Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Coliform bacteria

Coliform bacteria are a group of Gram-negative, non-spore-forming, rod-shaped, facultative anaerobic bacteria that ferment lactose to produce gas within 48 hours at 35–37°C, commonly inhabiting the intestinal tracts of warm-blooded animals and humans as well as environmental sources such as soil, vegetation, and surface water.^[1] While most coliforms are harmless to humans and do not cause disease, their presence in drinking water serves as an important indicator of potential fecal contamination and the possible introduction of pathogenic microorganisms like viruses, parasites, or other bacteria.^[2] This indicator role stems from their relative ease of detection through standardized microbiological tests, making them a practical proxy for assessing water sanitation and hygiene despite some naturally occurring environmental strains that may not signal true fecal pollution.^[3] The coliform group is broadly categorized into total coliforms, which include both fecal-origin and environmental bacteria, and fecal coliforms, a thermotolerant subset more reliably linked to recent mammalian waste.^[4] Escherichia coli (E. coli), a key fecal coliform species, exemplifies this diversity; while many strains are benign gut commensals, certain pathogenic variants (e.g., enterohemorrhagic E. coli O157:H7) can cause severe gastrointestinal illnesses, including bloody diarrhea and hemolytic uremic syndrome.^[5] Detection methods, such as the multiple-tube fermentation technique or membrane filtration, confirm coliform presence by observing acid and gas production from lactose, with confirmatory steps using selective media like mEndo agar to verify Gram-negative, non-spore-forming rods.^[6] In public health and environmental monitoring, coliform testing under regulations like the U.S. EPA's Revised Total Coliform Rule (RTCR) mandates routine sampling of public water systems, where any positive total coliform result prompts assessments for system vulnerabilities, and fecal coliform or E. coli detections trigger immediate boil-water advisories to mitigate risks.^[2] Sources of coliform contamination often include agricultural runoff, septic system failures, wildlife activity, or inadequate wastewater treatment, highlighting their utility in tracing pollution pathways in streams, groundwater, and treated supplies.^[7] Although coliforms themselves rarely cause outbreaks—unlike true pathogens they may accompany—their monitoring has significantly reduced waterborne diseases globally by enforcing treatment standards and infrastructure improvements.^[8]

Definition and Characteristics

Definition

Coliform bacteria are defined as a group of Gram-negative, non-spore-forming, rod-shaped bacteria that are aerobic or facultatively anaerobic and capable of fermenting lactose with the production of acid and gas within 48 hours at 35–37°C.^[3]^[9] This operational definition serves as a practical criterion for identification in microbiological testing rather than a strict taxonomic classification.^[3]^[10] A defining biochemical characteristic of coliform bacteria is the presence of the enzyme β-galactosidase, which hydrolyzes lactose into glucose and galactose, enabling the characteristic fermentation process.^[11]^[12] This enzyme activity is central to rapid detection methods used in water and food safety assessments.^[11] The term "coliform" originated in the early 20th century as part of standardized water quality testing protocols developed by the American Public Health Association to monitor for indicators of fecal pollution in drinking water supplies.^[13] These early methods, formalized around 1905–1910, emphasized lactose fermentation as a reliable proxy for detecting environmental contamination risks.^[13] Coliform bacteria primarily belong to the family Enterobacteriaceae.^[10]

Key Characteristics

Coliform bacteria are Gram-negative, rod-shaped bacilli that are non-spore-forming, with typical dimensions of 0.5–1.0 μm in width and 1.0–3.0 μm in length.^[14]^[15] These bacteria exhibit variable motility, with many species possessing peritrichous flagella for movement, while others, such as certain Klebsiella strains, are non-motile.^[15]^[16] Physiologically, coliform bacteria are facultative anaerobes, enabling growth under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions, which contributes to their adaptability in diverse environments.^[17] They are mesophilic organisms with an optimal growth temperature range of 35–37°C, aligning with the internal temperatures of warm-blooded hosts.^[14] Biochemically, a defining trait is their ability to ferment lactose via the enzyme β-galactosidase, producing carbon dioxide and acids within 48 hours at 35–37°C; they are consistently oxidase-negative and catalase-positive, aiding in their differentiation from other enteric bacteria.^[17]^[14]^[18] Regarding survival capabilities, coliform bacteria demonstrate resistance to certain environmental stresses, such as desiccation, allowing persistence in dry conditions like soil or surfaces through mechanisms involving intracellular protectants like trehalose.^[19] However, they exhibit sensitivity to disinfectants, particularly chlorine, which effectively inactivates them at standard residual concentrations used in water treatment.^[20] This combination of traits underscores their utility as indicators of water quality, though their inherent biological properties distinguish them from more robust pathogens.^[21]

Classification and Types

Total Coliforms

Total coliforms refer to a group of Gram-negative, rod-shaped bacteria that are facultative anaerobes capable of fermenting lactose with gas production within 48 hours at 35°C.^[3] This group primarily includes species from the genera Escherichia, Klebsiella, Enterobacter, and Citrobacter.^[22] These bacteria are defined operationally through standard microbiological tests rather than strict taxonomic criteria, allowing for the inclusion of additional Gram-negative genera that exhibit similar biochemical properties.^[23] The scope of total coliforms extends to both environmental and fecal origins, as they are ubiquitous in natural settings such as soil, decaying vegetation, and the intestinal tracts of warm-blooded animals.^[24] Unlike more specific indicators, total coliforms do not pinpoint a particular contamination source, making them useful for assessing overall water treatment efficacy rather than direct fecal input.^[25] For instance, they can proliferate in distribution systems due to biofilm formation or ingress of non-fecal environmental bacteria.^[2] A key limitation of total coliforms as indicators is that their presence signals potential sanitary defects in water systems, such as inadequate treatment or distribution issues, but does not confirm fecal pollution or health risks from pathogens.^[3] Environmental sources can lead to false positives for contamination, reducing their specificity compared to subsets like fecal coliforms.^[26] This broad occurrence necessitates complementary testing for more precise assessment of water quality.^[27] Regulatory standards for total coliforms in drinking water emphasize minimal presence to ensure system integrity. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) sets a Maximum Contaminant Level Goal (MCLG) of zero total coliforms and a Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) allowing no more than 5% of routine samples to test positive per month for systems collecting 40 or more samples, with any positive requiring follow-up.^[28] The World Health Organization (WHO) indicates that total coliforms should be absent immediately after disinfection as a marker of effective treatment, though they provide no specific guideline value for total coliforms and prioritize the absence of E. coli or thermotolerant coliform bacteria in any 100 mL sample for fecal-specific evaluation.^[29]

Fecal Coliforms and E. coli

Fecal coliforms represent a thermotolerant subset of the total coliform group, defined as those bacteria capable of fermenting lactose to produce acid and gas at an elevated temperature of 44.5°C within 48 hours, typically in the presence of bile salts or other selective agents.^[30] This thermotolerance distinguishes them from non-fecal coliforms and serves as an indicator of recent fecal contamination from warm-blooded animals, as such bacteria thrive in the intestinal tracts of mammals and birds at body temperatures around 37–40°C. Unlike total coliforms, which can include environmental strains, fecal coliforms are more specifically linked to enteric origins, though they may occasionally include non-fecal thermotolerant species like certain Klebsiella or Enterobacter.^[1] Among fecal coliforms, Escherichia coli (E. coli) is the predominant species in human and animal feces, accounting for approximately 90–95% of these bacteria in human waste.^[31] This high prevalence makes E. coli a more precise indicator of fecal pollution than the broader fecal coliform category, as recommended by regulatory bodies for water quality monitoring.^[32] E. coli is a gram-negative, rod-shaped bacterium that resides as a commensal in the lower intestine but includes pathogenic strains capable of causing severe illness. For instance, enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) strains, such as serotype O157:H7, produce Shiga toxins that lead to bloody diarrhea and potentially life-threatening hemolytic uremic syndrome.^[33] Differentiation of E. coli from other fecal coliforms relies on specific biochemical tests, including the production of indole from tryptophan, which is positive in over 95% of E. coli strains, and the detection of β-glucuronidase activity, an enzyme present in 94–96% of isolates that hydrolyzes substrates like 4-methylumbelliferyl-β-D-glucuronide to produce fluorescence.^[3] These tests, often combined in commercial media such as mColiBlue24 or Colilert, enable rapid confirmation by observing blue colonies or fluorescence under UV light, enhancing specificity in environmental and clinical samples.^[34]

Sources and Ecology

Natural Habitats

Fecal coliform bacteria primarily reside in the intestinal tracts of warm-blooded animals, including humans, where they form part of the normal gut microbiota. Total coliforms are ubiquitous in environmental settings such as soil and the surfaces of vegetation, where they colonize organically rich substrates without necessarily indicating fecal contamination.^[35]^[20]^[36] These organisms demonstrate notable persistence in nutrient-rich, moist environments, particularly aquatic sediments and areas of decaying plant matter, where organic substrates provide essential carbon and nitrogen sources for survival and limited growth. In such habitats, coliforms can endure for extended periods—often weeks to months—due to protection from environmental stressors like UV radiation and predation, although their viability declines in drier or nutrient-poor conditions. In nutrient-rich environments, coliforms can exhibit growth and multiplication, not just survival, complicating their use as strict fecal indicators.^[37]^[38]^[39]^[40] Non-pathogenic coliforms play a beneficial ecological role by contributing to nutrient cycling in natural habitats, where they decompose organic matter and facilitate the release of essential nutrients like nitrogen and phosphorus back into the soil and water. Through enzymatic breakdown of plant residues and detritus, these bacteria support broader ecosystem productivity, enhancing soil fertility and primary production without posing health risks. This decomposer function integrates coliforms into the foundational microbial processes of terrestrial and aquatic environments.^[41]

Contamination Sources

Coliform bacteria primarily contaminate water supplies and food chains through pathways linked to fecal matter and environmental disruptions, serving as indicators of potential pollution rather than direct pathogens in most cases. These bacteria, originating from the intestines of warm-blooded animals including humans, enter systems via untreated or poorly managed waste. While coliforms naturally inhabit soils and vegetation as a baseline, contamination arises when human activities or natural events mobilize them into potable sources.^[35] Fecal sources represent the dominant pathway for coliform introduction, particularly sewage overflows, animal manure, leaking septic systems, and agricultural runoff. Untreated sewage from urban infrastructure failures directly releases high concentrations of fecal coliforms into waterways, with studies showing levels exceeding safe thresholds during overflow events. Livestock manure applied to fields contributes significantly during rainfall, as runoff carries bacteria into streams and groundwater, a process exacerbated by intensive farming practices. Septic system malfunctions, common in rural areas, leach coliforms into nearby aquifers, with inadequate maintenance leading to persistent contamination plumes.^[42]^[20]^[43] Environmental inputs further amplify contamination risks, including wildlife feces, soil erosion from heavy rains, and failures in wastewater treatment facilities. Feces from birds, rodents, and other wildlife deposit coliforms near water bodies, especially in forested or suburban watersheds, where animal intrusion into wells or springs introduces bacteria directly. Soil erosion during intense rainfall events dislodges embedded coliforms from surface layers, transporting them via sediment-laden runoff into rivers and reservoirs. Wastewater treatment breakdowns, such as during power outages or overloads, release partially treated effluents containing elevated coliform counts, compromising downstream water quality.^[44]^[4] In food production, coliforms infiltrate supply chains through contaminated irrigation water and during animal processing. Irrigation with untreated surface water exposes crops to fecal coliforms from upstream runoff, leading to internalization in produce like leafy greens. In meat and dairy processing, cross-contamination occurs from animal hides or udders harboring coliforms, particularly in raw milk where environmental and fecal sources combine during milking. These pathways highlight the need for source water treatment in agriculture to mitigate risks.^[10]^[3] Global factors like urbanization and climate change intensify these contamination events by increasing runoff frequency and volume. Urban expansion replaces permeable surfaces with impervious ones, accelerating stormwater flow that flushes coliforms from streets and sewers into receiving waters, with post-2020 studies documenting spikes in urban fecal coliform levels during storms. Climate-driven changes, including more frequent heavy precipitation and floods, overwhelm treatment systems and erode soils, leading to documented surges in coliform concentrations after extreme weather events. These trends underscore the growing vulnerability of water and food systems to combined anthropogenic and climatic pressures.^[45]

Public Health Significance

Role as Indicators

Coliform bacteria serve as key indicator organisms for evaluating the microbiological safety of water and food, primarily by signaling potential fecal contamination that could introduce pathogenic microorganisms. Their presence suggests inadequate sanitation or treatment, as coliforms share fecal origins with harmful bacteria such as Salmonella spp. and Vibrio spp., which may coexist in contaminated environments like sewage or animal waste.^[42]^[10] This indicator principle relies on the assumption that conditions allowing coliform survival also favor pathogens, enabling rapid assessment without testing for every possible hazard.^[46] A distinction exists between total coliforms and fecal coliforms (including Escherichia coli) in their indicative roles. Total coliforms broadly indicate overall sanitation levels and possible pathways for contamination from environmental sources, while fecal coliforms and E. coli specifically denote recent fecal input, providing a more targeted signal of health risks from human or animal waste.^[47]^[10] Regulatory standards worldwide incorporate coliform monitoring to enforce water quality. In the United States, the Total Coliform Rule of 1989, revised as the Revised Total Coliform Rule in 2013, requires public water systems to test for total coliforms to verify treatment efficacy and detect distribution system vulnerabilities, with E. coli presence triggering immediate action.^[2]^[48] The European Union Drinking Water Directive (2020/2184), updating the 1998 framework, mandates the absence of coliform bacteria and E. coli in 100 ml of drinking water samples at the point of use.^[49]^[50] Coliforms offer practical advantages as indicators, including their relative ease of culturing on selective media and established correlation with fecal pollution pathways, facilitating cost-effective routine surveillance.^[14]^[51] However, limitations include the fact that not all coliform detections stem from fecal sources—some arise from soil or vegetation—potentially overestimating pathogenic risks and necessitating confirmatory tests for specificity.^[10]^[46]

Pathogenic Strains

Among coliform bacteria, pathogenic strains are primarily found within the Escherichia coli species, particularly the enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) pathotype, which includes serotype O157:H7 and others that produce Shiga toxins (Stxs).^[52] These toxins, encoded by stx1 and stx2 genes typically located on lambdoid bacteriophages integrated into the bacterial chromosome, enable EHEC to cause severe intestinal damage.^[53] EHEC strains are distinguished from non-pathogenic coliforms by their ability to directly induce human disease rather than merely indicating contamination.^[54] EHEC infections typically manifest as gastroenteritis, characterized by severe abdominal cramps and bloody diarrhea, often progressing to more serious complications like hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) in approximately 6% of cases overall, with up to 15% in children under 5 years and higher risk among the elderly.^[55]^[33] HUS involves a triad of microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and acute kidney injury, resulting from Shiga toxin-mediated endothelial cell damage in the kidneys and other organs.^[54] The toxins bind to globotriaosylceramide (Gb3) receptors on host cells, inhibiting protein synthesis and triggering apoptosis, which exacerbates vascular injury and systemic effects.^[56] Key virulence factors in EHEC include adherence mechanisms that facilitate colonization of the intestinal epithelium, such as fimbriae (pili) that promote initial attachment, alongside the locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE) pathogenicity island encoding intimin for intimate adhesion and actin pedestal formation.^[57] Shiga toxin production is regulated by environmental cues like quorum sensing and phage induction, with pathways involving the SOS response that enhances toxin release during bacterial lysis.^[58] These factors collectively enable EHEC to form attaching-and-effacing lesions, disrupting the mucosal barrier and allowing toxin translocation.^[59] In the United States, CDC estimates indicate that Shiga toxin-producing E. coli O157 causes approximately 86,200 illnesses annually (as of 2025), underscoring the public health burden of these pathogenic coliform strains.^[60]

Detection Methods

Culture-Based Techniques

Culture-based techniques for detecting coliform bacteria rely on the growth of these organisms in selective media under specific conditions, allowing for their isolation and enumeration in environmental samples such as water. These methods, developed over decades, exploit the ability of coliforms to ferment lactose, producing acid and gas that can be visually confirmed. They remain foundational in water quality testing due to their reliability and standardization across regulatory frameworks.^[6] The membrane filtration method involves passing a water sample through a 0.45 μm pore-size filter to capture bacteria, followed by incubation of the filter on selective agar media. For total coliforms, the filter is placed on m-Endo agar and incubated at 35 ± 0.5°C for 22-24 hours, where lactose-fermenting colonies appear as red colonies with a metallic sheen due to the dye fuchsin and basic fuchsin. This technique enables enumeration in large volumes, typically 100 mL, providing colony-forming units (CFU) per 100 mL.^[61]^[62] The multiple tube fermentation technique, also known as the most probable number (MPN) method, uses a series of dilutions of the sample inoculated into lactose broth tubes to estimate coliform density statistically. In the presumptive phase, tubes are incubated at 35°C for 24-48 hours; gas production in the Durham tube indicates presumptive coliforms. Confirmation follows by subculturing to brilliant green lactose bile broth at 35°C for total coliforms or EC broth at 44.5°C for fecal coliforms, verifying acid and gas production. This probabilistic approach is particularly useful for samples with low bacterial counts.^[6]^[3] Selective media enhance specificity in these techniques. Violet red bile agar (VRBA) is used for total coliform enumeration, where lactose-positive colonies form red zones with a precipitate after 18-24 hours at 35°C, inhibiting non-coliforms via bile salts and crystal violet. For fecal coliforms, m-FC agar is employed in membrane filtration, incubated at 44.5 ± 0.2°C for 24 hours, yielding blue colonies due to aniline blue indicator, as this temperature selects thermotolerant strains. These media formulations ensure differentiation from background flora.^[63]^[64] The ISO 9308-1 standard outlines a harmonized membrane filtration protocol for enumerating coliforms and Escherichia coli in water samples of 100 mL, incorporating chromogenic substrates for simultaneous detection while maintaining compatibility with traditional culture methods. This international guideline, updated in 2014, specifies incubation conditions and confirmation steps to ensure reproducible results across laboratories.^[65]

Molecular Techniques

Molecular techniques for detecting coliform bacteria leverage genetic and enzymatic markers to enable faster and more precise identification than traditional culture methods, targeting key indicators like β-galactosidase for total coliforms and β-glucuronidase for Escherichia coli. These approaches are particularly valuable in water quality monitoring, where timely results can inform public health responses. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays amplify specific DNA sequences to detect coliform presence. For total coliforms, primers commonly target the lacZ gene, which encodes β-galactosidase, an enzyme hydrolyzing lactose and present in most coliform species; quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) variants of this assay have been optimized for drinking water samples, achieving detection limits as low as 1 colony-forming unit (CFU) per 100 mL after bacterial concentration steps.^[66] For E. coli-specific detection, PCR targets the uidA gene encoding β-glucuronidase, which is highly conserved in this species but absent in most other coliforms, allowing differentiation with specificities exceeding 95% in environmental isolates.^[67] These assays can process samples in 2–4 hours, though they often require pre-enrichment to enhance sensitivity for low-abundance targets.^[68] Enzyme-substrate tests provide a non-genetic alternative by exploiting coliform metabolic activities with chromogenic or fluorogenic substrates. The Colilert system, approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, uses o-nitrophenyl-β-D-galactopyranoside (ONPG) as a substrate for β-galactosidase, producing a yellow color to indicate total coliforms, and 4-methylumbelliferyl-β-D-glucuronide (MUG) for β-glucuronidase, yielding fluorescence under UV light for E. coli. This defined substrate technology enables simultaneous detection and enumeration in Quanti-Tray formats, yielding results in 24 hours at 35°C, with the Colilert-18 variant providing results in 18 hours at 35°C suitable for freshwater and recommended for marine samples, with minimal false positives due to orthogonal enzyme specificities.^[69] Chemiluminescent in-situ hybridization (CISH) facilitates direct RNA detection in fixed bacterial samples using oligonucleotide probes complementary to coliform-specific ribosomal RNA sequences. Probes labeled with chemiluminescent acridinium esters hybridize to target RNA, and upon hydrolysis, emit light quantifiable via luminometry, allowing enumeration of viable E. coli and total coliforms at densities from 1 to 10^5 CFU/mL without culturing. This method is especially suited for complex environmental matrices, providing spatial resolution in biofilms or sediments.^[70] Compared to culture-based techniques, molecular methods like PCR, enzyme-substrate tests, and CISH offer superior speed—often completing in under a day versus 24–48 hours or more—and enhanced specificity through gene- or enzyme-targeted probes, reducing interference from non-coliform flora.^[71] They also support multiplexing for simultaneous total coliform and E. coli analysis, which can improve throughput in research and monitoring, though regulatory compliance typically requires approved culture-based or specific enzyme-substrate methods.^[72] However, these techniques require costly equipment such as thermal cyclers or fluorometers, skilled operators, and may detect DNA/RNA from non-viable cells, potentially inflating contamination estimates without viability confirmation.^[73] Additionally, inhibitor-rich samples like wastewater can necessitate purification steps, limiting field applicability.^[74]

Outbreaks and Management

Notable Incidents

One of the most significant foodborne outbreaks involving coliform bacteria occurred in 1993 in the western United States, primarily affecting Washington, California, Idaho, and Nevada, where Escherichia coli O157:H7 contaminated undercooked ground beef served at Jack in the Box restaurants. This incident resulted in 732 laboratory-confirmed cases of infection, including 4 deaths, mostly among young children, and highlighted the risks of inadequate cooking temperatures and cross-contamination in meat processing. The outbreak prompted major regulatory changes, including enhanced pathogen testing in the beef industry by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.^[75]^[76] In 2011, a large-scale outbreak of Shiga toxin-producing E. coli O104:H4 struck northern Germany and spread to other European countries, marking the first major epidemic of hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) caused by this strain. Linked to contaminated fenugreek sprouts from a single farm in Lower Saxony, the event led to approximately 3,950 cases of infection, 53 deaths, and over 800 cases of HUS, predominantly affecting adults. This outbreak underscored the challenges of tracing produce-borne pathogens and resulted in the temporary ban of sprout production in Europe.^[77]^[78] A prominent waterborne coliform incident took place in May 2000 in Walkerton, Ontario, Canada, where E. coli O157:H7 and Campylobacter jejuni contaminated the municipal drinking water supply due to heavy rainfall overwhelming an inadequately protected well and failures in chlorination. This crisis affected over 2,300 residents, causing more than 2,000 illnesses and 7 deaths, with long-term health effects including renal impairment for many survivors. The event exposed vulnerabilities in rural water systems and led to the formation of a public inquiry that reformed Canadian water quality regulations.^[79]^[80] In April 2025, an E. coli outbreak linked to romaine lettuce affected 15 U.S. states, sickening dozens of people, including children, and resulting in at least one death—a 9-year-old boy—while prompting recalls and investigations into supply chain contamination. Additionally, a 2025 outbreak of Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) infections was linked to aged raw milk cheese from Twin Sisters Creamery, leading to multiple illnesses and highlighting risks in unpasteurized dairy products.^[81]^[82] Recent trends in the United States from 2022 to 2025 have seen increased recreational water alerts due to sewage overflows, often elevating fecal coliform levels in beaches and lakes, as documented in CDC surveillance efforts as of 2025. These incidents, exacerbated by extreme weather and aging infrastructure, have prompted numerous beach closures and advisories, particularly in coastal and Great Lakes areas, to prevent gastrointestinal illnesses from E. coli exposure. CDC reports emphasize ongoing monitoring to mitigate such risks through wastewater surveillance and public notifications.^[83]^[84]

Prevention Measures

Prevention of coliform bacteria contamination primarily involves implementing robust treatment and management strategies in water supply, wastewater, and agricultural systems to mitigate risks from fecal sources such as sewage and animal waste.^[85] In water treatment, chlorination remains a cornerstone method, where maintaining a free chlorine residual of 0.5–1.0 mg/L after a sufficient contact time effectively inactivates coliform bacteria in drinking water and wastewater effluents.^[86] Filtration processes, such as rapid sand or membrane filtration, precede disinfection to remove particulate matter that may harbor coliforms, achieving up to 99% reduction in turbidity and associated microbial loads under the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Surface Water Treatment Rule.^[87] Ultraviolet (UV) disinfection complements these by delivering a dose of 40 mJ/cm² or higher, which inactivates over 99.99% of coliforms without chemical residuals, as demonstrated in municipal wastewater applications.^[88] Wastewater management strategies focus on preventing coliform leaching into groundwater and surface water through proper septic system design and agricultural practices. Septic systems must incorporate adequately sized tanks and drain fields to allow anaerobic digestion and soil filtration, reducing coliform levels by 90–99% when designed per EPA guidelines for onsite treatment.^[85] In agriculture, composting manure at temperatures exceeding 55°C for at least three days eliminates most fecal coliforms, preventing runoff contamination during land application as recommended by USDA organic production standards.^[89] Routine monitoring protocols ensure ongoing control, with the EPA's Revised Total Coliform Rule mandating monthly sampling of distribution systems for public water supplies, using indicators like total coliform presence to trigger corrective actions. In food processing, the FDA's Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) framework requires monitoring for coliforms at critical points such as pasteurization, with limits below 10 CFU/g in dairy products to prevent post-processing contamination.^[90] Public health interventions provide immediate responses to potential coliform incursions, including boil water advisories that recommend heating water to a rolling boil for at least one minute to kill coliforms when routine tests detect exceedances.^[91] Education campaigns emphasizing handwashing with soap for 20 seconds after using the restroom or handling potentially contaminated materials reduce secondary transmission following contamination events, as outlined in CDC infection control guidelines.^[92]

References

[1]
Loads of Coliforms and Fecal Coliforms and Characterization of ...
Jan 25, 2022 · Coliforms are a group of Gram-negative, non-spore-forming, rod-shaped aerobes and facultative anaerobes that inhabit the intestinal tract of all ...
[2]
Revised Total Coliform Rule And Total Coliform Rule | US EPA
Total coliforms are a group of related bacteria that are (with few exceptions) not harmful to humans. A variety of bacteria, parasites, and viruses, known as ...
[3]
[PDF] Enumeration of Escherichia coli and the Coliform Bacteria - FDA
Oct 1, 2020 · Although coliforms were easy to detect, their association with fecal contamination was questionable because some coliforms are found naturally ...
[4]
Coliform Bacteria in Drinking Water | Washington State Department ...
Total coliform bacteria are commonly found in the environment (e.g., soil or vegetation) and are generally harmless. If only total coliform bacteria are ...Missing: characteristics | Show results with:characteristics
[5]
Guidelines for Testing Well Water | Drinking Water - CDC
Jul 1, 2024 · Coliform bacteria live in people's and animals' digestive systems (guts), in soil, on plants, and in surface water like lakes or rivers. These ...What To Test For · Water Quality Indicators · Harmful Germs And Chemicals
[6]
[PDF] Method 9131: Total Coliform: Multiple Tube Fermentation Technique ...
The formation of gas in the fermentation tube and the presence of gram-negative, non-spore-forming, rod-shaped bacteria in the agar culture may be considered a ...
[7]
[PDF] Patterns and Sources of Fecal Coliform Bacteria in Three Streams in ...
Bacterial source. tracking (BST) recently has emerged as a powerful. tool for identifying the sources of fecal coliform. bacteria that impair surface waters. ...
[8]
Appendix C. Water | Infection Control - CDC
Jan 11, 2024 · Coliform bacteria are organisms whose presence in the distribution system could indicate fecal contamination. It has been shown that coliform ...Biofilms · Water And Dialysate Sampling... · Water Sampling Strategies...
[9]
[PDF] Coliform Bacteria – Indicators in Food & Water - Cornell CALS
Coliform bacteria are most often defined as “aerobic and facultatively anaerobic,. Gram-negative, non-spore-forming rods that ferment lactose with the ...
[10]
The Evolving Role of Coliforms As Indicators of Unhygienic ... - NIH
Sep 30, 2016 · Coliforms Represent a Common Raw Milk Contaminant that Originates from Various Environmental and Fecal Sources · Coliform Contamination in ...
[11]
and β-d-Glucuronidase-Positive Bacteria and Their Interference in ...
These rapid assays are based on the assumption that β-d-galactosidase and β-d-glucuronidase are markers for coliforms and E. coli, respectively. However ...
[12]
[PDF] REC2 for Water Testing – EPA Method Description – May 2020
REC2 medium utilizes the activity of the β-galactosidase (GAL) and β-glucuronidase (GLUC) bacterial enzymes produced by total coliform bacteria and E. coli ...
[13]
Introduction and Historical Background - Indicators for Waterborne ...
The first outbreak of a waterborne disease to be scientifically documented in modern Western society occurred in London, England, in 1854.
[14]
Coliform Bacteria- Characteristics, Examples, Identification
May 25, 2022 · Coliform bacteria are a group of Gram-negative, aerobic, and facultative anaerobic rod-shaped bacteria containing the enzyme- galactosidase.
[15]
Enterobacteriaceae - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
The Enterobacteriaceae are Gram-negative rod-shaped bacteria which are typically motile by virtue of peritrichous flagella, are non-sporing, facultative ...
[16]
Enterobacteriaceae: Characteristics, Identification - Microbe Notes
Aug 7, 2025 · Mostly motile with peritrichous flagella, ( most species in the genera Klebsiella and Shigella are non-motile); Catalase positive, oxidase ...Missing: size | Show results with:size
[17]
Coliform Bacteria - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Coliform bacteria are defined as rod-shaped Gram-negative nonspore forming and motile or nonmotile bacteria that can ferment lactose with the production of ...
[18]
Properties of Enterobacteriaceae Family - Microbe Online
Oct 1, 2013 · Enterobacteriaceae is a family of gram-negative rods which are catalase positive and oxidase negative.
[19]
Correlation of Intracellular Trehalose Concentration with Desiccation ...
Naturalized soil Escherichia coli populations need to resist common soil desiccation stress in order to inhabit soil environments.
[20]
https://extension.psu.edu/coliform-bacteria
[21]
https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev.micro.55.1.201
[22]
[PDF] Coliform Analytical Methods and Data Application in Wastewater ...
Mar 13, 2017 · Total Coliform Bacteria- Sanitary Indicators in Water. • 4 genera belong to the total coliform group: Citrobacter, E. coli, Enterobacter and.
[23]
[PDF] the use of coliforms, enterobacteriaceae, and gram- negative ...
Traditional coliform genera include Escherichia, Klebsiella, Citrobacter, and. Enterobacter, though organisms in over 20 Gram-negative genera meet the ...
[24]
The Evolving Role of Coliforms As Indicators of Unhygienic ...
Sep 29, 2016 · Coliform genera recognized as causing mammary infections include Escherichia, Klebsiella, Enterobacter, and Serratia (Hogan and Smith, 2003).
[25]
[PDF] FECAL INDICATOR 7.1 BACTERIA - USGS Publications Warehouse
— Under the Total Coliform Rule (U.S. Environmental. Protection Agency, 2001), public water supply systems also must monitor distribution systems for ...
[26]
[PDF] Recreational Water Quality Criteria
In the 1960s, the U.S. Public Health Service recommended using fecal coliform as FIB, and EPA recommended fecal coliform bacteria in 1976 (U.S. EPA, 1976).
[27]
Microbial Indicators of Fecal Pollution: Recent Progress and ...
Arguably, one of the most significant limitations is the inconsistent relationships between FIB occurrence, enteric pathogens, and health risks [25, 27]. In ...
[28]
National Primary Drinking Water Regulations | US EPA
No more than 5.0% samples total coliform-positive ( TC-positive ) in a month. (For water systems that collect fewer than 40 routine samples per month, no more ...Revised Total Coliform Rule · Chemical Contaminant Rules · Ground Water RuleMissing: genera | Show results with:genera
[29]
Guideline Technical Document – Total Coliforms - Canada.ca
Jun 19, 2020 · The WHO Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality (2017) specify that total coliforms should be absent immediately after disinfection, and that ...
[30]
[PDF] Sample Collection, Handling, and Analysis of Escherichia coli
Fecal coliforms: Fecal coliforms are traditionally defined as coliforms that ferment lactose at 44.5 °C in a medium with bile salts (Cabral, 2010); generally, ...
[31]
Comparison of thermotolerant coliforms and Escherichia coli ... - NIH
For example, according to Canadian Legislation either E. coli or fecal coliforms can be used if experience shows that greater than 90% of the fecal coliforms ...
[32]
[PDF] ESCHERICHIA COLI AND FECAL-COLBFORM BACTERIA AS ...
In 1986, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) recommended that Escherichia coli (E. coli) be used in place of fecal-coliform bacteria in State ...
[33]
Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf
Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) refers to a group of E. coli species that cause severe bacterial infection, resulting in bloody dysentery and an ...Continuing Education Activity · Introduction · Pathophysiology · Prognosis
[34]
Glucuronidase Activity Of Escherichia Coli Isolated From Chicken ...
The β-D-glucuronidase (GUD) enzyme is produced by 94 - 96% of E. coli strains. For this reason, the presence of GUD is useful in identifying this species. This ...
[35]
Bacteria and E. Coli in Water | U.S. Geological Survey - USGS.gov
Escherichia coli or E. coli is a type fecal coliform bacteria that is commonly found in the intestines of animals and humans. E. coli in water is a strong ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[36]
Water Microbiology | Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene
Total coliforms are found naturally in soil, surface water, plant material, and insects; however, one species of total coliform (E. coli) is found in the feces ...Total Coliform (bacteria)... · Recreational Water Testing · Swimming Beach TestingMissing: scientific | Show results with:scientific
[37]
Excessive Coliform Bacteria - CLEAN-FLO
Aug 22, 2024 · Furthermore, the nutrient-rich sediment and decomposing organic matter provide an abundant food source for coliform bacteria, supporting ...Missing: plant | Show results with:plant
[38]
Persistence and Decay of Fecal Microbiota in Aquatic Habitats - PMC
The transition from host to aquatic environment may lead to rapid inactivation, some degree of persistence, or growth. Microorganisms may remain planktonic, be ...
[39]
[PDF] Coliform Bacteria: The Effect of Sediments on Decay Rates and on ...
Aug 5, 2012 · ABSTRACT. Fecal indicator bacteria, such as total coliforms and E. coli, are a challenge to control in urban and rural stormwater runoff.
[40]
A short review of fecal indicator bacteria in tropical aquatic ecosystems
Here, we present a short review on the factors that control FIB dynamics in temperate systems and discuss their applicability to tropical environments.
[41]
Seasonal dynamics in the number and composition of coliform ...
Sep 15, 2021 · High numbers of coliform bacteria occur mainly in summer, which means at a time when high surface water temperatures prevail.
[42]
Fecal coliforms as indicators in tropical waters: A review - PMC
Total and fecal coliform bacteria are not reliable indicators of recent biological contamination of waters in tropical areas. Fecal streptococci and coliphages ...Missing: regions | Show results with:regions
[43]
Stressed aquatic ecosystems during plant decomposition
Apr 15, 2021 · E. coli controlled the benthic nutrient cycling in multiple pathways. Abstract. Benthic microbes play a crucial role in maintaining the ...
[44]
Coliform Bacteria in Drinking Water Supplies
Coliforms are bacteria that are always present in the digestive tracts of animals, including humans, and are found in their wastes.Missing: CDC | Show results with:CDC
[45]
Coliform Bacteria - Penn State Extension
Sep 8, 2025 · Coliform bacteria include a large group of many types of bacteria that occur throughout the environment. They are common in soil and surface water and may even ...
[46]
[PDF] Groundwater Fact Sheet Bacteria Indicators
Inadequate treatment of supply water, animal manure, and septic systems are major sources of coliforms in drinking water and groundwater. History of ...
[47]
Coliform Bacteria in Drinking Water - Vermont Department of Health
Oct 3, 2025 · Fecal coliform from human or animal waste in your drinking water can cause stomachaches, diarrhea and other gastrointestinal diseases. In some ...Missing: CDC | Show results with:CDC<|separator|>
[48]
[PDF] Severe Weather Events, Flooding, and Drinking Water Quality
Dec 9, 2024 · Heavy precipitation causes disruptions to drinking water quality, increasing disinfectant byproducts, total coliform, and E. Coli bacteria.
[49]
[PDF] Impact of land uses, drought, flood, wildfire, and ... - NSF PAR
Oct 29, 2020 · Flooding con- ditions result in high levels of bacteria associated with fecal contamination, especially in the stream setting, where large ...
[50]
Coliform Bacteria - MN Dept. of Health
Dec 8, 2022 · A group of closely related bacteria, the total coliform, has been selected as an indicator of harmful organisms in drinking water. Sources of ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[51]
National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Revisions to the Total ...
Feb 13, 2013 · The Revised Total Coliform Rule (RTCR) offers a meaningful opportunity for greater public health protection beyond the 1989 TCR.Total Coliform Rule... · III. Requirements of the... · Coliform Treatment Technique...
[52]
[PDF] DIRECTIVES - EUR-Lex - European Union
Dec 16, 2020 · Directive 98/83/EC set the legal framework to protect human health from the adverse effects of any contamination of water intended for human ...<|separator|>
[53]
Updated EU Drinking Water Directive Approved - Idexx Currents
Jun 17, 2022 · The directive now lists intestinal enterococci in the Group A parameters, along with Escherichia coli and coliform bacteria, which wasn't the ...
[54]
Methods for detection and enumeration of coliforms in drinking water
Sep 27, 2023 · This review article provides an overview of various traditional culture-based methods and rapid molecular methods employed for the analysis of coliforms in ...<|separator|>
[55]
A Brief Overview of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Its Plasmid ... - NIH
Among them, enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) is defined as pathogenic E. coli strains that produce Shiga toxins (Stxs) and cause hemorrhagic colitis (HC) and ...
[56]
Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli: Factors involved in virulence ...
coli (STEC) refers to E. coli pathotypes capable of producing Shiga toxin type 1 (Stx1), type 2 (Stx2), or both, encoded by stx1 and stx2 genes, respectively.
[57]
Escherichia coli Infection - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
EHEC/STEC produces Shiga-toxin and includes serotypes O157:H7, as well as others.[11][12][13] EHEC/STEC has been responsible for large diarrheal outbreaks ...
[58]
[PDF] Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli and the hemolytic–uremic ...
Oct 12, 2023 · 1 These pathogens have the potential to cause diarrhea, which is often bloody, and can trigger a thrombotic micro- angiopathy (TMA) that leads ...
[59]
Fimbriation and curliation in Escherichia coli O157: H7 - PMC - NIH
Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) serotypes, particularly E. coli O157:H7, possess a variety of fimbrial and afimbrial adhesins which have emerged ...
[60]
Shiga toxin in enterohemorrhagic E.coli: regulation and novel ... - NIH
EHEC implements two major virulence strategies: production of Shiga toxin (Stx) and formation of attaching and effacing (AE) lesions on enterocytes (Kaper ...
[61]
[PDF] Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli Virulence Gene Regulation
ABSTRACT Coordinated expression of enterohemorrhagic. Escherichia coli virulence genes enables the bacterium to cause hemorrhagic colitis and the ...
[62]
Technical Information | E. coli infection - CDC
May 14, 2024 · CDC estimates that each year in the United States: STEC O157 cause an estimated 97,000 illnesses, 3,270 hospitalizations, and 30 deaths.Purpose · Infectious Agent · Incidence And Outcomes
[63]
BAM Media M-196: mEndo MF Medium (BD #274930) - FDA
Oct 16, 2017 · Agar preparation – Rehydrate all product in 1L water containing 20 mL 95% ethanol. Heat to near boiling to dissolve agar, then promptly remove ...Missing: selective FC violet bile EPA<|control11|><|separator|>
[64]
https://www.nemi.gov/methods/method_summary/5587/
[65]
BAM Media M174: Violet Red Bile Agar (VRBA) - FDA
Oct 16, 2017 · After solidification, add a cover layer above the agar of approximately 3.0 to 4.0 ml to prevent surface growth and spreading of colonies.Missing: coliform selective Endo FC EPA
[66]
Standard Methods: 9222D: Membrane filtration test for fecal coliforms
Incubate at 44.5C for 22-24 h. Colonies that are various shades of blue are positive for fecal coliforms. The blue color indicates the capability to ferment ...Missing: thermotolerant | Show results with:thermotolerant
[67]
ISO 9308-1:2014 - Water quality — Enumeration of Escherichia coli ...
ISO 9308-1:2014 specifies a membrane filtration method for enumerating E. coli and coliform bacteria in waters with low bacterial numbers, like drinking water.Missing: multiple tube fermentation selective
[68]
Molecular Method for Detection of Total Coliforms in Drinking Water ...
The more narrow definition included primarily four genera—Escherichia, Klebsiella, Citrobacter, and Enterobacter—while the inclusion of anaeorgenic lactose ...
[69]
Novel multiplex-PCR test for Escherichia coli detection - ASM Journals
Apr 30, 2024 · Two genes usually chosen for PCR detection are β-D-galactosidase (lacZ) and β-D-glucuronidase (uidA) (11–14). The utilization of uidA can be ...Materials And Methods · Choice Of Genes And Is Pcr · Wet Laboratory Pcr...
[70]
Design and testing of a PCR assay to quantify coliform bacteria in ...
Sep 6, 2024 · Here we present an enhanced lacZ qPCR assay targeting β-galactosidase, encoded by lacZ, to assess coliforms in drinking water.
[71]
[PDF] Analytical Methods Approved for Drinking Water Compliance ...
Colilert-18® is an optimized formulation of the Colilert® for the determination of total coliforms and E.coli that provides results within 18 h of incubation at.
[72]
Rapid Detection, Identification, and Enumeration of Escherichia coli ...
A new chemiluminescent in situ hybridization (CISH) method provides simultaneous detection, identification, and enumeration of culturable Escherichia coli ...Dot Hybridization To... · Cish Using Pna Probes (pna... · Results
[73]
Evaluation of Polymerase Chain Reaction for Detecting Coliform ...
Oct 16, 2017 · Conclusion: The PCR method was shown to be an effective, sensitive, and rapid method for detecting coliform and E. coli in drinking water from ...
[74]
Opportunities and limitations of molecular methods for quantifying ...
We debate molecular (qPCR) vs culture-based tools for monitoring of bathing waters. We identify concerns surrounding the use of qPCR for bathing water ...
[75]
[PDF] The pros and cons of molecular techniques
The cons of molecular techniques applied to the detection of pathogens in water. - The detection of genomes by PCR-based techniques does not provide ...
[76]
Multistate Outbreak of Escherichia coli O157:H7 Infections ... - CDC
From November 15, 1992, through February 28, 1993, more than 500 laboratory-confirmed infections with E. coli O157:H7 and four associated deaths occurred in ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
[77]
How deadly burgers made food safer – the impact of the 1993 E.coli ...
In 1993, four children died and more than 700 people in four states were sickened with severe and often bloody diarrhea.
[78]
EHEC O104:H4 IN GERMANY 2011: LARGE OUTBREAK OF ... - NCBI
In the summer of 2011 Germany experienced one of the largest outbreaks of a food-borne infection caused by enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli ( ...
[79]
Outbreak: STEC 0104:H4 2011 - ECDC - European Union
May 22, 2011 · On 22 May 2011, Germany reported a significant increase in the number of patients with haemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) and bloody diarrhoea ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
[80]
Characterization of Waterborne Outbreak–associated ...
The Walkerton, Canada, waterborne outbreak of 2000 resulted from entry of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Campylobacter spp. from neighboring farms into the ...
[81]
2000 - E. coli O157 in Canada - World Health Organization (WHO)
May 30, 2000 · To date, 5 people have died and 27 are hospitalized. Exposure to E. coli is believed to have occurred between 12-15 May. Tests have confirmed E.Missing: crisis details
[82]
Waterborne Outbreaks Summary Reports - CDC
Top 5 causes of recreational water outbreaks—United States, 1971–2020 · 1. Cryptosporidium · 2. Pseudomonas · 3. Legionella · 4. Shigella · 5. Norovirus.Overview · Data Summary Reports · Recreational Water
[83]
NWSS Wastewater Monitoring in the U.S. - CDC
Sep 25, 2025 · Wastewater (sewage) can be tested to detect traces of infectious diseases circulating in a community, even if people don't have symptoms. You ...About CDC's Wastewater... · COVID-19 National Data · Influenza A National DataMissing: 2022-2024 recreational overflows
[84]
[PDF] Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems Manual Wastewater ...
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) first issued detailed guidance on the design, construc- tion, and operation of onsite wastewater treatment.Missing: manure | Show results with:manure
[85]
Chlorination of Waste Stabilization Lagoon Effluent - epa nepis
In almost all cases, adequate disinfection was obtained with com- bined chlorine residuals of between 0.5 and 1.0 mg/l after a contact period of approximately ...
[86]
[PDF] Guidance Manual for Compliance with the Filtration and Disinfection ...
This manual provides guidance for compliance with filtration and disinfection requirements for public water systems using surface water sources.
[87]
[PDF] Wastewater Technology Fact Sheet Ultraviolet Disinfection
The UV system at NBCUA was able to meet fecal coliform levels (200 count per 100 mL) better than chlorination since its installation in August 1989. The proper ...
[88]
[PDF] Tipsheet: Manure in Organic Production Systems
The NOP has very specific guidelines about manure-composting procedures. Raw manure must not contaminate soil, water, or crops with pathogens, excess nutrients ...Missing: coliform | Show results with:coliform
[89]
[PDF] Hazard Analysis and Risk-Based Preventive Controls for Human Food
This draft guidance, when finalized, will represent the current thinking of the Food and Drug. Administration (FDA or we) on this topic.<|separator|>
[90]
[PDF] Drinking Water Advisory Communication Toolbox - CDC
Use for loss of pressure or a water outage boil water advisory that does not require a Tier 1 Public Notice. ... Questions About Coliform Bacteria and Boil Water ...
[91]
D. Water | Infection Control - CDC
Jan 8, 2024 · They are 20–100 times more resistant to chlorine compared with coliforms; slow-growing strains of NTM (e.g., Mycobacterium avium and M. kanasii ...