Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Decabromodiphenyl ether

Decabromodiphenyl ether (decaBDE or BDE-209) is a fully brominated (PBDE) with the molecular formula C₁₂Br₁₀O, consisting of two phenyl rings bridged by an , each ring bearing five substituents. This organobromine compound exhibits high thermal stability, low volatility, and chemical inertness under ambient conditions, making it suitable as an additive in thermoplastics, textiles, adhesives, and other materials to enhance fire resistance. Commercial production of decaBDE occurs via stepwise bromination of using sources, resulting in a product where the decabrominated congener predominates due to thermodynamic favorability. It has been widely incorporated into housings, , and materials since the 1970s, valued for its cost-effectiveness and efficacy in reducing combustibility without covalent bonding to host polymers. DecaBDE's in the , potential for , and photolytic or metabolic debromination to partially brominated PBDEs—congeners with greater and —have driven regulatory , despite of low acute mammalian and limited genotoxic or carcinogenic potential in available studies. data indicate possible disruption, reproductive effects, and at high exposures, though direct causation of adverse outcomes remains unsubstantiated. In response, authorities including the U.S. EPA and have imposed phase-outs, import restrictions, and significant new use rules under frameworks like TSCA and REACH, prioritizing precautionary measures against its PBT characteristics over conclusive hazard .

Chemical Properties

Molecular Structure and Composition

Decabromodiphenyl ether (decaBDE), systematically named 2,2',3,3',4,4',5,5',6,6'-decabromodiphenyl ether and designated as BDE-209, is the fully brominated congener within the (PBDEs) family. Its molecular formula is C₁₂Br₁₀O, with a molecular weight of 959.22 g/mol, consisting of two phenyl s linked by an oxygen bridge, where each ring bears five bromine substituents occupying all , , and positions. This structure renders decaBDE a high molecular weight, non-reactive additive suitable for incorporation into polymeric materials as a . In contrast to commercial pentaBDE and octaBDE mixtures, which comprise congeners with 5 or 8 atoms respectively and exhibit greater (s on the order of 10⁻⁵ to 10⁻⁷ mmHg), decaBDE's complete bromination yields a significantly lower (approximately 2 × 10⁻⁸ mmHg at 25°C), minimizing its tendency to volatilize. Its (log Kₒₓ ≈ 9.97) reflects high , surpassing that of lower-brominated PBDEs, which influences its partitioning behavior in environmental and biological matrices. Commercial formulations of decaBDE, such as those historically marketed under trade names like Saytex 102E, achieve purity levels exceeding 97% BDE-209, with the balance primarily comprising nonabromodiphenyl ether (nonaBDE) impurities at 0.3–3.0% and trace amounts of other PBDEs. This high purity distinguishes modern decaBDE products from earlier PBDE mixtures, which contained more variable congener profiles.

Physical and Chemical Characteristics

Decabromodiphenyl ether exists as a white to pale yellow crystalline powder at room temperature. Its melting point exceeds 300 °C, reflecting substantial thermal stability suitable for high-temperature processing in polymeric matrices. The compound decomposes before boiling, with onset around 425 °C under certain conditions, underscoring its resistance to volatilization. Decabromodiphenyl ether demonstrates extremely low aqueous , measured at less than 0.1 μg/L at 25 °C per Guideline 105, which limits its dissolution in water-based environments. The (log Kow) ranges from 6.27 to higher values depending on experimental conditions, confirming pronounced hydrophobicity and preference for lipophilic phases. Chemically, decabromodiphenyl ether functions as an unreactive additive, physically dispersed rather than chemically bound in host materials, with no significant reactivity under ambient conditions. Its identification relies on spectroscopic techniques, including negative ionization , which yields characteristic clusters and molecular patterns for confirmation. High content (approximately 83% by weight) imparts inherent stability against thermal degradation in inert atmospheres.

History and Production

Development and Early Commercialization

Decabromodiphenyl ether (decaBDE), a fully brominated congener of (PBDEs), emerged from research into brominated flame retardants during the 1960s, when commercial mixtures of PBDEs with varying bromine contents were first introduced for additive applications in polymers. These developments coincided with growing demand for materials that could inhibit ignition in electrical and consumer products, building on earlier halogenated compounds. Major U.S. producers, including Chemical Corporation and (later Albemarle), scaled up synthesis of decaBDE as the dominant high-bromine variant, leveraging its thermal stability and compatibility with plastics like high-impact (HIPS). Commercialization accelerated in the early , with decaBDE integrated into formulations to meet voluntary flammability standards for enclosures, such as those from Underwriters Laboratories, amid rising awareness of fire risks in household appliances. Its adoption in television cabinets and other plastic housings was particularly rapid, as manufacturers sought to comply with standards addressing ignition from small flames, following the expansion of color production and instant-on features that heightened overheating concerns. By the late , surging demand drove substantial uptake, with decaBDE comprising a key component in HIPS for backs and similar applications, reflecting its efficacy in delaying combustion without significantly altering material properties. Decabromodiphenyl ether is manufactured through the exhaustive bromination of or its partially brominated intermediates using elemental in controlled reaction conditions, often employing solvents like dibromomethane at temperatures below 80°C to achieve high purity and . Initial commercial production was dominated by facilities in the and , where manufacturers such as those in the brominated flame retardants sector operated until voluntary phase-outs and regulatory restrictions took effect in the , including a US industry agreement to cease production by December 31, 2013. Subsequently, manufacturing capacity has shifted to , with and other regional producers like Horay Industry Co. filling the gap amid fewer immediate bans and rising demand from local ; Asia-Pacific now accounts for over 40% of global market share, fueled by expansion in and plastics manufacturing. The global market value stood at approximately USD 385 million in 2024, with projections estimating growth to USD 465 million by 2032 at a CAGR of about 4%, underscoring persistent production for exempted critical uses despite phase-outs in regulated regions. Exemptions under frameworks like the EPA's TSCA provisions for applications in wire coatings, enclosures, and processes have sustained supply chains, particularly in non-banned markets. Alternative estimates vary, with some reports citing a 2024 valuation up to USD 680 million and CAGRs ranging 3.9-5.1% into the 2030s, reflecting discrepancies in data but consistent evidence of ongoing demand.

Applications and Efficacy

Primary Uses in Industry

Decabromodiphenyl ether (decaBDE) serves predominantly as an additive in plastics, comprising the majority of its industrial consumption, with historical data indicating approximately 80-90% directed toward polymeric materials. It is compounded into high-impact (HIPS) at loadings of 5-15% by weight to formulate casings for electronic equipment, including television enclosures and computer housings. Other plastic applications encompass acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS) resins and polyolefins for wire insulation, conveyor belts, and electrical components. In textiles, decaBDE is incorporated at lower volumes, accounting for about 10% of total use, primarily in fabrics and coatings for furnishings. It also appears in adhesives, coatings, and engineering resins applied in electronics and automotive sectors, such as interior components and protective layers. Regulatory frameworks have granted exemptions for legacy uses in certain high-reliability contexts, including spare parts for wiring, cables, and electrical systems where substitution poses technical challenges.

Evidence of Fire Safety Benefits

Decabromodiphenyl ether (decaBDE), when combined with synergists like , enables high-impact and other plastics used in electronic enclosures to achieve the V-0 flammability rating, the most stringent vertical burn standard. This rating requires test specimens to self-extinguish within 10 seconds after flame application, with no flaming drips or sustained burning, thereby demonstrating delayed ignition and minimized flame propagation in small-scale simulations of fire exposure. In formulations, loadings of approximately 22% decaBDE and 6% suffice to attain V-0 compliance, highlighting its efficiency in suppressing combustion radicals and reducing heat release. Full-scale fire modeling and life-cycle assessments further quantify decaBDE's contributions. A 2000 study by Simonson et al. on television sets compared V-0 rated enclosures containing brominated flame retardants like decaBDE against lower-rated alternatives, finding that the former reduce the probability and severity of full-room fires by limiting initial flame spread and heat release rates, resulting in net environmental benefits from averted fire emissions despite production-phase chemical releases. Similarly, cost-benefit analyses of decaBDE in indicate that compliance with V-0 standards prevents fire escalation, with modeled reductions in fire incidents outweighing additive costs by factors tied to lower and escape time extensions. Real-world applications in correlate with diminished risks. DecaBDE-treated enclosures in televisions and computers have been linked to lower ignition vulnerability compared to untreated counterparts; for instance, sets marketed without s exhibit heightened to open- ignition sources like candles, contributing to pre-2000s showing stabilized or declining electronics-related casualties amid rising device ownership. Legislative reviews note decaBDE's role in global use, which has helped curb home incidence and severity by slowing in components during early stages./tabid/4290/ctl/Download/mid/13177/Default.aspx?id=13&ObjID=19036) Economic evaluations estimate that such interventions avert substantial annual damages, with retardants broadly preventing billions in global property losses by mitigating growth in high-risk materials.

Environmental Fate

Persistence and Transport Mechanisms

Decabromodiphenyl ether (decaBDE) demonstrates high persistence in environmental compartments such as and , with experimental half-lives exceeding 180 days under aerobic and conditions, indicating very low degradability. degradation studies in digested report half-lives around 700 days, while aerobic simulations show minimal mineralization over extended periods. This longevity stems from its resistance to at neutral and temperatures typical of natural waters, as well as limited photolytic breakdown in subsurface environments where light penetration is restricted. Photodegradation occurs more readily on exposed surfaces like silica or , with half-lives of 12–37 hours, but rates slow significantly in complex matrices such as (150–200 hours) or (30–60 hours) due to adsorption shielding the molecule from UV exposure. Overall, these properties position decaBDE as recalcitrant to natural attenuation processes, persisting for years in particulate-bound forms without substantial breakdown via biotic or abiotic pathways under ambient conditions. DecaBDE's transport in the environment is dominated by partitioning to solid phases rather than dissolution or volatilization, driven by its low vapor pressure (approximately 10^{-12}–10^{-10} Pa at 25°C) and high log K_{ow} (>10), which favor strong adsorption to organic matter in soils, dust, and sediments. This affinity limits aqueous solubility (<1 μg/L) and gaseous-phase mobility, restricting long-range atmospheric transport to particle-bound mechanisms like wind-blown dust or erosion rather than diffusion as vapor. Surface runoff and leaching carry adsorbed decaBDE from contaminated soils to waterways, with suspended particulates serving as the primary vector for oceanic deposition. Global monitoring reveals widespread distribution correlating with human activity, with soil and sediment concentrations often 1–2 orders of magnitude higher in urban and industrial zones (e.g., up to several mg/kg near manufacturing sites) than in rural or remote areas, reflecting releases from product use, wear, and disposal. Air sampling shows elevated particulate-phase levels downwind of cities and e-waste facilities, decreasing with distance from sources, while biota and sediment cores indicate historical accumulation peaks aligning with peak production in the 1980s–2000s. These patterns underscore localized sourcing and gradual dispersal via particulate pathways, without evidence of efficient poleward migration typical of volatile persistent organics.

Potential for Debromination

Laboratory studies have demonstrated the potential for debromination of (BDE-209) under controlled conditions, such as anaerobic microbial activity or ultraviolet (UV) photolysis, yielding lower-brominated (PBDEs) like nona- and octaBDEs. For instance, reductive debromination by sediment microbes occurs with half-lives of 6–50 years in anaerobic sediments, while photodegradation half-lives range from minutes on dry surfaces to days in dust matrices. In vivo experiments with fish, such as rainbow trout, show metabolic debromination to hepta- through nonaBDEs at rates of a few percent of the total burden after prolonged exposure. However, these transformations require specific conditions like direct UV exposure or enriched microbial consortia, which are not representative of most natural settings. Field observations, in contrast, indicate minimal debromination in environmental matrices under realistic conditions, with BDE-209 persisting as the dominant congener (>89% in sediments downstream of plants). Biota studies report low bioaccumulation factors, such as biomagnification factors (BMFs) of 0.03 in polar food webs and biota-soil accumulation factors (BSAFs) of 0.04–0.7 in , below thresholds for significant trophic transfer or transformation. In surficial sediments and soils, patterns suggest limited conversion to lower congeners over decades, often indistinguishable from historical commercial mixtures rather than active debromination. Reviews by the Persistent Organic Pollutants Review Committee note evidence of debromination in some sediments and but highlight uncertainty due to analytical challenges and confounding PBDEs, with no widespread production of bioavailable lower congeners. Influencing factors include conditions favoring microbial debromination, UV light penetration limited by particle (>96% to sediments/soils), and /microbial activity, yet overall efficiency remains low in oxic, buried, or shielded matrices. Empirical data thus refute significant environmental debromination as a primary fate pathway, emphasizing BDE-209's persistence over transformation to more mobile or toxic forms in most ecosystems.

Bioaccumulation and Ecological Studies

Decabromodiphenyl ether (decaBDE) demonstrates limited potential in aquatic organisms compared to lower-brominated (PBDEs), primarily due to its high molecular weight, low water solubility, and reduced uptake efficiency. Experimental factors (BCFs) in and other typically range from 10 to 1,000, corresponding to log BCF values below 3-4, which fall short of the threshold (log BCF/BAF >5) for significant under established criteria. factors (BAFs) derived from field monitoring similarly indicate low steady-state accumulation, with values often under 5,000 in lipid-normalized tissues of and , attributed to efficient elimination and minimal absorption across gills or membranes. Trophic transfer studies reveal factors (BMFs) and trophic magnification factors (TMFs) for decaBDE in the range of 1.0 to 2.0 across food webs, signifying negligible amplification from prey to predators, in contrast to tetra- through hexaBDEs which exhibit TMFs exceeding 3. Canadian environmental assessments, incorporating both laboratory and field data, determine that decaBDE does not satisfy stringent benchmarks—such as BCF/BAF >5,000 or TMF >1—applied to lighter PBDEs, due to insufficient evidence of sustained magnification in natural ecosystems. Ecological monitoring detects decaBDE in sediments at concentrations up to several micrograms per gram dry weight and in tissues, including fish, birds, and mammals, at parts-per-billion levels, reflecting its persistence and sorption to rather than biological uptake. However, long-term surveys in contaminated regions show no demonstrable population-level impacts on , such as altered community structures or reproductive declines attributable to decaBDE exposure, with detections often correlating to local industrial sources rather than widespread trophic effects.

Human Exposure

Pathways and Detection Levels

Human exposure to decabromodiphenyl ether (BDE-209) occurs mainly through , , and dermal of from indoor and occupational environments, where the compound leaches from treated polymers in , textiles, and plastics. represents the dominant external route, with and skin contact contributing significantly in high-use settings. Dietary exposure is minor, attributable to BDE-209's low solubility (<30 μg/L) and poor gastrointestinal absorption. In general populations, median BDE-209 concentrations in serum range from 1.2 to 2.8 ng/g lipid weight, based on samples from regions including Europe (e.g., Netherlands and United Kingdom, ca. 2016) and China (e.g., Laizhou Bay, 2013). Breast milk levels are comparable, with medians around 2.1 ng/g lipid weight reported in Chinese production areas (2009). Among occupationally exposed individuals, such as e-waste workers in South China (2014), mean serum levels reach 6.5 ng/g lipid weight, with breast milk means at 3.8 ng/g lipid weight; extremes in serum can exceed 400 ng/g lipid in heavily contaminated sites. Post-phase-out biomonitoring in Western countries shows declining trends in human levels since the early 2000s, reflecting reduced commercial mixtures. In Asia, where production persisted into the 2010s, concentrations have remained stable or increased in surveyed populations near manufacturing and recycling hubs.

Pharmacokinetics in Humans

Decabromodiphenyl ether (BDE-209) exhibits low oral in humans, with estimated at less than 5% based on extrapolations from rodent studies and human biomonitoring data indicating minimal systemic uptake relative to intake levels. In rats, oral dosing experiments demonstrate that the majority (>95%) of administered BDE-209 is excreted unchanged in , consistent with its large molecular size, high , and low water hindering gastrointestinal uptake. Human data, derived from and measurements, confirm limited , as BDE-209 concentrations remain low despite environmental exposures, unlike lower-brominated PBDE congeners with higher . Metabolism of BDE-209 in humans is minimal, with negligible conversion to hydroxylated or debrominated metabolites observed in studies using human liver microsomes and hepatocytes, and primarily unchanged parent compound detected in excreta from animal analogs. This contrasts with more extensively metabolized lower PBDEs, underscoring BDE-209's resistance to due to its full bromination. Following limited absorption, BDE-209 distributes preferentially to lipophilic tissues such as liver and adipose in models, with adipose samples showing detectable but low levels attributable to chronic low-dose exposure rather than high retention. Elimination is rapid, with fecal dominating and a estimated in days based on depletion studies in rats and steady-state biomarker profiles indicating no significant accumulation over time. This short contributes to reduced systemic retention in humans compared to lower PBDEs, which exhibit half-lives of months to years and greater potential.

Health Effects Evaluation

Empirical Toxicology Data

Acute oral toxicity studies in rats have reported LD50 values exceeding 15,000 mg/kg body weight, indicating very low potential. Dermal LD50 in rabbits exceeded 8,000 mg/kg, and inhalation LC50 in rats exceeded 48.2 mg/L for 1 hour, further supporting minimal acute hazards via these routes. No significant skin or eye irritation was observed in rabbits, and decabromodiphenyl ether (BDE-209) did not induce sensitization in guinea pigs. Chronic oral exposure studies in , such as 90-day and 2-year feeding trials, identified no-observed-adverse-effect levels (NOAELs) at doses up to 2.22 mg/kg/day in rats, based on dose-response assessments for behavioral and histopathological endpoints. The U.S. EPA derived a reference dose (RfD) of 0.007 mg/kg/day from this NOAEL, applying uncertainty factors for interspecies extrapolation and , deeming it protective against observed effects. Reviews from the 2000s to , including EPA's 2008 toxicological assessment and Canada's 2024 state-of-science report, consistently describe BDE-209's inherent as low, with dose-dependent effects emerging only at high exposures far exceeding environmental levels. Genotoxicity evaluations, including negative results in the Ames bacterial mutagenicity and other tests, indicate no significant DNA-damaging potential. Carcinogenicity data from long-term bioassays show limited evidence of tumors, primarily at maximally tolerated doses without clear dose-response progression attributable to BDE-209 itself, as opposed to lower-brominated debromination products. These findings underscore challenges, prioritizing direct empirical endpoints over indirect mechanisms in profiling.

Specific Organ and Systemic Effects

In studies, decabromodiphenyl ether (decaBDE) exposure at high doses induces liver and induction, primarily through activation, with effects observed in rats at dietary concentrations exceeding 0.3% (3000 mg/kg/day) over 90 days; these changes were reversible upon cessation of exposure. and contribute to in short-term rat models at doses around 100-500 mg/kg, though decaBDE-specific potency is lower than that of lower-brominated PBDE congeners. Human epidemiological data show no consistent liver effects attributable to decaBDE, with biomarkers like enzymes remaining unaltered in exposed workers. Thyroid effects in rodents include increased gland weight and modest reductions in thyroxine (T4) levels following gestational or chronic oral exposure to decaBDE at doses of 60-220 mg/kg/day, potentially linked to uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase induction enhancing hormone clearance; triiodothyronine (T3) levels are typically unaffected. These alterations occur without histopathological changes in most studies and are not replicated in humans, where cross-sectional analyses of PBDE-exposed populations fail to establish causal links to thyroid disruption after adjusting for confounders like age and iodine status. Skeptical reviews emphasize decaBDE's weak binding affinity to thyroid receptors compared to other PBDEs, questioning relevance at environmental exposures. Reproductive and developmental effects are limited to high-dose animal models, with studies showing no adverse outcomes in , , or pup viability up to 1000 mg/kg/day oral exposure, though some mouse models report delayed or reduced fetal weight at 120 mg/kg/day. Neurodevelopmental findings, such as impaired motor activity or learning in , require doses exceeding 300 mg/kg/day and are inconsistent across congeners, with decaBDE exhibiting lower potency than penta- or octaBDE mixtures; a dedicated developmental neurotoxicity study established a of 1000 mg/kg/day. Human cohort studies link PBDE mixtures to subtle neurobehavioral variations in children, but decaBDE-specific attributions are confounded by co-exposures and fail to demonstrate dose-response causality. Systemic effects like immune modulation appear negligible in decaBDE-focused assays, contrasting with broader PBDE concerns.

Limitations and Debates in Causality

Extrapolations from high-dose studies to exposures face significant challenges due to decaBDE's distinct , including low gastrointestinal rates of 10-25% in mammals, rapid fecal , and limited tissue penetration owing to its large molecular size, which result in internal doses far below administered amounts in animal models. These properties lead to half-lives of approximately 15 days in s and minimal , contrasting with more persistent lower-brominated PBDEs, thereby reducing the relevance of observed effects—such as or liver alterations at doses exceeding 1 mg/kg/day—to typical intake levels of 2-14 ng/kg/day. Animal toxicity studies often exhibit inconsistencies, with some reporting neurobehavioral changes in mice at neonatal doses of 2-20 mg/kg while guideline-compliant rat developmental neurotoxicity studies detect no adverse effects up to 1000 mg/kg/day, highlighting methodological variances like differences, litter effects, and statistical approaches that undermine causal attribution to decaBDE itself. Commercial decaBDE formulations frequently contain trace impurities of lower-brominated congeners or undergo partial debromination under experimental conditions, confounding results by attributing from more bioavailable and potent PBDEs to decaBDE, though evidence for significant mammalian debromination remains limited and debated. Hypotheses of endocrine disruption, particularly thyroid hormone interference, rely heavily on high-dose animal data showing hormone level changes that may represent adaptive physiological responses rather than pathogenic causality, with no direct linking decaBDE exposure to disrupted endocrine function or downstream outcomes. Epidemiological investigations are sparse, offering no conclusive correlations between decaBDE body burdens and adverse effects, in contrast to the robust associations seen with lower PBDEs, and overreliance on assays ignores organism-level that mitigate potential cellular interactions. Debates persist over whether precautionary interpretations amplify risks by sidelining these pharmacokinetic barriers and empirical gaps, as by reviews concluding the overall weight of does not substantiate decaBDE as a significant causal agent for neurodevelopmental or endocrine-mediated toxicities in .

Risk-Benefit Considerations

Quantified Fire Safety Achievements

The use of decabromodiphenyl ether (decaBDE) in television enclosures has been estimated to prevent approximately 190 fatalities per year , based on fire statistics attributing reduced ignition and spread from plastic components. In the , a detailed on cathode-ray tube televisions modeled decaBDE incorporation as averting about 160 deaths and 2,000 non-fatal injuries annually across an estimated 230 million TV sets, by lowering the leading to from 0.218% in non-retarded enclosures to 0.165% in retarded ones. This TV application also yielded net societal benefits of $657 million to $1,380 million USD per year in the modeled scenarios, incorporating avoided property losses (averaging $7,500 per TV fire and $180,000 per resulting house fire), value of statistical life at $5 million, and injury costs at $200,000 each, after subtracting production, use, and disposal expenses of flame retardants. The analysis projected 107 TV-initiated fires avoided per million sets and 11 full-house fires prevented per million sets over a 10-year product lifecycle. Broader assessments indicate decaBDE reduces fire destruction severity by up to 50% in treated plastics, as demonstrated in comparative tests releasing fewer toxic gases and limiting damage propagation./tabid/4290/ctl/Download/mid/13177/Default.aspx?id=13&ObjID=19036) These metrics underscore decaBDE's role in fire mitigation prior to phase-outs, with positive net returns in cost-benefit evaluations outweighing additive costs under realistic exposure assumptions lacking confirmed adverse health linkages.

Comparative Hazard Assessments

Life cycle assessments and hazard comparisons of decabromodiphenyl ether (DecaBDE) against alternatives highlight trade-offs where its retardancy efficacy often mitigates low-probability environmental exposures, per empirical evaluations from the . The U.S. EPA's alternatives assessment rated DecaBDE as having low acute mammalian (oral LD50 >2,000 mg/kg in rats), a profile shared by most of the 29 evaluated substitutes, including inorganic options like aluminum hydroxide and phosphorus-based compounds like resorcinol bis-diphenyl phosphate. However, DecaBDE scores very high for environmental persistence (half-life >180 days across media) and high (bioaccumulation factor up to 23,000 in aquatic organisms), exceeding many alternatives in these metrics but comparable to brominated substitutes like decabromodiphenyl . Developmental and assessments show DecaBDE with high potential based on (e.g., reduced in rats at doses >100 mg/kg/day), though epidemiological reveal limited , with no established genotoxic effects or direct links to adverse outcomes. Alternatives vary: some, like tris(tribromoneopentyl) , exhibit moderate to high (LD50 300-2,000 mg/kg), while others like demonstrate moderate (BCF 132-364) alongside endocrine activity concerns not empirically tied to DecaBDE. Environmentalist perspectives emphasize DecaBDE's potential debromination to more bioavailable congeners in conditions, raising unverified risks of magnified ecological impacts, yet countervailing indicate lower for DecaBDE (LC50 >100 mg/L) than certain alternatives. Reviews of analyses, such as a 2020 synthesis of studies, underscore that DecaBDE's inclusion in polymers reduces fire emissions and material losses, with environmental burdens from offset by avoided byproducts in high-risk applications, though gaps persist on long-term debromination yields. Comparative risk frameworks question phase-outs, noting that substitutes often underperform in inhibition, potentially elevating net hazards through increased fire frequency or alternative chemical releases, as critiqued in evaluations finding regulatory flammability mandates can amplify overall health and ecological impacts beyond safety gains. Empirical underscores DecaBDE's moderate repeated-dose effects (NOAEL ~10 mg/kg/day in ) without proven carcinogenicity, contrasting with some alternatives' higher or potentials, supporting arguments for context-specific retention where controls minimize persistence-driven risks.

Regulatory Developments

Historical Bans and Phase-Outs

In the early 2000s, regulatory scrutiny of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) intensified in the European Union due to environmental persistence and bioaccumulation concerns from lower-brominated congeners like pentaBDE and octaBDE, prompting evaluations of decabromodiphenyl ether (decaBDE) despite its higher degree of bromination and lower demonstrated bioavailability in empirical studies. The EU's Restriction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) Directive initially exempted decaBDE, but in 2008, the European Court of Justice ruled against this exemption for electronics and electrical applications, enforcing a ban effective July 1, 2008, under RoHS and the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) Directive to curb potential releases during disposal. This restriction targeted decaBDE in plastics for housings and components, driven by precautionary assessments under REACH precursors rather than acute toxicity data specific to decaBDE, which showed limited absorption and metabolism compared to lighter PBDEs. In the United States, state-level actions preceded federal efforts, with enacting Assembly Bill 302 in 2003 restricting PBDEs in mattresses and later upholstery, followed by bans in states like and on decaBDE in specific consumer goods amid rising PBDE detections in and , though decaBDE-specific body burdens remained lower and causal links to health effects were not firmly established. Federally, the EPA facilitated a voluntary phase-out in December 2009 through agreements with producers , Corporation, and ICL Industrial Products, committing to end manufacturing, import, and most uses by December 31, 2012, with complete cessation by December 31, 2013. This initiative responded to data from mixed PBDE exposures but faced criticism for relying on precautionary thresholds over decaBDE's empirical profile, which indicated minimal degradation to more toxic congeners under typical conditions. These phase-outs reflected broader PBDE family concerns, including the 2009 Stockholm Convention listing of commercial pentaBDE and octaBDE mixtures, which indirectly pressured decaBDE evaluations despite its exemptions and distinct physicochemical properties limiting uptake. Industry voluntary actions in both regions mitigated immediate mandates but highlighted tensions between benefits—evidenced by reduced ignition risks in treated materials—and environmental persistence risks, with decisions often prioritizing detection thresholds over quantitative risk models for decaBDE alone.

Regional Actions in Europe and North America

In the , decabromodiphenyl ether (decaBDE) faced initial restrictions under the Directive, prohibiting its use in electrical and electronic equipment marketed after July 1, 2008, due to concerns over environmental and potential to lower-brominated PBDEs. Subsequent under REACH Annex XVII, via Regulation () 2017/227 effective March 2, 2019, banned decaBDE in concentrations exceeding 0.1% by weight in textiles (except for specific transport uses until 2022), plastics (except recycled articles and certain exempted sectors like and equipment), and rubber coatings on backings. These measures reflect a precautionary approach prioritizing over direct , though exemptions persist for legacy articles placed on the market prior to restriction dates and for high-risk applications where alternatives prove inadequate, indicating risk-based allowances in sectors with demonstrated exposure controls. Inclusion in the POP Regulation () 2019/1021 further enforces a near-total prohibition, subject to ongoing specific exemptions registered under the Stockholm Convention framework, allowing limited continued use until phase-out deadlines like December 2023 for most parties. In , regulatory actions diverged toward use-specific controls rather than outright bans, emphasizing alongside evaluations of and toxicity. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, under TSCA Section 6(h) for persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic (PBT) chemicals, finalized in January 2020 a rule prohibiting manufacture, import, and processing of decaBDE for most uses starting January 6, 2022, while exempting ongoing processing in plastic articles for motor vehicles, , and electronics , as well as import of recycled plastics containing decaBDE. This significant new use designation requires EPA notification for non-exempt activities, balancing environmental concerns—such as and —with of low human health risks from direct and economic analyses projecting $3.5 million in annual costs against limited quantified benefits in risk reduction. Industry critiques, including from the , highlighted disproportionate economic burdens on and manufacturing without commensurate reductions in fire-related hazards, given decaBDE's historical role in averting billions in . Canada's assessments under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA), culminating in the 2010 State of the Science Report on PBDEs, classified decaBDE as persistent and but concluded low concern for immediate ecological or risks due to limited and degradation pathways, leading to voluntary phase-out commitments by major producers rather than mandatory . Regulations proposed in 2010 and finalized under the Prohibition of Certain Toxic Substances Regulations expanded bans on penta- and octaBDE to include decaBDE manufacture, import, and sale by , with exemptions for existing stocks and specific industrial uses like wire insulation until depletion. This approach incorporated empirical data on emissions reductions from voluntary actions, projecting minimal ongoing exposure risks while preserving in exempted applications, contrasting Europe's broader restrictions. Divergences from stem from North American reliance on site-specific risk evaluations over uniform thresholds, with U.S. and Canadian exemptions underscoring causal evidence that decaBDE's primary hazards arise from improper disposal rather than inherent use-phase .

Recent Global Updates and Market Status

In November 2024, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency finalized revisions to its regulations under the Toxic Substances Control Act for decabromodiphenyl ether (decaBDE), mandating enhanced workplace protections such as during manufacturing, processing, and distribution activities to minimize worker exposure to the extent practicable. These amendments, building on prior 2021 rules, include exclusions for articles containing decaBDE at concentrations below 0.1% by weight and for certain downstream uses, with implementation requirements taking effect in phases starting in to address practical challenges in compliance. Global market demand for decaBDE persists into the , driven primarily by production and consumption in , where the region accounts for the majority of usage in plastics and electronics; China's market alone was valued at approximately USD 245.8 million in , with projections for compound annual growth amid expanding industrial applications. Overall, the international decaBDE market is forecasted to expand at a CAGR of around 5.1% through 2032, reflecting sustained needs in flame-retardant formulations despite restrictions elsewhere. Exemptions continue to permit decaBDE in critical sectors, including military applications, wire and cable , and electronic enclosures, as notified under frameworks like the Stockholm Convention for articles in use; for instance, U.S. rules exempt its incorporation in lubricants, greases, and certain hydraulic fluids. Recent studies highlight ongoing emissions from legacy stocks in in-use products, estimating historical atmospheric releases of decaBDE (BDE-209) at 10.5 kilotons globally by 2018, with over 70% originating from product stocks rather than ; indoor concentrations of legacy brominated flame retardants like decaBDE have shown declines in some regions, though persistent reservoirs in and textiles pose long-term release risks into the . Regulatory approaches have faced scrutiny for potentially overlooking decaBDE's comparatively lower and risks relative to lower-brominated congeners, as evidenced by limited experimental data on carcinogenicity and a profile less prone to metabolic activation, contributing to lags in differentiated risk assessments amid blanket PBT classifications.

Alternatives Analysis

Chemical Substitutes and Their Profiles

One prominent chemical substitute for decabromodiphenyl ether (decaBDE) is decabromodiphenyl ethane (DBDPE; 84852-53-9), a structurally analogous to decaBDE and used in plastic polymers such as high-impact and acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene. DBDPE demonstrates high environmental persistence, with degradation half-lives exceeding 60 days in and sediment, and a high factor (log BAF > 3.7), comparable to decaBDE. Acute mammalian is low (LD50 > 2000 mg/kg in rats), but chronic exposure data are limited, with evidence of in aquatic organisms and potential neurodevelopmental effects from debromination products, though less pronounced than lower-brominated PBDEs. U.S. EPA assessments note data gaps in endocrine disruption and carcinogenicity for DBDPE, rating it as having very high persistence and high potential. Resorcinol bis(diphenyl phosphate) (RDP; CAS 57583-54-7), an organophosphorus compound, serves as a non-halogenated alternative in engineering plastics like and blends. RDP exhibits low environmental persistence, with rapid in water ( < 1 day at pH 7) and low bioaccumulation (log BCF < 3), reducing long-term ecological accumulation compared to decaBDE. Acute toxicity profiles show low mammalian hazard (oral LD50 > 2000 mg/kg), but subchronic studies indicate potential for liver induction and reproductive effects in at high doses (>1000 mg/kg/day); aquatic toxicity is moderate (LC50 1-10 mg/L for fish). EPA evaluations highlight lower acute risks but emphasize uncertainties in chronic endocrine and developmental toxicity due to insufficient multigenerational data. Both substitutes often necessitate higher loading concentrations (10-20% by weight versus 12-15% for decaBDE) to achieve equivalent flame retardancy, which can compromise material stiffness, impact strength, and processability in polymers. Comprehensive hazard profiling by EPA reveals that while many alternatives like DBDPE and RDP score favorably on acute endpoints, persistent data deficiencies in long-term human health and effects underscore the need for precautionary substitution strategies.

Non-Chemical and Design-Based Options

Non-chemical alternatives to decabromodiphenyl ether (decaBDE) emphasize product redesign and physical barriers that modify fire behavior without additive chemicals. In residential upholstered furniture, internal barriers—such as those developed for mattresses—can resist ignition from smoldering sources like cigarettes, which account for approximately 90% of upholstery fire deaths, while meeting proposed U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) standards under 16 CFR Part 1634. These barriers, often comprising inherently resistant fabrics, allow compliance without chemical treatments, with CPSC estimates indicating their use in about 5% of furniture production. Design modifications in , such as casings for televisions and computers, involve selecting polymers with intrinsic flame resistance, obviating the need for additives like decaBDE. Examples include polyphenylene sulphide, polyimides, and polyethersulphone, which achieve UL94 V-0 ratings suitable for electrical and electronic equipment components, wires, and housings in applications like buildings and transportation. Such redesigns may require shifts from standard high-impact to these engineering plastics, enabling fire performance with reduced or zero reliance on external retardants. For textiles in furniture, mattresses, and draperies, inherently flame-resistant fibers like , , or melamine-based materials serve as cover fabrics or barriers, passing smoldering ignition tests without additives. Natural , for instance, complies with ASTM E84 standards for furniture and without supplemental treatments. Feasibility studies confirm these options meet existing standards, but implementation often demands product redesign, potentially elevating material costs or altering properties like flexibility, though no broad retooling expenses were noted for furniture phase-ins effective , 2011. Limitations persist in high-risk scenarios, such as open-flame exposures from candles, where barriers alone may underperform compared to additive-enhanced foams, and manufacturer adoption remains low due to familiarity with chemical approaches. In , inherent polymers suit demanding environments like but may increase component weight or processing complexity in consumer goods, constraining scalability without engineering adjustments. Empirical assessments, including CPSC evaluations from 2007–2008, validate performance equivalence in controlled tests but highlight that real-world efficacy depends on holistic integration.

Comparative Performance and Trade-Offs

Chemical alternatives to decabromodiphenyl ether (decaBDE), such as organophosphorus compounds including resorcinol bis-diphenylphosphate and , often achieve comparable flame retardancy in standard tests like UL-94 vertical burn ratings when used at loadings of 5-30% in , but require higher concentrations than decaBDE's typical 2-25% bromine-based loading to match efficacy in limiting oxygen index (LOI) or heat release suppression, leading to potential reductions in material mechanical properties like tensile strength. In contrast, decaBDE provides efficient vapor-phase inhibition with lower additive levels, preserving polymer integrity better in high-performance applications. Safety trade-offs are evident in hazard profiles: organophosphates exhibit higher aquatic , with resorcinol bis-diphenylphosphate showing very high chronic effects (21-day NOEC of 0.021 mg/L for ), compared to decaBDE's low acute (LC50 >100 mg/L) and chronic (>10 mg/L) aquatic toxicity benchmarks, though decaBDE's persistence raises long-term concerns. Other substitutes like reduce flammability via endothermic decomposition but demand 13-60% loadings, increasing material density and cost while offering lower developmental toxicity risks than decaBDE. No universally matches decaBDE's across , low loading, and compatibility without elevated hazards in at least one domain, such as increased smoke production or algal toxicity from mixed esters ( <1.0 mg/L). Non-chemical options, including inherently flame-resistant polymers like polyimides or polyaryletherketones and design modifications such as barriers or component separation, suffice for lower-risk uses by meeting IEC or UL standards without additives, but falter in demanding sectors like and where decaBDE enabled compact, lightweight compliance with stringent heat release limits (e.g., FAR 25.853 for interiors). These approaches often necessitate redesigns that raise costs by 10-20% or compromise electrical insulation, rendering them impractical as drop-in replacements for legacy high-volume production. While eliminating , such methods yield unresolved gaps in scalability and performance equivalence for applications requiring minimal weight and maximal suppression.

References

  1. [1]
    Decabromodiphenyl ether | C12 Br10O | CID 14410 - PubChem
    Decabromodiphenyl oxide is an unreactive, additive flame retardant widely used for its thermal stability and its low cost in thermoplastic resins, thermoset ...
  2. [2]
  3. [3]
    [PDF] Decabromodiphenyl Ether - EPA
    Aug 14, 2017 · chemical reaction control the extent of bromination on the diphenyl ether molecule. The stepwise addition of bromine causes the formation of ...Missing: properties | Show results with:properties
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Decabromodiphenyl ether - Minnesota Department of Health
    Jan 31, 2011 · The toxicity, persistence, pervasiveness and potential to degrade into lower congeners are characteristics for which decaBDE is being named a ...Missing: properties | Show results with:properties
  5. [5]
    Photolytic Debromination of Decabromodiphenyl Ether (BDE 209)
    In this study, the photolytic debromination of DecaBDE has been investigated in order to study the formation of lower brominated diphenyl ethers.
  6. [6]
    Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers: A Case Study for Using ... - NIH
    The PBDE case study was developed to provide an example of a compound that is relatively stable in the environment, with the potential to bioaccumulate but for ...
  7. [7]
    TOXICOLOGICAL REVIEW OF DECABROMODIPHENYL ETHER ...
    This document and the accompanying IRIS Summary have been peer reviewed by EPA ... National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory. Office of ...
  8. [8]
    A comprehensive review on the decabromodiphenyl ether (BDE-209)
    Nov 25, 2023 · BDE-209 causes male reproductive toxicity mainly via impairment of steroidogenesis, generation of oxidative stress (OS) and interference with germ cell ...
  9. [9]
    Human Health State of the Science Report on Decabromodiphenyl ...
    May 16, 2024 · DecaBDE does not occur naturally in the environment and is not manufactured in Canada. However, decaBDE may be imported into Canada as a ...
  10. [10]
    Decabromodiphenyl Ether (DecaBDE); Regulation of Persistent ...
    Jan 6, 2021 · EPA is not regulating all activities or exposures to decaBDE, even though the Exposure and Use Assessment (Ref. 4) identified potential for ...
  11. [11]
    Decabromodiphenyl Ether and Phenol, Isopropylated Phosphate (3:1)
    Nov 19, 2024 · The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or Agency) is finalizing revisions to the regulations for decabromodiphenyl ether (decaBDE) and phenol, isopropylated ...
  12. [12]
    Decabromodiphenyl Ether - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Due to its low vapor pressure (2 × 10−8 mmHg), DeBDE will exist solely in the particulate phase in air and will be removed from the atmosphere by wet and dry ...
  13. [13]
    Brominated flame retardants (decabromodiphenyl ether) - GOV.UK
    Dec 4, 2024 · Data from animal studies suggest that PBDEs have low acute toxicity and that deca-BDE is much less likely than the lower-brominated PBDEs to cause adverse ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] DECABROMODIPHENYL ETHER Overview: - Regulations.gov
    May 14, 2015 · Clicking on the "Testing Status" link will take the user to the status (i.e., in review, in progress, in preparation, on test, completed ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Decabromodiphenyl Ether
    Information obtained from industry indicates that decaBDE is used by plastics compounders as an additive flame retardant in a variety of resins. The main resins ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Scanned Document - Tri-iso
    decabromodiphenyl ether, Deca, Benzene,1,1 ... -Solubility in water ... The high log Kow value (6.27) indicates that the product will adsorb strongly onto.
  17. [17]
    Mass spectrometric characteristics of decabromodiphenyl ether and ...
    The mass spectrometric properties of (12)C-and (13)C-labeled decabromodiphenyl ether (BDE-209) in the low-resolution mass spectrometry electron capture ...Missing: NMR data
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers (PBDEs) - EPA
    Three commercial PBDE mixtures have been used in manufactured products since the 1960s and 1970s, when these chemicals came into use,1 with each mixture made up ...
  19. [19]
    An overview of brominated flame retardants in the environment
    The major companies producing brominated flame retardants are Albemarle Corporation (previously Ethyl Corporation) (US), Great Lakes Chemical Corporation (US ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Decabromodiphenyl Ether (Deca-BDE) Legislative Report
    Jan 15, 2008 · The CA BHFTI standards, which also apply to textiles used in commercial settings, are referenced in building codes throughout the country ...<|separator|>
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Flame Retardants - National Institute of Standards and Technology
    Sep 30, 2009 · The introduction of voluntary flammability standards made possible by the use of flame retardant plastics in the TV enclosures.Missing: incidents | Show results with:incidents
  22. [22]
    Toxic Flame Retardants Can Spread From Your Electronics To Your ...
    Jun 16, 2020 · Halogenated flame retardants have been added to television cases since the 1970s. Researchers say these chemicals were added to older TVs ...Missing: incidents | Show results with:incidents
  23. [23]
    PRODUCTION, IMPORT/EXPORT, USE, AND DISPOSAL - NCBI
    The major application for decaBDE was in HIPS, which is used in the television industry for cabinet backs. It was also used for a large number of other polymers ...Missing: invention | Show results with:invention
  24. [24]
    Process for the preparation of decabromodiphenyl ether with ...
    A process for the preparation of Decabromodiphenyl ether is disclosed, which employs dibromomethane as the reaction medium, at temperatures not exceeding 80° C.
  25. [25]
    Method for the preparation of decabromodiphenyl ether
    Oct 13, 1987 · A process for the preparation of decabromodiphenyl ether by the reaction of diphenyl ether or of a partially brominated derivative thereof ...
  26. [26]
    Is decabromodiphenyl ether (BDE-209) a developmental ...
    The manufacturers have agreed to discontinue production of decaBDE in the U.S.A. as of 2013 (USEPA, 2010). PBDEs are additive flame retardants, i.e. they are ...Missing: producers | Show results with:producers
  27. [27]
  28. [28]
    Decabromodiphenyl Ether Market Size, Share & 2030 Growth ...
    Asia-Pacific accounted for 51.23% of the Decabromodiphenyl Ether market share in 2024 and is forecast to grow at a CAGR of 4.60% through 2030. National ...
  29. [29]
  30. [30]
    Persistent, Bioaccumulative, and Toxic (PBT) Chemicals under ...
    In October 2024, EPA issued a final rule amending the rules for decabromodiphenyl (decaBDE) and phenol, isopropylated phosphate (3:1) PIP (3:1). On this page.
  31. [31]
    Decabromodiphenyl Ether Market Size & Share Report (2025 - 2032)
    Rating 5.0 (221) Feb 7, 2025 · The global decabromodiphenyl ether market is estimated to be USD 375.80 Million in 2024 and is projected to reach USD 557.48 Million by 2032 ...Missing: shift | Show results with:shift
  32. [32]
    Decabromodiphenyl Ether Market Share, & Industry Trends 2023
    The global decabromodiphenyl ether market is set to estimate a valuation of US$ 309.5 million in 2023 and it is anticipated to grow at a CAGR of 4.6% to reach ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Decabromodiphenyl ether and other flame retardants in plastic ...
    Feb 23, 2018 · The main uses of c-decaBDE are in textiles and plastics4. Textile applications, which are estimated to around 10% of the total use, include ...Missing: primary | Show results with:primary<|separator|>
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants
    Apr 15, 2019 · Decabromodiphenyl ether is an aromatic organobromine chemical that have been used since the 1970s as additive flame retardants in a wide range ...Missing: commercialized | Show results with:commercialized
  35. [35]
    [PDF] Decision Guidance Document Decabromodiphenyl ether
    Korea's specific exemption on decaBDE is limited only to additives of electrical parts, and spare parts of legacy vehicles and aircraft that shall comply ...
  36. [36]
    Decabromodiphenyl Oxide - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Decabromodiphenyl oxide is a flame-retardant additive, a benzene ring compound with 83% bromine, used in polyolefin and other resin systems.
  37. [37]
    Fire-LCA study of TV sets with V0 and HB enclosure material
    This model aims at weighing the environmental benefit of a high level of fire safety, in terms of a reduction in the size and number of fires, against the cost ...
  38. [38]
    (PDF) Cost benefit analysis model for fire safety: Methodology and ...
    The primary justification for the proposed small flame requirement were analyses by Simonson ... Halogenated flame retardants: Do the fire safety benefits justify ...
  39. [39]
    Electronics and Flame Retardants - American Chemistry Council
    Televisions sold in markets lacking brominated flame retardants were found to be vulnerable to ignition.
  40. [40]
    The Importance of Flame Retardants in Fire Safety - Keyser & Mackay
    Flame retardants reduce fire risk and economic losses by inhibiting fire spread in materials, and are indispensable in industries due to the growing focus on ...
  41. [41]
    Decabromodiphenyl ether | C12 Br10O | CID 14410 - PubChem
    Decabromodiphenyl oxide is an unreactive, additive flame retardant widely used for its thermal stability and its low cost in thermoplastic resins, thermoset ...
  42. [42]
    [PDF] Ecological State of the Science Report on Decabromodiphenyl Ether ...
    The analysis also noted that the higher brominated diphenyl ethers, and decaBDE in particular, could accumulate to some degree in biota and debrominate to ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  43. [43]
    [PDF] POPRC-9/4: Decabromodiphenyl ether - Stockholm Convention
    Proposal to list decabromodiphenyl ether (commercial mixture, c-decaBDE) in Annexes A, B and/or C to the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants.Missing: standards | Show results with:standards
  44. [44]
    [PDF] Toxicological Profile for Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers (PBDEs)
    Volatilization of PBDEs from soil to air is limited by the low volatility of PBDEs and strong adsorption of PBDEs to soil. There is potential for PBDEs to ...
  45. [45]
    A critical review on BDE-209: Source, distribution, influencing factors ...
    As the most widely used polybrominated diphenyl ether, BDE-209 is commonly used in polymer-based commercial and household products.
  46. [46]
    Pollution Status and Human Exposure of Decabromodiphenyl Ether ...
    BDE-209 has been viewed as toxic and bioaccumulative because it might debrominate to less brominated polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs).
  47. [47]
    Decabromodiphenyl ether (deca-BDE) commercial mixture ...
    The main sources of BDE-209 to the outdoor environment have not been identified, but possibilities include: the escape of dust by ventilation and cleaning ( ...
  48. [48]
    Global Historical Stocks and Emissions of PBDEs - ACS Publications
    May 14, 2019 · Deciphering the impact of decabromodiphenyl ether (BDE-209) on benthic foraminiferal communities: Insights from Cell-Tracker Green staining ...<|separator|>
  49. [49]
    In Vivo and In Vitro Debromination of Decabromodiphenyl Ether ...
    BDE 209 was most concentrated in liver tissue on both a wet and lipid weight basis. The lipid content of the serum was not measured due to the low mass of serum ...
  50. [50]
    2: Evidence for Bioaccumulation - Canada.ca
    While decaBDE can accumulate in organisms, no unequivocal evidence supports its bioaccumulation or biomagnification in food chains.2.1. 2 New Biota... · 2.2 Bioconcentration... · Studies On Aquatic Species
  51. [51]
    Exposure pathways, levels and toxicity of polybrominated diphenyl ...
    Dust ingestion is primary route of human external exposure. · PBDEs displayed higher values in humans from the USA, PBDE production and e-waste recycling regions ...
  52. [52]
    Pollution Status and Human Exposure of Decabromodiphenyl Ether ...
    Jul 10, 2017 · (5) Deng et al. observed that a significant proportion of pentaBDE and octaBDE was debrominated from decaBDE in the roots of aquatic plants ...
  53. [53]
    Serum levels of decabromodiphenyl ether (BDE-209) in women from ...
    Median BDE-209 serum concentrations were highest in The Netherlands and United Kingdom, respectively 8.8 and 9.3 pg/g ww. or 2.6 and 2.8 ng/g lipid.
  54. [54]
    Polybrominated diphenyl ethers in the serum and breast milk of the ...
    BDE-209 was the predominant congener, with the mean concentrations of 403 ng/g lipid in serum and 45.6 ng/g lipid in breast milk, respectively. BDE-209 ...
  55. [55]
    Temporal Trends of Legacy and Current-Use Halogenated Flame ...
    General decreasing trends were found for PBDEs, while the temporal trends for AHFRs were not clear. Physical–chemical properties and emissions significantly ...
  56. [56]
    Bioavailability and Half-Life of Decabromodiphenyl Ether (BDE-209 ...
    The bioavailability of parent BDE-209 was calculated to be about 26% in rat. The concentrations of phenolic radioactivity in plasma 3 and 7 days after dosing ...
  57. [57]
    Bioavailability and half-life of decabromodiphenyl ether (BDE-209 ...
    The absorption of the flame retardant decabromodiphenyl ether (BDE-209) has been shown by its detection in human plasma, but reported experimental data on ...
  58. [58]
    Metabolism of Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers (PBDEs) by Human ...
    ... BDE-209—for periods of 24–72 hr. We also conducted gene ... Decabromodiphenyl ether in the rat: absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion.
  59. [59]
    Toxicology and human health assessment of decabromodiphenyl ...
    We evaluated the available pharmacokinetic data and human and animal toxicity data for 2,2',3,3',4,4',5,5',6,6'-decabromodiphenyl ether (BDE-209)
  60. [60]
    Toxicokinetics and edible tissues-specific bioaccumulation of ...
    Dec 15, 2022 · The bioaccumulation of BDE-209 in the liver is higher than that in the muscle. Abstract. Decabromodiphenyl ether (BDE-209), the primary ...
  61. [61]
    [PDF] ATSDR Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers (PBDEs) Tox Profile
    The ATSDR toxicological profile succinctly characterizes the toxicologic and adverse health effects information for these toxic substances described therein ...
  62. [62]
    [PDF] Response to Comments on the Draft Alternatives Assessment ... - EPA
    decabromodiphenyl ether can be absorbed, distributed to mammary tissue and secreted in human breast milk during lactation.” Concerns raised about rigorous ...
  63. [63]
    [PDF] SAFETY DATA SHEET - Chem Service
    Jun 15, 2016 · Decabromodiphenyl ether (BDE 209) (CAS 1163-19-5). Dermal. Acute. LD50. Rabbit. > 8000 mg/kg. Inhalation. LC50. Rat. > 48.2 mg/l, 1 Hours. Dust.
  64. [64]
    Neurodevelopmental effects of decabromodiphenyl ether (BDE-209 ...
    On June 30, 2008, the US EPA's IRIS updated their toxicological review on the 2,2',4,4',5,5',6,6'-decabromodiphenyl ether congener and published a revised ...
  65. [65]
    Hepatotoxicity of decabromodiphenyl ethane (DBDPE ... - PubMed
    Feb 25, 2020 · The present study indicated that BDE-209 and DBDPE may interfere with normal metabolism in rats through oxidative stress and inflammation, which ...
  66. [66]
    Effects of gestational exposure to decabromodiphenyl ether on ...
    Significant increases in thyroid weight and a decrease in adrenal weight were observed in high-dose BDE-209. Thyroxine (T4) concentrations were significantly ...Missing: decaBDE rodents
  67. [67]
    Effects of Gestational Exposure to Decabromodiphenyl Ether on ...
    Dec 29, 2009 · Significant increases in thyroid weight and a decrease in adrenal weight were observed in high-dose BDE-209. Thyroxine (T4) concentrations were ...
  68. [68]
    An oral developmental neurotoxicity study of decabromodiphenyl ...
    Under the conditions of this study, the no-observed-adverse-effect level for developmental neurotoxicity of DecaBDE was 1000 mg/kg/day, the highest dose ...
  69. [69]
    Toxicology and human health assessment of decabromodiphenyl ...
    We evaluated the available pharmacokinetic data and human and animal toxicity data for 2,2′,3,3′,4,4′,5,5′,6,6′-decabromodiphenyl ether (BDE-209) (CASRN ...<|separator|>
  70. [70]
    RELEVANCE TO PUBLIC HEALTH - Toxicological Profile for ... - NCBI
    This difference in toxicity may be related to differences in pharmacokinetics, resulting in lower bioavailability of decaBDE (see Sections 2.3 and 3.4 for more ...
  71. [71]
    [PDF] Cost Benefit Analysis Model for Fire Safety Methodology and TV ...
    Consequently, the cost of exposure and lack of expected associated adverse health effects to DecaBDE have been considered zero in this risk-benefit analysis.
  72. [72]
    Application of a Cost–benefit Analysis Model to the Use of Flame ...
    Aug 9, 2025 · In this paper, real and perceived risks associated with exposure to flame retardants and to fires are discussed and a monetary value placed on ...
  73. [73]
    [PDF] An Alternatives Assessment for the Flame Retardant ...
    This report identifies 29 alternatives to decaBDE, focusing on human health and environmental hazards, including acute toxicity, carcinogenicity, and ...
  74. [74]
    Review Life cycle assessment (LCA) studies on flame retardants
    Nov 20, 2020 · ... decabromodiphenyl ether (deca-BDE), octabromodipheyl ether (octa-BDE) ... Neurotoxicity and Risk Assessment of Brominated and Alternative Flame ...
  75. [75]
    [PDF] halogenated-flame-retardants-do-the-fire-safety-benefits-justify-the ...
    Studies show elevated rates of cancers that are thought to be related to dioxin exposure among firefighters. /25,26/. After 30 years of widespread use, several.
  76. [76]
    Ban on DecaBDE flame retardant in electronic and electrical ...
    Jun 30, 2008 · Electronic and electrical equipment that is marketed in Europe may no longer contain the flame retardant Decabromodiphenyl ether (DecaBDE) after 1 July 2008.
  77. [77]
    Restricted Flame Retardants: Decabromodiphenyl ether (DecaBDE ...
    DecaBDE is a flame retardant used in many products, but it poses risks and is restricted by the EPA and EU due to health and environmental concerns.
  78. [78]
    Toxic Chemical DecaBDE: EPA Says Phase It Out, Environmental ...
    According to EPA's announcement, the companies have committed to phase out decaBDE from most uses in the United States by December 31, 2012, and to end all uses ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  79. [79]
    Deca-BDE to be phased out in the USA - ScienceDirect.com
    ... voluntarily committed to phase out deca-BDE from most uses in the USA by 31 December 2012, and to end all uses by the end of 2013. Previous article in issue
  80. [80]
    [PDF] amending Annex XVII to Regulation (EC) No 1907 - EUR-Lex
    Feb 10, 2017 · (12) RAC and SEAC also agreed to exempt from the proposed restriction articles already placed on the market before the date of application of ...
  81. [81]
    Register of Specific Exemptions: Decabromodiphenyl ether
    The DecaBDE management is regulated under the Law on Environmental Protection 2020 and Decree 08/2022/ND-CP. Viet Nam is developing the draft National Technical ...
  82. [82]
    [PDF] Continued Use of Articles Containing DecaBDE - Reginfo.gov
    Sep 21, 2020 · EPA's 2019 proposal with respect to decaBDE enables the continued use of existing articles that contained decaBDE and authorizes the recycling ...
  83. [83]
    Regulation of Persistent, Bioaccumulative, and Toxic Chemicals ...
    Jul 29, 2019 · For chemical substances subject to TSCA section 6(h), EPA must issue a proposed rule by June 22, 2019, and a final rule no later than 18 months ...
  84. [84]
    [PDF] POLYBROMINATED DIPHENYL ETHERS (PBDEs) 2010
    Aug 28, 2010 · Ecological and human health screening assessments were conducted for polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) under the Canadian Environmental.
  85. [85]
    Risk management of decaBDE: voluntary phase-out exports to ...
    This risk management strategy noted a proposal by three large worldwide producers of DecaBDE to voluntarily phase-out the export of DecaBDE to Canada. This ...Missing: assessment | Show results with:assessment
  86. [86]
    Insights: China Decabromodiphenyl Ether Market Growth Potential ...
    Oct 17, 2025 · Who are the leading companies in the Decabromodiphenyl Ether Market? ACURO ORGANICS LIMITED (India); Horay Industry Co. (China); Otto Chemie ...Missing: Europe | Show results with:Europe<|separator|>
  87. [87]
    5 PBT Chemicals With Prohibitions Added to TSCA | APA Engineering
    Decabromodiphenyl ether (DecaBDE), used as flame retardants in the electronics ... It is exempted for use in military applications, lubricants and greases ...
  88. [88]
    Notifications of Articles in use - Stockholm Convention
    The manufacturing and use of Commercial Pentabromodiphenyl ether (c-pentaBDE) and commercial octabromodiphenyl ether (c-OctaBDE) have been banned in the EU ...
  89. [89]
    How much persistent organic pollutants have been produced and ...
    Oct 23, 2022 · A total of 6 (0.3−13) and 10.5 (9−12) kt of ∑5BDE and BDE209, respectively, has been emitted to the atmosphere by 2018. More than 70% of PBDE ...
  90. [90]
    Evidence for Declining Indoor Emissions of Some Legacy BFRs - NIH
    Comparison with earlier studies in Birmingham reveals significant (p < 0.05) declines in concentrations of legacy BFRs, but significant increases for NBFRs ...Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
  91. [91]
    [PDF] 3 guidance on alternatives to - Stockholm Convention
    C-decaBDE is a general-purpose additive flame retardant compatible with a wide variety of materials. Applications include plastics/polymers/composites ...
  92. [92]
    Data availability and quality for 36 alternative brominated flame ...
    Aug 10, 2025 · ... DBDPE is very similar to decaBDE in being highly bioaccumulative and toxic but is registered for huge amounts of use between 10,000 and 100, ...<|separator|>
  93. [93]
    The biological fate of decabromodiphenyl ethane following oral ...
    Like decaBDE, DBDPE is considered less toxic than lower brominated flame retardants, but has been linked to oxidative stress in freshwater fish (Feng et al., ...Missing: properties | Show results with:properties
  94. [94]
    Presence of diphenyl phosphate and aryl-phosphate flame ...
    The environmental persistence is considered low, although there is a moderate potential for bioaccumulation (U.S. EPA, 2014). Human exposure to FRs as well as ...
  95. [95]
    Partnership to Evaluate Flame Retardant Alternatives to DecaBDE
    This assessment evaluates potential hazards associated with 29 flame retardants that are likely to be functional alternatives to decaBDE.Missing: incidents | Show results with:incidents
  96. [96]
    An Alternatives Assessment for the Flame-Retardant ... - EPA
    Apr 21, 2025 · This report is intended to provide information that will enable the selection of safer alternatives to decaBDE, for a variety of products.Missing: DfE | Show results with:DfE
  97. [97]
    [PDF] Alternatives to Deca-BDE in Televisions and Computers and ...
    Dec 29, 2008 · These reports included analyses of the toxicity, persistence, and bioaccumulation potential for a variety of flame retardants as well as ...
  98. [98]
    c-decaBDE - Stockholm Convention
    c-decaBDE is a synthetic flame retardant used in plastics and textiles, mainly in plastics and electronics, and is a commercial mixture.
  99. [99]
    Flammability standards for furniture, building insulation and electronics
    However, recent experiences show that updated flammability standards can reduce the use of flame retardants while maintaining, or even increasing, fire safety.
  100. [100]
    [PDF] Commercial Alternatives to Deca BDE - FAA Fire Safety
    One of the widely used by aviation industry flame retardant, Deca BDE was voluntarily removed from the North American market by major flame retardant ...