Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Hours of service

Hours of service (HOS) regulations comprise federal rules in the United States that cap the driving and on-duty hours of commercial motor vehicle operators to curb driver fatigue and bolster highway safety. Administered by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), these provisions mandate rest intervals, including 10 consecutive hours off duty prior to commencing a driving period and a 30-minute break following eight cumulative hours of driving without interruption. Core limits encompass 11 hours of driving within a 14-hour on-duty window for property-carrying drivers, alongside weekly on-duty thresholds of 60 hours over seven days or 70 hours over eight days, resettable via a 34-hour restart period. Originating with 1937 Interstate Commerce Commission directives permitting 10 hours of driving per day, HOS rules have undergone repeated amendments to balance safety imperatives against industry productivity, culminating in 2020 revisions that introduced flexibilities like sleeper berth splitting and short-haul exemptions while preserving foundational restrictions. Enforcement relies on records of duty status, increasingly tracked through mandatory electronic logging devices (ELDs) since 2017, which automate compliance monitoring but have sparked disputes over technological reliability and driver harassment risks. Although designed to mitigate drowsiness-induced crashes—a causal factor in truck accident etiology—the empirical efficacy of HOS in diminishing overall crash rates or fatalities exhibits inconsistency across studies, with some analyses revealing negligible safety gains amid heightened operational costs and potential incentives for non-compliance under economic duress. Controversies endure regarding rule rigidity, as trucking stakeholders contend that uniform caps overlook variances in routes, weather, and traffic, occasionally prompting violations or advocacy for tailored exceptions, while safety proponents push for tighter constraints to address persistent fatigue prevalence.

Definition and Scope

Key Definitions

Hours of service (HOS) regulations, enforced by the (FMCSA) under 49 CFR Part 395, impose limits on the maximum permissible time, on-duty time, and mandatory rest periods for drivers of commercial motor vehicles to delineate operational boundaries. time is specifically defined as all time spent at the driving controls of a commercial motor vehicle in operation. On-duty time includes all periods from when a driver begins work or is required to be in readiness to work until relieved of all responsibility for performing work, encompassing time as well as non-driving activities such as loading or unloading , inspecting , or waiting for dispatch. Off-duty time constitutes periods when the driver is free from work responsibilities and not required to be available, enabling rest separate from on-duty obligations. Weekly on-duty accumulation is capped under the 60/70-hour rule, which prohibits driving after 60 hours of on-duty time in any 7 consecutive days for carriers not operating every day, or after 70 hours in 8 consecutive days for those that do, with the calculation period resetting after the requisite off-duty accumulation.

Applicability to Commercial Drivers

Hours of service (HOS) regulations under 49 CFR Part 395 apply to drivers operating commercial motor vehicles (CMVs) in interstate commerce, as enforced by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA). A CMV is defined as a motor vehicle used to transport passengers or property in interstate commerce when it meets specific criteria: a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) or gross combination weight rating (GCWR) of 10,001 pounds or more; designed or used to transport more than 8 passengers (including the driver) for compensation; designed or used to transport more than 15 passengers (including the driver) without compensation; or used to transport hazardous materials in quantities requiring placarding. These rules encompass both property-carrying CMVs, which transport goods or cargo, and passenger-carrying CMVs, such as buses designed to carry 9 or more passengers (including the driver), though the specific HOS limits may differ between the two categories. FMCSA's jurisdiction focuses on interstate operations, where commerce involves movement across lines or with for such , determined by the shipper's fixed purpose at the time of shipment. Drivers and carriers engaged in purely intrastate commerce are generally exempt from federal HOS rules unless the has adopted equivalent regulations, though evidence of interstate activity subjects a driver to FMCSRs for up to 4 months. Non-CMV operations, such as personal or recreational use of vehicles below the weight or passenger thresholds without commercial , fall outside the scope. This delineation ensures federal oversight targets safety risks in commercial interstate while deferring intrastate matters to authority absent .

Purpose and Empirical Foundations

Stated Objectives

The primary stated objective of hours of service (HOS) regulations is to prevent commercial motor vehicle crashes attributable to driver fatigue by restricting consecutive driving hours and requiring off-duty rest periods sufficient to restore alertness. This intent rests on the causal mechanism whereby diminishes reaction times, vigilance, and decision-making capacity, with effects comparable to blood concentrations above legal limits after 17–19 hours of sustained . The foundational rationale emerged from the Interstate Commerce Commission's (ICC) initial HOS rules in 1937–1938, promulgated under the Motor Carrier Act of 1935 to address escalating accident frequencies in the trucking sector during the unregulated and early 1930s, when operators routinely exceeded 15–18 hours of daily duty amid rapid industry expansion. Secondary aims encompass standardizing operational limits across carriers to curb competitive dynamics that could otherwise compel drivers to forgo adequate rest for expedited schedules.

Safety Efficacy Based on Data

Data from the and indicate that driver fatigue contributes to approximately 13% of large crashes, with estimates ranging from 10-20% for involvement in truck or bus incidents. Analysis of the 2020 Hours of Service (HOS) rule changes, which aimed to reduce through provisions like expanded sleeper berth flexibility, revealed no significant reductions in crash or fatality rates. A 2023 FMCSA report on the effects of these regulations found that while driver inspections with HOS violations increased from 7.6% pre-change to 8.5% post-change, monthly large truck crash rates remained essentially stable, shifting slightly from 5.58 to 5.70 per measure, with initial trends confounded by COVID-19-related factors such as waivers and reduced traffic volumes. Studies modeling HOS reforms predict only marginal impacts, with one analysis estimating less than a 4% reduction in fatigue-related accidents, underscoring that factors such as and speeding often play larger roles in crashes than extended duty hours alone. Evidence from intrastate operations in states like and , which permit more liberal HOS exemptions from federal interstate rules, shows no identifiable safety deterioration or increased crash risks attributable to these variations.

Historical Evolution

Origins and Early Rules (1930s–1990s)

The (ICC) promulgated the first federal hours-of-service (HOS) regulations for interstate motor carrier drivers on December 29, 1937, with the rules taking effect on July 1, 1938. These initial provisions limited driving to 10 hours within any 24-hour period following 8 consecutive hours off duty, while capping total on-duty time at 60 hours over 7 consecutive days or 70 hours over 8 days if the carrier provided the seventh and eighth days off. The regulations emerged amid the rapid expansion of trucking after railroads lost market dominance in the , as unregulated long-haul operations led to widespread driver fatigue and a surge in accidents attributed to extended work periods without mandated rest. Subsequent revisions in the mid-20th century addressed and flexibility amid growing use and linking to crashes. In 1952, the updated the rules to emphasize consecutive rest periods and clarified on-duty distinctions, building on evidence from accident investigations showing irregular schedules exacerbated exhaustion in long-haul trucking. By 1962, the framework shifted from a strict 24-hour cycle to a rolling period, allowing drivers up to 10 hours of and 15 hours of total duty within a flexible window, while mandating detailed paper logbooks for tracking to improve verification. The transfer of oversight to the Bureau of Motor Carrier Safety under the newly formed in 1967 further institutionalized these measures, incorporating union advocacy for rest alongside empirical studies on in extended hauls. Through the 1970s and 1980s, HOS rules evolved incrementally under the , refining weekly caps to 60 hours over 7 days with provisions for 70 hours in 8 days for operations spanning multiple days off, driven by persistent -related incident data despite requirements. These periods saw heightened emphasis on distinguishing driving from other on-duty tasks, informed by carrier safety audits revealing non-driving duties contributed to overall accumulation. The 1990s maintained relative stability in core limits, with minor adjustments such as formalizing split sleeper-berth options for team drivers to accumulate required rest non-consecutively, while relying exclusively on manual paper logs for enforcement prior to digital mandates. directed a comprehensive review in 1995 via the ICC Termination Act, prompting data-driven evaluations of risks but deferring major overhauls, as existing 10-hour driving and 15-hour duty windows—coupled with 10 consecutive hours off-duty resets—were deemed foundational amid ongoing accident analyses. This era underscored pre-digital challenges, including falsification, which safety reports linked to underreported violations in an industry still adapting to post-deregulation pressures from the 1980 Motor Carrier Act.

21st-Century Reforms (2000–2020)

In April 2003, the (FMCSA) issued revised hours-of-service regulations for property-carrying commercial motor vehicle drivers, establishing an 11-hour maximum driving limit following 10 consecutive hours off duty and prohibiting driving after the 14th consecutive hour on duty (excluding sleeper berth time), while introducing a 34-hour restart provision to reset the 60/70-hour weekly on-duty limits. These changes aimed to balance rest requirements with operational needs but faced immediate legal scrutiny; a federal court vacated key provisions in 2004 due to procedural issues, prompting interim enforcement and a revised rule effective January 2004, with further adjustments in 2005 to clarify the 14-hour window. Subsequent reforms in 2011 and 2013 responded to groups' pressures for enhanced mitigation, incorporating a mandatory 30-minute rest break after 8 cumulative hours of driving (initially tied to on-duty time but later clarified) and revising berth provisions to permit splitting the required 10-hour off-duty period into two segments totaling at least 10 hours, such as one of 8 consecutive hours in the berth plus 2 consecutive hours either in the berth or off duty. The American Trucking Associations () and other industry representatives challenged the 2011 rule in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, contending it imposed undue productivity burdens without proportional gains, leading to a 2013 judicial opinion that largely upheld the regulations but highlighted analytical shortcomings in FMCSA's economic assessments. A 2013 FMCSA then exempted certain short-haul operations from the break requirement if within specified radii, addressing some industry concerns over inflexibility. The 2020 final rule, effective September 29, 2020, introduced targeted flexibilities amid ongoing debates, expanding the adverse driving conditions exception to allow up to 2 additional hours beyond the 11-hour and 14-hour on-duty limits when encountering , , or other uncontrollable , shifting the 30-minute break trigger to driving time specifically rather than broader on-duty periods, and permitting sleeper berth splits of 7 consecutive hours plus 3 hours (or 8 plus 2) to better accommodate driving. While FMCSA cited driver surveys and operational data to support these adjustments as reducing prior rule's rigidity without trade-offs, advocacy groups like filed lawsuits alleging insufficient evidence of net benefits, reflecting persistent tensions between rest mandates and industry arguments for economic viability; endorsed the changes as practical relief from earlier constraints.

Recent Stability and Minor Adjustments (2021–Present)

Following the 2020 revisions to hours-of-service (HOS) rules, the (FMCSA) has not implemented any core changes to driving time limits, rest requirements, or the 14-hour duty window for property-carrying commercial motor vehicles. The agency has instead prioritized enforcement and compliance mechanisms, including ongoing actions to remove non-compliant electronic logging devices (ELDs) from its registered list. In 2025, FMCSA revoked registration for multiple ELDs, such as five devices on October 17 requiring carriers to transition by December 16, and others like PHOENIX ELD effective December 22, with carriers operating non-compliant devices thereafter deemed in violation as if using no ELD. FMCSA's 2024 enhancements to the Safety Measurement System () indirectly influence HOS adherence by reorganizing behavior analysis categories and severity weights for violations, including those in the Hours-of-Service Compliance , to better prioritize carriers with elevated risks tied to fatigue-related infractions. Integration of the Drug and Alcohol Clearinghouse under the 2024 Clearinghouse-II rule, effective November 18, further supports HOS enforcement by mandating state licensing agencies to deny or revoke driver's licenses for unresolved or violations, preventing prohibited drivers from logging or operating hours. As of September 2024, over 250,000 drivers were recorded in the Clearinghouse, with more than 177,000 in prohibited status pending return-to-duty processes. Empirical data indicate relative stability in HOS violation and trends post-2020, though violation rates increased modestly from 7.6% pre-reform to 8.5% afterward, prompting FMCSA analyses of specific violation- correlations without altering rules. FMCSA continues to renew Information Collection Requests for HOS logging under the , evaluating burdens amid stable large truck involvements, with no enacted adjustments to core provisions as of 2025.

Core Regulations for Property-Carrying Vehicles

Driving and On-Duty Limits

A driver engaged in property-carrying operations with a commercial motor vehicle may not drive beyond the 11th hour after coming on following 10 consecutive hours off or in a berth equivalent to off-duty time. This daily limit aims to prevent extended continuous operation that could impair alertness. All driving under this rule must conclude within a 14-consecutive-hour on-duty window that begins when the driver reports for duty after the required 10 hours off. The window encompasses all on-duty time, including non-driving activities such as loading or fueling, and excludes any sleeper berth time or off-duty periods that interrupt it. To interrupt extended driving sessions, a property-carrying driver must take at least 30 consecutive minutes off driving after 8 cumulative hours of driving time since the end of the last off-duty or berth period. This break qualifies as on-duty time not involving driving and satisfies the requirement even if the driver remains with the vehicle. Weekly on-duty limits further constrain operations: a driver may not drive if the total on-duty time exceeds 60 hours within any 7 consecutive days, or 70 hours within 8 consecutive days if the motor carrier qualifies under the extended provision. These thresholds reset only after 34 or more consecutive hours off duty, excluding short-haul or other specified exceptions.
Limit TypeConstraint for Property-Carrying Drivers
Daily Driving LimitMaximum 11 hours after 10 consecutive hours off duty
On-Duty Window14 consecutive hours from start of duty period
Driving Break30 consecutive minutes after 8 hours of driving (may be on-duty/not driving)
Weekly On-Duty Limit60 hours in 7 days or 70 hours in 8 days; resets after 34 consecutive hours off duty

Rest and Restart Provisions

Property-carrying commercial motor vehicle drivers are required to take at least 10 consecutive hours off duty following a 14-hour on-duty period to restart the 14-hour driving window. This mandatory rest period ensures recovery from for solo long-haul operators, who must park and cease all on-duty activities, including vehicle movement, during this time. The sleeper berth provision allows drivers to split the 10-hour off-duty requirement into two segments totaling at least 10 hours: one period of at least 7 consecutive hours in the sleeper berth and another of at least 2 consecutive hours either off duty or in the sleeper berth. Neither segment counts toward the 14-hour limit, enabling drivers in property-hauling operations to alternate shifts and maintain continuous progress over long distances without fully halting the vehicle. This flexibility enhances for teams by permitting one driver to rest in the berth while the other drives, contrasting with solo drivers who lack such options and must accrue the full 10 hours consecutively outside the vehicle. To reset the weekly 60-hour (in 7 days) or 70-hour (in 8 days) on-duty limits, drivers may take 34 or more consecutive hours off duty, restarting the calculation period from zero. Amendments effective September 29, 2020, removed prior restrictions requiring the restart to span two midnight-to-midnight periods or limiting use to once per week, allowing more frequent application as needed for extended property hauls. For team operations, this provision supports sustained productivity by enabling coordinated rest resets, whereas solo drivers rely on it for periodic recovery after accumulating weekly hours.

Regulations for Passenger-Carrying Vehicles

Distinct Requirements

Regulations for drivers of passenger-carrying commercial motor vehicles impose a maximum of 10 hours of time following 8 consecutive hours off duty, stricter than the 11-hour driving limit applicable to property-carrying drivers. Drivers may not operate a after accumulating 15 hours of on-duty time following those 8 consecutive hours off duty, extending the duty window beyond the 14-hour consecutive period for property operations but calibrated to the reduced off-duty reset period. Upon completing a passenger-carrying run—defined as the operation of a vehicle transporting passengers—drivers must receive at least 8 consecutive hours off duty before operating any commercial motor vehicle, enforcing immediate rest to mitigate fatigue immediately following public exposure. This provision addresses elevated crash risks associated with passenger occupancy, where driver impairment can endanger multiple lives, as evidenced by FMCSA data linking fatigue to higher-severity incidents in bus operations. Weekly limits follow the standard 60 hours on in 7 consecutive days, or 70 hours in 8 consecutive days if the operates vehicles every day of , but passenger operations—particularly in and services—face amplified hazards from irregular, non-repeating schedules that disrupt circadian rhythms, prompting stricter adherence to the 60-hour cap in practice. These distinctions, codified in 49 CFR § 395.5, prioritize safeguards against errors in high-occupancy scenarios over the flexibility afforded to .

Integration with Property Rules

Passenger-carrying commercial motor vehicle (CMV) drivers follow the same record-keeping and logging requirements as property-carrying drivers under 49 CFR Part 395, including the use of electronic logging devices (ELDs) to track duty status since the 2017 mandate. This shared framework ensures uniform compliance verification across CMV types, preventing discrepancies in fatigue monitoring. Both categories also require a 30-minute break after 8 cumulative hours of driving, a provision extended to passenger operations in the 2020 HOS revisions to align rest protocols and reduce evasion opportunities. Weekly on-duty limits harmonize at 60 hours in 7 consecutive days for carriers operating daily or 70 hours in 8 days otherwise, with both allowing a 34-hour consecutive off-duty restart to reset the calculation period. Passenger rules incorporate this property-derived restart mechanism without override, promoting consistent long-term management while accommodating operational cycles. The adverse driving conditions exception further integrates by permitting up to 2 additional hours of and on-duty time for both, extending passenger limits to 12 driving hours within a 17-hour when unforeseen hazards like weather impede safe stopping. Post-2003 HOS reforms emphasized causal links between extended duty and crashes, leading to structural alignments that closed potential loopholes, such as clarifying CMV definitions to bar drivers from exploiting exemptions or vice versa. While daily limits diverge—10 driving hours and 15 on-duty hours for s versus 11 and 14 for —these shared elements ensure non-redundant enforcement focused on empirical risks. crashes, though lower in volume (213 fatal bus-involved crashes in 2022 versus 5,624 for large trucks), frequently cite as a factor at rates comparable to operations (10-20% involvement), validating the integrated approach's emphasis on verifiable over type-specific variances.

Compliance and Record-Keeping

Electronic Logging Devices

Electronic logging devices (ELDs) are mandated technologies designed to automate the recording of hours-of-service data for commercial motor vehicle (CMV) drivers subject to (FMCSA) regulations under 49 CFR Part 395. The ELD rule, published on December 16, 2015, requires motor carriers and drivers previously using paper records of duty status (RODS) to transition to ELDs, which synchronize with the vehicle's engine control module and (GPS) to capture real-time data on driving time, vehicle location, miles driven, and engine operation. This automation aims to produce tamper-resistant logs that reflect actual driver activity, applicable to property- and passenger-carrying CMVs operated interstate or intrastate where HOS rules apply. Mandatory compliance began on December 18, 2017, for most affected entities, with a phase-in period allowing continued use of grandfathered automatic onboard recording devices (AOBRDs) until their phase-out on December 16, 2019. ELDs must be certified by manufacturers against FMCSA technical specifications, registered on the agency's ELD list, and capable of transferring data to enforcement officials via USB, , or email during inspections. Key features include automatic duty status switching based on vehicle motion—driving mode activates at speeds over 5 —and real-time tracking of the 11-hour driving limit, 14-hour on-duty window, and 60/70-hour weekly caps. ELDs incorporate malfunction and tampering detection mechanisms, such as monitoring for data diagnostic events, unidentified driving records, and unauthorized edits, which trigger edit flags, user alerts, and unalterable logs for FMCSA review. FMCSA maintains that these features reduce the falsification rates estimated at 20-30% under paper systems, based on pre-mandate audits, thereby supporting causal links to fewer fatigue-related violations. Adoption has reached near-universal levels among regulated fleets by 2023, per FMCSA oversight data, though upfront costs—including hardware at $200-500 per unit, installation, and subscriptions—total around $500-1,000 per vehicle initially, offset by FMCSA-estimated annual savings of 20 driver hours from eliminated paperwork. Independent analyses confirm reduced administrative burdens but highlight variable net effects depending on fleet size and .

Manual Logging and Verification

Manual logging of hours of service involves the preparation of paper-based records of duty status () by commercial motor vehicle drivers exempt from (ELD) requirements but still obligated to track duty time under 49 CFR Part 395. These records document each 24-hour period's driving, on-duty not driving, off-duty, and sleeper berth time, using grid-format logs that drivers must keep current and retain copies of for the previous seven days while on duty. For short-haul operations within a 100 air-mile radius for property-carrying drivers (or 150 air-miles for others), full may be replaced by simpler time records, such as daily time cards indicating start and end times, total hours worked, and vehicle identification, provided drivers return to their work reporting location within the specified radius and do not exceed 12 hours on duty. Drivers must also prepare an 8-day recapitulation summarizing cumulative hours of service at the end of each such period to facilitate compliance checks. Verification of manual logs begins with the driver's personal responsibility to ensure accuracy, including via on each log entry, with falsification prohibited under 49 CFR 390.35. Motor carriers must retain these records for at least six months (or one year for certain supporting documents), conduct regular reviews for errors or inconsistencies, and maintain an process to verify adherence to hours of service limits. During FMCSA safety audits, carriers submit logs and supporting documents like toll receipts or fuel records for cross-verification against reported duty status. The shift to ELD mandates since December 2017 has significantly reduced reliance on methods, confining them largely to legacy or narrowly exempt cases. Pre-digital manual logging was susceptible to errors and intentional falsification, with FMCSA roadside indicating false reports of accounted for approximately 4.9% of violations from 2019 to 2023, often stemming from pressures to meet delivery deadlines. Historical analyses prior to widespread ELD adoption highlighted even higher risks of manipulation in paper logs, contributing to safety concerns that prompted regulatory reforms. Such vulnerabilities underscore the preference for automated systems in reducing non-compliance, though manual methods persist where exemptions apply.

Exceptions and Flexibility Measures

Adverse Conditions and Short-Haul Exemptions

The adverse driving conditions exception allows property-carrying drivers to extend their 14-hour on-duty window by up to 2 hours if unforeseen delays occur due to factors such as severe weather (e.g., snow, ice, fog, or heavy rain), unusual traffic congestion, or vehicle-related issues like construction or accidents that impede progress. This provision, codified in 49 CFR § 395.1(b), requires that the motor carrier could not have reasonably anticipated the conditions at the time of dispatch, and the extension applies only to the time lost to the adverse conditions, not preemptively. The 11-hour maximum driving time limit remains unchanged, as does the requirement for 10 consecutive hours off duty to reset the cycle, ensuring the exception addresses uncontrollable delays without compromising core fatigue safeguards. For passenger-carrying drivers, the exception similarly extends the 15-hour window by 2 hours but caps additional driving at 2 hours beyond the standard 10-hour limit. This exception can be combined with short-haul operations, permitting further flexibility for localized routes affected by temporary hazards, though documentation via logs or electronic logging devices (ELDs) must still reflect the actual conditions encountered. Short-haul exemptions provide relief for regional operations by exempting qualifying drivers from ELD mandates under 49 CFR § 395.8 and the 60/70-hour on-duty limits under § 395.11. Under the expanded provision effective January 2021, drivers operating property-carrying vehicles within a 150 air-mile radius (approximately 173 statute miles) of their normal work reporting location qualify if they return to that location within 14 consecutive hours, followed by at least 10 consecutive hours off duty. Employers must retain time records documenting the driver's arrival and departure times for the initial work period after each off-duty interval, typically in a format showing start/end times without full logs. A narrower exemption persists for operations strictly within a 100 air-mile radius with return within 12 consecutive hours, allowing exemption from logging without mandatory time records if daily returns to the same location are maintained. Qualifying short-haul drivers may invoke a one-time 16-hour on-duty extension once every 7 consecutive days (or after a restart), provided the operation remains within the 150 air-mile radius and no prior extension occurred in the preceding 6 days; this aligns with the exception's intent to accommodate peak demand without routine overuse. These measures prioritize verifiable daily returns and localized scope to minimize regulatory burden on non-long-haul fleets while preserving oversight through record-keeping.

Sleeper Berth and Team Driving Options

The sleeper berth provision enables drivers to satisfy the required 10 consecutive hours off duty by splitting it into two qualifying rest periods that do not count against the 14-hour on-duty window: at least 7 consecutive hours in the sleeper berth combined with at least 2 consecutive hours either off duty or in the sleeper berth. To qualify, the sleeper berth must comply with 49 CFR 393.76, including minimum interior dimensions sufficient for sleeping (typically at least 75 inches long, 24 inches wide, and 24 inches high for single occupancy, or adjusted for doubles), adequate , protection from exhaust fumes, heat, and fuel leaks, and secure mounting to prevent movement or intrusion from the driver's compartment. In team driving scenarios, this provision supports alternating shifts where one rests undisturbed in the qualified berth while the other operates the vehicle, permitting near-continuous movement over long distances without both drivers needing a simultaneous 10-hour restart. Each team member remains subject to the 11-hour daily driving limit and 60/70-hour weekly caps, but the split rest allows the team to extend operational windows by pausing the non-driving member's clock during berth time. The FMCSA amended the provision on December 7, 2020, effective September 29, 2020, to permit the 7/3-hour split (down from a rigid 8/2-hour requirement), offering drivers greater latitude to align rest with traffic patterns, delivery windows, or personal circadian preferences without reducing total rest time. This flexibility primarily aids team operations by enabling shorter primary rests that better match shift handoffs, with FMCSA's regulatory evaluation estimating operational benefits through reduced idle time, though a 2023 agency review found limited measurable gains in fleet utilization post-implementation.

Enforcement and Compliance Oversight

Inspection Processes

Roadside inspections for hours-of-service (HOS) compliance are conducted by (FMCSA) personnel, state enforcement officers, and partners under the Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance (CVSA) , primarily at weigh stations, checkpoints, or during random stops. These inspections verify adherence to HOS regulations through of driver credentials, records of duty status (), and electronic logging devices (ELDs), where applicable, to detect violations such as exceeding driving time limits or failing to observe rest periods. Inspectors prioritize HOS checks in driver-focused procedures, downloading ELD data via wireless web services or direct interfaces to review recent duty cycles, location tracking, and engine synchronization for accuracy. Inspections are categorized into levels, with HOS scrutiny integrated across driver-involved types: Level I (comprehensive driver/vehicle check), Level II (walk-around driver/vehicle), and Level III (driver/credentials only). In Level I and III, which comprise a significant portion of HOS-relevant stops, officers assess the , , and HOS records against FMCSA rules (49 CFR Part 395), cross-referencing ELD outputs or paper logs for the prior 7-8 days to identify patterns like the 14-hour rule breach or insufficient off-duty time. ELD downloads provide automated, tamper-resistant data, enabling rapid verification of driving time (up to 11 hours daily) and 60/70-hour weekly limits, supplanting manual log audits where ELDs are mandated for most interstate carriers since December 2017. Annually, FMCSA and partners conduct approximately 3 million roadside inspections, with HOS compliance forming a core focus in 20-30% of cases involving credential reviews, though exact proportions vary by and priorities. Violation detection relies predominantly on log and ELD analysis rather than subjective assessments, though inspectors may note behavioral indicators like yawning or erratic vehicle control as supplementary cues during stops. Emerging technologies, such as in-cab camera feeds if accessible, support data validation but are not standard in routine FMCSA procedures, emphasizing verifiable records over real-time physiological monitoring like infrared-based drowsiness detection, which remains experimental for . Violations of hours-of-service (HOS) regulations by commercial motor vehicle drivers, such as exceeding the 11-hour driving limit within a 14-hour on-duty window or surpassing the 60/70-hour weekly caps, often result in immediate out-of-service orders during roadside inspections if the exceedance is acute, like operating beyond the 14-hour window without required breaks. Drivers placed out-of-service must cease operations until they regain compliance through sufficient off-duty rest, typically 10 consecutive hours, to mitigate fatigue-related risks. Penalties for carriers include civil fines scaled by severity; non-egregious HOS violations carry maximums of up to $19,246 per instance as adjusted for inflation, while egregious cases—such as driving limits exceeded by three or more hours—can reach $16,000 or higher per offense, plus potential per-day penalties for continued non-compliance post-order. These infractions also elevate scores in the Hours-of-Service Behavioral Analysis and Safety Improvement Category () under the Compliance, Safety, Accountability () program, triggering carrier interventions like audits, warning letters, or downgraded safety fitness ratings if thresholds are breached. Elevated scores from repeated HOS violations often lead to higher premiums for carriers, as insurers factor in the increased risk implied by poor data. Longitudinal data from FMCSA analyses indicate that HOS violation rates remained stable or slightly increased post-2020 rule revisions, which introduced flexibilities like expanded sleeper-berth options, yet large crash involvement and fatalities showed no corresponding decline through -2022, per the agency's 2023 report to evaluating regulatory effects. This pattern suggests that while captured more violations amid electronic adoption, causal links to outcomes remain inconclusive, with external factors like pandemic-related waivers complicating trend attribution. In , out-of-service HOS violations occurred in approximately 26% of Level I inspections (225,648 out of 863,851), reflecting persistent challenges despite regulatory tweaks.

Economic and Productivity Consequences

Impacts on Trucking Efficiency

Hours-of-service (HOS) regulations cap driving at 11 hours within a 14-hour on-duty window, constraining overall output by limiting available driving time relative to potential operational capacity. Industry analyses estimate that these rules contribute to a 3-5% loss in , as drivers reach hour limits before completing optimal routes, reducing loaded miles per trip. This effect is evident in operational data showing motor experiencing declines following stricter HOS implementations, with over 80% reporting reduced due to inflexible scheduling. Detention times—periods when drivers wait at shippers or receivers without advancing freight—exacerbate HOS inefficiencies by depleting the 14-hour window on non-driving activities. In , the trucking sector incurred $11.5 billion in lost productivity from driver , with average dwell times exceeding 1.5 hours per stop, forcing carriers to idle resources and shorten subsequent segments. Such delays compound HOS constraints, as non-productive clock usage leaves less margin for en-route adjustments, effectively lowering miles per available hour and necessitating additional trucks to maintain freight velocity. These productivity shortfalls ripple through supply chains, elevating freight rates by 5-10% in affected segments to offset reduced throughput and imposing delays on just-in-time reliant on precise timing. For instance, prolonged dwell times increase per-load costs, with industry estimates linking detention-induced inefficiencies to broader economic losses exceeding $3 billion annually in direct expenses alone. Carriers respond by overhauling routes or expanding fleets, but HOS limits prevent full utilization, sustaining higher operational costs and constraining national freight capacity during peak demand.

Driver Retention and Supply Chain Effects

The inflexible nature of hours-of-service (HOS) regulations contributes to elevated driver turnover rates, which exceed 90% annually among large truckload carriers and approach 78% for smaller operations, as these rules impose rigid scheduling that disrupts work-life balance and fosters from prolonged periods away from home. This scheduling rigidity, by limiting drivers' control over rest and driving windows, reduces job appeal relative to pay, deterring retention despite competitive wages in a labor market where trucking demands extended isolation and variable routes. Such dynamics exacerbate the ongoing driver shortage, with the American Trucking Associations estimating a need for 1.1 million additional drivers to meet freight demands over the next decade, as HOS constraints lower overall and make the profession less viable for new entrants prioritizing lifestyle flexibility over earnings potential. The shortage, compounded by retirements and insufficient pipelines, stems partly from regulatory limits that cap weekly driving hours at 60-70, reducing effective output per driver and carrier, which in turn pressures fleets to cycle through personnel rapidly. These labor market strains propagate to the , where HOS-induced shortfalls—estimated at 3-5% for fleets—constrain during , elevating freight rates and times for the 72% of U.S. freight moved by . In 2021-2022, amid surging and port backlogs, the resulting bottlenecks amplified transportation costs, which rose 20-30% in spot rates, feeding broader inflationary pressures on as shippers faced and rerouting expenses. Economic analyses attribute billions in annual wage losses to drivers—ranging from $1.6 billion to $3.9 billion—from HOS caps that curtail compensable hours, indirectly hiking operational costs passed to consumers and straining just-in-time models.

Criticisms, Debates, and Alternatives

Questioned Safety Returns

A 2023 evaluation by the (FMCSA) of the 2020 hours-of-service (HOS) rule modifications, which relaxed certain provisions such as the short-haul exemption and adverse driving conditions flexibility, found no significant differences in crash or fatality rates compared to pre-change periods, despite an increase in HOS violation rates post-implementation. This outcome suggests that stricter HOS limits prior to 2020 did not demonstrably yield superior safety outcomes, as relaxation did not correlate with elevated crash risks. Similarly, an exploratory analysis of 2011 HOS revisions projected reductions in fewer than 4% of fatigue-related accidents, indicating marginal expected safety gains from regulatory tightening. Empirical data from the FMCSA's Large Truck Crash Causation Study (LTCCS), analyzing over 1,000 crashes from 2001-2003, identifies driver as a contributing factor in approximately 13% of large truck crashes, far below leading causes such as improper following distance or issues. Speeding, by contrast, features more prominently in crash attributions, with FMCSA analyses consistently ranking it among the top behavioral factors, often exceeding in prevalence. Proponents of stringent HOS rules, including FMCSA regulatory impact assessments, frequently rely on modeled projections of mitigation to justify benefits, estimating potential fatality reductions of 1-2% or less; however, post-rule real-world evaluations, such as the 2023 report, reveal neutral or insignificant effects on overall crash metrics. HOS regulations presuppose uniform fatigue thresholds across drivers, overlooking physiological variability in sleep needs, recovery rates, and circadian rhythms, which first-principles indicates can render blanket driving-hour caps ineffective or counterproductive for rested individuals. Tightened schedules under HOS constraints may exacerbate non-fatigue risks, such as speeding to meet delivery windows, thereby offsetting purported gains through induced behavioral adaptations rather than addressing root causal pathways in crashes. While agency models assume linear safety improvements from reduced , the absence of robust causal linkages in observational data underscores skepticism regarding overstated returns, particularly given 's secondary role relative to other empirically dominant factors.

Burdens of Overregulation

The mandate for electronic logging devices (ELDs), enforced by the (FMCSA) starting December 2017, has generated substantial administrative overhead for the trucking sector, with average annual costs per truck ranging from $165 to $832, or approximately $495 on average. Given the presence of over 3.5 million motor subject to hours-of-service (HOS) rules, these per-unit expenses to roughly $2 billion in recurring -wide compliance burdens, encompassing hardware, software subscriptions ($15–$60 monthly per truck), maintenance, and training. Small carriers and owner-operators, comprising a significant portion of the and operating with thinner margins, face amplified strain from these fixed costs, which divert resources from fleet maintenance or expansion and exacerbate for independent operators. HOS regulations' prescriptive structure imposes inflexibility that disadvantages efficient operators capable of adapting to real-time conditions, such as or , by enforcing uniform limits like the 14-hour on-duty window regardless of actual levels or route demands. This rigidity penalizes high-performing carriers through arbitrary downtime, while incentivizing workarounds like manipulation or inefficient to maximize allowable hours, as evidenced by persistent violations data post-reform. From a cost-benefit perspective, such rules distort signals that would otherwise reward operators prioritizing through voluntary , instead fostering a compliance-driven environment where safe, efficient practices yield no competitive edge. Empirical assessments of HOS reforms, including the updates and ELD rollout, link these changes to measurable declines, with analyses forecasting up to a 14% reduction in output for long-haul drivers constrained by shortened effective driving windows. Literature reviews indicate that tighter HOS constraints have historically curtailed transportation by limiting flexible scheduling, correlating with underutilized equipment and higher operational costs without proportional efficiency offsets. These burdens compound for small firms, where the administrative load of and enforcement diverts time from revenue-generating activities, amplifying economic drag across the .

Market-Based and Technological Solutions

Insurance providers have implemented incentive programs offering premium discounts to trucking fleets that voluntarily adopt for verifying rest compliance and monitoring safe behaviors, thereby encouraging management without regulatory mandates. Insurance's Haul program, for example, delivers discounts ranging from 3% to 15% based on telematics data evaluating individual driver safety performance. Performance-based pay models tie driver compensation to efficiency, safety records, and productivity metrics rather than fixed hourly caps, fostering self-regulation through economic rewards. Schneider National's intermodal operations, for instance, award higher performance pay to drivers achieving strong compliance with work schedules, consistent availability, and low incident rates, with earnings scaling according to these factors. Such structures, including sliding scales that adjust rates based on mileage thresholds or behavioral scores, have been adopted by carriers to attract and retain drivers motivated by output over time restrictions. Voluntary technological interventions, including AI-powered fatigue detection, enable real-time monitoring and alerts tailored to individual drivers' conditions. Lytx's Fatigue Detection AI, deployed in 2025, employs machine vision and algorithms to identify subtle drowsiness indicators like eye closure duration and head position, prompting immediate interventions and outperforming traditional self-reporting in pilot evaluations. Similarly, Fatigue Science's Readi platform, tested in a 2025 pilot across 155 Day & Ross drivers, used AI to predict fatigue risk from biometric and operational data, yielding measurable reductions in high-risk driving periods without enforced logging. Telematics systems adopted on a voluntary basis have demonstrated enhancements through feedback loops on patterns. A 2024 FMCSA-sponsored of telematics implementation confirmed improvements in safe behaviors, such as reduced harsh braking and acceleration, alongside better , with fleets reporting voluntary uptake leading to lower collision rates in participating vehicles. These outcomes suggest that carrier-driven adoption of such tools can achieve mitigation comparable to or exceeding mandated approaches, as pilots indicate up to 57% reductions in inefficient idling tied to rest mismanagement. Empirical analyses of trucking deregulation since the 1980 Motor Carrier Act reveal that market sustains levels without uniform federal hours limits, as firms differentiate via reputational incentives and customized practices. A study examining regulatory changes found no statistically significant deterioration in highway post-deregulation, attributing stability to intensified pressuring carriers to prioritize low-risk operations. Further documents substantial safety gains in the subsequent decades, including declining fatality rates, in deregulated interstate trucking relative to regulated baselines, supporting arguments for localized adaptations over centralized rules. Industry associations, such as the American Trucking Associations, endorse devolving authority to states for policies, citing evidence that competitive pressures yield innovations like advanced monitoring without productivity losses.

References

  1. [1]
    Hours of Service (HOS) | FMCSA - Department of Transportation
    Nov 10, 2021 · “Hours of service” refers to the maximum amount of time drivers are permitted to be on duty including driving time, and specifies number and ...Regulations · Hours of Service Examples · Interstate Truck Driver's Guide...
  2. [2]
    Summary of Hours of Service Regulations | FMCSA
    Mar 28, 2022 · Drivers must take a 30-minute break when they have driven for a period of 8 cumulative hours without at least a 30-minute interruption. The ...
  3. [3]
    49 CFR Part 395 -- Hours of Service of Drivers - eCFR
    A property-carrying commercial motor vehicle driver has at least 10 consecutive hours off-duty separating each 14 hours on-duty.Title 49 · 395.1 · Maximum driving time · 395.13
  4. [4]
    The Interesting History of Hours of Service Rules in the US
    Jul 21, 2020 · HOS rules were first issued in the US in 1937, when the Interstate Commerce Commission issued its first driver regulatons, which allowed 10 hours driving time.
  5. [5]
    (PDF) The impact of hours-of-service regulations on transportation ...
    Aug 7, 2025 · In the USA the evidence of the safety effectiveness of HOS regulations is mixed. Both positive and negative findings have been reported, in ...
  6. [6]
    Hours of service too rigid, Office of Advocacy tells DOT
    May 15, 2025 · The US Small Business Administration's Office of Advocacy recently told the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration that its hours of service are too rigid.Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  7. [7]
    Safety Advocates Sue DOT, Try to Invalidate New HOS Rules
    Oct 13, 2020 · In the lawsuit, advocates allege the new HOS rules will intensify the problem of trucker fatigue. Here's why & what's at stake.
  8. [8]
    What are “property-carrying” and “passenger-carrying” vehicles?
    Oct 4, 2024 · Any commercial motor vehicle (CMV) as defined in 390.5 that is not a “passenger-carrying” vehicle will be considered a “property-carrying” vehicle.
  9. [9]
    49 CFR § 390.3T General Applicability Question 24 | FMCSA
    Evidence of driving or being available for use in interstate commerce makes the driver subject to the FMCSRs for a 4-month period from the date of the proof.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  10. [10]
    Trucking Industry - Highway Driving: Interstate and Intrastate - OSHA
    FMCSR Guidance: Interstate commerce is determined by the essential character of the movement, manifested by the shipper's fixed and persistent intent at the ...<|separator|>
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Drowsy Driving and Automobile Crashes - NHTSA
    this finding to the effect of sleep loss on reaction time. NHTSA figures show that most drowsiness- or fatigue-related crashes occur on higher speed roads ...
  12. [12]
    How Tired is Too Tired to Drive? A Systematic Review Assessing the ...
    Apr 4, 2023 · It appears that there is a notable decrease in driving performance (and associated increase in crash likelihood) when less than 5h prior sleep is obtained.
  13. [13]
    Hours of Service of Drivers - Federal Register
    Jan 24, 2005 · The ICC rule required motor carriers to provide drivers 9 consecutive hours off duty—a schedule that would have maintained circadian rhythms.<|separator|>
  14. [14]
    Fatigue, Hours of Service, and Highway Safety - NCBI
    Truck driver fatigue was found to be associated with 13 percent of the crashes (Starnes, 2006). This means that one of the drivers involved was found to be ...
  15. [15]
    Drowsy Driving - California Office of Traffic Safety
    According to the Governors Highway Safety Association (GHSA), 10 to 20 percent of large truck or bus crashes involved a tired driver. Signs of Driver Fatigue.
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Effects of HOS Regulations 2021-Report-Final May 2023
    The data do not show a significant difference in crash or fatality rates, although it is important to note that initial trends may have been confounded by the ...Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
  17. [17]
    FMCSA: Data Shows Little Effect from 2020 Hours of Service Changes
    Jun 16, 2023 · On the other hand, FMCSA found that the monthly truck crash rate moved but slightly, moving from 5.58 to 5.70, and the monthly large truck ...Missing: fatigue | Show results with:fatigue
  18. [18]
    An exploratory study of hours of service and its safety impact on ...
    Truck drivers are limited by hours of service regulations that recently changed. The change was predicted to reduce less than 4% of fatigue-caused accidents.
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Evaluation of the Impact of Changes in the Hours of Service ...
    Site visits to Florida and California to identify safety problems associated with extended and more liberal intrastate hours of service rules proved negative.
  20. [20]
    Hours of Service of Drivers; Driver Rest and Sleep for Safe Operations
    May 2, 2000 · The FMCSA is proposing to revise its hours-of-service (HOS) regulations to require motor carriers to provide drivers with better opportunities to obtain sleep.
  21. [21]
    Hours of Service Rules - Its History and the Latest Proposed Changes
    Oct 30, 2019 · The Earliest HOS Regulations Were Enacted Nearly One Hundred Years Ago! · The 24-hour Framework was Replaced With a Rotation Schedule in 1962.
  22. [22]
    Hours of Service Timeline: The Long, Convoluted History of Truck ...
    Jul 14, 2020 · 1937. The Interstate Commerce Commission issues its first hours of service rule. It allowed 10 hours driving time, 8 hours off duty, 60/70 hours ...
  23. [23]
    FMCSA Rules History & Revisions to Hours of Service - Geotab
    ... driver will be a safer driver. The first Hours of Service Rules for the U.S. were established in 1937. They were enforced starting in 1938, and by 1939 ...
  24. [24]
    Where Did the Hours of Service Rules Come From, Anyway?
    Mar 15, 2018 · HOS rules were created in 1930 and would remain fundamentally unchanged until 1995, when Congress directed the DOT to establish a new set rules ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] U.S. motor carrier hours of service regulations
    Apr 1, 2013 · This paper discusses the history of hours of service regulations for U.S. motor carriers and investigates the changes to individual carrier ...Missing: 1960s- 1980s
  26. [26]
    Revised Hours-of-Service Rule to Help Ensure Truck Drivers Get ...
    Apr 24, 2003 · The new rules allow drivers to drive 11 hours after 10 consecutive hours off-duty. Also, drivers may not drive beyond the 14th hour after coming ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] United States Court of Appeals
    Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge BROWN. In this case we consider two challenges to the 2011. Hours of Service (HOS) rule issued by the Federal Motor.
  28. [28]
    Hours of Service of Drivers; Amendment of the 30-Minute Rest Break ...
    Oct 28, 2013 · The FMCSA amends its December 27, 2011, final rule entitled “Hours of Service of Drivers” to provide an exception from the 30-minute rest break ...
  29. [29]
    Hours of Service of Drivers - Federal Register
    Jun 1, 2020 · FMCSA revises the hours of service (HOS) regulations to provide greater flexibility for drivers subject to those rules without adversely affecting safety.<|control11|><|separator|>
  30. [30]
    Hours of Service Drivers Final Rule | FMCSA
    Jul 23, 2020 · FMCSA revises the hours of service (HOS) regulations to provide greater flexibility for drivers subject to those rules without adversely affecting safety.
  31. [31]
    FMCSA Removes Five Electronic Logging Devices from Registered ...
    Oct 17, 2025 · Beginning December 16, 2025, motor carriers who continue to use the revoked devices listed above will be considered as operating without an ELD.Missing: phase- 2023
  32. [32]
  33. [33]
    Enhanced Carrier Safety Measurement System (SMS)
    Nov 20, 2024 · FMCSA announces enhancements to the Safety Measurement System (SMS) used to identify motor carriers for safety interventions and addresses comments received.
  34. [34]
    Drug & Alcohol Clearinghouse - Department of Transportation
    An online database that gives employers and government agencies real-time access to information about CDL driver drug and alcohol program violations.FMCSA Clearinghouse FAQ · Before You Register · Contact Us · Learning CenterMissing: HOS | Show results with:HOS
  35. [35]
    What You Need to Know About the Clearinghouse II Roll Out by ...
    Oct 3, 2024 · As of September 2024, over 250,000 CDL drivers have been reported to the Clearinghouse for a drug or alcohol violation. 177,092 of those drivers ...
  36. [36]
    FMCSA: HOS Violations Rise After Rule Change - TT
    May 17, 2023 · The pre-rule-change driver inspections with one or more HOS violations changed from 7.6% to an 8.5% rate for the post-change driver percentage, ...
  37. [37]
    49 CFR 395.3 -- Maximum driving time for property-carrying vehicles.
    Drivers need 10 hours off before starting, can drive 11 hours within 14 hours on duty, and must have a 30-minute break after 8 hours driving. 60/70 hour limits ...
  38. [38]
    Pros & Cons of Team Truck Driving - Trux Parking
    Jan 17, 2025 · Under the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration regulations, drivers can be on duty for 11 hours followed by 10 hours of rest – with team ...
  39. [39]
    The complete guide to Hours of Service - Samsara
    Feb 27, 2025 · The 34-hour restart rule gives drivers the opportunity to reset their 60-hour or 70-hour clocks back to zero. Drivers can take advantage of the ...
  40. [40]
    [PDF] Interstate Passenger Carrying Driver's Guide to Hours of Service
    At this point, the adverse driving conditions exception would allow you to drive for up to 4 more hours (2 hours to get to. 10 and 2 extra hours due to the fog) ...
  41. [41]
    Large Truck and Bus Crash Facts 2022 | FMCSA
    Oct 10, 2025 · This annual edition of Large Truck and Bus Crash Facts contains descriptive statistics about fatal, injury, and property damage only crashes ...Introduction · Data Sources · Vehicles
  42. [42]
    Summary - Commercial Motor Vehicle Driver Fatigue, Long ... - NCBI
    Approximately 4,000 fatalities result from crashes involving trucks and buses in the United States each year. Although estimates are wide-ranging, 10 to 20 ...
  43. [43]
    Electronic Logging Devices | FMCSA - Department of Transportation
    Oct 2, 2023 · An ELD synchronizes with a vehicle engine to automatically record driving time, for easier, more accurate hours of service (HOS) recording.ELD Rule · ELD Fact Sheet - English... · (ELD) Exemptions · About ELDs
  44. [44]
    49 CFR Part 395 Subpart B -- Electronic Logging Devices (ELDs)
    A motor carrier required to use an ELD must use only an ELD that is listed on the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration's registered ELDs list.
  45. [45]
    Who must comply with the electronic logging device (ELD) rule?
    The ELD rule applies to most motor carriers and drivers who are currently required to maintain records of duty status (RODS) per Part 395, 49 CFR 395.8(a).
  46. [46]
    General Information about the ELD Rule | FMCSA
    Apr 9, 2018 · Beginning on December 18, 2017, a driver using an ELD must have an ELD information packet onboard the commercial motor vehicle (CMV) containing ...
  47. [47]
    ELD List - fmcsa eld - Department of Transportation
    The AT ELD monitors its compliance with the technical requirements and detects malfunctions and data inconsistencies and keeps records of its malfunction and ...
  48. [48]
    ELD Fact Sheet - English Version | FMCSA
    All motor carriers and drivers subject to the ELD rule must use either an ELD or an AOBRD (automatic onboard recording device) by the “compliance date” ( ...
  49. [49]
    [PDF] Electronic Logging Devices (ELDs) Test Procedures
    Dec 16, 2015 · The ELD will be tamper-resistant so unauthorized alteration of the captured data will not occur. ELDs, certified by the providers, will meet or ...
  50. [50]
    [PDF] the electronic logging devices oversight report to congress
    Apr 19, 2023 · in net benefits of $1.174 million. To date, FMCSA's knowledge of ELD costs and benefits aligns with these estimates. Page 3. 3. Effectiveness.
  51. [51]
    [PDF] Electronic Logging Devices and Hours of Service Supporting ...
    Sets ELD performance and design standards, and requires ELDs to be certified and registered with FMCSA. • Establishes what supporting documents drivers and ...
  52. [52]
    6.4.4 Driver's Record of Duty Status (RODS) (395.8) - fmcsa/csa
    Drivers must record duty status for each 24-hour period, keep logs current, and submit paper logs within 13 days, retaining a copy for 7 days. Carriers must ...Missing: manual | Show results with:manual
  53. [53]
    Who is exempt from the ELD rule? | FMCSA
    Drivers who use the short-haul, timecard exceptions are not required to keep records of duty status (RODS) or use ELDs.
  54. [54]
    Driver's Records of Duty (RODs) and Supporting Documentation
    During a Safety Audit, motor carriers may be asked to submit documents supporting the driver's record of duty. Such documents can include any of the following: ...Missing: exemptions | Show results with:exemptions
  55. [55]
    How carriers can identify log falsification - FreightWaves
    Apr 10, 2023 · According to FMCSA data from 2019 to 2023, “a false report of driver's record of duty status” accounted for 4.9% of all roadside inspection ...
  56. [56]
    Historic FMCSA E-Logging Rule Met With Immediate Challenge In ...
    Dec 18, 2015 · Truck drivers historically kept track of their hours on paper logbook records, creating concerns about fraud and manipulation of the records ...Missing: rates | Show results with:rates
  57. [57]
    False Logs Still Top Out-Of-Service Driver Violations | CNS
    Jun 21, 2022 · 2018: 3.25% of OOS violations were for false logs; 2019: 4.16% of OOS violations were for false logs; 2020: 4.58% of OOS violations were for ...
  58. [58]
    How may a driver utilize the adverse driving conditions exception or ...
    Drivers who are dispatched after the motor carrier has been notified or should have known of adverse driving conditions are not eligible for the two hours ...
  59. [59]
    May a truck driver use the adverse driving conditions exception if he ...
    May a truck driver use the adverse driving conditions exception if he/she has accumulated driving time and on-duty (not driving) time, that would put the driver ...
  60. [60]
    Hours-of-service exemptions and exceptions. - Motive
    Passenger-carrying drivers can drive a maximum of 10 hours per shift. The adverse driving conditions exemption extends the 10 hours of drive time to 12 hours.2. The 16-Hour Short-Haul... · 3. Adverse Driving... · 4. Direct Emergency...
  61. [61]
    May the adverse driving conditions exception be used in concert ...
    Q: May the adverse driving conditions exception be used in concert with the revised short-haul provisions? A: Yes. However, if the adverse driving condition ...
  62. [62]
    FMCSA Hours of Service: The 100/150 Air Mile Exemptions - Foley
    Dec 2, 2024 · Operate within 100 air miles · Go off duty within 12 hours · Report back to the same work location every day · Have at least 10 consecutive hours ...
  63. [63]
    Understanding the FMCSA 16-hour rule: A complete guide for short ...
    Aug 4, 2025 · The FMCSA 16-hour rule lets qualifying short-haul drivers extend their workday from 14 to 16 hours once per week.
  64. [64]
    What rest periods qualify for the split sleeper berth provision? | FMCSA
    Truck drivers using the split sleeper berth provision under the hours-of- service (HOS) rule may take a period of at least 7-consecutive hours in the sleeper ...
  65. [65]
    49 CFR 393.76 -- Sleeper berths. - eCFR
    A sleeper berth must be located so that it will not be overheated or damaged by reason of its proximity to the vehicle's exhaust system. (h) Occupant restraint.
  66. [66]
    5.1.11 Sleeper Berths (393.76) - fmcsa/csa
    Sleeper berths must meet minimum dimension and installation guidelines. Sleeper berths must be adequately ventilated, and located so that occupants are ...Missing: provision current
  67. [67]
    How many hours can team drivers drive? - Motive
    Under the provision, one driver on a team can drive for 10 hours while the second driver obtains a full daily rest period without having to stay in the sleeper ...
  68. [68]
    Significant HOS change: FMCSA's 2020 split-sleeper provisions
    Jan 1, 2025 · Before September 29, 2020, when the new rule went into effect, the rule only allowed drivers to split the daily required 10-hour off-duty break ...
  69. [69]
    [PDF] Regulatory Evaluation of the 2020 Hours of Service Final Rule
    window, and thus FMCSA does not believe that the rule would negatively impact safety. ... of wakefulness and duty hours that could lead to fatigue-related crashes ...
  70. [70]
    All Inspection Levels - CVSA – Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance
    As a minimum, Level II Inspections must include examination of: driver's license; Medical Examiner's Certificate and Skill Performance Evaluation (SPE) ...
  71. [71]
    Electronic Logging Devices and Hours of Service Supporting ...
    Dec 16, 2015 · For the purposes of HOS enforcement, FMCSA requires all ELDs to record location in a way that provides an accuracy of approximately a 1-mile ...
  72. [72]
    DOT Inspection Levels 1-6 Explained - Lytx
    Level 1 involves a thorough 37-step procedure that checks both the driver and the vehicle, as well as any illegal cargo.
  73. [73]
    Level VIII Electronic Inspection FAQs - General - CVSA
    May 17, 2024 · Currently, roughly 3 million roadside inspections are conducted annually. ... number of inspections on interstate motor carriers has ...<|separator|>
  74. [74]
    Roadside Inspection Activity - A&I online
    This report is a breakdown of roadside inspection activity and can be filtered by fiscal or calendar year, carrier domicile, vehicle type, and geographic area ...All Violations · OOS Rates · By Level · By Fleet Size
  75. [75]
    Driver Fatigue and Distraction Monitoring and Warning System ...
    Feb 11, 2016 · A driver fatigue and distraction monitoring and warning system that provides reliable detection and warning of driver fatigue and distraction.
  76. [76]
    6.4.5 Drivers Declared Out-of-Service (395.13) - fmcsa/csa
    A driver is not permitted to drive after being on duty in excess of the maximum periods permitted, as detailed in 49 CFR 395.13.Missing: criteria | Show results with:criteria
  77. [77]
    Common driver and HOS violations. - Motive
    Common violations include operating past 14 hours, exceeding 60/70 hour limits, no record of duty status, false logs, and wrong class license.Missing: criteria | Show results with:criteria
  78. [78]
    DOT Hours Of Service Fines For Violations In 2025
    Sep 29, 2025 · In 2025, FMCSA can impose hours of service fines up to $19246 per violation for most non‑recordkeeping HOS violations against carriers.
  79. [79]
    DOT Fines for Hours of Service Violations - HOS247
    Mar 17, 2025 · Egregious violations (exceeding driving limits by more than three hours). Fines may reach up to $16,000 according to current FMCSA guidelines.Missing: maximum | Show results with:maximum
  80. [80]
    A guide to ELD violations and fines - Motive
    In this guide, we take an in-depth look at the true “cost” of ELD violations, their impact on CSA scores, how you can avoid ELD violations, and more.
  81. [81]
    Understanding Penalties for Hours of Service Violations
    Dec 13, 2024 · Employers or carriers can face fines ranging from $1,000 to over $16,000 per violation, depending on the severity and nature (e.g., ...
  82. [82]
    The Impact of Violating FMCSA and DOT Regulations - Simply Fleet
    Jul 15, 2025 · For example, exceeding hours of service limits can result in fines of up to $16,000 per offense, while failing to maintain proper drug and ...
  83. [83]
    FMCSA to Congress: Impacts of 2020 HOS changes inconclusive so ...
    May 10, 2023 · While HOS violations are up, crashes and fatalities are mostly flat, FMCSA said -- drawing no conclusions due to COVID waivers and more.
  84. [84]
    [PDF] 2023 - Pocket Guide to Large Truck and Bus Statistics
    *Out-of-service (OOS) violation numbers are based on inspections. For example, in. 2021, there were 863,851 Level I inspections completed, 225,648 resulted ...
  85. [85]
    Hours of Service Rules Affect Brokers, Too - DAT Freight & Analytics
    In comparison, the industry-wide loss of productivity for carriers is estimated in the 3-5% range. That means the carriers are “eating” about half of the ...
  86. [86]
    ATRI Survey Suggests Hours Of Service Rules - HorizonGO
    Drivers have less “off-peak” flexibility. Motor Carriers overwhelmingly (over 80%) say that they have had productivity losses since the rules went into effect.
  87. [87]
    Truck Driver Detention Study Shows Some Improvement
    Sep 10, 2024 · As a result, the trucking industry lost $3.6 billion in direct expenses and $11.5 billion in lost productivity from driver detention in 2023.
  88. [88]
    Impact of Driver Detention Time on Safety and Operations | FMCSA
    A 2018 OIG study concluded that detention time reduces annual earnings of for-hire commercial motor vehicle drivers in the truckload sector by more than $1 ...
  89. [89]
    The Clock is Ticking on Dwell, Detention, and Slack Time
    Iowa State University conducted a study, published back in 2015, and found that an average dwell time of two hours increases the freight rate for every load ...
  90. [90]
    Impact of Driver Detention Time on Safety and Operations
    Feb 16, 2024 · The comments explained that detention time causes supply chain issues, impacts efficiency, and reduces time available to make additional ...
  91. [91]
    The Impact of Driver Turnover: Why Truck Driver Retention Matters
    Dec 18, 2024 · Turnover rates for large truckload carriers hover around 90%, and smaller carriers experience turnover rates for truck drivers of close to 78%.
  92. [92]
    America's Truck Driver Shortage: Causes, Impact, and Solutions
    Feb 28, 2025 · Long-haul trucking has a turnover rate of over 90% in large companies. ... Understanding DOT Hours of Service (HOS) Rules: Truck Driver's Ultimate ...
  93. [93]
    Win the truck driver retention battle with technology - Geotab
    Aug 26, 2025 · Driver turnover crisis: The trucking industry faces a 94% turnover rate, with a projected shortage of 162,000 drivers by 2030, ...
  94. [94]
    [PDF] Truck driver shortage analysis 2019 - American Trucking Associations
    Regulations: Most of the time, regulations - like changes to truck driver hours-of-service - reduce industry productivity. Reductions in productivity exacerbate ...
  95. [95]
    ATA Releases Updated Driver Shortage Report and Forecast
    Jul 23, 2025 · In order to meet the nation's freight demand, the report says the trucking industry will need to hire 1.1 million new drivers over the next ...
  96. [96]
    HOS Rules Cost Drivers Billions in Wages
    Jun 24, 2025 · The HOS rules reduced fleet productivity by 3% to 5% and drivers lost between $1.6 billion to $3.9 billion in wages as a result of the ...
  97. [97]
    Heavy and Tractor-trailer Truck Drivers - Bureau of Labor Statistics
    Employment of heavy and tractor-trailer truck drivers is projected to grow 4 percent from 2024 to 2034, about as fast as the average for all occupations. About ...
  98. [98]
    Report to Congress on the Large Truck Crash Causation Study
    Roadway problems were present in 16 percent of the two-vehicle cases, and adverse weather conditions were present in approximately 13 percent of the crashes.
  99. [99]
    Large Truck and Bus Crash Facts 2021 | FMCSA
    Nov 4, 2024 · In 2021, 33 percent of work zone fatal crashes and 15 percent of work zone injury crashes involved at least one large truck. There were ...
  100. [100]
    [PDF] MOTOR CARRIER SAFETY Additional Research Standards ... - GAO
    Jul 29, 2015 · This report focuses on commercial interstate and intrastate hazardous material trucks that transport freight. These hours of service (HOS) rules ...
  101. [101]
    "The impact of hours-of-service regulations on transportation ...
    A chronic shortage of truck drivers coupled with new HOS regulations could further aggravate the driver recruitment and retention problems. In addition, due to ...Missing: criticisms overstated gains<|control11|><|separator|>
  102. [102]
    [PDF] Impact of Truck Drivers' General Health and Fatigue on Truck Crashes
    Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA)'s. Large Truck Crash Causation Study findings: • 13% of all large truck crashes: Truck drivers' fatigue was ...
  103. [103]
    Trucking Insurance Rates and the ELD Mandate
    May 6, 2018 · The average annual cost of an ELD is $495 per truck, with a total range of $165 to $832 per truck on an annualized basis.
  104. [104]
    The Complete Guide to the ELD Mandate | RTSinc
    The FMCSA has estimated that an ELD could cost anywhere from $165 to $832 per year, per truck. RTS Financial's partner, Transflo, offers two types of electronic ...
  105. [105]
    Understanding ELD Cost per Truck and Its Impact on Operations
    Apr 8, 2025 · The most visible ongoing expense is the monthly subscription fee. This typically ranges from $15 to $60 per truck monthly. Monthly fees ...
  106. [106]
    Impact of Overregulation in Trucking on Truckers - Bloom Services
    One of the biggest impacts of overregulation in trucking is the added cost. Truckers are required to invest in new equipment, technology, and training to meet ...Missing: small firms
  107. [107]
    Challenges of Hours-of-Service Regulations for Drivers
    Challenges include restrictive time limits, reduced flexibility, increased costs, limited earnings, and the strain on supply chains due to HOS regulations.
  108. [108]
    Hours of service, speed limiters, more among truckers' deregulatory ...
    May 9, 2025 · Various aspects of the hours-of-service rules were identified by commenters as needing change, including the 14-hour on-duty daily maximum, the 30-minute-break ...Missing: overregulation firms
  109. [109]
    Trucking Regulations: Hours-of-Service Battle Not Over Yet
    Controversy over new hours-of-service rules for the trucking industry was hot and prolonged prior to passage of new regulations last summer.
  110. [110]
    7 Safety Features to Save Money on Insurance Premiums - FTSGPS
    Feb 5, 2020 · For instance, Progressive offers discounts from 3% to 15% through their Smart Haul program. The data used helps assess how safe an individual ...2) Fleet Dashcams · 4) Lane Departure Warning · 7) Gps Fleet Tracking
  111. [111]
    Schneider's Intermodal truck driver pay: Regional vs. Local
    Performance pay rewards drivers for efficiency and overall safety. Drivers earn higher performance pay through work time compliance, overall days worked, and ...
  112. [112]
    Guide to Trucking Payments: How Do Truckers Get Paid?
    Dec 18, 2023 · Sliding scale pay adjusts driver compensation rates based on predetermined mileage thresholds or performance criteria. In other words, you ...
  113. [113]
    Lytx Unveils Fatigue Detection AI Technology
    Jul 28, 2025 · The new Fatigue Detection AI technology is meant to help fleets detect early signs of driver fatigue using machine vision, AI, and human review.
  114. [114]
    Fatigue Science makes platform available to trucking companies
    Sep 30, 2025 · The pilot tested the effectiveness of Fatigue Science's AI-powered fatigue prediction system Readi across 155 Day & Ross drivers. Day & Ross ...
  115. [115]
    Study of the Impact of a Telematics System on Safe and Fuel ...
    May 30, 2024 · Outcomes. The contractor submitted a final reportconfirming that there are safety benefits associated with driving behavior that optimizes fuel ...Missing: voluntary | Show results with:voluntary
  116. [116]
    Can A Telematics Pilot Improve Your Fuel Costs & Safety ...
    Overall, the net results were a 57% improvement in non-productive engine idling over the course of the 12-month pilot. A major benefit to telematics is the ...Missing: voluntary | Show results with:voluntary
  117. [117]
    Economic regulation and highway safety in the trucking industry
    An appeal to empirical evidence suggests that these factors netted out, and regulatory change did not have a statistically significant effect on highway safety.
  118. [118]
    [PDF] Deregulation and Safety: Experiences from the United States
    The trucking industry has also seen a substantial improvement in safety in the years since interstate deregulation with the 1980 Motor Carrier Act. As shown in ...