Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Critical radius

The critical radius is the threshold size for a or particle in a transformation process, such as solidification or , beyond which the aggregate is energetically favorable to grow rather than dissolve, balancing the competing effects of volume gain and penalty. This concept is fundamental to theory, determining the stability of initial clusters formed in supersaturated vapors, undercooled liquids, or supersaturated solutions during changes. In homogeneous nucleation, where clusters form spontaneously within a uniform phase without substrates, the critical radius r_c is derived from the Gibbs free energy change \Delta G for forming a spherical nucleus, given by \Delta G = \frac{4}{3}\pi r^3 \Delta G_v + 4\pi r^2 \sigma, where \Delta G_v is the volumetric free energy difference driving the phase change (negative for favorable transformations) and \sigma is the interfacial energy. At the critical radius, the derivative \frac{d\Delta G}{dr} = 0 yields r_c = -\frac{2\sigma}{\Delta G_v}, typically on the order of nanometers, such that nuclei smaller than r_c have positive net \Delta G and dissolve, while larger ones decrease in \Delta G and grow. The associated nucleation barrier \Delta G^* = \frac{16\pi \sigma^3}{3 (\Delta G_v)^2} quantifies the energy hurdle, which decreases with greater undercooling \Delta T (deviation from equilibrium temperature), thereby reducing r_c and facilitating nucleation. This principle extends to heterogeneous nucleation on impurity surfaces or container walls, where the effective critical radius is modified by a wetting angle factor, lowering the energy barrier and r_c compared to homogeneous cases, which is crucial in industrial processes like metal casting and cloud formation. Factors such as , interfacial tension (often 0.01–0.1 J/m² for solids-liquids), and level directly r_c, with practical examples including atomic-scale clusters in solidification requiring undercoolings of several kelvins to achieve viable nuclei. Understanding the critical radius enables control over microstructure in materials processing, precipitation in , and in pharmaceuticals, highlighting its role in overcoming kinetic barriers to phase stability.

Background and Definition

Definition

In classical nucleation theory, the critical radius denotes the radius of a spherical at which the change for its formation reaches a maximum, marking the energy barrier for phase transformation. This radius, often denoted as r^* or r_{\text{crit}}, represents the threshold size separating unstable embryos from stable nuclei: clusters smaller than r^* tend to dissolve due to the dominance of costs, while those larger than r^* grow spontaneously as the volumetric gain prevails. The concept is central to understanding processes like , , and in and . The change \Delta G for forming a spherical nucleus of radius r balances two opposing contributions: the positive interfacial energy associated with creating the new surface and the negative bulk from the . This is expressed as: \Delta G = 4\pi r^2 \gamma + \frac{4}{3}\pi r^3 \Delta G_v where \gamma is the interfacial energy per area, and \Delta G_v is the change per volume (negative for supersaturated or supercooled conditions). The critical radius occurs at the maximum of this , found by setting the d\Delta G / dr = 0, yielding: r^* = -\frac{2\gamma}{\Delta G_v} Here, the absolute value emphasizes the driving force magnitude. For vapor-to-liquid nucleation, an equivalent form is r^* = \frac{2\gamma v_m}{k_B T \ln S}, with v_m the molecular volume, k_B Boltzmann's constant, T temperature, and S supersaturation ratio. This definition assumes a sharp interface and isotropic properties, as per the capillary approximation in classical theory, though real systems may deviate due to curvature effects or non-spherical shapes. The critical radius inversely scales with the driving force (e.g., or ), highlighting its sensitivity to thermodynamic conditions.

Physical significance

The critical radius in theory represents the threshold size of an embryonic cluster or beyond which it becomes thermodynamically stable and tends to grow spontaneously, while clusters smaller than this size are unstable and dissolve back into the parent . This concept is central to (CNT), where the formation of a new , such as a from a liquid or a droplet from vapor, involves overcoming an energy barrier due to the interplay of surface and volume energy terms. For a spherical , the critical radius r^* is given by r^* = -\frac{2\gamma}{\Delta G_v}, where \gamma is the interfacial energy per unit area and \Delta G_v is the bulk change per unit volume (negative in supersaturated or supercooled conditions). Physically, the critical radius emerges from the of formation \Delta G(r) = 4\pi r^2 \gamma + \frac{4}{3}\pi r^3 \Delta G_v, which exhibits a maximum at r = r^*. For radii r < r^*, the positive surface energy term dominates, increasing \Delta G and driving dissolution as the unfavorable interface cost outweighs the volumetric driving force for phase change. Conversely, for r > r^*, the negative volume term prevails, decreasing \Delta G and promoting growth, as the bulk gain stabilizes the . This maximum \Delta G^* = \frac{16\pi \gamma^3}{3 (\Delta G_v)^2} at r^* quantifies the activation barrier that must be surmounted, often via , for viable to occur. The of the critical radius extends to the and feasibility of phase transitions in and atmospheric physics. In processes like solidification or cloud droplet formation, r^* inversely scales with the degree of undercooling or (since |\Delta G_v| increases with driving force), meaning greater reduces the barrier and facilitates at smaller sizes. This balance explains why extreme conditions, such as deep , can initiate rapid phase changes despite high interfacial energies, influencing phenomena from to in the atmosphere.

Theoretical Derivation

Thermodynamic basis

The thermodynamic basis of the critical radius in processes is rooted in (CNT), which models the formation of a new within a metastable as a balance between bulk and interfacial contributions to the . The total free energy change ΔG for forming a spherical embryo of radius r is given by \Delta G(r) = -\frac{4}{3} \pi r^3 |\Delta G_v| + 4 \pi r^2 \sigma, where |\Delta G_v| is the magnitude of the volumetric free energy difference driving the phase transition (positive for supersaturation or supercooling), and \sigma is the interfacial energy per unit area between the embryo and parent phase. This expression captures the competition: the negative volume term favors growth by reducing the overall free energy, while the positive surface term hinders it due to the energetic cost of creating new interface. The critical radius r^* corresponds to the size at which \Delta G(r) reaches a maximum, representing the energy barrier for . This maximum occurs where the derivative \frac{d \Delta G}{dr} = 0, yielding r^* = \frac{2 \sigma}{|\Delta G_v|}. At this radius, smaller embryos dissolve due to the dominance of , while larger ones grow spontaneously as the volume term prevails. The associated barrier is then \Delta G^* = \frac{16 \pi \sigma^3}{3 |\Delta G_v|^2}, which determines the exponential factor in the nucleation rate via the \exp(-\Delta G^* / k_B T), where k_B is Boltzmann's constant and T is . This framework, originally developed by Gibbs for the thermodynamics of heterogeneous systems and quantified for nucleation by Volmer and Weber in their treatment of vapor , assumes a and bulk properties independent of . Subsequent refinements by and Döring incorporated kinetic aspects, but the thermodynamic core remains centered on this free energy extremum, applicable to processes like droplet formation in supersaturated vapors or crystal in melts.

Mathematical derivation

The mathematical derivation of the critical radius in begins with the expression for the total change, ΔG, associated with the formation of a spherical of r in a supersaturated or supercooled . This change arises from two competing contributions: a negative term representing the bulk gain due to the , and a positive surface term accounting for the interfacial energy penalty. For a spherical , the free energy is given by \Delta G = \frac{4}{3} \pi r^3 \Delta G_v + 4 \pi r^2 \gamma, where \Delta G_v < 0 is the volumetric free energy difference per unit volume driving the phase change (e.g., related to supersaturation or undercooling), and \gamma > 0 is the isotropic interfacial energy per unit area between the nucleus and the surrounding phase. To find the critical radius r^*, which corresponds to the size at which the nucleus is in unstable equilibrium and serves as the energy barrier maximum, differentiate \Delta G with respect to r and set the derivative equal to zero: \frac{d \Delta G}{dr} = 4 \pi r^2 \Delta G_v + 8 \pi r \gamma = 0. Solving for r yields r^* = -\frac{2 \gamma}{\Delta G_v}. The negative sign of \Delta G_v ensures r^* > 0. This radius marks the point where smaller clusters tend to dissolve (as \frac{d \Delta G}{dr} > 0) and larger ones grow spontaneously (as \frac{d \Delta G}{dr} < 0). Substituting r^* back into the free energy expression gives the activation free energy barrier \Delta G^* for : \Delta G^* = \frac{16 \pi \gamma^3}{3 (\Delta G_v)^2}. In specific contexts, such as solidification under undercooling \Delta T, \Delta G_v can be approximated as \Delta G_v = -\frac{L_v \Delta T}{T_m} (where L_v is the per and T_m is the ), leading to r^* = \frac{2 \gamma T_m}{L_v \Delta T}. This highlights the inverse dependence of r^* on the driving force magnitude.

Interpretation and Factors

Energy barrier interpretation

In classical nucleation theory, the critical radius represents the size of a at which the change for its formation reaches a maximum, interpreted as the energy barrier that must be overcome for stable growth to occur. This barrier arises from the competition between the volume gain, which drives the , and the positive interfacial cost associated with creating a new surface. For a spherical , the total change is given by \Delta G(r) = \frac{4}{3}\pi r^3 \Delta G_v + 4\pi r^2 \gamma, where r is the radius, \Delta G_v < 0 is the bulk free energy difference per unit volume (dependent on supersaturation or supercooling), and \gamma is the interfacial energy per unit area. The maximum occurs at the critical radius r^* = -\frac{2\gamma}{\Delta G_v}, beyond which the volume term dominates, making further growth thermodynamically favorable. The height of this energy barrier, \Delta G^* = \Delta G(r^*) = \frac{16\pi \gamma^3}{3 (\Delta G_v)^2}, quantifies the thermodynamic obstacle to ; nuclei smaller than r^* tend to dissolve due to the surface energy penalty, while those larger grow spontaneously. This interpretation, rooted in Gibbs' thermodynamic framework for heterogeneous equilibria, underscores that is a activated where the barrier height inversely scales with the square of the driving force |\Delta G_v|, explaining the sensitivity of rates to conditions like and concentration. For instance, in solutions, higher supersaturation reduces r^* and \Delta G^*, facilitating . This energy barrier concept extends beyond homogeneous nucleation to heterogeneous cases, where substrates lower \Delta G^* by reducing the effective interfacial area, but the critical radius remains defined similarly by the balance at the barrier maximum. The exponential dependence of the nucleation rate on -\Delta G^*/k_B T (where k_B is Boltzmann's constant and T is ) highlights the barrier's role in determining kinetic feasibility, as derived in early formulations building on Gibbs' work.

Dependence on driving force and surface energy

In classical nucleation theory, the critical radius r^* of a spherical represents the size at which the change for nucleus formation reaches a maximum, marking the transition from unstable to stable growth. It is directly proportional to the interfacial \gamma (also denoted as \sigma or \alpha) and inversely proportional to the bulk driving force \Delta G_v (the volumetric difference between phases). The standard expression is r^* = \frac{2 \gamma}{|\Delta G_v|} where |\Delta G_v| denotes the magnitude of the driving force, which is negative for spontaneous phase transitions. The driving force \Delta G_v quantifies the thermodynamic favorability of the phase change and varies with conditions such as temperature undercooling \Delta T in solidification or supersaturation S in vapor condensation. For example, in crystallization from solution, \Delta G_v \approx -kT \ln S / v_m, where k is Boltzmann's constant, T is temperature, and v_m is the molecular volume; higher supersaturation increases |\Delta G_v|, thereby reducing r^* and lowering the energy barrier for nucleation. Similarly, in melting or boiling, greater undercooling or supersaturation amplifies the driving force, shrinking the critical size to nanometers or below, which facilitates nucleation in highly metastable states. Surface energy \gamma, the excess per unit area at the new , opposes nucleus formation by increasing the surface term in the total free energy \Delta G = \frac{4}{3} \pi r^3 \Delta G_v + 4 \pi r^2 \gamma. Higher \gamma values, typical in systems with mismatched structures or high atomic density differences, enlarge r^*, making small clusters unstable and raising the nucleation barrier \Delta G^* = \frac{16 \pi \gamma^3}{3 \Delta G_v^2}. For instance, in metallic alloys, \gamma ranges from 0.1 to 1 J/, directly scaling r^* and influencing whether occurs homogeneously or requires heterogeneous aids. This inverse relationship with driving force and direct proportionality to surface energy underscores why is kinetically hindered near (low |\Delta G_v|, large r^*) but accelerates far from it, with \gamma setting an intrinsic limit modulated by material properties like atomic bonding and curvature effects in small clusters.

Reduction Strategies

Supercooling

Supercooling, also known as undercooling, refers to the process of cooling a below its freezing without the onset of solidification, creating a metastable state that enhances the driving force for . In , this driving force arises from the bulk difference \Delta G_v between the and solid phases, which is approximately \Delta G_v = -\frac{\Delta H_f \Delta T}{T_m V_m}, where \Delta H_f is the of , \Delta T is the undercooling ( T_m - T ), T_m is the , and V_m is the . Greater increases |\Delta G_v|, thereby reducing the critical radius r^* = \frac{2\gamma}{|\Delta G_v|}, where \gamma is the solid- interfacial energy, making it easier for nuclei to form and grow beyond the unstable size. This reduction in critical radius lowers the energy barrier for nucleation, \Delta G^* = \frac{16\pi \gamma^3}{3 \Delta G_v^2}, which is exponentially related to the nucleation rate J \propto \exp\left(-\frac{\Delta G^*}{k_B T}\right), where k_B is Boltzmann's constant. For instance, in pure metals like aluminum, the critical radius decreases from approximately 1.8 at small undercoolings (\Delta T \approx 0.1 ) to below 0.2 at \Delta T = 10 , \gamma_{s\ell} \approx 0.093 J/m², and volumetric entropy of \rho \Delta s_f \approx 1.02 \times 10^6 J/m³, facilitating homogeneous under sufficient . In supercooled , extreme undercooling up to -40°C can achieve critical radii on the order of nanometers, though practical limits are set by heterogeneous sites. As a reduction strategy, controlled is employed in materials to refine microstructure by promoting numerous small rather than fewer large ones, though excessive undercooling risks rapid, uncontrolled leading to defects. The interplay of radius fluctuations and in the further stabilizes the critical configuration under , as described in comprehensive models of . Limitations include kinetic factors like reduced atomic diffusivity at lower temperatures, which can offset the thermodynamic benefits for very deep .

Supersaturation

In the context of , refers to a state where the concentration of a solute or vapor exceeds its or , creating a thermodynamic driving force for . This excess drives the formation of a new phase, such as from solution or droplets from vapor. In , the degree of , denoted as S = \frac{C}{C_{eq}} (where C is the actual concentration and C_{eq} is the concentration), directly influences the critical radius r^*, the minimum size at which a becomes and grows spontaneously. The relationship is given by r^* = \frac{2 \gamma V_m}{RT \ln S}, where \gamma is the interfacial , V_m is the of the new phase, R is the , and T is . As S increases, \ln S grows, reducing r^* and thereby lowering the barrier for , \Delta G^* = \frac{16\pi \gamma^3 V_m^2}{3 (RT \ln S)^2}. This makes it easier to form nuclei, facilitating phase transitions that might otherwise be kinetically hindered. To reduce the critical radius in practical applications, supersaturation is deliberately engineered through methods like rapid solvent evaporation, temperature quenching, or mixing reactive species to achieve high S values. For instance, in solution-based nanoparticle synthesis, increasing S from 2 to 4 can decrease r^* significantly, boosting the nucleation rate by orders of magnitude (e.g., ~10^{70}-fold) and enabling the production of smaller, more uniform particles. In gas-evolving catalytic reactions, such as water electrolysis, elevating dissolved gas supersaturation lowers r^* for bubble nucleation, reducing overpotentials and improving efficiency by promoting detachment at smaller bubble sizes. This strategy is particularly valuable in materials processing, where controlled supersaturation allows precise tuning of particle size distributions without relying on additives or impurities. However, excessive supersaturation can lead to uncontrolled homogeneous nucleation, resulting in a proliferation of small nuclei and potential aggregation. Thus, strategies often balance S to stay within the metastable zone, where growth dominates over excessive nucleation. Seminal studies emphasize that the inverse dependence of r^* on \ln S holds across diverse systems, from aqueous solutions to polymer melts, underscoring supersaturation's role as a versatile tool for minimizing critical radii in industrial crystallization and condensation processes.

Heterogeneous nucleation aids

Heterogeneous nucleation aids encompass a variety of substrates, particles, and chemical agents introduced into a to promote by providing preferential sites that lower the barrier compared to homogeneous . In , the energy barrier for heterogeneous is reduced by a factor f(\theta) = \frac{(2 + \cos\theta)(1 - \cos\theta)^2}{4}, where \theta is the between the nucleus and the aid; for \theta < 90^\circ, f(\theta) < 1, facilitating the formation of nuclei at lower driving forces such as reduced or . While the critical radius r^* = \frac{2\sigma}{\Delta G_v} (with \sigma as interfacial energy and \Delta G_v as the volumetric change) remains governed by bulk , aids effectively enable of clusters at sizes near r^* by minimizing the work required to reach it, often through matching or surface that stabilizes embryonic phases. In materials processing, particularly , grain refiners serve as key aids to control microstructure during solidification. For instance, the Al–5Ti–1B master alloy introduces TiB₂ particles, which act as potent nucleants for α-Al due to low mismatch (∼5.5%) and favorable , reducing the undercooling needed for from ∼5–10 K in unrefined melts to ∼1–2 K. This promotion occurs via heterogeneous sites on the particle surfaces, where the energy barrier is lowered, leading to finer sizes (e.g., from 1000 μm to 100 μm) and improved mechanical properties without altering the intrinsic r^*. Other aids include nanophase dispersions like Zr-based quasicrystals, which enhance potency through solute partitioning and short-range ordering. In atmospheric and biological contexts, aids such as mineral dust, biological proteins, and engineered particles facilitate ice nucleation. Bacterial ice-nucleating proteins from Pseudomonas syringae organize water molecules into ice-like structures via hydrophilic-hydrophobic patterns, raising nucleation temperatures from -38°C (homogeneous) to as high as -2°C by reducing the heterogeneous barrier through template-like binding. Silver iodide (AgI), used in cloud seeding, promotes ice formation due to its hexagonal lattice similarity to ice Ih, lowering the barrier and enabling nucleation at -10°C to -5°C supercooling; its efficacy stems from surface defects that enhance wetting. Similarly, soot particles with oxygenated functional groups (-OH, carbonyls) act as aids in combustion aerosols, varying in potency based on surface oxidation, which stabilizes small ice embryos and reduces effective barrier heights. These aids underscore the role of surface-specific interactions in bypassing high homogeneous barriers across phase transitions.

Applications

Atmospheric and cloud physics

In atmospheric and cloud physics, the critical radius plays a pivotal role in the nucleation of cloud droplets and ice crystals, determining whether embryonic particles can overcome the energy barrier to grow into stable cloud elements. Nucleation occurs primarily through heterogeneous processes on cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) or ice-nucleating particles (INPs), as homogeneous nucleation requires impractically high supersaturations in the atmosphere. For liquid droplets, Köhler theory describes the equilibrium vapor pressure over a curved droplet surface containing soluble aerosols, balancing the Kelvin effect (which increases vapor pressure due to surface curvature) and the solute effect (which decreases it via Raoult's law). The critical radius r^* marks the point of unstable equilibrium on the Köhler curve, where the free energy of formation reaches a maximum; droplets smaller than r^* evaporate, while those larger grow spontaneously into cloud droplets. The critical radius for a droplet is derived from the condition where the derivative of the saturation ratio S with respect to radius is zero, yielding r^* = \frac{2 M_w \sigma}{R T \rho_w \ln S^*}, where M_w is the molecular weight of water, \sigma is surface tension, R is the gas constant, T is temperature, \rho_w is water density, and S^* is the critical supersaturation. For a typical CCN like ammonium sulfate with dry radius 0.05 μm at 273 K, r^* \approx 0.1–0.5 μm and S^* \approx 0.1\%–0.5%, depending on solute mass and solubility. In clouds, rising air parcels generate transient supersaturations of 0.1%–1%, activating CCN sequentially from largest to smallest, which controls the number concentration of cloud droplets (typically 10–1000 cm⁻³) and thus influences droplet size spectra and precipitation efficiency. Over oceans, persistent supersaturations exceeding 0.5% allow activation of smaller CCN (critical dry size 25–30 nm), but overall resulting in fewer (typically 10–100 cm⁻³) and larger droplets compared to continental environments with higher CCN concentrations. For ice formation in cold clouds, the critical radius concept extends to deposition nucleation, where water vapor directly forms ice on INPs, or the Bergeron-Findeisen process in mixed-phase clouds. The free energy barrier \Delta G = 4\pi r^2 \sigma - \frac{4}{3}\pi r^3 \frac{\rho_i R T}{M_w} \ln \left( \frac{e_i}{e_{si}} \right) (with \sigma as ice-vapor , \rho_i ice , R the , T , M_w the of , and e_i / e_{si} the ice ) peaks at r^* = \frac{2\sigma M_w }{\rho_i R T \ln \left( \frac{e_i}{e_{si}} \right)}, typically on the order of 1–10 nm for supersaturations of 10%–20% at temperatures below -20°C. Heterogeneous INPs, such as or biological particles, reduce r^* and the required ice to 5%–15%, enabling formation at cirrus levels (T < -40°C) where homogeneous freezing demands supersaturations over 130%. This governs the indirect effect, as varying INP concentrations alter radiative properties and lifetime.

Materials processing and metallurgy

In materials processing and metallurgy, the critical radius plays a pivotal role in the solidification of metals and alloys, governing the initiation of stable nuclei during phase transformations from liquid to solid. During processes, such as those used in producing ingots or components, the formation of a solid nucleus requires overcoming an energy barrier where the critical radius r^* represents the minimum size at which the change favors growth over . This radius is derived from balancing the negative volume gain due to undercooling and the positive penalty, expressed as r^* = \frac{2 \gamma T_m}{\Delta H_f \Delta T}, where \gamma is the solid-liquid interfacial energy, T_m is the , \Delta H_f is the of , and \Delta T is the undercooling below T_m. For pure metals like , typical values yield r^* \approx 1.8 nm at significant undercooling (\Delta T = 0.2 T_m), enabling homogeneous in the melt interior, though practical solidification often relies on heterogeneous at lower undercooling to reduce r^* and promote finer microstructures. Heterogeneous nucleation, facilitated by impurities, mold walls, or added inoculants, lowers the effective critical radius in metallurgical processes by providing substrates that reduce the interfacial barrier, typically expressed as r_c = \frac{2 \gamma_{s\ell}}{\rho \Delta s_f \Delta T}, where \gamma_{s\ell} is the solid-liquid interfacial , \rho \Delta s_f is the volumetric of fusion, and other terms are as defined previously. In aluminum , for instance, at \Delta T = 20 K, r_c \approx 9.1 \times 10^{-9} m, influencing the transition from columnar to equiaxed grain structures in castings, which enhances mechanical properties like and resistance. This control over is critical in techniques used in manufacturing, where minimizing r^* through precise thermal gradients prevents defects like freckles or , ensuring uniform compositions. The concept extends to alloy design and in metallurgy, where understanding critical radius aids in predicting solidification paths and phase distributions. For eutectic alloys, the critical radius influences coupled growth of phases, as seen in cast irons where undercooling adjustments refine lamellar or nodular structures, improving and wear resistance. In powder metallurgy and additive manufacturing, cooling rates effectively decrease r^*, promoting homogeneous and nanoscale refinement for high-strength materials. These applications the critical radius's in optimizing parameters to achieve desired microstructural outcomes without excessive energy input.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] NUCLEATION
    Nucleation. Key Concept 7.1: Critical nucleus for homogeneous nucleation. • The radius of a critical nucleus at undercooling ∆T is given by: Rc = 2γs`Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  2. [2]
    Critical Radius
    The nucleus of a new stable phase will grow if it is large enough and that size can be expressed as a critical radius for a spherical nucleus.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  3. [3]
    nglos324 - criticalnucleus
    A critical nucleus is a nucleus at the critical radius (r*), where the transition occurs and growth decreases the Gibbs function.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  4. [4]
    Classical Nucleation Theory - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    This radius of maximum ΔG – denoted as the critical radius rcrit – plays an important role in the theory of nucleation. As long as the radius of a particle ...
  5. [5]
    [PDF] Nucleation
    The critical nucleus size can be denoted by its radius, and it is when r = r* (or r critical) that the nucleation proceeds. • An example of supercooling ...
  6. [6]
    Critical Radius of Spherical Nucleus
    A spherical nucleus can coninue to grow spontaneously only if the sum of the Gibbs energy changes (volumetric and interfacial) declines as the radius increases.
  7. [7]
    [PDF] Lecture 10: Homogeneous Nucleation
    An alternative way to derive r*: As a solid particle of radius r forms from the liquid, the change of Gibbs free energy is. ΔG(r) = + 4πr2γ
  8. [8]
    [PDF] Lecture 3: - Lehigh University
    A determination of the rates of nucleation and crystallization from the melt will lead to an estimate of a critical cooling rate necessary for glass formation.<|control11|><|separator|>
  9. [9]
    [PDF] OUTLINE 1. Nucleation of water droplets (6.1) Homogeneous and ...
    Nucleation of water droplets involves homogeneous nucleation in pristine air and heterogeneous nucleation with aerosols like sea salt or dust.<|control11|><|separator|>
  10. [10]
    None
    Summary of each segment:
  11. [11]
    [PDF] THE VALIDITY OF CLASSICAL NUCLEATION THEORY ... - Stacks
    It is straightforward to show that the critical radius rc, more precisely the critical radius of curvature, is identical to the homogeneous nucleation,.
  12. [12]
    Nucleation Theory - ScienceDirect.com
    Nucleation is the process by which clusters of a stable phase form in a metastable phase. Because it is the first step in many phase transformations.
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Nucleation and Growth - AUB
    For critical radius, the units are m (or nm, to choose a more practical unit); dimensions = length. • For nucleation rate, the units are number/m3/s ...
  14. [14]
    Mechanisms of Nucleation and Growth of Nanoparticles in Solution
    This review presents some of the most recent analyses showing how noble metals, quantum dots, and magnetic nanoparticles nucleate and grow in solution.
  15. [15]
  16. [16]
    None
    ### Summary of Critical Radius in Crystal Nucleation (Classical Theory)
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Particle Formation: Theory of Nucleation and Systems - MPIKG
    classical expression for the free energy to form a critical nucleus of radius R around an ion of radius R i is: the classical theory does not predict ...Missing: significance | Show results with:significance
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Supercooling and Nucleation
    Supercooling is when liquid doesn't freeze below freezing point due to lack of nucleation. Nucleation is the first step of crystallization, forming nano- to ...
  19. [19]
    A comprehensive treatment of classical nucleation in a supercooled ...
    Apr 1, 2003 · Nucleation involves fluctuations of both the radius of the droplet as well as the internal pressure within the droplet.
  20. [20]
    Nucleation as a rate-determining step in catalytic gas generation ...
    Nov 16, 2022 · Higher supersaturation of the dissolved gas reduces the critical radius and, thus, the energy barrier, so bubble nucleation is facilitated (25).
  21. [21]
  22. [22]
  23. [23]
    7.2: Nucleation of Liquid Droplets - Geosciences LibreTexts
    Dec 14, 2024 · The drop radius R* at this peak is called the critical radius, and the corresponding critical supersaturation fraction is S* = es*/es – 1.<|control11|><|separator|>
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Surface Thermodynamics and Nucleation of Water Droplets and Ice ...
    A critical embryo is defined as a water droplet of radius r = R. To determine the concentration of critical embryos, we utilize the Boltzman relation . (9.5).
  25. [25]
    Supersaturation and Critical Size of Cloud Condensation Nuclei in ...
    Apr 29, 2024 · Here, we show that high supersaturation >0.5% persists over the oceans with a critical CCN size of 25–30 nm, which is smaller than the conventional wisdom of ...
  26. [26]
    Droplet nucleation: Physically‐based parameterizations and ...
    Oct 21, 2011 · [6] The theory of droplet nucleation is founded on seminal work by Köhler [1921, 1926], who determined the equilibrium radius r of particles ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Chapter 4b: Nucleation and Growth 4.8 Solidification of Metals
    The critical-sized nucleus is related to the amount of ΑT by: r* = 2 γ Tm / ΑHf ΑT where r* - critical radius of nucleus; γΓ. – surface free energy; ΑHf - heat ...
  28. [28]
    Solidification of Metals and Alloys - IntechOpen
    The peak positive value corresponds to the critical radius 'rc' or the embryonic crystal. ... Campbell,J., Metal Casting Processes, “Metallurgy,Techniques ...