIA RELEASE ASEAN NCAP – SAFER CARS FOR ASEAN ...
    Mar 1, 2024 · The model was initially evaluated by ASEAN NCAP in 2019 under the 2017-2020 protocol, in which it achieved an overall score of 91.79 points ...
  55. [55]
    AEB / Lane Support Motorcyclist - Euro NCAP
    Euro NCAP introduces a first-ever Car-to-Motorcyclist safety framework into the programme, rewarding vehicle manufacturers that fit as standard systems.
  56. [56]
    [PDF] Euro NCAP Assessment Protocol - VRU - v11.4
    The following points are available for the different test speeds in each AEB/LSS. Motorcyclist scenario: 50%. 25%. & 12m. 25%. & 40m. 30 km/h 45 km/h 60 km/h 50 ...
  57. [57]
    MIROS developing AEB systems test ahead of new ASEAN NCAP ...
    Jul 15, 2020 · The latest assessment protocol is comprised of four pillars, namely adult occupant protection (AOP), child occupant protection (COP), safety ...
  58. [58]
    How much space do I need to perform ADAS tests? - AB Dynamics
    Oct 5, 2018 · Test speeds are defined in two ranges: AEB City – 10-50kph; AEB Inter-Urban – 30-80kph; Car-to-Car Rear Stationary (CCRs) – collision with ...
  59. [59]
    [PDF] AEB systems - Euro NCAP
    After this test continue to perform the remainder of the tests with speed increments of 5km/h by repeating section 8.3.1 to 8.4.3. In the AEB Inter-Urban CCRm ...
  60. [60]
    Resources - Global NCAP
    Assessment Protocol July 2022 - 2025: Adult Occupant Protection: PDF - Addendum April 2022 · Assessment Protocol July 2022 - 2025: Child Occupant Protection.Missing: shared ASEAN
  61. [61]
  62. [62]
    Advanced driver assistance - IIHS
    Some driver assistance technologies are reducing crashes. Front crash prevention, lane departure prevention, blind spot detection and rear crash prevention ...Missing: emphasis post- ASEAN NCAP
  63. [63]
    When too much of a good thing is better; How the Chery Omoda 5 ...
    Oct 10, 2024 · The Chery Omoda 5 netted a rating of 88.64 points to sit atop the ASEAN NCAP honour roll. To break it down, the SUV scored 17.36/20.00 points for COP.
  64. [64]
    Best in Class Cars of 2024 - Euro NCAP
    On this page you will find top performer in each category, as measured by the weighted sum of scores. Some categories may not be represented.2022 · Read more · Zeekr x · 2015
  65. [65]
    Are Chinese Made Cars Safe With Global Standards - Automacha
    Apr 16, 2025 · Chinese Made Cars have been dominating sales in ASIA and not they are set to do the same in Europe with high 5 star safety ratings.
  66. [66]
    Euro NCAP reveals Best in Class cars tested in 2024
    Jan 15, 2025 · Euro NCAP announces 2024 Best in Class cars, showcasing top safety performers like Mercedes-Benz E-Class, ZEEKR X, Škoda Superb, VW Passat, ...