Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Center for Inquiry

The Center for Inquiry (CFI) is a 501(c)(3) founded in 1991 by philosopher to foster a secular society grounded in science, reason, freedom of inquiry, and humanist values. It emerged as an umbrella institution uniting the Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the (CSICOP, established 1976) and the Council for Democratic and (CODESH, established 1980), both initiated by Kurtz to promote against and advocate naturalistic ethics over supernatural beliefs. Headquartered near the in , CFI operates a network of over 40 branches and communities worldwide, conducting research, education, and advocacy to defend evidence-based decision-making and challenge superstition, , and undue religious influence in . Its programs include the publication of magazines such as (via its ) and Free Inquiry, hosting conferences like those on and , and maintaining an Office of Public Policy in Washington, D.C., to support church-state separation and scientific integrity in governance. Among its defining characteristics, CFI has been instrumental in the modern movement, drawing inspiration from figures like , , and , while facing internal controversies, including Kurtz's 2010 departure amid disputes over leadership and emphasis on "" versus eupraxsophy—a practical without doctrinal rigidity. The organization continues to prioritize empirical scrutiny of extraordinary claims, contributing to public discourse on topics from investigations to , though critics have accused it of insufficient attention to issues within secular communities.

History

Origins in Skepticism and Humanism (1970s–1990)

In the 1970s, a surge in popular interest in pseudoscientific topics, including astrology, unidentified flying objects (UFOs), and psychic phenomena, coincided with cultural disillusionment following events like the Vietnam War and Watergate, prompting calls for empirical scrutiny over anecdotal or faith-based explanations. Philosopher Paul Kurtz, then a professor at the State University of New York at Buffalo, responded by convening the first national conference on "The New Irrationalisms" in 1975, which highlighted the need for organized scientific investigation into paranormal claims. Kurtz founded the Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal (CSICOP) in 1976 as a nonprofit dedicated to testing extraordinary assertions through rigorous, evidence-based methods. The organization attracted luminaries such as astronomer , author , psychologist , and mathematician , who served on its founding executive board and contributed to early investigative efforts. CSICOP's inaugural publication, The Zetetic (renamed The Skeptical Inquirer in 1977), provided a platform for peer-reviewed critiques of unsubstantiated claims, emphasizing and reproducible evidence over . Complementing this skeptical focus, Kurtz established the Council for Democratic and Secular Humanism (CODESH) in 1980 to advance ethical systems grounded in reason, science, and human potential without reliance on supernatural doctrines. CODESH promoted secular humanism as a positive alternative to religious dogma, issuing declarations like A Secular Humanist Declaration (1980) that outlined commitments to democracy, individual rights, and naturalistic morality. By the late 1980s, these entities—CSICOP and CODESH—had cultivated networks of researchers and educators, fostering a movement that prioritized causal explanations derived from observable data over mystical interpretations.

Founding and Early Expansion (1991–2000)

The Center for Inquiry (CFI) was established in 1991 in Amherst, New York, by philosopher Paul Kurtz as a unified headquarters merging the Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal (CSICOP, later renamed the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry) and the Council for Democratic and Secular Humanism (CODESH, later the Council for Secular Humanism). This structural integration combined scientific skepticism's focus on investigating paranormal claims with secular humanism's advocacy for naturalistic ethics and values, creating a centralized institution to advance reason-based inquiry. The headquarters was located adjacent to the University at Buffalo's North Campus, where Kurtz had been a philosophy professor since 1965, facilitating academic ties and resource sharing. From its inception, CFI incorporated foundational facilities for research, including an initial housing collections on , , and related naturalistic materials to support scholarly work in these areas. This served as an early for preserving and accessing resources dedicated to empirical and rational approaches, laying the groundwork for expanded centers. Under Kurtz's leadership as founder and chair, the organization began consolidating operations, publications like and Free Inquiry, and programmatic efforts to promote secular perspectives against faith-based dominance in public ethics and policy. Throughout the , CFI pursued initial growth by hosting conferences and events that highlighted the integration of skeptical methodologies with humanist principles, such as those continuing CSICOP's tradition of international gatherings examining and . Early outreach emphasized domestic consolidation before broader international expansion, with efforts focused on building institutional capacity in Amherst to foster a network of advocates. By 2000, this phase had solidified CFI's role as a key proponent of and , though formal European branches emerged later in the decade.

Institutional Growth and Challenges (2000–2015)

In 2006, the Center for Inquiry established its Office of Public Policy in Washington, D.C., on November 14, to advance secular governance and counter religious influence in federal legislation, including critiques of faith-based funding expansions under the Bush administration. This initiative marked a strategic pivot toward direct policy engagement, issuing the Declaration in Defense of Science and Secularism to rally support against encroachments on empirical standards in public affairs. CFI's advocacy against pseudomedicine grew through the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry's ongoing investigations and publications in Skeptical Inquirer, targeting unsubstantiated therapies like homeopathy with calls for regulatory scrutiny, as evidenced by petitions to agencies such as the FDA emphasizing the need for evidence-based labeling. These efforts aligned with broader institutional expansion, including sustained operations at branches like the Center for Inquiry–Los Angeles, fostering regional outreach on pseudoscience critiques. Internal tensions surfaced in 2009 when founder Paul Kurtz resigned amid disputes with board leadership, including CEO Ronald Lindsay, over organizational direction; Kurtz advocated a conciliatory humanism, while successors pursued a more confrontational approach resonant with "new atheism" proponents like Richard Dawkins, whom CFI featured in forums critiquing faith-based epistemologies. This schism highlighted ideological fractures, with Kurtz launching a rival institute, exacerbating funding strains from donor reevaluations tied to leadership stability. By 2015, CFI addressed structural challenges through mergers integrating the and as internal programs, enhancing operational efficiency and positioning the organization for amplified secular advocacy without diluting core skeptical commitments. These consolidations mitigated prior silos while navigating debates over alignment with assertive , prioritizing empirical rigor over accommodation.

Recent Developments and Leadership Transitions (2016–Present)

In December 2015, Ronald A. Lindsay announced his resignation as president and CEO of the Center for Inquiry, effective December 31, 2015, concluding his tenure amid the organization's merger preparations. Robyn E. Blumner assumed the role of CEO and president in early 2016, leveraging her background in civil liberties advocacy to steer CFI toward enhanced policy engagement and resource integration following the merger with the Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason & Science, which bolstered CFI's operational capacity and outreach. Under Blumner's leadership, CFI intensified digital advocacy, including legislative alerts and online campaigns against pseudoscientific exemptions in public health policy. In August 2025, the organization mobilized supporters in Massachusetts to back H.2554, a bill aimed at eliminating religious exemptions for routine childhood immunizations in schools to strengthen herd immunity and reduce outbreak risks. Concurrently, CFI sustained flagship events like CSICon, announcing the 2026 edition for June 11–14 in Buffalo, New York, to commemorate the 50th anniversary of the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry with programming on skepticism's future amid anti-science trends. CFI's Secular Rescue program adapted to escalating global threats against freethinkers, providing emergency relocation and support to over a dozen activists from high-risk areas like since its inception, with ongoing efforts documented in 2025 amid authoritarian crackdowns on secular expression. These initiatives reflect CFI's pivot toward proactive defense of inquiry against ideological encroachments, prioritizing evidence-based responses over accommodation of faith-based privileges.

Mission and Principles

Core Commitments to Science, Reason, and Secularism

The Center for Inquiry (CFI) maintains a foundational commitment to advancing a secular society through the primacy of reason, science, and freedom of inquiry, explicitly rejecting dogmatic assertions in favor of evidence-based evaluation. This ideology emphasizes philosophical naturalism, positing that explanations for natural phenomena must derive from observable, testable mechanisms rather than supernatural interventions. CFI's mission underscores falsifiability as central to valid knowledge claims, aligning with the scientific method's requirement that hypotheses be open to empirical disproof, thereby dismissing unfalsifiable propositions like paranormal events or divine causation. In governance and ethics, CFI advocates for policies insulated from religious imposition, grounded in causal realism—the view that events arise from verifiable chains of natural causes, not faith-derived absolutes. This extends to secular humanism, which CFI frames as a rational ethical system prioritizing human welfare through critical analysis, free from reliance on transcendent authority. Such humanism critiques faith-based morality for fostering unsubstantiated relativism or absolutism, instead deriving principles from empirical consequences and shared human needs, as articulated in CFI-affiliated declarations skeptical of redemption theories or untested dogmas. CFI distinguishes its approach from passive by proactively championing skeptical tools to interrogate all beliefs, integrating humanism's affirmative with scientific scrutiny to promote societal over mere negation of . This proactive stance fosters inquiry as a constructive force, encouraging evidence-driven decision-making across , policy, and personal conduct, rather than halting at disbelief.

Ideological Foundations: Skepticism versus Faith-Based Claims

The Center for Inquiry (CFI) grounds its ideology in , which demands and for all truth claims, including those rooted in religious faith. Religious doctrines, by contrast, often rely on unfalsifiable assertions—such as or an —that evade testing and thus fail basic criteria of rational evaluation, as articulated by CFI founder , who argued that faith-based creeds pretentiously claim authority without sufficient evidential warrant. Historically, such claims have intersected with , resisting naturalistic accounts like in favor of that lack predictive power or empirical support. CFI advocates naturalistic explanations as causally adequate for human phenomena traditionally attributed to the . , for instance, emerges from evolutionary processes fostering and reciprocity, rather than divine command, enabling grounded in observable human behavior and reason. , similarly, arises from neural complexity without requiring immaterial , aligning with neuroscientific data on function over dualistic faith posits. These views prioritize causal chains verifiable through , dismissing faith's explanatory gaps as unnecessary invocations of untestable agents. Central to CFI's stance is the defense of unrestricted inquiry against faith-enforced boundaries, exemplified by opposition to blasphemy laws that shield religious claims from criticism and stifle empirical scrutiny. Established in 2009, CFI's International Blasphemy Rights Day underscores this commitment, asserting that no doctrine merits legal protection from rational challenge, as such censorship perpetuates unfalsifiable beliefs over evidence-based discourse. Religious advocates counter that faith yields social utility, such as enhanced community cohesion and moral intuition, purportedly superior to skepticism's purported moral relativism. CFI rebuts this with data indicating that secular, naturalistic frameworks sustain ethical behavior effectively—evidenced by low crime and high societal trust in predominantly non-religious nations like Denmark and Sweden—while priming religious cues can sometimes amplify punitive rather than prosocial tendencies, undermining claims of faith's unique causal efficacy for morality. Thus, CFI maintains that truth-seeking demands evidence over utility, as beneficial effects do not validate ontologically flawed premises.

Evolution from Humanism to Broader Freethought Advocacy

The Center for Inquiry, initially rooted in Paul Kurtz's vision of , emphasized eupraxophy—a framework for ethical living and personal fulfillment grounded in reason and empirical rather than supernatural doctrines—as a constructive alternative to religious worldviews. This approach sought to build affirmative secular values, including individual autonomy and naturalistic ethics, while critiquing and claims through affiliated bodies like the Council for . The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, catalyzed a pivot toward more assertive freethought advocacy, aligning CFI with the "new atheism" surge that demanded unyielding opposition to faith-based epistemologies, particularly in light of religiously motivated violence. This shift prioritized exposing the causal harms of collectivist religious dogmas—such as theocratic impulses—over accommodationist strategies, integrating influences from figures like Richard Dawkins and Sam Harris while applying skeptical scrutiny to ideological overreach in any domain. Kurtz's 2009 resignation as board chairman highlighted ensuing tensions, as he argued the organization had veered into "angry atheism," diluting focus on shared humanistic principles with moderate nonbelievers or ethical religionists in favor of confrontation. Subsequent CFI leadership, exemplified by Tom Flynn's editorial influence at Free Inquiry, broadened advocacy to encompass defenses of individual liberty against both traditional religious orthodoxies and emerging secular dogmas that echoed collectivist . This drew acclaim for its unflinching causal realism in linking unsubstantiated beliefs to societal costs, fostering bolder policy engagements on church-state separation and . Critics, however, contended it risked isolating potential allies by eschewing pragmatic coalitions, potentially hindering humanism's appeal amid cultural polarization.

Organizational Structure

Governance and Leadership

The Center for Inquiry operates as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit under the oversight of a volunteer , chaired by constitutional Edward Tabash as of 2024, which holds responsibility for strategic direction, financial management, and mission alignment. The board comprises individuals with expertise in , , and , ensuring decisions prioritize evidence-based and secular principles over ideological influences. Robyn E. Blumner, a with prior experience leading the Foundation for Reason and Science, assumed the role of and CEO in following the organizations' merger and the departure of predecessor Ronald A. Lindsay. Under Blumner's tenure, leadership has emphasized legal advocacy, including challenges to religious exemptions in public policy and defenses of free speech in scientific discourse. This approach builds on a 2009 transition initiated by founder , who shifted from day-to-day executive duties to an emeritus role, enabling a pivot from Kurtz's emphasis on philosophical to streamlined operational management focused on policy impact and institutional growth. CFI's funding relies predominantly on private donations and membership dues, which constituted over $5.6 million in contributions for recent fiscal years reported by the , fostering independence from government grants or religious affiliations. Board-level oversight includes regular reviews of programs and expenditures to uphold empirical standards, such as vetting claims through scientific methodologies before public endorsement. This structure reinforces CFI's operational integrity by mandating in decision-making and adherence to verifiable evidence in advocacy efforts.

Headquarters, Branches, and Affiliates

The Center for Inquiry (CFI) maintains its primary headquarters at 3965 Rensch Road in , a facility that houses administrative operations, research resources, and the CFI Libraries, which include extensive collections on , , and across multiple specialized reading rooms. This location, situated near the University at Buffalo's North Campus, supports core programs such as editorial offices for affiliated publications and hosts events through the local CFI branch. CFI also operates executive offices in , at 621 Pennsylvania Avenue SE, focused on policy advocacy and outreach, and maintains a presence in , , at 4773 for activities. CFI's networked structure includes domestic branches such as those in Austin, Texas; Indianapolis, Indiana; and Michigan, which conduct local events, lectures, and community programs aligned with CFI's mission of promoting reason and science. Key affiliates encompass the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry (CSI), which operates as a programmatic division dedicated to investigating pseudoscience and publishing the Skeptical Inquirer magazine, and the Centre for Inquiry Canada (CFIC), a partnered entity with headquarters in Ottawa, Ontario, that runs volunteer-led branches across Canada for secular education and advocacy. These affiliates extend CFI's operational scale by leveraging shared resources while maintaining semi-autonomous structures for regional engagement. Additional partnerships include collaborations with specialized institutes, such as those advancing secular perspectives on religion, though CFI emphasizes operational independence in its core research into naturalistic worldviews through dedicated library and archival resources at the Amherst headquarters. This distributed model enables CFI to coordinate advocacy and inquiry efforts without centralizing all functions, supporting a total footprint that includes student chapters and community groups mapped via CFI's online directory.

International Operations and Partnerships

The Center for Inquiry maintains international branches and representatives in multiple countries, including , , , and , to extend its advocacy for reason, science, and beyond the . These affiliates organize local events, lectures, and community outreach tailored to regional contexts, such as promoting in areas with strong religious influences. For instance, CFI , established in the late through collaboration with CFI's for project, has focused on humanist education and countering in for over two decades. A cornerstone of CFI's global efforts is the Secular Rescue program, launched on September 30, 2016, which provides emergency financial, legal, and relocation assistance to secular writers, bloggers, activists, and apostates facing death threats or persecution in high-risk regions, particularly Muslim-majority countries like Bangladesh, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia. The program has facilitated the escape and resettlement of dozens of individuals, with ongoing cases involving weekly inquiries from those fleeing blasphemy accusations or fatwas; by 2022, it continued to support exiles advocating human rights and nonbelief amid persistent dangers. This initiative collaborates with networks of ex-Muslims and freethinkers, emphasizing aid to those renouncing Islam under threat of violence from theocratic enforcement. CFI holds special consultative status with the since 2005, enabling participation in global forums to advance secular policies and critique religious encroachments on , such as laws. Partnerships extend to academic and advocacy exchanges, though specific university programs remain limited; efforts include promoting scientific curricula through international representatives and alliances with groups like the merged Foundation, enhancing outreach in and beyond. Challenges persist from theocratic regimes, where local branches encounter and hostility—evidenced by Secular Rescue's documented rescues from extrajudicial killings—yet these operations have sustained measurable outcomes, including protected lives and amplified voices against faith-based oppression.

Programs and Initiatives

Skeptical Inquiry and Investigations

The Committee for Skeptical Inquiry (CSI), a core program of the Center for Inquiry, promotes scientific inquiry and critical investigation into controversial claims, including those involving the paranormal, pseudoscience, and extraordinary assertions. Established as the successor to the Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal in 2006, CSI employs empirical methods such as controlled experiments, statistical analysis, and peer-reviewed evaluation to test hypotheses, favoring reproducible evidence over subjective anecdotes or unverified testimony. CSI's investigations span topics like UFO sightings, psychic abilities, and alternative therapies, with findings disseminated through its bimonthly publication Skeptical Inquirer, which has critiqued unsubstantiated claims in areas from astrology to ghost recordings since its inception in 1976. For instance, in September 2019, CSI examined an alleged electronic voice phenomenon audio purported to capture a ghost, applying audio forensics and environmental controls to attribute the sounds to mundane sources rather than supernatural origins. These efforts underscore CSI's commitment to methodological rigor, often revealing cognitive biases or misinterpretations as explanations for apparent anomalies. The CFI Investigations Group extends this skeptical approach to consumer protection, targeting fraud linked to pseudoscientific products. In 2018, CFI filed a lawsuit against CVS, alleging deceptive marketing of homeopathic remedies that lack scientific efficacy, arguing such practices mislead consumers into forgoing evidence-based treatments. Courts have recognized CFI's expertise in pseudoscience as qualifying it to challenge these claims under consumer protection laws. In February 2020, CFI incorporated , a longstanding resource combating health through evidence-based critiques of unproven treatments and devices, bolstering its influence on regulatory policies against medical . This integration has amplified CFI's role in exposing fraudulent schemes, such as exaggerated claims for supplements or therapies, thereby contributing to informed public discourse and potential legislative reforms.

Secular Advocacy and Policy Engagement

The Center for Inquiry maintains an Office of Public Policy in Washington, D.C., led by Director of Government Affairs Azhar Majeed since July 2021, which conducts lobbying and advocacy to promote evidence-based policymaking and restrict religious influence on government decisions. This office opposes federal funding for faith-based social service programs, arguing that such initiatives risk entangling government with religious doctrine and undermining secular governance principles. In education policy, CFI has lobbied against school voucher programs that divert public funds to private religious institutions, as seen in its 2017 condemnation of a proposed $1 billion allocation under the Trump administration, contending that such measures erode the separation of church and state. CFI supports policies prioritizing over religious exemptions, including efforts to eliminate faith-based opt-outs from mandates. For instance, in response to ongoing debates over requirements, CFI has advocated for uniform, science-driven rules without religious carve-outs, highlighting correlations between such exemptions and increased outbreaks based on epidemiological data. This stance aligns with CFI's broader push in 2025 for policies countering pseudoscientific challenges to measures, such as those amplified by figures questioning efficacy. To challenge religious taboos constraining free expression, CFI initiated International Blasphemy Day on September 30, 2009, commemorating the Danish Muhammad cartoons controversy and promoting open critique of sacred doctrines as essential to secular discourse. The annual event underscores CFI's policy goal of defending speech rights against blasphemy laws, which it views as tools for theocratic control rather than legitimate protections of belief. While CFI's advocacy emphasizes curbing institutional religious privilege to safeguard pluralistic governance, some internal and external critiques note potential tensions with individual liberties, such as when policy enforcement might infringe on personal conscience absent empirical harm.

Education and Public Outreach Programs

The Center for Inquiry's Teacher Institute for Evolutionary Science (TIES) delivers to elementary and educators, supplying content knowledge, lesson plans, and strategies for teaching in alignment with while addressing common objections from non-scientific perspectives. Originating from workshops initiated by the Foundation for Reason & Science in 2015, TIES integrated into CFI's programs and marked its tenth anniversary in April 2025 with expanded online resources, including webinars featuring scientists and full curriculum units on and common ancestry. These efforts target regions with curricular resistance to , enabling teachers to integrate evidence-based without relying on unsubstantiated alternatives. Complementing classroom-focused initiatives, CFI's ScienceSaves campaign disseminates public education on empirical methods by documenting verifiable instances where scientific innovations—such as vaccines, clean water technologies, and medical diagnostics—have demonstrably enhanced human health and welfare, in contrast to unproven pseudoscientific claims. Launched to foster science appreciation, it includes teacher toolkits for incorporating these narratives into curricula, alongside an annual video scholarship contest that awards funding to student-produced content highlighting science's practical impacts; the 2025 contest concluded with winners selected in May. The program also advocates for National Science Appreciation Day on March 26, drawing on documented historical and contemporary data to underscore causal links between scientific inquiry and societal progress. CFI hosts CSICon, an annual conference dedicated to advancing critical thinking through keynote addresses, panels, and workshops on topics ranging from pseudoscience debunking to evidence-based policy, attracting hundreds of participants including educators and students to Las Vegas for immersive skeptical discourse. Events feature speakers like climate scientist Michael E. Mann and biologist Peter Hotez, emphasizing empirical validation over anecdotal or faith-derived assertions, with 2026 programming headlined by Bill Nye. Previously, CFI ran Camp Inquiry, a residential summer program for children aged 8–17 that combined recreational activities with hands-on experiments in scientific method and rational inquiry to cultivate early skepticism toward unsubstantiated beliefs; it operated from 2005 until its closure in 2015 due to resource constraints, leaving a legacy of alumni reports on sustained interest in evidence-based reasoning.

Discontinued or Evolved Projects

The Center for Inquiry operated Camp Inquiry, a residential summer camp program in Holland, New York, designed to teach children aged 7-16 critical thinking, skepticism, and scientific inquiry through activities free from supernatural or religious frameworks. The camp ran annually from 2006 to 2015, marking its tenth and final year in the latter. Its discontinuation reflected resource limitations in maintaining specialized youth programs, with CFI shifting focus toward broader outreach amid financial pressures following organizational mergers and consolidations. The Naturalism Research Project, launched in 2007 to promote philosophical via fellowships, library expansions, and conferences such as "The Future of Naturalism," evolved from a standalone initiative into components of CFI's wider research on and . Early successes included hosting scholars like and expanding resources for naturalistic ethics, but the project's discrete structure was absorbed into ongoing programs by the mid-2010s, prioritizing integrated advocacy over isolated academic pursuits. CFI's targeted campaigns on medicine and health , including critiques of alternative therapies through affiliated outlets like , were gradually incorporated into core skeptical inquiry efforts rather than maintained as distinct projects. This evolution underscored strengths in compiling empirical critiques of unproven treatments—such as data on —but revealed limitations in achieving long-term policy shifts, as fragmented initiatives yielded insights better sustained via centralized . Overall, these transitions highlighted trade-offs between innovative experimentation and scalable impact, with data-driven outputs enduring despite program sunsets.

Publications and Awards

Magazines, Books, and Media Outlets

The Center for Inquiry (CFI) publishes Skeptical Inquirer, a bimonthly magazine founded in 1976 by the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry (CSI), an affiliate organization dedicated to promoting scientific inquiry and debunking pseudoscience. The publication features articles on paranormal claims, scientific skepticism, and rational analysis, serving as a primary outlet for empirical critiques of unsubstantiated beliefs. CFI also produces Free Inquiry, established in 1980 under the Council for Secular Humanism, another affiliate, as a bimonthly exploring , , and critiques of religious from a naturalistic perspective. It claims to be the largest-circulation English-language magazine focused on value-rich lives without , with an average print circulation of 30,000 copies per issue. Through its historical association with —founded in 1969 by CFI co-founder —CFI has supported the publication of over 2,500 titles emphasizing , , and empirical examinations of and . Notable examples include edited volumes like Science and : Are They Compatible? (2003), which compiles arguments assessing compatibility through rather than theological assertions. These books, often authored by CFI affiliates, prioritize data-driven analysis over ideological advocacy, such as evaluating moral judgments via . In digital formats, CFI extends its output via the Point of Inquiry podcast, launched as its flagship program to host discussions on , , and countering , featuring experts in since at least 2005. The organization maintains online archives, blogs, and video content on platforms like to disseminate rational discourse, adapting traditional publishing to address contemporary claims of or ideological overreach. These media outlets collectively aim to foster evidence-based public dialogue, though specific metrics on digital reach remain limited in public reports.

Notable Awards and Recognitions

The Center for Inquiry (CFI) administers several awards that recognize contributions to secular humanism, skeptical inquiry, and rational thought, emphasizing empirical evidence and critical analysis over ideological conformity or public acclaim. The flagship Richard Dawkins Award, established in 2003 and presented annually by CFI since 2019 in partnership with the Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason & Science, honors individuals who publicly challenge religious dogma through writings, speeches, or media. Valued for its focus on substantive impact, the award has gone to recipients including Ayaan Hirsi Ali in 2008 for her critiques of Islamic practices and advocacy for ex-Muslim rights; Daniel Dennett in 2007 for philosophical defenses of atheism; Christopher Hitchens in 2009 for polemics against religion; Ricky Gervais in 2019 for comedic deconstructions of faith; Javed Akhtar in 2020 for promoting rationalism in India; Tim Minchin in 2021 for satirical advocacy of science; Bill Nye in 2023 for science education efforts; and John McWhorter in 2025 for linguistic and cultural critiques of dogma. Through its Committee for Skeptical Inquiry (CSI), CFI awards the Robert P. Balles Annual Prize in Critical Thinking, a $2,500 honor for published works demonstrating rigorous skepticism, logical reasoning, or empirical validation against pseudoscience. Launched in 2008, it prioritizes verifiable evidence over anecdotal claims, with past winners including CNN reporters for their 2018 documentary A Deal with the Devil exposing faith healer Peter Popoff in 2019; Maria Konnikova for The Confidence Game on psychological manipulation in 2017; and Susan Gerbic and Timothy Caulfield for investigative journalism and public health advocacy in 2022. The Morris D. Forkosch Award for the best humanist book and the Selma V. Forkosch Award for the outstanding article in Free Inquiry magazine, jointly established by CFI and the Council for Secular Humanism, each carry a $250 prize and celebrate writings advancing ethical secularism and evidence-based ethics. Criteria stress intellectual rigor and causal analysis of human behavior without supernatural assumptions; recent book winners include Katherine Stewart for The Power Worshippers in 2020, examining religious nationalism's empirical effects, and Stephen Weldon for The Scientific Spirit of American Humanism in 2021. These awards have drawn praise for spotlighting empirically grounded dissent but faced critique for perceived selectivity toward recipients aligning with progressive secularism, potentially overlooking conservative rationalists despite stated neutrality on impact over popularity.

Advocacy and Legal Efforts

Campaigns Against Pseudoscience and Religious Influence

The Center for Inquiry (CFI) launched the ScienceSaves campaign to promote public appreciation for scientific achievements and counter pseudoscientific claims, particularly in health and medicine, emphasizing real-world benefits like vaccines and evidence-based treatments. Initiated around 2022, the campaign includes annual observances such as National Science Appreciation Day on March 26, along with video scholarship contests for high school seniors to highlight science's role in improving lives, with winners announced as recently as May 2025 awarding up to $10,000. ScienceSaves specifically targets anti-vaccination misinformation by sharing stories of science's lifesaving impacts, arguing that rejecting evidence-based medicine leads to preventable harms, such as outbreaks of diseases like measles in unvaccinated communities. CFI's Office of Consumer Protection from Pseudoscience further advances these efforts by advocating against quackery and alternative medicine practices lacking empirical support, including homeopathy and unregulated supplements marketed as cures. The organization critiques such pseudosciences for exploiting vulnerable consumers, citing instances where delayed conventional treatments result in worsened outcomes; for example, studies on alternative medicine adherence show increased mortality risks in cancer patients forgoing proven therapies, with one analysis of over 1.2 million patients finding a 2.5-fold higher death rate among those using only alternative treatments. While proponents of alternative medicine invoke cultural traditions and personal autonomy, CFI maintains that health data prioritizes verifiable efficacy over anecdotal or placebo effects, as randomized controlled trials consistently demonstrate negligible benefits beyond placebo for many such interventions. In addressing religious influence, CFI has campaigned against faith healing practices, highlighting cases where reliance on prayer over medical intervention leads to child deaths, such as documented fatalities from untreated conditions like diabetes or pneumonia in faith-based communities. Publications like Skeptical Inquirer argue that faith healing lacks causal mechanisms supported by evidence, with reviews of claimed miracles revealing confirmation bias and selective reporting rather than reproducible outcomes. CFI also opposes religious exemptions in vaccination policies, advocating for measures allowing minors to access vaccines despite parental objections, as seen in their 2020 push before the D.C. Council to protect children from infectious diseases amid rising exemption rates correlating with higher outbreak incidences, per CDC data showing unvaccinated clusters accounting for 90% of measles cases in recent U.S. epidemics. Advocates for exemptions emphasize religious liberty and parental rights, yet CFI counters with evidence that such policies elevate unsubstantiated beliefs over public health imperatives, disproportionately endangering non-participants through herd immunity failures.

Key Lawsuits and Policy Interventions

In 2018, the Center for Inquiry filed lawsuits against CVS and , alleging consumer fraud under the District of Columbia Consumer Protection Procedures Act for marketing homeopathic products by placing them adjacent to conventional, science-based medicines without adequate disclosure of their lack of scientific efficacy. The suits contended that this merchandising practice misled consumers into believing homeopathic remedies were equivalent to FDA-approved treatments, despite homeopathy's reliance on unsubstantiated dilutions lacking active ingredients beyond effects. In September 2022, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals reversed a lower court's dismissal, ruling that CFI had standing as a harmed by the alleged deception and allowing the cases to proceed toward on claims of unfair and deceptive trade practices. In October 2024, CFI initiated a federal lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas on behalf of certified secular celebrant Eric McCutchan, challenging provisions of Texas Family Code § 2.202 that restrict marriage officiants to judges, retired judges, or religious clergy, thereby excluding non-religious celebrants trained through CFI's Secular Celebrant program. The complaint argues that the law violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments by privileging religious officiants and discriminating against secular humanists who perform equivalent ceremonies grounded in civil rather than doctrinal authority. As of July 2025, the case remains active, with CFI seeking declaratory relief to enable its celebrants to legally solemnize marriages, potentially expanding access to non-religious wedding services in Texas. CFI has intervened in policy debates over faith-based funding, notably objecting to government allocations that favor religious organizations in without safeguards against proselytization or discrimination. In 2007, through its affiliated , CFI challenged contracts awarding state funds to faith-based prison programs, arguing they unconstitutionally endorsed by using dollars for mandatory religious instruction that coerced participation. Although specific litigation outcomes varied, such efforts contributed to heightened scrutiny and partial policy adjustments, including requirements for secular alternatives in some state programs to mitigate violations. At the United Nations Human Rights Council, CFI has advocated for the repeal of blasphemy laws as violations of free expression, submitting statements and participating in sessions to urge member states to abolish penalties for criticizing religion. In July 2025, CFI addressed the Council's 59th session, challenging Iran and Iraq on their enforcement of blasphemy statutes that impose imprisonment or death for apostasy and religious insult, linking these laws to documented cases of arbitrary detention and suppression of dissent. Similar interventions targeted Morocco and Algeria in September 2025 for using blasphemy provisions to jail atheists and critics, emphasizing empirical evidence that such laws correlate with increased violence against nonbelievers rather than protecting social harmony. These advocacy efforts have supported incremental UN resolutions critiquing blasphemy enforcement, though binding policy changes remain limited by state sovereignty.

Controversies and Criticisms

Internal Disputes and Leadership Resignations

In 2010, Center for Inquiry (CFI) founder Paul Kurtz resigned amid disputes over the organization's strategic direction, accusing it of shifting toward "angry atheism" and being dominated by "fundamentalist atheists" who prioritized confrontation over constructive secular humanism. Kurtz specifically criticized CFI's endorsement of International Blasphemy Day in 2009, which he viewed as needlessly ridiculing religious believers and akin to inflammatory tactics, prompting him to form the Institute for Science and Human Values as an alternative. CFI leadership defended the event as a defense of free expression against religious censorship efforts, such as UN resolutions on blasphemy, but the rift highlighted factional divides between Kurtz's eupraxsophy-focused humanism and the board's embrace of bolder skepticism. A similar governance tension emerged in 2013 when CFI President and CEO Ronald Lindsay delivered opening remarks at the Women in Secularism 2 conference, questioning the invocation of "privilege" and feminist rhetoric in secular activism as potentially silencing dissent and prioritizing ideology over inquiry. The speech drew internal backlash, with staff and affiliates decrying it as dismissive of marginalized voices, leading to public calls for Lindsay's resignation from figures like Rebecca Watson. Lindsay clarified his intent was to advocate for open debate rather than exclusion, but the controversy exacerbated perceptions of CFI's resistance to evolving social dynamics within humanism. He ultimately resigned in March 2015, effective December 31, citing a desire to pursue other opportunities after seven years, though the episode contributed to ongoing board deliberations on leadership alignment with CFI's mission. The 2016 merger with the Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science amplified board-level debates over diversity and inclusivity, as critics like atheist activist Sikivu Hutchinson argued the combined entity's leadership and board lacked racial representation, potentially alienating non-white secularists and undermining outreach efficacy. Proponents of the merger emphasized operational synergies and expanded resources for skepticism advocacy, but the tensions reflected broader factionalism between prioritizing demographic mirrors of society versus expertise in inquiry and science. These disputes culminated in leadership transitions, including Robyn Blumner's appointment as CEO in 2016, which refocused CFI on policy engagement while navigating internal pressures to balance confrontational with broader humanist appeals, ultimately influencing resource allocation away from some provocative initiatives toward institutional stability.

Public Backlash from Religious and Conservative Groups

The 's advocacy against laws and promotion of events critical of have elicited strong reactions from faith-based groups. In 2009, CFI launched International Blasphemy Rights Day on September 30 to defend the right to criticize religious doctrines, which drew condemnation from Christian organizations. The Catholic League, a prominent Catholic , accused the initiative of targeting specifically, claiming it fosters mockery of sacred beliefs under the guise of free expression rather than fostering or tolerance for spiritual perspectives. A notable instance of venue-based backlash occurred in October 2011, when the Wyndgate Country Club in , abruptly canceled a CFI-Michigan event featuring evolutionary biologist . The club's owner cited Dawkins' outspoken —highlighted in media coverage—as incompatible with the venue's values, prompting CFI to file a federal lawsuit alleging against nonbelievers. The case settled in February 2013 with undisclosed terms, including policy changes by the club to prevent future bias, but the incident underscored perceptions among some conservative and religious venue operators that CFI's programming constitutes an intolerant assault on faith traditions. CFI's international efforts opposing UN resolutions on religious have also provoked direct confrontations from religious state representatives. During a 2014 address at the UN Human Rights Council, CFI representative Josephine Macintosh was repeatedly interrupted and heckled by the Saudi Arabian delegation while highlighting Saudi Arabia's use of blasphemy laws to suppress dissent, including against atheists and religious minorities. This episode reflected broader resistance from Islamic nations and aligned groups, who viewed CFI's stance as an infringement on protections against insults to religious sentiments, framing secular advocacy as culturally imperialistic and dismissive of spiritual pluralism. From a conservative liberty perspective, some critics have argued that CFI's support for science-based policies, such as mandates, aligns unwittingly with state coercion, prioritizing collective security over individual bodily autonomy and religious exemptions. While CFI has defended mandates as essential to freedoms, this position has fueled accusations of overreach, echoing concerns that secular impositions erode personal rights traditionally safeguarded by faith communities against governmental authority.

Accusations of Ideological Bias and Diversity Shortcomings

Critics have accused the Center for Inquiry (CFI) of exhibiting a left-center ideological bias, as assessed by media bias evaluators who point to its editorial stances in publications like Free Inquiry and Skeptical Inquirer that align with liberal policy positions on issues such as secularism, reproductive rights, and separation of church and state. This tilt is said to manifest in selective advocacy, where CFI prioritizes critiques of religious conservatism while showing reticence toward examining progressive orthodoxies, potentially undermining its commitment to impartial skepticism. Diversity shortcomings have drawn particular scrutiny, with claims of underrepresentation among leadership and tokenistic engagement with minorities. In 2019, science writer Kavin Senapathy resigned from CFI affiliations, criticizing the organization for failing to consider or elect non-white candidates to its board during a key election cycle, interpreting this as symptomatic of broader indifference to racial equity in skeptic circles. Employee reviews on platforms like Glassdoor have echoed this, noting struggles with diversity and inclusion in hiring and culture, often framing CFI's meritocratic approach as a barrier to broader racial and ethnic participation. Progressive skeptics, including those in outlets like Undark, argue that such gaps alienate potential allies from underrepresented groups and reflect a historical whiteness in organized humanism. Counterarguments emphasize CFI's prioritization of evidentiary rigor and idea-based affiliation over demographic quotas, citing affiliates like ex-Muslims (e.g., through partnerships with groups advocating against Islamist ) and black atheists such as Sikivu Hutchinson, who contribute to CFI-linked discourse on race and without compromising skeptical standards. This perspective holds that enforced diversity risks introducing ideological conformity, as seen in tensions where calls for inclusivity clash with demands for unyielding scrutiny of , regardless of proponent identity. Empirical defenses point to CFI's global branches and collaborations with diverse figures, suggesting representational critiques overlook substantive intellectual contributions from varied backgrounds.

Responses to Criticisms and Self-Reflection

In response to accusations of ideological rigidity, Center for Inquiry (CFI) leadership has emphasized the primacy of evidence-based inquiry over dogmatic social justice frameworks, arguing that such ideologies threaten scientific objectivity. CFI President and CEO Robyn Blumner, in a 2024 Skeptical Inquirer article, critiqued "social justice dogmatism and identitarianism" for infiltrating scientific discourse, asserting that skepticism must defend empirical methods against pressures to conform to identity-based narratives that prioritize subjective experience over testable data. This stance aligns with CFI's broader mission to prioritize causal mechanisms and falsifiability in evaluating claims, including those related to gender and race, where biological and statistical evidence is invoked to counter unsubstantiated assertions. CFI has adapted its outreach by engaging audiences across ideological lines, including conservatives wary of pseudoscientific claims in and environmental alarmism, through conferences like CSICon that feature speakers critiquing both religious and progressive orthodoxies. For instance, CFI-affiliated platforms have hosted discussions on issues in sports, defending sex-based categories on physiological grounds backed by performance data from sources like eligibility criteria. Such efforts reflect a strategic refinement to broaden skepticism's appeal beyond perceived left-leaning biases, without diluting commitments to verifiable evidence. Internal self-assessments within CFI publications have examined cognitive vulnerabilities, including partisan biases, with Skeptical Inquirer articles probing whether liberals exhibit greater susceptibility to certain pseudoscientific trends due to ideological priors. These reflections underscore CFI's resolve to apply skeptical tools inward, maintaining institutional focus on first-principles evaluation amid external pressures from both religious conservatives and activists. No formal internal reviews admitting systemic flaws have been publicly detailed, but ongoing editorial content in Free Inquiry and Skeptical Inquirer demonstrates iterative critique of movement shortcomings, such as overemphasis on emotional appeals. Over the long term, CFI has shown by sustaining programs—publishing peer-reviewed skeptical analyses and litigating against faith-based encroachments—despite persistent critiques from outlets accusing it of insufficient or insensitivity to social inequities. Membership and event attendance, including joint summits with skeptic groups, have remained stable, indicating that adherence to empirical rigor sustains operational viability even as detractors from ideological fringes amplify biases in their reporting.

Impact and Legacy

Achievements in Promoting Rational Inquiry

The Center for Inquiry's Teacher Institute for Evolutionary Science (TIES) has trained thousands of educators through workshops, webinars, and online resources designed to strengthen the teaching of and counter pseudoscientific claims in curricula. By providing hands-on materials and scientist-led sessions, TIES has reached educators who might otherwise lack access to such , enabling them to address standards-based evolution instruction amid challenges from creationist alternatives. The organization's flagship publication, , has advanced rational inquiry by publishing peer-reviewed critiques of extraordinary claims, with its articles referenced in academic works on and analysis. Launched in 1976 under the (CSI), a CFI program, the bimonthly magazine has maintained a circulation that influences both public discourse and scholarly examinations of topics like paranormal phenomena and . CFI's Secular Rescue initiative has provided emergency aid to over 180 , atheists, and freethinkers persecuted for rejecting religious , including relocation support and legal assistance to escape threats in countries enforcing or laws. These operations, funded by private donations, have enabled recipients to continue advocating for secular values in safer jurisdictions, demonstrating practical application of rationalist principles in defending . Gallup polls document declines in American belief in specific paranormal concepts, such as UFOs as extraterrestrial craft (down from higher levels in prior decades) and , amid broader exposure to evidence-based critiques that align with CFI's investigative efforts. Such trends reflect growing public toward unsubstantiated claims, quantifiable through repeated national surveys showing reduced endorsement rates for phenomena lacking empirical support.

Broader Societal Influence and Limitations

The Center for Inquiry has contributed to secularization trends by advocating for policies that limit religious influence in public institutions, such as challenging tax exemptions for religious entities estimated to cost U.S. taxpayers $71 billion annually in a 2012 analysis published in its journal Free Inquiry. Its programs, including the training of secular celebrants for non-religious ceremonies like weddings and memorials, support cultural normalization of secular alternatives to faith-based rituals. In education, CFI's promotion of critical thinking curricula indirectly aligns with broader efforts to prioritize evidence-based inquiry over dogmatic instruction, though direct causal attribution to national secularization metrics—such as the U.S. "nones" rising from 16% in 2007 to 29% in 2021—remains unestablished due to confounding socioeconomic factors. Despite these efforts, CFI's influence on deeply religious populations appears marginal, as religiosity in the U.S. has stabilized or slowed in decline among certain demographics, with no evidence of widespread conversion to attributable to the organization's work. constraints exacerbate this limitation; as a nonprofit with annual revenues around $4.5 million primarily from private donations, CFI depends heavily on individual and foundation support, which totaled assets of approximately $5.3 million in recent filings, restricting scalability compared to larger groups. This donor reliance can introduce vulnerabilities, such as potential shifts in priorities if funding sources wane, as seen in broader nonprofit sectors where ideological alignment influences . Globally, CFI extends its reach through international branches and UN advocacy, including challenges to blasphemy laws in and that penalize nonbelievers, and support for endangered atheist activists in Muslim-majority countries via emergency campaigns. However, resistance in Islamic societies remains formidable, where secular faces legal and cultural entrenchment, as evidenced by CFI's facilitation of rare secularist summits amid threats to participants. Such environments constrain causal impact, with local laws and societal norms limiting adoption of CFI-backed rationalist frameworks. Empirical assessment of CFI's societal effects is hampered by a dearth of rigorous studies, including no large-scale randomized controlled trials linking its interventions to measurable outcomes like reduced pseudoscientific beliefs or policy shifts. While sample-based analyses, such as those using CFI affiliates to explore nonbeliever mental health, provide localized insights, broader causal claims lack robust, longitudinal data isolating organizational influence from parallel trends in education and media exposure. This evidentiary gap underscores the challenges in quantifying advocacy-driven cultural change.

Reception Across Ideological Spectrums

The skeptical and secular humanist communities have consistently praised the Center for Inquiry (CFI) for its rigorous debunking of pseudoscience and paranormal claims through programs like the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry (CSI), which has inspired the formation of numerous local skeptic groups since the 1970s. Secular advocacy organizations, such as the Secular Coalition for America, have acclaimed CFI's integration of scientific skepticism with efforts to counter religious influence in policy, positioning it as a key defender of reason-based governance. Conservative commentators and religious organizations have expressed skepticism toward CFI, viewing its campaigns against faith-based claims as an assault on traditional values and cultural heritage, often labeling it as promoting militant atheism that undermines societal cohesion. Religious right groups have dismissed CFI's advocacy as hostile to Christianity, with reactions including exclusion from or implicit targeting in lists of ideological adversaries by conservative coalitions focused on preserving religious liberty. Progressive critics within the secular movement have faulted CFI for insufficient emphasis on issues, arguing that its focus on universal overlooks intersections with identity-based inequities and fails to prioritize against systemic beyond pseudoscience critiques. This has led to fractures, as seen in debates over "Atheism Plus," where CFI's defense of figures like against dismissal based on demographics drew accusations of resisting progressive reforms in humanist organizations. Empirically, CFI's legacy reflects these divides, with partisan gaps in U.S. in science widening since the —Democrats maintaining higher confidence (around 80% in recent surveys) while Republicans report lower levels (near 60%)—amid broader skepticism efforts that CFI has advanced but not uniformly resolved.

References

  1. [1]
    The History of CFI | Center for Inquiry
    In 1976, humanist philosopher Paul Kurtz brought together an unprecedented assembly of some of the greatest minds of the era to promote scientific inquiry and ...
  2. [2]
    About | Center for Inquiry
    ### Mission Statement
  3. [3]
    https://centerforinquiry.org/our-issues/office-of-public-policy/
  4. [4]
    Remembering Paul Kurtz - Center for Inquiry
    Nov 8, 2012 · Here is my elegiac tribute to Paul Kurtz (1925–2012), the founder of the worldwide skeptics movement.
  5. [5]
    History of CSICOP - Skeptical Inquirer
    CSICOP has been chaired since its inception in 1976 by Paul Kurtz, professor of philosophy (now emeritus) at the State University of New York at Buffalo. It ...
  6. [6]
    Why We Do This: Revisiting the Higher Values of Skeptical Inquiry
    Irrationalisms” called by philosophy professor Paul Kurtz at the State University of New York at Buffalo. It was the first organized effort by scientists ...
  7. [7]
    A Secular Humanist Declaration | Free Inquiry
    This declaration defends only that form of secular humanism which is explicitly committed to democracy.
  8. [8]
    Paul Kurtz (1925-2012) | Free Inquiry
    Paul Kurtz, founder and longtime chair of the ... 1991. ... In the same year Kurtz founded a third major nonprofit organization, the Center for Inquiry.
  9. [9]
    Paul Kurtz - UBNow: News and views for UB faculty and staff
    Oct 25, 2012 · He was 86. Often referred to as “the father of secular humanism,” Kurtz was the founder and longtime CEO of the Center for Inquiry, an Amherst- ...
  10. [10]
    About - CFI Libraries
    The Center for Inquiry Libraries (CFI Libraries) are located across from the North Campus of the University of Buffalo in Amherst, NY. The Libraries are a ...Missing: early history 1991-2000 institutes
  11. [11]
    Fall 1991 Volume 16, No. 1 - Skeptical Inquirer
    Center for Inquiry – Headquarters. PO Box 741. Amherst, NY 14226 (716) 636-4869 · Terms · Privacy Statement · Center for Inquiry, Inc © 2025 · All Rights ...
  12. [12]
    Celebrating the Opening of CFI Low Countries | Center for Inquiry
    Feb 29, 2008 · A new branch of Center for Inquiry Transnational in the the Netherlands and Belgium - together called the Low Countries.
  13. [13]
    Center for Inquiry - Religion Wiki - Fandom
    On November 14, 2006 the CFI opened its Office of Public Policy in Washington, DC and issued Declaration in Defense of Science and Secularism, which calls for ...
  14. [14]
    Center for Inquiry Office of Public Policy | Washington, D.C.
    Jun 12, 2009 · CFI performed a detailed historical study of federal funding for faith-based programs, extending from the rise of “charitable choice” ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  15. [15]
    [PDF] CFI Calls on FDA to Label Homeopathic Drugs as Untested ... - AWS
    Failing that, CFI urged the FDA to at least require homeopathic prod- ucts to be clearly labeled as untested and unproven. Homeopathy is a centuries-old.
  16. [16]
    The CFI Merger in Context | Free Inquiry
    Philosopher Paul Kurtz and a handful of others founded the Council (then the Council for Democratic and Secular Humanism, or CODESH) in 1980. Its founding ...
  17. [17]
    Closer Look at Rift Between Humanists Reveals Deeper Divisions
    Oct 1, 2010 · In June 2009, at odds with Mr. Lindsay, Mr. Kurtz was voted out as the center's chairman. In May, he resigned from the board altogether.
  18. [18]
    Richard Dawkins - Science and the New Atheism | Point of Inquiry
    Dec 7, 2007 · He also explores strategies for advancing atheism in society and highlights what secularists may learn from the gay rights and feminist ...
  19. [19]
    Center for Inquiry Board Statement | Center for Inquiry
    CFI Board accepts Paul Kurtz's resignation. ... The board sincerely thanks Paul Kurtz for his decades of service to the Center for Inquiry and its affiliates.
  20. [20]
    FACT SHEET REGARDING THE DONATION AND OUR FINANCIAL
    Q: What efforts have been made to contact the donor or persuade the donor to continue to support the Council? A: Shortly after the June 2009 board of ...
  21. [21]
    In Dark Times, Keeping the Flame of Reason Alight - Center for Inquiry
    We began 2015 by formally combining the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry and the Council for Secular Humanism into the Center for Inquiry. And as 2016 dawned, we ...Missing: expansions 2000-2015
  22. [22]
    The Crucial Connection between Skepticism and Secular Humanism
    You are probably aware by now that in early January the Center for Inquiry merged with the Council for Secular Humanism (Council) and the Committee for ...
  23. [23]
    Ronald A. Lindsay | Center for Inquiry
    I have informed the board of directors for the Center for Inquiry that I will be resigning my position as president and CEO on December 31, 2015. The Netanyahu ...
  24. [24]
    Meet the New Boss: Getting to Know Robyn Blumner
    Feb 12, 2016 · Robyn Blumner has been on the job as the Center for Inquiry's new CEO for just a couple of weeks, but in that time, the CFI staff—both in ...
  25. [25]
    CFI to Merge with the Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason ...
    The Center for Inquiry (CFI) has announced its merger with the Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason & Science (RDFRS). RDFRS's chief executive officer and ...Missing: developments | Show results with:developments<|control11|><|separator|>
  26. [26]
    Help Get More School Children Vaccinated in Your State
    The Center for Inquiry (CFI) calls on our supporters in Massachusetts to help pass H. 2554, a bill that would close a large loophole in the state's school ...
  27. [27]
    CSICon Homepage | CSIConference: Register Today
    CSICon 2026: June 11-14, Buffalo, NY. Celebrate Our History...Chart Our Future ; Get to Know Our Featured Guests. Bill Nye, Banachek, The Skeptics' Guide podcast ...Speakers · Register Now! · Conference Map · Hotel Information
  28. [28]
    https://centerforinquiry.org/blog/organized-politically-savvy-campaign-csicon-2026-anti-science-legislation-morning-heresy-102225/
  29. [29]
    Stories and Updates - Secular Rescue
    Through the new Secular Rescue program, the Center for Inquiry has been able to help over a dozen secularist writers and activists escape Bangladesh, where ...
  30. [30]
    Challenging Extremism, Not Faith: A Secular Journey in Bangladesh
    Sep 23, 2025 · Secular Rescue is a program of the Center for Inquiry that provides lifesaving assistance to freethinkers, humanists, and nonreligious ...Missing: activities | Show results with:activities
  31. [31]
    What is Secular Humanism - CFI - Center for Inquiry
    Secular humanism is a nonreligious worldview rooted in science, philosophical naturalism, and humanist ethics.
  32. [32]
    Secularism and Methodological Naturalism - Center for Inquiry
    Oct 25, 2010 · ... explanations, and not rely on faith and the supernatural. The ... Center for Inquiry, Inc © 2025 · All Rights Reserved. Registered 501 ...
  33. [33]
    What Is Supernatural? | Free Inquiry
    There have been many books and articles that define humanism. They all have in common a rejection ... Center for Inquiry, Inc © 2025 · All Rights Reserved.
  34. [34]
    A Unified Center for Inquiry, Stronger Than Ever
    Jan 14, 2015 · We use the tools of skepticism, and we are guided by the principles of secular humanism. We believe, and have always believed, that these ...
  35. [35]
    [PDF] A Secular Humanist Declaration
    Secular humanism places trust in human intelligence rather than in divine guidance. Skeptical of theories of redemp- tion, damnation, and reincarnation, ...
  36. [36]
    [PDF] The Affirmations of Humanism: A Statement of Principles and Values
    We are skeptical of untested claims to knowledge, but we are open to novel ideas and seek new departures in our thinking. We affirm humanism as a realistic ...
  37. [37]
    CFI Founder Issues New Statement on Humanism | Center for Inquiry
    Mar 23, 2010 · The Center for Inquiry strives to foster a secular society based on reason, science, freedom of inquiry, and humanist values. Visit CFI on the ...
  38. [38]
    Skepticism and Religion - Center for Inquiry
    May 9, 2013 · Instead of saying “No Comment” to religion's core claims, rationalist skepticism says “That's unreasonable for anyone to accept.” To this day, ...
  39. [39]
    [PDF] Why I Am a Skeptic about Religious Claims - AWS
    Faith by itself is hardly sufficient, for faiths collide—in any case, the appeal to faith to support one's creed is irrational in its pre- tentious claim based ...
  40. [40]
    [PDF] The Relationship Between Paranormal Beliefs and Religious Beliefs
    For example, the central belief of Christians that. Jesus Christ died for one's sins is essentially unfalsifiable as a scientific proposition. belief associated ...
  41. [41]
    Methodological Naturalism and Philosophical Naturalism: Clarifying ...
    First, naturalism is committed to a methodological principle within the context of scientific inquiry; i.e., all hypotheses and events are to be explained and ...
  42. [42]
    Naturalism vs. Supernaturalism: Framing the Debate
    Dec 14, 2011 · Naturalism is theology's rival and natural home for those done with religion, but naturalism should not be mistaken for theology's executioner either.
  43. [43]
    Blasphemy - | Center for Inquiry
    September 30 is International Blasphemy Rights Day, established in 2009 by the Center for Inquiry to reassert our commitment to defending the right to question ...
  44. [44]
    Blasphemy Rights - Center for Inquiry
    Protecting blasphemy rights around the world is a core part of CFI's mission. As part of that mission we created International Blasphemy Rights Day, ...
  45. [45]
    Religion and Morality - PMC - PubMed Central
    The relationship between religion and morality has long been hotly debated. Does religion make us more moral? Is it necessary for morality?
  46. [46]
    Scientific Understanding in Theories of Religion: Which Science ...
    Religion, however people define it, does not have these same strengths. Many times, religion and religious beliefs ... falsifiable ... Center for Inquiry, Inc © ...Missing: doctrines unfalsifiable
  47. [47]
    [PDF] In Defense of Eupraxophy - American Humanist Association
    In this paper Iwish to defend "eupraxophy." Paul Kurtz is Professor ofPhUosophy, SUNY,Buffalo, NY.President ofCouncU for. Democratic and Secular Humanism ( ...Missing: CFI | Show results with:CFI
  48. [48]
    9/11 gave birth to aggressive, unapologetic `New Atheists
    Aug 27, 2011 · center of the discussion," said Tom Flynn, director of The Center for. Inquiry, and a supporter of the New Atheists. "Previous freethinkersMissing: shift | Show results with:shift
  49. [49]
    Paul Kurtz - The New Atheism and Secular Humanism | Point of Inquiry
    Sep 14, 2007 · Paul Kurtz draws distinctions between the New Atheism and secular humanism, and explores commonalities that the nonreligious have with liberal religionists.Missing: eupraxophy | Show results with:eupraxophy
  50. [50]
    Author: Tom Flynn - Free Inquiry
    Tom Flynn was the caretaker and director of the Robert Green Ingersoll Birthplace Museum in Dresden, New York, from 1993 until his sudden death in August 2021.Missing: shift | Show results with:shift
  51. [51]
    Episode 45 – Truth Forum: The New Atheism, Part 1 - CFI Archives
    In the first of two installments, a panel of thinkers probes the relationship between naturalism, humanism, and “the new atheism.” On November 7, 2008, ...
  52. [52]
    The rise and fall of Paul Kurtz - Why Evolution Is True
    Oct 2, 2010 · In June 2009, at odds with Mr. Lindsay, Mr. Kurtz was voted out as the center's chairman. In May, he resigned from the board altogether.
  53. [53]
    CENTER FOR INQUIRY INC - GuideStar Profile
    May 18, 2022 · The Center for Inquiry (CFI) is dedicated to defending science and critical thinking in examining religion. CFI's vision is a world in which ...<|separator|>
  54. [54]
    SCOTUS v. Separation of Church and State | Center for Inquiry
    Oct 6, 2025 · He is the Chair of Center for Inquiry's Board of Directors and chair of the Council for Secular Humanism's First Amendment Task Force. Tabash has filed ...
  55. [55]
    Board | Center for Inquiry
    The Board of Directors for The Center for Inquiry is comprised of a dedicated group of volunteers who oversee the operations and continued success of CFI.
  56. [56]
    Robyn Blumner - CEO at Center for Inquiry and Executive Director of ...
    I led efforts to protect abortion rights, student free speech rights and to prevent the adoption of school vouchers, among dozens of public policy battles.
  57. [57]
    Leadership Changes Announced by the Center for Inquiry
    Jun 2, 2009 · Kurtz in this capacity will continue as a voting member of the boards of directors for the balance of his terms ending in 2013. In his new role ...
  58. [58]
    Center For Inquiry Inc - Nonprofit Explorer - ProPublica
    Compensation ; Barry Karr (Cfo, Treasurer) ; Thomas Flynn (Secretary) ; Ronald Lindsay (President) ; Kendrick Frazier (Director) ; Y Sherry Sheng (Director) ...
  59. [59]
    Contact Us - Center for Inquiry
    Address: Center for Inquiry Transnational P.O. Box 741, Amherst, NY 14226 ; Surface Deliveries Only: 3965 Rensch Rd, Amherst, NY 14228 ; Telephone: (716) 636-4869.
  60. [60]
    CFI Libraries
    The Center for Inquiry Libraries (CFI Libraries) are located across from the North Campus of the University of Buffalo in Amherst, NY.Missing: history 1991-2000 research institutes
  61. [61]
    CFI Western New York: Home
    The mission of the Center for Inquiry is to foster a secular society based on reason, science, freedom of inquiry, and humanist values.Missing: early history 1991-2000 research libraries
  62. [62]
    CFI Washington DC: Home
    The mission of the Center for Inquiry is to foster a secular society based on reason, science, freedom of inquiry, and humanist values.
  63. [63]
    Center for Inquiry - LinkedIn
    Locations · 3965 Rensch Rd. Amherst, NY 14228, US · 4773 Hollywood Boulevard. Los Angeles, CA 90027, US · 621 Pennsylvania Ave. SE. Washington DC, DC 20003, US.
  64. [64]
    Locations - Center for Inquiry
    Center for Inquiry – Headquarters. PO Box 741. Amherst, NY 14226 (716) 636-4869 · Terms · Privacy Statement · Center for Inquiry, Inc © 2025 · All Rights ...
  65. [65]
    Contact Us | CFI Austin
    Center for Inquiry Austin PO Box 300036 Austin, TX 78703 We are a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization that encourages evidence-based inquiry.
  66. [66]
    About Us - CFI Michigan
    Our Mission: Center for Inquiry (CFI) strives to foster a secular society based on reason, science, freedom of inquiry, and humanist values.
  67. [67]
    Programs - Center for Inquiry
    The mission of the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry is to promote scientific inquiry, critical investigation, and the use of reason in examining controversial ...
  68. [68]
    Centre for Inquiry Canada – Your humanist community for scientific ...
    CFIC Webinar Sunday, October 26, 2025 8 pm Eastern Time By Zoom Please pre-register for this free webinar here. Edgardo Sepulveda is a regulatory economist with ...
  69. [69]
    CFIC Branches - Centre for Inquiry Canada
    CFIC branches are local, volunteer-run communities that promote CFIC, offer programs, and are found across Canada, including virtual options.
  70. [70]
    Center for Inquiry Libraries - New York Heritage
    The purpose of the Center for Inquiry is to contribute to the public understanding and appreciation of science and reason, and their applications to human ...Missing: 1991-2000 research
  71. [71]
    Find A Group Map - Center for Inquiry
    CFI's Find a Group Map will help you connect with people who share your values and beliefs. Are you interested in student groups, humanist and freethinking ...
  72. [72]
    Our Partners and Allies - Centre for Inquiry Canada
    Center for Inquiry operates in the US and around the world. Its mission: To foster a secular society based on reason, science, freedom of inquiry, and humanist ...
  73. [73]
    Hope, Humanism, and Joy: My Inspiring Visit to CFI Kenya
    We spent a couple days visiting with George Ongere, the executive director of CFI Kenya, one of the Center for Inquiry's international branches. For over a ...
  74. [74]
    20-Years Of Humanism In Nigeria - Modern Ghana
    Jan 22, 2017 · Shortly after the event, the Center for inquiry-Nigeria was established. NHM worked closely with African American for Humanism, which was a CFI ...
  75. [75]
    Secular Rescue: Home
    Secular Rescue works to protect atheists and freethinkers who exercise their basic human rights to freedom of expression, conscience, and nonbelief.Missing: activities | Show results with:activities
  76. [76]
    Secular Rescue - Saving Freedom. Saving Lives. - YouTube
    Sep 30, 2016 · On Friday, Sept. 30 (International Blasphemy Rights Day), the Center for Inquiry will launch Secular Rescue, a program to relocate to safety ...
  77. [77]
    CFI: Secular Rescue – Saving Freedom, Saving Lives
    Sep 13, 2022 · Every week, Secular Rescue is contacted by someone just like Pasoon; someone who is persecuted for their apostasy, atheism, or human rights ...
  78. [78]
    Human Rights - Secular Rescue
    Secular Rescue is a Center for Inquiry program that's specifically designed to assist those who face threats due to their beliefs or expressions regarding ...<|separator|>
  79. [79]
    [PDF] cfi | annual report 2019 - AWS
    The Center for Inquiry has held special consultative status with the United Na- tions since 2005, allowing us to advance our mission on the world stage, form.
  80. [80]
    F.A.Q. for CFI-RDFRS Merger - Richard Dawkins Foundation
    Jan 21, 2016 · This is a merger of two organizations, a joining of equals, though the combined organization will bear the name of the Center for Inquiry.Missing: partnerships | Show results with:partnerships
  81. [81]
    The Danger is Now: International Blasphemy Rights Day 2021
    Sep 30, 2021 · The Center for Inquiry (CFI) is a nonprofit educational, advocacy, and research organization headquartered in Amherst, New York. It is also home ...
  82. [82]
    About the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry
    The mission of the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry is to promote scientific inquiry, critical investigation, and the use of reason in examining controversial ...
  83. [83]
    Category: A Closer Look - Skeptical Inquirer
    In September 2019, the Center for Inquiry (CFI) was asked to investigate an alleged audio recording of a ghost, commonly referred to as electronic voice ...
  84. [84]
    Center for Inquiry v. CVS
    By not separating the products, and not indicating to customers that it is homeopathic, CVS is committing consumer fraud. CFI has sued to stop them. CVS can ...
  85. [85]
    QUACKWATCH Joins the Center for Inquiry
    Feb 26, 2020 · Quackwatch has become part of the Center for Inquiry (CFI), which will maintain its sites and receive Dr. Barrett's research library later this year.Missing: integration | Show results with:integration
  86. [86]
    Quackwatch: Home Page
    Quackwatch, which is operated by Stephen Barrett, MD, is a network of Web sites and mailing lists maintained by the Center for Inquiry (CFI).Thirty Ways to Spot Quacks... · Funds · Of Questionable Treatments · Newsletter
  87. [87]
    CFI Indiana Civic Day 2025
    Feb 8, 2025 · Azhar Majeed is Center for Inquiry Director of Government Affairs. He joined CFI in July 2021 to lead its Office of Public Policy, where he ...<|separator|>
  88. [88]
    Azhar Majeed on 'America Prays,' Christian Nationalism, and ...
    Sep 28, 2025 · Azhar Majeed is the Director of Government Affairs at the Center for Inquiry (CFI), where he leads lobbying, policy strategy, and advocacy ...
  89. [89]
    The Secularist Objection to Faith-Based Funding | Center for Inquiry
    The Center for Inquiry (CFI) is a nonprofit educational, advocacy, and research organization headquartered in Amherst, New York. It is also home to the Richard ...
  90. [90]
    Our Stance on School Vouchers | Center for Inquiry
    The Center for Inquiry today condemned the Trump Administration's proposal to divert up to $1 billion in taxpayer funds to private religious schools. CFI Calls ...
  91. [91]
    Vaccine Policy Based on Science, Not Fearmongering
    There is overlap between the vaccine denier movement and support for religious vaccine exemptions. ... Center for Inquiry, Inc © 2025 · All Rights Reserved.
  92. [92]
    No faith exemptions from vaccine rules -- or any other law
    Sep 29, 2021 · The writer is a constitutional lawyer and chair of the Center for Inquiry's board of directors. ... Copyright © 2025, Los Angeles Times ...
  93. [93]
    Center for Inquiry Pens Open Letter to RFK Jr. Over Expulsion of ...
    Jul 3, 2025 · Center for Inquiry Pens Open Letter to RFK Jr. Over Expulsion of Medical Experts from ACIP. July 3, 2025. The Center for Inquiry (CFI), joined ...
  94. [94]
    Commemorate Blasphemy Rights Day—Have a Bake Sale or Read ...
    Sep 26, 2010 · You will probably recall that last year CFI sponsored the first ever International Blasphemy Day. ... Center for Inquiry, Inc © 2025 · All Rights ...
  95. [95]
    A Dissenting View About Blasphemy Day - Center for Inquiry
    Sep 29, 2009 · The celebrating of "Blasphemy Day" by the Center for Inquiry by sponsoring a contest encouraging new forms of blasphemy...
  96. [96]
    About | Teacher Institute for Evolutionary Science
    ... Science, now an arm of the Center for Inquiry. The purpose of TIES is to give middle school science teachers all the content knowledge and teaching tools ...
  97. [97]
    Award-winning Teacher Institute for Evolutionary Science (TIES ...
    Apr 10, 2025 · The Center for Inquiry's (CFI) award-winning Teacher Institute for Evolutionary Science (TIES) empowers educators across the United States ...
  98. [98]
    CFI's Flagship Educational Program Celebrates Ten-Year Anniversary
    Ten years ago, the Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason & Science launched the very first workshop of the Teacher Institute for Evolutionary Science (TIES) ...<|separator|>
  99. [99]
    Tying up Creationism in the Classroom | Bertha Vazquez
    Feb 15, 2019 · The Teacher Institute for Evolutionary Science (TIES) is a project of the Center for Inquiry. After decades of legal and legislative wins for evolution educ ...
  100. [100]
    What Is ScienceSaves?
    ScienceSaves celebrates what science makes possible. We're a nonpartisan campaign sharing real stories of how science improves lives, empowers people, ...
  101. [101]
    ScienceSaves Announces Winners of Its 2025 Video Scholarship ...
    May 28, 2025 · The Center for Inquiry's (CFI) ScienceSaves program is pleased to announce the winners of its 2025 Video Scholarship Contest.
  102. [102]
    Center for Inquiry: CFI
    CFI defends society against religious ideology and pseudoscience. Founded and inspired by great minds, such as Carl Sagan, Isaac Asimov, James Randi, Paul Kurtz ...The History of CFI · Our Mission · Branch Locations · Programs
  103. [103]
    CSICon - Center for Inquiry
    Oct 28, 2024 · CSICon is the premier science, skeptics and critical thinking conference, where hundreds of critical thinkers come to Las Vegas, the city of illusions.
  104. [104]
    Camp Inquiry Closes, But its Impact Remains
    Oct 29, 2015 · The Center for Inquiry is discontinuing Camp Inquiry, our annual weeklong program of education, investigation, and adventure for kids.
  105. [105]
    Camp Offers Training Ground For Little Skeptics - NPR
    Aug 7, 2008 · The next morning, Nathan Bupp explains why his organization, the Center for Inquiry, started this camp three years ago. "Evangelicals have camps ...
  106. [106]
    Camp Inquiry Rocks | Skeptical Inquirer
    Sep 14, 2009 · Every summer, The Center for Inquiry hosts Camp Inquiry, a week-long summer camp in Holland, NY.
  107. [107]
    [PDF] Center for Inquiry
    The Center for Inquiry confronted this challenge head-on, and at every level. From the United. Nations to the grass roots, from the political to the deeply ...Missing: 2000-2015 | Show results with:2000-2015
  108. [108]
    United in Inquiry: CFI Merges with CSI and Council
    Jan 23, 2015 · As we noted in our announcement, the Council and CSI aren't going anywhere but will continue as programs as CFI. This merger is in large part a ...
  109. [109]
    [PDF] Naturalism Research Project Launched at Center for Inquiry
    The Naturalism Research Project has announced the Resident Fellowship in Naturalism, which will begin in Fall. 2007, to be held by a senior scholar con- ducting ...
  110. [110]
    [PDF] paul kurtz: naturalism and the future - Free Inquiry
    The new Naturalism Research Project will more than double our library facilities and create a collegial setting for scholarly dialogue and research. In this new ...
  111. [111]
    [PDF] Steven Weinberg CV - UT Direct
    Advisory Committee, Naturalism Research Project, Center for Inquiry, 2006-*. Program Advisory Committee, International Workshop on the Interconnection ...
  112. [112]
    NCAHF's History - Quackwatch
    Mar 14, 2016 · In the late 1970s, as a national antiquackery network grew, LVCAHF discontinued its local activities but Barrett continued to operate it as an ...
  113. [113]
    [PDF] Probe Newsletter, June 1, 1997 - Center for Inquiry
    Mar 13, 1995 · "CTCA either could not or would not provide data," FTC says, and CTCA protested that it would be bad policy for the agency to rule on a ...
  114. [114]
    Skeptical Inquirer: Home
    Enjoy print or online access to the latest Skeptical Inquirer articles on your computer, phone, or tablet! Subscribe Now. is a magazine published by the Center ...About CSI · Skeptical Inquirer Presents · Archive · Subscribe
  115. [115]
    Skeptical Inquirer - Bias and Credibility - Media Bias/Fact Check
    History. Founded in 1976, Skeptical Inquirer is a bimonthly American magazine published by the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry (CSI) with the subtitle: The ...
  116. [116]
    Home | Free Inquiry
    ### Summary of Secular Humanism Evolution and New Atheism Influences
  117. [117]
    Advertising - Skeptical Inquirer
    Founded in 1980 and published bimonthly (six times per year), FREE INQUIRY (circulation averaging 30,000) features leading thinkers and activists who explore ...
  118. [118]
    Free Inquiry Magazine | CFI Store
    Subscribe today to FREE INQUIRY, the world's largest-circulation magazine for and about people who lead value-rich lives without religion!
  119. [119]
    Prometheus Books - Globe Pequot
    Publishing intelligent nonfiction for the thoughtful lay reader, Prometheus Books has focused on several core categories including popular science, critical ...
  120. [120]
    Science and Religion: Are They Compatible? | CFI Store
    In stockScience and Religion: Are They Compatible? edited by Paul Kurtz, with the assistance of Barry Karr and Ranjit Sandhu. Paper cover. 368 pgs. Prometheus Books ...
  121. [121]
    Can Science Help Us Make Wise Moral Judgments? | CFI Store
    In stockThis volume presents a unique collection of authors who generally maintain that science can help us make wise choices and that an increase in scientific ...
  122. [122]
    Point of Inquiry Podcast
    Point of Inquiry is one of the longest-running critical thinking podcasts, where the brightest minds of our time engage in deep conversation about the big ...
  123. [123]
    Center for Inquiry - YouTube
    The Center for Inquiry is a non-profit organization whose mission is to create a society where humanism, science, and reason are what informs public policy.Missing: 2000-2015 | Show results with:2000-2015
  124. [124]
    https://centerforinquiry.org/progress/
  125. [125]
    Richard Dawkins Award | Center for Inquiry
    The Center for Inquiry presents the Richard Dawkins Award annually to a distinguished individual from the worlds of science, scholarship, education or enter ...
  126. [126]
    John McWhorter to Receive CFI's 2025 Richard Dawkins Award ...
    Jan 14, 2025 · The Richard Dawkins Award is presented by the Center for Inquiry, home to the Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason & Science. McWhorter is the ...
  127. [127]
    CNN Reporters Awarded Balles Critical Thinking Prize for A Deal ...
    The Balles Prize is a $2,500 award given to the creator of the published work that best exemplifies healthy skepticism, logical analysis, or empirical science.
  128. [128]
    Timothy Caulfield, Susan Gerbic Awarded Balles Prizes for Critical ...
    The Robert P. Balles Annual Prize in Critical Thinking is an award given to the creator of the published work that best exemplifies healthy skepticism, logical ...
  129. [129]
    Katherine Stewart wins Forkosch Award for Best Humanist Book
    Apr 13, 2021 · Forkosch Award carries a prize of $250. Free Inquiry is copublished by the Council for Secular Humanism and the Center for Inquiry. # # #. The ...
  130. [130]
    Forkosch Awards Announced for 2021, 2022, and 2023 | Free Inquiry
    Forkosch Book Award for the year's best book on humanism ... Free Inquiry is copublished by the Council for Secular Humanism and the Center for Inquiry.
  131. [131]
    ScienceSaves: Celebrate the Power of Science | Skeptical Inquirer
    Center for Inquiry – Headquarters. PO Box 741. Amherst, NY 14226 (716) 636-4869 · Terms · Privacy Statement · Center for Inquiry, Inc © 2025 · All Rights ...
  132. [132]
    Office of Consumer Protection from Pseudoscience | Center for Inquiry
    The Office of Consumer Protection from Pseudoscience seeks to fight back against the harms caused by quacks, crooks, and charlatans, big and small.Missing: 2000-2015 | Show results with:2000-2015
  133. [133]
    Center for Inquiry - Combined Federal Campaign
    Nearly 50 years ago, a group of great minds, including Carl Sagan and Isaac Asimov, created an organization dedicated to reason, science, and secular values ...Missing: history founder
  134. [134]
    Quack Quack: The Threat of Pseudoscience | Dr. Joe Schwarcz
    Mar 3, 2023 · In Quack Quack he focuses on the deluge of anecdotes, cherry-picked data, pseudoscientific nonsense, and seductive baseless health claims that are undermining ...
  135. [135]
    Faith Healing: Religious Freedom vs. Child Protection
    The medical ethics principle of autonomy justifies letting competent adults reject lifesaving medical care for themselves because of their religious beliefs ...Missing: critiques | Show results with:critiques
  136. [136]
    Curing with Charm: Folkloric Faith Healing and the Power of Belief
    Faith healing and other “gifts” allegedly bestowed upon the faithful through preternatural means have long been examined by the skeptical community.
  137. [137]
    Let Kids of Anti-Vaxx Parents Consent to Vaccinations, CFI Tells ...
    Oct 29, 2020 · Children have the right to protection from preventable infectious diseases, even if their parents are unwilling to provide that protection ...
  138. [138]
    Equality for Nonbelievers | Center for Inquiry
    CFI holds that RFRA, and religious exemptions generally, are unconstitutional. Placing religious justifications for actions above secular ones preferences ...
  139. [139]
    Center for Inquiry v. Walmart
    CVS and Walmart's positioning of homeopathic products confuses customers, and creates false impressions of homeopathy's efficacy. The retailers know this, and ...
  140. [140]
    Walmart, CVS must face lawsuit over placement of homeopathic ...
    Sep 30, 2022 · The District of Columbia's highest court revived two lawsuits that claim CVS and Walmart are misleading consumers by selling unproven ...
  141. [141]
    Center for Inquiry, Inc. v. Walmart, Inc. & Center for ... - Justia Law
    Sep 29, 2022 · ... Walmart or CVS markets homeopathic products. The complaints allege that both retailers market homeopathic products to residents of the ...
  142. [142]
    Walmart, CVS face trial for putting sham homeopathic products next ...
    Oct 3, 2022 · The claims come from the nonprofit organization Center for Inquiry (CFI), which filed nearly identical lawsuits against CVS and Walmart in ...
  143. [143]
    Center for Inquiry Files Suit in Texas Seeking Legal Recognition for ...
    Oct 28, 2024 · CFI is demanding legal recognition of marriage officiants who are trained and certified through its groundbreaking Secular Celebrant program.
  144. [144]
    Center for Inquiry Continues Fight for Legal Recognition of Secular ...
    Jul 31, 2025 · The Center for Inquiry is fighting to allow secular celebrants to legally officiate marriages in Texas, as the current law bars them. CFI ...
  145. [145]
    CFI Continues Fight for Legal Recognition of Secular Celebrants in ...
    Aug 12, 2025 · In October 2024, CFI filed a federal lawsuit in Texas challenging the provision that bars secular officiants from legally solemnizing marriages ...
  146. [146]
    CFI Challenges Iran and Iraq on Blasphemy Laws at UN
    CFI Challenges Iran and Iraq on Blasphemy Laws at UN. July 7, 2025. At the fifty-ninth session of the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva, the Center for ...
  147. [147]
    Paul Kurtz criticizes fundamentalist atheists - Dangerous Intersection
    Oct 17, 2009 · In fact, Kurtz expressed that he was appalled that CFI supported “blasphemy day.” This amounts to “ridiculing” many sincere people. It is not a ...
  148. [148]
    Some Remarks on My Talk at WIS2 - Center for Inquiry
    Some Remarks on My Talk at WIS2. June 22, 2013. Ronald A. Lindsay. No Faith Value. It has been a few weeks since I have said anything in public about the ...Missing: WoLa | Show results with:WoLa
  149. [149]
    So Much for Center for Inquiry - Skepchick
    The CFI Board wishes to express its unhappiness with the controversy surrounding the recent Women in Secularism Conference 2. CFI believes in respectful debate ...
  150. [150]
    Statement Re My May 18 Blog Post - Center for Inquiry
    May 23, 2013 · Statement Re My May 18 Blog Post. May 23, 2013. Ronald A. Lindsay. No Faith Value. The decision to issue the following statement is my own ...Missing: resignation WoLa
  151. [151]
    Resignation Announcement - Center for Inquiry
    Mar 23, 2015 · My decision to leave is entirely voluntary; it was made without any pressure or suggestion, direct or indirect, from the board of directors.
  152. [152]
    The Skeptics Movement Can't Afford to Ignore Racial Inequality
    Feb 20, 2020 · CSI has published the bi-monthly Skeptical Inquirer since 1976, and, with the support of its parent organization, the Center for Inquiry (CFI), ...<|separator|>
  153. [153]
    Ronald A. Lindsay - Point of Inquiry Podcast
    Ron Lindsay is senior research fellow at the Center for Inquiry, having previously served as president and CEO from 2008 to 2016. Prior to joining CFI, ...Missing: resignation date
  154. [154]
    BLASPHEMY DAY TARGETS CHRISTIANITY - Catholic League
    Mar 20, 2017 · The Center for Inquiry, an atheist organization, launched the first International Blasphemy Day on September 30 ... criticism of religion, the day ...
  155. [155]
    Mich. Country Club Settles With Secularist Group in Richard ...
    Feb 28, 2013 · The event featuring Richard Dawkins was to occur in October 2011 at the Wyndgate Country Club and the lawsuit was filed by CFI in April of 2012.Missing: incident | Show results with:incident
  156. [156]
    Richard Dawkins Event Banned by Michigan Country Club
    The Wyndgate Country Club in Rochester Hills, MI, cancels Center for Inquiry–Michigan event with biologist Richard Dawkins because of his atheist philosophy.Missing: incident | Show results with:incident
  157. [157]
    [PDF] FI AS 16 new.indd - Free Inquiry
    When, in 2014, CFI representative. Josephine Macintosh spoke before the. United Nation's Human Rights Council, drawing attention to the desert king- dom's ...
  158. [158]
    The unintended consequences of COVID-19 vaccine policy - NIH
    Our analysis strongly suggests that mandatory COVID-19 vaccine policies have had damaging effects on public trust, vaccine confidence, political polarization, ...
  159. [159]
    Center for Inquiry - Bias and Credibility - Media Bias/Fact Check
    Funded by / Ownership. The Center for Inquiry (CFI) is a 501(c)(3) charitable nonprofit organization that is funded through donations and membership fees.
  160. [160]
    Who Are More Biased: Liberals or Conservatives? - Skeptical Inquirer
    Mar 19, 2019 · (716) 636-4869 · Terms · Privacy Statement · Center for Inquiry, Inc © 2025 · All Rights Reserved. Registered 501(c)(3). EIN: 22-2306795.
  161. [161]
    Center for Inquiry Reviews: Pros And Cons of Working ... - Glassdoor
    Rating 3.7 (13) And yet, each time, the leadership chose divisive stances that dismiss how their constituents are changing and growing. The board of directors is beholden to ...<|separator|>
  162. [162]
    The Failure of Ideological Purity Tests - Free Inquiry
    Center for Inquiry – Headquarters. PO Box 741. Amherst, NY 14226 (716) 636-4869 · Terms · Privacy Statement · Center for Inquiry, Inc © 2025 · All Rights ...
  163. [163]
    Skeptical Inquirer discussion on our ideology in science paper
    Jun 26, 2023 · Blumner, CEO and president of the Center for Inquiry. They'll discuss how the field of evolutionary and organismal biology has been “impeded or ...
  164. [164]
    Defending Science against Social Justice Dogmatism and ...
    Robyn E. Blumner is president and CEO of the Center for Inquiry and executive director of the Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason & Science.
  165. [165]
    Robyn Blumner of CFI discusses trans women athletes
    Nov 15, 2023 · The Center for Inquiry (CFI), founded in 1976 by luminaries like James Randi, Martin Gardner, Isaac Asimov, Paul Kurtz, and Carl Sagan, ...
  166. [166]
    Community Outreach | Center for Inquiry
    The Center for Inquiry is a worldwide movement of freethinkers, rationalists, skeptics, secular humanists, atheists, and agnostics, all working together at the ...
  167. [167]
    Who Are More Biased: Liberals or Conservatives? - Skeptical Inquirer
    Conservatives who, like the president, believe the mainstream media (MSM) have a liberal bias have been supported by evidence that journalists are more likely ...
  168. [168]
    Organized Skepticism: Four Decades ... and Today
    Paul Kurtz founded all these organizations. He built the Center for Inquiry's headquarters building, across the street from the University at Buffalo, where ...
  169. [169]
    [PDF] Download 2020 PDF - Center for Inquiry
    CFI stood, as it always has, as a beacon of evidence-based truth over misinformation and science over pseudoscience.Missing: falsifiability decision-
  170. [170]
    Education Department - Center for Inquiry
    TIES offers teachers engaging hands-on and online resources to cover their evolution standards. This includes live webinars with scientists, full units, and ...
  171. [171]
    Endangered Atheists Clamoring for Freedom - Secular Rescue
    Aug 5, 2024 · These two life-saving programs, both funded by our generous and caring donors, enabled us to aid more than 180 endangered apostates, atheists, ...Missing: operations aiding persecution
  172. [172]
    [PDF] Belief in Paranormal Phenomena Among Adult Americans c=
    Apr 22, 2021 · A Gallup national survey shows that paranormal beliefs are widespread. Yet belief in astrology and the reality of. UFOs has lessened,.Missing: declining correlation
  173. [173]
    Paranormal Phenomena Met With Skepticism in U.S. - Gallup News
    Jul 23, 2025 · Psychic healing and ghosts top Americans' paranormal beliefs, while most reject concepts like witches, astrology and reincarnation.Missing: Inquiry | Show results with:Inquiry
  174. [174]
    Cultural Indicators of the Paranormal - Skeptical Inquirer
    Mar 22, 2006 · Scientists have long lamented the public's persistent belief in the paranormal. In this area, recent Gallup polling shows both good news and bad news.
  175. [175]
    The World's Oldest Prejudice: The Center for Inquiry's Fight against ...
    Sep 4, 2016 · In the second issue of Free Inquiry, Paul Kurtz, the founder of Free Inquiry magazine and the Council, defended the right to criticize religion ...
  176. [176]
    Decline in Religious Belief Is Slowing—So What? - Free Inquiry
    Feb 27, 2025 · To begin, Americans have been outliers in matters of religion since the 1800s. As a whole, Americans have been more religious than most other ...Missing: limitations impact
  177. [177]
    Center for Inquiry - InfluenceWatch
    Center for Inquiry ; Revenue · $4,460,027 ; Expenses · $5,060,211 ; Assets · $5,290,209 ; Form Type, Form 990 ; Total revenue, $4,460,027.Missing: sources | Show results with:sources
  178. [178]
    Secularists of Islamic Societies Gather for Unprecedented Summit
    Feb 9, 2007 · The Center for Inquiry (CFI) is a nonprofit educational, advocacy, and research organization headquartered in Amherst, New York. It is also ...Missing: reach | Show results with:reach
  179. [179]
    The Social Context of Organized Nonbelief: County‐Level Predictors ...
    Jun 28, 2016 · Many recent social scientific studies have noted that the percentage of Americans with no religious affiliation is on the rise, ...
  180. [180]
    Center for Inquiry - Secular Coalition for America
    ... James Randi, Paul Kurtz and other groundbreaking thinkers, CFI promotes reason, science, and secularism. We advocate for the separation of church and state ...Missing: integration | Show results with:integration
  181. [181]
    Extreme Religious Conservative Group (Mistakenly?) Leaves CFI Off ...
    Mar 6, 2015 · “Of course, the Center for Inquiry is by no means anti-Christian, and we work to combat bigotry of all kinds, be it against atheists, Christians ...
  182. [182]
    Some Observations About Atheism Plus | Center for Inquiry
    Aug 27, 2012 · Therefore, it's not a valid criticism of A+ to say that it may cause some disagreements and disputes. ... Center for Inquiry, Inc © 2025 · All ...<|separator|>
  183. [183]
    To Our Friends | Center for Inquiry
    The Center for Inquiry's leadership and board have recently fielded questions regarding our termination of CFI's association with Kavin Senapathy.Missing: discontinued | Show results with:discontinued
  184. [184]
    Rapidly diverging public trust in science in the United States - PMC
    We revisit historical trends of trust in science among Americans by political orientation. We find steadily diverging trends by political views since the 1990s.Missing: Inquiry | Show results with:Inquiry