Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Predestination

Predestination is a doctrine in Christian theology asserting that God, in His eternal counsel, has sovereignly ordained all events, including the eternal destinies of human souls, by electing certain individuals to salvation through grace alone, while determining others to remain in their sin and face judgment, without regard to foreseen faith or works.^[1]^[2] The concept draws from biblical texts such as Romans 8:29–30, which describe God foreknowing and predestining the elect to conformity with Christ, and Ephesians 1:4–5, attributing election to God's will before the foundation of the world.^[3]^[4] Historically, the doctrine gained prominence through Augustine of Hippo's writings against Pelagius in the early fifth century, emphasizing divine initiative in salvation amid debates over human capability.^[1] It was further developed during the Protestant Reformation by John Calvin, who integrated it into a comprehensive framework of God's absolute sovereignty in Institutes of the Christian Religion.^[5] In Reformed traditions, predestination forms a cornerstone of the TULIP acronym, encapsulating total depravity, unconditional election, limited atonement, irresistible grace, and perseverance of the saints.^[6] The doctrine has sparked enduring controversies, particularly regarding its reconciliation with human free will and moral accountability, as human choices appear causally determined yet individuals are held responsible for sin and unbelief.^[7] Proponents of compatibilism argue that divine predetermination operates through secondary causes, preserving voluntary action without compromising sovereignty, while critics, including Arminians, contend it undermines genuine liberty and divine benevolence.^[3]^[6] These tensions have influenced soteriological debates across denominations, with implications for evangelism, assurance of salvation, and perceptions of God's justice, though empirical resolution remains elusive given the doctrine's foundation in scriptural exegesis rather than observable causation.^[4]^[7]

Definition and Core Concepts

Biblical Foundations

The doctrine of predestination originates in New Testament texts that describe God's eternal purpose in electing certain individuals for salvation through Christ, prior to their birth or actions. The Greek term proorizō, translated as "predestined," appears explicitly in Romans 8:29–30, Ephesians 1:5, and Ephesians 1:11, emphasizing divine initiative over human will.^[8]^[9]^[10] These passages, primarily from the Apostle Paul, link predestination to God's foreknowledge and purpose, forming a "golden chain" of salvation: foreknowledge leading to predestination, calling, justification, and glorification. In Romans 8:29–30, Paul states: "For those whom he foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the image of his Son, in order that he might be the firstborn among many brothers. And those whom he predestined he also called, and those whom he called he also justified, and those whom he justified he also glorified."^[8] This sequence underscores an unbreakable divine order, where God's prior determination ensures the conformity of the elect to Christ, without reference to foreseen faith or works. Similarly, Ephesians 1:4–5 declares that God "chose us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and blameless before him. In love he predestined us for adoption to himself as sons through Jesus Christ, according to the purpose of his will."^[11] Here, election precedes creation and is grounded solely in God's will, aiming at adoption and holiness.^[12] Romans 9 further elaborates on God's sovereign election through the analogy of the potter and clay, asserting that it "depends not on human will or exertion, but on God, who has mercy" (Romans 9:16).^[13] Paul cites the divine choice of Jacob over Esau before their birth—"though they were not yet born and had done nothing either good or bad—in order that God's purpose of election might continue, not because of works but because of him who calls" (Romans 9:11)—to illustrate unconditional selection.^[14] This chapter extends to implications of reprobation, as God hardens whom he wills (Romans 9:18), raising vessels of wrath for the display of his power while preparing vessels of mercy for glory (Romans 9:22–23).^[15] Supporting texts include John's Gospel, where Jesus affirms: "All that the Father gives me will come to me, and whoever will come to me I will never cast out" (John 6:37), and "No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws him" (John 6:44), indicating divine drawing as prerequisite for belief.^[16] Acts 13:48 reports that "as many as were appointed to eternal life believed," linking faith directly to prior appointment.^[17] These verses collectively establish predestination as God's efficacious, eternal decree, centered on Christ and independent of human merit.^[18]

Key Theological Terms

Predestination denotes God's eternal decree whereby He sovereignly ordains future events, including the salvation or damnation of individuals, rooted in His infallible foreknowledge and unchangeable will.^[19] This term, derived from the Latin praedestinatio, encompasses both active divine causation and permissive allowance in theological formulations across Christian traditions.^[1] Election, or divine election, refers to God's pre-temporal selection of specific persons for salvation, grounded exclusively in His sovereign purpose rather than any anticipated human response or merit.^[20] Biblical passages such as Ephesians 1:4-5 describe this as choosing "in him before the foundation of the world," emphasizing its unconditional nature in Reformed interpretations.^[21] In contrast, some traditions condition election on foreseen faith, though proponents argue this conflates divine initiative with human contribution.^[22] Foreknowledge (proginosko in Greek) signifies God's comprehensive knowledge of all things actualized in time, but in predestinarian contexts, it implies not passive foresight but active foreordination, where God's knowing entails His determining.^[23] Romans 8:29 links it to predestination: "those whom he foreknew he also predestined," indicating that foreknowledge serves the electing decree rather than preceding it independently.^[22] Reprobation constitutes the negative aspect of predestination, wherein God either passes over the non-elect—leaving them to their self-determined sin (single decree view)—or actively ordains their condemnation to manifest justice (double decree view).^[24] Formulated in Reformed confessions like the Westminster (1646), it holds that reprobation displays God's holiness without implicating Him as author of sin, as the decree permits human culpability.^[25] In Calvinistic soteriology, these doctrines align with the TULIP framework, a mnemonic summarizing the Synod of Dort's (1618–1619) affirmations against Arminianism: Total Depravity (humanity's inherent inability to choose God due to sin's corruption, per Romans 3:10-18); Unconditional Election (salvation chosen without human preconditions); Limited Atonement (Christ's death efficaciously secures redemption for the elect alone, as in John 10:11); Irresistible Grace (the Holy Spirit's effectual call overcomes resistance, drawing the elect infallibly); and Perseverance of the Saints (the elect endure in faith by divine preservation, Philippians 1:6).^[26] Though the acronym emerged later (circa 1932), it encapsulates eternal decrees central to predestination.^[27] Debates within predestinarian thought distinguish supralapsarianism, which logically orders God's decrees with election and reprobation preceding the fall—thus permitting sin and the cross to glorify divine attributes—and infralapsarianism, which sequences the fall first, electing from a sinful mass without purposing reprobation as primary.^[28] The former, associated with figures like Theodore Beza, prioritizes God's glory in the decree's intent; the latter, more common in Reformed orthodoxy, mitigates implications of divine authorship in evil by viewing election as remedial post-lapsarian.^[29] Both affirm single predestination in practice but differ in logical priority, neither altering the temporal simultaneity of eternal decrees.^[30]

Logical and Philosophical Underpinnings

Divine Sovereignty and Causality

In theological formulations of predestination, divine sovereignty refers to God's absolute authority and efficacious governance over all creation, encompassing the ordination of every event from eternity. This sovereignty implies that God determines the salvation of individuals not based on their foreseen actions or merits, but solely according to His unchanging will, as articulated in the eternal decree. For instance, John Calvin describes predestination as God's compact with Himself regarding each person's eternal fate, wherein the divine will serves as the sole efficient cause, unconditioned by external factors. Similarly, Thomas Aquinas posits that predestination resides entirely in the predestiner—God—whose will acts as the first cause of salvation, predetermining some to glory through grace without dependency on human cooperation.^[31] Causality under divine sovereignty distinguishes between primary and secondary causes, with God as the uncaused originator of all chains of events. In this view, God's decree causally precedes and ordains secondary human actions, ensuring their occurrence while preserving distinctions to avoid implicating God as the author of evil; sin arises from the voluntary defection of finite wills under divine permission.^[32] Calvin emphasizes that the divine will is self-justifying and primary in causality, governing predestination to life or reprobation without recourse to human foreknowledge or merit as causal antecedents.^[6] Aquinas reinforces this by arguing that God's will, as the ultimate efficient cause, effects predestination independently, with creaturely freedom operating compatibilistically within the ordained framework—humans act according to their natures and desires, which God sovereignly sustains and directs.^[31] Philosophically, this causality aligns with a realist ontology where divine intentionality grounds all contingent realities, rejecting libertarian indeterminism in favor of compatibilism: human volitions are free insofar as they align with internal inclinations, yet fully determined by the sovereign causal order.^[33] Critics from Arminian traditions contend this risks undermining moral accountability by overemphasizing monocausality, but proponents counter that sovereignty's primacy logically follows from God's aseity and omniscience, rendering alternative causal loci (e.g., autonomous human will) incoherent with monotheistic theism.^[34] Empirical theological reflection, drawing on scriptural precedents like the hardening of Pharaoh's heart, illustrates sovereignty's causal efficacy in historical events without negating secondary agency.^[33]

Compatibility with Human Agency

In theological formulations of predestination, particularly within Reformed traditions, divine sovereignty in foreordaining human destinies is held to be compatible with human agency, defined as the capacity for voluntary action aligned with one's inclinations and nature. Compatibilism posits that human beings act freely when their choices proceed from their strongest motives without external coercion, even if those motives and the overall causal chain are ultimately ordained by God.^[35]^[36] This view distinguishes between liberty of spontaneity—acting according to desire—and libertarian free will, which requires indeterministic, self-caused choices independent of prior causes; the former preserves moral responsibility under divine determinism, as agents remain the authors of their actions in a causal sense.^[37] Jonathan Edwards, in his 1754 treatise Freedom of the Will, argues that the will is not a self-determining faculty but necessarily follows the greatest apparent good or strongest inclination, rendering true freedom compatible with moral necessity. For Edwards, sin and obedience are voluntary: the unregenerate freely choose rebellion because their nature inclines them to self-love over God, while the elect, enabled by grace, willingly pursue holiness without violating their transformed desires.^[38] This aligns with causal realism, where divine predestination operates through secondary causes—including human volitions—without rendering actions involuntary, as coercion implies action against one's will, not in accordance with it.^[39] Augustine of Hippo similarly reconciles predestination with free choice, asserting in On Grace and Free Will (c. 426–427 CE) that human liberty persists post-fall but is enslaved to sin, requiring divine grace for salutary decisions; predestination thus aids the elect's free will without negating it, as God prepares the will through prevenient aid while preserving accountability for rejection of truth.^[40] John Calvin echoes this in his Institutes of the Christian Religion (1536–1559), insisting that predestination neither excuses vice nor diminishes culpability, for reprobates sin willingly from their corrupt nature, and the elect respond responsibly to the gospel call ordained alongside their election.^[41] Critics, such as some Arminian theologians, contend this undermines genuine agency by making choices causally inevitable, but compatibilists counter that inevitability from internal necessity does not equate to compulsion, preserving praise or blame based on the agent's character.^[42] Empirically, biblical texts invoked for compatibility include Joseph's brothers' sale into slavery, where human malice is real yet overruled by divine purpose (Genesis 50:20), illustrating how agency operates within providential chains without contradiction. Philosophically, this avoids infinite regress in causation by grounding human actions in natures ordained by God, affirming that responsibility inheres in self-motion according to disposition, not randomness.^[36]

Historical Development

Pre-Christian and Biblical Origins

Concepts of divine determinism and fate appear in pre-Christian philosophies, particularly among the Stoics, who posited that all events unfold according to an inexorable chain governed by the rational principle of logos, rendering human actions necessitated yet aligned with cosmic order.^[43] This Stoic view, articulated by thinkers like Chrysippus around 280–207 BCE, emphasized acceptance of fate as providential but lacked the personal, electing sovereignty central to later Christian predestination, treating fate as an impersonal necessity rather than purposeful divine decree for salvation.^[44] Early Christian apologists, such as Justin Martyr in the 2nd century CE, explicitly rejected such fatalism to affirm human responsibility under God's governance.^[44] In the Hebrew Bible, foundational ideas of God's sovereign election emerge, portraying Yahweh's unconditional choice of individuals and nations independent of merit. God selects Abraham around 2000 BCE to form a covenant people, promising blessing through his offspring without prior qualification (Genesis 12:1–3).^[45] Similarly, the election of Jacob over Esau before their birth illustrates divine prerogative, as stated: "Yet I have loved Jacob, but Esau I have hated" (Malachi 1:2–3, circa 430 BCE), emphasizing God's purpose in choosing vessels for mercy or wrath.^[34] The hardening of Pharaoh's heart during the Exodus (circa 1446 BCE) further underscores causal divine initiative, where God raises him up to display power, raising questions of human agency under sovereign will (Exodus 9:12).^[34] The New Testament explicitly develops predestination through Pauline epistles, framing it as God's eternal plan for salvation. In Romans 8:28–30 (written circa 57 CE), Paul outlines a sequence: those God foreknew, he predestined to be conformed to Christ's image, called, justified, and glorified, attributing salvation wholly to divine initiative.^[1] Romans 9:9–23 (same epistle) reinforces this by analogizing to potter-clay sovereignty, asserting God's right to elect mercy recipients, including Gentiles, irrespective of works. Ephesians 1:4–5,11 (circa 60–62 CE) states believers were chosen in Christ before the world's foundation and predestined for adoption, according to God's pleasure and will, integrating corporate and individual aspects within Christ's redemptive purpose.^[46] These texts, analyzed in scholarly exegesis, ground predestination in God's unchanging counsel, distinguishing it from pre-Christian fatalism by its teleological focus on glorifying a personal God through elected redemption.^[1]

Patristic and Early Church Formulations

The patristic period saw initial formulations of predestination rooted in scriptural interpretations of divine election and foreknowledge, often balancing God's sovereignty with human volition. Ignatius of Antioch (c. 35–108 AD), in his Epistle to the Ephesians, addressed believers as "predestined before the ages" by the Father's eternal will, emphasizing unity in Christ's passion as evidence of divine selection independent of temporal merits.^[47] Similarly, Irenaeus of Lyons (c. 130–202 AD) described God as having "completed the number which He before determined with Himself," referring to those "ordained unto eternal life" through Christ's recapitulation of humanity, underscoring a predetermined divine plan for salvation amid human recapitulation.^[47] These early references invoked predestination to affirm God's initiative in gathering the elect, drawing from Pauline texts like Ephesians 1:4–5 and Romans 8:29–30, without resolving tensions with free choice. Subsequent fathers like Tertullian (c. 155–240 AD) advanced the concept by linking predestination to God's foreknowledge of human responses, yet maintained that divine counsel incorporates foreseen faith and obedience as conditions for election, as seen in his Against Marcion where salvation aligns with voluntary alignment to God's will.^[48] Origen of Alexandria (c. 185–253 AD) and Clement of Alexandria (c. 150–215 AD) emphasized conditional predestination, positing that God's foreknowledge predetermines based on anticipated free human cooperation with grace, rejecting deterministic interpretations to preserve moral accountability; Origen argued in On First Principles that souls' pre-existence and choices influence their earthly destinies under divine oversight.^[49] This synergism predominated in the Greek East, viewing predestination as God's eternal decree accommodating creaturely liberty rather than overriding it, a stance echoed in Athanasius of Alexandria's (c. 296–373 AD) defenses of grace as enabling, not coercing, response to the Incarnation. The most systematic patristic formulation emerged with Augustine of Hippo (354–430 AD), who, in response to Pelagianism's emphasis on human merit, articulated predestination as God's unmerited, eternal decree electing some to salvation through efficacious grace while passing over others, independent of foreseen works. In On the Predestination of the Saints (c. 428–429 AD), Augustine distinguished predestination as the "preparation for grace" versus grace itself, asserting that perseverance unto glory is a divine gift, not human achievement, grounded in Romans 9 and Ephesians 1 to counter claims of self-initiated faith.^[50] He maintained compatibility with secondary causality—human acts as real yet divinely ordained—while insisting primary causality resides in God's will, a causal realism that prioritized empirical scriptural exegesis over philosophical autonomy of the will. Pre-Augustinian figures like Hilary of Poitiers (c. 310–367 AD) and Ambrosiaster (4th century) anticipated elements of this by stressing unconditional election, but Augustine's anti-Pelagian treatises, including On the Gift of Perseverance, integrated them into a cohesive framework influencing Western theology.^[51] Eastern fathers, such as John Chrysostom (c. 347–407 AD), critiqued overly deterministic readings, favoring foreknowledge-based election to uphold moral responsibility, highlighting a patristic divide that persisted beyond the early church.^[52] Medieval scholastics, employing Aristotelian logic and dialectical methods, systematically refined Augustinian predestination by addressing its compatibility with human free will and divine foreknowledge. Peter Lombard, in his Sentences (c. 1150), established predestination as God's unconditional election through mercy, independent of foreseen merits, asserting that the predestined cannot perish and the reprobate cannot be saved, thereby setting a foundational framework for subsequent commentaries.^[53]^[54] This text became the standard theological textbook, prompting generations of scholars to distinguish predestination (to grace and glory) from reprobation (permission of sin without causation).^[55] Anselm of Canterbury (1033–1109), in works like De Concordia Praescientiae et Praedestinationis et Gratiae cum Libero Arbitrio, reconciled divine necessity with contingency by arguing that God's timeless foreknowledge does not impose necessity on future free acts, preserving human ability to choose rightly under grace without implying Pelagian self-sufficiency.^[56]^[57] He posited that grace enables free choice, countering views that pitted predestination against liberty, and emphasized God's goodness as necessitating the salvation of the elect through non-coercive divine aid. Thomas Aquinas (1225–1274), in Summa Theologica (I, q. 23), advanced this by defining predestination as God's eternal decree applying created things to their end, prior to the distribution of grace and independent of foreseen merits, which follow as effects rather than causes.^[58] He reconciled it with free will through the distinction of primary (divine) and secondary (human) causality: God's efficacious grace infallibly moves the will to act freely, as the will's inclination toward the good aligns with divine motion without compulsion.^[32] Aquinas thus prioritized predestination to glory before grace, viewing reprobation as permissive rather than active, grounded in divine simplicity and intellect.^[59] John Duns Scotus (c. 1266–1308) introduced voluntarist nuances, insisting predestination stems absolutely from God's will, not intellect alone, with Christ's predestination logically prior to creation or the fall, rendering human merits subsequent and non-causal.^[60]^[61] Unlike Aquinas' stronger emphasis on divine necessity, Scotus highlighted God's absolute power (potentia absoluta) to decree salvation freely, while upholding free will as rational self-determination under grace, thus guarding against determinism by sequencing divine decrees independently of foreseen demerits.^[62] These refinements, amid debates on merit and necessity, fortified predestination against semi-Pelagian critiques, influencing later Catholic theology.^[63]

Reformation and Counter-Reformation Debates

The Reformation debates on predestination intensified with Martin Luther's The Bondage of the Will (1525), a direct response to Desiderius Erasmus's On the Freedom of the Will (1524), where Erasmus argued that humans retain sufficient free will to cooperate with grace for salvation, distinguishing divine foreknowledge from causal predestination.^[64] Luther countered that human will, enslaved by sin post-Fall, lacks freedom in spiritual matters and cannot initiate faith or good works without God's prior regenerative grace, grounding salvation solely in divine election to avoid attributing merit to human effort.^[65] While Luther emphasized God's sovereign foreknowledge and a single decree of election for the saved—foreseeing their faith through grace—he avoided systematizing reprobation as symmetric to election, viewing speculation on the damned as presumptuous intrusion into divine secrets.^[66] John Calvin advanced a more comprehensive framework in his Institutes of the Christian Religion, particularly Book 3, Chapter 21 of the 1559 edition, asserting double predestination: God eternally elects some to salvation through Christ while ordaining others to destruction for manifestation of divine justice, independent of foreseen faith or works to preserve unmerited grace.^[41] Calvin argued this doctrine, rooted in Romans 8–9 and Ephesians 1, upholds God's absolute sovereignty against semi-Pelagian compromises, warning that denying it undermines assurance of salvation by shifting focus to human ability. These Protestant positions sparked intra-Reformation tensions, as Lutherans like Philipp Melanchthon later softened toward conditional election based on foreseen faith, contrasting Calvin's stricter supralapsarian emphasis on God's decree logically prior to the Fall. In the Counter-Reformation, the Council of Trent (1545–1563) explicitly rejected absolute predestination in its Sixth Session Decree on Justification (January 13, 1547), affirming that free will, though wounded by sin, cooperates with prevenient grace and that predestination involves God's foreknowledge of human merits or faith, not an unconditional decree excluding human response.^[67] Canon 4 condemned views that grace operates without free will's consent, and Canon 17 rejected assurance of salvation based on predestination alone, labeling such presumption a denial of the "hidden mystery" of divine election while upholding sufficient grace for all but requiring cooperation.^[67] This Thomistic-inflected stance, prioritizing synergy over monergism, aimed to refute Protestant determinism, later elaborated by Luis de Molina's Concordia (1588) introducing middle knowledge—God's hypothetical awareness of free creaturely choices—to reconcile sovereignty with libertarian freedom, though Trent itself avoided such innovations.^[68]

Post-Reformation Developments

The Synod of Dort, convened from 1618 to 1619 by the Dutch Reformed Church, represented a decisive post-Reformation consolidation of predestinarian doctrine against Arminian challenges. Responding to the Remonstrants' five articles, which emphasized conditional election based on foreseen faith, the synod affirmed unconditional election, divine sovereignty in reprobation, and the perseverance of the saints in its Canons, particularly in the First Head on Divine Election and Reprobation.^[69]^[70] These canons rejected the notion that human will plays a decisive role in salvation apart from efficacious grace, insisting that God's decree precedes and determines human response.^[69] The decisions influenced Reformed confessions worldwide, embedding predestination as a hallmark of orthodox Calvinism while condemning Arminian views as semi-Pelagian.^[70] In England and New England, Puritan theologians extended Reformation predestination amid civil wars and colonial expansion. Figures like William Perkins systematized it in works such as A Golden Chain (1591), linking election to covenant theology, while emphasizing practical piety to assure believers of their calling.^[71] Jonathan Edwards, in his Freedom of the Will (1754), defended compatibilist predestination, arguing that divine causation does not negate voluntary human action but grounds it, countering Arminian and Enlightenment critiques of determinism.^[72] Edwards posited that the will inclines toward the greatest apparent good, with God's sovereign decree shaping those inclinations without coercion, thus preserving moral responsibility amid absolute foreordination.^[72] Catholic responses diverged sharply, with Jansenism emerging in the 17th century as a rigorist revival of Augustinian predestination. Cornelis Jansen's Augustinus (1640) argued for irresistible grace and limited sufficiency, echoing Calvin but within a Thomistic framework, claiming that postlapsarian human will cannot cooperate without prior regeneration.^[73] The movement, influential in France via Port-Royal, faced papal condemnation in 1653 and 1713 for implying insufficient grace for the non-elect and undermining free cooperation with divine aid, as articulated in Unigenitus.^[73] This highlighted ongoing tensions between predestinarian emphasis on sovereignty and Catholic synergism, where grace enables but does not compel assent.^[73] Arminianism persisted beyond Dort, evolving through Anglican and Methodist channels. John Wesley, drawing on Remonstrant precedents, promoted "prevenient grace" as universally restoring free will, allowing conditional election based on faith response, which gained traction in 18th-century revivals despite Dort's rejection of foreseen faith as the decree's ground.^[74] This view contrasted with Reformed perseverance by allowing apostasy, influencing Wesleyan traditions where predestination receded in favor of cooperative soteriology.^[75] In the 19th and 20th centuries, Reformed predestination faced rationalist challenges but saw refinements in Princeton theology, where Charles Hodge defended supralapsarian elements while upholding double predestination as biblically warranted.^[76] Karl Barth's Church Dogmatics (1936–1968) radically reoriented election Christocentrically, positing Christ as both the electing God and reprobate humanity, such that predestination reveals God's self-determination for reconciliation rather than individual decrees, mitigating traditional reprobation's implications.^[77] Barth critiqued classical views for speculatively dividing humanity, insisting election's object is solely Christ's person, with reprobation as the shadow of divine yes to the world.^[77] These developments underscore predestination's enduring role in ecclesial identity, balancing sovereignty with pastoral application amid philosophical scrutiny.^[76]

Denominational and Traditional Views

Reformed and Calvinist Perspectives

In Reformed theology, predestination is understood as God's eternal and unchangeable decree by which He sovereignly ordains whatsoever comes to pass, including the salvation of the elect and the reprobation of the non-elect, independent of any foreseen merit or faith in the individuals concerned.^[78] This doctrine emphasizes divine sovereignty as the ultimate cause of salvation, with human agency secondary and enabled solely by God's efficacious grace, ensuring that election originates solely in God's will rather than human works or decisions. John Calvin, a pivotal figure in its formulation, described predestination as the eternal election of some to salvation and others to destruction, rooted in God's inscrutable counsel and not human deserving, as detailed in Book 3, Chapter 21 of his Institutes of the Christian Religion (first published in 1536, with expanded editions through 1559).^[78] Calvin affirmed a form of double predestination, wherein God not only actively elects individuals to eternal life but also justly ordains the reprobate to perdition as a manifestation of His justice, though he cautioned against speculative probing into the hidden grounds of this decree to avoid presumption.^[78] This view was systematized in confessional documents such as the Canons of Dort (1618–1619), which responded to Arminian challenges by asserting unconditional election—God's choice of individuals to salvation based purely on His sovereign pleasure—and the efficacy of grace in drawing the elect irresistibly to faith.^[69] The Canons reject any conditioning of election on foreseen human response, insisting instead that fallen humanity's total depravity renders all spiritually dead and incapable of contributing to salvation apart from regenerating grace.^[69] The Westminster Confession of Faith (1646–1647), a cornerstone of Presbyterian Reformed orthodoxy, echoes these principles in Chapter 3, "Of God's Eternal Decree," stating that God hath "ordained whatsoever comes to pass" for His own glory, including the free actions of secondary causes like human choices, while predestinating the elect to life through Christ and foreordaining the rest to dishonor and wrath consistent with their sin.^[79] This framework integrates predestination with the doctrines later summarized by the TULIP acrostic (derived from the Canons of Dort but popularized in the 20th century), particularly Unconditional Election (God's choice not based on foreseen faith) and Perseverance of the Saints (the elect's preservation unto glory by divine power).^[80] Reformed thinkers maintain that this doctrine upholds God's aseity and causality, attributing salvation wholly to divine initiative while rendering human responsibility coherent through compatibilism—where divine determination and voluntary human action coexist without contradiction.^[79] Variations exist, such as infralapsarianism (decree of election post-fall, emphasizing reprobation as divine permission of sin) versus supralapsarianism (decree logically prior to the fall, viewing reprobation as active ordination), but both affirm the decree's eternity and immutability.^[79]

Arminian and Remonstrant Positions

Arminian theology, originating with Dutch theologian Jacobus Arminius (1560–1609), rejects the Calvinist doctrine of unconditional election in favor of a conditional predestination rooted in God's foreknowledge of human faith. Arminius maintained that predestination serves as the foundation of Christian salvation but must align with divine justice and human accountability, decreeing eternal life for those foreseen as responding positively to grace through faith in Christ, while permitting the perdition of the unrepentant without actively predestining them to damnation.^[81] In his Declaration of Sentiments (1608), Arminius emphasized that God elects no sinner apart from Christ and conditions predestination on the believer's union with Him, thereby preserving free will as compatible with divine sovereignty.^[82] The Remonstrants, Arminius's posthumous adherents led by figures such as Johannes Uytenbogaert, articulated this stance in the Five Articles of Remonstrance submitted to the States-General of the Netherlands on May 13, 1610. Article I explicitly affirms conditional predestination: "God, from eternity, has immutably decreed... to bestow salvation on those to whom He intends... to give faith in Christ and by which they persevere," while decreeing punishment for those "whom He foresaw would persevere" in unbelief, without making faith or unbelief the efficient cause of the decree itself.^[83] This formulation underscores that election depends not on an absolute sovereign will independent of creaturely response, but on God's prescience of faith enabled by prevenient grace—a universal divine assistance restoring free will post-Fall, though resistible by human volition.^[84] Remonstrant thought thus posits single predestination, wherein God actively elects to salvation based on foreseen perseverance in faith, but passively permits reprobation as a consequence of foreseen rejection, avoiding the notion of double predestination to damnation as incompatible with God's benevolence.^[85] This perspective integrates human agency into soteriology, arguing that total depravity renders the will incapable of unaided faith (Article III), yet sufficient grace empowers genuine choice without coercion.^[83] The Synod of Dort (1618–1619) condemned these views as Pelagian-leaning, exiling many Remonstrants, but the doctrines persisted in Methodist and Wesleyan traditions, influencing modern evangelical Arminianism.^[84]

Catholic and Thomistic Interpretations

In Catholic theology, predestination refers to God's eternal decree, as part of His providential governance, to apply the merits of Christ's redemption to specific individuals, directing them to supernatural beatitude through sanctifying grace. This doctrine affirms that salvation originates solely from God's initiative, yet requires human free cooperation with grace, rejecting any notion of fatalism or coercion. The Council of Trent, in its sixth session on justification (1547), described predestination as a "hidden mystery" of divine election, emphasizing that no one in mortal life should presume upon it with rash confidence, as election depends on persevering in charity until death, while the non-elect remain capable of conversion through sufficient grace.^[67] The Church teaches universal salvific will (1 Timothy 2:4), providing sufficient grace to all for salvation, but efficacious grace—irresistibly leading to meritorious acts—is granted to the elect, who freely respond.^[67] Thomistic interpretation, drawn from Thomas Aquinas's Summa Theologica (Prima Pars, q. 23, written ca. 1265–1274), integrates predestination within divine providence as the application of universal causality to particular rational creatures for eternal life. Aquinas posits that God predestines unconditionally, not based on foreseen merits (which presuppose grace), but according to His sovereign wisdom and goodness, foreordaining both the grace and the free acts by which the elect attain glory.^[31] This efficacy stems from God's intrinsic motion of the will as primary cause, which actualizes the will's potency without violating its liberty as secondary cause; the will remains free because it operates according to its nature, inclined toward the good presented by grace.^[31] Aquinas distinguishes predestination (positive decree to glory) from reprobation (negative permission of sin and final impenitence), rejecting double predestination by denying any active divine causation of damnation, which would imply injustice.^[31] Aquinas further clarifies that predestination encompasses not only final glory but preparatory graces, ordered in a "book of life" known eternally to God, ensuring infallible outcomes while preserving contingency in human acts from the creaturely perspective. This framework counters deterministic interpretations by grounding freedom in the will's rational appetite for the end ordained by God, who "draws" the elect without force (cf. John 6:44). Thomists, following Aquinas, uphold physical premotion—God's unresisted influence rendering the will efficacious—against alternative Catholic views like Molinism, which invoke middle knowledge of hypothetical free acts, though both affirm compatibility with defined dogma.^[31] The doctrine underscores divine mercy's primacy, as the elect's merits derive entirely from gratuitous grace, not intrinsic human excellence.^[31]

Eastern Orthodox and Synergistic Approaches

In Eastern Orthodox theology, predestination is understood not as an arbitrary divine decree determining individual salvation or damnation irrespective of human response, but as God's foreknowledge of human choices in synergy with His universal offer of grace. This view preserves human free will as essential to the salvific process, rejecting monergistic interpretations where grace operates unilaterally without human cooperation. The term synergia—cooperation between divine energy and human volition—encapsulates this dynamic, rooted in the patristic consensus that salvation is a joint endeavor initiated by God but requiring free assent from the individual.^[86]^[87] Orthodox doctrine emphasizes that God desires the salvation of all persons (1 Timothy 2:4), providing prevenient grace sufficient for every individual to respond positively, yet this grace saves only those who freely desire it, as articulated by St. John Chrysostom: "Grace, though it is grace, yet it saves only those who desire." Predestination thus aligns with divine foreknowledge of virtuous lives and noble dispositions, rather than predetermining reprobation; damnation results from self-chosen rejection of God, not divine caprice. St. John of Damascus further clarifies that God's will for salvation is "preliminary," contingent upon human synergy, while St. Gregory the Theologian states, "Salvation must be our work and God's." This framework integrates scriptural passages like Romans 8:28-30 and Ephesians 1:3-12, interpreting predestination as God's eternal plan to unite humanity in Christ through foreseen free cooperation, not irresistible compulsion.^[86]^[88]^[87] Synergistic soteriology, central to Orthodoxy, contrasts with Augustinian and Reformed emphases on total depravity necessitating unilateral regeneration, instead affirming that post-Fall humanity retains sufficient freedom to cooperate with grace toward theosis (deification). St. John Cassian (c. 360–435), a key patristic figure, exemplifies this by describing grace and free will as complementary, enabling ascetic struggle and moral transformation without Pelagian self-sufficiency or deterministic passivity. The [Orthodox Church](/page/Orthodox Church) maintains this position as the apostolic tradition, unaltered by later Western developments like double predestination, which it views as incompatible with divine philanthropy and human accountability. Salvation remains a lifelong process of synergy, involving sacraments, prayer, and ethical living, where apostasy is possible through willful abandonment of grace.^[89]^[90]^[86]

Other Christian Traditions

Lutheran theology, as formulated in the Formula of Concord (1577), affirms single predestination, whereby God eternally elects individuals to salvation through Christ by grace alone, without regard to foreseen merit or works, while rejecting double predestination that would decree damnation independently of human sin.^[91] This view holds that reprobation arises from humanity's willful rejection of the Gospel, not a parallel divine act of reproving, to preserve divine mercy and avoid speculation into God's hidden will.^[92] The Lutheran Church–Missouri Synod, for instance, teaches that Scripture supports predestination to salvation (e.g., Ephesians 1:4–5) but urges focus on the revealed Gospel promise rather than philosophical inquiries that undermine assurance of faith.^[93] Anglican doctrine, outlined in Article XVII of the Thirty-Nine Articles (1563), declares predestination to life as God's unchanging purpose from eternity to deliver the elect from curse and damnation through Christ, foreknown and predestined to adoption as sons (Romans 8:29–30).^[94] It explicitly warns against delving into the status of the non-elect, as such speculation has historically fostered either presumptuous security or despairing fatalism, emphasizing instead the comfort predestination provides to believers.^[95] Modern Anglicanism exhibits diversity, with some evangelicals leaning Calvinistic and others Arminian, but the Articles maintain compatibility with conditional elements tied to covenantal faithfulness without mandating double predestination.^[96] Baptist traditions display significant variation on predestination, reflecting historical splits between Particular (Calvinistic) and General (Arminian) Baptists since the 17th century. Reformed Baptists uphold unconditional election as part of God's sovereign decree, predestining the elect to faith and perseverance (e.g., the 1689 London Baptist Confession).^[97] In contrast, many Free Will Baptists and Southern Baptists reject strict predestination, affirming that election is conditional on foreseen faith enabled by grace, with the Southern Baptist Convention's Baptist Faith and Message (2000) allowing interpretive latitude without endorsing either TULIP's unconditional election or absolute free will apart from divine enablement.^[98] Wesleyan-Methodist perspectives, building on John Wesley's sermons (e.g., "On Predestination," 1752), interpret predestination as God's foreknowledge of those who will freely respond to prevenient grace, which universally restores human ability to accept or reject salvation, thus rejecting unconditional decree as incompatible with divine justice and universal gospel offer (1 Timothy 2:4).^[99] This synergism prioritizes free agency under grace, with election securing the faithful's conformity to Christ rather than arbitrarily selecting individuals irrespective of response.^[100] Anabaptist and Radical Reformation heirs, including Mennonites and Amish, generally eschew predestination doctrines, emphasizing believer's baptism and voluntary faith commitment as evidence against any preemptive divine determinism, viewing salvation as contingent on personal repentance and obedience rather than eternal decree.^[101] Influential Anabaptist thinkers like Balthasar Hubmaier (executed 1528) reconciled divine foreknowledge with libertarian free will, arguing humans retain capacity for genuine choice in spiritual matters.^[102] Pentecostal and charismatic traditions, emerging in the early 20th century (e.g., Azusa Street Revival, 1906), align closely with Arminian emphases on free will, interpreting predestination texts (Ephesians 1:5) corporately as God's plan to conform believers to Christ's image through Spirit-enabled response, while rejecting individual unconditional election to avoid undermining evangelism and personal accountability.^[103] Official statements from Assemblies of God (position paper, 1972, reaffirmed) affirm that all can be saved via faith, with no secret decree predetermining damnation.^[104]

Variants of Predestinarian Doctrine

Unconditional vs. Conditional Election

Unconditional election, a core tenet of Reformed theology, asserts that God's selection of individuals for salvation occurs sovereignly and independently of any foreseen actions, merits, or conditions within those persons, resting solely on His eternal decree and good pleasure. This doctrine, articulated in confessional standards such as the Westminster Confession of Faith (1646), Chapter III, emphasizes that election precedes and determines human response, as humans in their fallen state lack the capacity for faith apart from divine regeneration. Proponents cite passages like Ephesians 1:4-5, where God chooses believers "before the foundation of the world" according to the purpose of His will, and Romans 9:11-16, which states that election depends "not on human will or exertion, but on God, who has mercy," underscoring that the choice is not based on anticipated belief or obedience.^[105]^[106]^[107] In contrast, conditional election, associated with Arminian and Remonstrant theology, posits that God's election to salvation is contingent upon His foreknowledge of an individual's faith in Christ, such that the foreseen exercise of free will serves as the condition fulfilling divine decree. This view originates in the Five Articles of Remonstrance (1610), particularly Article I, which declares that God "has immutably decreed, from eternity, to bestow salvation on all those whom He foresaw would persevere in faith unto the end." Advocates reference texts like 1 Peter 1:1-2, linking election to foreknowledge, and Romans 8:29, interpreting "foreknew" as prescience of responsive belief rather than causative determination. The Synod of Dort (1618-1619) rejected this position, affirming instead that such conditioning undermines divine sovereignty by making human response the ultimate arbiter.^[108]^[84]^[109] The debate hinges on interpretations of divine foreknowledge and human agency: unconditional election prioritizes God's aseity and the incomprehensibility of His will, arguing that conditioning election on foreseen faith introduces a human-centric criterion incompatible with total depravity, as no one would believe without prior efficacious grace. Conditional election counters that it preserves genuine moral responsibility and aligns with scriptural calls to believe (e.g., John 3:16), avoiding implications of arbitrary divine favoritism. Historical tensions culminated in the Canons of Dort, which upheld unconditional election against Remonstrant conditionalism, influencing subsequent Reformed confessions while Arminian variants persisted in Methodist and Wesleyan traditions.^[110]^[111]

Single vs. Double Predestination

Single predestination is the theological position that God eternally elects specific individuals to salvation through grace, while those not elected remain in their fallen state and are condemned on account of their own sin, without God actively decreeing their damnation.^[112] This view emphasizes divine initiative in election but attributes reprobation—non-election—to human culpability rather than a parallel divine act of condemnation.^[113] It is commonly associated with Lutheran theology, where the Formula of Concord (1577) affirms God's election of the saved but rejects any notion that God predestines anyone to perdition, insisting instead that the damned perish by their willful rejection of grace.^[91] Double predestination, in contrast, holds that God's eternal decree encompasses both election to salvation and active reprobation to damnation, such that God sovereignly ordains the eternal destiny of all individuals, including the positive willing of destruction for the non-elect.^[114] John Calvin articulated this doctrine explicitly in his Institutes of the Christian Religion, defining predestination as "the eternal decree of God, by which he determined with himself whatever he wished to happen with each man," encompassing both the saved, whom he calls to salvation, and the reprobate, whom he ordains to destruction irrespective of foreseen merits or demerits.^[115] Calvin maintained this teaching from the first edition of the Institutes in 1536 onward, viewing reprobation as integral to magnifying divine grace in election, though he described the decree as a "horrible" mystery that underscores human unworthiness.^[32] The primary distinction between the two lies in the symmetry and mode of divine action: single predestination posits an asymmetry where election involves active, efficacious grace, but reprobation is permissive—God simply passes over the non-elect, allowing sin's consequences to unfold—thus avoiding the implication of God as the author of evil.^[6] Double predestination, as taught by Calvin, rejects this asymmetry in extent, affirming that God's decree equally determines both outcomes, though not symmetrically in causation, since election flows from mercy and reprobation from justice toward sin already decreed in the divine counsel.^[112] Reformed confessions like the Westminster Confession of Faith (1646) imply double predestination by stating God ordains whatsoever comes to pass, including the "passing by" of the non-elect in a manner that fulfills his decree of judgment, but many Reformed theologians, such as R.C. Sproul, clarify that reprobation remains judicial rather than arbitrary, rooted in God's foreknowledge of sin within his eternal plan.^[113] Debates over these doctrines often center on scriptural texts like Romans 9:21–23, where Paul describes God as the potter forming vessels of wrath and mercy, which Calvinists cite as evidence for double predestination's active decree, while single predestinarians interpret the "hardening" of Pharaoh as a response to sin rather than an initiating cause.^[114] Critics of double predestination, including some within Reformed circles, argue it risks portraying God as capricious, prompting distinctions like "active-passive" reprobation to preserve divine holiness, whereas proponents contend that single predestination undermines full sovereignty by introducing contingency into damnation.^[116] Historically, the Synod of Dort (1618–1619) endorsed elements of double predestination in rejecting Arminian conditional election, affirming God's decree as the ultimate cause of salvation and perdition alike, though without using the term explicitly.^[115]

Infralapsarianism and Supralapsarianism

Infralapsarianism and supralapsarianism represent two positions within Reformed theology concerning the logical order of God's eternal decrees relative to the fall of humanity into sin. Both views affirm the absolute sovereignty of God in predestination and are compatible with double predestination, but they differ in the sequence of divine purposes: infralapsarianism ("after the fall") posits that God's decree of election logically follows his decrees to create humanity and permit the fall, viewing election as an act of mercy toward some within the fallen mass of sinners; supralapsarianism ("before the fall"), by contrast, holds that the decree of election and reprobation precedes the decrees of creation and fall, emphasizing God's ultimate purpose to glorify himself through the differentiation of the elect and reprobate even prior to contemplating human sinfulness.^[28]^[117] The infralapsarian order of decrees is typically articulated as follows: first, God's decree to create human beings in his image; second, the decree to permit the fall into sin, rendering all humanity guilty and corrupt; third, the decree to elect some from this fallen mass to eternal life through Christ while passing over (or reprobating) the rest, leaving them to their deserved condemnation; and finally, decrees related to the means of salvation, such as the atonement and effectual calling for the elect.^[29]^[118] This view underscores God's justice in responding to sin already decreed, portraying reprobation as a judicial act of non-election rather than a positive decree of damnation for its own sake. Supralapsarians, however, sequence the decrees with election and reprobation first—God sovereignly choosing some individuals (as unfallen) for salvation and others for destruction to manifest his attributes of mercy and justice—followed by decrees to create those individuals, permit their fall (or ordain it in some formulations), and orchestrate redemptive history accordingly.^[28]^[119] These positions emerged as points of intra-Reformed debate in the late 16th and early 17th centuries, particularly among post-Reformation scholastics seeking to systematize Calvin's teachings on predestination. Supralapsarianism found early advocates in figures like Theodore Beza (1519–1605), who emphasized the primacy of God's glory in the eternal counsel, and later in some Dutch theologians such as Gisbertus Voetius (1589–1676), though it remained a minority stance. Infralapsarianism, defended by theologians like Francis Turretin (1623–1687) and William Ames (1576–1633), gained broader acceptance for its alignment with scriptural emphases on human sinfulness preceding divine mercy, as in Ephesians 2:1–5, which describes the elect as "dead in trespasses and sins" prior to regeneration.^[117]^[120] Major Reformed confessional standards reflect an infralapsarian framework without explicitly excluding supralapsarianism. The Synod of Dort (1618–1619), convened to counter Arminianism, adopted language in its Canons (Head 1, Article 6) describing election as occurring "out of the whole human race, fallen by its own fault from its primitive state of rectitude into sin and destruction," indicating a post-fall logical priority, though a minority of supralapsarian delegates participated without formal condemnation of their view. Similarly, the Westminster Confession of Faith (1646), in Chapter 3, section 5, states that God decreed "some men and angels" to be predestinated to everlasting life after the fall had rendered humanity "altogether indisposed, disabled, and made opposite to all good," embedding an infralapsarian sequence while maintaining confessional ambiguity on the debate's finer points. No major Reformed confession endorses supralapsarianism outright, and infralapsarianism has historically predominated, comprising the viewpoint of most Calvinist theologians and assemblies.^[120]^[121]^[122] The debate centers not on chronological timing—all agree the decrees are eternal and simultaneous—but on their logical relations, with supralapsarians arguing that God's teleological end (his glory in election and reprobation) must precede means (creation and fall), while infralapsarians prioritize the decretive order mirroring historical execution to avoid implying God ordains sin for reprobation independently of human guilt. Critics of supralapsarianism, including some Reformed thinkers, contend it risks portraying God as decreeing the fall primarily to populate hell, potentially undermining divine benevolence, though proponents counter that it better safeguards sovereignty by making all events subservient to the ultimate decree of differentiation. Infralapsarianism, in turn, is sometimes accused of subordinating God's glory to human contingency, yet it aligns more closely with the confessional emphasis on sin's reality as the occasion for mercy. Both views uphold the incomprehensibility of the divine mind, as per Isaiah 55:8–9, and reject speculation beyond revealed truth.^[29]^[28]

Corporate Election Theories

Corporate election theory posits that divine election in Scripture primarily concerns groups or entities, such as the nation of Israel or the Church as the body of Christ, rather than the unconditional selection of specific individuals for salvation.^[123] Proponents argue that God elects Christ as the head, with believers becoming elect by virtue of their union with Him through faith, emphasizing a collective destiny predetermined by God while preserving individual responsibility in responding to the gospel.^[124] This view interprets passages like Ephesians 1:4—"He chose us in him before the foundation of the world"—as referring to the corporate "us" incorporated into Christ, not a pre-temporal selection of discrete persons.^[125] The theory draws support from Old Testament precedents, such as God's election of Israel as a covenant people in Deuteronomy 7:6-8, where the choice is framed nationally and vocationally rather than individually deterministic.^[126] In the New Testament, Romans 9-11 is seen as addressing the election of Jews and Gentiles into one corporate body, with individual inclusion contingent upon faith rather than divine decree apart from human response.^[127] Predestination, in this framework, applies to the corporate plan of salvation—God's foreordination of the Church's role and destiny—while individual salvation aligns with foreseen belief, avoiding implications of arbitrary exclusion.^[128] Key proponents include evangelical scholars like Brian Abasciano, who in works such as Paul's Use of the Old Testament in Romans 9:1-9 (2005) argues for a corporate reading grounded in Second Temple Jewish understandings of election as communal.^[129] William W. Klein, in The New Chosen People: A Corporate View of Election (1990, revised 2015), contends that New Testament election language mirrors corporate patterns from the Hebrew Scriptures, critiquing individualist interpretations as anachronistic imports from later scholasticism.^[130] This perspective has gained traction among some Arminian and free-will advocates since the mid-20th century, as a biblically faithful alternative to Calvinist unconditional election, though it remains contested for potentially underemphasizing personal divine initiative in passages like Acts 13:48.^[131] Critics, including Reformed theologians like Thomas R. Schreiner, maintain that corporate election abstracts away from the individualized language of election in texts such as 2 Timothy 2:10 and fails to account for the eternal, unchangeable nature of God's decrees on persons.^[132] Empirical analysis of Greek terms like eklegomai (to choose) across 22 New Testament occurrences reveals a mix of corporate and individual applications, with corporate theory prioritizing contextual corporate settings to resolve tensions with human agency.^[126] Despite debates, the view underscores a causal realism in which God's sovereign plan operates through predictable means—faith as the instrument of incorporation—aligning predestination with observed patterns of gospel response across history, such as the 20th-century global growth of Christianity from 558 million adherents in 1970 to over 2.5 billion by 2020, attributable to voluntary belief rather than coerced selection.^[124]

Middle Knowledge and Molinism

Middle knowledge, or scientia media, refers to God's prevolitional knowledge of counterfactuals of creaturely freedom—what any free creature would freely do in any possible set of circumstances.^[133] This concept was introduced by the 16th-century Spanish Jesuit theologian Luis de Molina in his 1588 treatise Concordia liberi arbitrii cum gratiae donis, divina praescientia, providentia, praedestinatione et reprobatione (The Harmony of Free Will with the Gifts of Grace, Divine Foreknowledge, Providence, Predestination, and Reprobation), amid debates between Dominican Thomists and Jesuit defenders of human liberty.^[134] Molina positioned middle knowledge logically between God's natural knowledge of all necessary truths and possibilities (e.g., logical and metaphysical necessities) and God's free knowledge of what he actually decrees to occur in the actualized world.^[133] Through middle knowledge, God comprehends the full range of feasible worlds, each defined by the hypothetical free responses of agents to varying circumstances, without those responses being causally determined by divine decree.^[135] Molinism, the theological framework built on this doctrine, posits that divine sovereignty and genuine libertarian human freedom are compatible because God exercises providential control by selecting, via middle knowledge, which feasible world to actualize.^[136] In the context of predestination, Molinism maintains that God elects individuals to salvation not arbitrarily or irresistibly but by actualizing a world in which those he predestines freely cooperate with efficacious grace in the circumstances he sovereignly arranges.^[137] This approach avoids both Calvinist unconditional election (which Molinists argue negates libertarian freedom) and simple Arminian foreknowledge (which knows only what will occur in the chosen future but lacks explanatory power for God's selection among possible futures).^[138] Unlike Arminianism's reliance on God's exhaustive foreknowledge of a single fixed future contingent on creaturely choices, Molinism's middle knowledge enables God to know and counterfactually reason about all possible free actions prior to decreeing, allowing predestination to align with foreseen voluntary faith without reducing providence to passive observation.^[139] Molina defended this via scriptural appeals, such as 1 Samuel 23:11-12 (where God reveals David's hypothetical actions), and philosophical arguments that counterfactual truths are grounded in the natures of free agents themselves.^[135] The doctrine faced immediate scrutiny, particularly from Thomists like Domingo Báñez, who contended that middle knowledge implies divine dependence on creaturely contingencies, potentially undermining aseity and exhaustive sovereignty.^[134] Protestant reformers, including Calvinists, similarly rejected it, arguing that true predestination requires causal determination rather than counterfactual arrangement, as libertarian counterfactuals lack sufficient grounding independent of God's will.^[140] Despite papal review in the 1600s yielding no condemnation, Molinism persists in Catholic and some evangelical circles as a middle path, with modern proponents like William Lane Craig emphasizing its utility in explaining divine providence over evil and unanswered prayer without fatalism.^[141] Empirical assessments of its coherence remain debated, as it presupposes the existence of counterfactual truths verifiable only through logical consistency rather than direct observation, yet it aligns with biblical motifs of conditional divine responses (e.g., Matthew 11:21-23).^[142]

Controversies and Criticisms

Tensions with Free Will and Moral Responsibility

Predestinarian doctrines, particularly those emphasizing unconditional divine election, posit that God's eternal decree determines the eternal destinies of individuals prior to their existence or choices, thereby challenging conceptions of human free will as libertarian—i.e., the ability to originate actions without ultimate causal determination.^[143] This tension arises because moral responsibility intuitively requires agents to be ultimate sources of their actions, such that praise or blame attaches genuinely to voluntary decisions rather than predetermined outcomes.^[144] In theological contexts, if salvation or damnation is irrevocably fixed by divine sovereignty independent of human merit or response, critics argue that humans cannot be held accountable for failing to choose faith or persisting in sin, as their wills are causally necessitated.^[145] Proponents of strict predestination, drawing from Augustine of Hippo (354–430 CE) and John Calvin (1509–1564 CE), reconcile this via compatibilism, defining free will not as indeterminism but as voluntary action aligned with one's strongest desires, even under divine causation or human depravity. Augustine, in works like On the Free Choice of the Will (c. 395 CE), maintained that post-Fall human will remains free in a compatibilist sense—capable of choosing according to nature—but enslaved to sin without efficacious grace, which God predestines to liberate the elect.^[146] Calvin echoed this in Institutes of the Christian Religion (1536–1559), asserting the will's bondage to sin renders it unfree to choose God unaided, yet actions remain "free" insofar as they proceed from internal volition, preserving secondary causation and moral culpability for sin while attributing primary efficacy to God's decree.^[6] Under this view, moral responsibility endures because sinners willingly endorse their rebellion, akin to a prisoner "freely" choosing within confines, and divine predestination does not coerce but ordains the entire chain of desires and choices.^[147] Critics, including Arminian theologians like Jacobus Arminius (1560–1609) and Unitarian William Ellery Channing (1780–1842), contend that compatibilism evades rather than resolves the issue, as it conflates coerced volition with genuine agency, rendering punishment unjust if God authors the sinful inclinations through decree or permissive will.^[148] In double predestination variants, where God actively decrees reprobation to damnation, this imputes moral authorship of evil to the divine nature, contradicting attributes of justice and goodness, since non-elect individuals sin inevitably without alternative possibilities.^[149] Philosophically, incompatibilists argue that determinism—divine or natural—negates the "could have done otherwise" condition for responsibility, as evidenced by modern analyses equating predestinarian sovereignty with causal chains excluding agent origination.^[143] Responses from Reformed thinkers maintain that human accountability stems from self-determined rejection of God, not divine necessity, with God's holiness insulating Him from blame despite foreordination.^[150] Empirical intuitions of desert, however, persist across cultures, fueling ongoing debate on whether compatibilist redefinitions suffice for retributive justice or merely pragmatic accommodation.^[144]

Accusations of Divine Arbitrariness

Critics of unconditional election and double predestination doctrines assert that these formulations depict God as exercising arbitrary power in determining eternal destinies, selecting some individuals for salvation while passing over or actively decreeing damnation for others without any evidential basis in human character, actions, or foreseen responses to grace. This perspective holds that absent a conditioning factor such as divine foreknowledge of faith, God's choices lack a discernible rationale, rendering divine justice indistinguishable from caprice or favoritism.^[151]^[152] During the Reformation era, Dutch theologian Jacob Arminius (1560–1609) leveled this charge against stricter predestinarian systems, particularly supralapsarian variants, arguing in his Declaration of Sentiments (1608) that unconditional decrees prior to the fall imply God ordains sin and reprobation without reference to human contingency, fostering an image of divine voluntarism untethered from moral order or equity. Arminius maintained that such views provoke logical tensions, as they posit eternal punishment decreed irrespective of demerits, thereby attributing arbitrariness to the divine will rather than grounding election in prescience of responsive belief.^[153]^[154] Catholic critiques echo this, contending that Calvinist predestination severs reprobation from culpable human refusal of grace, portraying God as predetermining damnation ex nihilo rather than as a consequence of sin freely committed under sufficient prevenient aid. The Fifth Lateran Council (1512–1517) and subsequent Tridentine decrees (1545–1563) repudiated absolute predestination to evil, insisting that God's universal salvific will precludes arbitrary exclusion, with reprobation arising solely from foreseen perseverance in impenitence rather than unmotivated divine fiat.^[155]^[156] In broader theological discourse, figures like humanist Desiderius Erasmus (1466–1536) amplified the accusation in De Libero Arbitrio (1524), decrying Lutheran predestination as tyrannical arbitrariness that absolves humans of moral agency while imputing to God the role of indiscriminate judge, decreeing fates without evidentiary tie to volition or virtue. This critique persists in Arminian and semi-Pelagian traditions, where the absence of conditional elements is seen to erode attributions of divine benevolence, as the non-elect's perdition stems not from equitable judgment but from inscrutable preference.^[157]

Implications for Evangelism and Universalism

Predestinarian doctrines, particularly in Reformed theology, have prompted debates over their compatibility with evangelism, as critics contend that divine foreordination of salvation renders human efforts to proclaim the gospel superfluous, since only the elect will respond in faith regardless of preaching.^[158] This view posits that predestination fosters a form of determinism that could discourage missionary activity, with some Arminian theologians arguing it nullifies biblical imperatives like the Great Commission in Matthew 28:19-20.^[159] However, proponents of unconditional election maintain that God ordains not only the ends of salvation but also the means, including the preaching of the word, through which the Holy Spirit effectually calls the elect.^[160] Thus, evangelism remains a divine command and instrumentality, as historical Calvinists such as Jonathan Edwards and George Whitefield demonstrated through vigorous evangelistic campaigns, emphasizing that uncertainty about the identity of the elect necessitates universal proclamation.^[161] ^[162] Regarding universalism—the belief that all humanity will ultimately achieve salvation—predestination introduces a fundamental incompatibility, especially in formulations involving double predestination, where God actively decrees both election to life and reprobation to condemnation.^[113] Single predestination, which affirms election without a symmetric decree of damnation, might appear more amenable to universalist interpretations by avoiding explicit reprobation, yet even this framework typically upholds the reality of human rejection of grace, precluding the assurance of universal reconciliation.^[163] Theologians like John Piper argue that predestinarianism underscores God's sovereign particularity in salvation, rendering universalism a diluted variant that equates to predestination applied universally but inconsistently with scriptural depictions of judgment, such as in Romans 9:22-23.^[164] Critics of universalism within predestinarian traditions, including Karl Barth's qualified rejection, affirm that while God's will is for all to be saved (1 Timothy 2:4), human sin and divine justice necessitate the possibility of eternal loss, incompatible with guaranteed universal restoration.^[163] This tension highlights predestination's emphasis on divine sovereignty over egalitarian salvific outcomes.

Scriptural and Logical Rebuttals

Proponents of predestination, particularly within Reformed theology, counter criticisms of incompatibility with human free will by appealing to biblical passages that affirm divine sovereignty alongside human accountability. In Romans 9:14-21, Paul addresses potential charges of injustice in God's election by likening the Creator to a potter who shapes vessels for honor or dishonor according to his purpose, emphasizing that God's mercy is not owed but graciously extended to whom he wills, while human hardness of heart remains culpable.^[165] Similarly, Ephesians 1:4-5 declares that God chose believers in Christ before the foundation of the world according to the purpose of his will, underscoring election as rooted in divine counsel rather than foreseen human merit or decision, thus preserving God's initiative without negating calls to repentance found elsewhere, such as in Acts 17:30.^[166] John 6:44 further illustrates this by stating that no one can come to Jesus unless drawn by the Father, yet those drawn are raised up, integrating irresistible grace with the reality of belief as a human response enabled by God.^[167] Against accusations of divine arbitrariness, scriptural rebuttals highlight that election serves God's redemptive plan and glorification of his attributes, not caprice. Deuteronomy 7:7-8 explains Israel's selection not for its greatness but because of God's love and oath to the patriarchs, prefiguring New Testament election as an act of unmerited favor amid universal fallenness (Romans 3:10-12). Romans 9:22-23 contrasts vessels of wrath prepared for destruction with those of mercy prepared for glory, portraying reprobation as permitting sin's natural consequences while election displays divine patience and kindness, thereby manifesting God's holiness and justice without implying randomness.^[168] This framework rebuts claims of unfairness by affirming that no one deserves salvation, rendering election a sovereign display of grace rather than partiality (James 2:13 interpreted through the lens of total depravity).^[169] Logically, compatibilism reconciles predestination with moral responsibility by defining free will as voluntary action aligned with one's desires and nature, which in humanity's post-fall state inclines toward sin unless divinely regenerated (Jeremiah 17:9). Thus, unbelievers freely reject God because they desire to (John 3:19), bearing responsibility for choices consonant with their enslaved will (Romans 6:20), while God's decree ensures the certainty of outcomes without coercion, akin to how Joseph's brothers' evil intent freely fulfilled divine providence (Genesis 50:20).^[170] This avoids libertarian free will's incoherence—where choices lack sufficient causes—by grounding actions in character and causation, preserving accountability: sinners are blameworthy for desiring evil, and the elect for responding in faith post-regeneration. Critics' demands for autonomous will, proponents argue, impose human standards on divine aseity, ignoring that God's eternal decree incorporates secondary causes without authoring sin directly.^[38] Regarding evangelism, predestination motivates rather than undermines proclamation, as Scripture commands preaching the gospel to all (Matthew 28:19-20) while revealing that faith arises through hearing the word (Romans 10:14-17), with God ordaining both the elect's salvation and the means via human testimony. The Apostle Paul, despite knowing God's election (2 Timothy 1:9), vigorously evangelized (1 Corinthians 9:16-22), modeling that divine sovereignty frees evangelists from efficacy's burden, ensuring fruit among the predestined without universal success implying failure.^[160] This counters universalist implications by affirming hell's reality for the non-elect (Matthew 25:46), where evangelism fulfills God's decree, warning the reprobate and gathering the elect, as seen in the Great Commission's universal scope despite particular atonement views.^[171]

Broader Implications and Applications

Effects on Soteriology and Assurance of Salvation

In Reformed soteriology, the doctrine of predestination posits that salvation originates solely from God's eternal decree of election, whereby He unconditionally chooses individuals for eternal life apart from foreseen merit or faith, as articulated in the Westminster Confession of Faith (1646), which states that some are "predestinated unto everlasting life" by divine decree for the manifestation of God's glory. This monergistic framework—emphasizing God's unilateral initiative through effectual calling, regeneration, and irresistible grace—contrasts with synergistic views by rendering human response as the fruit rather than the cause of salvation, thereby centering soteriology on divine sovereignty rather than conditional cooperation.^[172] Consequently, predestination underscores that justification, sanctification, and glorification form an unbreakable chain ordained by God, ensuring the perseverance of the elect.^[173] Regarding assurance of salvation, predestination provides a foundational objective ground in God's immutable will, as John Calvin argued that true assurance derives primarily from the promises of the Gospel and the testimony of the Holy Spirit, rather than subjective introspection alone, mitigating doubts arising from personal frailty.^[174] The Canons of Dort (1618–1619), responding to Arminian challenges, affirm that believers may attain a reliable assurance through scriptural marks such as persevering faith, obedience, and love for God, while acknowledging that this confidence can fluctuate due to sin or temptation but remains attainable as part of saving faith itself.^[69] This approach counters potential despair by linking personal evidences to the eternal election they confirm, though critics from Arminian traditions contend it fosters uncertainty, as apparent believers might prove unelect if they apostatize— a concern Reformed theologians rebut by insisting true election manifests in perseverance.^[6] Historically, this interplay has influenced pastoral practice; for instance, Puritan divines like Thomas Brooks emphasized self-examination of grace's fruits as secondary confirmations of predestined election, promoting humility alongside confidence without presuming infallibility.^[174] In contemporary Reformed thought, figures such as John Piper reinforce that predestination bolsters assurance by shifting reliance from mutable human efforts to God's predestining love, evident in Romans 8:29–30, fostering evangelism unburdened by salvific outcomes dependent on human will.^[175] Thus, while predestination elevates divine agency in soteriology, it equips believers with a robust, biblically grounded assurance tempered by calls to holy living.

Influence on Ethics and Human Behavior

In Reformed theology, the doctrine of predestination has historically encouraged ethical rigor and disciplined behavior among adherents, as believers sought empirical signs of their election through moral and vocational success. John Calvin emphasized that while salvation is by divine decree alone, the elect demonstrate their status via sanctification and good works, which serve as secondary evidences rather than causes of salvation. This framework countered potential fatalism by framing ethical living not as a means to earn grace but as its inevitable fruit, fostering a worldview where idleness or vice signaled reprobation.^[176] Sociologist Max Weber argued in his 1905 work The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism that Calvinist predestination engendered an "inner-worldly asceticism," where uncertainty over one's eternal fate drove systematic self-control, industriousness, and reinvestment of profits—behaviors that inadvertently propelled modern capitalism. Weber posited that the doctrine's psychological tension, absent means to directly ascertain election, channeled anxiety into rational, goal-oriented action in daily life, evident in the economic ascendancy of Protestant regions like 17th-century England and the Netherlands compared to Catholic counterparts. Empirical studies have partially validated this link, with a 2018 analysis showing correlations between historical exposure to Calvinist predestination beliefs and preferences for early resolution in decision-making, mirroring the ethic's emphasis on disciplined foresight.^[177]^[178]^[179] Critics, including some within Christianity, have contended that predestination undermines moral responsibility by implying actions are divinely ordained, potentially fostering antinomianism—disregard for ethical norms under the guise of grace. However, Reformed thinkers like Calvin explicitly repudiated this, insisting human accountability persists compatibly with sovereignty, as divine predestination incorporates secondary causes like human choices without negating culpability. Historical evidence from Puritan communities, which enforced strict moral codes via covenants and discipline, refutes widespread antinomian outcomes, though isolated charges arose during 17th-century controversies like the English Antinomian debates.^[6]^[180]

Interactions with Modern Science and Determinism

Theological predestination, as articulated in Reformed traditions, posits that God sovereignly ordains all events, including human choices, in a manner compatible with secondary causation and human volition—a position known as compatibilism. This framework aligns with classical scientific determinism, exemplified by Pierre-Simon Laplace's 1814 hypothesis of a superintellect capable of predicting all future states from complete knowledge of present positions and forces governing nature.^[181] Such determinism mirrors aspects of divine foreordination, where outcomes are necessitated by prior divine decree yet executed through creaturely agency, without implying fatalism or coercion. Compatibilist theologians argue that human freedom resides in acting according to one's nature and desires, even if those are ultimately determined, a view that parallels how physical laws necessitate events without negating their occurrence via intermediate causes.^[147] Quantum mechanics, emerging in the 1920s, disrupted classical determinism by revealing inherent probabilistic elements, such as the unpredictable decay of radioactive particles or the measurement-induced collapse of wave functions.^[182] These phenomena introduce ontological indeterminism at fundamental scales, challenging the Laplacean ideal of a fully predictable universe and prompting debates over whether true randomness undermines causal closure. Predestinarians respond that divine sovereignty operates supra-physically, ordaining probabilistic outcomes through providential governance rather than mechanistic necessity; quantum indeterminism thus poses no threat to God's exhaustive control, as probabilities themselves fall under eternal decree.^[183] Some interpretations, like superdeterminism, reinstate a form of universal predetermination by correlating experimental choices with hidden variables, but these remain speculative and unverified empirically.^[182] Neuroscience further intersects with predestination via studies on decision-making, notably Benjamin Libet's 1983 experiments showing a readiness potential—a brain signal—emerging about 550 milliseconds before conscious awareness of intent to move, suggesting unconscious precursors to volition.^[184] Later fMRI research by Soon et al. in 2008 predicted choices up to 10 seconds in advance based on neural patterns, fueling claims of deterministic brain processes preceding subjective freedom.^[184] Compatibilists in Reformed theology interpret these as evidence for determined yet responsible agency, where "free" choices align with internal motivations shaped by divine providence, preserving moral accountability without requiring indeterministic libertarianism.^[185] Critiques, including Schurger et al.'s 2012 model attributing readiness potentials to stochastic neural fluctuations rather than fixed causation, indicate that neuroscience neither proves nor refutes compatibilist determinism, as empirical data address proximate mechanisms while theological predestination concerns ultimate divine causality.^[184]^[186]

References

[1]
What Is Predestination? A Biblical, Historical & Theological Overview
Aug 20, 2024 · Predestination is a doctrine in Christian theology that explains God's role in planning and bringing about actions in history.
[2]
Predestination, by W. Stanford Reid - Bible Research
Predestination refers to God's foreordination of all events, and his choice of some for eternal fellowship, while others are allowed to go their own way.
[3]
What does the Bible say about predestination vs. free will?
Jun 6, 2025 · God predestining who will be saved is based on His sovereignty, unchanging character (Malachi 3:6), foreknowledge (Romans 8:29, 11:2), love (Ephesians 1:4-5), ...Missing: sources | Show results with:sources
[4]
https://www.crossway.org/articles/help-im-struggling-with-the-doctrine-of-predestination/
[5]
'Calvinists' Before Calvin? - Desiring God
Oct 15, 2019 · John Calvin (1509–1564) pithily defined divine predestination as that “by which God adopts some to hope of life, and sentences others to eternal death.”
[6]
Tensions in Calvin's Idea of Predestination - The Gospel Coalition
Predestination, in Calvin's thought, is an article of faith, and reprobation, a doctrine of the elect. The non-elect never know that they are the reprobate. The ...
[7]
Predestination and free will - Christianity
Predestination is the belief that God has eternally chosen those that he intends to save (“the elect”) and that he works everything out in life towards that end ...Missing: scholarly | Show results with:scholarly
[8]
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Romans%208%3A29-30&version=ESV
[9]
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Ephesians%201%3A5&version=ESV
[10]
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Ephesians%201%3A11&version=ESV
[11]
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Ephesians%201%3A4-5&version=ESV
[12]
What Does the Bible Say About Predestination? - OpenBible.info
Ephesians 1:11-12 ESV / 172 helpful votes. Helpful Not Helpful. In him we have obtained an inheritance, having been predestined according to the purpose of him ...
[13]
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Romans%209%3A16&version=ESV
[14]
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Romans%209%3A11&version=ESV
[15]
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Romans%209%3A18%2C22-23&version=ESV
[16]
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=John%206%3A37%2C44&version=ESV
[17]
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Acts%2013%3A48&version=ESV
[18]
Predestination in the Bible - Scripture Quotes and Meaning
Romans 8:29-30 states, “For those God foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the likeness of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many ...
[19]
CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: Predestination - New Advent
Predestination (Latin præ, destinare), taken in its widest meaning, is every Divine decree by which God, owing to His infallible prescience of the future, has ...
[20]
Election and Reprobation | Monergism
We may define election as follows: Election is an act of God before creation in which he chooses some people to be saved, not on account of any foreseen merit ...
[21]
Election and Reprobation - Chapter 32 - Truth Story
Apr 12, 2020 · Election is “an act of God before creation in which he chooses some people to be saved, not on account of any foreseen merit in them, but only ...
[22]
Election and Foreknowledge - The Gospel Coalition
Definition. Foreknowledge, with reference to God, connotes foreordination. The doctrine of election affirms that God chose those whom he would save.<|separator|>
[23]
What is foreknowledge in the Bible? | GotQuestions.org
Jun 24, 2024 · In Christian theology, foreknowledge refers to the all-knowing, omniscient nature of God whereby He knows reality before it is real, all ...
[24]
The Doctrine of Reprobation - The Gospel Coalition
Reprobation is God's eternal decree whereby he foreordained that certain persons would be excluded from the number of those saved by grace.
[25]
Calvin on Predestination (Election and Reprobation) - Krisis & Praxis
Jan 1, 2023 · We call predestination God's eternal decree, by which he determined with himself what he willed to become of each man.
[26]
What is Calvinism and is it biblical? - Got Questions
Sep 4, 2024 · The five points of Calvinism can be summarized by the acronym TULIP. T stands for total depravity, U for unconditional election, L for limited atonement, I for ...hyper-Calvinism · Is Calvinism heresy? · Calvinism vs. Arminianism · Total depravityMissing: sources | Show results with:sources
[27]
The Origin of TULIP? (Updated!) - The Gospel Coalition
Jul 7, 2009 · The first recorded use of the acronym is in Loraine Boettner's popular book, The Reformed Doctrine of Predestination, published in 1932.
[28]
Theological Primer: Supralapsarianism and Infralapsarianism
Sep 18, 2013 · Supralapsarianism—supra meaning “above” or “before” and lapsum meaning “fall”—is the position which holds that God's decree to save is logically ...
[29]
Supralapsarianism and Infralapsarianism - Ligonier Ministries
Supralapsarianism is the belief God decided to elect before the fall, while infralapsarianism is the belief it was after the fall.
[30]
On Infra- and Supralapsarianism: A Primer - Modern Reformation
Mar 19, 2021 · Infralapsarianism presumes the fall of man when predestination is considered, while supralapsarianism does not, assuming unfallen humanity.
[31]
Predestination (Prima Pars, Q. 23) - Summa Theologiae - New Advent
I answer that, It is fitting that God should predestine men. For all things are subject to His providence, as was shown above (I:22:2).Missing: sources | Show results with:sources
[32]
Aquinas and Calvin on Predestination: Is There Any Common ...
The predestination of some to salvation means that God wills their salvation. This is where special and chosen loving comes in. The teaching of Aquinas on ...
[33]
Divine Sovereignty and Human Freedom - The Gospel Coalition
Divine sovereignty, which is that God exercises efficacious, universal, and loving control over all things, is compatible with human freedom.
[34]
Election and Predestination: The Sovereignty of God in Salvation
Sep 26, 2001 · The doctrine of election simply means that God, uninfluenced and before creation, predetermined certain people to be saved.
[35]
BIBLICAL COMPATIBILISM | How Does Human Freedom & God's ...
Jan 29, 2022 · Biblical compatibilism says that our choices proceed from the most compelling motives and desires we have, which in turn is conditioned on our base nature, ...
[36]
The Compatibility of Determinism and Human Freedom
Determinism and human freedom are compatible at least insofar as the Bible demonstrates that God's determination of what people do is compatible with their ...
[37]
Freedom of the Will: Understanding Jonathan Edwards's Most ...
Nov 30, 2016 · For this reason, Edwards has been called a “compatibilist” (i.e. that human liberty is logically compatible with divine sovereignty). Part ...
[38]
Christological Arguments for Compatibilism in Reformed Theology
Jonathan Edwards (1703–1758). Jonathan Edwards is perhaps the most widely recognized defender of Reformed compatibilism. ... [53] Jonathan Edwards, Freedom of the ...
[39]
[PDF] Freedom of the Will - Early Modern Texts
—Edwards's discussions of and quotations from Biblical passages are omitted, as they add nothing to the book's philosophical value. Those omissions are ...Missing: compatibilism | Show results with:compatibilism
[40]
CHURCH FATHERS: On Grace and Free Will (St. Augustine)
Now He has revealed to us, through His Holy Scriptures, that there is in a man a free choice of will. But how He has revealed this I do not recount in human ...
[41]
John Calvin: Institutes of the Christian Religion
The subject of predestination, which in itself is attended with considerable difficulty is rendered very perplexed and hence perilous by human curiosity, which ...Missing: responsibility | Show results with:responsibility
[42]
John Calvin and the "Awful" Doctrine of Predestination
Apr 30, 2018 · Calvin then addresses the mistaken notion that election removes human responsibility. Many today associate John Calvin with an aberration of ...
[43]
Is Predestination the Same Thing as Fate?
They differ only in this, that with predestination the external determination of human action proceeds from a rational Being, and with fatalism from an ...Missing: Christian | Show results with:Christian
[44]
Predestination History - Breakwater Embassy
The Stoics maintain that all things take place according to fate. Justin argues that freewill is our true condition and necessary for just punishment. Human ...
[45]
https://www.crossway.org/articles/what-is-the-doctrine-of-election/
[46]
Predestination Is Biblical, Beautiful, and Practical
Jul 30, 2018 · And yet, there it stands, in the plainest and most unapologetic of terms, in Ephesians 1:5: “In love he predestined us for adoption as sons ...
[47]
Calvinism in the Early Church - A Puritan's Mind
Ignatius: “To the predestined ones before all ages, that is, before the world began, united and elect in a true passion, by the eternal will of the Father…”.
[48]
[PDF] THE DOCTRINE OF ELECTION AND PREDESTINATION ... - Zenodo
Apr 1, 2002 · seen so far in Irenaeus, Tertullian, and Origen. He does develop the concept of predestination in a way that Irenaeus and Origen do not. At ...
[49]
The Early Church Fathers and Predestination - jarom.net
In harmony with the foregoing views as to human freedom and responsibility, conditional predestination is the doctrine inculcated by the Greek Fathers.
[50]
On the Predestination of the Saints, Book I (Augustine) - New Advent
Further, between grace and predestination there is only this difference, that predestination is the preparation for grace, while grace is the donation itself.Missing: formulation | Show results with:formulation
[51]
Election of Grace: Augustine's Doctrine of Predestination
Augustine established the principle that without predestination, there is no grace by which we are saved.
[52]
Some patristic quotations on predestination | Classically Christian
Sep 26, 2014 · The following quotations were part of the patristic commentary on Romans 8:26-39, pp. 177-178: This text does not take away our free will. It uses the word ...
[53]
A Review Of Peter Lombard's “The Sentences” Book 1 - Patheos
Sep 25, 2015 · Lombard argues that God's predestination is unconditional. He writes: “God elected whom he willed by a freely given mercy, not because the would ...
[54]
Master Peter Lombard: First Book of Sentences
Chapter IV: That God, both always and together, knows all. DISTINCTION XL. Chapter I: Whether anyone predestined can be damned, and/or anyone reprobate be saved ...
[55]
Peter Lombard, Master of the Sentences by Andrew Hoffecker
Book I dealt with the Trinity—the unity of the Godhead, the distinction and equality of the three persons, and topics such as providence, predestination, and ...
[56]
Anselm of Canterbury on Grace and Free Choice
Jan 22, 2016 · Anselm argues that free choice coexists with God's Grace. He wants to dispel a controversy of his day that one or the other but not both is a ...
[57]
De Concordia: Foreknowledge, Necessity and Predestination
Jan 5, 2015 · It is often said that God's predestination is based on His foreknowledge. That events are predestined based on the fact that God has foreseen them already ...
[58]
Thomas Aquinas on Predestination - Credo Magazine
Sep 24, 2011 · So predestination is not on account of any merits foreseen, but they are the cause of it only in the sense that they are part of the ordained ...
[59]
The Aquinas's paths of thinking about predestination in the Summa ...
In this paper the method of investigation of paths of thinking is applied to analyse St. Thomas Aquinas's question 23 on predestination from his Summa ...<|separator|>
[60]
General Audience of 7 July 2010: John Duns Scotus - The Holy See
Jul 7, 2010 · I say, therefore, that the fall was not the cause of Christ's predestination and that if no one had fallen, neither the angel nor man in ...
[61]
3. Scotus' writings - Absolute Primacy of Christ
Predestination is absolute in the intention of God and not relative to the foreseen needs of creatures. Scotus holds that this is true especially in the case ...
[62]
Jesus: Predestination And Merit | Duns Scotus - Oxford Academic
Oct 31, 2023 · '' Scotus claims that this statement is true, on the basis that Christ's human nature was predestined to be united to the second person of the ...
[63]
The Problem of Predestination of Human Beings according to John ...
IN THE CONCEPTION OF PREDESTINATION that John Duns Scotus made his own one can distinguish the following theses. (1) He carries out an attempt to reconcile ...
[64]
De Servo Arbitrio “On the Enslaved Will” or The Bondage of Will
While Erasmus argued for the free will of human beings, Luther argued that humans' sinful nature rendered them slaves to wickedness, free only to sin unless by ...
[65]
Luther, Erasmus, and the Bondage of the Will | PRCA
Feb 20, 2017 · Erasmus claims that man has a will able to choose the good without grace, and in other places maintains that man can will nothing good without ...
[66]
Am I Predestined? - Modern Reformation
Speculating about one's predestination was dangerous for Luther because it was tantamount to trespassing into God's secret chambers, whereas focusing on Christ ...
[67]
General Council of Trent: Sixth Session - Papal Encyclicals
No one, moreover, so long as he is in this mortal life, ought so far to presume as regards the secret mystery of divine predestination, as to determine for ...Missing: Counter- | Show results with:Counter-
[68]
How does the Roman Catholic Church interpret predestination?
Mar 12, 2016 · Against the Calvinist doctrine on predestination, the Council of Trent's 6th session (Decree on Justification) says: CANON IV.
[69]
The Canons of Dort | Christian Reformed Church
The Canons of Dort are statements of doctrine adopted by the Synod of Dort to settle a controversy, focusing on five points of doctrine.
[70]
[PDF] The Canons of Dort
The Canons of Dort are statements of doctrine adopted by the Synod of Dort in 1618-1619 to settle a controversy, and are a form of unity for Reformed churches.
[71]
The Theology of the Reformers - The Gospel Coalition
The primary purposes of the doctrine of predestination are to make believers grateful, humble, and bold in sharing the gospel. Recipients of God's grace should ...
[72]
Jonathan Edwards on Free Will | Christian History Institute
His treatise on Free Will is a lengthy argument against Arminian theology. Arminians hold that a man has at least a small say in his own salvation or damnation.
[73]
Jansenism | Catholic Answers Magazine
Jansenists hold that concupiscence (the tendency toward sin) always defeats the will in a fallen state. In those to whom God gives his grace, the will is ...Missing: response | Show results with:response
[74]
The Arminian Roots of John and Charles Wesley – wesleyscholar.com
Aug 31, 2025 · For Bishop Womack openly defended the doctrinal positions of the Opinions of the Remonstrants given at the Synod of Dort (1618), and it was ...<|separator|>
[75]
Are Methodists Arminians? - David F. Watson
Apr 15, 2020 · The high Calvinists won day at the Synod of Dort (1618-19), trouncing the “Remonstrants,” followers of Arminius. Nevertheless, Arminianism ...Missing: developments | Show results with:developments
[76]
Did Calvin's Successors Distort His Doctrine of Predestination?
The human predicament could not be overcome without God decreeing salvation in eternity. From this perspective, salvation is an eternal act accomplished by God.
[77]
Comparing Karl Barth and John Calvin, On Election
Aug 16, 2009 · For Calvin, Christ is the mediator of the eternal decree of election; whereas for Barth, Christ is both the Elector and the Elected One, who ...
[78]
Chapter 21, Institutes of the Christian Religion Book 3, John Calvin ...
CHAPTER 21. OF THE ETERNAL ELECTION, BY WHICH GOD HAS PREDESTINATED SOME TO SALVATION, AND OTHERS TO DESTRUCTION. The divisions of this chapter are,--I. The ...
[79]
Calvin, Dordt, and Westminster on Predestination
... Canons of Dordt are infralapsarian. This would appear to be the purport of ... Calvin: Institutes, III, xxiv, 1-4. 4. Calvin frequently uses the term â ...
[80]
TULIP and Reformed Theology: An Introduction - Ligonier Ministries
Mar 18, 2017 · The five points, as they are stated in order to form the acrostic TULIP, are: total depravity, unconditional election, limited atonement, irresistible grace, ...
[81]
Works of James Arminius, Vol. 1 - Christian Classics Ethereal Library
Predestination, when thus explained, is 1. The foundation of Christianity, and of salvation and its certainty. 2. It is the sum and the matter of the gospel.
[82]
Works of James Arminius, Vol. 1 - Christian Classics Ethereal Library
I. ON PREDESTINATION. The first and most important article in religion on which I have to offer my views, and which for many years past has engaged my ...
[83]
The Five Articles of the Remonstrants (1610) - CRI/Voice Institute
In these five articles they advocated conditional rather than absolute predestination, universal rather than limited atonement, the necessity of regeneration ...
[84]
Philip Schaff: Creeds of Christendom, with a History and Critical ...
Then the Remonstrance sets forth the five positive articles as follows: ARTICLE FIRST. Conditional Predestination.—God has immutably decreed, from eternity ...
[85]
The Five Articles of Remonstrance - Society of Evangelical Arminians
Jan 3, 2018 · This document was originally created about 1610 by the Remonstrants, the followers of Arminius, to outline the doctrines of the early Arminians.
[86]
On Predestination - Orthodox Christian Information Center
It is the grace of God and the will of man together. God desires, for He is the Lover of mankind: if a man desires also, for he is free, then that man is ...
[87]
Predestination, Providence, and Prayer | Ancient Faith Ministries
Feb 15, 2011 · ... synergia, without their own freedom, that is simply not true. That is absolutely not true. And we would never say, “Once saved, always saved ...
[88]
Augustine versus Chrysostom on Predestination
May 12, 2018 · In On Free Will and Grace he seemingly rejects Chrysostom's view of predestination: “There could be no merit in men's choice of Christ, if it ...
[89]
The Free Will of Man According to the Holy Orthodox Christian Church
Jul 7, 2014 · To describe the relation between the grace of God and free will of man, Orthodoxy uses the term cooperation or synergy (synergeia); in Saint ...
[90]
[PDF] St. John Cassian and the orthodox theaching of the divine grace
This teaching about the synergy is the difference between St. John and both Augustine and Pelagius. In fact, this is the orthodox teaching about the grace ...
[91]
What Do Lutherans Believe about Predestination? - CPH Blog
Oct 17, 2022 · Lutherans believe God chose to save them, not the other way around. God knows who will go to heaven/hell, but does not foreordain people to ...
[92]
FAQs about Doctrine - The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
ANSWER: The LCMS believes that Scripture clearly teaches (in passages such as those mentioned in your question) a predestination to salvation by God's grace in ...
[93]
Brief Statement of LCMS Doctrinal Position
Neither should we attempt to investigate the secret, concealed abyss of divine predestination, but should give heed to the revealed will of God. For He has made ...
[94]
Exposition of the Thirty-nine Articles - Article XVII (Part 1)
Jul 13, 2022 · Article XVII. Of Predestination and Election. PREDESTINATION to life is the everlasting purpose of God, whereby (before the foundations of the world were laid)
[95]
Article 17 — Of Predestination and Election - Church Society
Mar 18, 2017 · In Christ, the elect are saved forever from condemnation: chosen in him, redeemed in him, and certain to inherit in him (Ephesians 1:3-14).
[96]
The Anglican View of Predestination (Part II)
Nov 23, 2011 · It tells us that God predestined to eternal life those whom He chose out of mankind before the world began, so that they would be delivered from ...
[97]
The Doctrine Of Absolute Predestination - The Baptist Particular
Thus we see that predestination of God in this case not only secures the leading purpose that the elect shall be conformed to the glorious image of His Son, but ...
[98]
What do Southern Baptists believe about Predestination?
Nov 28, 2011 · Essentially, Southern Baptists, as a denomination, does not take a stance on free will, predestination, or unconditional election. There is an ...What does "predestination" mean? - Christianity Stack ExchangeHow do Southern Baptists who believe in the immortality of the soul ...More results from christianity.stackexchange.com
[99]
John Wesley on Predestination | James Pedlar
Feb 16, 2012 · Wesley felt that the idea of absolute unconditional predestination by divine decree was inconsistent with God's justice, as well as his love and goodness.
[100]
Sermon 58 - On Predestination | ResourceUMC
In a word, God, looking on all ages, from the creation to the consummation, as a moment, and seeing at once whatever is in the hearts of all the children of men ...
[101]
What is the Mennonite belief on predestination? - Quora
Jan 21, 2023 · Predestination was a Calvinistic teaching, that Almighty God predestined who would go to Heaven & who would not. This teaching is rejected by ...What was the threat posed by the Anabaptists to the Lutheran and ...How to explain the concept of predestination to someone ... - QuoraMore results from www.quora.com
[102]
Hubmaier's Concord of Predestination with Free Will
Hubmaier championed libertarian free will, or the innate human ability to choose between opposites in both the physical and spiritual realms.Missing: reconciling | Show results with:reconciling<|control11|><|separator|>
[103]
https://brill.com/view/journals/pent/27/1/article-p74_74.pdf
[104]
Ephe 1:4 –Pre-destination- Pentecostal stand! - Aju's Musings
Jan 3, 2011 · It teaches that God's predestination is conditional on His foreknowledge of our choices (made freely). He chose those for eternal life those who ...
[105]
What Is Unconditional Election? - Ligonier Ministries
Aug 1, 2022 · The idea of unmerited election is encapsulated in the Calvinistic acronym TULIP under the designation unconditional election (the U in TULIP).
[106]
Unconditional election - is it biblical? | GotQuestions.org
Nov 23, 2022 · God elects people to salvation by His own sovereign choice and not because of some future action they will perform or condition they will meet.
[107]
Unconditional Election | Monergism
Unconditional election is God's eternal, absolute, and immutable decree choosing some for life and others for death, based on His grace, not human merit.
[108]
What are the Five Articles of Remonstrance? | GotQuestions.org
Jan 4, 2022 · The Five Articles of Remonstrance are five points of Arminian theology written in 1610 by followers of Jacobus Arminius (1560—1609) ...
[109]
What is conditional election? | GotQuestions.org
Jan 4, 2022 · Boiled down to its simplest form, Arminian theology is that, ultimately, man's salvation depends on his “free will decision” alone and not God's ...
[110]
TULIP and Reformed Theology: Unconditional Election
The Reformed view of election, known as unconditional election, means that God does not foresee an action or condition on our part that induces Him to save us.
[111]
What is the Biblical basis for Conditional Election?
Feb 25, 2022 · In Christian theology, conditional election is the belief that God chooses for eternal salvation those whom he foresees will have faith in Christ.
[112]
Is Double Predestination Biblical? - Desiring God
Aug 26, 2022 · Some Destined to Disobey Now, the term double predestination is used to refer to the fact that if God destines some for salvation and adoption, ...
[113]
Is Double Predestination Biblical? - Ligonier Ministries
In this view predestination is double in that it involves both election and reprobation but is not symmetrical with respect to the mode of divine activity.
[114]
https://www.crossway.org/articles/is-double-predestination-fair/
[115]
Calvin's Doctrine of Predestination, Or Magnifying God's Grace by ...
Calvin plainly and powerfully taught God's predestination of mankind, both election and reprobation. He taught it from the beginning of his public ministry.
[116]
Debated Issues in Sovereign Predestination - The Gospel Coalition
In single-predestination God passively passes by those not elected to salvation, whereas in double-predestination he actively reprobates them. Second, Did God ...<|separator|>
[117]
Infralapsarianism and Supralapsarianism | Monergism
There is no Reformed confession which teaches the supralapsaian view; but on the other hand a considerable number do explicitly teach the infralapsarian view, ...
[118]
Supra- or Infra-lapsarianism? | PRCA - Protestant Reformed Churches
Mar 1, 2013 · They would further emphasize the historical fact that both the Westminster Confession and the Synod of Dort adopted the infra-lapsarian position ...
[119]
Notes on Supralapsarianism & Infralapsarianism
Supralapsarianism views God choosing the elect before the fall, while infralapsarianism views God choosing the elect after the fall, based on the logical order ...
[120]
Is Westminster Infralapsarian? - Protestant Reformed Churches
Mar 1, 2013 · The question is: "I know it is often said that Dort and Westminster were infralapsarian. This may be so in theCanons (of Dort), Art. 7 (chapter ...
[121]
Supra- and Infralapsarianism | Monergism
Among the members of the Synod of Dort and of the Westminster Assembly ... Dort and the Westminster Confession the infralapsarian view finds expression.
[122]
Did the Canons Misfire: Five Points on Synod of Dort
On election, a large majority of the synod were infralapsarian while a prestigous minority were supralapsarian. On the extent of the atonement, a large ...
[123]
What is corporate election? | GotQuestions.org
Jul 14, 2023 · Corporate election is the idea that, when God elected or predestined people to be saved, He did not pick out individual people; rather, God chose Christ.
[124]
The Corporate View of Election - Soteriology 101
Mar 9, 2015 · Predestination (Gk prooizo) means “to decide beforehand” and applies to God's purposes comprehended in election. Election is God's choice “in ...
[125]
[PDF] Ephesians 1:3-4: An Explanation of the Corporate and Christocentric ...
Ephesians 1:3-4 is interpreted as corporate election, where individuals are elected to salvation upon belief in Christ, becoming part of the corporate body of ...
[126]
Individual Election, Corporate Election, and Arminianism
Feb 17, 2016 · The passages positing foreknowledge and predestination of the elect may be understood quite as well one way as the other” (Ibid., 155).
[127]
The Corporate View of Election and Predestination - arminian theology
Jul 16, 2012 · Election is always only in union with the Captain and His ship. Predestination tells us about the ship's destination and what God has prepared ...Missing: theory | Show results with:theory<|separator|>
[128]
A Concise Summary of the Corporate View of Election and ...
Feb 13, 2013 · Here is an excellent concise summary of the doctrines of conditional election and predestination from the corporate election perpective.
[129]
Clearing Up Misconceptions About Corporate Election -- By: Brian J ...
Traditionally, both Calvinism and Arminianism have conceived of election unto salvation as individual. ... corporate election. Indeed, in a text like Romans 9, ...
[130]
Election and Predestination: A Discussion of the Key Texts
Among the key proponents of this view listed by Schreiner, are included such names as William Klein and Leon Morris.
[131]
"The Predestination Debate: A Harmony of Corporate Election and ...
Apr 13, 2015 · The topic of predestination has been discussed throughout church history in the work of men like Augustine, Pelagius, Calvin, Arminius, ...Missing: theory | Show results with:theory
[132]
Thomas R. Schreiner Refuting the Idea of Election ... - Kirk E. Miller
Mar 21, 2012 · Corporate election is the idea that God elects a group (like the Church) to salvation, not individuals. Schreiner argues this is an abstract ...
[133]
Middle Knowledge | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Middle knowledge is a form of knowledge first attributed to God by the sixteenth century Jesuit theologian Luis de Molina.Scientia Media · Objections to Middle Knowledge · The Usefulness of Middle...
[134]
Luis de Molina
The most famous and controversial of Molina's three published works was the Liberi arbitrii cum gratiae donis, divina praescientia, providentia, ...
[135]
Molina's 4 Proofs for Middle Knowledge | Free Thinking Ministries
Feb 23, 2018 · Middle knowledge is a concept that describes how God sovereignly operates in time with free agents. These days, many individuals attempt to ...
[136]
Molinism
Molinism, named after Luis de Molina, is a theological system for reconciling human freedom with God's grace and providence.<|separator|>
[137]
Salvation and Sovereignty: A Molinist Approach - The Gospel Coalition
The supposed key to the reconciliation is Molinism, the view that God has what is called “middle knowledge.” This refers to God's apparent knowledge of what ...
[138]
Arminianism vs Molinism - Free Thinking Ministries
Oct 25, 2017 · Molinism hinges on God's middle knowledge, knowing how people will freely choose, while God doesn't causally determine those choices.
[139]
[PDF] FOREKNOWLEDGE 1 Arminianism and Molinism on Divine ...
Molinism agrees with the Arminian stance on foreknowledge and human freedom, but argues that middle knowledge must also be posited for God to have strong ...
[140]
Luis De Molina and the Origins of Molinism | carm.org
Jun 1, 2017 · So, he developed the concept of what is called middle knowledge which is God's knowledge of what free creatures will choose to do under ...
[141]
Doctrine of God (Part 15): God's Middle Knowledge | Defenders: 3
Jul 1, 2015 · I'm inclined to believe that any creature with an absolute free will given an infinite amount of time will have to go up against God's will, ...
[142]
PREDESTINATION AND FREE WILL: IS MOLINISM BIBLICAL?
Jul 14, 2015 · Molinism harmonizes God's control and human free will using middle knowledge, where God knows what free agents would do in any situation.
[143]
Free Will - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Jan 7, 2002 · The second is that an adequate account of free will must entail that free agents are morally responsible agents and/or fit subjects for ...
[144]
Free Will - St Andrews Encyclopaedia of Theology
Aug 10, 2022 · Christian theology formulated its views of free will and moral responsibility against the background of Greek and Roman philosophy.
[145]
[PDF] Review of "Excusing Sinners and Blaming God: A Calvinist ...
The first holds that Calvinism undermines human responsibility and free will; according to the second, Calvinism undermines God's moral perfection and makes ...
[146]
Free will & Predestination | Issue 20 - Philosophy Now
But St Augustine went further than this: some men are predestined to exercise their Will to accept the offer of Grace and others are predestined to reject it.
[147]
Why I Am a Compatibilist about Determinism and Moral Responsibility
This essay sketches a case for the reasonableness of embracing compatibilism that involves both theological and nontheological considerations.Missing: predestination | Show results with:predestination
[148]
[PDF] The Moral Argument Against Calvinism
What thon is the system against which the View of Christian Doctrines is directed? Calvinism teaches, that, in consequence of Adam's sin in eating the forbidden ...
[149]
The 5 points that led me to leave Calvinism - Soteriology 101
Dec 8, 2014 · Calvinists always argue that God cannot deny Himself or His eternal nature, which is true. God cannot stop being God. Based on this Calvinists ...
[150]
Does Calvinism Make God a "Moral Monster"? - White Horse Inn
Nov 16, 2011 · However, Calvinism teaches that God never allows any evil that he has not already determined to work together for our good (Rom 8:28). Nothing ...
[151]
Arbitrary Predestination? - A Christian Thinktank
A positive predetermination to sin, and an unconditional Predestination to the eternal punishment of hell, that is, without consideration of future demerits.
[152]
Tim Keller: “3 Objections to the [Calvinistic] Doctrine of Election”
Jun 3, 2018 · Since Calvinism is founded on EXHAUSTIVE DIVINE DETERMINISM (EDD) – it constitutes a world in which whatsoever comes to pass is FIXED (i.e. ...
[153]
Arminius on Foreknowledge and Predestination - Thomas Jay Oord
Nov 18, 2013 · In the Declaration of Sentiments, Arminius argues that predestination understood by Calvin has negative implications. Such an understanding of ...
[154]
Jacobus Arminius' View of Predestination [In His Own Words], and ...
Mar 1, 2013 · Here are Jacobus Arminius' own words on how he conceived of a doctrine of predestination; this is following a lengthy argument, made by him before his ...
[155]
The Problem of Predestination: Reformed and Catholic Theology in ...
Jan 5, 2015 · This misconception runs something like this, “The Reformed view of predestination is arbitrary. In this view, God elects some and not others and ...
[156]
Is Everything Predestined? | Catholic Answers Podcasts
Dec 2, 2024 · Some people—including Calvinists—say that God arbitrarily predestines certain people to eternal salvation and other people to eternal damnation.Missing: critiques | Show results with:critiques
[157]
Article - Luther on Double and Single Predestination - PEPED
Jan 2, 2018 · Opponents of the doctrine of double predestination often object on the grounds that the doctrine makes God into an “arbitrary” being – having no ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[158]
If Calvinism is True then Why Evangelize? - Soteriology 101
Mar 9, 2020 · Under the Calvinistic system, God unchangeably determines those who will accept the belief that “God not only ordains the end; but also the ...
[159]
Calvinism and the Great Commission - Christian Courier
The doctrine of Calvinistic predestination makes void every command of God, offers no hope to the obedient, and nullifies every warning of eternal punishment.
[160]
Predestination and Evangelism | Reformed Bible Studies ...
The doctrine of predestination means that the Lord does not ordain the end (salvation) without also ordaining the means to that end (the way in which people ...
[161]
Could Calvinism be a stumbling block to the spread of the gospel of ...
Jan 4, 2022 · Calvinists hold that in eternity past God chose out some among mankind for His own. In the course of time, God grants repentance and faith to ...
[162]
If God predestines, why bother with evangelism? - Faithroots
Mar 4, 2024 · Calvinists have always been careful to distinguish between God's secret will and revealed will. We should not try to second guess who will be ...
[163]
On Barth's Denial of Universalism - The Gospel Coalition
Thus, for example, Joseph Bettis says that 'for Barth, one can reject both Arminianism and double predestination without having to accept universalism'.3.
[164]
Talbott vs. Piper (On Predestination, Reprobation, and the love of God)
Feb 25, 2020 · What is common to both versions, however, is the claim that God has bestowed a special grace upon those whom he has chosen to redeem, and it is ...
[165]
How Romans 9 Anticipates Objections to Unconditional Election
Aug 19, 2020 · It's not that God fashions vessels arbitrarily. It's simply that his choice isn't based on anything in the vessels themselves. Moses and ...Missing: arbitrariness | Show results with:arbitrariness
[166]
God's Purpose According To Election: Paul's Argument in Romans 9
1. Some New Testament scholars are content to charge predestination with being 'abstract' or 'philosophical,' as though this disqualifies it from being true.
[167]
How Does a Sovereign God Love?
Feb 1, 1983 · I want to try to defend the doctrine of God's sovereign predestination against Talbott's criticisms and so "preserve the truth of the gospel" ...
[168]
https://www.monergism.com/reformation-theology/blog/god-arbitrary-election-biblical-and-logical-reflection
[169]
Unconditional Election: Answering the Charge of Arbitrariness
Jul 19, 2019 · “The doctrine of election declares that God, before the foundation of the world, chose certain individuals from among the fallen members of ...Missing: rebuttals | Show results with:rebuttals
[170]
A Plea for Calvinistic Compatibilism - Credo Magazine
Sep 16, 2019 · God is absolutely sovereign. At the same time, people are truly responsible. That's compatibilism. That's evangelical Calvinism. These two ...
[171]
If God Predestines People, Why Evangelize? - Relearn.org
Jan 29, 2021 · We might think that predestination nullifies our involvement in evangelism but it's just the opposite. God, through the prompting of the Holy Spirt, uses us as ...
[172]
[PDF] The Reformed Doctrine Of Predestination | Monergism
The doctrine of Predestination receives comparatively little attention in our day and it is very imperfectly understood even by those.
[173]
What We Believe About the Five Points of Calvinism - Desiring God
Mar 1, 1985 · While not all Baptist churches hold to a Reformed theology, there ... acronym TULIP. T - Total depravity. U - Unconditional election. L ...Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
[174]
Calvin's Doctrine of Predestination | Monergism
[44] But the salvation of man is the great purpose of the entirety of God's work: “God has destined all things for our good and salvation.”[45] Predestination ...
[175]
Mercy on Every Side: Calvin's Misunderstood Doctrine of Election
Aug 18, 2020 · John Calvin's doctrine of election and predestination is frequently maligned, often misunderstood, and rarely explained.
[176]
Are You a Chosen One? - Calvinist Doctrine - 80/20 Endurance
Calvinist predestination means God chose a limited number of souls for salvation, and one's fate is unchangeable. Sinful living indicates one is not chosen.
[177]
Weber's Protestant Ethic Revisited: Explaining the Capitalism We ...
Aug 17, 2017 · According to Weber, this process occurs via the Calvinist concept of predestination, in which heaven is reserved for an elect and predetermined ...
[178]
Predestination and the Protestant Ethic - Oxford Academic
Feb 14, 2018 · This paper relates Weber's thesis on the religious origins of the Protestant ethic and the Kreps-Porteus (1978) model of preferences for ...
[179]
SOCY 151 - Lecture 16 - Weber on Protestantism and Capitalism
Weber argues that the Protestant faith, especially Luther's notion of “calling” and the Calvinist belief in predestination set the stage for the emergence of ...
[180]
Antinomianism: Reformed Theology's Unwelcome Guest? by Mark ...
God's benevolent love for His people is constant and unchangeable. It includes election, predestination, and His will to redeem His people. It is eternal, ...
[181]
Who let the demon out? Laplace and Boscovich on determinism
In this paper, I compare Pierre-Simon Laplace's celebrated formulation of the principle of determinism in his 1814 Essai philosophique sur les probabilités.
[182]
Does Quantum Mechanics Rule Out Free Will? | Scientific American
Mar 10, 2022 · The outcomes are not determined, so quantum mechanics is indeterministic. Superdeterminism returns us to determinism.” “The reason we can't ...
[183]
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphy.2020.00139/full
[184]
Free Will and Neuroscience: From Explaining Freedom Away to ...
As a result, today there are different irreconcilable positions about human free will: determinism is not absolute and free will exists; free will does not ...
[185]
Neuroscience and Cognitive Psychology Insights into the Classical ...
Mar 16, 2021 · Neuroscience and Cognitive Psychology Insights into the Classical Theological Debate about Free Will and Responsibility. By Tobias Alecio ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[186]
Theology, Free Will, and the Skeptical Challenge from the Sciences
Jul 7, 2020 · In this article, the core notion of free will is identified with the agent's cognitive ability to exert control over his or her actions thereby making moral ...