Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

All-pass filter

An all-pass filter is a signal processing component that transmits all frequencies of a signal with unity gain, meaning the magnitude response is constant across the entire frequency spectrum, while selectively modifying the phase relationships among those frequencies. This design ensures that the amplitude of the input signal remains unchanged at the output, but the timing or delay of different frequency components can be adjusted independently. All-pass filters are fundamental building blocks in both analog and digital domains, valued for their ability to manipulate phase without introducing amplitude distortion. In analog implementations, all-pass filters are typically realized using operational amplifiers and passive components like resistors and capacitors, with transfer functions that feature and zeros symmetrically placed in the s-plane—for every at s = p, there is a zero at s = -\overline{p}. analog all-pass filters provide a shift ranging from 0° at to -180° at high frequencies, with a -90° shift at the corner \omega = 1/[RC](/page/RC), while second-order versions extend this capability for more complex responses. These circuits are commonly employed for equalization in and single-sideband suppressed-carrier (SSB-SC) modulation schemes, where precise control over signal timing is essential without altering power levels. Digital all-pass filters, often implemented as (IIR) structures, exhibit similar properties in the z-domain, where poles and zeros form conjugate-reciprocal pairs across the unit circle, ensuring a constant magnitude response of 1 for all frequencies. A digital all-pass has the form H(z) = \frac{z^{-1} - a^*}{1 - a z^{-1}}, and higher-order versions can be cascaded or structured as lattice filters for and efficiency. Key applications in include compensating for nonlinear phase distortions in IIR filters to approximate linear-phase responses, as well as creating audio effects like artificial through structures such as Schroeder allpass sections and spatialization in systems like the Spatialisateur. They also play roles in multirate filtering, group-delay equalization, and phase correction in communications and audio systems.

Fundamentals

Definition and Characteristics

An all-pass filter is a device designed to transmit all of an input signal with equal gain, exhibiting a constant magnitude response of |H(jω)| = 1 across the entire spectrum for all angular frequencies ω, while introducing a shift that varies with , characterized by the argument arg(H(jω)). This distinguishes all-pass filters from other types, such as low-pass or high-pass filters, which selectively attenuate or boost specific bands to shape the response; in contrast, all-pass filters preserve the spectrum unchanged and solely modify the relationships among components. In a general , an all-pass filter is depicted as a processing unit that accepts an input signal x(t) and produces an output y(t), where y(t) maintains the same power distribution across frequencies as x(t) but with altered temporal alignment due to the modification. Key characteristics of all-pass filters include their invariant unity magnitude response, which ensures no or , and a flexible that can be engineered to be linear (constant group delay) or nonlinear, tailored to specific design requirements. The concept of the all-pass filter was first described in the context of in the 1920s by Otto Zobel for telephone line equalization at Bell Laboratories.

Mathematical Representation

The general transfer function for a continuous-time all-pass filter is given by H(s) = \frac{P(-s)}{P(s)}, where P(s) is a with all roots in the open left-half of the to ensure . This form arises from placing zeros at the mirror images of the poles across the imaginary axis, which maintains the all-pass property of unity magnitude response while introducing phase shifts. The magnitude response is |H(j\omega)| = 1 for all frequencies \omega, a direct consequence of the pole-zero symmetry. For polynomials with real coefficients, P(-j\omega) = \overline{P(j\omega)}, so |P(-j\omega)| = |P(j\omega)|, yielding |H(j\omega)| = 1. This property holds regardless of the order, as the distances from any point on the j\omega-axis to symmetric pole-zero pairs are equal. The is derived as \arg(H(j\omega)) = -2 \arg(P(j\omega)). Substituting s = j\omega gives H(j\omega) = \frac{P(-j\omega)}{P(j\omega)}, and using the conjugate property for real coefficients, \arg(H(j\omega)) = \arg(\overline{P(j\omega)}) - \arg(P(j\omega)) = -\arg(P(j\omega)) - \arg(P(j\omega)) = -2 \arg(P(j\omega)). This mirrored configuration ensures the phase shift is twice the negative of the contributed by the poles alone, without altering the . For a first-order all-pass filter, the transfer function is H(s) = \frac{a - s}{a + s} with real a > 0, placing the pole at -a and zero at a. The phase response starts at $0 radians at \omega = 0 (where H(0) = 1) and decreases to -\pi radians as \omega \to \infty. In the equivalent form H(s) = \frac{s - a}{s + a} = -\frac{a - s}{a + s}, an overall phase shift of \pi radians is introduced, so the phase starts at \pi radians at DC and decreases to $0 as \omega \to \infty, but the varying phase shift range remains the same. A second-order example is H(s) = \frac{s^2 - b s + c}{s^2 + b s + c}, where b > 0 and c > 0 ensure the denominator is Hurwitz (poles in the left-half plane). Here, the zeros are the reflections of the poles, and the shifts from $0 to -2\pi as \omega goes from $0 to \infty, providing a steeper suitable for higher-order approximations. The group delay is defined as \tau(\omega) = -\frac{d}{d\omega} \arg(H(j\omega)), which for all-pass filters is always positive and varies with frequency due to the nonlinear phase. Cascading multiple such sections can approximate a constant group delay over a desired bandwidth, as the cumulative \tau(\omega) flattens in the passband.

Applications

Phase Equalization

All-pass filters are essential for phase equalization, as they compensate for nonlinear phase shifts introduced by other filters, amplifiers, or transmission lines, enabling a flat group delay response across the relevant frequency range without altering the signal's magnitude spectrum. This capability stems from their inherent property of unity gain at all frequencies, allowing selective phase manipulation to counteract distortions that could otherwise lead to temporal smearing or misalignment in signal processing chains. By restoring linear phase characteristics, these filters ensure that the envelope of the signal propagates without dispersion, which is critical for maintaining signal integrity in both analog and digital domains. In analog applications, all-pass filters are used for phase equalization in pulse shaping and single-sideband suppressed-carrier (SSB-SC) modulation schemes, where precise control over signal timing is essential without altering power levels. In digital signal processing, they compensate for nonlinear phase distortions in infinite impulse response (IIR) filters to approximate linear-phase responses. They also play roles in multirate filtering, group-delay equalization, and phase correction in communications and audio systems. In audio systems, particularly crossover networks for multi-way loudspeakers, all-pass filters are cascaded to equalize phase differences between drivers, promoting coherent wavefront summation and improved reproduction. For example, in configurations where drivers are not physically aligned, cascading multiple all-pass sections around the crossover frequency region introduces a non-uniform distribution that corrects spectral notches and peaks, outperforming simpler fixed-delay approaches in achieving uniform response. This technique enhances and transient accuracy by aligning the phase contributions from low-frequency woofers and high-frequency tweeters, resulting in a more natural and immersive listening experience. In audio effects, all-pass filters create artificial through structures such as Schroeder allpass sections and spatialization in systems like the Spatialisateur. In communications, all-pass filters serve in equalizers to flatten responses, thereby reducing (ISI) by focusing received energy at precise sampling instants and mitigating the effects of dispersive media. Prefiltering with an all-pass structure at the transforms the overall into a minimum-phase equivalent, simplifying subsequent equalization and improving bit error rates in mobile and wireline systems. The design of all-pass filters for phase equalization begins with measuring the system's existing phase or group delay response using frequency-domain analysis tools. An inverse phase profile is then synthesized, often via optimization methods like least-squares error minimization, to create an all-pass filter that, when cascaded with the distorting element, yields the desired linear response. For instance, in digital implementations, the filter order and coefficients are determined to match a target group delay in the passband, as demonstrated by cascading a fourth-order all-pass with a to equalize nonlinearities. A specific application arises in graphic equalizers, where all-pass filters enable phase adjustments independent of modifications, preserving the balance of boosts or cuts while correcting any induced temporal shifts for more transparent sound processing.

Delay Line Approximation

All-pass filters approximate the ideal time delay, whose is given by H(s) = e^{-sT}, where T is the delay duration. This is non-causal and unrealizable with finite-order rational s in physical systems, as it cannot be synthesized using lumped elements. All-pass filters offer practical rational approximations that maintain a magnitude response while seeking to replicate the shift of - \omega T. A prominent method for this approximation is the , where the all-pass filter corresponds to the [1/1] Padé approximant of e^{-sT}, expressed as
H(s) = \frac{1 - \frac{T}{2} s}{1 + \frac{T}{2} s}.
This form provides superior phase linearity near () compared to the approximant $1 - sT, particularly in preserving a flatter group delay response at low frequencies.
Higher-order approximations enhance delay accuracy over broader bandwidths by cascading multiple first-order sections or employing higher-degree Padé approximants, such as the [2/2] form
H(s) = \frac{s^2 - 6 \frac{s}{T} + 12 \frac{1}{T^2}}{s^2 + 6 \frac{s}{T} + 12 \frac{1}{T^2}},
though this increases computational and implementation complexity. The primary objective in these designs is to flatten the group delay \tau(\omega) = -\frac{d\phi(\omega)}{d\omega} \approx T across the desired band, maximizing the region of constant delay.
Despite these benefits, limitations arise with increasing filter order: while approximation fidelity improves, the may exhibit ripple within the , degrading uniformity away from . In , all-pass filters similarly approximate fractional sample delays for , with the Thiran method yielding maximally flat group delay at low frequencies as a analog counterpart.

Analog Implementations

Active Configurations

Active all-pass filters utilize operational amplifiers (op-amps) to achieve shifting with gain across all frequencies, offering improved performance over passive designs. These configurations typically employ networks incorporating resistors and capacitors to realize the desired transfer functions, where poles and zeros are symmetrically placed on the imaginary axis in the s-plane for constant response. A basic first-order active all-pass filter can be implemented using a single op-amp with a low-pass RC feedback network. In this topology, the input signal is applied to the non-inverting input of the op-amp, while the feedback path consists of a resistor R in series with a capacitor C connected from the output to the inverting input, and another resistor R from the inverting input to ground. This configuration realizes the transfer function H(s) = \frac{1 - sRC}{1 + sRC}, where the pole at s = -1/(RC) is mirrored by a zero at s = 1/(RC), ensuring |H(jω)| = 1 for all ω. The phase shift varies from 0° at DC to -180° at high frequencies, with -90° at the pole frequency ω = 1/(RC). For unity gain, the resistors are equal, and component values are selected based on the desired corner frequency, such as R = 10 kΩ and C = 0.01 μF for f_c ≈ 1.59 kHz. An equivalent high-pass version is obtained by swapping the positions of R and C in the feedback network, yielding H(s) = \frac{sRC - 1}{sRC + 1}, with phase shift from -180° at DC to 0° at high frequencies. For second-order phase shifts, a Sallen-Key inspired topology using the Delyiannis circuit provides a quadratic all-pass response with a single op-amp. The circuit features an op-amp configured as a non-inverting with gain K > 1, where the feedback network includes two capacitors C in series from output to ground via a R1, and s R2 and R3 bridging the capacitors and connecting to the inverting input. Specifically, the input connects to the non-inverting terminal through R3 = R1, with R4 from inverting input to ground such that R4 = R2 / Q, and the op-amp set by additional resistors to achieve the required Q-factor. This realizes H(s) = -\frac{s^2 - (\omega_0 / Q) s + \omega_0^2}{s^2 + (\omega_0 / Q) s + \omega_0^2}, providing up to 360° shift centered at ω_0, with equations like R2 = Q / (2π f_0 C) and R1 = 1 / (2π f_0 C Q) for equal capacitors C. For gain overall, the configuration ensures the remains 1, and op-amps with exceeding ω_0 and open-loop >20 are recommended. A variant using two op-amps can buffer the sections for cascading, maintaining isolation. This , originally proposed by Deliyannis, enables high-Q factors suitable for precise phase equalization. Voltage-controlled active all-pass filters allow dynamic tuning of the pole frequency by incorporating variable resistors or voltage-controlled amplifiers (VCAs). In the first-order topology, a JFET operated in its triode region serves as a voltage-variable resistor (VCR) in place of the fixed R, where the drain-source resistance R_DS varies inversely with gate-source voltage V_GS (e.g., from >10 MΩ at pinch-off to ~150 Ω at V_GS = 0 V for devices like 2N3819). A control voltage applied to the gate tunes the corner frequency f_c = 1/(2π R_DS C), enabling phase shift adjustment with low distortion (<3%) for signals <500 mV peak when using balanced push-pull JFET pairs with op-amp buffering. Alternatively, photoresistors (e.g., LDRs) can replace fixed resistors for light-controlled tuning, though with slower response times. For higher orders, VCAs like the SSM2164 integrate into the feedback path to modulate gain and frequency electronically, facilitating applications in synthesizers or adaptive systems. These variants preserve unity gain by scaling components accordingly. Active configurations offer several advantages over passive counterparts, including high input impedance (typically >1 MΩ) that prevents loading of preceding stages, low (<100 Ω) for driving subsequent circuits without attenuation, and inherent buffering for easy integration into monolithic ICs. Unity gain is achieved without additional scaling, simplifying design and reducing component count, while op-amp compensation minimizes sensitivity to tolerances in R and C values.

Passive Configurations

Passive all-pass filters are implemented using networks composed solely of passive components such as resistors, inductors, and capacitors, without requiring external power sources. These configurations are particularly suited for applications in transmission lines and early communication systems where phase equalization is needed without amplitude distortion. Common topologies include the lattice, T-section, and bridged-T designs, each offering distinct advantages in achieving constant-resistance behavior and controlled phase shifts. The lattice filter, also known as the X-section filter, consists of symmetric arms featuring series and shunt elements, typically inductors and capacitors, arranged in a balanced structure. This topology realizes the transfer function H(s) = \frac{Z_2 - Z_1}{Z_2 + Z_1}, where Z_1 and Z_2 are the impedances of the opposing arms, providing the desired phase shift while maintaining unity magnitude response. For balanced operation and image impedance matching to a characteristic resistance R, the condition Z_1 \cdot Z_2 = R^2 must be satisfied, ensuring no reflection and constant input impedance. In first-order designs, component values are set as L_a = R / \omega_c and C_b = 1 / (R \omega_c), where \omega_c is the cutoff frequency; higher-order sections scale accordingly with parameters a and b for poles and zeros. This configuration was historically employed in early telephone repeaters for phase correction in long-distance lines. The T-section filter forms a three-element ladder network with two series arms and one shunt arm, suitable for realizing second-order delay approximations and extensible to higher orders through cascading. It operates as an unbalanced constant-resistance network, with the transfer function H(s) = \frac{s^2 - a s + b}{s^2 + a s + b}, where a and b define the phase characteristics. Design involves setting series inductors L_1 = L_a / 2 and shunt capacitor C_2 = 2 C_b, providing a positive slope in group delay. This simpler structure is advantageous for applications requiring minimal components, though it may introduce imbalances if not precisely tuned. The bridged-T section enhances the basic T configuration by adding a bridging capacitor across the series arms, improving high-frequency performance and ensuring constant resistance over a broader band. This topology supports both positive and negative group delay slopes, with design equations adjusted for coupling factor k = -(L_b - L_a)/(L_b + L_a) and modified series inductors L_1' = (L_a + L_b)/2. The bridging element mitigates parasitic effects and enhances stability in cascaded systems. Like other passive designs, it offers inherent stability without active elements. These passive configurations share key advantages, including the absence of a required power supply and inherent stability due to the lack of amplification, making them reliable for analog signal processing in environments like early telephony. However, they suffer limitations such as potential insertion loss in unbalanced setups and high sensitivity to component tolerances, necessitating precise matching for optimal performance.

Digital Implementations

Infinite Impulse Response Structures

Infinite impulse response (IIR) all-pass filters are recursive digital structures that maintain a constant magnitude response of unity across all frequencies while introducing controllable phase shifts, making them efficient for phase manipulation tasks. The general discrete transfer function for an Nth-order IIR all-pass filter is expressed as H(z) = z^{-N} \frac{P(1/z)}{P(z)}, where P(z) is an Nth-degree polynomial with all poles located inside the unit circle in the z-plane to guarantee stability. This form ensures that the zeros are the reciprocals of the poles, preserving the all-pass property. A fundamental building block is the first-order IIR all-pass filter, with transfer function H(z) = \frac{a^* + z^{-1}}{1 + a^* z^{-1}}, where a is a complex coefficient satisfying |a| < 1 for stability. For real a, the phase response is given by \arg(H(e^{j\omega})) = \atan\left( \frac{(a^2 - 1)\sin\omega}{(a^2 + 1)\cos\omega + 2a} \right), which provides a smooth phase transition from 0 at DC to -\pi at the Nyquist frequency, adjustable via the parameter a. This structure can be implemented using the difference equation y = a x + x[n-1] - a y[n-1], requiring minimal computational resources. For higher orders, the lattice structure offers an advantageous realization of IIR all-pass filters, employing reflection coefficients to construct an orthogonal lattice form that enhances numerical stability, particularly in fixed-point implementations and adaptive scenarios where coefficient quantization errors are prevalent. This structure decomposes the filter into cascaded stages, each defined by a reflection coefficient k_m with |k_m| < 1, facilitating robust recursion without pole-zero sensitivity issues. Cascaded second-order sections provide another practical implementation for IIR all-pass filters, especially when approximating analog all-pass prototypes through the , which maps the s-plane to the z-plane while preserving stability and frequency warping characteristics. Each second-order section takes the form H_k(z) = \frac{a_{2k} + a_{1k} z^{-1} + z^{-2}}{1 + a_{1k} z^{-1} + a_{2k} z^{-2}}, with coefficients derived to match the desired phase profile, allowing the overall filter to be built by multiplying such sections for higher-order responses. In adaptive applications, such as phase equalization in communication systems, IIR all-pass filters are tuned using the algorithm to minimize phase distortions and intersymbol interference by adjusting coefficients based on error signals, ensuring convergence to optimal phase correction without altering the magnitude response.

Finite Impulse Response Structures

Finite impulse response (FIR) all-pass filters are constrained by the requirement that their frequency magnitude response approximates unity across the band of interest, |H(e^{jω})| ≈ 1, while providing a desired phase response. For exact unit magnitude, only trivial FIR structures satisfy this condition, as non-trivial FIR filters cannot maintain a flat magnitude response without recursion. To achieve linear phase (constant group delay), which is the typical case for FIR all-pass approximations, the impulse response coefficients must exhibit even symmetry, h(n) = h(N-1-n), or odd antisymmetry, h(n) = -h(N-1-n), where N is the filter length. These symmetries ensure a real-valued frequency response but limit the phase to linear, preventing arbitrary nonlinear phase adjustments without magnitude distortion. The simplest exact FIR all-pass filter is a pure integer delay, H(z) = z^{-k}, with coefficients [0, ..., 0, 1, 0, ..., 0] where the 1 is at position k, providing a constant group delay of k samples and unity magnitude. Modulated versions approximate fractional delays, such as using , which yields linear phase FIR filters with coefficients symmetric or antisymmetric about the desired delay point. These are all-pass approximations suitable for sub-sample timing adjustments, with the magnitude close to unity at low frequencies but deviating at higher ones. Design of approximate FIR all-pass filters often employs windowing methods, such as applying a window to the ideal sinc function shifted for fractional delay, or frequency sampling to specify a desired phase on a grid while constraining magnitude ripples. For nonlinear phase approximations, optimization techniques like minimax error minimization via linear programming are used to balance magnitude flatness and phase accuracy. However, such designs require recursive IIR structures for exact nonlinear phase all-pass behavior, as FIR approximations struggle with efficiency. In multirate systems, FIR all-pass approximations facilitate phase interpolation during upsampling or downsampling, enabling fine control over timing without the instability risks associated with IIR filters. They are particularly useful in filter banks for constructing complementary pairs or in resampling where linear phase preserves signal integrity. A key limitation of FIR all-pass filters is the high order required to approximate nonlinear phase over a wide bandwidth while keeping magnitude ripples small, often necessitating dozens or hundreds of coefficients for acceptable performance. This computational inefficiency compared to low-order IIR all-pass filters makes FIR versions less practical for standalone use. For instance, a length-4 symmetric FIR approximating a 1.5-sample delay via Lagrange interpolation has coefficients h = [-0.0625, 0.5625, 0.5625, -0.0625], providing constant group delay but with magnitude deviations increasing beyond low frequencies (e.g., ripple < 1 dB up to 0.2π but > 3 dB at π). Due to these costs, FIR all-pass structures are rarely deployed independently, favoring or IIR alternatives in most phase-sensitive applications.

References

  1. [1]
    Allpass Filters | Physical Audio Signal Processing - DSPRelated.com
    An allpass filter can be defined as any filter having a gain of $ 1$ at all frequencies (but typically different delays at different frequencies).
  2. [2]
    [PDF] Digital Signal Processing All-Pass Systems - spinlab
    Definition. A stable LTI system E with rational transfer function H(z) is called all-pass if its DTFT satisfies |H(ejω)| = A for some value A > 0 and all.
  3. [3]
    Analog Allpass Filters | Introduction to Digital Filters - DSPRelated.com
    Analog allpass filters may be described as having a zero at $ s=-\overline{p}$ for every pole at $ s=p$ , while digital allpass filters must have a zero at $ z ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] CHAPTER 8 ANALOG FILTERS
    The purpose of an all-pass filter is to provide phase equalization, typically in pulse circuits. It also has application in single side band, suppressed carrier ...
  5. [5]
    Allpass Filter: All You Need To Know - WolfSound
    Oct 22, 2021 · An allpass filter is a filter with a unity gain across all frequencies. This means that no frequency passing through that filter will be boosted or attenuated.Definition of an Allpass Filter · Types of Allpass Systems · First-Order IIR Allpass
  6. [6]
  7. [7]
    All Pass Filter: Know Definition, Types, Advantages & Applications
    An All Pass Filter is a type of electronic filter that allows all frequencies to pass through unchanged in terms of amplitude, but alters the phase ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] The digital all-pass filter: a versatile signal processing building block
    The digital all-pass filter is a computationally efficient signal pro- cessing building block which is quite useful in many signal pm- cessing applications.
  9. [9]
    [PDF] A Short History of Circuits and Systems - IEEE CAS
    starting point and a filter circuit can be obtained by means of a systematic procedure. Page 89. 82. CHAPTER 5. THE HISTORY OF. Zobel filter circuit (W. Cauer ...
  10. [10]
    Analog Allpass Filters
    Analog allpass filters may be described as having a zero at $ s=-\overline{p}$ for every pole at $ s=p$ , while digital allpass filters must have a zero at $ z ...
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Transfer Functions
    Mar 8, 2011 · However, there will be phase shift and group delay produced by the allpass network. In mathematics, a Hurwitz polynomial, named after Adolf ...Missing: continuous- | Show results with:continuous-
  12. [12]
  13. [13]
    [PDF] ALLPASS FILTER DESIGN AND APPLICATIONS - Rice ECE
    Possible applications are: design of filters with a desired phase response (e.g., a delay element), the design of phase equalizers, or the design of recursive ...Missing: process | Show results with:process
  14. [14]
    Enhanced Equalization for Mobile Communication Systems
    Insufficient relevant content. The provided URL (https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6131279) points to a general IEEE Xplore page for "Enhanced Equalization for Mobile Communication Systems," but the accessible content does not specifically detail the use of all-pass filters in communications for phase equalization to minimize intersymbol interference (ISI). No full text or specific sections addressing this topic are available in the provided snippet or accessible preview.
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Digital Signal Processing All-Pass Filter Design Example - spinlab
    DSP: All-Pass Filter Design Example ... We will cascade a causal all-pass filter with the LPF to linearize the phase response and equalize the group delay in the ...
  16. [16]
    Time-Delay Approximation - MATLAB & Simulink - MathWorks
    To approximate time delays in continuous-time LTI models, use the pade command to compute a Padé approximation.
  17. [17]
    Padé Delay is Okay Today - Jason Sachs - EmbeddedRelated.com
    Mar 1, 2016 · Here's the step response of a unit time delay cascaded in series with a 1-pole low-pass filter. We'll show time constants 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, and 1.0 ...
  18. [18]
    #039: Allpass Systems: Phase and Time Delay - acculution
    Apr 23, 2022 · We have shown a very direct path to approximating a time delay with a transfer function using Padé expansion. For larger desired time delays ...
  19. [19]
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Allpass Filters - Analog Devices
    Allpass filters, using one op amp, maintain signal amplitude but introduce phase shift. They are used for phase equalization and SSB-SC modulation.
  21. [21]
    Focusing on Phase: The All-Pass Filter - Technical Articles
    The all-pass filter is a phase manipulator—you can selectively adjust the phase of the signals passing through the filter without altering the amplitude ...
  22. [22]
    A guide to using FETs for voltage controlled circuits, Part 1 - EDN
    Oct 13, 2017 · This article explores several approaches for using FETs in voltage controlled circuits.
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Design of integrated all-pass filters with linear group delay for ...
    Oct 5, 2022 · The lattice filter has a negative slope linear group delay, while the bridged-T also has a linear group delay, but of positive slope.Missing: configuration | Show results with:configuration
  24. [24]
    [PDF] T 1f-K E BELL § Y S TE M
    signed phase, using an "all-pass" network, which has a theoretically zero gain. These two problems, however, are very nearly identical, due to circumstances ...
  25. [25]
  26. [26]
    Allpass Filters | Introduction to Digital Filters - DSPRelated.com
    This appendix addresses the general problem of characterizing all digital allpass filters, including multi-input, multi-output (MIMO) allpass filters.
  27. [27]
    Adaptive phase equalization using all-pass filters - Academia.edu
    The research demonstrates that all-pass filters (APFs) are less sensitive to amplitude distortions; simulations indicated that with low channel amplitude ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Design of real FIR filters with arbitrary complex frequency responses ...
    For a FIR all-pass filter, its magnitude response ... Wo<~W<~rt-Wo and Wo<<rt. (16). If the phase (it)(w) is symmetric or antisymmetric about w = 1t/2, the FIR ...
  29. [29]
    (PDF) Design of FIR Digital Phase Networks - ResearchGate
    ArticlePDF Available. Design of FIR Digital Phase Networks. May 1981; IEEE ... Steiglitz at Princeton University · Kenneth Steiglitz · Princeton University.
  30. [30]
    Lagrange Interpolation | Physical Audio Signal Processing
    A simple matlab function for computing the coefficients of a Lagrange fractional-delay FIR filter is as follows: function h = lagrange( N, delay ) n = 0:N ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] All-pass and Fractional-delay Filters
    May 20, 2010 · All-pass filters pass all frequencies with equal amplitude. Fractional-delay filters delay a signal by a fractional number of samples.  ...
  32. [32]
    (PDF) Multirate Techniques in Filter Design and Implementation
    ... all-pass filters for constructing complementary pair, and linear phase. FIR filters for the sampling rate alterations. MATLAB EXERCISES. 9.1 Design a lowpass ...