Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Abstract and concrete

In philosophy, the distinction between abstract and concrete pertains to the nature of entities, where abstract objects—such as numbers, propositions, and universals—are characterized by lacking spatiotemporal location and causal efficacy, in contrast to concrete objects, which possess spatial and temporal properties and can interact causally with the physical world.^[1] This dichotomy, often traced to ancient thinkers but formalized in modern metaphysics, raises fundamental questions about ontology, including whether abstract objects exist independently or depend on human minds.^[1] In linguistics, the abstract-concrete divide manifests in the classification of nouns, with concrete nouns denoting tangible, perceptible entities (e.g., "apple" or "river") that can be experienced through the senses, while abstract nouns refer to intangible ideas, qualities, or states (e.g., "justice" or "happiness") that lack physical form.^[2] This categorization aids in grammatical analysis and semantic understanding, though definitions vary due to the inherent ambiguity of "abstract," leading to diverse identification methods such as morphological markers, derivational patterns, and contextual usage.^[2] Linguists emphasize that even concrete nouns involve some abstraction from sensory experiences, blurring strict boundaries in language structure.^[2] From a cognitive science perspective, abstract and concrete concepts differ in their formation and neural processing: concrete concepts rely on rich sensory-motor simulations grounded in perceptual experiences (e.g., visualizing a "dog"), whereas abstract concepts (e.g., "truth") draw on linguistic, social, and metaphorical associations without direct sensory referents.^[3] Research highlights that abstraction occurs through aggregating commonalities across experiences, facilitated by brain regions like the anterior temporal lobe for categorical knowledge, and that language plays a crucial role in refining abstract representations.^[3] This distinction influences learning, memory, and reasoning, with concrete concepts generally easier to acquire due to their embodied basis.^[3]

Core Concepts

Definitions of Abstract and Concrete

In philosophy, abstract entities or concepts are defined as those lacking physical existence, spatial-temporal location, and direct sensory perception.^[4] They include paradigmatic cases such as numbers, which exist independently of material instantiation; universals, like the property of triangularity shared across instances; and propositions, which express truth-bearing contents without embodiment.^[5] In contrast, concrete entities possess physical existence, occupy positions in space and time, and are accessible through sensory experience.^[5] These encompass individual objects, such as a specific chair, and particular events, like a historical battle, which can interact causally within the physical world.^[6] The etymological roots of these terms reflect their conceptual separation. "Abstract" originates from the late 14th-century Latin abstractus, the past participle of abstrahere ("to draw away" or "detach"), indicating a process of isolating general features from specific particulars.^[7] Similarly, "concrete" derives from the late 14th-century Latin concretus, past participle of concrescere ("to grow together"), denoting something composite, actual, and bound to material reality rather than detached generality.^[8] Representative examples illustrate these definitions: abstract items include justice, as an ideal norm without physical form, and redness, as a universal quality not tied to any single instance.^[5] Concrete counterparts are a red apple, a tangible object with sensory attributes and spatiotemporal position, and a specific trial, an observable event unfolding in time and place.^[6]

Key Distinctions and Examples

The primary distinctions between abstract and concrete entities center on their ontological characteristics: concrete entities possess particularity, occupy specific locations in space and time, and exert causal influence on the world, whereas abstract entities lack these attributes, being non-spatiotemporal and causally inert. This demarcation highlights how concrete objects interact directly with their environment through physical or event-based mechanisms, while abstract ones exist independently of such interactions, often as universals or structures shared across instances.^[9]^[10] Illustrative examples clarify these boundaries. Consider a particular wooden chair in a living room: it is concrete because it has a unique identity, exists at a definite spatiotemporal location, and can cause effects such as bearing weight or blocking light. By contrast, the abstract notion of "chairness"—the universal property that multiple chairs instantiate—lacks individuality, cannot be located in space or time, and does not directly interact causally, serving instead as a conceptual commonality. Similarly, in mathematics, the abstract set {1, 2, 3} is a non-spatiotemporal structure without causal powers, differing from a concrete collection of three physical apples, which occupies space, can rot or be eaten, and participates in causal chains.^[11]^[12] The abstract-concrete divide forms a spectrum rather than a strict binary, with degrees of abstraction evident in various entities. Fully concrete items include tangible physical objects like rocks or animals, grounded in immediate sensory and causal reality. At the opposite end lie pure abstracts such as numbers or propositions, entirely detached from spatiotemporal constraints. Borderline cases, like fictional entities (e.g., the character Sherlock Holmes), illustrate overlaps: they lack physical instantiation and causal efficacy but possess descriptive content akin to abstract structures, often classified as abstract artifacts created through linguistic practices. A common misconception equates all non-physical entities with the abstract category, overlooking views where certain non-physical items qualify as concrete. For instance, particular mental states or events—such as a specific episode of pain experienced at a given moment—may be deemed concrete in ontologies that emphasize their causal roles and temporal particularity, distinguishing them from atemporal abstracts like general concepts.^[10]

Philosophical Perspectives

Abstract Objects in Ontology

In ontology, abstract objects are defined as non-spatiotemporal and acausal entities that lack location in space or time and do not participate in causal interactions, such as numbers, properties, or Platonic forms.^[13] These entities contrast with concrete objects, like physical particulars, by existing independently of sensory experience or material instantiation.^[13] The primary philosophical defense of abstract objects' existence comes from realism, particularly Platonism, which posits that such entities inhabit a separate realm of objective reality. Plato's theory of Forms, articulated in works like The Republic, describes these as eternal, unchanging ideals—such as the Form of Justice or Beauty—that transcend the imperfect, changing world of sensible concretes and serve as paradigms for all instances.^[13] This view was advanced in modern philosophy by Gottlob Frege's logicism, which argues that numbers are objective abstracta, neither psychological ideas nor empirical aggregates, but logical objects discoverable through reason, as detailed in his Foundations of Arithmetic (1884).^[13] Frege's position underscores the indispensability of abstracts for mathematical truths, supporting their independent existence.^[13] Opposing realism, nominalism rejects the ontological commitment to abstract objects, viewing them as mere linguistic conveniences or names without independent reality, thereby adhering to Ockham's razor by eliminating unnecessary entities from one's ontology.^[13] William of Ockham's medieval formulation of this principle exemplifies the nominalist strategy, prioritizing concrete particulars over posited universals or abstracts.^[14] Aristotle, in critiquing Plato, further bolstered anti-realist sentiments by arguing for the immanence of forms within concrete substances, as in Metaphysics, where universals exist only as abstracted from particulars rather than as separate entities.^[13] Conceptualism offers a middle ground, positing abstracts as mind-dependent constructs, existent only in thought, thus avoiding both Platonist independence and strict nominalist denial.^[13]

Concrete Objects and Causality

In ontology, concrete objects are defined as spatiotemporal particulars endowed with causal powers, distinguishing them from abstract entities that lack location in space and time. These objects, such as physical bodies or events, exist independently and can exert influence on one another through causal interactions. In Aristotelian terms, concrete objects align with substances, which are the fundamental entities or primary beings that underlie change, serve as subjects of predication, and possess the capacity for independent existence and action.^[15]^[16] The causality principle highlights how concrete entities engage in interactions primarily through efficient causes, where one object produces effects in another via direct influence. This view is central to David Hume's empiricism, which grounds causation in the observed constant conjunction of concrete events—such as the motion of one billiard ball imparting momentum to another—rather than any intrinsic necessity or hidden powers beyond sensory experience. Hume argued that our understanding of causation arises solely from repeated impressions of such spatiotemporal occurrences, emphasizing the empirical observability of concrete causal relations.^[17] John Locke's philosophy provides historical context by differentiating primary and secondary qualities to clarify the concrete basis of sensory knowledge. Primary qualities—solidity, extension, figure, motion, and number—are objective, inseparable properties of concrete bodies that resemble the simple ideas they produce in the perceiver's mind, directly tied to the material structure of objects. Secondary qualities, such as colors, sounds, and tastes, are instead powers in concrete objects to generate varied sensory ideas in observers, depending on the arrangement of primary qualities in insensible particles; this distinction separates the concrete, mind-independent reality of objects from the abstract ideas abstracted from sensory data.^[18] Metaphysical debates often center on the problem of abstract causation, which underscores the causal efficacy of concrete objects by contrast: abstracts, being non-spatiotemporal, cannot cause concrete events, as illustrated by the intuition that the abstract number 2 does not bring about the existence of two physical apples. This acausality of abstracts challenges Platonist ontologies, prompting solutions like trope theory, where properties are reconceived as concrete, particular instances (tropes) unique to each object—such as the specific redness of one apple—endowing them with causal powers and avoiding the need for causally inert abstract universals.^[13]^[19]

Quasi-Abstract Entities

In certain areas of philosophy, particularly social ontology, the concept of quasi-abstract entities has emerged since the 2010s as a proposed category for objects that blend features of abstract and concrete entities. These are typically non-concrete but exhibit some causal or relational involvement through human practices or conventions, challenging strict dichotomies in specific contexts like social reality.^[20] Examples include social constructs such as states, which are argued to exist as quasi-abstract entities created through documentary acts, like declarations, that generate them performatively without being fully spatiotemporal objects.^[21] Fictional characters in literature or art may also qualify, possessing abstract narrative structures yet influencing concrete human behavior culturally and psychologically. Money exemplifies this blend, embodying abstract value and rules manifested in concrete forms like currency, enabling causal roles in exchanges via collective practices.^[22] Theories addressing such entities include documentary theory, which posits that performative documents bring quasi-abstract social objects into being. David Armstrong's immanent realism reinterprets universals as properties immanent within concrete particulars, realized through tropes that bridge generality with location, though not always termed quasi-abstract.^[23] These approaches aim to resolve ontological tensions by grounding abstract-like features in concrete or social substrates. Criticisms of quasi-abstract entities center on their failure to decisively resolve ontological tensions, as they often blur distinctions without clarifying commitments; for example, W.V.O. Quine's criterion of ontological commitment, which identifies existence with quantification over entities in the regimented best theory of the world, suggests that positing quasi-abstracts merely complicates ontology without eliminating skepticism toward any non-concrete posits.^[24] This view holds that such hybrids do not evade Quinean scrutiny, as theories invoking them still bind variables over ambiguously abstract elements, potentially inflating ontology without empirical justification.^[25]

Psychological Dimensions

Abstract Versus Concrete Thinking

In psychology, abstract thinking is defined as the cognitive process of generalizing from specific instances, engaging in hypothetical reasoning, and conceptualizing ideas beyond immediate sensory input. This mode enables individuals to identify patterns, draw inferences, and consider possibilities not tied to physical reality. Concrete thinking, by contrast, emphasizes literal interpretation of tangible, observable facts, relying on sensory-based processing and direct experience without extending to broader generalizations or hypotheticals.^[26]^[27] Key theoretical models highlight these distinctions in cognitive styles. Jean Piaget's formal operational stage, emerging around adolescence, marks the development of abstract thinking through systematic hypothesis testing and deductive logic, allowing for reasoning about abstract principles without concrete referents.^[28] Jerome Bruner's framework posits two primary modes of thought: the paradigmatic mode, which is abstract and pattern-seeking, focused on logical categorization and empirical verification, versus the narrative mode, which is more concrete and context-bound, emphasizing stories and sequential events to make sense of human experience.^[29] Similarly, Robert J. Sternberg's triarchic theory of intelligence contrasts analytical intelligence—abstract, involving evaluation and comparison of ideas—with practical intelligence, which is concrete and oriented toward adapting to everyday environmental demands through tacit knowledge.^[30] Illustrative examples underscore these differences. A person engaging in concrete thinking might describe a painting solely by its visible elements, such as "red circles on a blue background," focusing on literal shapes and colors. In abstract thinking, the same individual would interpret deeper symbolism, like "the circles representing cycles of life amid emotional turmoil," connecting the artwork to universal themes. These styles influence problem-solving and creativity, with abstract approaches fostering innovation through ideation and concrete ones ensuring practical execution.^[31] Clinically, pronounced concrete thinking appears in certain neurodevelopmental and psychiatric conditions, impairing social and interpretive functions. In autism spectrum disorders, individuals often display literal language processing and challenges with metaphors, leading to concrete interpretations that hinder understanding of implied meanings.^[32] In schizophrenia, concrete thinking manifests as deficits in proverb interpretation or abstraction tasks, where patients respond literally rather than inferentially, contributing to disorganized thought and social dysfunction.^[33] Such patterns suggest that excessive concreteness limits cognitive flexibility, though interventions like cognitive behavioral therapy can promote shifts toward more abstract processing.^[34]

Development and Assessment of Abstract Thought

The development of abstract thought in children follows distinct stages as outlined in Jean Piaget's theory of cognitive development. During the concrete operational stage, typically from ages 7 to 11, children can perform logical operations on tangible objects and events but struggle with hypothetical or abstract scenarios, relying instead on direct sensory experience.^[35] In contrast, the formal operational stage, beginning around age 11 and extending into adulthood, enables individuals to engage in abstract reasoning, such as hypothesizing outcomes or manipulating symbolic concepts without concrete referents.^[35] This progression marks a shift from concrete to abstract thinking, where adolescents and adults can systematically test ideas and consider multiple variables.^[36] Lev Vygotsky's sociocultural theory complements Piaget by emphasizing that abstract thinking emerges through social interactions and cultural mediation rather than solely through individual maturation. Vygotsky argued that higher mental functions, including abstraction, develop via the zone of proximal development, where guided support from more knowledgeable others—such as teachers or peers—helps children internalize complex concepts through language and collaborative problem-solving.^[37] For instance, pretend play and cultural tools like symbolic representations foster the transition to abstract thought by bridging everyday experiences with generalized ideas.^[38] Several factors influence the pace and nature of abstract thought development, including education and cultural context. Formal education accelerates abstraction by introducing symbolic systems like mathematics and science, which encourage logical deduction beyond immediate percepts.^[39] Culturally, Western education often prioritizes abstract logic and decontextualized reasoning, such as categorizing objects by abstract attributes, whereas some Indigenous cognitive traditions emphasize relational and concrete interconnections, like holistic environmental narratives, potentially delaying or altering abstract skill acquisition in those frameworks.^[40] These differences highlight how cultural practices shape the emergence of abstraction without negating its universality.^[41] Assessing abstract thought involves standardized tools and experimental methods to gauge reasoning abilities. Raven's Progressive Matrices, a non-verbal test of pattern recognition and analogy, reliably measures abstract reasoning by requiring participants to identify logical rules in visual sequences, with strong validity for fluid intelligence across ages and cultures.^[42] Piagetian tasks, such as conservation experiments—where children determine if quantity remains constant despite changes in appearance (e.g., reshaping clay)—evaluate the transition from concrete to abstract logic, as success indicates reversibility and decentration typically achieved by age 7.^[43] Modern neuroimaging techniques, like functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), reveal prefrontal cortex activation during abstract tasks, such as rule inference or generalization, distinguishing it from concrete processing regions.^[44] Contemporary research underscores environmental modulators of abstract thought. Bilingualism enhances cognitive flexibility, enabling better abstraction by promoting perspective-switching and inhibitory control, as evidenced by improved performance on divergent thinking tasks among bilingual children and adults.^[45] With aging, abstract thinking declines more noticeably than concrete processing; older adults show reduced prefrontal efficiency in abstract autobiographical recall, while concrete memory remains relatively stable, contributing to preserved daily functioning despite fluid intelligence losses.^[46] These findings inform interventions to support lifelong cognitive adaptability.^[47]

References

[1]
[PDF] Time, Causation, and Abstract Objects - PhilArchive
Apr 15, 2001 · Perhaps the most common characterization of abstract objects holds that such objects have neither spatio-temporal properties nor stand in any ...
[2]
Understanding of Abstract Nouns in Linguistic Disciplines
Jul 9, 2014 · This paper aims at considering the existing methods of determining abstract words with an attempt to understand which are better applicable.
[3]
[PDF] Abstraction and concepts: when, how, where, what and why?
Oct 2, 2019 · Yet all concepts, even highly concrete ones (e.g. dog) include information that is abstracted across individual episodes of experience, ...
[4]
[PDF] Abstract Objects in a Metaphysical Perspective - Dialnet
Feb 25, 2018 · Abstract objects, in a metaphysical sense, are forms of objects that exist outside physical space and time, and ground concrete objects.Missing: scholarly | Show results with:scholarly
[5]
[PDF] To Be More Concrete About Abstracta and Concreta
Abstract entities, like numbers, exist outside space and time, while concrete entities, like molecules, exist in space and time.
[6]
Being and Abstraction | Being: A Study in Ontology - Oxford Academic
Dec 15, 2022 · (More exactly, an abstract object will be one that enters into causal relations in no possible world, and a concrete object will be an object ...
[7]
Abstract - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
Originating from late 14th-century Latin abstractus (from abstrahere, "to draw away"), abstract means to detach or summarize, reflecting both concrete and ...
[8]
Concrete - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
Originating from late 14th-century Latin "concretus," meaning "grown together," concrete means actual, solid, and material, denoting something substantial, ...Missing: philosophy | Show results with:philosophy
[9]
[PDF] Modes, Disturbances, and Spatio-Temporal Location1 - PhilArchive
It is a standard assumption in contemporary metaphysics that concrete objects come with a location in space and time. A spatio-temporal location in fact is ...
[10]
Knowledge, Cause, and Abstract Objects - SpringerLink
According to platonists, entities such as numbers, sets, propositions and properties are abstract objects. But abstract objects lack causal powers and a ...
[11]
[PDF] On What There Is - rintintin.colorado.edu
On What There Is by Willard Van Orman Quine (1948). A curious thing about the ontological problem is its simplicity. It can be put in three. Anglo-Saxon ...
[12]
[PDF] Quine (1960), Word and Object VII
disagreement on what there is. One such issue that has traditionally divided philosophers is whether there are abstract objects. Nomi- nalists have held ...
[13]
Abstract Objects - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Jul 19, 2001 · The abstract/concrete distinction in its modern form is meant to mark a line in the domain of objects or entities. So conceived, the distinction ...About the Abstract/Concrete... · What is an Abstract Object? · The Way of Encoding
[14]
Nominalism in Metaphysics - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Apr 21, 2025 · Nominalism is an exclusionary thesis in ontology. It asserts that there are no entities of certain sorts.What Is Nominalism In... · 4. Nominalist Strategies · 4.1 General Nominalist...
[15]
Object - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Oct 26, 2017 · While usually the latter are classified as objects, it is a sensible view that the concrete things are objects, and the abstracta are otherwise.Abstract Objects · Ordinary Objects · Nonexistent Objects · Possible Objects
[16]
Substance - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Oct 3, 2004 · Aristotle analyses substance in terms of matter and form. Aristotle uses the term “matter” not as the name for a particular kind of stuff, nor ...History of the Philosophical... · Aristotle's account of substance · Locke on substance
[17]
David Hume: Causation - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Hume challenges us to consider what experience allows us to know about cause and effect. Hume shows that experience does not tell us much.Causation's Place in Hume's... · Necessary Connections and... · Causal Realism
[18]
Primary and Secondary Qualities in Early Modern Philosophy
Jun 1, 2022 · They are located in the material and structural aspects of the universe, the psychology of sense perception, and their intersection. John ...
[19]
Tropes - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Sep 9, 2013 · Trope theory is the view that reality is (wholly or partly) made up from tropes. Tropes are things like the particular shape, weight, and texture of an ...
[20]
A Documentary Theory of States and Their Existence as Quasi ...
Documentality, derived from Austin's theory of performative utterances, claims that documents acts can bring quasi-abstract objects, such as states into being.
[21]
A Documentary Theory of States and Their Existence as Quasi ...
Aug 6, 2025 · Documentality, derived from Austin's theory of performative utterances, claims that documents acts can bring quasi-abstract objects, such as ...
[22]
(PDF) David Lewis: On the Plurality of Worlds - ResearchGate
Lewis propounded a thesis of modal realism: the world we inhabit - the entire cosmos of which we are a part - is but one of a vast plurality of worlds.
[23]
[PDF] The Ontology of Spacetime - Strange beautiful grass of green
between concretely existing entities and abstract/fictional ''entities'', which are not in spacetime. As hinted above, a defender of the view that the ...<|separator|>
[24]
some philosophical reflections on the ontology of money
This (somewhat polemical) paper focuses on the ontological nature of money and draws comparisons to the ontological status of gauge freedom in physics.
[25]
Universals: An Opinionated Introduction - ResearchGate
Download Citation | On May 4, 2018, D. M. Armstrong published Universals: An Opinionated Introduction | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ...
[26]
[PDF] quine's philosophy of logic and mathematics - Princeton University
For rejection of abstract entities is what Quine takes nominalism to consist ... There is a bias against mathematical entities in Quine's thinking, and ...
[27]
(PDF) Armstrong on the Eleatic Principle and Abstract Entities
Aug 9, 2025 · If universals can exist outside states of affairs, then they can exist nowhere and nowhen, necessarily transcending the spacetime system and ...
[28]
Abstract Thinking - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Abstract thinking is defined as the process of reasoning with and conceiving theoretical or future concepts, allowing individuals to consider multiple ...
[29]
Development and validation of a measure of concrete and abstract ...
Concrete and abstract thinking. Abstract-analytical thinking is a mode of cognitive processing characterized by over-general thoughts of overall meaning as well ...
[30]
Piaget - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
Through assimilation and accommodation of the object, Piaget's theory of cognitive development is characterized by a stepwise move toward adaptation.Introduction · Issues of Concern · Enhancing Healthcare Team...
[31]
[PDF] The Narrative Construction of Reality
Chipman, and Robert. Glaser (Hillsdale, N. J., 1985). Jerome Bruner is research professor of psychology at New York Uni- versity, where he is also serving as ...
[32]
[PDF] Toward a triarchic theory of human intelligence
The triarchic theory of human intelligence comprises three subtheories. The first subtheory relates intel- ligence to the external world of the individual, ...
[33]
From mind to matter: neural correlates of abstract and concrete ...
Much work in the field of social cognition shows that adopting an abstract (vs concrete) mindset alters the way people construe the world.
[34]
Autism, Literal Language and Concrete Thinking - ResearchGate
Aug 9, 2025 · The author's aim in this article is to dwell on some developmental considerations that are relevant for explaining abnormalities in the ...
[35]
Premorbid status in schizophrenia and abstract, literal or autistic ...
It is concluded that process schizophrenics are not more literal than reactives but that the difference in correct abstracting ability is at least in part due ...
[36]
A word is worth a thousand pictures: A 20-year comparative analysis ...
Longitudinal research examining the course of abstract and concrete thinking in schizophrenia is rare and associations between abstract thinking and factors ...
[37]
Cognitive Development - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
Apr 23, 2023 · Third is the "Concrete Operational stage" (ages 7 to 11 years), when the child uses logical operations when solving problems, including mastery ...
[38]
10.2 Piaget's Concrete Operational and Formal Operational Stages
Describe Piaget's formal operational stage and the characteristics of formal operational thought. Identify the advances and limitations of formal operational ...Missing: seminal paper
[39]
(Re)Introducing Vygotsky's Thought: From Historical Overview to ...
Aug 7, 2019 · The paper presents a brief introduction to the topic of Vygotskian work and its application to modern psychology, rather than an addition to the field of ...
[40]
Vygotsky's theory in-play: early childhood education
According to Lev S. Vygotsky (1896–1934), the highest levels of abstract thinking and self-regulation in preschool development are established in pretend play.
[41]
[PDF] Culture and Cognitive Development
Dasen sug- gests that the similarities in developmental pattern between very different cultural groups leave open the possibility that there may be generalities ...
[42]
[PDF] M. Gelfand, CY Chiu, & YY. Hong (Eds.), Advances in Culture and ...
Abstract. This chapter reviews a body of research on cultural differences in framework theories for engaging with nature, focusing primary on Indigenous ...
[43]
Cognition is … Fundamentally Cultural - PMC
We conclude that cognition is indeed fundamentally cultural, and that consideration of its cultural dimension is essential for a comprehensive understanding.
[44]
Development and Validation of an 18-Item Medium Form of the ...
Jun 3, 2016 · The Ravens Advanced Progressive Matrices (APM) is a widely used measure of general intelligence (g), both across settings and cultures.
[45]
Evidence from a Study Based on Piagetian Conservation Tasks - PMC
Mar 21, 2016 · These authors suggest that gestures provide a bridge between action and abstract thought. Furthermore, although our findings tie in well ...
[46]
Neural representation of abstract task structure during generalization
Mar 17, 2021 · Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we observed that abstract task structure was represented within left mid-lateral prefrontal cortex, ...
[47]
Bilingualism and creativity: Benefits from cognitive inhibition ... - NIH
Nov 3, 2022 · Bilingualism promotes creativity through cognitive inhibition, linked to convergent thinking, and cognitive flexibility, linked to divergent ...
[48]
A novel scoring protocol reveals age-related differences in abstract ...
Dec 27, 2024 · A novel scoring protocol reveals age-related differences in abstract compared to concrete thinking in cued autobiographical remembering.
[49]
Abstract Concepts and Aging: An Embodied and Grounded ...
A reduction of the concreteness effect with normal aging was found by Peters and Daum (2008) who investigated effects of aging on vivid remembering during ...