Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Atomic chess

Atomic chess is a variant of standard chess played on an 8×8 board with the usual setup and movements, distinguished by a unique explosion mechanic: whenever a captures an opponent's , both the capturer and the captured are destroyed, along with all non-pawn on adjacent squares (horizontally, vertically, or diagonally). This explosive capture alters traditional strategy, emphasizing sacrificial tactics and positioning to detonate the opponent's king, as direct captures of the king are prevented as they constitute , recognized before execution (though mutual destruction occurs if kings are adjacent). Pawns are immune to these explosions unless directly captured, allowing them to promote normally to any except a king, while and remain permitted under standard conditions. The game lacks traditional , enabling kings to move adjacent to one another without penalty, though any move causing one's own king to explode is illegal. Rules are mostly standardized, though minor variations exist across platforms. Victory is achieved by exploding the opponent's king through an —either by an indirect from a nearby capture—while can theoretically win but is often superseded by the explosive rules. Draws occur via , threefold repetition, or other standard means, but the variant's aggressive nature typically leads to decisive outcomes. Atomic chess originated in 1995 when its rules were first implemented and published on the German Internet Chess Server (GICS) by developer connex, based on contributions from Klaus Knopper. It gained broader public attention around 2000 through online platforms, evolving from niche server play to a popular variant on sites like and , where it remains accessible for casual and competitive matches. The variant's explosive theme draws from nuclear concepts, fostering creative, high-risk gameplay that contrasts with classical chess's emphasis on preservation.

Rules

Setup and movement

Atomic chess is played on a standard 8x8 chessboard featuring 64 squares arranged in an alternating pattern of light and dark colors, typically with a1 being a dark square in the bottom-left corner from White's perspective. The initial setup mirrors that of international chess: White's pieces occupy the first two ranks, with pawns positioned on the second rank (a2 to h2) and the major pieces—rooks on a1 and h1, knights on b1 and g1, bishops on c1 and f1, queen on d1, and king on e1—on the first rank. Black's pieces are symmetrically placed on the seventh and eighth ranks, with pawns on a7 to h7 and the other pieces on the eighth rank in corresponding files. Piece movements and basic gameplay proceed identically to standard chess, with players alternating turns beginning with . The king moves one square in any direction—horizontally, vertically, or diagonally. The combines the rook's and 's movements, traveling any number of unoccupied squares horizontally, vertically, or diagonally. Rooks move any number of squares horizontally or vertically, while are restricted to any number of squares diagonally. Knights follow their unique L-shaped path: two squares in one direction and one perpendicular, or one square in one direction and two perpendicular, allowing them to jump over other pieces. Pawns advance one square forward (or two from their starting position), capture diagonally forward one square, and may perform captures under standard conditions; upon reaching the opponent's back rank, pawns promote to a , , , or . Castling is permitted under the usual restrictions: neither nor the relevant has moved previously, no pieces occupy the squares between them, and does not pass through or land on a square under attack. Standard algebraic notation is employed to record moves, with files denoted a to h from left to right and ranks numbered 1 to 8 from White's side; captures are indicated by an "x" (e.g., Bxc5), though their consequences diverge in atomic chess.

Capturing mechanics

In atomic chess, captures are performed by moving a piece to a square occupied by an opponent's piece, adhering to the standard movement patterns of chess pieces. For instance, bishops and move diagonally, rooks and move horizontally or vertically, knights execute their characteristic L-shaped jumps, and pawns advance diagonally to capture. Once a capture is executed, both the capturing and the captured are promptly removed from the board. This mutual elimination applies uniformly regardless of the pieces involved, provided the move itself is legal under standard chess movement rules. Captures maintain the piece-type agnostic validity of standard chess, meaning no additional restrictions apply at the initiation stage beyond the move's legality. Pawns specifically capture diagonally forward, mirroring conventional chess, while captures are allowed and trigger an around the square where the capturing lands, in addition to removing the targeted . This removal process leads to the resulting centered on the capture square, as detailed in the explosions section.

Explosions and their effects

In atomic chess, an explosion is triggered whenever a captures an opponent's , with the blast centered on the square of the captured , which is also the landing square of the capturing before any removals occur. The explosion immediately removes both the capturing and the captured from the board, regardless of their type. The blast extends to all eight adjacent squares surrounding the center—those orthogonally (forward, backward, left, right) and diagonally—destroying every non-pawn present on those squares, irrespective of color. This creates a destructive radius that can clear multiple in a single move, fundamentally altering board control compared to standard chess. Pawns are uniquely immune to explosion damage; they are not removed by the blast even if positioned on an adjacent square and can only be eliminated through direct capture in a separate move. This immunity preserves pawn structures and promotes aggressive play around them, as they act as shields against explosive losses. Explosions do not propagate or cause chain reactions; each capture initiates precisely one isolated blast event, limiting the scope of destruction to the initial 3x3 area while the center square remains empty post-capture. In notation and visual representations, this is typically depicted as a 3x3 grid centered on the capture square, with the central square vacated and pawns excluded from removal within the perimeter. Moves that would cause an explosion destroying the player's own king are prohibited, ensuring royal safety aligns with the variant's explosive dynamics.

Check, checkmate, and king rules

In atomic chess, a king is considered in check if the opponent can capture it or a piece adjacent to it on the next move, resulting in an explosion that would remove the king from the board, even if the capturing piece is also destroyed in the process. This adapts the standard chess concept of check to the variant's explosion mechanics, where threats extend beyond direct capture to indirect blasts affecting the 's square. Checkmate occurs when the king is in and there is no legal move to escape the threat, such as moving the king to a safe square, blocking the attacking line, or capturing the attacker—provided none of these actions would trigger an removing the player's own king. Unlike standard chess, in atomic chess often involves sacrificial captures that position an precisely to trap the king without escape options. Kings in atomic chess cannot capture any pieces, protected or unprotected, because doing so would cause an centered on the king's own square, immediately removing it from the board. This prohibition applies universally, making the king a purely defensive piece unable to engage in captures. Kings may be placed adjacent to each other without triggering an explosion or , as no capture occurs to initiate the blast; however, when adjacent, neither king attacks the other, nullifying any potential check between them. Any move, including captures or king movements, that would cause the player's own king to be removed by an explosion is illegal and prohibited. This rule ensures players cannot self-destruct their , extending to scenarios where a capture chain or adjacent blast would affect the 's position. is permitted under the same conditions as in standard chess—provided neither the nor the relevant has moved previously, the squares between them are unoccupied, and the is not in — but it is invalid if the maneuver would place the in or lead to an immediate risk upon completion.

Winning and drawing conditions

In atomic chess, a player achieves victory through two primary means: or the destruction of the opponent's via . occurs when the opponent's is under attack (in ) and has no legal move to escape the threat, mirroring the condition in standard chess but adapted to the explosive capture mechanics. A win by takes place if a capture made by the player triggers an that removes the opponent's from the board, granting an immediate victory to the capturing player regardless of whether the was directly captured, as kings cannot perform unprotected captures. This often arises from positioning a to explode an adjacent enemy near the . The game ends in a under standard chess conditions modified for the variant's rules. Stalemate results in a when the player whose turn it is has no legal moves available and their is not in . Threefold repetition allows a claim if the exact same position occurs three times during the game, considering the side to move and rights. The 50-move rule declares a if 50 consecutive moves by each player pass without any capture or pawn advance. Insufficient material leads to a when neither player can achieve or explode the opponent's , such as in a king-versus- where mutual proximity prevents decisive action. Resignation is permitted at any point, immediately awarding the win to the opponent.

Variations

Standard atomic chess

Standard atomic chess refers to the baseline variant of the game as implemented on major online platforms such as and , utilizing an chessboard with the standard starting position of pieces for white and black. Movement rules for all pieces mirror those of conventional chess, including pawn advances and special moves like , while the core mechanics of capturing, explosions, check, , and winning conditions align with the foundational rules outlined earlier in this entry. A distinctive feature is the handling of en passant captures, which are allowed and trigger an explosion centered at the target square behind the captured , destroying adjacent non-pawn pieces, though the involved pawns are removed only directly. Pawns remain immune to explosion effects from other captures, ensuring they are solely removed through direct involvement in a capture. Pawns promote to a , , , or upon reaching the opponent's back rank. Kings in standard atomic chess cannot capture any pieces, preventing self-induced explosions, and this rule holds invariant across implementations. Tournament play adheres to time controls akin to those in traditional chess, such as 3 minutes plus 1-second increment per move, and requires no physical board, facilitating competition exclusively.

Modified atomic variants

Modified atomic variants introduce deliberate alterations to the core explosion or other standard rules of atomic chess, creating diverse gameplay dynamics while retaining the explosive capture foundation. These adaptations often aim to balance destruction with strategic depth, address perceived imbalances, or cater to platform-specific preferences. Although less formalized than standard atomic chess, they appear in online communities, custom implementations, and house rules, fostering experimentation among players. One such variant, sometimes referred to as Power Atomic, expands the explosion radius beyond the standard 3x3 area to a larger grid, such as 5x5, encompassing more squares and amplifying destructive potential. This modification heightens the risk of chain reactions, often leading to rapid board clearance but also prolonging games as players adopt more cautious approaches to avoid mutual devastation. The increased scope demands greater positional awareness, as even distant pieces may be vulnerable to collateral damage. Annihilation Chess builds on atomic principles by removing pawn immunity to explosions, allowing pawns to be destroyed in blasts alongside other pieces. This eliminates the protective status pawns enjoy in standard atomic chess, making frontline advances more perilous and altering early-game pawn structures. Without this shield, pawn chains become fragile, encouraging aggressive captures that can wipe out entire files or ranks, though it may accelerate games toward bare-king endgames. No-castling Atomic prohibits castling entirely, forcing kings to remain centralized and exposing them to early explosion threats. By removing this defensive maneuver, the variant intensifies opening risks, as players must maneuver kings manually amid potential captures, often resulting in quicker escalations to mutual king hunts. This adaptation emphasizes raw mobility and sacrifice over safety, aligning with atomic's chaotic ethos while amplifying vulnerability from the outset. Platform-specific tweaks further customize atomic chess for online play. For instance, Lichess.org's implementation adheres closely to standard rules but supports tournament settings where draw-by-agreement can be optionally disabled to prevent premature stalemates in explosive positions, promoting decisive outcomes through forced continuations. Such adjustments ensure variant integrity across casual and competitive formats.

History

Origins and early development

Atomic chess emerged in 1995 as a invented through experimentation by anonymous players on the German (GICS), where users explored the concept of explosive captures that destroy surrounding pieces. The rules were first collected and formalized by Klaus Knopper, a key figure in the GICS , who documented them based on informal play among friends and server participants. These initial rules were implemented on GICS on November 27, 1995, by the user known as connex, marking the variant's debut in an organized online format. No single individual is credited as the sole inventor; instead, the development is attributed to the collaborative efforts of the GICS , reflecting the era's burgeoning interest in s via early platforms. This variant is distinct from an earlier 1949 invention by Nasouhi Bey Tahir, which featured a larger board and 'atomic bomb' promotions. The name "Atomic" was chosen to evoke the theme of explosions. The first formal rules were published online in late 1995 and 1996 through GICS help files and early discussions on forums, providing a standardized that included unique mechanics like pawn immunity to explosions. These publications helped solidify the variant's core principles, distinguishing it from other capture-based variants. Prior to , play was confined to a handful of chess servers, primarily GICS, where custom implementations allowed enthusiasts to experiment and refine the rules in real-time matches. Servers like the Free Internet Chess Server (FICS) saw early custom setups by players before official integration, though widespread adoption remained limited to niche online communities. This period laid the groundwork for atomic chess as a fast-paced, high-risk variant, fostering informal tournaments and theoretical discussions that emphasized aggressive tactics over traditional positional play.

Popularization and modern play

Atomic chess began to gain wider recognition in 2000, coinciding with the expansion of communities and early chess servers that facilitated play. This period marked a shift from niche experimentation to more accessible online formats, aligning with the broader growth of digital chess platforms in the early . The 2010s saw a significant surge in popularity, driven by its integration into major free platforms. .org added atomic chess as a supported in 2015, allowing for rated games and fostering competitive play among users. followed in late 2020, incorporating it into its variants section and enabling structured matchmaking, which further boosted participation. These additions transformed atomic chess from an obscure option into a staple of online ecosystems, with rated features encouraging skill development and community engagement. Online tournaments have become a cornerstone of modern atomic chess, particularly on .org, where annual events like the Atomic World Championship draw competitors worldwide. The 2025 edition, for instance, featured registration periods and structured matches with 3+1 time controls, attracting dedicated players. Popularity peaked during the 2020 , as online chess overall experienced explosive growth, with atomic chess benefiting from increased interest in fast-paced, tactical variants. Tournaments such as the Yearly Atomic Arena in 2025 saw over 2,400 participants and thousands of games played. The atomic chess community thrives online, with active discussions and organization on platforms like Discord's The House server, dedicated to variants including atomic, crazyhouse, and others. On Reddit, communities such as r/atomicchess host analysis and strategy sharing, while broader chess forums contribute to its visibility. By 2025, the player base remains robust, with Lichess.org reporting over 7,800 active atomic players weekly and rating distributions indicating sustained engagement across skill levels. Tournaments like the 2025 Atomic Chess Championship on Chess.com garnered peak viewership of over 4,500, underscoring its niche but dedicated following. Physical play of atomic chess remains rare, typically occurring informally with standard chessboards and agreed-upon to simulate explosions by removing pieces manually. It lacks official recognition from the International Chess Federation (), which governs only classical chess under its standardized laws without provisions for variants like atomic.

Strategy

Opening principles

In atomic chess, opening principles diverge significantly from standard chess due to the explosive consequences of captures, which can rapidly clear sections of the board and expose kings to immediate danger. Players prioritize safe piece development and mobility while avoiding early exchanges that might trigger unintended blasts annihilating multiple pieces, including potentially the king. Common initial moves for White include 1.Nf3, 1.Nh3, 1.e4, and 1.e3, as these allow knights and pawns to gain space without provoking central confrontations. For instance, 1.Nf3 is favored among higher-rated players for its flexibility in targeting weak squares like while Black must respond cautiously, often with 1... to block knight forks. King safety remains paramount from the outset, as explosions can propagate threats directly to the , making early essential but selective—queenside options are riskier due to potential disruptions. Black's replies emphasize defensive setups, such as 1...e6 against 1.Nh3 or 1...d6 against 1.e3, to maintain piece coordination without inviting sacrificial attacks. A notable example is the line following 1.e4, where Black avoids 1...e5 (which leads to quick losses via queen incursions like 2.Qh5 threatening f7) and instead opts for 1...d5 or similar to challenge the center safely. Sacrificial motifs, such as the Atomic King's Gambit, introduce controlled risks by offering pawns for rapid development and king exposure on the opponent's side. In this gambit, White plays 1.Nf3 f6 2.e3 e6 3.Bd3, sacrificing a pawn (e.g., via 3...Bb4 4.c3 Bxc3) to accelerate piece activity and force Black into passive defense. Such temptations exploit the explosion mechanic to clear enemy material selectively, but they require precise calculation to avoid self-inflicted damage. Standard aggressive openings like the Sicilian Defense (1.e4 c5) are generally avoided, as they invite explosive queen attacks on f7, often resulting in White's advantage. Openings are evaluated not solely on or but on a combination of count, vulnerability, and latent potential, with statistical analyses showing 1.Nh3 yielding around a 90 advantage for and 1.Nf3 about 80 . This holistic assessment underscores the need for setups that position for future blasts while minimizing one's own exposure, often leading to quieter structures in the first 10-15 moves.

Middlegame tactics

In atomic chess, middlegame play revolves around orchestrated explosions to disrupt the opponent's position while preserving one's own forces. Tactics often emphasize forcing the opponent into captures that initiate reactions, such as discovered attacks targeting near the king, where a single can annihilate multiple enemy units for a net gain. For instance, advancing a to provoke a response that exposes the king to an indirect blast is a common maneuver, as exchanges in this variant rarely favor simple material trades due to the involved. To counter these threats, players prioritize avoiding piece clustering, spreading their non-pawn forces to limit the scope of potential explosions and prevent catastrophic losses from adjacent captures. Knights hold particular value in the middlegame for their ability to leap over obstacles and infiltrate enemy lines, setting up isolated explosion opportunities without risking broad exposure; however, bishops may gain relative strength in open positions where long-range threats can be leveraged safely. Pawns, immune to explosive annihilation, are advanced strategically as protective shields around the king and key pieces, blocking avenues for opponent incursions while indirectly supporting threats like pawn promotion races, which differ from standard chess since underpromotion offers no advantage in this variant. Recurring motifs include configurations where a single piece threatens simultaneous explosions on multiple targets—often termed an "atomic fork"—exploiting the opponent's clustered defenses for decisive advantage. These imbalances typically accelerate simplification, as aggressive captures rapidly reduce the board to pawn-heavy endgames faster than in conventional chess, shifting focus from piece activity to control.

Endgame considerations

In atomic chess endgames, the frequent explosions from captures often reduce the board to minimal , typically resulting in and configurations such as K+P vs. K, where outcomes hinge on precise maneuvers and advancement rather than traditional piece coordination. Draws are common in these scenarios if opposing pawns block each other's paths, as pawns cannot be captured without risking mutual destruction due to their immunity from explosions when positioned directly behind the captured piece. Pawn dominance defines late-game play, with endgames frequently revolving around promotion races where the side achieving a faster pawn breakthrough can force a decisive explosion near the enemy . A single pawn advantage often proves winning, converting into superior firepower like KQP vs. , though blocked or backward pawns can progress, turning the position drawish. Pawns serve dual roles as both aggressive promoters and defensive blockers for their own kings, exploiting their explosion immunity to shield vital squares without fear of retaliatory blasts. Kings exhibit heightened activity in endgames, advancing aggressively to support pawn pushes or contest promotion squares, as they face less risk from distant captures but must avoid adjacency that invites zugzwang-forced separations. Adjacent kings are permissible but precarious, since any intervening capture would trigger an annihilating both, necessitating careful positioning to detach the enemy king via control. minimalism amplifies the drawish nature of many endgames, with K+P vs. K positions often ending in if the defending king intercepts the effectively, invoking the 50-move rule absent sufficient captures or pawn moves. clear non-pawn pieces rapidly, leaving bare or pawn-supported kings where insufficient for leads to automatic draws. Zugzwang variants are prevalent due to players' reluctance to initiate explosions that could backfire, making stalemates a frequent outcome in pawn-blocked setups; the defending side may deliberately avoid moves to force or the 50-move . In KPP vs. KP, for instance, can compel the opponent to expose their , allowing the attacker to exploit the "rule of the rectangle"—a geometric guideline where the attacking king must enter a defined board area around the pawn to secure and victory. Winning techniques emphasize forcing the opponent into unfavorable captures to unblock paths, enabling king-supported breakthroughs that culminate in explosive checkmates. In KP vs. K, the attacker wins by racing the king into the promotion rectangle, detonating the pawn to obliterate the defender; conversely, the defender counters by reaching the rectangle first to block or force a . Advanced plays involve "pawnitisation," a defensive technique in which pawns are promoted to s of the wrong color for the relevant , rendering the bishop ineffective and enabling s against material disadvantages like an extra enemy .

References

  1. [1]
    Atomic Chess - Chess Terms
    Atomic Chess is a chess variant that was first introduced to the broader public in 2000, although before then, this variant was already being played on small ...Captures And Explosions · Threats To The King · Special Pawn RulesMissing: history | Show results with:history
  2. [2]
    Atomic • Nuke your opponent's king to win. • lichess.org
    This study explains the rules of atomic chess in detail. Clarification. In Atomic the kings can be connected by moving one into the adjacent squares of the ...
  3. [3]
    Atomic Chess - GNU.org
    General rules. Captures destroy ('explode') both capturer and victim, and also destroy all non-Pawns adjacent to the capture square. The game is won by ...
  4. [4]
    Atomic Chess Rules - Unix-AG
    In most cases the server will recognize a direct atomic-checkmate before the king is actually captured. Moves causing own king's explosion are not allowed.Missing: history | Show results with:history
  5. [5]
    Atomic - Chess.com Variants Wiki | Fandom
    Oct 29, 2024 · Atomic is a historical variant. It's rules were first published on German Internet Chess Server in 1995. It was added to the Most Popular ...
  6. [6]
    Atomic - Play Chess Variants Online
    Capturing a piece leads to an explosion that affects every adjacent piece, except pawns.
  7. [7]
    What is Atomic chess? | Chess.com Help Center
    In Atomic chess, when you capture a piece it explodes! Explosions destroy all pieces that are 'touching' the captured piece, including the capturing piece, ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  8. [8]
    https://www.illion-atomic.netlify.app/atomic-rules/
  9. [9]
    Game rules (Atomic Chess) - BrainKing
    Atomic Chess · There is no check or checkmate. · Whenever a piece is captured, an explosion occurs on the regarding field. The explosion destroys · The player who ...Missing: history | Show results with:history<|control11|><|separator|>
  10. [10]
    Atomic Chess - Chessprogramming wiki
    Captures that result in the explosion of the own king are illegal, and therefore a king can never capture any other piece, and it is possible to move the kings ...
  11. [11]
    Rules of atomic - Ars Atomica
    Aug 19, 2017 · In the case of en passant, the 3x3 square in step 2 is not centred on the captured pawn, but on the square it bypassed (the square the capturing ...Captures · Illegal Moves · Adjacent Kings
  12. [12]
    Atomic Chess - SchemingMind.com
    The game can be won either by exploding the enemy king, or by checkmating him (see below for checkmate definition), or by opponent resignation. There are draws: ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  13. [13]
    Atomic Chess
    Pawns promote to another (non-royal) piece of choice when they reach last ... General rules. Captures destroy ('explode') both capturer and victim, and ...
  14. [14]
    Liam Hereford Wins Explosive Grand Final, Crowned Atomic Chess ...
    Mar 28, 2025 · The rules of Atomic Chess are pretty simple: it's like chess, but pieces explode. Whenever a piece is captured, an "explosion" reaching all the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  15. [15]
    Make a dumb chess variant - Chess Forums
    Dec 5, 2023 · This Chess Variant is like Atomic Chess but the explosive grid is 5x5 and not 3x3. Pawns too get exploded! Avatar of Wolf_O-Donnell. Wolf_O ...
  16. [16]
    Atomic Chess - Chronatog
    Atomic Chess has been played on various Internet Chess Servers (ICSes) since at least November 27, 1995 when Klaus Knopper collected the rules describing ...Missing: origins invention
  17. [17]
    Vlasov's ATOMIC-CHESS HOMEPAGE - Unix-AG
    In Atomic Chess, capturing a piece causes an explosion, destroying the captured piece and nearby pieces (except pawns). The game is won by checkmate or ...
  18. [18]
    Golden Era of Atomic Chess (1995-1999) - Chronatog
    Feb 11, 2019 · 01 March 1996 – Estimated start of work on the first Atomic-Chess playing engine, “Atomix” by Jonas Hoffman (JoelH) and Peter Schaefer ( ...Missing: origins invention
  19. [19]
    The History of Internet Chess Servers
    Feb 8, 2022 · The first internet chess server was creatively named Internet Chess Server or ICS for short and was programmed by Michael Moore and Richard Nash ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  20. [20]
    The rise of online chess
    Oct 4, 2024 · Online chess has existed since the 1970s but has seen a rapid growth in popularity amidst the COVID-19 pandemic and rise of chess live streaming.
  21. [21]
    Yearly Atomic Arena #eSmhstCH • lichess.org
    Jun 10, 2025 · 2459 players compete in the Jun 10, 2025 Yearly Atomic Arena. 3+0 rated games are played during 300 minutes. NeverOFzero takes the prize ...
  22. [22]
    The House Discord Community for Chess and Variants! - Lichess
    Jun 17, 2018 · Hey, Do you ever wish that there's a place to discuss chess variants, such as crazyhouse, atomic chess and antichess?
  23. [23]
    Atomic Chess - Reddit
    here is the link for the top 200 players in the world, you can watch their games to learn a whole lot more. I recommend also playing some bots to learn their ...Missing: discord | Show results with:discord
  24. [24]
    Weekly Atomic rating distribution • lichess.org
    7,858 Atomic players this week. You do not have an established Atomic rating.
  25. [25]
    Atomic Chess Championship 2025 - viewership stats and event ...
    Mar 28, 2025 · How many people watched Atomic Chess Championship 2025? · 4 525 Peak viewers · 20 071 Hours Watched · 2 801 Average Viewers · 7h 10m Airtime ...
  26. [26]
    [PDF] FIDE LAWS of CHESS
    The FIDE Laws of Chess cover over-the-board play, including basic rules, competition rules, and the objective of checkmating the opponent's king.<|control11|><|separator|>
  27. [27]
    Atomic Openings - Gilgamath
    May 7, 2021 · In Atomic chess, the most common openings are g1f3, g1h3, e2e4, and e2e3. g1h3 has a coefficient of around 90, while g1f3 is around 80.
  28. [28]
    Basic openings - Atomic chess guide - Andy Tockman
    This is a beginner's guide to the Atomic chess variant, in which all captures cause every non-pawn piece in a 1-square radius to explode.Missing: principles | Show results with:principles
  29. [29]
    Resources | Ars Atomica
    Jun 5, 2019 · Analysing games is a good way to improve your chess (also your atomic chess). ... An interesting pawn gambit, which can be accepted with 3…
  30. [30]
    FICS Help: atomic
    atomic Atomic chess is a chess variant in which pieces explode. RULES ... (From the above it should be clear that an en-passant move's 'ground zero' is ...
  31. [31]
    Atomic chess is difficult. How to play it - Lichess
    Jan 31, 2021 · Tip 1 : make room for your king if possible, try not to put pieces nearby but keep some pawns as defense material.
  32. [32]
    What is the piece value heuristic in atomic chess?
    Jul 8, 2020 · Knights are generally better than bishops in the very early opening and endgame, but not in the middlegame. The bishop pair is much stronger ...What is the idea behind 1. nh3 h6 in atomic chess?Relative value of chess pieces on queenside vs kingsideMore results from chess.stackexchange.comMissing: clustering | Show results with:clustering
  33. [33]
    About solving Atomic Chess
    Aug 5, 2020 · The short answer is: white probably wins, but there is no weak solution nor does it currently seem achievable to find one.
  34. [34]
    Atomic endgames: Rule of the rectangle (KP v K, KPP v KP)
    White can only win by queening. A lone queen wins against a separated kings, but only draws if the kings are connected. · Black cannot take the pawn; it is ...
  35. [35]
    Atomic endgames: K+2 v KP • lichess.org
    In this study we look at King + 2 pieces versus King + Pawn. For each combination of pieces (except the trivial Q+Q and Q+R), I give and demonstrate the ...