Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Action at a distance

Action at a distance is a fundamental concept in physics describing the influence one object exerts on another across without physical or an intervening medium, as seen in classical gravitational and electrostatic forces. This notion posits that forces propagate instantaneously or directly, independent of distance, challenging intuitive ideas of mechanical causation through . In , introduced action at a distance in his 1687 to explain universal gravitation, where masses attract each other proportionally to their product and inversely to the square of their separation, without specifying a mechanism. This idea faced sharp criticism from , who argued in his correspondence with (1715–1716) that such attractions implied occult qualities or perpetual miracles, violating mechanistic principles by allowing effects without intelligible causes or media. By the , Michael Faraday's concept of field lines (1831) and James Clerk Maxwell's equations (1861–1865) supplanted direct action at a distance, introducing continuous fields as mediators for forces like and , aligning with wave propagation in the . The 20th century revived action at a distance in through entanglement, where spatially separated particles exhibit correlated outcomes defying classical locality, as highlighted in the 1935 Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen labeling it "spooky action at a distance." (1964) demonstrated that quantum predictions violate local hidden-variable theories, with experiments since the confirming non-local influences without superluminal signaling; this work was recognized by the 2022 awarded to , , and for their experiments on entangled photons. raising philosophical debates on holism, separability, and compatibility with . Today, while field theories dominate classical interactions, quantum non-locality underscores action at a distance as a persistent feature of nature, influencing interpretations from collapse models to pilot-wave theories.

Fundamental Concepts

Definition and Principles

Action at a distance refers to a physical in which a change in the state of one object instantaneously influences the state of another object, irrespective of the spatial separation between them, without any intermediary mechanism or propagation through intervening space. This concept contrasts with contact forces, where influence requires direct physical touching, or field-mediated , where effects propagate continuously through a medium or field. The core principles of action at a distance include instantaneity, meaning the influence occurs with no temporal delay regardless of distance; symmetry, such that the action exerted by one object on another is equal and opposite to the reaction; and a dependence on separation, often following an inverse-square law where the strength diminishes proportionally to the reciprocal of the square of the distance. These principles underpin classical formulations like Newtonian gravitation, where the force between two masses acts directly and immediately. The term "action at a distance" derives from the Latin phrase actio in distans, which emerged in 17th- and 18th-century philosophical and scientific debates, particularly around gravity and repulsion in works by figures like and . Basic examples include the gravitational attraction between two masses, as described by , and the electrostatic repulsion between like charges, governed by , both exemplifying direct, non-propagating influences. Philosophically, action at a distance poses challenges to classical notions of and locality by implying influences that transcend spatial separation without a discernible mechanism, raising concerns about qualities and the mechanistic worldview dominant in early . This apparent violation of locality—where effects should be confined to immediate surroundings—prompted criticisms that such interactions resemble forces rather than explainable natural processes. In response, later developments like field theories offered alternatives by introducing mediating entities to restore continuity and causal propagation.

Categories of Action

Action at a distance in is primarily categorized by the types of forces involved, such as gravitational and electromagnetic, each characterized by their dependence on the separation between interacting entities and their instantaneous propagation. These categories share the principle of instantaneity, where the force acts without intermediary propagation delays, distinguishing them from later field-mediated descriptions. Gravitational action at a distance manifests as a universal attractive force between any two masses, proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between their centers. This is encapsulated in Newton's law of universal gravitation, formulated as
F = G \frac{m_1 m_2}{r^2},
where F is the magnitude of the gravitational force, G is the gravitational constant, m_1 and m_2 are the masses, and r is the distance; the force direction is along the line joining the centers, acting instantaneously without physical contact.
Electromagnetic action at a distance includes electrostatic interactions between charges and magnetostatic forces between currents. For stationary charges, Coulomb's law describes the force as
F = k \frac{q_1 q_2}{r^2},
where k is Coulomb's constant, q_1 and q_2 are the charges, and r is the separation; the force is along the line connecting the charges and can be attractive or repulsive depending on the signs of the charges. For steady currents, Ampère's force law governs the interaction between current elements, given by
d^2 \mathbf{F}_A = \frac{\mu_0}{4\pi} I_1 I_2 \frac{ [\ 3 (\hat{r} \cdot d\mathbf{l}_1) (\hat{r} \cdot d\mathbf{l}_2) - d\mathbf{l}_1 \cdot d\mathbf{l}_2 \ ] \hat{r} }{r^2},
where \mu_0 is the permeability of free space, I_1 and I_2 are the currents, d\mathbf{l}_1 and d\mathbf{l}_2 are current elements, and \hat{r} is the unit vector along the separation; this formulation also assumes instantaneous action and applies to magnetic variants between current-carrying wires.
Other classical categories encompass hypothetical or molecular-scale actions, such as the van der Waals cohesion forces between neutral molecules, treated as distance-dependent attractions without invoking fields in early kinetic theories. These forces act along the line of molecular centers with intensity varying as a of separation, decreasing slowly at larger distances and contributing to effects like in gases, as modeled in the of state where the attractive term a/V_m^2 accounts for long-range . Within these categories, distinctions arise in the nature of the forces: gravitational action is always attractive and scalar in magnitude (though vectorial in direction), while electromagnetic actions can be either attractive or repulsive based on charge or current orientations, and are inherently vectorial due to their directional dependence on relative positions and velocities. A common mathematical hallmark across gravitational and electrostatic categories is the inverse-square dependence on , reflecting a geometric dilution of influence over spherical surfaces in .

Roles in Physical Theories

Action at a distance serves as a foundational explanatory mechanism in classical physical theories by positing direct interactions between objects without requiring an intervening medium, such as the luminiferous ether proposed for light propagation. In Newtonian gravity, this concept simplifies the description of long-range attractions between masses, treating gravitational force as an inherent property that acts instantaneously across space, thereby avoiding the need for mechanical carriers or fluids to transmit the effect. Similarly, in early formulations of , action at a distance underpins , which models electrostatic forces between charged particles as direct proportional to their charges and inversely proportional to the square of their separation, eliminating reliance on a pervasive medium for force transmission. Predictively, action at a distance enables precise calculations of phenomena involving long-range forces through mathematical laws that relate quantities like mass, charge, and distance. For instance, allows derivation of planetary orbits consistent with Kepler's laws and explains tidal variations as resulting from the differential gravitational pulls of the and Sun on Earth's oceans. In electrostatics, facilitates computations of forces between charges, supporting applications in design and particle interactions without invoking propagation delays. Theoretically, action at a distance functions as a axiom in , where and gravitation form the basis for deterministic descriptions of mechanical systems, assuming instantaneous force transmissions. This contrasts sharply with the locality principle in , which prohibits superluminal influences to preserve and the invariant structure. Prior to Einstein, action at a distance played a key role in attempts to unify forces, as seen in 19th-century electrodynamic models that sought common inverse-square dependencies for and . However, its implication of infinite propagation speeds poses limitations, as it conflicts with relativistic by allowing effects to precede causes in certain reference frames. This framework influences scientific methodology by prioritizing mathematical formulations—such as inverse-square laws—over mechanistic explanations, as emphasized describing phenomena through quantifiable rules rather than speculating on underlying causes, famously stating "hypotheses non fingo." Such an approach fosters in while deferring questions of physical mediation to future theories.

Historical Evolution

Ancient and Early Modern Inquiries

In ancient Greek philosophy, concepts resembling action at a distance emerged through discussions of teleology and natural sympathies, where phenomena were attributed to inherent purposes or affinities in nature rather than mechanical contact. Aristotle, in his Physics and On the Heavens, framed natural motion as directed toward an end (telos), with elements like earth and water seeking their natural place due to an internal principle, implying interactions without direct pushing or pulling. Magnetic attraction, observed by earlier thinkers like Thales, was interpreted by Aristotle as a form of "natural affinity" or sympathy, where iron moves toward lodestone due to a shared elemental quality or soul-like property, allowing influence across space without a visible medium. This teleological view positioned such actions as purposeful expressions of nature's order, contrasting with later mechanistic explanations. Medieval scholars built on Aristotelian foundations but introduced ideas that subtly challenged instantaneous transmission of influences. Jean Buridan, in his Questions on Aristotle's Physics (c. 1340), developed the impetus theory to explain , positing that a mover impresses a permanent "impetus" (a quality of and ) on the projectile, sustaining its motion without continuous contact or air assistance, thus questioning Aristotle's reliance on antiperistasis (surrounding medium pushing back). This implied a finite persistence or propagation of force over distance, rather than instantaneity, as impetus could be acquired and lost gradually, influencing later inertial concepts. , in De configurationibus qualitatum et motuum (c. 1350), advanced analytical tools by using graphical representations—latitude diagrams—to model variations in motion and qualities, demonstrating that uniform yields distance proportional to the square of time through visual proofs of areas under curves. These methods highlighted non-uniform interactions in natural processes, paving the way for quantitative scrutiny of distant effects. Early modern thinkers shifted toward analogies from observable forces to hypothesize planetary interactions. , in (1609), drew a magnetic analogy for motion, likening the Sun to a that emits species or rays imparting directional force to planets, causing them to orbit elliptically without mechanical contact, thus evoking action across the void. , in his unpublished (1616), proposed that oceanic resulted from the Earth's combined and orbital motion around the Sun, creating accelerations that slosh water in basins; while rejecting explicit attraction, this kinematic model implicitly required a coherent gravitational influence varying with position to explain global patterns. These ideas marked a transition from qualitative sympathy to empirical analogies for unseen pulls. Seventeenth-century debates intensified over whether actions across space required a medium or could occur through the void, reflecting tensions between mechanistic and views. Proponents of void-based action, influenced by , argued for direct influences like propagating without intermediaries, while opponents insisted on a where forces transmitted via contiguous particles to avoid "" qualities. , in Principia Philosophiae (1644), offered an early alternative through his vortex model, envisioning the universe as a of subtle matter swirling in vortices that mechanically carry planets in orbits, eliminating the need for instantaneous distant attractions by relying on continuous contact. This corpuscular mechanics aimed to explain all interactions, including , as pushes through an ether-like medium. The period culminated in efforts toward quantification, as seen in Robert Hooke's corpuscular hypothesis for during the 1670s. In correspondence and lectures (e.g., 1679–1680), Hooke suggested that gravitational attraction arises from streams of subtle effluvia or microspheres emitted by bodies, pulling denser matter toward each other inversely with distance squared, blending action at a distance with a mechanistic emission model. This hypothesis, detailed in his Attempt to Prove the Motion of the Earth (1674), transitioned qualitative inquiries into testable propositions, influencing subsequent gravitational theories.

Newtonian Gravity and Instantaneity

Isaac Newton's formulation of gravity in his 1687 work established the concept of action at a distance as a central feature of gravitational interaction. In Book III of the Principia, Newton proposed the law of universal gravitation, stating that every particle of matter in the universe attracts every other particle with a force proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between their centers: F = G \frac{m_1 m_2}{r^2}, where G is the . This law posits an instantaneous attraction between bodies, propagating across space without any intervening medium or delay, unifying terrestrial and under a single principle. Newton explicitly asserted the instantaneity of gravitational action in the Principia, deriving it from empirical observations such as , where the force maintains elliptical orbits without propagation time affecting predictions. In Opticks (), particularly Query 31, he debated the causes of , suggesting it might arise from an ethereal medium of varying density but emphasizing that no such medium is necessary for its operation, as dense fluids would impede planetary motions. He rejected explanations requiring finite propagation speeds for , aligning with the instantaneous nature implied in his earlier work, while noting that phenomena like attractions in chemistry and similarly operate at a distance without mechanical contact. Philosophically, Newton adopted a descriptive approach, famously declaring in the General Scholium of the 1713 edition of the Principia, "Hypotheses non fingo" ("I frame no hypotheses"), refusing to speculate on the underlying of beyond what phenomena revealed. He viewed as an essential property acting directly between bodies, avoiding causal theories like vortices that lacked empirical support. This stance prioritized mathematical laws over metaphysical explanations, allowing the theory to explain diverse phenomena without invoking unseen agents. The law's applications demonstrated its power: it accounted for falling bodies on as the same causing planetary orbits , predicted bulges from lunar and attractions, and explained orbital perturbations among like Jupiter's on Saturn. These successes extended to cometary paths and even the shape of , flattening at the poles due to rotational effects balanced by gravitation. Criticisms arose prominently from in the 1710s, who, through his correspondence with (Newton's defender), rejected gravitational action at a distance as an "occult quality" akin to scholastic mysteries, arguing it implied perpetual miracles without mechanical explanation. Leibniz contended that true causes must involve contact or intermediaries, dismissing instantaneous attraction as unphilosophical and contrary to God's orderly creation, as detailed in letters exchanged between 1715 and 1716. This debate highlighted tensions between Newton's and Leibniz's , influencing later views on in physics.

Electrical and Magnetic Formulations

In the mid-18th century, advanced a one-fluid theory of , positing that electrical phenomena resulted from the transfer of a single subtle between bodies, with positive charge arising from an excess and negative from a deficiency. This framework, articulated in his 1751 Experiments and Observations on , explained and repulsions without invoking separate fluids, influencing subsequent quantitative studies by treating as a conserved, transferable entity. Franklin's ideas paralleled Newtonian gravity by suggesting interactions across space, though without specifying a beyond fluid imbalance. Quantitative formulations emerged with Charles-Augustin de Coulomb's experiments using a torsion balance in 1785, which precisely measured the electrostatic force between charged spheres. Coulomb established that the force F is directly proportional to the product of the charges q_1 and q_2 and inversely proportional to the square of their separation r, yielding the F = k \frac{q_1 q_2}{r^2}, where k is a constant depending on the medium. This inverse-square dependence mirrored Newton's gravitational law, implying instantaneous action at a distance through , without intermediary propagation. Coulomb extended similar measurements to , deriving an analogous law for the force between magnetic poles, again inversely proportional to the square of distance. These results treated both electric and magnetic interactions as direct, pairwise forces, akin to gravitational instantaneity. Alessandro Volta's invention of the in 1800 provided a steady source of , enabling more reliable quantitative tests of electrical laws beyond static charges. This device, consisting of stacked and discs separated by electrolyte-soaked cardboard, produced continuous from chemical reactions, facilitating experiments on current-based forces. , building on this, formulated in 1820 a force law for interactions between current elements, where the force between two infinitesimal currents is proportional to their magnitudes, the cosine of the angle between them, and inversely proportional to the square of their separation. Ampère's law described attractions between parallel currents in the same direction and repulsions otherwise, maintaining an action-at-a-distance paradigm without invoking fields. Debates persisted over whether these forces acted through vacuum or required an intervening ether, with proponents like Coulomb favoring direct propagation in empty space, while others, influenced by optical analogies, invoked a pervasive medium to avoid "occult" instantaneity. George Green's 1828 Essay on the Application of Mathematical Analysis to the Theories of Electricity and Magnetism introduced potential functions as a computational tool for these laws, defining the electric potential V such that the force derives from its negative gradient, without resolving the physical mechanism. Green's approach formalized calculations for distributed charges under inverse-square assumptions, bridging empirical laws and theoretical analysis. Hints of unification appeared with Hans Christian Ørsted's 1820 discovery that electric currents deflect magnetic needles, revealing an intimate link between and previously treated as distinct. This suggested both might stem from a common action-at-a-distance principle, though initially rejected such formulations, criticizing their lack of explanatory power for induction phenomena and advocating instead for contiguous action via tense media. Despite Faraday's reservations, Ørsted's findings spurred Ampère's work and foreshadowed integrated theories of electromagnetic forces.

Emergence of Field Theories

In the 1830s, introduced the concept of lines of force as a physical representation of electromagnetic interactions, fundamentally challenging the notion of instantaneous action at a distance. Faraday visualized these lines as tangible tensions and stresses permeating space, through which magnetic and electric influences were transmitted locally rather than directly across voids. This approach stemmed from his experimental observations, such as , where effects appeared to propagate continuously rather than jump instantly between bodies. By treating lines of force as real entities in the medium of space or , Faraday rejected the "absurd" idea of forces acting without intermediaries, proposing instead a continuous field that mediated all such phenomena. Building on Faraday's qualitative ideas, James Clerk Maxwell formalized the field theory in his 1865 paper "A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field," deriving a set of equations that described electromagnetic phenomena through propagating rather than direct actions. These equations unified , , and by predicting electromagnetic traveling at a finite speed equal to that of in , approximately 3 × 10^8 m/s, thereby eliminating the paradox of instantaneity. A key innovation preceding this was Maxwell's 1861 introduction of the in his paper "On Physical Lines of Force," which modified by adding a term proportional to the time rate of change of the . This ensured the for held universally, even in regions without conduction current, allowing to arise from changing and vice versa without invoking distant actions. The emergence of field theories carried profound philosophical implications, positioning fields as autonomous intermediaries that localized energy and interactions, in alignment with emerging conservation principles. Hermann von Helmholtz's 1847 formulation of the conservation of force () provided a theoretical foundation, arguing that natural processes must conserve energy locally to avoid violations inherent in instantaneous distant actions, which could imply energy creation or destruction. Helmholtz's work supported the view that electromagnetic effects occur through continuous disturbances, reinforcing the shift toward a mechanistic, localized over abstract forces. This resolved longstanding paradoxes in electrical laws, such as those of and Ampère, by interpreting them as manifestations of underlying dynamics. Despite these advances in , the concept of action at a distance persisted in gravitational theory throughout the , with Newton's law remaining the dominant formulation without a mediating field.

Integration with Spacetime in Relativity

Albert Einstein's theory of , introduced in 1905, revolutionized the notion of action at a distance by demonstrating the and establishing the c as the universal speed limit for causal influences. In classical theories, such as Newtonian or , forces were presumed to act instantaneously across any distance, implying a preferred absolute frame. abolishes this by showing that is observer-dependent; events simultaneous in one inertial frame may not be in another, rendering instantaneous propagation incompatible with the theory's postulates. Consequently, all physical influences, including electromagnetic and gravitational, must propagate at speeds no greater than c, effectively banning true action at a distance in its classical form. Einstein further integrated these ideas into in 1915, reformulating gravity not as a direct force between masses but as the curvature of four-dimensional induced by mass-energy. This geometric interpretation eliminates instantaneous action, as changes in geometry propagate as at the . The theory is encapsulated in the , G_{\mu\nu} = 8\pi T_{\mu\nu}, where G_{\mu\nu} is the representing curvature and T_{\mu\nu} is the stress-energy tensor describing the distribution of matter and energy (in units where G = c = 1). Solutions to these equations describe how mediates interactions, ensuring finite propagation delays for gravitational effects, much like electromagnetic fields in . This framework unifies the critique of distant action with a covariant description of the universe. In relativistic electrodynamics, the finite speed of light is explicitly incorporated through retarded potentials, which resolve the wave equations for electromagnetic fields with . The Liénard–Wiechert potentials provide the precise form for the scalar \phi and vector \mathbf{A} potentials due to a point charge in arbitrary motion: \phi(\mathbf{r}, t) = \frac{q}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \frac{1}{( \kappa s )_{\rm ret}}, \quad \mathbf{A}(\mathbf{r}, t) = \frac{\mu_0 q \mathbf{v}}{4\pi ( \kappa s )_{\rm ret}}, evaluated at the retarded time t_{\rm ret} when the distance s = |\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}'(t_{\rm ret})| satisfies s/c = t - t_{\rm ret}, with \kappa = 1 - \mathbf{n} \cdot \boldsymbol{\beta} accounting for the charge's velocity \boldsymbol{\beta} = \mathbf{v}/c. These potentials, derived as solutions to in the Lorenz gauge, ensure that fields at a point depend only on the charge's past position, prohibiting superluminal signaling and embedding action at a distance within local field propagation. Originally formulated by Alfred Liénard in 1898 and independently by Wiechert in 1900, they prefigured relativity's demands and remain foundational for describing from accelerating charges./10%3A_Radiation_by_Relativistic_Charges/10.01%3A_Lienard-Wiechert_Potentials) One notable attempt to revive a form of action at a distance within was the Wheeler-Feynman absorber theory of , which reinterprets classical electrodynamics using direct particle interactions via symmetric advanced and retarded waves. In this model, arises from the absorber's response at future times, with the universe's perfect absorption ensuring the observed retarded (past-to-future) causality without invoking fields as fundamental entities. However, the theory's reliance on global boundary conditions and its challenges with quantum integration have led to it being largely superseded by local quantum field theories..pdf) Overall, relativity's integration restores locality to physics by embedding apparent distant actions in the continuous structure of , where all interactions respect the light-speed limit and , fundamentally resolving the paradoxes of instantaneity in pre-relativistic theories.

Contemporary Interpretations

Action at a Distance in General Relativity

In (GR), action at a distance is largely eliminated through the theory's emphasis on curvature as the mediator of gravitational interactions, where influences propagate at finite speeds along null geodesics, respecting . However, apparent instances of instantaneous action can arise in specific coordinate systems, such as the , where the coordinate time for distant observers might suggest simultaneous changes in gravitational fields across vast distances. This illusion stems from the choice of coordinates rather than a feature of the theory; the underlying , governed by light cones, ensures that no information travels , preventing true action at a distance. For example, in the describing a spherically symmetric, non-rotating , the metric component g_{tt} = -\left(1 - \frac{2GM}{c^2 r}\right) can lead to apparent for infalling matter, but Lorentzian resolves this by confirming retarded . A key confirmation of GR's rejection of instantaneous action comes from , which Einstein predicted in 1916 as ripples in propagating at the , thus mediating gravitational influences in a field-like manner rather than through direct distance action. These waves carry and from their sources, such as merging black holes, with delays proportional to separation, as observed in the first direct detection by in 2015 from the merger GW150914, located 1.3 billion light-years away. This finite-speed propagation, consistent with the linearized \square \bar{h}_{\mu\nu} = -\frac{16\pi G}{c^4} T_{\mu\nu} in the weak-field limit, underscores that gravitational effects are local in the sense of , with global influences emerging from integrated over paths. The 2015 detection not only verified the prediction but also ruled out Newtonian-style instantaneity, as the wave arrival time matched the cosmological distance. The , formulated in the 1960s by Werner Israel, , and , further diminishes any residual notion of action at a distance by asserting that stationary black holes are fully characterized by just three parameters—, , and —losing all other "hair" or detailed information about their formation history or distant influences. This theorem implies that black holes do not retain memory of specific distant sources beyond these parameters, preventing perpetual nonlocal encoding that could mimic action at a distance; instead, any initial conditions are erased through the event horizon, with outgoing carrying away details in a manner consistent with local thermodynamics. Proven rigorously for the Kerr-Newman metric, the theorem highlights GR's commitment to locality, as perturbations from distant masses dissipate via waves rather than instantaneous adjustments. Modern critiques of GR occasionally highlight potential nonlocal effects in formalisms preparatory to quantum gravity, such as the ADM (Arnowitt-Deser-Misner) decomposition, where the Hamiltonian constraint can introduce integral relations over spacelike hypersurfaces that appear to couple distant points instantaneously in the canonical picture. These debates, explored in the context of Wheeler-DeWitt quantization, question whether GR's diffeomorphism invariance fully localizes interactions or if nonlocal terms emerge in asymptotic expansions, though proponents argue that such features are artifacts of the split into space and time, resolvable via covariant formulations. Efforts to address this include embedding GR in broader frameworks like string theory, where holographic principles, as in the AdS/CFT correspondence proposed by Juan Maldacena in 1997, reduce apparent distance dependencies by mapping bulk gravitational dynamics to boundary quantum field theories without direct action across the bulk. This duality suggests that what seems like distant influence in the gravitational side is encoded locally on the boundary, effectively eliminating action at a distance in the dual description.

Quantum Entanglement and Nonlocality

Quantum entanglement refers to a phenomenon in where two or more particles become correlated such that the of each particle cannot be described independently, even when separated by large distances. This correlation leads to apparent nonlocality, where measuring one particle instantaneously determines the state of the other, challenging classical intuitions of locality. famously dubbed this "spooky action at a distance" in a 1947 letter to , expressing his unease with the instantaneous correlations implied by . The paradox, introduced in a 1935 paper by , , and , argued that must be incomplete because it allows for such distant correlations without a physical mechanism connecting the particles. They considered a involving two entangled particles, such as electrons in a spin-singlet state, where measuring the spin of one particle along any axis instantly fixes the outcome for the distant partner, implying the existence of "elements of reality" predetermining the outcomes that fails to describe. This argument highlighted what EPR saw as a failure of to provide a local, realistic description of physical reality. John Stewart Bell addressed the EPR paradox in his 1964 theorem, demonstrating that no local hidden-variable theory could reproduce all predictions of . Bell derived an that must hold for any local realistic theory: for measurements on entangled particles using two settings (A, A') for one particle and (B, B') for the other, the correlation satisfies |⟨AB⟩ + ⟨AB'⟩ + ⟨A'B⟩ - ⟨A'B'⟩| ≤ 2, where ⟨ ⟩ denotes the expectation value of the product of measurement outcomes. predicts violations of this bound, up to 2√2 ≈ 2.828 for optimal angles, proving that either locality or must be abandoned in favor of . A refined version, the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (CHSH) from 1969, provided an experimentally testable form of Bell's result. Experimental tests began closing in on Bell's predictions in the . In 1982, and colleagues performed a key experiment using entangled photons from calcium cascades, varying analyzer settings rapidly to test the and observing a violation of 2.697 ± 0.015, exceeding the and supporting over local . More definitive loophole-free tests arrived in 2015, with independent groups using entangled photons separated by over a kilometer: the experiment reported a CHSH value of 2.42 ± 0.20, and the NIST/ collaboration achieved 2.27 ± 0.23, both statistically closing detection, locality, and freedom-of-choice loopholes while confirming nonlocality. The foundational experiments underpinning these results, particularly those testing Bell inequalities with entangled photons, were recognized by the 2022 awarded to John F. Clauser, , and . Despite the nonlocality, preserves relativistic causality through the no-signaling theorem, which states that entanglement cannot transmit classical information . Local measurements on one particle do not alter the reduced of the distant particle, ensuring that no observable signaling occurs even though correlations are perfect upon comparison. This theorem, a direct consequence of the quantum , reconciles apparent nonlocality with . Interpretations of quantum mechanics differ on the nature of this nonlocality. The , associated with , accepts nonlocal upon measurement, where the act of observing one particle instantaneously affects the global , though without information transfer. In contrast, the , proposed by Hugh Everett in 1957, avoids collapse altogether: entanglement leads to branching of the universal into parallel worlds, with each observer experiencing a consistent outcome locally, eliminating any "action" across distances. A common misconception is that entanglement enables , but the no-signaling theorem prohibits this; outcomes appear random to each observer until results are compared via classical channels. Thus, while correlations are instantaneous, they convey no usable information , maintaining consistency with .

Mediation in Quantum Field Theory

In (QFT), the concept of action at a distance from classical theories is resolved through the mediation of fundamental forces via the exchange of gauge bosons, ensuring locality while eliminating true instantaneous influences. The electromagnetic force, for instance, is mediated by photons, the strong force by gluons, and the weak force by , all arising from local gauge symmetries in the Lagrangian. This framework posits that interactions occur through the creation and absorption of these virtual particles, propagating at or below the , thereby preserving across . Feynman diagrams, introduced in the late 1940s, provide a perturbative tool for calculating scattering amplitudes in QFT, visualizing force mediation as particle exchanges. In , the lowest-order diagram for electron-electron scattering depicts the exchange of a single , yielding the potential in the non-relativistic limit as an effective 1/r interaction derived from the photon's off-shell propagator. These diagrams enable systematic expansion in powers of the coupling constant, such as the fine-structure constant α in , allowing precise predictions for processes like or . Virtual particles in QFT are described by off-shell , which do not obey the on-shell mass-energy , permitting effective "instantaneous" actions in low-energy approximations while the full theory remains causal due to retarded/advanced combinations. For the weak , this manifests in the Yukawa-like potential from massive W/Z exchange, exponentially damped at short ranges, contrasting the massless photon's long-range form. Overall causality is upheld by the light-cone structure, where influences propagate no , resolving classical nonlocality without violating . Renormalization addresses divergences arising in perturbative calculations, particularly those from short-distance (high-momentum) exchanges that approximate action at a distance. In renormalizable theories like , infinities in loop diagrams are absorbed into redefined parameters such as charge and , yielding finite, predictions after regularization schemes like dimensional continuation. This process ensures the theory's consistency for all distances, though higher-order terms highlight the effective nature of long-range potentials. For gravity, QFT attempts incorporate it via graviton exchange in perturbative quantum , but the theory is non-renormalizable due to the dimensionful (Newton's ), leading to infinities uncontrollable beyond one loop. Instead, an effective field theory approach treats as a low-energy approximation, valid for scales much larger than the Planck length, where quantum corrections from graviton loops provide finite, calculable effects like post-Newtonian terms in timing. This framework mediates gravitational "action at a distance" through virtual s while acknowledging the need for a ultraviolet-complete theory at high energies.

Ongoing Debates and Alternatives

In contemporary physics, a central surrounds the tension between locality and nonlocality, particularly illuminated by the AdS/CFT correspondence. Proposed by in 1997, this holographic duality equates a theory of in anti-de Sitter () space with a () on its boundary, implying that local gravitational interactions in the bulk manifest as nonlocal correlations on the lower-dimensional boundary. This framework suggests that apparent actions at a in the emergent could arise from fundamentally nonlocal quantum dynamics, challenging strict locality while preserving it in the boundary description. Ongoing research explores how this duality might reconcile distant influences in without invoking instantaneous propagation. Quantum gravity presents profound challenges to resolving action at a distance, exemplified by the . Articulated by in the mid-1970s, the paradox arises from , where black holes evaporate and seemingly destroy information about infalling matter, violating quantum unitarity and necessitating mechanisms for nonlocal information recovery at distant horizons. A proposed resolution came with the conjecture in 2013 by Maldacena and , equating Einstein-Rosen (ER) bridges—wormholes—with Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) entanglement, such that entangled particles are connected by spacetime shortcuts allowing information preservation without superluminal signaling. This idea posits that nonlocality in reflects underlying geometric connections, potentially unifying and , though it remains unverified experimentally. Alternative interpretations seek to accommodate action at a distance without abandoning or locality. The of , developed by John G. Cramer in , models quantum events as "transactions" between retarded (forward-in-time) and advanced (backward-in-time) waves, where offer and confirmation waves exchange energy across space, effectively enabling distant correlations relativistically. Similarly, addresses violations of Bell's inequalities by assuming that the universe's initial conditions correlate measurement settings with hidden variables, producing quantum statistics locally but deterministically, thus evading nonlocality at the cost of in experimental choices. These approaches, while mathematically consistent, face criticism for their philosophical implications and lack of empirical distinguishability from standard . Recent developments in the have advanced tests of these ideas through entanglement in curved . Proposals and initial experiments, such as those using distributed quantum networks of entangled clocks, aim to detect deviations in entanglement dynamics due to , potentially revealing how interacts with general relativity's . Complementing this, the framework has inspired simulations of as entanglement-mediated shortcuts, with quantum computer implementations in 2022 demonstrating traversable dynamics that mimic distant information transfer without violating . These efforts highlight ongoing unification attempts, where could geometrize nonlocal effects in . Philosophically, action at a distance is largely obsolete in standard models of and , supplanted by local field theories since the early , yet it endures in effective theories and interpretive debates as a tool for conceptualizing and gravitational emergence. As of 2025, while and enforce locality through mediators and structure, holographic and entanglement-based perspectives keep the concept alive in research, underscoring unresolved tensions between and .

References

  1. [1]
    Action at a distance - (Principles of Physics I) - Fiveable
    Action at a distance refers to the phenomenon where an object can exert a force on another object without any physical contact between them.
  2. [2]
    Action at a distance - Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    Action at a distance is a cause producing a spatially separated effect without a medium. Quantum entanglement is a modern example, though not instantaneous.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  3. [3]
    [PDF] A Brief History of The Development of Classical Electrodynamics
    1759: Francis Ulrich Theodore Aepinus shows that electrical effects are a combination of fluid flow confined to matter and action at a distance. He also ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] LEIBNIZ, THE CAUSE OF GRAVITY AND PHYSICAL THEOLOGY
    about miracles, Leibniz introduced the charge that Newton‟s belief in gravitation, and therefore in action at a distance, introduced occult powers into physics, ...
  5. [5]
    Action at a Distance in Quantum Mechanics
    Jan 26, 2007 · Action at a distance in quantum mechanics refers to non-local influences between distant systems, where no light signal can travel, as seen in ...Introduction · Action at a distance, holism... · Holism, non-separability and...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] Newtonian Dynamics - Richard Fitzpatrick
    It should be noted that Newton's third law implies action at a distance. In other words, if the force that object i exerts on object j suddenly changes then ...
  7. [7]
    Astronomy 162: Lecture 31
    Newton could not explain what gravity was. He asserted that Gravity is an "action at a distance". He had no hypothesis for what "agent" communicates the ...
  8. [8]
    ACTIO IN DISTANS, REPULSION, ATTRACTION - jstor
    In the présent study it is argued that Newton employed as a fiction the concept of actio in distans because it was convenient for his theory rather than because ...
  9. [9]
    10.1: The Inverse-Square Law - Physics LibreTexts
    Nov 5, 2020 · The net force between extended masses can be obtained using calculus, by breaking up the two objects into very small pieces and adding (vectorially!) the force.
  10. [10]
    Newton's Philosophy
    Oct 13, 2006 · It certainly seems that Newton was uncomfortable with the very idea of action at a distance. But of course, things are not always as they seem ...
  11. [11]
    Holism and Nonseparability in Physics
    Jul 22, 1999 · The Aharonov-Bohm effect (Section 10) also appears to exhibit action at a distance, as the behavior of electrons is modified by a magnetic field ...
  12. [12]
    The Feynman Lectures on Physics Vol. II Ch. 1: Electromagnetism
    We have said that the electrical force, like a gravitational force, decreases inversely as the square of the distance between charges. This relationship is ...Missing: categories | Show results with:categories
  13. [13]
    6.5 Newton's Universal Law of Gravitation – College Physics
    Newton's universal law of gravitation states that every particle in the universe attracts every other particle with a force along a line joining them.39 6.5 Newton's Universal... · Summary · The Cavendish Experiment...Missing: original | Show results with:original
  14. [14]
    [PDF] The Evolution from the Law of Gravitation to General Relativity
    This led to the formulation of Newton's law of universal gravitation in 1687: Any two bodies attract each other with a force proportional to the product of ...Missing: original | Show results with:original
  15. [15]
    5.3 Coulomb's Law – University Physics Volume 2 - UCF Pressbooks
    The principle of superposition says that the force on q 2 from each of the other charges is unaffected by the presence of the other charge.
  16. [16]
    [PDF] A magnetic field based on Amp`ere's force law - Kirk T. McDonald
    However, Weber considered that his force law, like Amp`ere's, involved instantaneous action at a distance, and he did not make a connection between ...
  17. [17]
  18. [18]
    6.5 Newton's Universal Law of Gravitation – College Physics
    Newton's universal law of gravitation states that every particle in the universe attracts every other particle with a force along a line joining them.
  19. [19]
    Chapter 3: Gravity & Mechanics - NASA Science
    Jan 16, 2025 · To every action there is always an equal and opposite reaction; or, the mutual actions of two bodies upon each other are always equal, and act ...
  20. [20]
    Einstein and the EPR Paradox - American Physical Society
    This is known as “nonlocal behavior;” Einstein dubbed it “spooky action at a distance.” It appears to violate one of the central tenets of relativity ...
  21. [21]
    Action at a Distance in Nineteenth Century Electrodynamics
    " Classical" physics in this context refers to the physics developed from the time of Newton to the beginning of this century, and often includes Einstein's ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  22. [22]
    [PDF] the limits of special relativity - arXiv
    Apr 12, 2007 · Another perspective is, as seen above, that there is instantaneous action at a distance, which apparently goes against relativistic causality.
  23. [23]
    Aristotle's Natural Philosophy
    May 26, 2006 · Aristotle had a lifelong interest in the study of nature. He investigated a variety of different topics, ranging from general issues like motion, causation, ...
  24. [24]
  25. [25]
    [PDF] John Buridan and the Theory of Impetus - Fordham University Faculty
    Nov 23, 2006 · John Buridan and the Theory of Impetus. 1. BOOK VIII, QUESTION 12. It is sought whether a projectile after leaving the hand of the projector ...Missing: instantaneous transmission scholarly sources
  26. [26]
    Change and Motion (Chapter 17) - The Cambridge History of Science
    Buridan's use of impetus theory to explain the acceleration of falling bodies was widely accepted in the late Middle Ages, by Albert of Saxony and Nicole ...<|separator|>
  27. [27]
    Geometric Kinematics: - The Method of Nicole Oresme
    1. Oresme's graphical method for proving the "mean speed rule" and that distance is proportional to time squared for uniformly accelerated motion.
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Chapter Three: Oresme and the Invention of Graphing
    His hypothesis is that the turning point was in the 14th century, when clocks were invented, better sailing charts were devised and better accounting was worked ...
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Analogy in Scientific Discovery: The Case of Johannes Kepler
    Kepler's best-known discoveries are the three laws of planetary motion: ... In this analogy, Kepler likened the sun and planet to two magnets that approach.Missing: primary | Show results with:primary
  30. [30]
    A Tidal Theory Based on the Inertial Motion of the Matter in the ...
    Historically, Johannes Kepler in 1609 suggested that the gravitation of the Moon causes the tides. However, Galileo Galilei in 1616 wrote Discourse on the Tides ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] The Arguments on Void in the Seventeenth Century - PhilArchive
    The existence of void and its nature were a matter of continuous philosophical debate until the eighteenth century. The controversy was started by Aristotle who ...Missing: distance | Show results with:distance
  32. [32]
    Descartes' Physics - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    Jul 29, 2005 · Descartes' vortex theory attempts to explain celestial phenomena, especially the orbits of the planets or the motions of comets.3. Space, Body, And Motion · 4. The Laws Of Motion And... · 5. The Problem Of Relational...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Vortex Theories in the Early Modern Period - HAL-SHS
    May 31, 2023 · It was only in 1644 that Descartes finally published his Principia Philosophiae (Descartes 1644), which gave a complete presentation of his.Missing: alternative | Show results with:alternative<|separator|>
  34. [34]
    On the invisibility and impact of Robert Hooke's theory of gravitation
    Hooke's model, instead, consisted in the idea that planets move in the void space under the influence of a gravitational attraction directed toward the sun.
  35. [35]
    Newton's Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica
    Dec 20, 2007 · Philosophers have viewed the Principia in the context of Einstein's new theory of gravity in his theory of general relativity.
  36. [36]
    The Third Book of Opticks (1718) (Normalized) - the Newton Project
    Gravity tends downwards, but the Pressure of Water arising from Gravity tends every way with equal force, and is propagated as readily, and with as much ...
  37. [37]
    Newton and Planetary Motion - UNL Astronomy
    The law can be more fully stated as, “Whenever one body exerts force upon a second body, the second body exerts an equal and opposite force upon the first body.
  38. [38]
    Chapter 3: Gravity & Mechanics - NASA Science
    Jan 16, 2025 · Newton's first law describes how, once in motion, planets remain in motion. What it does not do is explain how the planets are observed to move ...
  39. [39]
    [PDF] Selections from the Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence
    In later papers Leibniz makes other criticisms. One of these is the charge that gravity is a scholastic occult quality, and that it would be a miracle for ...
  40. [40]
    Electrical Years: Part 2 | National Museum of American History
    Electricity as a fluid. One of Benjamin Franklin's most important contributions to early electrical science was his theory of how electricity moved. Isaac ...
  41. [41]
    The Kite Experiment, 19 October 1752 - Founders Online
    Franklin was the first scientist to propose that the identity of lightning and electricity could be proved experimentally.
  42. [42]
    June 1785: Coulomb Measures the Electric Force
    Jun 1, 2016 · Charles Augustin Coulomb (top) used a calibrated torsion balance (bottom) to measure the force between electric charges.Missing: action | Show results with:action
  43. [43]
    Coulomb's law - Richard Fitzpatrick
    According to Eqs. (161) and (163), if the first charge or mass is moved then the force acting on the second charge or mass immediately responds.Missing: formulation primary source
  44. [44]
    Torsion Balance – 1785 - Magnet Academy - National MagLab
    According to Coulomb's law, the electric force between objects is inversely proportional to the distance between the objects. A similar inverse square law ...
  45. [45]
    [PDF] ARGUMENTS IN FAVOUR OF ACTION AT A DISTANCE - Unicamp
    Sevexal arguments favuuring instantaneous action at a distance are presented. The ac- tion at a distance laws of Newton, Coulomb, Ampere and Weber are ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  46. [46]
    Voltaic Pile – 1800 - Magnet Academy - National MagLab
    The voltaic pile, invented by Alessandro Volta in 1800, was the first device to provide a steady supply of electricity using zinc and copper discs with ...Missing: quantitative | Show results with:quantitative
  47. [47]
    March 20, 1800: Volta describes the Electric Battery
    Volta found that different types of metal could change the amount of current produced, and that he could increase the current by adding disks to the stack. In ...Missing: quantitative | Show results with:quantitative
  48. [48]
    [PDF] Ampère's Electrodynamics - Unicamp
    Feb 29, 2020 · Ampère's conclusion: The force between two current elements is inversely proportional to the square of their distance. Page 17. 17. Ampère's ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  49. [49]
    The key role of Oersted's and Ampère's 1820 electromagnetic ...
    May 1, 2017 · We show that the concept of electric current was elaborated only after the discovery by Oersted in 1820 of a connection between electricity and magnetism.
  50. [50]
    The Green of Green Functions - Physics Today
    Green's first published work, in 1828, was An Essay on the Application of Mathematical Analysis to the Theories of Electricity and Magnetism. This major work, ...Missing: action | Show results with:action
  51. [51]
    July 1820: Oersted & Electromagnetism - American Physical Society
    Jul 1, 2008 · In July 1820, Danish natural philosopher Hans Christian Oersted published a pamphlet that showed clearly that they were in fact closely related.
  52. [52]
    [PDF] Faraday, Thomson, Maxwell: Lines of Force in the Ether
    In place of Newtonian “action at a distance,” Faraday aimed to explain all physical phenomena in terms of local fields, which could convey effects point-by ...Missing: historical | Show results with:historical
  53. [53]
    The birth of the electric machines: a commentary on Faraday (1832 ...
    Apr 13, 2015 · When, in 1820, he heard about Ørsted's experiment he determined to conduct his own investigations into the nature of electromagnetism. What ...
  54. [54]
    '…a paper …I hold to be great guns': a commentary on Maxwell ...
    Apr 13, 2015 · Maxwell's great paper of 1865 established his dynamical theory of the electromagnetic field. The origins of the paper lay in his earlier papers of 1856.
  55. [55]
    [PDF] J ames Clerk Maxwell and his Equations
    Maxwell's prediction that light consists of electromagnetic waves ... The finite velocity of propagation of electromagnetic action dealt a death blow to.
  56. [56]
    (PDF) Maxwell's Displacement Current - ResearchGate
    Aug 17, 2019 · Displacement current was originally conceived by James Clerk Maxwell in 1861 in connection with linear polarization in a dielectric solid which ...Missing: action | Show results with:action
  57. [57]
    Hermann von Helmholtz - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    Feb 18, 2008 · Helmholtz argues that a proof that all natural actions can be accounted for by universal action at a distance is equivalent to a refutation of ...
  58. [58]
    Helmholtz and the British scientific elite: From force conservation to ...
    Nov 16, 2011 · This article discusses the close relationship that developed during the 1850s and 1860s between Hermann von Helmholtz (1821–94), one of the leading German ...
  59. [59]
  60. [60]
    [PDF] ON THE ELECTRODYNAMICS OF MOVING BODIES - Fourmilab
    This edition of Einstein's On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies is based on the English translation of his original 1905 German-language paper. (published as ...
  61. [61]
    The Field Equations of Gravitation - Wikisource, the free online library
    Aug 9, 2025 · We obtain the ten general covariant equations of the gravitational field in spaces, in which matter is absent.
  62. [62]
    Entanglement is spooky, but not action at a distance | Science News
    Jan 27, 2016 · Recent experiments on quantum entanglement confirm that it's spooky, but it was not, as Einstein implied, action at a distance.
  63. [63]
    Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be ...
    Feb 18, 2025 · Einstein and his coauthors claimed to show that quantum mechanics led to logical contradictions. The objections exposed the theory's strangest ...
  64. [64]
    On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox | Physics Physique Fizika
    On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox. JS Bell. Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
  65. [65]
    Proposed Experiment to Test Local Hidden-Variable Theories
    Proposed Experiment to Test Local Hidden-Variable Theories. John F. Clauser*. Michael A. Horne · Abner Shimony · Richard A. Holt.
  66. [66]
    Experimental Test of Bell's Inequalities Using Time-Varying Analyzers
    Experimental Test of Bell's Inequalities Using Time-Varying Analyzers. Alain Aspect, Jean Dalibard*, and Gérard Roger ... 49, 1804 – Published 20 December, 1982.
  67. [67]
    Loophole-free Bell inequality violation using electron spins ... - Nature
    Oct 21, 2015 · Here we report a Bell experiment that is free of any such additional assumption and thus directly tests the principles underlying Bell's inequality.
  68. [68]
    Significant-Loophole-Free Test of Bell's Theorem with Entangled ...
    Dec 16, 2015 · We report a Bell test that closes the most significant of these loopholes simultaneously. Using a well-optimized source of entangled photons.
  69. [69]
    The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Argument in Quantum Theory
    Oct 31, 2017 · One might suggest that such relational actions-at-a-distance are harmless ones, perhaps merely “semantic”; like becoming the “best” at a ...<|separator|>
  70. [70]
    Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics
    May 3, 2002 · The Copenhagen interpretation was the first general attempt to understand the world of atoms as this is represented by quantum mechanics.
  71. [71]
    Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics
    Mar 24, 2002 · The existence of the other worlds makes it possible to remove randomness and action at a distance from quantum theory and thus from all physics.
  72. [72]
    Experimental Test of the No-Signaling Theorem | Phys. Rev. Lett.
    Nov 7, 2007 · The theory of special relativity lies on a very basic hypothesis: anything carrying information cannot travel faster than the light in vacuum.
  73. [73]
    [PDF] The Standard Model of Particle Physics - arXiv
    Oct 21, 2005 · The force carriers, of spin 1, are the photon γ, the weak interaction gauge bosons W+, W− and Z0 and the eight gluons g that mediate the ...
  74. [74]
    [PDF] arXiv:1609.02015v4 [hep-ph] 11 Jun 2019
    Jun 11, 2019 · The gauge particles have all spin s = 1h and mediate each of the three forces: photons (γ) for U(1) electromagnetism, gluons for SU(3)C of ...
  75. [75]
    [PDF] arXiv:hep-ph/9706219v1 2 Jun 1997
    In scalar QED there are five Feynman diagrams corresponding to two-photon exchange, which contribute to the fourth-order amplitude M(4): the two-rung ladder ...
  76. [76]
    [PDF] arXiv:2005.08719v1 [physics.hist-ph] 18 May 2020
    May 18, 2020 · The concept of virtual particles arises in perturbation theory of quantum field theory, which has been formulated mathematically in an exact way ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  77. [77]
    [PDF] Causality and Relativity in Quantum Physics - arXiv
    It implies an instantaneous “understanding” between the particles when they are modelled by quantum mechanics; a “spooky action at a distance”. Einstein et ...
  78. [78]
    [PDF] Renormalisation in Quantum Field Theory - arXiv
    Aug 12, 2019 · These notes are based on a series of 9 lectures delivered at the 31st SERC School in Theoret- ical High-Energy Physics, held at Kalyani ...
  79. [79]
    [PDF] Introduction to the Effective Field Theory Description of Gravity - arXiv
    So-called non-renormalizable theories can be renormalized if treated in a general enough framework, and they are not inconsistent with quantum mechanics[1]. In ...
  80. [80]
    The Large N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity
    Jan 22, 1998 · We show that the large N limit of certain conformal field theories in various dimensions include in their Hilbert space a sector describing supergravity.
  81. [81]
    [1306.0533] Cool horizons for entangled black holes - arXiv
    Jun 3, 2013 · General relativity contains solutions in which two distant black holes are connected through the interior via a wormhole, or Einstein-Rosen bridge.
  82. [82]
    The transactional interpretation of quantum mechanics
    Jul 1, 1986 · The transactional interpretation permits quantum-mechanical wave functions to be interpreted as real waves physically present in space.
  83. [83]
    Testing quantum theory on curved spacetime with quantum networks
    May 27, 2025 · Here we show that entangled clocks can test quantum theory on curved spacetime, and that such experiments are within reach of current technology.
  84. [84]
    [1401.3416] Wormholes and Entanglement - arXiv
    Jan 15, 2014 · Maldacena and Susskind have proposed a correspondence between wormholes and entanglement, dubbed ER=EPR. We study this in the context of 3d ...
  85. [85]
    How Bell's Theorem Proved 'Spooky Action at a Distance' Is Real
    Jul 20, 2021 · John Stewart Bell's 1964 theorem showing that quantum mechanics really permits instantaneous connections between far-apart locations.