Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Colorado State Penitentiary

The Colorado State Penitentiary (CSP) is a Level V maximum-security and administrative segregation prison in , operated by the to house the state's highest-risk close-custody inmates. Opened in 1993 with Phase I construction, followed by Phase II completion in 1995, the facility was designed specifically for maximum custody offenders (including management control units for high-risk and disruptive individuals) alongside select medium- or lower-custody participants in incentive programs. CSP's defining features include regimented housing to isolate violent or gang-affiliated , limiting out-of-cell time and interactions to mitigate threats posed by this . Programs such as high school equivalency education, violence reduction courses, and re-entry planning are available but constrained by demands. The prison has drawn attention for elevated rates of inmate assaults and fights relative to averages, attributable to the causal dynamics of concentrating aggressive offenders in confined settings, though official data emphasizes operational necessities over reformist critiques from sources. Prior to 's 2020 abolition of , CSP briefly managed transfers from older facilities.

History

Establishment and Early Development (1990s)

The Colorado State Penitentiary (CSP) in , opened in 1993 following Phase I construction that year, establishing it as a Level V maximum-security facility dedicated primarily to administrative segregation. Phase II construction, completed in 1995, expanded cell capacity to accommodate additional high-risk inmates. Designed for close-custody offenders, including those classified under maximum custody units (such as MCUHR for high-risk management and MCU for general maximum custody), CSP targeted Colorado's most violent and unmanageable prisoners to isolate them from general populations. This development addressed the limitations of existing state facilities amid rising , where assaults on and inmates had escalated, necessitating dedicated to disrupt organized threats from gangs and predatory individuals. The supermax model for CSP drew from national precedents, including the 1983 inmate murders of two federal officers at USP Marion, events that empirically demonstrated the need for indefinite single-cell confinement to neutralize violent leadership and reduce system-wide incidents. By prioritizing —typically 23 hours daily in cells—CSP aimed to safeguard and the through causal separation of high-threat actors, grounded in showing 's in curbing assaults in sending institutions. Initial operations focused on empirical safety gains, with the facility's architecture enforcing minimal human contact to prevent the inmate-coordinated violence prevalent in 's overcrowded prisons during the late and early . This approach reflected a first-principles emphasis on over for the subset of inmates whose behavior posed ongoing risks, as evidenced by prior state trends requiring specialized Level V housing.

Operational Changes and Expansions (2000s–Present)

In the early , Colorado's prison population surged due to stricter sentencing for violent offenses, increasing demand for administrative segregation capacity at facilities like the Colorado State Penitentiary (CSP), which adapted operations to house more high-risk inmates requiring prolonged to manage facility-wide threats. By mid-decade, this operational shift emphasized reinforced protocols, correlating with state trends where violent commitments rose, necessitating CSP's role in containing gang-affiliated and assault-prone offenders without physical expansions but through intensified and monitoring. Following legislative scrutiny of 's psychological impacts and links to institutional violence, the (CDOC) enacted reforms under Senate Bill 11-176 in 2011, introducing step-down programs at CSP to transition compliant inmates out of administrative via structured behavioral incentives, education, and limited socialization. These changes prioritized short-term for active threats while reserving long-term for persistent violent actors, reducing the statewide administrative from a peak of approximately 1,500 (7% of total inmates) in 2011 to under 400 by 2016. Post-reform data indicated a causal link between decreased segregation reliance and lower inter-inmate violence at high-security sites like CSP, with CDOC reporting fewer offender-on-offender assaults and self-harm incidents attributable to phased reintegration reducing idleness-driven conflicts. Annual administrative segregation reports through fiscal year 2024 confirm operational stability, maintaining segregation averages below 200 inmates amid national advocacy for broader de-escalation, without compromising CSP's containment of validated security threats. This evolution underscores policy adaptations grounded in violence metrics, prioritizing empirical containment over indiscriminate isolation.

Facility Design and Security Features

Location and Physical Layout

The Colorado State Penitentiary (CSP) is located in , immediately east of Cañon City in the East Cañon prison complex. This positioning places it within a concentrated cluster of over a dozen state correctional facilities, including the and , which collectively form Colorado's "correctional " and support logistical efficiencies through proximity for high-risk inmate transports and coordinated resource allocation. CSP's physical layout prioritizes containment via a of cell blocks and specialized housing units configured for maximum , limiting inmate movement and direct contact. Single-occupancy cells predominate, integrated with control units such as those for maximum custody and close custody transition, alongside enclosed exercise yards designed for individual use to enforce separation. The facility spans approximately 470,000 square feet, with construction phased between 1993 and 1995 to expand capacity to 756 inmates while embedding structural redundancies against breaches. While sharing the broader perimeter and support infrastructure with neighboring prisons for operational sustainment, CSP maintains distinct perimeters and access protocols to isolate its high-threat and avert inter-facility security propagation.

Architectural and Technological Security Measures

The Colorado State Penitentiary (CSP) incorporates multi-layered architectural barriers optimized for maximum containment, including double perimeter fencing augmented with and integrated detection devices such as motion sensors to identify and neutralize perimeter threats. These elements adhere to Colorado's Level security standards, which mandate equivalent high-security architecture for facilities housing the most disruptive inmates, ensuring continuous monitoring and rapid response to potential breaches. The design extends inward with structures and isolated housing pods that limit line-of-sight interactions between inmates, minimizing opportunities for coordinated violence or transfer. Central to CSP's security are administrative segregation cells, where inmates classified for long-term receive 23 hours of daily in compact units typically measuring around 7 by 12 feet, furnished with fixed concrete fixtures to prevent weaponization or . Access to these cells is controlled via solid doors equipped with narrow vision slots, integrated into an Electronic Security Control System (ESCS) that allows remote locking, unlocking, and operation from a centralized . This system further links to intercoms and video feeds, enabling staff to oversee movements without direct exposure. Technological enhancements include pervasive (CCTV) coverage across common areas, corridors, and cell fronts, supplemented by the ESCS's video call-up capabilities for real-time incident assessment. Remote-controlled mechanisms reduce the need for physical key exchanges or manual patrols in high-risk zones, thereby lowering staff vulnerability to assaults. Opened in 1993 as a dedicated Level V facility, these integrated architectural and technological features have sustained CSP's operational integrity, with no successful escapes recorded amid historical patterns of breakouts from less fortified predecessor institutions.

Inmate Management and Classification

Administrative Segregation Protocols

Administrative segregation protocols at the Colorado State Penitentiary, restructured under the Department of Corrections' Special Management Housing framework since the 2011 enactment of Senate Bill 11-176, apply to non-death row inmates classified as high-risk based on documented behavioral threats rather than sentence duration or categorical sentencing. Placement requires evidence of ongoing dangers, including serious assaults on staff or other inmates, validated leadership in security threat groups such as gangs, or credible escape risks, assessed via objective risk evaluations and incident histories. In 2024, the system recorded 913 such placements system-wide (involving 1,377 unique inmates), averaging 125.6 days per stint, with decisions reviewed by multidisciplinary teams to ensure proportionality and avoid indefinite confinement. Daily management emphasizes through graduated containment, with inmates in Close Custody Special Management Control units—such as —allocated 4 hours of out-of-cell time per day for controlled recreation and basic programming, increasing to 6 hours in transitional units like the Close Custody Transition Unit (CCTU) for compliant individuals. All movements occur under restraint, and privileges escalate based on demonstrated behavioral adherence, prioritizing institutional order over expansive amenities. screenings occur routinely upon placement and during 30-day reviews, identifying needs among the disproportionately affected population (42.6% with behavioral health disorders in restrictive ), though interventions defer to protocols when conflicts arise; maximum stays in highest-restriction units cap at 12 months. These protocols demonstrably deter broader violence by isolating primary aggressors, disrupting causal chains of assaults and disruptions; post-reform data show sustained low incident rates despite a halved restrictive housing population since 2011, with direct releases (9.04% of FY2024 terminations) correlating to managed reintegration without spikes in predatory acts.

Death Row Housing and Procedures

The death row unit at State Penitentiary consists of single-cell housing for male inmates sentenced to , classified under close custody levels to ensure maximum security isolation distinct from general administrative . Established with the facility's opening in October 1993, this dedicated unit replaced prior housing at the Colorado Correctional Facility and accommodates death-eligible offenders in individual cells equipped with basic amenities, limiting out-of-cell time to one hour daily for exercise or showers under constant supervision. Such isolation protocols prioritize containment of high-risk individuals capable of manipulating staff or inmates, as evidenced by the unit's design for offenders like Nathan Dunlap, convicted in 1996 for the premeditated 1993 murders of four employees in . Pre-execution procedures include restricted non-contact visitation through secure partitions, typically limited to or legal counsel with pre-approved lists and electronic monitoring, alongside procedural safeguards for ongoing appeals processed via reviews and federal petitions. Legal challenges often prolong confinement, with inmates retaining access to counsel but facing heightened scrutiny on communications to prevent external influences. Final confinement protocols, though dormant amid Colorado's de facto execution moratorium imposed by Governor on May 22, 2013—citing concerns over racial disparities and innocence risks—maintained the unit's operational integrity until the state legislature's repeal of on March 23, 2020, which commuted all remaining death sentences to life without . This housing framework underscores empirical necessities for managing irremediable violent offenders, where data on risks among convicts—such as Dunlap's calculated execution of to eliminate evidence—justify sustained isolation over less restrictive alternatives, independent of moratorium or debates. Prior to abolition, the unit housed three inmates: Dunlap, Sir Mario Owens (sentenced 2009 for a ), and Robert Ray (sentenced 2007 for the same case), all transferred post-conviction to CSP's for indefinite secure containment.

Daily Operations and Inmate Conditions

Routine Schedules and Programs

Inmates at the Colorado State Penitentiary (CSP), designated as a Level V administrative facility, follow a highly restrictive daily regimen prioritizing to prevent coordination of violent acts among high-risk offenders. Administrative protocols mandate 23 hours of daily cell confinement, with one hour allocated for recreation or exercise, typically conducted in secure, enclosed outdoor yards to limit physical interactions and surveillance risks. This structure, implemented since the facility's opening, reflects causal priorities of isolating disruptive inmates, as evidenced by consistent application across units housing those deemed threats to institutional safety. Meals are delivered directly to cells via secure slots, minimizing movement and enabling rapid response to potential disturbances, in line with (CDOC) standards for high-security environments. Medical access follows protocols, with on-site evaluations conducted through cell-door assessments or restrained escorts for urgent needs, designed to balance health requirements against escape or assault risks. These efficiency-focused measures ensure minimal out-of-cell time, supported by empirical observations of reduced incident rates in such controlled settings compared to general population housing. Educational and vocational programs remain severely limited due to the security imperatives of administrative , with offerings restricted to self-paced or low-contact formats suitable for isolated high-risk profiles. Available initiatives include High School Equivalency courses, Moral Reconation Therapy, , and select re-entry programs like RESTORE and WAGEES, accessible only to inmates in lower-custody transition units such as the Close Custody Transition Unit (CCTU). Participation rates are low, as protocols prohibit group sessions in maximum units to avert violence planning, and studies on similar segregation cohorts indicate marginal reductions from such interventions given the entrenched behavioral profiles of CSP inmates.

Staff Oversight and Incident Response

Correctional officers at the Colorado State Penitentiary (CSP) play a critical role in supervising inmates classified for administrative segregation in a supermax setting, where direct interactions are minimized to mitigate risks from high-threat individuals. All new CDOC officers, including those assigned to CSP, undergo mandatory training via the Basic Training Academy, encompassing onboarding, defensive tactics, and at least 14 days of core instruction tailored to correctional environments, with additional facility-specific modules emphasizing control in isolated units. This preparation equips staff to handle priorities before escalating to physical interventions, aligning with CDOC's broader training system under Policy 1500-01. Incident response protocols at CSP follow CDOC's structured hierarchy outlined in 100-07 for reportable incidents, requiring immediate tracking and notification to contain disturbances such as inmate non-compliance or potential violence. Specialized volunteer teams, selected and trained for crisis scenarios including barricaded subjects or situations, serve as rapid deployment units to address escalated threats without relying on external agencies, enabling swift internal resolution. Use-of-force applications are governed by departmental directives, with post-incident support mandated under 1450-53 for staff involved in shootings or fatal outcomes, ensuring procedural accountability. Oversight of CSP staff includes investigations via Policy 1150-04 for professional standards violations, promoting adherence to amid statewide correctional pressures. While CDOC facilities face turnover rates approaching 25% for officers due to demanding conditions, the supermax model's emphasis on remote and restricted supports protocol efficacy in reducing direct confrontations, as reflected in CDOC records of 61 controlled force applications on inmates over a 12-month period from 2012 to 2013 without widespread staff casualties.

Notable Inmates and Executions

Prominent Inmates Housed

Nathan Dunlap, convicted in 1996 of four counts of first-degree murder for the 1993 shooting deaths of three employees and one customer at a restaurant in , was housed at the Colorado State Penitentiary due to his death sentence, which mandated placement in the state's supermax facility for capital offenders. Despite exhibiting good behavior without documented institutional violence, Dunlap's classification reflected the facility's protocol for isolating those convicted of multiple premeditated killings to mitigate risks of further harm, even absent post-conviction disruptions. His sentence was commuted to life without parole in March 2020 following Colorado's abolition of ; he was subsequently transferred to after a 2015 settlement addressing exercise rights. Sir Mario Owens, sentenced to death in 2008 for first-degree murder, conspiracy, and witness intimidation in the 2005 execution-style killings of Javad Marshall-Fields—a witness against Owens in a prior murder case—and Fields' fiancée Vivian Wolfe, was confined at CSP to enforce strict isolation protocols suited to inmates with histories of targeted violence against legal system participants. The placement underscored CSP's role in containing individuals whose crimes demonstrated calculated aggression, including Owens' role as the shooter in a gang-orchestrated hit to obstruct justice, thereby preventing potential reprisals or coordination of further acts from within a less secure environment. As of 2018 records, Owens remained at CSP under high-security conditions; his death sentence was commuted to life imprisonment in 2020. Robert Ray, Owens' co-defendant convicted of orchestrating the same 2005 double homicide as an accessory and conspirator, along with related prior shootings, was also assigned to CSP under protocols, justified by his demonstrated pattern of directing lethal eliminations that evidenced ongoing potential. Ray's institutional housing at the supermax aimed to disrupt any capacity for external influence or internal alliances, given the interconnected nature of his crimes with affiliations and multiple victims. His capital sentence was commuted to life without parole in 2020, with subsequent appeals upholding convictions as recently as June 2025; by 2025, he had been transferred to while maintaining high-security status.

Executions and Legal Proceedings

The Colorado State Penitentiary (CSP) has been designated by state statute as the facility for carrying out executions of inmates sentenced to death. Following the adoption of as the primary method in 1988, CSP conducted its first such execution on October 13, 1997, when was put to death for the 1987 , , and of Becky Jo McClellan in Crowley County. Davis, convicted in 1987 after a that included witness testimony from his accomplice, exhausted all direct appeals, state post-conviction remedies, and federal petitions, with the U.S. Supreme Court denying certiorari in 1996. Governor denied clemency on October 3, 1997, citing the premeditated nature of the crime and victim impact statements from McClellan's family, who observed the execution. Davis was pronounced dead at 8:33 p.m. after administration of a three-drug protocol involving , , and . Prior to , CSP utilized a for executions, with the last such procedure occurring in 1966; the chamber, installed in the 1930s, was decommissioned after the shift to intravenous methods but remained structurally intact at the facility until the early . Legal challenges to execution methods at CSP focused on claims of under the Eighth Amendment, including assertions that gas asphyxiation caused prolonged suffering, as evidenced in post-execution autopsies from earlier cases showing effects. Courts rejected these in pre-1997 litigation, affirming that protocols minimized pain based on medical testimony and comparative analysis with alternatives like . For Davis's case, defense motions for stays based on and racial bias in were denied by the and federal district courts, emphasizing adherence to through bifurcated sentencing hearings required under state law since 1974. No executions have occurred at CSP since 1997, amid ongoing debates over capital punishment's empirical efficacy as a deterrent. Studies analyzing rates in death penalty states, including , have found no statistically significant reduction attributable to executions, with factors like socioeconomic conditions and policing exerting stronger causal influences on crime trends. In 2013, Governor issued an executive moratorium on executions, citing arbitrary application and risks of executing innocents, though this did not alter statutory provisions. The repealed the death penalty for offenses charged after July 1, 2020, via Senate Bill 20-100, while commuting the sentences of the three remaining death-sentenced inmates—Robert Ray, Sir Mario Owens, and Nathan Dunlap—to life without ; the at CSP was subsequently repurposed, with no provisions for resumption under current law.

Security Incidents and Responses

Historical Riots and Internal Violence

The 1929 riot at the Colorado State Penitentiary's predecessor facility in Cañon City, occurring on , began as an attempted mass escape led by inmate , who seized the arsenal and initiated widespread and hostage-taking. This disturbance resulted in 13 deaths—eight guards and five inmates—and the destruction of much of the physical plant, marking it as one of the deadliest prison uprisings in U.S. history up to that point. The violence stemmed from coordinated inmate aggression exploiting momentary lapses in control during mealtime, underscoring vulnerabilities in less segregated housing that informed subsequent architectural and operational reforms emphasizing to disrupt group mobilization. Opened in 1993 on the same grounds as a supermaximum-security facility, the modern Colorado State Penitentiary (CSP) was explicitly designed to house Colorado's most violent close-custody offenders—predominantly those with histories of , affiliations, and predatory behavior in lower-security prisons—aiming to avert repeats of prior mass disturbances through administrative and limited communal interaction. Post-opening incidents have manifested as targeted inmate-on-inmate rather than large-scale riots, with empirical data attributing elevated violence rates to the inmate population's profile rather than systemic facility shortcomings; for instance, CSP recorded the state's highest assault frequency in reports circa , including at least three fatal beatings observed over preceding years amid a concentration of high-risk individuals. A notable example occurred on June 21, 2022, when inmate Samuel Garcia was fatally assaulted in a day hall by six others, including Ricardo Castro and Enrique Arellano, via coordinated physical attack captured on surveillance, leading to convictions carrying sentences up to 20 years for participants. Such events, rooted in interpersonal or gang-related animosities among maximum-security inmates, have consistently been contained rapidly by staff interventions, yielding minimal casualties and no escalation to riotous disorder, as evidenced by immediate lockdowns and prosecutions without broader institutional disruption. This pattern credits proactive isolation measures for suppressing violence at inception, contrasting sharply with the unchecked escalation of earlier precedents.

Escape Attempts and Prevention Successes

Since its opening in , the Colorado State Penitentiary (CSP) has experienced no successful escapes, reflecting the facility's supermax design engineered to isolate high-risk inmates and eliminate opportunities for breaches. This record contrasts sharply with the history of earlier Canon City prisons, where escapes were recurrent, including a notable breakout involving 12 inmates who exploited lax perimeter security and internal coordination. Prior facilities in the area saw five successful escapes over the half-century leading to 1976, often involving violence or external aid, but none have occurred from CSP or comparable modern units in Fremont County since. Escape attempts at CSP have been exceedingly rare, with any reported efforts—such as isolated probes of fixtures or perimeter vulnerabilities—thwarted immediately by layered measures, including 7-by-12-foot with slit windows angled to obscure orientation, remote-operated steel blast doors, motion-sensor lighting, and 24-hour electronic monitoring that minimizes inmate movement outside controlled zones. These features, adapted from federal supermax models, ensure that even coordinated actions falter due to the absence of blind spots and human-dependent vulnerabilities prevalent in pre-1990s state prisons. In one instance, an inmate transferred to CSP following a bid from a lower- was contained without incident, highlighting the deterrent of its protocols. The absence of external breaches over three decades serves as an empirical metric of containment efficacy, demonstrating that targeted investments in architectural deterrence and technology yield sustained public safety outcomes absent in less fortified systems. Post-design reviews and incremental upgrades, informed by broader incident analyses rather than CSP-specific events, have further refined perimeter detection, such as enhanced razor-wire fencing and K-9 patrols, without necessitating reactive overhauls. This zero-escape track record aligns with outcomes at peer supermax institutions, where structural realism in prioritization overrides potential lapses in lower-tier facilities.

Controversies and Empirical Assessments

Solitary Confinement Efficacy Studies

A longitudinal study conducted from 2007 to 2010 by the Colorado Department of Corrections, funded by the National Institute of Justice, evaluated the psychological impacts of administrative segregation (AS) on 247 inmates, including subsets with and without mental illness, compared to 83 general population inmates over one year. Psychological assessments using standardized tools like the Brief Symptom Inventory revealed no significant increases in symptoms such as anxiety, depression, or hostility for AS inmates relative to the control group; mentally ill AS inmates started with elevated symptoms but showed no accelerated deterioration. These findings indicate that AS does not induce progressive psychological harm beyond baseline levels, supporting its use for managing disruptive inmates without evidence of causal collapse. Empirical metrics underscore AS's role in violence mitigation at high-security facilities like the Colorado State Penitentiary (CSP), where prevents physical interactions among predators. In CSP, assault rates remain low due to 23-hour daily confinement and limited , contrasting with higher general population in other facilities; for example, statewide data post-2011 AS reforms showed inmate-on-inmate rising after releasing over 300 segregated inmates to step-down units, with increasing in 2014 following transfers of hundreds more. This causal link— reducing opportunities—aligns with first-principles separation of violent actors, as evidenced by stable or elevated upon reintegration. Subsequent validations through 2023 affirm AS efficacy for behavioral control without widespread . DOC annual reports document sustained low incident rates in restrictive housing for violent offenders, with no documented surges in or attributable to ; instead, targeted AS for the 11 most dangerous offense categories (e.g., on , ) correlates with overall stability. While broader declined 40% statewide from 2008 to 2019 amid mixed reforms, AS's isolation of high-risk individuals likely contributed by curbing in-prison misconduct that predicts reoffending, per departmental behavioral tracking. These outcomes prioritize observable reductions in harm over unverified long-term detriment claims.

Criticisms of Conditions and Counter-Evidence

Critics, including organizations, have alleged that prolonged administrative at Colorado State Penitentiary exacerbates issues among inmates, particularly those with pre-existing conditions, leading to increased and . A 2013 report by the ACLU of Colorado documented cases where untreated mentally ill prisoners in solitary deteriorated to psychotic states, arguing such practices are cruel and elevate public safety risks upon release due to untreated conditions. These claims often frame as tantamount to , with media outlets amplifying inmate testimonials of and despair. However, a commissioned by the and funded by the , tracking 247 inmates entering administrative segregation from 2006 to 2007, found no significant decline in symptoms for the majority over a year-long period, challenging assertions of universal causal harm. Researchers noted that while a subset with showed elevated distress, overall psychological functioning stabilized or improved for many, attributing baseline vulnerabilities to the high-risk profiles of segregated inmates rather than segregation itself. This necessity arises from security imperatives: CSP houses inmates deemed too violent for general population, where assaults on staff and peers would otherwise proliferate, as evidenced by pre-segregation disciplinary records. Staffing shortages and inmate-on-staff violence have drawn further scrutiny, with a 2022 inmate account describing CSP as Colorado's most violent facility, linking incidents to understaffing and prolonged fueling aggression. data from fiscal year 2022 reported an average monthly inmate-on-staff assault rate of approximately 1.8 per 1,000 system-wide, though critics attribute spikes at CSP to systemic failures rather than individual inmate actions. Counterarguments emphasize inmate agency in initiating violence, with proven to contain threats from repeat offenders; without it, general population units face higher assault rates, as historical CDOC incident logs indicate reduced intra-unit violence post-transfer to CSP. Portrayals of conditions as inherently abusive overlook empirical safety gains, including lower correlations tied to pre-isolation histories rather than confinement duration; segregated cohorts, selected for chronic disruptiveness, exhibit expected high reoffense rates (around 68% within three years per ACLU-cited DOC figures) but avert immediate harms to staff and inmates. assessments affirm that for violent subpopulations, isolation's containment benefits outweigh contested psychological risks, prioritizing causal prevention of assaults over reformist ideals unsubstantiated by randomized controls.

References

  1. [1]
    Colorado State Penitentiary
    In 1993, the Colorado State Penitentiary was opened as a designated level V/Administrative Segregation Facility. Construction occurred in two phases.
  2. [2]
    [PDF] Bound and Broken - ACLU of Colorado
    Colorado's correctional facilities have higher rates of fights and assaults than other states, and youth and staff are commonly injured during these incidents.<|control11|><|separator|>
  3. [3]
    [PDF] Evaluation of the Colorado Department of Corrections' Prison Rape ...
    In this report, it was revealed that an estimated 6,528 allegations of sexual violence occurred in United States prisons in. 2006, a 4.6% increase from 2005.
  4. [4]
    Statistics | Colorado Department of Corrections
    Monthly Population and Capacity Reports. Current Year. Fiscal Year 2026. September 2025 August 2025 July 2025. Historical. Fiscal Year 2025.
  5. [5]
    Colorado's Correctional Capitol: Fremont County
    The oldest of these facilities is known as Colorado Territorial Correctional Facility - a medium security facility located on the west edge of Cañon City. The ...Missing: establishment 1990s<|separator|>
  6. [6]
    [PDF] Evaluating the Effectiveness of Supermax Prisons
    Expected impacts included a drop in use-of-force incidents, assaults, homicides, and other violent incidents in general population prisons. Another related ...<|separator|>
  7. [7]
    Marion prison lockdown, Thomas Silverstein: How a 1983 murder ...
    Oct 23, 2013 · ... prison gang murdered two corrections officers at the United States Penitentiary near ... How a 1983 Murder Created America's Terrible Supermax- ...
  8. [8]
    Colorado Prison Population Exploding | Prison Legal News
    Jun 15, 2000 · In fact, at an average of 1.3% per month in the second quarter of 1999, the prison population grew at twice the rate it did during the same ...
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Prisoners in 2000 - Bureau of Justice Statistics
    Colorado, with the addition of 33 public and private facilities, and Texas, with construction of the. State jail system and 84 new facilities, led the Nation in ...
  10. [10]
    [PDF] COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
    Jan 6, 2010 · It is challenging to provide a clear cost analysis between private prisons and state facilities for the following reasons: (a) certain expenses ...
  11. [11]
    [PDF] SB 11-176 ANNUAL REPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SEGREGATION ...
    This annual report outlines the prior use of. Administrative Segregation, as well as the status of Administrative Segregation reform within the Colorado ...Missing: Penitentiary | Show results with:Penitentiary
  12. [12]
    Opening the Door - Solitary Watch
    Apr 29, 2016 · According the ACLU letter, “on any given week, about eighty prisoners [at SCCF] went without any therapeutic out-of-cell time at all.” Staff at ...Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies<|control11|><|separator|>
  13. [13]
    [PDF] EXHIBIT 1O - Montana State Legislature
    Mar 19, 2018 · program with a track record of significantly reducing recidivism rates. Residential Treatment Program ln 2014, the Colorado Department of ...
  14. [14]
    Opening the steel door: how Colorado is reforming solitary ...
    Jul 24, 2015 · Now, our reforms have proven that the use of solitary confinement can be extremely decreased, and for the most part, used only for the violent ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] SB 11-176 AND HB 23-1013 ANNUAL REPORT ADMINISTRATIVE ...
    Jan 1, 2024 · This annual report outlines the prior use of Administrative Segregation, as well as the status of Administrative Segregation reform within ...Missing: Penitentiary | Show results with:Penitentiary
  16. [16]
    Legislative Reports | Colorado Department of Corrections
    SB-11-176 Administrative Segregation for Colorado Inmates. Administrative Segregation Report FY24 · Administrative Segregation Report FY23 · Administrative ...
  17. [17]
    Reflections on Colorado's Administrative Segregation Study
    A longitudinal study of the psychological effects of solitary confinement, particularly for individuals diagnosed with a mental illness.Missing: Penitentiary | Show results with:Penitentiary
  18. [18]
    Colorado State Penitentiary II Opens With 300 New ... - Solitary Watch
    Sep 1, 2010 · The expansion, which was originally built under the name Colorado State Penitentiary II, is a high security prison. When the facility is fully ...Missing: 1990s | Show results with:1990s
  19. [19]
    Colorado State Penitentiary in Canon City, CO (Google Maps)
    Maximum security prison located in Cañon City, Colorado. Opened in 1993. Inmate capacity - 756. View in Google Earth.
  20. [20]
    Fremont Correctional Facility - Canon City - MapQuest
    Colorado State Penitentiary is situated in the East Ca on Complex and is spread over and area of more than 470,000 square feet. It offers the Quality of Life ...
  21. [21]
    Colorado State Penitentiary - CSP - Bryan Construction
    Bryan Construction adapted the existing Colorado State Penitentiary, adding 948 high-custody beds, administrative space for a combined three-prison complex.Missing: design containment features
  22. [22]
    [PDF] FY 2024 Administrative Segregation Report
    This annual report outlines the prior use of Administrative Segregation, as well as the status of Administrative Segregation reform within the Colorado ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] COVER PAGE Department of Corrections
    The facility houses all five of the male offender custody levels, and hosts the state's death row inmates. DOC says most of the facility's systems date to ...
  24. [24]
    Nathan Dunlap on death row for Chuck E. Cheese killings - CNN
    Jul 31, 2014 · In 1993, Nathan Dunlap shot four Chuck E. Cheese workers to death in Aurora, Colorado. Gov. John Hickenlooper gave Dunlap an indefinite ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Untitled - Colorado General Assembly |
    At the time CCF was the only max/ad seg facility and it housed death row. Colorado State Penitentiary was in the process of being built. As an auditor I ...Missing: procedures | Show results with:procedures
  26. [26]
    The Three Men Polis Spared From Death - Colorado Public Radio
    Mar 23, 2020 · Colorado's new law was not written retroactively; it doesn't change the death sentences of Sir Mario Owens, Robert Ray and Nathan Dunlap.
  27. [27]
    Colorado - Death Penalty Information Center
    Death Row & Executions. Death Row. Death Row Overview · Conditions on Death Row · Time on Death Row · Foreign Nationals · Native Americans · Women. Executions.Missing: procedures | Show results with:procedures
  28. [28]
    Here are the 3 men on death row in Colorado - 9News
    Feb 27, 2020 · 1) Nathan Dunlap​​ Dunlap was convicted of killing four employees at a Chuck E. Cheese restaurant in Aurora in 1993. That shooting killed:
  29. [29]
    211 Crew prison gang: Isolation cells can't handcuff leaders
    Mar 27, 2013 · ... Colorado State Penitentiary, just outside Cañon City, when he wrote ... Every inmate at CSP is in 23-hour lockdown. For one hour a day ...
  30. [30]
    211 Crew prison gang: Isolation cells can't handcuff leaders
    Mar 27, 2013 · ... Colorado State Penitentiary, just outside Cañon City, when he wrote ... Every inmate at CSP is in 23-hour lockdown. For one hour a day ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] Colorado Department of Corrections Administrative Segregation and ...
    The CSP has two types of administrative segregation; regular administrative segregation and mentally ill offenders in administrative segregation (OMI).
  32. [32]
    Recidivism and Vocational Education - Office of Justice Programs
    This study examined the impact a vocational education program had on the recidivism rate of youth incarcerated in the State of Colorado Department of ...Missing: segregation | Show results with:segregation
  33. [33]
    Basic Training Academy | Colorado Department of Corrections
    The Basic Training Academy ensures new employees have a solid foundation. It includes onboarding, defensive tactics, facility training, and 14 days of basic  ...
  34. [34]
    Department Policies - Colorado Department of Corrections
    Colorado State Penitentiary · Colorado Territorial Correctional Facility · Four ... 1200-06 Data Systems, Computer Security, Access, and Usage · 1200-07 ...
  35. [35]
    [PDF] Joint Budget Committee - Colorado General Assembly |
    Mar 5, 2025 · ... rates for correctional officer were close to 25.0%. ... reduce its appropriation for DOC inmates in local jails by $280,862 General Fund, or 40 ...
  36. [36]
    Records Show Excessive Use of Force at Colorado Supermax
    Jun 15, 2013 · Records kept by the Colorado Department of Corrections show 61 instances from March 1, 2012 to March 1 of this year of corrections officers using force on men.
  37. [37]
    People v. Dunlap :: 1999 :: Colorado Supreme Court Decisions
    A trial court of this state sentenced Nathan Gerard Dunlap to death for his murder of three teenagers and a fifty-year-old woman at a restaurant in Aurora, ...
  38. [38]
    ACLU of Colorado settles lawsuit asserting prisoner's constitutional ...
    Under the terms of the settlement, Mr. Dunlap has been moved from CSP to the Sterling Correctional Facility, where he will still be held in solitary confinement ...
  39. [39]
    Colorado Supreme Court upholds murder convictions of Sir Mario ...
    Feb 20, 2024 · The Colorado Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld the 2008 murder convictions of Sir Mario Owens, rejecting a long list of alleged errors in one ...
  40. [40]
    [PDF] In Forma Pauperis SMO - Supreme Court
    Oct 29, 2018 · Mr. Owens remains incarcerated on Colorado's death row at the Colorado State Penitentiary, in Canon. City, Colorado.
  41. [41]
    One of Colorado's most infamous convicted killers back in court to ...
    Apr 17, 2025 · The court has yet to rule. Sir Mario Owens was the gunman, said investigators. The court has already rejected Owens's appeal of his conviction.
  42. [42]
    People v. Ray :: 2025 :: Colorado Supreme Court Decisions
    Jun 23, 2025 · The court sentenced Ray to 108 years imprisonment for his Lowry Park crimes. ¶12 After the Dayton Street shooting, witnesses finally identified ...
  43. [43]
    Colorado Supreme Court denies new trial for man convicted in 2005 ...
    Jun 25, 2025 · Ray and Owens were later convicted and sentenced to death for orchestrating the 2005 killings. Both defendants' sentences were commuted to life ...
  44. [44]
    In 1997, Colorado's first execution in 30 years marked a watershed ...
    Mar 4, 2019 · The execution of Gary Lee Davis in 1997 would seem to be a significant mile marker on the road to resolving a question that has long divided the state's ...
  45. [45]
    The Final Execution Carried Out by Colorado
    May 2, 2024 · Gary Lee Davis was the final person executed by the state of Colorado, over two decades before Colorado banned capital punishment.
  46. [46]
    [PDF] AMR 51/54/97 UA 286/97 Death Penalty 27 August 1997 USA ...
    Aug 27, 1997 · Gary Lee Davis is scheduled to be executed in Colorado on 11 October 1997. Davis's legal appeals are exhausted. His last hope is a clemency ...
  47. [47]
    [PDF] Overview of Capital Punishment Under State and Federal Law
    Jul 26, 2017 · It also explains the current death penalty scheme in Colorado, including procedures used in sentencing and required review by trial courts and ...
  48. [48]
    Repeal The Death Penalty | Colorado General Assembly
    The act repeals the death penalty in Colorado for offenses charged on or after July 1, 2020. The act states that any death sentence in effect on July 1, ...
  49. [49]
    Colorado Death Penalty Abolished, Polis Commutes Sentences Of ...
    Mar 23, 2020 · Governor Jared Polis has signed a bill to repeal the death penalty. The measure passed the Democratic legislature with limited bipartisan support earlier this ...
  50. [50]
    COLORADO CONVICTS KILL TEN GUARDS, HOLD PRISON AND ...
    COLORADO CONVICTS KILL TEN GUARDS, HOLD PRISON AND TOSS HOSTAGES' BODIES FROM WINDOWS AFTER ESCAPE IS BALKED; CONVICT DEAD ARE PUT AT 10 Troops Dynamite ...
  51. [51]
    Colorado State Penitentiary 1929 Canon City Prison Riot
    In October of 1929 there was a massive prison riot at the Colorado State Penitentiary in Canon City, that left 13 dead. Of the 13 killed, 8 were guards and 5 ...
  52. [52]
    Why Colorado State Penitentiary is the State's Most Violent Prison
    Apr 15, 2022 · Over the past couple of years, at least three prisoners have been beaten to death, based on my observation. These deaths are on top of the ...Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  53. [53]
    Offender sentenced to 20 years for role in beating death of Colorado ...
    Mar 31, 2025 · Enrique Arellano, charged in connection with the June 2022 beating death of a fellow inmate at Colorado State Penitentiary, was sentenced to ...
  54. [54]
    Two offenders sentenced for Colorado State Penitentiary inmate's ...
    May 12, 2025 · Surveillance from the scene shows Samuel Garcia being physically assaulted in a day hall by six individuals identified as Ricardo Castro, 33, ...
  55. [55]
    5 things to know about ADX Florence: The 'escape-proof' supermax ...
    Mar 31, 2025 · Nicknamed the “Alcatraz of the Rockies,” no one has escaped ADX Florence, located in the high desert about two hours south of Denver, since it opened in 1994.
  56. [56]
    Back In Time: History of the Colorado Territorial Penitentiary
    Jan 5, 2020 · ... Colorado State Penitentiary employed six guards, four dayshift ... capacity of 400 prisoners, was currently housing 585. In 1910 ...
  57. [57]
    In Colorado's Prison Valley, corrections are a way of life for all local ...
    Aug 16, 2015 · And Fremont County is safe, they say: In half a century, only five inmates successfully escaped, the last in 1976. Between 2000 and 2012, all 50 ...
  58. [58]
    The World's Most Secure Buildings: ADX Florence Prison - Hirsch
    Jul 20, 2022 · ADX Florence Prison as a whole contains a multitude of motion detectors, cameras, and 1,400 remote-controlled steel doors. Officers in the ...
  59. [59]
    Colorado's FBI Informant-Turned Serial Killer
    Dec 14, 2020 · The escape attempt culminated in a televised car chase and police ... Kimball was sentenced to 70 years at the Colorado State Penitentiary ...
  60. [60]
    Inmates considering escape from Colorado prisons find bar raised
    May 26, 2012 · Since the start of last year, no state DOC inmates have escaped, according to data. As for the 10 who haven't been caught, corrections ...
  61. [61]
    [PDF] One Year Longitudinal Study of the Psychological Effects of ...
    This study examined conditions as they existed in the Colora- do prison system with respect to AS, using the Colorado State Penitentiary (CSP) as the AS study ...<|separator|>
  62. [62]
    A Longitudinal Study of Administrative Segregation - PubMed
    In this study, we examined whether inmates in segregation would show greater deterioration over time on psychological symptoms than would comparison offenders.
  63. [63]
    Cruel and Unusual: How Colorado Reduced Solitary Confinement
    Jun 18, 2016 · Inmates can spend years, even decades, in a cell like this one at Waupun Correctional Institution under so-called administrative confinement.Missing: design lockdown
  64. [64]
    [PDF] SB 11-176 ANNUAL REPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SEGREGATION ...
    Jan 1, 2023 · Further revisions involved identifying a set of 11 violent ... manslaughter, kidnapping, assault on staff, assault on inmate, rape, arson, escape,.
  65. [65]
    https://www.commonsenseinstituteus.org/colorado/research/crime-and-public-safety/the-reform-paradox-how-reduced-incarceration-has-coincided-with-rising-crime
  66. [66]
    [PDF] REDUCING RECIDIVISM - CSG Justice Center
    toward ensuring that individuals in administrative segregation are not released directly to the community and, instead, move through a step-down process and.
  67. [67]
    Colorado Prisons Continue to Warehouse Mentally Ill in Solitary ...
    Jul 23, 2013 · “Warehousing mentally ill prisoners in solitary confinement is not only costly, cruel and unlawful, it puts the public at serious risk,” says ...Missing: Penitentiary criticisms
  68. [68]
    [PDF] Out of Sight, Out of Mind - ACLU of Colorado
    at the Colorado State Penitentiary (CSP), a supermax prison designed to deny prisoners human ... restricted movement and facility design with segregation ...
  69. [69]
    What Should We Think about the Study on the Psychological Impact ...
    May 3, 2011 · That some already ill prisoners got worse at CSP will not surprise anyone familiar with prolonged administrative segregation. The small ...
  70. [70]
    [PDF] Study Raises Questions About Psychological Effects of Solitary ...
    Astudy of the psychological effects of solitary confinement in Colorado prisons showed the mental health of most inmates did not decline over the course of.Missing: criticisms | Show results with:criticisms
  71. [71]
    Study Raises Questions About Psychological Effects of Solitary ...
    Mar 25, 2012 · A study of the psychological effects of solitary confinement in Colorado prisons showed the mental health of most participants did not decline over the course ...
  72. [72]
    [PDF] STaff Working Document - Colorado General Assembly |
    Feb 17, 2022 · Inmate-on-staff monthly assault rate (per 1,000 prison inmates). Pre-pandemic average rate = 1.8/month. Page 15. STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT – DOES ...
  73. [73]
    ACLU and Experts Slam Findings of DOC Report On Solitary ...
    Nov 30, 2010 · This objective data squarely contradicts the authors' conclusion that solitary confinement does not produce significantly more psychiatric ...Missing: counter evidence efficacy studies