Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Caboose

A caboose is a specialized attached to the end of freight to provide shelter and workspace for the , including the and brakemen, while also enabling observation of the train's rear for mechanical issues such as hot boxes or dragging equipment. Originating in the from rudimentary shanties built onto boxcars or flatcars, cabooses evolved into dedicated vehicles with features like stoves for cooking, bunks for rest, and elevated or bay windows for visibility, reflecting the practical needs of early rail operations where crew safety and train integrity required constant monitoring absent modern . By the late 19th century, the caboose had become a standard fixture on North American freight trains, often equipped with red lanterns or markers to signal the train's terminus and serving additional roles such as storing paperwork and tools, though its design prioritized functionality over revenue generation. The term "caboose" derives from the Dutch "kombuis," originally denoting a ship's galley, underscoring the car's role as a mobile crew quarters akin to maritime accommodations. Cabooses were largely phased out starting in the 1960s and accelerating through the 1980s due to advancements in remote-sensing technology, including end-of-train devices that monitor air brake pressure and transmit rear-end data, alongside lineside defect detectors and regulatory changes permitting reduced crew sizes, rendering onboard observation economically and operationally obsolete. Today, cabooses persist primarily in tourist railroads, museums, or as repurposed structures, symbolizing an era when human vigilance directly ensured train safety amid the limitations of mechanical railroading.

Definition and Purpose

Basic Design and Functions

A caboose is a dedicated railroad car attached to the trailing end of freight trains in North America, serving primarily as a mobile headquarters for the train crew including the conductor and brakemen. Its core structure consists of a sturdy underframe supporting a box-like body equipped with essential amenities such as bunks for sleeping, a small galley with stove for meals, toilet facilities, and storage compartments for personal effects and tools, enabling crew to sustain operations over long distances without disembarking. The design incorporates an elevated observation compartment, typically a cupola protruding from the roof, fitted with multiple windows to afford the crew unobstructed rearward and sideways visibility along the 's length. From this vantage, crew members conducted manual inspections for mechanical anomalies, including overheated journal bearings known as hot boxes—which could ignite fires or cause derailments—flat or cracked wheels, dragging brake rigging, or shifted , relying on direct visual scanning, auditory detection of unusual noises, and periodic walk-arounds when feasible. This rearward monitoring enforced regulatory requirements for presence to handle emergency braking, uncoupling, and alignment checks, directly contributing to integrity by allowing prompt intervention before minor faults escalated into major failures. Cabooses also bore distinctive markers to denote the train's , such as red rear-facing lights or flags displayed at night and by day respectively, visible to following or yard movements to prevent collisions and ensure operational awareness. These elements underscored the caboose's foundational role in pre-electronic railroading, where human oversight formed the primary causal mechanism for maintaining safe passage through empirical detection of physical deteriorations in real time.

Etymology

Origins of the Term

The term "caboose" derives from the word kabuis or kombuis, denoting a ship's or , which entered English nautical around the mid-18th century to refer to a vessel's cooking area. This origin reflects the small, enclosed space for preparing meals, akin to a or , stemming ultimately from kabūse and Latin capanna. By the early , the word had broadened in colloquial English usage beyond ships, occasionally applied to any rudimentary shelter or rear compartment. In the railroad context, "caboose" first appeared in around , initially describing a attached to freight s, often improvised from modified boxcars or flatcars with added shelters for brakemen and conductors. The earliest documented railroad-specific reference dates to 1859 in U.S. records involving a over operations, marking its transition from ad-hoc housing terminology to a more defined role at the 's end. Early adoption was uneven, with the term sometimes denoting any trailing vehicle rather than exclusively the standardized rear for monitoring and signaling. By the 1870s, "caboose" had standardized across major U.S. lines as the preferred term for the dedicated end-of-train car, supplanting regional variants like "cabin car," "way car," or "van" (the latter borrowed from guard's vans). Period railroad timetables and employee manuals from lines such as the show this shift, with "caboose" appearing consistently in operational logs by 1875, reflecting empirical standardization amid growing freight traffic demands. Synonyms persisted regionally, particularly in the Northeast where "cabin car" lingered into the , but national usage converged on "caboose" due to its concise utility in dispatch and safety protocols.

Historical Development

Early Origins

The earliest precursors to dedicated cabooses emerged in the during the rapid expansion of American railroads following the operational start of lines like the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad in , when frequent derailments and mechanical failures highlighted the need for rear-of-train observation to detect issues such as overheating axles that could ignite freight cars. Initial setups were rudimentary, consisting of wooden shanties or simple shelters erected on flatcars or converted boxcars to provide brakemen and conductors with a vantage point for monitoring the train's end, as manual braking systems required crew members distributed throughout the consist to apply hand brakes on individual cars during emergencies. A pivotal development occurred in the 1840s on the Auburn & Syracuse Railroad, where conductor Nat Williams reportedly modified a wooden into a dedicated rolling office and at the train's rear, marking one of the first formalized caboose-like structures to address visibility limitations that contributed to undetected hazards like "hot boxes"—overheated journal bearings on axles prone to sparking fires in wooden cars. This innovation was driven by the era's high accident rates, with early rail operations plagued by failures in wooden-wheel-and-axle assemblies that often went unnoticed from the , exacerbating risks amid the proliferation of freight traffic on nascent lines. These early caboose forms were influenced by the distributed nature of crews under pre-air-brake regimes, where brakemen rode atop or between to signal and apply , necessitating a rear for coordinating stops and inspecting for trailing defects like dragging equipment or shifting loads that could lead to runaways or collisions. By the mid-1840s, such rear had become a practical necessity on expanding networks, though they lacked standardized designs and often served dual roles as shelters during long hauls.

Evolution in the 19th and 20th Centuries

In the , railroads transitioned from makeshift crew accommodations, such as repurposed boxcars or flatcars with added shelters, to dedicated caboose cars designed specifically for rear-end operations. A pivotal innovation was the introduction of the , a raised providing elevated visibility for monitoring the train's length, attributed to T.B. Watson, a on the Chicago & North Western Railway in 1863. This design addressed empirical needs for detecting issues like load shifts or overheated journals (hot boxes), which manual inspections from ground level often missed, thereby enhancing operational safety amid increasing train lengths. The adoption of George Westinghouse's straight air brake system in marked a causal shift by automating brake applications from the , reducing the reliance on distributed brakemen who previously traversed rooftops to set hand brakes manually—a practice that contributed to numerous falls and injuries. However, cabooses retained essential functions, as air brakes did not eliminate the need for rear-crew vigilance over train integrity, marker lights, and rear signaling, particularly since early systems lacked redundancy for detecting brake failures or separations. By the , under leaders like , railroads such as the Union Pacific began standardizing features like eight-sided cupolas and basic crew quarters, driven by accident data showing persistent risks from undetected mechanical faults during extended hauls. Into the early , wooden cabooses proved vulnerable to fires from stoves or external sparks, prompting a material shift to for greater durability and resistance; the Reading Railroad pioneered designs in the early 1920s, building on 1920 U.S. Railway Administration wooden prototypes. efforts accelerated post- through guidelines from bodies like the American Railway Association (precursor to the AAR), incorporating underframes and consistent placements to facilitate interchange and wartime efficiency demands. Concurrently, iterative enhancements based on operational analyses included integrating stoves for cooking and heating, along with fold-down bunks, to sustain crew alertness on multi-day runs where from exposure had been documented as a factor in errors. ![Cupola caboose][float-right] These adaptations reflected pragmatic responses to data from derailments and inspections, prioritizing visibility, structural integrity, and crew endurance without overhauling core rear-monitoring roles. By the mid-20th century, such as with Union Pacific's 1942 CA-3 steel models featuring enlarged windows, designs had evolved to balance these imperatives amid heavier freight loads.

Peak Usage

During the post-World War II period from the 1940s to the 1970s, cabooses achieved maximum prevalence in U.S. and Canadian railroading, with tens of thousands in service to accommodate the era's extensive freight operations. State laws and union agreements mandated their presence on virtually all freight trains, ensuring rear-end visibility and crew accommodation until regulatory changes in the 1980s. These requirements stemmed from safety concerns over train separation and hotbox detection, which relied on human observation rather than remote technology. Cabooses supported standard freight crews of four to five members, including the , , and flagman, who occupied the for shifts on long-distance runs. This staffing model facilitated the monitoring essential to the period's high-volume hauls, as U.S. railroads transported 655.9 billion revenue ton-miles of freight in , reflecting a 44 percent rise from amid postwar economic expansion. Usage density varied regionally, with coal-hauling railroads maintaining higher proportions of cabooses due to the demands of unit train operations requiring vigilant rear oversight, in contrast to lighter or more automated freight corridors. Such lines often operated under stricter state mandates, extending caboose reliance into later decades before nationwide phase-out.

Design Variations

Cupola Cabooses

The cupola caboose featured an elevated, often offset observation compartment mounted atop the main car body, enabling crew members to monitor the train's preceding cars from a raised vantage point. This design provided enhanced rearward and lateral visibility, allowing observation of the train's length for potential issues such as hotboxes or shifted loads. The concept originated in 1863, credited to T. B. Watson, a freight conductor on the Chicago & North Western Railway, who modified a damaged wooden caboose by enlarging a roof hole at the Clinton, Iowa, shops, thereby improving oversight of the train. Cupola cabooses dominated American railroading through the early , with approximately 34,000 in service by the mid-. Initially built predominantly of wood, the design transitioned toward construction post-World War I for greater durability and reduced fire risk, with full all-steel models emerging by the late on lines like the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway. Pullman-Standard contributed significantly to this evolution, producing 100 cupola cabooses of the CA-4 class for the in 1944, characterized by riveted bodies, tall centered s, and lengths of about 30 feet. The primary advantage of the lay in its direct elevated line-of-sight, permitting crews to detect defects like overheating journals, dragging components, and load shifts, as well as to assess slack action—the bunching and stretching of cars during starts and stops. However, the raised exposed occupants to inclement through drafty windows and increased susceptibility to vibrations amplified by the height above the underframe and track. As freight car heights increased after the , cupola visibility forward along the became progressively obstructed, highlighting inherent limitations in adapting to evolving equipment standards.

Bay Window Cabooses

Bay window cabooses emerged in the early as an alternative to designs, featuring protruding side sections with multiple large windows to enhance crew visibility along the train's flanks. This configuration addressed limitations of elevated s, particularly as freight cars grew taller by the late , obstructing overhead views and necessitating better lateral observation for tasks like monitoring during shunting and hump-yard sorting. The design originated with the Akron, Canton & Youngstown Railroad pioneering its adoption around 1922, favoring the lower-profile bays that cleared low overpasses and tunnels prevalent on eastern lines. Railroads such as the employed bay window cabooses, constructing models with dual side bays to replace cupolas entirely, enabling conductors to oversee train operations from a single-level interior without climbing stairs. Southern Pacific selected bay windows for superior side visibility, especially in handling taller loads like autoracks, which further justified the shift toward this type through the . Typically built with riveted steel panels on steel frames, these cabooses incorporated the projecting bays as integral extensions, often with two to four windows per side for panoramic views suited to congested yard environments where precise tracking of car movements was essential. The all-floor-level layout minimized fall risks compared to multi-level cupola variants and supported efficient monitoring of signals and switches during switching maneuvers. While direct quantitative data on accident reductions remains sparse in early reports, the design's emphasis on unobstructed side sightlines aligned with broader post-1920 safety priorities for improved crew observation amid rising freight volumes.

Extended-Vision Cabooses

Extended-vision cabooses emerged in the post-World War II era as an evolution in caboose design, featuring a or section that projected outward beyond the main car's sides to afford crew a panoramic rearward view. This configuration addressed visibility constraints posed by freight trains lengthening to over 100 cars by the , enabling monitors to scan a broader arc for hazards like shifting loads or mechanical failures without relying on restricted windows. The design prioritized unobstructed sightlines in response to operational demands of expanded rail networks and higher speeds, with prototypes appearing as early as 1953 from manufacturers like the International Car Company. Construction shifted to all-steel bodies for these models, providing superior structural integrity, fire resistance, and over prior wood-framed variants, which facilitated year-round crew habitability amid varying climates. Insulation layers, often or composites, reduced heat loss, while riveted or welded plating withstood the rigors of impacts and track vibrations. Railroads such as the Atchison, Topeka and adopted these in significant numbers during the 1950s peak, followed by widespread use through the on lines like the Northern Pacific, where extended-vision units comprised a growing share of fleets amid modernization efforts. Specific variants incorporated sloped or angled end profiles to minimize wind resistance and enhance downward visibility toward the tracks, optimizing for trains operating at speeds up to 60 mph. For instance, the Rock Island Railroad's 17000-series extended-vision cabooses, built by International Car Company in the late , exemplified this with flared cupola extensions measuring approximately 10-15 feet wider than the car's base width, directly countering blind spots in elongated consists. Such features causally improved end-of-train monitoring efficacy by expanding the observable field to nearly 180 degrees horizontally, reducing reliance on periodic stops or locomotive-based signals for fault detection in dynamic operations.

Other Specialized Types

Transfer cabooses were compact, heavy-duty variants designed for short-haul yard-to-yard transfers and terminal operations, often employed by belt railroads in urban areas where long-distance visibility was unnecessary. These cars typically lacked elevated cupolas, prioritizing durability over observation, and were among the last caboose types built before widespread phase-out in the late 20th century. The New York Central Railroad constructed its N6 and N6A class transfer cabooses in early 1966 at Despatch Shops in Rochester, New York, classifying them as 977 series for intra-terminal service. Similarly, the Milwaukee Road produced dozens of transfer cabooses by repurposing tenders from retired F-class 4-6-4 and L-class 2-8-2 steam locomotives, adapting them for maintenance and switching duties. Drover's cabooses served , providing accommodations for handlers transporting , sheep, or other animals over extended routes in , often featuring bunks, cooking facilities, and sometimes integrated pens or extended bodies converted from boxcars. These specialized cars allowed drovers to monitor and care for shipments en route to markets or processing plants, distinct from standard freight cabooses due to their focus on personnel tied to perishable cargo. The operated 28 such drover cabooses, numbered 2022 to 2088, all converted between August 1927 and July 1931 from existing equipment to meet demands of the era's booming . Maintenance-of-way (MOW) cabooses supported track crews performing repairs on roadbeds, signals, and , functioning as quarters for workers rather than train-end monitors. These variants were frequently repurposed from retired freight cabooses, equipped with tools and storage for ongoing railroad upkeep. The Union Pacific assigned former Missouri Pacific compact-body cabooses to its MOW 7500 series starting in December 1994, utilizing them for specialized track maintenance operations across its network.

Operational Role and Safety

Crew Responsibilities

The caboose crew, generally comprising the conductor, rear brakeman, and flagman prior to the 1980s, conducted continuous visual monitoring of the train's trailing cars for defects including hot boxes—overheated journal bearings that risked fire or failure—dragging equipment, and shifted loads, often requiring stops for on-the-spot repairs. This rearward observation complemented locomotive crew inspections, addressing visibility limitations from the train's head end where smoke, curves, and length obscured rear issues. The rear brakeman additionally handled coupling and uncoupling of cars during yard switching and intermediate stops, while verifying air brake applications across the consist to ensure uniform response. The oversaw administrative tasks from a dedicated workspace, wheel reports that documented each car's mileage, condition, and any anomalies, alongside managing waybills and switch lists to coordinate handoffs and . In emergency scenarios, such as suspected derailments or separations, the flagman deployed torpedoes, fuses, and flags to establish rear protection, alerting oncoming via visual and auditory signals as mandated by operating rules. For extended hauls governed by the federal Act limiting duty to 12 hours, cabooses provided bunks for off-watch rest and a for , enabling sustained vigilance without full crew relocation to terminals. This on-board human oversight functioned as a direct causal check against undetected mechanical breakdowns, such as partial failures or bearing seizures at the train's extremity, which forward-based alone could not reliably preempt.

Safety Features and Limitations


Cabooses incorporated safety features primarily centered on visual observation and signaling from the train's rear. Crew members displayed markers—red lights at night and flags during daylight—to denote the end of the train, thereby warning approaching locomotives or yard personnel of its presence and mitigating rear-end collision risks. These crews also conducted manual inspections for mechanical defects, such as hot boxes where axle bearings overheated and emitted visible smoke or flames, which could otherwise ignite cargo or cause derailments if undetected. From elevated vantage points like cupolas or bay windows, they scanned for signs of parted trains, where uncoupling occurred unnoticed from the locomotive, enabling prompt signaling to halt operations and avert runaways. Emergency equipment including flares and fusees allowed crew to protect stopped trains by placing signals on the track to alert following traffic.
Despite these roles, cabooses posed inherent limitations by positioning human crew at the vulnerable rear, exposing them directly to impacts. reports detail numerous pre-1980s incidents where subsequent trains collided with cabooses, often crushing or entrapping occupants due to the lack of advanced collision avoidance systems. For instance, a 1983 Northern rear-end collision struck the stationary train's caboose, displacing it violently and injuring crew. Such events underscored how manned rears, while enabling detection, simultaneously created occupancy hazards absent in unmanned end-of-train devices. Additionally, the caboose's freight-car construction transmitted severe vibrations and jolts from track irregularities and slack action, exacerbating crew fatigue and injury risks during extended runs, though quantitative exposure data specific to cabooses remains sparse relative to studies.

Decline and Replacement

Technological Advancements Enabling Phase-Out

The development of end-of-train (EOT) devices in the marked a pivotal shift toward automated in freight rail operations, allowing locomotives to remotely monitor rear pressure and integrity without a caboose . These battery-powered units, attached to the last car's coupler, transmitted via radio signals to confirm air continuity and detect uncoupling or other failures, functions previously reliant on visual and checks from the caboose. Early precursors, such as flashing rear-end devices (FREDs), emerged in 1969 when the Florida East Coast Railroad deployed them to signal the train's rear presence, evolving rapidly into telemetry-capable systems by the mid-. Two-way EOT systems, introduced in the late 1970s, enabled bidirectional communication, permitting locomotive crews to initiate emergency brake applications from the front if rear telemetry indicated issues like pressure loss. The Federal Communications Commission facilitated this by regulating radio frequencies for EOT transmissions, with historical records noting approvals and power considerations dating to 1978 that supported reliable operation over long distances. Concurrently, centralized air brake monitoring from the locomotive, enhanced by these devices, eliminated the need for rear-end manual verification of brake line integrity, as pressure data was relayed in real time. Automated lineside detection systems further supplanted caboose observations during the and , with sensors for hot bearings, wheel defects, and dragging equipment providing alerts to dispatchers or crews, bypassing human visual patrols. assessments demonstrated that such reduced detection errors compared to manual methods, permitting EOTs as equivalents to traditional inspections in rule-making that prioritized verifiable data over crew presence. This data-centric approach causally diminished risks tied to human factors, such as or obstructed views, by ensuring consistent, objective fault signaling across lengths exceeding 100 cars.

Economic and Operational Factors

The elimination of cabooses significantly reduced labor costs for U.S. railroads by obviating the need for dedicated rear-end members, such as conductors and brakemen, who previously occupied these and required additional compensation. Freight typically included 4-5 members, with caboose-based roles accounting for a substantial portion of expenses, often structured as extra paychecks tied to train length and duration. Post-elimination, these crew reductions contributed to overall operating cost savings estimated at 5-8% for typical Class I railroads, with industry-wide annual savings from caboose removal alone reaching approximately $200 million by the mid-1990s. Beyond wages, cabooses imposed ongoing maintenance burdens, including inspections, repairs, and fleet integration, which added to expenses without generating revenue. These cars required specialized upkeep for living quarters, lighting, and safety , diverting resources from core freight operations. Removal streamlined and lowered these ancillary costs, enabling railroads to allocate savings toward and modernization. Operationally, caboose elimination enhanced train efficiency by reducing overall weight and aerodynamic drag, which previously increased fuel consumption and limited train lengths. Without the trailing car's mass—typically 20-30 tons—locomotives could haul equivalent or greater loads with less power, yielding measurable fuel economies. The of 1980 further facilitated these gains by permitting flexible labor agreements that curtailed mandatory crew hours and sizes, allowing operators to adapt staffing to technological capabilities rather than fixed roles. These factors underpinned a broader rebound in railroad financial performance post-deregulation, with metrics demonstrating substantial improvements. Revenue ton-miles per employee hour rose from 148 in 1980 to 288 by 1988, reflecting intensified output without commensurate labor inputs. Rail carriers transitioned from systemic losses in the to sustained profitability, supported by declining operating ratios and expanded freight volumes, as market-driven and controls under Staggers enabled competitive reinvestment.

Empirical Safety Outcomes Post-Elimination

Following the widespread elimination of cabooses on U.S. freight trains in the mid-1980s, enabled by the Staggers Rail Act of 1980 and the adoption of end-of-train (EOT) devices, train accident rates declined by 65 percent between 1981 and 2009, as reported by the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA). This improvement continued, with rates falling an additional 12 percent by the 2010s, reflecting the efficacy of technological substitutes like EOTs for monitoring rear-end integrity and brake function in real time. Injuries and fatalities among rear-end crew members, previously exposed to slack action, rough riding conditions, and equipment failures in cabooses, were effectively eliminated for that position, contributing to an overall reduction in railroad employee casualties that halved from their peak by the . EOT devices, which transmit on air pressure and train separation, outperformed visual inspections from cabooses by enabling faster detection and response to parted trains or pressure losses, as evidenced by (NTSB) analyses of incidents where two-way EOTs prevented rear-end collisions that manned cabooses might have missed. Empirical data from FRA and NTSB records show no corresponding increase in undetected failures, such as shifted loads or hot boxes, post-phase-out; instead, automated defect detectors and EOT integration correlated with sustained declines in derailments and collisions, underscoring that remote monitoring mitigated risks more reliably than human observation amid longer trains and higher speeds. Overall fatality rates for rail employees dropped from approximately 2.0 per 100,000 worker-hours in the late 1970s to under 1.0 by the 1990s, with technological advancements like EOTs playing a key role in prioritizing causal prevention over traditional staffing.

Labor and Regulatory Controversies

Union Advocacy for Mandated Cabooses

The Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen (BRT), a major labor organization representing brakemen and conductors, actively lobbied for state-level full crew laws that effectively mandated cabooses by requiring multiple crew members on freight trains, positioning these measures as essential for rear-end surveillance and hazard detection. These efforts intensified in the and amid railroads' pushes for operational efficiencies, with unions arguing that caboose crews prevented accidents by allowing direct observation of train integrity, though such claims were frequently linked to preserving employment for thousands of rear-end personnel. By the mid-1970s, organizations like the BRT and its successors, including the United Transportation Union, campaigned against crew reductions that would eliminate caboose assignments, framing the retention of full crews—including a dedicated caboose—as a safeguard against risks like overheated bearings or dragging equipment that might go unnoticed without on-site monitoring. Union lobbying contributed to the persistence of state statutes in over a dozen jurisdictions requiring cabooses or equivalent rear crews until waivers and repeals began in the early 1980s, with advocacy often involving testimony before legislatures emphasizing anecdotal safety benefits derived from crew presence rather than controlled comparative analyses. In response to proposed staffing cuts, railroad unions issued threats during negotiations, such as those in the late over work rule changes that threatened positions tied to caboose operations, underscoring the intertwining of rhetoric with imperatives. These actions delayed eliminations until bilateral agreements post-1980, where unions secured compensatory provisions like extended mileage allowances in exchange for phased caboose retirements, reflecting a strategic pivot from mandates to negotiated protections amid mounting evidence that technological alternatives could replicate observational functions without additional personnel. The of October 7, 1980, significantly deregulated the railroad industry by reducing oversight on rates, mergers, and operations, thereby permitting railroads greater flexibility in crew configurations and equipment use, including the phased reduction of caboose requirements through negotiated labor agreements. This legislation facilitated the substitution of traditional cabooses with end-of-train devices, as railroads demonstrated operational efficiencies without mandating rear-end crew presence. In 1982, major U.S. railroads reached a national agreement with unions, initially eliminating cabooses on 25 percent of trains, subject to safety validations by neutral arbitrators; the (FRA) began granting waivers for broader caboose exemptions based on empirical data from pilot programs showing that flashing rear-end devices (FREDs) provided equivalent or superior monitoring of train integrity compared to manned cabooses. By the mid-1980s, the FRA explicitly declined to impose a federal caboose mandate, citing technological advancements like as adequate substitutes, which preempted stricter state-level requirements under the Federal Railroad Safety Act. Federal courts reinforced deregulation through preemption rulings, such as in cases challenging statutes; for instance, a 1987 decision held that a requiring occupied cabooses on trains over 2,000 feet was preempted by FRA safety regulations, as the agency had comprehensively addressed train-end monitoring without endorsing manned cabooses. Similarly, legislation in 1986 mandating cabooses was invalidated, affirming that policy on reductions and equipment standards superseded overrides, thereby standardizing caboose elimination nationwide. In , parallel deregulatory shifts under the National Transportation Act of accelerated caboose phase-out, with Canadian National and Canadian Pacific railways fully eliminating manned cabooses by the early following trials validating end-of-train devices, mirroring U.S. empirical findings that overrode prior mandates without increased accident rates attributable to reductions.

Critiques of Protectionist Positions

Critiques of protectionist for mandatory cabooses emphasize that such positions often conflated job preservation with imperatives, overlooking that rear-positioned s incurred disproportionate personal hazards without yielding reductions in train-wide accident rates. Rear-end collisions exposed caboose occupants to severe risks from slack action and impact forces, with historical accounts describing the caboose as one of the most perilous locations due to its vulnerability in such events. End-of-train telemetry devices (ETDs or ), mandated as caboose replacements by the in , monitor brake pipe pressure and transmit rearward data in —functions surpassing caboose inspections—while eliminating exposure to these rear risks. Empirical assessments post-phase-out, including rulings upheld in federal courts, affirmed that ETDs adequately fulfilled roles without the added dangers and costs of manned cabooses. Union-driven mandates delayed adoption of these technologies, inflating operational costs through required , caboose maintenance, and fuel drag—expenses that eroded 's to more flexible trucking prior to . The of October 14, 1980, relaxed such constraints, enabling railroads to contract freely with shippers and streamline , which unlocked annual savings estimated at up to $7 billion by 1987 through rate flexibility and gains. Post-1980, surged from $1.5 billion annually to $9.5 billion by 2006, productivity tripled, and freight ton-miles doubled, revitalizing the industry against truck competition and refuting predictions of safety or service collapse from reduced . These outcomes underscore how protectionist rules hindered resource reallocation toward innovations like ETDs, fostering inefficiencies that burdened shippers and diminished 's modal advantages, such as lower use per ton-mile compared to highways.

Preservation and Modern Context

Museum and Restoration Efforts

Preservation initiatives for cabooses gained momentum in the mid-20th century as heritage organizations sought to document the end of an era in railroading, with efforts focusing on acquiring retired wooden and examples for static displays and limited operational use in educational settings. The Mid-Continent Railway Museum, operational since the early , maintains one of the oldest preserved cabooses, a 1892 Chicago St. Paul Minneapolis & Omaha model built in the railroad's shops, alongside other and variants restored for interpretive exhibits and occasional charters. Strasburg Rail Road, revived for tourist service in 1958, integrates preserved cabooses into its operations, such as No. 12 constructed in 1925, allowing visitors to experience rear-end crew functions during heritage excursions that highlight pre-phase-out train configurations. techniques emphasize structural integrity through underframe reinforcements, body panel replacements using period-appropriate materials, and interior refits that recreate bunks, desks, and stoves based on builder documentation to ensure historical fidelity. Following the 1980s regulatory elimination of caboose mandates, railroads donated surplus cars to museums and societies, contributing to the preservation of hundreds of examples across the for public education on operations.

Recent Developments (2020-2025)

In 2025, the Wabash County Museum in launched a campaign to restore the interior of its New York Central caboose No. 19480, built in the early , aiming to create a hands-on educational space with interactive elements such as virtual displays for over 20,000 annual visitors. The project, seeking $25,000, emphasizes blending historical authenticity with modern technology to enhance public engagement. Union Pacific completed the overhaul and repaint of former Southern Pacific caboose 4699 at its Ogden maintenance shops in late 2024, returning it to service in the Eugene, Oregon, area by February 2025 as a track inspection vehicle. This restoration preserved the original Southern Pacific livery, marking a rare instance of active rail use for a historic caboose post-phaseout. The Museums at Union Station in Ogden, Utah, acquired Western Pacific caboose CA-14 in July 2025, adding it to the Eccles Rail Center collection for static display and preservation. Concurrently, Rio Grande Southern caboose No. 0404 was transported from the Colorado Railroad Museum to the Durango & Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad in May 2025 for a full mechanical overhaul and repainting, preparing it to pair with restored locomotive No. 20 for excursions starting in 2026. Restoration of a historic caboose began in downtown , in August 2025, with initial phases including window replacement by Gammon Glass and exterior repainting by Capitol Construction, positioning it as a revitalized local landmark at Earp Park. These efforts reflect a trend toward integrating digital enhancements, such as interactive monitors in restored interiors, to educate visitors on caboose functions without reviving freight operations, as end-of-train devices have rendered manned cabooses obsolete since the . No proposals for reinstating cabooses in revenue freight service emerged during this period.

Adaptive Reuse and Cultural Legacy

Following the widespread phase-out of cabooses in revenue freight service during the 1980s and 1990s, surplus examples became available for non-railroad applications, enabling cost-effective adaptive reuse due to their durable steel construction and compact dimensions. Railroads and private buyers often sold or donated these cars at low prices, facilitating conversions into residential dwellings, office spaces, and short-term vacation rentals. For instance, a 1940s-era caboose was refurbished into an Airbnb tiny home in Kentucky by a father-daughter team, accommodating up to four guests with added bedrooms and bathroom facilities. Similarly, a century-old caboose on Maine's Sugarloaf Mountain underwent seven years of restoration for use as a mountain retreat rental, highlighting the practicality of repurposing for tourism-oriented architecture. In American cultural narratives, the caboose embodies the terminus of the , evoking metaphors of finality such as "end of the line" in and depictions of railroading life. This symbolism underscores themes of industrial closure and worker vigilance at the train's rear, appearing in and portraying railroad eras before . Post-decline, cabooses retained prominence in model railroading, where enthusiasts construct historical layouts featuring them as essential rearward markers, sustaining demand for scale replicas despite the hobby's overall contraction since its peak. As symbols of railroading's from labor-intensive to technology-driven operations, preserved cabooses contribute to tourist that collectively draw millions of visitors annually to sites. Museums displaying multiple examples, such as those with extensive caboose collections, attract rail enthusiasts seeking tangible links to pre-deregulation freight practices, reinforcing the vehicle's legacy in industrial without active operational roles.

References

  1. [1]
    A Brief History of the Caboose - Union Pacific
    Use of cabooses began in the 1830s, when railroads housed trainmen in shanties built onto boxcars or flatcars. Early Uses. Technology Overtakes the Caboose.Missing: types | Show results with:types
  2. [2]
    A railroading staple: The caboose | Trains Magazine
    Apr 18, 2024 · On the Pennsylvania Railroad, the caboose was a cabin or “cabin car.” The Burlington, C&NW, and other roads used the term waycar. Canadian ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  3. [3]
    Technology Overtakes the Caboose - Union Pacific
    The increasing heaviness and speed of the trains made on-board cooking hazardous and unnecessary. New labor agreements reduced the hours of service required for ...
  4. [4]
    What Happened to the Caboose? - Railinc
    Jul 18, 2023 · The caboose was largely replaced by technology. Today, railroads utilize End of Train Devices (EOTs), sometimes referred to as a flashing rear end device (FRED ...
  5. [5]
    Caboose (Train): Definition, Types, Photos - American-Rails.com
    Feb 22, 2025 · One of the final cupola designs to improve visibility was the extended vision cupola, or EVC. This featured added a protruding window ...
  6. [6]
    Union Pacific Steel Cabooses - UtahRails.net
    Feb 2, 2021 · The new compact body design retained the interior space of a cupola caboose, but without the space below the cupola, which was used only for ...Missing: quarters | Show results with:quarters
  7. [7]
    Caboose Facts & History | Strasburg Rail Road
    Jun 4, 2024 · The caboose is the boxy car that was historically attached to the end of a freight train. In their earliest days, they were created by ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  8. [8]
    What Happened To The Caboose? - Colorado Railroads
    Mar 16, 2018 · Such an incident was called a hotbox, and they caused a great deal of grief for the railroad and its neighbors. A caboose manned with eyes and ...
  9. [9]
    End-of-train devices replaced cabooses - Trains Magazine
    Cabooses also carried marker lights to warn following trains. But the caboose has yielded to other technology. Defect observation has been taken over by ...
  10. [10]
    Caboose - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
    Originating from Middle Dutch kambuis, meaning "ship's galley," the word combines elements like "cabin" and "house" and also refers to a railcar for crew ...Missing: railroad | Show results with:railroad
  11. [11]
    Caboose' origin probably Dutch - The Oklahoman
    Aug 6, 2005 · Merriam Webster's, Encarta, Oxford and American Heritage all agree that the probable origin is the Dutch word "Kabuis, which entered the English ...
  12. [12]
    The Term Caboose - TrainsAreFun
    The railroad historian David L. Joslyn, a retired Southern Pacific Railroad draftsman, has connected caboose to kabhuis, a Middle Dutch word referring to the ...
  13. [13]
    Different Names for Caboose on Different Railroads
    Apr 17, 2019 · Caboose names include: Way Car, Cabin Car, Brake Van, Guard Van, Van, Combine, Outside Braced Wooden Crummies, and Big Woody/Little Woody.
  14. [14]
    Caboose | B&O Railroad Museum
    Caboose. Quick Facts. Name, Caboose. Manufacture Date, 1961. Railroad Of Record, Baltimore & Ohio Railroad ... first caboose was created in the 1840s, when a ...
  15. [15]
    Celebrating the caboose: Five facts you didn't know
    Mar 5, 2018 · Interestingly, the word caboose may derive from the Dutch word “kombuis.” It originally referred to a galley on a ship.Missing: kabuis | Show results with:kabuis
  16. [16]
    A Quick History of the Caboose - Railfanning.org
    T. B. Watson, a conductor with the Chicago & North Western, is credited with creating the cupola caboose in 1863.
  17. [17]
    The Caboose's Early Uses - Union Pacific
    The addition of the cupola – the lookout post atop the car – is attributed to a conductor who discovered in 1863 that he could see his train much better if he ...
  18. [18]
    Union Pacific Cabooses, Introduction - UtahRails.net
    The railroad caboose is a vital part of American railroading. Its use was mandated during the middle years of the 19th Century by a need to locate members ...
  19. [19]
    L&NE Caboose #580 - Tri-State Railway Historical Society
    The Reading Railroad first developed this steel caboose design in the early 1920s based on a 1920 USRA design for wooden cabooses. Between July of 1924 and ...
  20. [20]
    Whatever Happened to the Little Red Caboose? | Glimpses
    Sep 22, 2016 · In the 1980s legal requirements for having a “full” freight crew of five to six employees changed rapidly. Railroads began to negotiate ...
  21. [21]
  22. [22]
    Freight Rail Crew Size | AAR - Association of American Railroads
    Freight railroad crew sizes have been reduced from five to three to two people pursuant to collective bargaining agreements with labor unions under the ...Missing: era | Show results with:era
  23. [23]
    Moving the Goods: As the Interstate Era Begins | FHWA
    Jun 30, 2023 · Traffic transportation by rail in 1956 amounted to 655.9 billion ton-miles, a 44-percent increase over the level of 1929.
  24. [24]
    North East Coal Train Caboose ?? - Trains.com Forums
    Oct 14, 2008 · Cabooses were generally required until the mid 90's. So you should have a caboose on your coal train. Many time coal trains that required ' ...Mixing cabooses on railroads ever done? - Trains.com Forumscoal cars from different railroads and in mixed freightMore results from forum.trains.comMissing: variations | Show results with:variations
  25. [25]
    QR 20 CABOOSES STAND #3 - La Grange Railroad Museum
    By the late 19th century, the railroad caboose was a staple on the rear of freight trains and its basic shape and design, for the most part, was in place. By ...<|separator|>
  26. [26]
    Milwaukee Road 01984 - Illinois Railway Museum
    Instead of a cupola on the roof it has a bay window on each side to provide the conductor better visibility over his train. It was built by the railroad's own ...
  27. [27]
    SP: Why bay window vs cupola cabooses - Trainorders.com
    Apr 27, 2017 · SP preferred bay windows for safety, better visibility, especially with autorack cars, and to avoid issues with tunnels and high rear crew in cupolas.Milwaukee Road Rib Side Caboose Questionsmilw road caboose questionMore results from www.trainorders.com
  28. [28]
    Southern Bay Window Survivors - Hawkins Rails
    the typical American caboose design ... visibility ...Scrapbooks · By Locations · Close Up — The OriginalsMissing: living quarters
  29. [29]
    Caboose Fatalities - General Discussion - Trains.com Forums
    Mar 10, 2009 · In contrast, a bay-window caboose is all on one floor level, so there's no place to fall to, other than from a standing position to the same ...Missing: signals congested
  30. [30]
    2025 Premier O Scale Extended Vision Caboose Announced
    Our model depicts the extended vision caboose introduced by International Car Company in 1953 and produced for two decades, which was rostered by railroads from ...
  31. [31]
    21st Century Return for a Wide-Vision Caboose - HO Collector
    Oct 17, 2023 · A design from the 1950s became the symbol of "modern" railroading in the 1970s when the first wide-vision caboose models were produced in ...
  32. [32]
    Caboose Types & Eras? | ModelRailroadForums.com
    Apr 24, 2021 · dave1905 said: By the time the EOT was developed the critical functions of the caboose (lining behind the train, performing air tests, watching ...
  33. [33]
    What is the history of the Rock Island caboose? - Facebook
    Jul 17, 2025 · The Rock Island Railroad 17000 series extended vision cupola cabooses were built by the International Car Company of Kenton, Ohio, starting in ...Collecting and history of Lionel train cabooses - Facebook1864-era military train design and style - FacebookMore results from www.facebook.com
  34. [34]
    Transfer Caboose - Reading Car Company
    The N6 and N6A class transfer cabooses were built in early 1966 by the New York Central in their Despatch Shops in Rochester, NY. Classed 977 by NYC, they were ...
  35. [35]
    ETRM Car 01738 - East Troy Railroad Museum
    The Milwaukee Road built several dozen transfer cabooses using the tenders from the old F class 4-6-4 and the L-class 2-8-2-type "Mikado" steam locomotives.
  36. [36]
    Drovers' caboose | Trains Magazine
    Nov 3, 2020 · The drovers' caboose was a unique part of American railroading tied to the shipment of livestock such as cattle and sheep.
  37. [37]
    Union Pacific Drover Cabooses - UtahRails.net
    Sep 5, 2019 · UP had 28 drover cabooses, numbered in the series between UP 2022 to UP 2088. All 28 cars were converted between August 1927 and July 1931.
  38. [38]
    UP Steel Maintenance-of-Way Cabooses - UtahRails.net
    Sep 27, 2019 · MP 7500 Series. Former Missouri Pacific cabooses in UP MOW service. Beginning in December 1994, several former Missouri Pacific compact body ...Overview · UP 903000 Series · UP 906000 Series
  39. [39]
    Railroad Brakeman: How The Job Has Changed Through The Years
    Sep 9, 2024 · Historically, brakemen manually applied brakes on moving cars. Today, they mainly throw switches and couple/uncouple cars, with a lower ...
  40. [40]
    Caboose and marker lamp rules - Trains.com Forums
    Oct 29, 2009 · One of the first things to do after boarding a caboose was to check the flagging equipment and the markers. The markers could be put up/turned ...Caboose Marker Lights - Trains.com ForumsCaboose Marker Lamps - Electronics and DCC - Trains.com ForumsMore results from forum.trains.comMissing: flares derailing
  41. [41]
    [PDF] NTSB/RAR-84/02
    May 15, 1984 · graph; CTC system; rear-end collision; caboose; absolute signal; unqualified locomotive operator; entrapped crewpersons; rear-end fatality ...
  42. [42]
    [PDF] PB83-916309 - NTSB
    Apr 13, 2025 · REAR END COLLISION OF TWO. BURLINGTON NORTHERN ... The approaching train struck the caboose of train 43305, moving the caboose about.
  43. [43]
    [PDF] NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD - ROSA P
    Apr 13, 1983 · The approaching train struck the caboose of train 43J05, moving the caboose ... 8/ Railroad Accident Report--"Rear-End Collision of Two Southern ...
  44. [44]
  45. [45]
    Sorry, but it's “Goodbye, Caboose” – EoT devices have made you ...
    Jul 11, 2020 · While the first caboose replacement was a simple flashing rear-end device (FRED), first used by the Florida East Coast Railroad in 1969, it was ...
  46. [46]
    [PDF] Federal Communications Commission FCC 10-36
    Mar 11, 2010 · 1978 ... The Second FNPRM also seeks comment on the feasibility of increasing the allowed power for end of train devices to provide a more.
  47. [47]
    Technology Replaced People and RailCars — Demise of the Caboose
    Dec 4, 2022 · The caboose provided shelter for the crew required to switch and shunt, watching for load shifting, damage to equipment and cargo, and overheating axles.
  48. [48]
    Missouri Pacific Railroad, et al., Plaintiffs-appellees, v ... - Justia Law
    The FRA has determined it is appropriate for itself to do nothing about cabooses, and affirmatively has left the matter not to the states but to collective ...<|separator|>
  49. [49]
    [PDF] 1997 01 02 - Two-Way EOT Final.pdf - Federal Railroad Administration
    Jan 2, 1997 · An EOT device is a radio telemetry device composed of a front unit, located in the cab of the controlling locomotive, and a rear unit, located ...
  50. [50]
    THE END OF THE LINE - Chicago Tribune
    Feb 2, 1995 · According to industry figures, dumping cabooses has saved the railroads about $200 million a year. The industry figures it used to spend 50 ...
  51. [51]
    Productivity Growth and Some of Its Determinants in the ... - jstor
    The results indicate that elim- ination of cabooses and associated crew members from freight trains reduced costs by 5-8% on the typical Class I railroad in ...
  52. [52]
    What is the reason for the removal of cabooses from trains? Is there ...
    Dec 30, 2023 · They fell out of use. When train crews were larger and trains were not technically outfitted, the caboose was needed to house the conductor and ...Why do trains no longer have a caboose? - QuoraWhen did trains stop using cabooses in the US? - QuoraMore results from www.quora.com
  53. [53]
    Illinois Trains Dropped Last Car Due To Modern Technology
    May 8, 2025 · Railroads saved money through reduced crew size which resulted from eliminating cabooses that added weight to trains and led to lower fuel ...Missing: economic | Show results with:economic
  54. [54]
    The Staggers Act of 1980 | AAR - Association of American Railroads
    The Staggers Act is a bipartisan piece of legislation that transformed freight rail by allowing market-driven pricing and competition.
  55. [55]
    [PDF] The Success of the Staggers Rail Act of 1980
    Oct 5, 2005 · Railroads also cut costs by eliminating cabooses and related crew members. ... Railroad Operating Costs per Revenue Ton-Mile, 1980-2002. (2002 ...Missing: impact | Show results with:impact
  56. [56]
    [PDF] Economic and Financial Impacts of the Staggers Rail Act of 1980
    Its purpose was to restore the financial stability of the rail system and to improve the operation and structure of the rail- road industry through rate-making ...
  57. [57]
    Railroad Performance Under the Staggers Act | Cato Institute
    Between 1980 and 1985, the operating ratio (operating cost to revenues) decreased slightly but remained above 90 percent. Consequently, the return on investment ...
  58. [58]
    [PDF] IMPACT OF THE STAGGERS RAIL ACT OF 1980
    Regulation also prohibited carriers from restructuring their systems, including abandoning redundant and light density lines, a necessity for controlling cost.
  59. [59]
    [PDF] America's Freight Railroads Under Balanced Regulation
    Since the Staggers Act was passed, average rail rates have fallen 44 percent, train accident rates are down 77 percent, rail traffic volume is up 90 percent, ...Missing: caboose | Show results with:caboose
  60. [60]
    [PDF] The Economics of Railroad Safety - Northwestern University
    The major safety issues are not collisions or derailments, but rather occupational injuries to employees, collisions with negligent road users at highway grade.
  61. [61]
    Figure 1 - Rail-Related Fatality Rate: 1978-2000
    Sep 10, 2012 · Year, Rate. 1976, 2.10. 1977, 2.04. 1978, 2.19. 1979, 1.87. 1980, 1.97. 1981, 1.90. 1982, 1.95. 1983, 1.92. 1984, 2.10. 1985, 1.81.
  62. [62]
    Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen | Encyclopedia.com
    The initial meeting in Charles Woodworth's caboose Number 10 in June 1883 spawned a larger meeting in September at Blend Hall in Oneonta, where participants ...
  63. [63]
    Understanding the Railroads-Unions Fight | Cato Institute
    Echoing the elimination of firemen in the 1960s and brakemen in the 1980s, railroads are looking to further reduce the size of train crews to one. Under ...
  64. [64]
    What happened to the caboose? - Trains Magazine
    suitably equipped with bunks and a stove for heating and ...
  65. [65]
    S.1946 - Staggers Rail Act of 1980 96th Congress (1979-1980)
    Staggers Rail Act of 1980 - Declares that the goals of this Act are: (1) to assist in rehabilitating the Nation's rail system to meet the demands of interstate ...<|separator|>
  66. [66]
    880 F.2d 1104 - Public Resource
    Therefore, the state says, it is free to require trains to have cabooses. 11. This argument misses the point. The FRSA does not merely preempt those state laws ...
  67. [67]
    The End-Of-Train Device (ETD) and Its Impact on Railroading
    Jul 5, 2024 · By the 1980s and 1990s, major rail companies across the United States and Canada began to phase out cabooses from regular service, replacing ...
  68. [68]
    Forty Years After Surface Freight Deregulation
    Dec 14, 2020 · Between 1981 and 1996, real rail revenue per ton-mile fell by nearly 50 percent. At least one-third of this rate reduction can be attributed ...
  69. [69]
    Chicago St. Paul Minneapolis & Omaha #6110
    This bay window caboose is the oldest caboose at Mid-Continent. It was built in the Omaha Road's Hudson, Wisconsin car shops in 1892.
  70. [70]
    Cabooses - Mid-Continent Railway Museum
    Cabooses were found at the end of most freight trains until the 1980s. They provide shelter for crew members located the rear of the train.Missing: variants | Show results with:variants
  71. [71]
    Caboose Train Rides - Strasburg Rail Road
    Take a ride aboard Strasburg Rail Road's historic Caboose No. 12, built in 1925! Ride back in time through the Lancaster County countryside. Book now!Missing: preservation | Show results with:preservation
  72. [72]
    Caboose | Strasburg Rail Road
    The caboose provided the train crew with shelter at the rear of the train. The train crew could exit the train for switching or to protect the rear of the train ...Missing: preservation | Show results with:preservation
  73. [73]
    Greenfield man to speak on historic caboose restoration - Saratogian
    Feb 17, 2009 · Bucca has taken painstaking efforts to make sure restoration efforts are historically accurate. From Cooperstown and Charlotte Valley ...
  74. [74]
    [PDF] New Focus on caboose 5591 - Railroad Museum at Ardenwood
    Jan 10, 2015 · Those familiar with the car will remember that a 1970's era restoration, while motivated by historical preservation, fell short of accurate ...
  75. [75]
    Where have all the cabooses gone ?... - Trains.com Forums
    Mar 27, 2005 · Most of the cabooses were scrapped, donated to local cities for display in parks or sold off. The MRL recently converted several to RCL control ...Missing: AAR | Show results with:AAR
  76. [76]
    Washington project rebuilding GN caboose from the frame up - Trains
    Feb 6, 2021 · The extensive renovation of this 1923 Great Northern caboose is nearing completion in Tenino, Wash. Robert W. ScottMissing: techniques | Show results with:techniques
  77. [77]
    Wabash County Museum raising money to renovate caboose interior
    Oct 14, 2025 · 14, 2025 at 3:38 PM PDT. WABASH, Ind. (WPTA) - The Wabash County Museum is raising money to renovate a caboose that's over a century old.
  78. [78]
    Oct. 7 - Wabash County Museum seeks community funds to restore ...
    Oct 7, 2025 · The museum's restoration project will transform the caboose into a hands-on learning environment for more than 20,000 annual visitors and nearly ...
  79. [79]
    Wabash County Museum Seeks Community Support for Restoration ...
    Wabash County Museum Seeks Community Support for Restoration of Little Red Caboose. InkFreeNews.com Posted Oct 06, 2025 Updated: Oct 3, 2025 @ 3:23 PM.
  80. [80]
    NEW Southern Pacific Caboose in 2025 by the UP! (4K) | Eugene OR
    Feb 15, 2025 · A newly restored Southern Pacific caboose by the UP in 2025! I never thought I would see such a thing! Shot with the DJI Air 3 Music is used ...
  81. [81]
    "new" Southern Pacific caboose - Espee - Groups.io
    UP sent former SP caboose 4699 to the Ogden MW Shops in late 2024 for an overhaul and repaint. It had been a fixture in the Eugene yards for many years. When ...
  82. [82]
  83. [83]
    Revered railcar: Western Pacific caboose joins museum collection at ...
    Jul 1, 2025 · The Museums at Union Station has acquired and added a Western Pacific Railroad CA-14 caboose to the Eccles Rail Center.
  84. [84]
    Restoration of Rio Grande Southern caboose to complement Ten ...
    Jul 7, 2025 · Caboose No. 0404 is loaded and ready to move from the Colorado Railroad Museum to the Durango & Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad in May 2025.
  85. [85]
    RGS Caboose Prepares for the Limelight - Colorado Railroad Museum
    Jul 7, 2025 · The caboose is anticipated to accompany RGS “Ten-Wheeler” No. 20 as it makes its triumphant return to Durango & Silverton rails in winter 2026.
  86. [86]
    Restoration Begins on Historic Caboose in Downtown Nevada!
    Aug 6, 2025 · The first phase of the project kicked off this morning as Gammon Glass, a trusted local business, began replacing the windows on the caboose.
  87. [87]
    Earp Park Caboose Gets a Fresh Start! - Nevada MO Main Street ...
    Caboose Update at Earp Park! ✨ . The caboose has a brand-new coat of paint thanks to the incredible generosity of JR Watts and Capitol Construction, ...
  88. [88]
    Museum Under the Stars | WCHM - Wabash County Museum
    ... restoration. of our 1920s-era Caboose. Imagine stepping inside the fully restored caboose, where the scent of aged. wood and clank of metal meet virtual ...Missing: renovation | Show results with:renovation
  89. [89]
    Father And Daughter Team Converted A Caboose Into An Airbnb
    Dec 31, 2021 · The train caboose on Airbnb features two bedrooms, three beds and one bathroom, and can comfortably house four people for a relaxing stay. It ...
  90. [90]
    This 100-Year-Old Caboose is Now an Airbnb on a Mountain in Maine
    Dec 27, 2024 · That caboose has been converted into an Airbnb on Sugarloaf Mountain. It took seven years to restore and covert it, and although it may be homey inside, it ...
  91. [91]
    [PDF] Railroad Poetics: Infrastructure, Stories, and Worldmaking
    was riding the train to the end of the line. It was a nice conceit, but I kept it to myself. If a stranger asked where I was going, I said Chicago. (6).
  92. [92]
    [PDF] New Search - EBSCO Information Services
    As model trains became more affordable, they increased in popularity. Model railroading in the United States reached a pinnacle in the 1950s, when model ...
  93. [93]
    Are cabooses used in model railroading? - Facebook
    Aug 31, 2025 · Railroads have run Cabooses since before the Civil War. Model Railroading will never phase them out.The Decline of Model Trains as a Hobby - FacebookWhen did trains stop using cabooses? - FacebookMore results from www.facebook.comMissing: popularity decline
  94. [94]
    Heritage Rail ridership/attendance - HeritageRail Alliance
    Mar 17, 2018 · 10 million riders/visitors per year. Add in all the thousand or so small static museums and I'll wager the number hits 11 million.Missing: cabooses | Show results with:cabooses<|control11|><|separator|>