Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Co-Redemptrix

![Vierge en oraison (Il Sassoferrato)](./assets/Vierge_en_oraison_Il_Sassoferrato Co-Redemptrix is a theological title in Roman Catholic Mariology referring to the Virgin Mary's subordinate yet unique participation in the redemption of humanity, accomplished exclusively by Jesus Christ, through her free consent to the Incarnation at the Annunciation and her compassionate union with his Passion on the Cross.^[1]^[2] The term, derived from Latin roots meaning "woman who redeems with" the Redeemer, underscores her instrumental role in distributing graces merited by Christ's sacrifice, without implying equality in salvific efficacy.^[3]^[4] The concept draws from scriptural depictions of Mary's fiat ("let it be done") in Luke 1:38 and her presence at Calvary in John 19:25-27, interpreted by theologians as her offering her own sorrows in co-offering Christ's oblation for salvation.^[5] Papal magisterium from Leo XIII onward has affirmed elements of this doctrine, with Pius X, Benedict XV, Pius XII, and John Paul II employing language akin to coredemption, such as Mary's "reparation" for sin and unique association with the redemptive act.^[5]^[6] However, the title itself has not achieved dogmatic status, distinguishing it from defined Marian dogmas like the Immaculate Conception and Assumption.^[7] Proponents, including international movements like Vox Populi Mariae Mediatrici, advocate for its proclamation as the fifth Marian dogma to clarify Mary's role amid modern theological ambiguities, citing widespread devotion and historical precedents.^[8] Controversies arise from concerns that the term could be misinterpreted as ascribing co-equal redemptive power to Mary, potentially confusing the faithful or ecumenical dialogue, leading Pope Francis to reject it explicitly in 2021, favoring scriptural titles like "the Woman" from Genesis 3:15 and Revelation 12.^[9]^[3]^[10] This debate highlights tensions between preserving traditional Marian emphases and avoiding formulations that might obscure Christ's sole mediatorship as articulated in 1 Timothy 2:5.^[11]

Theological Foundations

Scriptural and Biblical Basis

Proponents of the title Co-Redemptrix for the Virgin Mary identify an implicit scriptural foundation in passages that highlight her unique cooperation in the divine plan of salvation, particularly through her fiat at the Annunciation and her presence at the Cross, though the term itself is absent from the Bible and the doctrine relies on typological and analogical reasoning rather than explicit statements.^[12]^[13] Central to this view is Genesis 3:15, the protoevangelium, where God declares to the serpent: "I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and hers; he will strike your head, and you will strike his heel." Catholic interpreters, drawing on the Vulgate's rendering ("she shall crush thy head"), see this as prophesying Mary's singular enmity against Satan and her participatory role alongside Christ in crushing sin's power, positioning her as the New Eve whose obedience reverses Eve's fall.^[14]^[12] This passage establishes a foundation for Marian coredemption by linking her offspring—Jesus—with her own involvement in redemption's victory.^[15] In the New Testament, Luke 1:38 records Mary's consent to the Incarnation: "Behold, I am the handmaid of the Lord; let it be to me according to your word," interpreted as her free cooperation enabling the redemptive Incarnation, without which Christ's salvific mission could not occur.^[12] This act of oblation is seen as uniquely meritorious, subordinately uniting her will to God's in the objective redemption. Complementing this, John 19:25-27 depicts Mary at the foot of the Cross, where Jesus entrusts her to the beloved disciple: "Woman, behold, your son!... Behold, your mother!" Proponents argue this symbolizes her spiritual motherhood of humanity and her co-suffering (compassio) with Christ, offering her Son and sharing in the sacrificial atonement as a secondary, ministerial participant.^[16]^[17] Revelation 12:1-5 describes a "woman clothed with the sun, with the moon under her feet," who gives birth to a male child destined to rule nations, pursued by the dragon. Traditional exegesis identifies this figure with Mary, emphasizing her role in bringing forth the Redeemer amid cosmic conflict, thus extending her coredemptive participation from Incarnation through eschatological triumph over evil.^[15] These texts collectively form the biblical typology for Mary's subordinate yet essential collaboration in salvation history, though critics contend they overextend symbolic language and conflict with 1 Timothy 2:5's affirmation of Christ as sole mediator.^[18] The interpretations remain matters of theological development rather than direct proof-texts, rooted in the Church's reading of Scripture through tradition.^[13]

Patristic and Traditional Underpinnings

The patristic foundations of the concept of Mary as Co-Redemptrix lie in the early Church Fathers' typological interpretation of Mary as the New Eve, whose obedience reversed the disobedience of the first Eve, thereby cooperating uniquely in the restoration of humanity through her fiat at the Annunciation. St. Irenaeus of Lyons (c. 130–202 AD), in Against Heresies (Book III, Chapter 22, Section 4), articulated this by stating: "What the virgin Eve had bound in unbelief, the Virgin Mary loosed through faith," portraying Mary's consent as instrumental in recapitulating and initiating the redemptive process bound to Christ's incarnation.^[19] This framework, rooted in Romans 5:12–21's parallel between Adam and Christ, underscores Mary's active participation subordinate to her Son, without implying equality in the merits of redemption, which remain solely Christ's.^[19] Other patristic witnesses extended this cooperative role. St. Ephrem the Syrian (c. 306–373 AD) described Mary as the "mediatrix of the whole world" after Christ the mediator, emphasizing her distribution of redemptive graces flowing from her union with the Redeemer.^[20] St. Ambrose of Milan (c. 339–397 AD), in On the Mysteries (Chapter 52), linked Mary's overshadowing by the Holy Spirit to her conceiving "Redemption for the race of men," highlighting her virginal consent as pivotal to the incarnational aspect of salvation.^[21] These texts, drawn from scriptural exegesis rather than speculative innovation, reflect a consensus on Mary's fiat and presence as uniquely efficacious in facilitating redemption, though the explicit term "Co-Redemptrix" emerged later. In traditional theology, medieval and post-medieval developments built upon patristic typology to affirm Mary's coredemptive cooperation more explicitly. St. Bernard of Clairvaux (1090–1153), in his homily Missus est Angelus (In Praise of the Blessed Virgin Mary), portrayed the angel's announcement as hinging on Mary's consent: "The price of our salvation is offered to you; if you consent, we shall at once be delivered," positioning her fiat as the human condition for the Incarnation and thus redemption.^[22] St. Thomas Aquinas (1225–1274), while emphasizing Christ's exclusive satisfaction for sin in the Summa Theologica (III, q. 1, a. 2), acknowledged Mary's obedience "in the name of all human nature" (III, q. 30, a. 1), enabling her to merit congruously as Mediatrix of graces derived from Christ's redemption. St. Alphonsus Liguori (1696–1787), a Doctor of the Church, synthesized this tradition in The Glories of Mary, declaring Mary the "co-operatrix with her Son in our justification" by meriting the application of redemptive graces through her sorrows and intercession, as God entrusted all merits to her dispensation.^[23] This view, echoed in liturgical traditions like the Feast of Our Lady of Sorrows (established 1814 but rooted in earlier devotions), portrays her coredemptive role as participatory and subordinate, grounded in her free cooperation at key salvific moments rather than independent efficacy.^[23] Such affirmations, while not dogmatic, represent a consistent thread in Catholic theological tradition, distinguishing from Protestant critiques by prioritizing Mary's historical and mystical union with Christ's oblation.

Historical Development

Origins in Early Christianity

The typology of Mary as the "New Eve" emerged in second-century Christian writings as the foundational patristic insight into her cooperative role in salvation, paralleling Eve's disobedience with Mary's obedience to initiate the reversal of humanity's fall. St. Justin Martyr (c. 100–165 AD), in his Dialogue with Trypho (c. 150 AD), first articulated this contrast, explaining that "Eve, who was a virgin and undefiled, having conceived the word of the serpent, brought forth disobedience and death. But the Virgin Mary received faith and joy when the angel Gabriel announced to her the good news that the serpent's deceit would be destroyed."^[24] This framework positioned Mary's consent at the Annunciation (Luke 1:38) as actively engendering life and obedience, countering the entry of sin and death through Eve's virginal state.^[25] St. Irenaeus of Lyons (c. 130–202 AD) systematized this typology in Against Heresies (c. 180 AD), explicitly linking Mary's fiat to salvific causation: "Eve, by disobeying, became the cause of death for herself and the whole human race, so also Mary… was obedient and became the cause of salvation (salutis) for herself and the whole human race."^[25] He further argued that "just as the human race was subject to death by a virgin, it was freed by a virgin, with the virginal disobedience balanced by virginal obedience," thereby framing her role as instrumental in recapitulating and redeeming human origins through the Incarnation.^[25] Irenaeus's emphasis on obedience as untying "the knot of Eve's disobedience" highlighted Mary's free cooperation as essential to God's redemptive plan, distinct from yet subordinate to Christ's divine initiative.^[26] By the fourth century, this motif persisted in Eastern patristics, with St. Ephrem the Syrian (c. 306–373 AD) affirming Mary as the New Eve whose indispensable obedience participated in overturning the primordial fault, as noted in analyses of his hymnic corpus.^[27] These early texts did not employ the term "Co-Redemptrix," which denotes unique coredemptive participation including her sorrows at the Cross (John 19:25–27), but established the core principle of her active involvement in redemption's inception via the Incarnation, influencing subsequent theological developments without implying parity with Christ's sole mediation (1 Timothy 2:5).^[25]

Medieval and Counter-Reformation Expansion

In the medieval period, the theological reflection on Mary's cooperative role in redemption deepened, building on patristic foundations through the lens of her fiat at the Annunciation and her compassion at the Cross. St. Bernard of Clairvaux (1090–1153), a Cistercian abbot and Doctor of the Church, prominently advanced this understanding by portraying Mary as the "aquaeduct of grace" who uniquely suffered with Christ (cum-passio), thereby participating in the application of redemptive graces to humanity.^[28] He described her as the "procurer of grace, the mediator of salvation, and the restorer of the ages," emphasizing her subordinate yet essential cooperation in distributing the merits of Christ's Passion.^[29] This view gained traction among Franciscan theologians, who highlighted Mary's predestined consent as enabling the Incarnation itself, while Dominican thinkers like St. Thomas Aquinas expressed more reserved interpretations, focusing on her exemplary rather than strictly coredemptive merit.^[30] Blessed John Duns Scotus (c. 1265–1308), a Franciscan philosopher-theologian, further expanded the framework by defending Mary's preservative redemption in his articulation of the Immaculate Conception, arguing that her freedom from original sin was achieved through the foreseen merits of Christ, underscoring her unique predestination as Mother of the Redeemer.^[27] Scotus posited that the Incarnation—and thus redemption—was primarily decreed for Christ's glorification, with Mary's role integrally ordered to it from eternity, providing a metaphysical basis for her coredemptive cooperation without impugning Christ's sole sufficiency.^[31] These medieval developments, often framed in sermons and disputations, reflected a growing liturgical and devotional emphasis on Mary's sorrows as meritorious for the Church, evident in texts like the Stabat Mater sequence attributed to the 13th century.^[5] During the Counter-Reformation (c. 1545–1648), amid defenses against Protestant critiques of Marian devotion, scholastic theologians systematized and intensified the coredemptive theme, employing precise distinctions between objective redemption (Christ's alone) and subjective application (Mary's subordinate share). Francisco Suárez (1548–1617), a Jesuit Doctor of the Church and pioneer of systematic Mariology, analyzed Mary's cooperation as occurring "in actu secundo" through her intercession and immolation at Calvary, affirming her as coredemptrix in dispensing graces won by Christ.^[32] Suárez integrated Scotist insights with Thomistic causality, arguing that Mary's fiat and fiat-like fiat at the Cross constituted a secondary, instrumental causation in redemption's distribution, countering reformers' emphasis on sola Christus without denying it.^[33] Contemporaries like Alfonso Salmerón (1515–1585), another Jesuit exegete, explicitly termed Mary "corredemptrix" and "cooperatrix salutis humani generis," linking her role to scriptural typology of the New Eve.^[34] This era saw the term Coredemptrix emerge more frequently in theological treatises and curial documents, reflecting a response to confessional polemics by clarifying Mary's hyperdulia as rooted in objective historical participation rather than mere honorific title.^[35] Figures such as St. Peter Canisius (1521–1597) and St. Lawrence of Brindisi (1559–1619) echoed these affirmations in catechetical and apologetic works, promoting Marian coredemption as essential to ecclesial piety amid Tridentine reforms.^[35] The expansion culminated in enriched liturgical expressions, such as feasts honoring Mary's sorrows, solidifying the doctrine's place in post-Reformation Catholic synthesis.^[5]

Modern Petitions and Advocacy

In the post-Vatican II era, advocacy for a dogmatic definition of Mary as Co-Redemptrix gained momentum through organized lay initiatives and international petitions. The association Vox Populi Mariae Mediatrici, active since the early 1990s, coordinated global efforts to petition the Holy See for the proclamation of Mary under the complementary titles of Co-Redemptrix, Mediatrix of all graces, and Advocate, emphasizing her subordinate yet unique participation in Christ's redemptive work.^[36]^[37] By 1997, advocates reported collecting 4.5 million signatures from Catholics across six continents, presented to Pope John Paul II amid calls for solemn definition.^[38] These petitions drew endorsements from ecclesiastical figures, including Mother Teresa of Calcutta, at least 42 cardinals, and nearly 500 bishops, who signed documents affirming the theological basis for the titles.^[39] An international symposium in Rome in 1997, organized by Vox Populi Mariae Mediatrici, featured participation from over 200 bishops and archbishops, further amplifying the call through scholarly presentations and direct appeals to the pontiff.^[40] Proponents, including theologian Mark Miravalle, argued that such a definition would clarify Mary's maternal roles in salvation history, citing precedents like the petitions preceding the dogmas of the Immaculate Conception in 1854 and the Assumption in 1950, which also amassed millions of signatures.^[41] By the 2000s, the movement claimed aggregate support exceeding 8 million signatures from priests, religious, and laity, alongside endorsements from over 800 cardinals and bishops in more than 180 countries.^[42] Ongoing advocacy included regional episcopal backing, such as petitions from Asian bishops in 2010 urging recognition of the titles.^[43] Publications, conferences, and online campaigns sustained the effort into the 21st century, with Vox Populi Mariae Mediatrici maintaining archives of petitions and theological defenses to foster ecclesial dialogue.^[44]

Magisterial Affirmations and Clarifications

Pre-20th Century Papal Endorsements

Papal endorsements of Mary's cooperative role in redemption prior to the 20th century emerged primarily in the 19th century, building on longstanding theological reflections on her as the New Eve whose fiat facilitated the Incarnation and her presence at the Cross contributed to the salvific work. Pope Pius IX (r. 1846–1878) advanced this understanding in his 1854 apostolic constitution Ineffabilis Deus, defining the Immaculate Conception and linking it directly to Mary's participatory dignity in salvation history: "God... decreed... that the Blessed Virgin Mary should be free from original sin... in view of the merits of Jesus Christ the Savior of the human race... [so] that she might be a worthy mother of the divine Redeemer and thus cooperate most perfectly in the work of human redemption." This formulation underscores Mary's predestined exemption from sin as ordered toward her unique collaboration with Christ, not as equal but as subordinate and uniquely efficacious, meriting graces through her union with the Redeemer. Pius IX further elaborated on this cooperation in other pronouncements, such as his 1849 encyclical Ubi Primum, where he entrusted the investigation of the Immaculate Conception to cardinals, emphasizing Mary's role as the dispenser of graces acquired by Christ: "God has committed to Mary the treasury of all divine gifts that all may know that through her are obtained every hope, every grace, and all salvation." The pope's writings consistently portray Mary's sorrows and fiat as actively contributing to the application of redemption, aligning with patristic views of her as co-sufferer without implying co-equality in merit, which remains solely Christ's. Pope Leo XIII (r. 1878–1903) provided the most explicit pre-20th-century endorsement of the terminology in his 1894 encyclical Iucunda Semper Expectatione, stating: "For in the Rosary all the part that Mary took as our co-Redemptress comes to us more fully, and in the very order in which it was offered to God in the sufferings of the Son."^[45] This usage of "co-Redemptress" (Latin co-redemptrix) highlights Mary's participatory sufferings in the Passion as integral to the faithful's contemplation and reception of redemption, presented not as innovative but as consonant with rosary devotion's meditative focus on her sorrows. Leo XIII reiterated her reparative role in subsequent rosary encyclicals, such as Supremi Apostolatus Officio (1883), describing Mary as "the dispenser of all the gifts which Our Saviour purchased for us by His death and by His blood," thereby affirming her secondary but essential mediation in redemption's fruits. These endorsements reflect a consistent magisterial trajectory, rooted in scriptural typology (e.g., Genesis 3:15) and conciliar affirmations like Trent's on Mary's merits, without dogmatic definition but with authoritative approbation of devotional and theological expressions. Earlier popes, such as Benedict XIV (r. 1740–1758), contributed indirectly by praising litanies invoking Mary's sorrows as meritorious, fostering the doctrinal soil for 19th-century clarifications, though explicit co-redemptive language crystallized under Pius IX and Leo XIII.

Vatican II and Post-Conciliar Documents

The Second Vatican Council's Dogmatic Constitution on the Church (Lumen Gentium), promulgated on November 21, 1964, situated the doctrine of the Blessed Virgin Mary within the mystery of the Church and Christ's redemptive work, emphasizing her subordinate yet unique cooperation without adopting the title "Co-Redemptrix," which had been proposed in earlier drafts but excluded to safeguard the uniqueness of Christ's mediation.^[46] In paragraph 56, the Council teaches that Mary "devoted herself totally as a handmaid of the Lord to the person and work of her Son, under Him and with Him... serving the mystery of redemption," highlighting her free consent and active role from the Annunciation onward.^[46] Paragraph 57 further describes this union manifesting from Christ's conception to His death, where Mary, "grieving exceedingly with her only begotten Son, [united] herself with a maternal heart with His sacrifice, and lovingly consent[ed] to the immolation of this Victim which she herself had brought forth."^[46] Paragraph 61 of Lumen Gentium explicitly affirms that Mary "cooperated by her obedience, faith, hope and burning charity in the work of the Saviour in giving back supernatural life to souls," rendering her "our mother in the order of grace."^[46] Paragraph 62 underscores her ongoing salvific influence post-Assumption, invoking her under titles including "Mediatrix," while insisting this maternal mediation "in no wise obscures or diminishes this unique mediation of Christ, but rather shows His power."^[46] These teachings integrate patristic and traditional elements of Mary's coredemptive participation—such as her fiat reversing Eve's disobedience—into an ecclesial framework, portraying her as the exemplar of the Church's faithful adherence to Christ's salvific mission. In post-conciliar documents, Pope Paul VI's apostolic exhortation Marialis Cultus, issued on February 2, 1974, reaffirmed Lumen Gentium's portrayal of Mary's redemptive cooperation, particularly in paragraph 20, which notes the union of Mother and Son in redemption climaxing at Calvary, where she "united herself with a maternal heart to His sacrifice" amid the Church's nascent formation.^[47] The exhortation references Lumen Gentium 62 and 63 to frame Marian devotion as oriented toward Christ, cautioning against exaggerations while endorsing her role as model of faith and intercessor in salvation history.^[47] Pope John Paul II advanced this doctrine in his encyclical Redemptoris Mater, dated March 25, 1987, which echoes Lumen Gentium 61 in paragraph 22: Mary "cooperated by her obedience, faith, hope and burning charity in the Savior’s work of restoring supernatural life to souls."^[48] Paragraph 40 describes her enduring "maternal mediation" as cooperating "in the saving work of her Son, the Redeemer," subordinate to His merits yet uniquely noble from her association at the Incarnation and Cross.^[48] These texts clarify Mary's coredemptive function as participatory and exemplary, deriving efficacy from union with Christ, without equating it to His infinite satisfaction, and aimed at fostering authentic devotion amid post-conciliar liturgical renewal.^[48]

Specific Papal Allocutions and Statements

Pope Benedict XV, in the apostolic letter Inter Sodalicia issued on March 22, 1918, described Mary's participation in redemption by noting that she "suffered and almost died with her suffering and dying Son" and "immolated with him the fruit of her womb," concluding that she "redeemed the human race together with Christ" and thus "may be said to have cooperated in the work of salvation in the manner of a co-redeemer."^[49]^[50] Pope Pius XI, in a radio message delivered on April 28, 1935, to mark the closing of the Holy Year at Lourdes, invoked Mary explicitly as "Co-Redemptrix," addressing her as "O Mother of piety and mercy, who as Co-Redemptrix stood by your most sweet Son suffering with Him when He consummated the redemption of the human race on the tree of the Cross, and who, until the end of time, remains the support of sinners."^[51]^[52] Pope Pius XII affirmed Mary's coredemptive role in various addresses, including his May 13, 1946, allocution to pilgrims at Fatima, where he emphasized her "sorrowful compassion" at the Cross as uniquely participating in Christ's redemptive sacrifice, stating that "the tears of the Mother have become the salvation of men."^[5] In a 1950 address to the International Congress on the Apostolate of the Laity, he further highlighted Mary's "unique cooperation" in the distribution of graces flowing from redemption.^[8] Pope John Paul II referenced Mary's coredemptive participation in multiple statements, including his March 31, 1983, address to the Italian Catholic Action, where he portrayed her at the foot of the Cross as united in suffering with Christ, thereby becoming "Co-redemptrix" through her fiat extended to Calvary.^[53] He reiterated this in a 1997 general audience on October 1, underscoring her role as Mediatrix oriented toward Christ, implicitly tied to her redemptive cooperation, while cautioning against any diminishment of Christ's sole mediation.^[54] John Paul II employed the term or concept at least seven times across addresses, consistently framing it as subordinate to Christ's unique redemption.^[55]

Case for Dogmatic Definition

Core Elements of the Proposed Dogma

The proposed dogmatic definition centers on affirming the Blessed Virgin Mary under the complementary titles of Co-redemptrix, Mediatrix of all graces, and Advocate, highlighting her subordinate yet uniquely efficacious roles in salvation history. Proponents, including the international association Vox Populi Mariae Mediatrici, advocate for a papal declaration that formally recognizes these titles as divinely revealed truths, building on scriptural, patristic, and magisterial foundations without implying equality with Christ's sole mediatorship.^[36]^[41] This triad underscores Mary's integral involvement in both the acquisition and application of redemption, as petitioned in over 8 million signatures collected globally by 2019 from laity, clergy, and bishops across more than 150 countries.^[56] The core element of Co-redemptrix denotes Mary's free and active cooperation in objectively meriting the graces of redemption alongside Christ, through her fiat at the Annunciation (Luke 1:38), her fiat of Calvary in offering her Son during His Passion, and her compassionate participation in His sufferings as prophesied in Simeon’s words (Luke 2:35). This cooperation is strictly subordinate to Christ's infinite satisfaction and merits, functioning as a secondary causality that uniquely applies to her as the Mother of the Redeemer, reversing Eve's disobedience in the protoevangelium (Genesis 3:15).^[4]^[57] The term avoids any notion of parity, emphasizing cor as "with" in a participatory sense, as articulated by theologians like Fr. Stefano Manelli, who distinguish it from Christ's primary redemption.^[12] As Mediatrix of all graces, the proposal asserts Mary's universal role in dispensing sanctifying and actual graces to humanity, derived from her coredemptive merits and exercised through her intercession, such that no grace reaches the faithful apart from her maternal mediation under Christ, the one Mediator (1 Timothy 2:5). This distributive function flows causally from her spiritual motherhood over the Church, confirmed in papal documents like Benedict XV's Inter Sodalicia (1918), which links her mediation to her prior cooperation in redemption.^[58]^[41] The title Advocate completes the framework by defining Mary's ongoing solicitation of graces before God on behalf of her children, invoking her as the "Help of Christians" who defends and aids the Church against spiritual adversities, as evidenced in apparitions like Lourdes (1858) and Fatima (1917) where she presented herself in advocatory roles.^[36] Together, these elements aim to clarify Mary's subordinate solidarity with Christ's priesthood, fostering deeper devotion without diminishing His uniqueness, as supported by endorsements from figures like Cardinal Luigi Ciappi, who in 1996 described the definition as theologically sound and pastorally beneficial.^[56]

Theological Rationale and Benefits

The theological rationale for designating Mary as Co-Redemptrix rests on her singular, subordinate cooperation in Christ's redemptive work, rooted in scriptural precedents such as the protoevangelium in Genesis 3:15, where enmity is placed between the serpent and the woman, fulfilled in Mary's role as the New Eve allied against sin.^[14] Her fiat at the Annunciation (Luke 1:38) initiated the Incarnation, enabling the objective redemption, while her presence at the Cross (John 19:25-27) exemplified her voluntary offering of maternal sufferings in perfect union with her Son's sacrifice, meriting graces subordinately as an instrument chosen by God.^[59] This cooperation is not co-principal with Christ's infinite merits but a secondary, freely given participation predestined by divine providence, as articulated by theologians who emphasize Mary's immaculate freedom to consent throughout salvation history.^[60] Papal magisterium has affirmed elements of this doctrine, with Pius XII invoking her as Coredemptrix for accompanying Christ to the Cross, and John Paul II describing her as participating "in the redemptive sacrifice of her Son" in Redemptoris Mater.^[61]^[62] The doctrine underscores causal realism in redemption: Christ's Passion as the unique efficient cause, with Mary's acts deriving efficacy solely from their inseparability from His, akin to how Eve's consent facilitated the Fall but Mary's reversed it through redemptive obedience.^[63] Theologians argue this highlights Mary's predestined inclusion in the Incarnation's decree, ensuring her sorrows—foretold in Simeon’s prophecy (Luke 2:35)—contributed distributively to humanity's reconciliation by applying Christ's merits as the most perfect human associate.^[64] Such reasoning privileges empirical fidelity to patristic typology (e.g., Irenaeus on the New Eve) and avoids equating her role with Christ's divinity, clarifying that Co-Redemptrix denotes instrumental collaboration without independent salvific power.^[14] Defining the dogma would yield ecclesial benefits by providing precise parameters against reductive interpretations, such as viewing Mary merely as a passive symbol, thereby safeguarding Christ's sole mediatorship while elevating authentic devotion.^[65] It would foster spiritual fruits, including deeper consecration to Mary as a path to Christ, countering modern secular drifts by reinforcing participatory grace in the faithful's own coredemptive sufferings (Colossians 1:24).^[66] Proponents contend this clarity aids evangelization, as evidenced by historical surges in Marian piety following defined dogmas like the Immaculate Conception, promoting unity through explicit affirmation of her subordinate yet essential maternity in salvation.^[65]

Global Petitions and Ecclesial Support

The international lay organization Vox Populi Mariae Mediatrici, founded to promote the dogmatic definition of Mary as Co-Redemptrix, Mediatrix of all graces, and Advocate, has spearheaded global petition drives since the 1990s, gathering signatures from lay faithful, clergy, and religious across multiple continents.^[42] ^[36] By 1998, the group reported delivering petitions bearing 4.7 million signatures from 157 countries on six continents to the Vatican.^[67] Subsequent tallies indicated over 6 million signatures from 148 countries by 2000, reflecting sustained international advocacy.^[68] More recent estimates from the organization's profiles place the total exceeding 8 million signatures, underscoring widespread popular devotion, particularly in regions with strong Marian traditions such as Latin America, Asia, and Europe.^[44] Ecclesial endorsements have accompanied these efforts, with notable support from individual hierarchs and groups of theologians. At least 42 cardinals and nearly 500 bishops worldwide have signed petitions or expressed backing for the proposed dogma, including prominent figures like St. Teresa of Calcutta.^[39] In 1996, five cardinals co-sponsored an international symposium on Marian coredemption in Fatima, Portugal, and circulated an open letter to fellow cardinals urging papal consideration of the titles, emphasizing Mary's subordinate yet unique cooperation in redemption as rooted in Scripture and Tradition.^[69] The International Marian Association (IMA), comprising over 150 theologians, philosophers, and pastors, has advocated for the dogma in formal correspondence, such as a 2017 letter to Cardinal Gerhard Müller affirming the term "Co-Redemptrix" as consistent with magisterial usage and countering reservations about novelty.^[70] While no episcopal conferences have formally petitioned as bodies, regional support has emerged through symposia and declarations, such as those from Asian and African Marian scholars integrated into global campaigns.^[71] These efforts highlight a grassroots-to-hierarchical dynamic, with petitions often framed as fulfilling the sensus fidelium and responding to private revelations like those at Amsterdam (1945–1959) and Fatima, though Vatican responses have emphasized doctrinal clarification over immediate definition.^[72]

Criticisms and Counterarguments

Concerns Over Terminology and Misinterpretation

Critics of the proposed dogmatic definition of Mary as Co-Redemptrix argue that the terminology risks obscuring Christ's unique role as sole Redeemer, as articulated in 1 Timothy 2:5, by suggesting a parity rather than subordinate cooperation.^[2] The prefix "co-" derives from Latin cum meaning "with," intended to denote Mary's participatory role in salvation through her fiat and suffering at the Cross, yet opponents contend it deviates from scriptural and patristic language, fostering confusion among the faithful and non-Catholics alike.^[39] Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, later Pope Benedict XVI, expressed reservations in 1997, stating that the formula "co-redemptrix" departs excessively from the language of Scripture and the Fathers, thereby giving rise to misunderstandings that could imply Mary shares equally in redemption rather than instrumentally under Christ.^[73] He further noted that such phrasing might "obscure" the foundational truth that all grace originates through Christ alone, potentially diluting the centrality of His mediatory sacrifice.^[74] Pope Francis has reinforced these concerns, rejecting the title in multiple statements, including a 2019 address where he described proposals for dogmatic elevation as "foolishness" due to the likelihood of misinterpretation, emphasizing that Mary is not a co-redeemer but points solely to her Son.^[75] In a 2021 reflection, he clarified that while popular piety attributes various titles to Mary, "co-redemptrix" introduces unnecessary confusion, as Christian doctrine affirms Christ's exclusive redemptive agency without requiring additional dogmatic specification.^[76] Theological commentators, such as those from Catholic Answers, highlight that the term's ambiguity has historically led to perceptions of Marian overemphasis, prompting calls for alternative expressions like "participatrix in redemption" to preserve doctrinal precision without alienating ecumenical partners or the laity unfamiliar with nuanced Latin etymology.^[2] Proponents counter that proper catechesis mitigates these risks, but skeptics maintain that the potential for interpretive error outweighs the benefits, especially in an era of widespread theological literacy gaps.^[3]

Ecumenical and Interfaith Implications

Proponents of the Co-Redemptrix title argue that its dogmatic definition could foster ecumenical dialogue by clarifying Mary's subordinate yet unique cooperation in redemption, potentially bridging gaps with traditions that honor her intercession, such as Eastern Orthodoxy.^[71] However, Orthodox theologians generally reject the term, viewing it as implying a co-equal redemptive role that undermines Christ's sole mediatorship, despite shared veneration of Mary as Theotokos.^[77] Eastern Orthodox doctrine emphasizes Mary's sinlessness and fiat but limits her role to exemplary obedience, without extending to coredemption, as affirmed in patristic sources like St. John Damascene's homilies.^[78] Protestant denominations, particularly Reformed and Evangelical groups, oppose the concept outright, interpreting it as a violation of sola Christus—Christ alone as redeemer—based on scriptural passages like 1 Timothy 2:5 and Hebrews 7:25, which exclude secondary redeemers.^[2] This stance has historically fueled Reformation-era critiques of Marian dogmas, with figures like John Calvin decrying excessive honors to Mary as idolatrous distractions from gospel centrality.^[57] Ecumenical bodies, including the World Council of Churches, have cited such titles as barriers to unity, arguing they exacerbate divisions over soteriology evident since the 16th-century schisms.^[38] Vatican II deliberately omitted "Co-Redemptrix" in Lumen Gentium chapter 8 to prioritize ecumenical sensitivity, as documented in conciliar debates where bishops like Cardinal Heenan warned of alienating non-Catholics.^[79] Subsequent papal reservations, including those from Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger in 1982 and Pope Francis in 2019, highlight the term's potential for misinterpretation abroad, which could hinder dialogues like the Joint International Commission with Orthodox churches established in 1980.^[10] Pope Francis explicitly stated on March 24, 2021, that Mary is not Co-Redemptrix, emphasizing Christ's uniqueness to avoid ecumenical harm.^[76] On interfaith fronts, advocates claim the dogma could enhance dialogue with Islam, where Mary (Maryam) holds Qur'anic prominence in Surah 19, by underscoring her universal maternity without proselytizing.^[80] Cardinal Varkey Vithayathil noted in 2008 that proclaiming Mary's coredemptive role might aid interreligious understanding, particularly with Muslims who recite the Fatiha invoking her indirectly through prophetic traditions.^[71] Yet critics, including Jewish and secular interfaith scholars, view exalted Marian titles as reinforcing Catholic particularism, complicating Abrahamic dialogues focused on shared monotheism over christological extensions.^[81] No major interfaith council has endorsed the title, and its absence from documents like the 2019 Vatican-Islam A Document on Human Fraternity reflects caution against doctrinal specifics that could polarize.^[82]

Recent Hierarchical Reservations

In December 2019, Pope Francis rejected proposals to proclaim Mary as co-redemptrix, describing the concept as "foolishness" during an in-flight press conference returning from Thailand and Japan.^[75] He emphasized that Mary presents herself simply as a disciple, stating, "Mary never introduced herself as co-redemptrix," and underscored Christ's sole role as Redeemer, with Mary as a supportive figure at humanity's side.^[75] This stance aligns with concerns that the title could obscure the uniqueness of Christ's redemptive work, potentially fostering theological confusion among the faithful. Pope Francis reiterated these reservations in March 2021 during a general audience, clarifying that Jesus entrusted Mary to believers as a mother, explicitly "not as co-redeemer."^[83] He highlighted the devotional affection behind such titles but warned against excesses that might elevate Mary to a mediatory role rivaling Christ's, noting, "Christian piety always gives beautiful titles to her, like a son to the mother, but beyond this there is no title."^[9] This reflects a broader hierarchical preference for established Marian doctrines, such as those from Lumen gentium, over new dogmatic formulations that risk misinterpretation. Cardinal Gerhard Müller, former prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, has similarly opposed attributing the title "co-redemptrix" to Mary, arguing in his 2017 Cardinal Müller Report that it lacks sufficient foundation in Scripture and patristic tradition and could engender misunderstandings.^[84] Müller contends the term deviates from biblical language, potentially implying a parity with Christ that contradicts core Christological truths, though he affirms Mary's subordinate cooperation in salvation without endorsing the specific nomenclature.^[10] These positions from senior hierarchs underscore caution against dogmatic elevation, prioritizing clarity in an era of doctrinal fragmentation and ecumenical dialogue.

Current Status and Ongoing Debate

Post-2020 Developments

In March 2021, Pope Francis stated during a general audience that the Virgin Mary was entrusted by Jesus as a mother to humanity, explicitly rejecting the title of co-redemptrix as "an exaggerated expression of love" that could foster misunderstandings, emphasizing that Christ alone is the Redeemer.^[85]^[83] This echoed his earlier reservations, underscoring a consistent Vatican preference for established Marian titles like Mother of God and Mediatrix without the co-redemptrix designation to avoid implying parity with Christ's unique redemptive role.^[86] Proponents of the dogma, including the lay organization Vox Populi Mariae Mediatrici, continued advocacy efforts through publications and theological defenses, interpreting papal comments as not foreclosing doctrinal development while reaffirming Mary's subordinate yet essential participation in redemption as rooted in tradition approved under prior pontiffs like Pius X.^[87]^[35] No new formal petitions surpassing prior totals—estimated at over 8 million signatures historically—were publicly reported by 2025, though online resources and articles sustained grassroots momentum without hierarchical endorsement.^[42] By August 2024, the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith issued norms on discerning supernatural phenomena, which some Marian advocates linked to broader reflections on private revelations supporting titles like Mediatrix and Co-Redemptrix, though the document itself addressed apparitions without direct reference to the dogma.^[88] As of October 2025, no further papal allocutions or curial actions advanced the proposed definition, maintaining the status quo of theological debate amid reservations from recent popes.^[85]

Prospects for Future Resolution

The prospects for a dogmatic definition of Mary as Co-Redemptrix appear limited in the near term, primarily due to repeated reservations expressed by Pope Francis. In December 2019, during a homily at the Casa Santa Marta, Francis described the idea of proclaiming Mary as co-redemptrix as "foolishness," emphasizing that she should be honored as "woman" and "mother" without additional titles that could obscure Christ's unique role as Redeemer.^[75] He reiterated this stance in March 2021, stating during a general audience that Jesus entrusted Mary to humanity as a mother, "not as co-redeemer," rejecting theological movements advocating for the title.^[9] These pronouncements align with the Vatican's broader caution against new Marian dogmas, as evidenced by a July 2024 Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith statement reaffirming a 1974 decision against apparitions tied to Co-Redemptrix promotion and underscoring that "Christ is the one and only redeemer."^[89] Advocacy persists among certain theologians and lay groups, who argue that formal definition could clarify Mary's subordinate yet unique participation in redemption, drawing on precedents like Vatican II's Lumen Gentium (1964), which describes her cooperation "in a wholly singular way."^[90] Figures such as Scott Hahn and Mark Miravalle have cited global petitions—over 8 million signatures historically—and papal usages of related terms by predecessors like Pius X and John Paul II as grounds for optimism.^[91] However, these efforts lack traction at the curial level, with no commissions or synodal discussions advancing the proposal since the early 2000s, when Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (later Benedict XVI) expressed reservations about its ecumenical impact.^[92] Future resolution hinges on papal succession and ecclesial priorities, as Marian dogmas like the Immaculate Conception (1854) and Assumption (1950) emerged after prolonged theological maturation amid cultural shifts.^[35] Under Francis, who as of October 2025 remains pontiff at age 88, emphasis on synodality and dialogue over doctrinal innovation reduces likelihood, with critics of the title warning of potential confusion or Protestant alienation.^[83] Should a successor receptive to traditional Mariology ascend—speculatively urged by some in 2025 writings—the debate could revive, but historical Vatican reticence since 1998 suggests any definition would require overwhelming consensus to avoid deepening internal divisions.^[93] Absent such convergence, the concept may endure as permissible piety rather than binding dogma, per existing magisterial affirmations of Mary's coredemptive role without titular elevation.^[2]

References

[1]
Co-Redemptrix | Mother of All Peoples
Co-redemptrix means Mary, the "woman with the Redeemer," actively participates in the work of Redemption, sharing in the restoration of grace, in a subordinate ...
[2]
Does the Church Teach Mary Is Co-Redemptrix? - Catholic Answers
May 1, 2021 · So she's not equal to Jesus, but she is a woman who cooperates with the Redeemer. She cooperates with God's plan and her son's role in it. So ...
[3]
Library : Mediatrix, Si! Coredemptrix, No! | Catholic Culture
The meaning of "co-redemptrix" is not "with the Redeemer" but rather "the woman who redeems with" [implying: ". . . with the Redeemer"]. Delving deeper into the ...
[4]
Part 1 of "Mary Co-redemptrix: A Response to 7 Common Objections ...
Mary as Co-redemptrix means her unique participation in redemption with and under Jesus, not equal to him, but cooperating with him in the work of redemption.
[5]
The Mystery of Mary Coredemptrix in the Papal Magesterium
In these final two statements we find a synthesis of the previous papal teaching on the coredemption as well as a stable point of reference for the teaching ...
[6]
Mary Co-redemptrix and the Fifth Marian Dogma - Dominic Medals
We begin with the words of Pope John Paul II, with a phrase pregnant in meaning. He tells us that “Mary's role as Co-redemptrix did not cease with the ...
[7]
Mary Is Co-Redemptrix - Traditional Catechism
Mary is Co-Redemptrix because her tears and suffering, united with Christ's, are part of the redemption, and she is an instrument of the Holy Ghost, ...
[8]
Popes of the Marian Age and Mary Co-redemptrix
Sep 15, 2023 · The nineteenth and twentieth century papal pronouncements bring the doctrine, and eventually the title, to the ranks of the ordinary teaching of the Church's ...Missing: statements | Show results with:statements
[9]
Once again, Pope Francis says Mary is not the 'co-redemptrix'
Mar 24, 2021 · The term “co-redemptrix” implies Mary had a subordinate but essential participation in the redemption of souls because of her free consent to ...
[10]
Pope Francis and Mary Co-Redemptrix - Where Peter Is
Dec 27, 2019 · Pope Francis is correct in saying that Mary never introduced herself as co-redemptrix in her 1531 apparitions at Guadalupe.
[11]
Does "Co-redemptrix" or "Mediatrix" mean "Co-Saviour"?
"Co-Redemptrix" refers to Mary's participation in Jesus' work, kind of the way an Evangelical pastor participates with Jesus when he prays for people and ...<|separator|>
[12]
Part 1 of Mary Coredemptrix In Sacred Scripture by Rev. Stefano ...
Our aim is to gather and organize all the elements which Sacred Scripture offers us to understand the truth about Mary's mediation as "Coredemptrix of the human ...
[13]
Mary, Mother of Salvation | Catholic Answers Magazine
Mary's role as Co-Redeemer and Mediatrix of grace is not a formally defined dogma of the Catholic Church. It remains a pious opinion.
[14]
Mary Co-Redemptrix - Catholicism.org
Feb 21, 2006 · ... Mary Co-Redemptrix is that they have first suppressed the correct reading of Genesis 3:15. Here is the correct reading from the Douay-Rheims ...
[15]
Co-redemptrix Foretold:The Old Testament - Mother of All Peoples
Sep 15, 2023 · Mary Co-redemptrix is the Woman of Genesis 3:15. But she is also the Woman and the Virgin Mother of Isaiah, who in another great Old ...<|separator|>
[16]
Co-Redemptrix and Mediatrix of All Graces. | by John Fisher 2.0
Mar 16, 2020 · There are three Biblical Texts that I will use to establish Mary's role as Co-Redemptrix. The first is from Genesis 3:15. There are four ...
[17]
Is Mary a Co-redemptrix? - Dan Lynch Apostolates
At Calvary, Mary shares in the suffering of her Redeemer Son, and consents to the offering of him as the victim-ransom of Redemption (cf. Jn. 19:26-27).” ( ...
[18]
Is Mary the co-redemptrix / mediatrix? | GotQuestions.org
Sep 24, 2025 · Mary is “most blessed among women” (Luke 1:42) because she was the mother of the Messiah. But she is not divine and cannot be seen as part of ...
[19]
Against Heresies (Book III, Chapter 22) - New Advent
Against Heresies (Book III, Chapter 22) · 1. Those, therefore, who allege that He took nothing from the Virgin do greatly err, [since,] in order that they may ...
[20]
Mediatrix | Biblical Mariology
Mediatrix of All Graces. St. Ephrem (+373): “After the mediator, you (Mary) are the mediatrix of the whole world.” St. Cyril of Alexandria (+444): “Hail Mary ...<|separator|>
[21]
On the Mysteries (St. Ambrose) - CHURCH FATHERS - New Advent
At last it came upon the Virgin Mary, and the Power of the Highest overshadowed her, Luke 1:35 when she conceived Redemption for the race of men. And that ...Missing: consent | Show results with:consent
[22]
The Whole World Awaits Mary's Reply - St. Bernard of Clairvaux
The angel awaits an answer; it is time for him to return to God who sent him. We too are waiting, O Lady, for your word of compassion.Missing: redemption | Show results with:redemption
[23]
The Glories Of Mary St. Alphonsus Liguori - eCatholic2000
Mary is called the co-operatrix with her Son in our justification, because God has committed to her keeping all the graces that he has des tined for us.
[24]
Dialogue with Trypho, Chapters 89-108 (Justin Martyr) - New Advent
For Eve, who was a virgin and undefiled, having conceived the word of the serpent, brought forth disobedience and death. But the Virgin Mary received faith ...
[25]
How Can You Say That Mary Is the 'New Eve'? - Catholic Answers
Thus Irenaeus says that Eve “by disobeying became the cause of death ... So, Paul is saying that Mary participated in the Redemption by giving birth ...
[26]
Mary as the New Eve - Irenaeus - Crossroads Initiative
Dec 9, 2017 · Irenaeus shows that the Blessed Virgin Mary is truly a new Eve, just as her son Jesus Christ is a new Adam. He contrasts Eve's disobedience with ...Missing: redemption | Show results with:redemption
[27]
[PDF] The Role of Mary in the Work of Redemption: Seven Key Moments
Ephraem of Syria (c. 306–. 373) and St. Epiphanius of Salamis (c. 315–403) affirm Mary as the New Eve, and they acknowledge her indispensable role in the ...Missing: ephrem | Show results with:ephrem
[28]
Saint Bernard: Key promoter and devotee of Mary Co-Redemptrix
Aug 20, 2024 · St. Bernard of Clairvaux's (†1153) great devotion to Mary, especially as Co-Redemptrix, is quite evident from his vast collection of Marian works.
[29]
Mary as Co-redemptrix, Mediatrix of All Grace, and Advocate
Jul 9, 2013 · It is the role of our Lady as: “Co-redemptrix, Mediatrix of All Grace, and Advocate”. Simply put this dogma would properly define what has always been taught ...Missing: Aquinas | Show results with:Aquinas
[30]
The MOST Theological Collection: Mary in Our Life - Catholic Culture
The MOST Theological Collection: Mary in Our Life. "Chapter III: The Popes and the Co-redemptrix" ... Medieval theologians also discussed it, but it is only ...
[31]
Duns Scotus, Defender of the Immaculate Conception - Wikisource
Mar 17, 2022 · Scotus continues: "Mary, then, needed redemption more than anyone else. She needed redemption so much the more, the greater the good ...
[32]
https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/34267/chapter/290530790
[33]
[PDF] Reflections on the Problem of Mary's Preservative Redemption
The first representative of this group is Francisco Suarez, S.J.. (d. 1617) ... in actu secunda, with Mary as Coredemptrix also in actu secundo.28. To ...
[34]
Mary's Role in the Redemption and the Contemporary Church
Oct 24, 2018 · Ignatius of Loyola, Alfonso Salmerón (1515-1585) calls Mary as a theologian corredemptrix, mediatrix and cooperatrix salutis humani generis.
[35]
Mary Co-redemptrix is Catholic Tradition - Mother of All Peoples
Sep 24, 2025 · In Genesis 3:15, Mary is foreshadowed as uniquely participating in the work of Jesus Christ in the crushing of the head of Satan. At the ...
[36]
The Fifth Marian Dogma | EWTN
Vox Populi Mariae Mediatrici is a lay organization seeking the papal definition of the Blessed Virgin Mary as Coredemptrix, Mediatrix of all graces and Advocate ...
[37]
[PDF] Co-Redemptrix, Mediatrix and Advocate: Should There ... - eCommons
Since 1993, more than four million people around the world have signed petitions asking. Pope John Paul II to define and infallibly proclaim the new Marian ...
[38]
Movement to declare Mary"co-redemptrix"stirs ecumenical concerns
Jan 1, 1997 · Miravalle said his belief John Paul will act is buttressed by 4.5 million signatures on petitions sent to the pope from Catholics on six ...Missing: 1996 | Show results with:1996
[39]
Mary, Coredemptrix — Really?! - Missio Immaculatae Magazine
Apr 22, 2017 · The Marian title of “Coredemptrix” is controversial because there is confusion about how to understand it. There are various perspectives ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[40]
ALL 4 MARIAN DOGMAS IN ICON; ICON AT VOX POPULI
At the 1997 International “Vox Populi Mariae Mediatrici” Conference which translates – “Voice of the People For Mary Mediatrix.”, over 200 Bishops, Archbishops, ...Missing: date numbers
[41]
A New Marian Dogma? Coredemptrix, Mediatrix of All Graces ...
We have the teachings of the Second Vatican Council on Marian coredemption and mediation clearly manifested in Lumen Gentium, nn. 56-62. In addition, these same ...
[42]
The Petition - Mother of All Peoples
The Mother of Jesus is Spiritual Mother of all humanity in her three maternal roles as Co-redemptrix, Mediatrix of all graces and Advocate.
[43]
Bishops back Mary co-redemptrix dogma - Clerical Whispers
Mar 31, 2010 · Two Asian bishops have backed a move to formally recognize Mary as “co-redemptrix, mediatrix and advocate for all Christians.”.
[44]
Vox Populi Mariae Mediatrici - GuideStar Profile
The organization has three (3) lines of activity: (1) promoting the definition of Our Lady as Co-redemptrix ... Over 8 million petitions have been signed for the ...
[45]
https://www.vatican.va/content/leo-xiii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_l-xiii_enc_08091894_iucunda-semper-expectatione.html
[46]
Lumen gentium - The Holy See
Lumen Gentium is a dogmatic constitution on the Church, aiming to bring the light of Christ to all, and to unfold the Church's nature and mission.
[47]
Marialis Cultus (February 2, 1974)
Summary of each segment:
[48]
Redemptoris Mater (25 March 1987)
Summary of each segment:
[49]
The Father William Most Theological Collection - Catholic Culture
Pope Benedict XV spoke even more explicitly in his Inter Sodalicia:5. "With her suffering and dying Son, Mary endured suffering and almost death. She gave up ...
[50]
The Mother Co-Redemptrix | Heralds of the Gospel Magazine
We believe that Mary was truly and effectively the Co-Redemptrix of humanity for two fundamental reasons: a) Because She was the Mother of Christ the Redeemer.<|control11|><|separator|>
[51]
Teaching of the Popes: Pius XI
Radio message to Lourdes, April 28, 1935: O Mother of piety and mercy, who as Co-Redemptrix stood by your most sweet Son suffering with Him.
[52]
Church Teaching on Mary's Cooperation in the Redemption of ...
Mary's work was not active receptivity, as the Germans assert, but an effective and active cooperation in generating the title for the Redemption.
[53]
Pope John Paul II's Teaching on Marian Coredemption by Arthur ...
The Pope says: The sufferings of Christ created the good of the world's Redemption. This good in itself is inexhaustible and infinite. No man can add anything ...
[54]
1 October 1997 - The Holy See
Oct 1, 1997 · Among the titles attributed to Mary in the Church's devotion, chapter eight of Lumen gentium recalls that of "Mediatrix". Although some Council ...
[55]
Pope St. John Paul II and Mary as Co-Redemptrix - Catholicism Anew
May 20, 2014 · John Paul II used the phrase “co-redeemer” seven times, let us explain. The Church experienced a golden age of Mariology. Never has the Church ...
[56]
Letter Concerning the Dogmatic Definition of Mary as Coredemptrix ...
After the dogmatic definition of the Assumption by Pope Pius XII on 1 November 1950, Our Lady told Ida that this definition had to precede "the last and ...Missing: allocution | Show results with:allocution
[57]
Mary as Co-Redemptrix: God's Foolishness - Crisis Magazine
Dec 27, 2019 · There is no Catholic dogma on Mary as Co-Redemptrix. However, several popes (Pius IX, Leo XIII, Pius X, Benedict XV, Pius XI, Pius XII, and ...
[58]
Part 2 of Mary: Coredemptrix, Mediatrix, Advocate by Mark I Miravale ...
He further refers to the Virgin Mother as; "...with her only-begotten Son, the most powerful Mediatrix and Reconciler of the world...."[182]. Pope Leo XIII ...
[59]
How Can Catholics Understand Mother Mary as Co-Redemptrix?
Apr 1, 2021 · Similarly, in a radio message to pilgrims in Lourdes, on April 28, 1935, Pius XI, makes it even clearer: 'O Mother of piety and mercy, who ...
[60]
Marian Coredemption and Mediation: An Introduction
Jan 28, 2019 · Mary in the work of redemption was by God's will joined with Jesus Christ, the cause of salvation, in much the same way as Eve was joined with ...
[61]
Catholic Doctrine of Coredemptrix: Scripture and Tradition
Here Mary is united to Christ in the whole work of Redemption, sharing, according to God's plan, in the Cross and suffering for our salvation.
[62]
Redemptoris Mater (25 March 1987) - The Holy See
Mar 25, 1987 · Redemptoris Mater discusses Mary's role in salvation, her active presence in the Church, and her as a model for the Church, prefiguring the ...
[63]
The Truth About Marian Coredemption- Msgr. Calkins
The conditions by which a doctrine is and must be considered Church doctrine are totally and amply verifiable in Marian Coredemption: its foundation is indirect ...
[64]
[PDF] Theological Reflections on Marian Coredemption and the Work of ...
Jun 1, 2017 · God's plan to include Mary in the work of redemption was predestined by that same decree of divine providence that predestined the Incarnation.
[65]
7 Reasons to Declare A New Marian Dogma Now
Nov 16, 2019 · Here are 7 foundational reasons why the contemporary Church and world would profoundly benefit from a solemn definition of Mary as the Spiritual ...
[66]
The Blessed Virgin Mary: Co-redemptrix | The Fatima Center
Mar 31, 2021 · Mary is given the title Co-redemptrix, because She consented to be the Mother of God; but it is also because Mary plays a pivotal role in Christ's sufferings ...
[67]
Petition Urges Pope to Proclaim Mary as a 'Co-Redeemer'
Mar 21, 1998 · The group says it has sent the Vatican petitions bearing more than 4.7 million signatures from 157 countries on six continents. ... co-redeemer ...
[68]
Seeking a Promotion for the Virgin Mary - The New York Times
Dec 23, 2000 · Since then the pope has received more than six million signatures from 148 countries on petitions asking him to give the Virgin Mary the ...Missing: numbers | Show results with:numbers
[69]
Cardinals' Letter Promoting Marian Dogma - EWTN
Here is an English translation of the letter written by the five cardinal co-sponsors of the Fatima Symposium on Marian Co-redemption and sent to the world's ...
[70]
[PDF] International Marian Association Letter to Cardinal Mueller
May 31, 2017 · In sum, Your Eminence, to state that “the Church does not call Mary a co- redeemer” or that the Church “does not attribute” to Mary the role of ...
[71]
Mary Co-redemptrix: Advocate for Inter-religious Dialogue
Sep 15, 2023 · Proclaiming Mary as the Spiritual Mother of All Humanity would benefit ecumenical and interreligious dialogue because it would help non-Catholics to understand ...Missing: ecclesial | Show results with:ecclesial
[72]
Hail, Mary - Newsweek
Aug 24, 1997 · Promising world peace, Mary told Ida to petition the pope for the "Last Dogma in Marian History," including the titles Co-Redemptrix, Mediatrix ...
[73]
The Blessed Virgin Mary, Co-Redemptrix - Bridges and Tangents
Jan 1, 2012 · Cardinal Ratzinger's objection seemed to be that the actual formula 'Co-Redemptrix' is too much of a departure from Scripture – it would ...
[74]
[PDF] Is "co-redemptrix" a title for the Blessed Virgin Mary?
Aug 17, 2025 · According to Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, the title "co-redemptrix" would. "obscure" the origin that "everything comes through Christ," as ...
[75]
Pope calls idea of declaring Mary co-redemptrix 'foolishness' | Crux
Dec 12, 2019 · Pope Francis appeared to flatly reject proposals in some theological circles to add “co-redemptrix” to the list of titles of the Virgin Mary.<|separator|>
[76]
Pope: Mary is not Co-redemptrix - PrayTellBlog
Mar 24, 2021 · Pope Francis has said once again that Mary is not Coredemptrix: “It's true that Christian piety always gives beautiful titles to her, like a son to the mother.
[77]
Co-redemptrix and Mediatrix ? - The Byzantine Forum - byzcath.org
Jun 22, 2001 · Co-redemptrix, on its face, will be taken to mean "joint" or "co-equal" -- and that would be objectionable to both Orthodox and Roman Catholic ...Mary as co-redemptrixCo-RedemptrixMore results from www.byzcath.org
[78]
Marian Devotion, Orthodox and Roman Catholic / OrthoChristian.Com
Jul 9, 2024 · Our Orthodox devotion to Mary (whom we call “the Theotokos”) often heads the list of Protestant objections, since it features so prominently in Roman ...
[79]
Our Lady's Co-Redemption - Voice of the Family
Oct 18, 2023 · ... Vatican II, before detailing how the Council actually taught co-redemption, without using the term “co-redemptrix” for ecumenical reasons.
[80]
Mary: Co-Redemptrix, Mediatrix and Advocate - EWTN
A fifth Marian dogma, proclaiming Mary as Mother of humanity, Co-redemptrix, Mediatrix, and Advocate for the human race.
[81]
[PDF] Mary Co-Redemptrix as a Help - Ecce Mater Tua
Jan 1, 2023 · This eventually led me to dedicate this short reflection on “Mary. Co-redemptrix as a help in Dialogue.” In inter-religious dialogue it is of ...
[82]
[PDF] Mary Co-redemptrix: Controversies and Doctrinal Questions
The Second Vatican Council clearly recognized such cooperation. In commenting on the response of Mary to the message of the angel, Vatican II affirmed that Mary.
[83]
Pope Francis: Jesus entrusted Mary to us as a Mother, 'not as co ...
At this morning's general audience, Pope Francis said that Jesus entrusted the Virgin Mary to us as a Mother, “not as co-redeemer.”
[84]
[PDF] Letter of Dr. Robert Fastiggi in Response to the Cardinal Mueller ...
Jun 15, 2017 · In The Cardinal Müller Re- port, however, you explicitly state that the title, Co-redemptrix, cannot be attributed to the Blessed Virgin Mary, ...
[85]
Once again, Pope Francis says Mary is not the 'co-redemptrix' | Crux
Mar 24, 2021 · Pope Francis said on Wednesday the Virgin Mary is not a co-redemptrix with Christ, a title which some theological movements in recent decades have tried to ...
[86]
Pope Francis explains why he does not consider Our Lady co ...
Mar 24, 2021 · Pope Francis was explaining the role of Our Lady in Salvation history, and the use of the title “co-redemptrix” to describe her.
[87]
Observations on Pope Francis' "March 24" Comments
Mar 25, 2021 · When Pope Francis tells us, in his General Audience of March 24, that the Madonna covers us “as a Mother, not as a goddess, not as a co-redeemer ...Missing: statements | Show results with:statements
[88]
Mary Co-redemptrix and Mediatrix of All Graces: Perennial Catholic ...
Aug 15, 2024 · Pope Pius IX, in his 1849 encyclical, Ubi Primum, states: “For God ... Another encyclical teaching by Leo XIII unequivocally defends Mary's ...
[89]
Vatican publishes 1974 decision denying alleged 'co-redemptrix ...
Jul 11, 2024 · Pope Francis has explicitly said that Mary is not a co-redemptrix and that Christ is the one and only redeemer. The dicastery's statement came ...
[90]
The Council and Co-redemptrix - Mother of All Peoples
Mar 5, 2024 · The Council Fathers love the universal Mother and seek to profess the whole truth about her role in salvation history.
[91]
Why Now is the Time for a New Marian Dogma - Catholic Exchange
Miravalle: The Marian title “Co-redemptrix” refers to the unique participation of Mary in the work of our redemption accomplished by Jesus Christ. The prefix “ ...
[92]
https://www.catholicstand.com/considering-a-new-marian-dogma/
[93]
Marian theologian urges Leo XIV to proclaim Mary as Co-Redemptrix
May 17, 2025 · A prominent Marian theologian is urging Catholics to join him in calling upon newly elected Pope Leo XIV to formally proclaim Mary as Co-Redemptrix.Missing: 2020-2025 | Show results with:2020-2025