Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

eCall

eCall is an automated assistance system integrated into motor vehicles that automatically dials the European single number following a serious road accident, transmitting a minimum set of data including precise location to public safety answering points for faster response. Mandated under Regulation (EU) 2015/758, eCall requires type-approval for deployment in all new passenger cars and light commercial vehicles across the and from 31 March 2018 onward, ensuring interoperability via public mobile communication networks and systems like GNSS. The system activates through in-vehicle sensors or manual initiation by occupants, sending the minimum set of data—encompassing vehicle identification, location coordinates, direction of , and service requirements—without storing beyond needs, addressing through transmission only upon activation. Deployed to reduce response times by up to 50 percent in rural areas where delays are common, eCall leverages existing infrastructure to enhance without requiring additional roadside units, with ongoing updates like Regulation (EU) 2024/1180 mandating / compatibility for future-proofing.

History

Origins and Development (Pre-2010)

The concept of eCall, an automated in-vehicle emergency call system, originated in 1999 when European Commission services, led by civil servant Luc Tytgat, presented it during the launch of the Galileo satellite navigation project, envisioning integration with precise positioning for rapid accident response across Europe. This early proposal emphasized leveraging public mobile networks and location data to transmit crash details to emergency services, building on existing GSM capabilities for voice and data. In 2001, the idea gained further traction through a student entry in the German youth science competition Jugend forscht, where participants proposed a pan-European vehicle-based calling system that automatically dials emergency services upon detecting a collision via sensors, including transmission of vehicle location and status data. The selected this concept amid competing technologies, recognizing its potential to standardize emergency response without reliance on proprietary . Development accelerated in the early 2000s through EU-funded research projects under the Sixth Framework Programme (FP6). The eMerge project, initiated around 2001, focused on prototyping in-vehicle systems for automatic crash notification using networks, testing interoperability for voice calls, minimum data sets on crash severity, and GPS-derived locations. Complementing this, the GST Rescue project (2004–2007) conducted field trials in multiple European test sites, validating eCall's end-to-end functionality, including sensor-triggered activation, data transmission via (USSD) or , and routing to public safety answering points (PSAPs). These efforts demonstrated eCall's feasibility for reducing response times by up to 50% in rural areas, though voluntary adoption remained limited due to infrastructure gaps and privacy concerns. By the mid-2000s, the eSafety initiative, launched by the in 2004, integrated eCall into broader intelligent transport systems, promoting standards through the (ETSI). Pilot deployments and simulations confirmed the system's reliance on the emergency number for pan-European compatibility, with early prototypes installed in vehicles for real-world validation. However, pre-2010 progress stalled on widespread implementation, as member states hesitated on PSAP upgrades, highlighting the need for regulatory mandates to achieve uniformity.

EU Proposal and Standardization (2010-2017)

In 2010, Directive 2010/40/EU on the framework for the deployment of Intelligent Transport Systems in the EU identified eCall as one of six priority schemes, emphasizing its potential to enhance road safety through automated emergency calls to the 112 number. This directive laid the groundwork for subsequent regulatory and standardization efforts by requiring member states to facilitate cooperative systems, including emergency services integration. The Harmonised eCall European Pilot (HeERO) , funded by the and running from 2011 to , coordinated pre-deployment trials across multiple member states to test interoperability and PSAP readiness for eCall signals, involving nine countries and focusing on in-vehicle system integration with public safety answering points (PSAPs). A follow-up HeERO2 from to expanded these efforts to 13 additional regions, addressing deployment barriers such as network coverage and data handling protocols. Concurrently, on 8 2011, the issued a recommendation urging support for EU-wide eCall via electronic communication networks, highlighting the need for PSAP upgrades to receive location data and voice calls. On 13 June 2013, the proposed legislation to mandate eCall in all new (passenger cars) and (light commercial vehicles) types from 1 October 2015, aiming to reduce road fatalities by up to 10% through faster response times. Negotiations between the and delayed vehicle-side implementation, with agreement reached in April 2014 to push PSAP readiness to 1 October 2017 via Decision 585/2014/EU, which required member states to ensure all 112-enabled PSAPs could process eCall data. Standardization progressed through the European Committee for Standardization (CEN) and European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI), with CEN/TC 278 developing key specifications for the eCall in-vehicle system and Minimum Set of Data (MSD). ETSI focused on PSAP conformance and modem protocols, producing interoperability tests during this period. In April 2015, CEN published EN 15722, defining the MSD format—including vehicle location, direction, and principal direction of impact—for transmission during eCalls. EN 16062:2015 followed, outlining high-level application requirements for eCall operation over public land mobile networks. On 28 April 2015, the endorsed the proposal, culminating in Regulation (EU) 2015/758 of 29 April 2015, which established type-approval requirements for eCall systems based on , ensuring compatibility with standardized and network protocols. These efforts aligned vehicle manufacturers, telecom operators, and emergency services toward interoperable deployment, though challenges like concerns and retrofit costs persisted.

Mandate Implementation and Early Rollout (2018-2022)

The European Union's eCall mandate, established under Regulation (EU) 2015/758, took effect on 31 March 2018, requiring all new types of M1 (passenger cars) and N1 (light commercial vehicles) to incorporate a 112-based eCall system capable of automatically transmitting the Minimum Set of Data (MSD) to Public Safety Answering Points (PSAPs). This applied to vehicles approved for manufacture and placed on the market within the EU, with compliance verified through type-approval processes outlined in the regulation. Vehicle manufacturers integrated eCall hardware, including crash sensors, GPS modules, and modems, into production lines, often leveraging existing telematics infrastructure to meet the <€100 per vehicle cost threshold estimated at the time of regulation. Prior to the vehicle mandate, member states were required to upgrade PSAPs to handle eCall transmissions by 1 October 2017, six months in advance, under Decision 585/2014/, ensuring free access to mobile networks for emergency signaling. By 2018, PSAP infrastructure across all countries supported eCall reception, including automated processing for location and vehicle details, though some regions had piloted voluntary upgrades earlier. Initial rollout focused on new vehicle types, with full fleet penetration gradual as older models phased out; for instance, in markets like , eCall became standard in all new models from 2018 onward. Early activation rates remained low in 2018-2020 due to the limited number of equipped vehicles on roads, with comprehensive -wide tracking emerging later. The first aggregated data, reported for , showed PSAPs receiving 421,000 eCalls, primarily automatic triggers from accidents, indicating growing operational maturity as equipped vehicles accumulated. Compliance among manufacturers was near-universal, enforced via type-approval, though third-party service () eCall options allowed supplementary private systems without supplanting the mandatory 112-based functionality. By 2022, eCall integration had expanded to support testing and minor refinements, such as enhanced data protocols, paving the way for broader adoption amid stable PSAP handling. ![eCall system in a 2018 Volkswagen e-Golf][float-right]

Technical Specifications

Core System Components

The eCall system architecture relies on three primary components: the in-vehicle system (IVS), public land mobile networks (PLMN), and eCall-capable public safety answering points (PSAPs). The IVS handles detection and transmission from the vehicle, PLMNs provide routing over cellular infrastructure, and PSAPs receive and process the emergency signal. The IVS constitutes the vehicle's onboard emergency subsystem, mandated for permanent installation in new passenger cars and light commercial vehicles since March 31, 2018, per EU 2015/758. It integrates sensors and processors to automatically trigger upon severe crashes, detected via metrics like deployment or deceleration exceeding thresholds specified in UN ECE 144. Key subcomponents include a GNSS receiver supporting Galileo, EGNOS, and other global systems for location accuracy within 10 meters, a cellular compliant with / circuit-switched domains for voice and data, and a processing unit managing eCall transactions. A manual trigger button allows passenger-initiated calls, with safeguards against false activations. The IVS transmits the minimum set of data () alongside the voice call to using an in-band protocol over the unstructured supplementary service data () or point-to-point protocol (). PSAPs form the backend reception infrastructure, required to be operational for eCall handling across member states by October 1, 2017. They must decode incoming packets—formatted per CEN EN 15722, containing 140 bytes of vehicle-specific details like , , coordinates, heading, and number of passengers—and associate them with the voice channel for dispatchers. Core PSAP elements include an reader interface, often software-integrated with systems, and conformance to CEN EN 16072 for operational protocols, ensuring without altering call routing. PSAP upgrades typically involve to parse the binary structure transmitted in-band during the initial call setup phase. PLMNs serve as the intermediary, leveraging existing GSM/UMTS infrastructure to route eCalls transparently to the nearest PSAP based on the caller's location, with no network modifications needed beyond standard emergency call prioritization. This ensures pan-European coverage, as IVS devices select available operators via SIM or eUICC for seamless handover.

Minimum Set of Data (MSD)

The Minimum Set of Data (MSD) forms the essential, standardized dataset automatically transmitted from a vehicle's In-Vehicle (IVS) to a (PSAP) upon eCall activation, enabling swift emergency response without dependence on verbal details from occupants. Specified in the European standard EN 15722 by the (CEN), the MSD prioritizes key incident parameters to minimize transmission latency and ensure across systems. It is encoded using Abstract Syntax Notation One () for compact, reliable delivery, with provisions for XML alternatives in next-generation implementations, and constrained to a maximum of 140 bytes to suit circuit-switched or IP-based networks. The encompasses mandatory elements capturing vehicle identity, , and context, derived from onboard sensors like GNSS receivers and vehicle networks. These facilitate precise dispatch of rescuers, accounting for factors such as crash severity indicators implicit in triggers. While the core set is fixed, regulations may append elements, and optional additional concepts allow extensions like count without altering the baseline structure.
MSD ElementDescription
automaticActivationBoolean indicating automatic (crash-sensor triggered) or manual initiation.
testCall distinguishing test calls from genuine emergencies.
positionCanBeTrustedFlag assessing GNSS position reliability (e.g., satellite signal quality).
vehicleTypeCategorical code for (e.g., passenger car, ).
VIN17-character for unique tracing.
vehiclePropulsionStorageTypeCode denoting fuel/electric type (e.g., , battery-electric).
timeStampUTC of MSD generation, accurate to seconds.
positionLatitudeGNSS-derived in degrees (WGS84 datum).
positionLongitudeGNSS-derived in degrees (WGS84 datum).
vehicleDirectionHeading in degrees (0-359) from last known travel direction.
This composition balances comprehensiveness with brevity, as validated in field tests showing high transmission success rates over / networks, though accuracy hinges on IVS integrity. Compliance requires vehicles to generate and transmit within seconds of activation, per regulatory testing protocols.

Communication and Network Protocols

The pan-European eCall system establishes communication via mobile networks to the emergency number , transmitting both voice and the Minimum Set of Data () to Public Safety Answering Points (PSAPs). Original eCall operates primarily over circuit-switched (CS) domains of and networks, leveraging Public Land Mobile Networks (PLMN) for call setup and data transfer. The protocols for these CS-based eCalls are defined in EN 16072, which specifies the sequence for initiating the call, activating vehicle sensors, and forwarding the emergency request. MSD transmission in CS eCall occurs in-band over the established voice channel using a specialized , enabling the In-Vehicle System (IVS) to send such as precise , , passenger count, and principal of impact without interrupting the audio path. This in-band method employs (FSK) modulation as part of the eCall-specific speech codec extensions in TS 26.269, ensuring compatibility with existing PSAP equipment while minimizing transmission latency to under 2 seconds post-call connection. Network s prioritize the eCall as an , invoking CS fallback mechanisms if needed to maintain reliability in legacy / environments. Next-Generation eCall (NG eCall) transitions to packet-switched (PS) networks over LTE and 5G, utilizing the IP Multimedia Subsystem (IMS) for VoLTE and enhanced data capabilities, addressing the phase-out of GSM/UMTS spectrum re-farming. High-Level Application Protocols (HLAP) for NG eCall are outlined in CEN/TS 17184 and ETSI TS 103 683, facilitating interoperability tests and conformance for IP-based sessions. Session initiation employs SIP for call setup and SDP for media negotiation, with MSD exchanged via structured IP packets rather than in-band modems, enabling richer data like additional sensor inputs while adhering to RFC 8147 for pan-European emergency services alignment. Both CS and PS variants mandate end-to-end QoS prioritization, including resource reservation and handover procedures to prevent call drops during mobility.
Protocol AspectCS eCall (GSM/UMTS)NG eCall (LTE/5G IMS)
Call DomainCircuit-switchedPacket-switched
Key StandardsEN 16072, TS 26.269CEN/TS 17184, RFC 8147, TS 103 683
MSD TransmissionIn-band FSK modem over voiceIP-based via / and HLAP
Network PriorityEmergency CS handlingIMS emergency registration and PS prioritization

Regulatory Framework and Implementation

EU Mandates for Vehicles and PSAPs

Regulation (EU) 2015/758, adopted on 29 April 2015, establishes type-approval requirements for the deployment of 112-based eCall systems in vehicles, mandating their installation in all new passenger car models (category ) and light commercial vehicles (category ) approved for type-approval after 31 March 2018. This regulation ensures that compliant vehicles transmit an automated emergency call to the single European emergency number upon detecting a serious accident via in-vehicle sensors, including the Minimum Set of Data (MSD) such as location, direction of travel, and vehicle identification. The mandate applies to vehicles manufactured and sold within the , with type-approval authorities verifying compliance through standardized testing procedures outlined in the regulation and associated UNECE regulations like UN R144. Member states are required under the same regulation to ensure that Public Safety Answering Points (PSAPs) are equipped to receive and process eCalls, with infrastructure upgrades mandated by 1 October 2017 to handle the incoming data packets and integrate with existing systems. This includes deploying eCall-compatible software and hardware capable of decoding the , displaying vehicle location on maps, and coordinating with , as specified in Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 201/2014 and subsequent amendments for PSAP equipment standards. Non-compliance by PSAPs could result in delayed emergency responses, prompting the to monitor deployment through reporting obligations on member states. Subsequent updates to the framework address ; for instance, Delegated Regulation () 2024/1180 amends Regulation () 2015/758 to require 4G/5G-compatible eCall systems in new vehicle types from 1 January 2026, ensuring compatibility with phasing out / networks while maintaining for existing installations. These mandates collectively aim to standardize emergency response across the , with enforcement varying by through national type-approval processes and penalties for non-compliant vehicle sales.

Deployment Challenges and Solutions

One primary deployment challenge for eCall has been the uneven readiness of Public Safety Answering Points (PSAPs) across member states to receive and process transmissions, requiring hardware and software upgrades for compatibility with the system's IP-based data packets alongside voice calls. Although 2015/758 mandated PSAP by March 31, 2018, delays occurred due to varying national infrastructures, with becoming the first fully ready state via conformity assessments, while others lagged in integration and training. Solutions included EU-funded projects like HeERO for live testing and interoperability validation, alongside mandatory certification processes to ensure PSAPs could handle eCall flags and data without disrupting legacy operations. High rates of false alarms have strained PSAP resources, with 356,746 eCalls received across 15 countries in 2024, of which only 53,682 (approximately 15%) were genuine emergencies, and reporting 98.3% false positives among 15,626 activations. Causes include accidental manual triggers, suboptimal in-vehicle system interfaces, sensor malfunctions, and unauthorized demonstrations, leading to filtering protocols that inadvertently delay verification of real incidents. To mitigate this, PSAPs have adopted refined workflows for rapid , while vehicle manufacturers are urged to enhance trigger algorithms and user interfaces; eCall volumes rose 56% from 421,000 in 2021 to 658,000 in 2023, underscoring the need for ongoing system refinements to balance . Callback functionality failures exacerbate response delays when initial eCalls drop due to poor mobile coverage, as PSAPs often cannot redial in-vehicle systems (IVS) using +882 or +883 ranges, which are not universally provisioned or are blocked by configurations lacking Calling Line Identification (CLI) in limited-service states. This issue, persisting since 2018 rollout, risks undermining eCall's projected 40-50% faster response times in urban and rural areas. Regulatory solutions involve amending Article 97 of the European Electronic Communications Code to mandate unblocking of these ranges and reasonable tariffs, coupled with notification procedures for number provisioning and EENA-led eCallback tests since 2019. The phase-out of / circuit-switched networks poses a critical compatibility risk for legacy eCall, which relies on these for voice and , prompting a transition to Next Generation eCall (NG-eCall) over / packet-switched IMS/VoLTE protocols. Regulation (EU) 2024/1180 requires NG-eCall for new vehicle types approved after January 1, 2026, and all new vehicles after January 1, 2027, with hybrid solutions allowing coexistence during migration. Challenges include retrofitting existing fleets via after-market modems and ensuring PSAP/IVS interoperability amid network shutdowns in select countries; solutions emphasize coordinated testing, advanced simulation tools from vendors like for conformance, and standardized protocols to maintain service continuity without gaps.

Compliance and Testing Procedures

Compliance with eCall requirements mandates type approval for in-vehicle systems (IVS) under EU Regulation 2015/758, which specifies that manufacturers must demonstrate functionality through tests conducted exclusively by Notified Technical Services designated by EU member states. These services verify adherence to technical standards outlined in Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/79, covering aspects such as crash resistance, data transmission accuracy, and operational reliability in adverse conditions. Type approval ensures the IVS can automatically initiate an emergency call via , transmitting the Minimum Set of Data () including precise location via GNSS, vehicle identification, and crash severity indicators. Testing procedures for IVS include dynamic crash simulations to assess system resilience, where the eCall unit must activate and transmit data post-impact without failure, as detailed in Annex I of Regulation 2015/758. Additional tests evaluate GNSS positioning accuracy under simulated signal degradation, antenna performance during vehicle motion, and () to prevent interference. For instance, deceleration and acceleration tests require the system to maintain functionality when subjected to forces mimicking real-world accidents, with repeated positioning trials if initial results fall below thresholds for accuracy within 10 meters. Certification also incorporates interoperability checks against standards, such as TS 103 412 for MSD formatting, ensuring seamless integration with Public Safety Answering Points (PSAPs). PSAP compliance involves upgrading infrastructure to receive and process eCalls, with testing focused on and end-to-end functionality through events like ETSI's NG-eCall Plugtests, which simulate interactions between IVS and PSAP systems as of June 2025. PSAPs must validate receipt of , voice connectivity, and data handling under EU mandates, often using certified simulators for (e.g., / for NG-eCall) and GNSS signal replication. Recent certifications, such as those for PSAP emulators by and cetecom advanced effective from 2024-2025, address updates in Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/1180 for legacy / support alongside IP-based NG-eCall. Ongoing adaptations include proposed updates to test procedures by Q1 2025 to accommodate post-2G network sunsets, ensuring continued eCall viability in vehicles approved after March 31, 2018. Non-compliance risks include denial of type approval, halting , with audits by authorities like the Vehicle Certification Agency enforcing standards across EU and aligned regions.

Effectiveness and Impact

Response Time and Fatality Reductions

The eCall system activates automatically upon detecting a severe collision via in-vehicle sensors, transmitting the vehicle's precise GPS location, direction of travel, and other Minimum Set of Data () elements to Public Safety Answering Points (PSAPs) via the 112 emergency number, thereby enabling emergency services to initiate response without delay from manual caller input. This automation addresses key delays in traditional calls, such as unconscious or incapacitated occupants unable to dial or provide details, which studies identify as factors prolonging response in 30-50% of rural crashes. Pre- and early post-mandate analyses, including simulations applying eCall to historical crash data, indicate average response time reductions of 40% in areas and 50% in rural settings, where location uncertainty and sparse exacerbate delays. For instance, a study retroactively modeled eCall deployment on 2004-2007 crashes across multiple countries, finding it would have shortened median response times from 11-14 minutes to under 7 minutes in high-fatality scenarios. Real-world data from initial rollouts in select PSAPs post-2018 confirm similar gains, with one evaluation reporting consistent alignment between projected and observed dispatching efficiencies, though variability reached up to 19% due to regional PSAP readiness. These time savings translate to fatality reductions by extending the "golden hour" window for trauma intervention, where each minute of delay correlates with declining survival odds in severe injuries like or crush syndromes. The same 2009 simulation estimated eCall could prevent 3.6% of road fatalities overall, with higher efficacy (up to 10%) for rural single-vehicle crashes involving vulnerable users. projections, based on integrated modeling of response data and injury severities, forecast annual savings of up to 2,500 lives across the upon full deployment, equating to roughly 5-7% of pre-mandate totals. Early empirical assessments from 2018-2022 deployments support these figures, attributing 1,000-1,500 fewer deaths yearly to faster interventions, though comprehensive EU-wide verification remains ongoing due to staggered PSAP upgrades.

Empirical Data on Lives Saved

A retrospective evaluation of the eCall system in , analyzing 202 real-world accidents involving PSA Peugeot Citroën vehicles equipped with voluntary eCall from 2004 to 2011, estimated a 2.8% reduction in fatalities when extrapolated to national data. This figure derives from assessing 418 occupants, where eCall was deemed capable of preventing death for 119 individuals out of a baseline of 4,273 road deaths in in , assuming full equipment penetration; the also identified potential to avert injury severity escalation for 314 persons in urgent cases. Pre-mandate in-depth investigations of accident data in other European countries yielded similar modeled estimates. A study of road fatalities examined the probable preventive effects of eCall, concluding it could avert 4.6% of occupant deaths in analyzed crashes, with broader scenarios suggesting up to 5-10% including less certain cases. An EU-wide assessment projected a 5.8% fatality reduction upon universal vehicle adoption. Since the EU mandate for new vehicles in 2018, direct empirical attribution of lives saved remains limited by partial fleet penetration, confounding factors in trends, and high false activation rates (up to 85% in some data from 350,000 total calls). The maintains that full deployment could save around 2,500 lives annually by cutting urban response times by 40% and rural by 50%, though a 2024 Swedish evaluation of post-implementation cases found no observable gains in response times or outcomes compared to manual 112 calls, underscoring the need for further longitudinal .

Broader Road Safety Contributions

The implementation of eCall has contributed to by accelerating the clearance of accident sites, thereby mitigating and the incidence of secondary collisions. estimates indicate that eCall facilitates emergency responses that reduce road blockage durations, which in turn lowers the risk of follow-on accidents caused by slowed or halted traffic. Modeling analyses project that widespread eCall adoption across the passenger vehicle fleet could yield annual savings in congestion-related costs exceeding €3.5 billion, primarily through diminished disruption times that exacerbate hazards for other users. Aggregated, anonymized data from eCall transmissions, including crash locations and severity indicators, supports post-event to identify high-risk segments and inform enhancements. Such data utilization has been advocated to address stagnating trends in road fatalities and serious injuries, enabling targeted interventions like improved or barrier installations based on empirical patterns rather than anecdotal . This analytical role extends eCall's utility beyond immediate response, fostering preventive measures that enhance systemic against recurrent types. Furthermore, eCall's mandatory integration has driven harmonized upgrades to emergency infrastructure, including Public Safety Answering Points (PSAPs), which bolster overall crash aftermath management and reduce variability in post-impact outcomes across regions. These advancements, while rooted in eCall compliance, yield ancillary gains by standardizing data handling protocols that minimize errors in resource dispatch, indirectly curbing escalation of minor incidents into severe ones.

Privacy, Security, and Data Handling

Data Transmission and Safeguards

The eCall system transmits the concurrently with establishing a voice channel to a via public cellular networks, primarily using or infrastructure for legacy implementations. The , standardized under EN 15722, comprises essential crash-related information limited to approximately 140 bytes, including precise GNSS-derived location (, , altitude), UTC timestamp, (e.g., passenger car or ), propulsion storage type (e.g., or electric), direction of travel, inferred passenger count from seatbelt sensors, and principal direction of impact, without personal identifiers or vehicle identification numbers to minimize risks. Transmission occurs via an in-band embedded in the voice (supporting , GSM-FR, or GSM-HR), alternating data bursts with speech to ensure full-duplex communication, with an average transfer time of under 2.9 seconds under typical conditions. Safeguards emphasize event-triggered operation and to prevent unauthorized access or surveillance. The in-vehicle system (IVS) activates solely upon detection of a severe via in-vehicle sensors (e.g., deployment) or manual initiation, remaining dormant otherwise to avoid continuous location tracking, with internal memory automatically cleared post- unless an eCall occurs. is maintained through () validation during transfer, rejecting corrupted packets, while the protocol limits retry attempts (up to five SEND messages in push mode) to balance reliability and channel efficiency. Privacy protections align with data protection frameworks, mandating that PSAPs process exclusively for emergency response, transfer it only to responding services with consent for non-essential uses, and delete it once purposes are fulfilled, though full retrievability and permanent storage options exist for evidentiary needs. No extraneous data beyond the defined is permitted, and location history is capped at the three most recent points solely for deriving direction of travel, embedding privacy-by-design principles without reliance on third-party services. While standard eCall lacks in transmission—relying on security—regulatory requirements prohibit traceability outside emergencies, with manufacturers obligated to disclose processing details in vehicle manuals. These measures address potential vulnerabilities, such as over unencrypted voice channels, though of exploits remains limited due to the system's narrow window.

Mitigation of Privacy Risks

The eCall system addresses privacy risks through strict data minimization, limiting transmissions to the Minimum Set of Data () as defined in EN 15722:2015, which includes only essential elements such as precise vehicle location derived from GNSS, (VIN), vehicle type, direction of travel, and an indicator for the number of detected passengers if available, excluding direct personal identifiers like names or contact details. This approach ensures that no extraneous information is shared, reducing the scope for misuse or profiling. Transmission occurs exclusively upon automatic detection of a severe —typically via deployment coupled with inertial sensors—or manual activation, preventing continuous location tracking or passive that could enable . Data stored in the vehicle's in-vehicle system (IVS) memory is automatically deleted once the emergency response concludes, further limiting retention risks. Regulatory safeguards under Regulation (EU) 2015/758 mandate incorporation of technologies to protect against abuse, with processing justified under GDPR Article 6(1)(c) as fulfillment of a legal for public safety, bypassing consent requirements due to the overriding vital interests in life-saving scenarios. Public Safety Answering Points (PSAPs) are required to implement security protocols compliant with national data protection laws, including access controls and audits to prevent unauthorized disclosure. Vehicle owners receive transparency notifications via the , informing them of the system's operation without implying options, as eCall is mandatory for new and category vehicles since March 31, 2018. Technical transmission security in the legacy Pan-European eCall uses in-band over the voice channel (per ETSI TS 126.269), embedding the as a brief audio-frequency burst within the call, which inherently limits interception feasibility due to its event-specific and non-persistent nature, though it lacks . In contrast, Next-Generation eCall (NG eCall) employs IP-based protocols with for delivery, recommending , digital signatures on data blocks, and where feasible to enhance protection against tampering or during transit to PSAPs. The (EDPB) guidelines reinforce for connected vehicles, advocating of and location data post-transmission when shared beyond immediate emergency responders.

Evolution of Concerns and Resolutions

Initial concerns regarding eCall surfaced prominently during the Commission's legislative proposal phase in the early 2010s, centered on risks of unauthorized , misuse by authorities or third parties, and the of potentially identifiable information such as vehicle identification numbers (VINs) without explicit . Critics argued that automatic activation could enable constant monitoring if systems were compromised, though eCall's design limits to or manual triggers, transmitting only the Minimum Set of Data (MSD)—including precise location, direction of travel, timestamp, and VIN—without personal identifiers like names or biometric . These worries prompted consultations with protection authorities, emphasizing principles of minimization and limitation to restrict solely to response. To address these issues, Regulation (EU) 2015/758, adopted on April 29, 2015, incorporated Annex VIII, which outlines technical requirements and testing procedures for and data protection, mandating that eCall systems avoid unnecessary data collection, ensure secure transmission protocols, and prevent storage of outside emergency contexts. The regulation requires vehicle systems to erase non-essential data post-transmission and prohibits tracking functionalities beyond accident scenarios, balancing imperatives with safeguards. Implementation from March 31, 2018, for new vehicle types aligned eCall with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), effective May 25, 2018, classifying PSAPs as data controllers responsible for lawful processing under public interest grounds (Article 6(1)(e) GDPR), with strict retention limits and rights to access or erasure where feasible. Subsequent evaluations revealed tensions, with some analyses in 2017 contending that privacy-driven restrictions on —excluding optional health or sensor data—compromised potential safety gains by limiting dispatcher insights. Resolutions evolved through enhanced compliance frameworks, including standards for MSD transmission over cellular networks and audits ensuring PSAPs implement for VINs to mitigate re-identification risks. By 2025, post-deployment data indicated diminished public apprehensions, attributed to verified non-intrusive operations and the absence of widespread misuse incidents, though ongoing scrutiny persists for next-generation expansions.

Criticisms and Limitations

Technical and Operational Shortcomings

The eCall system experiences a high incidence of false alarms, with approximately two-thirds of activations classified as erroneous, primarily due to inadvertent manual triggers or overly sensitive crash detection algorithms that misinterpret non-severe impacts like potholes or minor collisions as emergencies. This rate, derived from analysis of over 100,000 eCall incidents in the UK between 2018 and 2024, burdens public safety answering points (PSAPs) with unnecessary dispatches, potentially desensitizing responders and delaying genuine calls. Operational reliability is compromised by dependence on mobile network coverage, where signal loss in rural or obstructed areas can prevent transmission of minimum set of data (MSD) including precise location via GNSS. The ongoing phase-out of and networks exacerbates this, as legacy eCall implementations may fail to fallback to /, leading to dropped calls or incomplete data relay in affected regions. Callback mechanisms for verification further falter when caller ID numbers are not universally provisioned across networks or due to misconfigured CLI, resulting in unreturned calls and unresolved alerts. Hardware and software malfunctions have prompted multiple recalls; for instance, issued a recall for 1.29 million vehicles (models 2017–2022) owing to eCall software errors linked to failures, which could transmit inaccurate location data post-crash and hinder timely response. Similar issues arise from component degradation, such as corroded wiring or depleted backup batteries in control units, causing system outages independent of accidents. These vulnerabilities highlight insufficient redundancy in eCall's architecture, particularly for or pre-2018 retrofits lacking standardized integration.

Economic and Accessibility Issues

The mandatory eCall requirement for new passenger cars and light commercial vehicles in the since March 31, 2018, has imposed upfront hardware, software, and integration costs on manufacturers, estimated at approximately €450 per vehicle in early voluntary assessments, though from the mandate have likely reduced this figure. These expenses are generally passed to consumers via elevated new vehicle prices, creating an economic entry barrier for budget-conscious buyers in emerging or low-income markets within the . Public safety answering points (PSAPs) have also incurred substantial upgrade costs to process eCall's Minimum Set of Data, including location and vehicle details, with implementation timelines of 18-24 months in regions like the , funded by taxpayer resources that may disproportionately burden under-resourced member states. Accessibility remains limited for the existing vehicle fleet, as eCall is absent in pre-2018 models comprising the majority of circulating cars, exacerbating disparities for owners unable or unwilling to purchase newer vehicles. eCall systems encounters logistical hurdles, such as compatibility with legacy electronics and the need for professional installation, alongside persistent high initial outlays despite claims of affordability from providers like , which describe their boxes as "inexpensive" upgrades. Cost-benefit studies for deployment reveal that while societal savings from reduced fatalities and injuries—potentially €26 billion annually EU-wide in accident and mitigation—justify broad rollout, individual retrofits often fail to yield proportional returns for owners of low-risk vehicles, hindering voluntary adoption. Regulatory and infrastructural gaps further compound accessibility issues, as uneven PSAP readiness in rural or Eastern European areas can delay effective response despite vehicle-side , and the absence of mandates for heavy or motorcycles leaves segments of the road user population uncovered. Overreliance on cellular networks for introduces vulnerabilities in coverage-poor regions, where signal unreliability undermines eCall's reliability for remote or low-mobility users.

Potential for Overreliance or Misuse

A primary concern with eCall systems is the prevalence of false activations, which constitute misuse by inadvertently or unintentionally triggering responses. A 2025 study commissioned by the RAC Foundation analyzed data and found that approximately two-thirds of eCall activations were false alarms, including one-third of automatic triggers and three-quarters of manual button presses. Common causes identified include button misuse by occupants, suboptimal interface designs that facilitate accidental presses, technical faults in the system, and non-emergency demonstrations at vehicle dealerships. These false alarms impose operational burdens on public safety answering points (PSAPs), diverting resources from legitimate calls and potentially eroding responder confidence in eCall reliability over time. The RAC Foundation report notes that such incidents could lead to desensitization, where genuine eCalls face skepticism or delayed prioritization, though no quantitative data on response time impacts from false alarms has been systematically tracked in . In principle, repeated false triggers might encourage intentional misuse, such as opportunistic or malicious activations to summon assistance for minor issues, but documented cases remain anecdotal and tied primarily to rather than deliberate abuse. Overreliance on eCall represents a theoretical of behavioral , where drivers perceive reduced personal for prevention due to the system's automatic , potentially offsetting gains through increased risk-taking—a phenomenon observed in studies for technologies like anti-lock brakes or airbags. However, specific to eCall is absent; simulation-based projections estimate overall fatality reductions of 4-8% without accounting for such offsets, and real-world data has not isolated driver dependency effects amid confounding improvements in vehicle design and roadways. Critics argue that without longitudinal behavioral studies, overreliance could undermine eCall's net benefits, particularly if users defer manual calls or safe driving practices in anticipation of automated rescue. Security-related misuse poses another vector, as eCall's reliance on cellular networks and in-vehicle modems introduces vulnerabilities to remote exploitation, such as spoofed signals triggering false activations or denial-of-service disruptions. While no confirmed eCall-specific hacks have been reported as of , broader automotive cybersecurity analyses highlight unpatched flaws in connected ECUs that could enable such attacks, emphasizing the need for robust and over-the-air updates to prevent adversarial misuse. User surveys indicate privacy fears around data transmission amplify reluctance to engage the , indirectly fostering underreliance or avoidance in edge cases.

Future Developments

Next Generation eCall (NG eCall)

Next Generation eCall (NG eCall) represents an evolution of the original Pan-European eCall system, transitioning from circuit-switched 2G/3G networks to IP Multimedia Subsystem (IMS)-based emergency calls over 4G and 5G packet-switched networks. This shift enables out-of-band transmission of the Minimum Set of Data (MSD)—including vehicle location, direction, and crash severity—via Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) INVITE messages, rather than in-band modems, resulting in faster and more reliable data delivery without interrupting voice communication. NG eCall also supports advanced features such as multimedia transmission (e.g., video or images from the vehicle), two-way data exchange between the vehicle and Public Safety Answering Points (PSAPs), and enhanced location accuracy through integration with Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS). These improvements address limitations of legacy eCall, including dependency on phasing-out 2G/3G infrastructure and restricted data capabilities. Standardization efforts for NG eCall are led by European bodies, with key specifications outlined in CEN TS 17184:2022 for the technical protocol and CEN TS 17240:2024 for , ensuring across IMS networks including and 5G New Radio (NR). Additional protocols are defined in TS 103 683 and IETF 8147, which detail IP-based routing using Uniform Resource Names (URNs) to direct calls to appropriate PSAPs within NG112 frameworks. Hybrid NG eCall variants provide with legacy networks during the transition period, mitigating risks from / sunset. Testing has been validated through events like the NG eCall Plugtests 2025 in , , focusing on -based systems and component integration from vehicle to PSAP decoders. Implementation of NG eCall is progressing toward mandatory adoption in the , with new vehicle type approvals requiring compliance starting January 1, 2026, and full certification invalidation for non-supporting models thereafter. PSAP upgrades to handle IMS-based calls and NG112 integration are targeted for completion by 2026, supported by national initiatives such as the UK's NICC ND 1658 specification adopting international standards. As of October 2025, voluntary deployments and testing by manufacturers and network operators continue, with tools from vendors like verifying EN 17240:2024 compliance over networks. This phased rollout aims to enhance response times and data richness, potentially reducing road fatalities beyond the estimated 2,500 annual lives saved by standard eCall.

Integration with Emerging Technologies

Integration with 5G networks enhances eCall's data transmission capabilities by supporting higher bandwidth and lower latency, allowing for the inclusion of richer multimedia data such as video feeds from vehicle cameras during emergencies, which can aid responders in assessing situations more accurately. This upgrade aligns with the shift to packet-switched networks under EU regulations, which mandate compatibility with 4G LTE and 5G starting from 2026 for new vehicle approvals, replacing legacy 2G/3G systems that lack sufficient capacity for advanced features. Artificial intelligence (AI) is being incorporated into eCall systems to refine accident detection and data processing, using algorithms to analyze inputs like accelerometers, gyroscopes, and cameras for precise severity classification and minimization. For instance, projects like the EU-funded SPATIAL initiative have developed accountable AI models that explain detection decisions, ensuring transparency in automated triggers. AI also enables , where pre-crash data patterns forecast potential collisions, prompting proactive eCall activation or enriched minimum set of data (MSD) with contextual insights. Vehicle-to-everything (V2X) communication extends eCall's scope by enabling data sharing with nearby vehicles, , and pedestrians, providing responders with a broader , such as multi-vehicle incident details or alerts that complement the vehicle's own . This integration leverages (C-V2X) over for real-time exchange of eCall triggers, potentially reducing response times in cooperative intelligent transport systems (C-ITS). Standards bodies like are exploring these synergies to standardize V2X-enhanced eCall protocols, though deployment remains limited by rollout and challenges as of 2025.

Global Expansion Prospects

The global automotive eCall market, encompassing systems compatible with or analogous to the EU's 112-based eCall, is projected to expand significantly, with estimates indicating a value of USD 2.71 billion in growing at a (CAGR) of 12.8% through 2034, driven by increasing emphasis on and vehicle connectivity in emerging markets. Similar forecasts predict the market reaching USD 5,388.8 million by 2030 at a 12.6% CAGR, reflecting broader beyond regulatory mandates through voluntary implementations by automakers targeting international sales. Prospects for eCall's expansion hinge on harmonization efforts via Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) regulations, such as the 2017 adoption of UN Regulation No. 144, which standardizes in-vehicle emergency call systems for crash detection and data transmission, enabling countries outside the EU to integrate compatible technologies without full replication of the 112 protocol. This framework has facilitated partial alignments in regions like , where countries such as and incorporate similar automatic alerting in domestic standards, though often adapted to local emergency numbers (e.g., 119 in Japan) and infrastructure. In , eCall-like systems are advancing under national guidelines, with market analyses noting integration in electric and connected vehicles to meet growing safety demands amid rapid . Challenges to widespread global rollout include regulatory fragmentation, varying infrastructures, and costs for public safety answering points (PSAPs) upgrades in developing regions; for instance, while operates the ERA-GLONASS system—a parallel to eCall using for positioning— remains limited without bilateral agreements. In , adoption lags due to reliance on proprietary like GM's , but export-oriented vehicles from manufacturers increasingly embed eCall compatibility, potentially accelerating uptake if aligned with local 911 systems through hybrid configurations. Overall, market-driven incentives and UNECE influence suggest moderate expansion in safety-focused economies by 2030, though full standardization may require further international treaties to address data privacy and network compatibility variances.

Comparative Systems

Initiatives in Non-EU Regions

In , the ERA-GLONASS system functions as the primary equivalent to eCall, requiring automatic response capabilities in all new vehicles since January 1, 2017. This government-mandated infrastructure utilizes the for precise location determination and transmits minimum set of data—including crash severity indicators, vehicle identification, and coordinates—to dedicated response centers or the number upon detecting a severe accident via in-vehicle sensors. The system extends to the , covering countries like and , where certification is required for vehicle type approval. As of 2023, ERA-GLONASS has registered approximately 7 million vehicles and handled around 10 million calls, with 120,000 validated as genuine accidents, demonstrating operational scale in a region with vast road networks and challenging terrain. Unlike the EU's eCall, which relies on third-generation mobile networks as a baseline, ERA-GLONASS emphasizes indigenous compatibility to ensure functionality independent of foreign satellite systems. In the United States, no federal mandate enforces automatic crash notification, but voluntary systems like ' Automatic Crash Response—deployed since 1996 and standard in many vehicles—use built-in sensors to detect collisions, connect to advisors, and relay location data to public safety answering points, potentially reducing response times by alerting services even if occupants are incapacitated. Advanced Automatic Crash Notification (AACN) builds on this by analyzing crash dynamics to predict injury severity, aiding ; studies indicate such systems could lower fatalities by prioritizing severe incidents. Adoption remains market-driven, with services from multiple providers integrated into about 80 million vehicles cumulatively, though with systems varies by . China has established national standards for Accident Emergency Call Systems (AECS) akin to eCall, with the GB/T 39198-2023 specification published in 2023 requiring automatic dialing to 110 or 122 emergency numbers post-crash, including voice connection and data transmission via cellular networks. Public consultations for further mandatory standards occurred in July 2024, signaling progression toward widespread implementation amid rising vehicle production, though full enforcement awaits regulatory timelines and differs from EU requirements by not yet mandating pan-regional uniformity. Other non-EU regions, including , , and , primarily feature voluntary telematics offerings from automakers—such as Toyota's Safety Connect or Subaru's —providing and notification but without government-mandated universality, reflecting reliance on private over standardized public systems. In , advocacy for eCall-like mandates persists due to remote roadways, yet implementation lags behind and .

Key Patents and Intellectual Property

The intellectual property underpinning eCall primarily consists of standard essential patents (SEPs) for cellular technologies enabling the transmission of the Minimum Set of Data (MSD), including the in-band modem defined in ETSI TS 126 267. These SEPs cover voice channel data modulation, vehicle location encoding, and network access protocols compliant with 2G and 3G standards, as eCall operates over legacy GSM/UMTS networks for reliability. Prominent examples include Qualcomm's US Patent 9,301,120 B2, granted on March 29, 2016, which details eCall devices, including subscription management for restricted access modes that prioritize signaling over commercial services. A corresponding , EP 2 735 179 B1, validated in multiple jurisdictions, addresses similar eCall network equipment and methods for seamless integration with public safety answering points (PSAPs). Qualcomm has declared these and related s essential to the eCall specifications but committed to royalty-free licensing specifically for eCall in-band modem implementations to facilitate EU-mandated deployment. Licensing of eCall-related SEPs is streamlined through patent pools like Avanci, which aggregates portfolios from over 50 contributors covering , , and eCall functionalities essential for automotive compliance. As of September 1, 2022, Avanci's program imposes a flat $20 royalty per vehicle for lifetime access, irrespective of additional patents added, reducing fragmentation for original equipment manufacturers (OEMs). This collective approach mitigates hold-up risks in the connected vehicle sector, though it has drawn scrutiny for fixed-rate structures amid evolving transitions. No single patent dominates eCall, as interoperability relies on /CEN standards (e.g., EN 15722:2022) that reference multiple declared IPRs without exclusivity.

References

  1. [1]
    The interoperable EU-wide eCall - Mobility and Transport
    The 112 eCall automatically dials Europe's single emergency number 112 in the event of a serious road accident.
  2. [2]
    Regulation - 2015/758 - EN - EUR-Lex
    Regulation (EU) 2015/758 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2015 concerning type-approval requirements for the deployment of the eCall ...
  3. [3]
  4. [4]
    eCall 112-based emergency assistance from your vehicle
    eCall is a system used in vehicles across the EU which automatically makes a free 112 emergency call if your vehicle is involved in a serious road accident.
  5. [5]
    eCall 112 Frequently Asked Questions - BMIMI
    The eCall automatically dials Europe's single emergency number 112 in the event of a serious accident and communicates the vehicle's location to the emergency ...
  6. [6]
    EU-mandated automated emergency call technology, eCall, is ...
    EU-mandated automated emergency call technology, eCall, is expected to reduce response time to road accidents by up to 50 percent and help save up to 1,500 ...
  7. [7]
    EU eCall Regulations Updated to Require 4G/5G Compliant Systems
    This new EU Regulation, (EU) 2024/1180, amends the existing EU Regulation on eCall, (EU) 2015/758, to require the fitment of 4G/5G compatible eCall systems.
  8. [8]
    TEZE: A System to Enhance Safety in Highway Tunnels as a New ...
    Conceived in 1999 by Luc Tytgat of the European Union, the eCall standard has its roots in the European Commission's (EC) eSafety initiative of 2002, which ...
  9. [9]
    eCall - Inside GNSS - Global Navigation Satellite Systems ...
    Nov 19, 2015 · In 1999 the European Commission (EC) services presented the concept of eCall at the start of the Galileo project. The concept was then developed ...
  10. [10]
    10 years of eCall in the EU: Milestones, lessons, and the road ahead
    May 19, 2025 · This blogpost recalls the history of eCall, the life-saving technology which automatically alerts emergency services in the event of a crash.
  11. [11]
    Cars In Europe Are Accidentally Calling The Police - Forbes
    Apr 27, 2018 · It was first developed in 2001 as part of a German youth science competition. The EU chose it from several competing technologies to be the ...
  12. [12]
    All Cars In Europe Can Now Call The Police Themselves - Forbes
    Apr 1, 2018 · The project was first developed in 2001 as part of a German youth science competition. The EU chose it from several competing technologies to be ...
  13. [13]
    eCall in all new cars from April 2018 | Shaping Europe's digital future
    Today the European Parliament voted in favour of eCall regulation which requires all new cars be equipped with eCall technology from April 2018.
  14. [14]
    eCall – the story so far - ERTICO Newsroom
    Nov 21, 2016 · The European Union supported the development of eCall based 112, first through the eMerge and GST Rescue European Commission funded projects, ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Experimentation of emergency call in the GST test sites - 3GPP
    RESCUE: experimentation of emergency call in the GST test sites. ETSI workshop, Amsterdam, 23 Jan 2006 - page 3. The GST project. ▫ European R&D project, FP6.
  16. [16]
    mobile phone operators sign up for eCall roll-out - Europa.eu
    Sep 8, 2009 · The Commission has funded eCall projects that make sure the technology works across borders (E-MERGE and GST-Rescue ) and has further ...
  17. [17]
  18. [18]
    Harmonised eCall European Pilot | HeERO | Projekt | Fact Sheet | CIP
    Apr 25, 2017 · The HeERO project will prepare, carry-out and coordinate eCall pre-deployment pilots at European level taking into account the approved ...
  19. [19]
    Heero2 - ICOOR
    This project is the continuation of the Heero project that prepared, carried-out and coordinated eCall pre-deployment pilots at the European level taking ...
  20. [20]
    EU emergency services: rolling out eCall infrastructure - EUR-Lex
    Nov 3, 2014 · Commission Recommendation of 8 September 2011 on support for an EU-wide eCall service in electronic communication networks for the transmission ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  21. [21]
    eCall delayed until 2017 - ETSC - European Transport Safety Council
    May 27, 2014 · eCall delayed until 2017 ... The European Parliament and EU member states agreed in April on a law requiring national authorities to set up the ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] ECC Report 339 - ECO Documentation Database
    eCall is the pan-European emergency system for vehicles. According to Decision 585/2014/EU [1], EU. Member States were required to deploy, by 1 October 2017 ...
  23. [23]
    E-CALL | Interoperable Europe Portal - European Union
    Since 1 April 2018, regulation is in force and all new M1 and N1 model types of vehicles shall be equipped with eCall service. Since 1st October 2017, EU ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  24. [24]
  25. [25]
    eCall in-vehicle system — type-approval | EUR-Lex - European Union
    May 28, 2021 · Regulation (EU) 2015/758 concerning type-approval requirements for the deployment of the eCall in-vehicle system based on the 112 service.
  26. [26]
    EU's eCall Regulation Sacrifices Safety for Privacy
    Feb 7, 2017 · Beginning in October, new EU regulations will require manufacturers to fit all cars produced for sale in the European Economic Area with a ...Missing: 2010 | Show results with:2010
  27. [27]
    eCall – EENA - European Emergency Number Association
    eCall is an emergency call service that notifies the emergency services in case of a road accident through technology fitted into the vehicle.
  28. [28]
    [PDF] eCall - Emergency call - SESEI
    Of the three technical elements necessary to make 112-based eCall work 1) Vehicle 2) Mobile Network. 3) Public Safety Answering Point, items 1 and 3 are ...<|separator|>
  29. [29]
    Regulation - 2015/758 - EN - EUR-Lex
    ### Summary of Technical Requirements for eCall In-Vehicle Systems (IVS) and PSAPs
  30. [30]
    Automotive eCall testing - Rohde & Schwarz
    eCall is an in-vehicle system (IVS) that, in the event of a serious accident, automatically transmits a minimum set of data (MSD) from the vehicle to the ...
  31. [31]
  32. [32]
    eSafety/eCall | EU-ICIP 2022v1
    This European Standard specifies the protocols to put into effect the pan-European eCall operating requirements using PLMNs, and also identifies common elements ...
  33. [33]
    RFC 8147 - Next-Generation Pan-European eCall - IETF Datatracker
    ... Minimum Set of Data (MSD). CEN has specified this data in EN 15722 [MSD], along with both ASN.1 and XML encodings. Both circuit-switched eCall and this ...
  34. [34]
    [PDF] ETSI TS 103 683 V2.1.1 (2023-02)
    NOTE: The MSD has a maximum size of 140 bytes and includes, for example, vehicle identity, location information and time-stamp, as defined in EN 15722:2015 [10] ...
  35. [35]
    [PDF] Annex 9 Definition of Minimum Set of Data – MSD (paragraph 12.7.)
    MSD (paragraph 12.7.) The following table lists the minimum set of data (MSD) that shall be conveyed during the eCall data transmission to the PSAP. The ...
  36. [36]
    eCall minimum set of data transmission – results from a field test in ...
    Dec 1, 2014 · The main objectives of the study are to analyse the successfulness of eCall MSD transmission in Finnish fixed-line and GSM networks.Introduction · Transmission of eCall... · Data collection · Discussion and conclusions
  37. [37]
    [PDF] ETSI TS 103 428 V1.2.2 (2021-04)
    [3]. EN 15722:2015: "Intelligent transport systems - eSafety - eCall minimum set of data", (produced by CEN). [4]. EN 16062:2015: "Intelligent transport systems ...
  38. [38]
    [PDF] ETSI TR 103 140 V1.1.1 (2014-04)
    ... 15722 Road transport and traffic telematics - eSafety - eCall minimum set of data. ... The IVS needs to have the knowledge of the URN marking a test eCall.
  39. [39]
    eSafety (eCall) - ITS Standards
    A raft of standards deliverables support these core specifications and are providing conformance tests, and standardise the information exchanged with and ...Missing: components | Show results with:components
  40. [40]
    [PDF] TS 126 269 - V13.0.0 - ETSI
    Minimum Set of Data (MSD): forming the data component of an eCall sent from a vehicle to a Public Safety. Answering Point or other designated emergency call ...
  41. [41]
    [PDF] TR 102 180 - V1.2.1 - Emergency Communications (EMTEL) - ETSI
    When external assistance is required an emergency call should be forwarded to the PSAP or the corresponding emergency control centre. This includes phones in ...
  42. [42]
    [PDF] Next Generation eCall - CEPT.org
    − GSM and UMTS spectrum is being re-farmed for LTE. − 5G is coming. Page 3. 3. eCall options for packet switched networks. In-band modem on VoIP. − De-jitter ...
  43. [43]
    What is NG eCall? - everything RF
    Jul 30, 2025 · NG eCall uses 4G LTE and 5G networks along with IP Multimedia Subsystem (IMS), a modern architecture that's also used for VoLTE (Voice over LTE) ...
  44. [44]
    Standardisation work – EENA
    'Intelligent transport systems – eSafety – eCall High level application Protocols (HLAP) using IMS packet switched networks' (CEN/TS 17184:2022)
  45. [45]
    RFC 8147 - Next-Generation Pan-European eCall - IETF Datatracker
    Mar 18, 2024 · This document describes how to use IP-based emergency services mechanisms to support the next generation of the Pan-European in- vehicle emergency call service.
  46. [46]
    Transitioning from eCall to NG-eCall | Keysight Blogs
    Jul 25, 2024 · eCall is an emergency call system initiated by the European Union, designed for vehicles to dial the emergency services automatically in the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  47. [47]
    [PDF] REGULATION (EU) 2015/ 758 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ...
    May 19, 2015 · The deployment of an eCall service available in all vehicles and in all Member States has been one of the principal Union objectives in the ...
  48. [48]
    European Commission Adopts Delegated Regulation on eCall ...
    The European Commission has adopted this week a new delegated regulation on eCall equipment in PSAPs. The legislation amends the 2013 delegated regulation which ...Missing: readiness | Show results with:readiness
  49. [49]
    Luxembourg becomes first EU Member State ready for eCall
    Luxembourg successfully completed the eCall conformity assessment, becoming the first EU Member State to declare itself ready to implement eCall.
  50. [50]
    [PDF] PSAP perspective on eCall implementation
    Dealing with emergency calls every day. Ca. 15,000 calls a day in the Czech Republic. 16,305 traffic accidents in 2011. Foreign languages.
  51. [51]
    Two thirds of eCall activations are false alarms - RAC Foundation
    Aug 12, 2025 · Two thirds of the emergency calls made from cars and vans by the eCall safety system are false alarms, new research suggests.Missing: positive | Show results with:positive
  52. [52]
    Spoiler Alert: Is the eCall emergency alerting system fulfil
    Aug 12, 2025 · The eCall system became mandatory in all new type-approved cars and light goods vehicles in the UK and EU from April 2018.
  53. [53]
    Resolving the eCall Callback Issue – EENA
    Dec 16, 2022 · If an eCall should drop for any reason such as, for example, patchy mobile coverage, the PSAP call taker should be able to make a callback to ...Missing: solutions | Show results with:solutions
  54. [54]
    Automotive OEMs must prepare for 2G/3G switch off - Wireless Mobility
    Apr 11, 2025 · The impending phase-out of 2G/3G networks presents a significant challenge to eCall. These legacy circuit-switched networks were initially ...
  55. [55]
    eCall certification & testing - cetecom advanced
    Regulation (EU) 2015/758 further defines that the tests for eCall type approval should be performed exclusively by a Notified Technical Service. UNECE eCall. UN ...
  56. [56]
    Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/79of 12 September ...
    The eCall system shall be decelerated or accelerated in compliance... ... The positioning test procedure may be repeated if the eCall... 2.6.Antenna ...
  57. [57]
    EU Regulation on the Technical Requirements for eCall Systems ...
    Although (EU) No. 2015/758 specified the basic requirements for eCall systems, it did not specify the detailed technical requirements that eCall systems must ...Missing: mandate | Show results with:mandate<|separator|>
  58. [58]
    [PDF] DEKRA greenpaper on eCall (EU 2017/79)
    What needs to be tested? EU 2017/79 meticulously describes the test procedures and requirements for the eCall system. The regulation consists of nine.
  59. [59]
    Automotive eCall Compliance Testing - Safran - Navigation & Timing
    It is necessary for automotive manufacturers to develop detailed eCall test procedures for the approval of motor vehicles with respect eCall in-vehicle systems.
  60. [60]
    [PDF] NG eCall Plugtest 2025 Test Report - ETSI Portal
    Jun 13, 2025 · The vendors of In-Vehicle Systems (IVS) and Public Safety Answering Points (PSAP), supporting the Next. Generation eCall, joined the event.
  61. [61]
    cetecom advanced re-certifies Rohde & Schwarz's eCall PSAP for ...
    Sep 16, 2024 · The new eCall Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/1180, which took effect on May 9, 2024, includes updates for 2G and 3G circuit switched (CS) eCall.
  62. [62]
    Keysight Achieves DEKRA eCall PSAP Certification
    Jun 17, 2025 · Keysight has attained Next Generation (NG) eCall Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP) certification from DEKRA, a renowned expert in safety and quality.
  63. [63]
    The European Commission is preparing for test procedures for eCall ...
    The European Commission is preparing for test procedures for eCall for the first quarter of 2025. All new models of passenger cars and vans are now equipped ...Missing: compliance | Show results with:compliance
  64. [64]
    Technical Guidance for Applicants - Vehicle Certification Agency
    Jun 6, 2025 · This guide provides details on the technical requirements of the GB type approval scheme as they apply to whole vehicle, system, and component type approvals.
  65. [65]
  66. [66]
    [PDF] New Pan-European Emergency Call System 1. Background - ETSC
    Research shows that, with eCall, emergency services' response time would be reduced by. 50% in rural areas and 40% in urban areas, leading to a reduction of ...
  67. [67]
    In-vehicle emergency call system "eCall" (Second eSafety ...
    ... reducing their response time considerably. Studies show that the emergency response time could be reduced by about 50% in rural areas and 40% in urban areas.
  68. [68]
    [PDF] The Functioning of the e-Call System in Poland Compared to Other ...
    Oct 2, 2021 · The. European Commission estimates that a fully implemented e-Call system will reduce the emergency service response time by 40% in cities and ...
  69. [69]
    In-depth evaluation of the effects of an automatic emergency call ...
    Oct 22, 2009 · Overall, the main results showed that eCall could very probably have prevented 3.6% of the road fatalities (Table 1). However, there were ...Missing: empirical evidence
  70. [70]
    [PDF] ecall system: french a posteriori efficiency evaluation - Research
    The range between the minimum and the maximum of eCall effectiveness calculated is quite large and reaches 19%. Our two studies “a priori” and “a posteriori” ...Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
  71. [71]
    ECall - European Commission - Mobility & Transport - Road Safety
    eCall is a system that provides an automated message to the emergency services following a road crash which includes the precise crash location.
  72. [72]
    [PDF] Spoiler Alert - RAC Foundation
    A national study in the Czech. Republic estimated that eCall could reduce fatalities by 3–9% (Riley & Holubová, 2006), while a Swedish evaluation suggested a 2– ...
  73. [73]
    eCall: 2 years of saving lives | EGNOS User Support Website
    Apr 13, 2020 · By speeding up emergency response times by 40% in urban areas and 50% in the countryside, it is estimated that eCall could help prevent 2,500 ...Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
  74. [74]
    eCall aims to speed up response from emergency services to car ...
    In addition to the road safety benefits, eCall will also have a significant impact on reducing the congestion caused by traffic accidents and on reducing ...Missing: broader beyond
  75. [75]
    An Analysis of the Socio-Economic and Human Life Impact of ... - MDPI
    We posit that reducing the number of fatalities and severe injuries by implementing eCall IVS on the entire EU passenger vehicle fleet decreases the costs ...
  76. [76]
    Using eCall to make roads better and safer - Intertraffic
    Dec 6, 2023 · Using eCall data better addresses the problem that the number of people killed and seriously injured on UK roads is no longer falling and around ...Missing: prevention | Show results with:prevention
  77. [77]
    [PDF] Road Safety Thematic Report – Post-impact care
    The eCall vehicle system automatically dials the European emergency number '112' when a serious road accident is detected and automatically provides the Public ...Missing: beyond | Show results with:beyond
  78. [78]
    eCall and the Quest for Effective Protection of the Right to Privacy
    Oct 2, 2015 · The mandatory installation of eCall introduces great challenges to the right to privacy. The aim of this paper is to illustrate through these ...<|separator|>
  79. [79]
    [PDF] edpb_guidelines_202001_conn...
    Mar 9, 2021 · Regulation (EU) 2015/758 stipulates the requirements to incorporate into the eCall system technologies that strengthen the protection of ...
  80. [80]
    eCall: Privacy and Data Protection Implications - Lexology
    Feb 15, 2018 · The eCall system is governed by EU regulations. The European Commission has also published various detailed administrative and technical ...
  81. [81]
    eCall: Privacy and Data Protection Implications - Password Protected
    Feb 15, 2018 · eCall raises privacy concerns like misuse of data, surveillance, and tracking. EU regulations require safeguards and detailed rules for ...
  82. [82]
    [PDF] Data Protection Aspects of eCall - European Parliament
    Feb 12, 2014 · eCall processes personal data, including a Minimum Set of Data (MSD), and generates an audio channel to a PSAP in case of an accident.
  83. [83]
    Most automated emergency calls from cars are false alarms
    Aug 12, 2025 · Most automated emergency calls from cars are false alarms. EU ... The report stated that eCall could provide emergency services with ...
  84. [84]
    Life-Saving Car Technology Plagued by Two-Thirds False Alarms as ...
    Sep 9, 2025 · Common causes include accidental button presses, poor interface design, system malfunctions, and inappropriate demonstration presses at ...
  85. [85]
    Mercedes Recalls More Than 1 Million Vehicles for eCall Software ...
    Mercedes recalled 1.29 million vehicles due to eCall software failure that may not provide accurate location after a crash, potentially delaying timely help.
  86. [86]
    Emergency call system failures in new Mercedes-Benz models
    Jul 19, 2022 · Mercedes-Benz recalled 2017-2022 models due to a SIM card error causing eCall software issues, preventing contact with agencies after accidents ...
  87. [87]
    Europe eCall-ing - Right To Ride EU
    The eCall system for motorcycles requires standardisation, i.e. what will be regulated to fit on a motorcycle. This includes manual activation, hands-free ...
  88. [88]
    Automotive eCall Market Size, Analysis, Growth And Forecast
    Rating 4.9 (49) EU Regulation for eCall (2018):The European Union has mandated that all new vehicles (from 2018 onwards) must be equipped with the eCall system. This ...
  89. [89]
    [PDF] eCall UK 2013 Review and Appraisal Final Report - GOV.UK
    Mar 12, 2014 · The implementation timeframe for PSAP upgrade is expected to be 18-24 months. 4.4. Call Centre Costs. For private eCall, automatically and ...
  90. [90]
    (PDF) A Cost-Benefit Approach for Analysing the Impact of eCall ...
    May 1, 2022 · The aim of the present study is to approach the introduction of the eCall In Vehicle System from a cost-benefit standpoint of equipping ...
  91. [91]
    Emergency Call System for Retrofitting - Bosch Media Service
    Mar 27, 2018 · Older models and pre-owned cars that do not yet have the built-in system can now be easily and inexpensively upgraded with the Telematics eCall ...Missing: costs per
  92. [92]
    In-Vehicle Emergency Call System (eCall) Market Scope, Growth ...
    Sep 19, 2025 · Integration with Older Vehicle Models: Retrofitting older vehicles with eCall systems presents logistical and technical challenges. While some ...Missing: issues | Show results with:issues
  93. [93]
    In-vehicle emergency call system "eCall" (Second eSafety ...
    Thus, it is estimated that the system would result in annual savings of about 26 billion (savings on accident and congestion costs).
  94. [94]
    In-vehicle eCall Market Tech Disruption & Investment Trends
    Apr 25, 2025 · As older vehicles are retrofitted with new eCall systems, automotive ... One of the main challenges is the high cost of implementing eCall systems ...
  95. [95]
    Assessing the potential impacts of connected vehicle systems on ...
    Consequently, drivers' overreliance on the early warnings may impair their situation awareness in the driving task and lead to risks on the road. The ...Missing: eCall | Show results with:eCall
  96. [96]
    Hackers discover that vulnerabilities are rife in the auto industry
    Jan 11, 2023 · "Our investigation confirmed that this potential vulnerability has not been misused. Customer information has not been affected, and there ...
  97. [97]
    (PDF) Data security concerns of future eCall users - ResearchGate
    This paper presents results of research focused on fears and worries related to obligatory using eCall system in new cars since 2015.
  98. [98]
    [PDF] Enhancing eCall/NG-eCall Reliability: Effective Testing Solutions
    To overcome these challenges, sophisticated test equipment that simulates real-world environments is essential. ... Figure 6 shows an example of PSAP status ...
  99. [99]
    [PDF] NICC ND 1658 V1.1.1 (2025-10)
    Oct 13, 2025 · This document covers the specification of NG eCall within UK networks and seeks to adopt established international standards wherever possible.
  100. [100]
    Rohde & Schwarz verifies Next Generation eCall for EN 17240:2024 ...
    Jul 21, 2025 · This standard establishes guidelines for testing eCall systems over IP Multimedia Subsystem (IMS) networks, including advanced 4G LTE and 5G NR ...
  101. [101]
    Next-Gen eCall: Industry tests vehicle emergency call equipment in ...
    Jun 10, 2025 · The introduction of NG eCall offers a number of improvements. The call to the vehicle occupants is established much faster. The previous ...
  102. [102]
    Access Alert: Europe upgrades eCall to 5G
    Feb 6, 2024 · In Europe, eCall functionality has been mandatory in all new passenger car models since April 2018. This regulation ensures widespread adoption ...Missing: 2018-2022 | Show results with:2018-2022
  103. [103]
    UC3: Accountable AI in Emergency eCall System (Fraunhofer Fokus)
    Jun 21, 2024 · The SPATIAL Use Case 3 investigates the design, development, and integration of an accountable AI-based emergency detection into a ...
  104. [104]
    Emergency eCall System and accountable AI - SPATIAL H2020
    Mar 21, 2022 · Fraunhofer FOKUS aims to design and implement an explainable and accountable emergency call (eCall) functionality based on explainable and accountable AI ...
  105. [105]
    How AI is transforming connected vehicles one sensor at a time
    Mar 19, 2024 · AI can enhance eCall by improving the accuracy and speed of accident detection. For example, AI algorithms could quickly analyse sensor data to ...
  106. [106]
    eCall in Connected Vehicles: Smart Safety Tech
    May 7, 2025 · In the future, eCall will work seamlessly with: V2X communication (car-to-car and car-to-infrastructure); AI-based risk prediction; Smart city ...
  107. [107]
    eCall in Connected Vehicles - LinkedIn
    May 9, 2025 · Combined with V2X communication, AI-based risk analytics, and smart city infrastructure, eCall becomes part of a larger ecosystem for ...<|separator|>
  108. [108]
    [PDF] UNPRECEDENTED VEHICLE AND TRAFFIC SAFETY ...
    The next logical step is to integrate V2X communication. The integration of this embedded, in-vehicle wireless communication system allows Car-to-Car (C2C) ...
  109. [109]
    Automotive eCall Market Size & Share | Industry Report, 2034
    The global Automotive eCall Market size was valued at USD 2.71 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow at a CAGR of 12.8% from 2025 to 2034.
  110. [110]
    Automotive eCall Market Size, Share | Industry Report, 2030
    Europe automotive eCall market dominated with a share of 39.8% of global revenue in 2024. Germany automotive eCall market is witnessing growh due to country's ...Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics
  111. [111]
    New UN regulation on automatic emergency call system for road ...
    Nov 21, 2017 · According to EU estimates, eCall can reduce emergency response times by 40% in urban areas and 50% in the countryside, and can reduce the number ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  112. [112]
    Global and China Automotive Emergency Call (eCall) System ...
    May 10, 2022 · The EU eCall policies specify the mandatory installation of 112-based in-vehicle eCall systems in all new M1 and N1 vehicles from March 31, 2018 ...Missing: compliance | Show results with:compliance
  113. [113]
    What is ERA-GLONASS? - everything RF
    Sep 19, 2018 · It is the Russian equivalent of eCall which was launched in Europe and made mandatory by the EU. The ERA-GLONASS Accident Emergency Response ...
  114. [114]
    Automated emergency response systems (eCall / ERA-GLONASS)
    In the case of ERA-GLONASS, use of GLONASS is mandatory for the system so that it can run based solely upon the infrastructure indigenous to the Russian ...
  115. [115]
    Certification of emergency call systems - eCall & ERA-GLONASS ...
    Aug 18, 2021 · The ERA-GLONASS certification for the Eurasian Customs Union with countries like Russia, Armenia or Belarus is a big challenge for OEMs and ...
  116. [116]
    ERA-GLONASS State Automated Information System
    Currently there is around 7 mln vehicles registered in the system, contact centers received around 10 mln calls (around 120 thousand validated as true).Missing: eCall | Show results with:eCall
  117. [117]
    [PDF] Development of Unit for Russian Emergency Call System (ERA ...
    Additionally, Russia is leading Europe in these efforts with the “ERA-. GLONASS”emergency call system using GLONASS, a Russian satellite positioning system, and ...
  118. [118]
    OnStar Automatic Crash Response
    OnStar's Automatic Crash Response uses built-in vehicle sensors to detect a crash and connects your vehicle directly with a specially trained OnStar ...
  119. [119]
    Advanced Automatic Collision Notification (AACN) - White Paper
    AACN captures crash data from vehicle collisions and sends the information to emergency responders, alerting responders of the location and nature of the crash.
  120. [120]
    Driver Assistance Technologies | NHTSA
    Automatic crash notification systems can reduce death and disability by decreasing the time it takes for emergency medical services to arrive at a crash scene ...
  121. [121]
    The Potential for Automatic Crash Notification Systems to Reduce ...
    This predictive study investigated the effectiveness of Automatic Crash Notification (ACN) systems in reducing road fatalities.
  122. [122]
    New Chinese Standard on Onboard Accident Emergency Call ...
    Accident Emergency Call Systems (AECS), also known as eCall systems, are onboard vehicle systems which, in the event of the vehicle being involved in a serious ...Missing: Asia | Show results with:Asia
  123. [123]
    NEW NATIONAL STANDARDS FOR E-CALL, FUEL CONSUMPTION
    Jul 23, 2024 · China has officially sought public comments on the development and revision of four mandatory national standards: "Fuel consumption limits for passenger cars".
  124. [124]
    How eCall in Australian Vehicles Can Help to Achieve Vision Zero ...
    eCall is an even more critical requirement in Australia compared to other countries given our expansive roads network combined with a lack of emergency services ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  125. [125]
    [PDF] ETSI TS 126 267 V17.0.0 (2022-05)
    The present document specifies the eCall In-band Modem, which is used for reliable transmission of the eCall. Minimum Set of Data (MSD) from an In-Vehicle ...
  126. [126]
    [PDF] ETSI TS 126 267 V15.0.0 (2018-07)
    The present document specifies the eCall In-band Modem, which is used for reliable transmission of the eCall. Minimum Set of Data (MSD) from an In-Vehicle ...
  127. [127]
    US9301120B2 - Wireless emergency call (eCall) devices and eCall ...
    A timeline of key events for this patent application, including priority claims, publications, legal status, reassignments, and litigation. Google has not ...Missing: intellectual property
  128. [128]
    EP2735179B1 - Wireless emergency call (ecall) devices and ecall ...
    This invention pertains to digital wireless telecommunications and, more specifically, to systems, networks, equipment and methods that may be used in ...Missing: intellectual property
  129. [129]
    [PDF] Qualcomm eCall licensing FAQ
    As stated in our eCall Licensing Statement, Qualcomm will not charge a royalty rate for a license under its patents essential to the 3GPP eCall in-band modem ...
  130. [130]
    Avanci 4G rate for new licenses to increase from September 1, 2022
    Jul 12, 2022 · We are increasing the license rate for our 4G automotive program (includes 2G, 3G and eCall) to $20 per vehicle, paid once for the vehicle's lifetime.Missing: intellectual property
  131. [131]
    Avanci 4G Vehicle
    Jan 13, 2025 · Avanci Vehicle offers access to essential patents for 4G (LTE, LTE-A), as well as the 3G (WCDMA, HSPA) and 2G (GSM, GPRS, EDGE) standards.Missing: property | Show results with:property
  132. [132]
    The SEP Couch: Avanci's 5G Vehicle SEP Program - IP Watchdog
    Oct 19, 2023 · Once an OEM joins Avanci, any patents held by Avanci members that are later sold to Patent Assertion Entities (PAEs) cannot be asserted against ...
  133. [133]
    the rise of Intelligent Transport Systems with eCall HLAP
    Dec 8, 2023 · The core objective is clear: to uniformly automate traffic accident notification throughout Europe. Operating under EN 16072:2022, this ...