Abstract expressionism
Abstract Expressionism was a stylistically diverse American art movement that emerged in New York City in the early 1940s and flourished until the mid-1950s, characterized by radical innovations in technique and subject matter that prioritized the individual artist's psyche, spontaneity, and direct emotional expression over representational forms.[1][2]
Key characteristics encompassed two primary tendencies: energetic, gestural "action painting" involving improvised brushwork or dripping techniques on large-scale canvases often laid on the floor, and more contemplative "color field" paintings featuring expansive areas of saturated color to evoke universal themes.[1][2]
Influenced by European modernism, Surrealist automatism, and psychological theories such as those of Carl Jung, the movement rejected premeditated composition in favor of process-driven creation, as articulated by artists like Adolph Gottlieb, Mark Rothko, and Barnett Newman: "To us, art is an adventure into an unknown world of the imagination which is fancy-free and violently opposed to common sense."[1]
Prominent figures included Jackson Pollock, whose 1947 drip technique exemplified physical engagement with the canvas; Willem de Kooning, known for dynamic abstractions of the female form; Mark Rothko, with his luminous color fields; and others such as Franz Kline, Robert Motherwell, Clyfford Still, and Lee Krasner.[1][2]
Abstract Expressionism shifted the epicenter of the avant-garde from Paris to New York, establishing the "New York School" amid post-war economic recovery and cultural assertiveness, while its non-figurative emphasis symbolized individual liberty during the Cold War era of McCarthyism and geopolitical tension.[1][2]
A defining controversy involves the United States Central Intelligence Agency's covert promotion of the movement through front organizations like the Congress for Cultural Freedom and Museum of Modern Art-led exhibitions, such as The New American Painting (1958–1959), to propagandize American individualism against Soviet socialist realism, with unwitting artists serving as tools in cultural warfare.[3][4]