Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Availability

In computing and reliability engineering, availability refers to the proportion of time a system, service, or component is operational and accessible to users when required, typically expressed as a percentage of the total operational period. This metric emphasizes the system's readiness to perform its intended functions without interruption, distinguishing it from reliability, which focuses on the probability of failure-free operation over a specified duration. Availability is commonly calculated using the formula A = \frac{MTBF}{MTBF + MTTR} \times 100\%, where MTBF (Mean Time Between Failures) represents the average time between system failures, and MTTR (Mean Time to Repair) denotes the average time required to restore functionality after a failure. Today, availability is a cornerstone of , a discipline pioneered by to bridge development and operations teams in ensuring scalable, resilient infrastructure. In SRE practices, it directly informs Service Level Objectives (SLOs) and Agreements (SLAs), targeting "nines" of availability—such as 99.9% (three nines) equating to about 8.76 hours of allowable downtime per year—to balance user expectations with operational feasibility. High availability is particularly vital in , , and , where even brief outages can result in substantial loss and erode customer trust; for instance, studies indicate that costs enterprises an average of $9,000 per minute as of 2024. Achieving it involves strategies like (e.g., clustering), load balancing, and automated recovery mechanisms, often integrated into architectures such as those described in the AWS Well-Architected Framework's Reliability Pillar. While availability metrics provide a high-level view of system performance, they must be contextualized with factors like —the ease of repairs—and overall against diverse failure modes, including faults, software , and external disruptions.

Fundamental Concepts

Definition of Availability

Availability is a key metric in that quantifies the proportion of time a is operational and capable of performing its intended under specified conditions. It is typically expressed as the of uptime to the total time considered, which includes both operational and non-operational periods:
A = \frac{\text{uptime}}{\text{uptime} + \text{downtime}}
This measure reflects the 's readiness to deliver services, emphasizing the balance between periods of successful operation and interruptions due to failures or maintenance. The core components of availability are uptime and , which are derived from fundamental reliability and parameters. Uptime is closely tied to the mean time to (MTTF), representing the average duration a operates before experiencing a in non-repairable contexts, or more generally the mean time between (MTBF) for repairable systems. , conversely, is characterized by the mean time to repair (MTTR), the average time required to restore the to operational after a . These building blocks allow availability to be approximated as A \approx \frac{\text{MTBF}}{\text{MTBF} + \text{MTTR}} under steady operating conditions, highlighting how improvements in either failure resistance or repair efficiency enhance overall readiness. Availability can be assessed in different forms, including instantaneous availability, which captures the probability of operational at a specific point in time, and steady-state availability, which represents the long-term equilibrium proportion of uptime as observation periods extend indefinitely. Steady-state availability is particularly emphasized in practice for evaluating sustained operational readiness, assuming constant and repair rates over time. Unlike reliability, which measures the likelihood of uninterrupted over a fixed without considering , availability incorporates the system's restorability, making it a broader indicator of dependability. In such as power grids, transportation networks, and healthcare systems, is essential to ensure continuous service delivery and minimize disruptions that could have severe economic or consequences. For instance, achieving availability levels above 99.9% is often targeted to support the uninterrupted operation of these vital systems, underscoring its role in broader dependability frameworks.

Related Metrics in Reliability Engineering

In reliability engineering, reliability is defined as the probability that a system or component will perform its required functions under stated conditions for a specified period of time without . This metric emphasizes failure-free operation over a defined , differing from availability, which assesses the proportion of time a system is in an operational during steady-state conditions. While reliability focuses on the likelihood of avoiding breakdowns within a duration, availability incorporates both failure prevention and recovery, providing a broader measure of dependability over extended periods. Maintainability quantifies the ease and speed with which a failed can be restored to operational using prescribed procedures and resources. It directly influences in availability assessments by minimizing the time required for repairs, inspections, or modifications, thereby enhancing overall uptime. For instance, effective reduces repair complexity through better design features like modular components, which in turn lowers the total non-operational time and supports higher availability levels. Key supporting metrics include (MTBF), which represents the average operating time between consecutive failures in repairable systems, and (MTTR), the average duration to restore functionality after a failure. In high-reliability systems where MTTR is significantly smaller than MTBF, availability can be approximated as A \approx \frac{\text{MTBF}}{\text{MTBF} + \text{MTTR}}, illustrating how reliability (via MTBF) and (via MTTR) jointly determine operational readiness. This relationship underscores the interdependence of these metrics in predicting long-term system performance. Collectively, reliability, availability, and form the RAM triad, a foundational framework in standards for evaluating dependability and life-cycle costs. Adopted in and guidelines, such as those from the U.S. of , the RAM approach integrates these attributes to guide design, testing, and sustainment decisions aimed at maximizing mission capability.

Mathematical Modeling

Core Formulas for Availability

In reliability engineering, the core formulas for availability in simple, non-configured systems are derived from probabilistic models assuming exponential distributions for failure and repair times, which imply constant failure and repair rates. These models treat the system as alternating between operational (up) and failed (down) states, often analyzed using Markov processes or renewal theory. The instantaneous availability A(t) represents the probability that the system is operational at time t, starting from an operational state at t = 0. For a repairable system with constant failure rate \lambda = 1/\mathrm{MTTF} and repair rate \mu = 1/\mathrm{MTTR}, where MTTF is the mean time to failure and MTTR is the mean time to repair, the formula is A(t) = \frac{\mu}{\lambda + \mu} + \frac{\lambda}{\lambda + \mu} e^{-(\lambda + \mu)t}. This expression is obtained by solving the Kolmogorov forward equations for the two-state Markov chain describing the system: the up-state probability satisfies P_0'(t) = -\lambda P_0(t) + \mu (1 - P_0(t)), with initial condition P_0(0) = 1, yielding the steady-state term \mu / (\lambda + \mu) plus a transient exponential decay. As t \to \infty, the transient term vanishes, resulting in the steady-state availability A = \frac{\mathrm{MTTF}}{\mathrm{MTTF} + \mathrm{MTTR}}, or equivalently A = \frac{\mathrm{MTBF}}{\mathrm{MTBF} + \mathrm{MTTR}}, where MTBF is the mean time to (synonymous with MTTF for repairable systems in this context), precisely $1/\lambda in the exponential model. This formula assumes constant and repair rates, leading to memoryless inter-failure and repair times, and holds in the long-run limit regardless of initial conditions under general conditions. The derivation follows from the limiting proportion of time spent in the up state in an alternating renewal process, where the steady-state probability is the ratio of mean up time to total cycle time. Inherent availability A_i is a specific case of steady-state availability that excludes logistical delays, administrative times, and supply issues, focusing solely on active repair time: A_i = \frac{\mathrm{MTTF}}{\mathrm{MTTF} + \mathrm{MTTR}}. It represents the availability achievable under ideal support conditions with instantaneous logistics. In contrast, operational availability A_o accounts for real-world delays, using A_o = \frac{\mathrm{MTBM}}{\mathrm{MTBM} + \mathrm{MMDT}}, where MTBM is the mean time between maintenance actions (including preventive maintenance) and MMDT is the mean maintenance downtime incorporating repair, supply, and administrative delays. These distinctions highlight how A_i provides an upper-bound measure of design-inherent reliability and maintainability, while A_o reflects actual field performance. Availability is a dimensionless ranging from 0 (always down) to 1 (always up), interpreted as the proportion of time the system is operational. It is commonly expressed as a , such as 99.9% (known as "three nines"), which equates to about 8.76 hours of per year for a continuously operating system, establishing critical benchmarks for high-reliability applications like or .

Configurations in Series and Parallel Systems

In , systems composed of multiple components can be arranged in series or configurations, each affecting overall availability differently under the assumption of component . For a series , where the failure of any single component causes the entire to fail, the steady-state availability A_s is calculated as the product of the individual component availabilities: A_s = \prod_{i=1}^n A_i. This multiplicative effect means that even minor unavailability in one component significantly degrades the overall performance; for instance, in a power plant's and dual-fuel subsystem arranged in series, the 's availability drops to the product of their individual values, such as 91.67% for the multiplied by 60.76% for the over operational periods. In contrast, a system incorporates , where the system remains operational as long as at least one component functions, failing only if all components fail simultaneously. The steady-state availability A_p for such a is given by A_p = 1 - \prod_{i=1}^n (1 - A_i), reflecting the complement of the joint unavailability of all components. An example is a redundant setup in a thermal power plant, where multiple units operate in parallel; the system availability approaches 1 if individual unit availabilities are high, as failure in one unit does not halt operations provided others remain functional. Series configurations inherently amplify downtime risks because unavailabilities compound multiplicatively, making the more vulnerable to single points of failure and often resulting in lower overall availability compared to individual components. Parallel configurations, however, mitigate this through , pushing availability closer to 1 and providing , though at the cost of increased complexity and resource use. These calculations assume component , meaning the failure or repair of one does not influence others, and often identical repair times across components for steady-state analysis. A key limitation arises from common-cause failures, where shared environmental or design factors (e.g., a bird strike affecting multiple engines) violate independence, potentially underestimating unavailability in both configurations.

Advanced Modeling Techniques

Advanced modeling techniques extend beyond basic series and parallel configurations to address the probabilistic dynamics and complexities of real-world systems, such as repair dependencies, non-Markovian behaviors, and multi-state failures. These methods enable more accurate predictions of availability in scenarios involving time-varying failure rates, shared resources, or repair processes, often requiring computational tools to handle the increased dimensionality. Markov chain models represent system states—typically up (operational) and down (failed)—as a continuous-time Markov process, where transitions occur due to failures or repairs at exponential rates. State-transition diagrams illustrate these changes, with absorbing states sometimes used for permanent failures, though repairable systems focus on transient or recurrent states. Steady-state availability is derived by solving the global balance equations, \pi Q = 0, where \pi is the steady-state probability vector and Q is the infinitesimal generator matrix, subject to the normalization \sum \pi_i = 1; the availability is then the sum of probabilities of up states. This approach excels in capturing load-sharing or standby redundancies but assumes memoryless (exponential) distributions. Monte Carlo simulation estimates availability by generating numerous random sequences of failure and repair events, sampling from underlying distributions to simulate system behavior over time and computing the proportion of operational time. This method is particularly valuable for systems with non-exponential distributions, such as Weibull or lognormal lifetimes, where analytical solutions are intractable, allowing incorporation of operational dependencies like phased missions or correlated failures. For instance, in power systems analysis, simulations have quantified availability under variable repair times, achieving with 10^4 to 10^6 trials depending on system scale. Fault tree analysis (FTA) integrates with availability modeling by constructing top-down logic diagrams of failure events, using gates (AND, OR, k-out-of-n) to propagate basic component failures to top events like system outage, then quantifying probabilities via minimal cut sets or for dynamic aspects. When combined with availability metrics, FTA assesses the impact of repair rates on outage duration, enabling for critical paths; for example, in nuclear safety, it has identified dominant failure modes contributing to unavailability exceeding 10^{-4} per demand. This hybrid approach handles coherent systems effectively but requires careful event ordering for time-dependent faults. Software tools facilitate these computations: SHARPE supports hierarchical modeling of Markov chains, fault trees, and Petri nets for availability evaluation, using symbolic manipulation to avoid state explosion in moderately sized systems. OpenFTA provides an open-source platform for constructing and analyzing fault trees, incorporating for probability estimation and minimal cut set enumeration. However, both tools face scalability limitations for large-scale systems with thousands of components, often requiring approximations or to manage in model complexity.

Practical Applications

Examples in System Design

In system design, availability calculations often begin with simple components to establish baseline performance. Consider a single system where the (MTBF) is 1000 hours and the (MTTR) is 10 hours. The steady-state availability A is computed as A = \frac{\text{MTBF}}{\text{MTBF} + \text{MTTR}} = \frac{1000}{1000 + 10} = 0.99, or 99%. This indicates the server is operational 99% of the time in the long run. To enhance availability, is commonly introduced, such as deploying two identical in configuration, where the remains operational if at least one functions. For each with A = 0.99, the availability A_p is A_p = 1 - (1 - A)^2 = 1 - (0.01)^2 = 0.9999, achieving approximately 99.99%. This demonstrates how multiplies individual component reliabilities to significantly boost overall uptime, a principle rooted in modeling. Design choices like strategies further influence availability targets, such as the industry benchmark of "" (99.999% uptime, allowing about 5.26 minutes of annual ). In the single server example, reducing MTTR to 1 hour yields A = \frac{1000}{1000 + 1} \approx 0.999, or three nines, but achieving requires MTTR below 0.1 hours alongside higher MTBF, highlighting the need for proactive repair processes in design. For the parallel setup, the same MTTR reduction elevates A_p to nearly 99.9999%, underscoring redundancy's role in meeting stringent targets.

Case Studies from Engineering Fields

In , high-availability networks are engineered to achieve 99.999% uptime, often referred to as "" reliability, to ensure continuous service for such as emergency communications. This target minimizes outages through redundant routing protocols and fault-tolerant devices, which automatically reroute traffic during failures to maintain connectivity. Following the widespread adoption of fiber optic technologies in the early 2000s, carriers shifted from copper-based systems to dense (DWDM) over fiber, enabling scalable redundancy with duplicated routes or hybrid fiber-microwave backups to enhance overall network resilience against physical disruptions. For instance, optical network designs incorporating edge-disjoint paths have demonstrated availability levels up to 99.9995%, significantly reducing downtime in service provider backbones. In , aircraft systems are designed to exceed 0.999 availability, aligning with (FAA) standards that emphasize probabilistic safety assessments for critical components like and flight controls. These requirements, evolving from FAA 25.1309 issued in the 1980s, mandate that probabilities remain below 10^{-9} per flight hour, directly influencing availability through rigorous reliability allocations. strategies, leveraging sensor data and , further bolster this by forecasting component degradation. The FAA's Required Communication Performance (RCP) 240 criteria, for example, specify aircraft system availability thresholds to support en-route , ensuring uninterrupted (GPS) integration even under partial failures. Power grid engineering highlights availability challenges through the analysis of cascading failures, as exemplified by the August 14, 2003, Northeast blackout that affected over 50 million people across eight U.S. states and , . Triggered by overgrown trees contacting high-voltage lines and compounded by software failures in alarm systems, the event propagated through interconnected transmission lines, illustrating series system vulnerabilities where the failure of one component sequentially overloads others. The U.S.-Canada Power System Outage report identified inadequate and inadequate protective relaying as key contributors, leading to a loss of 61,800 megawatts of power and emphasizing the need for modeled availability in parallel configurations to isolate faults. Post-incident reforms, including enhanced vegetation management and synchrophasor technology for wide-area , have improved grid availability by mitigating similar cascading risks, with subsequent analyses showing reduced outage durations in vulnerable series-linked substations. For healthcare devices, pacemaker design under quality management standards prioritizes to ensure life-sustaining functionality, with requirements focusing on robust component selection and mode mitigation to achieve MTBF exceeding 10 years. The FDA's premarket approval process for implantable cardiac pacemakers mandates demonstration of reliability through and clinical data, targeting availability greater than 99.9% over the device's lifespan to prevent abrupt . Design strategies emphasize (MTTR) reductions via modular architectures and remote monitoring capabilities, allowing non-invasive diagnostics that cut intervention times from days to hours in post-implant scenarios. sealing and redundant circuits have historically contributed to high reliability in pacemaker systems, underscoring the impact of ISO-compliant processes on long-term availability.

Historical Development

Origins and Evolution of Availability Concepts

The concept of availability in engineering traces its roots to the 1940s and 1950s, emerging from military logistics during and after World War II, where initial efforts focused on reliability measures to ensure equipment functionality in combat scenarios. In the U.S. military, particularly the Army, the push for quantifiable reliability began with analyses of electronic failures in radar and vacuum tube systems, where over 50% of stored airborne equipment failed to meet operational standards due to logistical and maintenance challenges. This period saw the introduction of mean time between failures (MTBF) as a key metric, influenced by early reliability modeling from the German V-2 rocket program, where mathematician Erich Pieruschka developed probabilistic survival models under Wernher von Braun; these ideas were adopted post-war by the U.S. Army for missile and electronics systems, evolving reliability from a binary "works or fails" view to probabilistic assessments that laid groundwork for availability by incorporating repair times. By the , availability concepts were formalized in 's space programs, distinguishing them from pure reliability for mission-critical systems in the Apollo missions. NASA initially lacked a unified reliability philosophy, blending statistical predictions with engineering judgment, but emphasized —such as triple backups in subsystems—to enhance operational readiness and minimize downtime, implicitly advancing availability as the proportion of time systems could perform required functions. The "all-up" testing approach for the rocket, introduced in 1963 by George Mueller, integrated these ideas by launching fully assembled vehicles from the first flight, achieving success in all 13 missions and highlighting availability through reduced maintenance intervals in high-stakes environments. Standardization efforts in the 1970s and 1980s further refined availability amid the computing boom, with publications like MIL-HDBK-217 providing methods for predicting electronic failure rates via parts count and stress analysis to compute MTBF, enabling availability estimates for repairable systems. First issued in 1961 and revised extensively (e.g., MIL-HDBK-217C in 1979), this handbook supported military logistics by incorporating environmental factors into reliability models. Concurrently, the (IEC) Technical Committee 56, established in 1965, began developing dependability terminology, culminating in IEC 60050 chapters on reliability and service quality by the late 1980s, which defined availability as the ability to perform under stated conditions, influencing global engineering practices. Post-2000 developments integrated availability into , notably through the ITIL framework's 2001 release, which formalized availability management processes to optimize uptime, including monitoring and contingency planning for services. This shift addressed the rise of and cyber-physical systems, where availability evolved to encompass dynamic and resilience against cyber threats, building on earlier engineering foundations to support distributed, always-on architectures.

Influential Literature and Standards

Martin L. Shooman's 1968 book, Probabilistic Reliability: An Engineering Approach, provided a comprehensive perspective on probabilistic methods, deriving core formulas for availability in repairable systems and highlighting its distinction from pure reliability through the inclusion of maintainability factors. The text became a staple for deriving steady-state availability expressions, such as A = \frac{\mu}{\lambda + \mu} for single-unit systems, where \lambda is the and \mu the repair rate, influencing subsequent reliability curricula and practices. Kishor S. Trivedi's 2002 edition of Probability and Statistics with Reliability, Queuing, and Computer Science Applications extended these foundations to domains, updating models to predict availability in computing systems and incorporating queuing theory for performance-reliable designs. With over 5,000 citations, it emphasized non-Markovian models for more accurate availability assessments in distributed systems, bridging classical reliability with modern IT applications. Standards have formalized availability practices across industries. The IEEE Std 1413-1998, titled IEEE Standard Methodology for Reliability Predictions and Assessment for Electronic Systems and Equipment, established a framework for implementing reliability programs that incorporate availability predictions, guiding engineers in selecting methods to quantify and improve system uptime in electronic hardware. Complementing this, the ISO/IEC/IEEE 24765:2017, Systems and Software Engineering—Vocabulary, defines availability as "the degree to which a system, product or component is operational and accessible when required for use," providing a standardized terminology that supports consistent application in software and systems engineering. Recent literature has advanced availability prediction through , addressing gaps in traditional models for dynamic environments. A seminal post-2010 contribution is the review by Z. M. Çınar et al. in Sustainability, which analyzes techniques like neural networks and random forests for , enabling proactive availability enhancement in Industry 4.0 manufacturing by reviewing methods that achieve high forecasting accuracies, such as up to 98.8% in motor fault detection benchmarks. Similarly, A. Theissler et al.'s 2021 paper in Reliability Engineering & System Safety explores for automotive , highlighting how neural networks, including convolutional variants, enhance predictions through in practical use cases. These works, cited over 500 times collectively as of 2025, highlight 's role in scaling availability modeling beyond static formulas to adaptive, approaches in and cyber-physical systems. Recent advancements as of 2025 include the of large models for interpretable in distributed availability systems, further evolving predictive capabilities in environments.

References

  1. [1]
    Availability - Reliability Pillar - AWS Documentation
    Availability is the percentage of time that a workload is available for use. Available for use means that it performs its agreed function successfully when ...
  2. [2]
    Reliability vs Availability: A Best Practice Guide - Nobl9
    Availability focuses on whether a system is accessible when needed and is defined as the percentage of time the system remains operational and reachable.
  3. [3]
    2. Equipment Availability and MTBF Calculations - Racom
    Equipment Availability is expressed by the equation: A = MTBF / (MTBF + MTTR) where MTBF is mean time between failures and MTTR is mean time to repair. Both ...
  4. [4]
    A brief history of high availability - CockroachDB
    Jan 23, 2025 · In this post, we take a look at how distributed databases have historically handled fault tolerance and—at a high level—what high availability ...
  5. [5]
    Product SRE, improving reliability of services - Google SRE
    The core responsibilities of SREs are to be "responsible for the availability, latency, performance, efficiency, change management, monitoring, emergency ...
  6. [6]
    Defining Availability, Maintainability and Reliability in SRE
    Oct 25, 2021 · In order to be reliable, a system requires both availability and maintainability. A system can't be reliable if it's not available. It's also ...Availability, Defined · Maintainability · Reliability, Defined
  7. [7]
    Reliability vs. Availability: Key Metrics for System Perform | Atlassian
    Why are reliability and availability important? Both reliability and availability impact a business's bottom line because they affect customer satisfaction.
  8. [8]
    Why Are Availability and Reliability Crucial? - PagerDuty
    Reliability, Availability, Maintainability, and Safety (RAMS) are key system design attributes that help teams understand whether systems fulfill key ...
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Availability - NASA
    RMA - Definitions. • Reliability (R) o The probability an item will perform its intended function with no failure for a given time.
  10. [10]
    System Reliability, Availability, and Maintainability - SEBoK
    May 24, 2025 · Reliability, availability, and maintainability (RAM) are three system attributes that are of tremendous interest to systems engineers, logisticians, and users.
  11. [11]
    https://asq.org/quality-resources/reliability
  12. [12]
    Maintainability vs. Reliability - UpKeep
    Maintainability refers to the ease with which maintenance activities can be performed on an asset or equipment. Its purpose is to measure the probability that ...
  13. [13]
    Reliability Availability and Maintainability (RAM) | www.dau.edu
    This guide supports that objective. It addressess reliability, availability, and maintainability (RAM) as essential elements of mission capability. It focuses ...
  14. [14]
    Availability and the Different Ways to Calculate It
    Steady State Availability. Inherent ... Unlike reliability, however, the instantaneous availability measure incorporates maintainability information.
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Chapter 3-Fundamental Concepts in Reliability Engineering
    The above expression represents the situation when a component's failure times are exponentially distributed. MTTF is a reciprocal of the constant hazard rate, ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Time
    MTTR + MTTF. , where MTTR stands for the component's mean time to repair. Thus, in the limit the mean time between cycles is given by MTBC = 1/ (. ) Lim (t) t.
  17. [17]
    [PDF] RELIABILITY INDICES - Duke University
    A = lim. t→∞. A(t). Under very general conditions, the Steady State Availability can be shown to be: A = MTTF. MTTF + MTTR . The Mean Time to Repair (MTTR) ...<|separator|>
  18. [18]
    Inherent Availability | www.dau.edu
    Availability of a system with respect only to operating time and corrective maintenance.AI ... (MTTR), that is: AI = MTBF ÷ (MTBF + MTTR)Missing: MTTF / (MTTF + source
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Calculating Total System Availability - awsstatic.com
    Just like MTBF, MTTR is usually stated in units of hours. The following equations illustrates the relations of MTBF and MTTR with reliability and availability.
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Thermal Power Plant Performance Analysis
    For a series system with n independent components, system's availability is equal to the product of individual availabilities: AПtч ¼. Y i. AiПtч. П106ч where ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] RELIABILITY OF SYSTEMS WITH VARIOUS ELEMENT ...
    The reliability of a series system is easily calculated from the reliability of its components. Let Yi be an indicator of whether component i fails or not ...
  22. [22]
    Reliability and Availability Modeling - SpringerLink
    In this chapter, we give examples of reliability and availability models. We begin with examples of block diagrams, fault trees and reliability graphs.
  23. [23]
    [1701.06415] Steady state availability general equations of decision ...
    Jan 20, 2017 · Steady state availability is one important analysis that can be made through Markov chain formalism that allows researchers generate equations ...Missing: seminal | Show results with:seminal
  24. [24]
    A Monte Carlo simulation approach to the availability assessment of ...
    In this paper, we present a Monte Carlo simulation technique which allows modelling the complex dynamics of multi-state components subject to operational ...
  25. [25]
    UPS reliability analysis with non-exponential duration distribution
    Monte Carlo simulations are performed to validate the results of the analytical model and of the approximation. Introduction. Interruptions of the electrical ...
  26. [26]
    [PDF] NUREG-0492, "Fault Tree Handbook".
    Analysis," Reliability and Fault Tree Analysis, SIAM, 1975, pp. 101-126. 7. W.C. Cochran, Sampling Techniques, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York,. 1977. 8 ...Missing: seminal | Show results with:seminal
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Fault tree analysis: A survey of the state-of-the-art in modeling ...
    Fault tree analysis (FTA) is a method to analyze risks related to safety and economically critical assets, using various modeling and analysis techniques.
  28. [28]
    SHARPE Portal
    A general hierarchical modeling tool that analyzes stochastic models of reliability, availability, performance, and performability.
  29. [29]
    The OpenFTA Open Source Project on Open Hub
    OpenFTA is an advanced tool for fault tree analysis, containing powerful algorithms for determining minimum cuts and failures including Monte Carlo simulation.
  30. [30]
    [PDF] Safe and Optimal Techniques Enabling Recovery, Integrity, and ...
    Jun 1, 2019 · OpenFTA has some scalability issues, e.g., for Example 3 above, OpenFTA took about 40 minutes to perform the probability analysis. Page 26 ...Missing: website | Show results with:website
  31. [31]
    The Reliability, Availability and Productiveness of Systems
    Find the system MTBF, MTTR and steady-state availability. ANSWER. 1. ( 2500)4. R1(t) = e- 7000. = 0.98386. (3000 - 2500). Rz(t) = <I>. 200.
  32. [32]
    [PDF] Resilience Design Patterns - INFO - Oak Ridge National Laboratory
    Dec 16, 2022 · For example, a system with a five-nines availability rating has 99.999% availability and an annual downtime of 5 minutes and 15.4 seconds ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Task Force on Optimal PSAP Architecture
    Jan 29, 2016 · Emergency communication networks strive to be reliable with high availability. Five nine's (99.999%) is the goal for availability of these ...
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Enabling and managing end-to-end resilience - fbiic
    One approach to building highly available networks is to use extremely fault tolerant network devices throughout the network. To achieve high availability end- ...
  35. [35]
    [PDF] The Telecommunication Industry: Cisco and Lucent's Supply Chains
    Aug 13, 2016 · fiber optic equipment, which gave its rival Nortel a major advantage in 2000. ... equipment standards (99.999% uptime) that are very ...
  36. [36]
    [PDF] Report ITU-R M.2533-0 (09/2023) Utility radiocommunications ...
    To ensure such availability, the companies use redundant telecommunications solutions typically duplicated fibre optic routes, or a fibre route backed up by ...
  37. [37]
    [PDF] Guaranteeing service availability in optical network design
    Jan 16, 2006 · Two edge-disjoint paths can cover all or a large portion of the node pairs until an availability level of 99.9995%, which is in the region of a.
  38. [38]
    [PDF] An Analysis of Barriers Preventing the Widespread Adoption of ...
    The aviation industry has long recognized the potential benefits of predictive maintenance, a maintenance strategy that leverages sensor and operational data ...
  39. [39]
    [PDF] 90-117 - Advisory Circular - Federal Aviation Administration
    Oct 3, 2017 · Table 2-5, RCP 240 Availability Criteria. (Aircraft System), provides the aircraft system availability criteria. Table 2-6, RCP 240. Integrity ...Missing: predictive | Show results with:predictive<|separator|>
  40. [40]
    [PDF] FAA Roadmap for Artificial Intelligence Safety Assurance, Version I
    Jul 23, 2024 · It can aid in predictive maintenance, optimizing the decommissioning and recycling of aircraft parts, and managing assets efficiently. AI also ...
  41. [41]
    [PDF] Final Report on the August 14, 2003 Blackout in the United States ...
    Dec 24, 2003 · The report makes clear that this blackout could have been prevented and that immediate actions must be taken in both the United States and ...
  42. [42]
    [PDF] 4. Dependencies and Cascading Effects
    Feb 11, 2015 · Figure 4-3: Power System Internal Dependence Cascading Failure in the 2003 Northeast Blackout ... Technical Analysis of the August 14, 2003 ...
  43. [43]
    [PDF] A Short History of Reliability - NASA
    Apr 28, 2010 · By the 1940s, reliability and reliability engineering still did not exist. The demands of WWII introduced many new electronics products into ...Missing: MTBF | Show results with:MTBF
  44. [44]
    MTBF and Annualized Failure Rates - Math Encounters Blog
    Feb 9, 2016 · I used to give a seminar on MTBF and its early origins. It traces back to the V2 program in WW2.Von Braun hired hired Eric Pieruschka, a German ...
  45. [45]
    [PDF] Reliability inthe Apollo Program - NASA
    beginning of the 1960s,NASA hadno con¬ sistent philosophy on how to achieve high reliability of those systems. Engineers at. NASA headquarters, the Marshall ...
  46. [46]
    MIL-HDBK-217 F RELIABILITY PREDICTION ELECTRONIC
    The purpose of this handbook is to establish and maintain consistent and uniform methods for estimating the inherent reliability.
  47. [47]
    International Perspectives on Reliability - Reliabilityweb
    In 1965, the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) established a technical committee (TC56) to address reliability. The initial title of IEC/TC56 was ...
  48. [48]
    Availability Management | IT Process Wiki
    Dec 31, 2023 · ITIL Availability Management aims to define, analyze, plan, measure and improve all aspects of the availability of IT services.
  49. [49]
    Probabilistic Reliability: An Engineering Approach - Google Books
    Author, Martin L. Shooman ; Publisher, McGraw-Hill, 1968 ; Original from, the University of Michigan ; Digitized, Nov 27, 2007 ; ISBN, 0070570159, 9780070570153.Missing: formulas | Show results with:formulas
  50. [50]
    Amazon.com: Probabilistic Reliability: An Engineering Approach
    30-day returnsThis second edition material on important new topics including fault-tolerant computers, software reliability, and risk analysis.Missing: formulas | Show results with:formulas
  51. [51]
    ISO/IEC/IEEE 24765:2017 - Systems and software engineering
    In stock 2–5 day deliveryISO/IEC/IEEE 24765:2017 provides a common vocabulary applicable to all systems and software engineering work. It was prepared to collect and standardize ...
  52. [52]
    https://www.iso.org/standard/71952.html
  53. [53]
    Predictive maintenance enabled by machine learning: Use cases ...
    Top-5 influential papers (measured by number of citations), Top-5 most active authors, most frequently addressed use cases, and most frequently used ML methods.