Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Boo.com

Boo.com was a short-lived founded in 1998 by Swedish entrepreneurs Ernst Malmsten, Kajsa Leander, and Patrik Hedelin, which sought to establish a global online retailer of high-end and through a technology-intensive targeting markets in and the . The company launched on November 3, 1999, after raising about $135 million from investors including , , of , and the , reaching a peak valuation of $390 million during the dot-com boom. Featuring innovations like a fitting room with the "Ms. Boo" and aggressive marketing that garnered 350,000 pre-registrations, Boo.com entered administration on May 18, 2000, after exhausting funds at a rate exceeding $10 million per month amid the bubble's burst. Contributing factors included overambitious causing slow load times incompatible with dial-up , operational costs for a 400-person international team, and sales projections of $100 million in the first year that were not met, with initial conversion rates at 0.25%. Launch marketing costs hit $22.4 million, generating buzz but only £200,000 in sales during the final two months. The brand and domain were acquired by Fashionmall.com, while technology assets went to Bright Station for £250,000; the episode, detailed in Malmsten's 2001 book Boo Hoo: A Dotcom Story from Concept to Catastrophe, serves as a cautionary tale of dot-com excesses, influencing e-commerce development toward more practical models, with online sales comprising about 5% of UK retail by the late 2000s.

Founding and Background

Founders and Inception

Boo.com was founded by three Swedish entrepreneurs: Ernst Malmsten, who served as CEO; Kajsa Leander, a former model and co-founder responsible for ; and Patrik Hedelin, a and former investment banker who handled finances. Malmsten and Leander, childhood friends who had previously dated, brought complementary expertise in business and fashion, while Hedelin provided financial acumen from his banking background. Prior to Boo.com, the founders achieved early success with Bokus.com, an online bookstore they launched in 1997. The venture was sold in 1998 to a book distributor for an eight-figure sum, reportedly making Malmsten, Leander, and Hedelin millionaires and validating their approach. Emboldened by this experience, the trio established Boo.com in 1998 with headquarters in London's , aiming to build a global online retailer after recognizing the untapped potential of beyond books. The London location was chosen for its vibrant scene and international appeal, positioning the company to target a worldwide market. From a small initial team, Boo.com quickly assembled an roster of talent, including industry specialists and experts, to support its ambitious vision; from an initial team of around 40, it had grown to over 400 employees across multiple offices by late 1999. This diverse group reflected the founders' goal of creating a culturally attuned platform with global reach.

Initial Concept and Planning

Boo.com's core concept emerged in 1998 as a multi-brand retailer specializing in premium and apparel, aimed at affluent, fashion-conscious consumers aged 18-24 worldwide. The founders envisioned a global platform that would offer high-end brands such as , , and , emphasizing urban chic styles without discounting to maintain exclusivity. This idea drew inspiration from the founders' prior success with an , adapting it to capitalize on emerging youth trends in and . Planning phases began with market research highlighting the potential of a $60 billion global online apparel sector driven by Generation X shoppers, alongside projections for rapid growth in UK online shopping from £600 million in 1999 to £12.5 billion by 2005. The team decided to prioritize international scalability from inception, targeting 18 countries at rollout with support for seven languages and 18 currencies to appeal to a borderless youth demographic. Initial focus narrowed to key markets in Europe and the US, balancing ambitious global reach with practical logistics like warehouses in Louisville, Kentucky, and Cologne, Germany. Pre-launch activities from 1998 to 1999 included site prototyping featuring innovative product visualizations and a virtual named Miss Boo to enhance the experience. The founders scouted partnerships with premium brands, securing agreements despite resistance from traditional channels concerned about and conflicts. Legally, the company was established as a UK-based entity with a headquarters, even though the Swedish founders operated from multiple European locations including and . Challenges during planning centered on reconciling expansive global ambitions with the nascent infrastructure of 1998, including unreliable access and compatibility issues across devices like Macs. development for the interactive caused significant delays, pushing back timelines and complicating integrations. These hurdles underscored the difficulties of pioneering a multilingual, multi-currency site in an era when online retail was still experimental.

Business Strategy

Company Vision and Brand Identity

Boo.com was established with the ambitious vision of becoming the world's first truly global online retailer specializing in and , positioning itself as a with universal appeal and aspiring to "Amazon the sector" by creating a comprehensive, one-stop destination for premium, trendy apparel that enabled seamless cross-border shopping. The company aimed to capture the burgeoning demand for high-end brands like and in the digital space, targeting a new era of where international accessibility and brand prestige converged. The brand name "Boo" originated from the iconic film star , with founders initially pursuing bo.com—inspired by her—before acquiring boo.com for $2,500 when the preferred domain was unavailable. This selection emphasized brevity and memorability, ensuring the name's playful connotation translated neutrally across cultures without linguistic pitfalls. Boo.com's brand identity revolved around a hip, urban aesthetic tailored to affluent, fashion-conscious young adults aged 18-24, evoking an exclusive yet approachable portal to online luxury through vibrant, trend-setting visuals and interactive elements like the virtual shopping guide Miss Boo. High-profile backing from fashion moguls such as of and of further reinforced this positioning, lending an air of celebrity-adjacent prestige to the venture. Central to its differentiation was a focus on fostering and immersion rather than transactional alone, exemplified by the launch of "Boom," a lavish multilingual online that showcased cultural trends, editorials, and stories to build user engagement and loyalty. This approach sought to transform Boo.com into a dynamic hub for , blending commerce with aspirational content to cultivate long-term affinity.

Marketing and Launch Strategy

Boo.com executed an ambitious centered on building hype and among a young, affluent, fashion-conscious demographic aged 18-24, leveraging high-profile teaser campaigns to generate pre-launch buzz. The company secured over 350,000 email registrations from potential customers prior to going live, capitalizing on the founders' media-savvy profiles—particularly co-founder Kajsa Leander, a former model—to fuel efforts in and trade publications. Partnerships with major brands such as , , and were integral, enabling co-marketing initiatives that promoted Boo.com's platform as a cutting-edge destination for premium , while investments from entities like the and further amplified credibility through cross-promotional opportunities. The launch on November 3, 1999, was orchestrated simultaneously across the , , and several European markets, with plans for Asian expansion to follow, eschewing a phased rollout in favor of immediate global presence. This approach included localized websites supporting multiple currencies and languages—initially in UK English, US English, , , Danish, and , with versions for , , and others—to target an initial footprint in 18 countries, with ambitions to scale to over 30 markets through dedicated warehouses in , and , . A substantial $22.4 million was allocated to marketing and in the initial months, funding extensive high-impact campaigns across , newspapers, and channels, alongside the production of an in-house called "" and a 44-page print "Look Book" catalogue to engage the audience beyond direct sales. Central to the branding was the Miss Boo mascot, a computer-animated virtual salesperson originally conceived as "" and rebranded as Miss Boo, who appeared in promotional materials to guide users with shopping tips and interactive product visualizations, embodying the site's youthful, tech-forward identity. Advertising efforts heavily targeted youth-oriented , including magazines and outlets appealing to trendsetters, to position Boo.com as a subversive alternative to traditional . PR stunts and events, such as leveraging the site's innovative features for previews, complemented digital ads and helped sustain pre-launch excitement despite multiple delays from the original May 1999 target.

Technology and Platform

Innovative Features

Boo.com pioneered several technical innovations aimed at transforming online fashion retail by addressing key barriers such as product and sizing inconsistencies, while creating an immersive, game-like experience to appeal to a youthful, tech-savvy demographic aged 18-24. The sought to simulate the in-store shopping experience digitally, enabling global users to interact with products in ways that bridged the gap between physical and virtual retail. Central to these innovations were interactive features like 3D product rotation and zoom capabilities, which allowed customers to drag items onto virtual models, rotate them 360 degrees, and examine details from multiple angles for a virtual try-on effect. Complementing this was "Miss Boo," a virtual salesperson—initially conceptualized as ""—designed to guide users through the site with contextual tips and assistance at each shopping stage, mimicking a . The interface leveraged a Flash-based system for dynamic navigation, incorporating animated elements to foster engagement and a sense of akin to video games. The underlying tech stack featured a custom-developed platform built with and to handle inventory management without maintaining physical stock, relying instead on a dropshipping model where orders were fulfilled from centralized warehouses in locations like , and , . This system supported multi-language and multi-currency functionality from launch, facilitating simultaneous rollout in 18 countries with localized content in languages including English (UK and US), , , Danish, and . Development of these features spanned 18 months, with an investment of approximately $6 million dedicated to for the initial spring/summer 2000 season.

Development and User Experience Issues

Boo.com's development process was marred by significant technical challenges, primarily stemming from its ambitious attempt to create a custom platform for global . The site relied heavily on and technologies to enable innovative features like product visualization and try-ons, but these proved overly complex and incompatible with the dial-up connections prevalent in , where average speeds were around 56 kbps. This led to excessive page load times, with each new page taking up to 8 seconds to render, far exceeding the usability threshold of 3 seconds recommended for sites at the time. Development delays compounded these issues; the platform took twice as long as anticipated to build, following a six-month delay due to technical challenges and implementation issues with fulfillment partners like and . User experience was further hampered by confusing and choices that prioritized over functionality. The featured minuscule icons, hierarchical menus requiring precise mouse manipulation, and non-standard scrolling widgets that revealed only 20 words of product text at a time, often necessitating horizontal scrolling on small screens. Features like the virtual shopping assistant "Miss Boo" and outfit visualization on digital mannequins, intended to replicate in-store experiences, instead demanded excessive dragging and confined product details to a one-square-inch window, frustrating users accustomed to simpler browsing. Additionally, users had to download a to access the site, further deterring access on the era's browsers and connections. The site's heavy graphics overwhelmed dial-up modems, leading to frequent freezes and an overall "slow and unpleasant" interaction that alienated potential customers. These flaws manifested in poor metrics and widespread user dissatisfaction at launch. The experienced frequent crashes and , particularly during , resulting in a dismal conversion rate of just 0.25%—equating to only 4 orders per 1,000 visitors on the first day. Customer complaints flooded in about the site's sluggishness, non-intuitive controls, and inability to or rotate products effectively on standard browsers like 4.0, which lacked full support for the advanced scripting. Internally, launch pressure led to inadequate testing; the absence of a comprehensive early on meant that complex elements like multi-currency , on-the-fly calculations across 18 countries, and manual language translations were implemented hastily, exacerbating and requiring post-launch fixes that strained resources. High staff turnover in the tech team, amid a workforce of 350 across global offices, further disrupted development continuity as diverse expertise was needed for the 's intricate backend.

Funding and Financial Management

Investment Rounds and Valuation

Boo.com secured initial seed capital from the personal proceeds of its founders, who had recently sold their successful online bookstore, Bokus.com, for several million dollars in 1998, providing the bootstrap funding to launch the venture. This early financial base, combined with the founders' proven track record in , enabled the company to attract significant during the height of the dot-com era. The company's first formal investment round, a Series A in early 1999, raised approximately $12.5 million, with notable commitments from industry leaders including $6.3 million jointly from of and the . Subsequent rounds followed rapidly amid investor enthusiasm for Boo.com's ambitious global e-commerce platform, culminating in a Series C round of $101 million in July 1999 led by undisclosed investors. In total, Boo.com raised about $135 million across three primary funding rounds, drawing from a mix of investment banks and strategic partners. Key backers included prominent firms such as , , , and the , alongside others like and Omnia (backed by Lebanon's Hariri family), which provided the largest single investment of around $40 million. These investors were lured by the founders' prior success with Bokus.com and the promise of dominating international online sportswear and , a nascent market in the late . Investment terms typically granted equity stakes and board seats to major participants, ensuring oversight in the high-stakes environment. At its peak in late , Boo.com achieved a of $390 million, reflecting the speculative fervor of the where global ambitions and first-mover potential commanded premium pricing despite limited operational history. This valuation underscored the era's optimism but also highlighted the risks of funding decisions driven more by hype than proven metrics.

Expenditures and Burn Rate

Boo.com exhibited an extraordinarily high , consuming capital at a peak of approximately $3 million per week, or roughly $12 million per month, which contributed to the rapid depletion of its funds. Over its 18-month existence, the company spent a total of $185 million, vastly outstripping its revenue, which totaled less than $2 million during that period. This unsustainable pace was driven by aggressive expansion and operational costs without corresponding income growth. Key expenditure categories highlighted the company's focus on brand building and global infrastructure at the expense of fiscal restraint. Marketing alone accounted for $42 million, including a $25 million pre-launch advertising campaign featuring print ads, billboards, and efforts costing $600,000 through agencies like , plus over $654,000 on novelty promotional items such as disposable cameras and snow globes. Technology and content development exceeded $6 million in the first year, covering platform creation for multi-currency transactions and detailed product at $200 per item for spring and summer collections. Salaries supported a of more than 420 employees across international offices, with founders Ernst Malmsten and Kajsa Leander each receiving $150,000 annually, supplemented by perks like $100,000 allowances for apartment rent and redecoration. Additional overhead included maintaining lavish offices in , , , , and . Overspending manifested in extravagant operational choices, such as hiring consultants at $5,000 per day for branding projects like the "Miss Boo" campaign, which involved teams of stylists and copywriters, and hosting high-profile launch parties that emphasized celebrity attendance and luxury experiences. Executives frequently traveled via for transatlantic meetings, underscoring a culture of opulence amid mounting losses. These practices exemplified broader inefficiencies, including unoptimized vendor deals for inventory that failed to generate proportional returns. Financial mismanagement compounded these issues, as Boo.com lacked enforceable milestones to curb spending and continued aggressive hiring—expanding from 40 to over 420 staff—despite plateauing at around $500,000 per month at best. This approach ignored early warning signs of low user engagement and shortfalls, accelerating the cash outflow without adjustments to achieve .

Decline and Closure

Launch Timeline and Early Performance

Boo.com officially launched on November 3, 1999, marking an ambitious global rollout that simultaneously debuted the site in multiple markets including the , , , , and , featuring apparel and accessories from over 18 leading brands such as Polo Sport, , and Levi's. The platform offered thousands of products targeted at affluent 18- to 25-year-olds, emphasizing innovative viewing and virtual try-on features to simulate an in-store experience. Despite the high-profile debut, the site encountered immediate technical challenges, with reports of slow loading times and compatibility issues across browsers and dial-up connections, which hindered user engagement from the outset. In its first week of operation, Boo.com attracted 228,848 visits but converted only 609 into orders, generating $64,000 in gross —a conversion rate of approximately 0.27%. Over the subsequent six weeks, cumulative reached $353,000, with the conversion rate improving slightly to 0.98% as minor adjustments were made, yet overall sales remained far below projections amid persistent complaints. By early 2000, the site's performance metrics underscored its struggles, including high return rates driven by sizing inconsistencies across international brands and no physical try-on options, which exacerbated customer dissatisfaction. The launch period quickly transitioned into operational turbulence. In December 1999, widespread media and user reports highlighted ongoing site glitches, such as multimedia elements failing to load properly on various devices, further eroding early momentum. By January 2000, Boo.com initiated cost-cutting measures, laying off around 30 to 40 employees—approximately 10% of its workforce of about 400—to streamline operations and address underperformance. Supply chain hurdles compounded these issues, with delays in securing inventory from fashion brands reluctant to prioritize the unproven e-tailer, leading to stock shortages and fulfillment bottlenecks in key markets. In March 2000, amid mounting financial pressure, Boo.com sought and secured an emergency infusion of £12.5 million from existing investors to extend , though this proved insufficient to reverse the trajectory. Revenue growth stalled well below expectations, with total sales reaching approximately $1.1 million from February to April 2000, reflecting the combined impact of technical woes and logistical inefficiencies. These early indicators of distress culminated on May 18, 2000, when the company entered after failing to raise an additional $20 million, effectively ceasing operations just six months post-launch.

Primary Reasons for Failure

Boo.com's collapse was precipitated by its ill-timed launch amid the dot-com bubble's peak, which began to burst after the Index peaked in March 2000, with a subsequent decline of over 39% for the year, severely curtailing availability and investor confidence in high-burn internet startups. The scarcity of internet access at the time exacerbated these challenges, as only about 20% of households had internet connections, predominantly slow dial-up, rendering the site's advanced features unusable for most potential customers. Strategic missteps further compounded the issues, including an overambitious plan to expand globally across 18 countries and seven languages simultaneously without adequate market validation, leading to mismatched regional sales performance—such as U.S. sales comprising only 20% against a targeted 40%. conflicts arose as major and resisted partnering due to fears of losing over and , limiting product availability and hindering the platform's appeal. Operationally, the company suffered from high customer acquisition costs that far outpaced revenue generation and contributed to a rapid depletion of its $130 million in funding. Inventory mismanagement stemmed from custom-built backend systems that created inefficiencies in stock handling and , while leadership overconfidence—fueled by the founders' prior success with Bokus.com—resulted in unchecked spending on luxuries like first-class travel and a bloated staff of over 400 across multiple offices. The cumulative effect of these factors—technological and shortcomings intertwined with excessive expenditures and a sudden market downturn—drove Boo.com to just six months after launch, with its monthly surpassing $10 million by early 2000 and total sales under $5 million over the operational period.

Aftermath and Legacy

Bankruptcy Proceedings and Asset Sale

On May 18, 2000, Boo.com entered under procedures after raising approximately $135 million in but ultimately spending around $188 million, including accrued debts, leading to an inability to secure additional funding. Liquidators from were appointed to oversee the process, immediately halting all operations across the company's global offices. This resulted in the redundancy of over 400 staff and contractors, primarily in and , with affected employees receiving statutory redundancy payments of around £800 each in the . The proceedings focused on asset to recover value for creditors, who were owed approximately £49 million in total, including trade debts to advertising agencies and suppliers. received over 30 offers for the company's assets within days of the filing and prioritized swift sales to minimize further losses. Operations ceased entirely, with customer orders processed via credit card refunds to avoid disputes, and the company's high-profile Soho office in was vacated. In June 2000, key assets were sold piecemeal: the Boo.com , , mailing lists, and remaining were acquired by U.S.-based Fashionmall.com (operating through E-Com Inc.) for $550,000. Separately, the company's technology platform, including and patents related to its interface, was purchased by British IT firm Bright Station for £250,000 (approximately $375,000), later resold and integrated into other ventures. These sales represented a fraction of the company's value, with total recoveries falling well short of outstanding obligations. Major investors, including , , LVMH's , and the , lost the bulk of their £80 million-plus investment, as the asset disposals yielded less than $2 million overall. Despite scrutiny over spending decisions, no significant lawsuits for mismanagement were filed against the founders or executives, allowing the proceedings to conclude without prolonged litigation.

Long-Term Impact and Lessons Learned

Boo.com's spectacular failure epitomized the excesses of the , serving as a stark symbol of overambitious spending and unrealistic scaling that burned through $135 million in within 18 months. This collapse, one of Europe's first high-profile casualties in May 2000, contributed to heightened scrutiny in due diligence, prompting investors to demand more rigorous business models and realistic projections in the post-crash era. The company's downfall underscored the pitfalls of unchecked optimism, influencing a broader shift toward principles that emphasize iterative development and market validation over lavish pre-launch investments. Key lessons from Boo.com's experience highlight the dangers of deploying untested technology at scale; the site's innovative virtual shopping assistant and product views, while visionary, suffered from compatibility issues with dial-up and lacked user testing, resulting in low conversion rates of just 0.25% initially. Founders also learned the perils of simultaneous international expansion, as launching in 18 countries with over 100 offices in two years overwhelmed operations and without phased market entry. Controlling burn rates proved critical, with Boo.com's weekly expenditures exceeding $3 million untethered to revenue, leading to when additional funding dried up. Over-engineering features beyond the era's technological limits, such as complex rotations and zooms, delayed the launch by six months and alienated early users. Culturally, Boo.com endures as a in business education, frequently cited in case studies on strategy and dot-com failures, including in Dave Chaffey's Digital Marketing: Strategy, Implementation and Practice. The founders' 2001 memoir, Boo Hoo: A Dot.com Story from Concept to Catastrophe by Ernst Malmsten, Erik Portanger, and Charles Drazin, provides an insider's account of the venture's rise and fall, further cementing its place in narratives of the internet bubble. On a positive note, Boo.com pioneered 3D visualization for fashion items, a later refined and adopted by platforms like Venda.com, which repurposed its codebase to support over 140 profitable retailers, demonstrating the viability of advanced online retail tools once matured. sites continue to build on such innovations with virtual try-on features, though tempered by user-centric design.

Current Status

Domain History and Revivals

Following Boo.com's bankruptcy in May 2000, its assets, including the boo.com domain and brand rights, were sold at auction. Fashionmall.com, a U.S.-based online fashion retailer, acquired the domain for $550,000 along with brand rights and mailing lists, plus £250,000 for intellectual property and the computer system. The company relaunched the site in October 2000 as a streamlined fashion portal aimed at 18- to 30-year-olds, featuring brand showcases, shopping guides, and community elements, but operating on a fraction of the original's budget to avoid past excesses. This revival emphasized accessibility over flashy technology, yet it struggled to gain traction amid the post-dot-com market downturn and was discontinued by Fashionmall.com within a few years due to profitability issues. In 2007, Fashionmall.com sold the boo.com domain to Web Reservations International (WRI), a Dublin-based firm. WRI relaunched the site that May as a planning platform, integrating , user reviews, pricing comparisons, and booking capabilities for hotels and accommodations, drawing on content from its portfolio including Hostelworld.com. Targeted at budget-conscious young travelers, the site incorporated networking features to build around trip planning, but it faced challenges in user adoption and revenue generation. Operations ceased in October 2010, with WRI announcing closure effective November 1, citing insufficient performance despite the company's overall success in travel bookings. As of 2020, boo.com redirects visitors to Hostelworld.com, WRI's flagship hostel booking platform now under the Hostelworld Group. The domain's history of high-profile failure has limited its perceived value for new ventures, with no further revival attempts documented. Both post-2000 iterations—Fashionmall's fashion-focused and WRI's —failed to recapture the original Boo.com's media hype or achieve sustained viability, underscoring the challenges of repurposing a tarnished asset.

Founders' Subsequent Careers

Following the collapse of Boo.com in May 2000, co-founder Ernst Malmsten co-authored the book Boo Hoo: A Dotcom Story from Concept to Catastrophe with Erik Portanger and Charles Drazin, published later that year by , which provided an insider account of the company's rise and fall and sold film rights to . By 2005, Malmsten had shifted to running a London-based focused on content and strategy for brands. In 2011, he returned to as chief executive of Lara Bohinc, a London-based jewelry and accessories company that launched an online store that year. As of 2019, Malmsten reflected in interviews that the Boo.com experience highlighted the thin line between success and failure in , attributing challenges to overly ambitious global launches and technological hurdles. Kajsa Leander, another co-founder and co-author of Boo Hoo, largely distanced herself from high-profile business ventures after Boo.com, pursuing interests in creative fields. Leander has made occasional media appearances discussing lessons from Boo.com, emphasizing the perils of overambition and rapid scaling without sufficient market validation. Patrik Hedelin, the third co-founder who handled finances at Boo.com, returned to his roots post-collapse, maintaining a lower public profile compared to his co-founders. He co-founded eEquity AB, a venture capital firm specializing in technology and investments, in 2010, where he serves as managing partner and has focused on smaller-scale ventures rather than large consumer-facing startups. Hedelin has continued as an advisor and board member for various tech companies, building on his pre-Boo.com experience in . The founders have collectively viewed the Boo.com episode as a profound learning experience, often citing , excessive spending, and mismatched timing with market readiness in interviews and their book, with no joint projects undertaken since the company's closure.

References

  1. [1]
    Boo.com - an example of a failed ecommerce strategy - Smart Insights
    Jun 19, 2014 · ... story of Boo.com failure from the excellent book "Boo Hoo - a dotcom story". "Unless we raise $20 million by midnight, boo.com is dead". So ...
  2. [2]
    BUSINESS | Boo's journey to failure - BBC News
    Oct 31, 2001 · "Boo Hoo: a dot.com story ... Rory Cellan-Jones, the BBC's internet and business correspondent, attributes Boo's failure to a host of reasons.Missing: history | Show results with:history
  3. [3]
    Boo.com spent fast and died young but its legacy shaped internet ...
    May 16, 2005 · There is, however, a case to be made that the failure of Boo.com tarnished the reputation of European web start-ups and left the web to be ...
  4. [4]
    Boo's Swedish founder to spend more time with his family | Business
    Feb 10, 2000 · Mr Hedelin, who last year co-founded Boo.com with Ernst Malmsten and Kajsa Leander and is understood to hold around 15% of the equity, said ...
  5. [5]
    Boo.Com Is Getting Downright Scary - Bloomberg.com
    May 21, 2000 · Its hip 29-year-old founders, Ernst Malmsten and former Elite model Kajsa Leander, exemplified the kind of young urbanites boo would target.
  6. [6]
    From Big Idea to Big Bust: The Wild Ride of Boo.com
    Dec 13, 2000 · Patrik Hedelin, a former investment banker and Boo.com's third, though more removed, co-founder, had the same arrangement. "It's easy for the ...
  7. [7]
    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2000-05-21/boo-dot-com-is-getting-downright-scary-intl-edition
  8. [8]
    Miss Boo, a fashionista ahead of her time - The Hustle
    who'd sold their online book ...Missing: inception | Show results with:inception
  9. [9]
    https://thehustle.co/miss-boo-a-fashionista-ahead-of-her-time
  10. [10]
    boo.com - Ridicule is nothing to be scared of. - Campaign
    Feb 16, 2000 · Along with compatriot Partik Hedelin (chief financial officer), they set up headquarters in Soho's Carnaby Street at the end of 1998 ...<|separator|>
  11. [11]
    Boo.com Rises from Dot-Com Graveyard - E-Commerce Times
    Founded late in 1999 by a team that included well-known European fashion models, Boo developed cutting edge technology that allowed shoppers to try clothes on 3 ...Missing: inception | Show results with:inception
  12. [12]
    Hitting The Wall At Boo - Newsweek
    Jul 16, 2000 · With his business partners, Kajsa Leander and Patrik Hedelin, Malmsten had an audacious idea: to build an ultrahip, technically awesome ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  13. [13]
    Boo.com Case Study - Scribd
    ... Boo.com brand, Boom a lavish online fashion magazine was created which required substantial staff for different language versions. The magazine wasn't a ...
  14. [14]
    Case Study: Boo.com - The Overdesigned Collapse of a Fashion ...
    Jul 11, 2025 · Strategic Failures – Boo.com. Boo.com's most critical strategic failure was its overinvestment in unproven technology without confirming product ...
  15. [15]
    None
    Nothing is retrieved...<|control11|><|separator|>
  16. [16]
    Boo's Demise - NN/G
    May 28, 2000 · On May 18, 2000, the BBC reported that Boo.com had gone bankrupt. Good riddance. Boo was one of the very few high-profile sites to launch in recent months that ...Missing: development engineers cost 3D
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Explaining the E-Commerce Shakeout
    Six weeks after the launch, Boo.com was forced to discount its merchan- dise by 40%. Some of the blame for the company's mismanagement lies with Boo.com's board ...
  18. [18]
    Boo.com, Online Fashion Retailer, Goes Out of Business
    May 19, 2000 · Ernst Malmsten and Kajsa Leander, two 29-year-old Swedes, founded Boo.com here in 1998, planning to create an online fashion retailer that would ...
  19. [19]
    Boo.com Stock Price, Funding, Valuation, Revenue ... - CB Insights
    Funding, Valuation & Revenue. 3 Fundings. Boo.com has raised $135M over 3 rounds. Boo.com's latest funding round was a Series C for $101M on July 1, 1999.Missing: investment | Show results with:investment
  20. [20]
    Boo.com 2025 Company Profile: Valuation, Investors, Acquisition
    Information on acquisition, funding, investors, and executives for Boo.com. Use the PitchBook Platform to explore the full profile.Missing: investment | Show results with:investment
  21. [21]
    Mideast investors were Boo.com's biggest backers
    May 19, 2000 · It is not only high-profile western investors like Bernard Arnault and the Benetton family who had their fingers burnt in the spectacular ...Missing: LVMH | Show results with:LVMH
  22. [22]
    Boo.com demise may choke funding - MarketWatch
    May 18, 2000 · ... valuation dropped to $320 million compared with $390 million in November. Then, in February J.P. Morgan & Co. resigned as Boo.com's advisers.
  23. [23]
    Boo-hoo history of boo.com - Financial News London
    The collapse of boo.com, the first and highest profile new economy failure last year, highlighted for many the folly of handing over large amounts of cash ...
  24. [24]
    Gone, but not forgotten - Campaign
    Boo.com 1999 to 2000. Could it have been the wild parties, the regular trips to New York on Concorde or the private members' club access for senior staffers?
  25. [25]
    From Big Idea to Big Bust: The Wild Ride of Boo.com
    Dec 13, 2000 · The two began hiring consultants, first to put the technology right, then for other things as well. ''The major money was spent because our ...
  26. [26]
    Boo hoo : a dot-com story from concept to catastrophe
    Apr 19, 2021 · In boo hoo co-founder and CEO Ernst Malmsten gives his personal account of boo's rise and fall, capturing the atmosphere and characters of an extraordinary ...Missing: metrics orders
  27. [27]
    Boo gets booed | Technology | The Guardian
    Nov 10, 1999 · There wasn't much of a welcome this week for the web's latest online shop - Boo.com. Liz Bailey finds out what went wrong. Wed 10 Nov 1999 ...
  28. [28]
    BUSINESS | Boo.com axes staff - BBC News
    Boo.com, with big name backers and global ambitions, lays off 30 workers as it aims to overcome its troubled early days.
  29. [29]
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/618808.stm
  30. [30]
    BUSINESS | Top web retailer collapses - BBC News
    May 18, 2000 · European online clothing retailer Boo.com has collapsed through lack of funds, just six months after it launched to a huge fanfare of publicity.Missing: $22.4 million<|control11|><|separator|>
  31. [31]
    INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS; Boo.com, Online Fashion Retailer ...
    May 19, 2000 · Whether Boo.com's failure presages further problems for clothing e-tailers is unclear. But some Internet analysts said Boo.com's rise and fall ...
  32. [32]
    Britain's Boo.com Goes Broke - Los Angeles Times
    May 19, 2000 · Co-founders Ernst Malmsten and Kajsa Leander brought in KPMG International to liquidate the company, saying their “strenuous efforts” to raise ...Missing: bankruptcy 18
  33. [33]
    Boo.com creditors are owed £49 million - The Register
    Thu 10 Aug 2000 // 14:57 UTC. The Official Receiver has completed a report on Boo.com, copies of which are in the hands of its creditors.
  34. [34]
    US company to pay $1/2m for assets of boo.com, in which investors ...
    Jun 1, 2000 · A US company has agreed to buy for $550,000 certain assets of boo.com, including the domain name and any rights relating to the boo brand, ...
  35. [35]
    When a Dot Com Goes Bust - WIRED
    Jun 7, 2000 · Within days the technology sold for a bargain $368,800 to the ... fashionmall.com. But the education toy retailer Toysmart is still ...
  36. [36]
    Boo's financial fiasco. - Accountancy Age
    Nov 14, 2001 · When KPMG liquidators were called in, boo had burned through nearly $100m (#70m) and had outstanding debts of around $20m. Hedelin, a investment ...
  37. [37]
    Boo.com: 3 Lessons from an eCommerce Horror Story - Marmind
    Paths to Failure. Boo.com was one of the greatest failures of the dot.com bubble that burst around the turn of the millennium. 16 years on, we are still ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  38. [38]
    6 Lessons from Boo.com's eCommerce Failure - Apptunix
    Dec 12, 2018 · It was established by the Swedes, Ernst Malmsten, together with Kajsa Leander and Patrik Hedelin, in 1998, which was the first internet high- ...
  39. [39]
    Boo Hoo: A Dot. Com Story from Concept to Catastrophe
    This is the story of how an international model and a former poetry critic from Sweden dreamed up the most ambitious and glamorous internet startup ever ...Missing: metrics orders
  40. [40]
    Fashionmall.com Swoops In for the Boo.com Fire Sale
    Jun 2, 2000 · Analysts questioned the rationale for buying a brand that has the taint of failure. ''It's been much maligned,'' Ken Cassar, senior retail ...
  41. [41]
    ONLINE SHOPPER; Boo.com Tries Again, Humbled and Retooled
    Jan 11, 2001 · It turned out that the higher price was outdated, based on conversion rates calculated in July. ''We are in the midst of improving the site,'' ...
  42. [42]
    Boo.com to Rise Again, Run by Fashionmall - Computerworld
    Aug 21, 2000 · Fashionmall.com is getting ready to reopen Boo.com's virtual doors this fall. But the new Boo.com will operate differently than the original ...
  43. [43]
    Boo.com returns for the third time - Campaign
    May 2, 2007 · Boo.com ready for relaunch · Fashionmall to revive Boo.com on &#036;1m marketing spend · Boo.com to return on October 30 · Boo.com to be ...Missing: 2001 Brightbridge
  44. [44]
    Boo.com reincarnated as travel website - The Irish Times
    May 3, 2007 · The infamous dotcom flop Boo.com has been bought and relaunched as a travel website by Dublin-based internet company Web Reservations ...
  45. [45]
    Boo.com back after dot-com boo-boos - CNET
    May 2, 2007 · One of the most high-profile failures of the 2000 dot-com crash, a British fashion site, takes on a new form as a travel site.<|separator|>
  46. [46]
    Curse of Boo.com strikes again, travel version closes | PhocusWire
    Jan 5, 2011 · No, is the short answer. Boo.com relaunched in May 2007 as a travel planning website by Web Reservations International, owner of Hostelworld and ...Missing: redirects | Show results with:redirects
  47. [47]
    Iain Hollingshead: Whatever happened to ... boo.com? - The Guardian
    May 12, 2006 · There are hints of a resurrection of boo.com itself, which has reclaimed its independent website. "The boo is back!" it says. "A new site will ...Missing: youth | Show results with:youth
  48. [48]
    Boo.com founder Ernst Malmsten returns to online retail with Lara ...
    Apr 13, 2011 · Ernst Malmsten, the co-founder of Boo.com, has returned to online retail for the first time since the company became one of the biggest failures of the dotcom ...
  49. [49]
    Ernst Malmsten: “E-commerce today's barriers are the same than 20 ...
    May 17, 2019 · Malmsten was the founder of Boo.com, pioneer in fashion's e-commerce in the nineties decade. The entrepreneur has discussed the main challenges ...Missing: career | Show results with:career
  50. [50]
    Patrik Hedelin - Managing Partner - eEquity - Careers
    Patrik has worked in e-commerce, in corporate finance, and as an investment professional for the past 20 years. Prior to eEquity he co-founded boo.com and ...
  51. [51]
    Swedish E-Commerce Pioneer Makes a Big Digital Bet - Bloomberg
    Mar 21, 2018 · Hedelin built a reputation as a pioneer in e-commerce after advising online book store Bokus.com in the 1990s. He also co-founded the fashion ...
  52. [52]
    What happened to the stars of the dotcom boom? - The Times
    Jun 15, 2015 · Co-founder Kajsa Leander went on to launch the branding agency Studio Berg with her husband, Joel Berg, and is now a director at Vision and Art, ...