Range of motion
Range of motion (ROM), also referred to as articular range of motion, is the extent and direction of movement possible at a joint, serving as a measure of the extent of movement possible around a joint axis and determined by the condition of the joints, muscles, and surrounding connective tissues. This functional capacity varies by joint and individual, reflecting the interplay of anatomical structures like ligaments, tendons, and joint capsules that limit or enable motion.[1] ROM is clinically assessed through three primary types: active ROM, where the individual performs the movement independently; passive ROM, where an examiner moves the joint; and active-assistive ROM, involving partial patient effort with assistance to overcome limitations.[2] Measurement typically employs a goniometer, a protractor-like device aligned with bony landmarks to quantify angular displacement in degrees, with reliability enhanced by averaging multiple trials.[2] These assessments are fundamental in physical therapy for diagnosing joint dysfunction, establishing rehabilitation goals, monitoring progress, and evaluating factors such as muscle strength, flexibility, and neurological integrity.[2] Maintaining optimal ROM is crucial for joint health, as it ensures nutrient delivery via synovial fluid and blood supply to cartilage, while inadequate ROM can lead to stiffness, pain, or secondary issues like muscle imbalances.[1] Factors influencing ROM include age-related degeneration, acute injuries such as fractures, chronic conditions like arthritis or neurological disorders, and soft tissue restrictions from swelling or scarring.[3] Interventions like targeted stretching, strengthening exercises, and physical therapy aim to restore or preserve ROM, reducing injury risk and enhancing daily function and athletic performance.[1][3]Fundamentals
Definition and Importance
Range of motion (ROM) refers to the full extent and direction of movement possible around a joint, representing the distance a bone can move relative to its adjacent bone. It is typically measured in degrees from a neutral anatomical position and is influenced by the integrity of surrounding joints, muscles, and connective tissues.[4] ROM encompasses primary joint movements, including flexion, a bending action that decreases the angle between two bones; extension, which straightens the joint by increasing that angle; abduction, the movement of a limb away from the body's midline; adduction, the return toward the midline; and rotation, the pivoting of a bone around its longitudinal axis.[5] The clinical assessment of range of motion (ROM) emerged in the early 20th century with the development of physical therapy and biomechanics, including the adoption of goniometers in the 1910s and their increased use during World War I for evaluating injuries. Early evaluations focused on restoring functional movement.[6] Initial assessments of ROM relied on visual approximations, marking the transition from qualitative observations to more structured analyses of joint function in clinical settings.[6] Maintaining optimal ROM plays a vital role in preserving joint health by preventing stiffness and contractures, while enabling essential activities of daily living such as dressing, eating, and ambulating.[7] It also serves as a key indicator of musculoskeletal disorders, with restrictions often signaling conditions like arthritis, trauma, or neurological impairments that impair overall mobility.[3] Adequate ROM supports broader physical function, reduces sedentary behavior, and helps mitigate risks for chronic diseases by facilitating sustained physical activity throughout life.[7]Types of Range of Motion
Range of motion (ROM) is categorized into three primary types based on the degree of patient involvement and external assistance: active ROM (AROM), passive ROM (PROM), and active-assisted ROM (AAROM). These distinctions arise from the source of movement initiation and control, influencing their application in rehabilitation and assessment.[8][9] Active ROM refers to the degree of joint movement achieved solely through voluntary contraction and relaxation of the patient's own muscles, without any external aid. This type requires sufficient muscle strength and neuromuscular control to propel the body part through its available range. For example, raising the arm overhead using shoulder muscles exemplifies AROM, as it engages agonist and antagonist muscle groups to facilitate motion. AROM is fundamental for evaluating functional capacity and promoting muscle endurance.[10][11] Passive ROM involves an external force, such as a therapist's hands or a mechanical device like a continuous passive motion machine, moving the joint while the patient remains fully relaxed and contributes no muscular effort. This allows assessment of the joint's inherent mobility independent of muscle influence, often revealing underlying structural limitations. PROM is particularly valuable in early postoperative care, such as after knee arthroplasty, to maintain joint lubrication and prevent adhesions without risking muscle strain.[8][9] Active-assisted ROM combines partial voluntary muscle activation by the patient with external support to complete the movement, typically when full AROM is not yet feasible due to weakness or pain. Assistance may come from a therapist, pulley system, or the patient's unaffected limb, enabling progression in rehabilitation. This type is commonly employed in the initial phases of recovery following rotator cuff surgery, where it supports gradual restoration of motion while minimizing stress on healing tissues.[10][11] The types differ markedly in muscle involvement: AROM demands full patient-generated force through concentric and eccentric contractions, PROM excludes any muscular contribution to isolate joint mechanics, and AAROM relies on hybrid effort where patient input is supplemented externally. Regarding end-feel—the tactile resistance encountered at motion's limit—AROM typically yields a soft, muscular resistance from stretched antagonists, whereas PROM often presents a firmer, capsular end-feel indicative of ligamentous or bony constraints, aiding diagnosis of joint pathology. Clinically, AROM assesses strength and coordination for daily activities, PROM evaluates joint integrity such as capsular tightness in frozen shoulder, and AAROM facilitates safe progression in therapy to rebuild function without overload.[9][12][10]Measurement and Assessment
Methods for Measuring ROM
Goniometry remains the cornerstone of range of motion (ROM) assessment in clinical practice, utilizing a goniometer to quantify joint angles in degrees. Universal goniometers, the most prevalent type, feature a protractor body with two adjustable arms and are available in short-arm variants for smaller joints like the wrist or ankle and long-arm versions for larger joints such as the hip or knee. Digital goniometers, including dedicated electronic devices and smartphone-integrated models, enhance accuracy through automated angle detection via accelerometers, demonstrating equivalent or superior inter- and intrarater reliability to universal models, with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) often exceeding 0.90 for hip and knee ROM.[2][13] The measurement procedure begins with positioning the patient to stabilize the proximal joint segment in a neutral alignment, ensuring consistent soft tissue tension. The clinician palpates key bony landmarks to locate the joint's axis of rotation, then aligns the goniometer's fulcrum directly over this axis. The stationary arm is oriented parallel to the longitudinal axis of the proximal (stationary) segment, while the moving arm tracks the distal (mobile) segment. For active ROM, the patient voluntarily moves the joint through its full arc until resistance is met; for passive ROM, the clinician gently assists the movement. The angle is read and recorded at end-range, with measurements typically repeated three times and averaged to account for variability. Improper arm alignment or patient positioning can introduce errors of up to 5-10 degrees, emphasizing the need for precise technique.[2][14] Inclinometers offer a gravity-dependent, non-invasive alternative to goniometry, particularly for assessing spinal curvature or limb inclination, by placing the device along the segment of interest to measure tilt relative to a horizontal reference. These tools exhibit strong intrarater reliability (ICC 0.94) and interrater reliability (ICC 0.80) for knee extension ROM, outperforming universal goniometers (interrater ICC 0.36) in populations with anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Smartphone applications functioning as digital inclinometers leverage built-in sensors for similar measurements, achieving comparable reliability (interrater ICC 0.79) and minimal detectable changes of 3-5 degrees, making them viable for telemedicine or field-based assessments despite slight systematic differences of 3-5 degrees compared to traditional goniometers.[15][14] Visual estimation serves as a quick, instrument-free method for preliminary ROM screening, relying on the clinician's observation of joint alignment against anatomical references or a plumb line. However, its reliability is limited by subjectivity, with interrater ICCs of 0.82-0.83 for knee flexion and extension, lower than goniometry's 0.86-0.90, and prone to inconsistencies of 5-10 degrees across testers due to variations in experience and perspective. This approach is best reserved for initial evaluations rather than precise quantification.[16] Standardization protocols are essential to enhance measurement accuracy and reduce variability, as outlined in evidence-based guidelines from the American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) and supported by clinical research. These recommend specific patient positioning—such as supine for hip flexion or prone for knee extension—to isolate the joint and maintain consistent gravitational and soft tissue influences, with the joint stabilized to prevent compensatory movements. Measurements should involve at least three repetitions per motion, recording the average to mitigate intrarater fluctuations, and both active and passive ROM where clinically appropriate. Key error sources include inter-rater variability (up to 10 degrees without protocol adherence), palpation inaccuracies, and soft tissue artifact; protocols emphasize training, clear landmark identification, and error minimization through repeated practice to achieve ICCs above 0.85.[17][18] Advanced methods like 3D motion capture systems, exemplified by VICON, provide high-fidelity ROM analysis for research and complex assessments by tracking multiple degrees of freedom across joints. The setup entails installing 5-8 infrared cameras in a calibrated volume (typically 4x3x3 meters) around the subject, with reflective markers or rigid clusters attached to anatomical landmarks on body segments. Data capture occurs at 100 Hz as the subject performs calibrated movements, such as hemispherical trajectories for validation. Processing involves software like VICON Nexus for marker trajectory reconstruction, synchronization via time-stamping, and kinematic modeling to compute joint angles, yielding average rotational accuracy of 0.40 degrees (standard deviation 0.35 degrees) after Procrustes alignment to correct for coordinate offsets. These systems excel in quantifying multi-planar ROM but demand substantial setup time and cost, limiting routine clinical use.[19]Normal Ranges and Norms
Normal ranges of motion (ROM) for human joints are established through standardized measurements of active or passive motion, typically expressed in degrees, and serve as benchmarks for clinical assessment. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) provides widely referenced normative values derived from healthy populations, focusing on major joints across the upper and lower extremities as well as the spine. These norms, originally compiled in the AAOS handbook on joint motion measurement, reflect average arcs achievable without pain or restriction in asymptomatic adults. Similarly, the seminal study by Boone and Azen (1979) measured active ROM in 109 healthy male subjects aged 20-54 years using a clinical goniometer, establishing age-stratified norms for extremities and confirming significant differences across age groups for most motions. Modern studies, such as a 2016 analysis of 440 young Japanese adults, validate and expand these references by quantifying individual variations while aligning closely with AAOS standards. The values below are primarily for active ROM, with passive ROM typically 10-20% greater in healthy adults.[2] The following tables summarize representative AAOS normative ROM values for key joints, compiled from established clinical guidelines. These values represent typical full arcs from neutral position and are applicable to both active and passive motion in healthy adults unless specified.[20]Upper Extremities
| Joint | Motion | Normal ROM (degrees) |
|---|---|---|
| Shoulder | Flexion | 0-180 |
| Extension | 0-60 | |
| Abduction | 0-180 | |
| Adduction | 0-30 | |
| Internal Rotation | 0-70 | |
| External Rotation | 0-90 | |
| Elbow | Flexion | 0-150 |
| Extension | 0 | |
| Forearm | Pronation | 0-80 |
| Supination | 0-80 | |
| Wrist | Flexion | 0-80 |
| Extension | 0-70 | |
| Radial Deviation | 0-20 | |
| Ulnar Deviation | 0-30 |
Lower Extremities
| Joint | Motion | Normal ROM (degrees) |
|---|---|---|
| Hip | Flexion | 0-120 |
| Extension | 0-20 | |
| Abduction | 0-40 | |
| Adduction | 0-20 | |
| Internal Rotation | 0-45 | |
| External Rotation | 0-45 | |
| Knee | Flexion | 0-135 |
| Extension | 0 | |
| Ankle | Dorsiflexion | 0-20 |
| Plantarflexion | 0-50 | |
| Inversion | 0-35 | |
| Eversion | 0-15 |
Spine
| Region | Motion | Normal ROM (degrees) |
|---|---|---|
| Cervical | Flexion | 0-45 |
| Extension | 0-45 | |
| Lateral Flexion | 0-45 (each side) | |
| Rotation | 0-60 (total) | |
| Thoracolumbar | Flexion | 0-90 |
| Extension | 0-30 | |
| Lateral Flexion | 0-30 (each side) | |
| Rotation | 0-30 (each side) |