Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Chronotype

A chronotype is an individual's inherent preference for the timing of , , and daily activities, which aligns with the of their internal and determines whether they are naturally inclined toward morning or evening orientations. This trait exists on a , with most people falling into three broad categories: morning types (often called "larks"), who prefer early rising and peak performance in the morning; evening types (""), who thrive later in the day and have delayed sleep schedules; and intermediate types, representing the majority of the population with balanced preferences. Chronotypes are shaped by genetic factors, environmental influences, and developmental changes, with estimates around 50% from twin studies, and genome-wide association studies (GWAS) identifying key variants contributing to morningness-eveningness differences, alongside earlier findings implicating genes like PER3. They are typically assessed through validated self-report , such as the Morningness-Eveningness (MEQ), which scores preferences for daily routines, or the Chronotype (MCTQ), which calculates mid-sleep time on free days as a proxy for circadian . and also modulate chronotypes, with adolescents and young adults shifting toward eveningness and older individuals trending morningward, while males tend to exhibit slightly later chronotypes than females. Mismatches between an individual's chronotype and external demands—such as work or school schedules—can lead to "social jetlag," chronic , reduced cognitive performance, and elevated health risks, including metabolic disorders, cardiovascular issues, and psychiatric conditions like and , particularly among evening types. Research highlights the importance of chronotype alignment for optimizing , , and overall well-being, with ongoing studies exploring its interactions with modern factors like light exposure and .

Definition and Types

Definition

A chronotype represents an individual's inherent preference for the timing of and , arising from the phase difference between their endogenous —typically slightly longer than 24 hours—and the external 24-hour light-dark cycle. This misalignment or alignment leads to distinct patterns of daily activity, where morning-oriented individuals, often called "larks," exhibit peaks in alertness and performance early in the day, while evening-oriented individuals, known as "," show these peaks later, with most people falling into an intermediate category. Grounded in circadian biology, chronotype reflects how the internal synchronizes (or desynchronizes) with environmental zeitgebers like light exposure to regulate sleep-wake cycles. Central to understanding chronotype are the distinctions between endogenous timing, driven by the in the brain, and exogenous influences from social schedules, light, and lifestyle factors. This trait is modulated by age, with chronotypes shifting toward eveningness during and back toward morningness in later adulthood; by sex, where females tend to have earlier chronotypes than males; and by environmental pressures, such as urban light pollution or , which can delay the internal clock. In the general population, chronotypes follow a roughly Gaussian distribution, with intermediate types often comprising the largest proportion, though exact distributions vary by measurement method, population, and demographics. Chronotype is often quantified through proxies that capture this relationship, such as the midpoint of sleep (MSF) on free days, which estimates the preferred sleep center adjusted for accumulated . Alternatively, it can be assessed biologically via the angle between dim melatonin onset (DLMO)—the time when levels rise in dim conditions, marking the start of the biological night—and habitual sleep onset, providing a direct measure of circadian alignment. These methods highlight chronotype as a stable yet adaptable trait, distinct from but influenced by broader circadian rhythms.

Types of Chronotypes

Chronotypes are typically classified along a of morningness-eveningness preferences, with the Horne-Östberg (MEQ) serving as a foundational tool for categorization. Scores on the MEQ range from 16 to 86, dividing individuals into five groups: definite morning types or "larks" (70-86), moderate morning types (59-69), intermediate types (42-58), moderate evening types (31-41), and definite evening types or "" (16-30). This classification reflects a spectrum of diurnal activity patterns, where larks exhibit peak alertness and energy in the early morning, owls in the late evening, and intermediates falling between these extremes. The prevalence of these chronotypes varies significantly by demographics, particularly and sex. In children, morning types predominate, but preferences shift toward evening types during , peaking around ages 15-25, before gradually reverting to morning orientations in older adulthood. Females tend to display a stronger morning orientation than males across the lifespan, with the largest sex differences observed in ; however, this disparity decreases with advancing . Overall, intermediate chronotypes are the most common, comprising the largest proportion of the , while extreme larks and are less prevalent. Chronotypes exhibit relative stability in adulthood, functioning as a trait-like characteristic with only minor advancements toward earlier preferences over periods such as seven years. Nonetheless, they remain modifiable to some extent by lifestyle factors, including exposure to light, , and , which can temporarily alter . A key illustration of this modifiability is "social jetlag," defined as the discrepancy between biological sleep timing dictated by one's chronotype and the imposed of work or days, often resulting in later bedtimes and wake times on days. The distribution of chronotypes across populations is partly influenced by genetic factors, with estimates around 50%.

Biological Foundations

Circadian Rhythms

The circadian system in mammals is orchestrated by a central master clock located in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the hypothalamus, which coordinates daily physiological and behavioral rhythms across the body. The SCN receives direct neural inputs from retinal ganglion cells via the retinohypothalamic tract, allowing it to synchronize internal timing with external environmental cues. In addition to this central pacemaker, peripheral circadian clocks exist in nearly every organ and tissue, including the liver, heart, and pancreas, where they regulate local processes such as metabolism and hormone release. These peripheral oscillators operate semi-autonomously but are synchronized by the SCN through neural, hormonal, and metabolic signals, ensuring coherent 24-hour oscillations throughout the organism. Chronotype emerges as a stable manifestation of an individual's circadian phase relative to the solar day, influenced by this hierarchical clock network. At the molecular level, the circadian clock relies on a transcriptional-translational feedback loop (TTFL) that generates self-sustaining oscillations with a period close to 24 hours. In the positive arm of the loop, the transcription factors CLOCK and BMAL1 heterodimerize and bind to promoter elements, activating the expression of (PER1, PER2) and (CRY1, CRY2) genes. The resulting PER and CRY proteins accumulate in the , form complexes, and translocate to the nucleus, where they inhibit CLOCK-BMAL1 activity, repressing their own transcription in the negative arm of the loop. This feedback cycle, modulated by post-translational modifications such as and ubiquitination, sustains rhythmic with a delay that determines the clock's . Interconnected secondary loops involving genes like REV-ERB and further stabilize the rhythm, contributing to the robustness of the TTFL across SCN neurons and peripheral cells. Circadian rhythms are entrained to the 24-hour day by external time-giving cues known as , with serving as the primary signal that resets the SCN clock. exposure, particularly in the blue spectrum during the early morning, induces phase advances, while evening causes phase delays, allowing alignment with the light-dark cycle. , secreted by the under SCN control, acts as a chemical that reinforces , promoting phase advances when administered in the afternoon and helping to stabilize rhythms in conditions of weak cues. In the absence of , circadian rhythms exhibit a free-running period averaging approximately 24.2 hours, which typically results in a gradual drift relative to clock time unless entrained. A basic mathematical model describes circadian phase dynamics as a periodic function: \theta(t) = \omega t + \phi \pmod{2\pi} where \theta(t) is the phase at time t, \omega = 2\pi / \tau is the angular frequency with \tau as the endogenous period (approximately 24.2 hours in humans), and \phi represents the phase shift that aligns the rhythm with environmental or behavioral cycles, thereby influencing chronotype. This phase model captures how zeitgeber-induced advances or delays adjust \phi to maintain synchronization, with deviations leading to transient misalignments in daily functioning.

Genetic Basis

Twin and family studies have established that chronotype is a moderately heritable trait, with heritability estimates ranging from 40% to 54% based on analyses in diverse populations including those from the United States, United Kingdom, Scandinavia, and Brazil. These findings indicate a substantial genetic contribution to individual differences in diurnal preferences, though environmental factors also play a role in modulating expression. Chronotype is a polygenic influenced by hundreds of genetic loci, as revealed by genome-wide association studies (GWAS). A GWAS of 697,828 individuals identified 351 genome-wide significant loci associated with self-reported chronotype, enriching for genes involved in circadian regulation, cAMP signaling, glutamate signaling, and insulin pathways, as well as those expressed in the . Key genes implicated include PER2 and PER3, which encode proteins central to the circadian and have variants linked to advanced or delayed sleep phase disorders; CLOCK, with polymorphisms such as rs1801260 associated with evening chronotypes; and RORB, a top hit in earlier GWAS for its role in eveningness preference. Among recent findings, a 2024 GWAS in individuals with identified 15 loci specifically associated with morning chronotype, highlighting subtype-specific genetic architecture. Polygenic risk scores (PRS) derived from adult GWAS have shown utility in predicting chronotype in adolescents, with higher morningness PRS linked to earlier onset of morning preferences during puberty. These scores also interact with sex and pubertal stage, such that genetic predisposition to eveningness is more pronounced in females post-puberty, influencing the developmental trajectory of chronotype. Additionally, Mendelian randomization analyses have demonstrated bidirectional genetic associations between chronotype and shift work, where genetic liability to evening chronotype increases shift work exposure, and vice versa, potentially mediated by circadian disruption and melatonin dysregulation.

History

Early Concepts

The earliest observations of diurnal variations in human physiology and behavior date back to ancient times, with noting in the fifth century BCE that patients exhibited 24-hour fluctuations in symptoms alongside longer-term rhythms, suggesting an awareness of daily cycles influencing health. These insights laid preliminary groundwork for understanding individual differences in activity and rest patterns, though without a formalized concept of chronotype. In the 18th and 19th centuries, precursors to chronotype research emerged through studies on , such as Jean-Jacques d'Ortous de Mairan's experiments demonstrating persistent daily leaf movements in plants isolated from , establishing the endogenous nature of circadian timing that would later inform human sleep-wake variations. Human sleep timing observations during this period, including accounts of biphasic sleep patterns common until the industrial era, highlighted societal shifts toward consolidated nighttime sleep but also implicit individual variations in preferred rest periods influenced by environmental demands. Key milestones in the early advanced these ideas toward recognizing stable individual differences. German psychiatrist , in his late 19th and early 20th-century clinical and experimental work (circa 1890s–1910s), systematically described morning and evening dispositions—along with intermediate types—based on empirical assessments of maximum physical capacity, cognitive performance, and variations throughout the day. Kraepelin's neuropsychological experiments and studies revealed that some individuals peaked in and efficiency in the morning, while others did so in the evening, challenging prior views of uniform diurnal patterns and providing the first structured framework for what would become chronotype classification. Building on this, Nathaniel Kleitman's 1938 Mammoth Cave experiment with Bruce Richardson tested human adaptability to a 28-hour cycle in constant darkness, finding that subjects reverted to approximately 24-hour rest-activity patterns, supporting the endogenous regulation of -wake cycles. Kleitman's seminal 1939 book, Sleep and Wakefulness, synthesized these findings and existing knowledge on basic rest-activity cycles, emphasizing diurnal differences in and performance as integral to human physiology. In the and , initial theories debated whether chronotype-like individual differences represented fixed endogenous traits or primarily environmental adaptations. Early research, including field experiments in isolated environments like caves and the from 1938 to 1963, increasingly demonstrated that human rhythms persisted independently of external cues, favoring endogenous origins over purely exogenous (environment-driven) explanations. This period saw a shift from in the late 1940s toward acceptance of internal clocks, with discussions highlighting how genetic and physiological factors might underpin stable preferences for morning or evening activity, though adaptability to zeitgebers like remained a contested influence. These foundational debates set the stage for later genetic investigations into chronotype stability.

Modern Developments

The modern era of chronotype research began in the 1970s with Oscar Öquist's 1970 thesis at the , which introduced systematic assessment of morningness-eveningness preferences as a core dimension of individual circadian variation, laying the groundwork for empirical studies on diurnal preferences. This period saw the refinement of measurement tools, such as the 1976 Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ) by Horne and Östberg, which quantified chronotype along a continuum and enabled population-level analyses. By the , genetic investigations advanced significantly with the discovery of the CLOCK gene in 1994, a key transcriptional activator in the mammalian circadian feedback loop, which informed early models linking genetic variants to chronotype stability and phase differences. In the 2000s and , chronotype research integrated with and , revealing neural and population-level correlates. Functional MRI studies demonstrated chronotype-specific patterns in brain activation, such as enhanced connectivity in evening types during attention tasks, highlighting how circadian preferences influence cognitive processing. Epidemiological cohorts, including large-scale surveys, established chronotype as a modifiable in daily functioning, with evening chronotypes showing delayed peaks in and . A landmark 2016 genome-wide association study (GWAS) in over 100,000 participants identified 12 novel genetic loci associated with chronotype, primarily involving components like PER2 and implicating pathways in neural signaling. This was expanded by a 2019 GWAS across 697,828 individuals, which pinpointed 351 loci influencing chronotype, enriching understanding of retinal and hypothalamic pathways. Post-2020 developments have emphasized therapeutic applications and advanced predictive modeling. Chronotherapy trials have expanded to tailor interventions, such as timed light exposure or medication dosing, to individual chronotypes, with randomized studies showing improved outcomes in mood stabilization when aligning treatments with circadian phase. Machine learning approaches, including polygenic risk scores from GWAS data, have enabled accurate chronotype prediction, achieving up to 80% concordance in adolescent cohorts by integrating genetic, actigraphic, and environmental inputs. Recent studies (as of 2025) have further linked chronotype to cognitive outcomes, neural dynamics, and mental health vulnerabilities, such as increased depression and anxiety risks in evening types, underscoring its role in perioperative care and emotional well-being.

Measurement

Self-Report Questionnaires

Self-report questionnaires represent a primary for assessing chronotype through subjective reports of sleep-wake preferences, daily rhythms, and behavioral tendencies, offering accessible and cost-effective tools for large-scale studies. These instruments typically involve multiple-choice or Likert-scale items that quantify an individual's alignment with morningness or eveningness, enabling categorization into chronotype groups based on total scores. Widely adopted examples include the Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ), the Circadian Type Inventory (CTI), and the Chronotype Questionnaire (MCTQ), each emphasizing different facets of diurnal preferences while demonstrating strong psychometric properties. The Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ), developed by Horne and Östberg in 1976, is one of the earliest and most influential self-report tools for chronotype assessment. It consists of 19 items that probe preferred times for , waking, peak alertness, and subjective fatigue, with responses scored on a yielding a total range of 16 to 86. Higher scores indicate greater morningness, while lower scores reflect eveningness; conventional cutoffs categorize individuals as "definitely morning type" (70-86), "moderately morning type" (59-69), "neither type" (42-58), "moderately evening type" (31-41), or "definitely evening type" (16-30). The MEQ exhibits high (Cronbach's α ≈ 0.83) and test-retest reliability (r ≈ 0.89 over weeks), making it reliable for repeated measures in research. Cross-cultural adaptations have validated its use in diverse populations, including , Slovak, , and Malaysian versions, though score distributions vary by cultural and geographic factors, with eveningness more prevalent in urban or equatorial settings. The Circadian Type Inventory (CTI), originally developed in the by Folkard and revised by Di Milia and colleagues in the early 2000s, focuses on psychological dimensions of chronotype, particularly adaptability to irregular schedules like . This 18-item questionnaire assesses two key factors: languidity (tendency for inertia and prolonged recovery after ) and flexibility (ease of adjusting to shifts), using a 6-point for responses. High languidity scores correlate with rigid, evening-oriented chronotypes, while high flexibility indicates better tolerance for disruptions, aiding in the identification of individuals suited for non-standard work hours. The revised CTI demonstrates improved psychometric properties, with Cronbach's α values of 0.80-0.85 for its subscales and moderate test-retest reliability (r ≈ 0.70-0.75), though it is less focused on absolute timing compared to other tools. The Munich Chronotype Questionnaire (MCTQ), introduced by Roenneberg and colleagues in 2003, provides a more nuanced assessment by deriving chronotype from reported behaviors on work and free days, emphasizing real-world social influences on rhythms. Comprising around 20 items on bedtimes, wake times, and latency, it calculates the mid- on free days (MSF) as a continuous chronotype indicator, corrected for (MSFsc) to account for oversleeping. MSF values below approximately 4:00 AM denote morning types, while later values indicate evening types, offering a distribution-based rather than categorical approach. The MCTQ has high test-retest reliability (r > 0.90 for timing items) and has been adapted for shift workers (MCTQShift), enhancing its applicability in occupational settings. Validation studies confirm the of these questionnaires against objective measures like , with correlations between self-reported mid-sleep times and actigraphy-derived acrophases typically ranging from r = 0.70 to 0.80, particularly stronger on free days. For instance, MEQ scores align moderately with actigraphic rest-activity cycles (r ≈ 0.65-0.75), while MCTQ's MSF shows robust agreement with wrist-monitored sleep offsets (r ≈ 0.75-0.85). However, limitations include self-report biases such as recall inaccuracies or social desirability, which can overestimate duration by 30-60 minutes compared to . Cultural influences further moderate reliability, as eveningness preferences may be underrepresented in collectivist societies due to normative schedules, leading to score shifts of up to 1-2 hours in comparisons. Despite these constraints, self-report tools remain foundational for chronotype research due to their practicality and established correlations with physiological markers.

Objective and Composite Scales

Objective measures of chronotype rely on empirical data from physiological and behavioral monitoring, providing more direct assessments than self-reports. , using wrist-worn devices to track rest-activity cycles, estimates chronotype by analyzing sleep onset and offset over 7-14 days to derive metrics like the mid-sleep point on free days (MSF). These devices detect movement patterns to infer sleep-wake cycles with high reliability, often correlating well with for chronotype classification. Wearable apps, such as those integrated with the Oura Ring, extend this approach by using sensors for sleep tracking and chronotype estimation based on nightly patterns. Physiological markers offer precise indicators of circadian phase. Dim light melatonin onset (DLMO), measured through serial samples under dim light conditions, serves as the gold standard for assessing endogenous chronotype by identifying the rise in levels, typically occurring 2-3 hours before habitual time. EEG-based quantifies —the time from lights out to the first epoch of —revealing chronotype differences in sleep architecture, such as shorter latencies in morning types under aligned conditions. Composite scales combine subjective preferences with behavioral or objective data for a hybrid assessment. The Composite Scale of Morningness (), developed in the , consists of 13 items evaluating both preferred and actual times for , physical exercise, and mental alertness, yielding scores that classify individuals as morning, intermediate, or evening types and validate against MSF. The Munich ChronoType Questionnaire () computes social jetlag (SJL) as the absolute difference between mid-sleep on free days (MSF) and workdays (MSW), adjusted for , to quantify misalignment between biological and social rhythms, with higher SJL indicating evening chronotypes. These scales complement self-report questionnaires by incorporating real-world behavior, enhancing reliability in chronotype assessment.

Characteristics

Sleep Patterns

Chronotypes significantly influence the timing of , with morning types (also known as larks) typically having earlier schedules, often going to bed around 9-11 PM and waking around 5-7 AM to align with their advanced circadian . In contrast, evening types (or ) exhibit a delayed schedule, often going to bed near 1:00 AM and awakening around 9:00 AM, reflecting a circadian approximately 2-3 hours later than that of morning types. chronotypes display patterns positioned between these extremes, with bedtimes and wake times varying gradually along the spectrum. These differences can be quantified using the midpoint of on free days (MSF), a key metric from the Munich Chronotype Questionnaire that captures preferred timing without work-related constraints. Regarding sleep duration and quality, evening chronotypes frequently endure shorter sleep lengths during weekdays due to societal demands that enforce early morning awakenings, resulting in chronic sleep restriction and the accumulation of "social jetlag"—a misalignment between biological and social clocks. This mismatch often leads to reduced sleep efficiency and heightened subjective sleepiness upon waking compared to morning types. Moreover, evening types report elevated rates of insomnia symptoms, particularly when their natural late preferences conflict with conventional schedules, exacerbating sleep onset difficulties and overall poorer sleep quality. Morning types, conversely, generally achieve more consistent durations closer to the recommended 7-9 hours, with fewer disruptions under standard routines. Specific sleep disorders also vary by chronotype. Extreme evening types are disproportionately affected by delayed sleep phase syndrome (DSPS), a circadian rhythm sleep-wake disorder involving persistent delays in sleep onset and offset by more than two hours relative to societal norms, often scoring as definitive evening chronotypes on assessments. Associations with (OSA) show variations across chronotypes, with evening types potentially facing higher prevalence or altered symptom profiles due to their delayed sleep patterns and related comorbidities, though morning types may exhibit better treatment adherence.

Diurnal Rhythms and Daily Functioning

Chronotype influences diurnal rhythms, manifesting in variations of , cognitive , and physiological processes throughout the day. Individuals with a morning chronotype typically experience alertness between 8 and 10 a.m., with performance declining progressively into the evening, whereas those with an evening chronotype exhibit lower alertness in the early morning and reach their in the late afternoon or evening hours. These patterns reflect underlying circadian differences, where morning types align with earlier to light-dark cycles, leading to troughs in the evening, and evening types show delayed rhythms with morning troughs. Evening chronotypes often demonstrate heightened creativity and during their optimal evening periods, though they report greater fatigue and reduced performance in the morning. Social jetlag—the misalignment between biological and social clocks, commonly exceeding 1 hour in evening types—exacerbates these effects, associating with an increased likelihood of depressive symptoms and overall mood disturbances. In contrast, morning types maintain more stable daily functioning, with fewer disruptions from such misalignment. Daily functioning extends to behavioral preferences aligned with chronotype, including meal timing and exercise. Morning chronotypes prefer earlier meals, such as substantial breakfasts, and show lower desire for high-fat foods, while evening types tend toward later intake, including late-night snacking. Exercise preferences follow suit, with morning types favoring early-day activity for optimal performance and adherence, whereas evening types perform better and persist longer in late-afternoon or evening sessions. Physiologically, these align with rhythms like core body temperature, which reaches its minimum later in evening chronotypes (around 6 a.m. versus 4 a.m. in morning types), and , where morning types exhibit a more pronounced awakening response peak shortly after rising.

Psychological and Cognitive Associations

Personality Traits

Research has consistently identified associations between chronotype and the , with evening types (often termed "night owls") showing distinct patterns compared to morning types ("larks"). A encompassing 44 samples and over 16,000 participants revealed that eveningness correlates positively with extraversion (r = 0.20) and (r = 0.17), while correlating negatively with (r = -0.19). These effect sizes indicate small to moderate relationships, suggesting that evening types may be more outgoing, creative, and less disciplined in their routines, whereas morning types exhibit greater reliability and structure-orientation. shows a weaker positive association with morningness (r = 0.14 for morning-evening difference), implying morning types are somewhat more cooperative and trusting. Beyond the , evening chronotypes are linked to heightened risk-taking and novelty-seeking behaviors. Studies demonstrate that evening types engage in more impulsive decisions and sensation-seeking activities, independent of factors like perceived risk or other dimensions, with correlations typically in the small range (r ≈ 0.15–0.25). For instance, evening individuals score higher on novelty-seeking scales, reflecting a for new experiences and lower . These associations may arise through shared neurobiological mechanisms, particularly involving pathways that regulate reward sensitivity and . moderates these relationships, as chronotype shifts toward morningness with advancing years, potentially attenuating evening-type traits in older adults.

Cognitive Abilities and Academic Performance

Research on chronotype and has yielded mixed results, with some evidence suggesting a slight advantage for evening types in verbal IQ. A study of 54 healthy adults found that evening chronotypes exhibited higher verbal ability scores compared to morning types, particularly among women, with differences estimated at 3-5 IQ points on verbal subtests. However, this association appears limited to specific domains and does not extend to overall measures. When controlling for duration and work schedules, no robust physiological link between chronotype and general emerges, as later timing in higher-IQ individuals is primarily attributed to flexible schedules rather than inherent circadian differences. Chronotype influences specific cognitive functions, with evening types showing strengths in creative tasks and morning types excelling in analytical ones. In contrast, morning types demonstrate superior analytical processing and in early hours, benefiting from synchrony with their . is particularly sensitive to chronotype mismatches; a 2025 study of college students revealed that evening types experienced significant declines in capacity during morning assessments due to desynchrony between their natural rhythm and testing times. Academic performance is notably affected by chronotype, independent of . A 2024 investigation of 273 students demonstrated that chronotype predicts both expected and actual point average (GPA) beyond the effects of IQ and , with morning-oriented students achieving higher GPAs overall. Evening students particularly underperform in early morning es, where misalignment with their circadian preferences contributes to variance in grades, as evidenced by analyses of timing and in large cohorts. This underscores how institutional schedules favoring morning types can exacerbate performance disparities for evening chronotypes.

Health and Societal Implications

Disease Risks

Evening chronotypes, often referred to as "night owls," exhibit a heightened vulnerability to various disorders compared to morning types. Specifically, individuals with an evening chronotype face approximately a 1.5-fold increased risk of , particularly among women, as evidenced by longitudinal cohort studies. This association extends to , where evening chronotypes predict poorer prognosis and higher incidence rates, with prospective analyses showing elevated risks even after adjusting for duration. Furthermore, evening chronotypes are linked to substance use disorders, characterized by earlier age of onset, greater symptom severity, and suboptimal treatment outcomes, according to a 2025 synthesizing multiple cohort and case-control studies. In terms of physical health, evening chronotypes demonstrate consistent associations with metabolic and cardiovascular conditions driven by circadian misalignment. Late chronotypes exhibit higher () values, typically 0.4 to 0.7 kg/m² greater than morning or intermediate types, contributing to risk through disrupted eating patterns and reduced . This misalignment also elevates risk by approximately 30%, as circadian desynchrony impairs glucose metabolism and insulin sensitivity, per cross-sectional and prospective epidemiological data. Cardiovascular disease risks are similarly amplified, with evening types showing poorer overall heart health metrics, including higher odds of and , due to chronic disruptions in rhythms and lipid profiles. Additionally, late chronotypes with low face increased risk, as studies from 2025 indicate that evening preferences interact with genetic factors to heighten susceptibility, independent of other lifestyle confounders. These disease risks are mediated by physiological mechanisms such as chronic social jetlag, which induces akin to repeated time-zone shifts. Evening chronotypes often experience greater social jetlag— the mismatch between biological and social clocks—leading to elevated inflammatory markers like , as demonstrated in recent cohort studies linking this misalignment to pro-inflammatory release. From 2020 to 2025, research has further elucidated mediators of cognitive decline in late chronotypes, including poor sleep quality and increased prevalence, which accelerate neurodegeneration through and vascular damage. Immunity disruptions also play a , with chronodisruption in evening types enhancing inflammatory responses in and impairing immune cell function, as shown in studies of obese populations and immune-mediated diseases. Genetic variants may modulate these susceptibilities, though detailed interactions are explored elsewhere.

Societal and Pandemic Effects

Modern societal structures often impose fixed schedules that misalign with individual chronotypes, particularly disadvantaging evening types, which comprise approximately 25% of the . Early start times, typically around 8:00 AM, conflict with the delayed common in adolescents and young adults who shift toward evening chronotypes during , leading to chronic , increased , and poorer academic performance among late chronotypes. Similarly, standard 9-to-5 work hours exacerbate and reduced for evening types, who experience higher odds of poor work ability and health-related impairments compared to morning types. Shift work introduces bidirectional influences with chronotype, where genetic predispositions toward eveningness may increase selection into night shifts, while prolonged can alter chronotype toward later preferences over time. A 2025 study demonstrated causal genetic links in both directions, with evening chronotype genetically associated with higher likelihood of engagement, and potentially reinforcing later chronotypes through circadian disruption. This interplay heightens vulnerability to sleep disturbances and occupational health risks for mismatched workers. The (2020-2025) amplified chronotype-related challenges while revealing adaptive benefits from altered routines. Lockdowns led to widespread delays in sleep-wake cycles, with average bedtime shifts of 15-38 minutes later and wake times delayed by 21-60 minutes, reducing social jetlag and improving sleep duration for many, though evening types reported the largest increases in sleep and issues. Night shift workers, often misaligned with their chronotypes, exhibited up to double the odds of infection compared to day shifts, attributed to immune dysregulation from circadian misalignment. Broader societal shifts during and post-pandemic underscored chronotype impacts across demographics. , prevalent from 2020 onward, benefited intermediate chronotypes by allowing flexible schedules that minimized mismatches, leading to reduced social jetlag and enhanced health compared to rigid office timings. The period also highlighted age-specific needs, such as adolescents requiring later school starts (e.g., 8:30-9:45 AM) to accommodate their naturally delayed chronotypes, with studies showing 25-77 minutes of additional weekly and improved attendance when delays were implemented. These observations emphasize how environmental flexibility can mitigate chronotype-related societal burdens.

Applications

Chronotherapy

Chronotherapy involves the strategic timing of medical interventions to align with an individual's circadian rhythms and chronotype, aiming to enhance efficacy while minimizing adverse effects. This approach leverages the body's endogenous oscillations in , absorption, and target sensitivity, which vary predictably over 24 hours. For instance, medications synchronized with peaks—typically in the early morning—can optimize hormonal and metabolic responses, as exhibits a robust that influences immune and stress-related pathways. Personalizing dosing schedules to an individual's chronotype, such as morning versus evening administration, has been shown to reduce side effects in contexts like , where misalignment can exacerbate due to disrupted cellular repair cycles. Key examples illustrate chronotherapy's application across conditions. In hypertension management, a 2024 sub-study of the involving over 5,000 participants found that evening dosing of antihypertensives for late chronotypes—aligning with their delayed circadian phase—reduced the incidence of non-fatal by approximately 44% compared to misaligned morning dosing, without increasing other cardiovascular risks. For inhibitors used in , emerging 2025 research advocates chronotype-based scheduling to exploit diurnal variations in immune cell activity, potentially improving tumor response rates by administering treatments during peak T-cell infiltration periods, such as mornings for early chronotypes. In , chronotherapy tailors analgesics to rhythmic pain sensitivity patterns, which differ by chronotype—morning types report higher chronic scores—allowing timed dosing to achieve maximal relief with fewer gastrointestinal side effects. Similarly, in chemotherapy for solid tumors, chronomodulated delivery of agents like has demonstrated reduced severe toxicities, such as , by up to 30% when timed to rest-activity cycles that match patient chronotype. From 2020 to 2025, clinical trials in cardiometabolic diseases have advanced chronotherapy, with the 2021 NHLBI workshop highlighting bedtime antihypertensive dosing to blunt nocturnal surges, reducing cardiovascular events in chronotype-mismatched patients. Pragmatic studies have increasingly integrated AI-driven tools for chronotype assessment, using wearable data and models to predict individual circadian phases from patterns, enabling real-time personalization in outpatient settings and improving adherence in and trials. These developments underscore chronotherapy's shift toward precision medicine, with ongoing phase III trials evaluating chronotype-tailored interventions for broader cardiometabolic outcomes, including applications in psychiatric conditions like .

Lifestyle and Work Schedule Adjustments

Individuals with evening chronotypes can benefit from morning bright light exposure to advance their circadian phase and align better with early-rising societal demands. Studies have shown that tailored , such as 30 minutes of 10,000 lux light in the morning, reduces sleep disturbances and in evening types by promoting earlier onset and improved daytime alertness. Syncing and exercise timing to an individual's circadian enhances metabolic and levels. For instance, consuming larger earlier in the day for morning types or during for evening types supports better and reduces cardiometabolic risks, as demonstrated in chronotype-adapted dietary interventions. Similarly, scheduling exercise during performance windows—such as afternoon sessions for evening chronotypes—improves cardiovascular outcomes and muscle recovery while minimizing injury risk. In educational and professional settings, flexible schedules accommodate chronotype differences to optimize functioning. Delaying adolescent school start times by 1 hour reduces social jetlag—the misalignment between biological and social clocks—by approximately 34 to 60 minutes, leading to longer duration and better academic performance among late chronotypes. In workplaces, corporate assessments using tools like the Munich Chronotype Questionnaire enable shift assignments that match employee preferences, such as evening shifts for night owls, thereby enhancing quality and reducing errors in industries like and . These lifestyle adjustments have been linked to measurable improvements in during the 2020s. Chronotype-aligned interventions, including and schedule flexibility, decrease and sleepiness in mismatched populations while boosting and outcomes, such as lower scores. Such strategies address broader societal mismatches, where rigid schedules exacerbate chronotype-related disparities.

References

  1. [1]
    The role of chronotype in the interaction between the alerting and ...
    Jul 17, 2020 · Chronotype refers to the time of day preferred by individuals to perform daily activities according to their circadian rhythm.Introduction · Flanker Task · Discussion
  2. [2]
    Chronotypes: Definition, Types, & Effect on Sleep
    Jul 10, 2025 · Chronotype is the natural inclination of your body to sleep at a certain time, or what most people understand as being an early bird versus a night owl.
  3. [3]
    Genetic Basis of Chronotype in Humans: Insights From Three Landmark GWAS - PubMed
    ### Summary of Chronotype and Genetics from Abstract and Key Points
  4. [4]
    Biological Rhythm and Chronotype: New Perspectives in Health - PMC
    The circadian rhythmicity in human beings is represented by a complex phenotype derived from multiple underlying genetic factors that define the chronotype.3. Results · 3.2. Circadian Rhythm And... · 3.3. Chronotype, Sleep And...
  5. [5]
    Chronotype, circadian rhythm, and psychiatric disorders
    Chronotype, which represents individual preferences for activity and performance, is associated with human health issues, particularly psychiatric disorders.Circadian Rhythm · Chronotype · Sleep Regulation
  6. [6]
    Chronotype and Social Jetlag: A (Self-) Critical Review - MDPI
    Distributions of social jetlag (SJL) in the Munich ChronoType Questionnaire (MCTQ) database (as of July 2017). The distribution is based on half-hourly bins ...
  7. [7]
    Chronotype differences in circadian rhythms of temperature ... - NIH
    Nov 4, 2009 · It has long been suggested that chronotype differences arise from differences in the timing of their endogenous circadian rhythms that regulate ...
  8. [8]
    Chronotype, circadian rhythm, and psychiatric disorders - Frontiers
    Chronotype reflects the individual variability in the phase of entrainment. In the modern world, social activities may not be consistent with personal ...<|separator|>
  9. [9]
    Chronotypes in the US – Influence of age and sex | PLOS One
    The variability in chronotype decreases with age, but is generally higher in males than females. This is the first study to estimate the distribution and ...
  10. [10]
    Epidemiology of the human circadian clock - PubMed
    Sleep and wake times show a near-Gaussian distribution in a given population, with extreme early types waking up when extreme late types fall asleep.
  11. [11]
    Concordance of Chronotype Categorisations Based on Dim Light ...
    Jun 17, 2021 · Chronotype reflects circadian timing and can be determined from biological markers (e.g., dim light melatonin onset; DLMO), or questionnaires ( ...
  12. [12]
    Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ)
    16-30 - "definite evening" · 31-41 - "moderate evening" · 42-58 - "intermediate" · 59-69 - "moderate morning" · 70-86 - "definite morning".
  13. [13]
    Morningness-Eveningness, Chronotypes and Health-Impairing ...
    Horne and Östberg (1976) propose cut-off scores to distinguish five types, from definitely morning type through three intermediate types to definitely evening ...
  14. [14]
    Chronotypes in the US – Influence of age and sex - PMC - NIH
    Jun 21, 2017 · The greatest differences are observed between 15 and 25 for both sexes, equaling more than 50% of the total chronotype difference across all age ...
  15. [15]
    Stability of chronotype over a 7‐year follow‐up period and its ...
    Feb 17, 2020 · Chronotype was found to be a stable, trait-like construct with only a minor level advance over a period of 7 years. The change in chronotype was ...
  16. [16]
    Social jetlag: misalignment of biological and social time - PubMed
    The discrepancy between work and free days, between social and biological time, can be described as 'social jetlag.'
  17. [17]
    Genetic Basis of Chronotype in Humans: Insights From Three ...
    Several twin and family studies have estimated the heritability of chronotype to be approximately 50% based on estimates in the United States, United Kingdom, ...
  18. [18]
    Neuroanatomy, Nucleus Suprachiasmatic - StatPearls - NCBI - NIH
    As the master oscillator, the suprachiasmatic nucleus uses humoral and neuronal inputs to coordinate peripheral circadian clocks. Peripheral organs including ...
  19. [19]
    Regulating the Suprachiasmatic Nucleus (SCN) Circadian Clockwork
    The suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) is the principal circadian clock of the brain, directing daily cycles of behavior and physiology.
  20. [20]
    Advances in understanding the peripheral circadian clocks - PMC
    The peripheral clocks include the cardiovascular, metabolic, endocrine, immune, and reproductive systems.
  21. [21]
    The Biology of Central and Peripheral Circadian Clocks
    Apr 26, 2012 · Peripheral circadian clocks, such as those that are found in the liver, are influenced by the autonomic nervous system and by systemic cues ...
  22. [22]
    Circadian Clock Genes and the Transcriptional Architecture of the ...
    In the core feedback loop, the transcription factors BMAL1 (green circles) and CLOCK (blue circles) bind to E-box domains on gene promoters, including the genes ...
  23. [23]
    Transcriptional architecture of the mammalian circadian clock - PMC
    a) At the core, CLOCK and BMAL1 activate the Per1, Per2, Cry1 and Cry2 genes, whose protein products interact and repress their own transcription. The stability ...
  24. [24]
    Biochemical mechanism of the mammalian circadian clock - Liu
    Aug 25, 2025 · The mammalian circadian clock is controlled by a feedback loop composed of activators (CLOCK and BMAL1) and repressors (PER and CRY).
  25. [25]
    Effects of light on human circadian rhythms, sleep and mood - PMC
    Aug 20, 2019 · As outlined above, light is the key zeitgeber in the circadian system and interacts with the master clock in the SCN via non-image-forming ...
  26. [26]
    Bright light affects human circadian rhythms - PubMed
    The relative effectiveness of external zeitgebers synchronizing circadian rhythms can be evaluated by measuring the size of the range of entrainment.
  27. [27]
    Methods to Assess Melatonin Receptor-Mediated Phase-Shift ... - NIH
    The neurohormone melatonin facilitates entrainment of biological rhythms to environmental light-dark conditions as well as phase-shifts of circadian rhythms ...
  28. [28]
    Circadian Rhythm and Sleep Disruption: Causes, Metabolic ...
    Because the mean free-running human τ is approximately 24.2 hours (4, 5), circadian rhythms must be entrained to the 24-hour LD cycle daily. A short or long ...
  29. [29]
    Mathematical modeling of circadian rhythms - PMC - PubMed Central
    Mathematical models of circadian rhythms have been proposed to provide a better understanding of and to predict aspects of this complex physiological system.
  30. [30]
    Pharmaceutical-based entrainment of circadian phase via nonlinear ...
    This formulation yields phase dynamics identical to the case for ϕ, with particular solutions of the form ϕ(t; 0) = ωt + ϕ0 with initial phase ϕ0. The ...
  31. [31]
    Genetic Basis of Chronotype in Humans - Oxford Academic
    Several twin and family studies have estimated the heritability of chronotype to be approximately 50% based on estimates in the United States,9 United Kingdom, ...
  32. [32]
    A Twin Study of Genetic Influences on Diurnal Preference and Risk ...
    Twin and molecular genetic studies consistently show that diurnal preference is influenced by genetic factors, with heritability between 40% and 54%. Recent ...
  33. [33]
    Genome-wide association analyses of chronotype in ... - Nature
    Jan 29, 2019 · Chronotype is genetically correlated with psychiatric traits ... We estimated the heritability of chronotype to be 13.7% (95% CI: 13.3–14.0%), as ...
  34. [34]
    Variants in the circadian clock genes PER2 and PER3 associate ...
    May 2, 2024 · We identified a family with autosomal dominant inheritance of two PER3 heterozygous variants that can be linked to Advanced sleep phase disorder.
  35. [35]
    Circadian clock gene variants and their link with chronotype ...
    Genetic variants of some circadian clock genes could explain the link between genetic susceptibility to the individual's chronotype and obesity risk.
  36. [36]
    GWAS of 89,283 individuals identifies genetic variants associated ...
    Feb 2, 2016 · Detailed comparison (Supplementary Fig. 18) shows that in the chronotype GWAS the loci near FBXL3, RASD1 and NOL4 were no longer genome-wide ...
  37. [37]
    A genome-wide association study identifies candidate genes for ...
    May 22, 2024 · Results. GWAS detected 15 loci significantly associated with chronotype in the subjects with self-reported depression, such as rs12736689 at ...
  38. [38]
    Genetic prediction of early adolescent chronotype: effects of sex and ...
    Apr 11, 2025 · This study aims to assess the utility of polygenic scores (PGS) derived from adult GWAS in predicting adolescent chronotype, mental health, and cognitionMaterials And Methods · Polygenic Score Prediction · Discussion
  39. [39]
    Role of polygenic risk scores in the association between chronotype ...
    Dec 20, 2023 · This study explores the association between chronotypes and adolescent health risk behaviors (HRBs) by testing how genetic background moderates these ...
  40. [40]
    Bidirectional genetic associations between chronotype and shift work: A Mendelian randomization study
    ### Summary of Findings on Bidirectional Genetic Associations Between Chronotype and Shift Work, and Mention of Melatonin
  41. [41]
    Chronobiology | Research Starters - EBSCO
    In the fifth century BCE, Hippocrates reported that his patients had twenty-four-hour fluctuations as well as longer-term rhythms in their symptoms. Herophilus ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  42. [42]
  43. [43]
    History of sleep: what was normal? - News-Medical
    May 17, 2017 · We used to sleep in two phases, with a first sleep and then a second sleep. Arguably from time immemorial to the nineteenth century, ...
  44. [44]
    Emil Kraepelin's concepts of the phenomenology and physiology of ...
    Our findings challenge the common notion that Nathaniel Kleitman was the first to systematically describe the morningness-eveningness dimension. ... chronotype ...
  45. [45]
    Emil Kraepelin's concepts of the phenomenology and physiology of ...
    Of special relevance are his findings on chronotypes: Based on empirical clinical studies, neuropsychological experiments and sleep studies, Kraepelin ...
  46. [46]
    Kleitman and Richardson's Sleep Study In Mammoth Cave
    Dec 5, 2021 · Kleitman and Richardson spent 32 days in the cave with a strict schedule of sleeping for 9 hours, working for 10, and 9 hours of leisure time.
  47. [47]
    Sleep and Wakefulness, Kleitman - The University of Chicago Press
    It discusses phases of the sleep cycle, experimental work on sleep and wakefulness, sleep disorders and their treatment, and such sleep-like states as hypnosis ...
  48. [48]
    Timeless spaces: Field experiments in the physiological study of ...
    Apr 19, 2023 · This paper will consider a series of field experiments in human circadian rhythms that occurred in cave and Arctic spaces between 1938 and 1963.Missing: chronotype fixed
  49. [49]
    Transdisciplinary unifying implications of circadian findings in the ...
    Oct 29, 2003 · Endogenous time structure (chronome) of internally coordinated free-running rhythms (top) through feedsidewards in network of spontaneous (α), ...Introduction · New Wonder Drugs · Puzzle #2: Circadian...
  50. [50]
    [PDF] International Journal of Chronobiology, Vol. 4, 97-110, (1976)
    Oquist (1970) produced a Swedish language Morningness-Eveningness questionnaire which appeared to be able to distinguish between these two extremes. Östberg ...Missing: chronotype | Show results with:chronotype
  51. [51]
    Human Brain Mapping | Neuroimaging Journal - Wiley Online Library
    Apr 10, 2019 · fMRI identifies chronotype-specific brain activation associated with attention to motion—Why we need to know when subjects go to bed.
  52. [52]
    Epidemiology of objectively measured bedtime and chronotype in ...
    Chronotype and sleep duration have been studied in different age and disease cohorts (Borisenkov 2010; Borisenkov et al. 2010; Roenneberg et al. 2007 ...
  53. [53]
    Causal dynamics of sleep, circadian rhythm, and mood symptoms in ...
    Apr 4, 2024 · This study explores the complex interplay between sleep disturbances, circadian rhythms, and mood disorders, shedding light on the challenging ...
  54. [54]
    A self-assessment questionnaire to determine morningness ...
    The questionnaire is a self-assessment tool to determine morningness-eveningness, showing morning types have earlier temperature peaks and retire/arise earlier ...
  55. [55]
    (PDF) A Self Assessment Questionnaire to Determine Morningness ...
    Aug 7, 2025 · This five-item questionnaire derives from the original 19-item MEQ (Horne and Östberg, 1976) and includes questions on preferred bed/wake ...
  56. [56]
    Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire - SpringerLink
    Horne, J. A., & Östberg, O. (1976). A self-assessment questionnaire to determine morningness-eveningness in human circadian rhythms. International Journal of ...
  57. [57]
  58. [58]
    Cross-cultural comparison of seven morningness and sleep-wake ...
    Aug 30, 2014 · Here, we used seven different measures to assess differences in morningness-eveningness between Germany, Slovakia and India.Missing: MEQ | Show results with:MEQ
  59. [59]
    Circadian Type Inventory--Revised
    The Circadian Type Inventory--Revised (Di Milia, Smith, & Folkard, 2004; Di Milia, Smith, & Folkard, 2005) is a revised version of the Circadian Type Inventory ...
  60. [60]
    Refining the psychometric properties of the circadian type inventory
    In response to the limitations of the CTQ, Folkard (1987) developed a revised measure known as the circadian type inventory (CTI). The CTI consisted of two ...Missing: Mil | Show results with:Mil
  61. [61]
    A validation of the revised circadian type inventory in a working ...
    Aug 7, 2025 · The Circadian Type Inventory (CTI) (Di Milia et al. 2005; Folkard et al. 1979) comprises of two scales developed for the purpose of assessing ...
  62. [62]
    Refining the psychometric properties of the circadian type inventory
    Aug 7, 2025 · PDF | The psychometric properties of the 18-item circadian type inventory (CTI) were examined in a non-shiftwork sample.Missing: Mil | Show results with:Mil
  63. [63]
    Chronotype and Social Jetlag: A (Self-) Critical Review - PMC
    Chronotype and Social Jetlag: A (Self-) Critical Review. Till Roenneberg. Till ... definitions of the MCTQ-derived chronotype and the concept of social jetlag.
  64. [64]
    MCTQ
    The MCTQ estimates chronotype based on the midpoint between sleep onset and offset on work-free days (midsleep on free days: MSF), corrected for “oversleep” ...
  65. [65]
    [PDF] Epidemiology of the human circadian clock
    We started by assigning mid- sleep on free days (MSF; the half-way point between sleep-onset and sleep-end) as a definition of chronotype.28 The distribution of ...
  66. [66]
    The Munich ChronoType Questionnaire for Shift-Workers (MCTQShift)
    The Munich ChronoType Questionnaire (MCTQ) is a useful tool for determining chronotype. It assesses chronotype based on sleep behavior.<|separator|>
  67. [67]
    Validity of chronotype questionnaires in adolescents: Correlations ...
    Mar 5, 2022 · There were stronger positive correlations between weekend acrophase with MS (actigraphy and self-report) and MSF-SC when compared with weekdays ...
  68. [68]
    Association between the Munich Chronotype Questionnaire and ...
    One previous study found significant correlations between actigraphy-derived sleep start times and both corrected and uncorrected midpoint of sleep on free days ...
  69. [69]
    Full article: Validation of the Caen Chronotype Questionnaire
    Chronotype self-report instruments are time and cost-efficient ... Validity of chronotype questionnaires in adolescents: correlations with actigraphy.
  70. [70]
    A systematic review on the sleep patterns, chronotype, latitude and ...
    This study presents a systematic review design aiming to explore how chronotype features are assessed in school-aged children (ages 4–11) and how chronotype ...
  71. [71]
    Psychometric Properties of Questionnaires for Assessing Chronotype
    Feb 29, 2020 · Since its publication, the MEQ is one of the most widely used self-report chronotype scale. The MEQ consists of 19 items regarding sleep/wake ...
  72. [72]
  73. [73]
    Differential impact of chronotype on weekday and weekend sleep ...
    Laboratory studies have indicated that evening types are subjectively sleepier at wake time than morning types, and this may be related to differences in the ...
  74. [74]
    Association between insomnia symptoms and chronotype—A ...
    Aug 7, 2025 · Individuals with an evening chronotype were more likely to report insomnia symptoms compared with those with morning or intermediate chronotypes ...Missing: mismatch | Show results with:mismatch
  75. [75]
    Delayed Sleep-Phase Disorder - ScienceDirect.com
    It is suggested that virtually all DSPD patients score as extreme evening types although not all evening types report the distress required for a diagnosis of ...
  76. [76]
    Cross‐sectional interrelationships between chronotype, obstructive ...
    Chronotype is linked to adverse health measures and may have important associations with obstructive sleep apnea and blood pressure, but data are limited.Missing: variations | Show results with:variations
  77. [77]
    Morning Chronotype Is Associated with Improved Adherence to ...
    Oct 24, 2022 · Anxiety was highest among participants with an intermediate chronotype. No significant differences in sleep apnea characteristics were noted, ...
  78. [78]
    The effects of time of day and chronotype on cognitive and physical ...
    Oct 24, 2018 · This study aimed to investigate the impact of chronotype on indices of cognitive and physical performance at different times of day in healthy volunteers.Sleep Analysis · Performance Measures · Executive Function (ef)
  79. [79]
    Social jetlag is associated with an increased likelihood of having ...
    This study suggests that greater social jetlag was significantly associated with an increased likelihood of having depressive symptoms.Missing: decline | Show results with:decline
  80. [80]
    The association among chronotype, timing of food intake ... - Nature
    Sep 21, 2016 · The different dietary patterns between the chronotype groups were observed not only in the nutrient intake but also in the food preferences.Subjects And Methods · Eating Attitudes · DiscussionMissing: meal | Show results with:meal
  81. [81]
    Impact of Meal Timing and Chronotype on Food Reward and ... - NIH
    May 22, 2020 · To conclude, early meal timing and early chronotype are independently associated with smaller appetite and lower desire for high-fat food.
  82. [82]
    Differential effects of chronotype on physical activity and cognitive ...
    Apr 16, 2023 · Chronotype may predict the ideal time of day to engage in exercise to achieve maximal performance, and researchers have determined that morning ...
  83. [83]
    Eveningness is associated with higher risk-taking, independent of ...
    Although risk-taking was associated with both risk perception and some personality dimensions, eveningness predicted risk-taking independent of these factors.
  84. [84]
    Association between morningness‐eveningness and temperament ...
    Jul 18, 2012 · Women tend to be more morning-type-oriented (Natale and Danesi, 2002; Adan et al., 2010) and to have lower Novelty Seeking and higher Harm ...
  85. [85]
    the relationship of chronotype with psychiatric trait dimensions and ...
    Jun 4, 2024 · We expected diurnal variation in psychiatric symptoms and behaviors to depend on chronotype, manifested by worse levels at suboptimal times of ...
  86. [86]
    An Interdisciplinary Perspective on the Association Between ... - NIH
    Jun 27, 2019 · Personality is a strong predictor of well-being and reliable associations exist between specific personality traits and chronotype. Personality ...
  87. [87]
    Personality traits relate to chronotype at both the phenotypic and ...
    May 17, 2021 · The present study examines the relationships between sleep timing (chronotype), diurnal preferences, and the Five-Factor Model of personality traitsINTRODUCTION · METHOD · RESULTS · DISCUSSION
  88. [88]
    Morningness-Eveningness Correlates with Verbal Ability in Women ...
    Morningness-Eveningness Correlates with Verbal Ability in Women but Not Men. William D. S. Killgore and Desiree B. Killgore william.d.killgore@us.army.milView ...
  89. [89]
    The relationship between chronotype and intelligence - Nature
    Apr 28, 2020 · Our results indicate that later sleep timing in those with higher IQs is not due to physiological differences, but rather due to later work schedules.<|separator|>
  90. [90]
    Chronotype and synchrony effects in human cognitive performance
    ABSTRACT. Chronotype is a proxy for various intra-individual rhythms (e.g. sleep-wake cycles) which fluctuate throughout the day.Results · Chronotype, Tod And... · Chronotype, Tod, And...
  91. [91]
    Time of day and chronotype in the assessment of cognitive functions
    Individuals with the extreme evening chronotype rate their mental activity lowest at 8 am, while its value is higher for the other chronotypes, reaching the ...
  92. [92]
    Impact of morning and evening chronotypes - ScienceDirect.com
    Mar 20, 2025 · However, it is important to note that the eveningness chronotype has also been associated with better creative thinking and problem-solving ...
  93. [93]
  94. [94]
    3.4 million real-world learning management system logins reveal the ...
    Mar 29, 2018 · Social jet lag interacts with chronotype to shape academic performance. An early chronotype student taking only early morning classes and a late ...
  95. [95]
    Role of chronotype in depression - Baishideng Publishing Group
    Sep 25, 2025 · Evening chronotype was associated with increased depression risk in women but not men; women with evening chronotype had 1.5-fold higher ...
  96. [96]
    Chronotype in bipolar disorder: an 18-month prospective study - NIH
    This study indicated that evening chronotype predicts a poor prognostic for BD. It reinforces the relevance of treating rhythm disruptions even during euthymia ...
  97. [97]
    Sleep inertia drives the association of evening chronotype with ...
    Sep 11, 2024 · We found that evening chronotype predicted increased incidence of major depressive disorder, schizophrenia, generalized anxiety disorder and bipolar disorder.<|separator|>
  98. [98]
    Chronotype and substance use disorder: A systematic review with ...
    The review found consistent evidence that evening preference is associated with earlier onset, higher symptom severity, and poorer treatment outcomes. Five ...<|separator|>
  99. [99]
    Night owls have higher BMI, larger waists and face higher risk of ...
    Sep 9, 2024 · The results also showed that late chronotypes had a 0.7 kg/m2 higher BMI, 1.9 cm larger waist circumference, 7 cm2 more visceral fat and 14% ...Missing: difference | Show results with:difference
  100. [100]
    The association between metabolic parameters and evening ...
    Nov 21, 2022 · In this meta-analysis, we found that evening chronotype was associated with higher BMI compared to morning chronotype in both the general ...
  101. [101]
    Evening Chronotype, Circadian Misalignment, and Metabolic Health
    Sep 12, 2023 · Previous cross-sectional studies have reported an association between a late chronotype and a 30% elevated risk for diabetes (1), potentially ...
  102. [102]
    Evening Chronotype is Associated with Poor Cardiovascular Health ...
    Evening chronotype is associated with poor cardiovascular health and adverse health behaviors in a diverse population of women.
  103. [103]
    Prospective study of the association between chronotype and ...
    Oct 11, 2023 · ... Our findings suggest that biologically and socially affected sleep timing misalignment is a contributing factor to cardiovascular disease risk.<|separator|>
  104. [104]
    Associations Between Chronotype, Genetic Susceptibility and Risk ...
    The role of chronotype in influencing colorectal cancer (CRC) risk, particularly in conjunction with genetic predisposition, remains unclear and warrants ...
  105. [105]
    Mendelian randomization study of sleep traits and risk of colorectal ...
    Apr 18, 2025 · The aim of the current study was to assess whether genetically predicted chronotype, insomnia and sleep duration are associated with CRC risk in ...
  106. [106]
    Later sleep timing and social jetlag are related to increased ...
    The mechanisms linking later sleep timing and social jetlag with adverse health outcomes are unclear but may be related to inflammation. There are extensive ...
  107. [107]
    Chronotype as a potential risk factor for cognitive decline
    Apr 11, 2025 · Chronotype could be a potential risk factor for cognitive decline, potentially through mediators sleep quality, alcohol intake, physical ...
  108. [108]
    Chronodisruption enhances inflammatory cytokine release from ...
    Feb 26, 2025 · This study evaluated the inflammatory profile of visceral adipose tissue (VAT) across chronotypes in individuals with obesity and examined clock gene ...
  109. [109]
    Chronotype in Patients With Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Disease
    Results showed that later chronotype may be a risk factor for worse quality of life and increased symptom burden in patients with IMIDs.
  110. [110]
    Lower school performance in late chronotypes: underlying factors ...
    Jun 29, 2017 · Early school starting times challenge late chronotypes more than early chronotypes, which could lead to more tardiness (e.g. due to oversleep), ...
  111. [111]
    Associations between chronotype and employment status in a ...
    Our findings suggest that evening-types are at a disadvantage with regards to occupational, educational and health outcomes in older adults due to their ...
  112. [112]
    On workdays, earlier sleep for morningness and later wakeup for ...
    Evening chronotypes exhibited significantly higher odds of poor work ability (adjusted odds ratio: 2.291, 95% CI: 1.717-3.058) and greater health-related ...
  113. [113]
    Bidirectional genetic associations between chronotype and shift work
    Oct 30, 2025 · Shift work, particularly night shifts, disrupts circadian rhythms and contributes to various adverse health outcomes.
  114. [114]
    Impact of COVID-19 lockdown on sleep-wake schedule and ... - NIH
    The sleep onset time and wake-up time in the people, irrespective of age and gender, was significantly delayed with average sleep onset by 38±1.2 minutes and ...
  115. [115]
    Greatest changes in objective sleep architecture during COVID-19 ...
    On average, bedtime was delayed by 15 min (1–36) and lockdown had an even stronger effect on wake-up time, +21 min (1–48). There was an increased time in bed ( ...
  116. [116]
    Evening-types show highest increase of sleep and mental health ...
    The objective of this multinational study was to examine the potential role of circadian type in explaining sleep and mental health outcomes during the COVID-19 ...
  117. [117]
    Better alignment between circadian preference and sleep and work ...
    Results found that sleep health improved under lockdown measures in terms of increased sleep duration and reduced social jetlag, and sleep and work times ...
  118. [118]
    Delayed School Start Times and Adolescent Sleep - NIH
    School start times were delayed 25 to 60 minutes, and correspondingly, total sleep time increased from 25 to 77 minutes per weeknight.
  119. [119]
    Delaying Middle School and High School Start Times Promotes ...
    Studies show that implementation of later school start times for adolescents is associated with longer total sleep time, reduced daytime sleepiness, increased ...
  120. [120]
    An Overview of the Circadian Clock in the Frame of Chronotherapy
    Jul 6, 2022 · This review discusses the links between an altered circadian clock and the rise of pathologies. We then sum up the proofs of concept advocating ...
  121. [121]
    The Chronobiology of Hormone Administration: “Doctor, What Time ...
    Chronotherapy represents a therapeutic strategy designed to synchronize the administration of pharmacological agents with the body's inherent circadian rhythms ...
  122. [122]
    Chronopharmacology: New Insights and Therapeutic Implications
    Daily oscillations in abundance of proteins necessary for either drug absorption or metabolism result in circadian pharmacokinetics; and oscillations in the ...
  123. [123]
    Personalizing chronotherapy of immune checkpoint blockade - PMC
    Oct 31, 2025 · We outline here the key steps required to validate and implement chronotype-based scheduling, including rigorous clinical-translational studies.Missing: post- | Show results with:post-
  124. [124]
    Association Between Chronotype and Chronic Neuropathic Pain ...
    Morning chronotypes are more sensitive to chronic neuropathic pain, reporting higher pain scores than do intermediate chronotypes.Missing: chronotherapy chemotherapy
  125. [125]
    Rhythmic pattern in pain and their chronotherapy - ScienceDirect.com
    Aug 31, 2007 · The objective of the chronotherapeutic approach of pain management is to ensure that patients obtain maximal analgesia with minimal side effects ...Missing: chronotype | Show results with:chronotype
  126. [126]
    Chronotherapy: Circadian Rhythms and Their Influence in Cancer ...
    Oct 17, 2022 · Chronotherapy aims to understand the impact that biological rhythms have on the response to a therapy to optimize its action, maximize health benefits, and ...Missing: principles | Show results with:principles
  127. [127]
    Toward Precision Medicine: Circadian Rhythm of Blood Pressure ...
    Toward precision medicine: Circadian rhythm of blood pressure and chronotherapy for hypertension - 2021 NHLBI Workshop Report
  128. [128]
    Wearable technology and systems modeling for personalized ...
    Here, we review how personalized chronotherapy can improve patients' quality of life by taking advantage of wearable data and its analysis through mathematical ...Missing: pragmatic | Show results with:pragmatic
  129. [129]
    Artificial Intelligence in Sleep Medicine: The Dawn of a New Era - PMC
    Apr 30, 2024 · The dawn of AI and ML in sleep medicine marks a pivotal era of enhanced diagnostic precision, personalized treatment, and rapid advancements in quality ...
  130. [130]
    Bright Light Treatment for Depression with Evening Chronotype
    Sep 14, 2020 · This study aims to examine the efficacy of adjunctive bright light ... Keywords: Bright light therapy; evening chronotype; nonseasonal depression.
  131. [131]
    Bright Light Intervention for Breast Cancer Survivors: Effects
    This study aimed to examine the effects of a chronotype-tailored bright light intervention on sleep disturbance, fatigue, depressive mood, cognitive dysfunction ...
  132. [132]
    Effects of a chronotype-adapted diet on weight loss, cardiometabolic ...
    Feb 28, 2024 · This study protocol describes a randomized controlled trial designed to explore the effects of a chronotype-adapted diet, compared with a diet ...
  133. [133]
    Exercise time of day and blood pressure: Considering chronotype ...
    Jun 27, 2024 · The finding that exercise timing may matter by chronotype is unique. Although the emphasis on chronotype was not the focus of the current paper ...
  134. [134]
    Circadian rhythm phase shifts caused by timed exercise vary ... - NIH
    These results suggest the need for personalized exercise timing prescriptions based on chronotype. Late chronotypes, who experience the most severe ...Missing: preferences | Show results with:preferences
  135. [135]
    Later school start time is associated with longer school day sleep ...
    Mar 2, 2023 · Later school start time is associated with longer school day sleep duration and less social jetlag among Norwegian high school students ...
  136. [136]
    Sleepmore in Seattle: Later school start times are associated with ...
    Dec 12, 2018 · We also show that the later school start time is associated with a better alignment of sleep timing with the circadian system (reduced social ...
  137. [137]
    Chronotype in relation to shift work: A cohort study among ... - NIH
    Aug 19, 2024 · This study shows that chronotype is associated with sleep–wake times in a work‐free period, shift type preference, and sleep problems in nurses.Missing: bidirectional genetics
  138. [138]
    Aligning Work and Circadian Time in Shift Workers Improves Sleep ...
    Mar 30, 2015 · To promote sleep and reduce the mismatch between circadian and working time, we implemented a chronotype-adjusted (CTA) shift schedule in a factory.
  139. [139]
    Current sleep interventions for shift workers: a mini review to shape ...
    The effects of circadian misalignment can also be problematic for the workplace, leading to reduced levels of alertness and productivity, higher rates of ...
  140. [140]
    INDUSTRIAL HEALTH - J-Stage
    Oct 8, 2025 · Evening chronotypes had higher risks of insomnia, poor mental health, and poor fatigue recovery during WAW than did morning chronotypes. However ...
  141. [141]
    Maximize Productivity Through Chronotype Alignment With Shyft
    Cortisol and Alertness Patterns: Cortisol levels naturally peak in the morning and gradually decline throughout the day, affecting energy and concentration ...