Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Canting arms

Canting arms, also known as armes parlantes in French, Sprechende Wappen in German, or armas parlantes in Spanish, are coats of arms designed as visual puns or rebuses that allude to the bearer's name, title, occupation, estate, or other attributes through their blazon or heraldic description. These devices were particularly valued in medieval heraldry for their mnemonic qualities in an era of low literacy, serving as identifiable emblems akin to modern logos while incorporating contemporary humor through wordplay. Originating in by the , canting arms became widespread among and kingdoms, with estimates suggesting they comprise 20–25% of all medieval heraldic devices, and even higher proportions in Germanic regions. Their popularity stemmed from the rise of hereditary surnames and the need for quick visual recognition in tournaments, battles, and seals, often reflecting linguistic shifts or regional dialects. In , following the 1696 edict on armorial registrations, many new arms were deliberately assigned punning designs to generate fees, further proliferating the style. While common across , , , , and , interpretations could become obscure over time due to obsolete words or unfamiliar languages, leading to some lost meanings. Canting arms vary in complexity, from simple designs featuring a single charge—like the Kingdom of Castile's gules, a or (pun on "castillo," for ) or the Kingdom of León's , a purpure (pun on "león," for )—to composite rebuses combining multiple elements, such as the de Lucy family's depiction of a (alluding to "lus" or luce, an old term for ). More intricate examples include the Quatremayne arms (, a fess between four hands, playing on "quatre mains" or "four hands" in ) or regional styles like Anglo-Norman arms emphasizing the full (e.g., Arches with three arches) versus Germanic ones often using partial name elements or indirect symbols (e.g., Wuerfel with dice). Other variations encompass field-only cants based on tinctures (e.g., quarterly and for Blanc de Simiane, punning on "white and "), heraldic terminology , or allusions to attributes beyond names, such as Pierre Pépin's , three grape stones (referencing "pépin," for grape seed). These elements highlight the playful yet functional nature of in encapsulating identity within the rigid conventions of .

Definition and Principles

Definition

Canting arms are heraldic bearings that incorporate visual puns, rebus-like elements, or symbolic representations playing on the bearer's name, title, or attributes, such as a depiction of foxes to evoke the surname "Fox." These designs function as visual rebuses, where the arrangement of charges and tinctures directly alludes to the holder's identity through phonetic, visual, or etymological associations, distinguishing them from the more abstract or conventional symbolism found in other heraldic devices. The term "" derives from the Latin cantare, meaning "to sing" or "to speak," reflecting the punning or "speaking" quality of these , as if they or proclaim the bearer's name. In , they are known as armes parlantes ("speaking "), emphasizing this verbal allusion. At their core, are structured through combinations of charges—heraldic symbols like animals, objects, or geometric forms—that collectively evoke the referenced name, often categorized as simple (a single charge), composite (multiple related charges), or complex (indirect allusions via sound or meaning). This rebus-like composition ensures the arms serve both as identifiers and mnemonic devices within the practice of .

Principles of Design

Canting arms rely on the core principle of incorporating charges—heraldic symbols such as animals, objects, or geometric forms—that phonetically, visually, or symbolically mimic components of the bearer's name, thereby creating a punning within the . This design approach leverages the of to encode personal identity, ensuring the emblem serves both as a mnemonic device and an artistic expression. Heraldic conventions are adapted for canting arms by requiring all punning elements to remain identifiable and precisely blazonable, meaning they must be describable using standardized heraldic without . Charges selected for their punning value must adhere to fundamental rules like the rule—no metal upon metal or color upon color—to maintain visual clarity and contrast, while avoiding designs that introduce excessive complexity or non-traditional elements that could hinder recognition. Overly obscure puns are discouraged, as they risk violating the clarity essential to heraldic identifiability, ensuring the arms can be accurately reproduced and distinguished in various . The types of wordplay in canting arms encompass allusive, , and paronomastic forms, each employing distinct mechanisms to integrate into the design. Allusive wordplay involves indirect references, where charges evoke broader associations or attributes linked to the name rather than a direct pictorial match, allowing for symbolic depth while preserving heraldic simplicity. wordplay, in contrast, functions as a pictorial pun by combining visual elements to represent name components literally, such as through the arrangement of objects or figures that together form a rebus-like solvable in heraldic terms; this type often prioritizes a or unified charge for balance. Paronomastic wordplay relies on sound-alikes or phonetic similarities, incorporating charges whose names in heraldic echo the bearer's , thereby embedding the pun within the descriptive language itself rather than solely in the visual composition. Despite their playful nature, canting arms face limitations to ensure they do not undermine the practical functionality of armorial bearings, particularly for identification in or official contexts. Designs must strike a between witty and adherence to , avoiding puns that rely on , dialectal, or foreign linguistic elements that could obscure meaning over time or across regions. Furthermore, the emphasis on simplicity prevents overcrowding with multiple punning charges, which might compromise the emblem's distinctiveness and reproducibility.

Historical Development

Origins in Heraldry

Canting arms, known as armes parlantes in , emerged in the 12th and 13th centuries across as a form of visual within the nascent system of , where charges on a alluded to the bearer's name or title. This development coincided with the broader rise of during the (circa 1147–1291), a period when knights required distinctive identifiers on shields, surcoats, and seals amid the chaos of armored combat and tournaments. The practice reflected the medieval penchant for puns and rebuses, aiding in low-literacy societies where heraldic designs served as for . The influence of medieval played a pivotal role in the adoption of canting arms, as hereditary surnames began solidifying among the in the , often derived from occupations, locations, or personal traits that lent themselves to pictorial representations. For instance, Anglo-Norman elites, who pioneered many early heraldic innovations, frequently incorporated elements echoing these surnames into their arms, transforming abstract names into memorable visual emblems. By the 13th century, an estimated 20–25% of heraldic devices employed such canting elements, particularly in regions like and where feudal hierarchies emphasized clear lineage and status. Key early adopters were the of and , where canting arms appeared in some of the oldest surviving rolls of arms, such as the Armorial Wijnbergen (c. 1270–1280), a documenting vassals' shields under Louis IX and Philip III. This roll exemplifies the integration of canting motifs in official records, showcasing how used them to evoke family names amid the proliferation of hereditary arms. In the cultural of the era, heraldry's utility in tournaments and on underscored the value of arms for instant recognition; during jousts or battles, a punning design could swiftly convey a knight's identity to allies and foes alike, reinforcing social and martial bonds in medieval . bearing these arms on legal documents further embedded elements in administrative practices, ensuring their memorability in feudal .

Evolution and Usage

Following their emergence in medieval , canting arms expanded significantly during the post-medieval period, particularly from the 14th to 16th centuries, as fostered an appreciation for intellectual wordplay and visual puns in art and symbolism. In , this coincided with the era's heraldic proliferation, where the , incorporated in 1484, oversaw numerous grants that often incorporated canting elements to reflect family names or occupations, such as arrows for the family denoting arrow-makers. Across , an estimated 20-25% of armorial bearings featured such allusions, with their prevalence linked to the growing use of hereditary surnames amid feudal expansion. Regional variations in canting styles emerged distinctly during this era. In Germanic heraldry, designs tended toward literal rebuses, such as dice (Würfel) for the Würfel family or a deer on a mountain (Hirschberg) for Hirschberg, emphasizing direct visual representations of name components. English and Anglo-Norman arms favored phonetic or whole-name cants, like three arches for Arches or trumpets for , with about 60% of 13th-14th century examples using complete name allusions and simpler animal or object charges. , by contrast, employed subtler, more complex rebuses, such as grape stones (pépins) for Pierre Pépin or fleurs-de-lis evoking "lis" (lily) for names like , often integrating layered puns that aligned with the era's sophisticated courtly culture. The practice declined from the 17th to 19th centuries amid broader shifts in toward standardization and reduced societal emphasis. The ' heraldic visitations, conducted between 1530 and 1688, required families to register and prove ancient arms, limiting the creation of new punning designs and favoring inherited, non-allusive coats to avoid challenges. This formalization, coupled with the "" period's artistic stagnation and waning chivalric interest, led to a steady diminishment in the perceived value and innovation of overall, including canting elements. In the 20th and 21st centuries, canting arms experienced a revival, particularly in personal, corporate, and institutional contexts, influenced by modern principles that emphasize memorable, symbolic branding. The Heraldry Society notes numerous grants to livery companies, such as the 1991 arms of the Fan Makers' Company featuring a with a fan as a on their trade, and the 1956 arms of the Guild of Air Pilots incorporating motifs. In the United States, early 20th-century corporate heraldry saw a resurgence, with organizations adopting punning elements to evoke identity, as seen in municipal arms like Oxford's ox and ford . This contemporary use extends to fictional and personal designs, blending traditional puns with digital adaptability while adhering to heraldic guidelines from bodies like the American Heraldry Society.

Categories of Canting Arms

Personal Coats of Arms

Personal coats of arms incorporating canting elements are heraldic designs granted to individuals such as , knights, or , where the charges visually on the bearer's , first name, or occasionally a motto to evoke . These arms function as visual rebuses, aligning with broader heraldic principles of symbolic representation through charges that allude to the holder's name or attributes. Such designs emphasize individuality within the hereditary system, distinguishing the bearer in tournaments, seals, and official documents. The granting process for personal canting arms in , , and is overseen by the , where the three Kings of Arms—, Clarenceux, and Norroy and —hold delegated authority from the to approve and issue grants to suitable petitioners. Petitioners submit a formal to the , drafted with assistance from an , who collaborates on the design to ensure it adheres to heraldic rules, including the integration of canting motifs if proposed, while maintaining distinctiveness and propriety. This process, formalized since the , evaluates the petitioner's eminence and refines the arms to reflect personal significance without conflicting with existing grants. Common motifs in personal canting arms include , objects, or elements directly tied to the or of the bearer's name, such as beasts representing faunal terms in surnames or tools evoking occupational origins. These can range from simple single charges, like structures alluding to place-based names, to combinations forming phonetic puns, often using the blazon's language for layered allusions. Field divisions or tinctures may also contribute, partitioning colors to mimic name components for subtler effects. In medieval , canting arms were a predominant form among personal devices, estimated to comprise 20-25% of surviving examples across based on analyses of historical rolls of arms. Studies of Anglo-Norman rolls from the 13th-14th centuries identify around 80 such instances, primarily phonetic puns on full names or initial syllables, underscoring their frequency in early and usage. This prevalence highlights canting as a key method for memorable personal during the period.

Municipal and Corporate Coats of Arms

Canting arms for municipalities and corporations adapt the principle to represent collective identities, often drawing on place names, founding figures, or associated trades to foster communal recognition. For instance, a coastal named Fischbach might incorporate charges to allude to its name, emphasizing geographic or economic ties rather than individual lineage. These designs serve to unify civic or corporate groups by embedding symbolic references that are accessible to members and outsiders alike. Historically, municipal coats of arms were frequently granted through royal charters between the 14th and 17th centuries, particularly in Europe, where sovereigns authorized civic emblems to affirm local autonomy and loyalty. In the and the , such grants were prevalent, reflecting a decentralized heraldic that encouraged elements in urban insignia. Corporate arms for guilds or companies followed similar processes, evolving from medieval trade associations. In contrast, British heraldry standardized more rigidly, with fewer features in municipal designs due to centralized oversight by bodies like the . Modern corporate grants, such as those in , are issued by heraldic authorities like the , which petitions for legal entities including businesses and societies. Variations in these arms often blend canting elements with local symbols to enhance unity and relevance, such as combining a name-based with regional motifs like rivers or industries. This approach evolved from personal arms of lords or benefactors, which, upon inheritance or extinction of lines, transitioned to municipal use, adapting individual puns to broader territorial identities. Studies indicate canting arms comprised 20-25% of medieval heraldic devices overall, with higher rates in Germanic regions, underscoring their role in civic across the and compared to more restrained British examples.

Ecclesiastical Coats of Arms

Ecclesiastical coats of arms incorporating canting elements emerged in the 13th century as the adopted , initially using personal or familial arms on and later developing institutional designs for sees, abbeys, and orders. This adoption paralleled the broader evolution of during the , with early examples appearing on episcopal by the late and becoming standardized by around 1300 across Christian . In ecclesiastical contexts, canting arms are uniquely adapted through , where a bishop's personal shield is combined with the diocesan arms to signify pastoral authority, often integrating Christian symbols such as the crosier or keys of St. Peter to evoke doctrinal themes. For instance, the arms of the feature a golden hart (male deer) wading through blue and white waves, a direct on "Hartford" that alludes to the biblical hart as a symbol of piety and thirst for God from Psalm 42. Similarly, personal arms of s frequently blend name-based puns with sacred motifs, as seen in the shield of Bishop Timothy Senior of Harrisburg, where crossed staves—a golden crosier and silver —pun on "senior" (Latin for elder) while referencing 1 Peter 5:1-2 on shepherding the flock and supporting the vulnerable. Motifs in these arms often combine saints' attributes with name puns to reinforce spiritual significance, prioritizing religious iconography over mere wordplay. Bishop of Rockhampton's arms include a red Cross of St. in the and a silver stag in the base, canting on his surname through the McCarthy clan badge while invoking the archangel's protective role as patron of the diocese. Another example is of St. Paul and , whose shield depicts an elderberry tree as a canting to his surname "Hebda" (resembling "bez hebd," meaning elderberry), with berry clusters symbolizing the cardinal virtues and evoking the in Marian devotion. Following the , oversight formalized heraldry in the and beyond, with modern guidelines emphasizing doctrinal and liturgical appropriateness over witty or secular puns, as outlined in the Church's heraldic traditions that subordinate heraldic ingenuity to expressions of faith and piety. This approach ensures designs avoid profane elements, focusing instead on symbols that affirm hierarchy and spiritual mission, such as mitres, crosiers, and saintly emblems.

Notable Examples

Historical Personal Examples

One prominent example of historical personal canting arms is that of the family in , whose coat features , on a three fox's heads erased or, directly punning on the surname "Fox." This design exemplifies the use of animal charges to allude to the bearer's name, a common canting device in medieval where the visual element mirrors the phonetic or literal meaning of the family name. The arms are documented in 14th-century English rolls of arms, such as those compiled in heraldic collections from the period, illustrating how such punning elements were integrated into personal identifiers for knights and . In , the arms of the of Viennois evolved in the first half of the 13th century to include dolphins (dauphins in French), a direct canting reference to the title "," meaning "" and symbolizing the heir to the throne. The quarters the French royal arms (azure semé of golden fleurs-de-lis) with a golden field (or) bearing a haurient, crested and finned in red (), visually depicting the creature in a stylized, embowed pose typical of heraldic marine charges. This design, first adopted by Guigues IV, Count of Vienne (d. 1142), but standardized in the 13th century, underscores how canting arms reinforced dynastic identity and legitimacy in medieval Europe. These examples illustrate core principles of canting arms in personal heraldry, where charges like or objects directly evoke the bearer's name without relying on abstract , ensuring immediate recognition on shields and seals. The arms use fox heads on a for emphasis, common in English styles to avoid simplicity; and the Dauphin's integrates with quarterings to blend personal punning with inherited prestige. Visually, the fox heads appear erased against the on , evoking cunning; and the curves gracefully, its red accents adding vibrancy to the gold field—all tailored to medieval artistic conventions without anachronistic embellishments.

Modern and Fictional Examples

In contemporary heraldry, personal coats of arms continue to incorporate canting elements, particularly in grants issued by official bodies like the in . A notable example is the arms granted to of in July 2006, upon her 18th birthday, which feature a label with three bees, a on her name ("Beatrice" interpreted as "bee" + "trice" or three times). This design alludes to both her personal identity and her mother Sarah Ferguson's arms, which include a single . Such modern grants emphasize personal significance while adhering to heraldic traditions. In the United States and other regions, and societies promote canting arms as a way to connect individuals to their heritage. The (), a prominent focused on pre-17th-century , registers thousands of modern armorial designs, many of which are canting. For instance, the registered arms of Ælfwynn Fiske (registered May 1990 in the Kingdom of An Tir) include a , directly punning on her "Fiske." These examples illustrate how canting arms foster creativity and identity in contemporary genealogical contexts, with thousands of SCA armory registrations since 1971 incorporating such puns. Corporate heraldry in the 20th and 21st centuries often adapts principles for , though formal grants remain rare and typically non-punning. The has granted arms to modern companies like (1979) and (2003), using symbolic elements to evoke heritage rather than strict name puns. However, informal corporate logos sometimes employ canting-like visuals; for example, brewery brands may incorporate to allude to names involving "," blending heraldic style with commercial identity. In fictional works, canting arms enrich world-building by mirroring real heraldic puns while serving narrative purposes. J.R.R. Tolkien's Rohirrim in The Lord of the Rings (1954–1955) bear a white horse on a green field as their emblem, a canting allusion to their name meaning "horse-lords" in Tolkien's constructed language, symbolizing their equestrian culture. Similarly, in George R.R. Martin's A Song of Ice and Fire series (1996–present), houses frequently use canting sigils: House Haigh's pitchfork on yellow evokes "hay," while House Ironsmith's forge and anvil pun on their name, highlighting the prevalence of such devices in Westerosi nobility. In role-playing games like Dungeons & Dragons (first published 1974), players often devise canting arms for characters and factions, such as a house with fish charges for a "Fisher" lineage, drawing from heraldic traditions to enhance immersion. Recent trends in canting arms reflect technological advances and cultural shifts. Digital design tools, such as software used by firms like Digital Heraldry, enable intricate puns that would be challenging in , allowing for personalized and complex compositions in both personal and commercial applications. This has democratized , with online generators and apps facilitating custom canting designs for enthusiasts and fantasy creators. However, critics argue that the of heraldic elements in —evident in logos for brands like those in Modern Heraldry (Counter-Print, 2020)—dilutes traditional significance, turning symbolic puns into mere marketing gimmicks without historical depth.

Cultural and Symbolic Significance

Interpretations and Variations

Canting arms are subject to diverse cultural interpretations, ranging from literal visual puns to more allegorical representations that evoke broader attributes or histories associated with the bearer's name. In , interpretations tend to emphasize straightforward visual elements, such as charges directly depicting name components, reflecting the practical needs of identification in a multilingual post-Conquest society. By contrast, Italian heraldry often incorporates more elaborate punning with , body parts, or composite charges, allowing for allegorical layers that tie into familial narratives, though mottos occasionally reinforce these without being formally integrated into the shield itself. Linguistic variations significantly influence the design and of canting arms, particularly in regions with historical language shifts. In , Norman-French influences introduced challenges with name translations, where surnames derived from French terms (e.g., phonetic adaptations like "de la Roche" rendered as rock-like charges) created obscure or hybrid puns that blend and elements, complicating literal readings across dialects. Similarly, in Germanic traditions, canting arms may employ rebuses drawing on archaic or regional pronunciations, such as combining elements for compound names, leading to variations that prioritize phonetic over strict visual fidelity. These linguistic hurdles often result in obscure cants using obsolete terms or rare languages, as seen in Breton-derived arms like apple trees for "aval gor," which resist straightforward without . Beyond mere puns, canting arms possess symbolic depth, layering with references to virtues, historical deeds, or feudal roles. For instance, a charge might visually allude to a name while allegorically signifying or prowess, as in charges evoking chivalric ideals during the era. This multifaceted symbolism served low-literacy medieval societies by encoding not just but also inherited status and moral attributes, transforming a simple into a device. Scholarly debates on canting arms, particularly in 19th-century antiquarian studies, center on whether they prioritize humorous wordplay or serve as markers of noble identity. Michel Pastoureau further challenged notions of canting as a late or low-status practice, estimating that 20–25% of medieval devices employ allusive elements to affirm feudal lineage rather than mere amusement.

Influence on Heraldic Art

Canting arms, by incorporating visual puns and rebuses into heraldic designs, spurred artistic innovations in medieval heraldry, particularly through the introduction of unusual charges such as everyday objects and plants that deviated from traditional beasts and symbols. This creative approach expanded the visual vocabulary of coats of arms, allowing for greater complexity in blazons and enhancing their role in illuminated manuscripts and seals, where such motifs aided identification in a low-literacy society. In the , canting arms influenced the development of personal emblems known as imprese, as documented in Paolo Giovio's Dialogo dell'imprese militari et amorose (1555), which explored the metamorphosis of heraldic badges into more intellectual and symbolic devices. This transition bridged medieval punning traditions with , inspiring allegorical representations in art that emphasized and ambiguity through animal and hybrid motifs. The legacy of canting arms persists in modern , where heraldic elements like shields and symbolic charges inform and , adapting punning motifs for contemporary visual identity. Digital tools now preserve and recreate these heraldic motifs, enabling their study and application in vector-based designs that maintain historical accuracy while supporting new artistic expressions. Criticisms of have centered on their potential to impose overly complex or punning elements, as seen in the 1696 royal edict that required registration of arms and led heralds to assign punning designs to generate fees, causing resentment among those affected.

References

  1. [1]
    Canting Arms - Heraldica
    Those are coats of arms whose blazon, or verbal description in the language of heraldry, recalls the name (or, less often, some attribute or function) of the ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  2. [2]
    [PDF] Heraldry for Those Who Cant - Modar University
    Canting arms (also known as Armes Parlantes, Armas Cantantes and Sprechende. Wappen) are usually defined today as armory in the nature of a rebus alluding to ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] Canting arms: a comparison of two regional styles - ellipsis.cx...
    Background. Canting (or allusive) arms are those that make reference to the name of their bearer through a visual pun. In French, these devices are called ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  4. [4]
    A Complete Guide to Heraldry
    A COMPLETE GUIDE TO HERALDRY. PLATE I. Plate I. THE ROYAL ARMS. A COMPLETE GUIDE TO HERALDRY. BY. ARTHUR CHARLES FOX-DAVIES. OF LINCOLN'S INN, BARRISTER-AT-LAW.
  5. [5]
    The Handbook to English Heraldry by Charles Boutell Chapters I-IX
    By writers such as these, accordingly, all “canting arms” (by French Heralds called “armes parlantes”) have been absurdly assigned to a separate class, in ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  6. [6]
    Essays of an Americanist. - Project Gutenberg
    Such arms were called canting arms, the term being derived from the Latin cantare, to sing or chant, the arms themselves chanting or announcing the family ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] Heraldry-For-Beginners.pdf
    Are the arms a pun on their owner's name (known as Canting Arms)?. Examine and identify the charges on the arms. What particular relevance, if any, do those ...
  8. [8]
    Heraldry: The beginnings
    Impetus was given to the development of heraldry by the 12th century Crusades, particularly the Third Crusade in 1189, by which time heraldry had 'broken out ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  9. [9]
    Wijnbergen; 1265 - Blason.es
    This armorial is called «Wijnbergen» because it was named after one of its early owners, and the names of its authors are unknown. I have retained this name in ...
  10. [10]
  11. [11]
    [PDF] THE COAT OF ARMS - The Heraldry Society
    ... modern education (Figure 21). Twentieth century additions to the arms of older livery companies. Numerous companies have petitioned for the addition or ...
  12. [12]
    Authentic Heraldry Made Simple
    The closest that medieval heraldry came to merit badge heraldry was in canting arms, rebuses, burgher or guild heraldry (which could be self-concious ...
  13. [13]
    Guidelines for Heraldic Practice - The American Heraldry Society
    It is permissible to design new arms that are variations on those of a family with the same name, but the differences between the existing coat and the new one ...
  14. [14]
    Granting of Arms - College of Arms
    The first step in applying for a grant of arms is to submit a petition, or memorial as it is called, to the Earl Marshal. This will be drafted by one of the ...Proving a right to arms · Registering a Pedigree · Artwork and Scrivening
  15. [15]
    City Heraldry and Grants of Arms - Livery Committee
    Arms are granted by the Crown through the warrant of the Earl Marshal to living persons which are inherited by their legitimate heirs, and to legal entities ...
  16. [16]
    CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: Ecclesiastical Heraldry - New Advent
    Ecclesiastical heraldry includes arms of religious groups, insignia of rank, religious heraldry, and emblems of saints, first appearing on seals and vestments.Missing: canting | Show results with:canting
  17. [17]
    Archdiocesan Coat of Arms – Archdiocese of Hartford
    Feb 14, 2019 · The arms of the Archdiocese of Hartford are called canting arms or armes parlantes, which speak or proclaim the name of the bearer.
  18. [18]
    Our Bishop - Roman Catholic Diocese of Harrisburg
    ” As such, they are an example of “canting arms”- a design which incorporates a pun on the bearer's name. In his First Letter, Saint Peter addresses the ...
  19. [19]
    Motto & Coat of Arms - Catholic Diocese of Rockhampton
    These canting arms which represent the bearer's name is a visual pun and say, in heraldic terms, Michael McCarthy.
  20. [20]
    Bishop Hebda's Coat Of Arms | Diocese of Gaylord
    Predominant is the image of the elderberry tree, which cants or serves as a visual pun that plays on the bishop's name.Missing: canting | Show results with:canting
  21. [21]
    Vatican to Publish Manual on Ecclesiastical Coats of Arms - Zenit.org
    Jan 30, 2014 · The Vatican is to publish a manual on ecclesiastical heraldry in the Catholic Church. The work, which the Vatican describes as “very ...Missing: 16th | Show results with:16th
  22. [22]
    The Project Gutenberg eBook of "Peeps at Heraldry" by Phœbe Allen
    ... three foxes' heads erased are borne respectively by the Foxes of Middlesex ... coat of arms, which affords an excellent example of canting heraldry (Fig.
  23. [23]
    The Arms of Ireland: Medieval and Modern | The Heraldry Society
    Apart from the early instances named above (eg Wijnbergen Roll [c. 1280-1330], the Rous Roll [1483], the Behaim Globe [1492], and College of Arms Ms 12 [1531-3] ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Grosse Heidelberger (Manesse) - MEDIEVAL ARMORIALS
    Nov 30, 2008 · The blazons correspond to the WLH and not to the MAN, as do the. (incorrect) arms of the swabian family for Heinrich von Morungen (WLH:16), ...
  25. [25]
    Dauphiné (Traditional province, France) - CRW Flags
    Nov 13, 2016 · In the first half of the 13th century, the Dauphin of Viennois adopted canting arms with a dolphin. This dolphin was a stylized fish with a ...
  26. [26]
    File:Arms of Beatrice of York.svg - Wikimedia Commons
    The coat of arms was granted in July 2006, on her 18th birthday. The three small bees on the label alludes to the arms of her mother Sarah. The appearance of ...
  27. [27]
    Hopkins Farm Brewery
    Welcome to Hopkins Farm Brewery! We're a family-owned and operated farm brewery rooted in the beautiful community of Havre de Grace, Maryland.
  28. [28]
    White Horse - Tolkien Gateway
    Oct 17, 2024 · The White Horse was the emblem of the kingdom of Rohan. It was depicted on a green field on the banner of Rohan and emblazoned on a shield ...Missing: pun | Show results with:pun
  29. [29]
    Heraldry - A Wiki of Ice and Fire - Westeros.org
    Canting arms are a type of heraldic pun, whereby the blazon of the shield makes a direct reference to the name of the family. Examples include: The candles of ...
  30. [30]
    Digital Heraldry – Quentin Peacock, Digital Heraldry Artist
    Member of the Society of Heraldic Arts working exclusively in vector graphics to create professional heraldry for individuals and corporations.Missing: trends canting
  31. [31]
    Exploring the enduring influence of heraldry in design
    May 1, 2020 · As the publisher returns with Modern Heraldry: Volume Two, we dissect the relationship between the ancient technique and modern day branding.
  32. [32]
    None
    ### Summary of Regional Variations in Canting Arms, Mottos, Cultural Interpretations, and Linguistic Aspects
  33. [33]
    Ambiguous Figures of Otherness: Redoubtable Beasts in Princely ...
    If among these animal as armoiries parlantes (canting arms). Their ... These imprese thus constituted the most Paolo Giovio's Dialogo dell'imprese ...
  34. [34]
    Modern Heraldry: why designers still use centuries-old branding ...
    Apr 22, 2020 · The design world continues to borrow from heraldry, with crests, stamps, seals, and shields a frequent fixture in modern branding.
  35. [35]
    Checking the Blazons | Digital Heraldry Research Environment ...
    The Digital Heraldry Research Environment provides a database and a set of tools to study, identify, and describe coats of arms in their historical contexts ...