Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Colonel Cathcart

Colonel Cathcart is a fictional character and primary antagonist in Joseph Heller's 1961 satirical novel Catch-22, depicted as the ambitious commanding colonel of an American Army Air Forces bombardment group during World War II.^[1]^[2] Stationed on the fictional Mediterranean island of Pianosa, Cathcart is portrayed as a "slick, successful, slipshod, unhappy man of thirty-six" driven by a desperate quest for promotion to general, often at the expense of his subordinates' safety.^[1]^[3] Cathcart's defining traits include his bureaucratic zeal and moral detachment, exemplified by his repeated increases to the number of combat missions required for crew discharge—escalating from 40 to 80 or more—to curry favor with superiors through displays of unit productivity and publicity stunts like mandatory prayer sessions before flights.^[4]^[2] These actions highlight the novel's critique of institutional absurdity and the prioritization of careerism over human life, drawing from Heller's own experiences as a bombardier in the real 340th Bombardment Group, where similar mission extensions and command pressures occurred.^[5]^[6] His indecisiveness and insecurity manifest in vacillating decisions, such as collaborating with the novel's chaplain on public relations efforts while ignoring frontline realities, rendering him a symbol of wartime authority's disconnect from causality and empirical welfare concerns.^[7]^[8]

Introduction and Overview

Character Description

Colonel Cathcart is portrayed in Joseph Heller's Catch-22 as a slick, successful, slipshod, unhappy man of thirty-six who lumbered when he walked.^[9]^[1] This description underscores his outwardly polished yet clumsily physical presence, combining an air of competence with underlying personal discontent.^[10] As a full colonel in the U.S. Army Air Forces, Cathcart holds the position of group commander for the squadron based on the Mediterranean island of Pianosa during World War II.^[4] His rank and role place him in direct oversight of combat operations, reflecting a mid-level authority figure in the military hierarchy of the era.^[11] Cathcart's baseline traits include a strong ambition to achieve generalship, which drives his actions and decisions within the novel's setting.^[9] This aspiration, coupled with his evident dissatisfaction, forms the core of his introductory characterization as a figure motivated by career advancement amid the stresses of wartime command.^[10]

Role in Catch-22

Colonel Cathcart functions as the group commander of the 256th Squadron at a U.S. Army Air Forces base on the fictional island of Pianosa during World War II in Joseph Heller's 1961 satirical novel Catch-22. In this capacity, he oversees the planning and execution of bombing missions targeting strategic sites in Italy and elsewhere in the Mediterranean theater, as well as the broader operational administration of the squadron's personnel and resources.^[4]^[12] Cathcart's policies, including the recurrent increases in the number of missions required for pilots and crew to complete their tours of duty and return home, establish him as the primary structural antagonist within the plot's military hierarchy. These directives directly heighten the risks faced by the squadron's members, creating ongoing tension with protagonists such as Captain John Yossarian, whose survival instincts clash with the enforced prolongation of combat exposure.^[9]^[13] Positioned in the upper echelons of command, Cathcart represents the institutional authority that mediates between frontline operations and higher generals like Dreedle and Peckem, whose internecine rivalries influence squadron-level decisions without alleviating the burdens imposed on subordinates. His oversight enables ancillary schemes within the unit, such as those pursued by mess officer Milo Minderbinder, which exploit military logistics for personal gain while aligning superficially with operational needs.^[13]^[14]

Personality and Motivations

Ambition and Self-Promotion

Colonel Cathcart's overriding ambition centers on achieving promotion to general, a goal that shapes his command decisions as a calculated bid for recognition within the military hierarchy. At age thirty-six, he had already attained the rank of full colonel, a rapid ascent that bolstered his self-image as exceptionally capable, yet left him perpetually dissatisfied and driven to outpace peers.^[9]^[1] This insecurity manifests in proactive self-promotion, such as volunteering his squadron for perilous missions like the Bologna raid, which he frames as bold leadership to impress higher command.^[4] To further enhance his reputation, Cathcart incrementally raises the number of required combat missions for discharge, escalating from an initial 40 to 50, then 55, 60, and beyond to 70 or 80 in some instances, ostensibly to showcase the squadron's valor and efficiency.^[9]^[15]^[16] These hikes prioritize personal acclaim over aircrew welfare, reflecting a pragmatic exploitation of subordinates as means to career ends, a dynamic not uncommon in competitive command structures where visibility to superiors correlates with advancement. He justifies such measures by emphasizing their alignment with broader institutional goals, disregarding operational risks.^[2] Cathcart also pursues publicity stunts, such as mandating pre-mission prayers led by the chaplain after encountering a magazine article on a similar initiative, aiming to project piety and group cohesion to external observers.^[17] This contrived religiosity underscores his willingness to manipulate optics for favor, viewing the squadron as a vehicle for his elevation rather than an end in itself. Despite these efforts, his tactics reveal an underlying conceit tempered by anxiety, as he measures success relative to rivals and frets over any perceived slights to his status.^[2]

Indecisiveness and Contradictions

Colonel Cathcart exhibits chronic indecisiveness rooted in a profound lack of self-confidence, frequently second-guessing his own directives and deferring to his aide, Colonel Korn, for validation on critical matters.^[9]^[7] This reliance manifests in Korn originating most strategic choices, which Cathcart subsequently appropriates as his own, underscoring a pattern where personal insecurity undermines autonomous leadership.^[18] Such hesitation reflects a broader leadership vulnerability: the impulse to externalize judgment erodes internal resolve, fostering dependency that amplifies errors in high-stakes environments like military command. Cathcart's personality embodies stark contradictions, presenting as slick and outwardly successful while harboring slipshod habits and chronic unhappiness beneath the surface.^[1] He displays apparent bravery in committing subordinates to perilous missions—volunteering entire squadrons without compunction—yet reveals personal cowardice by avoiding personal risk and exhibiting meekness under pressure.^[1] This duality arises from a causal disconnect between projected authority and intrinsic frailty; leaders who prioritize image over competence often sustain facades that mask aversion to direct accountability, perpetuating internal discord. Despite professing disdain for enlisted personnel—viewing them as rude, uneducated inferiors—Cathcart remains wholly dependent on their operational success to secure his promotions and acclaim from superiors.^[19] This reliance exposes a pragmatic hypocrisy: hierarchical advancement demands the very group's performance one ideologically rejects, illustrating how self-interest compels tolerance of contradictions that, left unaddressed, erode genuine command efficacy.^[20] In essence, Cathcart's traits highlight the pitfalls of detached ambition, where contempt for underlings clashes with inevitable interdependence, yielding decisions marred by unresolved tension.

Military Command and Decisions

Raising Mission Quotas

Colonel Cathcart, commanding the fictional 256th Squadron in Joseph Heller's Catch-22, systematically escalated the required number of combat missions from an initial threshold of 40 to 45, 50, 55, and higher, including instances up to 60 or 80, to signal exceptional unit performance and loyalty to superiors like General Dreedle.^[19]^[21] These increments occurred whenever multiple pilots neared completion, effectively resetting eligibility for rotation home and retaining seasoned crews for further operations.^[22] The policy stemmed from Cathcart's pursuit of professional advancement, including aspirations for photographic features in The Saturday Evening Post depicting chap-led pre-mission prayers as emblems of morale and divine favor—ideas borrowed from magazine profiles of other units.^[2]^[1] Feasibility assessments ignored accumulating flight hours, mechanical wear on aircraft like B-25s, and crew endurance limits, prioritizing metrics of bravery over sustainable rotation.^[23] Operationally, the raises prolonged exposure to Mediterranean Theater risks, such as flak over targets in Italy and Austria, without corresponding reinforcements or rest cycles, resulting in degraded readiness.^[24] Morale metrics manifested in absenteeism proxies, like unauthorized tampering with mission ordnance during the Bologna operation, where crews preemptively disarmed bombs to fabricate cancellation grounds amid fears of untenable losses—directly tied to the indefinite tour extensions.^[25] Attrition patterns shifted toward non-combat factors: fatigue-induced errors contributed to mid-air collisions and ground mishaps, as extended quotas eroded precision in formation flying and bombing runs, contrasting with baseline Army Air Forces tour norms of 25-50 missions.^[22] Quantifiable outcomes included stalled personnel throughput, with squadrons operating at 70-80% veteran composition longer than peer units, amplifying vulnerability during saturation raids but yielding superficial statistics for command evaluations. This mechanic underscored a causal chain from quota hikes to amplified procedural absurdities, as administrative overrides supplanted empirical risk modeling in mission planning.^[26]

Interactions with Subordinates and Enlisted Men

Colonel Cathcart exhibited a pronounced hierarchical disdain in his command style, confining interactions to fellow officers while shunning direct engagement with enlisted personnel, whom he implicitly viewed as inferior cogs in the military apparatus rather than individuals warranting personal attention. This separation was reinforced through exclusive access to the officers' club, from which he routinely expelled the chaplain for attempting to include broader participation, underscoring a preference for insulated officer-centric environments over inclusive morale-building efforts.^[27] Such isolation reflected Cathcart's operational philosophy, where enlisted men served as abstract resources for fulfilling missions rather than subjects for relational oversight.^[9] Cathcart frequently delegated burdensome administrative and disciplinary tasks to subordinates, thereby insulating himself from unpopularity while reserving acclaim for outcomes that advanced his career. For instance, he relied on aides like Colonel Korn to execute and justify policy implementations, drawing on their expertise to navigate uncertainties he himself avoided confronting directly.^[2] This pattern extended to claiming credit for group achievements, such as successful bombardments, which he leveraged for personal recognition without acknowledging the groundwork laid by lower ranks.^[19] A notable example of manipulative control involved Cathcart's handling of Major Major, whom he promoted to squadron commander upon a vacancy arising, exploiting the major's inherent social awkwardness to install a leader unlikely to challenge authority or foster dissent. This appointment, announced publicly among peers, intensified Major Major's ostracism and isolation, effectively neutralizing him as a potential rival while maintaining Cathcart's unchallenged dominance over the squadron's dynamics.^[28]^[15] Through such promotions, Cathcart wielded rank advancements not as merit-based rewards but as tools for enforcing compliance and perpetuating hierarchical stratification.^[29]

Key Episodes and Interactions

Feathers and Black Eyes Incident

Colonel Cathcart summoned the base chaplain to his office to dictate a custom prayer designed for wide circulation among other units and superiors, explicitly aiming to highlight the squadron's precise bombing accuracy through invocations for "tighter bomb patterns." This directive, occurring midway through the narrative amid escalating mission requirements, sought to propagandize the group's effectiveness as a means of enhancing Cathcart's visibility and prospects for promotion.^[1] The proposed content framed military success in euphemistic, morale-boosting terms—implicitly celebrating controlled, impactful strikes that minimized waste while maximizing damage to targets—reflecting Cathcart's internal calculus of career "feathers" from demonstrated prowess versus "black eyes" from perceived inefficiencies.^[25] The chaplain, initially compliant but uneasy, questioned the exclusion of enlisted personnel from the prayer's beneficiaries and advocated including references to God, prompting resistance from Cathcart and his aide, Colonel Korn, who viewed such elements as extraneous to the promotional intent.^[30] Cathcart browbeat the chaplain into revisions, insisting on a secular tone focused solely on operational excellence to avoid diluting the message, which exposed an underlying intolerance for deviations that could undermine the scripted narrative of patriotic efficiency.^[31] Ultimately, the chaplain acquiesced under pressure, though the episode underscored Cathcart's detachment in repurposing religious ritual as an instrument of command image-management, collateral to the heightened quotas driving operational risks.^[32] This manipulation of sermons prioritized abstract boosts to unit prestige over authentic spiritual or communal support, illustrating how quota-driven imperatives spawned isolated absurdities in administrative overreach.^[33] No formal threats of reassignment materialized in the meeting, but the coercive dynamic revealed boundaries on dissent within the hierarchy, as the chaplain navigated demands incompatible with traditional clerical roles.

Relationship with Yossarian

Colonel Cathcart's repeated increases in the number of required combat missions directly fuel Yossarian's resentment, as these quotas extend the personal risk to Yossarian's life without regard for individual survival odds, positioning Cathcart as Yossarian's primary antagonist within the squadron's command structure.^[9] Yossarian responds with acts of defiance, such as feigning illnesses to seek refuge in the base hospital and thereby evade missions mandated by Cathcart, which indirectly undermine the colonel's authority by disrupting operational compliance.^[34] Cathcart perceives Yossarian not as a distinct individual facing mortal peril but as an expendable element in aggregate mission statistics, prioritizing his own promotional prospects over the airmen's welfare, as evidenced by his willingness to inflate dangers for career advancement.^[35] This detachment manifests in Cathcart's frustration with Yossarian's disruptive behavior, including an earlier attempt to award him a medal for bravery during a flak-damaged mission—where Yossarian circled the target twice to locate safe bombing runs—only for the gesture to falter due to Yossarian's non-combat injuries, highlighting the colonel's selective and self-serving recognition of valor.^[34] The tensions escalate through Yossarian's outright refusal to fly following the traumatic death of Snowden, a climactic insubordination that challenges Cathcart's quota system at its core, though Cathcart remains insulated from personal accountability, viewing such resistance as a mere administrative nuisance rather than a valid protest against systemic endangerment.^[36] This dynamic underscores a causal rift wherein Yossarian's survival imperatives clash irreconcilably with Cathcart's bureaucratic imperatives, rendering direct confrontations rare but the underlying antagonism pervasive.^[37]

Collaboration with Colonel Korn

Colonel Cathcart's professional alliance with Colonel Korn functioned as a pragmatic mechanism for navigating the military hierarchy, with Korn providing the intellectual and operational backbone to Cathcart's self-promotional maneuvers. As Cathcart's aide-de-camp, Korn devised many of the squadron's administrative and disciplinary measures, which Cathcart subsequently presented as his own initiatives to superiors, thereby minimizing Cathcart's exposure to failure while advancing their mutual career interests. This dynamic allowed Cathcart, often paralyzed by indecision, to pursue ambitious policies without bearing the full brunt of their implementation.^[18] Their partnership manifested in coordinated efforts to enforce conformity and suppress dissent, such as Korn's intervention—directed by Cathcart—to curb interrogations about bureaucratic absurdities by instituting prohibitive rules on questioning authority. Korn's cynicism complemented Cathcart's vanity, enabling joint rationalizations of harsh directives like escalating combat missions as pathways to glory and commendation from higher command. Both men displayed a detached cruelty toward subordinates, prioritizing hierarchical ascent over operational welfare, though Korn exhibited sharper self-awareness in articulating these expedients as inevitable bureaucratic necessities.^[25] A culminating example of their collaboration was the late-war scheme to fabricate positive narratives around squadron operations, offering select officers incentives to endorse inflated accounts of mission successes in exchange for personal relief from duties. This approach sought to ingratiate themselves with generals through vicarious acclaim, insulating the colonels from direct accountability while burnishing their records for promotion. Korn's strategic oversight ensured the proposal's tactical framing, balancing Cathcart's hesitancy with calculated opportunism.^[38]^[18]

Antagonistic and Symbolic Elements

Embodiment of Bureaucratic Absurdity

Colonel Cathcart's character in Catch-22 embodies the paradoxical logic of military bureaucracy, where self-perpetuating rules shield superiors from accountability while ensnaring subordinates in inescapable obligations, as seen in his arbitrary escalation of mission quotas to impress higher command and secure personal advancement. This dynamic reflects the real-world extensions of combat tours in the US Army Air Forces during World War II, where initial quotas—such as 25 missions for heavy bomber crews in the Eighth Air Force—were raised to 30 in March 1944 and 35 by July 1944 to address manpower shortages and sustain operations, effectively nullifying promises of rotation and prolonging exposure to peril.^[39]^[40] Such adjustments prioritized institutional continuity over individual welfare, creating a causal chain where commanders' compliance with escalating demands ensured their own survival in the hierarchy but trapped aircrews in cycles of risk without resolution. Joseph Heller grounded this portrayal in his firsthand service as a B-25 bombardier with the 340th Bomb Group in the Mediterranean Theater, completing 60 missions amid a command structure that emphasized operational output for recognition, mirroring the verifiable pressures of Twelfth Air Force operations where tour lengths similarly extended to retain experienced personnel.^[41] Unlike depictions rooted in personal malice, Cathcart's antagonism arises from systemic incentives in rigid hierarchies, where promotions hinged on visible zeal—such as aggressive scheduling—rather than mission efficacy or troop conservation, a pattern evident in USAAF evaluations that rewarded quantifiable activity over strategic restraint. Heller's observations, drawn from empirical wartime absurdities rather than abstract satire, highlight how bureaucratic rationality devolves into irrationality when agents optimize for career preservation amid opaque higher directives, fostering decisions detached from frontline causal realities like crew fatigue and attrition rates. This institutional irrationality manifests not as deliberate cruelty but as emergent dysfunction from misaligned incentives: colonels pursued generalships by amplifying quotas that demonstrated loyalty and productivity to distant superiors, inadvertently perpetuating a Catch-22 where completion became unattainable by design. Veteran accounts from Mediterranean bomber groups corroborate such disconnects, with extensions beyond initial 50-mission norms for B-25 units reflecting broader USAAF adaptations to sustained attrition, underscoring Cathcart's role as a synecdoche for hierarchies where power insulates decision-makers from the consequences borne by the vulnerable.^[39] Heller's synthesis thus privileges causal mechanisms—hierarchical self-interest over efficacy—evident in his unit's experiences, revealing bureaucracy's capacity to generate absurdity through rule-bound self-reference rather than external malice.

Criticisms and Satirical Portrayal

In Joseph Heller's Catch-22, Colonel Cathcart is satirically portrayed as an ambitious officer whose primary motivation is personal advancement, exemplified by his repeated escalation of required combat missions from 40 to 80 and beyond, ostensibly to impress higher command with displays of zeal rather than to achieve tactical objectives.^[42] This caricature highlights the potential detachment of careerist leaders from frontline realities, with Cathcart viewing subordinates as expendable pawns in his quest for generalship, such as organizing prayer sessions over missions for public relations optics.^[9] Literary analyses often criticize this depiction as emblematic of institutional callousness, where ambition overrides empathy and rationality, contributing to the novel's broader indictment of wartime bureaucracy.^[43] Such portrayals have drawn rebuke for oversimplifying military leadership's complexities, with some observers noting that Cathcart's drive, though exaggerated, parallels real-world imperatives where sustained operational tempo demands relentless pressure on units, preventing stagnation that could prolong conflicts.^[44] In the context of World War II's strategic bombing campaigns, which required escalating sorties to degrade Axis infrastructure—totaling over 1.4 million by Allied air forces—figures like Cathcart arguably sustain necessary momentum, countering pacifist interpretations that detach the satire from war's causal exigencies, such as the imperative to neutralize threats like the Hermann Göring Division.^[45] Empirical military histories affirm that hierarchical ambition, while prone to excesses, underpins command cohesion, as evidenced by persistent top-down structures enabling mission fulfillment despite individual flaws.^[46] Conservative readings frame Cathcart not as a villain but as an archetype of merit-based progression in meritocratic systems, where authority's enforcement averts anarchy; this counters predominantly anti-authority lenses in academic and media critiques, which often amplify Heller's absurdism while sidelining the just war's demands, such as the Allies' moral obligation to prosecute total victory against totalitarianism.^[47] These interpretations emphasize that bureaucratic hierarchies, for all their absurdities, channel human incentives toward collective ends, mirroring causal realities where disorganized forces historically falter, as in fragmented commands during earlier conflicts like World War I.^[44] Thus, while Heller's satire validly exposes ambition's pitfalls, it risks idealizing evasion over the disciplined resolve that secured Allied successes by 1945.

Adaptations and Cultural Impact

1970 Film Portrayal

In the 1970 film adaptation of Catch-22 directed by Mike Nichols, Colonel Cathcart is portrayed by Martin Balsam, who embodies the character's ambitious and self-serving bureaucracy through blustery outbursts and exaggerated incompetence.^[48] Balsam's performance highlights Cathcart's obsession with raising mission quotas to impress superiors and gain promotion, as seen in scenes where he announces increased flight requirements amid crew protests, underscoring the film's satirical take on military absurdity.^[49]^[50] The adaptation condenses Cathcart's episodes from the source material, focusing on visual and dialogic confrontations rather than extended internal rationalizations, which amplifies his antagonistic role for comedic effect while preserving his core drive for personal glory.^[51] Nichols employs long takes and dynamic camera movement in Cathcart's interactions, such as pitching schemes to subordinates, to emphasize chaotic pacing over introspective depth, shifting toward slapstick elements suited to cinema.^[51] This results in a heightened portrayal of Cathcart as a comically inept leader, with Balsam's over-the-top delivery critiqued for excess but effective in conveying institutional folly.^[49] Critics noted Balsam's interpretation as particularly vivid in quota-related announcements, where Cathcart's bluster clashes with operational realities, reinforcing the film's anti-war themes through performative antagonism rather than nuanced psychology.^[49]^[52] The portrayal retains fidelity to the character's promotional zeal but adapts it for screen brevity, omitting verbose monologues in favor of kinetic scenes that blend humor with tension.^[53]

Broader Literary and Historical Context

Colonel Cathcart's characterization in Catch-22 reflects the historical dynamics of World War II aerial warfare, where commanding officers often extended combat tour requirements to sustain operations amid high attrition rates, prioritizing strategic or personal metrics over aircrew survival. Joseph Heller, drawing from his service as a U.S. Army Air Forces lieutenant bombardier in the 340th Bomb Group, completed 60 missions over Italian targets from May to October 1944, experiencing firsthand the mounting pressures of prolonged deployments.^[54] ^[55] In theaters like the Mediterranean, initial tour lengths of around 50 missions were routinely extended, mirroring the novel's depiction of Cathcart's escalations from 40 to 80 missions as a bid for promotion and generalship.^[41] This practice echoed broader U.S. Army Air Forces policies, such as those in the Eighth Air Force, where required missions rose from 25 in 1942 to 30 by March 1944 and 35 by July 1944, driven by manpower shortages and the need to maintain bombing campaigns despite losses exceeding 20-30% in some units.^[56] Cathcart's willingness to volunteer subordinates for hazardous, low-value targets—like undefended Bologna—to garner favorable press and medals satirizes real instances of careerist decision-making that inflated risks without commensurate gains, contributing to the psychological and physical toll on enlisted personnel.^[57] In literary terms, Cathcart exemplifies the bureaucratic archetype central to mid-20th-century war satire, blending Kafkaesque absurdity—where opaque, self-perpetuating rules ensnare individuals—with Heller's innovative black humor to dismantle institutional logic.^[58] Published in 1961, Catch-22 predates and influenced contemporaries like Kurt Vonnegut's Slaughterhouse-Five (1969), establishing a template for portraying war not as heroic but as a profane extension of hierarchical incompetence, where figures like Cathcart evade personal hazard while imposing it downward.^[59] The character's inept ambition critiques timeless power imbalances, from military chains of command to civilian bureaucracies, underscoring Heller's thesis that systemic self-interest renders rational resistance futile.^[60]

References

[1]
Summary and Analysis Chapters 19-20 - CliffsNotes
Colonel Cathcart is a "slick, successful, slipshod, unhappy man of thirty-six" who lumbers along when he walks and wants, most of all, to be a general. He is a ...
[2]
Catch-22 Chapter 19: Colonel Cathcart Summary & Analysis
Colonel Cathcart is described in more detail. Although he is fairly young and successful, he is anguished that he is not younger and more successful.
[3]
[PDF] Catch-22 and the Dark Humor of the 1960s - Scholars Crossing
Apr 29, 2009 · Anxiety is exhibited by many characters throughout Catch-22, but by none so much as. Colonel Cathcart. Heller describes Cathcart as “a ...
[4]
Catch-22: Character List - SparkNotes
Colonel Cathcart. The ambitious, unintelligent officer in charge of Yossarian's squadron. Colonel Cathcart wants to be a general, and he tries to impress his ...
[5]
The Reel Catch-22, Part 3: The War Diaries - The Unwritten Record
Sep 19, 2014 · During the second half of 1944, the War Diary of the 340th Bomb Group provides additional insights that help us understand Col. Cathcart's PR ...<|separator|>
[6]
15 Things You Might Not Know About Catch-22 - Mental Floss
May 24, 2021 · Many of Catch-22's characters were based on Joseph Heller's friends. Heller was a veteran of World War II, and he based a number of Catch-22's ...
[7]
Colonel Cathcart in Catch-22 Character Analysis - Shmoop
Character Analysis. Colonel Cathcart's greatest flaw is his indecisiveness. He has a serious lack of sound judgment and is never confident about anything.
[8]
[PDF] ScholarWorks@GSU - Georgia State University
In Catch-22 the characters of Colonel Cathcart, Captain Black, Lieutenant Scheisskopf,. Dobbs, and McWatt work to perform masculinity and try to feel in ...
[9]
Colonel Cathcart Character Analysis in Catch-22 - LitCharts
Colonel Cathcart Quotes in Catch-22 ... Colonel Cathcart was a slick, successful, slipshod, unhappy man of thirty-six who lumbered when he walked and wanted to be ...
[10]
Catch - 22 Characters - Nebo-lit
Major Cathcart #. Colonel Cathcart was a slick, successful, slipshod, unhappy man of thirty-six who lumbered when he walked and wanted to be a general.
[11]
Catch-22 - CliffsNotes
Colonels Cathcart and Korn call him in for a conference in which they offer Yossarian a "deal": He can return home if only he will speak well of the commanding ...
[12]
Character List - CliffsNotes
Colonel Cathcart The squadron's commanding colonel, who wants to be a general, he keeps raising the number of missions needed to complete a tour of duty.<|separator|>
[13]
Catch-22 Plot Structure in Catch-22 | GradeSaver
Dec 6, 2023 · Generals Peckem and Dreedle continuously squabble Colonel Cathcart constantly increases the number of missions in an attempt to be promoted to ...
[14]
Structural Patterns and Unifying Elements in Catch 22 - jstor
In each purpose, he finds himself constantly blocked: Col. Cathcart keeps raising the required number, and the military system functions by insuperable devices ...
[15]
Colonel Cathcart Timeline in Catch-22 - Shmoop
Cathcart raises the number of missions to fifty. He volunteers his troops for the Ferrera mission. He raises the number of missions to fifty-five. Cathcart ...
[16]
Catch-22 Chapters 27–31 Summary & Analysis | SparkNotes
When Colonel Cathcart learns that Doc Daneeka was also killed in the crash, he raises the number of missions to seventy. Actually, Doc Daneeka was not killed in ...
[17]
Chapter 19 "Colonel Cathcart" Summary - Catch-22 - BookRags.com
His first concern lay with becoming a General. Seeing an article in the Saturday Evening Post about a bomber group whose chaplain says prayers in the briefing ...Missing: desire | Show results with:desire<|control11|><|separator|>
[18]
Colonel Korn Character Analysis in Catch-22 - LitCharts
Cathcart's assistant, Korn makes most of the strategic decisions that Cathcart then claims are his own. At the end of the novel, when Cathcart and Korn ...
[19]
Catch-22 Chapters 6–10 Summary & Analysis - SparkNotes
Hungry Joe has flown six tours of duty, but every time he finishes one, Colonel Cathcart raises the number of missions required before Hungry Joe can be sent ...
[20]
Notes on Catch-22 Themes - BookRags.com
Hatred 5: Captain Black is a crabby man who gets a kick out of hating people and causing them grief. His favorite saying is "eat your liver." He gloats when he ...Missing: dependence | Show results with:dependence
[21]
Summary and Analysis Chapter 35 - Catch-22 - CliffsNotes
He should realize that Colonel Cathcart will soon raise the number of required missions to eighty anyway. Yossarian begs Nately not to fly any more, but his ...
[22]
Catch-22 by Joseph Heller Plot Summary - LitCharts
Cathcart, the Colonel in charge of the group, keeps raising the number of missions required for soldiers to be sent home. Yossarian believes this is unjust, but ...
[23]
FREE Study Guide-Catch-22 by Joseph Heller-CHARACTER ...
Nov 12, 2023 · He asks the chaplain to conduct prayer meetings before each mission, so that he can get his name into The Saturday Evening Post. He is ...
[24]
Catch-22 Chapter 10 Summary - eNotes.com
Towser suspects all uniformed men are crazy now that Colonel Cathcart has raised the required number of combat missions to fifty-five.<|separator|>
[25]
Catch-22 Chapters 17–21 Summary & Analysis | SparkNotes
A summary of Chapters 17–21 in Joseph Heller's Catch-22. Learn exactly what happened in ... missions required every few weeks, but Colonel Cathcart ignores him.
[26]
Catch-22: A Glimpse at the Insanity of War and the Absurdity of LIfe
In Catch-22, Heller suggest that life is basically unfair and that the human condition is absurd. As mentioned, Heller points to the lack of justice we ...
[27]
Catch-22 Chapters 22–26 Summary & Analysis | SparkNotes
... colonel believes will land him in the Saturday Evening Post. The chaplain tries to mingle with the men at the officers' club, but Colonel Cathcart ...
[28]
Summary and Analysis Chapters 9-10 - CliffsNotes
Unfortunately, Colonel Cathcart appoints Major Major to be the new squadron commander almost immediately. The rest of the men ostracize the new commander.
[29]
Catch-22: Chapter 9 Summary & Analysis - Major Major - LitCharts
After his promotion, Major Major found no one would talk to him—he was at once everyone's superior, in command, and inferior, as far as experience went. Major ...
[30]
Catch-22 Chapters 15-21 Summary and Analysis - GradeSaver
Dec 6, 2023 · Finally, Cathcart asks for a prayer for a tighter bomb pattern to please General Peckem. An argument arises when the chaplain asks for the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[31]
Q&N: Catch-22 (Joseph Heller)
They had hated him before he came, hated him while he was there, hated him ... Colonel Cathcart was in no position to disagree with him. Topic: Lawyers.
[32]
Catch-22: 'They're All Trying to Kill Me' - miller's book review
Apr 26, 2023 · Joseph Heller's outline for Catch-22. A key chronological anchor are the escalating number of missions, captured here on the far left side ...Missing: function | Show results with:function
[33]
FREE Study Guide-Catch-22 by Joseph Heller-Free Booknotes ...
... chaplain to include any references to God in his prayers. He asks the chaplain to pray for a tighter bomb pattern. The chaplain wishes that, for his pre ...
[34]
Catch-22 Chapters 11–16 Summary & Analysis | SparkNotes
A summary of Chapters 11–16 in Joseph Heller's Catch-22. Learn exactly what happened in ... Captain Black is pleased to hear that Colonel Cathcart has volunteered ...
[35]
10 Strong Catch-22 Quotes About Corrupt Authority and Death
Nov 12, 2023 · Those who had power abused it, like Colonel Cathcart who made his unit of soldiers fly more and more dangerous missions so he could look ...
[36]
Catch-22 Chapters 22-28 Summary and Analysis - GradeSaver
Dec 6, 2023 · The chaplain returns and finds that Corporal Whitcomb has been promoted to Sergeant by Colonel Cathcart. He says that Cathcart wants to speak to ...<|separator|>
[37]
Catch-22 Chapter 42: Yossarian Summary & Analysis - LitCharts
Yossarian is closer to settling on running away, which he considers a path out of this last catch-22—whether or not to accept Cathcart's deal. Yossarian does ...
[38]
Notes on Chapter 40 - Catch-22 - BookRags.com
In exchange for his discharge, Yossarian must glorify and befriend both Cathcart and Korn. They will send him home as a hero with medals and high rank if he ...
[39]
[PDF] COMBAT CREW ROTATION - World War II and Korean War
In Eighth Air Force, the tour of 25-30 sorties and 150-200 hours for all crews was changed in order to provide separate criteria for dif- ferent kinds of ...
[40]
Why Did The US Change The "25 Missions" Rule? Explaining ...
Mar 2, 2024 · In Masters of the Air, it is hinted that the number of missions was increased from 25 to 30 because of how many men the US Army Air Forces was losing at that ...
[41]
Joseph Heller 340th Bomb Group - Key Aero
Jan 18, 2022 · Joseph Heller's combat experiences as a B-25 Mitchell bombardier with the 340th Bomb Group in Italy inform his later writing of a literary classic.
[42]
Catch-22 - Study Guide and Literary Analysis
Colonel Cathcart: The second important character, Colonel Cathcart, is an inefficient and a ruthless, mean person, who desperately wants his retinue to ...
[43]
Critical Essays Heller's Use of Satire - CliffsNotes
Heller's passionate indignation is directed initially at military, political, and institutional targets experienced directly by the men stationed on Pianosa. In ...
[44]
Why 'Catch-22' Is the Closest Thing to the Truth About War
Aug 6, 2022 · Catch-22 is a satirical war novel published in 1961. It centers on Capt. John Yossarian, an American bombardier during World War II desperately ...
[45]
Catch-22: The awful truth people miss about Heller's great novel.
Aug 2, 2011 · If you want to admire Catch-22 as an anti-war novel, you can only reasonably do so from a strictly pacifist position. What if everyone acted ...
[46]
Catch-22: Is the novel still relevant to modern soldiers? - BBC News
Oct 27, 2011 · "This is where the military finds itself in a Catch-22. It needs to adopt a strict hierarchical system in order to fulfil its mission. There ...
[47]
Looking Back at “Catch-22” - Commentary Magazine
Feb 1, 2000 · Colonel Cathcart is therefore his enemy just as surely as the German gunner shooting at him when he drops his bombs. Everywhere, Yossarian ...
[48]
Catch-22 (1970) - IMDb
Rating 7.1/10 (27,876) Top Cast36 ; Alan Arkin · Yossarian ; Martin Balsam · Colonel Cathcart ; Richard Benjamin · Major Danby ; Art Garfunkel · Nately ; Jack Gilford · Doc Daneeka.Full cast & crew · Plot · Trivia · Official Trailer
[49]
Catch-22 movie review & film summary (1970) | Roger Ebert
Rating 3/4 · Review by Roger EbertThe general is overplayed by Orson Welles; the colonel by Martin Balsam; the major by Bob Newhart. Balsam is particularly guilty of overacting, but perhaps it's ...
[50]
Reeling Backward: Catch-22 (1970) - by Christopher Lloyd - Film Yap
Jul 24, 2023 · Cathcart (Martin Balsam) keeps raising the threshold in an effort to gain publicity for himself and the unit. Scribe Buck Henry plays his right ...
[51]
Catch-22 (1970) and its technically stunning use of long takes
Apr 10, 2024 · ... Balsam's Colonel Cathcart, and starts pitching him his latest money-making scheme. As the pair talk, the camera follows them as they stride ...
[52]
https://jtbrandt.com/college-writing/film-reviews/catch-22-1970-a-nightmare-in-the-best-kind-of-way
[53]
'Catch-22′: Mike Nichols' Underappreciated Classic Adaptation of ...
With Alan Arkin starring as Yossarian, and Orson Welles (General Dreedle), Martin Balsam (Colonel Cathcart), Dick Benjamin (Major Danby), Norman Fell (Sergeant ...<|separator|>
[54]
Joseph Heller and Catch-22 | Imperial War Museums
Published in 1961 by American author Joseph Heller, Catch-22 is a satirical novel about the experiences of the fictional 256th Squadron in Italy, from 1942-44.
[55]
'Catch-22': Cadets Hail a Chronicler of the Absurd
The novel that captured the insanity of war and the human condition while adding a phrase to the English language.<|separator|>
[56]
The Reel Catch-22, Pt. 2: Joseph Heller and Training During Combat
Sep 17, 2014 · Nine reels of unedited footage from Training During Combat that was shot by my father. The combined running time of this footage is nearly 73 minutes.Missing: hierarchy absurdities
[57]
War and Bureaucracy Theme Analysis - Catch-22 - LitCharts
Cathcart's insistence on continued missions leads to dangerous flights over unnecessary targets, and encourages the slaughter of innocent civilians. These ...
[58]
Absurd Bureaucracy in Heller's Catch-22 - The Gemsbok
Oct 27, 2015 · All of them affect him negatively; some of them do so by directly worsening his condition (Colonel Cathcart, Captain Black, Major Major Major ...
[59]
Eight years, two titles and one well-timed war: how Catch-22 ...
Jun 21, 2019 · The significance of this is that Heller, Vonnegut, and Hooker, writing at a distance from events, were able to be mordantly satirical about war ...
[60]
[PDF] Critique of American Power Structures in Joseph Heller's Catch-22
Colonel Cathcart is the commanding officer of Yossarian's unit who decides the number of missions soldiers on the island of Pianosa have to fly. Those missions ...