Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Chromosomal crossover

Chromosomal crossover, also known as crossing over, is the reciprocal exchange of genetic material between non-sister chromatids of homologous chromosomes during , resulting in the formation of recombinant chromosomes that carry new combinations of alleles. This process occurs specifically in I of meiosis I, when homologous chromosomes pair and to form bivalents, enabling the precise alignment and breakage at corresponding loci. The mechanism of chromosomal crossover begins with the programmed induction of DNA double-strand breaks by the Spo11 protein, followed by 5' to 3' resection of the broken ends to generate single-stranded DNA overhangs. These overhangs facilitate strand invasion into the homologous DNA template, mediated by recombinases such as RAD51 and DMC1, leading to the formation of double Holliday junctions. Resolution of these junctions in a subset of intermediates—designated as class I crossovers via the interference-sensitive pathway involving the MLH1-MLH3 complex—produces the physical exchanges, while the majority are resolved as non-crossovers. This regulated process ensures that crossovers are limited in number and positioned to promote genome stability. Chromosomal crossovers play a critical role in by promoting through the shuffling of maternal and paternal alleles, which enhances adaptability and evolutionary potential in populations. Additionally, they form chiasmata—visible cytological manifestations of crossovers—that physically link homologous chromosomes, ensuring their proper bipolar orientation and segregation during I to prevent and associated disorders such as infertility or conditions like . The phenomenon was first inferred in 1911 by through studies of linked traits in , with constructing the initial map in 1913 to quantify recombination frequencies. A notable regulatory feature, crossover interference, which reduces the proximity of adjacent crossovers to maintain even distribution, was recognized shortly thereafter by Sturtevant and Hermann Muller and remains a conserved aspect across eukaryotes.

Overview

Definition

Chromosomal crossover, also known as crossing over, is the reciprocal exchange of genetic material between non-sister chromatids of pairs during , leading to new combinations of alleles on the resulting chromosomes. This process involves the physical breakage and rejoining of DNA strands, resulting in recombinant chromatids that carry segments from both parental homologs. It occurs primarily during prophase I of , the specialized cell division that produces gametes, when replicated homologous chromosomes—each consisting of two —align closely to form a structure known as a tetrad or bivalent. Homologous chromosomes are pairs of chromosomes, one inherited from each parent, that contain the same genes at corresponding loci but may differ in alleles. In diagrams of this process, tetrad formation is depicted as the paired homologs with their four chromatids aligned, followed by crossover points where non-sister chromatids exchange segments, often visualized as X-shaped chiasmata. Although less common and typically involving rather than homologs, similar recombination events, termed sister chromatid exchanges, can occur during in cells, but these do not contribute to between individuals in the same way as meiotic crossover. Overall, chromosomal crossover plays a key role in generating essential for .

Biological Contexts

Chromosomal crossover primarily occurs during prophase I of meiosis in eukaryotic organisms, where homologous chromosomes pair and exchange segments of DNA. This process is crucial for gamete formation, as it shuffles genetic material between maternal and paternal chromosomes, generating haploid gametes with recombined genomes from diploid precursors. In most eukaryotes, at least one crossover per chromosome pair is required to ensure balanced reduction division and viable offspring. The significance of chromosomal crossover extends to promoting by creating novel combinations, which drives evolutionary and population diversity. It also physically links homologous chromosomes, facilitating their proper alignment and segregation during I, thereby minimizing the risk of in gametes. Without sufficient crossovers, chromosome missegregation can occur, compromising across . While meiosis represents the primary context, rare mitotic crossovers in somatic cells provide a secondary mechanism for genetic exchange, often triggered by DNA damage repair needs. These events can generate somatic mosaicism, enhancing tissue adaptability and occasionally contributing to evolutionary changes by altering heterozygosity in clonal lineages. In asexual or vegetatively propagating organisms, such crossovers support stability and selection efficiency without . Crossover frequency varies significantly among organisms, reflecting adaptations to reproductive strategies; for example, many exhibit higher recombination rates than animals, which facilitates hybrid vigor by rapidly assembling favorable combinations in . This elevated rate in plants underscores crossover's role in agricultural breeding for enhanced adaptability and yield.

Historical Background

Early Observations

The concept of chromosomal crossover emerged from early 20th-century genetic and cytological studies that revealed non-random inheritance patterns and physical structures suggestive of genetic during . In 1910, initiated experiments with the Drosophila melanogaster, discovering a white-eyed mutant that demonstrated sex-linked inheritance, and by 1911, he observed that certain traits were inherited together more often than expected under independent assortment, indicating linkage on the same chromosome. further noted rare exceptions to this linkage—recombinant offspring—that suggested physical between homologous chromosomes, providing the first genetic evidence for crossover as a mechanism breaking linkage. Independently, in 1909, Belgian cytologist Frans Alfons Janssens described chiasmata—visible cross-shaped structures—during cytological observations of meiotic prophase in orthopteran species such as grasshoppers, proposing that these represented points of physical breakage and reunion between non-sister chromatids. Janssens's "chiasmatype theory" linked these structures to the breakage and rejoining of chromosomes, offering a cytological basis for observed in breeding experiments. Building on Morgan's findings, in 1913, Alfred H. Sturtevant, an undergraduate in Morgan's lab, analyzed recombination frequencies between multiple sex-linked genes in Drosophila and constructed the first genetic map, demonstrating that crossover rates were proportional to the distance between genes on a chromosome. This linear arrangement implied that crossovers occurred at random along chromosomes, with frequency serving as a measure of genetic distance, a principle that revolutionized gene mapping. Parallel evidence came from , particularly in (Zea mays), where early 20th-century studies by R. A. Emerson and colleagues identified linkage groups through crosses tracking traits like aleurone color and texture. By the 1920s, recombination frequencies in corn hybrids confirmed that genetic exchange rates correlated with map distances, mirroring observations in Drosophila and supporting crossover as a universal meiotic process. These empirical observations from flies and corn laid the groundwork for understanding crossover without delving into molecular details.

Theoretical Foundations

In 1909, Frans Alfons Janssens proposed the chiasmatype theory, which interpreted observed chiasmata during as physical points of crossover between homologous chromosomes, suggesting an actual exchange of chromosomal segments to explain . This theory linked the visible cytological structures—chiasmata—to the genetic phenomenon of crossing over, positing that these intersections represent breakage and rejoining events that shuffle alleles between maternal and paternal chromosomes. Building on cytological observations from the early 1900s, and his collaborators developed a model during 1909–1920s emphasizing physical breakage and reunion of chromosomes as the mechanism underlying crossing over. demonstrated that linked genes could recombine through such exchanges, providing a chromosomal basis for patterns and refuting earlier notions of genes as indivisible units. This breakage-reunion hypothesis gained traction as it aligned genetic mapping data with chromosome behavior, establishing crossing over as a key driver of . A further theoretical advance came with the recognition of crossover interference, where the occurrence of one crossover reduces the likelihood of another nearby on the same . inferred this in 1915 while analyzing recombination data from , noting deviations from expected random distribution; Hermann J. Muller elaborated on it in 1916, proposing mechanisms to explain the non-random spacing. This concept, detailed in The Mechanism of Mendelian Heredity (1915), highlighted regulatory aspects of recombination and influenced subsequent models of behavior. The physical nature of chromosomal exchange was experimentally confirmed in 1931 through parallel studies by Harriet B. Creighton and Barbara McClintock in maize, and Curt Stern in Drosophila. Creighton and McClintock used cytologically marked chromosomes and genetic markers to show that recombination events correlated with visible segment swaps between homologs, directly supporting breakage and reunion. Similarly, Stern's analysis of structurally abnormal chromosomes demonstrated that genetic crossing over was accompanied by physical interchange, solidifying the chromosomal model. Prior to these confirmations, the pre-molecular era featured vigorous debates on whether occurred via chromosomal mechanisms or cytoplasmic processes, such as blending in the cell's non-nuclear material. Proponents of cytoplasmic argued that traits and recombination might arise from plasmagene mixing rather than chromosome-specific exchanges, challenging the emerging chromosomal theory. These discussions, fueled by observations in and animals, ultimately favored chromosomal explanations as cytogenetic evidence accumulated, though cytoplasmic elements were later recognized for specific .

Molecular Mechanisms

DNA Double-Strand Break Model

The double-strand break (DSB) repair model represents the predominant mechanism for initiating chromosomal crossover during , evolving from the earlier Holliday model proposed in , which posited single-strand nicks leading to heteroduplex formation and potential crossovers but lacked explanation for observed gene conversion efficiencies. In 1983, Szostak and colleagues refined this framework into the DSB repair model, emphasizing that recombination begins with programmed DSBs that are resected to form single-stranded tails, enabling invasion of a homologous template and subsequent repair that can yield either crossover or non-crossover products. Initiation of the DSB repair pathway occurs during the leptotene stage of prophase I in meiosis, where the SPO11 protein, a topoisomerase-like enzyme, catalyzes the formation of numerous DSBs across the genome to promote homologous chromosome pairing and recombination. These breaks are deliberately induced at hotspots, with resection by exonucleases generating 3' single-stranded DNA overhangs coated by recombinase proteins such as RAD51 and DMC1. Following resection, one of the 3' overhangs from the DSB invades the homologous nonsister chromatid, displacing one strand to form a structure that serves as a for and strand exchange. This invasion captures the second end of the DSB, leading to the formation of a double intermediate through second-end capture and ligation. Resolution of the double proceeds via heteroduplex formation, where mismatched bases arise from strand , followed by branch migration that extends the heteroduplex region along the chromosomes. Endonucleases then cleave the junctions in orientations that either produce a crossover, exchanging flanking genetic markers, or a non-crossover, restoring the original configuration without exchange. Recent studies have reconstituted SPO11-mediated DSB formation , providing insights into the enzyme's catalytic mechanism, hotspot recognition, and interactions with accessory proteins, further validating the DSB model. The frequency of crossovers relates to genetic map distance through the Haldane mapping , which assumes no and Poisson-distributed crossovers:
r = \frac{1 - e^{-2d}}{2}
where r is the recombination frequency and d is the map distance in Morgans. This corrects for multiple crossovers, providing a foundational tool for estimating genetic distances from observed recombination rates.
The foundational experiments of the established key mechanisms of in prokaryotes, providing early insights that later informed eukaryotic chromosomal crossover. In 1944, , Colin MacLeod, and demonstrated that deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) from virulent strain III-S could transform non-virulent strain II-R into a virulent form, proving DNA as the genetic material responsible for bacterial transformation. This process involved the uptake and integration of exogenous DNA into the bacterial genome via , highlighting a mechanism for genetic exchange without . Building on this, and Edward Tatum's 1946 studies on revealed genetic recombination through conjugation, where auxotrophic mutants exchanged genetic markers to produce prototrophic recombinants, confirming that bacteria undergo heritable genetic mixing akin to in higher organisms. These findings established as a core prokaryotic process for and , setting the stage for analogies to eukaryotic systems. The double-strand break model of meiotic recombination in eukaryotes echoes these bacterial pathways in utilizing programmed breaks for crossover formation. At the molecular level, bacterial recombination shares striking parallels with eukaryotic crossover, particularly in strand invasion mechanisms. In prokaryotes, the RecA protein forms helical filaments on single-stranded DNA to facilitate homology search and strand exchange during recombination, a process essential for repairing DNA damage and integrating transformed DNA. This RecA-mediated step is directly analogous to the function of the eukaryotic RAD51 recombinase, which performs similar strand invasion in homologous recombination pathways, including those during meiosis. Evolutionary conservation underscores these links, with prokaryotic recombination machinery serving as precursors to the eukaryotic meiotic apparatus. Genes encoding in have homologs across eukaryotes, such as RAD51 and its meiotic paralog DMC1, which are integral to crossover formation and reflect ancient origins of recombination proteins predating the eukaryotic-prokaryotic divergence. For instance, transformation in relies on RecA-directed to repair double-strand breaks (DSBs) arising from replication stress or DNA damage, paralleling the DSB-initiated recombination that drives meiotic crossover in eukaryotes. This conservation highlights how bacterial processes provided a template for understanding the adaptive role of crossover in genome and .

Biochemistry of Meiotic Recombination

Key Proteins and Initiation

Meiotic recombination is initiated by the formation of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), primarily catalyzed by the SPO11 protein, a conserved endonuclease that forms a complex with accessory factors to cleave DNA at recombination hotspots. SPO11 shares structural homology with topoisomerase VI and creates DSBs by forming covalent bonds with the 5' phosphate ends of the broken DNA strands, a process essential for subsequent strand invasion and crossover formation. Mutations in SPO11 lead to a complete absence of DSBs, resulting in infertility due to disrupted chromosome pairing and segregation in both males and females across species, including humans. Following DSB formation, the MRN complex—comprising MRE11, RAD50, and —plays a critical role in processing the break ends to generate single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) overhangs suitable for homologous strand invasion. MRE11 provides activity to resect the 5' ends, while RAD50's and NBS1's regulatory domains tether the DNA ends and facilitate recruitment of other repair factors, ensuring efficient extension of resection during . In mammalian , the MRN complex is indispensable for both initiating and sustaining resection, with deficiencies causing severe meiotic arrest. Strand invasion, the next key step, is mediated by the recombinases RAD51 and DMC1, which form nucleoprotein filaments on the processed ssDNA to search for and invade homologous duplex DNA. RAD51, a ubiquitous recombinase involved in both mitotic and meiotic repair, promotes inter-sister and inter-homolog interactions, while the meiosis-specific DMC1 enhances inter-homolog bias by forming specialized presynaptic filaments that tolerate mismatches and stabilize joint molecules. Both proteins often co-occupy ssDNA regions at DSB sites, with DMC1's activity being particularly crucial for efficient meiotic progression in diverse eukaryotes. The MSH4 and MSH5 proteins, homologs of bacterial MutS mismatch repair factors, function as a heterodimer (MutSγ) to stabilize recombination intermediates and impart a pro-crossover bias during meiosis. This complex binds to double Holliday junctions and other branched structures, promoting their maturation into crossovers by interacting with downstream factors and preventing dissolution into non-crossovers. In yeast and mammals, MSH4-MSH5 associates with DSB hotspots and chromosome axes, and its regulated proteolysis fine-tunes crossover numbers to ensure proper distribution. Recent advances have elucidated the role of PRDM9, a , in specifying meiotic hotspots through targeted histone modifications that guide SPO11 to DSB-prone regions. PRDM9 binds DNA via its zinc-finger array and deposits H3K4me3 and H3K36me3 marks, which recruit DSB machinery and prevent recombination at gene promoters; post-2020 studies highlight its dependence on factors like HELLS for local enrichment and interactions with readers such as ZCWPW1 to promote DSB formation. Additionally, EWSR1 has been shown to be essential for PRDM9-mediated methylation and meiotic progression, underscoring dynamic chromatin regulation in hotspot control.

Chiasma Formation and Resolution

Chiasmata represent the cytological manifestation of chromosomal crossovers, appearing as X-shaped connections between homologous chromosomes during the diplotene stage of I in . These structures physically link the recombined chromatids, maintaining homolog until I. The formation of chiasmata involves the resolution of recombination intermediates known as Holliday junctions, which are four-stranded DNA structures arising during meiotic recombination. These junctions are processed by specific resolvases to yield either crossover or non-crossover products, with the resolution pathway biased toward crossovers in meiosis to ensure genetic exchange between homologs. In meiotic cells, the primary resolution of double Holliday junctions into crossover products is carried out by the MLH1-MLH3 (MutLγ) endonuclease complex, which provides the bias towards crossovers essential for class I events and distinguishes meiotic repair from mitotic pathways that favor non-crossovers. Additional enzymes, such as GEN1 (a structure-selective endonuclease), and the SLX4-associated complex (containing SLX1 and MUS81-EME1), contribute to resolving other joint molecule intermediates, particularly in class II crossovers or as backups. Chiasmata play a critical role in ensuring proper biorientation of homologous chromosomes at I, where they facilitate monopolar attachment of sister kinetochores and promote stable bipolar orientation of homolog pairs on the , thereby preventing and . Proteins such as MSH4 and MSH5 contribute to the stability of these recombination intermediates prior to resolution. In mammals, chiasma frequency is typically one to three per chromosome arm, providing sufficient linkages to support accurate segregation across the genome.

Crossover Interference and Classes

Crossover interference is a regulatory mechanism in meiosis that suppresses the formation of adjacent crossovers on the same chromosome pair, promoting their even spacing to ensure at least one crossover per chromosome for proper segregation. This phenomenon results in crossovers occurring farther apart than expected under random distribution. Interference is quantified using the coefficient of coincidence (S), defined as the ratio of observed double-crossover frequency to the expected frequency assuming independence; S values less than 1 indicate positive interference, with the degree of interference (I) calculated as I = 1 - S. Meiotic crossovers are categorized into two primary classes based on their molecular pathways and relationship to . Class I crossovers constitute the majority, approximately 90% in organisms such as mice and , and are strictly regulated by . These arise via the double (dHJ) pathway, where meiosis-specific proteins MSH4 and MSH5 form a heterodimer (MutSγ) that stabilizes early recombination intermediates, facilitating biased resolution toward crossovers by the MutLγ (MLH1-MLH3). In contrast, class II crossovers are interference-independent, comprising a smaller proportion (typically 10% or less), and proceed through a Mus81-dependent pathway involving the Mus81-Mms4 (or Mus81-Eme1) endonuclease . This pathway resolves recombination intermediates without dHJ stabilization, often yielding shorter associated conversion tracts compared to class I events. The distribution of crossovers, including interference patterns, is modulated by cell cycle kinases such as (CDK1) and (PLK1). CDK1 phosphorylates key recombination and proteins, priming sites for PLK1 recruitment and activity, which in turn promotes the dissolution of non-crossover intermediates and enforces spacing through feedback on recombination machinery. Recent analyses of human recombination maps have shown that proximity influences gradients, with weakened near telomeres leading to elevated crossover rates in distal chromosomal regions during female .

Variations and Types

Mitotic Crossover

Mitotic crossover, also known as , occurs primarily during the G2 or M phase of the cycle, where it serves as a to repair DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) arising from replication stress, endogenous cellular processes, or exposure to mutagens such as . In contrast to meiotic recombination, which involves paired homologous chromosomes, mitotic crossover in cells preferentially involves exchange between rather than non-sister homologs, minimizing the risk of gross chromosomal rearrangements due to the lack of homolog pairing in . This process is initiated similarly to meiotic DSB repair, with DSBs processed by the MRN complex and resected to generate single-stranded DNA overhangs, but it relies heavily on the RAD51 recombinase for strand invasion and search, without the involvement of meiosis-specific proteins like DMC1. The mechanism of mitotic crossover typically results in sister chromatid exchange (SCE), a reciprocal exchange that restores the original DNA sequence without net loss or gain, thereby maintaining genomic stability. When crossover occurs between homologous chromosomes—though rarer—it can lead to (LOH) distal to the exchange point, potentially unmasking recessive mutations or promoting activation. Key proteins such as RAD51, RAD52, and facilitate the pathway, enabling the invading strand to pair with the sister chromatid template and resolve via either crossover or non-crossover outcomes, with crossovers being suppressed to favor gene conversion in mitotic contexts. This regulation ensures that mitotic cells prioritize error-free repair over diversity generation, distinguishing it from the obligatory crossovers in . Detection of mitotic crossover events often employs genetic or cytogenetic assays tailored to model organisms or human cells. In , twin-spot analysis visualizes reciprocal homozygous clones arising from in heterozygous backgrounds, where adjacent "twin spots" of mutant tissue indicate crossover events during division. In human cells, (FISH), particularly chromosome orientation FISH (CO-FISH), detects SCE by labeling strand-specific probes to reveal exchanges at telomeres or chromosome arms, allowing quantification of spontaneous or induced events. These methods have confirmed that mitotic crossover frequency is low, typically around 10^{-5} to 10^{-6} per cell division for inter-homolog events in mammalian tissues. The rate of mitotic crossover increases under conditions of elevated DNA damage or during cellular aging, as replication accumulates and repair suppression mechanisms weaken, leading to higher incidences of and LOH. For instance, exposure to genotoxic agents like UV or chemotherapeutic drugs can elevate frequencies by 10- to 100-fold, serving as a for genomic . Recent studies have linked recurrent mitotic crossovers to somatic mosaicism in cancer, where LOH events drive tumor heterogeneity and progression by inactivating tumor suppressors in clonal populations, as observed in colorectal and cancers. This underscores the dual role of mitotic recombination in both safeguarding and, under dysregulation, compromising genome integrity.

Non-Homologous Crossover

Non-homologous crossover refers to aberrant recombination events between non-homologous chromosomes or DNA sequences, distinct from the standard processes that ensure accurate genetic exchange. These events primarily occur through two mechanisms: non-allelic homologous recombination (NAHR), which involves misalignment between similar but non-allelic sequences, and (NHEJ), an error-prone pathway that ligates DNA ends without requiring extensive . In NAHR, short stretches of mediate the crossover, often resulting in structural variants like deletions, duplications, or translocations, while NHEJ can resolve double-strand breaks by direct joining, frequently introducing small insertions or deletions at the junction. Triggers for non-homologous crossovers often involve genomic regions prone to misalignment, such as low-copy repeats (LCRs), which are segmental duplications comprising about 5% of the and sharing 90-97% sequence identity. These LCRs facilitate NAHR by providing ectopic that promotes unequal pairing during or , leading to crossover events between non-homologous sites. Segmental duplications, enriched in pericentromeric and subtelomeric regions, further increase susceptibility to such misalignments, as they create hotspots for recombination errors. Notable examples include the constitutional t(9;22) translocation, known as the , which arises primarily via NHEJ-mediated joining of and 22 breakpoints in chronic (CML). Another is NAHR in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A (CMT1A), where recombination between LCRs on chromosome 17p12 causes a 1.4 Mb duplication of the PMP22 gene, accounting for about 70% of cases. Unlike homologous crossover, which requires strict and is tightly regulated to prevent errors, non-homologous events lack this fidelity, relying on minimal or no , resulting in higher error rates and frequent production of unbalanced products. This can lead to through unbalanced translocations or copy number variations, disrupting and chromosomal integrity. Recent CRISPR-based studies in 2025 have highlighted a bias toward NHEJ in non-homologous repair events, revealing off-target large structural variants induced by Cas9-mediated double-strand breaks, which mimic natural non-homologous crossovers and underscore the pathway's mutagenic potential.

Biological Consequences

Genetic Diversity and Evolution

Chromosomal crossover during shuffles alleles between homologous chromosomes, breaking (LD) and generating novel haplotypes that enhance within populations. This process disrupts non-random associations of alleles at different loci, with the rate of LD decay proportional to recombination frequency, allowing for the creation of new genetic combinations that fuel variation. In finite populations, such shuffling counters the accumulation of deleterious mutations and promotes heterozygosity, as evidenced by reduced LD in regions of high recombination activity across eukaryotic genomes. Crossover facilitates by enabling beneficial to spread independently of linked or deleterious variants, particularly through recombination hotspots where crossover rates are elevated. These hotspots, often spanning short genomic intervals, allow selective sweeps to assemble advantageous combinations more efficiently, accelerating responses to environmental pressures. For instance, mutational hotspots driven by sequence-specific biases can lead to highly repeatable adaptive , as observed in microbial systems under strong selection, underscoring recombination's role in generating adaptive . The machinery of chromosomal crossover is evolutionarily conserved, tracing its origins to bacterial systems essential for and maintenance. In eukaryotes, this ancestral pathway was co-opted for , with core components like RecA orthologs (Rad51/Dmc1) and Spo11-derived topoisomerases enabling double-strand break initiation and strand invasion, making crossover essential in most eukaryotes for ensuring proper chromosome segregation during , thereby supporting and reduction. This conservation highlights recombination's fundamental role in eukaryotic , evolving from prokaryotic repair mechanisms over a billion years ago to support genetic exchange in multicellular lineages. In , crossover influences heterozygosity and the efficacy of selection via models like Hill-Robertson interference, where tight linkage reduces the fixation probability of beneficial alleles in finite populations. Recombination alleviates this interference by breaking negative LD, thereby increasing and enhancing adaptive potential, as demonstrated in theoretical frameworks showing recombination's advantage scales with rates per map length. Recent studies (2022–2025) further reveal that variation in crossover rates shapes in plants, with recombination landscapes modulating hybrid viability and genomic divergence; for example, suppressed recombination in structural variants like inversions protects adaptive loci during , driving . In species like sunflowers, differential recombination rates between parental genomes contribute to by facilitating the retention of beneficial haplotypes.

Implications for Disease and Mapping

Dysregulation of chromosomal crossover can lead to severe pathological outcomes, particularly resulting from meiotic . In humans, failure or reduction in crossover events during I is associated with improper chromosome segregation, increasing the risk of gametes with abnormal chromosome numbers. For instance, maternal meiotic of is the primary cause of (trisomy 21), where reduced recombination near the pericentromeric region correlates with segregation errors in advanced maternal age cases. Similarly, genome-wide reductions in recombination counts have been observed in oocytes exhibiting meiosis I errors for , highlighting crossover's role in stabilizing segregation. Asynapsis, the failure of homologous chromosomes to pair and during , often disrupts crossover formation and triggers through activation of checkpoints that eliminate defective gametes. In females, persistent asynapsis recruits proteins like to activate an asynapsis checkpoint, leading to oocyte and ovarian reserve depletion, which contributes to premature ovarian insufficiency. In males, severe asynapsis causes meiotic in spermatocytes, silencing unsynapsed via meiotic silencing of unsynapsed chromatin (MSUC) and resulting in or . Aberrant retention of regulators like HORMAD1 and HORMAD2 on asynaptic axes exacerbates this by sustaining checkpoint signaling and loss. In somatic cells, mitotic crossovers contribute to (LOH), a key driver of oncogenesis by inactivating tumor suppressor genes. Mitotic recombination events, such as those repairing DNA double-strand breaks at fragile sites, can generate LOH regions that homozygose deleterious alleles, promoting tumor progression in cancers like those involving . For example, in models, mitotic recombination in Trp53 heterozygous cells leads to LOH and development, mirroring cancers where such events amplify oncogenic potential. This mechanism contributes to LOH in solid tumors, underscoring mitotic crossover's role in genomic instability. Chromosomal crossover frequencies underpin genetic mapping techniques, enabling the localization of genes and quantitative trait loci (QTLs) through linkage analysis. Recombination rates, measured as map distances in centimorgans, reflect physical distances between loci and have been used since the early to construct linkage maps in model organisms and s. In modern genome-wide association studies (GWAS), fine-scale crossover maps integrate recombination hotspots to refine blocks, improving the resolution of trait-associated variants. For instance, GWAS of recombination phenotypes has identified genetic regulators of crossover rates, enhancing the accuracy of population-scale mapping in s and crops. Recent high-resolution recombination maps, incorporating both crossovers and non-crossovers, further support GWAS by providing comprehensive atlases for ancestry-informed variant imputation. Therapeutic strategies targeting crossover machinery, such as SPO11, hold promise for addressing recombination-related . Rare human SPO11 alleles disrupt meiotic double-strand break formation, leading to asynapsis and ; mouse models of these variants confirm reduced and offspring viability, suggesting potential for allele-specific interventions. While direct SPO11 inhibitors are under exploration for cancer (to prevent LOH), enhancing SPO11 activity via targeted delivery, as demonstrated in rice hybrids using dCas9-SPO11 fusions to stimulate local recombination, could inform fertility treatments in mammals by rescuing defective hotspots. Advances in predicting crossover hotspots, including 2024-2025 AI-driven models for breeding programs, leverage on and genomic data to forecast recombination landscapes, optimizing crop and livestock selection for enhanced .

References

  1. [1]
    Let's get physical – mechanisms of crossover interference - PMC
    May 26, 2021 · The formation of crossovers between homologous chromosomes is key to sexual reproduction. In most species, crossovers are spaced further apart ...
  2. [2]
    Crossing Over…Markov Meets Mendel - PMC - NIH
    May 17, 2012 · Chromosomal crossover is a biological mechanism to combine parental traits. It is perhaps the first mechanism ever taught in any introductory biology class.
  3. [3]
    Thomas Hunt Morgan, Genetic Recombination, and Gene Mapping
    In 1911, while studying the chromosome theory of heredity, biologist Thomas Hunt Morgan had a major breakthrough. Morgan occasionally noticed that "linked" ...
  4. [4]
    Crossing Over - National Human Genome Research Institute
    Crossing over is a cellular process that happens during meiosis when chromosomes of the same type are lined up.
  5. [5]
    Genetics, Meiosis - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
    Crossing over refers to a phenomenon that takes place during prophase I. When homologous chromosomes come together to form tetrads, the arms of the chromatids ...
  6. [6]
    sister-chromatid exchange (SCE) definition
    sister-chromatid exchange (SCE). Definition: Search ... An event similar to crossing over that can occur between sister chromatids at mitosis or at meiosis.
  7. [7]
    Crossover recombination between homologous chromosomes in ...
    Oct 25, 2024 · Crossing over between homologous chromosomes in meiosis is essential in most eukaryotes to produce gametes with the correct ploidy.
  8. [8]
    Molecular Mechanisms of Meiotic Crossover Control - PubMed Central
    Crossovers are formed by genetic recombination between homologs (reviewed by Cromie and Smith [10]). An early step in recombination is formation of DNA double- ...
  9. [9]
    Landscaping Crossover Interference Across a Genome - Penn State
    COs between two homologous chromosomes during meiosis promote genetic diversity, and are regulated by three machineries, (i) obligate CO formation, (ii) CO ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  10. [10]
    [PDF] Meiotic Crossover Patterning
    Jul 22, 2021 · The mechanisms behind crossover patterning remain largely unknown, and key players appear to act at all scales, from the DNA level to inter- ...
  11. [11]
    Somatic recombination in adult tissues: What is there to learn? - PMC
    Mitotic recombination has important consequences on adult tissues, creating genetic mosaicism, promoting tumor formation and having the potential to modify ...
  12. [12]
    Mitotic crossover - an evolutionary rudiment which promotes ... - NIH
    By increasing homozygosity, mitotic crossover acts to improve the efficiency of selection in asexual populations which are subjected to directional selection[6] ...
  13. [13]
    Mitotic homologous recombination maintains genomic stability and ...
    Mitotic homologous recombination promotes genome stability through the precise repair of DNA double-strand breaks and other lesions that are encountered ...
  14. [14]
    Diversity and determinants of recombination landscapes in flowering ...
    In plants, recombination rates are believed to be higher in species with smaller genomes because the linkage map length is independent of genome size and the ...
  15. [15]
    Variation in Recombination Rate Is Shaped by Domestication ... - NIH
    Meiotic recombination generates genetic diversity upon which selection can act. Recombination rates are highly variable between species, populations, ...
  16. [16]
    Rewiring Meiosis for Crop Improvement - PMC - PubMed Central
    Jul 19, 2021 · Meiotic recombination drives genome evolution and is a powerful tool for breeders to create new varieties important to food security.
  17. [17]
    Thomas Hunt Morgan – Article - NobelPrize.org
    Apr 20, 1998 · Thomas Hunt Morgan was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1933. The work for which the prize was awarded was completed over a 17-year period ...
  18. [18]
    The Centenary of Janssens's Chiasmatype Theory - PMC - NIH
    One crucial step in the understanding of meiosis was provided in 1909 by Frans Alfons Janssens who published in La Cellule an article entitled “La théorie de la ...Missing: source | Show results with:source
  19. [19]
    The chiasmatype theory. A new interpretation of the maturation ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · First published in 1909 in La Cellule, F. A. Janssens's “The chiasmatype theory. A new interpretation of the maturation divisions” proved ...
  20. [20]
    The First Genetic-Linkage Map - www.caltech.edu
    Mar 21, 2013 · In 1913, Alfred H. Sturtevant helped lay the foundations of modern biology by mapping the relative location of a series of genes on a chromosome.
  21. [21]
    East, Emerson, and the Birth of Maize Genetics - ResearchGate
    Two scientists, E. M. East and R. A. Emerson, were largely responsible for the development of maize as a pivotal species in genetics.
  22. [22]
    Thomas Hunt Morgan Proposes Genetic Recombination
    Morgan proposed a process of crossing over, or recombination. Specifically, he proposed that the two paired chromosomes could "cross over" to exchange ...
  23. [23]
    Proof of physical exchange of genes on the chromosomes - PNAS
    May 10, 2005 · An elegantly simple experiment in 1931 that exchange between genes was accompanied by exchange of cytological, ie, physical, parts of chromosomes.Missing: corn | Show results with:corn
  24. [24]
    [PDF] A correlation of cytological and genetical crossing-over in Zea mays.
    Having demonstrated that physical exchange between chromatids did in fact occur, Creighton and McClintock proceeded to establish a relationship between the ...
  25. [25]
    Gene - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    Jun 29, 2022 · Chromosomes had been suggested as containing hereditary material before, but evidence was not forthcoming until the early twentieth century.
  26. [26]
    (PDF) Richard Goldschmidt and the Crossing-Over Controversy
    Aug 7, 2025 · Three early 20th-century attempts at unifying separate areas of biology, in particular development, genetics, physiology, and evolution, are ...<|separator|>
  27. [27]
    Homologous recombination in DNA repair and DNA damage tolerance
    Jan 1, 2008 · Homologous recombination (HR) comprises a series of interrelated pathways that function in the repair of DNA double-stranded breaks (DSBs) and interstrand ...
  28. [28]
    Predicting recombination frequency from map distance | Heredity
    Dec 24, 2022 · The equations for the inverse mapping functions were: r = \frac{1}{2}( {1 - e^{ - 2d}}) (Haldane 1919), r = \frac{1}{2}\,tan\,h\left( {2d} ...
  29. [29]
    Spo11 and the Formation of DNA Double-Strand Breaks in Meiosis
    Spo11 catalyzes DNA double-strand break formation in meiosis, acting via a topoisomerase-like reaction, and is related to archaeal topoisomerase VI.
  30. [30]
    Spo11: from topoisomerase VI to meiotic recombination initiator
    Spo11 is a key initiator of meiotic recombination, vital for genetic diversity, and is believed to have evolved from topoisomerase VI.
  31. [31]
    In vitro reconstitution of meiotic DNA double-strand-break formation
    Feb 19, 2025 · We report the successful purification of the mouse SPO11–TOP6BL complex, presenting in vitro reconstitution of meiotic DSB formation.
  32. [32]
    Mouse MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 is needed to start and extend meiotic ...
    Apr 16, 2025 · Here we examine roles of the conserved MRN complex (MRE11, RAD50, and NBS1) through genome-wide analysis of meiotic resection during spermatogenesis in mice.
  33. [33]
    The MRE11–RAD50–NBS1 Complex Conducts the Orchestration of ...
    MRN is the core conductor for the initial and sustained responses to DNA double-strand breaks, stalled replication forks, dysfunctional telomeres, and viral ...
  34. [34]
    Two auxiliary factors promote Dmc1-driven DNA strand ... - PNAS
    May 15, 2020 · Unlike Rad51, which contributes to both mitotic and meiotic recombination, Dmc1 functions only during meiosis. Both Rad51 and Dmc1 bind single- ...
  35. [35]
    The Recombinases DMC1 and RAD51 Are Functionally and ...
    Mek1 suppresses Rad51-mediated strand invasion of sister chromatids by (transient) inhibition of Rad51/Rad54 complex formation and via a Rad54-independent ...
  36. [36]
    The Configuration of RPA, RAD51, and DMC1 Binding in Meiosis ...
    Aug 20, 2020 · Meiotic recombination proceeds via binding of RPA, RAD51, and DMC1 to single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) substrates created after formation of ...
  37. [37]
    Regulation of Msh4-Msh5 association with meiotic chromosomes in ...
    We show that Msh5 specifically associates with DSB hotspots, chromosome axes, and centromeres on chromosomes.
  38. [38]
    ZCWPW1 is recruited to recombination hotspots by PRDM9 ... - eLife
    Aug 3, 2020 · PRDM9 deposits both H3K4me3 and H3K36me3 histone methylation marks at the sites it binds, and this methyltransferase activity is essential for ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  39. [39]
    PRDM9 activity depends on HELLS and promotes local 5 ... - eLife
    Oct 13, 2020 · HELLS and PRDM9 are required for 5hmC enrichment at meiotic hotspots. Recently, it was shown that HELLS interacts with all three TET ...
  40. [40]
    The histone modification reader ZCWPW1 promotes double-strand ...
    Sep 6, 2022 · PRDM9 writes H3K4me3 and H3K36me3 marks at meiotic hotspots via the methyltransferase activity of its PR/SET domain, thus specifying ...Missing: advances | Show results with:advances
  41. [41]
    EWSR1 affects PRDM9-dependent histone 3 methylation and ...
    Dec 29, 2020 · Our results demonstrate that EWSR1 is essential for promoting PRDM9-dependent histone methylation and normal meiotic progress.
  42. [42]
    Chiasmata - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Chiasma Resolution. In order for the paired chromosomes to separate at the first meiotic division, it is necessary for the chiasmata to be resolved. The ...Recombination Nodules · Meiosis In Development And... · 2.2. 2 Chiasmata Formation...
  43. [43]
    Mouse HFM1/Mer3 Is Required for Crossover Formation and ...
    Faithful chromosome segregation during meiosis requires that homologous chromosomes associate and recombine. Chiasmata, the cytological manifestation of ...
  44. [44]
    Holliday Junction Resolution and Crossover Formation - ScienceDirect
    Jan 20, 2004 · Holliday junctions have been considered a central intermediate in homologous recombination ever since Robin Holliday proposed their existence ...
  45. [45]
    Resolution of single and double Holliday junction recombination ...
    Jan 3, 2017 · Here, we show that GEN1 cuts DNA substrates containing single or double Holliday junctions to generate cross-over or noncross-over recombination products.
  46. [46]
    Mechanism of Holliday junction resolution by the human GEN1 protein
    Holliday junction (HJ) resolution is essential for chromosome segregation at meiosis and the repair of stalled/collapsed replication forks in mitotic cells.
  47. [47]
    Coordinated Actions of SLX1-SLX4 and MUS81-EME1 for Holliday ...
    Oct 24, 2013 · Here, we show that three structure-selective endonucleases, namely SLX1-SLX4, MUS81-EME1, and GEN1, define two pathways of HJ resolution in human cells.
  48. [48]
    Human GEN1 and the SLX4-associated nucleases MUS81 and ...
    Oct 17, 2013 · Human GEN1 and the SLX4-associated nucleases MUS81 and SLX1 are essential for the resolution of replication-induced Holliday junctions. Cell ...
  49. [49]
    Chiasmata Promote Monopolar Attachment of Sister Chromatids and ...
    Mar 10, 2011 · The chiasma is a structure that forms between a pair of homologous chromosomes by crossover recombination and physically links the homologous ...
  50. [50]
    Chiasmata and the kinetochore component Dam1 are crucial for ...
    Feb 3, 2021 · These results demonstrate that chiasmata alter attachment correction patterns by enabling error correction factors to eliminate bi-oriented ...Abstract · 2. Results · 2.3. Chiasmata Coordinate...
  51. [51]
    Variation and Evolution of the Meiotic Requirement for Crossing ...
    In mammals, the correlation between chiasma number and chromosome arm number is higher than the corresponding correlation with chromosome number (Dutrillaux ...
  52. [52]
    A mathematical framework for examining whether a minimum ...
    The histogram of average genetic lengths per chromosome arm shows a peak near the 50 cM [9], seemingly consistent with the model of average one chiasma per arm.
  53. [53]
    Meiotic Crossover Interference: Methods of Analysis and ...
    Using random gametes, the coefficient of coincidence (CoC) compares the observed frequency of double crossovers with that expected from independent crossovers.<|separator|>
  54. [54]
    Meiotic Crossover Patterning - Frontiers
    Hulten later developed the Chiasma Interference Map (CHIM), in which chiasmata are marked along the chromosome and chiasmata that occurred on the same ...
  55. [55]
    The Mus81/Mms4 endonuclease acts independently of ... - PubMed
    Class I is dependent upon MSH4/MSH5 and exhibits crossover interference, while class II is dependent upon MUS81/MMS4 and exhibits no interference. mms4 ...
  56. [56]
    The CDK1-TOPBP1-PLK1 axis regulates the Bloom's syndrome ...
    Feb 4, 2022 · We show here that crossover avoidance by BTR further requires the activity of cyclin-dependent kinase-1 (CDK1), Polo-like kinase-1 (PLK1), and ...
  57. [57]
    Complete human recombination maps - Nature
    Jan 22, 2025 · Human recombination maps are a valuable resource for association and linkage studies and crucial for many inferences of population history ...
  58. [58]
    How Cells Respond to DNA Breaks in Mitosis - ScienceDirect.com
    When DSBs occur during mitosis, cells no longer arrest but prioritize completion of cell division over repair of DNA damage.Missing: crossover | Show results with:crossover
  59. [59]
    Mechanisms and Regulation of Mitotic Recombination in ...
    When sister chromatid repair is accompanied by a crossover, it results in sister-chromatid exchange (SCE). If the repair event occurs between misaligned ...
  60. [60]
    The RAD51 recombinase protects mitotic chromatin in human cells
    Sep 10, 2021 · In this study, we show that RAD51 protects under-replicated DNA in mitotic human cells and, in this way, promotes mitotic DNA synthesis (MiDAS) and successful ...Missing: crossover | Show results with:crossover
  61. [61]
    DMC1 attenuates RAD51-mediated recombination in Arabidopsis
    Aug 25, 2022 · Essential for maintaining chromosomal integrity in mitotic cells, the strand-exchange activity of RAD51 is downregulated in meiosis, where it ...
  62. [62]
    Equal Sister Chromatid Exchange Is a Major Mechanism of Double ...
    Equal sister chromatid exchange (SCE) is a major mechanism of double-strand break (DSB) repair in yeast, using the sister chromatid as a template.
  63. [63]
    Loss of Heterozygosity Occurs via Mitotic Recombination in Trp53 + ...
    Abstract. Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) occurs commonly in cancers causing disruption of tumor suppressor genes and promoting tumor progression.
  64. [64]
    Mitotic cells can repair DNA double-strand breaks via a homology ...
    Oct 3, 2020 · These results provide evidence showing that a portion of mitotic cell DSBs are undoubtedly repaired through action of the HDR repair pathway.
  65. [65]
    Twin Spots as Evidence for Mitotic Crossing-over in Aspergillus ...
    Twin spots of mutant cells occurring on the abdomen of a Drosophila were produced by crossing-over at the four strand stage of mitosis.
  66. [66]
    Termini of human chromosomes display elevated rates of mitotic ...
    This approach allowed the detection of recombinational crossovers occurring anywhere along the length of individual chromosomes, including reciprocal events ...
  67. [67]
    Mitotic recombination produces the majority of recessive fibroblast ...
    About 8 −10 × 105 freshly prepared cells were seeded in a 100-mm culture ... frequency of 12 × 10−5. The frequency even differed dramatically between ...
  68. [68]
    Genome-wide identification of copy neutral loss of heterozygosity ...
    Abstract. Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) is a genetic alteration that results from the loss of one allele at a heterozygous locus. In particular, copy neutra.
  69. [69]
    Replicative Age Induces Mitotic Recombination in the Ribosomal ...
    Instead, we suggest that the age-associated increase in rDNA recombination is a response to increasing DNA replication stress generated in aging cells.Missing: crossover | Show results with:crossover
  70. [70]
    Sister Chromatid Exchanges Are Mediated by Homologous ... - NIH
    Sister chromatid exchange (SCE) frequency is a commonly used index of chromosomal stability in response to environmental or genetic mutagens.
  71. [71]
    Molecular underpinnings and environmental drivers of loss of ...
    Dec 26, 2023 · Our data indicate that mitotic recombination plays a major role in LOH in ISCs. As recombination results from DNA double-strand break repair ...
  72. [72]
    How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Mitotic Recombination
    In this article, however, I discuss the implications of recent findings regarding the frequency, nature, and consequences of LOH in normal somatic cells in vivo ...
  73. [73]
    Mechanisms of structural chromosomal rearrangement formation - NIH
    Jun 14, 2022 · Most recurrent rearrangements are caused by a mechanism named Non-Allelic Homologous Recombination (NAHR) that occurs between Low Copy Repeats ...
  74. [74]
    END-JOINING, TRANSLOCATIONS AND CANCER - PMC - NIH
    This group includes the Philadelphia chromosome, t(9;22) (translocation ... NHEJ is the primary pathway for formation of chromosome translocations.
  75. [75]
    The 22q11 low copy repeats are characterized by unprecedented ...
    Low copy repeats (LCRs), also referred to as segmental duplications, are a driving force in genome evolution, adaptation, and instability. In the diploid ...
  76. [76]
    Genetics of Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) Disease within the Frame of ...
    Jan 22, 2014 · This unique genomic architecture creates a non-allelic homologous recombination (NAHR) which cause the CMT1A duplication or HNPP deletion.
  77. [77]
    The hidden risks of CRISPR/Cas: structural variations and genome ...
    Aug 5, 2025 · Whole genomic analysis reveals atypical non-homologous off-target large structural variants induced by CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genome editing.
  78. [78]
    Linkage disequilibrium — understanding the evolutionary past and ...
    the nonrandom association of alleles at different loci — is a sensitive indicator of the population genetic forces that structure a ...
  79. [79]
    https://dash.harvard.edu/server/api/core/bitstream...
    Crossovers also create new combinations of alleles, thus contributing to genetic diversity and evolution (3). Recent linkage disequilibrium (LD) and ...
  80. [80]
    Recombination: the good, the bad and the variable - Journals
    Nov 6, 2017 · The effects of recombination can be good, as it can facilitate adaptation, but also bad when it breaks apart beneficial combinations of alleles.Missing: seminal | Show results with:seminal
  81. [81]
    A mutational hotspot that determines highly repeatable evolution ...
    Oct 19, 2021 · In this work, we reveal that a near-deterministic genetic hotspot can be built and broken by a handful of silent mutations.Results · Clonal Interference Cannot... · Methods
  82. [82]
    Origins of the machinery of recombination and sex | Heredity - Nature
    Feb 20, 2002 · Meiosis evolved because of resulting selection for periodic ploidy reduction, with incidental consequences for intrapopulation genetic exchange.
  83. [83]
    Evolutionary Origin of Recombination during Meiosis | BioScience
    Possible α-proteobacterial origin of genes central to meiosis. Role of RecA recombinase in bacterial transformation. Role of RecA orthologs in eukaryotes.
  84. [84]
    The Hill–Robertson effect: evolutionary consequences of weak ...
    Sep 19, 2007 · The 'Hill–Robertson (HR) effect' describes that linkage between sites under selection will reduce the overall effectiveness of selection in finite populations.
  85. [85]
    Genomics of plant speciation - ScienceDirect.com
    Sep 11, 2023 · We review how genomics has advanced what we know of some routes to new species formation, like hybridization or whole-genome duplication.Missing: papers | Show results with:papers
  86. [86]
    The role of recombination landscape in species hybridisation and ...
    Jul 5, 2023 · In this paper we review the relationship between recombination and introgression in plants and argue that large rarely recombining regions likely play a major ...
  87. [87]
    New Insights into Human Nondisjunction of Chromosome 21 ... - NIH
    Mar 14, 2008 · Nondisjunction occurs when chromosomes fail to segregate during meiosis; when this happens, gametes with an abnormal number of chromosomes are ...
  88. [88]
    Etiology of Down Syndrome: Evidence for Consistent ... - NIH
    Down syndrome caused by meiotic nondisjunction of chromosome 21 in humans, is well known to be associated with advanced maternal age.<|separator|>
  89. [89]
    [PDF] Methods and Genome-Wide Association Study for Meiotic ...
    Jul 27, 2021 · In addition, there is evidence that genome-wide recombination counts in oocytes with a MI nondisjunction error of chromosome 21 are reduced ...
  90. [90]
    BRCA1 safeguards genome integrity by activating chromosome ...
    May 2, 2024 · BRCA1 promotes chromosome asynapsis checkpoint, not canonical DNA damage checkpoint, to eliminate recombination-defective oocytes.
  91. [91]
    Chromosome Asynapsis Is the Main Cause of Male Sterility in the ...
    Apr 30, 2023 · The asynapsis led to the silencing of unsynapsed chromatin. We suggest that chromosome asynapsis is the main cause of meiotic arrest and male ...
  92. [92]
    Aberrant activation of chromosome asynapsis checkpoint triggers ...
    Mar 6, 2025 · We show that when HORMAD1 and HORMAD2 are retained on synapsed chromosome axes, they recruit BRCA1, activate chromosome asynapsis checkpoint, and trigger ...
  93. [93]
    Mechanisms underlying losses of heterozygosity in human ... - PNAS
    Several basic mechanisms have been considered to account for LOH: mitotic nondisjunction, loss of a segment of chromosome resulting from a deletion event, ...
  94. [94]
    Genetic Linkage Mapping: Definition, Techniques, and Applications
    A genetic linkage map describes the position of a species' or experimental population's known genes or genetic markers in terms of recombination frequency.
  95. [95]
    Characterizing mutagenic effects of recombination through ... - Science
    Jan 25, 2019 · We used crossovers from many individuals to construct genetic maps ... We performed genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of the recombination ...
  96. [96]
    A segregating human allele of SPO11 modeled in mice disrupts ...
    Modeling of a rare SPO11 allele in mice demonstrates it causes defects that could impact fertility of affected people and their children.
  97. [97]
    dCas9-SPO11-1 locally stimulates meiotic recombination in rice
    Apr 30, 2025 · We investigate the use of a dCas9-SPO11-1 fusion and clusters of 11 gRNAs to alter meiotic recombination in two chromosomal regions of a rice hybrid.