Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Antediluvian

Antediluvian (/ˌæntɪdɪˈluːviən/) is an adjective originating from Latin ante ("before") and diluvium ("flood" or "deluge"), coined in the 1640s by English writer Sir Thomas Browne to describe the era preceding the Great Flood narrated in the biblical Book of Genesis, or figuratively something primitive, antiquated, or vastly outdated. In biblical cosmology, the antediluvian period spans from the Fall of Man to the Deluge (Genesis 4–8), characterized by extended human lifespans—such as Adam's 930 years and Methuselah's 969 years—genealogical lineages tracing through Seth, increasing wickedness culminating in the Nephilim (giants or "fallen ones" from unions of "sons of God" and human women), and God's judgment via floodwaters that spared only Noah's family and ark-bound animals. This narrative, while central to Judeo-Christian tradition, lacks empirical geological corroboration for a global cataclysm, with mainstream stratigraphy attributing sedimentary layers to gradual processes rather than a singular deluge, though some interpret localized Mesopotamian floods as inspirational sources. Beyond scriptural contexts, "antediluvian" entered broader English usage by the to evoke pre-flood , often pejoratively for obsolete ideas or customs, as in critiques of outdated technologies or norms persisting from eras predating scientific paradigms. Its invocation in pseudoscientific or esoteric theories—claiming advanced lost civilizations—remains speculative, unsubstantiated by archaeological continuity from through transitions showing incremental rather than cataclysmic disruptions.

Definition and Etymology

Linguistic Origins

The term antediluvian derives from Latin ante ("before") and ("deluge" or "flood"), directly denoting the era preceding a great . This compound form entered English in the mid-17th century, coined by physician and scholar Sir in his 1646 work Pseudodoxia Epidemica, where it explicitly referenced the pre-Noachian world described in . Browne's usage tied the word to biblical , distinguishing the antediluvian period as that between and the in chapters 5–6, before the term's later extension to imply extreme antiquity. Early English appearances were confined to theological and scholarly commentaries on Scripture, reflecting the Vulgate's diluvium as a rendering of the Hebrew mabbûl (מַבּוּל), a term reserved in 6–9 for the singular, world-encompassing inundation. The Hebrew mabbûl connotes not mere flooding but a ic overthrow from above, akin to divine devastation, which Latin captured in to evoke the narrative's watery cataclysm without the Hebrew's full theological nuance of upheaval. This linguistic underscores antediluvian's origins in scriptural rather than secular , with initial attestations in 17th-century religious discourse predating its broader adoption.

Primary and Extended Meanings

The term antediluvian primarily refers to the era before the Great Flood narrated in chapters 6–8, encompassing the time from 's creation to Noah's generation. This period, as calculated from the genealogies in the of 5, extends 1,656 years from to the onset of the Flood in Noah's 600th year. In its extended senses, antediluvian has evolved beyond the literal biblical timeframe to denote anything extraordinarily ancient, primitive, or obsolete, often applied figuratively to ideas, customs, or artifacts perceived as relics of a bygone age. For instance, it describes outdated technologies or conservative viewpoints as "antediluvian" in contemporary discourse. Early scientific usage, particularly in 19th-century geology, extended the term to pre-Flood rock layers and fossils, as seen in William Buckland's Reliquiae Diluvianae (1823), which interpreted cave deposits as evidence of a diluvial catastrophe. However, this application waned by the mid-19th century as uniformitarian models, emphasizing gradual processes over catastrophic events, gained traction amid empirical observations—such as stratified rock sequences lacking a universal flood marker—undermining claims of a recent global deluge. The term's scientific denotation thus became archaic, supplanted by precise geochronological frameworks post-Lyell and Darwin.

Biblical Framework

Genesis Narrative Overview

The Book of Genesis describes the antediluvian period beginning with the creation account in chapters 1 through 3, where God forms the universe over six days, resting on the seventh, and specifically creates humanity on the sixth day, with Adam formed from the dust of the ground and Eve from Adam's rib. God places Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden, permitting them to eat from any tree except the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, under penalty of death. A serpent deceives Eve into eating the forbidden fruit, which she shares with Adam, resulting in their immediate awareness of nakedness, shame, and subsequent confrontation with God, leading to curses upon the serpent, Eve, Adam, and the ground, followed by their expulsion from Eden to prevent access to the tree of life. Genesis 4 recounts the birth of and to , their respective occupations as a and , and 's acceptance of Abel's offering but rejection of Cain's, prompting Cain to Abel in a field. curses Cain, marking him for protection from vengeance, after which Cain settles in , builds a named after his son , and begets further descendants including Lamech, who takes two wives and fathers sons associated with tent-dwelling, livestock, , and . Meanwhile, have another son, , leading to a separate lineage invoked in the name of the , contrasting with Cain's line. Chapter 5 provides a from through to , listing ten generations with progressively decreasing lifespans noted in the text. In Genesis 6:1-4, the narrative shifts to population growth, with the "sons of God" taking wives from the "daughters of men," producing offspring described as the , characterized as mighty men of renown who existed both then and afterward. observes the pervasive wickedness of humanity, with every intention of the thoughts of their hearts only evil continually, expressing regret for creating mankind and resolving to blot them out along with animals from the . However, finds favor with due to his righteousness among a corrupt generation, setting the stage for divine instructions regarding the .

Genealogies and Chronology

The antediluvian genealogy in 5 traces the lineage from to through , listing ten patriarchs with their ages at fathering the next in line, subsequent lifespan, and total longevity. fathered at age 130 and lived 930 years total; fathered Enosh at 105 and lived 912; Enosh fathered at 90 and lived 905; fathered at 70 and lived 910; fathered at 65 and lived 895; fathered at 162 and lived 962; fathered at 65, lived 365 years, and "walked with God; then he was no more, because God took him away" without recorded death; , the longest-lived at 969 years, fathered Lamech at 187; Lamech fathered at 182 and lived 777; fathered , , and , living 950 years total, with the flood occurring in his 600th year. Summing the begetting ages in the yields 1,656 years from to the , reflecting a compressed where generations overlapped significantly, such as Methuselah dying in the year per textual computation. This Masoretic framework underpins 17th-century chronologist James Ussher's Annals of the World, which dates to 4004 BC and the to 2348 BC, synchronizing biblical data with historical anchors like and records while assuming no gaps in the . The variant extends pre- chronology by approximately 600 years due to higher begetting ages (e.g., at 230 for ), pushing the to around 3100–3200 years after , a discrepancy attributed to translational expansions or differing Hebrew Vorlagen, though Masoretic manuscripts show greater internal numerical consistency and alignment with fragments. These lack archaeological or biological corroboration, as no pre-modern remains or substantiate lifespans exceeding typical maxima around 120 years, with post-flood declines in reported ages aligning more closely to observed limits but still unverified empirically beyond textual .

Society, , and Moral Decline

The antediluvian period, as depicted in , features lifespans far exceeding modern norms, with individuals routinely living over 900 years. According to the genealogies in 5, lived 930 years, 912, Enosh 905, 910, 895, 962, 365 (translated without ), Methuselah 969, Lamech 777, and 950. These ages suggest a pre-flood or permitting extended , though empirical verification remains absent, and interpretations range from literal chronology to symbolic representations of eras or dynasties in ancient Near Eastern traditions. Societal developments in the biblical narrative indicate early advancements in and , particularly through Cain's descendants. Genesis 4 describes Jabal as the ancestor of tent-dwellers and livestock herders, Jubal as the father of musicians playing and pipe, and as a forger of and iron tools, implying and specialization. Cain's founding of a named further points to and expansion from the initial family lines, while 6:4 mentions the —interpreted as mighty warriors or giants arising from unions between "sons of God" and "daughters of men"—suggesting prowess or hybrid vigor in a growing society. These elements portray a progression from agrarian roots to complex skills, unmarred by post-flood constraints until moral corruption intensified. Moral decline culminated in pervasive wickedness, prompting divine judgment. Genesis 6:5 states that "the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and every intention of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually," with the earth filled by violence (Genesis 6:11-13). This ethical deterioration, linked to unchecked human autonomy post-Eden, contrasts earlier patriarchal piety—evident in figures like Enoch walking with God—and underscores a causal progression from individual sin to societal corruption, as humanity multiplied without restraint. Scholarly analyses of the text emphasize this as a theological motif of human depravity, drawing parallels to Mesopotamian flood precursors like the Atrahasis epic, where overpopulation and noise (as divine annoyance) mirror biblical violence, though Genesis frames it through monotheistic moral realism rather than polytheistic caprice.

The Deluge Transition

Biblical Flood Description

In the Genesis account, God pronounces judgment on a corrupted humanity, stating that "the wickedness of man was great in the earth" and deciding to destroy mankind, beasts, creeping things, and birds by means of a flood while preserving Noah, described as "a just man and perfect in his generations," along with his family. God directs Noah to construct an ark from gopher wood, with specified dimensions of 300 cubits in length, 50 cubits in width, and 30 cubits in height, divided into three stories with a door in the side and a window or skylight, sealed inside and out with pitch. Noah receives instructions to gather provisions of every food for sustenance and to bring into the ark pairs of every living creature according to their kinds—specifically, two of every (male and female) and seven pairs each of animals and —to keep them alive through the . At 600 years old, Noah enters the with his wife, sons , , and , and their wives, followed by the animals, just as the flood begins with the bursting of "all the fountains of the great deep" and the opening of "the windows of ," accompanied by rain upon the earth. The waters rise steadily, lifting the ark, with rain falling for 40 days and nights while the flood continues to prevail, covering "all the high hills that were under the whole heaven" to a depth exceeding the highest mountains by 15 cubits, resulting in the perishing of every creature not aboard the ark, as "all flesh died that moved upon the earth." The deluge subsides gradually, with the waters receding after prevailing for 150 days, the ark resting on the mountains of Ararat, and Noah sequentially releasing a raven and a dove to assess the drying land; the dove eventually returns not, carrying an olive leaf on its prior flight. Upon 's command, and all aboard disembark to repopulate the , with offering burnt sacrifices on an from animals and birds, prompting to bless and his sons, permitting the consumption of meat while prohibiting blood, and establishing a never again to destroy the by , sealing it with as a perpetual between , , and every living creature. The concludes the antediluvian era by noting that from 's sons , , and "was the whole overspread."

Timing and Duration Debates

The chronology of the antediluvian period, spanning from to the onset of the Flood, varies significantly between major textual traditions of 5. The (MT), the Hebrew basis for most modern Bibles, calculates this interval as precisely 1,656 years by summing the ages at which each patriarch begat the next generation. In contrast, the (LXX), the ancient Greek translation, extends this period to approximately 2,242–2,262 years due to higher begetting ages assigned to several patriarchs, such as adding 100 years to each of the first five post-Adam generations and further discrepancies thereafter. Biblical scholars debate these variances, with some attributing them to intentional expansions in the LXX for theological emphasis on or with other ancient chronologies, while others propose scribal errors, differing systems (e.g., lunar vs. solar reckoning), or deliberate gaps in the MT to compress the timeline; defenses of the MT's primacy argue it aligns better with internal biblical consistency and avoids inflating pre-Flood eras beyond empirical textual warrant. The duration of the Flood itself, as described in Genesis 7–8, unfolds in phased stages without explicit total summation, leading to interpretive calculations based on dated events relative to Noah's age. commenced on the 17th day of the second month in Noah's 600th year and lasted 40 days, after which waters continued to prevail for 150 days until receding began. Subsequent drying phases included mountaintops emerging on the first day of the first month in Noah's 601st year, with the fully dry by the 27th day of the second month, yielding a total ark occupancy of approximately 371 solar days or 378 days assuming 30-day months—equating to roughly one biblical year plus 10–18 days. Theological scholarship divides on whether these durations demand literal historicity or permit symbolic framing, with literalists emphasizing the narrative's precise dating as evidence of factual intent, precluding non-historical readings without textual warrant, while framework interpreters view the year-long motif as a stylized recapitulation of creation week cosmology rather than chronological precision. Absent assumption of the narrative's historicity, no independent empirical methods exist to date or verify the event's timing, rendering debates contingent on prior commitments to scriptural inerrancy versus accommodation to ancient Near Eastern mythic forms.

Scientific and Geological Interpretations

Early 19th-Century Geology

In the early , geologists such as advocated , proposing that periodic global revolutions, including massive , had caused extinctions and reshaped the Earth's surface, with evidence from strata indicating abrupt faunal turnovers rather than gradual change. , in his 1813 Essay on the Theory of the Earth, interpreted megafaunal remains like mammoths as victims of a recent akin to the biblical , arguing that such large, intact skeletons embedded in northern sediments could only result from sudden, violent inundation rather than slow burial. British geologist advanced diluvialism—the attribution of superficial deposits and fossils to Noah's Flood—in his 1823 work Reliquiae Diluvianae, examining remains at Kirkdale, , as evidence of pre-flood carnivore activity interrupted by deluge-borne mud, which he claimed uniquely explained the global distribution of erratic boulders, gravel beds, and megafaunal bones without invoking ongoing modern processes. Early stratigraphic classifications often labeled fossil-bearing layers as "antediluvian," positing them as repositories of pre-Flood destroyed in the catastrophe, with Buckland and contemporaries like Cuvier reconciling empirical observations of displaced erratics—massive rocks far from their origins—and sorted gravels as hydraulic sorting effects from a single worldwide event around 2348 BCE per biblical chronology. This framework dominated until the 1830s, when Charles Lyell's Principles of Geology (volumes published 1830–1833) promoted , asserting that present-day gradual processes like and , operating over immense time, sufficiently accounted for strata and fossils without invoking biblical-scale catastrophes, thereby undermining diluvial explanations for erratics (reinterpreted as ice-rafted) and prompting figures like Buckland to revise their views toward localized diluviums rather than a universal . By 1830, diluvialism had waned among leading geologists, as uniformitarian critiques highlighted inconsistencies, such as the lack of uniform global sediment layers or expected Flood-deposited human artifacts alongside .

Modern Uniformitarian Consensus

The modern uniformitarian paradigm in posits that Earth's geological features result from gradual, observable processes operating over vast timescales, rather than a singular global cataclysm. This consensus, solidified by the 19th century through figures like and refined by subsequent empirical observations, emphasizes that sedimentary layers, erosion patterns, and fossil distributions align with incremental deposition and tectonic activity, not a worldwide depositing all strata simultaneously. No unified global flood layer exists in the stratigraphic record; instead, distinct regional deposits interrupt otherwise continuous sequences, contradicting expectations of a planet-wide inundation erasing prior . Annual —fine-layered sediments from seasonal lake deposition—form continuous chronologies exceeding 50,000 years, as documented in Japanese records where varve counting yields precise annual increments without interruption from a global . Ice cores from preserve unbroken climatic proxies for 800,000 years, while Greenland cores extend continuously to 123,000 years, revealing cyclic glaciations and atmospheric compositions incompatible with a recent total submersion. provides overlapping tree-ring sequences spanning over 13,000 years in , confirming uninterrupted growth patterns through multiple supposed epochs. These proxies collectively demonstrate persistent environmental stability and biological continuity far beyond any proposed antediluvian timeline. Fossil succession exhibits ordered progression—simple at basal strata, followed by , amphibians, reptiles, and mammals—mirroring phylogenetic branching rather than hydrodynamic sorting by a single event, where density or mobility would not predict such consistent global layering across habitats. of igneous intrusions and metamorphic rocks intercalated within sedimentary sequences yields ages from hundreds of millions to billions of years, cross-validated by multiple systems (e.g., uranium-lead, potassium-argon), affirming and precluding compression into a one-year . Regional layers, such as the ~8-11 foot thick silt at (modern Fara, ) dated to circa 2900 BCE via associated artifacts, align with localized Euphrates-Tigris overflows evidenced at sites like and Kish, providing a basis for Mesopotamian myths without implying global extent or sedimentary uniformity.

Flood Geology and Creationist Models

Flood geology posits that the geological column, including sedimentary layers and fossil assemblages, primarily resulted from a global cataclysmic occurring approximately 4,350 years ago, as dated by young-earth creationists using biblical genealogies such as those in 5 and 11. Proponents, including organizations like the Institute for Creation Research (ICR) and , argue that this event rapidly deposited vast sediment volumes, explaining features like the Grand Canyon's strata formed in months rather than millions of years. This framework interprets empirical data—such as sorted fossil layers by ecological zones and rapid burial indicators—through a biblical timeline, rejecting uniformitarian assumptions of gradual processes. Key creationist models propose mechanisms for the flood's dynamics. Walt Brown's hydroplate theory suggests subterranean water chambers ruptured, ejecting hydroplates that slid across the earth, causing separation, mountain uplift, and massive for during the flood's initial . This model accounts for phenomena like the Mid-Atlantic Ridge's formation and origins from ejected material, unifying flood onset with ongoing geological activity. Alternatively, John Baumgardner's catastrophic invokes runaway of cold oceanic lithosphere, accelerating plate speeds to kilometers per second, generating floodwaters from slab dehydration and driving sprinting to their current positions over flood-year timescales. These models differ in emphasis—hydroplates on surface rupture versus tectonics on mantle convection—but converge on catastrophic energy release explaining and ocean basin deepening. Creationists cite fossil graveyards, such as the or Formation with billions of specimens, as evidence of simultaneous mass burial inconsistent with local events but fitting global hydraulic sorting by mobility and density. Polystrate fossils, like upright trees penetrating multiple strata (e.g., Formation examples spanning 20-40 feet vertically), indicate rapid sedimentation rates exceeding 10 feet per year, precluding slow deposition. Such features, proponents argue, reflect turbulent flood currents embedding organisms before decay, with dominant in lower layers due to benthic habitats overwhelmed early. Post-flood, creationist models predict a single rapid lasting 500-700 years, triggered by warm post-deluge oceans evaporating moisture while cooler continents (from volcanic aerosols) promote snowfall. Larry Vardiman's simulations at ICR model growth under these conditions, aligning with proxy data like varves and distributions. Internal critiques note model variances, such as heat dissipation challenges in catastrophic requiring ad hoc cooling, and the of fossils relative to vertebrates, attributed to pre-flood sparsity (around 10 million) and ark survivors repopulating highlands. Despite discrepancies, these frameworks prioritize a unified ~4,350-year-old event as causally central to earth's .

Cross-Cultural and Mythological Contexts

Parallels in Ancient Flood Narratives

In Mesopotamian literature, the flood narrative appears in the , where , a king of , receives divine warning from the god Ea about a deluge decreed by the gods to eradicate noisy humanity; he constructs a large boat, loads it with his family, craftsmen, and animals, and survives the seven-day before releasing birds to find land. The story's Akkadian versions date to approximately 2000–1500 BCE, with roots in earlier traditions. Similarly, the epic, composed around the mid-17th century BCE, attributes the to the gods' frustration with human overpopulation and clamor, prompting —warned by —to build a vessel preserving life amid the ensuing catastrophe. The , attested in texts from about 1600 BCE, features , king of , divinely alerted by to a intended to destroy mankind's seed; he seals a boat and emerges post-deluge to receive immortality. Beyond , the Hindu Satapatha Brahmana (circa 700–300 BCE) recounts , forewarned by a incarnation of of an impending flood, constructing a boat to carry himself, the seven sages, seeds of plants, and animals, which the fish tows to a mountain as waters subside. In , as preserved in Apollodorus's Bibliotheca (circa 1st–2nd century CE but drawing on earlier sources like ), , son of , heeds his father's warning of Zeus's flood punishing human wickedness; he and his wife build a chest, float to safety on , and repopulate earth by casting stones that become humans. These narratives share core motifs, including a divine or semi-divine to a righteous individual, construction of a seaworthy , preservation of select humans and animals or seeds, a period of inundation followed by recession, and post-flood rituals or repopulation. Scholars debate whether these parallels stem from independent recollections of regional catastrophes—such as Mesopotamian floods, a inundation around 5600 BCE, or post-glacial sea-level rises—or from , potentially originating in Sumerian-Mesopotamian tales spreading via trade or conquest, with later adaptations in Indo-European or Eastern traditions lacking direct archaeological ties to shared cataclysms. Empirical analysis favors localized flood memories amplified into mythic universals over monocausal global events, given geological for recurrent but non-synchronous deluges in flood-prone valleys and coastal areas.

Antediluvian Figures and Traditions

In Enochic literature, the Watchers—depicted as angels who descended to earth—engaged in unions with human women, producing hybrid offspring akin to the biblical , and imparted such as , , and to humanity. This tradition, preserved in the pseudepigraphal dated to the 3rd–1st centuries BCE, portrays the Watchers' actions as corrupting influences leading to moral decay prior to a cataclysmic judgment. Greek mythology features Titans like Prometheus, a pre-Olympian credited with molding humans from clay and bestowing fire and crafts, symbolizing the transmission of civilizing knowledge from divine sources. While the represents their overthrow rather than a , Prometheus's role as a benefactor defying higher gods echoes themes of illicit enlightenment, with his punishment underscoring the perils of such gifts to mortals. In the Mayan , a K'iche' text transcribed in the from pre-Columbian oral traditions, gods created wooden people as an intermediate human form lacking proper reverence, which were subsequently annihilated in a orchestrated by the Heart of Sky. This of flawed precursors destroyed for inadequacy parallels narratives of pre-catastrophe societies, though rooted in Mesoamerican cosmology emphasizing cyclical creation. Across these traditions, motifs of hybrid or divinely influenced beings and lost advanced knowledge recur, potentially reflecting archetypal responses to cultural memories of upheaval, yet comparative analysis reveals independent origins without evidence of a shared global antecedent.

Cultural Depictions and Legacy

Pre-Flood World in Art and Literature

Renaissance frescoes, such as those in the painted by Raphael's workshop between 1518 and 1519, depicted scenes from including the and early antediluvian harmony in . These works emphasized divine order and paradisiacal abundance prior to human transgression. In the 17th century, woodcuts and s illustrated the pre-flood world as an idyllic , exemplified by Matthäus Merian's 1633 Paradise, which portrayed lush vegetation and harmonious coexistence of humans and animals. Such visual representations drew from biblical descriptions to evoke a lost of innocence. John Milton's Paradise Lost (1667) offered an expansive literary vision of the antediluvian era, detailing the splendor of Eden, the temptation, and the immediate aftermath of the Fall in Books 1 through 12. Milton's epic influenced subsequent artistic interpretations by blending classical epic form with scriptural narrative to underscore pre-flood perfection marred by sin. By the 19th century, Edward Bulwer-Lytton's The Coming Race (1871) evoked antediluvian civilization through the subterranean Vril-ya, descendants of an advanced pre-flood race possessing superior technology like vril energy. This novel reflected Romantic fascination with ancient lost worlds, portraying antediluvian society as technologically utopian yet isolated from surface decline. Victorian-era depictions largely maintained focus on pre-fall harmony or speculative advancements, reserving explicit moral decay narratives—mirroring Genesis 6's wickedness—for allegorical cautionary tales warning against contemporary societal vices.

Antediluvian Fauna and "Monsters"

In the early , paleontological discoveries of large extinct mammals and reptiles prompted interpretations of these creatures as antediluvian beasts destroyed in a global flood. , in his 1823 work Reliquiae Diluvianae, examined fossil assemblages in British bone caves like Kirkdale, initially attributing them to diluvial (flood-related) action while later emphasizing ecological explanations such as dens to reconcile evidence with biblical catastrophe. , who coined the term "" in 1842, described fossils as massive indicative of pre-flood , contributing to public displays like models that portrayed such animals as "antediluvian monsters" and "pre-Adamite beasts." Creationist perspectives often link biblical descriptions of behemoth and leviathan in Job 40–41 to dinosaurs or similar reptiles coexisting with humans before or after the flood. Behemoth, depicted with a tail "like a cedar" (Job 40:17) and herbivorous habits, has been proposed as a sauropod dinosaur such as Brachiosaurus, while leviathan's fiery breath, armored scales, and aquatic prowess (Job 41:18–21) suggest a large crocodile or extinct marine reptile like Mosasaurus. These interpretations, advanced by young-earth advocates, posit that such "monsters" were known to ancient peoples and survived onto post-flood lands, with dragon legends worldwide as cultural memories. Proponents of recent dinosaur existence cite discoveries like the 2005 extraction of flexible soft tissues, including blood vessels and osteocytes, from a Tyrannosaurus rex dated to approximately 68 million years by radiometric methods. Paleontologist Mary Schweitzer reported these preserved structures after demineralizing the bone, which creationists argue indicates rapid burial and insufficient time for complete decay, implying dinosaurs perished within thousands of years rather than millions. Schweitzer attributes preservation to iron-mediated crosslinking from , maintaining consistency with , though critics from creationist organizations like contend such mechanisms fail to explain multi-million-year durability without contamination or error. Empirical fossil records, however, reveal no stratigraphic overlap between human remains and non-avian dinosaurs, with the latter's extinction layer (K-Pg boundary) at 66 million years preceding Homo sapiens by over 65 million years based on consistent dating across global sites. Purported evidence of coexistence, such as alleged human-dinosaur footprints or artifacts, has consistently been debunked as misidentifications, erosion artifacts, or hoaxes upon scrutiny by paleontologists. Creationist models invoke post-flood extinction waves for , attributing dinosaur and die-offs to climatic shifts, habitat loss, and human hunting in the millennia following Noah's dispersal, with about 70% of ark kinds (including ) failing to persist long-term. This framework aligns with observed late Pleistocene megafauna reductions but lacks direct fossil corroboration for human-reptile interactions, relying instead on interpretive gaps in uniformitarian timelines.

Modern Speculations and Pseudoscience

In the late , Ignatius Donnelly's 1882 book Atlantis: The Antediluvian World popularized the notion that the mythical represented a technologically advanced pre-flood civilization, linking it to biblical narratives and global flood myths as remnants of a shared cataclysmic history. Donnelly argued that Atlanteans possessed , , and monumental architecture, influencing subsequent cultures, but his synthesis relied on speculative etymologies and unverified parallels rather than physical evidence. Modern proponents extend these ideas, positing antediluvian societies with sophisticated knowledge lost to a global disaster. Contemporary speculations, notably by author Graham Hancock, claim an advanced ice-age civilization existed around 12,000 years ago—coinciding with the Younger Dryas period—and was obliterated by comet impacts or rapid sea-level rise, survivors disseminating technology to nascent societies like those at Göbekli Tepe. Hancock's theories, detailed in works like Magicians of the Gods (2015), interpret astronomical alignments and megalithic sites as evidence of inherited wisdom, yet they encounter criticism for lacking artifacts indicative of industrialization, such as widespread metallurgy or machinery, which would persist in the geological record absent total annihilation. Archaeological consensus attributes known pre-12,000 BCE sites to hunter-gatherer complexity, not lost high technology, emphasizing gradual cultural evolution over sudden inheritance. Sites like in , dated via radiocarbon to approximately 9600–8000 BCE, are invoked as potential outposts of this civilization, featuring T-shaped pillars and carvings suggesting organized labor. However, excavations reveal no signs of flood destruction—such as layers or abrupt abandonment—and the site's context aligns with societies experimenting with architecture, predating biblical flood timelines by over 7,000 years under conventional chronologies. Similarly, underwater formations like the off , with apparent stepped terraces, are cited as submerged antediluvian , but geological analyses conclude they result from natural fracturing and erosion in prone to right-angle cleavage, with no marks or associated cultural debris confirming human modification. These pseudoscientific frameworks prioritize mythological interpretations and ambiguous anomalies—such as of linear features—over empirical data, often dismissing mainstream as dogmatic while failing to produce testable predictions or replicable finds. Proponents' reliance on non-peer-reviewed narratives contrasts with the absence of durable traces (e.g., no pre-flood alloys or engines recovered globally), rendering claims unfalsifiable and akin to rather than causal analysis grounded in and dating.

Debates on Historicity and Implications

Evidence for Global vs. Local Flood

Proponents of a global flood cite the vast, flat-lying sedimentary strata in formations like the Grand Canyon as indicators of rapid, continent-scale deposition inconsistent with uniformitarian gradualism. Creationist , such as Steve Austin of the Institute for Creation Research, point to minimal erosion between layers, suggestive of high-energy currents, and the burial of upright (polystrate) fossils spanning multiple strata as empirical signs of catastrophic, waterborne sorting during a single event rather than eons of slow accumulation. The biblical narrative employs hyperbolic language such as "all the earth" (kol ha'aretz) and "under the whole heaven" ( 7:19), which literalist interpreters, including those at , argue denotes universal coverage based on phenomenological descriptions from an ancient Near Eastern worldview, precluding a merely regional inundation. Conversely, archaeological strata in Mesopotamian sites provide proxies for localized megafloods; at , excavator identified an 8-11 foot thick sterile silt deposit overlying cultural remains, radiocarbon-dated to circa 3500 BCE and attributed to River overflow rather than oceanic transgression. Similar layers at Kish and , dated 2900-3000 BCE, suggest recurrent regional flooding in the Tigris- alluvial plain without global sedimentological signatures. Population genetics reveal no severe bottleneck circa 2500 BCE aligning with a repopulation from eight survivors; and Y-chromosome analyses indicate effective population sizes exceeding thousands continuously, with human heterozygosity levels incompatible with such drastic reduction, unlike localized animal founder effects in isolated . Deep-sea core samples from ocean basins show varved sediments and magnetic reversals with uninterrupted accumulation rates averaging centimeters per , lacking turbidite megabeds or erosional unconformities diagnostic of recent worldwide hydraulic turmoil. Uninterrupted profiles in peat bogs and lake cores, such as those spanning the in and , record sequential vegetational shifts without depositional hiatuses or anomalous mixing that a global submersion would impose, with angiosperm sorted by ecological zone rather than indiscriminately jumbled. Likewise, living atolls and barrier reefs, like those in the Pacific with annual growth bands exceeding 10,000 years via uranium-thorium , exhibit continuous upward accretion incompatible with total inundation and recolonization.

Young Earth vs. Deep Time Conflicts

Young Earth creationism posits that the Earth and universe are approximately 6,000 to 10,000 years old, derived from a literal of biblical genealogies in 5 and 11, supplemented by historical correlations such as Archbishop James Ussher's 17th-century chronology placing creation at 4004 BCE. Proponents reconcile empirical data suggesting greater antiquity through mechanisms like creation with apparent maturity—where features such as tree rings, sedimentary layers, or isotopic ratios were instantiated fully formed—and episodes of accelerated nuclear decay, as investigated by the (Radioisotopes and the Age of the Earth) project, which inferred billions of years' worth of decay compressed into shorter periods without violating observed physical constants today. In contrast, deep-time estimates the 's age at about 4.54 billion years, primarily from uranium-lead dating of crystals in meteorites and ancient terrestrial rocks, where the decay of ( 4.47 billion years) to lead-206 yields concordant ages across multiple systems, corroborated by samarium-neodymium and rubidium-strontium methods. These dates assume constant decay rates, uniform initial conditions, and closed systems, premises validated by cross-checks with astronomical observations (e.g., remnants) and historical records (e.g., in tree rings up to 12,000 years). Young Earth advocates challenge these assumptions as circularly reliant on uniformitarian presuppositions that exclude catastrophic or interventions, arguing that diffusion of from crystals indicates diffusion rates incompatible with billions of years. A key tension arises in cosmology with the distant starlight problem: light from galaxies billions of light-years away implies transit times exceeding a young universe's lifespan, prompting Young Earth solutions like in a bounded white-hole cosmology (where Earth-centered slows relative to cosmic) or anisotropic synchrony conventions redefining . Deep-time models resolve this via cosmic and , with data from Hubble and JWST confirming distances consistent with 13.8 billion years. Further discord involves the stratigraphic record, where unequivocal human fossils or artifacts are absent from or layers purportedly spanning billions to hundreds of millions of years, a pattern Young Earth proponents attribute to misclassification of pre-flood deposits as ancient due to evolutionary timelines that presuppose emergence only recently, rather than coexistence with now-extinct . Mainstream concurs on the absence, attributing it to humans' recent origin (oldest Homo sapiens fossils ~300,000 years old in Pleistocene strata), with lower layers dominated by microbial mats and , but dismisses Young Earth reinterpretations as given independent biostratigraphic and geochronologic coherence. This underscores broader methodological divides, with Young Earth emphasizing biblical over models potentially influenced by naturalistic biases in academia.

Moral and Theological Ramifications

The antediluvian period, as depicted in , culminates in widespread corruption, with the earth described as filled with violence and every inclination of human thoughts wicked continually ( 6:5, 11-12). This state prompts divine grief and a of , portraying the not merely as but as a deliberate against total human depravity, where permeates all flesh and necessitates destruction to preserve through , deemed "a righteous man, blameless in his generation" ( 6:9, 13). Theologically, this underscores causal realism in divine : unchecked ethical decay invites retributive action, illustrating that , absent intervention, leads to without empirical mitigation from archaeological records of pre-flood , which remain absent. Post-flood, the narrative shifts to , with established as a sign promising no recurrence of global despite persistent human sinfulness ( 9:13-17). This ratification highlights theological tension between and , where God's forbearance—evident in sparing Noah's line—serves as for redemptive patience, yet warns of localized judgments to come, as human depravity endures beyond the waters ( 8:21). Commentators note this as emblematic of over , where floodwaters purge corruption but do not eradicate sin's root, affirming that operates amid realism about . Earlier antediluvian developments, such as urban founding by ( 4:17) and innovations in music and among his descendants ( 4:21-22), demonstrate human ingenuity amid moral descent. Yet, situated in the Cainite lineage—marked by and exile—these advances typify divorced from , progressing technologically while ethically regressing, as no redemptive occurs before the deluge's warrant. Theologically, this juxtaposition critiques secular in , positing that material sophistication amplifies, rather than ameliorates, depravity's fruits, a view echoed in assessments of pre-flood as outgrowth of such . Interpretive debates center on whether the narrative mandates literal historicity or permits , with allusions—such as likening end-times to Noah's days (Matthew 24:37-39) or Peter invoking the flood as baptismal type (1 Peter 3:20-21)—favoring concrete event as foundation for symbolic layers of judgment and . Proponents of literalism argue typological depth presupposes factual , countering allegorical reductions that dilute causal accountability for ; critics, however, contend symbolic readings preserve theological amid evidential scrutiny, though such views risk undermining scriptural intent per original genre as historical-theological prose. No consensus prevails, but the text's emphasis on verifiable moral causation— begetting erasure—privileges over abstraction.

References

  1. [1]
    Antediluvian - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
    "Antediluvian" originates from Latin ante "before" + diluvium "flood," coined by Sir Thomas Browne (1640s) meaning "before Noah's flood" or "very antiquated ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  2. [2]
    What does "antediluvian" mean? - Bible Hub
    Definition and Etymology. The term “antediluvian” is derived from the Latin words “ante,” meaning “before,” and “diluvium,” meaning “flood.
  3. [3]
    What is the definition of antediluvian? | GotQuestions.org
    Jan 7, 2022 · The word antediluvian has also come to mean “extremely old” or “out-of-date.” We know from the genealogies listed in Genesis 1—6 that people ...
  4. [4]
    Antediluvian - Topical Bible
    The term "Antediluvian" refers to the period and the people that existed before the Great Flood, as described in the Book of Genesis.<|separator|>
  5. [5]
    The Antediluvians - Geoscience Research Institute
    Jan 1, 1991 · The Sumerian king list described the second phase, man's prosperity, success and longevity, while the Atra-Hasis Epic concentrated upon the ...
  6. [6]
    Antediluvian - Definition, Meaning & Synonyms - Vocabulary.com
    that is, the Biblical flood with Noah's ark. Generally, though, the word is used — often humorously — to describe ...
  7. [7]
    The Curious Origins of the Word 'Antediluvian' - Interesting Literature
    'Antediluvian' comes from two Latin words: the prefix ante- which means 'before' (as in 'antenatal' classes which take place before childbirth; 'AM', as in '9am ...
  8. [8]
    Antediluvian Knowledge - TheTorah.com
    Oct 10, 2018 · In the Hebrew Bible, Arpachshad's son is Shelah (Gen 10:24; 11:12), and Keinan is the son of Enosh (Gen 5:9) in the antediluvian era, but in ...
  9. [9]
    ANTEDILUVIAN Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
    Before there was antediluvian, there were the Latin words ante (meaning "before") and diluvium (meaning "flood"). In the 1600s, English speakers were using ...
  10. [10]
    Antediluvian isn't a Very Old Word - Wordfoolery
    Oct 24, 2022 · Literally it translates as “before Noah's flood” and is formed by joining two Latin terms ante and diluvium. Ante which you may recall from ante ...
  11. [11]
    https://biblehub.com/hebrew/3999.htm
  12. [12]
    The Hebrew Term for “The Flood” (TWOT) - Reformed Reader
    Feb 21, 2020 · The word for “flood” in Genesis 6-11 is not a normal word for “a lot of water.” The term is “mabbul” (מַבּוּל) and it isn't overly easy to translate.
  13. [13]
    The Flood™ (Gen 6:17) - by Michael Carasik - The Bible Guy
    Nov 5, 2024 · The use of the term mabbûl to designate a flood/inundation is specific to biblical Hebrew, but outside the book of Genesis, inundation events ...
  14. [14]
    What is the antediluvian period? - Third Millennium Ministries
    Antediluvian means “before the flood.” It refers to the entire period before the flood recorded in Genesis 6-8.Missing: primary | Show results with:primary
  15. [15]
    https://answersingenesis.org/bible-history/some-remarks-preliminary-to-a-biblical-chronology/
  16. [16]
    ANTEDILUVIAN definition | Cambridge English Dictionary
    Meaning of antediluvian in English ... extremely old-fashioned: My mother has some hopelessly antediluvian ideas about the role of women. Synonym. antiquated.
  17. [17]
    ANTEDILUVIAN Definition & Meaning - Dictionary.com
    adjective · of or belonging to the period before the Biblical Flood. · very old, old-fashioned, or out of date; antiquated; primitive. antediluvian ideas.
  18. [18]
    (PDF) William Buckland's “Reliquiae Diluvianae”: the book and its ...
    Sep 3, 2024 · Thus, Buckland straddled an important period in the early history of geology ... indicating that the bones are “antediluvian”. Buckland ...
  19. [19]
    GSA Today - The evolution of creationism
    In his Reliquiae Diluvianae (Relics of the Flood, 1823) Oxford's first geology professor, Reverend William Buckland, gathered facts thought to demonstrate the ...
  20. [20]
    The Downfall of Scriptural Geology - Ministry Magazine
    The same events that led to the downfall of scriptural geology can be correlated with the rise of Darwinian evolution. Let us piece together the historical ...Missing: antediluvian | Show results with:antediluvian
  21. [21]
    antediluvian, adj. & n. meanings, etymology and more
    antediluvian is a borrowing from Latin, combined with English elements. Etymons: ante- prefix, Latin dīluvium, ‑an suffix. See etymology. Nearby entries.
  22. [22]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis+1-2&version=ESV
  23. [23]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis+2%3A15-17&version=ESV
  24. [24]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis+3&version=ESV
  25. [25]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis+4%3A1-8&version=ESV
  26. [26]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis+4%3A9-24&version=ESV
  27. [27]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis+4%3A25-26&version=ESV
  28. [28]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis+5&version=ESV
  29. [29]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis+6%3A1-4&version=ESV
  30. [30]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis+6%3A5-7&version=ESV
  31. [31]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis+6%3A8-9&version=ESV
  32. [32]
    Can I Trust the Numbers in Genesis 5? - Apologetics Press
    Aug 2, 2020 · Person. Masoretic Hebrew · Septuagint. Samaritan Pentateuch ; Adam. 130 + 800 = 930 years. 230+ 700 = 930 years. 130 + 800 = 930 years ; Seth. 105 ...Missing: genealogy | Show results with:genealogy
  33. [33]
    Annals of the World | Information School | University of Washington
    He places the Exodus in 1491 BCE, Abraham's birth at 1996 BCE and the Flood at 2348 BCE, eventually reaching back to the beginning with a capital B on that ...
  34. [34]
    Chronology: Septuagint versus Masoretic Text - Bible Topic Exposition
    Jan 3, 2017 · That's a difference of 1,386 yrs! The difference is due to the patriarchs' Begetting Ages and (post-Food) Lifespans…in the LXX versus the MT.
  35. [35]
    The Masoretic text of Genesis 5 and 11 is still the most reliable
    Mar 29, 2019 · Since the Greek Septuagint (LXX) manuscript family produces a chronology over 1,300 years longer than the Hebrew Masoretic (MT) manuscript ...
  36. [36]
    Is There Evidence For Long Life Spans in the Bible?
    Jul 21, 2016 · The Bible records long life spans, but some scholars suggest they are metaphorical. Finding archaeological evidence is difficult, but other ...
  37. [37]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis+4%3A20-22&version=ESV
  38. [38]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis+6%3A4&version=ESV
  39. [39]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis+6%3A5%2C11-13&version=ESV
  40. [40]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis+6%3A9&version=ESV
  41. [41]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis%206:5-9&version=KJV
  42. [42]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis%206:14-16&version=KJV
  43. [43]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis%206:19-21&version=KJV
  44. [44]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis%207:2-3&version=KJV
  45. [45]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis%207:6-13&version=KJV
  46. [46]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis%207:11&version=KJV
  47. [47]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis%207:17-20&version=KJV
  48. [48]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis%207:21-23&version=KJV
  49. [49]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis%207:24&version=KJV
  50. [50]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis%208:4-12&version=KJV
  51. [51]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis%208:15-20&version=KJV
  52. [52]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis%209:1-17&version=KJV
  53. [53]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis%209:18-19&version=KJV
  54. [54]
    Biblical chronogenealogies · Creation.com
    Jan 28, 2006 · Adam died in AM 930, Noah was born in AM 1056, and the Flood occurred 600 years later, which was in AM 1656. ... For a defence of the Masoretic ...
  55. [55]
    The Chronological Debate From Adam to Abraham: In Defense of ...
    Jun 27, 2023 · 969 years—Methuselah therefore somehow survived the Flood by a full 14 years ... Masoretic Text, with its roughly 2,000 years from Adam to the ...
  56. [56]
    [PDF] Septuagintal Versus Masoretic Chronology in Genesis 5 and 11
    M reports only 292 years from the Flood of Noah to Terah's 70th year. Mysteriously, S presents this period as 650 years longer than that, with an interval of ...
  57. [57]
    https://answersingenesis.org/bible-timeline/timeline-for-the-flood/
  58. [58]
    Chronology of Noah's Flood (Gen 7-8)
    This gives a total of 378 days, which is one year, 18 days (calculated using a 30 day month).
  59. [59]
    Duration of Noah's Flood - Fully Explained! - BibleInsight
    Many translations indicate the Flood ended on the 27th day of the 2nd month of the 601st year of Noah. Gen 8:14 And in the second month, on the twenty seventh ...
  60. [60]
    A New Flood Chronology Based on Seven-Day Creation Cycles
    Apr 13, 2022 · Days of waiting for the Flood—7 days (Genesis 7:4, 10); Duration of heavy rains and Flood proper (Heb. mabbul)—40 days (7:12, 17); Time to the ...
  61. [61]
    [PDF] Biblical Evidence for the Universality of the Genesis Flood
    The extent of the Genesis Flood has been vigorously debated by biblical scholars. For those who accept a recent creation week of six literal consecutive ...
  62. [62]
    Extinctions: Georges Cuvier - Understanding Evolution - UC Berkeley
    Cuvier scoffed at the idea that living members of these fossil species were lurking somewhere on Earth, unrecognized—they were simply too big. Instead, Cuvier ...
  63. [63]
    Reliquiae Diluvianae; or, Observations on the Organic Remains ...
    Buckland's great scientific work outlined his arguments that the evidence of geology alone demonstrated that a great flood had covered the entire globe during ...
  64. [64]
    The Complete Work of Charles Darwin Online
    The first five chapters explain the principles of dating rocks and of reconstructing geological history. Lyell discusses the principle of superposition, by ...
  65. [65]
    Uniformitarianism: Charles Lyell - Understanding Evolution
    Lyell's version of geology came to be known as uniformitarianism, because of his fierce insistence that the processes that alter the Earth are uniform through ...
  66. [66]
    37.1: Uniformitarianism vs. Catastrophism - Geosciences LibreTexts
    Apr 11, 2024 · Attributing geologic change to a flood (specifically to “The” Flood) was the ideology called catastrophism. This was palatable to those thinkers ...
  67. [67]
    Questioning "Flood Geology" | National Center for Science Education
    A key problem for flood geologists is the order and sequence of fossil remains in the geological record.
  68. [68]
    A 60,000 Year Varve Record from Japan Refutes the Young-Earth ...
    Aug 16, 2016 · Here a varve chronology stretching back well over 50,000 years has been established. An important summary of the significance of this varve ...
  69. [69]
    Ice cores and climate change - British Antarctic Survey - Publication
    Jun 30, 2022 · The oldest continuous ice core records to date extend 123,000 years in Greenland and 800,000 years in Antarctica.
  70. [70]
    A 7,272-year tree-ring chronology for western Europe | Nature
    Nov 8, 1984 · The world's longest continuous tree-ring chronology is based on the bristlecone pine (Pinus aristata and Pinus longaeva) growing in the ...
  71. [71]
    [PDF] Radiometric Dating, Geologic Time, And The Age Of The Earth
    Feb 19, 1982 · The ages of the various rock formations, the Earth, the Moon, and meteorites have been measured using radiometric (also called isotopic) dating ...
  72. [72]
    The Flood: Mesopotamian Archaeological Evidence
    Flood deposits were found at Ur, Kish, and Shuruppak. Ur's flood is around 3500 BCE, while Kish and Shuruppak have multiple floods at different times.
  73. [73]
    Much Evidence Exists for a Worldwide Flood
    Geological strata and their contained marine fossils provide critical evidence that the ocean once covered the continents, even the highest continental areas.
  74. [74]
    https://answersingenesis.org/fossils/fossil-record/the-fossil-record-1/
  75. [75]
    Hydroplate theory - Creation Ministries International
    Apr 7, 2013 · Probably the most comprehensive Flood model is Walt Brown's Hydroplate Theory (HPT) because it purports to explain numerous events and ...
  76. [76]
    Dr. Walt Brown's Hydroplate Theory - The Chalcedon Foundation
    Sep 7, 1998 · The hydroplate theory is an alternate explanation of both the events of the Noahic flood, the present-day geological features of the world, and the actual ...
  77. [77]
    "Catastrophic Plate Tectonics" by John R. Baumgardner
    Baumgardner, John R. (2003) "Catastrophic Plate Tectonics: The Physics Behind the Genesis Flood," Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism: ...
  78. [78]
    https://answersingenesis.org/the-flood/flood-models-the-need-for-an-integrated-approach/
  79. [79]
    https://answersingenesis.org/blogs/calvin-smith/2025/02/24/these-fossilized-trees-problem-for-evolution/
  80. [80]
    Polystrate trees and 'fossil forests' explained
    Apr 19, 2025 · During Noah's Flood, rapid sedimentation would quickly cover the floating trees that sank in this way. This readily explains many of the ...
  81. [81]
    Polystrate Trees | Upright Trees Are Evidence of Catastrophe
    Jul 31, 2021 · The great flood in Noah's day that would have uprooted vegetation, reshaped the continents, and buried a vast number of animals and plants ...<|separator|>
  82. [82]
    The unique post-Flood Ice Age - Creation Ministries International
    Oct 17, 2019 · The unique biblical Ice Age model solves the stubborn mysteries of earth science that secular scientists have been wrestling with for more some 200 years.Missing: young | Show results with:young
  83. [83]
    Developing a More Rigorous Ice Sheet Model
    Jan 29, 2021 · In the creation model, a single Ice Age lasting hundreds of years was caused by and quickly followed the Genesis Flood.1 In 1994, ...<|separator|>
  84. [84]
    [PDF] Catastrophic Plate Tectonics.indd - Answers in Genesis
    John R. Baumgardner, Ph. D., Los Alamos National Laboratory, now an ... Creationism and plate tectonics: A re-evaluation of the evidence. 12. Wise ...
  85. [85]
    Catastrophic Plate Tectonics - The Institute for Creation Research
    Pittsburgh, PA: Creation Science Fellowship, 287–305. * Dr. Baumgardner earned his Ph.D. in geophysics and space physics from UCLA.
  86. [86]
    The Epic of Gilgamesh Tablets 11 & 12 Summary & Analysis
    Utnapishtim, the survivor of the flood that almost wiped out humankind, tells his story. Once upon a time, he says, he was king of Shuruppak, a beautiful, ...
  87. [87]
    The Story of Atrahasis
    It combines familiar Sumerian motifs of the creation of mankind and the subsequent flood. On one of the Sumerian king-lists, Atrahasis is listed as king of ...
  88. [88]
    The Atrahasis Epic: The Great Flood & the Meaning of Suffering
    Mar 6, 2011 · Written down in the mid-17th century BCE, the Atrahasis can be dated by the colophon to the reign of the Babylonian King Hammurabi's great- ...
  89. [89]
    The Great Flood: Sumerian version - Livius.org
    Oct 12, 2020 · Ziusudra is king of Šuruppak and a seer, who witnesses the gods' council and decision in a vision, and understands that something terrible is ...
  90. [90]
    Startling Similarity between Hindu Flood Legend of Manu and the ...
    Apr 30, 2015 · In this story, the god appears to Manu in the form of a little fish whilst he was performing his ablutions in a pond. Manu kept the fish, which ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  91. [91]
    DEUCALION (Deukalion) - Hero of the Great Deluge of Greek ...
    Deukalion was the son of Prometheus, creator of mankind, and Pyrrha the daughter of Pandora, the first woman.
  92. [92]
    The Mesopotamian Origin of the Biblical Flood Story - TheTorah.com
    Oct 22, 2020 · Part of the Epic of Atrahasis, found in Sippar, dating from the reign of King Ammisaduqa of Babylon (ca. 1635 B.C.E.). British Museum (Museum # ...
  93. [93]
    Why are flood myths in so many ancient stories? - Big Think
    Feb 3, 2023 · Theories for flood myth similarities include cultural transmission, comparable experiences, or that they are due to how our brains work. Some ...
  94. [94]
    The Benei Elohim, the Watchers, and the Origins of Evil
    Nov 3, 2016 · In another thread woven into the story of the Watchers in Enoch, humans are taught magic and other forbidden knowledge: And they taught them ...
  95. [95]
    Fallen Angels in the Book of Enoch: Who Are the Watchers?
    Nov 28, 2023 · The Book of Enoch describes the Watchers, angels who disobeyed God by mating with human women and teaching forbidden knowledge. · These actions ...
  96. [96]
    The Fallen Angels – 1 Enoch 6-8 - Reading Acts
    May 31, 2016 · The Book of the Watchers describes the fallen angels (1 Enoch 6-8). In the biblical story of the Nephilim, the sons of God saw the daughters of men were ...
  97. [97]
    PROMETHEUS - Greek Titan God of Forethought, Creator of Mankind
    Prometheus was the ancient Greek Titan-god of forethought and crafty counsel who was given the task of moulding mankind out of clay.
  98. [98]
    Prometheus - Mythopedia
    Mar 8, 2023 · Prometheus, son of Iapetus, was a crafty Titan who acted as a benefactor of the first humans, giving them fire in defiance of the mighty Zeus.
  99. [99]
    Creation Story of the Maya - Living Maya Time - Smithsonian Institution
    The Popol Vuh, or Popol ... deities tried another time, and created humans from wood but the wooden people could not worship either, so they were destroyed.
  100. [100]
    [PDF] Popol Vuh: Sacred Book of the Quiché Maya People - Mesoweb
    Although the Popol Vuh has the wooden effigies destroyed in a flood ... wooden effigies before their destruction in the flood (p. 83; lines 654-655) ...
  101. [101]
    Correspondences Between Apkallu and the Nephilim - Samizdat
    Jun 25, 2015 · AD Kilmer has suggested that the ancient sages of Mesopotamian tradition–the apkallu–may be related to the Nephilim.
  102. [102]
    Raphael and Painting: 9 The Loggia Frescoes
    Mar 25, 2020 · This has thirteen bays in which Raphael's workshop painted frescoes of scenes from the Old and New Testaments, between 1518-19.Missing: pre- world
  103. [103]
    Paradise, 17th Century artwork - Stock Image - C022/2685
    Paradise. 1633 engraving by Swiss engraver Matthaus Merian der Altere, entitled 'Paradise'.
  104. [104]
    Paradise Lost: A Reader's Guide to a Christian Classic | Desiring God
    Dec 21, 2021 · Milton famously said that he intended his epic to be “doctrinal and exemplary to a nation.” There is edification as well as enjoyment in ...Missing: antediluvian | Show results with:antediluvian
  105. [105]
    The Coming Race - Encore Edition - Broadview Press
    Free delivery over $65 30-day returnsEdward Bulwer-Lytton's The Coming Race was one of the most remarkable and most influential books published in the 1870s.Missing: antediluvian | Show results with:antediluvian
  106. [106]
    The Coming Race by Lord Lytton - Marxists Internet Archive
    By one of such revolutions, that portion of the upper world inhabited by the ancestors of this race had been subjected to inundations, not rapid, but gradual ...Chapter Xvi · Chapter Xxv · Chapter V
  107. [107]
    Representations of Change and Decay in Victorian Literature
    May 16, 2010 · This motif of yellow helps to tie the elements of decay together and create a coherent pattern of decay throughout the story. When Pip first ...Missing: tales decline
  108. [108]
    William Buckland and the British Bone Caves - guy van rentergem
    Still believing that the Noachian Flood was a historical event, Buckland concluded that the bones were antediluvian or older than the Deluge.Missing: interpretation | Show results with:interpretation
  109. [109]
    XVI. Account of an assemblage of fossil teeth and bones of elephant ...
    Buckland William. 1822XVI. Account of an assemblage of fossil teeth and bones of elephant, rhinoceros, hippopotamus, bear, tiger, and hyæna, and sixteen ...Missing: antediluvian interpretation
  110. [110]
    the extinct animals of Crystal Palace Park as heritage artefacts
    By referring to these extinct animals as 'antediluvian monsters' and 'pre-Adamite beasts', Hawkins and Richard Owen, who was brought in at a late stage to lend ...
  111. [111]
    Memoir on the megatherium, or giant ground-sloth of America
    Jan 28, 2008 · Memoir on the megatherium, or giant ground-sloth of America. by: Owen, Richard, 1804-1892. Publication date: 1861. Topics: Sloths, Fossil.
  112. [112]
    https://answersingenesis.org/dinosaurs/scholars-mystery-of-behemoth/
  113. [113]
    What is Job's 'Behemoth'? | ArmstrongInstitute.org
    Jan 18, 2019 · the behemoth is most likely a sauropod dinosaur such as diplodocus or brachiosaurus—dinosaurs with long necks and gigantic tails ...Pre-Adamic World · Behemoth Created With Man · What The Fossil Record Says<|separator|>
  114. [114]
    Dragons & Dinosaurs - Creation Experience Museum
    May 14, 2022 · When the Bible mentions dragons, behemoth, and leviathan, could it be that dinosaurs are what the writer had in mind?
  115. [115]
    Dinosaur Shocker - Smithsonian Magazine
    Probing a 68-million-year-old T. rex, Mary Schweitzer stumbled upon astonishing signs of life that may radically change our view of the ancient beasts.
  116. [116]
    Soft tissue and cellular preservation in vertebrate skeletal elements ...
    Soft tissues and cell-like microstructures derived from skeletal elements of a well-preserved Tyrannosaurus rex (MOR 1125) were represented by four components.Missing: creationist | Show results with:creationist
  117. [117]
    Dinosaur soft tissue gets 'ironic' response · Creation.com
    Jan 25, 2014 · Evolutionist Mary Schweitzer trying desperately to explain dinosaur soft tissue by saying iron in blood preserved it 70+ million years.
  118. [118]
    https://answersingenesis.org/dinosaurs/bones/iron-key-to-preserving-dinosaur-soft-tissue/
  119. [119]
    Did Humans and Dinosaurs Ever Live Together? - Discover Magazine
    Sep 27, 2023 · Some claim that the fossil record shows no direct evidence of humans living alongside dinosaurs.Missing: overlap | Show results with:overlap
  120. [120]
    https://answersingenesis.org/noahs-ark/tracing-the-fate-of-the-animals-that-survived-the-post-flood-extinction/
  121. [121]
    Over-kill, over-chill, or over-ill? - Creation Ministries International
    Mar 29, 2021 · The post-Flood Ice Age explains the megafauna-mass-extinction mystery. As shown in a previous article, the early to middle part of the Ice Age ...Missing: waves | Show results with:waves
  122. [122]
    Atlantis: the antediluvian world : Donnelly, Ignatius, 1831-1901
    Jun 27, 2007 · Publication date: 1882 ; Topics: Atlantis (Legendary place), Geographical myths, Deluge, Atlantis ; Publisher: New York : Harper & Brothers.
  123. [123]
    No, There Wasn't an Advanced Civilization 12,000 Years Ago
    Jun 1, 2017 · Graham Hancock is an audacious autodidact who believes that long before ancient Mesopotamia, Babylonia and Egypt there existed an even more ...
  124. [124]
    The Dangers of Ancient Apocalypse's Pseudoscience - Sapiens.org
    Dec 6, 2022 · Reviewing Netflix's Ancient Apocalypse, an anthropologist explains how Graham Hancock devalues both archaeology and Indigenous heritage.
  125. [125]
    How old is it? Dating Göbekli Tepe.
    Jun 22, 2016 · There are neither domesticated plants, nor animals at Göbekli Tepe. Radiocarbon data support the general archaeological dating (see below).
  126. [126]
    Yonaguni Monument : diving a mysterious underwater city in Okinawa
    May 6, 2019 · He claimed the Yonaguni monument was all natural because the rocks of the islands had the property to break out neatly in such a way to form ...<|separator|>
  127. [127]
    Apocalyptic Pseudoarchaeology - Skeptical Inquirer
    Ancient Apocalypse recycles old pseudoscientific tropes and mixes them with fallacies and other epistemically unreliable content.
  128. [128]
    Grand Canyon: Exposing the Flood
    Dec 30, 2020 · The rocks reveal the enormity of the global Flood, and the canyon exhibits catastrophic carving from receding floodwaters.
  129. [129]
    https://answersingenesis.org/geology/grand-canyon-facts/startling-evidence-for-noahs-flood/
  130. [130]
    https://answersingenesis.org/the-flood/
  131. [131]
    The Great Flood: Archaeology? - Livius.org
    Oct 12, 2020 · In 1929, the archaeologist Leonard Woolley (1880-1960) announced that he had discovered a 3¾ meter thick clay deposit, which he believed had ...
  132. [132]
    GEOLOGIST CONFIRMS BIBLE FLOOD STORY; Prof. Woolley ...
    Woolley Returns From Ur in Mesopotamia With Proof of Deluge Before 4000 B.C. WATER'S SILT 8 FEET DEEP Deposit Found in Excavations Covers Evidence of High Type ...
  133. [133]
    Human population genetics and a Noahic Bottleneck
    Apr 13, 2023 · Genetic evidence suggests human population never was as low as 2. Creationists claim a bottleneck of 5, but TMR10A places Noah at 180,000 years ...
  134. [134]
    [PDF] Twenty-one Reasons Noah's Worldwide Flood Never Happened
    Young-Earth creationists claim that the Paleozoic sedimentary rocks in the Grand Canyon and the Mesozoic sedimentary rocks of the Grand.
  135. [135]
    Flood Geology and the Grand Canyon: What Does the Evidence ...
    Jun 29, 2016 · Pollen and spores are incredibly small, and easily carried by wind and water great distances. How could a global flood with tsunamis sweeping ...Missing: contradicting | Show results with:contradicting<|separator|>
  136. [136]
    The Fatal Flaws of Flood Geology
    The flood geology theory teaches essentially that the Biblical Flood of Noah buried all the fossils within a year's time, several thousand years ago.Missing: diluvialism megafauna
  137. [137]
    https://answersingenesis.org/creationism/young-earth/young-earth-creationist-view-summarized-and-defended/
  138. [138]
    The RATE Project | The Institute for Creation Research
    1. A large amount of radioactive decay has occurred. · 2. Nuclear decay processes were accelerated during episodes in earth history. · 3. Conventional ...
  139. [139]
    Zircon Chronology: Dating the Oldest Material on Earth | AMNH
    In comparison, the half-life of the radioactive uranium 238 isotope is 4.5 billion years, which makes it useful for dating extremely old materials. Zircon ...
  140. [140]
    https://answersingenesis.org/geology/radiometric-dating/rocks-around-the-clock-do-zircons-contain-reliable-time-stamps-and-early-earths-secrets/
  141. [141]
    A new cosmology: solution to the starlight travel time problem
    A new model, of a type similar to Humphreys', has been described that allows billions of years to pass in the cosmos but only 24 hours on Earth during Day 4.
  142. [142]
    https://answersingenesis.org/astronomy/starlight/
  143. [143]
    https://answersingenesis.org/fossils/fossil-record/where-are-all-the-human-fossils/
  144. [144]
    Human Fossils | The Smithsonian Institution's Human Origins Program
    Jan 3, 2024 · Fossil discoveries show that the human family tree has many more branches and deeper roots than we knew about even a couple of decades ago.Fossils · Species · Human Family Tree · Mystery Skull Interactive
  145. [145]
    Genesis 6 - Barnes' Notes on the Whole Bible - Bible Commentaries
    And the land was corrupt. - In contrast with Noah, the rest of the race were corrupt - entirely depraved by sin. “It was filled with violence” - with the ...
  146. [146]
    A Biblical Theology of the Flood
    ... moral depravity and sinfulness, the all-pervading corruption and violence of all living beings ("all flesh") on earth (Gen 6:1-8, 11-12), which demands ...<|separator|>
  147. [147]
    Topical Bible: Universal Corruption and Violence
    Genesis 6:11-13 : "Now the earth was corrupt in the sight of God, and full of violence. And God looked upon the earth and saw that it was corrupt; for all ...
  148. [148]
    https://answersingenesis.org/hermeneutics/is-genesis-1-literal-literalism-or-literalistic/
  149. [149]
    The Identity of the “Sons of God” in Genesis 6:1–4: A Theological ...
    Aug 9, 2025 · The Sethite interpretation best aligns with the theological trajectory of Genesis 6, which emphasizes human responsibility for moral corruption ...Missing: period | Show results with:period