Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Concord Management and Consulting

Concord Management and Consulting LLC (Russian: ООО «Конкорд Менеджмент и Консалтинг») is a Saint Petersburg-based Russian holding company founded in 1997 and controlled by businessman , primarily managing a group of subsidiaries engaged in , operations, and contracts, including services for the that earned the moniker "Putin's chef." The firm expanded into construction, media, and other sectors, leveraging Prigozhin's connections to secure lucrative state deals, but faced and scrutiny for alleged ties to disinformation activities and private military operations via affiliated entities. In 2018, the U.S. Department of Justice indicted Concord for conspiracy to defraud the by funding the 's operations aimed at influencing the 2016 presidential election, though the case was dismissed in 2020 before trial due to evidentiary and security challenges in prosecution. Following 's death in a 2023 plane crash, the company continues operations under new management amid ongoing sanctions.

Overview

Founding and Ownership

Concord Management and Consulting LLC (OOO "Konkord Menedzhment i Konsalting") was established on May 26, 1997, in St. Petersburg, , with tax identification number (INN) 7825100880 and principal state registration number 1037843002515 (entered in the register on January 8, 2003). The company operates as a entity focused on management and consulting services, serving as a holding structure for related businesses, including catering operations under Concord Catering. It was founded by Russian businessman , who built it as part of his broader commercial empire originating from post-Soviet catering contracts. Prigozhin maintained primary and control of Concord Management and Consulting, which formed the core of the Concord group encompassing multiple subsidiaries. U.S. Treasury Department sanctions in June 2017 explicitly designated the company as owned or controlled by , citing its role in funding associated entities. Ownership records indicate held direct shares in key Concord holding companies until at least 2019. In November 2019, Prigozhin transferred ownership of Concord Management and Consulting and affiliated entities, though the precise recipients and structure post-transfer remain opaque in public records. Prior to this, family members such as his mother, Violetta Prigozhina, were listed in some sanctions contexts as nominal owners of group assets, but Prigozhin retained effective control. The company's structure emphasized layered ownership through subsidiaries to manage diverse operations, consistent with Prigozhin's business practices.

Primary Business Operations

Concord Management and Consulting LLC (), based in St. Petersburg, Russia, functioned primarily as a managing subsidiaries focused on , , and services. Its core operations centered on securing and executing large-scale contracts for food supply and , particularly with state entities. Through its subsidiary Concord Catering, CMC provided meals to public schools, hospitals, and , leveraging connections to Russian processes. A significant portion of CMC's revenue derived from military catering contracts. Concord Catering supplied food to the Russian armed forces, including troops deployed in , under multi-year agreements with the Ministry of Defense. In 2022 alone, these state contracts generated approximately 80 billion rubles (about $1.3 billion at contemporaneous exchange rates) for the firm, as disclosed by Russian President during a June 2023 meeting with military leaders. The company also handled logistics for high-profile state banquets and institutional feeding programs, expanding from initial school meal provisions in —where it won millions of dollars in contracts—to broader defense sector engagements. CMC's operations emphasized efficiency in government tenders, often amid reports of competitive advantages tied to political proximity. By 2023, however, the Russian military announced plans to terminate its primary contract with Concord Catering, shifting to a competitor amid post-mutiny restructuring following Yevgeny Prigozhin's death. Despite such shifts, the firm's model relied on state dependency, with forming the backbone of its commercial activities prior to sanctions and legal challenges.

Connection to Internet Research Agency

Funding and Establishment

The LLC (IRA) was established in , , in 2013, initially functioning as a commercial entity focused on media monitoring and advertising services. It rapidly transitioned into a hub for coordinated online influence activities, employing hundreds of staff by 2014 to generate and disseminate content across platforms. The agency's origins trace to earlier media projects funded by entities linked to Kremlin-aligned oligarchs, evolving from informal operations into a structured organization with departments dedicated to content creation, analytics, and IT support. Funding for the IRA's establishment and expansion was provided by , a Russian entrepreneur known for his catering contracts with the Russian government, through companies he controlled, including Concord Management and Consulting LLC. U.S. authorities allege that and Concord Management allocated substantial resources—estimated in the millions annually—to cover operational costs such as employee salaries averaging around 65,000 rubles monthly in early years, office infrastructure in the Olgino district, and technological tools for anonymous posting. Concord Management, founded by in 1995 and involved in diverse business ventures, served as a primary financial conduit, transferring funds to the IRA without direct public acknowledgment of the connection. publicly confirmed his role in founding the IRA in February 2023, shortly before his death. By mid-2014, the IRA's budget had scaled significantly, supporting over 1,000 employees and operations, with monthly expenditures exceeding $1.25 million by September 2016 to sustain efforts targeting multiple countries, including the . These funds enabled the of servers, networks, and false personas for operatives, masking the origin of activities. While denied direct ties in initial responses to indictments, internal IRA communications referenced "our funder" in ways consistent with his involvement, as detailed in unsealed U.S. legal documents.

Organizational Structure and Activities

The (IRA) maintained a hierarchical structure with specialized departments dedicated to online operations, evolving from a modest operation in mid-2014 to employing hundreds of personnel by 2016. Headquartered in St. Petersburg, , the entity was directed by general director Mikhail Bystrov and Mikhail Burchik, under the umbrella of Project Lakhta. Key subdivisions included the Translator Department, which by early 2016 comprised 11 employees tasked with adapting content for international audiences, encompassing sub-units for platforms, analytics, graphics design, and support. A dedicated U.S.- department, led by Dzheykhun Aslanov, focused on American-targeted initiatives, supported by roles such as content creators of fictitious personas, IT administrators, graphic artists, specialists, and analysts. Operational activities centered on generating and disseminating through managed accounts impersonating U.S. persons, aiming to provoke societal and influence electoral processes. Employees produced thousands of posts daily across platforms including , , and , often promoting polarizing narratives on topics like , , and gun rights to both support and undermine in the 2016 election. The IRA purchased approximately 3,500 advertisements on for about $100,000, reaching an estimated 126 million users, while operating 3,814 accounts that engaged over 1.4 million individuals. Beyond digital efforts, staff coordinated on-the-ground events, such as pro-Trump rallies in cities like and , using fake personas to recruit participants and fabricate grassroots support. These operations relied on technical infrastructure for , including VPNs and servers, with personnel working in shifts to sustain continuous output—up to 2,000 posts per day in peak periods. Named operatives like Anna Bogacheva and Aleksandra Krylova traveled to the U.S. in 2014 under false professional pretenses to gather on political tactics. The structure emphasized scalability, with administrative oversight ensuring alignment with strategic goals of foreign influence, funded through entities like Concord Management and Consulting.

Alleged Involvement in Foreign Influence Operations

2016 U.S. Presidential Election Efforts

Concord Management and Consulting LLC, a St. Petersburg-based firm controlled by Russian oligarch , served as the primary financial backer for the (IRA), funding its social media influence operations targeting the 2016 U.S. presidential election. , through and its subsidiary Concord Catering, channeled funds disguised as payments for software support via approximately 14 bank accounts held by Concord affiliates. By September 2016, the IRA's monthly budget for these efforts under "Project Lakhta" exceeded 73 million Russian rubles, equivalent to over $1.25 million USD, including bonuses for operatives. The funded operations, which began in with U.S. but escalated in early 2016 to explicitly favor and disparage , involved creating fictitious U.S. personas to disseminate divisive content on platforms. employees posed as American activists, organizing real-world events such as pro-Trump rallies in in August 2016 and in October 2016, where they recruited and compensated unwitting U.S. participants. These activities included staging counter-protests and building grassroots-style groups like "United Muslims of America" to exploit social tensions. In terms of scale, the managed 470 accounts that generated 80,000 posts reaching an estimated 126 million users, alongside approximately 3,500 ads purchased for about $100,000; on , it operated 3,814 accounts posting 175,993 election-related tweets that notified 1.4 million people. A U.S. indicted , the , , and 12 other nationals on February 16, 2018, charging them with conspiracy to defraud the by impairing the lawful functions of government agencies overseeing elections. Although charges against were dismissed in March 2020 due to procedural challenges in serving the indictment, publicly acknowledged interference in U.S. elections in November 2022. The Mueller investigation found no evidence of coordination between these efforts and the campaign.

Scope and Methods of Social Media Operations

![Excerpt from the February 2018 U.S. Department of Justice Indictment of the Internet Research Agency][float-right] The Internet Research Agency (IRA), funded by Concord Management and Consulting LLC through Yevgeny Prigozhin, conducted extensive social media operations as part of Project Lakhta, which allocated approximately $1.25 million monthly by September 2016 for information warfare activities targeting the United States. These operations, beginning as early as 2014 and intensifying ahead of the 2016 U.S. presidential election, involved creating and managing hundreds of fake social media accounts impersonating American users to sow discord and influence public opinion. By 2016, IRA-controlled groups and pages on platforms like Facebook amassed hundreds of thousands of followers, posting divisive content on issues such as immigration, race relations, and gun rights to exacerbate societal tensions.
PlatformAccounts/PagesKey Metrics
Facebook470 accounts (e.g., Being Patriotic, Matt Skiber)80,000 posts from January 2015 to August 2017; reached up to 126 million users; over 3,500 ads costing approximately $100,000
Twitter3,814 accounts (e.g., @TEN_GOP, @jenn_abrams)175,993 tweets in the 10 weeks before the election; amplified by bots and purchased interactions
Other (Instagram, YouTube)Dozens of accounts and channelsThousands of posts and videos promoting polarizing narratives
Methods included the use of stolen American identities and fabricated personas to post organic content and purchase targeted advertisements, often supporting and opposing starting in early 2016. operatives employed VPNs and U.S.-based proxies to mask their locations, coordinated bot networks for amplification, and even organized real-world events such as pro- rallies in cities like (June 25, 2016), (August 20, 2016), and (October 2, 2016), paying U.S. individuals up to $1,000 to participate as purported activists. Content strategies focused on both sides of political divides, creating fictitious organizations like "Black Matters US" to exploit racial grievances and "United Muslims of America" to stoke , while tracking engagement metrics to refine targeting. These tactics, funded and overseen by Concord through disguised payments for "software support," aimed to mimic authentic American discourse without direct coordination with the Trump campaign, though some content was retweeted by campaign affiliates.

Mueller Special Counsel Indictment

On February 16, 2018, a federal grand jury in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia returned an indictment charging Concord Management and Consulting LLC, along with related entities Concord Catering and the Internet Research Agency LLC (IRA), and 13 Russian nationals, with interfering in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. The charges stemmed from the Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into Russian election interference, focusing on a scheme to defraud the United States through deceptive social media operations and unauthorized political activities. Concord was specifically named in Count One of the eight-count indictment, alleging a conspiracy to defraud the U.S. government in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 by undermining the lawful functions of bodies such as the Federal Election Commission and the Department of Justice in administering federal election laws. The indictment detailed Concord's role as the primary financial backer of the IRA's activities, with Concord and its owner Yevgeniy Prigozhin disbursing over 75 million Russian rubles (approximately $1.25 million) between 2014 and 2016 to fund the farm's operations in St. Petersburg, . Prosecutors alleged that IRA employees, numbering in the hundreds by 2016, created and managed thousands of fake U.S.-based social media accounts on platforms like , , and , posing as American citizens to sow discord, advocate for certain candidates, and organize real-world political events. These efforts included staging rallies in U.S. cities—such as pro-Trump events in and anti-Clinton protests in —and purchasing targeted political advertisements costing around $100,000, with spending concentrated in swing states like and during the election period. Key figures indicted alongside Concord included IRA supervisors like Mikhail Bystrov and Mikhail Burchik, who oversaw departments focused on U.S. politics, and operatives such as , described as having funded the conspiracy to the tune of significant sums funneled through entities. The operations began as early as 2014, expanding to explicitly target the 2016 election by mid-2015, with IRA staff receiving bonuses for high-performing content and directives to support while discrediting , though the indictment emphasized independent Russian actions without alleging coordination with the Trump campaign. Additional counts against IRA individuals involved wire fraud, , and , but Concord faced only the overarching conspiracy charge, reflecting its alleged role as the enabler rather than direct executor of on-the-ground tactics.

Prosecution Challenges and Defense Arguments

Concord Management and Consulting LLC, one of the entities indicted by on February 16, 2018, for conspiracy to defraud the under 18 U.S.C. § 371, mounted an aggressive legal defense uncommon among the 13 Russian nationals and affiliated entities charged in the same superseding . Unlike the , which did not appear in court, Concord retained U.S.-based counsel from LLP and entered a not guilty plea on May 4, 2018, challenging the 's validity and the special counsel's authority. A core defense argument contested Mueller's appointment as unconstitutional, asserting it violated the by vesting a principal officer's powers in an inferior officer without confirmation. Concord filed a motion to dismiss on these grounds in May 2018, citing precedent like Edmond v. United States (1997), but U.S. District Judge rejected it on October 25, 2018, ruling Mueller's role aligned with permissible precedents and did not require principal officer status. Additional motions argued improper venue in the , claiming insufficient ties to local acts, and , but these were also denied in November 2018, with the court finding adequate connections via U.S.-based servers and financial transactions. Concord further contended the charged described a "make-believe ," lacking elements of actual defraudment since operations did not inherently violate U.S. and no false statements to agencies were alleged. filings emphasized that funding foreign political speech, even if deceptive, did not meet the statute's requirements for impairing governmental functions, drawing on cases like United States v. Paula (1980). Prosecutors countered that the scheme evaded obligations and U.S. bank reporting by routing funds through shell entities, but Concord highlighted evidentiary gaps, including reliance on classified intelligence that could not be fully disclosed without risking sources. Prosecution efforts faced significant hurdles from Concord's demands for discovery, including over 200,000 documents and data from Russian servers, which Mueller's team accused Concord of exploiting for a disinformation campaign. In January 2019, special counsel filings detailed how Concord leaked purportedly hacked emails and false narratives to Russian media, such as claiming Mueller fabricated evidence, prompting Judge Friedrich to restrict disclosures and rebuke defense tactics on January 30, 2019. Concord sought to share "sensitive" U.S. government information with Yevgeny Prigozhin, its alleged controller, arguing necessity for defense preparation, but courts limited this to protect national security. These disputes delayed trial preparations, originally set for spring 2019, and underscored challenges in litigating against a foreign entity with no extradition incentive, as Prigozhin remained in Russia. As loomed in April 2020, prosecutors grappled with Concord's non-compliance with subpoenas for from over 300 purported employees, whom the claimed were fictitious or uncooperative, leading to accusations of "" the U.S. system without intent to contest on merits. This, combined with classification barriers preventing full evidentiary presentation—such as on IRA operations—strained the case's viability, though Mueller's team maintained the rested on financial records tracing $35 million in laundered funds from Concord to IRA between 2014 and 2016.

Dismissal of Charges

In February 2018, the U.S. 's Office indicted Management and Consulting LLC (), a Russian entity owned by , on charges of conspiracy to defraud the through funding the Agency's () operations, including social media activities aimed at influencing the 2016 . Unlike the and other co-defendants that did not appear, entered a not guilty plea in June 2018 and actively litigated the case in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, demanding extensive materials from prosecutors. This participation led to prolonged disputes over classified evidence, with filing motions to dismiss the on grounds including the alleged unlawfulness of Robert Mueller's appointment, though Judge rejected that argument in November 2018, ruling that Mueller's authority was presumptively valid absent clear evidence of impropriety. Discovery challenges escalated, as prosecutors withheld sensitive materials citing risks, including potential exposure of U.S. sources and methods related to Russian interference detection. Concord's defense team, led by U.S.-based attorneys, repeatedly sought access to millions of pages of , arguing it was necessary for a fair trial, while prosecutors countered that full disclosure could compromise ongoing efforts. By early 2020, after Mueller's resignation in May 2019 and under the direction of , the Department of Justice reassessed the prosecution's viability, determining that Concord's engagement appeared aimed at exploiting U.S. legal processes to obtain rather than mounting a substantive defense, given the defendant's non-extradition and the infeasibility of a . On March 16, 2020, federal prosecutors filed a motion to dismiss the charges against with prejudice, stating that continuing the case was "no longer in the best interests of justice or the country's ," as it risked unauthorized dissemination of without advancing accountability, since Concord executives remained in Russia beyond U.S. . Judge Friedrich approved the dismissal the following day, March 17, 2020, without opposition from Concord's counsel, effectively ending the criminal proceedings after nearly two years of pretrial litigation. The decision closed the only Mueller-indicted foreign entity case to reach active U.S. participation, leaving the underlying allegations untested in ; Concord publicly framed the outcome as vindication, while critics, including some former Mueller team members, viewed it as a retreat influenced by political pressures within the Barr-led DOJ, though no of was substantiated in records.

Sanctions and Geopolitical Repercussions

U.S. Treasury Designations

On March 15, 2018, the U.S. Department of the Treasury's (OFAC) designated Concord Management and Consulting (a.k.a. LLC Concord Management and Consulting; a.k.a. Concord Management and Consulting, LLC) as a Specially Designated National (SDN) pursuant to 13694, as amended by 13757, for engaging in significant malicious cyber-enabled activities that constituted interference in the 2016 U.S. . The designation targeted Concord's role in providing financial support to the (), a entity accused of conducting operations to influence U.S. public opinion and exacerbate societal divisions. This action blocked all property and interests in property of Concord held by U.S. persons and prohibited U.S. persons from engaging in transactions with the entity, with violations subject to civil and criminal penalties. The sanctions on were part of a broader set of designations announced that day, which included 13 individuals and 12 entities linked to cyber operations against the , including interference and other malign activities. OFAC identified as controlled by , a businessman previously designated in December 2016 under 13661 for supporting senior government officials in the context of Ukraine-related sanctions. Prigozhin's ownership and funding of were cited as enabling the IRA's operations, which involved creating fake accounts, organizing political rallies, and disseminating divisive content under the guise of U.S.-based . These measures aimed to disrupt financial networks sustaining such interference, though officials noted that the designations did not preclude ongoing U.S. legal proceedings, such as those initiated by the Mueller . Concord's SDN status remains active as of the latest OFAC updates, subjecting any U.S.-linked assets or dealings to forfeiture and restricting international financial interactions to isolate from the global economy. emphasized that these sanctions were evidence-based, drawing from on and funding flows, rather than unverified allegations, to counter foreign threats to democratic processes. No delisting has occurred, despite Concord's participation in related U.S. court cases, reflecting sustained U.S. policy toward Russian-linked entities involved in election meddling.

International and Domestic Russian Responses

The Russian government dismissed the U.S. indictment and sanctions against Concord Management and Consulting as lacking evidence of state involvement. On February 19, 2018, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov stated that the charges targeted private individuals and entities without proving any connection to Russian authorities, maintaining the official position that Moscow did not meddle in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. President Vladimir Putin reinforced this denial in March 2018, asserting that the indicted Russians, including those linked to Prigozhin's operations, "don't work for the Russian state" and suggesting domestic legal action if warranted, while rejecting broader claims of government orchestration. Domestically, Prigozhin mounted a legal defense against the U.S. charges, hiring American counsel to contest jurisdiction and argue that the alleged activities were protected speech under Russian law, leading to the dismissal of the case in March 2020 on procedural grounds rather than exoneration. Despite these denials, Prigozhin admitted in a November 7, 2022, Telegram post to funding interference efforts, declaring, "Gentlemen, we interfered, we interfere and we will interfere," though Russian state media framed such actions as independent of Kremlin direction. Internationally, U.S. actions prompted aligned nations to enact parallel sanctions on , Concord affiliates, and related entities like the , viewing them as tools of Russian malign influence. The imposed designations on in 2020 under frameworks addressing destabilization in and , expanding in December 2021 to target operations for violations, with the bloc citing overlapping evidence of election meddling from U.S. investigations. , the , and followed suit, coordinating with U.S. measures to restrict 's networks, as announced in Treasury actions referencing allied designations. Legal pushback emerged in courts, where and family members challenged sanctions; the EU General annulled measures against his mother, Violetta Prigozhina, on March 8, 2023, ruling insufficient evidence tied her directly to his activities beyond familial links, though 's own designations persisted. Non-Western responses were muted, with no widespread adoption of sanctions and occasional portrayals in Russian-aligned media as overreach by a Russophobic West.

Assessments of Impact and Controversies

Empirical Evidence on Influence Effectiveness

Empirical analyses of the Agency's () operations, funded by Concord Management and Consulting, indicate limited reach relative to the U.S. electorate. On , -linked accounts generated content potentially exposed to approximately 32 million users from April to November 2016, but exposure was highly concentrated, with 1% of users accounting for 70% of impressions, primarily among strong Republicans. data revealed that pages amassed about 3 million followers by election day, with total impressions reaching up to 126 million, though a substantial portion occurred post-election and relied on algorithmic amplification rather than direct engagement. These figures represent a fraction of the 231 million eligible voters, with spending on ads totaling under $100,000 compared to billions in domestic campaign expenditures. Longitudinal studies linking user Twitter feeds to survey on attitudes and have found no statistically significant causal effects from IRA exposure. One analysis of over 2,000 respondents showed negligible shifts in preferences (e.g., -0.18 percentage points) or issue positions, with changes not exceeding 0.2 standard deviations, concluding the campaign had no meaningful impact on election outcomes or . Similarly, examinations of interactions with IRA accounts among users detected no alterations in political engagement, ideological , or affective divisions, attributing this to targeting already polarized audiences and minimal interaction rates (averaging 0.1% of user activity). While some indirect effects, such as minor fluctuations in online betting markets, have been observed, these are attributed more to than voter sentiment shifts. Causal assessments of discourse reveal that content had constrained effects on broader voter subgroups. Granger causality tests indicate posts exerted limited sway over undecided or weak supporters' attitudes, with greater propagation occurring via aligned domestic accounts rather than direct foreign inputs. Peer-reviewed emphasizes that, absent randomized exposure experiments, correlational data overstates potential , and first-hand operational scale—hundreds of staff producing thousands of posts—pales against organic U.S. political content volumes. Overall, empirical evidence supports the view that efforts amplified existing divisions but did not demonstrably alter voting behavior at scale.

Debates Over Political Motivations and Exaggerations

Critics of the Mueller investigation, including Concord Management's legal team, argued that the February 16, 2018, indictment of the firm was politically motivated, portraying it as part of a broader "witch hunt" against the Trump campaign amid unsubstantiated claims of collusion. Concord's attorneys contended the charges represented a "make-believe crime," emphasizing that the company's social media operations lacked intent to defraud the U.S. and were not coordinated with any political campaign, while challenging Special Counsel Robert Mueller's appointment as unconstitutional. The U.S. Department of Justice's decision to drop charges against Concord on March 16, 2020, citing risks to national security from trial proceedings, fueled assertions that the case was pursued for narrative rather than prosecutorial merit, as the firm aggressively defended itself in U.S. courts without extradition of principals. The 2023 Durham report highlighted systemic issues in the FBI's handling of Russian interference probes, including "confirmation bias" and a "lack of analytical rigor," which predisposed investigators to pursue leads aligning with preconceived narratives of Trump-Russia ties, though it did not directly address the Concord indictment. Proponents of this view, including former President and lawmakers, maintained that exaggerating Concord's role—linked to the (IRA)—served to legitimize the and investigation, despite Mueller's ultimate finding of insufficient evidence for between the and . Debates over exaggerations center on empirical assessments of the IRA's influence, funded in part by , which multiple peer-reviewed studies have quantified as negligible on voter behavior. A 2019 PNAS analysis of 1,239 partisan users found no causal effects from IRA interactions on political attitudes, , or engagement, with engagements comprising just 0.1% of users' activity and reaching only 19% of the sample indirectly. Similarly, a 2023 study of 32 million potential exposures concluded no meaningful link to attitude shifts or changes, with effects under 0.2 standard deviations and less than 0.7 points in vote preferences; exposure was overwhelmingly among strong Republicans (9 times higher than Democrats), rendering swing-voter influence improbable. These findings contrast with initial and portrayals of decisive , underscoring how domestic content dwarfed IRA efforts—25 times more U.S. posts and 9 times more from politicians—while IRA operations targeted both parties without favoring one outcome exclusively. Skeptics attribute overstatements to institutional biases in and , where early reliance on unverified amplified perceptions of threat, despite Mueller's detailing only $100,000 in IRA ads reaching an estimated 126 million impressions, many post- and with low click-through rates under 0.5%. Concord's defenders further noted the firm's catering business origins and lack of state ties, arguing the narrative conflated opportunistic trolling with strategic subversion, a view bolstered by the absence of proven vote tallies or polling shifts attributable to IRA activity.

Recent Developments

Prigozhin's Death and Aftermath

, the founder and principal owner of Concord Management and Consulting LLC, died on August 23, 2023, when the private jet he was aboard crashed in , northwest of , en route from to St. Petersburg. The crash killed all ten people on board, including co-founder , as confirmed by Russian investigators through genetic testing of the remains on August 27, 2023. The incident occurred exactly two months after Prigozhin's short-lived against Russian military leadership on June 23-24, 2023, during which Wagner forces marched toward before standing down following negotiations. Russian President stated in October 2023 that the crash resulted from an onboard equivalent to a hand , based on analysis of body fragments, though the acknowledged the possibility of deliberate without attributing blame. No definitive cause has been publicly established beyond these claims, amid widespread speculation of linked to the mutiny's fallout, but official investigations have not confirmed foul play by state actors. In the aftermath, Prigozhin's death accelerated Russian state efforts to dismantle or absorb his business empire, including Management and Consulting, which had served as the financial backbone for his operations, including catering contracts and ties to the . Prigozhin's son, , attempted to retain control over portions of the Group and other family assets operating domestically in . However, in March and April 2024, Prigozhin was posthumously removed from shareholder registries of key entities, including M LLC (a core component of Concord Management), Ritm LLC, and LLC, with no disclosed replacements, signaling effective state expropriation or dissolution of his holdings to eliminate potential opposition networks. These changes followed pre-death initiatives post-mutiny to unwind Prigozhin-linked firms through contract cancellations and regulatory pressures, ensuring Concord's operations aligned with state priorities rather than private influence. U.S. sanctions on Concord and related entities remained in place, unaffected by the ownership shifts, as the company's prior in the Mueller had already been dismissed in 2021 due to prosecutorial challenges.

Ongoing Sanctions Status

Limited Liability Company Concord Management and Consulting remains designated by the U.S. Department of the Treasury's (OFAC) as a Specially Designated National (SDN) under 13661, which targets persons responsible for undermining Ukraine's and , as well as under cyber-related sanctions programs for interference in U.S. elections. The entity, also known as Konkord Menedzhment i Konsalting , is listed with its principal place of business at D. 13 Litera A, St. Petersburg, , 191011, prohibiting U.S. persons from engaging in transactions with it and blocking its property and interests in the United States. The designation originated on June 20, 2017, when OFAC identified as owned or controlled by Yevgeniy Prigozhin, who was sanctioned for providing material support to Russian government efforts in and meddling. Additional layers were added on March 15, 2018, linking to cyber actors involved in the 2016 U.S. presidential interference through funding operations. No delisting has occurred as of October 2025, despite Prigozhin's death in August 2023, as OFAC designations on entities persist independently of individual principals unless explicitly revoked. These sanctions impose comprehensive restrictions, including asset freezes and transaction bans, enforced through the SDN List to deter ongoing associations with sanctioned activities. International databases such as OpenSanctions confirm Concord's active status across multiple U.S. programs, with no reported modifications or lifts in recent federal registers or OFAC updates. requires to avoid secondary sanctions for non-U.S. entities dealing with Concord.

References

  1. [1]
    ООО "Конкорд Менеджмент и Консалтинг" - Rusprofile
    ООО "Конкорд Менеджмент и Консалтинг" работает с 1997 года в Санкт-Петербурге, специализируясь на оптовой неспециализированной торговле.
  2. [2]
    Treasury Sanctions Russian Cyber Actors for Interference with the ...
    Mar 15, 2018 · Concord Management and Consulting LLC, which is controlled by Prigozhin, provided funding to the IRA. Concord Management and Consulting LLC was ...
  3. [3]
    Grand Jury Indicts Thirteen Russian Individuals and Three Russian ...
    Feb 16, 2018 · The other individual defendant, Yevgeniy Viktorovich Prigozhin ... Concord Management and Consulting LLC, Concord Catering, and many subsidiaries ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] The GRU, Yevgeny Prigozhin, and Russia's Wagner Group
    Jul 7, 2020 · Yevgeny Prigozhin, and the Wagner Group “private” military company. ... Concord Management and Consulting LLC and Concord Catering, Case 1 ...
  5. [5]
    Dismiss Count(s) | DocumentCloud
    v. CONCORD MANAGEMENT AND CONSULTING LLC and. CONCORD CATERING, Defendants. Criminal No. 18-CR-32 (DLF) MOTION TO DISMISS CONCORD DEFENDANTS On February 16 ...
  6. [6]
    Citing Security, Feds Drop Case Against Russians Linked To ... - NPR
    Mar 17, 2020 · The companies, Concord Management and Consulting LLC and Concord Catering, were indicted by special counsel Robert Mueller as part of the ...Missing: facts | Show results with:facts
  7. [7]
    Wagner, like nobody's business – Investigations with Impact
    Sep 2, 2024 · Concord Management and Consulting LLC – December 2023Télécharger. On December 18, a new general director was appointed as head Concord ...Missing: facts | Show results with:facts
  8. [8]
    OOO "Konkord Menedzhment i Konsalting" (TIN:7825100880)
    Pisarenok Vladislav Vladimirovich. Date of creating: 26.05.1997. Date of entry in the register: 08.01.2003 ... TIN (INN): 7825100880. KPP (tax registration ...Missing: Management Consulting
  9. [9]
    Limited Liability Company Concord Management and Consulting
    Limited Liability Company Concord Management and Consulting is subject to sanctions. See the individual program listings below. Type, Company, [sources]. Name ...
  10. [10]
    Russian company indicted by Mueller pleads not guilty to election ...
    May 9, 2018 · Concord Management and Consulting is the parent company of Concord Catering, both founded by Yevgeny Viktorovich Prigozhin. Yevgeny ...
  11. [11]
    Yevgeniy Viktorovich Prigozhin - OpenSanctions
    ... Concord company group, Concord Management and Consulting LLC, Megaline LLC. ... Prigozhin founded and owned until November 2019, and a group of other ...
  12. [12]
    Treasury Designates Individuals and Entities Involved in the ...
    Jun 20, 2017 · Limited Liability Company Concord Management and Consulting and Concord Catering are being designated for being owned or controlled by Yevgeniy ...Missing: ownership | Show results with:ownership
  13. [13]
    LI2022042HU.01009801.xml - EUR-Lex - European Union
    Violetta Prigozhina is the mother of Yevgeny Prigozhin and owner of Concord Management and Consulting ... Concord group, founded and owned until 2019 by her son.<|separator|>
  14. [14]
    Russian Military to Drop Catering Contract With Prigozhin's Firm
    Oct 5, 2023 · Concord Catering is a subsidiary of Concord Management and Consulting, which was indicted by the United States for allegedly carrying out a ...
  15. [15]
    'Putin's Chef' Sued 560 Times for Supplying Russian Army With ...
    Jan 24, 2023 · ... catering business, Concord Catering, which began by supplying food for school children. He later secured a contract to feed the Russian army.
  16. [16]
    Wagner leader Prigozhin to be investigated for $2 billion pay in a ...
    Jun 28, 2023 · In addition, Prigozhin's Concord catering company made 80 billion roubles from state contracts to supply food to the Russian army, Putin said.
  17. [17]
    In Wake Of Mutiny, Prigozhin's Media Empire In Russia Shuts Down
    Jul 2, 2023 · Under the contract, Concord had provided food to Russian troops fighting in Ukraine, as well as to hospitals and public organizations in the ...
  18. [18]
    Yevgeny Prigozhin: From Putin's chef to rebel in chief - BBC
    Jun 25, 2023 · Firms affiliated with Prigozhin also won lucrative catering contracts from the military and state-run schools. How the Wagner group began.<|separator|>
  19. [19]
    A Russian businessman linked to Putin admits to U.S. election ...
    Nov 7, 2022 · In Moscow alone, his company Concord won millions of dollars in contracts to provide meals at public schools. Prigozhin has also organized ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Internet Research Agency (IRA)
    The IRA was funded by Russian businessman Yevgeny Prigozhin and operated ostensibly as a digital marketing firm, complete with a corporate hierarchy and all the ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Internet Research Agency Indictment - Department of Justice
    Feb 16, 2018 · Defendants CONCORD and PRIGOZHIN spent significant funds to further the. ORGANIZATION's operations and to pay the remaining Defendants, along ...Missing: Yevgeny | Show results with:Yevgeny
  22. [22]
    Yevgeny Prigozhin, We Knew Him When - Lawfare
    Jun 27, 2023 · According to Special Counsel Robert Mueller, Prigozhin established and funded the Internet Research Agency—the “troll farm” famous for posting ...
  23. [23]
    Yevgeny Prigozhin - Wikipedia
    Yevgeny Viktorovich Prigozhin (1 June 1961 – 23 August 2023) was a Russian mercenary leader, rebel commander, and oligarch. He led the Wagner Group, ...Concord Management · Murder of Yevgeny Nuzhin · Nikolai Patrushev
  24. [24]
    Russian Troll Farm Indicted by Mueller Had Multi-Million Dollar Budget
    Feb 16, 2018 · By September 2016, the Internet Research Agency in Russia had a monthly budget of more than $1.25 million to carry out an influence campaign ...
  25. [25]
    None
    Below is a merged summary of the "Structure of the Internet Research Agency" based on the provided segments from the Mueller Report Volume I and Volume II. Since the content varies across segments, I’ve consolidated all relevant information into a comprehensive response, using a table in CSV format to organize detailed data efficiently. The summary retains all mentioned details, addresses inconsistencies (e.g., missing information in some segments), and includes useful URLs where provided.
  26. [26]
    [PDF] Report on the Investigation into Russian Interference in the 2016 ...
    Mar 7, 2019 · 1 (“Internet Research Agency. Indictment”). 5. Internet Research Agency Indictment ¶¶ 52, 54, 55(a), 56, 74; see also Josh Milton Google.
  27. [27]
    Putin-linked businessman Yevgeny Prigozhin admits to U.S. election ...
    Nov 7, 2022 · Kremlin-connected entrepreneur Yevgeny Prigozhin admitted Monday that he had interfered in US elections and would continue to do so.Missing: IRA | Show results with:IRA
  28. [28]
  29. [29]
    Concord Management slams Mueller case as 'make-believe crime'
    May 14, 2018 · Concord Management and Consulting said in a court filing Monday that foreign interference in the election is a “make-believe crime.” The ...
  30. [30]
    Special Counsel Lawyer Duels In Federal Court With Attorney For ...
    May 16, 2018 · His client, Concord, and the powerful Russian who controls it, Yevgeny Prigozhin, were charged in February by Mueller's office in an indictment ...
  31. [31]
    The Constitutional Challenge to Robert Mueller's Appointment (Part I)
    Oct 25, 2018 · Concord moved to dismiss the indictment on the ground that Special Counsel Mueller was appointed unlawfully. On August 13, Judge Dabney ...
  32. [32]
    U.S. judge rejects move to dismiss Mueller indictment ... - Politico
    Nov 15, 2018 · Lawyers for Concord also argued that Mueller's appointment was illegal and unconstitutional, a claim that had been rejected by three other ...Missing: challenges | Show results with:challenges
  33. [33]
    Is Russia playing a double game in Mueller court battle? - ABC News
    Oct 5, 2018 · Since the unsuccessful argument against Mueller, Concord has challenged the case on other legal grounds, including claiming "selective ...
  34. [34]
    Update: 'Putin's Chef' Lashes Out after Lawyer Rebuked in Troll ...
    Jan 30, 2019 · "This confirms the version of the company Concord Management and Consulting, that prosecutor Mueller lacks evidence and is fabricating it.
  35. [35]
    Concord Management Used Discovery for Disinformation Campaign ...
    Jan 30, 2019 · The special counsel's office has filed a memorandum in U.S. v. Concord Management and Consulting, LLC in opposition to Concord's motion to ...
  36. [36]
    Russian firm wants to disclose 'sensitive' US government info in ...
    Nov 27, 2018 · A Russian consulting firm indicted by special counsel Robert Mueller plans to ask a U.S. court to allow it to share information that the ...
  37. [37]
    [PDF] Case 1:18-cr-00032-DLF Document 94 Filed 01/30/19 Page ... - CNN
    Jan 30, 2019 · Second, Concord argues that because the indictment alleges that Prigozhin is affiliated with Concord he must be permitted to view the sensitive ...
  38. [38]
    Justice Dept. Moves to Drop Charges Against Russian Firms Filed ...
    Mar 17, 2020 · The Justice Department moved on Monday to drop charges against two Russian shell companies accused of financing schemes to interfere in the 2016 election.
  39. [39]
    Judge Sides With Indicted Russian Firm on Mueller Report's Harm
    Jul 9, 2019 · U.S. District Judge Dabney Friedrich unsealed her July 1 ruling on Monday night, agreeing with attorneys for Concord Management and Consulting ...Missing: challenges | Show results with:challenges<|separator|>
  40. [40]
    Justice Dept. abandons prosecution of Russian firm indicted in ...
    Mar 16, 2020 · ... Concord Management and Consulting ... Legal analysts from the outset viewed the Internet Research Agency indictments ...
  41. [41]
    U.S. prosecutors drop Mueller-era case against Russian firm | Reuters
    Mar 17, 2020 · ... Concord Management and Consulting LLC, was due to face a criminal trial in the case. The request to drop the case puts a dent in former ...
  42. [42]
    Sanctions List Search - OFAC - Treasury
    The Sanctions List Search tool uses approximate string matching to identify possible matches between word or character strings as entered into Sanctions List ...Missing: establishment ownership structure
  43. [43]
    'Russia did not meddle': Kremlin dismisses US indictments on ...
    Feb 19, 2018 · Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said the indictment focused on the individuals charged and that there is no proof that Russian government ...
  44. [44]
    Putin Says Those Charged With U.S. Election Meddling 'Don't ...
    Mar 4, 2018 · There are none and there cannot be any," Putin's spokesman, Dmitry Peskov, said later. In January 2017, U.S. intelligence agencies said that ...
  45. [45]
    Russian firm accused of funding US election trolling disputes ...
    May 14, 2018 · Russian firm accused of funding US election trolling disputes Mueller charge. Company tied to Putin's chef says prosecutors invented 'make- ...
  46. [46]
    Russia's Prigozhin admits interfering in U.S. elections | Reuters
    Nov 7, 2022 · ... of sponsoring Russia-based "troll farms" that seek to influence U.S. politics. In July, the U.S. State Department offered a reward of up to ...
  47. [47]
    EU imposes sanctions on Russian mercenary group Wagner over ...
    Dec 13, 2021 · European diplomats said the bloc would make use of several existing sanctions regimes in order to add names of Wagner-linked personnel and firms ...
  48. [48]
    Treasury Sanctions Russians Bankrolling Putin and Russia-Backed ...
    Mar 3, 2022 · The EU, Canada, United Kingdom, and Australia have also designated Prigozhin.The EU and Canada have also designated Lyubov, and Canada has ...
  49. [49]
    Mother of Russian mercenary chief Prigozhin wins rare appeal ...
    Mar 8, 2023 · Prigozhina's challenge said the EU had failed to specify reasons for her blacklisting and sanctioned her only to put pressure on him. "It cannot ...
  50. [50]
    Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence ...
    Jan 9, 2023 · An example of such a foreign intervention was the one conducted during the 2016 US election campaign by the Internet Research Agency, an ...Missing: employees | Show results with:employees
  51. [51]
    Assessing the Russian Internet Research Agency's impact ... - PNAS
    Nov 25, 2019 · There is widespread concern that Russia and other countries have launched social-media campaigns designed to increase political divisions in ...
  52. [52]
    Study Confirms Influence of Russian Internet “Trolls” on 2016 Election
    Mar 29, 2022 · A study by Columbia SIPA researchers that examined the impact of Russian internet “trolls” on online betting markets suggests that the trolls' activity ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  53. [53]
    Suspended accounts align with the Internet Research Agency ...
    Apr 10, 2024 · The ongoing debate surrounding the impact of the Internet Research Agency's (IRA) social media campaign during the 2016 U.S. presidential ...
  54. [54]
    The Limited Room for Russian Troll Influence in 2016
    Oct 27, 2020 · Coordinated campaigns by sock puppets on social media are likely neither necessary nor sufficient to signify serious foreign threats to ...Missing: studies | Show results with:studies
  55. [55]
    Russian company latches on to 'witch hunt' accusations | CNN Politics
    Aug 29, 2018 · Concord wants the court to force Mueller to turn over “any information” about investigations and legal steps taken toward people and companies ...Missing: debates | Show results with:debates
  56. [56]
    Durham report takeaways: A 'seriously flawed' Russia investigation ...
    May 16, 2023 · The report contends that the FBI fell prone to “confirmation bias,” repeatedly ignoring, minimizing or rationalizing away evidence that undercut ...
  57. [57]
    [PDF] Report on Matters Related to Intelligence Activities and ...
    May 12, 2023 · The principal report is confidential, but contains no classified information based on thorough, coordinated reviews of the information contained ...
  58. [58]
    The Durham Report: Trump's Vindication? | Cato at Liberty Blog
    May 16, 2023 · The FBI's investigation into his alleged collusion with Russian officials in order to influence the outcome of the 2016 election–internally known at the FBI as ...
  59. [59]
    What we know about Russia plane crash that reportedly killed ... - BBC
    Aug 27, 2023 · Wagner mercenary chief Yevgeny Prigozhin is confirmed to have died in a plane crash north of Moscow following DNA testing of the bodies found in the wreckage.
  60. [60]
    What to Know About the Plane Crash That Killed Yevgeny Prigozhin
    Aug 30, 2023 · Mr. Prigozhin's death was confirmed by the Russian authorities on Sunday after investigators said that genetic testing showed that the victims ...
  61. [61]
    Kremlin says Prigozhin plane may have been downed on purpose
    Aug 30, 2023 · The private Embraer jet on which Prigozhin was travelling to St Petersburg from Moscow crashed north of Moscow killing all 10 people on board on ...Missing: details | Show results with:details<|separator|>
  62. [62]
    Onboard grenade blast caused plane crash that killed Wagner boss ...
    Oct 5, 2023 · Prigozhin died when his business jet crashed on 23 August, two months after he staged an aborted mutiny against Russian military commanders in ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  63. [63]
    What caused the plane crash that reportedly killed Wagner warlord?
    Aug 25, 2023 · The crash took place northwest of Moscow and killed all on board, said Russia's aviation agency, apparently including Prigozhin, chief of the ...
  64. [64]
    After mutiny, Kremlin look to unwind holdings tied to Wagner ...
    Jul 1, 2023 · Prigozhin's main company, Concord, and subsidiary companies provided food ... “In CAR, Wagner has perfected a blueprint for state capture ...
  65. [65]
    After Prigozhin: Does Wagner Group have a future? - Russia Program
    Sep 11, 2024 · Prigozhin's son, Pavel, tried to retain parts of his father's business, including those in the Concord Group, which operated inside Russia.Missing: Consulting | Show results with:Consulting
  66. [66]
    The calm after the storm | OSW Centre for Eastern Studies
    Oct 30, 2023 · Yevgeny Prigozhin's mutiny, despite being short-lived (lasting about 24 hours from 23 to 24 June), had a strong political and psychological effect.
  67. [67]
    Russia/Ukraine-related Designations and Identifications
    Jun 20, 2017 · LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY CONCORD MANAGEMENT AND CONSULTING (a.k.a. KONKORD ... CONCORD MANAGEMENT AND CONSULTING; a.k.a. OBSHCHESTVO S ...
  68. [68]
    Russia/Ukraine-related Designations Updates; Issuance of Cyber ...
    Mar 15, 2018 · Petersburg 191011, Russia; Registration ID 1037843002515 [UKRAINE-EO13661]. -to- LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY CONCORD MANAGEMENT AND CONSULTING ( ...Missing: INN 7825100880