Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Coking

Coking is the thermal process of heating , known as coking coal, in the absence of oxygen at temperatures around 1000–1100°C to remove volatile matter through , yielding —a porous, carbon-rich solid used primarily as a and in blast furnaces for iron and . This transforms the 's organic components into a stable, high-strength material essential for modern , with global exceeding hundreds of millions of tons annually to support the industry's demand. Historically, the adoption of in 1709 by Abraham Darby revolutionized ironmaking by replacing scarce , enabling the scale-up of during the and laying the foundation for widespread manufacturing. Despite its indispensability, coking generates significant byproducts like and gases, which have raised environmental concerns over emissions and in facilities.

Definition and Fundamentals

Coal Coking Process

The coal coking process entails the high-temperature pyrolysis of bituminous coal in oxygen-deficient environments to produce metallurgical coke, a carbon-rich, porous solid fuel with minimal volatiles, primarily utilized as a reducing agent and heat source in blast furnaces for iron smelting. This destructive distillation drives off 20–30% of the coal's mass as volatile matter, yielding approximately 70–80% coke by weight, alongside coal gas, tar, and aqueous liquor. Coking coals must possess inherent caking properties, typically medium- to high-volatile bituminous types with free-swelling indices of 3–9 and low ash (under 10%) and sulfur (under 1%) content to ensure the formation of strong, coherent coke with adequate porosity for gas permeability in furnaces. Coal preparation begins with blending multiple seams to achieve consistent quality, followed by crushing to a top size of 25–50 mm and screening to remove fines, with adjusted to 4–8% for optimal charging. The prepared blend, weighing 20–40 tons per , is charged into slot-type byproduct recovery ovens—narrow, silica-refractory chambers (about 12–15 m long, 0.4–0.5 m wide, 4–6 m high) arranged in batteries of 50–100 units—via mechanical larry cars through top charging holes. Doors are sealed, and levelers distribute the charge evenly to promote uniform heating. Carbonization initiates through indirect heating from oven walls and flues, where or coke oven gas sustains wall temperatures of 1100–1200 °C. Devolatilization commences at 350–500 °C, softening the into a phase via of vitrinite macerals, releasing primary volatiles (e.g., CO, H₂, CH₄, tars) that peak between 500–900 °C; secondary reactions then crack heavier hydrocarbons and resolidify the residue into a of carbon domains. The process duration spans 14–24 hours, with progressing from walls to the oven center at rates of 10–20 mm/h, ensuring complete without oxygen ingress to prevent . Volatiles exit via ascension pipes to collectors, where primary cooling condenses tars and , followed by secondary cooling and electrostatic precipitation for fine tar recovery. Raw coke oven gas, comprising 50–60% hydrogen and methane, undergoes desulfurization (e.g., via ammonia liquor scrubbing), ammonia stripping, and tar/light oil separation to recover chemicals like ammonium sulfate (up to 15 kg/ton coke), benzene-toluene-xylene (20–50 L/ton), and naphthalene. The cleaned gas, providing 70–80% of plant energy needs, fuels oven heating. Coking completion is signaled by thermal profiles or gas evolution cessation; the doors are opened, and a hydraulic pusher rams the glowing coke (at ~1000 °C) onto a quench car for water immersion quenching, reducing temperature to under 200 °C and arresting oxidation while generating steam emissions. The quenched coke is screened, sorted for size (lump >40 mm for furnaces), and stockpiled, yielding products with >85% fixed carbon, porosities of 40–50%, and reactivities tuned for low CRI (coke reactivity index <25%) via precise blend control. Emissions from charging, coking, and pushing include particulates, VOCs, and PAHs, mitigated by engineering controls like enclosed pushes and gas cleaning.

Petroleum Coking Process

Petroleum coking is a thermal cracking process applied to heavy residual fractions from crude oil distillation, such as vacuum residuum, to convert them into lighter hydrocarbon distillates and solid petroleum coke by rejecting excess carbon. The process operates at temperatures of 450–550°C and near-atmospheric pressures, promoting endothermic pyrolysis reactions that break down large hydrocarbon molecules into gases, naphtha, gas oils, and coke. It enables refineries to upgrade low-value bottoms streams that would otherwise be limited to fuel oil markets, increasing overall distillate yields by up to 70-80% from the feed while producing coke as a byproduct for fuel or metallurgical use. The predominant method, delayed coking, functions as a semi-batch operation using pairs of large insulated coke drums, typically 6-9 meters in diameter and 30-40 meters tall, to allow continuous feed processing. The heavy feed, often comprising 5-20% asphaltenes and high Conradson carbon residue (10-25%), is preheated and then rapidly heated in a fired tubular furnace to 480-510°C, initiating cracking without full coking in the furnace to avoid fouling. The hot effluent, a mix of vapors and liquid, is routed to one of the coke drums where residence time of 12-24 hours at 400-450°C completes the thermal decomposition: lighter vapors are generated and sent to fractionation towers for separation into coker naphtha (boiling <220°C), coker gas oil (220-540°C), and off-gases, while heavier components polymerize and dehydrogenate into solid coke deposits filling 70-80% of the drum volume. Once the on-stream drum fills with coke, the feed switches to the idle drum, and the filled unit undergoes quenching with steam and water to cool and fracture the coke, followed by mechanical or hydraulic decoking using high-pressure water jets to cut out the solid mass, which is then screened and stored. Cycle times per drum are typically 24-48 hours, with coke yields ranging from 20-35% of feed depending on residuum quality—heavier feeds like those from Venezuelan or Canadian heavy crudes produce more needle coke suitable for electrodes, while lighter residues yield fuel-grade coke with higher sulfur (2-6%) and metals content. The distillates require hydrotreating due to high olefin and sulfur content from the cracking severity. Alternative variants include fluid coking, a continuous process using fluidized bed reactors at 500-560°C with recycled coke particles as heat carrier, achieving lower coke yields (15-25%) and higher distillate conversion through greater severity but producing more olefinic products. Flexicoking extends fluid coking by integrating a gasification step to convert excess coke into syngas, reducing solid waste and enabling hydrogen production, though it requires higher capital investment and is less common. Delayed coking dominates globally, accounting for over 90% of coking capacity as of 2023, due to its lower cost and reliability for processing diverse heavy feeds.

Historical Development

Early Coal Coking and Metallurgical Applications

The production of coke from coal for metallurgical use originated in England amid efforts to overcome the fuel shortages plaguing charcoal-dependent iron smelting, which consumed vast woodlands and drove up costs by the late 17th century. Bituminous coal was heated in enclosed structures or pits without air to expel volatile gases and tars, yielding a porous, high-carbon residue suitable as a reducing agent. Early patents for such coking appeared as early as 1627, with sporadic trials yielding inconsistent results due to sulfur impurities contaminating the iron. These impurities caused brittle outputs, limiting viability until process refinements addressed coal variability and oven design. Abraham Darby I achieved the first sustained success in 1709 at his Coalbrookdale furnace in Shropshire, where he smelted iron ore using coke derived from local bituminous coal. Drawing from his prior experience in brass smelting and casting, Darby optimized coking to minimize sulfur, enabling coke to sustain the high temperatures (around 1,200–1,500°C) needed for blast furnace operation. This replaced charcoal's inconsistent heat and volume limitations, producing cast iron pigs that could be molded into goods like pots, with initial outputs demonstrating commercial feasibility through lower fuel needs—coke required roughly one-third the weight of charcoal for equivalent reduction. Metallurgically, coke's uniform structure and energy density revolutionized iron production by enhancing carbon transfer to the ore, yielding pig iron with 3–4.5% carbon content ideal for casting rather than the wrought iron favored under charcoal regimes. This shift reduced smelting costs by up to 50% in early adopters and scaled output from tens to hundreds of tons annually per furnace, as coke's abundance from coalfields bypassed timber deforestation constraints. By 1750, coke-fired furnaces outnumbered charcoal ones in Britain, underpinning expansions in machinery and infrastructure, though initial resistance stemmed from perceived quality differences in forge conversion to wrought iron.

Industrial Expansion in the 19th and 20th Centuries

The expansion of coal in the 19th century was propelled by the growing iron and steel industries, which required a reliable, high-carbon fuel to replace charcoal and inefficient bituminous coal in blast furnaces. In the United States, the Connellsville district of southwestern Pennsylvania emerged as the epicenter, leveraging high-quality bituminous coal from the Pittsburgh seam to produce metallurgical coke via beehive ovens, which heated coal in low-oxygen conditions to drive off volatiles. By 1880, U.S. coke output reached 3.3 million short tons, with Connellsville contributing 2.2 million short tons from over 4,200 ovens. This growth reflected broader industrialization, as railroads and capital investment enabled scaling; Pennsylvania's coke ovens supplied distant steel mills, with production in the Connellsville area climbing to 6.5 million short tons by 1890. Technological refinements, such as brick beehive ovens introduced in the late 19th century, improved process control and yield compared to earlier mound methods, facilitating further proliferation. By 1900, national coke consumption surpassed 20 million tons, underscoring coke's causal role in enabling efficient smelting and the Bessemer converter's adoption for mass steel production. Regions like western Pennsylvania and northern West Virginia expanded rapidly, with coke output integral to the U.S. becoming a steel powerhouse; for instance, the Rochester and Pittsburgh Coal and Iron Company began oven operations in 1884 using Lower Freeport coal. Into the 20th century, coking capacity intensified with the transition to byproduct recovery ovens, which captured gases like ammonia and coal tar for chemical uses, enhancing economic viability over waste-emitting beehive designs. The , implemented in a 1896 Pennsylvania plant, marked this shift, with byproduct ovens displacing beehives by the 1910s amid resource pressures and efficiency demands. U.S. production peaked in the World War I era, reaching 56.5 million short tons in 1918, driven by steel demands for munitions and infrastructure; Connellsville hit 13.1 million short tons in 1907, while the adjacent Klondike district peaked at 9.6 million short tons in 1916. Appalachian dominance persisted, with expansions in West Virginia's southern counties and Alabama supporting exports and domestic metallurgy, though exhaustion of prime seams and electric arc furnace alternatives began curbing growth post-1920s.

Rise of Petroleum Coking in Refining

The earliest instances of petroleum coking occurred in the 1860s, when refiners distilled from crude oil in simple iron stills, leaving a carbon-rich residue of coke and tar that was manually excavated after each batch. This rudimentary process treated coke as a low-value byproduct, with production limited by the batch nature of horizontal still operations and the focus on for lighting. The development of thermal cracking processes in the early 20th century marked a pivotal shift, as rising demand for gasoline—driven by the internal combustion engine—necessitated upgrading heavier fractions of crude oil. Standard Oil's Burton thermal cracking process, introduced around 1912 at its Whiting, Indiana refinery, cracked gas oils under high pressure and temperature to yield more gasoline, but it generated significant coke deposits that required frequent shutdowns for cleaning. This led to the innovation of delayed coking in 1929, when Standard Oil of Indiana commissioned the first commercial delayed coker unit at the same Whiting facility; the process separated cracking in a heater from soaking and coking in dedicated drums, enabling semi-continuous operation and higher throughput of residual feeds into lighter distillates plus solid petroleum coke. Adoption accelerated post-World War II amid surging demand for transportation fuels, as refineries increasingly processed heavier crude residues to maximize light product yields—coking converted "bottom-of-the-barrel" materials that distillation alone could not upgrade. By the 1950s, variants like (developed by ) further improved efficiency for fluidizable feeds, allowing gasification of excess coke for additional hydrogen and energy. U.S. petroleum coke production capacity expanded dramatically thereafter, from approximately 53,000 barrels per day in the 1980s to over 900,000 barrels per day by the 2020s, reflecting the processing of heavier global crudes and economic incentives to reject carbon as coke rather than burn low-value residuals. Output rose 64% between 1980 and 1990 alone, underscoring coking's role in refinery profitability. This expansion was causally tied to shifts in crude quality and market economics: lighter sweet crudes yielded less residuum, but access to heavier sours (e.g., from Venezuela and later Canadian oil sands) increased bottoms upgrading needs, with coking providing a cost-effective thermal rejection of impurities like sulfur and metals into the solid coke byproduct. By 2011, U.S. refineries supplied 132 million barrels of petroleum coke annually, much of it exported or used in power generation and aluminum smelting, though production dipped to 39.3 million metric tons in 2024 amid fluctuating heavy oil imports. Delayed coking units proliferated globally, comprising a key residue conversion step in over 100 refineries by the early 21st century, prioritizing yield of naphtha, gas oils, and diesel over residual fuel oil.

Technical Processes and Chemistry

Key Reactions in Coal Coking

The coal coking process entails the anaerobic pyrolysis of bituminous coal at temperatures typically ranging from 900 to 1100 °C, where thermal decomposition drives the removal of volatile matter to yield metallurgical coke. This transformation proceeds through sequential stages of bond cleavage, devolatilization, and structural reorganization, with the coal's macromolecular network—comprising aromatic clusters linked by aliphatic bridges and heteroatoms—undergoing fragmentation and condensation. In the pre-decomposition phase below the onset temperature (Td ≈ 620–670 K), minor reactions include condensation of functional groups and desorption of physically bound species, such as water vapor and gases like CH₄ and CO₂; decarboxylation of carboxyl groups (e.g., R-COOH → R-H + CO₂) predominates between 373–473 K, releasing CO₂ and stabilizing the structure slightly before major breakdown. The active decomposition stage, from Td to ≈820 K, marks the core of primary pyrolysis, characterized by homolytic scission of weak C-C and C-O bonds in aliphatic side chains and bridges, generating free radicals that propagate via hydrogen abstraction and β-scission. Devolatilization intensifies here, evolving tars, light hydrocarbons, and aliphatics between 473–643 K, shifting to methane, polynuclear aromatics, phenols, and nitrogen heterocycles above 643 K; initial dehydrogenation of aromatic moieties forms radical intermediates (e.g., loss of H from C₆H₅-R → C₆H₄•-R + H•), facilitating metaplast formation during the plastic phase around 400–500 °C. Devolatilization commences as low as 150–200 °C, with volatile content dropping to 3–4% of initial levels by 480–700 °C under slow heating rates typical of . Secondary reactions dominate above 820 K, peaking at 973–1173 K for bituminous coals, involving cracking of primary volatiles (e.g., tar decomposition to H₂, CO, and lighter gases via heterocyclic ring opening) and aromatization of the residue. Coke matrix consolidation arises from radical recombination, polymerization of aromatics, and hydrogen elimination, yielding a porous, anisotropic carbon structure; hydrogen gas evolution persists beyond 760 °C, while overall yields reflect competition between primary fragmentation and secondary coking of vapors, with slower heating (as in industrial batteries) favoring higher coke output over tar. Mechanisms emphasize free-radical chain processes over ionic pathways, with coal rank influencing activation energies—lower for higher-volatile bituminous coals prone to swelling.

Variations in Petroleum Coking Techniques

Delayed coking represents the most prevalent technique in petroleum refining, accounting for the majority of global coker capacity due to its established reliability and adaptability to heavy residues. In this semi-batch process, vacuum distillation residues or other heavy feeds are preheated in a furnace to approximately 480-505°C before being directed into paired, insulated coke drums where thermal cracking proceeds over a residence time of 12-24 hours at temperatures around 400-450°C and near-atmospheric pressure. The drums alternate operations—one filling while the other cools—with solid coke buildup hydraulically cut and removed post-cycle, yielding petroleum coke alongside lighter products such as naphtha, gas oils, and gases. This method favors production of sponge coke suitable for aluminum anodes or fuel, though shot coke forms with certain feeds, and its flexibility accommodates varying crude qualities while rejecting metals into the coke fraction. Fluid coking, a continuous alternative, utilizes a fluidized-bed reactor system to achieve higher cracking severity than delayed coking, processing even heavier feeds with reduced coke yields and elevated distillate outputs. Feedstock is atomized onto a circulating bed of seed coke particles in the reactor maintained at 510-570°C, where vapor-phase cracking occurs rapidly; heat is generated by partial combustion of coke in an adjacent burner operating at 595-675°C, with fluidized particles circulating between vessels. The process operates above atmospheric pressure and produces finer fluid coke particles, often more olefinic products due to shorter residence times, enabling up to 10-15% higher liquid yields relative to delayed coking for comparable feeds. Flexicoking extends fluid coking by integrating a gasification reactor, converting surplus coke into low-BTU synthesis gas via reaction with steam and air, thereby minimizing net solid coke production—often to near-zero—and supplying additional refinery fuel gas. In this configuration, the fluid coker reactor feeds coke to a heater and gasifier operating at elevated temperatures, where partial oxidation and steam reforming produce "flexigas" while recirculating heated coke particles for process continuity. This variation enhances overall carbon utilization, reduces byproduct disposal needs, and lowers emissions like SO2 and NOx compared to standard fluid coking, though it requires more complex infrastructure and is less common in deployment.

Quality Control and Coke Properties

Quality control in coal coking processes focuses on ensuring metallurgical coke meets blast furnace requirements through rigorous testing of physical, mechanical, and chemical properties. Key parameters include the Coke Reactivity Index (CRI), which quantifies coke's gasification rate with CO₂ at 1,100°C for 2 hours, and the Coke Strength after Reaction (CSR), measuring the percentage of coke particles larger than 10 mm post-reaction and tumbling; desirable values are CRI below 25–30% and CSR above 60% to minimize degradation in the furnace reducing zone. Mechanical strength is evaluated via indices like M40 (percentage of particles >40 mm after drum tumbling) and M10 (>10 mm), with targets of M40 >80% and M10 >85% for structural integrity during burden descent. Chemical composition control targets low ash (<12%), sulfur (<0.7%), and moisture (<5%), as higher levels impair furnace efficiency and increase slag volume; these are monitored via proximate and ultimate analyses during coal blend selection and post-carbonization sampling. Process variations, such as coal blend optimization and coking temperature (typically 1,000–1,100°C), directly influence coke microstructure—lower porosity and anisotropic domains correlate with superior strength and reactivity resistance, verified through optical microscopy and X-ray diffraction. Quality assurance involves automated sampling from ovens, laboratory assays per ISO or ASTM standards, and feedback loops to adjust blending ratios, with deviations triggering production halts to prevent off-spec output that could elevate blast furnace coke rates by 5–10 kg/t hot metal. For petroleum coking, quality control emphasizes feedstock properties and operational parameters in delayed or fluid coking units to yield green or calcined coke suited for anodes or fuel. Critical properties include volatile combustible matter (VCM, <10% for calcined anode grade), sulfur (<3% for low-sulfur variants), and trace metals like vanadium (<300 ppm) and nickel (<200 ppm), which are controlled by residuum quality and heater outlet temperatures (450–500°C); excessive VCM leads to puffing and electrode defects during electrolysis. Density (bulk >0.8 g/cm³) and real (1.9–2.1 g/cm³ post-calcining at 1,200–1,400°C) are assessed via helium pycnometry, ensuring thermal and electrical conductivity for aluminum applications. Petroleum coke grading distinguishes anode-grade (high carbon purity, low impurities) from fuel-grade (higher up to 6–8%, viable for power but limited by emissions), with rapid analytical methods like enabling on-site verification of bulk properties such as calorific value (>8,000 kcal/kg). and handling protocols, including water suppression for control, maintain uniformity (typically 1–50 mm) and prevent contamination, as verified by guidelines. Overall, discrepancies in these properties can reduce anode life by 10–20% or , underscoring the need for empirical testing over predictive models alone.

Industrial Applications

Role in Iron and Steel Production

Metallurgical coke, derived from the high-temperature carbonization of coking coals, serves as the primary solid fuel and chemical reductant in blast furnaces for pig iron production, which supplies the basic oxygen furnace stage of steelmaking. In the blast furnace, coke undergoes combustion with preheated blast air to generate the heat required to melt the charge (typically 1,500–2,200°C), while its carbon content reacts with oxygen from iron ore (Fe₂O₃ or Fe₃O₄) to produce carbon monoxide (CO), the key reducing gas that converts iron oxides to metallic iron via indirect reduction: Fe₂O₃ + 3CO → 2Fe + 3CO₂. Coke also permeates the furnace burden to maintain a stable structure, preventing collapse under the weight of descending materials, and contributes carbon to the molten iron, yielding pig iron with 3.5–4.5% carbon content. Coke consumption, or "coke rate," in modern furnaces typically ranges from 350–400 kg per metric ton of hot metal produced, though advanced operations with pulverized injection or enrichment can reduce this to around 250–300 kg/t through partial substitution of coke's roles. This BF-BOF pathway accounts for roughly 70% of global crude steel output, underscoring coke's centrality to primary steelmaking, as alternatives like require significant energy inputs that often rely on reformed rather than solid reductants. In the electric arc furnace (EAF) route, comprising about 30% of global steel production and focused on scrap recycling, petroleum-derived needle coke plays a critical indirect role via graphite electrodes. Needle coke, a premium anisotropic petroleum coke with low impurity levels and needle-like microstructure, is calcined and graphitized to form electrodes that conduct electricity and sustain arcs up to 3,000–6,000°C for melting and refining. Its superior thermal conductivity, low thermal expansion (under 1.0 × 10⁻⁶/°C), and resistance to oxidation enable ultra-high-power electrodes essential for efficient EAF operation, where electrode consumption can reach 3–6 kg per metric ton of steel. Standard petroleum coke, however, lacks the structural integrity and purity for blast furnace use or electrode production, limiting its application to minor blending (up to 5–10% in coal cokes) or as a recarburizer in ladle metallurgy due to elevated sulfur (2–6%) and volatile matter.

Uses of Petroleum Coke

Petroleum coke, a carbon-rich of high-boiling thermal cracking in oil refineries, finds primary application as fuel-grade material in energy-intensive industries and as calcined-grade feedstock for production. Fuel-grade petroleum coke, typically containing higher levels (up to 6-8%), is burned for its high heating value of about 14,000-15,000 British thermal units per pound, serving as an economical alternative to in and power plants. In production, it provides up to 50-80% of energy needs in facilities equipped for high-sulfur fuels, while in power generation, it supports baseload in regions like and where imports reached significant volumes in 2023. Calcined petroleum coke (CPC), produced by heating green coke at 1,200-1,400°C to remove volatiles and enhance graphitizability, constitutes the bulk of anode-grade material for primary aluminum , where it comprises 65-80% of prebake anodes used in the Hall-Héroult electrolytic . Global aluminum production, exceeding 70 million metric tons annually as of 2023, drives demand for low-impurity CPC (sulfur <3%, metals <300 ppm) sourced from specific refineries processing sweet crudes. In steelmaking, CPC serves as a key ingredient in graphite electrodes for electric arc furnaces (EAF), enabling submerged arc melting of scrap and direct reduced iron; needle-grade CPC, with low ash and high carbon purity, is preferred for this, supporting over 30% of global steel output via EAF routes in 2024. Secondary uses include gasification for syngas in chemical production and as a reducing agent in titanium smelting, though these account for less than 5% of total consumption. In 2023, the United States exported approximately 41 million short tons of petroleum coke, primarily fuel-grade to Asia for cement and power applications, underscoring its role in global energy trade amid domestic refining expansions. While versatile, applications are constrained by sulfur and heavy metal content, necessitating specialized handling or blending to meet emission standards in regulated markets.

Other Specialized Applications

Foundry coke, a larger and more robust variant of metallurgical coke with lump sizes typically exceeding 100 millimeters, is employed in cupola furnaces for the smelting of cast iron and other metals in foundry operations. It functions both as a high-calorific fuel providing consistent heat for melting scrap steel, iron, and non-ferrous alloys like copper, and as a reducing agent to facilitate carbon addition and oxide removal during the process. In the United States, foundry coke constitutes 5 to 7 percent of total metallurgical coke output, underscoring its niche but essential role in producing ductile and gray iron castings for applications in automotive components and machinery. Metallurgical coke also supports non-ferrous metal production, serving as a reducing agent in the smelting of ores for metals such as copper, lead, aluminum, titanium, and silicon. In these processes, coke's high carbon content and low reactivity with slag enable efficient conversion of metal oxides to elemental forms at elevated temperatures, often in electric arc or reverberatory furnaces. This application extends coke's utility beyond ferrous metallurgy, contributing to the production of alloys used in electronics, aerospace, and construction materials. Coke breeze, the fine byproduct fraction under 25 millimeters from coking operations, finds specialized use as a carbonaceous backfill in impressed current cathodic protection systems for underground pipelines, storage tanks, and structures. Its low resistivity and high conductivity enhance anode performance by distributing current uniformly and minimizing polarization effects, with calcined petroleum coke breeze preferred for its superior purity and stability in corrosive soils. Additionally, fuel-grade petroleum coke, derived from delayed coking, is utilized in cement kilns as a substitute for coal or natural gas, comprising up to 40 percent of fossil fuel inputs globally due to its high heating value of approximately 8,000 kcal/kg and ability to sustain clinkering temperatures above 1,450°C.

Environmental and Health Considerations

Emissions from Coal Coking Operations

Coal coking operations, conducted in coke oven batteries, emit a complex mixture of pollutants during the destructive distillation of bituminous coal at temperatures of 1,000°C to 1,400°C in the absence of oxygen. These emissions originate from multiple process stages, including coal preparation and crushing, charging into ovens, carbonization, pushing of incandescent coke, and quenching with water. Particulate matter (PM), primarily filterable PM consisting of coal dust, soot, and tar droplets, arises from mechanical disturbances and incomplete combustion, while gaseous and volatile releases stem from thermal decomposition of coal volatiles. Approximately 20% to 35% of the initial coal charge is volatilized as gases and vapors during carbonization, with much captured as coke-oven gas in by-product recovery systems, though fugitive emissions persist via oven doors, lids, and offtake systems. The composition includes PM with a benzene-soluble fraction containing polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) such as benzo(a)pyrene, benzanthracene, chrysene, and phenanthrene (>40 PAHs identified), alongside trace metals like , , and mercury. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) feature , , and xylenes, often as vapors from charging and leaks. Gaseous components encompass (CO), (H2S), (NH3), nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur oxides (SOx), , , and aliphatic aldehydes; coke-oven gas itself comprises (primary), , , CO, CO2, , and minor H2S and NH3. Uncontrolled emission factors, expressed in kg per Mg of charged, quantify typical releases absent mitigation, as documented by the U.S. Agency's AP-42 compilation (updated periodically, with data reflecting empirical measurements from U.S. facilities).
Process StepPM (filterable, kg/Mg)VOCs (as CH4, kg/Mg) (kg/Mg) (kg/Mg) (kg/Mg)
Coal crushing (with cyclone)0.055----
Oven charging0.241.250.3-0.015
Oven door leaks0.270.75---
Oven pushing0.58-0.035--
Quenching (dirty water)2.62----
Underfire stack (raw )0.234--2.0-
These factors derive from stack testing and material balance methods across operational coke plants, highlighting quenching and pushing as dominant PM sources and charging as key for VOCs and CO. Coke oven emissions, particularly the PAH-rich PM fraction, are classified as carcinogenic by agencies including the National Toxicology Program, based on elevated risks in exposed workers.

Pollution Associated with Petroleum Coking

The delayed coking process, a primary method for coking, emits volatile organic compounds (VOCs) such as non-methane/non-ethane hydrocarbons, including n-decane, m,, and n-nonane, primarily during coke drum switching, venting, and blowdown operations. These emissions occur as lighter fractions are released from cracking of heavy residues at temperatures around 450–500°C. (SO₂) and nitrogen oxides (NOₓ) are also released, stemming from sulfur-rich feedstocks (up to 5–7% sulfur in some residues) and high-temperature combustion-like conditions in the . Particulate matter (PM), including fine coke dust, is generated during coke drum cutting with high-pressure water jets and subsequent handling of green , which has particle sizes often below 10 μm (PM₁₀). Fugitive emissions from storage piles exacerbate PM releases, with wind-blown dust containing trace metals like (up to 500 ppm in petcoke) and . Calcining of raw petcoke for further use adds gaseous pollutants like (HCl) and additional SO₂, with U.S. facilities reporting over 56,000 tons of SO₂ annually from such operations as of 2024. Wastewater from quenching hot coke drums and decoking contains emulsified oils, dissolved organic matter rich in nitrogen and sulfur heterocycles, and including lead, mercury, , and , often exceeding local discharge limits without advanced treatment. Suspended solids from coke fines contribute to high (TSS) levels, typically 500–2,000 mg/L in untreated . Unlike many refinery streams, petcoke-related wastewater lacks comprehensive federal effluent guidelines under the Clean Water Act, allowing discharges with pollutants like these metals into surface waters. Petroleum coke itself, as a , poses risks during open storage, with erosion from rain and wind mobilizing PAHs, , and ultrafine particles into air and ; stockpiles have been linked to localized PM₁₀ exceedances near facilities. , including CO₂ and CH₄, arise from flaring off-gases and incomplete in associated units, though quantification varies by efficiency. Regulatory standards under EPA's New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for refineries limit VOCs and PM from delayed cokers but do not fully address downstream petcoke handling impacts.

Empirical Data on Health and Ecological Effects

Empirical studies on workers exposed to coke oven emissions from coal coking have consistently demonstrated elevated risks of respiratory diseases and cancer. A cohort analysis of coke oven workers found an increased incidence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), with odds ratios indicating a dose-response relationship tied to exposure duration and intensity to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and particulate matter in emissions. The National Cancer Institute reports that occupational exposure to these emissions raises the risk of lung cancer, with standardized mortality ratios in historical cohorts exceeding 1.5 for oven operators, and possibly kidney cancer based on limited evidence from elevated biomarkers. Epidemiological data from U.S. coke plants further confirm higher lung cancer rates among charging and topside workers, attributing causality to direct inhalation of volatile organic compounds like benzene and benzopyrene, classified as Group 1 carcinogens by the International Agency for Research on Cancer. Neurobehavioral impairments have also been documented in coke oven workers, with cross-sectional studies linking chronic benzopyrene exposure to reduced memory and learning capacities, evidenced by lower choline levels in brain regions and performance deficits on standardized cognitive tests. Proximity to coking facilities correlates with adverse birth outcomes; a spatiotemporal analysis in residential areas near plants showed increased preterm births and low birth weights, with relative risks up to 1.2 per interquartile increase in emission proxies like PM2.5 and PAHs. An interrupted time series following the 2012 closure of a major Chinese coking plant revealed short-term reductions in cardiovascular hospitalizations by 10-15% and longer-term air quality improvements, underscoring causal links between coking emissions and population-level health burdens from fine particulates and sulfur oxides. For petroleum coking, empirical toxicity assessments indicate lower direct health risks compared to coal processes. Animal studies by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency found exhibits low , with no observed carcinogenicity in rodent inhalation or dermal exposure trials at concentrations up to 100 mg/m³. Human health consultations near storage sites, such as in , detected elevated and metals like but concluded non-cancer risks below thresholds of concern for chronic exposure, though dust handling can exacerbate respiratory irritation in sensitive populations. Comprehensive reviews affirm petcoke's limited potential, with ecological toxicity tests showing LC50 values for aquatic species exceeding 1,000 mg/L, far above typical environmental releases. Ecologically, coal coking contributes to localized air and degradation through emissions of PAHs, , and effluents. Monitoring data from coking operations reveal annual releases of up to 10-20 kg of PAHs per ton of produced, leading to sediment contamination and in aquatic food chains, with fish tissue concentrations correlating to reduced in receiving waters. Terrestrial impacts include vegetation stress from acid deposition, with studies in mining-adjacent coking regions documenting 20-30% declines in plant cover due to and fallout, exacerbating rates by 1.5-2 times baseline levels. Greenhouse gas contributions from coking, primarily CO2 and leaks, account for approximately 1-2% of sector-wide emissions in integrated facilities, though mitigation via gas recovery has reduced by up to 90% in modern plants per operational audits. Petroleum coking's ecological footprint centers on dust and combustion byproducts during calcining. Lifecycle assessments quantify petcoke disposal via as emitting 0.5-1.0 tons of CO2 equivalent per ton processed, with minimal leaching of metals like into under controlled conditions, though open stockpiles have led to localized PM10 spikes exceeding 150 µg/m³ in wind-prone areas, temporarily impairing nearby microbial activity. Empirical recovery data from U.S. facilities indicate that while and contents pose risks to avian and invertebrate species— with bioassays showing 50% mortality at 500 mg/kg —engineered liners and revegetation efforts have restored site productivity within 5-10 years post-closure. Overall, peer-reviewed syntheses emphasize that unregulated fugitive emissions drive most impacts, with regulated operations showing negligible long-term ecological persistence compared to counterparts.

Economic and Strategic Importance

Global Production and Market Dynamics

Global metallurgical coke production reached an estimated market value of USD 346.15 billion in 2023, with projections for USD 361.92 billion in 2024, driven primarily by demand in the sector. dominates output, accounting for the majority of global supply; its production totaled 324.78 million metric tons in the first eight months of 2024, reflecting a 0.4% year-on-year decline amid domestic demand fluctuations and import reliance for coking . Other significant producers include the , which output 39.3 million metric tons in 2024, down from 40.7 million tons in 2023 due to reduced activity. and European nations contribute smaller shares, with global seaborne exports falling 5% year-on-year to 27 million metric tons in 2023, signaling tighter trade amid regional self-sufficiency efforts. Petroleum coke production, a byproduct of oil , complements metallurgical applications in non-ferrous metals and electrodes; U.S. exports alone reached 41 million tons in 2023, near the decade-long average, while global market value stood at approximately USD 31.3 billion in 2024, forecasted to expand to USD 35.5 billion in 2025 amid rising refinery outputs in and the . Total global petroleum coke volumes are less precisely tracked but align with heavy crude processing trends, with major producers including , , and . Market dynamics hinge on steel production cycles, which consumed roughly 70-75% of metallurgical in recent years, exerting upward pressure on prices during supply disruptions like weather events or shortages. In 2024, coking and prices experienced volatility, with global exports projected to rise 6% by 2026 due to infrastructure in emerging markets, though efficiency gains and adoption temper long-term growth. Early 2025 saw initial price hikes from supply constraints and robust orders, pushing the market toward equilibrium despite geopolitical tensions affecting imports. Trade flows favor as a net importer, with emerging as a key exporter of approximately 5.6 million tons of metallurgical in 2024. Overall, the sector's stems from inelastic in developing economies, offset by incremental decarbonization pressures reducing intensity per ton of .

Dependence in Steel Manufacturing

The blast furnace-basic oxygen furnace (BF-BOF) route, which accounts for approximately 70% of global crude production, relies on metallurgical as an essential input for reducing and providing structural support in the furnace. In this , serves as the primary source of carbon for carburization, generates reducing gases like , and maintains the permeable bed necessary for gas flow and burden descent, properties not fully replicable by alternatives at scale. Global output exceeded 1.8 billion tonnes in 2023, implying roughly 1.1-1.26 billion tonnes of metallurgical demand annually, derived from about 770 kg of coking per tonne of produced via BF-BOF. This dependence persists due to the limited scalability of scrap-based electric arc furnace (EAF) routes, which comprised only 28-30% of production in 2023 and require high-quality scrap availability, often insufficient for virgin needs in growing economies. Countries like , producing over half of global , maintain a 90% BF-BOF share, amplifying systemic reliance on coking imports, as domestic reserves are often rather than metallurgical grade. similarly faces import dependency, with coking needs projected to rise from 87 million tonnes in fiscal year 2025 to 135 million tonnes by 2030 to support capacity expansion to 300 million tonnes. Supply disruptions, such as those from export halts or geopolitical tensions, have historically driven coke price volatility exceeding 100% year-over-year, underscoring vulnerabilities in steel margins and output stability. While (DRI) and hydrogen-based reduction pathways aim to diminish coke use, they currently represent under 2% of global capacity and face technical barriers in achieving equivalent productivity and cost without subsidies. Thus, coke remains indispensable for primary steelmaking, with BF-BOF's dominance projected to decline only gradually to 60% by 2030 amid uneven supply and infrastructure inertia.

Supply Chain Vulnerabilities and Geopolitics

The global for metallurgical , essential for producing used in furnaces, exhibits significant vulnerabilities due to geographic concentration among a limited number of exporters. accounts for approximately 52% of global metallurgical coal exports, making producers worldwide heavily reliant on its output for consistent supply. This dependence exposes the chain to disruptions from , labor strikes, or policy shifts in , as evidenced by historical export fluctuations tied to domestic regulations and weather events. Similarly, the faces risks from its geographically concentrated production in , where localized events like floods or regulatory changes can curtail output, amplifying global shortages. Geopolitical tensions exacerbate these vulnerabilities, particularly through sanctions and conflicts affecting key suppliers. Following Russia's 2022 invasion of , Western sanctions on Russian exports—previously a major source for and —drove up global metallurgical prices by restricting approximately 40 million metric tons of annual supply, forcing buyers to pivot to pricier alternatives from the U.S. and . In , Russian advances toward the Pokrovsk basin in late 2024 halted operations at critical mines supplying up to 30% of the country's coking needs, compelling steelmakers to import at premiums of around 30% higher costs, thereby straining national output that had already declined to 6 million tons in 2023. Such disruptions highlight how military actions targeting or ports create bottlenecks, as strategic coal-handling facilities become potential flashpoints. Trade policies and regional self-sufficiency efforts further underscore strategic risks. China's control over more than 50% of global production amplifies its influence on demand, yet its reliance on imported —despite domestic production—subjects the chain to U.S.-China trade frictions and export controls. The , importing nearly 90% of its needs for production, remains particularly exposed to these dynamics, with limited domestic alternatives heightening exposure to supplier embargoes or shipping route interruptions in the . Overall, the combination of oligopolistic supply structures and interstate rivalries positions coking supply chains as a point in broader economic competitions, where disruptions can cascade into production halts and escalated costs for downstream industries.

Controversies and Debates

Environmental Criticisms Versus Industrial Necessity

Coke production, primarily from in , generates significant environmental concerns, including emissions of volatile organic compounds such as and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), which are linked to increased risks of and other health issues among workers and nearby communities. Coke oven operations also release greenhouse gases, with from coking coal mines contributing an additional 17% to the 20-year of . Furthermore, the sector, reliant on coking for roughly 70% of global via the blast furnace-basic oxygen furnace (BF-BOF) route, accounts for 7-9% of worldwide CO2 emissions, totaling about 2.6 GtCO2e annually as of recent estimates. Despite these impacts, metallurgical coke remains indispensable for efficient operations, serving as both a high-temperature exceeding 2000°C and a that converts to molten iron by removing oxygen, while providing structural permeability to allow gas flow. Without coke, the BF-BOF process—which produced over 1.3 billion tonnes of crude in 2023—would fail to achieve the necessary chemical reduction and , rendering large-scale primary infeasible with current technology. Global steel demand, projected at 1.82 billion tonnes in 2023 and rising to support and , depends on this route for virgin steel production, as electric arc furnaces (EAFs) using metal cannot fully substitute due to limited scrap availability and quality constraints for high-grade applications. The tension arises in policy debates, where environmental advocates emphasize health risks and climate contributions—such as coal mine equating to emissions exceeding those of major economies—urging rapid phase-outs, yet analyses highlight that alternatives like hydrogen-based direct reduction remain unproven at scale, with deployment limited to pilot projects and high costs that could disrupt supply chains vital for . While oven emissions constitute a small of total GHGs relative to 's end-use , regulatory delays under certain administrations have been criticized for prioritizing controls over operational continuity, underscoring the causal trade-off between emission reductions and maintaining output essential for global development. Empirical from life-cycle assessments indicate that even optimized coking emits less CO2 per tonne of than many proposed substitutes when scaled, though ongoing research into or faces metallurgical limitations in replicating 's strength and reactivity. Thus, while criticisms drive , the irreplaceable role of coking in primary persists amid incomplete decarbonization pathways.

Alternatives to Coking in Steel Production

Electric arc furnaces (EAFs) represent a primary alternative to coke-dependent blast furnace-basic oxygen furnace (BF-BOF) , utilizing to melt scrap or (DRI) rather than coke for reduction and heat. In 2023, EAFs accounted for 28.6% of global crude production, compared to 71.1% for BF-BOF routes that rely on metallurgical coke. This scrap-based EAF process avoids coking entirely, emitting approximately 0.5 s of CO2 per of versus 2.2 s for BF-BOF, though emissions depend on the source and scrap quality. EAFs require no constant coke supply, operating at lower temperatures and with greater flexibility for adjustments, but they are constrained by global scrap availability, which covers only about 30-40% of primary demand without supplementation from DRI or . Direct reduced iron (DRI) production offers another coke-free pathway by reducing pellets or lumps using (from ) or at temperatures below iron's (around 1200°C), yielding sponge iron that feeds EAFs for melting and refining. Traditional gas-based DRI, dominant in regions like the , avoids coking ovens and blast furnaces, with lower CO2 intensity (under 0.5 tonnes per tonne when paired with blends) due to the absence of carbon-intensive coke. Global DRI output supports about 8-10% of production indirectly via EAFs, with capacities expanding; for instance, U.S. DRI capacity reached 7.7 million tonnes by 2024, enabling coke-free primary from ore. However, gas-based DRI still emits CO2 from reforming , limiting its decarbonization potential without shifts to renewables. Hydrogen direct reduction (H-DR or H2-DRI) emerges as a near-zero-emission alternative, replacing carbon-based reductants with produced via using renewable electricity, producing water vapor instead of CO2 during reduction. Pilot plants, such as Sweden's HYBRIT initiative, demonstrated fossil-free production from in 2021, with commercial-scale projects targeting output by 2026-2030; global H2-DRI capacity forecasts predict growth to support 10-20% of by 2035 if costs fall below $2/kg. Yet, as of 2025, adoption remains limited—less than 1% of production—due to high capital costs (2-3 times BF-BOF), energy demands (requiring 3-4 times more electricity), and infrastructure gaps, evidenced by delays in projects like those in and amid supply uncertainties. Projections indicate BF-BOF's share declining to 60% by 2030 as EAF and DRI routes expand, but full transition hinges on /DRI scalability and green energy affordability, with or reduction as niche, unproven supplements.

Policy Responses and Technological Feasibility

Governments have implemented targeted regulations to curb emissions from coal coking operations, focusing on hazardous air pollutants and greenhouse gases. In the United States, the Environmental Protection Agency finalized stricter standards in 2024 for oven emissions, including caps on , volatile organic compounds, and , which were upheld against industry challenges in October 2025, aiming to reduce cancer risks near facilities by up to 60%. The European Union's (CBAM), effective in transitional phase since October 2023 and fully from 2026, imposes carbon pricing on imported steel based on embedded emissions, indirectly pressuring coking-dependent producers in high-emission regions like and by adding costs equivalent to €85-150 per ton of CO2 by 2030. Broader policy frameworks emphasize incentives for low-carbon transitions in . The U.S. Department of Energy promotes decarbonization through R&D funding and tax credits under the , targeting a shift from coke-based blast furnaces to furnaces, though integrated mills reliant on coking face ongoing emissions standards without full phase-out mandates. Internationally, alignment with goals has spurred national strategies, such as Japan's modeling of pathways, but enforcement varies, with coal mine methane reductions from coking supply chains identified as a quick-win yet underutilized . Technological alternatives to traditional coking, such as hydrogen direct reduced iron (H2-DRI) combined with electric arc furnaces, demonstrate feasibility at pilot scales but face scalability barriers for global deployment. H2-DRI avoids by using as a reductant, potentially cutting CO2 emissions by 95% compared to blast furnace-basic oxygen furnace routes, with commercial plants like Sweden's HYBRIT operational since 2021 producing fossil-free at costs 20-40% higher than conventional methods due to prices exceeding $3-6 per kg. Challenges include deficits, requiring massive electrolyzer capacity—equivalent to 380 GW globally by 2050 for alone—and dependence on low-cost renewable electricity, which remains intermittent and geographically limited. Electrolysis of emerges as a more radical option, directly splitting ore into iron using renewable , bypassing coking entirely, with lab- demonstrations achieving high-purity output but demands 40-50% above H2-DRI and costs prohibitive at without breakthroughs in . (CCU) applied to coke ovens shows limited promise, with studies indicating 45-89% CO2 reduction potential via processes like calcium looping enhanced by coke oven gas, yet high penalties (10-20% of plant output) and unproven integration hinder commercial viability beyond niche applications. Overall, while policies accelerate R&D, coke's role as both reductant and structural support in blast furnaces persists, with alternatives feasible for 20-30% of production by 2030 in regions with cheap renewables, but full substitution demands unresolved advances in cost, supply chains, and grid stability.

References

  1. [1]
    Coke (coal) - Glossary - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)
    Coke (coal) is a solid residue from low-ash coal, made by baking it at high temperatures to remove volatiles, leaving fixed carbon and ash. It is used as fuel ...<|separator|>
  2. [2]
    steel production, coking coal - World Coal Association - Energy BC
    The coking process consists of heating coking coal to around 1000-1100ºC in the absence of oxygen to drive off the volatile compounds (pyrolysis). This process ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  3. [3]
    Coking coal of the United States—Modern and historical coking coal ...
    Jan 13, 2021 · Coking coal, or metallurgical coal, has been produced in the United States for nearly 200 years. Coking coal is primarily used in the production ...
  4. [4]
    History of Coke - Indiana University of Pennsylvania
    The conversion of coal into coke for the smelting of iron was first attempted in England in the 18th century. Before this time, iron-making utilized large ...
  5. [5]
    The Steel Story - worldsteel.org
    Then in 1709, Abraham Darby perfected the use of coke in a blast furnace to produce pig iron for pots and kettles. This new technique helped boost production, ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] 12.2 Coke Production 12.2.1 General Metallurgical coke is produced ...
    Metallurgical coke is produced by destructive distillation of coal in coke ovens. Prepared coal is "coked", or heated in an oxygen-free atmosphere until all ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] COKE PRODUCTION FOR BLAST FURNACE IRONMAKING
    The entire cokemaking operation is comprised of the following steps: Before carbonization, the selected coals from specific mines are blended, pulverized, and ...
  8. [8]
    Understanding Coke Making in Byproduct Coke Oven Battery
    Mar 9, 2015 · Coking temperatures generally range from 900 deg C to 1,100 deg C and are on the higher side of the range to produce blast furnace coke. During ...
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Coke Manufacturing - MIGA
    Pre-heat and use high grade coal to reduce coking time, increase throughput, reduce fuel consumption, and minimize thermal shock to refractory bricks. Coke Oven ...<|separator|>
  10. [10]
    Coking Coal - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Coking coal is defined as a type of coal that softens and swells when heated, forming lightweight, porous coke particles, and is characterized by a free ...
  11. [11]
    Coke making in Byproduct Coke Oven Batteries - IspatGuru
    Jun 1, 2014 · The coking process consists of heating coal in the absence of air to drive off the volatile compounds. The resulting material is a carbon mass ...
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Steelmaking: The Coke Oven By-Product Plant
    In the process of converting coal into coke using the by-product coke oven, the volatile matter in the coal is vaporized and driven off. This volatile ...
  13. [13]
    Coke Oven By-Product Recovery Plants: National Emissions ... - EPA
    These two streams are processed to recover by-product coal chemicals and to condition the gas, so that it can be used as fuel.
  14. [14]
    How a Coke Plant Works
    Oct 4, 2018 · Coal is the main ingredient used to make coke. Iron is produced by inputting coal into a blast furnace. However, coal cannot be put directly into a blast ...
  15. [15]
    Coking | FSC 432: Petroleum Refining
    The common objective of the three coking processes is to maximize the yield of distillate products in a refinery by rejecting large quantities of carbon in the ...
  16. [16]
    Petroleum Coke - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Delayed coking is a batch process where residual components of crude oil are heated to about 475°C to 520°C (890–970°F) in a furnace and then confined in a coke ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Coking 101 An Introduction to Delayed Coking
    The objective of the. Coker is to process the asphalt-like material to produce higher value products, such as gasoline, diesel fuel,. LPG, and petroleum coke.
  18. [18]
    Delayed Coking | FSC 432: Petroleum Refining
    Delayed coking involves heating feed in a tubular heater, then the coking occurs in an insulated coke drum, which is why it's called 'delayed coking'.
  19. [19]
    Delayed coking in the oil & gas industry - Refining - KROHNE Group
    The Delayed Coking process is applied to the residual heavy oil, also called residuum feed, which emerges from the bottom of the vacuum distillation column.
  20. [20]
    Delayed coking - Sulzer
    Delayed coking uses dual coke drums, alternating feed. Feed is heated, solidifies, and light ends flash off. A solid coke remains in the drum. Water is used to ...
  21. [21]
    Delayed coking as a sustainable refinery solution - DigitalRefining
    Delayed coking is a carbon rejection technology using heavy petroleum residues to produce lighter hydrocarbon distillates (inclusive of naphtha and coker gasoil) ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] PETROLEUM COKE: ESSENTIAL TO MANUFACTURING - API.org
    Petroleum coke, or petcoke, is a product produced from all types of oil (light/heavy crudes) during the oil refining process. Many different products are ...
  23. [23]
    Fluid and Flexi-Coking | FSC 432: Petroleum Refining
    Fluid coking can process heavier VDR and gives a higher distillate yield (and lower coke yield) than delayed coking. Figure 6.9 shows a schematic diagram of ...
  24. [24]
    Delayed coking and flexicoker in crude oil refining - Inspenet
    Aug 27, 2024 · The process consists of heating a heavy hydrocarbon in a furnace at high speed and then sending it to coke drums. Under specific pressure and ...
  25. [25]
    Coking is a refinery process that produces 19% of finished ... - EIA
    Jan 28, 2013 · Coking is a refinery unit operation that upgrades material called bottoms from the atmospheric or vacuum distillation column into higher-value products.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  26. [26]
    TRANSITION FROM CHARCOAL TO COKE IN IRON ... - Nature
    The search for a substitute began beforo tho eighteenth century; the first patent for coko was taken out in 1627, nnd apparently tho. Darbys of Coalbrookdale ...
  27. [27]
    Key Figures in the History of the Ironbridge Gorge
    It was here that in 1709 he perfected his technique for using coke as a fuel to smelt iron. Abraham Darby I died on 8 March 1717 (aged 39). His legacy and ...
  28. [28]
    Why Abraham Darby I chose to smelt iron with coke
    Abraham Darby's great breakthrough was realising that iron made with coke could produce a grey iron pot in a cold mould, which allowed him to use the much ...
  29. [29]
    Coke smelting (Chapter 9) - The British Industrial Revolution in ...
    Abraham Darby's success in 1709 was a macro-invention that radically changed factor proportions as coke displaced charcoal in the blast furnace. The macro- ...
  30. [30]
    The Adoption of Coke-Smelting by the British Iron Industry, 1709-1790
    The costs of making pig iron with coke fell significantly during the first half of the century, while char- coal pig iron costs rose sharply in the 175Os, ...
  31. [31]
    The US Coal Industry in the Nineteenth Century – EH.net
    The coal industry was a major foundation for American industrialization in the nineteenth century. As a fuel source, coal provided a cheap and efficient source ...
  32. [32]
    [PDF] Coking Coal of the United States—Modern and Historical Coking ...
    Mar 4, 2015 · up to 74 tons of coke per day in the early 20th century until mining ... production of anode coke from Blue Gem coal: Fuel, v. 89, no ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] COAL AND COKE RESOURCE ANALYSIS - NPS History
    The coal and coke industries of western Penn- sylvania and northern West Virginia played a crucial role in the industrial development of the United States ...
  34. [34]
    Coke Making - e-WV
    Feb 8, 2024 · Coke made from bituminous coal displaced anthracite as the leading blast furnace fuel in America in 1869. The first coke made in West Virginia ...
  35. [35]
    Coke Production, Beehive and Byproduct for United States
    Coke Production, Beehive and Byproduct for United States (A01207USA448NNBR) ; 1918: 56.48 ; 1917: 55.61 ; 1916: 54.53 ; 1915: 41.58 ; View All ...
  36. [36]
    DCU Timeline in the United States - Coking.com
    Nov 2, 2013 · 1860's Refiners boiled petroleum in an iron still to distill kerosene. Afterwards, the coke and tar where dug out. Single horizontal stills were used.
  37. [37]
    [PDF] Delayed Coking
    Delayed coking is a process to produce distillates from heavy residuum, and is a relatively inexpensive, predominant coking technology.
  38. [38]
    Fundamentals of Delayed Coking Joint Industry Project
    Sep 26, 2025 · Delayed coking evolved steadily over the early to mid 1900s to enable refiners to convert high boiling, residual petroleum fractions to light products such as ...
  39. [39]
    Fundamentals of Delayed Coking Joint Industry Project (JIP ...
    Delayed coking evolved steadily over the early to mid-1990s. Its purpose is to enable refiners to convert high-boiling, residual petroleum fractions to light ...
  40. [40]
    U.S. Refinery Marketable Petroleum Coke Production Capacity as of ...
    U.S. refinery petroleum coke production capacity was 53,405 in the 1980s, 341,335 in the 1990s, 463,980 in the 2000s, 760,441 in the 2010s, and 908,574 in the ...
  41. [41]
    REFINERY COKE-1 MAJOR GROWTH IN COKE PRODUCTION ...
    U.S. petroleum coke production has increased 64% during the 10-year period from 1980 to 1990. This dramatic rise makes it timely to discuss the history and ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  42. [42]
    US coke output falls in 2024 | Latest Market News - Argus Media
    The US produced about 39.3mn t of coke in 2024, down from 40.7mn t produced a year earlier, according to data from the US Energy Information Administration (EIA) ...
  43. [43]
    [PDF] Thermal Decomposition of Coal
    Carbonization is more correctly used to describe the process for the production of char or coke when the coal is heated at temperatures in excess of about 773 K ...
  44. [44]
    A review on coal pyrolysis and gasification - Oxford Academic
    Sep 24, 2025 · Saxena [83] also summarized the coal pyrolysis mechanism as one that begins with a C-C bond rupture at about 400°C, noting that the C-C bond ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  45. [45]
    [PDF] COKING - Gyan Sanchay
    Dehydrogenation. –The initial reaction in carbonization involves the loss of hydrogen atom from an aromatic hydrocarbon and.
  46. [46]
    Fluid Coke - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Due to the higher thermal cracking severity used in fluid coking compared with delayed coking, the products are somewhat more olefinic than the products from ...
  47. [47]
    Variability in Metallurgical Coke Reactivity Index (CRI) and Coke ...
    Jan 6, 2022 · The coke reactivity index and coke strength after reaction are critical parameters for the efficient operation of a blast furnace.
  48. [48]
    Standard Test Method for Measuring Coke Reactivity Index (CRI ...
    Nov 16, 2017 · This test method, patterned after the Nippon Steel test procedure, describes the equipment and techniques used for determining lump coke reactivity in carbon ...
  49. [49]
    Coke quality requirements by European blast furnace operators
    Aug 6, 2025 · Special emphasis is given to the high temperature properties of coke expressed by the CSR and CRI indices. CSR indices below 60% are in most ...
  50. [50]
    Physical and chemical properties of metallurgical coke and its ...
    Jun 15, 2024 · The primary indicators of coke quality are particle size, mechanical strength (M40, M10), thermal strength (CRI, CSR) and composition.
  51. [51]
    [PDF] predictions of coke quality and future requirements for cokemaking
    This paper reviews quality requirements of metallurgical coke for the blast furnace, coke structure, and relationships between structure and quality.
  52. [52]
    [PDF] Metallurgical Coal and Coke Testing - SGS
    The maximum dilatation value is the key parameter and for individual coals, the highest value possible is considered optimal: •. High volatiles: +50 to >300%. •.
  53. [53]
    Coal for metallurgical coke production: predictions of coke quality ...
    This paper reviews quality requirements of metallurgical coke for the blast furnace, coke structure, and relationships between structure and quality.
  54. [54]
    Optimizing coal blending for metallurgical coke production using a ...
    This blending process ensures that coke quality parameters are met, while also optimizing the use of high-quality coking coal and extending the available coal ...
  55. [55]
    [PDF] Impact of Feed Properties and Operating Parameters on Delayed ...
    Petroleum Coke General Properties: Volatile Combustible Matter (VCM). • VCM ... • Rules of thumb for control in fuel coke. – Increase heater outlet 5-7 ...
  56. [56]
    13 Petroleum Coke Properties You Need to Know - East Carbon
    Jun 10, 2025 · 1. Appearance and Color · 2. Density · 3. Hardness · 4. Structure · 5. Calorific Value · 6. Thermal Conductivity · 7. Electrical Conductivity · 8.
  57. [57]
    Petroleum Coke - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Petroleum coke is a chunky powdered carbon product derived from petroleum. If petroleum coke is heated to a high temperature, it may emit volatiles such as ...
  58. [58]
    Rapid quantitative analysis of petroleum coke properties by laser ...
    May 21, 2024 · Based on the actual demand for rapid and accurate analysis of petroleum coke properties, an optimized RF calibration model was proposed, ...
  59. [59]
    What Is Petroleum Coke Used For? | McCreath Laboratories
    Nov 9, 2022 · High-grade petcoke can produce electrodes for aluminum and steel industries due to its low heavy metal and sulfur concentrations while low- ...
  60. [60]
    [PDF] Guidance Document for the Storage and Handling of Petroleum Coke
    An emission control technique that is commonly used at petcoke storage locations is the application of water to storage piles. The systematic application of ...
  61. [61]
    Coal to Make Coke and Steel - University of Kentucky
    Coke is a porous, carbon-rich material used to make steel. The coke is mixed with iron ore and limestone to make molten iron, which is then further treated and ...
  62. [62]
    Coke in the iron and steel industry - ScienceDirect.com
    Metallurgical coke is an essential raw material for the primary iron production using blast furnaces. Among coke characteristics, good mechanical strength is ...
  63. [63]
    Sustainable development of primary steelmaking under novel blast ...
    Depending on the amount of auxiliary injectants, a conventional blast furnace consumes 350–400 kg coke per ton hot metal (kg/thm) as reducing agent, energy ...
  64. [64]
    The technologies leading steel down the pathway to decarbonisation
    Nov 5, 2020 · ... coke and a highly reducible ferrous burden is required to achieve a 'minimum coke rate' in the order of 250 kg per tonne of hot metal.
  65. [65]
    The share of EAF in global steel production in 2024 increased to ...
    Jun 12, 2025 · Blast furnace steelmaking accounted for 70.4% of the total volume. In 2024, the share of global EAF production reached 29.1%, up from 28.6% ...
  66. [66]
    [PDF] Steel and raw materials
    In 2021, global EAF output accounted for about 30% of global steel production (around 560 Mt), which required the output of about 60 Mt of BF, 120 Mt of DRI, ...
  67. [67]
    Factbox: What are graphite electrodes and needle coke? | Reuters
    Sep 21, 2017 · Needle coke is the main raw material used in the electrodes that producers say can take up to six months to make with processes including ...
  68. [68]
    Needle Coke: The Key to Unlocking the Full Potential of Ultra-High ...
    May 11, 2023 · Needle coke provides superior properties that enable the production of high-quality graphite electrodes capable of handling high currents and ...
  69. [69]
    A semi-industrial scale study of petroleum coke as an additive in ...
    Petroleum coke has been used in very different proportions, ranging from 5 to 40 wt.%, in the production of metallurgical cokes of better quality (lower ...<|separator|>
  70. [70]
    Most U.S. petroleum coke is exported - U.S. Energy Information ... - EIA
    Nov 14, 2024 · Fuel-grade petcoke is used mainly as a fuel at cement plants and power plants. The product serves a wide range of markets, with countries in ...
  71. [71]
    What is Petroleum Coke? - EKT Interactive
    Fuel: Petroleum coke is used as a fuel in various industries, such as power generation, cement production, and industrial boilers. It is a cheaper alternative ...
  72. [72]
    What is Petcoke? And What is it Used For? - Petro Online
    Feb 6, 2015 · High grade petcoke which is low in sulphur and heavy metals can be used to make electrodes for the steel and aluminum industry. But the majority ...
  73. [73]
    Application of petroleum coke in steel and cement industries
    Jun 19, 2025 · The steel industry is one of the largest consumers of petroleum coke. Petcoke finds its primary use as a fuel source in blast furnaces due to ...
  74. [74]
    What Is Petroleum Coke Used For? - East Carbon
    Jun 6, 2025 · As a matter of fact, pet coke controls the carbon content of molten metal by adding carbon during steelmaking process. There are good reasons ...
  75. [75]
    Petroleum coke and its many types and uses - Permu Trade LLC
    Rating 5.0 (2) Types of petroleum coke · 1. Needle coke · 2. Honeycomb coke · 3. Shot coke · 4. Sponge coke.
  76. [76]
    What Is Foundry Coke Used for ? | Jinsun Carbon
    May 28, 2025 · Foundry coke serves as a fuel and reducing agent in metal casting. It serves as a heat source for the melting of metals such as iron and copper ...What Is Foundry Coke? · Main Uses · Considerations for Selecting...
  77. [77]
    Birmingham, AL - FOUNDRY COKE - ABC Coke
    Foundry coke's ability to burn hot and consistently is key for melting metal like iron and scrap steel. Fuel and Carbon Source. It provides both the heat needed ...
  78. [78]
    [PDF] Foundry Coke: A Review of the Industries in the United States and ...
    Jan 1, 2010 · Foundry coke, which accounts for 5 to 7 percent of annual U.S. metallurgical coke production, is used primarily in the production of cast iron ...
  79. [79]
    Metallurgical Coke (Met Coke) and Its Crucial Role in Diverse ...
    Jul 20, 2023 · In smelting processes, such as aluminum smelting, Met coke serves as a reducing agent to convert metal oxides into their elemental forms. This ...
  80. [80]
    Metallurgical Coke - Anupam Fuels
    Additionally, met coke is employed in non-ferrous metallurgy processes, such as smelting copper and lead ores. Its consistent availability and reliable ...
  81. [81]
    Calcined Petroleum Coke Breeze - Jennings Anodes
    Calcined petroleum coke breeze is a carbonaceous backfill material widely used in underground cathodic protection applications.
  82. [82]
    Petroleum Coke Breeze - Corrosionpedia
    Petroleum coke breeze is a carbon backfill which is used around impressed current anodes for underground cathodic protection applications.
  83. [83]
    Petcoke markets and the cement industry
    Sep 11, 2020 · Conventional fossil fuels account for around 80 per cent of fuels used in cement kilns worldwide, of which petcoke accounts for a 40-45 per cent ...
  84. [84]
    [PDF] What is Petcoke? - National Association of Clean Air Agencies
    Who Uses Petcoke as a Fuel? Cement Kilns: Consumes up to 40% of all petcoke nationally. Utilizes petcoke to replace natural gas and coal in kilns.
  85. [85]
    [PDF] RoC Profile: Coke-Oven Emissions - National Toxicology Program
    About 20% to 35% of the initial coal charge is emitted as gases and vapors, most of which are collected in by-product coke production. Coke-oven gas includes ...
  86. [86]
    [PDF] AP 42 12.2 Coke Production - EPA
    Particulate, VOCs, carbon monoxide and other emissions originate from several byproduct coking operations: (1) coal preparation, (2) coal preheating (if used), ...
  87. [87]
    [PDF] Coke Oven Emissions | EPA
    Coke oven emissions are a mixture of coal tar, coal tar pitch, volatiles, creosote, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and metals. PAHs are semi-volatile ...
  88. [88]
    Source Test Report for the 205 Delayed Coking Unit Drum 205-1201 ...
    Jun 17, 2025 · The objective of the 2010 Source Test was to quantify the concentrations and mass emission rates of non-methane/non-ethane volatile organic ...
  89. [89]
    Emission characteristics and associated assessment of volatile ...
    In addition, n-decane (12.6%), m,p-xylene (12.4%), and n-nonane (8.9%) were the main species in the normal production process of the delayed coking unit.
  90. [90]
    Test Report Emission Test Program EPA Information Collection ...
    Jun 17, 2025 · The testing was conducted on July 18 through August 3, 2011 on the 736 Delayed Coking Unit (DCU) in response to the USEPA Section 114 ...
  91. [91]
    Petroleum Coke: Industry, Health, and Environmental Issues
    Nov 18, 2016 · % by weight petroleum coke, or petcoke. Petcoke is a co-product of. Carbon 80.0–95.0 several processes used during petroleum refining to upgrade
  92. [92]
    Petroleum Refinery Waste Is Processed Without Pollution Controls ...
    Jul 25, 2024 · Petcoke processing facilities reported emitting at least 230,408 pounds of hydrocholoric acid, 56,588 tons of sulfur dioxide, and 1,048 tons of ...
  93. [93]
    Organic matter in delayed coking wastewater - ScienceDirect.com
    Nov 1, 2020 · The results showed that the emulsified oil and DOM in coking wastewater contained highly condensed molecules with a large number of nitrogen and ...<|separator|>
  94. [94]
    Petroleum Refineries: New Source Performance Standards (NSPS)
    Mar 27, 2025 · The final standards for new process units include emissions limitations and work practice standards for fluid catalytic cracking units, fluid coking units, ...
  95. [95]
    EPA faces lawsuit over water pollution from petroleum coke plants
    Oct 31, 2024 · The industrial plants, a source of heavy metals and cancer-causing compounds, have never been regulated by national water standards.Missing: wastewater | Show results with:wastewater
  96. [96]
    Petroleum Coke in the Urban Environment: A Review of Potential ...
    May 29, 2015 · Basic toxicological research suggests that the main threat to human health from petcoke is aggravation of the respiratory system. However, ...
  97. [97]
    40 CFR Part 98 Subpart Y -- Petroleum Refineries - eCFR
    (g) CH4 emissions from equipment leaks, storage tanks, loading operations, delayed coking units, and uncontrolled blowdown systems under this subpart. (h) CO2, ...
  98. [98]
    Increased risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases in coke ...
    Coke oven workers are regularly exposed to coke oven emissions (COE) and may be at risk of developing lung diseases. There is limited evidence for the link ...
  99. [99]
    Coke Oven Emissions - Cancer-Causing Substances - NCI
    Jun 10, 2024 · The emissions are complex mixtures of dust, vapors, and gases that typically include carcinogens such as cadmium and arsenic.
  100. [100]
    [PDF] An Epidemiologic Study of Health Effects and Coke Oven Emissions ...
    Sep 25, 2013 · Epidemiologic studies conclusively demonstrate that coke oven workers engaged in charging the coke ovens have a higher incidence of lung cancer ...Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
  101. [101]
    The effect of occupational exposure to benzo[a]pyrene on ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · Mechanistically, exposure to B[a]P was linked to memory and learning disabilities in these coke-oven workers by a reduction in choline, ...
  102. [102]
    Spatiotemporal association between birth outcomes and coke ...
    Oct 23, 2014 · Previous research has shown exposure to air pollution increases the risk of adverse birth outcomes, although the effects of residential ...
  103. [103]
    An interrupted time series analysis of the cardiovascular health ...
    Jul 31, 2023 · The closure of a coal coking plant provides an ideal 'natural' experiment opportunity to rigorously evaluate the health benefits of air ...
  104. [104]
    Health Effects of Petroleum Coke - US EPA
    Sep 16, 2016 · Inhaled PM10 particles from petroleum coke can affect the heart and lungs. EPA research does not suggest different health risk than PM10.Missing: production | Show results with:production
  105. [105]
    [PDF] KCBX Petroleum Coke Health Consultation 8-22-16
    Aug 22, 2016 · Conclusion 1 Blown dust from the KCBX facility poses a public health hazard to residents living adjacent to the piles, especially for sensitive ...
  106. [106]
    [PDF] Petroleum Coke: Industry and Environmental Issues
    Oct 29, 2013 · Most toxicity analyses of petcoke find it has a low potential to cause adverse effects on aquatic or terrestrial environments as well as a low ...
  107. [107]
    Impact and elastic modulus of coal mining on terrestrial ecosystems
    Mar 19, 2025 · The impacts on the ecological environment include air pollution, mining wastewater pollution, induced geological disasters, and mine thermal ...
  108. [108]
    Quantifying the coal mining impact on the ecological environment of ...
    Jul 20, 2023 · The main manifestations are soil erosion, vegetation degradation, and desertification (Bian et al., 2020). At the same time, the low rainfall ...
  109. [109]
    Reductions of multiple air pollutants from coking industry through ...
    Jan 15, 2024 · This study focuses on the emission trends, reduction effects of various measures, and the impact on air quality and human health in the regional scale.Missing: peer | Show results with:peer
  110. [110]
    Comprehensive environmental impact assessment of a combined ...
    In this study, a well-to-wheels life cycle assessment was conducted to determine the environmental impacts from disposing of petroleum coke by converting it ...
  111. [111]
    [PDF] Human Health Risk Characterization of Petroleum Coke Calcining ...
    Apr 5, 2016 · Though calcined coke has shown low hazard potential in human populations due to low volatile content, there remains some public health concern ...
  112. [112]
    Petroleum coke in the urban environment: a review of ... - PubMed
    May 29, 2015 · Epidemiological studies in coke oven workers have shown increased risk for cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases, but these studies ...
  113. [113]
    Metallurgical Coke Market Size, Share & Growth Report 2030
    The global metallurgical coke market size was estimated at USD 346.15 billion in 2023 and is expected to reach USD 361.92 billion in 2024. What is the global ...Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics
  114. [114]
    Coking Coal's Rollercoaster Ride: What 2024 Taught Us - MetalMiner
    Dec 3, 2024 · Some experts have now forecast that global coking coal exports will increase by about 6% by 2026. The expected growth in exports will primarily ...
  115. [115]
    Global Metallurgical Coke Exports Down 5% in 2023 ... - BigMint
    Global seaborne metallurgical coke export volumes decreased around 5% yoy to 27 million tonnes (mnt) in 2023 from around 28.5 mnt in 2022.Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics<|separator|>
  116. [116]
    Petroleum Coke Market Report 2025, Trends And Forecast To 2034
    In stockThe petroleum coke market size has grown rapidly in recent years. It will grow from $31.3 billion in 2024 to $35.5 billion in 2025 at a compound annual growth ...
  117. [117]
    Global met coke market: Key factors driving volatility in 2025
    May 2, 2025 · According to an industry survey estimate, Indonesia exported approximately 5.60 million tonnes of metallurgical coke in 2024. Of the total ...
  118. [118]
    Decoding the First Round of Coke Price Increases in 2025
    Jul 15, 2025 · The coke market is witnessing its first round of price increases in 2025, driven by a complex interplay of supply constraints and robust demand ...
  119. [119]
    Share of EAF route in global steel production likely to rise to 40% in ...
    Aug 6, 2024 · The share of the primary blast furnace-basic oxygen furnace (BF-BOF) route in global steel production is projected to shrink to 60% in 2030 from 71% in 2023.
  120. [120]
    Mitigating emissions in the global steel industry: Representing CCS ...
    Globally, 72% of steel is made by the BF-BOF route, due largely to its 90% market share in China. Approximately 23% of steel is produced via the scrap-based EAF ...
  121. [121]
    High dependency on imported coking coal, scrap shortage among ...
    Jun 26, 2025 · India's steel sector, targeting 300 MTPA capacity by 2031, faces hurdles including reliance on imported coking coal and limited steel scrap availability.
  122. [122]
    Coking coal imports to rise, steel for 300 MT, 2030 | EY - India
    Sep 11, 2025 · India's coking coal demand expected to rise from 87 MT in FY25 to 135 MT by 2030, driven by steel industry expansion under the National ...Missing: manufacturing | Show results with:manufacturing
  123. [123]
    Coking coal beats iron ore to top spot for most expensive ...
    Sep 21, 2021 · Coking coal has surpassed iron ore to become the most expensive raw material input for steel makers, following a blistering rally in prices in the recent weeks.
  124. [124]
    [PDF] Pedal to the Metal 2024 | Global Energy Monitor
    Further, of steelmaking capacity under development announced since 2023, 93% of capacity with a known production route is EAF, indicating a strong boost in ...
  125. [125]
    Metallurgical coal and the changing politics of climate in Australia
    Australia is the world's leading met coal exporter, producing 52 % of global exports. Total export earnings in 2023–4 were $54 billion, yet are forecast to ...
  126. [126]
    Interesting Facts About Coking Coal: A Critical Raw Material
    Jun 23, 2025 · Petrographic analysis can predict coke quality – coals with 60-80% reactive macerals and 15-30% inert macerals produce optimal coke structure.
  127. [127]
    Reasons behind the price premium for U.S. metallurgical coal exports
    Apr 24, 2024 · The average price for U.S. metallurgical coal exports rose particularly sharply in 2022 following trade restrictions on coal from Russia—one of ...
  128. [128]
    Pokrovsk Coke Plant - Economic Impact and Tactical Considerations
    Jan 14, 2025 · The closure of the Pokrovsk mine introduces significant cost and supply chain issues. Ukraine will be forced to import coking coal, which is 30% ...
  129. [129]
    Geopolitical Tensions in Global Coking Coal Market - Discovery Alert
    Oct 15, 2025 · Strategic ports handling coking coal exports become potential targets during conflicts, creating bottlenecks that affect global supply chains.
  130. [130]
    Global Metallurgical Coke Market Outlook 2025: Trends & Shifts
    May 2, 2025 · Declining Steel Production Impacts Coke Demand. China's dominance in global steel production—accounting for over 50% of worldwide crude steel ...
  131. [131]
    [PDF] Coking coal: Impact assessment for supply security
    The transformation in coke ovens of coking coal into coke for use in blast furnaces accounted for 89% of the EU's total coking coal consumption in 2020 (Figure ...
  132. [132]
    [PDF] Hidden impact of Australian coking coal in steelmaking | Ember
    Sep 4, 2025 · Between 2019 and 2023, global coking coal production averaged 1.05 billion tonnes per year. The largest producers were China (52.2%), Australia ...
  133. [133]
    Decarbonizing the iron and steel industry: A systematic review of ...
    The iron and steel sector emits 2.6 Gt CO2e annually, which is 7% of the global emissions from the energy use and 7–9% of global anthropogenic CO2 emissions—the ...
  134. [134]
    Steel and Coal - Global Efficiency Intelligence
    The steel industry accounted for around 14% of total global coal consumption in 2022. Of this, 9% is coking coal and 5% is thermal coal. The steel industry is ...
  135. [135]
    Metallurgical Coke – The Backbone of Modern Steelmaking
    Oct 28, 2024 · Its unique properties and functions are crucial for producing molten iron, which is subsequently refined into steel. Chemical Properties. The ...<|separator|>
  136. [136]
    [PDF] 2024 World Steel in Figures
    May 27, 2024 · Steel production has been stable since 2020. Globally, 219 kg of steel was used in new products per person in 2023. World crude steel production ...
  137. [137]
    What is the role of coke in metallurgical process? | Jinsun Carbon
    Dec 17, 2024 · Coke provides the heat and carbon to turn iron ore into molten iron, the initial step in steel production. Without coke, the blast furnace ...
  138. [138]
    World Steel Association Releases Global Steel Demand Outlook ...
    According to the report, global steel demand will rebound by 2.3% in 2023, reaching 1.82 billion mt. In 2024, global steel demand will increase by 1.7%, ...Missing: reliance | Show results with:reliance
  139. [139]
    [PDF] The Intrinsic Role of Coal in Achieving Steel Dominance
    May 1, 2025 · Most metallurgical coal is converted into coke to be used in steel manufacturing, and approximately 16 MMst of metallurgical coal was used in ...
  140. [140]
    Why the steel industry needs to tackle coal mine methane - Ember
    Jan 23, 2023 · Coking coal methane adds 27% to the CO2 emissions from the steel industry and warms the planet more than the CO2 emissions of Germany or Canada.
  141. [141]
    Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of conventional and alternative ...
    The steel industry has high greenhouse gas emissions, accounting for more than 7 % of global CO2 emissions [2]. The conventional method of steelmaking, ...
  142. [142]
    Greenhouse Gas Emissions - Clean Air Council
    Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Coke Oven Facilities ; CO2 emissions: 53.4 MMT CO2 Eq. ; CH4 emissions: 0.4 MMT CO2 Eq.* ; Total emissions: 53.8 MMT CO2 Eq.
  143. [143]
    As Trump delays steel pollution rules, study shows public health risks
    Aug 28, 2025 · An environmental report maps toxic air pollution near U.S. coal-based steel facilities. The Trump EPA has postponed rules meant to clean up ...Missing: debates criticisms
  144. [144]
    Life cycle assessment of coke production based on real plant and ...
    Apr 8, 2025 · The purpose of this study to assess the environmental impact of coke production based on the data of a real coking plant and compare four ...
  145. [145]
    To what extent could biochar replace coal and coke in steel ...
    May 1, 2023 · This paper investigates the key challenges affected on the steel production plant and the ability of biochar to overcome these difficulties.<|separator|>
  146. [146]
    Blast Furnace to EAF Challenges Analysis - Steel Hub
    As of 2023, EAFs account for about 28% of global steel production, totalling around 550 million tonnes. The International Energy Agency (IEA) projects this ...
  147. [147]
    EAF vs Blast Furnace - Steel Dynamics
    EAF steelmaking technology generates a mere fraction of the carbon emissions produced, and energy intensity required, by traditional blast furnace steelmaking ...
  148. [148]
    Direct Reduced Iron (DRI) - Midrex Technologies, Inc.
    DRI is a premium ore-based metallic (OBM) raw material made by removing chemically-bound oxygen from iron oxide pellets and lump ores without melting.
  149. [149]
    Direct-reduced iron becomes steel decarbonization winner
    Jun 22, 2022 · DRI with hydrogen brings this below 0.5 mt/CO2 per mt, Singapore Exchange said at the SGX Iron Ore Forum in May.
  150. [150]
    Cleaner ironmaking tech a bright spot as US firms… - Canary Media
    Jun 24, 2025 · Most steelmakers rely on iron from polluting coal-fired blast furnaces. But exploding demand for “direct reduced iron” promises to slash the industry's ...<|separator|>
  151. [151]
    Green H2-DRI Steelmaking: 15 Challenges and solutions
    Transitioning to green H2-DRI steelmaking pathways has major potential for decarbonizing the steel industry, contributing to over 7% of annual global GHG ...
  152. [152]
    Green Steel 2025-2035: Technologies, Players, Markets, Forecasts
    Hydrogen-based DRI (H2-DRI) powered by green hydrogen is emerging as the primary goal for the industry, with all major steelmakers looking to adopt this ...
  153. [153]
    Hydrogen skepticism besets steelmaking sector - Recycling Today
    Jul 27, 2025 · Two projects postponed in Ohio and Germany are among nearly 10 high-profile hydrogen energy investments that tapped the brakes in mid-2025.
  154. [154]
    [PDF] Hydrogen in steel (EN) - OECD
    All decarbonisation scenarios foresee an important role for hydrogen-based steelmaking, still the current production is limited. More conservative estimates ...<|separator|>
  155. [155]
    Green-steel hubs: A pathway to decarbonize the steel industry
    Dec 19, 2024 · Green-steel production does not rely on coking coal but instead requires significant amounts of electrical energy, particularly during the ...
  156. [156]
    EPA Reverses Course on Toxic Emissions from Steel Industry Coke ...
    Oct 3, 2025 · The agency will now uphold the 2024 air standards, which set caps on emissions from these facilities.
  157. [157]
    [PDF] The Steel Industry's Hazardous Air Pollution
    Aug 21, 2025 · EPA generally regulates hazardous air pollutants by facility type,22 and in 2024, EPA issued several rules for the steel sector. One of these ...
  158. [158]
    Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism - Taxation and Customs Union
    CBAM is a system to confirm that a price has been paid for the embedded carbon emissions generated in the production of certain goods imported into the EU.CBAM Guidance and Legislation · CBAM Registry and Reporting · Omnibus I
  159. [159]
    How CBAM Is Reshaping the Steel Industry - Ovako
    CBAM pushes companies toward cleaner technologies as EU steelmakers face rising carbon costs, potentially €150 per ton CO2 by 2030.Cbam Impact On Steel And... · How Cbam Works In Steel... · Technological Transition And...<|separator|>
  160. [160]
    [PDF] Decarbonizing the U.S. Steel Industry - Department of Energy
    Meeting the carbon challenge for steel will require continued energy and yield improvements, a shift to a circular economy, and the adoption of low-emissions.
  161. [161]
    Decarbonising the steel industry: modelling pathways in Japan
    Jul 18, 2025 · Several alternate technological pathways are being considered – and modelled here – for the decarbonisation of Japan's steel sector. These range ...<|separator|>
  162. [162]
    Low-Carbon Production of Iron & Steel: Technology Options ...
    Combining these approaches could eliminate CO2 emission from coking, sintering, and pelletizing completely, yielding in maximumly 20% CO2 decrease for a ...
  163. [163]
    [PDF] Scaling Up Hydrogen: The Case for Low- Carbon Steel
    Jan 11, 2024 · High costs are the biggest challenge for hydrogen-based steelmaking today. Making steel in a. DR-EAF process in Europe with green hydrogen is 20 ...
  164. [164]
    Opportunities and challenges in the evolving H2-DRI-EAF pathway ...
    Feb 27, 2024 · The foremost challenges include ensuring an adequate supply of DR-grade iron ore, and establishing a sustainable green hydrogen value chain for ...
  165. [165]
    Iron and steelmaking account for around one-tenth of all CO2 ...
    Oct 13, 2025 · A frontier technology is the electrolysis of iron ore, in which renewable electricity splits iron ore directly into iron and oxygen, removing ...
  166. [166]
    Coke Oven Gas Emerges as Optimal Hydrogen Source for Enhancing
    Sep 6, 2025 · Calcium looping is an innovative carbon capture technique that addresses the persistent issue of greenhouse gas emissions from industries ...
  167. [167]
    Techno-economic feasibility and sustainability of an integrated ...
    The process uses captured CO2 to produce SNG, achieving 89.5% energy efficiency, reducing CO2 emissions by 45% and fossil depletion by 81%. It costs 2.39 € per ...
  168. [168]
    Emerging green steel markets surrounding the EU emissions trading ...
    Oct 13, 2025 · There is a limited set of technological options to reduce emissions for steelmaking by 85 % or more. Secondary steel production using scrap in ...
  169. [169]
    Pathways to Green Steel | Midrex Technologies, Inc.
    The technologies for achieving climate-neutral steelmaking are available right now – ready to be implemented in existing and future plants. All three major ...