Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Business Roundtable

The Business Roundtable is an association of more than 200 chief executive officers from leading U.S. companies across every sector of the economy, dedicated to promoting sound public policies that foster a thriving economy and free enterprise. Established in 1972 through the merger of three predecessor groups—the March Group of CEOs focused on public policy, the Construction Users Anti-Inflation Roundtable, and the Labor Law Study Committee—the organization was created to enable corporate leaders to collaborate on economic issues and provide informed policy recommendations to government. Originally aligned with principles emphasizing corporate responsibility to shareholders, as articulated in its periodic statements on corporate governance since the late 1970s, the Business Roundtable exerted influence on regulatory and economic policies while advocating for reduced government intervention. A defining shift occurred in 2019, when nearly 200 member CEOs endorsed a new Statement on the Purpose of a Corporation, pledging to lead companies for the benefit of all stakeholders—including customers, employees, suppliers, communities, and shareholders—marking a departure from prior endorsements of shareholder primacy. This redefinition has drawn criticism from shareholder advocates, who argue it risks undermining accountability to owners and enabling vague social commitments without measurable outcomes, as evidenced by subsequent analyses questioning its implementation and sincerity.

History

Founding and Early Objectives (1972–1980s)

The Business Roundtable was established in 1972 through the merger of the Construction Users' Anti- Roundtable, focused on curbing construction cost , and the Labor Law Study Committee, composed of executives from major corporations addressing restrictive labor regulations. In 1973, this entity absorbed the March Group, an informal network of chief executive officers convened by John Harper of and Fred Borch of to discuss challenges, with Roger Blough of leading the anti- efforts. The merger created a unified platform for approximately 200 CEOs of leading U.S. firms to coordinate on economic issues amid rising , regulatory expansion, and public distrust of business following events like the and . Initial objectives centered on enabling CEOs to collaboratively analyze economic and business problems and deliver practical recommendations to policymakers, emphasizing reduced intervention in private enterprise to foster and . The group aimed to counter anti- sentiments by promoting informed perspectives on inflation control, labor flexibility, and antitrust overreach, viewing excessive as a barrier to efficient markets. Early task forces, chaired by CEOs, targeted specific reforms, such as opposing wage-price controls and advocating enhancements as the primary antidote to rather than fiscal interventions. In the , the Roundtable achieved legislative successes, including against a broad antitrust bill in 1975 and helping defeat proposals for a Consumer Protection Agency and pro-union labor legislation in 1977 by mobilizing congressional opposition, particularly among Republicans. During the 1980s, under the Reagan administration, it supported initiatives, reductions, and free-market policies, aligning with efforts to dismantle barriers in industries like and transportation, while Reagan addressed its 1988 annual meeting to underscore shared goals on . These activities positioned the organization as a key advocate for through competitive markets, though internal debates persisted on balancing interests amid economic recovery.

Expansion and Policy Influence (1990s–2000s)

During the 1990s, the Business Roundtable solidified its role as a leading voice for corporate interests in U.S. policy debates, maintaining a membership of chief executives from approximately 150 major corporations while expanding its influence through strategic coalitions and direct lobbying efforts. This period saw the organization leverage its network to advocate for economic policies aimed at enhancing global competitiveness, particularly in trade. Membership stability allowed focus on high-impact initiatives rather than numerical growth, with collective member revenues underscoring substantial economic sway. A pivotal example of policy influence was the Roundtable's push for North American free trade integration. In 1990, it urged President to initiate a with , laying groundwork for broader negotiations. By , the organization formed and led the U.S.A.-NAFTA coalition, comprising over 2,300 businesses, to secure congressional approval of the (NAFTA), mobilizing CEOs—including American Express's James Robinson, who tasked each Roundtable member with contacting at least three senators—to counter opposition and emphasize job creation and benefits. This advocacy contributed to NAFTA's passage without strong labor or environmental side agreements, aligning with the Roundtable's priority of reducing trade barriers. In the 2000s, the Roundtable shifted emphasis toward fiscal and regulatory policies to sustain post-1990s growth amid economic challenges like the dot-com bust and . It opposed tax increases, issuing no calls for hikes even as deficits grew, instead prioritizing reforms to lower effective corporate rates and broaden the base for competitiveness—contrasting with earlier moderation on deficits. On regulation, the group advocated cost-benefit analyses in to curb burdens, while supporting targeted reforms in areas like healthcare to control costs without expansive mandates. These efforts reflected a consistent causal focus on policies fostering and , though critics noted limited efficacy in averting broader elite fragmentation.

Endorsement of Shareholder Primacy (1997)

In September 1997, the Business Roundtable released its "Statement on ," a comprehensive policy document signed by chief executives of leading U.S. corporations that formalized the organization's commitment to as the core tenet of effective corporate leadership. The statement defined the "principal objective of a business enterprise" as "to generate economic returns to its owners," explicitly identifying shareholders as the primary stakeholders whose interests should guide corporate decision-making. It further articulated that "the paramount duty of and of boards of directors is to the ’s stockholders," establishing a hierarchy that prioritizes long-term value creation for shareholders over other considerations. Although the document recognized the need to balance relationships with other constituencies—including employees, customers, suppliers, and local communities—it framed such engagements as instrumental to enhancing returns rather than as independent obligations. For instance, it advocated for strategies that foster employee loyalty and only insofar as they contribute to sustained economic performance and stock value appreciation. Key governance recommendations reinforced this primacy, urging boards to focus on strategic oversight, rigorous performance evaluation of , and of executive incentives—such as through equity-based compensation—with outcomes. The also emphasized , including active participation in electing directors and voicing concerns on issues like mergers or executive pay, while cautioning against short-termism that could undermine long-term value. This framework aligned with prevailing legal interpretations under Delaware , where directors' duties of care and loyalty were construed to serve interests preeminently. The 1997 endorsement crystallized a among Business Roundtable members—representing firms with combined assets exceeding trillions of dollars—on best practices amid 1990s debates over corporate , influencing subsequent regulatory discussions and boardroom norms until revisions in later decades.

Mission, Principles, and Governance

Core Mission and Evolving Principles

The Business Roundtable functions as an association of chief executive officers from America's leading companies, focused on advocating for public policies that promote a thriving U.S. economy, free enterprise, and broad opportunity through sustained economic growth and innovation. Established in 1972 through the merger of preexisting business advocacy groups like the Labor Law Study Committee and the Construction Users Anti-Inflation Roundtable, its foundational objective was to counter rising anti-business sentiment, regulatory overreach, and public criticism by emphasizing the role of private enterprise in generating jobs, prosperity, and national competitiveness. Since 1978, the organization has periodically issued Principles of Corporate Governance, serving as guidance for public companies on best practices in board oversight, executive accountability, and long-term value creation. Early iterations prioritized , market competition, and managerial discretion aligned with duties, reflecting a to capitalism's core mechanisms of profit-driven and . By 1997, these principles explicitly endorsed , stating that "the principal objective of a enterprise is to generate economic returns to its owners" and that boards and bear a paramount duty to stockholders, influencing corporate practices amid debates over agency costs and short-termism. Over time, the principles evolved to incorporate broader considerations, culminating in a 2019 update that de-emphasized singular focus in favor of commitments to customers, employees, suppliers, communities, and shareholders alike, framed as essential for sustainable success in a complex . This shift responded to critiques of and environmental pressures but has faced scrutiny for limited tangible changes, as analyses of member companies' documents post-2019 show persistent emphasis on interests without widespread structural reforms like revised standards or board mandates. The core advocacy mission, however, remains anchored in pro-growth policies such as , , and , with principles adapting to maintain relevance amid demands while prioritizing empirical economic outcomes over ideological concessions.

Membership Composition

The Business Roundtable comprises more than 200 chief executive officers from leading U.S. companies across diverse industries. Membership is restricted to CEOs of major corporations, with selection focused on executives of prominent firms that exert significant economic influence, though formal eligibility criteria are not publicly specified beyond this threshold. Members represent every sector of the U.S. economy, including technology (e.g., Apple, ), finance (e.g., , ), healthcare (e.g., , ), manufacturing (e.g., , ), retail (e.g., , ), and consumer goods (e.g., , ). This broad composition ensures representation from firms driving innovation, employment, and policy-relevant operations nationwide. Collectively, member companies support 37 million U.S. jobs and account for nearly one-quarter of the nation's GDP, underscoring their substantial aggregate economic footprint. These organizations generate trillions in annual revenues and employ millions, positioning the Roundtable as a for high-level corporate perspectives on national policy issues.

Leadership Structure and Current Board

The Business Roundtable is governed by a composed primarily of chief executive officers from its member companies, who set policy priorities and oversee strategic direction. The board chair, elected from among the member CEOs, leads the organization, chairs meetings, and represents it in public , typically serving a one- to three-year term. Operational leadership is provided by a and CEO, supported by a staff team handling , , and administration; policy execution occurs through specialized committees chaired by board members focusing on areas such as , , and . As of January 2025, , chair and CEO of Systems, Inc., serves as chair of the Business Roundtable, having assumed the role on January 1, 2024. , former , continues as the organization's president and CEO, managing daily operations since 2012. The board comprises 28 members, including at-large representatives and chairs of key policy committees, drawn from diverse sectors to reflect the membership's breadth.
RoleNameCompany
Chair, Business RoundtableChuck RobbinsCisco Systems, Inc.
CEO, Business RoundtableJoshua BoltenBusiness Roundtable
Chair, Corporate Governance CommitteeAlan D. SchnitzerThe Travelers Companies, Inc.
Chair, Tax & Fiscal Policy CommitteeJon R. MoellerThe Procter & Gamble Company
Chair, Trade & International CommitteeJudy MarksOtis Worldwide Corporation
Chair, Technology CommitteeAdena FriedmanNasdaq
Chair, Infrastructure CommitteeRaj SubramaniamFedEx Corporation
Chair, Energy & Environment CommitteeJennifer RumseyCummins Inc.
Chair, Education and Workforce CommitteeChris KastnerHII
Chair, Health & Retirement CommitteeBlake MoretRockwell Automation
Chair, Immigration CommitteeBeth FordLand O'Lakes, Inc.
Chair, Smart Regulation CommitteeBrendan BechtelBechtel
The remaining board members serve as at-large representatives, including prominent CEOs such as of Apple, of , and Mary T. Barra of , ensuring broad sectoral input on efforts.

Policy Advocacy and Activities

Major Policy Priorities

The Business Roundtable (BRT) prioritizes policies aimed at enhancing U.S. economic competitiveness, including maintaining a competitive tax system, advancing smart , promoting open , and strengthening workforce development. In a March 2025 statement, BRT urged policymakers to focus on pro-growth measures such as revitalizing domestic and de-risking supply chains through targeted policies. These efforts build on longstanding for fiscal policies that encourage and job creation. On tax policy, BRT advocates retaining the 21% corporate rate established under the 2017 (TCJA) and extending its pro-growth provisions, including full expensing for capital s and a competitive international regime to counter foreign discriminatory measures. In July 2024, BRT committed to full advocacy support for protecting these reforms, emphasizing their role in generating and employment. A 2025 ad campaign further highlighted the need to extend TCJA elements to sustain . In and , BRT supports commonsense policies to expand markets, bolster domestic production, and address vulnerabilities, as outlined in an October 2025 roadmap featuring five pillars: reducing input costs, enhancing , reforming regulations, investing in skills, and securing advantages. This aligns with broader calls for policies that create high-quality and counter global economic risks. Regulatory priorities emphasize a balanced approach that fosters innovation while minimizing burdens, advocating for reforms to outdated rules that hinder growth without compromising essential protections. BRT has historically pushed for efficient capital markets and investor protections through sound governance standards. Workforce and education rank highly, with BRT urging systemic fixes to align training with in-demand careers, including expanded apprenticeships and skills development to build an "ever-ready" labor force. These priorities reflect BRT's CEO-led committees' focus on policies promoting long-term prosperity over short-term interventions.

Engagement with Legislation and Regulation

The Business Roundtable engages with legislation and regulation primarily through direct of , submission of formal comments to federal agencies, and issuance of policy letters advocating for pro-growth reforms that reduce regulatory burdens on businesses. In , the organization reported spending $16.97 million on federal efforts, focusing on issues such as , , and . It consistently promotes robust cost-benefit analyses in and opposes measures deemed overly prescriptive, arguing that such approaches stifle innovation and economic competitiveness. For instance, in response to requests, the group has advocated for regulatory process improvements, including early and expanded economic impact assessments. A prominent example of its legislative involvement is the strong endorsement of the 2017 (TCJA), which the Business Roundtable praised as a "monumental victory" for unlocking by lowering the rate to 21% and enhancing competitiveness. The organization has since urged Congress to extend and strengthen TCJA provisions, submitting letters in 2025 emphasizing retention of the 21% rate and other pro-growth elements to sustain job creation and investment. This advocacy aligns with its broader push for tax policies that prioritize over revenue maximization, though critics from investor groups have filed proposals scrutinizing such corporate political activities for potential conflicts with . In , the Business Roundtable has sought reforms to the Dodd-Frank Act, supporting Trump's 2017 efforts to roll back certain provisions viewed as constraining lending and economic activity. It has submitted comments to the Securities and Exchange Commission on rules stemming from Dodd-Frank, advocating for accountability measures tied to financial restatements while critiquing implementation for adding disclosure burdens without clear benefits. More recently, in December 2023, the group opposed aspects of the Endgame proposal on bank capital requirements, contending that understated impacts would limit banks' ability to extend credit and . The organization also weighs in on emerging regulatory areas, such as cybersecurity and antitrust. In July 2024, it commented on the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency's proposed rules under the Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act, calling for harmonization with existing laws to avoid redundant reporting that could hinder efficient responses. On antitrust, the Business Roundtable has cautioned against "overreaching" enforcement in 2024 statements, warning that excessive actions erode free enterprise foundations, while historically contributing to the defeat of stringent antitrust amendments in the 1970s. In privacy legislation, it has advocated for a federal consumer data law since 2018 to preempt fragmented state rules, as outlined in a May 2024 letter on the American Privacy Rights Act. For artificial intelligence, a March 2025 response urged congressional legislation to maintain a national framework without excessive bureaucracy. These engagements reflect a consistent strategy of influencing policy to favor deregulation and unified federal standards over state-level or agency-driven expansions.

Economic Impact and Achievements

The member companies of the Business Roundtable represent a substantial portion of the U.S. economy, employing roughly 37 million workers domestically while generating 24% of national GDP; their employees earn annual wages 37% above the U.S. average, reflecting higher and in these firms. Among globally oriented members, these enterprises underpin over 90 million American jobs and more than 50% of GDP, with export-oriented activities amplifying domestic economic multipliers through supply chains and spillovers. Business Roundtable's advocacy has notably influenced pro-growth fiscal policies, including its 2017 multi-million-dollar public campaign endorsing comprehensive tax reform that culminated in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA). The TCJA's reduction of the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% facilitated over $1 trillion in repatriated overseas earnings in the following years and correlated with a surge in business investment, reaching 21-year highs as a share of GDP in 2018. Pre-enactment surveys of Roundtable CEOs indicated that 76% anticipated expanding hiring and capital expenditures under the reformed system, outcomes aligned with observed post-TCJA wage growth exceeding 3% annually for several years amid low unemployment. Through sustained for regulatory streamlining and innovation, Business Roundtable has supported initiatives enhancing U.S. competitiveness, such as expanded nuclear capacity and alternative fuels, which contributed to record domestic production surpassing 100 quadrillion BTU in and bolstering resurgence. These efforts, grounded in empirical for market-oriented reforms, have been credited with fostering sustained GDP rates averaging 2.5% annually from 2010 to , though disentangling Roundtable-specific causality from broader macroeconomic trends requires caution given concurrent factors like technological advancement and global demand.

The 2019 Statement on Corporate Purpose

Development and Key Provisions

The 2019 Statement on the Purpose of a Corporation was developed internally by the , an of CEOs from major U.S. , as an update to its longstanding principles on . Drafted through consultations among member CEOs, it superseded the organization's 1997 statement, which had emphasized maximizing as the primary corporate duty. The new statement was announced on August 19, 2019, and initially endorsed by 181 CEOs representing companies with significant economic influence, including firms like Apple, , and . This shift was motivated by the view that modern corporate success requires addressing broader societal needs amid economic challenges such as wage stagnation and inequality, while maintaining commitment to free-market principles. The statement's core provision declares that "the purpose of a corporation is to promote an that serves all Americans," framing businesses as engines for job creation, , and within a free enterprise system. It asserts that CEOs must lead their companies to connect with and strengthen trust among key s, rejecting a singular focus on short-term financial returns. Specific commitments include: delivering value to customers through competitive products and services that improve lives; investing in employees via competitive wages, , and safe working conditions to foster and ; dealing fairly and ethically with suppliers to support mutual ; supporting communities through responsible resource use, , and ; and generating long-term value for shareholders by balancing these responsibilities to ensure sustainable growth. These provisions aim to integrate stakeholder interests without diluting accountability to owners. While the statement does not prescribe legal changes or enforceable metrics, it positions corporations as stewards of broader economic health, arguing that thriving businesses depend on healthy ecosystems involving workers, communities, and markets. Endorsed by nearly 200 CEOs by late 2019, it reflects a among signatories that , as articulated in prior decades, no longer fully captures effective leadership in a complex global economy. Critics from shareholder advocacy groups, such as the National Center for Public Policy Research, have questioned its vagueness and potential to invite regulatory overreach, but proponents within the Business Roundtable maintain it aligns with of long-term value creation through .

Shift from Shareholder to Stakeholder Focus

The Business Roundtable's longstanding endorsement of originated in its corporate governance principles articulated since 1978, with the 1997 statement explicitly declaring that "the paramount duty of management and of boards of directors is to the corporation's stockholders" and emphasizing maximizing as the core objective. This position aligned with Friedman's 1970 doctrine that corporate executives' primary responsibility is to shareholders, viewing social responsibilities as potentially undermining . Prior statements, including those in 1978 and subsequent updates through 1997, reinforced this by prioritizing long-term shareholder returns over broader societal obligations, framing directors' fiduciary duties under laws like Delaware's corporate code as owed principally to owners. The 2019 Statement on the Purpose of a Corporation, released on August 19, 2019, and initially signed by 181 CEOs of major U.S. companies, marked a explicit pivot by declaring that companies should "lead their companies for the benefit of all stakeholders," listing customers, employees, suppliers, communities, and without hierarchical prioritization. This reframing abandoned the singular focus on shareholder returns, instead outlining balanced commitments such as delivering value to customers through quality goods, investing in employees via fair compensation and training, supporting suppliers with equitable dealings, embracing sustainable practices for communities, and generating long-term value for only as part of this holistic approach. The shift was presented as adapting to modern economic realities, including wage stagnation and inequality, though it did not alter underlying legal duties, which remain tied to shareholder interests under statutes like the . Critics from shareholder advocacy perspectives, such as the Manhattan Institute, argued the change represented rhetorical repositioning without substantive legal or operational reform, as metrics post-2019 showed continued emphasis on metrics like and stock buybacks, with U.S. firms repurchasing $806 billion in shares in 2019 alone, up from prior years. Empirical analyses, including a 2022 study of signatory firms, found no significant deviation from shareholder-oriented behaviors, such as reduced capital expenditures or R&D in favor of dividends, suggesting the shift prioritized over causal changes in incentives. Proponents within the Business Roundtable countered that integration enhances resilience and innovation, citing examples like improved correlating with productivity gains, though such claims lack uniform causal evidence across signatories. This transition thus highlighted tensions between aspirational principles and entrenched economic pressures favoring measurable financial returns.

Reception, Implementation, and Debates

Initial Reception and Signatory Commitments

On August 19, , the Business Roundtable released its "Statement on the Purpose of a Corporation," signed by 181 CEOs of leading U.S. companies, including of , of Apple, and of . The signatories committed to generating value for all s through specific principles: delivering products and services that meet customer needs; investing in employees via competitive pay, benefits, training, and fostering dignity, respect, and inclusion; conducting business ethically with suppliers while supporting their success; embracing sustainable practices and supporting communities where operations occur; and creating long-term by providing , fair engagement, and effective capital allocation. These commitments represented a departure from the group's statement emphasizing , though the version retained shareholders as one stakeholder group without specifying prioritization or metrics for balancing interests. The statement garnered immediate praise from mainstream outlets and business commentators for signaling a shift toward broader corporate responsibility amid rising inequality and social pressures. The New York Times highlighted it as evidence that "maximizing profits in all situations cannot necessarily be the sole purpose" of corporations, quoting signatories' emphasis on employees and communities. Harvard Business Review described it as a realization that companies require "a purpose beyond profit," potentially aligning with long-term sustainability. Support came from figures like former Vanguard CEO Bill McNabb, who endorsed the focus on long-term value for all constituencies, and Forbes contributors who viewed it as the "death" of short-term shareholder maximization. However, early reactions included skepticism from shareholder advocates and governance experts, who labeled it "cheap talk" lacking enforceable mechanisms or legal shifts. The American Enterprise Institute questioned whether it threatened efficient capital allocation by diluting focus on owners. Business Roundtable acknowledged these critiques in a follow-up on August 25, 2019, defending the statement as reflective of CEOs' actual practices rather than a rejection of capitalism or accountability, while emphasizing alignment of stakeholder and shareholder interests over time. Initial stock market data showed minimal adverse reaction among signatory firms, suggesting investors did not perceive immediate threats to returns.

Empirical Outcomes and Empirical Critiques

Empirical analyses of the market's initial response to the August 19, 2019, Business Roundtable statement revealed mixed results, with one indicating that pledge-signing firms experienced positive abnormal stock returns in the days following the announcement, suggesting perception of potential value creation through a stakeholder approach. However, subsequent quarters showed a statistically significant decrease in shareholder payouts for these firms compared to non-signatories, though overall stock performance did not markedly underperform broader indices. Post-statement corporate behavior among signatories largely adhered to pre-2019 trends favoring , as evidenced by continued increases in buybacks as a ratio of assets through early , rising long-term levels, and steady growth in payments including dividends. metrics such as , , and return on sales exhibited no significant shifts post-pledge through 2022 for a sample of 117 signatory firms, with showing heightened but no changes in bid-ask spreads indicative of substantive operational alterations. During the , signatory companies did not outperform non-signatories in preserving jobs or advancing stakeholder protections, with equivalent rates of layoffs and no discernible improvements in workplace safety or equity initiatives; for instance, , led by vocal stakeholder advocate , reduced its workforce by 1,000 employees in 2020. A 2020 assessment by KKS Advisors and The Test of Corporate Purpose, funded by the , graded signatories poorly on fulfilling pledges amid economic distress, highlighting persistent prioritization of financial metrics over employee or community outcomes. Critiques grounded in these data portray the statement as largely rhetorical, with minimal reforms—such as retaining as the core objective in CEO compensation and corporate guidelines—and limited tying of executive pay to metrics, occurring in fewer than half of cases by 2023. Analyses conclude that the pledge represented "cheap talk" or greenwashing, as pre-existing ESG commitments among signatories explained prior higher scores without evidence of accelerated post-2019 implementation driving causal improvements in welfare. By 2024, five years on, while rhetorical emphasis on purpose increased, empirical persistence of -oriented practices like buybacks underscored reversion pressures and the absence of verifiable long-term shifts toward balanced .

Viewpoints on Shareholder Primacy vs. Stakeholder Capitalism

Shareholder primacy posits that the primary responsibility of corporate directors is to maximize long-term value for shareholders, as articulated in Friedman's 1970 doctrine that businesses should focus on profit-making within legal bounds to best serve society indirectly through economic efficiency. This view aligns with legal precedents emphasizing fiduciary duties to owners, arguing that clear accountability to shareholders disciplines management against short-termism or diversion of resources to unrelated social goals. Proponents, including legal scholars, contend that diluting this focus invites agency problems where executives pursue subjective interests under the guise of "stakeholder" priorities, potentially eroding firm value without verifiable benefits to other groups. In contrast, stakeholder capitalism, as endorsed in the Business Roundtable's 2019 statement signed by 181 CEOs, advocates balancing interests of customers, employees, suppliers, communities, and shareholders to foster sustainable growth and societal well-being. Advocates, including Business Roundtable members, argue this approach enhances , as evidenced by firms prioritizing employee during crises showing higher survival rates, and counters criticisms of by integrating environmental and factors into . However, the statement's vagueness on trade-offs—lacking metrics for balancing competing claims—has drawn skepticism, with critics noting it permits managerial discretion without enforceable standards, potentially serving as symbolic amid pressures from activists rather than a substantive shift. Empirical analyses largely favor for superior financial performance, with studies indicating that explicit value-maximization strategies correlate with higher returns and innovation, while stakeholder-oriented models show mixed or negligible outperformance after controlling for quality. Post-2019 on signatory firms reveal no significant reactions or changes, suggesting investors perceived the pledge as non-binding optics rather than a pivot threatening returns. Critiques highlight that often masks reversion to profit priorities, as seen in Business Roundtable's 2024 emphasis on over expansive social commitments, underscoring causal links where diffused reduces without proportional gains. Sources promoting models, frequently from business schools or progressive outlets, exhibit selection biases favoring anecdotal successes over rigorous controls, whereas consistently validates primacy's role in wealth creation that indirectly benefits broader constituencies through job growth and innovation.

Controversies and Criticisms

Pre-2019 Criticisms from Progressive Perspectives

Progressive critics, including labor advocates and left-leaning economic analysts, have long argued that the Business Roundtable's longstanding commitment to , formalized in its policy statement, fostered corporate short-termism at the expense of workers and broader economic equity. By emphasizing for investors, the organization was accused of enabling practices such as stock buybacks and tied to share prices, which diverted resources from wage growth and , contributing to stagnant median incomes amid rising since the . This perspective held that such doctrines exacerbated , with corporate groups like the Roundtable undermining power through opposition to pro-labor reforms, a dynamic seen as central to the erosion of the . Unions and progressive policy outlets specifically targeted the Roundtable's against worker-friendly , portraying it as a bulwark for corporate interests over . For instance, the group was faulted for resisting expansions of eligibility under the Obama administration's 2016 Labor Department rule, which aimed to extend protections to millions of salaried workers earning up to $47,476 annually but faced industry pushback led by business associations including the Roundtable. Critics from outlets like described this as part of a pattern of "viciously anti-" stances, including historical support for right-to-work laws and opposition to the of 2009, which sought to streamline but was blocked amid corporate mobilization. researchers highlighted how such employer , exemplified by the Roundtable's influence, perpetuated weak private-sector density—dropping to 6.4% by 2018—while enabling practices that suppressed and wage gains. On , progressive voices lambasted the Roundtable for championing reductions, such as its endorsement of the 2017 , which lowered the rate from 35% to 21% and was projected by the Joint Committee on Taxation to deliver 83% of benefits to the top 1% over time. Think tanks like the Center for American Progress contended that this advocacy entrenched plutocratic tendencies, allowing firms to amass profits—U.S. receipts fell by 31% in 2018 per IRS data—while resisting investments in public goods that could mitigate inequality. Environmental progressives further criticized the organization's support for deregulation, including opposition to stringent EPA rules on emissions, arguing it prioritized shareholder returns over sustainable practices amid climate imperatives. These critiques often emanated from sources with ideological leanings toward expanded government intervention, such as union-affiliated reports and , which may overemphasize structural barriers while underplaying market-driven efficiencies in ; nonetheless, empirical trends like the CEO-to-worker pay ratio reaching 278:1 by 2018 per data lent quantitative weight to claims of skewed priorities under shareholder-focused models.

Post-2019 Backlash and Reversion Pressures

Following the 2019 statement, the Business Roundtable faced immediate criticism from shareholder advocacy groups, such as the Council of Institutional Investors, which argued that the pledge undermined managerial accountability to shareholders by diluting the focus on financial performance. In response to this pushback, the organization issued clarifications on August 25, 2019, emphasizing that commitments to stakeholders would not override directors' duties under state , which traditionally prioritize long-term . Empirical analyses post-2019 revealed limited behavioral shifts among signatories, with corporate actions continuing to emphasize shareholder returns through stock buybacks and dividends even amid the . For instance, a 2020 Roosevelt Institute study of firms found that CEOs prioritized debt-financed shareholder payouts over stakeholder investments in late 2019 and early 2020, suggesting the statement functioned more as rhetorical signaling than a substantive pivot. Similarly, a 2020 assessment in highlighted failures in elevating social concerns during crises, as pandemic layoffs and racial justice protests exposed gaps between pledges and outcomes, eroding credibility. Investor and activist pressures intensified reversion toward , with critics like Harvard Law School's blog outlining distrust in the pledge due to its , lack of metrics, and potential for managerial without enforceable changes. By 2024, conservative political backlash against ""—including initiatives tied to stakeholder rhetoric—prompted state-level actions, such as and divesting billions from funds perceived as prioritizing non-financial goals, forcing asset managers to recalibrate. In recent years, the Business Roundtable itself signaled alignment with these pressures; on April 28, 2025, it advocated banning environmental, social, and "political" shareholder proposals at annual meetings, framing them as distractions from core business operations and long-term value creation. This stance, critiqued by some as abandoning the 2019 vision, reflected broader market dynamics where underperforming ESG-focused strategies amid economic headwinds reinforced demands for profit-centric governance. A 2024 evaluation of the pledge's five-year impact noted persistent shareholder-oriented metrics in and board priorities, indicating enduring primacy despite initial fanfare. The 2019 Business Roundtable statement's endorsement of stakeholder governance has prompted debates over its compatibility with directors' duties under U.S. , particularly in , where over 60% of companies are incorporated. Critics contend that elevating non-shareholder interests risks breaching the duty of loyalty by subordinating maximization, a principle rooted in cases like eBay Domestic Holdings, Inc. v. Newmark (Del. Ch. 2010), which emphasized directors' obligations to pursue economic value for stockholders. However, Delaware courts have rejected rigid , affirming instead a "single-firm" model where directors may consider stakeholders if decisions rationally advance the 's long-term interests, protected by the absent bad faith or disloyalty. In Moelis & Co. LLC v. Rosalsky (Del. Ch. 2024), the reiterated duties to the and stockholders but upheld flexibility for board actions serving holistic value creation, implicitly accommodating aspects of the BRT framework without endorsing it as a legal . Shareholder litigation against BRT signatories has tested these tensions, often alleging fiduciary breaches from DEI or initiatives pursued under rationales. , a signatory, faced a 2023 securities and derivative suits after consumer backlash to its Pride merchandise display, with plaintiffs claiming the board failed to disclose or mitigate risks of value destruction from politicized appeals, resulting in a $15 billion market cap loss. A federal court denied Target's motion to dismiss the securities claims on December 4, 2024, allowing allegations of misleading disclosures on ESG-related vulnerabilities to proceed. Similarly, shareholders have pursued books-and-records demands and suits asserting breaches from DEI policies and opposition to state legislation like 's HB 1557, though Delaware's Chancery Court in 2023 applied the to shield directors in a related oversight challenge, finding no credible breach basis. These cases highlight empirical risks: while courts rarely pierce the business judgment presumption, plaintiffs leverage post-BRT scrutiny to demand oversight reforms, with over 20 anti-DEI shareholder proposals filed in 2023 alone. Regulatory conflicts have intensified via state attorneys general actions targeting ESG/DEI alignments with BRT principles as potential fiduciary or antitrust violations. In April 2025, 15 Republican AGs, led by Missouri's Andrew Bailey, demanded the Business Roundtable direct signatories to cease DEI programs, arguing they expose firms to civil rights liabilities and deviate from shareholder-focused duties amid declining empirical support for such initiatives' returns. State financial officers followed with an August 2024 letter criticizing BRT-endorsed DEI integration for fostering discrimination risks and fiduciary lapses, urging reversion to merit-based governance. Texas AG Ken Paxton has pursued parallel probes, including 2025 investigations into proxy advisors like ISS and Glass Lewis for ESG recommendations allegedly misleading on fiduciary standards, and multi-state antitrust suits against asset managers like BlackRock for coal sector pressures under stakeholder pretexts. These efforts, bolstered by laws in 18 states by 2024 restricting ESG in public funds, create compliance frictions: companies risk state boycotts or penalties for stakeholder pursuits, yet federal inaction—e.g., no SEC challenges to BRT—leaves tensions unresolved, with courts occasionally enjoining overreach like Texas's proxy rules.

Recent Developments (2020–2025)

Post-Pandemic Policy Initiatives

Following the , Business Roundtable prioritized policy advocacy for economic recovery, emphasizing infrastructure modernization, workforce reskilling to address labor shortages, and fortification to mitigate disruptions exposed by global lockdowns and trade interruptions. Member CEOs, representing companies employing millions, lobbied for bipartisan measures to stimulate private investment and long-term growth, as outlined in their 2023 policy priorities statement, which highlighted opportunities for regulatory streamlining and skills development. A key initiative was robust support for the (IIJA), signed into law on November 15, 2021, which authorized $1.2 trillion in spending, including $550 billion in new investments for roads, bridges, broadband expansion, and clean water systems. Business Roundtable urged congressional passage in letters dated August 5 and September 20, 2021, arguing the bill would accelerate permitting processes, lower costs, and catalyze private-sector contributions to repair an estimated $2.6 trillion infrastructure deficit. The organization applauded its final enactment, projecting it would create jobs and enhance competitiveness amid post-pandemic supply bottlenecks. Their pre-legislation report, "Delivering for America," modeled macroeconomic benefits, estimating that sustained infrastructure spending could boost GDP by 0.1-0.2 percentage points annually through 2030. In workforce policy, Business Roundtable advocated reforms to the federal system under the , focusing on apprenticeships, skills-based hiring, and cybersecurity training to fill 8.5 million unfilled jobs reported in mid-2022 labor data. Their 2023 priorities called for aligning with employer needs to close skills gaps exacerbated by pandemic-driven shifts to and , with member companies committing to internal upskilling programs via the 2022-launched Corporate Initiatives Group. This included a June 2025 initiative to bolster pipelines for skilled trades amid ongoing shortages in and . To enhance , Business Roundtable released reports recommending diversified sourcing, government incentives for domestic production, and public-private partnerships to secure critical sectors like semiconductors and pharmaceuticals, where vulnerabilities led to shortages costing the U.S. an estimated $230 billion in 2021. Their July 2024 policy paper proposed targeted investments and trade policies to reduce over-reliance on single foreign suppliers, building on earlier analyses of interdependencies in strategically vital chains. These efforts aligned with broader calls for permitting reforms to expedite and projects, aiming to support recovery without increasing regulatory burdens on businesses.

2024–2025 Actions on Manufacturing, Tax, and Governance

In October 2025, the Business Roundtable released a report outlining a roadmap to revitalize American , emphasizing five policy pillars: competitive with retention of the 21% corporate rate and immediate R&D expensing; regulatory relief to reduce compliance costs; workforce development through skills training; investments in and transportation; and targeted policies to counter unfair practices while strengthening alliances. The initiative aimed to address vulnerabilities exposed by prior disruptions and to foster high-quality job creation, with CEOs citing the need for lower input costs and domestic production incentives. The organization also submitted comments to the U.S. Trade Representative on Section 232 investigations into imports of , industrial machinery, and related components in October 2025, advocating against broad tariffs that could raise costs for U.S. manufacturers dependent on global parts supply. Instead, it recommended preferential trade agreements with allies like , , , and the to secure supply chains while protecting domestic innovation, estimating the U.S. industrial machinery sector's exports at $80 billion in 2024. On tax policy, the Business Roundtable prioritized extending 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) provisions set to expire in 2025, lobbying for a permanent 21% corporate rate, full expensing for capital investments, and a competitive international tax regime to prevent profit shifting and support repatriation. In its Q1 2025 CEO Economic Outlook, members highlighted maintaining the corporate rate as critical for bolstering domestic manufacturing, with plans for hiring linked to tax competitiveness. The group deployed $6.86 million in lobbying expenditures in Q1 2025 focused on these tax extensions and technology-related fiscal measures, while praising the February 2025 House budget resolution as a step toward pro-growth reforms. Regarding , the Business Roundtable announced its 2024 board and policy committee leadership in January, with ongoing advocacy for principles emphasizing board independence, protections, and efficient capital markets. In April 2025, it called for prohibiting environmental, , and "political" proposals at annual meetings, arguing such resolutions distract from core business operations and impose undue burdens without enhancing long-term value. This stance reflected a against proxy activism, prioritizing governance reforms that align with investor interests over extraneous mandates.

References

  1. [1]
    About Us - Business Roundtable
    Business Roundtable is an association of more than 200 CEOs of America's leading companies, representing every sector of the U.S. economy.
  2. [2]
    Business Roundtable: CEOs of America's Leading Companies
    Business Roundtable is an association of chief executive officers of America's leading companies working to promote a thriving US economy.
  3. [3]
    [PDF] History - Amazon S3
    Business Roundtable was established in 1972 through the merger of three existing organizations. One was the. March Group—made up of chief executive ...
  4. [4]
    Business Roundtable | Organization | C-SPAN.org
    Business Roundtable. The Roundtable was founded in 1972 by John Harper, the head of ALCOA Aluminum, and Fred Borch, CEO of General Electric, ...
  5. [5]
    Five Years On: Corporate Purpose and Profit | Business Roundtable
    Aug 16, 2024 · The statement adopted by Business Roundtable in August 2019 reflected this conviction. It was not a call on companies to address every societal ...
  6. [6]
    Business Roundtable Redefines the Purpose of a Corporation to ...
    Aug 19, 2019 · Business Roundtable today announced the release of a new Statement on the Purpose of a Corporation signed by 181 CEOs who commit to lead their companies for ...
  7. [7]
    Analysis of the Business Roundtable Statement
    Sep 26, 2019 · The Statement purports to redefine the purpose of a corporation as a commitment to all of its stakeholders, including customers, employees, ...
  8. [8]
    Has The Business Roundtable Statement Transformed Capitalism?
    Sep 7, 2021 · But it had equally vehement opponents: that same afternoon, the Council of Institutional Investors criticized the statement as a backward step ...
  9. [9]
    Revisiting the Business Roundtable's Social Justice Manifesto
    Jul 28, 2025 · Multiple other studies suggest the 2019 Business Roundtable statement represented greenwashing rather than genuine commitment. Research by ...
  10. [10]
    Business Roundtable - InfluenceWatch
    Business Roundtable was formed in 1972 by the merger of two lobbying nonprofits: the Construction Users' Anti-Inflation Roundtable and the Labor Law Study ...
  11. [11]
    The Birth of the Business Roundtable - Princeton Scholarship Online
    The original Business Roundtable—before it absorbed the March Group in the spring of 1973—formed in October 1972 through the merger of the Labor Law Study ...
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Conflict, Change, and Economic Policy in the Long 1970s - CUNY
    between inflation and growth, 42 and the Business Roundtable argued that the only solution to inflation was to "improve productivity."43 It wanted tax ...Missing: positions | Show results with:positions
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Business Roundtable - Department of Energy
    Business Roundtable (www.businessroundtable.org) is an association of chief executive officers of leading U.S. companies with $4.5 trillion in annual ...
  14. [14]
    Business Roundtable - Wikipedia
    The Business Roundtable (BRT) is a nonprofit lobbyist association based in Washington, DC whose members are chief executive officers of major US companies.Missing: early | Show results with:early
  15. [15]
    Last Call to Arms on the Trade Pact - The New York Times
    Aug 23, 1993 · U.S.A.-Nafta, a coalition of 2,300 businesses that support the pact, sent executives to meet members of Congress in their home districts this ...
  16. [16]
    Nafta Pro: A Trade Bonanza - Bloomberg
    USA-NAFTA, a coalition formed by the Business Roundtable that includes the National Association of Manufacturers and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, has signed ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Clinton and the Process to Pass NAFTA: Making Sausage - DTIC
    the CEO of American Express, prodded his fellow CEOs and Business Roundtable members to support NAFTA. Robinson tasked each member to talk to at least three ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Power without Efficacy: The Decline of the American Corporate Elite
    A new organization, the Business Roundtable, was formed, consisting of chief executive officers (CEOs) of Fortune 800 corporations. Unlike the CED, whose ...
  19. [19]
    An Open Letter To The Business Roundtable 181 - Forbes
    Aug 19, 2020 · A September 1997 White Paper, “Statement on Corporate Governance” begins by saying, “The Business Roundtable wishes to emphasize that the ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] CORPORATE PURPOSE AND THE BUSINESS ROUNDTABLE
    Shareholder primacy was ill-conceived in the first place and has utterly failed to provide for the needs of all stakeholders. The alternative is state.Missing: endorsement | Show results with:endorsement<|separator|>
  21. [21]
    Companies Don't Need Permission From The Business Roundtable ...
    In a 1997 “Statement on Corporate Governance,” for example, the Roundtable said “the principal objective of a business enterprise is to generate economic ...
  22. [22]
    The Business Roundtable and 'Stakeholder Capitalism'
    Sep 3, 2020 · ... 1997 “Statement on Corporate Governance”: “The paramount duty of management and of boards of directors is to the corporation's stockholders ...
  23. [23]
    Shareholder Value Is No Longer Everything, Top C.E.O.s Say
    Aug 19, 2019 · The Business Roundtable included its own articulation of the theory in an official doctrine in 1997, writing that “the paramount duty of ...
  24. [24]
    Shareholders First: What Hasn't Changed since the Business ...
    Aug 19, 2020 · In its 1997 “Statement on Corporate Governance,” the BRT stated that “the paramount duty of management and of boards of directors is to the ...
  25. [25]
    So Long to Shareholder Primacy
    Aug 22, 2019 · Since 1997, those Principles have advocated the theory of “shareholder primacy—that corporations exist principally to serve shareholders”—and ...Missing: endorsement | Show results with:endorsement
  26. [26]
    Did the Business Roundtable Sound the Death Knell for ...
    Aug 26, 2019 · Judy Samuelson. Vice President, Founder, and Executive Director. The Business Roundtable, one of the most powerful pro-business lobbying ...
  27. [27]
    Business Roundtable on Corporate Governance - 1663 Words
    May 22, 2025 · The Business Roundtable (BRT) 1997 Statement on Corporate Governance may serve as a case-study in stockholder theory.
  28. [28]
    The Business Roundtable Statement on the Purpose of ... - Net Impact
    Aug 27, 2019 · Each version of the document issued since 1997 has endorsed shareholder primacy - that corporations exist to serve shareholders.
  29. [29]
    Stakeholder Governance and the Eclipse of Shareholder Primacy
    May 7, 2024 · Even the Business Roundtable, which officially adopted shareholder primacy in 1997, did not recognize its existential threat to society and ...
  30. [30]
    How Sincere Is Business Roundtable's Shift to Stakeholder Primacy?
    Jan 21, 2020 · In 1997, the BRT principles came down on the side of “shareholder primacy,” the notion that businesses exist to serve the stockholder first.
  31. [31]
    Did the Business Roundtable just sound the death knell for ... - Quartz
    “We believe the free-market system is the best means of generating good jobs, a strong and sustainable economy, innovation, a healthy environment and economic ...
  32. [32]
    Nearly 200 CEOs say shareholder value is no longer a main objective
    Aug 19, 2019 · The reimagined idea of a corporation drops the age-old notion that corporations function first and foremost to serve their shareholders and maximize profits.
  33. [33]
    Redefining the purpose of a corporation – theory or practice?
    Jan 20, 2019 · The BRT has defined a corporation's purpose as working for the benefit of all stakeholders, such as customers, employees, suppliers, communities ...
  34. [34]
    Was the Business Roundtable Statement Mostly for Show?
    Aug 18, 2020 · These documents therefore provide a natural place to look for the company's official position on corporate purpose. If companies whose CEOs ...
  35. [35]
    Have Business Roundtable Companies Lived Up to Their ...
    May 18, 2022 · Business Roundtable companies generally have retained corporate governance principles and practices that reflect traditional shareholder primacy.<|separator|>
  36. [36]
    Member CEOs of Leading U.S. Companies - Business Roundtable
    Roundtable members are the chief executive officers of leading US companies. Collectively, they represent every sector of the economy.
  37. [37]
    Board Of Directors - Business Roundtable
    Business Roundtable members are the chief executive officers of leading U.S. companies. Collectively, they represent every sector of the economy…<|separator|>
  38. [38]
    Business Roundtable Announces 2025 CEO Board of Directors and ...
    Jan 9, 2025 · Business Roundtable today announced the organization's Board of Directors and policy committee leadership for 2025.
  39. [39]
    Business Roundtable Calls on Policymakers to Prioritize U.S. ...
    Mar 4, 2025 · “Business Roundtable supports commonsense trade policies to open markets to U.S. exports, revitalize the domestic manufacturing base and de-risk ...
  40. [40]
    Business Roundtable Letter on Restoring and Extending the Pro ...
    I. Retain the permanent corporate income tax rate of no more than 21% · II. Maintain a competitive international tax system · III. Continue and strengthen broad- ...
  41. [41]
    Globally Competitive Tax System - Business Roundtable
    Business Roundtable supports efforts to prevent discriminatory tax measures by foreign governments that target American companies.Missing: influence 1990s 2000s trade
  42. [42]
    ICYMI: 'Business Roundtable will be putting its full weight behind ...
    Jul 10, 2024 · The first is to retain the 21% corporate income tax rate. The second is maintaining a competitive international system.Missing: major | Show results with:major
  43. [43]
    ICYMI: Business Roundtable Launches New Tax Advocacy Ad on ...
    Apr 1, 2025 · Business Roundtable launched a new ad on FOX News urging Congress to extend and strengthen President Trump's 2017 tax reform.Missing: trade | Show results with:trade
  44. [44]
    Business Roundtable CEOs Release Roadmap to Revitalize ...
    Oct 14, 2025 · New Report Outlines Five Policy Pillars to Lower Costs, Strengthen Supply Chains and Create High-Quality Jobs. October 14, 2025.Missing: 2023-2025 | Show results with:2023-2025
  45. [45]
    Modernizing Regulation - Business Roundtable
    Business Roundtable advocates for a smart, balanced approach to regulation that supports innovation, economic growth and job creation.Missing: taxes trade
  46. [46]
    Sound Corporate Governance Policies - Business Roundtable
    Business Roundtable has been a leading voice in support of sound corporate governance policies that protect investors, promote efficient capital markets.Missing: major | Show results with:major
  47. [47]
    Education & Workforce Development | Business Roundtable
    Business Roundtable urges policymakers to fix the nation's workforce development system to better prepare workers for in-demand careers.Missing: major | Show results with:major<|separator|>
  48. [48]
    Business Roundtable Lobbying Profile - OpenSecrets
    Business Roundtable spent $16970000 lobbying in 2020. See the details.Missing: legislation | Show results with:legislation<|separator|>
  49. [49]
    Business Roundtable Response to the OMB Request for Information ...
    May 12, 2025 · Business Roundtable has long advocated a wide variety of reforms to improve the regulatory process, promote robust cost-benefit analysis and ...Missing: legislation | Show results with:legislation
  50. [50]
    A Smart Approach to Regulation - Business Roundtable
    Mar 19, 2019 · A smarter approach to regulation would embrace the following: Early engagement with stakeholders;; Expanded use of cost-benefit analyses ...
  51. [51]
    Business Roundtable: Congress and President Trump Deliver a ...
    Jul 3, 2025 · Business Roundtable commends Congress and President Trump for delivering a monumental victory that unlocks a more prosperous economic environment for American ...
  52. [52]
    Corporate Influence Over Legislation/Regulation on Key Themes ...
    Feb 27, 2024 · The CEOs targeted are all part of the Business Roundtable (BRT) – a Washington-based lobbyist association representing the chief executives of ...
  53. [53]
    US Business Roundtable supports Dodd Frank reform
    Mar 9, 2017 · The Business Roundtable (BRT), an association of the top US chief executives, has voiced its support for President Trump's plans to reform ...
  54. [54]
    Business Roundtable Response to the SEC Executive ...
    Aug 19, 2025 · Business Roundtable supports the principle of holding executives accountable when they are unjustly enriched due to financial misstatements.
  55. [55]
    Business Roundtable Comments on the Basel III Endgame Proposal
    Dec 21, 2023 · The impact of this proposal is understated and will impede the ability of America's banks to provide a range of critical financial services to ...
  56. [56]
    Business Roundtable Comments on the CISA Proposed Regulation ...
    Jul 3, 2024 · Harmonizing CIRCIA's reporting requirements with existing laws and regulatory requirements is needed to promote an effective, efficient and ...Missing: legislation | Show results with:legislation<|separator|>
  57. [57]
    Business Roundtable Calls on Both Presidential Candidates to ...
    Jun 27, 2024 · However, excessive regulation and overreaching antitrust actions are eroding the foundation of free enterprise and the benefits it provides.Missing: legislation | Show results with:legislation
  58. [58]
    Antitrust Bill Stopped By a Business Lobby - The New York Times
    Nov 16, 1975 · Business Roundtable, lobbying orgn whose 158 corp members are all giant US corps, played major role in killing amendment to antitrust bill ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  59. [59]
    Business Roundtable Letter on the American Privacy Rights Act
    May 30, 2024 · Since 2018, Business Roundtable has consistently called for a federal consumer data privacy law that will protect and empower consumers and ...
  60. [60]
    Business Roundtable Response to the Request for Information on ...
    Mar 14, 2025 · Business Roundtable members, whose companies are among the world's largest developers and deployers of AI, are committed to ensuring the ...Missing: criteria | Show results with:criteria<|control11|><|separator|>
  61. [61]
    Impact Map | Business Roundtable
    Business Roundtable Member Companies' Contributions to the U.S. Economy ; 37 · U.S. Jobs ; 24%. of U.S. GDP ; 37%. higher annual wages than national average ; $10.Missing: achievements | Show results with:achievements
  62. [62]
    Globally Engaged U.S. Companies Support Over Half of American ...
    Jun 9, 2022 · New Business Roundtable Study: Globally Engaged U.S. Companies Support Over Half of American Jobs & U.S. GDP · 90.9 million jobs · 1 million or ...Missing: achievements | Show results with:achievements
  63. [63]
    Business Roundtable launching multi-million dollar push backing ...
    Jul 28, 2017 · The Business Roundtable is embarking on a multi-million-dollar national TV and radio campaign, beginning in early August, to give tax reform ...
  64. [64]
    Lobbying expenses spiked as Congress shaped tax overhaul - PBS
    Feb 10, 2018 · The Business Roundtable, made up of the CEO's of America's largest companies, promoted what it described as “pro-growth tax reform.” The ...
  65. [65]
    Congress Should Extend TCJA Provisions, Business Group Says
    Apr 9, 2024 · Tax Reform Benefited Workers. Prior to passage of TCJA, a survey of Business Roundtable members indicated that 76% of CEOs would increase hiring ...Missing: influence | Show results with:influence
  66. [66]
    Business Roundtable - Purpose of a Corporation | Business ...
    Business Roundtable companies have invested in workers, taken a leading role in fighting the pandemic, and supported the communities where they serve. Companies ...
  67. [67]
    [PDF] Statement on the Purpose of a Corporation - S3c
    Aug 19, 2019 · We believe the free-market system is the best means of generating good jobs, a strong and sustainable economy, innovation, a healthy environment ...
  68. [68]
    Purpose of a Corporation - Business Roundtable
    Businesses make and sell consumer products; manufacture equipment and vehicles; support the national defense; grow and produce food; provide health care; ...
  69. [69]
    Purpose of a Corporation Anniversary Page - Business Roundtable
    Nearly 200 CEOs of America's largest companies adopted a new Statement on the Purpose of a Corporation declaring that companies should deliver long-term value ...
  70. [70]
    Then vs Now- Business Roundtable Redefines Purpose Statement
    “Shareholder primacy,” as the doctrine is known, was famously espoused in 1970 by Milton Friedman, a member of the “Chicago School” of economics, and has been ...
  71. [71]
    [PDF] Making Sense of the Business Roundtable's Reversal on Corporate ...
    In August 2019, the Business Roundtable (BRT) issued a statement on the purpose of the corporation in which it reversed a longstanding position. periodically ...
  72. [72]
    The Business Roundtable's Stakeholder Pledge, Five Years Later
    Aug 19, 2024 · The new statement declared its signers' commitment to “lead their companies for the benefit of all stakeholders.”
  73. [73]
    Will Corporations Deliver Value to All Stakeholders?
    May 23, 2022 · By contrast, if the BRT Statement were found to represent a mere public-relations move, this finding would support critics of stakeholderism ...
  74. [74]
    [PDF] The Business Roundtable's Stakeholder Pledge, Five Years Later
    Aug 19, 2024 · Five years ago, the Business Roundtable issued a statement pledging to “lead their companies for the benefit of all stakeholders.
  75. [75]
    181 Top CEOs Have Realized Companies Need a Purpose Beyond ...
    Aug 20, 2019 · On August 19 the Business Roundtable issued an open letter titled “Statement on the Purpose of a Corporation.” One of the preeminent ...
  76. [76]
    Redefined Purpose of a Corporation: Welcoming the Debate
    Aug 25, 2019 · The new Business Roundtable Statement on the Purpose of a Corporation has received a great deal of support, as well as questions and criticisms.
  77. [77]
    Why Maximizing Shareholder Value Is Finally Dying - Forbes
    Aug 19, 2019 · By 2019, maximizing shareholder value has come to be seen as leading to a toxic mix of soaring short-term corporate profits, astronomic executive pay.
  78. [78]
    From Shareholder to Stakeholder Capitalism: Follow the Yellow ...
    Dec 6, 2019 · The Business Roundtable in August issued a Statement on the Purpose of a Corporation ... ” Its cheap talk because given the way capitalism ...
  79. [79]
    Talk is cheap - occasional links & commentary
    Aug 27, 2019 · ... Business Roundtable published its new statement of purpose of a corporation ... Anything else is just cheap talk. *I certainly don't want to ...
  80. [80]
    Shareholders Vs. Stakeholders | American Enterprise Institute - AEI
    Sep 9, 2019 · According to many headlines, the Business Roundtable's revised “Purpose of a Corporation” is a threat to shareholders and to the efficient ...
  81. [81]
    Stock market response to the statement on the purpose of a ...
    Feb 2, 2023 · This study provides empirical support that, in the ... Revisiting the Business Roundtable's 'Stakeholder Capitalism,' one year later.
  82. [82]
    [PDF] Effect of Stakeholder Capitalism After the 2019 Business ...
    May 5, 2024 · Studies show that ESG's use of a Stakeholder Capitalism approach results in both positive and negative outcomes. ... (2020) titled "On the 2019 ...
  83. [83]
    Stakeholder Capitalism Gets a Report Card. It's Not Good.
    Dec 2, 2020 · The pandemic and the movement for racial justice have tested corporate pledges to elevate social concerns alongside shareholder interests.Missing: empirical critiques
  84. [84]
  85. [85]
    181 CEOs pledged to lead companies for 'all stakeholders' in 2019 ...
    like Apple, Walmart, and Pepsi — signed a pledge that was promoted in a full-page ad in The ...Missing: signatories list
  86. [86]
    CEO's Endorsements of Stakeholder Values: Cheap Talk or ...
    Apr 12, 2024 · We contribute to that debate by analyzing the Roundtable Statement empirically, using a combination of commercial datasets and hand-collected data.
  87. [87]
    Will the Real Shareholder Primacy Please Stand Up?
    Apr 9, 2024 · The question whether corporations should be run solely to benefit shareholders, or whether instead they should be run to benefit all communities ...
  88. [88]
    The Illusory Promise of Stakeholder Governance
    Mar 2, 2020 · Stakeholderism would increase the insulation of corporate leaders from shareholders, reduce their accountability, and hurt economic performance.
  89. [89]
    Optimizing Stakeholder Values - AACSB
    May 11, 2022 · In fact, empirical evidence suggests that stakeholder-based corporations are more likely to survive and thrive in a crisis because they have ...
  90. [90]
    Six Reasons We Don't Trust the New “Stakeholder” Promise from the ...
    Sep 2, 2019 · A new statement from the Business Roundtable commits to stakeholder interests instead of making the primary purpose of the company shareholder value.Missing: empirical critiques
  91. [91]
    The Return of Shameless Shareholder Capitalism - Project Syndicate
    Jun 23, 2025 · So, as many critics warned from the start, the Business Roundtable never meant what it said in 2019. Whatever its claims about environmental or ...Missing: empirical critiques
  92. [92]
    Why Screwing Unions Screws the Entire Middle Class - Mother Jones
    Feb 22, 2011 · The first is this: Income inequality has grown dramatically since the mid ... Business Roundtable. They didn't have to wait long for their first big ...
  93. [93]
    The Business Roundtable's Strange Outbreak of Social Conscience
    Aug 20, 2019 · They are reliably and viciously anti-union, as well as opposed to needed environmental regulation. Did you see the Roundtable oppose Trump's ...
  94. [94]
    Explaining the erosion of private-sector unions: How corporate ...
    Nov 18, 2020 · Explaining the erosion of private-sector unions: How corporate practices and legal changes have undercut the ability of workers to organize and bargain.
  95. [95]
    Ending Plutocracy: A 12-Step Program | The Nation
    Jun 11, 2008 · But fierce opposition from the Business Roundtable, the nation's ... So why should we let our tax dollars go to firms that increase economic inequality?
  96. [96]
    [PDF] The Double Standard at Work - AFL-CIO
    European companies' campaigns against workers' freedom of association in the Southern United States have wider implications and effects beyond whether employees ...
  97. [97]
    CII Responds to Business Roundtable Statement
    The statement undercuts notions of managerial accountability to shareholders, in CII's view. The Council has a productive relationship with BRT ...
  98. [98]
    Business Roundtable's Redefinition | Practical Law - Westlaw
    This Legal Update describes Business Roundtable's redefined standard that a corporation should promote 'An Economy That Serves All Americans.'Missing: provisions | Show results with:provisions
  99. [99]
    CEOs Shouldn't Be Afraid of Politicians Who Cry 'Woke' | Yale Insights
    Sep 15, 2022 · In August, the Business Roundtable, an American corporate lobby group, updated its 2019 “Statement of the Purpose of a Corporation”. It ...
  100. [100]
    Business Roundtable calls for ban on environmental, social and ...
    Apr 28, 2025 · The Business Roundtable (BRT) has called for the banning of environmental, social and “political” shareholder proposals.
  101. [101]
    DBCI: Howard Robertson on Shareholder Primacy in Delaware ...
    Jun 19, 2024 · The court reaffirmed that directors and officers of a Delaware corporation owe fiduciary duties to the corporation and its stockholders.
  102. [102]
    Target must face shareholder lawsuit over Pride backlash, US judge ...
    Dec 5, 2024 · Target (TGT.N) has failed to persuade a judge in Florida to dismiss a lawsuit that accused the retailer of deceiving shareholders.Missing: fiduciary duty
  103. [103]
    Target Executives Face Shareholder Suit Over 2023 Pride Campaign
    Jan 9, 2025 · The company's board of directors also violated its fiduciary duties to adequately oversee and disclose those risks, the suit also claims.Missing: merchandise | Show results with:merchandise
  104. [104]
    Disney, Fiduciary Duties, Business Judgment, and Corporate ESG ...
    Jul 9, 2023 · Shortly after the bill was enacted, a longtime Disney shareholder presented Disney ... (DEI) policy breached their fiduciary duties. In this ...
  105. [105]
    Attorney General Bailey Leads 14 States In Demanding The Nation's ...
    Apr 15, 2025 · Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey and Arkansas Attorney General Tim Griffin led 14 states in directing a letter to the Business Roundtable.Missing: ESG | Show results with:ESG
  106. [106]
    [PDF] Business-Roundtable-Letter-August-28.pdf - Utah State Treasurer
    Aug 28, 2024 · 10 In claiming to represent your stakeholders, the best your member CEOs can hope for is instilling political divisiveness into your businesses.<|separator|>
  107. [107]
    Attorney General Ken Paxton Investigates Proxy Advisors Glass ...
    Sep 16, 2025 · Attorney General Ken Paxton announced an investigation into Glass Lewis & Co. (“Glass Lewis”) and Institutional Shareholder Services, ...Missing: primacy | Show results with:primacy
  108. [108]
    Business Roundtable Outlines Policy Priorities, Opportunities for ...
    Feb 7, 2023 · On Workforce Development: · On Sensible Regulation: · On a Competitive Tax System: · On Rules-Based Trade:.
  109. [109]
    Business Roundtable Letter to Senators Urging Support for ...
    Business Roundtable Letter to Senators Urging Support for Bipartisan Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act. A PDF version is available here. August 5, 2021.
  110. [110]
    Letter to Congress in Support of the Infrastructure Investment and ...
    Sep 20, 2021 · September 20, 2021 ... On behalf of the CEO members of Business Roundtable, I urge your support for the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act.
  111. [111]
    Business Roundtable Applauds Final Passage of Infrastructure ...
    Nov 5, 2021 · “The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act will help to unleash private investment and streamline permitting to lower costs and accelerate ...Missing: support | Show results with:support<|separator|>
  112. [112]
    Delivering for America - Business Roundtable
    $$8.2 trillion would be added to the U.S. Gross Domestic Product over 20 years; · Roughly $3.82 in additional economic growth would be generated for every ...Missing: achievements | Show results with:achievements
  113. [113]
    Business Roundtable Launches New Workforce Initiative to ...
    Jun 17, 2025 · Business Roundtable today launched a new initiative to address worker shortages in skilled trades by strengthening talent pipelines.Missing: COVID | Show results with:COVID<|separator|>
  114. [114]
    Resilient, Diverse and Secure: Improving Critical Supply Chains
    This report examines the interdependencies in strategically significant supply chains and makes recommendations for improving resiliency both overall and within ...Missing: 2021-2023 | Show results with:2021-2023
  115. [115]
    Recommendations for Improving U.S. Supply Chain Resiliency
    Jul 22, 2024 · Business Roundtable today released a new report outlining policy recommendations for strengthening and securing critical supply chains.Missing: 2021-2023 | Show results with:2021-2023
  116. [116]
    The Business Roundtable and US Manufacturing: Even a Stopped ...
    Oct 17, 2025 · Competitive Tax Policy – Maintain a globally competitive tax system, including the 21% U.S. corporate rate, immediate R&D expensing and full ...
  117. [117]
    Business Roundtable Comments on the Section 232 National ...
    Oct 17, 2025 · The Roundtable encourages the Administration to establish preferential trade in industrial machinery and parts with these trading partners, all ...
  118. [118]
    Business Roundtable Comments on the Section 232 National ...
    Oct 17, 2025 · It is a global leader in manufacturing and innovation, representing an estimated $80 billion in exports in 2024. 3 The industry has also ...
  119. [119]
    CEO Economic Outlook Index Q1 2025 - Business Roundtable
    CEOs Say Maintaining a Competitive Corporate Tax Rate Is Important for Strengthening Domestic Manufacturing · Plans for hiring decreased 13 points to a value of ...Missing: governance | Show results with:governance
  120. [120]
    Business Roundtable Deploys $6.86M for Ambitious Tax Agenda in ...
    May 13, 2025 · Expect sustained lobbying throughout 2025, with particular intensity around tax provisions set to expire and emerging technology regulations.
  121. [121]
    all statements - Business Roundtable
    Business Roundtable: House Approval of Budget Resolution Is a Pivotal Moment in Extending and Strengthening Tax Reform. February 25, 2025.
  122. [122]
    Business Roundtable Announces 2024 Board of Directors and ...
    Jan 12, 2024 · Business Roundtable today announced the organization's Board of Directors and policy committee leadership for 2024.Missing: positions | Show results with:positions
  123. [123]
    Business Roundtable Proxy "Reform" Agenda Threatens
    May 13, 2025 · The Business Roundtable Proxy “Reform” Agenda was recently released in a position paper entitled “The Need for Bold Proxy Process Reforms.