Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Cardinal vowels

Cardinal vowels are a standardized set of reference sounds in , developed by British phonetician to provide fixed points for accurately describing and comparing the quality of vowels across languages. The system comprises 18 cardinal vowels, including eight primary ones that occupy the peripheral positions in the vowel space—defined by extreme tongue heights (high to low) and positions (front to back)—along with eight secondary vowels that reverse the typical lip-rounding patterns and two additional centralized vowels. These vowels, which rarely occur naturally in speech, form the basis of the International Phonetic Alphabet's vowel chart and enable precise transcription by anchoring other vowel sounds relative to them. Jones introduced the cardinal vowel system in his 1917 English Pronouncing Dictionary and elaborated it in An Outline of English Phonetics (1918), drawing from X-ray imaging and auditory analysis to define articulatory positions. The primary cardinals (numbered 1 to 8) feature unrounded lips for front vowels (e.g., as CV1, the highest front unrounded) and rounded lips for back vowels (e.g., as CV8, the highest back rounded), while secondary cardinals (9 to 16) invert this rounding for finer distinctions. Jones recorded demonstrations of these vowels in 1917, 1943, and 1956, which remain influential resources for phonetic training and remain relevant in modern linguistics for mapping vowel inventories. This framework revolutionized phonetic description by establishing a universal scale, independent of any single language, and continues to underpin vowel analysis in fields like and language teaching.

History and Development

Origins with

, a prominent phonetician, developed the cardinal vowel system during the early while working at (), where he was appointed as a part-time lecturer in in 1907 and later became head of the Department of in 1912. His work was heavily influenced by his studies under Paul Passy in around 1905–1906, which exposed him to the principles of and the need for standardized vowel references within the emerging (). As a key member of the —joining in 1906 and serving as editor of its journal Le Maître Phonétique—Jones sought to address inconsistencies in vowel description across languages, drawing on collaborative discussions with Passy and other phoneticians to establish a universal framework. The cardinal vowel system originated as a response to the limitations of using language-specific examples, such as those from English or , for , which often led to variable interpretations in usage. By 1917, Jones had formulated a set of eight primary cardinal vowels as fixed auditory and articulatory reference points, designed to map the extremes of the vowel space without reliance on any particular language's , thereby providing reliable anchors for cross-linguistic comparisons. This approach emphasized perceptual uniformity, ensuring that phoneticians could approximate vowel qualities consistently regardless of their native language backgrounds. To demonstrate the system, Jones recorded the primary cardinal vowels using his own voice as the model, producing gramophone discs for () in 1917, which served as the first auditory exemplars for teaching and research. These recordings were pivotal in disseminating the , with later re-recordings in 1943 and 1956 to account for age-related vocal changes. Jones detailed the cardinal vowels in his seminal publication An Outline of English Phonetics (first edition, 1918), where he outlined their positions and purposes, building on his earlier experimental work and collaborations within the .

Standardization and Evolution

The cardinal vowel system, initially developed by , gained formal recognition through its integration into the () framework during the mid-20th century, with key advancements occurring in the . The 's 1947 chart revision incorporated modifications to symbols, such as the introduction of lowered variants like ɩ for near-high front unrounded and ɷ for near-high back rounded, enhancing the precision of the trapezium diagram that references cardinal positions. This built on earlier efforts, leading to the 1949 publication of The Principles of the International Phonetic Association, which formalized the quadrilateral as a standard tool for phonetic description, embedding cardinal s as reference points within notation. Further refinements came at the 1989 , where the revised its overall chart and principles, adjusting the space representation to better align with articulatory and acoustic data while retaining the cardinal framework as a foundational element. Subsequent contributions from phoneticians like Peter Ladefoged helped evolve the system's practical application and documentation. In the 1970s, Ladefoged produced recordings of the cardinal vowels, drawing on demonstrations by former students of Jones to incorporate a broader range of speaker diversity and reflect variations in production across accents. These efforts, featured in his 1975 textbook A Course in Phonetics, emphasized auditory training and provided updated audio exemplars that deviated slightly from Jones's originals to account for natural phonetic variability. Such recordings facilitated greater accessibility for teaching and research, bridging traditional articulatory standards with emerging empirical studies. The evolution of recording technology paralleled these institutional developments, transitioning from mechanical to electrical and eventually digital formats. Jones's initial 1917 gramophone recordings used acoustic horns and diaphragms, capturing limited frequency ranges without amplification. By 1956, Jones re-recorded the cardinal vowels on electrical disc for Linguaphone, enabling clearer audio fidelity and allowing comparisons that highlighted consistency in his productions despite age. Later, Ladefoged's 1970s analog tapes and subsequent digital remasterings extended this progression, supporting modern analyses like formant extraction and ensuring the cardinal system's enduring utility in phonetic education.

Definition and Principles

Core Concept of Cardinal Vowels

Cardinal vowels constitute a standardized reference system in , consisting of 8 primary, 8 secondary, and 2 centralized vowels that function as perceptual anchors along a of height (from close to open) and backness (from front to back). These vowels are not tied to any specific but serve as fixed points for objectively describing qualities worldwide. The primary set includes unrounded front vowels and rounded back vowels at extreme positions, while the secondary set introduces variations in lip rounding to cover additional perceptual contrasts. The core purpose of cardinal vowels is to enable precise, language-neutral comparisons of any vowel sound by relating it to these anchors, for example, characterizing a given vowel as "slightly lower and more back than Cardinal Vowel 2" or "more open than Cardinal Vowel 1." This approach allows phoneticians to transcribe and analyze vowels consistently without relying on subjective or language-specific descriptions, facilitating cross-linguistic and phonetic . By providing a shared framework, cardinal vowels ensure that descriptions remain verifiable through auditory training rather than varying interpretations. A fundamental principle underlying the cardinal vowel system is auditory equidistance, where the perceptual intervals between consecutive vowels are designed to sound equally spaced to the trained , emphasizing auditory over rigid articulatory or physiological metrics. This spacing creates a balanced perceptual scale, though it is arbitrary and learned through rote practice rather than derived from uniform physical steps. The positions were systematized to map the perceptual boundaries of the vowel space effectively. The vowels form the foundational structure for the (IPA) vowel chart, which adopts their arrangement of height and backness but extends it with supplementary symbols for intermediate or centralized s not captured by the cardinal set alone. While the IPA symbols approximate cardinal qualities, they are not identical, as the chart accommodates a broader range of attested sounds across languages. This integration underscores the cardinal system's role as a perceptual standard within the IPA framework.

Articulatory and Auditory Foundations

The articulatory basis of cardinal vowels lies in the physiological of the vocal tract, primarily involving the 's along two dimensions: , ranging from close (high) to open (low), and backness, from front to central to back. Lip and jaw opening further modulate the , with cardinal vowels positioned at the extremes of these parameters to serve as points. For instance, the is raised as high and forward as possible for the front-close vowel without producing friction, while the open-back vowel involves the lowest and most retracted achievable. These configurations are not arbitrary but reflect the functional limits of tongue mobility within the oral cavity. The auditory foundation of the cardinal vowel system relies on the perceptual capabilities of trained phoneticians, who recognize these s as forming steps in vowel quality across the perceptual space. This equidistance is subjective and learned, based on consistent differences in auditory rather than precise measurements, allowing for reliable comparisons of vowel sounds in different languages. While underlying frequencies contribute to these perceptual distinctions, the system emphasizes auditory judgment over acoustic quantification. Phoneticians acquire proficiency in producing and recognizing cardinal vowels through structured , typically involving of standardized recordings over several weeks of ear- and articulatory . This process includes listening to isolated vowel tokens and nonsense words, followed by replication to internalize the extreme positions and perceptual intervals. Such enables consistent replication without deviating into adjacent vowel qualities. Physiologically, the cardinal vowels represent the vocal tract's capacity to attain these extreme articulatory targets without strain or compensatory adjustments that could alter the intended quality, such as excessive tension or friction noise. The tongue's is constrained by the , , and oral cavity dimensions, ensuring that the reference positions are natural maxima rather than forced exaggerations. This alignment with human anatomical limits underpins the system's practicality for phonetic description.

The Cardinal Vowel Set

Primary Cardinal Vowels

The primary cardinal vowels comprise eight standardized reference sounds central to Daniel Jones's system for phonetic description, established in his 1917 work The English Pronouncing Dictionary and elaborated in An Outline of English Phonetics (1918). These vowels define the peripheral boundaries of the human vocal tract's vowel-producing capacity, serving as immutable auditory anchors that phoneticians learn through repeated listening to recordings, such as those produced by Jones himself. Unlike vowels in specific languages, they are idealized qualities not tied to any natural occurrence but designed for consistent cross-linguistic comparison and transcription. Their positions are plotted on the vowel —a with tongue height on the vertical (close at the top, open at the bottom) and tongue advancement on the horizontal (front on the left, back on the right)—forming the foundational points along the front unrounded and back rounded edges. The following table summarizes the eight primary cardinal vowels, including their numbering, IPA symbols, articulatory configurations (tongue position and height, lip posture, jaw opening), and roles as auditory references. Articulatory details are based on Jones's specifications, emphasizing extreme yet stable positions to avoid consonantal friction.
NumberSymbolArticulatory PositionAuditory Reference Quality
CV1(close front unrounded)Tongue arched maximally high and forward toward the hard palate; lips spread horizontally; jaw minimally open or closed.Highest and frontmost unrounded vowel, serving as the upper limit for front vowel height without producing a fricative sound.
CV2(close-mid front unrounded)Tongue raised to close-mid height in the front, slightly lower than CV1; lips spread; jaw moderately open.Intermediate between CV1 and CV3, marking the boundary where front vowels begin to perceptibly lower in height.
CV3[ɛ] (open-mid front unrounded)Tongue positioned at open-mid height in the front, with the front lowered noticeably; lips spread or neutral; jaw openly dropped.Halfway between CV2 and CV4, providing a reference for mid-level front unrounded vowels.
CV4(open front unrounded)Tongue lowered as far as possible in the front without bunching; lips spread; jaw maximally open to its physiological limit.Lowest front unrounded vowel, acting as the neutral open reference point for calibrating all other open vowels.
CV5[ɑ] (open back unrounded)Tongue flattened low and retracted toward the soft palate; lips neutral or slightly spread; jaw maximally open.Lowest back unrounded vowel, contrasting with CV4 to define the horizontal spread of open vowel space.
CV6[ɒ] (open back rounded)Tongue low and back, similar to CV5 but with slight centralization; lips firmly rounded and protruded; jaw widely open.Open back rounded counterpart to CV5, establishing the starting point for rounded back vowels at maximal openness.
CV7(close-mid back rounded)Tongue raised to close-mid height in the back; lips rounded and protruding; jaw moderately open.Intermediate between CV6 and CV8, referencing the close-mid level for back rounded vowels.
CV8(close back rounded)Tongue raised maximally high and back toward the soft palate; lips rounded and protruding; jaw closed or minimally open.Highest back rounded vowel in the primary set, delineating the upper limit for back rounded qualities.
On the IPA vowel trapezium, CV1–4 occupy the left (front unrounded) side from top to bottom, while CV5 lies at the bottom-right corner, and CV6–8 trace the right (back rounded) side upward, creating a balanced framework for vowel classification. Each serves as a perceptual fixed point: for instance, any vowel can be described relative to them, such as "more open than CV3 but fronter than CV7." The secondary cardinal vowels extend this core set by incorporating additional rounded front and unrounded back-central variants.

Secondary Cardinal Vowels

The secondary cardinal vowels were later introduced by to supplement the primary set, addressing the need for reference points that better cover rounded front vowel qualities and unrounded back vowel qualities not adequately represented in the original eight primaries. These eight vowels reverse the lip-rounding of the primaries and are defined as follows: Unlike the primary cardinal vowels, which maintain consistent lip positions (unrounded for front, rounded for back), the secondary set reverses this pattern to isolate the effects of lip configuration on vowel timbre; for instance, CV9 mirrors the tongue height and frontness of primary CV1 but incorporates lip rounding, which lowers the second frequency and creates a distinct auditory quality. While the secondary cardinal vowels are referenced less frequently than the primaries, they prove valuable for phonetic transcription in languages exhibiting these configurations, such as French (with as in sur and [ø] as in peu) or Japanese (with [ɯ] as in high vowels).

Centralized Cardinal Vowels

The cardinal vowel set is completed by two additional centralized vowels, serving as references for central positions in the vowel space:
  • CV17: [ɨ], the close central unrounded vowel, with the tongue raised high and central, lips neutral.
  • CV18: [ə], the mid central vowel (schwa), with the tongue at mid height and central, lips neutral.
These provide anchors for centralized vowels, equidistant between front and back peripherals, and are essential for describing reduced or vowel qualities in many languages.

Articulation and Acoustics

Production Mechanisms

The production of cardinal s relies on precise configurations of the vocal tract, primarily involving the , , , and to achieve standardized reference positions. The serves as the primary , determining vowel through its vertical position—raised high for close vowels like (Cardinal Vowel 1, CV1) and lowered for open vowels like (CV4)—and frontness or backness via horizontal placement, with maximal fronting for CV1–CV4 (e.g., the arched forward and upward without contacting the for ) and maximal backing for CV5–CV8 (e.g., retracted for [ɑ] in CV5). The contributes to openness by descending significantly for low vowels, such as fully dropping to its lowest position while keeping the forward for , whereas it remains relatively elevated for high vowels like (CV8). Lip configuration modulates , typically unrounded and for primary front vowels (CV1–CV4) to maximize oral cavity contrast, and rounded and protruded for primary back vowels (CV5–CV8) to narrow the front resonator, as in puckering for . The aids in overall tract expansion, particularly for open vowels, by relaxing to allow greater volume behind the , though its role is secondary to the 's positioning. Producing the extreme cardinal vowels involves systematic techniques to reach these articulatory limits without introducing friction or consonant-like qualities. For CV1 , begin from a schwa-like , then raise and front the body as far as possible toward the while spreading the lips and minimizing drop, ensuring no palatal constriction occurs. Similarly, for CV4 , lower the maximally to open the widely, the low and forward with its front near the lower teeth, and keep the lips and unrounded to maintain front . For CV5 [ɑ], retract the low and back while slightly the lips and adjusting the for openness; intermediate vowels like CV2 are approximated by gradually lowering the from while preserving fronting. These steps, originally defined by based on observations, emphasize sequential adjustments starting from auditory and kinesthetic references to ensure perceptual uniformity across the set. Individual anatomical differences, such as variations in length, jaw mobility, or pharyngeal depth, prevent exact replication of the idealized positions, leading to approximations even among trained speakers. Phonetic training focuses on consistent perceptual and articulatory approximations rather than identical biomechanics, allowing speakers to achieve recognizable equivalents despite personal variations, as evidenced by cross-speaker studies showing deviations from the standard vowel quadrilateral. To facilitate learning and self-correction, tools like mirrors help visualize elevation, jaw drop, and lip spreading in real time, while spectrograms provide feedback on production accuracy through to reference forms, without delving into frequency analysis.

Acoustic Characteristics

The acoustic characteristics of cardinal vowels are primarily defined by their formant frequencies, which are resonant frequencies in the vocal tract that shape the spectral envelope of the sound wave. The first formant (F1) correlates with vowel openness or height, increasing as the jaw lowers and the widens, while the second formant () reflects frontness or backness, rising with tongue advancement toward the and falling with retraction. These formants create distinct spectral peaks that ensure perceptual clarity, with higher formants ( and beyond) contributing less to primary vowel identity but aiding in fine distinctions. Typical values for primary cardinal s, based on recordings from male s, illustrate these patterns. For instance, CV1 exhibits a low F1 of approximately 270–300 Hz, indicating a closed , and a high of about 2300–2400 Hz, marking extreme frontness; in contrast, CV5 [ɑ] shows a high F1 of around 750–800 Hz for openness and a low of roughly 700–1200 Hz for backness. These values vary slightly by due to vocal tract length and tension, but they establish reference points for acoustic analysis. Spectral patterns in cardinal vowels often involve formant clustering or merging, where adjacent formants concentrate energy in narrow frequency bands, enhancing auditory salience—for example, in CV5 [ɑ], F1 and F2 may merge around 1000 Hz, creating a robust low-frequency emphasis. Lip rounding, as in CV8 , systematically lowers all formant frequencies compared to unrounded equivalents; this effect, observed in comparisons like (F1 ~300 Hz, F2 ~600–750 Hz) versus a hypothetical unrounded [ɯ], shortens the effective vocal tract length and shifts resonances downward by 10–20%. Perceptually, the cardinal vowels achieve equidistance not in linear physical frequency space but in auditory scales, such as the or ERB rate, which account for nonlinear human hearing sensitivity. This scaling ensures equal perceptual steps between vowels, as logarithmic transformations of F1 and better predict judged positions on the cardinal diagram than raw Hertz values. For example, the auditory distance between CV1 and CV2 matches that between CV4 and CV5 [ɑ], despite uneven physical shifts, supporting their use as perceptual anchors. Measurement of these characteristics relies on spectrography, where time-frequency representations (spectrograms) reveal formant tracks through linear predictive coding (LPC) or cepstral analysis of steady-state vowel segments. Tools like Praat or Wavesurfer extract F1 and F2 by identifying spectral peaks in 20–50 ms windows, allowing verification of cardinal qualities against reference recordings. This method has been instrumental in confirming the acoustic stability of quantal vowels like and [ɑ], where formant clusters resist minor articulatory variations.

Applications in Phonetics

Describing Vowel Systems

Cardinal vowels serve as a standardized set of reference points for systematically describing and comparing vowel inventories in different languages, independent of any specific linguistic system. Developed by in the early , these vowels define the peripheral boundaries of the vocal tract's articulatory space, allowing linguists to plot a language's relative to them on a chart or . This approach facilitates objective characterization by noting deviations in tongue height, frontness or backness, and lip rounding, often using diacritics to indicate fine adjustments such as slight lowering or centralization. By anchoring descriptions to these fixed references, phoneticians can avoid subjective interpretations tied to a researcher's native language, promoting consistency in cross-linguistic analysis. In practice, language-specific vowels are positioned relative to the primary cardinal vowels (CV1 to CV8 ) through acoustic measurements like frequencies or auditory comparison, revealing their proximity or deviation. For example, the English lax high /ɪ/ (as in "bit") is typically plotted between CV1 and CV2 , appearing slightly lower and more centralized than CV1, often transcribed with a centralizing as [ɪ̽]. Similarly, the mid /e/ (as in "mesa") is described as slightly lower than CV2 , approximated as [e̞], reflecting its close-mid quality in the language's five-vowel system. In , emphatic (pharyngealized) vowels, influenced by nearby emphatic consonants, tend to lower and back, positioning them near CV5 [ɑ], with acoustic correlates like reduced values enhancing their retracted character. These relative placements enable detailed inventories, such as mapping how a language's vowels fill or expand the space defined by the cardinals. The integration of cardinal vowels with the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) further supports descriptive precision in transcriptions. IPA symbols for vowels are arranged on a chart that mirrors the cardinal positions, guiding symbol selection based on a vowel's relative location—for instance, choosing for sounds near CV2 or [ɪ] for those midway between CV1 and CV2. This alignment ensures that transcriptions reflect universal phonetic properties rather than language-specific approximations, aiding in the documentation of diverse vowel systems. The primary advantage of this method lies in its facilitation of unbiased cross-linguistic comparisons; by referencing a neutral scale, researchers can quantify similarities and differences in vowel quality across languages, such as how English's diphthongal tendencies contrast with the monophthongs of Spanish, without perceptual bias from familiar sounds.

Role in Language Teaching and Learning

Cardinal vowels form a foundational element in phonetic training programs for language educators and learners, particularly in structured courses emphasizing ear-training and imitation. At institutions such as (), practical phonetics curricula draw on Daniel Jones's foundational system, incorporating recordings of primary cardinal vowels like [i, e, ɛ, a, ɑ, ɔ, o, u] for auditory discrimination and production exercises. Students engage in dictation tasks with nonsense words containing these vowels, repeated multiple times to build recognition, followed by imitation to refine ; assessments reveal identification accuracies of 78.4% for isolated vowels and 58.7% in contextualized forms, highlighting progressive skill development despite challenges with height-adjacent confusions. In ESL contexts, cardinal vowels provide standardized references to guide learners toward target vowel qualities, facilitating approximation of sounds absent in their native languages. For instance, CV1 serves as a for training high front unrounded vowels, helping distinguish /iː/ (as in "sheep") from /ɪ/ (as in "ship") by exaggerating tongue height and duration contrasts, which reduces substitution errors common among speakers of languages like or . This approach enables teachers to use a universal scale for feedback, promoting consistent without over-reliance on variable native models. Contemporary digital tools have expanded access to cardinal vowel practice through interactive simulations and immersive technologies. Software like Pronunciation Studio's quizzes allows users to listen, identify, and produce primary cardinal vowels in self-guided sessions, reinforcing perceptual and articulatory skills for ESL learners. Virtual reality (VR) technologies have also been applied in pronunciation ; for example, in one EFL program using VR-assisted pronunciation (VRAPT) targeting vowels such as /i/ (CV1) and /ɪ/, young learners showed significant gains in accuracy, with mean scores improving from 3.64 to 6.01 after ten 90-minute sessions. Recent as of 2024 has further explored effective methods for teaching the and transcription of cardinal vowels, emphasizing perceptual and articulatory in programs. Research demonstrates the effectiveness of cardinal vowel-based training in boosting accuracy. After 12 weeks of ear-training with cardinal stimuli, students achieved 82% correct identification for and formed perceptual groupings that reduced errors in adjacent vowels, evidencing improved auditory categorization. Short-term phonetic drills targeting reference-like vowels have also yielded acoustic enhancements, such as increased frequencies aligning closer to native targets, supporting better integration in EFL settings.

Limitations and Criticisms

Accuracy and Precision Challenges

The cardinal vowel system depends on auditory equidistance as judged by trained phoneticians, yet this perceptual foundation introduces inherent subjectivity and inter-listener variability. (1965) demonstrated that even linguists exhibit inconsistencies in locating vowels relative to cardinal reference points, with short-term reliability dropping due to perceptual fluctuations and long-term judgments varying by up to several chart positions based on experience. Similarly, productions by expert phoneticians reveal substantial individual differences, as shown by Ladefoged's recordings of trained speakers attempting cardinal vowels, where patterns overlapped across intended categories, indicating substantial individual differences from idealized positions. This reliance on human undermines the system's precision, as equidistance is not objectively verifiable but shaped by listener training and physiological perception limits. Physiological constraints exacerbate these accuracy challenges, as anatomical variations prevent uniform production of cardinal vowels across speakers. Vocal tract length and shape differ systematically by age, sex, and body size, altering frequencies and making extreme positions—essential for cardinals like or [ɑ]—infeasible or distorted for some individuals. For example, children with shorter vocal tracts produce vowels with elevated F1 and F2 s, with formant frequencies approximately 50% higher than adult norms, significantly shifting their acoustic output away from adult cardinal norms during development. Even adults face limits; smaller oral cavities constrain back vowel , leading to compensatory or adjustments that compromise the intended neutrality. These constraints highlight that the cardinal system assumes an idealized , reducing its applicability for diverse populations. Historical critiques further underscore precision issues, particularly the bias from modeling cardinals after Daniel Jones's own voice, which acoustic analyses later quantified as non-equidistant. Jones's 1956 recordings served as the primary reference, but acoustic analyses have revealed inconsistencies, such as uneven spacing between adjacent cardinals (e.g., and [ɛ]) that deviated from perceptual equidistance claims. Ladefoged (1964) critiqued this articulatory-auditory mismatch, noting that Jones's personal introduced speaker-specific traits, like centralized , biasing the universal framework. These findings exposed the system's foundational subjectivity, as the "standard" realizations were not replicable without reference to Jones's unique vocal profile. In response to these limitations, modern phonetics has shifted toward -based models in computational applications, prioritizing acoustic measurements over perceptual references for greater objectivity. These models map s using F1 (tongue height) and (frontness/backness) frequencies, enabling precise across speakers via techniques like Lobanov or Watt-Fabricius methods. Influential work by Fant (1960) established the acoustic underpinnings, while high-impact studies like Hillenbrand et al. (1995) provided empirical formant data from hundreds of speakers, showing vowel clusters with standard deviations under 10% after normalization—far tighter than cardinal variability. More recently, as of the 2020s, approaches in have enhanced formant-based normalization, further emphasizing the cardinal system's subjective foundations. This approach dominates speech technology, offering scalable precision without the equidistance assumptions of the cardinal system.

Cultural and Linguistic Variations

The vowel system, while designed as a universal reference for vowel description, reveals significant challenges when applied to diverse linguistic contexts outside languages, where certain qualities lack direct equivalents and necessitate approximations. For example, the secondary vowel [ɒ] (open back rounded) is peripheral and rarely occurs in natural speech across the world's languages, leading phoneticians to approximate it with near-open variants in descriptions of vowel systems in and Asian languages. Similarly, in West languages like Èwùlù, English loanwords are adapted by mapping vowels such as [ɛ] (CV3) and (CV4) to native [-ATR] counterparts, which are acoustically lower and more centralized, highlighting how the tongue-position focus of the system does not fully align with [±ATR] distinctions prevalent in these languages. Cultural and perceptual factors further complicate the universality of cardinal vowels, as native language experience shapes vowel categorization. Japanese speakers, whose vowel inventory includes a single high front unrounded /i/ without a tense-lax distinction, often exhibit reduced sensitivity to differences between English /iː/ and /ɪ/, both perceived as akin to native /iː/, which impacts their discrimination of cardinal-like high front contrasts such as CV1 and nearby qualities. This L1 perceptual bias extends to other non-native distinctions, where listeners assimilate unfamiliar cardinal references to their native categories, resulting in lower accuracy compared to speakers of languages with denser front vowel systems like English or . To address these variations, researchers have proposed adaptations and revisions to the cardinal system, particularly in the context of African linguistics during the 2000s, emphasizing language-specific reference sets that incorporate alongside traditional dimensions. For instance, studies on Niger-Congo languages recommend expanding vowel charts to pair positions with [±ATR] variants, using acoustic measurements to better represent systems like those in Anyi, where seven- or nine- inventories deviate from cardinal peripherals. These proposals aim to mitigate the Eurocentric foundations of Daniel Jones's model, which relied on phonetician pronunciations, by advocating for diverse auditory references that reflect cross-linguistic perceptual agreement. Such updates include calls for multilingual reference recordings to enhance global applicability in phonetic description and .

References

  1. [1]
    Cardinal Vowels
    The systematization of cardinal vowels is mainly the work of Daniel Jones. His definitions of the primary cardinals may be found in An Outline of English ...
  2. [2]
    [PDF] Day 4: Daniel Jones and 18 basic vowels
    Oct 24, 2025 · The cardinal vowels are the basic vowels that form the basis for describing the sounds of a lan- guage, as defined by Daniel Jones. The “English ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] A set of reference vowels first defined by Danie
    CARDINAL VOWELS: A set of reference vowels first defined by Daniel. Jones (British phonetician). (Latin cardo, cardinis 'a hinge'). When preparing a vowel chart ...
  4. [4]
    The real 'enry 'iggins | UCL News
    Sep 6, 2006 · Jones arrived at a set of eight 'primary cardinal vowels', and recorded these on gramophone disc for HMV in 1917. He later added eight ' ...
  5. [5]
    Daniel Jones - Linguistics - Oxford Bibliographies
    Jul 30, 2014 · Jones's system of Cardinal Vowels is one of his most lasting legacies. Developed by 1917, it is still to this day employed in much current ...
  6. [6]
    Daniel Jones, Paul Passy, and the Development of the Cardinal ...
    Jan 1, 1995 · SUMMARYDeveloped in the first quarter of the present century, Daniel Jones's (1881-1967) Cardinal Vowel theory has proved for many years to ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] the acoustic analysis of early speech recordings - ISCA Archive
    Jones recorded his framework of reference vowels on three occasions—in 1917, 1943 and 1956—and it would be of interest to make a quantitative comparison of ...
  8. [8]
    Catalog Record: An outline of English phonetics
    An outline of English phonetics. Author: Jones, Daniel, 1881-1967. Published: 1922. An outline of English phonetics. Author: Jones, Daniel, 1881-1967. Published ...
  9. [9]
    IPA historical charts - International Phonetic Association
    This document presents all versions and revisions of the International Phonetic Alphabet charts published throughout the Maître Phonétique and supplements ...
  10. [10]
    The official IPA vowel diagram | Journal of the International Phonetic ...
    Feb 6, 2009 · The old form of diagram introduced by Daniel Jones, and still surviving as the only official IPA shape must surely be now discarded.Missing: collaboration | Show results with:collaboration
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Handbook_of_the_IPA.pdf
    Handbook of the International Phonetic Association is a comprehensive guide to the Association's 'International Phonetic Alphabet'.
  12. [12]
    cardinal vowels
    Secondary cardinal vowels produced by Daniel Jones taken from a Linguaphone recording. Peter Ladefoged's cardinal vowels: Primary Secondary Whole vowel chart.Missing: 1970s | Show results with:1970s
  13. [13]
    A Course in Phonetics - Peter Ladefoged - Google Books
    Author, Peter Ladefoged ; Publisher, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1975 ; Original from, the University of Michigan ; Digitized, Feb 21, 2008 ; ISBN, 0155151800, ...
  14. [14]
    (PDF) The acoustic analysis of early speech recordings
    F1/F2 plot comparing the Cardinal Vowels from the 1917 and 1956 recordings. The connecting lines draw attention to the approximately triangular vowel space ...
  15. [15]
    audiufon: audio demonstrations, Utrecht University, Phonetics
    The concept of Cardinal Vowels was developed by the speaker of these recordings, Daniel Jones (1881-1967). In Jones' publications, we can read how the ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Vowels (pdf)
    Cardinal Vowels of Daniel Jones (1917). • Arbitrary Reference points in a 2D vowel space. • Auditory qualities learned by rote. • Definitions: • highest front ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Vowels - Columbia CS
    • The front cardinal vowels are auditorily equidistant steps between (1) and ... • The back vowels are at the same equidistant steps as the front ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Learning Cardinal Vowels - International Phonetic Association
    [3] E. Fischer-Jørgensen, “Some Basic Vowel Features,. Their Articulatory Correlates and Their Explanatory. Power in Phonology,” in Phonetic Linguistics. Essays.
  19. [19]
    “The Science Of Vocal Pedagogy” in “The ... - Indiana University Press
    The best way to do this is to imitate the vowel as it is reproduced from a record. Experiments have proven that this method of imitating physiological ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  20. [20]
    MyEnglishness - The Cardinal Vowels with Daniel Jones
    May 19, 2015 · A cardinal vowel is a vowel sound produced when the tongue is in an extreme position, either front or back, high or low. The current system was ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] HANDOUT 5: THE CARDINAL VOWELS.
    Cardinal Vowels, and any vowel in any language can be identified by being placed within the system. core of the Daniel Jones system (Primary cardinal vowels).
  22. [22]
    [PDF] TONGUE POSITION IN ROUNDED AND UNROUNDED FRONT ...
    As expected, lip rounding alone always lowered all three formant frequencies. In- creasing the first-formant frequency for the rounded members of the [i-y] ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] LINGUISTICS 221 LECTURE #5 Vowels, consonants (continued) A ...
    CARDINAL VOWELS: A set of reference vowels first defined by Daniel. Jones ... • u CV8. CV2 e •. • o CV7. CV3. ´ •. • ø. CV6. CV4 a•. • å CV5. Extreme left corner ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Cardinal Vowels
    The shape of the area in which the tongue moves is usually idealised to form a quadrilateral (sometimes a triangle, as in the preceding video clip), on which ...
  25. [25]
    Cardinal vowels - english speech services
    Jul 5, 2012 · As systematized by Daniel Jones, there are eight primary cardinals. You can hear Jones producing these eight cardinals by clicking on the ...
  26. [26]
    [PDF] Vowels (pdf)
    Other problems with formants: rounding. • Vowels that differ only in lips: [i] vs. [y]. • “Opposite” lip positions in Secondary Chart. • e.g., (1) and (9) have ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Acoustic Correlates of the IPA Vowel Diagram
    This study investigates the relationship between the acoustic features of short steady-state vowels and per- ceived vowel quality, and describes formulae ...Missing: characteristics | Show results with:characteristics
  28. [28]
    Linguistics 103 - Vowel Chart with Sound Files - Bruce Hayes
    Approximate formant frequencies of the above vowels (Hz) ; Upper high. 294 2343 3251. 283 2170 2417. 293 2186 2507. 333 1482 2232 ; Lower high. 360 2187 2830. 401
  29. [29]
    [PDF] On the acoustic and perceptual characterization of reference vowels ...
    Mar 11, 2012 · Formant merging creates a vowel- specific sharp concentration of spectral energy in a narrow region of the frequency scale. This acoustic ...
  30. [30]
    Vowels (Chapter 4) - English Phonetics and Phonology
    Oct 17, 2025 · Cardinal vowels are not the vowels of any specific language. Rather, they constitute standardized reference vowel qualities. They were ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] A Course in English Phonetics for Spanish Speakers
    Cardinal Vowel No. 2; English vowel No. 3 (set); first element of English diphthongs (late, fair); Spanish vowel No. 2. Cardinal Vowel No. 3 front between ...
  32. [32]
    [PDF] teaching arabic emphatics to the english learners of
    vowel jal, or preferably Cardinal Vowel 5 as an auxiliary device to produce the emphatics is because this vowel is pharyngeal in terms of its relevant.
  33. [33]
    IPA Vowel symbols - Macquarie University
    Nov 13, 2024 · Cardinal Vowels. The 16 cardinal vowels are sub-divided into 8 primary and 8 secondary cardinal vowels. The first five primary cardinal ...
  34. [34]
    Measuring Vowels (Chapter 10) - The Cambridge Handbook of ...
    Nov 11, 2021 · In his vowel space, he defined the vowels in perceptually equidistant steps, except for the first and fifth vowels, which could be defined ...
  35. [35]
    [PDF] practical phonetics training and the nature of phonetic judgements
    This thesis is concerned with training in the discipline known as practical phonetics and with the nature of phonetic judgements made by students during the ...
  36. [36]
    Primary Cardinal Vowels - Pronunciation Studio
    Feb 2, 2024 · Well done for finishing Primary Cardinal Vowels. Next lesson: PRIMARY & SECONDARY CARDINAL VOWELS. 1; 2; 3; 4; 5; 6; 7; 8; 9; 10. Current ...
  37. [37]
    [PDF] virtual reality assisted pronunciation training (vrapt) for young - ERIC
    In order to test the impact of virtual reality games, the information received on the students' pronunciations of words and sentences was gathered through the ...
  38. [38]
    [PDF] term Phonetic Training Supports Second Language Vowel Production
    The hypothesis was that the conducted short-term phonetic training will result in improvement of production performance on both target vowels, and the results ...
  39. [39]
    Variability in Vowel Perception - J. D. M. H. Laver, 1965
    The results of the variation are used to evaluate the short- and long-term efficiency of the Daniel Jones Cardinal Vowel System of locating vowels. References.
  40. [40]
    Vowel Acoustic Space Development in Children - PubMed Central
    This article integrates published acoustic data on the development of vowel production. Age specific data on formant-frequencies are considered.
  41. [41]
    (PDF) ADAPTATION OF [ATR] IN ENGLISH LOANWORDS IN ÈWÙLÙ
    Dec 14, 2023 · ... African languages described as type /1IU/ languages, which. have [ATR] ... cardinal vowels nos. 3 and 4, respectively,. are interpreted by ...
  42. [42]
    [PDF] Perception of English /i/ and /1/ by Japanese listeners
    This paper reports on a subset of results from a preliminary study in which. Japanese listeners identified English vowels in terms of English vowel.
  43. [43]
    Vowel discrimination by speakers of English, German, Japanese ...
    THIS PAPER (1) DISCUSSES AN EXTENSIVE CROSS-LINGUISTIC vowel-discrimination experiment and relates the results to various hypotheses concerning speech ...
  44. [44]
  45. [45]
    [PDF] Towards an Auditory Reference System for Primary Vowel Types
    The highest agreement on defining reference sounds for cardinal vowels has been found for listeners of the British tradition. High levels of agreement were ...