Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Bat flight

Bat flight is the powered, sustained aerial locomotion unique to bats (order Chiroptera), the only mammals capable of true flight, enabling over 1,500 species—as of 2025—to forage, migrate long distances, and evade predators with exceptional agility.^[1]^[2] Evolved around 52.5 million years ago in the early Eocene epoch from ancestors likely adapted for climbing and gliding in forested environments, bat flight relies on compliant wings formed by a thin skin membrane stretched across elongated forelimb bones, particularly the fingers, which allow dynamic adjustments in shape and camber during flight.^[3] Unlike the rigid, feathered wings of birds, these flexible patagia—supported by lightweight, elongated digits and intrinsic muscles—facilitate high maneuverability, though they result in lower aerodynamic efficiency during steady cruising compared to avian flight.^[4] The morphology of bat wings varies across species, with body masses ranging from 2 grams in tiny insectivores like Kitti's hog-nosed bat to 1.6 kilograms in large fruit bats like the Indian flying fox, influencing flight styles from hovering to fast forward propulsion.^[5] Wing loading, typically lower than in birds, supports agile turns and obstacle avoidance, while features like the uropatagium (tail membrane) aid in stability and prey capture in some species.^[4] Bats employ unsteady aerodynamic mechanisms, such as leading-edge vortices, to enhance lift during slow flight and hovering.^[4] Integrating sensory and neural control, bat flight synchronizes echolocation pulses with wingbeats for precise navigation in cluttered environments, while airflow-sensing hairs on the wings provide real-time feedback for adjustments.^[1] Advances in high-speed imaging and fluid dynamics have revealed complex wake structures, including tip and root vortices, underscoring how bats' compliant wings enable versatile force generation across speeds.^[6] Overall, these adaptations highlight bat flight's evolutionary convergence on powered locomotion, distinct from gliding precursors, and its potential to inspire bio-mimetic designs for agile aerial vehicles.^[7]

Fundamentals of Bat Flight

Kinematics of Wing Motion

Bat wing kinematics describe the coordinated movements of the wings during flight, characterized by a cyclical flapping motion that enables propulsion, lift, and maneuverability. The primary cycle consists of a power downstroke followed by a recovery upstroke, with each phase involving distinct articulations at the shoulder, elbow, wrist, and finger joints to optimize aerodynamic performance. These motions are highly flexible due to the bat's membranous wing structure, allowing for rapid adjustments in wing shape and orientation. High-speed videography studies have revealed three-dimensional trajectories of wingtips that trace elliptical paths, with amplitudes varying by flight speed and species; for instance, in the nectar-feeding bat Glossophaga soricina, wingtip excursions reach up to 120 degrees during hovering.^[4] During the downstroke, the wing extends fully as the shoulder joint pronates and the elbow extends, positioning the wing nearly perpendicular to the airflow to maximize force production. The wrist locks to maintain a rigid leading edge, while the fingers splay to stretch the patagium—the thin membrane spanning the wing—creating camber (curvature) that enhances lift. This phase typically accounts for 60-70% of the cycle duration, with the patagium actively tensioned by muscles such as the m. occipito-pollicalis to prevent fluttering and ensure smooth airflow over the wing surface. In contrast, the upstroke involves retraction and folding: the shoulder supinates, the elbow flexes, and the wrist unlocks, allowing the wing to sweep backward and upward at a lower angle of attack, reducing drag while contributing to thrust in forward flight. Camber decreases as the digits bend inward, folding the trailing edge and minimizing negative lift; in species like the fruit bat Cynopterus brachyotis, upstroke folding reduces wing area. These joint movements, tracked via marker-based 3D reconstruction in wind tunnel experiments, demonstrate how bats achieve asymmetric kinematics for efficient energy use.^[4]^[8]^[9] Wingbeat frequency, a key quantitative aspect of kinematics, typically ranges from 5 to 20 Hz across bat species, decreasing with body mass and increasing with flight speed up to an optimal point before stabilizing. Smaller insectivorous bats, such as Myotis species, exhibit higher frequencies around 15-20 Hz during agile maneuvers, while larger fruit bats like Pteropus operate at 5-8 Hz for sustained flight. Amplitude, measured as the peak-to-peak angular excursion, often spans 90-150 degrees and diminishes at higher speeds to maintain stability. These variations are captured in high-speed videography at 500-1000 frames per second, revealing complex 3D wingtip paths that deviate from planar motion due to spanwise bending and twisting, as observed in studies of straight-line flight. The dynamic stretching of the patagium during these cycles, combined with camber modulation via phalangeal joints, allows bats to fine-tune wing profile for different phases, contributing to their exceptional maneuverability without delving into force generation details.^[10]^[11]^[12]^[13]

Aerodynamic Forces in Flight

Bat flight relies on a complex interplay of aerodynamic forces generated by the wings' interaction with the surrounding air, primarily lift to support body weight, thrust to propel forward, and drag as the opposing resistive force. These forces arise from both steady and unsteady aerodynamic mechanisms, with bats' highly flexible wings enabling dynamic adjustments that enhance performance beyond rigid-wing models. Lift is produced mainly during the downstroke through high angles of attack, while thrust emerges from the asymmetric motion of the wings, particularly the leading-edge sweep and feathering during the upstroke. Drag, encompassing profile and induced components, is actively minimized through adaptive wing camber and span adjustments.^[4] The fundamental equation for lift in bat flight follows the standard aerodynamic form adapted for flapping wings:

L = \frac{1}{2} \rho v^2 S C_L

where L is the lift force, \rho is air density, v is the relative airspeed (influenced by flapping velocity), S is the effective wing area, and C_L is the lift coefficient. In bats, C_L varies significantly (typically 0.5–1.5) due to the flexible membrane wings, which allow real-time camber changes and vortex management to augment lift at low speeds. For instance, during slow flight, bats achieve up to 40% higher lift through attached leading-edge vortices (LEVs) formed at the sharp leading edge, stabilizing flow separation and delaying stall. These LEVs, intensified by wing morphing, contribute substantially to unsteady lift, distinguishing bat aerodynamics from steady-state models.^[4]^[14] Thrust in bat flight stems from the asymmetric flapping cycle, where the downstroke generates forward propulsion via high-power strokes and the upstroke contributes through inverted wing orientation and reduced drag. This asymmetry, often involving bilateral differences in amplitude, enables maneuvering while maintaining net thrust; for example, during turns, outward wings produce additional thrust to facilitate lateral motion. Drag minimization occurs via optimized wing shapes that reduce both profile drag (from skin friction) and induced drag (from wingtip vortices), achieved by increasing aspect ratio at higher speeds and cambering to control boundary layer separation. Studies show bats adjust stroke plane angle and wing extension to lower drag coefficients by up to 20% across flight speeds, enhancing overall efficiency.^[9] Unsteady aerodynamics play a pivotal role in bat flight, with mechanisms like LEVs and wake capture amplifying forces during transient phases. Wake capture occurs when wings interact with shed vortices from prior strokes, particularly at stroke reversal, generating impulsive lift and thrust peaks that can account for 20–30% of cycle-averaged forces. These effects, unique to bats' supple wings, allow sustained hovering and agile maneuvers at Reynolds numbers around 10^4–10^5. Regarding energy efficiency, the cost of transport (COT)—defined as mechanical power per unit mass and distance, adapted for flapping as \text{COT} = \frac{P}{m g v} where P is power, m mass, g gravity, and v speed—reveals bats achieve lower COT than comparably sized birds, with values around 10–15 J/kg·m in steady flight, owing to efficient unsteady mechanisms and minimal inertial costs from wing flexion.^[4]^[15]^[16]

Wing Anatomy and Morphology

Structural Components of Wings

The bat wing membrane, known as the patagium, consists of a thin, bilayered skin primarily composed of elastin and collagen fibers that provide flexibility and tensile strength. Elastin bundles form the predominant structural element, allowing the membrane to stretch and recoil during flight, while interspersed collagen fibers add durability to withstand aerodynamic stresses.^[17]^[18] This network also includes fibroblasts, muscles, and neurovascular bundles embedded within the dermis layers, enabling the patagium to function as a dynamic, compliant surface.^[19] The skeletal framework of the bat wing relies on highly elongated finger bones from digits II through V, which serve as primary spars supporting the expansive patagium. These digits are exceptionally lengthened compared to other mammals, with lightweight, slender phalanges that minimize mass while maximizing wingspan. The thumb (digit I) is reduced in size and bears a claw, functioning separately for grasping rather than primary support.^[20]^[21] Additional skeletal elements enhance structural integrity, including the styliform bone (or cartilage in some species), which acts as a keystone along the leading edge to maintain tension and prevent membrane collapse under load. The propatagium extends from the neck to the base of the first digit, forming the leading-edge membrane, while the uropatagium stretches between the hindlimbs and tail, providing posterior stability and aiding in maneuvers.^[22]^[23]^[24] Wing actuation is powered by specialized musculature, with the pectoralis muscle serving as the dominant downstroke generator, enlarged to deliver high force for propulsion. The supracoracoideus muscle facilitates the upstroke through a tendon arrangement that routes over the shoulder joint, similar to avian systems, optimizing power transmission with minimal energy loss. These primary flight muscles attach to the elongated arm bones and integrate with membrane-embedded fibers for coordinated motion.^[25]^[26]^[27] Sensory integration is achieved through dense networks of nerves and mechanoreceptors distributed across the patagium, providing proprioceptive feedback essential for real-time wing adjustments. These include tactile hairs linked to low-threshold mechanoreceptors that detect airflow and strain, relaying signals via somatosensory pathways to the central nervous system. Wing innervation patterns differ from other mammalian forelimbs, with specialized topographic organization supporting precise control during flapping.^[28]^[29]^[30] Such components collectively allow bats to achieve highly variable wing conformations for diverse flight demands.

Morphological Parameters and Variations

Morphological parameters in bat wings are quantified using several key metrics that describe overall shape and loading, providing insights into flight capabilities across species. The aspect ratio (AR) is defined as the square of the wingspan (b) divided by the total wing area (S), expressed as AR = \frac{b^2}{S}, where a higher value indicates longer, narrower wings suited for efficient forward flight.^[31] Wing loading (WL) measures the body mass (m) supported per unit wing area, calculated as WL = \frac{m g}{S} with g as gravitational acceleration, reflecting the force required for takeoff and sustained flight; lower values facilitate easier maneuvers in cluttered environments.^[31] The wing chord, typically measured as the width at the mid-wing position perpendicular to the span, contributes to area calculations and influences local aerodynamic properties, though it varies along the wing due to the patagium's flexibility.^[32] Variations in these parameters are pronounced across bat taxa, correlating with specialized flight demands. Fast-flying species in the family Molossidae exhibit high aspect ratios exceeding 7, enabling sustained high speeds with reduced induced drag, as seen in their elongated, narrow wings.^[31] In contrast, agile gleaning bats, such as those in the Vespertilionidae and certain Phyllostomidae, often display low wing loading below 20 N/m², allowing precise hovering and prey capture from surfaces with minimal takeoff energy.^[31] Wingtip morphology further diversifies performance: pointed tips, common in open-air foragers, enhance speed and stability by minimizing tip vortices, while rounded tips, prevalent in clutter navigators, improve maneuverability through better low-speed control and reduced stall risk.^[31] Recent phylogenetic analyses up to 2025 reveal evolutionary correlations between these parameters, body size, and flight speed, underscoring conserved patterns within clades. For instance, studies on Brazilian Atlantic Forest bats demonstrate that larger body sizes predict higher initial flight accelerations via increased aspect ratios, independent of foraging guild.^[33] Across vespertilionid and molossid lineages, wing loading and aspect ratio covary positively with maximum flight speeds, with phylogenetic signal indicating that body mass mediates these traits through allometric scaling.^[34] Such analyses highlight how morphological diversity has been shaped by selective pressures on speed and agility over evolutionary time.^[34]

Evolution of Bat Flight

Origins from Gliding Ancestors

The evolutionary origins of bat flight are traced to arboreal mammals that likely relied on gliding as a precursor to powered locomotion, with the fossil record providing key evidence of this transition. One of the earliest known bat fossils from a complete skeleton, Onychonycteris finneyi, dating to approximately 52.5 million years ago (mya) from the Early Eocene Green River Formation in Wyoming, exhibits elongated forelimbs with wing-like structures, including a well-developed patagium supported by elongated digits, indicative of capabilities beyond mere quadrupedal movement.^[35] This primitive morphology, featuring shorter hindlimbs relative to forelimbs and a tail longer than in modern bats, suggests O. finneyi retained traits of arboreal-gliding precursors, such as those seen in modern gliding mammals, while showing early adaptations for flapping flight. Similarly, the 2023 description of Icaronycteris gunnelli from the same formation provides another complete skeleton of comparable age, reinforcing the primitive morphology of early bats. Phylogenetic analyses place O. finneyi as a basal chiropteran, sister to all other known bats, highlighting its role in bridging non-volant ancestors to fully aerial bats.^[36] Hypotheses on bat flight evolution posit that powered flight arose from gliding ancestors similar to extant flying squirrels or colugos, where initial skin membranes between limbs facilitated controlled descent from trees, gradually evolving into active propulsion. This "gliding-to-flying" model is supported by recent phylogenetic comparative studies analyzing limb scaling across mammals, which demonstrate that bat forelimb proportions align more closely with those of gliders than with non-gliding insectivores, indicating strong selective pressure for elongation and membrane support prior to full flight.^[7] For instance, biomechanical modeling of O. finneyi reveals aerodynamic efficiencies in gliding that could have been incrementally enhanced by flapping motions, contrasting with the powered flight of birds or pterosaurs but paralleling independent gliding evolutions in other mammals.^[37] These findings challenge earlier views of bats deriving directly from terrestrial runners, emphasizing arboreal lifestyles as a prerequisite for aerial experimentation.^[38] Genetic mechanisms underpinning this transition involve modifications in developmental genes that promoted digit elongation essential for wing formation. Hox gene clusters, particularly Hoxd and Hoxa, exhibit unique expression patterns in bat embryos, driving prolonged growth of digits 2–5 to support the chiropatagium membrane, unlike the apoptosis that separates digits in other mammals.^[39] Adaptive evolution in these genes, evidenced by positive selection signatures in bat lineages, facilitated the extreme forelimb hyperelongation observed in fossils like O. finneyi, enabling the shift from passive gliding to powered flight.^[40] Such molecular repurposing underscores how regulatory changes in ancient genetic toolkits allowed bats to achieve mammalian flight without novel structures. The timeline of bat flight evolution aligns with post-Cretaceous environmental shifts, with molecular clock estimates indicating the common ancestor of all bats emerged around 66–64 mya during the Paleocene, shortly after the K-Pg mass extinction, when forested habitats expanded.^[41] Powered flight likely evolved by 52 mya, as evidenced by diverse Eocene fossils, marking a rapid diversification that saw bats occupy nocturnal niches amid recovering ecosystems.^[42] This burst of evolution, from gliding precursors to volant specialists, reflects opportunistic adaptation to post-extinction opportunities in insect-rich canopies.^[43]

Evolutionary Adaptations in Morphology

Following the origin of powered flight from gliding ancestors, bat wing morphology underwent significant refinements driven by selective pressures for diverse flight functions, leading to clade-specific innovations. In Yangochiroptera, which encompasses most echolocating microbats, pronounced elongation of forelimb digits II–V created high aspect ratio wings suited for sustained high-speed flight, enabling efficient cruising and long-distance migration in open airspace.^[31] This digit extension, facilitated by regulatory changes in genes like Prx1 and Bmp2, increased wing span relative to area, reducing induced drag and enhancing lift-to-drag ratios.^[44] In contrast, within the vespertilionid family (Yangochiroptera: Vespertilionidae), wing membranes exhibit localized thickening due to denser collagen and elastin fibers, providing greater tensile strength and durability for prolonged endurance flights during foraging or hibernation migrations. These adaptations reflect lineage-specific responses to ecological niches, with Yangochiroptera generally favoring speed-oriented morphologies over the broader, more maneuverable wings of Yinpterochiroptera.^[45] Post-Eocene adaptive radiations further diversified bat wing forms, coinciding with surges in insect abundance that rewarded aerial insectivory. Around 34–50 million years ago, after the Eocene thermal maximum, bat lineages proliferated as global insect diversity peaked, driving the evolution of varied wing shapes to exploit nocturnal insect swarms.^[46] High-aspect-ratio wings emerged in open-habitat specialists, while low-aspect-ratio designs suited cluttered environments, correlating with the radiation of over 1,400 extant species. Comparatively, bat wings' patagial membranes represent a pivotal evolutionary innovation over avian feathered wings, prioritizing flexibility for dynamic control. Unlike the stiff, hierarchical feather structures in birds that rely on passive morphing via overlapping vanes, bat membranes—spanning elongated digits with embedded muscles (plagiopatagiales proprii)—allow active camber adjustments and spanwise bending, enabling superior maneuverability at low speeds and in cluttered spaces.^[47] This compliant design, derived from repurposed proximal limb development programs (e.g., MEIS2/TBX3 expression), supports rapid shape changes under aerodynamic loads, a flexibility absent in rigid feathered appendages.^[45] Evolutionary constraints on bat wing morphology highlight trade-offs between mass reduction and structural integrity, particularly in skeletal elements. To minimize inertial costs for flapping flight, bat phalanges and metacarpals exhibit thinned cortices and reduced bone mass—up to 50% lighter than non-volant mammals—while maintaining strength through increased density and anisotropic mineralization.^[48] Finite element models of bat forelimb bones demonstrate that this balance results in higher stiffness-to-weight ratios, but excessive thinning risks buckling under peak loads, as simulated stress concentrations exceed 20 MPa in elongated digits during takeoff.^[49] Mechano-chemical regulation via proteins like osteocalcin further optimizes this trade-off, promoting adaptive remodeling to withstand flight stresses without compromising overall lightness.^[50]

Ecological and Functional Adaptations

Foraging Strategies and Wing Use

Bats employ diverse foraging strategies that are closely tied to their wing morphology, enabling specialized flight behaviors for prey capture. In aerial hawking, bats pursue flying insects in open spaces using high aspect ratio (AR > 6) wings that prioritize speed over maneuverability, allowing sustained pursuit at velocities up to 100 km/h with relatively low energy costs.^[51] Emballonurids, such as species in the genus Taphozous, exemplify this strategy with their long, narrow wings suited for fast, straight-line chases in uncluttered airspace.^[52] These adaptations facilitate efficient insect interception but limit sharp turns, reflecting a trade-off optimized for open-air hunting.^[51] In contrast, gleaning bats target stationary prey on foliage or surfaces, relying on short, broad wings with low AR (<4) and low wing loading (WL) to enable precise hovering, slow-speed maneuvers, and rapid launches from perches.^[51] Phyllostomids, including many New World leaf-nosed bats like those in the genus Artibeus, use these morphological traits to navigate cluttered vegetation, executing tight turns and stationary hovers for silent prey detection and capture. The rounded wingtips and reduced WL enhance lift at low speeds, supporting the stealthy, perch-to-flight transitions essential for this strategy.^[51] Trawling represents another specialized approach, where bats skim water surfaces to capture aquatic prey, employing flexible wings with low WL for stable, low-altitude flight and gentle dips.^[51] Species in the genus Myotis, such as Myotis adversus and Myotis daubentonii, possess relatively large wings that allow efficient skimming without excessive drag, enabling prolonged low-level foraging over rivers or ponds at night.^[53] This morphology supports the tactile and echolocation-guided prey detection during water contact, minimizing energy expenditure in humid, open-water habitats.^[51] Beyond insectivory, wing adaptations align with dietary shifts in other foraging modes. Frugivorous bats often feature rounded wings with moderate AR for sustained station-holding near fruit clusters, facilitating load-carrying during feeding bouts.^[51] Nectarivores, such as certain glossophagine phyllostomids, utilize long, narrow wings for precise hovering over flowers, combining high maneuverability with efficient energy use in floral visitation.^[51] Carnivorous and sanguinivorous species, including vampire bats (Desmodus rotundus), exhibit agile wing forms with low to moderate WL for quick, erratic turns when pursuing vertebrates or accessing blood sources, emphasizing rapid acceleration over endurance.^[51] Recent kinematic analyses have revealed how bats incorporate fuel-saving glides into hawking flights, enhancing foraging efficiency. Studies of species like Nyctalus noctula demonstrate powered-gliding descents with shallow angles (e.g., 1.1° during foraging), where wing adjustments allow altitude modulation without full flapping, reducing overall power requirements compared to level flight.^[54] These undulating trajectories, observed via high-resolution tracking, enable extended prey searches while conserving metabolic fuel, particularly in aerial insectivores.^[54]

Environmental Influences on Flight Performance

At high altitudes, reduced air density poses significant challenges to bat flight by decreasing lift generation and increasing the power required for takeoff and sustained flight, effectively elevating wing loading demands as bats must support their body mass with less aerodynamic support. To counteract this, many bat species expand wing area or modify kinematics, such as increasing stroke amplitude, to maintain lift in thinner air; for instance, Mexican free-tailed bats (Tadarida brasiliensis) routinely fly at elevations up to 3,300 m by lowering wing loading through broader wings.^[55] Recent phylogenetic analyses of bat guilds indicate that open-space foragers, including some montane species, exhibit adjustments in aspect ratio—longer, narrower wings—to optimize glide efficiency under low-density conditions, with wing loading and aspect ratio positively correlated with elevation in these taxa.^[56] Habitat structure profoundly influences bat flight performance, with cluttered environments like dense forests selecting for wings that enable low-speed, highly maneuverable flight to navigate obstacles and pursue prey amid vegetation. In such settings, bats often possess wings with high camber—curved airfoil shapes—and thinner, more elastic plagiopatagia, allowing rapid adjustments for tight turns and hovering; tropical rainforest species exemplify this, showing accelerated growth in dactylopatagium for enhanced agility. Conversely, open habitats such as grasslands or skies above water favor soaring and efficient long-distance travel, where bats evolve stiffer wing membranes and higher aspect ratios to minimize drag and maximize glide ratios, as seen in species like the common noctule (Nyctalus noctula) that exploit unobstructed airspace.^[57]^[1] Climatic factors, particularly temperature, modulate bat flight by affecting muscle power output and wing membrane properties, with cooler conditions potentially reducing contractile velocity and elasticity. Wing muscles in fruit bats like Carollia perspicillata display low thermal dependence, maintaining shortening velocities and relaxation rates with Q10 values below 1.5 across 27–37°C, enabling sustained performance during nocturnal flights in variable thermal regimes without substantial power loss. Membrane elasticity also varies with temperature, as lower ambient conditions stiffen the compliant plagiopatagium, which bats mitigate through behavioral adjustments like pre-flight warming; however, extreme cold can limit overall flight endurance by increasing energetic costs. In long-distance migration, bats incorporate gliding phases within powered flights to enhance efficiency, as demonstrated by 2025 modeling of Nyctalus noctula paths showing powered-gliding/climbing reduces fuel consumption per distance by optimizing altitude changes and drag minimization compared to level flight.^[58]^[57]^[59] Physiological limits at high elevations are exacerbated by hypoxia, prompting adaptations in oxygen delivery among high-flying species, including highland vespertilionids like certain Myotis populations in montane regions. These bats possess enlarged lung volumes—up to 72% greater than non-flying mammals of similar size—facilitating rapid increases in ventilation (10–17 times resting levels) to enhance oxygen uptake during flight under low partial pressures. Highland vespertilionids further exhibit metabolic flexibility, such as reduced basal rates and enhanced hemoglobin affinity, allowing them to tolerate hypoxia while maintaining aerobic capacity for prolonged ascents, though limits prevent most from exceeding 3,000–4,000 m routinely without thermal or updrafts support.^[60]^[56]

References

[1]
Bat flight - ScienceDirect.com
May 18, 2015 · Bats are unique among extant flying animals, as they have compliant wings and an echolocation sensory system that distinguish them from birds and insects.
[2]
The evolution of flight in bats: a novel hypothesis - Wiley Online Library
Sep 10, 2020 · Though flight in bats has been extensively studied, the evolutionary history of the ability to fly in the chiropterans remains unclear. We ...Echolocation And The... · Gliding Model · Echolocation-First...
[3]
Bat flight: aerodynamics, kinematics and flight morphology
Mar 1, 2015 · Summary: Hedenström and Johansson review the way in which the bat's wing structure equips it for efficient and manoeuvrable flight.ABSTRACT · Introduction · Wakes of real bats · Functional morphology for bat...
[4]
Advances in the study of bat flight: the wing and the wind
Here, we review how recent bat flight research has provided significant new insights into several important aspects of bat flight structure and function.
[5]
Gliding toward an understanding of the origin of flight in bats - PeerJ
Jul 25, 2024 · Bats are the only mammals capable of powered flight and have correspondingly specialized body plans, particularly in their limb morphology.
[6]
[PDF] Quantifying the complexity of bat wing kinematics - Brown CS
Jun 25, 2008 · In this paper, we apply proper orthogonal decomposition (POD), a computational tool, to the wing kinematics of a bat flying in a wind tunnel, ...Missing: seminal | Show results with:seminal
[7]
Kinematics and wing shape across flight speed in the bat ...
Oct 5, 2012 · Inner wing area and four wing angles are shown for three different speeds. The bat schemes illustrate the definition of the parameters. The ...Kinematic Parameters · Wing Movement · Controlling Wing Area
[8]
Bat echolocation calls: adaptation and convergent evolution - Journals
Bat echolocation calls vary in their dominant frequency approximately between 11 kHz (e.g. Euderma maculatum; Fullard & Dawson 1997) and 212 kHz (Cloeotis ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[9]
Scaling of wingbeat frequency w/ body mass in bats
Mar 1, 2012 · Here, we report new wingbeat frequency data for 27 morphologically diverse bat species representing nine families, and additional data from the ...SUMMARY · INTRODUCTION · RESULTS AND DISCUSSION · CONCLUSION
[10]
Scaling bat wingbeat frequency and amplitude
Sep 1, 2002 · Wingbeat frequency for each species was found to vary only slightly with flight speed over the lower half of the speed range. At high speeds, ...Materials And Methods · Data Collection · Discussion
[11]
Kinematics and wing shape across flight speed in the bat ... - NIH
Due to the strong dependency of the generated aerodynamic lift on flight speed of a wing, bats are expected to alter their kinematics and wing morphology ...Missing: seminal papers
[12]
Vortices and Forces in Biological Flight: Insects, Birds, and Bats
Jan 19, 2024 · The LEVs are intensified by dynamic wing morphing in bird and bat flight, producing a significantly elevated vortex lift. The complex wake ...
[13]
Multiple leading edge vortices of unexpected strength in freely flying ...
Nov 20, 2013 · The LEV is generated by separation of the flow at the leading edge of the wing and enables the flow to reattach before the trailing edge. In ...
[14]
Estimation of Unsteady Aerodynamics in the Wake of a Freely Flying ...
It is shown that unsteady aerodynamics are necessary to satisfy the drag/thrust balance by approximating the unsteady drag term. These findings may shed light ...
[15]
Diversity in the organization of elastin bundles and ...
Jan 10, 2017 · The bilayered skin of all bat wing membranes possesses abundant elastin bundles, muscles, neurovascular bundles, and bundles of organized ...
[16]
the role of elastin fibres in the mechanical behaviour of bat wing ...
However, although the macroscopically visible fibres in bat wing membranes are composed predominantly of elastin, they possess a small fraction of collagen ...Missing: composition | Show results with:composition
[17]
A collagen and elastic network in the wing of the bat - PMC - NIH
Bundles of collagen fibrils, elastic fibres and fibroblasts are organized into a network that lies in the plane of a large portion of the bat wing.Missing: composition | Show results with:composition
[18]
Digital gene expression tag profiling of bat digits provides robust ...
Nov 6, 2010 · As the only truly flying mammals, bats use their unique wing - consisting of four elongated digits (digits II-V) connected by membranes - to ...Missing: finger | Show results with:finger
[19]
Bat Facts | Smithsonian Institution
The bones of the arm and four of the fingers are light, slender, and lengthened to support, spread, and manipulate the membrane. The thumb, usually with a sharp ...Missing: elements elongated digits
[20]
of Biology - The Evolution of Flight in Bats - jstor
1998). The styliform cartilage can deflect the wingtip upward, which may function in a manner similar to that of an endplate, disrupting the shedding of ...
[21]
Bats - Missouri Department of Conservation
May 21, 2025 · ... elongated fingers (digits); and the small hind legs. The clawed thumbs are separate. The patagium of a bat has four distinct parts: the ...
[22]
[PDF] Bats - Brown CS
This consists of a membrane-the uropatag- ium or interfemoral membrane-stretched between the hindlimbs and tail (Fig. 2.3). In many bat species, the uropatagium ...
[23]
Functional anatomy of the wing muscles of the Egyptian fruit bat ...
Sep 30, 2024 · A characteristic of all bats, which separates them from other mammals, is the enlarged pectoralis muscle for powered flight (Figures 1, 2, 3).
[24]
Patagium - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
As mentioned above, the tendon of the supracoracoideus muscle passes through the triosseal canal and attaches to the proximal humerus, thereby raising the wing.
[25]
[PDF] The Biology of Bats
The hind legs are attached to the patagium, a membrane that runs down the sides of the body from the wings to the feet. The hind legs extend out to the sides ...Missing: composition | Show results with:composition
[26]
Somatosensory Substrates of Flight Control in Bats - PubMed Central
Wing sensory inputs provide behaviorally relevant information to guide flight; however, components of wing sensory-motor circuits have not been analyzed.
[27]
Functional role of airflow-sensing hairs on the bat wing - PMC
The bat wing is sparsely covered with sensory hairs, and wing-hair removal results in reduced flight maneuverability.
[28]
Bat wing sensors support flight control - PMC - NIH
Jun 20, 2011 · Recent studies revealed that mechanoreceptors located on the antennae might provide a similar function for four-winged insects (25). Flying ...Missing: components | Show results with:components
[29]
Ecological morphology and flight in bats (Mammalia; Chiroptera ...
Bat wing morphology is considered in relation to flight performance and flight behaviour to clarify the functional basis for eco-morphological correlations ...
[30]
A bat wing and wing profile with some basic aerodynamic definitions....
A bat wing and wing profile with some basic aerodynamic definitions. The symbols are as follows: L is lift, D is drag, c is chord line, h is maximum distance ...
[31]
(PDF) Body size and wing shape as predictors of the initial flight ...
Feb 10, 2025 · Here, we evaluated how body size and wing shape can be predictors of initial flight acceleration (0-10 meters) in 15 bat species (3 families) ...
[32]
Correlated evolution of wing morphology and echolocation calls in ...
They found that bats with high wing loading and aspect ratio produce narrowband calls, while species with low wing loading and aspect ratio emit broadband ...
[33]
Aerodynamic reconstruction of the primitive fossil bat ... - NIH
One of the oldest bats known from a complete skeleton is Onychonycteris finneyi ... gliding bat ancestor similar to Onychonycteris but lacking this structure.
[34]
Bats Evolved Flight Before Echolocation | AMNH
Feb 24, 2008 · The new species, named Onychonycteris finneyi, was unearthed in 2003 in southwestern Wyoming and is described in a study led by Nancy Simmons, ...Missing: earliest evidence
[35]
Palaeoatmosphere facilitates a gliding transition to powered flight in ...
Mar 26, 2024 · Gliding is thought to have evolved independently at least seven times in mammals. These gliders possess up to three separate skin membranes ...
[36]
Taking Wing: Uncovering the Evolutionary Origins of Bats
Dec 1, 2008 · Hailing from Wyoming, the species—dubbed Onychonycteris finneyi—is the most primitive bat ever discovered. ... gliding of prebat ancestors ...
[37]
Unique expression patterns of multiple key genes associated ... - NIH
Unlike the avian wing with feathers, the bat wing is supported by four elongated digits within the wing membrane (figure 1b). While the four posterior fingers ( ...Missing: elements | Show results with:elements
[38]
Adaptive Evolution of the Hox Gene Family for Development in Bats ...
Thus, our study, with genomic and newly sequenced Hox genes, identifies two candidate Hox genes that may be closely linked with developmental changes in bats ...
[39]
Why Do Bats Fly? An Evolutionary Journey
Aug 21, 2024 · Many bat experts believe the ancestor of all bats was a flightless, forest-dwelling creature that lived around 64 million years ago.
[40]
Oldest-known bat skeletons shed light on evolution of flying mammals
Apr 13, 2023 · "They probably evolved during the Paleocene epoch, the 10-million-year interval between the end of the Mesozoic era and the Eocene epoch," ...Missing: timeline mya
[41]
Why Bats Are One of Evolution's Greatest Puzzles
Apr 21, 2020 · Bats may be the only mammals to evolve powered flapping flight, but other mammal species from flying squirrels to a lemur-like creature called ...
[42]
Understanding of bat wing evolution takes flight - PubMed Central
Several morphological changes were required to derive the bat wing from its ancestral form, including increasing the membrane surface area between the digits ...
[43]
Comparative single-cell analyses reveal evolutionary repurposing of ...
Jul 16, 2025 · The bat wing is characterized by an extreme elongation of the second to fifth digits with a wing membrane called the chiropatagium connecting ...Missing: patagium | Show results with:patagium
[44]
[PDF] A synthesis of ecological and evolutionary determinants of bat ...
The ori- gin of the major bat lineages coincides with an increase in the average annual temperature and with diversity peaks of plants and insects [29].Missing: post- | Show results with:post-
[45]
What Factors Shape the Flyability in Bats?—The Perspective from ...
The wing structure of bats is composed of flexible and elastic bones, along with multiple independently controllable joints, which allow them to generate ...
[46]
how forelimb specialization enables active flight in modern vertebrates
Jun 7, 2017 · Feathered wings and membrane wings have vastly different architectures, but both are adapted for efficient flight [59]. 2.3.1. Feathered wings.
[47]
Bone density and the lightweight skeletons of birds - Journals
Mar 17, 2010 · By analogy, increased bone density in birds and bats may reflect adaptations for maximizing bone strength and stiffness while minimizing bone ...
[48]
[PDF] Mechano-chemical regulation of bat wing bones for flight
evident in the wing bones of bats, causes a marked decrease in bone ... extracted the bone proteins, performed mass spectrometry, and analyzed the mass ...
[49]
Mechano-chemical regulation of bat wing bones for flight
We provide new evidence on how bat wing development might facilitate flight though protein-based regulation of bone mineralization and lead to more deflection ...Missing: finite | Show results with:finite
[50]
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354396642_Mechano-chemical_regulation_of_bat_wing_bones_for_flight
[51]
(PDF) Wing morphology, echolocation calls, diet and emergence ...
Aug 6, 2025 · Wing morphology, echolocation calls, diet and emergence time of black-bearded tomb bats (Taphozous melanopogon, Emballonuridae) ... fast hawking in ...
[52]
Flight performance, foraging tactics and echolocation in the trawling ...
The slightly larger Myotis adversus had relatively larger wings than M. daubentoni, conferring a slightly lower wing-loading. Nevertheless, M. adversus flew ...
[53]
https://zslpublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1991.tb03824.x
[54]
[PDF] Anatomical and Physiological Adaptations for Flight
Adaptations to low air density Flying in less dense air requires expansion of wing area (lower wing loading) or changes in wing kinematics to generate ...<|separator|>
[55]
Different bat guilds have distinct functional responses to elevation
In open-space bats, wing load and aspect ratio traits were related with elevation. Abstract. Understanding biodiversity's responses to environmental ...
[56]
Low thermal dependence of the contractile properties of a wing ...
Summary: The contractile properties of a bat wing muscle are less thermally dependent than those of other studied animals, which may help maintain muscle.
[57]
Powered-gliding/climbing flight performed by bats for saving fuel
Sep 1, 2025 · ABSTRACT. Results of recent research show that bats perform flights with continual altitude changes rather than flying at a constant altitude.Missing: hawking | Show results with:hawking
[58]
Biomechanical, Respiratory and Cardiovascular Adaptations of Bats ...
Sep 9, 2011 · Bats have lung volumes about 72% greater than non-flying mammals of the same size. Pulmonary ventilation can rapidly increase 10 to 17 times as ...