Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Colony-forming unit

A colony-forming unit (CFU) is a unit of measurement in microbiology used to estimate the number of viable microorganisms—such as bacteria or fungi—in a sample by counting the discrete, visible colonies that develop from their growth on a solid agar medium under controlled incubation conditions.^[1] This approach quantifies only live, culturable cells capable of replication, as each colony typically arises from a single cell or a small cluster of cells that multiply into a detectable mass containing millions of progeny.^[1] CFUs provide a practical proxy for microbial viability and density, expressed as CFUs per milliliter (CFU/mL) or per gram (CFU/g), and are fundamental to standard plating techniques like the spread plate or pour plate methods.^[2] In microbiology, CFUs are routinely applied to monitor microbial contamination in clinical diagnostics, food safety assessments, environmental samples, and pharmaceutical quality control, where thresholds (e.g., <500 CFU/mL of heterotrophic bacteria in drinking water) indicate acceptable levels of hygiene or infection risk.^[3] For probiotic products, CFU labeling on supplements denotes the concentration of live beneficial microbes per serving, ensuring efficacy as defined by international guidelines requiring sufficient viable cells to deliver health benefits when consumed.^[1] Automated tools, such as image analysis software, increasingly support precise CFU enumeration to enhance reproducibility in high-throughput settings.^[4] Beyond microbiology, the CFU concept extends to hematology and stem cell biology, where colony-forming unit (CFU) assays evaluate the proliferative and differentiative potential of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) by culturing them in semi-solid media to form multilineage colonies, such as granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM) or erythroid (CFU-E) types.^[5] These assays, often optimized with cytokines like erythropoietin (EPO) and stem cell factor (SCF), quantify clonogenic capacity over 7–14 days, providing insights into HSPC function for research on blood disorders, bone marrow transplantation, and regenerative medicine.^[5] In vitro CFU-C (colony-forming unit-culture) results correlate with clinical outcomes, such as survival in myelodysplastic syndromes, independent of prognostic scoring systems.^[6]

Fundamentals

Definition and Concept

A colony-forming unit (CFU) serves as an estimate of the number of viable cells—whether microbial or progenitor—that possess the proliferative capacity to generate a visible colony under defined culture conditions.^[7] This unit quantifies clonogenic potential, reflecting only those cells capable of sustained division and growth into a detectable aggregate of a large number of progeny.^[8] In microbiology, CFUs apply to bacteria and fungi, providing a standard for assessing viable microbial populations in environmental, clinical, or food samples.^[9] Conversely, in hematology and stem cell biology, CFUs denote hematopoietic progenitor cells that undergo proliferation and differentiation to form multilineage blood cell colonies, such as erythroid or myeloid lineages, in semi-solid media supplemented with growth factors.^[10]^[6] The core process entails diluting and inoculating the sample onto a solid agar surface or into a semi-solid matrix, incubating at optimal temperature and atmosphere to promote growth, and enumerating the resulting macroscopic colonies as proxies for initial viable cells.^[7] Each colony arises from the expansion of a single CFU, offering insight into cell viability and functionality.^[10] A critical limitation is that one CFU may derive from a single cell, a multicellular clump, or aggregated particles, potentially causing underestimation of true viable cell counts when clumps form a single colony.^[11] Clumping, in particular, commonly leads to underestimation by conflating multiple viable cells into one observable unit.^[12] CFU concentrations are frequently expressed in logarithmic scale, such as log₁₀ CFU/mL, to concisely represent expansive numerical ranges.^[7]

Historical Development

The concept of the colony-forming unit (CFU) originated in the late 19th century with advancements in microbiology, particularly through Robert Koch's development of techniques for isolating and counting viable bacteria. In the 1880s, Koch introduced methods using solid nutrient media, such as potato slices and later agar plates, to propagate individual bacterial colonies from dilute suspensions, enabling the enumeration of viable cells and the establishment of pure cultures. This plate dilution approach laid the foundation for quantifying microbial viability by observing colony growth, a principle central to the modern CFU assay. The term "colony-forming unit" first appeared in scientific literature in the 1930s.^[13]^[14] The CFU concept expanded significantly into stem cell biology in the 1960s through the pioneering work of James Till and Ernest McCulloch. In their 1961 spleen colony assay, they transplanted limiting dilutions of irradiated mouse bone marrow cells into recipient mice, observing macroscopic nodules in the spleen that represented clonal proliferation of hematopoietic progenitors, termed CFU-spleen (CFU-S). This in vivo assay provided the first direct evidence of self-renewing hematopoietic stem cells capable of multilineage differentiation, marking a seminal milestone in identifying and studying stem cell potential.^[15] Key advancements in the late 20th century included the standardization of microbial CFU methods and innovations in stem cell assays. The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) formalized guidelines for microbiological examinations in ISO 7218:2007, which outlined requirements for accurate colony counting in food and feed safety, with updates in subsequent editions to refine techniques for reproducible results. In hematology, the 1970s saw the adoption of methylcellulose-based semi-solid cultures, enabling in vitro visualization and enumeration of hematopoietic colony-forming units like CFU-GM and BFU-E, which advanced clonal analysis of progenitors.^[16]^[17] In modern contexts since the 1990s, CFUs have integrated into quality control for probiotics, where viable cell counts ensure product efficacy under ISO standards like 15214:1998, reflecting the growing commercial and regulatory emphasis on microbial viability. Similarly, in regenerative medicine, CFU assays have evolved to support stem cell therapies, leveraging historical clonal principles to assess potency in clinical applications.^[18]^[17]

Applications in Microbiology

Principles of Microbial Colony Formation

Microbial colony formation begins with a single viable cell that undergoes binary fission, a process of asexual reproduction where one cell divides into two genetically identical daughter cells. This initiates exponential growth, characterized by a doubling of the cell population with each division cycle, typically every 20-30 minutes under optimal conditions for many bacteria like Escherichia coli. As divisions continue, the accumulating cells form a visible aggregate on solid culture media, usually reaching 10^6 to 10^8 cells in size, with diameters of 0.5-2 mm after 24-48 hours of incubation, depending on species and environmental conditions. Growth is most active at the colony periphery, where nutrients are accessible, while central cells may enter stationary or death phases due to resource limitation.^[19] Several environmental factors govern the efficiency and morphology of colony formation. Nutrient availability provides essential carbon, nitrogen, and energy sources for division, while temperature influences enzymatic activity and membrane fluidity—mesophilic bacteria like most pathogens thrive at 20-45°C, with optima around 37°C. pH affects protein stability and transport, favoring neutrophiles in the 5.5-8.0 range, and oxygen levels dictate aerobic respiration or fermentation pathways, with aerobes requiring 20% O₂ and anaerobes avoiding it. Selective media further modulate formation by inhibiting unwanted growth; for instance, MacConkey agar contains bile salts and crystal violet to suppress Gram-positive bacteria, allowing selective proliferation of Gram-negative enteric species that can ferment lactose.^[20]^[21] The colony-forming unit (CFU) quantifies only culturable cells capable of division and colony initiation, distinguishing it from total cell counts that include non-viable or dormant forms. It excludes viable but non-culturable (VBNC) bacteria, which maintain metabolic activity and membrane integrity but fail to grow on standard media due to stress-induced dormancy, such as from nutrient starvation or temperature shifts—leading to underestimation of true viability in environmental or clinical samples.^[22] Mathematically, CFU concentration is derived from serial dilution principles, where samples are progressively diluted (e.g., 10-fold steps) to yield countable colonies (30-300 per plate). The formula is:

\text{CFU/ml} = \frac{\text{number of colonies} \times \text{dilution factor}}{\text{volume plated (ml)}}

This accounts for the inverse relationship: each dilution reduces cell density proportionally, so observed colonies represent the original population scaled by the total dilution factor (product of stepwise factors) and adjusted for plated volume, ensuring accurate back-calculation to the source concentration.^[23] Clumping complicates accurate CFU enumeration, as pre-formed aggregates or biofilms from multiple cells can produce fewer, larger colonies than expected, skewing counts downward. In Staphylococcus aureus, clumping factors like ClfB promote cell adhesion and biofilm matrix formation, especially under calcium-depleted conditions, leading to clustered growth that mimics single-cell origins and underrepresents the actual viable population.^[24]

Common Uses in Microbial Enumeration

Colony-forming unit (CFU) assays serve as a cornerstone for enumerating viable microorganisms in various microbiological contexts, providing a direct measure of live bacterial, yeast, or mold populations through colony development on solid media. In food safety, CFU counts are routinely applied to assess bacterial load, with the FDA's Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM) outlining procedures such as aerobic plate counts for total viable bacteria in products like dairy and meats. For instance, Chapter 3 of BAM uses pour or spread plating to quantify aerobic mesophilic bacteria, ensuring compliance with safety thresholds. Similarly, in water quality testing, CFU enumeration monitors heterotrophic bacteria, where the EPA recommends levels below 500 CFU/mL in potable water to indicate treatment efficacy and prevent health risks. In pharmaceuticals, USP <61> specifies microbial enumeration tests for nonsterile products, requiring total aerobic microbial counts (TAMC) below 10^3 CFU/g or mL for many formulations to meet quality specifications. CFU assays are essential for evaluating microbial viability following exposure to antimicrobial agents, enabling precise quantification of surviving populations. In antibiotic efficacy studies, pre- and post-treatment CFU counts determine log reductions, such as achieving ≥4 log10 CFU decrease to confirm bactericidal activity against pathogens like Salmonella. For disinfectants, similar assessments measure survival rates; for example, exposure to quaternary ammonium compounds often results in >5 log10 CFU reductions in biofilm-associated bacteria, validating product performance against environmental contaminants. Radiation effects on microbes, including UV or gamma irradiation, are likewise gauged by CFU decline, with studies showing dose-dependent drops from 10^8 to <10 CFU/mL in water samples, informing sterilization protocols in clinical and food processing settings. In quality control for probiotics and vaccines, CFU enumeration ensures the delivery of viable organisms at therapeutic levels. Probiotic products, such as yogurts, must maintain at least 10^6 CFU/g or mL through shelf life to confer health benefits, as per guidelines from health authorities emphasizing live cell quantification via plate counts. For bacterial vaccines containing live attenuated microbes, such as the BCG vaccine for tuberculosis, CFU testing verifies potency, with standards requiring minimum viable counts (e.g., 10^5-10^7 CFU/dose) to guarantee immunogenicity without overgrowth risks.^[25] Environmental monitoring employs CFU assays to track microbial contaminants across matrices like soil, air, and clinical samples. In soil and air, settle plates or impaction methods yield CFU/m^3 metrics, detecting airborne pathogens at levels exceeding 100 CFU/m^3 as indicators of poor ventilation in healthcare facilities. Clinical applications include urine cultures for urinary tract infections (UTIs), where ≥10^5 CFU/mL of a single pathogen species confirms diagnosis and guides antibiotic therapy. Specific plating techniques adapt CFU enumeration to microbial physiology, building on principles of colony formation under controlled oxygen conditions. The pour-plate method, involving molten agar overlay, suits anaerobes and microaerophiles by creating subsurface colonies with limited oxygen diffusion, while the spread-plate technique, depositing samples on solidified agar, favors aerobes for surface growth and easier colony isolation. In food safety, FDA BAM Chapter 18 for yeasts and molds prefers spread plating over pour plating to avoid heat stress on fungi, achieving accurate counts of <10^2 CFU/g in susceptible products like juices.

Applications in Stem Cell Biology

Principles of Hematopoietic Colony Formation

Colony-forming units (CFUs) in hematopoiesis represent committed progenitor cells positioned downstream from multipotent hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) within the hematopoietic hierarchy. These progenitors are multipotent or oligopotent cells that have undergone lineage restriction but retain the capacity for limited self-renewal and differentiation into specific blood cell lineages. They respond to specific cytokines that drive commitment and expansion; for instance, erythropoietin (EPO) primarily acts on erythroid progenitors to promote their survival and proliferation, while other factors like stem cell factor (SCF) and interleukin-3 (IL-3) support broader myeloid lineage development.^[26]^[27]^[28] The foundational assay for assessing hematopoietic CFUs involves plating isolated bone marrow or peripheral blood mononuclear cells in a semi-solid methylcellulose medium supplemented with appropriate growth factors and cytokines. Under these conditions, individual progenitor cells proliferate and differentiate, forming visible colonies after an incubation period of 7-14 days at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2. Colonies are then identified and enumerated based on their morphology under an inverted microscope; for example, burst-forming unit-erythroid (BFU-E) colonies appear as large, multi-clustered bursts of hemoglobinized cells, whereas colony-forming unit-granulocyte/macrophage (CFU-GM) colonies exhibit more compact, granular structures. This in vitro system recapitulates key aspects of hematopoietic development, allowing quantification of progenitor activity without the need for in vivo transplantation.^[29]^[30]^[31] During colony formation, hematopoietic progenitors undergo sequential proliferation and maturation along defined differentiation pathways, leading to the production of mature cells from myeloid and erythroid lineages. Common pathways include the development of granulocytes (e.g., neutrophils, eosinophils) and monocytes/macrophages from CFU-GM progenitors, erythrocytes from BFU-E and CFU-E, and megakaryocytes from CFU-Meg. This process involves multiple cell divisions—typically 8-20 per colony—coupled with progressive loss of proliferative potential and acquisition of lineage-specific markers, such as glycophorin A for erythroid cells or CD41 for megakaryocytes. The assay thus provides a functional readout of progenitor competence in supporting lineage-specific hematopoiesis.^[32]^[33]^[34] CFU frequency serves as a key metric for evaluating stem and progenitor cell activity, with typical values indicating rarity within the bone marrow; for example, CFU-GM progenitors occur at approximately 20–100 per 10^5 mononuclear cells (or 1 in 1,000 to 5,000) in healthy adult bone marrow.^[35] This low frequency underscores the hierarchical organization, where HSCs (even rarer, at 1 in 10^6-10^7 cells) give rise to these downstream effectors. Variations in CFU output can reflect physiological states, such as stress erythropoiesis, or pathological conditions affecting hematopoiesis.^[36]^[31] While CFU assays effectively model progenitor function, they highlight discrepancies between in vitro and in vivo hematopoiesis due to the absence of a complex microenvironment. In vivo, stromal cells in the bone marrow niche provide essential support through cell-cell interactions, extracellular matrix components, and secreted factors like CXCL12 and SCF, which maintain HSC quiescence and direct progenitor localization. In contrast, semi-solid cultures lack these dynamic elements, potentially leading to altered proliferation rates or incomplete maturation; efforts to incorporate stromal co-cultures or biomimetic scaffolds aim to bridge this gap by mimicking niche signals.^[37]^[38]^[39]

Specific Types of Hematopoietic CFUs

Hematopoietic colony-forming units (CFUs) represent committed progenitor cells that differentiate into specific blood cell lineages when cultured in semi-solid media supplemented with appropriate cytokines. These assays, originally developed from the foundational spleen colony technique by Till and McCulloch in 1961, allow functional assessment of progenitor potential.^[40] Specific subtypes are distinguished by the morphology, size, and cellular composition of the resulting colonies, reflecting their lineage commitment. The CFU-GM, or granulocyte-macrophage progenitor, generates mixed colonies comprising neutrophils, monocytes/macrophages, and sometimes eosinophils or basophils, serving as a key indicator of myeloid lineage potential.^[41] These progenitors respond primarily to granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), often in combination with interleukin-3 (IL-3), and are abundant in bone marrow, facilitating rapid assessment of granulocytic and monocytic differentiation.^[42] In contrast, the CFU-E, or erythroid colony-forming unit, produces small, compact colonies of maturing erythroblasts that develop into red blood cells, strictly dependent on erythropoietin (EPO) for survival and proliferation.^[43] These progenitors represent a late-stage commitment in erythropoiesis, forming hemoglobinized cells within 7-10 days of culture.^[28] The CFU-Meg, or megakaryocyte colony-forming unit, yields large colonies of polyploid megakaryocytes that fragment into platelets, driven by thrombopoietin (TPO) as the primary stimulator.^[44] This unipotent progenitor is essential for thrombopoiesis and is identified by acetylcholinesterase staining or CD41/CD61 expression in colony cells.^[45] The CFU-GEMM, a multipotent progenitor, forms rare, heterogeneous colonies containing cells from multiple myeloid lineages, including granulocytes, erythrocytes, monocytes, and megakaryocytes, highlighting its multipotent nature close to the hematopoietic stem cell hierarchy.^[41] These colonies require a cocktail of cytokines such as stem cell factor (SCF), IL-3, and EPO for development.^[42] Additional specialized subtypes include the CFU-Eo, which produces pure eosinophil colonies stimulated by IL-5, often in synergy with IL-3, and is relevant for assessing allergic or parasitic responses.^[46] The BFU-E, or burst-forming unit-erythroid, precedes the CFU-E and forms larger, multi-cluster "bursts" of erythroid cells, less dependent on EPO but responsive to SCF and IL-3, marking an earlier erythroid commitment stage.^[28] In vivo, the CFU-S assay detects primitive, long-term repopulating hematopoietic stem cells by spleen colony formation in irradiated recipients, providing insight into self-renewal capacity beyond in vitro limits.^[40] Clinically, hematopoietic CFU assays, particularly CFU-GM, are employed to diagnose leukemic involvement of progenitors, where reduced or abnormal colony formation indicates disease progression in acute myeloid leukemia.^[47] In transplantation, post-thaw CFU-GM enumeration assesses umbilical cord blood unit potency, with standards established since the 1980s to ensure engraftment success and correlate with neutrophil recovery.^[48]

Measurement Methods

Manual and Semi-Automated Counting

Manual and semi-automated counting of colony-forming units (CFUs) relies on traditional protocols to ensure accurate enumeration in both microbial and hematopoietic samples. For microbial CFU assays, standard procedures involve preparing serial dilutions ranging from 10^{-1} to 10^{-6} to achieve plates with countable colonies, followed by plating volumes of 0.1 to 1 mL onto agar media such as nutrient agar or selective media. Incubation typically occurs at 35–37°C for 24–48 hours to allow bacterial colony development. In hematopoietic contexts, similar serial dilutions are applied to cell suspensions, with plating volumes of 1 mL per well in semi-solid methylcellulose-based media like MethoCult, and incubation at 37°C with 5% CO_2 for 7–14 days to permit multilineage colony formation from progenitor cells.^[49]^[50]^[51]^[30]^[31] Counting techniques emphasize manual inspection to tally distinct colonies while adhering to established criteria for validity. The Quebec colony counter, a manual darkfield device with an adjustable probe and illuminated stage, facilitates precise tallying by allowing users to mark and register each colony on plates up to 100 mm in diameter, reducing transcription errors. Valid colonies are generally defined as those with a diameter greater than 0.5 mm, distinct edges, and no overlap, with optimal plates containing 25–250 colonies to minimize counting inaccuracies; plates exceeding 300 colonies are deemed too numerous to count (TNTC). In hematopoietic assays, colonies are similarly evaluated for size and morphology, often requiring identification of clusters exceeding 50 cells to confirm progenitor origin.^[52]^[53]^[54]^[55]^[56] Semi-automated aids enhance visibility and consistency without full automation. For microbial plates, light boxes provide uniform backlighting to highlight colonies against the agar, aiding manual enumeration under low magnification. In hematopoietic CFU assays, stereomicroscopes offer magnified views (up to 50x) to distinguish subtle morphological differences, such as granulocyte-macrophage versus erythroid colonies, improving identification accuracy. To address statistical variability inherent in low-density plating—modeled by the Poisson distribution, where colony counts follow a variance equal to the mean—multiple replicate plates (typically 3–5) are prepared and averaged, reducing error margins to below 20% for counts above 30 colonies per plate.^[57]^[58]^[56]^[59]^[60] Common error sources include overgrowth, where excessive inoculum leads to confluent spreading that obscures individual colonies, and satellite colonies, small growths encircling larger ones due to nutrient diffusion or antibiotic instability, potentially leading to overestimation of counts. Corrections such as integrating the Most Probable Number (MPN) method—using statistical tables from multi-tube dilutions—can estimate viable cells when plates show overgrowth, providing a complementary probabilistic measure to direct CFU tallies. Safety protocols mandate Biosafety Level 2 (BSL-2) containment for assays involving pathogens, including personal protective equipment, biosafety cabinets for plating, and decontamination procedures to prevent aerosol exposure. For food microbiology applications, adherence to ISO 4833 ensures standardized enumeration, specifying pour-plate or spread-plate techniques with defined incubation conditions to yield reproducible results across labs.^[61]^[62]^[63]^[64]^[65]^[66]^[67]

Automated Systems and Software

Automated systems for colony-forming unit (CFU) counting have revolutionized high-throughput analysis in both microbiology and stem cell biology by integrating imaging hardware with sophisticated software, enabling precise enumeration and reducing operator variability. These systems typically employ flatbed scanners or digital cameras coupled with microscopes to capture high-resolution images of agar plates or culture dishes, followed by algorithmic processing to detect and quantify colonies based on size, shape, and density thresholds. For instance, the STEMvision instrument, introduced around 2010, uses a bench-top scanner and dedicated software to automate the imaging and scoring of hematopoietic colonies in CFC assays, standardizing counts for stem cell research. Similarly, the BIOMIC V3 system utilizes color digital imaging to count bacterial, yeast, and mold colonies on agar plates, supporting applications in microbial enumeration with minimal manual intervention.^[68]^[69] Software tools form the core of these automated pipelines, ranging from open-source platforms to proprietary solutions tailored for specific workflows. ImageJ, a widely adopted open-source image processing program, features plugins like ColonyCounter that apply thresholding and particle analysis algorithms to segment and tally colonies from scanned or photographed plates, making it accessible for researchers analyzing microbial or stem cell CFUs. Commercial software, such as that integrated with the ProtoCOL 3 system, extends functionality to include zone measurements for antibiotic susceptibility testing, automatically detecting colonies as small as 0.043 mm in diameter on plates up to 150 mm. These tools prioritize reproducibility, with ImageJ-based methods validated for yeast colony counting through automated edge detection and size filtering. In automated plating, devices like the Whitley WASP Touch spiral plater deposit samples in an Archimedes spiral pattern on agar, ensuring even distribution and facilitating downstream imaging by eliminating the need for multiple serial dilutions, thus minimizing human error in sample preparation.^[70]^[71]^[72]^[73] Advancements in artificial intelligence and machine learning have further enhanced colony classification, particularly for distinguishing hematopoietic lineages by morphological features such as shape and clustering patterns. Tools like AutoCellSeg employ supervised machine learning for robust segmentation and counting of CFUs in cell segmentation assays, achieving reliable performance across varied imaging conditions since its development in 2018. More recent convolutional neural network-based approaches, such as C-COUNT introduced in the mid-2020s, specifically identify erythroid progenitor CFU-e colonies while differentiating them from myeloid types and artifacts, leveraging deep learning for high-throughput stem cell analysis. Validation studies demonstrate that these automated systems often achieve over 95% agreement with manual counts in controlled settings, with ProtoCOL systems showing low relative errors (under 10%) for bacterial plates and STEMvision providing consistent hematopoietic scoring comparable to expert reviewers. Integration with flow cytometry in hybrid assays further refines CFU quantification by combining imaging data with cellular phenotyping, enhancing overall assay precision in research and clinical applications.^[74]^[75]^[76]^[77]

Alternatives and Considerations

Alternative Units of Viability

Direct microscopic counts provide an alternative to colony-forming units by distinguishing total cell numbers from viable populations without relying on culture growth. Total counts can be achieved through simple bright-field microscopy or automated counters, while viable assessments often employ fluorescence-based LIVE/DEAD staining kits, such as the BacLight assay, which uses SYTO 9 to label live cells with green fluorescence and propidium iodide to penetrate and label dead cells with red fluorescence. This method allows rapid enumeration of viable bacteria in biofilms or suspensions, with studies showing high correlation between fluorescence counts and culturability when optimized for instrument settings.^[78]^[79] Molecular methods offer culture-independent quantification of viable cells by targeting nucleic acids or surface markers. For microbial viability, quantitative PCR (qPCR) targeting 16S rRNA genes, often combined with propidium monoazide (PMA) pretreatment to exclude DNA from dead cells with compromised membranes, enables selective amplification of viable bacterial genomes. This approach has been validated for detecting viable but non-culturable (VBNC) states in environmental samples, providing estimates in gene copies per volume that correlate with metabolic activity.^[80] In stem cell biology, flow cytometry using Annexin V conjugated to fluorophores detects early apoptosis by binding externalized phosphatidylserine on the plasma membrane of viable but apoptotic cells, distinguishing them from necrotic or healthy populations when co-stained with propidium iodide. Seminal work established this as a sensitive indicator of progenitor cell health, with binding detectable within hours of stress induction.^[81] For viral infectivity, plaque-forming units (PFU) serve as an analogous metric to CFUs, measuring the number of infectious virions capable of lysing host cell monolayers and forming visible plaques under an agar overlay. The plaque assay involves serial dilution of virus samples, infection of susceptible cells, and counting cleared zones after incubation, yielding titers in PFU per milliliter that directly reflect replication competence. This method remains the gold standard for quantifying infectious virus particles in vaccine development and pathogenesis studies.^[82] Metabolic assays assess viability through proxies of cellular energy status, bypassing the need for colony formation. ATP bioluminescence assays, such as BacTiter-Glo, quantify intracellular ATP levels via luciferase-mediated light emission, where one viable cell correlates to approximately 10^-15 moles of ATP, enabling detection limits as low as 10 cells in microbial cultures. This homogeneous assay is particularly useful for high-throughput screening of antibiotic effects on bacterial viability. Impedance microbiology, exemplified by systems like BACTEC, monitors real-time changes in electrical impedance or conductivity caused by microbial metabolism of nutrients, detecting growth phases within hours for blood cultures and distinguishing viable pathogens from contaminants.^[83]^[84] Advanced alternatives leverage omics for deeper insights into progenitor potential without traditional culture. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) profiles transcriptomes of individual hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells, revealing continuous differentiation spectra and functional heterogeneity based on gene expression signatures like those of HOX family members, as demonstrated in post-2015 studies of human bone marrow CD34+ populations. Metabolic flux analysis, using 13C-labeled substrates, maps intracellular pathway activities to infer viability and metabolic rewiring in cell lines, providing quantitative flux rates (e.g., in mmol/gDW/h) that highlight adaptive responses under stress, though typically applied in controlled cultures rather than directly bypassing them.^[85]^[86]

Limitations and Best Practices

Colony-forming unit (CFU) assays, while foundational for quantifying viable cells, exhibit significant limitations stemming from their reliance on microbial growth under artificial conditions. A primary constraint is culture bias, which excludes unculturable or viable but non-culturable (VBNC) cells; for instance, less than 1% of soil bacteria are typically culturable using standard media, leading to severe underestimation of microbial diversity and abundance. ^[87] This bias is exacerbated by VBNC states, where bacteria remain metabolically active but fail to form colonies due to dormancy induced by environmental stresses, thus underestimating true viability in microbial samples. ^[88] Additionally, subjectivity in colony identification arises from variable colony morphology, overlapping growth, and observer interpretation, contributing to inter-laboratory inconsistencies. ^[31] The assay is also time-intensive, particularly for slow-growing organisms, often requiring days to weeks for visible colony development, which limits throughput and real-time applications. ^[89] In stem cell biology, CFU assays face field-specific challenges related to cytokine dependency, where variations in growth factor concentrations or combinations can profoundly influence colony formation and lead to high assay variability. ^[90] Poor inter-laboratory reproducibility further hampers reliability, as differences in media composition, cell handling, and incubation conditions affect outcomes, making the assay less suitable as a standalone potency test for hematopoietic stem cell products. ^[91] To mitigate these limitations, best practices emphasize rigorous experimental design and statistical rigor. Replicate plating with at least three to five technical replicates is recommended to account for plating variability, followed by statistical analysis such as calculating 95% confidence intervals using the Poisson distribution approximation, where the standard deviation is the square root of the CFU count. ^[92] Media optimization, including selection of appropriate nutrient formulations and supplements tailored to the target organism or cell type, enhances colony yield and reduces bias. ^[93] For antimicrobial testing, adherence to standardized protocols like ASTM E2315 ensures consistent suspension-based CFU enumeration by specifying inoculum preparation, exposure times, and recovery methods. Recent advancements integrate omics data to validate and contextualize CFU results; for example, single-cell transcriptomics has been combined with CFU assays to refine hematopoietic progenitor hierarchies, revealing discrepancies between culture-based and genomic estimates of stem cell potential. ^[94] Looking ahead, the rise of microbiome research is driving a shift toward culture-independent methods, such as metagenomics, to complement or replace CFUs for more comprehensive viability assessments. ^[95]

References

[1]
[PDF] November 6, 2018 Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305) Division of ...
Nov 6, 2018 · A colony forming unit, or CFU, is a measurement of viable microbial cells that are capable of replicating on agar plates and forming ...
[2]
[PDF] Aerobic Plate Count (January 2001 Edition) - FDA
Jan 1, 2001 · Count all colony forming units. (CFU), including those of pinpoint size, on selected plate(s). Record dilution(s) used and total number of ...
[3]
[PDF] BESC Module 9 – Dental Unit Water Quality - CDC
prevention principles. • Colony counts in water from untreated systems can exceed 1 million CFU/mL (CFU = colony forming unit) ...
[4]
Machine learning for enumeration of cell colony forming units - PMC
Nov 5, 2022 · Counting colony forming units (CFUs) provide quantitative information regarding the health of a specific bacterial species in a particular ...
[5]
Assay Optimization for the Objective Quantification of Human ... - NIH
The colony forming unit (CFU) assay can be used to assess the lineage potential of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPC) in vitro. CFU assays are ...
[6]
Colony-forming unit cell (CFU-C) assays at diagnosis - NIH
In vitro colony-forming unit cell (CFU-C) assays are usually-used to detect the quantitative and qualitative features of haematopoietic stem cells (HSCs).
[7]
Colony-Forming Unit - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
The colony forming unit (CFU) is a measure of viable colonogenic cell numbers in CFU/mL. These are an indication of the number of cells that remain viable ...
[8]
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123809285100107
[9]
Colony-forming unit Definition and Examples - Biology Online
Apr 3, 2024 · A Colony Forming Unit (CFU) represents a single viable cell or a group of cells capable of forming a visible colony under specific growth ...Colony Forming Unit Definition · Conceptualizing CFU · Unit in the CFU
[10]
Culture and Analysis of Hematopoietic Progenitor Cells in CFU Assays
The colony-forming unit (CFU) assay is one of the most widely used assays for hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs). CFU assays allow measurement ...
[11]
Absolute bacterial cell enumeration using flow cytometry
As it is likely that each CFU arose from more than one bacterium, the resulting CFU count will underestimate the actual number of viable bacteria present (Daley ...
[12]
Robust estimation of bacterial cell count from optical density - Nature
Sep 17, 2020 · The CFU protocol has well-known issues of cell clumping and slow, labor-intensive execution, and counts only live and active cells, which ...
[13]
Robert Koch: the grandfather of cloning? - PubMed
His method for propagating individual colonies of bacteria on plates, a technique that came to be called cloning.
[14]
The limitations of the colony-forming unit in microbiology
Jan 6, 2016 · Bacterial enumeration was first achieved in 1878 when the British surgeon Joseph Lister combined serial dilution of soured milk with inoculating ...<|separator|>
[15]
CFU-S assay: a historical single-cell assay that offers modern insight ...
Oct 22, 2021 · James Till and Dr. Ernest McCulloch developed the first in vivo clonal strategy, termed the spleen colony-forming unit (CFU-S) assay, to assess ...
[16]
ISO 7218:2007 - Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs
ISO 7218:2007 covers examination for bacteria, yeasts and moulds and can be used if supplemented with specific guidance for prions, parasites and viruses.Missing: CFU 2020
[17]
Hematopoietic stem cell discovery: unveiling the historical and future ...
Jan 29, 2025 · This assay facilitates the identification, enumeration, and analysis of colonies formed by differentiated hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs)
[18]
Assessing Viability and Stress Tolerance of Probiotics—A Review
The health effects of probiotics are reliant on dose and the minimum recommended amount to be consumed is often defined as 109 CFU per day, labeled as CFU/ml or ...
[19]
Bacterial growth: a statistical physicist's guide - PMC - NIH
Eventually, the cell divides into two daughter cells, in a process called binary fission. The cell size at which division occurs is dependent on the growth ...
[20]
https://bio.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Microbiology/Microbiology_(Bruslind)/10%3A_Environmental_Factors
[21]
MacConkey Agar- Composition, Principle, Uses, Preparation and ...
Aug 10, 2022 · MacConkey agar is a selective and differential media used for the isolation and differentiation of non-fastidious gram-negative rods.
[22]
The importance of the viable but non-culturable state in human ...
If VBNC cells are present, the total number of viable bacteria in a sample will be underestimated by the CFU count method due to the inherent non-culturability ...Detection Of Vbnc Cells · Bacteria With A Vbnc State · Vbnc And Biofilm
[23]
Serial Dilution: Formula, Calculator, Method, Uses, Examples
Sep 7, 2023 · Serial dilution is a series of sequential dilutions that are performed to convert a dense solution into a more usable concentration.Serial Dilution Formula and... · Online Serial dilution calculatorMissing: derivation | Show results with:derivation
[24]
Staphylococcus aureus clumping factor B mediates biofilm formation ...
In this study, we confirm that ClfB is required for biofilm formation under calcium-depleted conditions.
[25]
Erythropoietin guides multipotent hematopoietic progenitor cells ...
The erythroid stress cytokine erythropoietin (Epo) supports the development of committed erythroid progenitors, but its ability to act on upstream ...
[26]
Cytokine receptors and hematopoietic differentiation | Oncogene
Oct 15, 2007 · EPO, for example, primarily regulates levels of erythrocyte progenitors, while IL-3 stimulates the growth of most lineages. This has led to the ...
[27]
Characterization, regulation and targeting of erythroid progenitors in ...
The erythroid progenitors BFU-E (burst-forming unit-erythroid) and CFU-E (colony-forming unit-erythroid) have a critical role in erythropoiesis.
[28]
Protocol: Human Colony Forming Cell (CFC) Assay - R&D Systems
The colony forming cell (CFC) assay, also referred to as the methylcellulose assay, is an in vitro assay used in the study of hematopoietic stem cells.Missing: principles hierarchy
[29]
[PDF] Human Colony-Forming Unit (CFU) Assays Using MethoCult™
Colonies grown in MethoCult™ Express are larger than in standard MethoCult™ media and can be counted as early as after 7 days of culture, but without.
[30]
Current practices and Prospects for Standardization of the ...
The CFU assay is a hematopoietic functional assay, which is often used to measure the function or potency of hematopoietic progenitors present in stem cell ...
[31]
Dynamics of human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell ...
BFU-E represents the first progenitor cell stage that is unipotent and committed to the erythroid lineage. BFU-E gives rise to CFU-E, the final erythropoietic ...
[32]
Hematopoiesis from Pluripotent Stem Cells - Thermo Fisher Scientific
The earliest detectable hematopoietic progenitor cell that rise to granulocytes, erythroblasts, monocytes, and megakaryocytes is termed CFU-GEMM (colony-forming ...
[33]
Isolation and transcriptome analyses of human erythroid progenitors
Burst-forming unit-erythroid (BFU-E) and colony-forming unit-erythroid (CFU-E) cells are erythroid progenitors traditionally defined by colony assays.
[34]
Numbers of colony forming units of the myeloid lineage. (A ...
(B-D) The frequencies of colony forming units (CFU) are stated per 10 5 total bone marrow cells: (B) CFU-GM, (C) CFU-G and (D) CFU-M. Each group consisted of at ...
[35]
Mimicking the functional hematopoietic stem cell niche in vitro - NIH
Our data show that hydrogel-based cultures of mesenchymal stromal cells form a functional in vitro niche by mimicking key features of marrow physiology.
[36]
In vitro biomimetic engineering of a human hematopoietic niche with ...
Jun 4, 2018 · In vitro colony-forming unit assays demonstrated the maintenance of stem or progenitor cell capacities (with multilineage and proliferation ...
[37]
The physical microenvironment of hematopoietic stem cells and its ...
Nov 19, 2019 · In this review, we focus on emerging evidence that hematopoietic stem cell fate is altered in response to a variety of microenvironmental physical cues.
[38]
The origins of the identification and isolation of hematopoietic stem ...
Till and McCulloch proposed that these latter cells were hematopoietic stem cells, that these cells could self-renew, and that they could make all blood cell ...
[39]
Hematopoiesis - Holland-Frei Cancer Medicine - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
Colony-forming cells with a more restricted commitment status than the CFU-GEMM, such as the BFU-E or CFU-GM, lack self-renewal potential and are normally in an ...Missing: units types relevance
[40]
CFU-GEMM - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Hematopoietic progenitors. GM-CSF alone or in combination with other cytokines stimulates the growth of CFU-G, CFU-M, CFU-GM, CFU-GEMM, CFU-DC, CFU-Eo, ...
[41]
Colony Forming Unit E - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Specific assays are termed CFU-GEMM, CFU-GM, CFU-E, CFU-G ... Erythroid-committed progenitors form two distinct types of colonies termed CFU-E and BFU-E.
[42]
Colony Forming Unit - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Colony-forming unit (CFU) is defined as a measure of the clonogenic progenitor capacity of hematopoietic cells, assessed by counting different types of ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[43]
Colony-forming unit-megakaryocyte (CFU-meg) numbers and serum ...
Oct 10, 2000 · In vitro colony-forming unit-megakaryocyte (CFU-meg) assay can provide useful information on thrombocytopenic disorders, although CFU-meg data ...
[44]
Regulation of Human Eosinophil Precursor Production by Cytokines
the number of eosinophil progenitors, which give rise to eosinophil colony-forming units (CFU-Eo) on secondary semi-solid culture with either interleukin-5 ...
[45]
Erythroid progenitors (BFU-e and CFU-e) in acute leukaemia
The reduction of BFU-e and CFU-e in active acute leukaemia suggests the involvement of erythropoietic progenitors in the pathophysiology of this type of ...
[46]
Evaluation of post-thaw CFU-GM: clinical utility and role in quality ...
The CFU assay is considered the only in vitro assay that assesses the biologic function of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPC).
[47]
[PDF] Serial Dilution Protocols - American Society for Microbiology
Sep 30, 2005 · To calculate this dilution series: Determine the dilution factor of each tube in the set. dilution factor for a tube = _____amount of.Missing: derivation | Show results with:derivation
[48]
How to quantify bacterial cultures - From CFU and OD to counting ...
May 2, 2023 · Volume plated (mL) x DF of the plate = Total Dilution FactorNumber of colonies counted (CFU) / Total Dilution Factor = Total CFU / mL. For ...
[49]
ATCC Bacteriology Culture Guide
Perform a serial dilution by transferring 0.5 mL from the first tube to a tube with 4.5 mL, and then 0.5 mL from the second tube to a third tube, etc. This ...
[50]
Quebec Manual Darkfield Colony Counter (110V/60Hz)
The Reichert Quebec Darkfield Manual Colony Counter allows you to easily and accurately count bacteria colonies. It comes with an adjustable dish holder.Missing: CFU valid size
[51]
[PDF] USE OF THE QUEBEC DARKFIELD COLONY COUNTER
Place agar plate, position probe, zero counter, touch each colony, and counts are automatically registered. Then replace the lid.
[52]
Manually Colony Counting vs. Using a Colony Counter - Neutec Group
As noted in the FDA BAM (Chapter 3), the appropriate colony counting range is 25-250 colonies per plate. Plates that exceed 250 CFUs are too numerous to count ...
[53]
[PDF] Evaluation of Accuracy Limits of Countable Colony-forming Units on ...
The purpose of this study was to determine the validity of accuracy limits for quantifying CFUs on agar plates. Methods: Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922) and ...
[54]
How do I recognize colonies with more than 50 cells? - ResearchGate
Sep 24, 2014 · For counting colonies 1st stain them with crystal violet and then count under stereo microscope. you would be able to differentiate colonies >50 cells.<|control11|><|separator|>
[55]
Colony Counter System with Mini LED Light Box and Magnifier
In stock 90-day returnsA complete, effective and accurate way to count colonies of bacteria or other microorganisms grown on an agar plate.
[56]
Colony formation assay: A tool to study cell survival | Abcam
**Summary of Colony Formation Assay History (Focus on 1950s and Microbial/Bacterial Origins):**
[57]
Factors influencing the accuracy of the plating method used to ...
Sep 30, 2010 · However, plate counts vary according to a Poisson distribution as Fisher et al. (1922) showed for replicate plates of soil samples and ...
[58]
Variability and Uncertainty Analysis of the Cross‐Contamination ...
Oct 18, 2012 · Variability between the counted numbers of colony-forming units (CFUs) on different plates leads to an uncertain estimate of the Poisson ...
[59]
Evaluation of an Automated System for the Counting of Microbial ...
Jul 3, 2023 · Colony counting remains one of the most commonly used methods for determining the number of microorganisms in a sample (1, 2). Disregarding ...
[60]
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01908.x
[61]
Modeling the relationship between most probable number (MPN ...
We construct a probabilistic model that provides a clear theoretical explanation for the variability in, and discrepancy between, MPN and CFU measurements.
[62]
Consider the Most Probable Number Method for Bioburden Testing
Oct 22, 2018 · The most probable number (MPN) bioburden test method can be a valuable tool for determining bioburden counts when the typical bioburden test methods are ...
[63]
BSL2 Microbiology Lab - Meat Science
The BioSafety Level 2 Microbiology Laboratory (BSL2) facilitates the study of containment of food-borne human pathogens such as E. coli, Listeria, and ...Missing: CFU ISO 4833
[64]
[PDF] Biosafety Level 2 Guide - University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
This guide is designed for laboratories working with biological materials requiring biosafety level 2 (BL-2) containment and practices. The BL-2 guide is ...Missing: CFU ISO 4833
[65]
Microbiology of the food chain - ISO 4833-2:2013
In stockISO 4833-2:2013 specifies a horizontal method for enumeration of microorganisms that are able to grow and form colonies on the surface of a solid medium ...
[66]
STEMvision™ - Automated Counter for CFU Assays
STEMvision is a bench-top instrument and computer system designed specifically for automated imaging and counting of hematopoietic colonies in the colony- ...
[67]
BIOMIC V3: Automated Colony Counter - Giles Scientific USA
BIOMIC V3 automatically counts bacterial, yeast, and mould colonies and virus plaque assays on agar plates with color digital imaging technology.
[68]
Colony Counter
Oct 20, 2009 · Installation: Download Colony_Counter.jar to the plugins folder, or subfolder, restart ImageJ, and there will be a new "Colony Counter" command ...
[69]
Automated image analysis with ImageJ of yeast colony forming units ...
ImageJ has been utilized for counting colonies as an open-source image analysis program for Macintosh, Windows, and Linux operating systems (Wilson et al., 2017) ...
[70]
ProtoCOL 3 - rapidmicrobiology
ProtoCOL 3 is the next generation instrument for colony counting, zone measurements (inhibition and AST), membranes, Petri-film and a range of other ...
[71]
Whitley WASP Touch
Whitley WASP Touch is a spiral plater designed for the needs of contemporary microbiology laboratories. It is extremely simple to use and provides real cost ...
[72]
AutoCellSeg: robust automatic colony forming unit (CFU)/cell ...
May 8, 2018 · We present AutoCellSeg (based on MATLAB) that implements a supervised automatic and robust image segmentation method.
[73]
C-COUNT: a convolutional neural network–based tool for automated ...
The C-COUNT tool identifies CFU-e colonies, distinguishing them from myeloid colonies and from noncolony cell aggregates or debris.
[74]
Validation of an automated colony counting system for group A ...
Feb 8, 2016 · The automatic counting protocol requires 30–40 s per plate while the manual counting takes and average of 4 min per plate. Fig. 3. figure 3.<|separator|>
[75]
Comparative Study on Evaluating the Performance of Automated ...
Aug 7, 2025 · The results showed that the relative error of the automatic counting method was -7.4%~ + 8.3%, with average relative error of 0.2%, and the time ...
[76]
Assessment and Interpretation of Bacterial Viability by Using ... - NIH
Microscopic assessment of LIVE/DEAD-stained bacterial cells is usually simplified to either “green”-labeled (live) or “red”-labeled (dead) cells. However ...
[77]
LIVE/DEAD BacLight : application of a new rapid staining method for ...
A rapid epifluorescence staining method using the LIVE/DEAD Bacterial Viability Kit (BacLight) was applied to estimate both viable and total counts of bacteria ...
[78]
RNA-based qPCR as a tool to quantify and to characterize dual ...
Sep 20, 2019 · A RNA-based qPCR able not only to quantify but also to characterize microbial interactions within dual-species biofilms composed by P. aeruginosa and S. aureus.Missing: seminal | Show results with:seminal
[79]
Flow cytometry using annexin V can detect early apoptosis ... - Nature
Mar 12, 1998 · Analysis of annexin V binding in PBSC harvests is a simple flow cytometry technique which gives additional information on the status of CD34 + progenitor cells.Missing: review | Show results with:review
[80]
Viral Concentration Determination Through Plaque Assays - NIH
Nov 4, 2014 · Plaque assays quantify infectious viruses by counting plaques in cell culture. They use overlays to restrict viral spread, and are considered ...
[81]
ATP Bioluminescence Assay To Evaluate Antibiotic Combinations ...
Jul 25, 2022 · The aim of the study was to validate an ATP assay as an alternative to the conventional colony count method in studies of antibiotic combinations.
[82]
Novel Electrical Method for Early Detection of Viable Bacteria in ...
We present a novel electrical method for detecting viable bacteria in blood cultures that is 4 to 10 times faster than continuous monitoring blood culture ...
[83]
A comprehensive single cell transcriptional landscape of human ...
Jun 3, 2019 · Using single-cell RNA-Seq, we show that existing approaches to stratify bone marrow CD34+ cells reveal a hierarchically-structured ...
[84]
Metabolic flux analysis: a comprehensive review on sample ...
Sep 7, 2022 · Metabolic flux analysis (MFA) quantitatively describes cellular fluxes to understand metabolic phenotypes and functional behaviour after environmental and/or ...Missing: bypassing | Show results with:bypassing
[85]
(PDF) Cultivation of unculturable soil bacteria - ResearchGate
Aug 6, 2025 · In addition, the less than 1% of bacteria that can be cultured are not representative of the total phylogenetic diversity.
[86]
How to Evaluate Non-Growing Cells—Current Strategies for ... - NIH
Such approach allows antimicrobial effectivity testing against VBNC cells by means of a quantitative CFU/mL reduction after resuscitation, in a similar manner ...
[87]
A high-throughput and low-waste viability assay for microbes - Nature
Nov 2, 2023 · The colony-forming unit (CFU) assay has remained the gold standard to measure viability across disciplines, but it is time-intensive and ...
[88]
Current practices and prospects for standardization of the ...
The goal of this study was to ascertain current laboratory practices for performing the CFU assay with an eye towards identifying practices that could be ...Missing: diagnosis | Show results with:diagnosis
[89]
A cautionary tale about the use of colony-forming efficiency as ... - NIH
Jul 16, 2020 · The CFU assay is an important tool for quality assessment of MSCs in research and biomanufacturing, but there are limits to its use. Caution is ...
[90]
Maximum likelihood estimators for colony-forming units
Jul 23, 2024 · We provide a comparison of methods for estimating abundance of microbes and detail a mapping between different methods, which allows to extend their range of ...
[91]
Protocol Resources for Colony-Forming Assays
Explore our collection of protocols and tech tips for information and support on setting up, optimizing, and standardizing the CFU assay.Missing: practices | Show results with:practices
[92]
New frameworks for hematopoiesis derived from single-cell genomics
Sep 5, 2024 · Later, in vitro colony-forming unit (CFU) assays were developed to test the function of single hematopoietic progenitor cells. These assays ...
[93]
Methods in Microbiome Research: Past, Present and Future - PMC
Profiling microbial communities in a culture-independent manner enabled the identification of gut microbiota that are highly refractory to culture-based assays.