Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Reality

Reality is the aggregate of all entities and processes that exist independently of human cognition or conceptualization, characterized by persistent causal interactions verifiable through empirical observation and experimentation.^[1] In metaphysical terms, it encompasses the fundamental nature of being, including substances, properties, and relations that underpin the observable world.^[2] Philosophers have long debated its ontological status, with realism positing an objective existence beyond subjective experience, contrasting with idealist views that subordinate it to mind-dependent constructs, though empirical sciences prioritize evidence of mind-independent structures like spacetime and quantum fields.^[3] Key characteristics include causality, wherein events follow from prior states according to invariant laws, and persistence, where entities maintain identity amid change, as evidenced in physical theories from classical mechanics to relativity. Controversies persist regarding unobservables, such as multiverses or consciousness's role, yet foundational realism aligns with scientific progress by favoring theories that predict and explain data without ad hoc appeals to observer effects beyond established quantum interpretations.^[4] Epistemologically, access to reality demands rigorous testing against sensory data and logical coherence, guarding against biases in interpretive frameworks prevalent in certain academic traditions.^[5]

Etymology and Definitions

Linguistic Origins

The English term "reality" derives from the French réalité, which entered usage in the 15th century to denote "property, character, or quality," stemming from Medieval Latin realitas (nominative realitās), an abstract noun formed from realis meaning "actual" or "real."^[6] The root realis originates in Latin res, signifying "thing," "matter," or "affair," emphasizing concrete existence over the imaginary or abstract.^[6] This linguistic evolution reflects a shift from denoting tangible objects to the broader quality of objective being, first appearing in English around the 1540s.^[6] In philosophical contexts, realitas emerged in the 13th century within scholasticism, attributed to thinkers like John Duns Scotus (c. 1266–1308), who used it to discuss the independent existence of universals and essences amid debates between realism and nominalism.^[7] Early English applications, recorded from 1513 onward, often carried legal connotations, such as "fixed property" or immovable assets, linking the term to enduring, verifiable holdings distinct from chattel.^[8] By the 17th century, its usage expanded in metaphysics to signify the aggregate of all that exists independently of human cognition, as in the works of René Descartes, who contrasted realitas with mere appearance or illusion.^[9] Linguistically, the term's adoption parallels the post-medieval emphasis on empirical verification, with no direct ancient Greek equivalent; Greek philosophy employed concepts like ousia (substance or being) or alētheia (unconcealed truth) but lacked a precise analog for "reality" as objective state.^[7] Modern dictionaries, such as the Oxford English Dictionary, trace its multifaceted origins to both French and Latin borrowings, underscoring its role in bridging legal, ontological, and perceptual discourses.^[9]

Philosophical and Scientific Conceptions

In philosophy, realism asserts that entities and properties exist independently of human minds or perceptions, forming a mind-independent substrate of reality.^[10] This view traces to ancient thinkers like Aristotle, who emphasized substances as primary realities composed of matter and form, contrasting with Plato's idealism where ultimate reality resides in eternal, non-physical Forms accessible only through reason.^[11] Idealism, conversely, maintains that reality is fundamentally mental or dependent on consciousness, as in Berkeley's subjective idealism ("esse est percipi"), where objects persist only through perpetual perception by a divine mind.^[12] Materialism, a dominant strand in modern philosophy, posits that all phenomena, including consciousness, reduce to physical processes and matter, rejecting supernatural or immaterial substances.^[13] This aligns with causal chains governed by natural laws, as articulated by Democritus in ancient atomism—positing indivisible particles in void as the basis of all—and revived in Enlightenment thinkers like Hobbes, who viewed mental states as motions in matter.^[14] Critics of idealism and dualism argue that materialism best explains empirical regularities, though debates persist on whether qualia (subjective experiences) fully reduce to brain states.^[15] Scientifically, classical physics conceives reality as a deterministic, objective material world of particles and forces operating in absolute space and time, as formalized by Newton in his Principia Mathematica (1687), where laws like gravitation describe causal interactions without observer dependence.^[16] Einstein's general relativity (1915) refines this by curving spacetime as the fabric of reality, where mass-energy dictates geometry, verified empirically through phenomena like gravitational lensing observed in 1919 solar eclipse expeditions.^[17] Quantum mechanics introduces probabilistic elements, challenging local realism—the notion that objects have definite properties independent of distant measurements and that influences propagate at finite speeds. Experiments confirming Bell's inequalities, such as those by Aspect et al. in 1982, demonstrate non-local correlations in entangled particles, implying reality lacks predefined attributes prior to measurement.^[18]^[17] Interpretations diverge: the Copenhagen view emphasizes observer-induced collapse of wave functions, while Everett's many-worlds (1957) posits branching realities encompassing all outcomes, preserving determinism at multiversal scales.^[19] These conceptions underscore a physical reality emergent from quantum fields, as in quantum field theory, where particles are excitations in pervasive fields, yet debates on foundational issues like measurement persist without consensus.^[20]

Ontological Foundations

Being and Existence

In ontology, being denotes the fundamental condition or structure that underlies all entities, encompassing what it means for something to be at all, whereas existence refers to the actual instantiation or actuality of particular entities within reality.^[21]^[22] This distinction arises from the recognition that not all conceivable essences or possibilities achieve concrete realization; existence thus acts as the principle by which potential forms become actualized.^[23] Ancient Greek philosophy, particularly through Parmenides around 475 BCE, framed being as a singular, eternal, and unchanging unity, indivisible and without generation or destruction, since non-being cannot be thought or spoken of coherently.^[24] Parmenides argued via deductive reasoning that "what is" must be whole, complete, and immobile, rejecting sensory appearances of change as illusory, a view that prioritized logical coherence over empirical flux.^[25] This monistic conception influenced subsequent metaphysics by establishing being as self-identical and necessary, though it faced critiques for underaccounting observable diversity, as later developed by pluralists like the Atomists. Medieval scholasticism refined the essence-existence relation, with Thomas Aquinas in the 13th century positing that in all created beings, essence—what a thing is—differs from existence—the act by which it is—such that finite entities participate in existence as a received perfection rather than possessing it inherently.^[26]^[27] For Aquinas, this real distinction implies contingency: no essence guarantees its own existence, necessitating an uncaused cause (God) whose essence is identical to existence, pure act without composition.^[28] This framework integrates Aristotelian categories with theological causality, emphasizing that existence is not a genus or property but the ultimate perfection actualizing potency. In 20th-century phenomenology, Martin Heidegger in Being and Time (1927) highlighted the "ontological difference" between Being (Sein)—the enabling horizon or meaning that lets entities show up as what they are—and beings (Seiendes), the concrete entities themselves.^[29] Heidegger critiqued prior philosophy for conflating the two, arguing that beings always presuppose Being, yet the question of Being's meaning had been forgotten amid preoccupation with beings' properties.^[30] He proposed Dasein (human existence) as the site for accessing this difference, through temporal structures like care and thrownness, though his analysis remains interpretive rather than demonstrative, subject to debates over its evasion of systematic proof.^[29] Contemporary analytic ontology often equates being with existence in a Quinean sense, where commitment to entities follows from quantified statements in theories, treating "what exists" as coextensive with "what there is" without deeper metaphysical strata.^[21] Ontological pluralists, however, allow varied modes of existence (e.g., abstract vs. concrete), challenging uniform treatments while grounding claims in logical and empirical scrutiny over speculative deduction.^[22] Empirical sciences verify existence through repeatable observations and causal interactions, as in physics' detection of particles via collider data (e.g., Higgs boson confirmed 2012 at CERN), underscoring that robust ontological claims require integration with verifiable mechanisms rather than isolated introspection.

Properties and Universals

In ontology, properties are the qualitative or relational attributes possessed by particulars, such as the mass of an electron or the shape of a sphere, which contribute to distinguishing and relating entities within reality. These properties raise the problem of universals: how can distinct particulars share identical attributes, as when multiple objects exhibit the same redness or sphericity? Realist theories posit universals as repeatable entities that ground such resemblances, enabling causal regularities and scientific laws by ensuring that like causes produce like effects across instances.^[31] Nominalist alternatives deny universals' independent existence, attributing resemblance to mere linguistic conventions or contingent similarities among particulars, though this struggles to explain the necessity in natural laws without invoking ad hoc resemblances.^[32] Plato's theory of Forms advances transcendent realism, wherein universals exist as eternal, immaterial paradigms in a separate realm, with particulars participating imperfectly in them; for instance, all circular objects approximate the Form of Circularity, which itself lacks spatial location or change.^[33] Aristotle critiques this separation, proposing immanent realism: universals inhere directly within particulars as their essences or forms, actualized through matter, such that "humanness" exists only in human individuals without a transcendent substrate. This view aligns with empirical observation by tying universals to observable substances, avoiding Plato's "third man" regress where Forms require further Forms to explain participation.^[34] Both positions affirm universals' reality to account for predication and induction, but Aristotle's emphasis on immanence better accommodates causal interactions grounded in material composition. Contemporary debates extend to trope theory, treating properties as non-repeatable particulars (tropes)—e.g., this specific redness in one apple distinct from that in another—bundled into objects via compresence rather than shared universals. Proponents argue tropes preserve ontological parsimony by eliminating abstract repeatables while explaining resemblance through qualitative similarity among tropes, potentially resolving bundle theories of substances without invoking bare particulars.^[31] Critics contend tropes fail to fully capture laws of nature, as exact replication in causation requires identity, not mere similarity, reverting to nominalist challenges in predicting uniform outcomes like gravitational attraction across masses. Empirical support for either view remains indirect, drawn from physics' reliance on invariant properties (e.g., charge conservation) favoring realists, versus quantum indeterminacy suggesting particularized instances.^[35] Ultimately, the debate hinges on whether reality's causal structure demands transcendent or immanent sharing of properties, with realism better suiting first-principles explanations of regularity over nominalist reductions.

Abstract Objects and Mathematics

Abstract objects, including mathematical entities like numbers, sets, and functions, are characterized by their independence from spatiotemporal location and causal efficacy, raising questions about their inclusion in the ontology of reality.^[36] In philosophical discourse, these objects are distinguished from concrete particulars, which possess physical properties and participate in causal relations.^[36] The debate centers on whether such entities exist objectively or are merely conceptual constructs, with implications for understanding the structure of reality beyond empirical observation. Mathematical platonism asserts the independent existence of abstract mathematical objects, maintaining that truths about numbers and geometries hold necessarily and are discovered rather than invented.^[37] Proponents, including Kurt Gödel, argued that mathematical intuition provides access to this abstract domain, akin to perceptual knowledge of the physical world, though lacking sensory mediation.^[37] The indispensability argument, advanced by Willard Van Orman Quine and Hilary Putnam, contends that since mathematics is essential for empirical science—formulating laws like those in physics—commitment to abstract objects is rationally required for realism about the sciences.^[37] This view aligns with the observation that mathematical structures, such as the natural numbers extending to infinity, underpin predictive successes in fields like quantum mechanics and general relativity, suggesting a deep correspondence with reality's causal framework.^[37] Opposing platonism, nominalist positions deny the existence of abstract objects, proposing instead that mathematical discourse refers to concrete particulars, linguistic conventions, or fictional entities.^[38] Strict nominalism, as articulated by Hartry Field, seeks to reconstruct mathematics without ontological commitment to abstracts, for instance, by developing "nominalistic" versions of geometry using concrete spacetime points rather than abstract spaces.^[38] Critics of platonism highlight the Benacerraf problem: if abstract objects are causally inert and non-spatiotemporal, epistemic access to them via reason alone undermines naturalistic accounts of knowledge, paralleling challenges in direct realism about physical reality.^[37] Empirical considerations favor nominalism by privileging causally efficacious entities; for example, numerical patterns emerge from physical interactions, as in counting discrete particles, without necessitating a separate platonic realm.^[38] Hybrid views, such as structuralism, reconcile the debate by positing that mathematics describes structural relations among concrete objects rather than standalone abstracts, thereby integrating mathematical realism with physical ontology.^[37] Surveys of mathematicians reveal a prevalent intuitive platonism, with many reporting a sense of discovery in theorems, yet philosophical rigor often tempers this toward anti-realist interpretations to avoid metaphysical extravagance.^[37] Ontologically, the status of abstract objects impacts causal realism: if reality comprises only entities capable of influencing events, mathematics functions as a descriptive tool capturing invariant patterns in the physical domain, indispensable yet not ontologically primitive.^[36] Recent debates, such as those between Peter van Inwagen and William Lane Craig, underscore ongoing contention, with fictionalist nominalism gaining traction for its parsimony in explaining mathematical efficacy without positing acausal existents.^[39]

Epistemological Dimensions

Perception and Direct Realism

Perception involves the transduction of environmental stimuli—such as light wavelengths, sound pressure waves, and tactile pressures—into electrochemical signals processed by sensory organs and neural pathways, yielding conscious experiences that represent spatial, temporal, and qualitative features of the world.^[40] In the context of reality, philosophical inquiry centers on whether these experiences afford unmediated access to mind-independent entities or are filtered through internal proxies like neural representations or qualia. Direct realism posits that, in veridical cases, perceivers stand in immediate epistemic and phenomenological relations to external objects, which cause and constitute the content of perception without intermediary veils.^[41] This contrasts with indirect theories, where awareness targets mental surrogates that bear representational relations to the world.^[41] Aristotle articulated an early form of direct realism in De Anima, contending that perception arises when a sense organ receives the intelligible form (eidos) of an object, actualizing the organ's potential without incorporating the object's matter or generating a copy; thus, the perceiver directly apprehends the object's qualities as they exist.^[42] This framework avoids positing sense-data, emphasizing causal actualization over representation. In the 18th century, Thomas Reid advanced direct realism within Scottish common-sense philosophy, rejecting the representative "ideas" of Locke and Hume as engendering skepticism; he argued that perception operates via original faculties that yield direct conception and belief in external objects, evidenced by the instinctive reliability of sensory judgments in everyday action.^[43] Contemporary defenses, such as John Searle's in Seeing Things as They Are (2010), maintain that perceptual experiences are intentional states presenting ordinary objects under mind-to-world direction of fit, where the objects themselves satisfy the experience's conditions without mediation by freestanding representations; illusions and hallucinations, Searle notes, fail satisfaction but share no common factor with veridical cases beyond causal ancestry.^[44] Proponents invoke explanatory parsimony: direct realism sidesteps regressive problems of justifying representations and aligns with perceptual phenomenology's immediacy, wherein objects appear presented rather than inferred.^[45] It also undergirds noninferential justification for external-world beliefs, as perceptual awareness grounds entitlement without prior validation of intermediaries.^[41] Challenges include perceptual variations (e.g., Müller-Lyer illusion, where lines of equal length appear unequal due to contextual cues) and scientific findings of neural processing delays (e.g., visual signals taking ~100-150 ms from retina to cortex).^[46] Direct realists counter via disjunctivism, holding that veridical perceptions involve object-involving relations absent in illusory counterparts, preserving phenomenological fidelity in good cases.^[47] Empirically, enactive approaches bolster the view: perception emerges from sensorimotor interactions, where an object's affordances (action possibilities) are directly accessed via contingent neural responses to movement, as shown in studies of change blindness and predictive coding that prioritize ecological validity over static representations.^[40] Retinal and cortical rivalry experiments, while cited against directness, demonstrate rivalry at neural levels but do not preclude object-directness at the conscious level, as causal chains from world to experience remain unbroken.^[46] Thus, direct realism coheres with causal mechanisms in neuroscience, interpreting brain activity as enabling rather than intervening in worldly presentation.^[40]

Skeptical Hypotheses and Responses

Skeptical hypotheses in epistemology challenge knowledge of reality by proposing scenarios where experiences systematically misrepresent the external world, rendering ordinary beliefs unjustified. These include ancient dream arguments, positing that waking life might be indistinguishable from dreams, as articulated by philosophers like Zhuangzi in the 4th century BCE and later by Descartes.^[48] In his Meditations on First Philosophy (1641), René Descartes introduced the "evil demon" hypothesis: a powerful deceiver could fabricate all sensory perceptions and even mathematical truths, leaving only the cogito—"I think, therefore I am"—indubitable.^[49] Contemporary formulations extend this doubt. The brain-in-a-vat (BIV) scenario envisions human brains isolated and connected to computers that simulate sensory inputs indistinguishable from unaided perception, first popularized in philosophical discourse in the 20th century.^[50] Philosopher Nick Bostrom's simulation hypothesis (2003) argues that if posthumans capable of running ancestor simulations exist, the vast number of simulated realities implies most conscious beings are simulated rather than base-level. Bostrom's trilemma posits that either civilizations go extinct before such simulations, lose interest in them, or we are almost certainly in one. Responses to these hypotheses emphasize logical incoherence, evidential underdetermination, and pragmatic grounds for realism. Hilary Putnam's semantic argument (1981) contends the BIV claim is self-refuting: a BIV's language refers only to vat-simulated objects, so "we are brains in a vat" (referring to real brains and vats) cannot be true if asserted by a BIV.^[51] Critics of Bostrom note the argument's reliance on unproven assumptions about computational feasibility and posthumans' motivations, with empirical evidence favoring base reality via Occam's razor, as elaborate deceptions add unnecessary entities without explanatory gain.^[52] G.E. Moore's "proof of the external world" (1939) counters by asserting evident facts like "here is one hand," which skeptical scenarios fail to undermine without circularity.^[53] Further rebuttals invoke causal and evolutionary considerations: perceptions reliably track reality because natural selection favors veridical representations for survival, not systematic illusion, as deceptive inputs would hinder adaptive behavior.^[48] Scientific theories' predictive success—e.g., quantum mechanics accurately modeling subatomic events since the 1920s—bolsters confidence in an observer-independent reality over ad hoc skeptical alternatives lacking comparable empirical support.^[53] While skeptical hypotheses remain logically possible, their invocation requires extraordinary evidence, which is absent, privileging the coherent, parsimonious view of reality as causally efficacious and mind-independent.^[54]

Phenomenology and Lived Experience

Phenomenology, as developed by Edmund Husserl in the early 20th century, examines the structures of consciousness through direct analysis of lived experience, or Erlebnis, prioritizing first-person descriptions over theoretical assumptions about external reality.^[55] Husserl's method involves epoché, a suspension of judgments about the existence of the external world to focus on the pure phenomena as they appear in consciousness, revealing intentionality—the directedness of experience toward objects.^[56] This approach posits the Lebenswelt, or lifeworld, as the pre-reflective horizon of everyday experience, where reality manifests as a coherent, meaningful backdrop prior to scientific abstraction.^[57] Maurice Merleau-Ponty extended this framework in his 1945 work Phenomenology of Perception, arguing for the primacy of embodied perception in constituting reality, where the body serves as the medium through which the world is encountered, not merely represented.^[58] Unlike Husserl's more transcendental focus, Merleau-Ponty emphasized how sensory-motor engagement—such as the intertwining of touch and being touched—grounds lived experience in a pre-objective spatiality and temporality, challenging dualisms between subject and object.^[59] Empirical validation of such claims appears in studies of perceptual illusions, where discrepancies between sensory input and neural processing highlight the body's active role in shaping phenomenal reality.^[60] In relation to objective reality, phenomenological descriptions provide causal insights into how consciousness correlates with worldly structures, but they face critiques for potential correlationism, wherein entities are only accessible via human experience, undermining independent realism.^[61] Quentin Meillassoux, for instance, argues that this confines contingency and necessity to subjective brackets, neglecting mathematical facts about reality's ancestral past, such as pre-human geological events verifiable through empirical science.^[62] Responses integrate phenomenology with causal mechanisms, as in neurophenomenology, pioneered by Francisco Varela, which combines first-person reports of lived states with third-person neuroimaging to map qualia onto brain dynamics, such as correlating meditative awareness with default mode network deactivation.^[63] Contemporary empirical phenomenology employs structured interviews to elicit micro-phenomenological accounts of brief experiences, yielding data on temporal granularity—e.g., experiences unfolding in 30-70ms cycles—aligning with neural oscillation findings and supporting realism by linking subjectivity to verifiable physiological processes.^[64] Critics from realist traditions, however, contend that phenomenology risks solipsism by prioritizing essences over falsifiable predictions, as seen in analytic philosophy's preference for behavioral and neuroscientific tests of perceptual content over introspective purity.^[65] Thus, while illuminating the subjective texture of reality, phenomenology's truth-value hinges on causal integration with objective evidence, avoiding unsubstantiated idealist drifts.^[66]

Philosophical Traditions

Western Philosophy

Ancient Greek philosophy initiated systematic inquiry into the nature of reality, with Pre-Socratic thinkers seeking a fundamental arche or principle underlying the observable world, often material elements like water or air, though such views prefigure later metaphysical realism by positing a unified substrate. Plato advanced a transcendent realism in his Theory of Forms, arguing that eternal, immaterial Forms constitute the true, intelligible reality, while the sensible world offers mere approximations or shadows, accessible only through reason rather than perception.^[67] Aristotle rejected Plato's separated Forms as explanatorily inert, developing hylomorphism wherein individual substances form the primary realities, each a composite of indeterminate matter (hyle) actualized by specific form (eidos or morphe), enabling causal explanation grounded in observable changes from potentiality to actuality.^[68] Medieval scholasticism extended these debates, particularly through the problem of universals, where realists like Thomas Aquinas maintained that universal properties (e.g., "humanity") exist objectively, either ante rem in divine intellect or in re in particulars, supporting a realist ontology compatible with empirical categorization.^[69] Nominalists, such as William of Ockham (c. 1287–1347), countered that universals lack independent existence, functioning merely as mental concepts or linguistic conventions (flatus vocis) to denote resemblances among individuals, prioritizing parsimony in ontology and foreshadowing empiricist skepticism toward abstract entities.^[69] This tension influenced theology and science, with realism bolstering essentialist views of natural kinds and nominalism aiding conceptual shifts toward mechanistic explanations. In the early modern period, René Descartes foundationalized epistemology via methodical doubt, arriving at the cogito ergo sum as the indubitable certainty of a thinking substance (res cogitans), distinct from extended body (res extensa), thus framing reality as dualistic realms interacting causally yet ontologically separate, though the precise mechanism of mind-body union remained contentious.^[70] Continental rationalists like Spinoza reconceived reality monistically as a single substance (God or Nature) with infinite attributes, knowable through adequate ideas, while empiricists such as Locke emphasized primary qualities (solidity, extension) as mind-independent powers inhering in material substances, derived from sensory data.^[71] Immanuel Kant synthesized rationalism and empiricism in transcendental idealism, distinguishing phenomena—the structured appearances conforming to a priori forms of sensibility (space, time) and categories of understanding—from unknowable noumena or things-in-themselves, positing that human cognition shapes experiential reality without accessing its intrinsic causal structure.^[72] Post-Kantian developments included Hegel's absolute idealism, viewing reality as dialectical unfolding of Geist (spirit) through historical contradictions, and 19th-century realists like Brentano reviving intentionality to anchor mental acts in objects. In the 20th century, analytic philosophy pursued scientific realism, with logical positivists reducing metaphysical claims to verifiable propositions, while ordinary language philosophers like Wittgenstein examined how linguistic "language-games" disclose reality's form without positing hidden structures. Phenomenologists such as Husserl employed epoché to describe essences in pure consciousness, and existentialists like Heidegger reframed reality through Being (Sein), disclosed in authentic Dasein amid everyday thrownness.^[73] These traditions underscore persistent oscillation between realist commitments to mind-independent causal orders and anti-realist emphases on constructed or phenomenal access, informed by evolving empirical constraints.

Eastern Philosophies

In Advaita Vedanta, a prominent school of Hindu philosophy systematized by Shankara (c. 788–820 CE), ultimate reality is Brahman, characterized as nondual, infinite existence-consciousness-bliss (sat-chit-ananda) that serves as the unchanging substratum of all phenomena, as derived from Upanishadic texts such as the Chandogya Upanishad (6.2.1).^[74] The individual self (Atman) is ontologically identical to Brahman, with apparent distinctions arising from ignorance (avidya) and the superimposition of maya, an inexplicable power that projects the empirical world as a dependent, less-than-real appearance akin to a mirage or dream.^[74] This yields a hierarchical ontology: vyavaharika satya (empirical reality) for transactional experience, where objects appear manifold under causation and space-time, and paramarthika satya (absolute reality) as the singular, self-luminous Brahman beyond attributes or duality.^[74] Shankara's commentaries on the Brahmasutra (e.g., 2.1.14) argue that the world's independence is illusory, reducible to Brahman without remainder, privileging scriptural pramana (authority) over perception for discerning nonduality.^[74] Mahayana Buddhism, particularly the Madhyamaka tradition established by Nagarjuna (c. 150–250 CE) in his Mulamadhyamakakarika, conceives reality through shunyata (emptiness), the absence of inherent existence (svabhava) in all dharmas (phenomena), which lack autonomous essence and originate dependently via pratityasamutpada (causal interdependence).^[75] This avoids both eternalism (positing fixed substances) and nihilism by framing emptiness as a relational negation: phenomena function conventionally through conceptual and causal dependencies but ultimately lack self-sufficient grounds, as chains of origination regress infinitely without a foundational base.^[75] Nagarjuna's two truths doctrine delineates samvriti-satya (conventional truth) for interdependent appearances sustaining ethics and cognition, and paramartha-satya (ultimate truth) as the emptiness of intrinsic nature, realized via prasanga (reductio ad absurdum) to dismantle reified views.^[75] Empirical implications include the rejection of mind-independent permanents, aligning causality with observed conditionality while critiquing substantialist ontologies for proliferating unverifiable essences.^[75] Taoist ontology, as expounded in Laozi's Tao Te Ching (compiled c. 4th–3rd century BCE), identifies the Dao as the ineffable, generative process of reality itself, encompassing the ceaseless transformation of the "ten thousand things" (wanwu) without static unity or endpoint (ch. 1, 42).^[76] The Dao operates through correlative dynamics of yin (receptive, dark) and yang (active, light) forces, which interpenetrate in balanced flux rather than opposition, yielding phenomena as emergent patterns of spontaneous change (ziran) rather than created artifacts (ch. 42).^[76] Naming or conceptual fixation distorts this flux, as the Dao precedes distinctions and eludes definition, promoting wu wei (effortless non-interference) as epistemic alignment with reality's natural efficacy over contrived action (ch. 2, 37).^[76] Ontologically, this processual view subordinates being to becoming, with empirical correlates in observable cycles (e.g., seasons, growth) that evade reduction to invariant laws, emphasizing harmony via yielding to undifferentiated origins.^[76]

Indigenous and Other Perspectives

Indigenous ontologies diverge from Western substance-based metaphysics by prioritizing relational constitutions of existence, wherein humans, non-human entities, landscapes, and ancestors co-constitute reality through ongoing interactions rather than isolated essences.^[77] ^[78] These perspectives, preserved in oral traditions and practices, emphasize responsibilities toward kin networks extending beyond anthropocentric boundaries, as documented in ethnographic accounts from diverse regions.^[79] In Australian Aboriginal traditions, the Dreaming—or Jukurrpa—serves as a foundational ontology integrating cosmogony, cosmology, and social order, where ancestral beings traversed the land in a timeless era, forming topographic features, species, and normative laws that persist and demand adherence today.^[80] This framework rejects linear temporality, viewing reality as eternally emergent from ancestral actions encoded in the landscape, with human agency limited to maintaining these relations through ceremonies and custodianship.^[81] North American Indigenous views, varying across tribes such as the Lakota or Navajo, construe reality as a vital, animated continuum where natural elements, animals, and celestial bodies possess inherent agency and spiritual potency, demanding reciprocal relations for sustenance.^[82] Knowledge of this reality derives from immersive participation and visionary experiences rather than abstract analysis, with the physical world reflecting deeper spiritual truths.^[83] African Indigenous ontologies, as in Bantu or Yoruba systems, posit a hierarchical yet relational cosmos originating from a supreme creator deity who imbues all beings with vital force, where human personhood manifests through communal bonds—exemplified by ubuntu, denoting "I am because we are."^[84] Epistemologies here favor collective deliberation, elder testimony, and relational validation over individualistic empiricism, grounding reality in shared ancestral and social fabrics.^[85] Animist orientations, common in shamanic practices across Indigenous groups from Siberian to Amazonian contexts, extend subjectivity to non-human actants like rivers or spirits, positing reality as a negotiated multiplicity of perspectives rather than a singular objective substrate.^[86] Scholarly reconstructions of these views, however, warrant scrutiny for potential imposition of external categories, as colonial documentation often filtered Indigenous articulations through Eurocentric lenses, potentially inflating relational motifs to contrast with scientific materialism.^[87]

Scientific Theories

Classical Realism in Physics

Classical realism in physics asserts that the fundamental entities, laws, and structures posited by classical theories—such as Newtonian mechanics, classical electromagnetism, and thermodynamics—describe an objective, mind-independent reality with definite properties existing independently of observation. This view underpinned the development of physics from Isaac Newton's Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica in 1687, which formulated laws of motion and universal gravitation as descriptions of real causal interactions among material bodies in absolute space and time. Newtonian realism posits point particles with intrinsic masses, positions, and velocities that evolve deterministically under real forces, enabling precise predictions like planetary orbits accurate to within arcminutes over centuries, as verified by observations from Johann Kepler's data through Edmond Halley's comet return in 1758. Key principles include locality, wherein causes propagate continuously through space at finite speeds or instantaneously in Newtonian gravity, and determinism, where initial conditions fully specify future states without probabilistic elements or observer-induced collapses. In classical electromagnetism, formalized by James Clerk Maxwell's equations in 1865, realism extends to unobservable entities like electromagnetic fields as physical media transmitting forces, evidenced by their successful prediction of light as an electromagnetic wave, confirmed experimentally by Heinrich Hertz in 1887 through radio wave generation and detection. Thermodynamics, developed in the 19th century by Rudolf Clausius and William Thomson (Lord Kelvin), treats heat as molecular kinetic energy in a realist framework, aligning with kinetic theory's atomic hypothesis, which Ludwig Boltzmann advanced despite initial empirical underdetermination, later corroborated by Jean Perrin's 1908 experiments on Brownian motion measuring Avogadro's number at approximately 6.022 × 10²³ particles per mole. This realist commitment drove empirical success, such as the Michelson-Morley experiment in 1887 yielding null results for ether drift, initially interpreted within classical frameworks before relativity, yet affirming the approximate truth of classical laws for terrestrial scales. Underdetermination arises in Newtonian mechanics through empirically equivalent formulations—such as action-at-a-distance versus field-mediated forces—but realists maintain that one ontology, often gravito-magnetic fields, better captures causal structure, as argued in analyses of spacetime geometry in classical limits.^[88] Classical realism's validity persists in effective theories for non-relativistic, macroscopic domains, where predictions match observations to high precision, as in GPS corrections accounting for classical residuals beyond relativistic effects, without invoking quantum indeterminacy.^[89]

Quantum Mechanics and Reality

Quantum mechanics, formulated in the 1920s, provides a highly accurate mathematical framework for predicting the behavior of particles and fields at atomic and subatomic scales, with experimental confirmations reaching precisions of parts per billion in phenomena like the anomalous magnetic moment of the electron.^[90] However, its formalism—relying on wave functions that evolve deterministically via the Schrödinger equation yet yield probabilistic outcomes upon measurement—poses profound challenges to classical notions of an objective, observer-independent reality composed of definite particle positions and trajectories.^[91] Key empirical observations, such as the double-slit interference pattern demonstrating wave-particle duality and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) correlations revealing instantaneous influences across distances, indicate that microscopic entities lack definite properties until interacting with macroscopic apparatus, undermining the intuitive picture of localized, independent objects.^[92] The measurement problem encapsulates this tension: the Schrödinger equation implies linear superposition of states, yet repeated measurements yield single, definite results without superpositions of outcomes, requiring an ad hoc "collapse" postulate that lacks dynamical justification within the theory. This discrepancy has no resolution in standard quantum mechanics, prompting diverse interpretations that seek to reconcile the formalism with a coherent ontology. The Copenhagen interpretation, associated with Niels Bohr and Werner Heisenberg, treats the wave function as a tool for calculating probabilities rather than a depiction of physical reality, asserting that definite properties emerge only through irreversible interactions with classical measuring devices, without committing to microscopic ontology.^[93] Critics argue this instrumentalism evades the problem by prioritizing epistemology over metaphysics, potentially reflecting a reluctance to confront quantum non-intuitiveness rather than empirical necessity.^[94] In contrast, realist interpretations preserve objective reality independent of observation. The de Broglie-Bohm theory, or Bohmian mechanics, posits definite particle positions guided by a pilot wave derived from the wave function, restoring determinism and hidden variables while reproducing all quantum predictions through non-local influences.^[92] This framework upholds causal realism at the expense of locality, aligning with experiments violating Bell's inequalities, which in 1964 demonstrated that no local hidden-variable theory can match quantum correlations without superluminal signaling or abandoning locality.^[95] Loophole-free tests, including a 2023 superconducting circuit experiment achieving a CHSH inequality value of 2.67 ± 0.07 (exceeding the classical bound of 2), confirm these violations under stringent conditions, ruling out local realism but permitting non-local realist alternatives like Bohmian mechanics.^[95] The Many-Worlds interpretation, proposed by Hugh Everett in 1957, eliminates collapse by positing that all possible outcomes occur in branching parallel universes, with decoherence explaining the appearance of definite experiences within each branch.^[94] While parsimonious in avoiding special postulates, it faces challenges in deriving the Born rule probabilities from the unitary dynamics and ontological extravagance, as the measure of branches remains debated without empirical distinguishability from other views.^[94] Emerging approaches like quantum Darwinism suggest that environmental interactions redundantly encode quantum states into classical pointers, fostering objective, shared reality from quantum substrates without invoking collapse or multiplicity.^[96] Experimental validations, including 2019 pointer state selections in cavity QED systems, support this mechanism for the quantum-to-classical transition.^[96] Despite interpretive pluralism, quantum mechanics' empirical success—underpinning technologies like semiconductors and lasers—affirms its descriptive power, while the absence of consensus on ontology underscores that the theory constrains observable statistics rather than mandating a particular metaphysics of reality.^[90] Violations of Bell inequalities preclude local deterministic realism but leave room for non-local or relational variants, with ongoing research into quantum foundations, such as 2023-2025 multi-particle entanglement tests, probing deeper constraints without resolving the measurement enigma.^[97] Academic debates often reflect foundational preferences, with instrumentalist views dominant in particle physics applications where predictive utility trumps ontology, yet realist alternatives gain traction amid critiques of Copenhagen's vagueness.

Relativity, Space, and Time

Special relativity, formulated by Albert Einstein in 1905, posits two fundamental postulates: the laws of physics are identical in all inertial reference frames, and the speed of light in vacuum is constant regardless of the motion of the source or observer.^[98] These lead to counterintuitive consequences, including time dilation—where clocks in relative motion tick at different rates—and length contraction along the direction of motion, both verified experimentally through phenomena like the extended lifetime of cosmic-ray muons decaying in Earth's atmosphere.^[99] The theory unifies space and time into a four-dimensional Minkowski spacetime, where events are invariant intervals rather than absolute positions, and the famous equation E = mc^2 equates mass and energy, confirmed in nuclear reactions and particle accelerators.^[100] General relativity, published by Einstein in 1915, extends these ideas to accelerated frames and gravity, interpreting the latter not as a force but as the curvature of spacetime caused by mass-energy. The equivalence principle equates inertial and gravitational mass, implying that free-falling observers follow geodesics in curved spacetime, described by the Einstein field equations G_{\mu\nu} = \frac{8\pi G}{c^4} T_{\mu\nu}, which relate geometry to stress-energy.^[101] Empirical validations include the 1919 solar eclipse observation of starlight deflection by the Sun's gravity, matching predictions to within 20%; the precise precession of Mercury's orbit; time dilation in gravitational fields measured by atomic clocks on aircraft; and the 2015 detection of gravitational waves by LIGO from merging black holes, confirming wave propagation at light speed.^[102]^[103] In relativistic physics, space and time form an objective, observer-independent spacetime manifold, where simultaneity is relative—events simultaneous in one frame may not be in another—challenging classical notions of absolute time but preserving causality via light cones that delimit possible influences.^[104] This framework supports a realist view of reality as a fixed geometry of events, with empirical success across scales from GPS satellite corrections (accounting for both velocity and gravitational effects to achieve meter-level accuracy) to cosmological expansion.^[105] While some interpret relativity's structure as implying a "block universe" eternalism, where past, present, and future coexist tenselessly, this remains a philosophical overlay not strictly required by the equations, which admit dynamic interpretations consistent with a flowing time coordinate amid objective relations. Relativistic spacetime thus reveals reality's causal fabric as geometrically encoded, empirically robust against alternatives like Newtonian absolutism, though tensions persist with quantum mechanics in regimes of extreme curvature.^[106]

Cosmological Models

Cosmological models provide frameworks for understanding the origin, evolution, and large-scale structure of the universe, grounded in general relativity and empirical observations such as galaxy distributions, cosmic expansion, and relic radiation. The standard model, known as Lambda Cold Dark Matter (ΛCDM), builds on the Big Bang theory, which posits that the universe originated from a hot, dense state and has been expanding for approximately 13.8 billion years.^[107] This expansion is evidenced by Hubble's law, where distant galaxies recede at velocities proportional to their distance, as quantified by the Hubble constant H_0.^[108] Key supporting data include the cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation, a uniform glow at 2.725 K discovered in 1965, representing the cooled remnant of the early universe's thermal equilibrium.^[108] The ΛCDM model incorporates cold dark matter, which clusters to form gravitational wells for galaxy formation, and a cosmological constant Λ interpreted as dark energy driving late-time acceleration. Planck satellite measurements from 2018 yield precise parameters: matter density Ω_m ≈ 0.315, dark energy density Ω_Λ ≈ 0.685, and an age of 13.787 ± 0.020 billion years, aligning with observations of light element abundances from Big Bang nucleosynthesis, such as deuterium and helium ratios predicted within minutes of the initial expansion.^[107] These predictions match measured primordial abundances, with helium-4 at about 24% by mass, supporting the model's validity during the first few minutes when baryonic matter density was Ω_b h^2 ≈ 0.0224.^[107] Baryon acoustic oscillations in galaxy clustering and Type Ia supernova distance moduli further corroborate the flat geometry (Ω_tot ≈ 1) and accelerated expansion discovered in 1998.^[109] Despite its successes, ΛCDM faces tensions, notably the Hubble tension, where early-universe CMB-derived H_0 ≈ 67.4 km/s/Mpc contrasts with local measurements around 73 km/s/Mpc from Cepheid-calibrated supernovae, exceeding 5σ discrepancy and suggesting potential systematic errors or extensions beyond the model.^[110] ^[109] Inflationary theory, proposed in 1980 by Alan Guth, addresses the horizon and flatness problems by positing rapid exponential expansion in the first 10^{-32} seconds, smoothing initial irregularities and explaining CMB uniformity, though direct evidence remains indirect via tensor-to-scalar ratio constraints from BICEP and Planck data.^[109] Ongoing anomalies, including σ_8 tension in matter clustering and potential dynamical dark energy signatures, indicate ΛCDM as a robust approximation rather than a complete description, prompting exploration of modified gravity or varying constants while preserving causal structure from general relativity.^[109]

Contemporary Developments

Advances in Quantum Gravity and TOE

Efforts to formulate a theory of quantum gravity, which reconciles general relativity's description of gravity as spacetime curvature with quantum mechanics' probabilistic framework for matter and forces, remain a central challenge in theoretical physics, as the two theories produce incompatible predictions at extreme scales such as black hole singularities or the Planck length of approximately 1.6 × 10^{-35} meters.^[111] A complete theory of everything (TOE) would extend this unification to incorporate all fundamental interactions, including the strong, weak, and electromagnetic forces described by the Standard Model, potentially resolving issues like the hierarchy problem and providing a framework for cosmology. Major approaches include string theory, which posits fundamental entities as one-dimensional vibrating strings requiring extra spatial dimensions, and loop quantum gravity (LQG), which quantizes spacetime itself into discrete loops without additional dimensions. Neither has yielded empirically verified predictions distinct from general relativity or quantum field theory, though mathematical consistency and computational techniques continue to advance.^[112]^[113] In string theory, recent progress includes the "bootstrap" method applied in December 2024 by New York University physicists to validate consistency constraints on string vacua, addressing the landscape of approximately 10^{500} possible configurations by deriving self-consistent scattering amplitudes for gravitons without assuming supersymmetry.^[114] Additionally, in November 2024, researchers proved a long-standing conjecture on the positivity of graviton scattering amplitudes in string theory, providing evidence for unitarity in quantum gravity interactions and bolstering its perturbative framework.^[115] String theory has also offered novel interpretations of cosmic expansion, suggesting in October 2024 that string-theoretic effects could mimic dark energy without invoking a cosmological constant, potentially explaining the observed accelerated universe expansion rate of about 73 km/s/Mpc.^[116] These developments, while theoretically promising, rely on holographic dualities like AdS/CFT and lack direct experimental falsification, with critics noting the absence of low-energy predictions testable by current accelerators like the LHC.^[117] Loop quantum gravity has seen advancements in incorporating quantum information concepts, with a February 2023 arXiv preprint outlining how entanglement entropy in spin networks yields area quantization consistent with black hole thermodynamics, predicting discrete spectral lines in gravitational wave echoes potentially detectable by LIGO upgrades.^[113] In June 2025, LQG models revealed distance-dependent fluctuations in spacetime geometry, where correlations decay with separation, offering a mechanism for emergent macroscopic smoothness from microscopic discreteness at the Planck scale.^[118] Alternative proposals include a March 2025 entropy-based derivation of gravity from quantum relative entropy at Queen Mary University of London, unifying emergent geometry with thermodynamic principles without modifying general relativity at large scales.^[119] A May 2025 theory from Aalto University integrates gravity into the Standard Model via gauge symmetries, preserving renormalizability and avoiding infinities in perturbative expansions, though it awaits cosmological consistency checks.^[120] Experimental probes are emerging, with August 2025 proposals for table-top tests using entangled particles to detect gravity-induced decoherence, potentially distinguishing quantum from classical gravity at sensitivities near 10^{-15} meters.^[111] A June 2025 framework posits time as having three dimensions with space as emergent, deriving quantum gravity effects that could unify forces but requires validation against observed particle masses.^[121] Despite these theoretical strides, no TOE candidate has predicted novel phenomena confirmed by observation, such as deviations in gravitational wave signals from binary mergers detected by LIGO since 2015, underscoring the need for higher-precision data from facilities like the Einstein Telescope.^[122] Progress hinges on computational tools, including AI-assisted exploration of string landscapes initiated in 2024, yet fundamental obstacles like non-perturbative definitions persist.^[123]

Debates on Consciousness and Observation

In quantum mechanics, the measurement problem questions why quantum superpositions appear to collapse into definite outcomes upon observation, prompting debates over whether consciousness is essential to this process. Early formulations, such as John von Neumann's 1932 chain of measurements, suggested that the infinite regress of observers ends only with a conscious mind, implying that subjective awareness might actualize reality from potential states.^[124]^[125] This view influenced Eugene Wigner's 1961 thought experiment, where he posited that a friend's measurement of a particle's spin remains in superposition until observed by the conscious experimenter, potentially linking mind to wave function collapse.^[125] However, empirical evidence and theoretical advances refute the necessity of consciousness. Quantum decoherence, formalized in the 1970s by H. Dieter Zeh and elaborated by Wojciech Zurek, explains the apparent collapse as arising from unavoidable interactions between quantum systems and their macroscopic environment, which rapidly entangle and suppress interference without requiring deliberate measurement or awareness.^[126] Experiments, such as those using automated photon detectors in double-slit setups since the 1980s, demonstrate interference pattern disruption solely due to physical detection, independent of subsequent human viewing of results.^[127]^[128] Physics consensus, as articulated in peer-reviewed analyses, holds that "observer" denotes any irreversible interaction amplifying quantum effects to classical scales, not sentience; claims otherwise stem from misinterpretations popularized in non-technical media.^[129] Philosophically, these debates intersect with realism, positing an observer-independent reality governed by causal laws, versus instrumentalist or idealist views where observation constructs outcomes. Proponents like Shan Gao argue that resolving the measurement problem demands conscious observers to avoid infinite regress, suggesting mind as fundamental to quantum reality.^[130] Yet, such positions lack falsifiable predictions and contradict decoherence's success in modeling environmental "measurements" in isolated systems, as verified in cavity quantum electrodynamics experiments by 2000.^[126] Relational interpretations, like Carlo Rovelli's, emphasize perspective-dependence without invoking consciousness, aligning with empirical data while challenging absolute objectivity.^[131] Critics of consciousness-centric theories highlight their reliance on speculative extensions beyond quantum formalism, which predicts outcomes accurately sans mind; for instance, cosmic microwave background observations from 1965 onward reveal early universe quantum fluctuations "measured" by photons predating observers.^[132] Mainstream academia, despite noted interpretive biases toward instrumentalism, converges on decoherence's sufficiency, underscoring that reality persists causally prior to observation, with consciousness emerging as a late evolutionary product rather than its architect.^[133] Ongoing experiments, such as those probing objective collapse models via spontaneous radiation limits (e.g., GERDA collaboration's 2020 null results for germanium decays), further constrain mind-dependent collapses, favoring mind-independent ontologies.^[126]

Multiverse Hypotheses and Criticisms

Multiverse hypotheses propose that our observable universe is one of many, potentially infinite, distinct universes, each possibly governed by varying physical laws or initial conditions. These ideas emerge primarily from extensions of established theories in cosmology, quantum mechanics, and string theory, aiming to address puzzles like the fine-tuning of fundamental constants. However, they remain speculative, lacking direct empirical confirmation.^[134] In inflationary cosmology, eternal inflation—developed by Andrei Linde in his 1983 chaotic inflation model—suggests that inflation does not end uniformly across the universe but continues indefinitely in patches, spawning "bubble universes" with diverse properties due to quantum fluctuations in the scalar field. This process, occurring since shortly after the Big Bang around 13.8 billion years ago, implies a vast ensemble where our universe occupies one low-entropy bubble amid exponentially growing others. Linde's framework posits that the observed uniformity and flatness of our cosmos result from such a mechanism, with different bubbles exhibiting varied cosmological constants or particle masses.^[134]^[135] The many-worlds interpretation (MWI) of quantum mechanics, formulated by Hugh Everett in his 1957 dissertation, posits that every quantum measurement causes the universal wavefunction to branch into parallel worlds, each realizing one possible outcome without wavefunction collapse. This deterministic view preserves the linearity of the Schrödinger equation across the entire multiverse, explaining phenomena like superposition and interference without invoking observer-dependent collapse. Proponents argue it resolves measurement paradoxes in quantum theory, which has been verified in experiments such as double-slit interference since the early 20th century, though MWI itself predicts no distinct observables beyond standard quantum predictions.^[136]^[137] String theory's landscape contributes another multiverse variant, where the theory's extra dimensions and compactifications yield approximately 10^{500} possible vacuum states, each corresponding to a universe with unique low-energy physics. Coined by Leonard Susskind around 2003, this landscape arises from the moduli stabilization problem in string theory, suggesting that eternal inflation could populate these vacua, explaining why our universe's parameters permit atoms and life via the anthropic principle. While string theory unifies gravity and quantum fields, its landscape remains untested, as supersymmetry—predicted at energies around 10^{16} GeV—has not appeared in LHC data up to 13 TeV collisions as of 2023.^[138]^[139] Critics contend that multiverse hypotheses evade falsifiability, a core scientific criterion articulated by Karl Popper, as other universes lie beyond causal contact, rendering predictions indistinguishable from a single-universe model. For instance, inflationary multiverses predict cosmic microwave background anisotropies consistent with observations from Planck satellite data (2013-2018), but alternative single-universe explanations suffice without invoking unobservables. Sabine Hossenfelder argues that multiverse claims function as post-hoc rationalizations, akin to religious faith, since they adjust parameters to fit data without risking refutation, contrasting with testable theories like general relativity.^[140]^[141]^[142] These proposals also violate Occam's razor by positing immense ontological extravagance—trillions of unobservable universes—to explain fine-tuning that might stem from undiscovered principles, such as cyclic cosmologies or modified gravity. Paul Davies and others note that without empirical tests, like detecting bubble collisions in cosmic data (none found in WMAP or Planck surveys), multiverses resemble metaphysics rather than physics, potentially stalling progress by excusing theoretical failures. Defenders, including Sean Carroll, counter that parent theories like quantum mechanics and inflation are falsifiable, but critics like John Horgan maintain the multiverse extension itself lacks evidential support after decades of speculation.^[143]^[144]^[145]

Technological and Simulated Realities

Virtual Reality and Simulations

Virtual reality (VR) encompasses immersive technologies that generate interactive, computer-simulated environments, typically accessed through head-mounted displays, sensors, and controllers to mimic sensory experiences.^[146] Pioneering efforts trace to 1956, when Morton Heilig patented the Sensorama, a booth delivering synchronized visuals, sounds, vibrations, and odors for up to four users.^[146] In 1968, Ivan Sutherland introduced the first head-mounted display at Harvard, featuring stereoscopic views and basic tracking via a mechanical arm.^[147] Subsequent milestones included NASA's VIEW system in 1985 for flight simulation and Jaron Lanier's VPL Research coining "virtual reality" in 1987 while developing the DataGlove.^[148] By the 2010s, consumer VR advanced with the Oculus Rift prototype in 2012, crowdfunded via Kickstarter, leading to its 2016 commercial release after Facebook's acquisition.^[147] Apple's Vision Pro, launched in February 2024, integrated high-resolution micro-OLED displays (over 4K per eye), eye and hand tracking, and spatial computing at a starting price of $3,499.^[149] Entering 2025, VR trends emphasize lighter headsets, 8K resolutions for reduced screen-door effects, and AI-driven content generation to lower development barriers, alongside broader adoption in training, therapy, and enterprise applications.^[150] Global VR market revenue reached approximately $12 billion in 2024, projected to grow amid hardware refinements like passthrough cameras for mixed reality blending.^[151] VR's capacity to replicate perceptual realities challenges distinctions between simulated and base experiences, fueling the simulation hypothesis that our universe may be an artificial construct run by advanced posthumans.^[152] Philosopher Nick Bostrom formalized this in his 2003 paper, positing a trilemma: either civilizations self-destruct before achieving simulation-capable computing, posthumans lack interest in running ancestor simulations, or we are almost certainly simulated beings, as simulated minds would vastly outnumber non-simulated ones under feasible resource assumptions.^[52] Bostrom's argument relies on exponential growth in computing power, akin to Moore's Law, enabling one base reality to spawn billions of detailed simulations. Critics counter that the hypothesis invokes untestable assumptions and multiplies entities needlessly, contravening Occam's razor by favoring a complex simulated layer over direct reality.^[153] Empirical disconfirmation arises from quantum phenomena like superposition and entanglement, which defy efficient classical computation; simulating a single electron's wavefunction requires resources scaling exponentially with precision, rendering universe-scale simulation infeasible even for advanced civilizations.^[154] To model the observable universe at Planck-scale resolution would demand more bits than particles exist, exceeding black hole information limits and thermodynamic bounds on computation.^[155] No observable glitches, pixelation, or code artifacts manifest, and physical constants appear fine-tuned for non-simulable complexity rather than optimized shortcuts.^[156] Thus, while VR demonstrates perceptual mimicry, the simulation hypothesis remains speculative without verifiable evidence, prioritizing causal chains grounded in observed physics over probabilistic metaphysics.^[157]

Computational Theories of Reality

Computational theories of reality assert that the universe functions as a discrete computational process, where physical laws emerge from underlying algorithmic rules rather than continuous fields or substances. These ideas suggest reality's base layer consists of information processing, analogous to a digital computer executing programs, with phenomena like space, time, and matter arising from binary operations or cellular automata updates. Pioneered in the mid-20th century, such theories challenge traditional continuum-based physics by proposing discreteness at the Planck scale, supported by observations of quantum granularity but lacking direct empirical confirmation of computational substrates.^[158] Konrad Zuse introduced foundational concepts in his 1969 book Rechnender Raum (Calculating Space), positing the universe as a giant cellular automaton where spacetime evolves through local rule applications, similar to Turing machines.^[159] Edward Fredkin coined "digital physics" in 1978, developing "digital mechanics" to describe reality as finite, reversible computations conserving information, with particles as stable patterns in a discrete grid.^[160] Stephen Wolfram's 2002 A New Kind of Science empirically explored simple programs, showing how one-dimensional cellular automata generate complexity resembling physical laws, arguing the universe's behavior stems from irreducible computations rather than differential equations.^[161] Seth Lloyd's 2006 Programming the Universe extends this to quantum scales, viewing the cosmos as a quantum computer where particle interactions perform universal gate operations, processing bits into observable reality.^[162] A prominent variant, the simulation hypothesis, claims our perceived reality is an ancestor simulation run by advanced posthumans. Philosopher Nick Bostrom's 2003 paper argues probabilistically: if posthumans exist and simulate ancestors, simulated minds vastly outnumber base-reality ones, making simulation likely unless civilizations self-destruct early or abstain from simulations.^[163] Proponents cite quantum indeterminacy and fine-tuned constants as potential artifacts of efficient rendering, though these interpretations remain speculative.^[164] Critics contend these theories are unfalsifiable pseudoscience, as they predict no unique observables distinguishable from standard physics. Physicists highlight prohibitive computational demands: simulating quantum many-body systems requires exponential resources, rendering full-universe ancestor sims implausible even for advanced civilizations, per thermodynamic limits and error correction needs.^[155] ^[153] Sabine Hossenfelder and others note the hypothesis assumes unproven posthuman motivations and ignores that simulations would nest infinitely or terminate, without empirical tests like "glitches" holding up under scrutiny.^[165] While inspiring computational models in physics, such as lattice quantum field theories, these ideas function more as philosophical frameworks than predictive science, with no verified evidence supplanting established theories like general relativity or quantum mechanics.^[153]

Worldviews and Implications

Religious and Metaphysical Views

In Abrahamic religions, including Christianity, Islam, and Judaism, ultimate reality is identified with a transcendent, personal God who exists necessarily and creates the contingent physical universe ex nihilo. The Christian doctrine, as articulated in Genesis 1:1, posits that "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth," establishing God as the uncaused cause and source of all existence, with human nature bearing His image yet marred by original sin following the Fall.^[166] In Islam, tawhid—the doctrine of God's absolute oneness—asserts that Allah alone possesses inherent reality, with all creation deriving its existence from divine will and lacking independent subsistence, as emphasized in Quranic verses like Surah Al-Ikhlas (112:1-4): "Say, He is Allah, [who is] One."^[167] Eastern religious traditions offer contrasting ontologies. Hinduism, particularly in Advaita Vedanta, conceives Brahman as the singular, non-dual ultimate reality—eternal, infinite, and beyond attributes—while the empirical world manifests as maya, a veiling power that projects illusory multiplicity and change onto this undifferentiated essence, concealing true unity until realized through knowledge (jnana).^[168] Buddhism, across its schools, denies any permanent, independent essence in phenomena, teaching sunyata (emptiness) as the absence of intrinsic existence: all dharmas arise interdependently, marked by impermanence (anicca), suffering (dukkha), and no-self (anatta), such that conventional reality is a provisional construct dissolved in enlightenment.^[169]^[170] Metaphysical views, independent of religious revelation, probe the fundamental structure of being through reason. Substance dualism, defended by René Descartes in his 1641 Meditations on First Philosophy, maintains that reality comprises two irreducible categories—res cogitans (thinking substance, or mind) and res extensa (extended substance, or matter)—interacting despite their ontological disparity, contrasting with monistic alternatives that reduce all to one principle.^[171] Metaphysical realism holds that entities exist mind-independently, with properties grounded in their nature rather than perception, as explored in analytic philosophy's emphasis on discovering reality's causal structure via a posteriori inference and logical analysis.^[172] These frameworks often intersect with religious ontologies, such as in theistic realism where divine mind sustains extra-mental order, though empirical science challenges idealist variants by privileging observable causal mechanisms over purely mental substrates.^[173]

Cultural Relativism vs. Objective Reality

Cultural relativism posits that moral, ethical, and factual truths are context-dependent, varying by cultural norms without universal standards for judgment.^[174] This view emerged in early 20th-century anthropology to counter ethnocentrism, emphasizing understanding practices from within their cultural framework rather than imposing external evaluations.^[175] Proponents argue it promotes tolerance by rejecting absolute truths, but critics contend it undermines objective reality by implying no independent criteria exist to assess cultural claims, such as historical practices like infanticide or slavery.^[176] Objective reality, in contrast, maintains that certain truths—particularly in the natural sciences—transcend cultural boundaries, grounded in empirical verification and causal mechanisms observable universally. Physical laws, such as the speed of light at 299,792,458 meters per second in vacuum or the gravitational constant of 6.67430 × 10^{-11} m^3 kg^{-1} s^{-2}, hold consistently across galaxies and epochs, as confirmed by astronomical observations and particle accelerator experiments replicated globally.^[177] These constants' invariance challenges relativistic interpretations, as deviations would disrupt predictive models like general relativity, which accurately forecast phenomena from black hole mergers detected in 2015 to planetary orbits.^[178] Even in domains like morality, cross-cultural research reveals universals that relativism overlooks. A 2019 analysis of ethnographic data from 60 societies identified seven recurrent cooperation norms—helping kin, aiding groups, reciprocity, bravery, deference to superiors, fair division, and property respect—present in all examined cultures, suggesting innate human adaptations rather than arbitrary inventions.^[179] Similarly, a 2020 study of moral dilemmas in 42 countries found consistent patterns, such as aversion to harm, outweighing variations and indicating shared cognitive foundations.^[180] Psychologist Steven Pinker argues that such progress in reducing violence—from 15th-century homicide rates of 30-100 per 100,000 in Europe to under 1 today—stems from applying universal reason and evidence, not cultural fiat, rendering relativism self-defeating as it universally asserts relativity's truth.^[181] Relativism's persistence in academic discourse, despite empirical counterevidence, may reflect institutional preferences for interpretive frameworks over falsifiable claims, often prioritizing narrative over causal analysis.^[182] Yet, objective reality's robustness is affirmed by technologies like GPS, reliant on relativity's precise, culture-independent predictions, and medical advances predicated on biological universals, such as DNA's double helix structure discovered in 1953 and validated worldwide.^[174] This tension underscores that while cultural lenses shape perceptions, they do not alter underlying realities verifiable through experimentation and logic.

References

[1]
Reality as Persistence and Resistance | Perspectives on Science
The Aristotelian notion of reality: the real consists of persistent potentialities or powers (or dispositions, tendencies, affordances, capacities, abilities).
[2]
Metaphysics | Philosophy - UGA
Metaphysics is the branch of philosophy that examines the fundamental nature of reality, including the relationship between mind and matter, between substance ...
[3]
What Is The Nature Of Reality? | Issue 61 - Philosophy Now
And so reality itself, comprising the independent nature and existence of everything knowable, exists independently of our minds' apprehension of it. At ...
[4]
[PDF] METAPHYSICS – AN OVERVIEW Basic Concepts, Methods, Issues ...
What Is Metaphysics? A Definition of Metaphysics: Metaphysics is the philosophical investigation of the ultimate nature of reality. Some Basic Types of ...
[5]
[PDF] Methods in Science and Metaphysics - PhilSci-Archive
Mar 11, 2019 · Can we distinguish science from metaphysics? Traditionally, metaphysics is defined as the most general study of reality, concerned with the ...
[6]
Reality - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
Originating from 1540s French réalité and Medieval Latin realitatem, reality means the quality or state of being real or objectively existing.
[7]
Etymology: The root of the words 'real' and 'reality'
thing. Its earliest English uses, ...When was the term “reality” first used referring to a TV show?What's the literal meaning of "Real Estate"? - English Stack ExchangeMore results from english.stackexchange.com
[8]
reality - Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Etymology. From French réalité (“quality of being real”), from Middle French ... Recorded since 1550 as a legal term in the sense of “fixed property ...
[9]
reality, n. meanings, etymology and more | Oxford English Dictionary
reality is of multiple origins. Partly a borrowing from French. Partly a borrowing from Latin.
[10]
2 The Philosophical Conception of an Independent Reality
Analyses the possibility of objective knowledge of an independent reality, characterised by its independence from knowledge and belief.
[11]
The Nature of Reality | Rationalising The Universe
Aug 4, 2016 · The concept of reality has developed over the times, since the early Greek philosopher Thales, who believed that the source of everything came ...
[12]
What is the difference between philosophical idealism and ...
Jul 31, 2020 · Realism is the view that the universe is external; it's really out there. Idealism is the view that it's like a dream in universal ...Missing: arguments | Show results with:arguments
[13]
History and philosophy of materialism explored in new book
The core idea of “materialism” is that all facts, events and objects are dependent on or reducible to physical processes.
[14]
Materialism matters: The role of philosophy in science
matter — exists, and everything in the Universe, including consciousness, is made from or is a ...
[15]
Contribution to the History of the Concept of Reality - jstor
The problem of epistemology consists in the investigation of the principles by which the real sciences are guided. A critical history of the concept of reality ...
[16]
The quantum revolution questioned the nature of reality
Quantum theory taught scientists much more than how to make computer chips. It taught that reality isn't what it seems.
[17]
The Universe Is Not Locally Real. Here's How Physicists Proved It
Oct 6, 2022 · Under quantum mechanics, nature is not locally real: particles may lack properties such as spin up or spin down prior to measurement, and they ...
[18]
Quantum experiment in space confirms that reality is what you make it
Oct 27, 2017 · An odd space experiment has confirmed that, as quantum mechanics says, reality is what you choose it to be. Physicists have long known that ...
[19]
Physicists Divided on What Quantum Mechanics Says about Reality
Aug 8, 2025 · A survey of more than 1,000 physicists finds deep disagreements in what quantum theories mean in the real world.
[20]
Quantum physics demands a new understanding of reality
Apr 14, 2025 · Any conception of reality must include the role of observation. According to quantum mechanics, however, the property you're not observing ...
[21]
Ontological Commitment - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Nov 3, 2014 · Ontology, as etymology suggests, is the study of being, of what there is. The ontologist asks: What entities or kinds of entity exist?
[22]
Existence | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
The philosophical view according to which there are different ways of existence is known as ontological pluralism. As Turner (2010) and McDaniel (2009; 2017) ...
[23]
CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: Essence and Existence - New Advent
Essence, however, is properly described as that whereby a thing is what it is. Existence is that whereby the essence is an actuality in the line of being.<|control11|><|separator|>
[24]
Parmenides - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Feb 8, 2008 · Parmenides uses “being” to express a very strong notion, which Aristotle eventually was to capture with his concept of “what it is to be.” To ...
[25]
Parmenides' Philosophy: The Concept of Being
Oct 7, 2023 · At the heart of Parmenides' philosophy is the idea that “Being” is singular, eternal, and unchanging. He presents this argument in his only ...The context of Parmenides... · Parmenides' central idea... · The nature of Being
[26]
Aquinas: Metaphysics | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Essence/existence composites merely have existence; whatever an essence/existence composite is, it is not its existence. Insofar as essence/existence composites ...The Nature of Metaphysics · Essence and Existence · Participation · Matter and Form
[27]
[PDF] Thomas Aquinas On Being and Essence - Fordham University Faculty
That is to say, if something is in a genus or a species, then its existence must be distinct from its essence, whence if the existence of something is not ...
[28]
Aquinas' Way to God: Arguing Essence and Existence - Word on Fire
May 11, 2020 · Arguments for God's existence, like Aquinas' from essence and existence, do more than just convert people; they deepen our understanding of ...
[29]
Martin Heidegger - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Jan 31, 2025 · Heidegger was an ontological pluralist: he held that there are multiple distinct kinds of being. Human beings or “Dasein”, Heidegger argued, ...Heidegger and the Other... · Heidegger's Aesthetics · Heidegger on Language · 108
[30]
Martin Heidegger on Being: Why is There Something Rather than ...
Dec 9, 2024 · Being is what makes beings be or exist: Being is what makes there be something (ie, some being or beings) rather than nothing.<|separator|>
[31]
[PDF] Tropes: For and Against Anna-Sofia Maurin University ... - PhilArchive
If properties are universals, the nature which grounds resemblance is numerically the same in its different instances. If properties are tropes, it is not. Post ...
[32]
[PDF] The Problem of Universals: A Reappraisal of Realism and Nominalism
Jul 10, 2025 · The problem of universals can be reinterpreted by examining the historical evidence as to the arguments on behalf of and against realism and ...<|separator|>
[33]
Universals - Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Aristotle, in contrast, held a theory of universals as immanent beings, in rebus ('in things'): there can be no universals unless there are individuals in ...
[34]
Aristotelian universals, strong immanence, and construction
Nov 4, 2023 · The Aristotelian view of universals, according to which each universal generically depends for its existence on its instantiations, has recently ...
[35]
Higher-order metaphysics and the tropes versus universals dispute
Nov 25, 2020 · In this paper I first argue that higher-order realism does not in fact resolve the tropes versus universals dispute.
[36]
Abstract Objects - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Jul 19, 2001 · The abstract/concrete distinction has a curious status in contemporary philosophy. It is widely agreed that the ontological distinction is ...
[37]
Platonism in the Philosophy of Mathematics
Jul 18, 2009 · Following Cantor, most mathematicians and philosophers now defend the actual infinity of the natural numbers.What is Mathematical Platonism? · The Fregean Argument for...<|control11|><|separator|>
[38]
Nominalism in the Philosophy of Mathematics
Sep 16, 2013 · According to platonism, mathematical objects (as well as mathematical relations and structures) exist and are abstract; that is, they are not ...
[39]
Do Numbers Exist? A Debate about Abstract Objects | Reviews
Jun 4, 2025 · Peter van Inwagen and William Lane Craig, Do Numbers Exist? A Debate about Abstract Objects, with a Foreword by Mark Balaguer, Routledge 2024, 275pp., $35.95 ( ...
[40]
[PDF] Sensorimotor Direct Realism: How We Enact Our World
It also draws on empirical evidence from the relevant cognitive sciences. > ... scientific evidence in favour of the direct realist view of perception.
[41]
Direct Realism
(i) Direct realism holds that in perception, we are directly aware of the external world. (ii) Indirect realism (or "representationalism") holds that in ...
[42]
aristotle's direct realism in de anima michael esfeld - jstor
Why can Aristotle's theory of perception and thought be received within the framework of a direct realism? Ontologically speaking, the crucial point is this ...
[43]
Why Direct Realism? (Chapter 1) - Thomas Reid and the Problem of ...
Apr 28, 2021 · If you're new to the philosophy of perception, you may wonder why Direct Realism is worth defending against Indirect Realism or Idealism.
[44]
Being a Direct Realist – Searle, McDowell, and Travis on 'seeing ...
Nov 13, 2023 · 1 Introduction. Borrowing John Searle's words, direct realism about perception is about 'seeing things as they are', without any mediation of ...
[45]
[PDF] IN SEARCH OF DIRECT REALISM - Rutgers Philosophy
The direct realist should, I suggest, be viewed as rejecting both of the characteristic theses of representationalism, while still maintaining that perception ...
[46]
An empirical refutation of the direct realist theory of perception
The paper describes a recent experiment involving retinal and cortical rivalry that provides strong empirical evidence that the Direct Realist theory is ...
[47]
Against Direct Realism | Issue 146 - Philosophy Now
Direct realism brings together the directness claim and the realism claim to defend our intuitions of direct perceptual access to an independent world.
[48]
Epistemology - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Dec 14, 2005 · Here are some famous examples of skeptical hypotheses: All the other humans around me are automata who simply act exactly as if they have ...Virtue Epistemology · Epistemic Contextualism · Naturalism · Religion<|separator|>
[49]
The Pervasive Presence of the Evil Genius in Descartes' Meditations
Feb 15, 2004 · Descartes' hypothesis that there is an evil genius, an expremely ... Although the strong version of the evil demon hypothesis is ...
[50]
Brain in a Vat Argument, The | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Putnam thus stipulates that all sentient beings are brains in a vat, hooked up to one another through a powerful computer that has no programmer: “that's just ...Putnam's argument · Reconstructions of the Argument · Brains in a Vat and Self...
[51]
Brains in a Vat - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Oct 29, 2004 · In a famous discussion, Hilary Putnam has us consider a special version of the brain-in-a-vat hypothesis. Imagine that you are a brain in a vat ...Putnam's BIVs and the... · The Simple Arguments · Objections and Responses
[52]
Review of Bostrom's Simulation Argument - Stanford University
Bostrom argues that this calculation gives us the fraction of all people in existence that are actually simulated people and not “real” people. Bostrom then ...
[53]
Responding to Skepticism – Keith DeRose - Yale University
Skeptical arguments use hypotheses to show how we might be wrong about what we think we know, like the 'brain-in-a-vat' scenario. The argument is that if we ...
[54]
Contemporary Skepticism | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Philosophical views are typically classed as skeptical when they involve advancing some degree of doubt regarding claims that are elsewhere taken for granted.
[55]
Phenomenology - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Nov 16, 2003 · Phenomenology is the study of structures of consciousness as experienced from the first-person point of view.The Discipline of... · From Phenomena to... · The History and Varieties of...
[56]
The relevance of Husserl's phenomenological exploration ... - Nature
Jul 11, 2017 · Phenomenology represents a detailed and systematic attempt to understand the structures of first person lived experience.Husserl's Early... · Subjectivity And Interiority... · Notes
[57]
Making Sense of Husserlian Phenomenological Philosophy in ...
May 10, 2023 · At times, Husserl refers to the lifeworld as “the world of immediate experience” indicating that it encapsulates our ordinary day-to-day ...
[58]
Phenomenology of Perception - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews
Apr 18, 2012 · This classical work famously grounds experience in the body, showing how the latter conditions perception and action in various domains.<|separator|>
[59]
Phenomenology of Perception | Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Donald ...
Apr 15, 2013 · This new translation, the first for over fifty years, makes this classic work of philosophy available to a new generation of readers.
[60]
How phenomenology can help us learn from the experiences of others
Apr 5, 2019 · Phenomenology is a form of qualitative research that focuses on the study of an individual's lived experiences within the world.
[61]
[PDF] Science, Realism and Correlationism. A Phenomenological Critique ...
In light of this critique, the aim of this paper is twofold: On the one hand, I shall defend phenomenology against Meillassoux' main argument, the 'argument ...
[62]
[PDF] HUSSERL, SPECULATIVE REALISM, AND THE OUTLINES OF A ...
Abstract: This paper addresses the challenge Quentin Meillassoux has posed to phenomenology with his critique of correlationism.
[63]
The Hitchhiker's Guide to Neurophenomenology - Frontiers
This paper is a practical guide to neurophenomenology. Varela's neurophenomenological research program (NRP) aspires to bridge the gap between, and integrate, ...Abstract · Introduction · Varela's... · Some Lessons From Our...
[64]
The lived experience of remembering a 'good' interview: Micro ...
Sep 10, 2022 · Micro-phenomenology is an interview and analysis method for investigating subjective experience. As a research tool, it provides detailed descriptions of brief ...
[65]
[PDF] A Critique of Transcendental Phenomenology - PhilArchive
In this paper I want to address the place of truth and realism in Husserl's phenomenology. Truth and realism were important underlying motivations for Husserl ...
[66]
Criticizing the phenomenological critique—Autopoiesis and critical ...
This paper, in turn, argues for critical systems, providing a critique of phenomenology which shows that at least three of its own presuppositions are invalid.
[67]
Theory of Forms
Feb 28, 2015 · For Plato's Forms are not mental entities, nor even mind-dependent. They are independently existing entities whose existence and nature are ...<|separator|>
[68]
Aristotle's Hylomorphism: The Causal-Explanatory Model
May 21, 2018 · Aristotle's hylomorphism is, roughly speaking, the idea that objects are compounds consisting of matter and form. For example, a statue is a ...
[69]
Universals | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
The Problem of Universals arises when we ask these questions. Attempts to solve this problem divide into three broad strategies: Realism, Nominalism, and ...
[70]
René Descartes: The Mind-Body Distinction
One of the deepest and most lasting legacies of Descartes' philosophy is his thesis that mind and body are really distinct—a thesis now called “mind-body ...
[71]
An Introduction to Western Epistemology – Philosophical Thought
Rationalism: human reason can give us knowledge of reality · Empiricism: this view holds that experience is the source of all knowledge; knowledge is derived ...
[72]
Immanuel Kant, Experience, and Reality – Philosophy-A Short ...
Phenomena are the appearances, which constitute the our experience; noumena are the (presumed) things themselves, which constitute reality. All of our synthetic ...
[73]
The Key Ideas of Western Philosophy | Issue 105
One of the earliest was Xenophanes (570-480 BC) who claimed that human knowledge has the character of belief, in that we cannot 'know' reality. At the personal ...
[74]
Śaṅkara - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Oct 4, 2021 · According to Advaita Vedāntins, the Upaniṣads reveal a fundamental principle of nonduality termed “brahman,” which is the reality of all things.Missing: Maya | Show results with:Maya<|separator|>
[75]
Nāgārjuna - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Feb 10, 2010 · His philosophy of the “middle way” (madhyamaka) based around the central notion of “emptiness” (śūnyatā) influenced the Indian philosophical ...
[76]
Daoist Philosophy
Dao is the process of reality itself, the way things come together, while still transforming. All this reflects the deep seated Chinese belief that change is ...
[77]
Exploring Indigenous relationality to inform the relational turn in ...
Jul 24, 2023 · Indigenous thinking provides guidance on how to integrate a focus on the collective, i.e. a focus beyond humans, in processes of knowledge ...
[78]
Indigenous Philosophy and the Politics of Ontology
Jul 19, 2024 · Indigenous conceptions of relational ontology place particular responsibilities on people to care for Country that they have been bequeathed by ...
[79]
https://journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.14318/hau7.1.019
[80]
'Dreamtime' and 'The Dreaming' – an introduction - The Conversation
Jan 22, 2014 · The Jukurrpa is an all-embracing concept that provides rules for living, a moral code, as well as rules for interacting with the natural environment.
[81]
[PDF] THE AUSTRALIAN ABORIGINAL 'DREAMTIME' - Gamahucher Press
The. 'Dreamtime' lays down the Aborigines' cosmology, cosmogony and ontology. As already noted, the whole of the Aborigines' social life, religion and ...
[82]
Indigenous Americans: Spirituality and Ecos
But more than that, indigenous Americans tend to see this living world as a fantastic and beautiful creation engendering extremely powerful feelings of ...
[83]
Indigenous Worldviews vs Western Worldviews
Jan 26, 2016 · Indigenous worldview: Spiritually orientated society. System based on belief and spiritual world. Western worldview: Scientific, skeptical.
[84]
The Fundamental Reality in the Ontology of African People
In the ontology of traditional Africa, the highest being is God (the supreme being). He is the same as the Christian God. He created all living things in ...
[85]
[PDF] African Epistemology - PhilArchive
African epistemology is the study of the phenomenon of knowledge from an African perspective, where this is to be understood as the perspective of the ...
[86]
[PDF] What Are Indigenous Ontologies? - BGC Exhibitions
“Radical Alterity Is Just Another Way of Saying 'Reality': A Reply to Eduardo Viveiros de Castro.” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 5, no. 2 (2015): 1–41.
[87]
Indigenous Knowledge and Ontological Difference? Ontological ...
Feb 2, 2024 · Real knowledge emerges from “impossible” worldviews. Or, put differently, it is possible to accept knowledge that is produced by people ...
[88]
DISCUSSION: REALISM ABOUT WHAT?*
Roger Jones asks what Newtonian realists should be realists about, given that there are four empirically equivalent formulations of Newtonian mechanics ...
[89]
(In)effective realism? - PMC - PubMed Central - NIH
Apr 25, 2022 · 8) For example, Newtonian mechanics is an effective theory since it is successfully applicable in the non-quantum domain of low relative speeds ...
[90]
The Quantum Measurement Problem: A Review of Recent Trends
Feb 26, 2025 · This paper reviews the current status of the Measurement Problem, distinguishing between what is well understood and what remains unresolved.
[91]
An introduction to quantum measurements with a historical motivation
Aug 11, 2019 · We first explain the origins and the meaning of the measurement problem in quantum theory, and why it is not present in classical physics.
[92]
Bohmian mechanics - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Oct 26, 2001 · In Bohmian mechanics a system of particles is described in part by its wave function, evolving, as usual, according to Schrödinger's equation.
[93]
Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics
Quantum mechanics is a physical theory developed in the 1920s to account for the behavior of matter on the atomic scale.The Development of Quantum... · The Many-Worlds Interpretation
[94]
Why the Many-Worlds Interpretation Has Many Problems
Oct 18, 2018 · The many-worlds interpretation (MWI) suggests that we live in a near-infinity of universes, all superimposed in the same physical space but mutually isolated ...
[95]
Loophole-free Bell inequality violation with superconducting circuits
May 10, 2023 · Here we demonstrate a loophole-free violation of Bell's inequality with superconducting circuits, which are a prime contender for realizing quantum computing ...
[96]
Quantum Darwinism, an Idea to Explain Objective Reality, Passes ...
Jul 22, 2019 · Three experiments have vetted quantum Darwinism, a theory that explains how quantum possibilities can give rise to objective, classical reality.
[97]
Violation of Bell inequality with unentangled photons - Science
Aug 1, 2025 · Here, we show that much richer phenomena appear with correlations between more than two particles, by demonstrating experimental violation of ...
[98]
Einstein's Philosophy of Science
Feb 11, 2004 · The principle of univocalness played a central role in Einstein's struggles to formulate the general theory of relativity.
[99]
[PDF] Untitled
Special Relativity Theory. Special relativity theory predicts that many things we intuitively think to be invariant (length, interval of time, synchronicity ...
[100]
[PDF] The Special and the General Theory, by Albert Einstein
Appendix III, on “The Experimental Confirmation of the Gen- eral Theory of Relativity,” has been written specially for this translation.
[101]
Einstein's Theory of Gravitation | Center for Astrophysics | Harvard ...
including light.
[102]
Gravity near a massive body - University of Pittsburgh
Einstein's theory associates gravitational effects with a curvature of spacetime. As we have just seen, the familiar effects of gravity arise from curvature in ...
[103]
GP-B — Einstein's Spacetime - Gravity Probe B
Gravity feels strongest where spacetime is most curved, and it vanishes where spacetime is flat. This is the core of Einstein's theory of general relativity ...Missing: evidence | Show results with:evidence
[104]
Early Philosophical Interpretations of General Relativity
Nov 28, 2001 · Already in the special theory of relativity (1905), Einstein's operational definition of the “simultaneity” of distantly separated events, ...Missing: key | Show results with:key
[105]
The Reality of Time – Sean Carroll
Apr 3, 2015 · According to eternalism, the apparent “flow” of time from past to future is indeed an illusion, even if the time coordinate in our equations is ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[106]
[PDF] A Realist's Rejection of the Block Universe - PhilArchive
Aug 2, 2025 · Eternalism, or the block universe theory, maintains that past, present, and future events all exist equally in a four-dimensional spacetime.
[107]
[1807.06209] Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters - arXiv
Jul 17, 2018 · Abstract:We present cosmological parameter results from the final full-mission Planck measurements of the CMB anisotropies.
[108]
WMAP Big Bang CMB Test - NASA
Feb 20, 2024 · The existence of the CMB radiation was first predicted by Ralph Alpherin 1948 in connection with his research on Big Bang Nucleosynthesis ...
[109]
Status of the LambdaCDM theory: supporting evidence and anomalies
May 28, 2024 · The standard LambdaCDM cosmology passes demanding tests that establish it as a good approximation to reality. It is incomplete, with open questions and ...
[110]
The Hubble Tension Is Becoming a Hubble Crisis | Scientific American
Apr 2, 2025 · A long-simmering disagreement over the universe's present-day expansion rate shows no signs of resolution, leaving experts increasingly vexed.
[111]
Is gravity quantum? Experiments could finally probe one of physics ...
Aug 13, 2025 · Physicists are developing laboratory tests to give insight into the true nature of gravity.
[112]
String theory is not dead | Knowable Magazine
Nov 21, 2024 · String theory is a mathematical description of nature that requires space to possess several additional dimensions beyond the ordinary three.Missing: advances | Show results with:advances
[113]
[2302.05922] Loop Quantum Gravity and Quantum Information - arXiv
Feb 12, 2023 · We summarize recent developments at the interface of quantum gravity and quantum information, and discuss applications to the quantum geometry of space in loop ...
[114]
Physicists 'Bootstrap' Validity of String Theory - NYU
Dec 17, 2024 · String theory posits that the most basic building blocks of nature are not particles, but, rather, one-dimensional vibrating strings that move ...Missing: advances | Show results with:advances
[115]
A new puzzle piece for string theory research: Study proves 4 ...
Nov 20, 2024 · String theory aims to explain all fundamental forces and particles in the universe—essentially, how the world operates on the smallest ...
[116]
String theory provides a new take on the expansion of the Universe
Oct 28, 2024 · String theory could reshape our understanding of the Universe's accelerating expansion and unlock the mysteries of dark energy.
[117]
Strings 2024 | Not Even Wrong - Columbia Math Department
Jun 4, 2024 · “Insights into quantum gravity” is not what we're getting from current string theory research, take a look at the talks at Strings 2024 to see ...
[118]
Loop Quantum Gravity Correlations Reveal Distance-Dependent ...
Jun 26, 2025 · The future of LQG appears promising, with ongoing research expected to reveal new insights into the fundamental nature of spacetime and gravity.
[119]
Gravity from entropy: A radical new approach to unifying quantum ...
Mar 4, 2025 · The study, titled Gravity from Entropy, introduces a novel approach that derives gravity from quantum relative entropy.Missing: advances | Show results with:advances
[120]
New quantum theory of gravity brings long-sought 'theory ... - Phys.org
May 5, 2025 · Researchers at Aalto University have developed a new quantum theory of gravity which describes gravity in a way that's compatible with the standard model of ...Missing: 2023-2025 | Show results with:2023-2025
[121]
New theory proposes time has three dimensions, with space as a ...
Jun 21, 2025 · A quantum theory of gravity could lead to, or become, a grand theory of the universe—the so-called "theory of everything." The elusive unifying ...
[122]
New theory could finally make 'quantum gravity' a reality - Live Science
May 15, 2025 · A new physics paper takes a step toward creating a long-sought "theory of everything" by uniting gravity with the quantum world.
[123]
AI Could Help Find a Solution for String Theory | Scientific American
May 6, 2024 · String theory could provide a theory of everything for our universe—but it entails 10500 (more than a centillion) possible solutions.<|control11|><|separator|>
[124]
Between myth and history: von Neumann on consciousness in ...
The von Neumann attitude on the quantum description of measurement has been long misrepresented. · His position was depicted as ascribing a crucial role to ...
[125]
Does Consciousness Cause Quantum Collapse? | Issue 121
After the discovery of quantum mechanics, several prominent physicists suggested that consciousness does play a fundamental role in governing particle motion.Missing: debates | Show results with:debates
[126]
The Role of Decoherence in Quantum Mechanics
Nov 3, 2003 · Decoherence is precisely the study of such situations. It is is relevant (or is claimed to be relevant) to a variety of questions ranging from the measurement ...
[127]
The Myth of the 'Observer Effect' in Quantum Physics
May 29, 2023 · The 'observer' needs no consciousness or mind to 'observe'–that is, to perform a measurement. Secondly, nowadays, using modern electronic ...
[128]
The need for a "conscious observer" - Physics Forums
Nov 25, 2020 · A conscious observer plays absolutely no role in any of quantum mechanics. Collapse of the wave function (assuming an interpretation that posits it) is ...
[129]
Consciousness and quantum mechanics - Physics Forums
Jul 18, 2020 · Decoherence theory makes it obvious that quantum systems are being "measured" all the time by interactions with their environment, without any ...
[130]
Quantum mechanics makes no sense without the mind | Shan Gao
Nov 22, 2022 · Physicists and philosophers argued that resolving the measurement problem requires an appeal to the minds of conscious observers. That is still the case today.<|separator|>
[131]
Can Relational Quantum Mechanics Solve the Hard Problem of ...
Sep 18, 2024 · This led some to suggest that consciousness itself might be the ultimate observer that “pops” the ballooning quantum state. Wouldn't that be ...
[132]
How does the quantum measurement problem challenge our ...
Jan 16, 2025 · We do not need to consider any role of consciousness when doing calculations or making predictions using quantum mechanics. So, there is no ...
[133]
[PDF] Consciousness and the Measurement Problem in Quantum Mechanics
Jun 30, 2025 · In this paper we will focus on the idea that consciousness can collapse the wave function, as this has recently been given new force by the ...
[134]
[1512.01203] A brief history of the multiverse - arXiv
Dec 3, 2015 · The theory of the inflationary multiverse changes the way we think about our place in the world. According to its most popular version, our world may consist ...
[135]
Worlds Without End | STANFORD magazine
Linde's 1983 “chaotic inflation” theory did away with the assumption that the Big Bang encompassed every part of the early universe. Instead, he argued that ...
[136]
Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics
Mar 24, 2002 · The Many-Worlds Interpretation (MWI) of quantum mechanics holds that there are many worlds which exist in parallel at the same space and time as our own.Correspondence Between the... · Probability in the MWI · Objections to the MWI
[137]
https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691273679/the-many-worlds-interpretation-of-quantum-mechanics
[138]
The String Theory Landscape | Scientific American
Jan 1, 2006 · The theory of strings predicts that the universe might occupy one random "valley" out of a virtually infinite selection of valleys in a vast landscape of ...Missing: multiverse | Show results with:multiverse
[139]
The String Theory Landscape - Stanford Report
Sep 10, 2018 · According to the theory, this heavenly sprawl still occurs in distant corners of the cosmos, spinning out a web of related daughter universes ...
[140]
Is the multiverse physics, philosophy, or something else entirely?
Jan 18, 2017 · Some theories about the multiverse, they continued, lack the falsifiability required to render them legitimate scientific theories. For instance ...
[141]
Why the multiverse is religion, not science. - Backreaction
Jul 9, 2019 · Believing in the multiverse is logically equivalent to believing in god, therefore it's religion, not science.
[142]
The Multiverse: Science, Religion, or Pseudoscience? - Backreaction
Sep 10, 2022 · The fourth and final objection is that the multiverse is good because it's a simple theory. You see, multiverse fans argue that if you don't ...Missing: criticism | Show results with:criticism
[143]
Why the Multiverse May Be the Most Dangerous Idea in Physics
Aug 1, 2014 · The basic reason is the extreme flexibility of the proposal: it is more a concept than a well-defined theory. Most proposals involve a patchwork ...
[144]
Multiverses Are Pseudoscientific Bullshit - John Horgan
Feb 21, 2025 · Today, physicists still lack evidence of other universes, or even good ideas for obtaining evidence. Many nonetheless insist our cosmos is just ...
[145]
Beyond Falsifiability – Sean Carroll
Jan 17, 2018 · Among the fakes is the idea that “the multiverse isn't science because it's unobservable and therefore unfalsifiable.” I've written about this ...
[146]
History of VR – Timeline of Events and Tech Development
Sep 16, 2020 · 1956. Cinematographer Morton Heilig created Sensorama, the first VR machine (patented in 1962). It was a large booth that could fit up to four ...
[147]
History Of Virtual Reality - Virtual Reality Society
1929 – Link Trainer The First Flight Simulator · 1960 – The first VR Head Mounted Display · 1961 Headsight – First motion tracking HMD · 1965 – The Ultimate ...
[148]
A Brief History of Virtual Reality: Major Events and Ideas | Coursera
Jul 8, 2025 · In this article, you'll learn more about the history of VR, including some of the key figures, technologies, and events that have made it possible.
[149]
https://tmasolutions.com/insights/virtual-reality-trends
[150]
Top 5 Virtual Reality Trends of 2025 — The Future of VR
Dec 11, 2024 · Discover the top VR trends and predictions shaping this year, from immersive experiences to cutting-edge innovations in the virtual world.Vr Trends Of 2025: More Is... · 5. Adoption Of Vr In The... · Virtual Reality Uses In The...
[151]
The 10 most innovative AR and VR companies of 2025
Mar 18, 2025 · Snap, Unity, Xreal, and Texas A&M University are among Fast Company's Most Innovative Companies in augmented and virtual reality for 2025.
[152]
The Simulation Argument: some explanations - Oxford Martin School
The Simulation Argument purports to show, given some plausible assumptions, that at least one of three propositions is true (Bostrom 2003; see also Bostrom 2005) ...<|separator|>
[153]
Why the simulation hypothesis is pseudoscience - Big Think
Mar 17, 2023 · The simulation hypothesis posits that everything we experience was coded by an intelligent being, and we are part of that computer code.
[154]
Why We Don't Live in a Simulation | by Tim Lou, PhD - Medium
Jun 17, 2021 · Describing reality as a simulation vastly understates the complexities of our world. Here's why the simulation hypothesis is a lousy one.
[155]
why it is (nearly) impossible that we live in a simulation - Frontiers
The “simulation hypothesis” is a radical idea which posits that our reality is a computer simulation. We wish to assess how physically realistic this is.<|control11|><|separator|>
[156]
We Are Probably Not in a Simulation - Richard Carrier Blogs
Jan 18, 2024 · Are we and the universe just a giant computer simulation run by aliens in some external meta-universe? It's the new craze to think so.The Cartesian Demon Problem · The Nick Bostrom Problem · The Moons Of Cheese Problem<|separator|>
[157]
Probability and consequences of living inside a computer simulation
Mar 3, 2021 · It is shown that under reasonable assumptions a Drake-style equation can be obtained for the probability that our universe is the result of a deliberate ...
[158]
Zuse hypothesis - Algorithmic Theory of Everything - Digital Physics ...
His "Rechnender Raum" (Computing Cosmos / Calculating Space) started the field of Digital Physics in 1967. Today, more than three decades later, his paradigm- ...
[159]
[PDF] Konrad Zuse's Rechnender Raum (Calculating Space) - PhilPapers
Konrad Zuse did, however, acknowledge the problems likely to be faced in attempting to reconcile a digital view of the universe with theories of physics.
[160]
[PDF] DIGITAL MECHANICS Fredkin.pdf - Duke People
I merely wanted to figure out, in perfect detail, how that information had to be represented and how the informational process that we call “physics” functioned ...
[161]
Online—Table of Contents - Stephen Wolfram: A New Kind of Science
The latest on exploring the computational universe, with free online access to Stephen Wolfram's classic 1200-page breakthrough book.
[162]
Programming the universe : Seth Lloyd - Internet Archive
Jul 16, 2012 · Programming the universe · Share or Embed This Item · Flag this item for · Programming the universe · DOWNLOAD OPTIONS · IN COLLECTIONS.
[163]
[PDF] Are You Living in a Computer Simulation?
This paper argues that at least one of the following propositions is true: (1) the human species is very likely to go extinct before reaching a.
[164]
The Simulation Argument
The original paper is here, as are popular synopses, scholarly papers commenting or expanding on or critiquing the first paper, and some replies by the author.
[165]
Do we live in a simulation? The problem with this mind-bending ...
Jan 21, 2022 · Perhaps the biggest assumption in the simulation hypothesis is that simulated brains will quickly overwhelm the number of organic brains.
[166]
[PDF] Human Nature and the Christian - DigitalCommons@Cedarville
The biblical view of human nature is that humans were created in God's image, but the Fall changed this, with sin now part of who we are.
[167]
Does the Muslim Notion of God as One (Tawhid) Contradict the ...
Tawhid , one of the essential elements of Islam, functions as a multi-dimensional concept involving three aspects: There is only one God, God is essentially one ...
[168]
https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1035&context=honors
[169]
[PDF] A Critical Analysis of Tsongkhapa's Philosophy of Emptiness.
Apr 16, 2012 · The doctrine of emptiness proposes, in general terms, that all phenomena, objects, people, experiences, thoughts, etc., have no intrinsic ...
[170]
Emptiness/No-Self – Encyclopedia Buddhica Fall 2019
Nov 26, 2019 · Sunyata, the sanskrit word for emptiness, is a concept in Buddhism which analyzes the existence and reality of everything around us.
[171]
Physicalism, Dualism, and Idealism: 3 Competing Metaphysical ...
Feb 5, 2025 · Physicalism says that everything is physical, including the mind; Dualism says that reality consists of both physical and non-physical mental ...Missing: sources | Show results with:sources
[172]
Method in Metaphysics: Discovering the Fundamental Structure of ...
Mar 4, 2021 · The task of metaphysics is to discover the fundamental structure of reality by means of reason (that it takes reason to be its primary tool ...
[173]
What Are We? Three Views on Human Nature
The three views on human nature are Naturalism, Postmodernism, and Christian Theism, which are based on different worldviews.
[174]
Cultural Relativism: Definition & Examples - Simply Psychology
Sep 29, 2023 · Cultural relativism is the principle of regarding the beliefs, values, and practices of a culture from the viewpoint of that culture itself.
[175]
Cultural relativism: definition & examples (article) - Khan Academy
Cultural relativism refers to not judging a culture to our own standards of what is right or wrong, strange or normal.Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
[176]
[PDF] Critiquing Cultural Relativism - Digital Commons @ IWU
In theory, cultural relativism emphatically denies rea son and objective reality.3 In practice, it sanctions the worst manifestations of violence and oppression ...Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
[177]
How does the whole universe agree on the laws of physics?
Oct 26, 2020 · The hypothesis that the fundamental laws of physics are the same everywhere in the universe and at all times is based on empirical evidence.
[178]
Are the Laws of Physics Really Universal? | NOVA - PBS
Oct 21, 2015 · Astrophysicist Adam Frank profiles four theorists who challenge the notion that there is one set of unchanging laws that perfectly describes the universe.
[179]
Seven moral rules found all around the world | University of Oxford
Feb 11, 2019 · The rules: help your family, help your group, return favours, be brave, defer to superiors, divide resources fairly, and respect others' property, were found ...
[180]
Universals and variations in moral decisions made in 42 countries ...
Jan 21, 2020 · Moral universals are difficult to find, as they often reveal some degree of cultural variation upon closer inspection.
[181]
What does Pinker point out about relativism, the view that there is no ...
Feb 8, 2023 · Pinker argues that relativism is self-contradictory, as it makes universal claims about the nature of truth and reality, which undermines its ...
[182]
Why the World is the Way It Is: Cultural Relativism and Its Descendents
Nov 12, 2020 · Cultural relativism is the idea that truth is historically conditioned, each culture has its own valid perception, and there are no objective ...