Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Chaldea

Chaldea was a historical region comprising the marshy alluvial plains of southern , situated between the lower River, the , and the in what is now southern . Inhabited primarily by the tribes—West Semitic-speaking Aramean groups who migrated eastward and settled in the area by the early first millennium BC—the region served as a semi-autonomous tribal under overlordship from the 9th century BC onward. The Chaldeans first appear in Assyrian records around 878 BC as Kaldu, denoting disruptive raiders in the southern marshes, but they gradually assimilated Babylonian culture while maintaining tribal identities organized into principalities like Bit-Yakin and Bit-Dakkuri. Exploiting the weakening of the in the late , Chaldean leader seized in 626 BC, founding the —also termed the —and allying with the to destroy in 612 BC, thereby ending dominance. Under Nabopolassar's son (r. 605–562 BC), the empire reached its zenith through military campaigns that subdued , , and —culminating in the siege of and destruction of in 587 BC—as well as economic reforms, canal constructions, and monumental architecture, including the and the legendary . The Chaldeans advanced Mesopotamian traditions in astronomy and , with their priestly scholars influencing later Hellenistic views of Babylonian wisdom. The empire collapsed in 539 BC when of Persia captured without battle, incorporating Chaldean territories into the Achaemenid realm and dispersing the tribal identities amid broader Babylonian assimilation.

Etymology

Origins and historical usage of the term

The term "Kaldu" ( for Chaldeans) first appears in royal inscriptions from the early BCE, denoting West Semitic tribal groups inhabiting the southern marshes and coastal regions of . These attestations, such as in records associated with kings like (r. 883–859 BCE), portray the Kaldu as semi-nomadic intruders or allies challenging Babylonian and Assyrian control, distinct from the indigenous -speaking population. The name's remains uncertain but is classified as West Semitic, potentially reflecting Aramean linguistic influences or terms for transient herders, rather than deriving from roots tied to Babylonian heartlands. In biblical Hebrew, rendered as "Kasdim," the term emerges in texts like those of the 8th–6th centuries BCE, initially signifying these southern tribes known for raiding and soothsaying practices (e.g., Job 1:17; Isaiah 23:13), but later broadening to encompass the Neo-Babylonian rulers after their dynasty's rise circa 626 BCE. This usage aligns with empirical references to Chaldean military prowess and divinatory expertise, without conflating them wholesale with urban Babylonians. Following the Achaemenid conquest of Babylon in 539 BCE, Greco-Roman sources repurposed "Chaldeans" ( Chaldaîoi) to denote either the Babylonian territory syncretically or, more prominently, a hereditary specializing in astronomy, , and temple rituals. , in his Histories (c. 440 BCE), explicitly identifies Chaldeans as priests of Bel () who studied celestial omens and generational wisdom, elevating them as intellectual custodians of Babylonian lore amid dominance. This semantic shift, evident by the BCE, decoupled the term from its original tribal connotations, applying it to erudite elites in Hellenistic accounts while retaining echoes of southern Mesopotamian origins.

Geography

Location and territorial extent

Chaldea encompassed the marshy lowlands of southern , situated south of and extending southward to the head of the , between the River delta and the . This core territory, often characterized by wetlands and riverine environments, was delineated in Neo-Assyrian records as a semi-autonomous inhabited by tribes resistant to centralized control. The area was politically fragmented into tribal territories, primarily Bit-Yakin along the coastal fringes near the Gulf, Bit-Dakkuri to the northwest, and Bit-Amukani positioned inland toward , as attested in Assyrian inscriptions from campaigns by rulers like . These divisions reflected the decentralized structure of Chaldean polities, with boundaries shifting under military pressures and hegemony, generally spanning from the vicinity of northward to the marshes but excluding more northern Babylonian heartlands. Archaeological and evidence underscores the region's fluid extent, tied to tribal migrations and seasonal flooding rather than fixed frontiers.

Physical and environmental characteristics

Chaldea encompassed the low-lying, marshy alluvial plains formed by the sediment deposits of the Tigris and Euphrates rivers near their estuaries in southern Mesopotamia. This deltaic region featured extensive wetlands and seasonal watercourses, with soils enriched by silt from riverine floods but characterized by poor natural drainage. The terrain's flat topography, averaging near sea level, facilitated the accumulation of standing water, creating a mosaic of permanent marshes interspersed with levees and shallow lagoons extending toward the Persian Gulf. The environment was dominated by the rivers' flood regimes, which deposited nutrient-rich while posing risks of inundation across the unprotected plains. Annual flood waves, peaking in spring from and rains, transformed dry lands into temporary lakes, sustaining beds and aquatic ecosystems vital to the region's . Salinization occurred in poorly managed areas due to evaporation in the , with average annual rainfall below 200 mm, rendering the land dependent on riverine inputs for . These features isolated Chaldea from the more elevated highlands to the north, with the southern marshes acting as a while providing access to gulf routes via shifting channels. The alluvial soils supported dense in wetter zones, including reeds covering thousands of square kilometers historically, alongside sparse tamarisk and groves on higher ground. Geoarchaeological evidence indicates avulsions and course changes in the rivers over , altering local wetlands and influencing the distribution of habitable firm ground.

Chaldean People and Culture

Ethnic origins and composition

The tribes emerged in the historical record as semi-nomadic confederations of West Semitic origin, closely aligned with Aramean groups, who began infiltrating the marshlands of southern around the from the Syrian-Levantine region. These migrants were distinct from the East Semitic-speaking populations that had dominated Babylonian society for millennia, as evidenced by inscriptions portraying Chaldeans as peripheral raiders and settlers rather than core Babylonian elements. Their arrival represented a demographic shift, introducing tribal pastoralists into a landscape of urbanized agrarian communities shaped by earlier , , and Amorite influences. Chaldean society was structured around kinship-based clans prefixed with "bit-" (meaning "house" or "tribe" in ), including prominent groups such as Bit-Yakin, Bit-Dakkuri, and Bit-Amukani, which maintained semi-independent chiefdoms in the delta and fringes. This tribal organization facilitated their adaptation to the alluvial environment, blending Aramean nomadic traditions with local practices through intermarriage and alliances, incorporating residual Elamite and Amorite elements from prior conquests without fully assimilating into the cultural matrix. records from the onward document these clans as cohesive units resisting centralized control, underscoring their ethnic cohesion as newcomers rather than extensions of or Babylonian lineages—a distinction reinforced by their initial use of West Semitic and dialects, countering later narratives of seamless continuity with northern groups. While direct archaeogenetic data on ancient Chaldean remains remains scarce, the convergence of migration patterns in cuneiform texts, tribal , and linguistic shifts supports their primary West Semitic (Aramean) ancestry, with limited genetic continuity to pre-existing Mesopotamian substrates through localized rather than wholesale replacement. This composition enabled Chaldeans to leverage their martial tribalism for political ascent while preserving a separate amid Babylonian urban centers.

Language and linguistics

The ancient Chaldeans, originating as West tribal groups akin to the , likely spoke dialects related to early , a Northwest language, prior to their settlement in southern around the 10th–9th centuries BC. Upon migrating into the region and integrating with local populations, these vernaculars coexisted with but were overshadowed by the dominant East Akkadian, particularly its Babylonian dialect. During the (626–539 BC), under rulers such as and , served as the primary language for administration, royal inscriptions, legal documents, and , reflecting full into Mesopotamian traditions. This Late Babylonian variant of was exclusively recorded in cuneiform on clay tablets, with over 10,000 Neo-Babylonian texts surviving from sites like and , attesting to its use in economic records, chronicles, and scholarly works without evidence of a parallel "Chaldean" or . No distinct Chaldean language beyond assimilated tribal dialects appears in these corpora, indicating that original West Semitic speech forms were supplanted or marginalized in formal contexts. Aramaic, while increasingly prevalent as a spoken across the due to its alphabetic script and policies from the Neo-Assyrian period onward, held secondary status in Chaldean officialdom, appearing mainly in informal or peripheral notations rather than core archives. Post-conquest by in 539 BC, Aramaic's role expanded under Achaemenid rule, influencing the empire's linguistic shift, but Chaldean-era primacy remained with as evidenced by the continuity of Babylonian traditions until their decline in the Hellenistic era.

Religion and religious practices

The Chaldeans adhered to the polytheistic religious traditions of ancient , with primary devotion to the Babylonian pantheon, as evidenced by royal inscriptions and temple dedications from the Neo-Babylonian period. , the patron deity of , held supreme status, with his cult centered in the temple, which (r. 605–562 BC) extensively restored using baked bricks and bitumen to reinforce its foundations and ziggurat, . , god of writing and wisdom, and , the moon god, received prominent worship, particularly under (r. 556–539 BC), who elevated Sin's temple in through reconstruction efforts documented in texts. Religious practices emphasized ritual purity, offerings, and festivals such as the , where the king reaffirmed divine favor through symbolic acts, including the ritual slapping of the monarch to confirm his legitimacy before Marduk's statue. Chaldean priests, often from temple schools in and southern marshlands, specialized in through omens, extispicy (examination of animal entrails), and celestial observations, roles that integrated religious authority with advisory functions for rulers. These practices, rooted in omen series like the Enūma Enlil, underscored causal interpretations of divine will influencing earthly events, though empirical validation remained tied to priestly traditions rather than systematic falsification. While Chaldean tribes originated in southern Mesopotamia's marshy regions, potentially maintaining localized shrines, archaeological and inscriptional evidence shows rapid assimilation to Babylonian rituals over Aramean influences, with limited to occasional identifications of tribal deities with major gods like Ea or local manifestations of Ishtar. Neo-Babylonian kings, including and Nebuchadnezzar, sponsored temple revivals across the region, prioritizing urban cult centers and suppressing nomadic variants to consolidate imperial piety.

History

Early mentions and tribal migrations (c. 10th–8th centuries BC)

The Kaldu, or Chaldeans, first appear in historical records around the early first millennium BC, with sparse references suggesting their emergence in southern by approximately 1000 BC as West Semitic tribal groups related to the . These tribes likely migrated from the Syrian-Arabian desert fringes or southeastern regions, driven by ecological pressures and the power vacuum following the collapse of earlier Mesopotamian states, settling in marshy areas of the . Prior to the , no detailed annals document their activities, indicating a period of gradual consolidation rather than prominent political engagement. The initial encounters with the Kaldu are recorded in the annals of (r. 883–859 BC), who launched campaigns into southern , subjugating Kaldu settlements and extracting tribute, portraying them as nomadic threats disrupting trade and borders. These expeditions, part of broader expansion southward, compelled the tribes to organize defensively, fostering resilient confederations that evaded complete incorporation into the provincial system. By the late 9th century BC, under continued pressure from kings like , the Kaldu had established semi-autonomous enclaves, notably the Bit-Yakin along the coast, Bit-Dakkuri near , and Bit-Amukani further south, each led by chieftains who balanced nominal vassalage with internal sovereignty. This tribal structure, characterized by pastoral and maritime economies, enabled resistance to Assyrian assimilation, preserving cultural and linguistic distinctiveness amid recurrent raids and deportations. The resulting equilibrium of coercion and autonomy laid foundational dynamics for interactions with Mesopotamian powers.

Rebellions and conflicts with Assyria (8th–7th centuries BC)

During the reign of Tiglath-Pileser III (745–727 BC), Chaldean tribes in southern Mesopotamia, including those in the marshy Sealand regions, initiated frequent uprisings against Assyrian expansion into Babylonia. In 731 BC, Ukin-zer, a Chaldean chieftain from Bit-Amukkani, usurped the Babylonian throne from the pro-Assyrian ruler Nabû-nādin-zēri, forcing Tiglath-Pileser to divert forces southward while engaged in western campaigns such as the siege of Damascus. These actions highlighted early Chaldean exploitation of Assyrian commitments elsewhere, though Tiglath-Pileser ultimately suppressed the revolt and incorporated Chaldean territories into Assyrian administration. Under (722–705 BC), resistance escalated as Merodach-Baladan II, leader of the Bit-Yakin tribe, seized in 721 BC following Shalmaneser V's death, establishing a twelve-year rule marked by alliances with . In 720 BC, he repelled an Assyrian advance at Dēr but faced 's major counteroffensive, culminating in defeat in 710 BC; then entered without opposition, exiling Merodach-Baladan to Elamite territories. These conflicts involved guerrilla tactics in difficult terrain, allying with Elamite forces to harass supply lines. Sargon's death in 705 BC prompted Merodach-Baladan's return in 703 BC, again backed by , allowing a brief nine-month reclamation of Babylon before 's victory at Kiš drove him into the southern marshes. pursued remnants in subsequent campaigns, including operations against strongholds in 700–694 BC, capturing and executing Merodach-Baladan's kin. Such recurrent rebellions, often leveraging Elamite incursions and Babylonia's waterways for evasion, necessitated annual expeditions to the south, straining imperial logistics and manpower as detailed in royal annals that record deportations of over 100,000 and repeated fortress constructions. This internal drain, amid external threats like , underscored Assyrian overextension without implying Chaldean dominance.

Rise of the Chaldean dynasty and fall of Assyria (626–612 BC)

In 626 BC, amid a following the death of the -appointed viceroy Kandalanu in 627 BC and the absence of a strong king after Ashurbanipal's demise, , a tribal leader from the Bit-Yakin tribe, led a against control. He captured , ascending the throne on 26 Marcheswan (22/23 November), thereby founding the and declaring independence from the , which was debilitated by internal succession struggles and overextension. recognized his kingship by 22 (31 August), and (Erech) resisted counterattacks in Tisri (September/October), signaling early consolidation of authority in southern . Nabopolassar focused on securing southern Babylonian cities, defeating garrisons and local rivals through campaigns that expelled forces from key centers like by 626 BC and . Initial clashes yielded mixed results, including a failed assault on -held Sallat in 625 BC (21 Iyyar), but by 616 BC, his forces triumphed over at Qablinu near the , capturing Mannaean auxiliaries and plundering regions like Hindanu, thereby extending control over the corridor and stabilizing dominance in the and central Babylonian territories. These victories transitioned Nabopolassar from a tribal chieftain to a who reestablished Babylonian , returning exiled gods to Babylonian shrines as symbols of restored sovereignty. To decisively weaken Assyria, Nabopolassar allied with Cyaxares, king of , around 614 BC after Median forces sacked and Tarbisu; Nabopolassar arrived post-capture to formalize the pact, dividing prospective spoils. This Medo-Babylonian coalition escalated pressure on heartlands: in 615 BC, Nabopolassar besieged but withdrew upon relief, while Medes raided Arrapha. The partnership culminated in the siege of starting in (May/June) 612 BC; after three months, the River flooded, breaching walls, and king Sin-shar-ishkun perished in his burning palace. The allies plundered the city in Ab (July/August), with Nabopolassar pursuing fleeing remnants toward Nisibin, effectively dismantling power in its core territories. This event, corroborated by the Babylonian Chronicle, marked the irreversible collapse of 's imperial structure, though residual forces persisted briefly in .

Neo-Babylonian Empire under Nebuchadnezzar II (605–562 BC)

Nebuchadnezzar II ascended the throne in 605 BC following the death of his father , immediately launching a campaign that culminated in the decisive victory over Egyptian forces at the , securing Babylonian control over the (Hatti-land). This triumph, detailed in the Babylonian Chronicle, marked the beginning of Neo-Babylonian dominance in the region, repelling Egyptian influence and enabling subsequent expansions into and . In 597 BC, Nebuchadnezzar besieged after King Jehoiakim's rebellion, capturing the city and deposing Jehoiachin, whom he exiled to along with thousands of elites, as recorded in the Jerusalem Chronicle (ABC 5). Following Zedekiah's installation as and his subsequent , Nebuchadnezzar returned in 589 BC, imposing a prolonged that ended in 587 BC with Jerusalem's fall, the destruction of its , and mass deportations, aligning cuneiform regnal synchronisms with archaeological of burn layers and fortifications. These conquests generated substantial and labor, which Nebuchadnezzar redirected toward monumental constructions in , including the fortification of city walls with baked bricks and the erection of the , adorned with glazed blue bricks depicting lions, bulls, and dragons in dedication to and Ishtar. Inscriptions on cylinders and bricks from his reign explicitly credit him with these works, emphasizing restoration for divine favor. Nebuchadnezzar also rebuilt the ziggurat, a massive seven-tiered symbolizing the cosmic mountain, using millions of bricks as proclaimed in his dedicatory texts. These projects, spanning palaces, temples like , and canals for irrigation, transformed into a fortified cultural center, though their scale relied on coerced labor from subject peoples rather than innate . Administratively, Nebuchadnezzar maintained a centralized rooted in Babylonian traditions, with royal appointees (bēl pīḫāti) governing provinces and overseeing flows, while integrating tribal loyalties through elite appointments that preserved scribal and legal systems. This hybrid ensured fiscal control over temples and estates, funding imperial stability without fully supplanting indigenous customs.

Decline and Persian conquest (562–539 BC)

Following the death of in 562 BC, the , ruled by the , entered a phase of political instability driven by succession disputes and factional conflicts between and groups as well as priestly and elites. succeeded his father but was deposed and killed after two years, in 560 BC; , a official who may have orchestrated the coup, ruled until 556 BC, followed by his young son , whose brief reign of mere months ended in deposition, paving the way for to seize the throne in May 556 BC. Nabonidus, an Aramean high official rather than direct royal heir, pursued policies that deepened internal divisions, including religious reforms elevating the moon god —whose temple he restored in —over Babylon's patron deity , thereby alienating the powerful Marduk priesthood and disrupting traditional rituals such as the New Year festival, which failed to occur during his prolonged absences. From approximately his seventh to seventeenth regnal years (c. 550–540 BC), resided in the remote Teima oasis in Arabia, conducting campaigns to secure trade routes and subdue local tribes, while delegating rule to his son as in ; this decade-long neglect of the capital eroded administrative cohesion, exhausted military resources on peripheral fronts, and fostered discontent among the Babylonian elite and populace. These vulnerabilities proved decisive against the rising Persian threat under , who had defeated the Median king in 550 BC and consolidated control over western . In 539 BC, Cyrus's forces crossed the unopposed, defeated the Babylonian army at , and prompted the surrender of without resistance; on the third day of Arahsamna (October 29 in the ), Persian general Ugbaru entered peacefully as its gates were opened by local officials, while fled but was subsequently captured. The records no major battle within the city itself, attributing the swift collapse to internal acquiescence rather than overwhelming force. The , inscribed shortly after the conquest, serves as Achaemenid propaganda claiming divine favor from , who allegedly abandoned for offending traditional cults and selected to liberate , restore temples, and return exiled gods' statues, thereby justifying Persian rule to Babylonian subjects. was reorganized as an Achaemenid satrapy under Gubaru as governor, marking the end of dynastic autonomy and the integration of Mesopotamian territories into the expansive Persian Empire, with no significant Chaldean-led resistance thereafter.

Legacy

Influence on Mesopotamian and biblical traditions

The Chaldean rulers of the (626–539 BC) maintained with prior Mesopotamian traditions by sustaining scribal practices and temple-centered administration inherited from the Kassite and earlier Babylonian periods. and patronized scholarly activities in , where texts documented legal, astronomical, and literary works, preserving a "Babylon-centric" that emphasized traditions and rather than radical innovation. This era saw the production of archival tablets that bridged Kassite-era documentation, with Chaldean kings restoring temples like , thereby upholding the religious and administrative frameworks established centuries earlier. Urban planning under exemplified this preservation, as evidenced by the reconstruction of Babylon's fortifications, processional streets, and the ziggurat, which adhered to grid patterns and monumental scales rooted in second-millennium BC Mesopotamian . These efforts integrated tribal elements into Babylonian civic life, fostering a that reinforced rather than supplanted indigenous architectural and infrastructural norms. In biblical texts, Chaldeans appear as the agents of Judah's conquest, with Nebuchadnezzar II's campaigns in 597 BC and 586 BC resulting in the siege of , destruction of the , and of elites to , as recorded in 2 Kings 24–25 and Jeremiah 52. These accounts portray Chaldean forces under Nabû-šarra-uṣur (Nebuchadnezzar) as systematic imperial extractors, capturing King Jehoiachin and later , seizing temple treasures, and relocating approximately 10,000 skilled Judahites, reflecting the geopolitical reality of Babylonian dominance over states without interpretive embellishment beyond the Judahite perspective of loss. Following the conquest in 539 BC, territories in southern were incorporated into the Achaemenid satrapy of , where local administrative practices, including record-keeping and temple economies, persisted under Persian oversight, ensuring the transmission of Neo-Babylonian traditions into the . The satrapal structure maintained territorial and fiscal continuity from Chaldean precedents, with Babylonian elites continuing judicial and cultic roles subordinate to Persian governors.

Association with astronomy and scholarly traditions

In ancient sources from the fifth century BCE onward, "Chaldean" underwent a semantic , shifting from denoting a tribal group in southern to signifying a hereditary of learned priest-scholars expert in celestial observation, , and . This association stemmed from reports of Babylonian temple-based , where priests maintained meticulous records of heavenly bodies to interpret omens. (first century BCE), synthesizing earlier Hellenistic accounts, portrayed Chaldeans as ascetic observers stationed in elevated towers and subterranean chambers, dedicating their lives to tracking planetary motions and deducing predictive patterns from stellar alignments. During the Hellenistic era following Alexander's conquests (after 323 BCE), intellectuals adopted "" as a byword for astronomer-priest, influencing the of zodiac signs and planetary deities in Greco-Roman . , a third-century BCE priest of Bel-Marduk from , exemplified this transmission by authoring the Babyloniaca in , which detailed Babylonian cosmological timelines and astronomical cycles, including and predictions, thereby bridging Mesopotamian data with . This terminology reflected causal knowledge transfer via Seleucid patronage of Babylonian temples, where Greek rulers like Antiochus I consulted native scholars for calendrical and divinatory expertise. The empirical underpinnings of this reputation trace to Neo-Babylonian (626–539 BCE) scribal traditions, preserved in omen compendia like the Enūma Anu Enlil series—over 70 tablets cataloging correlations between observed celestial events (e.g., lunar eclipses, planetary conjunctions) and historical outcomes, based on centuries of archival data rather than speculative invention. These texts, excavated from sites like and , underscore a proto-scientific of from verifiable observations, which Greek sources amplified into a archetype of arcane wisdom.

Modern interpretations and ethnic identity debates

Chaldean Catholics, a Christian community primarily from northern , frequently self-identify as direct descendants of the ancient tribes, invoking through the preservation of Neo-Aramaic dialects and Mesopotamian Christian dating to the early centuries AD. This assertion gained prominence with the formal establishment of the in 1553, when named the schismatic group from the as "Chaldeans" to evoke biblical and ancient Babylonian associations, fostering a distinct ethnic narrative amid Ottoman-era divisions. However, historical analysis reveals a substantive gap post-539 BC conquest, as ancient Chaldean tribal structures dissolved through assimilation into Achaemenid, Seleucid, and Parthian administrations, with the term "Chaldean" surviving only as a designation for Babylonian astronomers and priests in Herodotus's accounts (c. 440 BC), not as an enduring ethnicity. Assyrian advocates counter that modern Chaldeans represent a southern or denominational variant of the broader ethnic continuum, tracing unified origins to ancient Mesopotamian Aramaic-speakers who absorbed imperial culture after the 612 BC fall of , with post-16th-century church labels overlaying a shared genetic and linguistic substrate. Population genetic studies confirm high homogeneity among contemporary , , and groups, clustering distinctly from or populations and aligning with ancient Levantine-Mesopotamian profiles, supporting minimal biological differentiation. Yet, this pan- framework is rebutted by cuneiform records of tribes—such as the Bit-Yakin and Bit-Dakkuri clans—as western Aramean migrants antagonistic to hegemony from the , evidenced by repeated revolts documented in royal inscriptions like those of (745–727 BC). Academic scholarship predominantly regards ancient Chaldeans as a loose Aramean tribal that infiltrated southern around the , adopting for governance under the while retaining nomadic traits, before full cultural integration by the Hellenistic era. Modern and identities, rooted in northern Christian communities evangelized from (c. 200 AD), reflect linguistic evolution from substrates rather than direct lineage, with Neo-Aramaic (Sureth) varieties showing but regional phonological divergences tied to post- geographies. Claims of exclusive ancient descent for modern groups lack archaeological or textual , as southern populations likely intermixed with later Arab migrations, while northern Christians preserved traditions absent in ancient records. Proponents of ethnic unification argue it bolsters power for endangered minorities, as seen in for in Iraq's 2005 under the "Chaldo-" umbrella, aiding resource claims amid 2014 displacements affecting over 100,000 individuals. Conversely, enforcing a singular overlooks evidentiary tribal hostilities—such as alliances with Elamites against —and risks causal distortion by retrofitting assimilated ancient polities onto modern denominational schisms, potentially diluting targeted cultural revivals like -specific liturgical reforms since Vatican II (1962–1965). Empirical prioritization of genetic uniformity and shared heritage thus favors viewing these groups as cognate branches of a post-imperial Mesopotamian-Aramaean stock, rather than interchangeable labels for convenience.