Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Developmental language disorder

Developmental language disorder (DLD) is a neurodevelopmental condition that impairs a child's ability to learn, understand, and use spoken and written language, persisting beyond the expected developmental stage without being attributable to , , disorder, or inadequate language exposure. It affects core aspects of communication, including , , sentence structure, and social language use, and is estimated to impact approximately 7% of school-age children worldwide, with prevalence rates ranging from 6.4% to 8.5% among 4- to 10-year-olds. DLD is a lifelong condition that evolves with age but often leads to challenges in , social interactions, and if not addressed early. Children with DLD typically exhibit delays in language milestones, such as late talking or limited by age 2, and ongoing difficulties forming complex sentences, following multi-step directions, or comprehending abstract concepts like metaphors. These issues can manifest in preschoolers as trouble naming objects or retelling stories, while in school-age children, they may appear as struggles with , writing, or participating in classroom discussions, sometimes being misattributed to behavioral problems. Comorbidities are common, with individuals facing up to six times the risk of or other learning disabilities in adulthood. The etiology of DLD is multifactorial, involving a complex interplay of genetic and environmental influences, with no single cause identified. Genetic factors play a significant role, as 50% to 70% of children with DLD have a family history of the disorder, and genetic studies, including linkage analyses and candidate gene investigations, have implicated genes such as FOXP2, CMIP, and ATP2C2 in language processing pathways. Environmental risks, including prenatal exposures or low socioeconomic status, may exacerbate vulnerability, though multilingualism does not cause DLD. Diagnosis requires a comprehensive evaluation by a speech-language pathologist, incorporating standardized tests, language sampling, and observation to rule out other conditions and confirm persistent impairment relative to peers. Intervention for DLD primarily involves speech-language therapy tailored to the individual's age and needs, focusing on building , , narrative skills, and pragmatic language use through structured activities and parent involvement. Early identification and treatment, ideally before entry, yield the best outcomes, with evidence supporting approaches like focused stimulation for preschoolers and metacognitive strategies for older children. While DLD cannot be cured, appropriate support enables many individuals to achieve functional communication and reduce long-term impacts on education and employment.

Introduction

Definition and Characteristics

Developmental language disorder (DLD) is a characterized by persistent difficulties in the acquisition and use of , affecting both expressive and receptive skills, which significantly impair daily functioning, educational achievement, and social interactions. These challenges occur in the absence of other explanatory conditions, such as , , , or neurological impairments. DLD is not attributable to low nonverbal IQ or socioeconomic factors alone, distinguishing it as a primary language impairment rooted in differences that hinder typical . Key characteristics of DLD include impairments across seven core areas of language: (morphology and ), (semantics and word finding), (narrative and ), (social language use), , phonological processing, and sentence comprehension. These deficits manifest early in childhood, often as delayed speech onset or limited , and persist beyond the typical resolution age of 4-5 years, evolving into more subtle challenges like difficulty with complex instructions or abstract concepts in later years. Without , DLD remains a lifelong condition, impacting , , and . In contrast to typical , where transient delays in often resolve spontaneously through natural exposure and maturation, DLD represents a enduring profile of weakness that does not improve without targeted support. For instance, a with DLD might readily comprehend simple sentences like "The runs" but struggle with embedded structures such as "The boy who chased the ran away," leading to misunderstandings in classroom or social settings.

Historical Background

The recognition of what is now known as developmental language disorder (DLD) began in the early , with initial descriptions of unexplained language deficits in children. As early as 1822, cases were noted in , and by the mid-19th century, terms such as "congenital " and "congenital word " were used to describe children exhibiting severe impairments in language comprehension or production without identifiable neurological damage or . In the , reports of "" emerged, referring to children who developed idiosyncratic, private languages due to profound developmental language impairments, marking a shift toward viewing these conditions as distinct from acquired aphasias in adults. During the and , research increasingly highlighted familial patterns in language impairments, suggesting potential genetic underpinnings through studies of aggregation within families, which laid the groundwork for later etiological investigations. The 1980s brought greater standardization with the introduction of "" (SLI) as a diagnostic term in the DSM-III (1980), which classified it under specific developmental disorders affecting in isolation from intellectual or sensory deficits. By the , attention turned to subtypes, such as expressive (primarily affecting output) versus receptive (primarily affecting input) impairments, to account for the disorder's heterogeneity, with seminal work by researchers like Dorothy Bishop emphasizing grammatical deficits in certain cases. Advances in the , particularly through techniques like MRI, revealed structural and functional brain differences in affected children, such as atypical perisylvian regions involved in language processing, providing empirical support for DLD as a neurodevelopmental condition. A pivotal milestone came in 2016–2017 with the CATALISE project, a multinational involving over 50 experts, which culminated in publications in the Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry recommending "developmental language disorder" (DLD) as the preferred term to replace SLI. This shift aimed for broader applicability by avoiding the exclusionary implications of "specific," which suggested no comorbidities, and by aligning with criteria to better encompass persistent language difficulties with functional impacts.

Classification and Terminology

Evolution of Terms

Early terminology for what is now known as developmental language disorder (DLD) included terms such as "developmental ," and "," which were used primarily before the . These labels drew analogies to adult-onset conditions like resulting from or injury, implying neurological damage or specific deficits akin to acquired impairments, which was misleading for a developmental without clear brain lesions. Such terms fell out of favor as research emphasized the neurodevelopmental nature of the disorder, distinct from adult pathologies. From the 1980s through the , "" (SLI) became the dominant term, particularly in research, describing persistent language deficits in children with normal nonverbal intelligence and no identifiable cause such as or neurological injury. SLI highlighted the unexplained and isolated nature of the language difficulties, but it faced criticism for the word "specific," which implied exclusion of comorbidities like or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, despite evidence of frequent overlaps in clinical populations. A pivotal shift occurred in 2017 with the CATALISE-2 consensus framework, developed through a multinational process involving over 50 experts, which recommended replacing SLI with "developmental language disorder" (DLD) to encompass persistent language problems that affect everyday function, without mandating normal IQ or fully excluding comorbidities. This change was supported by longitudinal studies demonstrating that many children with language difficulties also exhibit co-occurring conditions, making the "specific" criterion overly restrictive and hindering identification. Internationally, DLD gained traction with its adoption in the in 2022 as "developmental disorder of language" (code 6A01.2), focusing on difficulties in , comprehension, or use not better explained by other biomedical conditions. This contrasts with the broader "" category in the , which includes etiologies like or neurological insults, whereas DLD specifically denotes unexplained developmental cases. The rationale for adopting DLD emphasizes promoting earlier identification by broadening criteria, reducing through neutral language that aligns with views, and avoiding deficit-focused terms like "" to foster inclusive support. This evolution reflects ongoing efforts to align terminology with and clinical needs, facilitating better advocacy and intervention. A scoping review published in 2025 of Speech-Language-Hearing journals from 2017 to 2024 found that 58% of relevant articles used "DLD," 22% used "SLI," 12% used "language ," and 8% used other terms, demonstrating increasing but incomplete adoption.

Diagnostic Criteria

The diagnostic criteria for developmental language disorder (DLD) are primarily guided by the CATALISE-2 consensus, which defines DLD as a persistent difficulty in the acquisition and use of arising during the developmental period that results in significant limitations in functional communication and social participation. This includes impairments in or that are not attributable to a known biomedical cause, such as or genetic syndromes, and that are expected to endure into middle childhood or beyond based on prognostic indicators like the breadth of affected skills. Language abilities must be significantly below age expectations, often operationalized in clinical practice as performance more than 1.25 standard deviations below the mean on standardized measures, though the emphasis is on functional impact rather than rigid test cutoffs. Exclusionary factors are central to the , ruling out explanations such as sensory impairments (e.g., ), (though a low nonverbal IQ does not preclude DLD if language deficits are disproportionate), disorder, neurological conditions, or environmental deprivation like inadequate language exposure. Bilingualism, use, or transient delays in do not exclude a DLD , provided the individual's language skills in their primary or home language are also impaired. Co-occurring conditions, such as attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, may accompany DLD but do not alter the core . The , 11th Revision (), aligns closely with these criteria, specifying persistent deficits in the acquisition, understanding, production, or use of language (spoken or signed) that are markedly below age expectations, cause significant limitations in daily communication, onset during development, and are not better explained by , sensory impairment, , or environmental factors. While no official subtypes are recognized in CATALISE-2 or due to insufficient validation, assessments often identify patterns such as combined expressive-receptive impairments (affecting both understanding and production) versus primarily expressive difficulties (limited to output). Diagnosis is typically deferred until after 4 years to differentiate DLD from transient delays common in younger children, though earlier identification is possible if multiple prognostic markers (e.g., deficits under 3 or persistent grammatical errors by 5) indicate likely endurance. Functional impact on everyday activities, such as educational progress or social interactions, must be evident for the to apply across ages.

Signs and Symptoms

Language Impairments

Children with developmental disorder (DLD) exhibit impairments across core domains, including , , , , , , and , which persist despite normal nonverbal and adequate environmental exposure. In the of , affected individuals frequently produce errors in morphological and , such as omitting or misusing irregular forms (e.g., "runned" instead of "ran") and struggling with tense marking or complex constructions. challenges typically involve slower acquisition rates, word-finding difficulties (often filled with hesitations like "um"), and a reduced , particularly for abstract or decontextualized terms. impairments hinder the organization and coherence of narratives or conversations, leading to disjointed storytelling or difficulty sequencing events logically. Pragmatic deficits manifest as challenges in interpreting , maintaining conversational , or repairing communication breakdowns, resulting in misunderstandings during interactions. Phonological issues are often subtle, involving delayed sound production or reduced that does not meet criteria for a separate , while difficulties arise with ambiguous sentences, complex instructions, or inferential questions. limitations contribute to poor recall of word lists or sequences, exacerbating overall processing demands. These impairments evolve across developmental stages, with manifestations varying by age. In toddlers, DLD often presents as delayed emergence of first words (beyond ) and limited gestural communication, such as reduced or showing to express needs. Preschoolers (ages 3–5) typically produce shorter, simpler sentences with frequent grammatical omissions and may rely on immediate of phrases heard from others as a communication strategy. By school age (5–10 years), challenges intensify in academic contexts, including gaps in due to syntactic issues, difficulties with written expression, and ongoing grammar errors persisting to age 7 or beyond. In , these deficits can widen relative to peers, impacting abstract and figurative use. The severity and prominence of these impairments show considerable variability among individuals with DLD, as not all domains are equally affected and profiles differ based on factors like linguistic environment. For instance, while expressive grammar errors may dominate in some cases, a also experience receptive challenges, such as struggles with understanding nuanced or multi-step language, though the extent varies widely. This heterogeneity underscores the need for individualized assessment, as some children may compensate in familiar contexts while faltering in novel or demanding situations.

Comorbid Conditions

Developmental language disorder (DLD) frequently co-occurs with other neurodevelopmental conditions, which can complicate diagnosis and management. Common comorbidities include , with an estimated overlap of approximately 50% between the two disorders, driven by shared phonological processing deficits that affect both oral language and reading acquisition. Similarly, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) co-occurs in 25-40% of cases, where attention challenges exacerbate difficulties in language-related tasks such as following instructions or sustaining verbal interactions. Social anxiety often emerges in individuals with DLD due to ongoing from communication breakdowns, leading to heightened emotional distress and avoidance of social situations. Motor coordination issues, such as those seen in (also known as dyspraxia), affect up to 50% of children with DLD, manifesting as delays in fine and that indirectly influence language use in activities like gesturing or . Additionally, 20-30% of children with DLD exhibit traits, such as subtle social communication nuances, though full is typically excluded in DLD diagnosis; these overlaps arise from shared genetic risk factors rather than a direct causal relationship. DLD is distinct from primary articulation disorders, as children with DLD often produce accurately but struggle with prosody, , or semantics. While there may be overlap with phonological disorders—where sound patterns are affected—these are not the core feature of DLD, which encompasses broader impairments. The presence of comorbidities significantly worsens long-term outcomes for individuals with DLD. For instance, the combination of DLD and is associated with substantially higher rates of failure and reduced compared to DLD alone. Co-occurring ADHD further elevates risks for externalizing behaviors and poorer educational performance, underscoring the need for comprehensive assessments to address these interconnected challenges. Overall, these comorbidities contribute to increased vulnerabilities, including lower and difficulties in adulthood.

Etiology and Risk Factors

Genetic Influences

Developmental language disorder (DLD) exhibits substantial , with estimates ranging from 50% to 70% based on twin studies that compare concordance rates between monozygotic and dizygotic pairs. For instance, monozygotic twins show concordance rates around 70-96% for language impairments, compared to 46-69% in dizygotic twins, indicating a strong genetic component beyond shared environment. Familial aggregation further supports this, with 50% to 70% of children with DLD having at least one family member affected, and first-degree relatives facing a 20-40% risk significantly higher than the general prevalence of about 7%. DLD is primarily polygenic, involving multiple genetic variants of small effect rather than single high-penetrance mutations. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified several loci associated with language-related traits, including up to 42 for dyslexia in recent analyses as of 2022, contributing to the disorder's heterogeneity. Key genes include KIAA0319 and DCDC2, which are implicated in neuronal migration during brain development and linked to both reading disabilities and broader language impairments. Mutations in FOXP2 are rare, accounting for approximately 1-2% of severe cases, but they often result in a subtype characterized by verbal dyspraxia and profound expressive language deficits. These genes influence critical brain regions involved in language processing, such as , which is essential for and syntactic processing; disruptions in here can impair neural connectivity and circuit formation. Recent studies as of 2024 have implicated the anterior neostriatum in DLD, highlighting its role in integrating genetic vulnerabilities with language function. Epigenetic factors, including and histone modifications, further modulate the expression of these genes, potentially amplifying genetic risk through environmental interactions during early development. Longitudinal evidence from cohorts like the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) demonstrates that genetic risk scores predict the persistence of language impairments from childhood into , with higher polygenic loads correlating with reduced recovery rates. This underscores the role of in shaping DLD's developmental trajectory, independent of transient environmental influences.

Environmental and Other Factors

Prenatal factors contribute significantly to the risk of developmental language disorder (DLD) by disrupting early development and auditory processing. Low birth weight, defined as less than 2500 grams, is associated with an approximately twofold increased risk of language impairments, often co-occurring with other perinatal complications that affect neurodevelopment. Preterm birth before 37 weeks occurs in about 15% of DLD cases and elevates the likelihood of language delays, with 20-25% of preterm infants showing persistent language problems due to immature development in auditory regions. Maternal during further heightens this risk through nicotine's interference with receptors in the fetal , with 93% of reviewed studies reporting adverse effects on language outcomes via and reduced volume. Similarly, maternal infections such as or during early trigger inflammatory responses that impair fetal neural migration, linking to later expressive and receptive language deficits. Social and environmental influences in can exacerbate DLD symptoms without being primary causes, particularly through variations in language exposure. Children from low (SES) backgrounds often receive reduced linguistic input, such as fewer words and conversational turns from caregivers, which correlates with poorer and development; for instance, toddlers with suspected DLD hear about 20% fewer adult words daily compared to typically developing peers. Limited access to books or interactive play in such settings amplifies delays in expressive language, though interventions increasing input can mitigate these effects. Bilingual exposure does not inherently increase DLD risk when languages are balanced, as it supports without hindering monolingual benchmarks. Other biomedical factors, including subtle auditory challenges, may compound DLD vulnerability. A history of recurrent otitis media with effusion in infancy leads to fluctuating , doubling the odds of persistent language production and comprehension deficits by disrupting phonological processing during critical periods. While nutrition broadly lacks strong causal ties to DLD, worsens outcomes by impairing myelination and function, resulting in reduced verbal abilities and slower language acquisition in affected children. Gene-environment interactions play a key role in DLD etiology, where high genetic liability amplifies the impact of adverse exposures. For example, children with elevated polygenic risk scores for impairments exhibit worse expressive when combined with low early , as shown in 2020s twin and longitudinal studies highlighting quality as a moderator of genetic effects.

Diagnosis

Screening and Tools

Screening for developmental language disorder (DLD) typically involves initial tools to identify children at risk, such as parent questionnaires like the MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories (CDI), which evaluate early vocabulary production, gestures, and comprehension in toddlers aged 8 to 18 months. Teacher reports, including structured questionnaires on communication skills and family history, also contribute to early detection in and school settings. Quick screening tests, such as the CELF Preschool-2 Screener, provide brief assessments of sentence comprehension and structure for children aged 3 to 6 years, with standard scores below 85 signaling potential risk for further evaluation. Comprehensive assessment employs standardized language tests to measure core domains including semantics, syntax, and . The Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals, Fifth Edition (CELF-5), designed for individuals aged 5 to 21 years, assesses receptive and expressive through subtests like recalling and understanding spoken paragraphs, yielding composite scores that quantify deficits. Nonword repetition tasks, such as the Children's Test of Nonword Repetition (CNRep), evaluate phonological by requiring children to repeat novel sound sequences, with lower accuracy rates distinguishing DLD from typical development. Dynamic assessment methods, which involve interactive teaching and immediate feedback during tasks like word learning, reveal a child's learning potential beyond static performance, aiding in the identification of modifiable language difficulties. A multidisciplinary approach is essential, integrating input from speech-language pathologists (SLPs) and psychologists to interpret results holistically. For diverse populations, bilingual tools like the Bilingual English-Spanish Assessment (BESA) assess phonological and language skills in children aged 4 to 6 years across both languages, helping to differentiate true impairment from bilingual acquisition patterns. Benchmarks for DLD include performance below the 16th (standard score of 85 or lower) on language composites by age 5, indicating significant impairment relative to peers. Ongoing monitoring with repeated assessments tracks persistence, as early deficits may evolve over time.

Differential Diagnosis

Differential diagnosis of developmental language disorder (DLD) involves distinguishing it from other conditions that may present with similar language impairments, ensuring that the primary issue is a persistent difficulty in without an underlying biomedical cause. This process typically requires comprehensive assessments to rule out alternative explanations, focusing on the absence of , cognitive, sensory, or behavioral deficits that characterize other disorders. Accurate differentiation is crucial, as misdiagnosis can lead to inappropriate interventions. DLD must be differentiated from autism spectrum disorder (), where language difficulties often co-occur but are accompanied by core deficits in social reciprocity, such as reduced and pragmatic impairments, which are absent in DLD. The , Second Edition (ADOS-2), is commonly used to evaluate social communication and rule out by identifying these specific social deficits. Children with DLD typically exhibit stronger nonverbal and better social motivation compared to those with . In contrast to , DLD diagnosis requires a functional nonverbal IQ above 70, indicating that language impairments occur despite adequate cognitive potential in non-linguistic domains. The , Fifth Edition (WISC-V), is employed to assess this discrepancy by measuring verbal and nonverbal abilities separately, confirming that the language deficit is not due to global intellectual impairment. Hearing loss and speech sound disorders also necessitate exclusion through targeted evaluations. Audiological tests, such as and otoacoustic emissions, are essential to rule out sensory hearing impairments that could mimic delays in DLD. Speech sound disorders primarily affect articulation and phonology, leading to errors in sound production without the grammatical and syntactic deficits central to DLD; the Goldman-Fristoe Test of Articulation-3 (GFTA-3) helps differentiate these by quantifying speech sound errors isolated from broader structures. Selective mutism differs from DLD in that it involves a refusal to speak in specific social contexts due to anxiety, rather than consistent language production errors across all settings. Children with demonstrate normal language abilities when anxiety is not present, whereas those with DLD exhibit persistent structural language deficits regardless of context. Diagnosing DLD in multilingual children poses unique challenges, as typical bilingual may resemble delays due to uneven proficiency across languages. To address this, assessments should employ language-specific norms and evaluate all languages spoken by the child to confirm impairments in each, avoiding overdiagnosis of typical variation as DLD. Comorbid overlaps with conditions like can complicate diagnosis but are permissible if DLD criteria are met independently.

Treatment and Management

Speech-Language Therapy

Speech-language therapy for developmental language disorder (DLD) primarily involves targeted interventions delivered by speech-language pathologists to enhance language skills in children. Direct therapy, a clinician-led approach, focuses on structured drills to build and , such as explicit on grammatical morphemes and contrasts, which has shown positive effects on expressive phonological and morphosyntactic skills. In contrast, milieu teaching is a naturalistic embedded in child-led play, where therapists follow the child's interests to elicit communication and provide models, effectively promoting grammatical development particularly in children with lower (MLU). Recasting, another key technique, involves the therapist immediately modeling the correct form of the child's utterance without direct correction, such as reformulating a grammatical error during ; meta-analyses indicate it yields moderate to large effect sizes (d = 0.76–0.96) in improving expressive and syntax in children with DLD. Evidence-based methods extend to specialized techniques like script training for narratives and phonological awareness interventions. Script training encourages children to recount structured stories or routines, such as daily events, to develop and complex structures, resulting in large effect sizes for language gains in children with DLD. interventions target sound manipulation skills through activities like phoneme segmentation and rhyming, which enhance meta-phonological abilities and support expressive vocabulary and reading precursors. Optimal dosage typically involves 2–3 sessions per week, with each session lasting 20–30 minutes, over 6–12 months to achieve measurable gains in morphosyntax and vocabulary, as higher frequency short sessions facilitate better retention than infrequent longer ones. Emerging digital interventions, such as apps and online programs targeting and phonological skills, show promising efficacy as complements to traditional . A 2025 systematic review found significant improvements in these domains for children with DLD, with digital tools reducing therapist workload and increasing accessibility. addresses core focus areas including expressive through sentence-building exercises, receptive via tasks like following multi-step directions, and through role-play of social scenarios to improve conversational and skills. Outcomes demonstrate significant improvements, with studies reporting moderate to large effect sizes in expressive (e.g., SMD = 1.08) equivalent to 20–30% gains relative to untreated peers, alongside enhanced narrative production. Parent training programs, such as the Hanen It Takes Two to Talk approach, equip caregivers with strategies like responsive interaction to reinforce at home, leading to sustained progress and increased family communication opportunities.

Educational and Supportive Interventions

Educational and supportive interventions for developmental language disorder (DLD) emphasize systemic accommodations within school settings to facilitate academic participation and communication. , children with DLD qualify for services under the (IDEA) as having a "speech or language impairment," enabling the development of Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) that incorporate specific language goals, such as improving vocabulary or sentence structure, tailored to the child's needs. These IEPs often include accommodations like simplified instructions, visual aids (e.g., highlighted directions or picture schedules), and extra processing time to reduce and enhance comprehension. Small-group pull-out sessions, where students receive targeted support outside the main classroom, allow for focused practice on language skills in a low-pressure environment, while assistive technologies such as speech-to-text applications help bypass expressive challenges during writing tasks. Family involvement plays a crucial role in reinforcing school-based supports through structured training programs that equip parents with strategies to foster at home. Programs like the Hanen Centre's It Takes Two to Talk provide parents of young children with language delays—applicable to DLD—with tools to enhance everyday interactions, such as following the child's lead in play and incorporating during routines. Daily reading routines, guided by parental strategies like shared book reading and vocabulary expansion discussions, can significantly boost a child's expressive and receptive skills by embedding language practice in familiar contexts. Parent-directed interventions, particularly those using multimedia feedback and video modeling, have shown promise in increasing adult-child conversational turns and child vocalizations in low-resource homes. Multidisciplinary collaboration ensures cohesive support across settings, involving speech-language pathologists (SLPs), teachers, psychologists, and families to align interventions with the child's evolving needs. This teamwork facilitates transition planning, especially during , by preparing students for increased demands in through academic counseling and skill-building for postsecondary environments. Access to these interventions remains uneven, with early services under IDEA available from birth to age 3, yet fewer than half of children with DLD receive identification and support due to systemic barriers. Low (SES) groups face heightened disparities, as social determinants like parental education and community resources limit timely evaluation and consistent , exacerbating language gaps.

Prognosis and Outcomes

In Childhood

Children with developmental language disorder (DLD) exhibit variable resolution patterns, with early identification and intervention playing key roles in outcomes. Approximately 70% of children identified as late talkers show significant in expressive by 3, often aligning with typical developmental trajectories thereafter. However, for those progressing to a persistent DLD beyond , spontaneous resolution becomes less likely, with targeted therapy contributing to improvements in skills by age 7. Predictors of better resolution include early initiation of speech- therapy starting around ages 3-4, preserved comprehension abilities, and absence of comorbidities such as or disorder. Educational impacts are pronounced, particularly in acquisition. By entry, around 50% of children with DLD struggle with reading and writing due to underlying phonological processing deficits and weak oral language foundations, significantly increasing their risk of compared to peers. This often manifests as difficulties in word recognition and comprehension, leading to broader academic challenges. Longitudinal tracking reveals that without supportive interventions, these gaps widen, affecting overall performance through . Social and emotional consequences further compound the challenges of DLD in childhood. Communication difficulties frequently result in peer rejection and exclusion, with children with DLD being 44% more likely to experience than typically developing peers. Anxiety affects up to 80% of these children, manifesting as elevated social and separation anxiety rates six times higher than in the general population, alongside increased and behavioral issues like hyperactivity or aggression. These socio-emotional difficulties stem from gaps in understanding and expressing needs, often leading to withdrawn or disruptive behaviors in peer settings. Longitudinal studies, such as the Norwegian Language-8 project, underscore the ongoing needs of children with DLD, highlighting stable trajectories of impairment in a majority, with early markers like delays at age 3 predicting the need for sustained interventions into middle childhood.

In Adulthood

Individuals with developmental language disorder (DLD) often experience persistent challenges into adulthood. These impairments affect an estimated 2-3% of the adult population, based on questionnaire-based rates of 3.36-3.70%. Longitudinal studies from the , including follow-ups of childhood cohorts, indicate improvements in pragmatic skills but ongoing gaps in structural abilities, with receptive and expressive scores remaining significantly below norms (e.g., mean receptive standard score of 83.5 versus 106.2 in peers). In and , adults with a history of DLD face notable barriers, including higher rates of or (around 34% not employed versus 27% in peers) and challenges in achieving professional roles (10% versus 40%). is lower, with only 10% completing university degrees compared to 41% of typically developing peers, often due to difficulties with complex reading and demands; accommodations such as extended time on tasks can mitigate some issues. Systematic reviews highlight that while overall rates may be similar (66% versus 73%), individuals with DLD are more likely to hold part-time or low-skilled positions. Socially, adults with DLD encounter relationship difficulties and reduced social confidence, leading to challenges in forming and maintaining friendships. risks are elevated, with rates approximately twice as high as in the general and increased prevalence of anxiety and low . Adaptive strategies, such as using written notes for communication, help some individuals manage daily interactions. Overall, these outcomes underscore the lifelong impact of DLD, with limited but growing longitudinal data emphasizing the need for continued support. Recent research as of continues to highlight the benefits of lifelong interventions in improving functional outcomes.

Epidemiology

Prevalence Rates

Developmental language disorder (DLD) affects approximately 7-8% of children aged 4-5 years, or about 1 in 14 children globally. In the United States, an epidemiologic study of monolingual English-speaking children estimated the at 7.4%. In the , a population-based study reported a of 7.6% among children aged 4-5 years entering . These estimates are consistent across English-speaking countries, reflecting standardized diagnostic criteria for persistent language difficulties without other explanatory factors. Prevalence is generally stable at around 7% through school age and into , though some studies report slight decreases (e.g., to 6.4% at age 10) due to resolution of milder cases or methodological differences. In childhood, DLD shows a male-to-female of approximately 1.3:1, with boys at higher (around 8% prevalence) compared to girls (around 6%), though this may equalize in adulthood as diagnostic patterns shift. Underdiagnosis is common, particularly among multilingual children and ethnic minorities, where cultural and linguistic factors and limited to appropriate assessments can mask symptoms.

Demographic Variations

Developmental language disorder (DLD) exhibits variations in and across socioeconomic groups, with children from low (SES) backgrounds showing higher rates of . In a large of English schoolchildren aged 4 to 11 years, the predicted probability of DLD was approximately 19% among those in the lowest SES (based on income deprivation affecting children) compared to 7% in the highest , indicating a 2.5-fold increase associated with socioeconomic . This disparity is mediated by environmental factors such as reduced linguistic input in the , though to diagnostic services can further rates, leading to higher in low-SES groups despite similar underlying risks when controlling for . Racial and ethnic differences in DLD prevalence are influenced by assessment biases and access to services, resulting in observed overrepresentation among some minority groups. As of 2025, in the United States, approximately 8.9% of Black children aged 3 to 17 years have a voice, speech, or language disorder, compared to 7.3% of White children and 6.4% of Hispanic children, suggesting overrepresentation in Black populations potentially due to biased evaluation tools that misinterpret dialectal variations as impairments. For multilingual children, such as Spanish-English bilinguals, true DLD prevalence aligns closely with monolingual rates at around 7% when assessments account for bilingual proficiency, though underdiagnosis occurs due to limited culturally sensitive tools, affecting 5-7% of this population in properly evaluated samples. Gender disparities in DLD are prominent in childhood but tend to equalize in adulthood. Boys are 1.3 to 2 times more likely to be affected during early and school-age years, with a male-to-female prevalence ratio of 1.3:1 overall and up to 2:1 in severe cases at the lowest language percentiles, potentially linked to genetic and hormonal factors influencing early . By adulthood, however, the ratio balances out, with equal rates observed as diagnostic criteria focus less on behavioral differences that may mask DLD in females during childhood. Geographically, DLD prevalence is relatively consistent across high-income countries at around 7%, but remains understudied in low-resource settings where environmental and access barriers complicate estimates. Recent data as of 2023 indicate a range of 5-10% in diverse populations, with the and highlighting that developmental disabilities, including language disorders, affect over 300 million children worldwide, underscoring the need for expanded research in low- and middle-income regions.

Research Directions

Neurobiological Studies

Neurobiological studies of developmental language disorder (DLD) have identified structural brain differences, particularly in gray matter volume within left perisylvian regions such as Broca's and Wernicke's areas. (MRI) research consistently reveals anomalous gray matter volume and reduced leftward asymmetry in these areas, including the and , compared to typically developing children. For instance, children with DLD often exhibit larger right-hemisphere perisylvian volumes or bilateral symmetry, which may disrupt typical language lateralization. tractography further highlights atypical connectivity, with reduced and increased mean diffusivity in the arcuate fasciculus, impairing dorsal language pathways between frontal and temporal regions. Functional neuroimaging complements these findings by demonstrating altered activation patterns during language processing. Functional MRI (fMRI) studies show reduced left-hemisphere activation in the inferior frontal gyrus and superior temporal gyrus/sulcus during expressive and receptive language tasks, such as verb generation or passive listening, with compensatory increased right-hemisphere involvement in some cases. Electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) reveal slower neural tracking of speech rhythms in the auditory cortex, indicating delays in processing auditory stimuli that contribute to phonological deficits. A key debate in the field concerns whether DLD arises primarily from auditory temporal processing deficits or domain-specific linguistic impairments. The temporal processing hypothesis has been explored in recent studies (), linking difficulties in perceiving rapid acoustic changes (e.g., rise times in speech) to broader challenges via atypical perisylvian function. Others emphasize grammar-specific circuits, arguing that phonological representation deficits in left-hemisphere networks are more central, with auditory issues as secondary effects. Recent advances in diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) from 2023–2024 confirm these anomalies, including reduced integrity in the arcuate fasciculus linked to learning outcomes, and suggest genetic influences on microstructure in temporo-parietal tracts. However, heterogeneous findings across studies indicate no single neurobiological for DLD has been established.

Intervention Efficacy

Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials indicate that speech-language therapy interventions for children with developmental language disorder (DLD) yield moderate to large effect sizes in improving and grammatical skills. For expressive , standardized differences (SMDs) range from 0.43 to 1.08 compared to no or waitlist controls, with gains in word and . Similarly, expressive grammar interventions show SMDs around 1.02, enhancing morphosyntactic accuracy and utterance complexity, though receptive grammar improvements are less consistent due to fewer studies. In contrast, pragmatic language interventions demonstrate more variable efficacy, with only about half of studies reporting significant effects and smaller overall gains (SMDs from 0.04 to 1.50) in areas like and coherence. These interventions often emphasize structured encouragement of social communication but lack robust for broad . gaps persist, particularly for adults with DLD, where randomized controlled trials constitute less than 10% of the , limiting understanding of long-term benefits beyond childhood. Multilingual interventions remain underexplored, with systematic reviews highlighting a scarcity of for bilingual children across key domains like and morphosyntax. Digital tools, such as apps targeting , show promising short-term improvements but are constrained by small sample sizes and preliminary designs. Predictors of better outcomes include starting before age 5 and integrating with educational supports, which enhances overall more than alone. Ongoing trials from 2024 to 2025 are evaluating teletherapy's role post-COVID, while emerging research explores biomarkers like patterns to enable personalized plans.

References

  1. [1]
    Developmental Language Disorder - NIDCD - NIH
    May 8, 2023 · Developmental language disorder (DLD) is a communication disorder that interferes with learning, understanding, and using language.Missing: authoritative sources
  2. [2]
    Spoken Language Disorders
    Summary of each segment:
  3. [3]
    The Genetic and Molecular Basis of Developmental Language ...
    This review provides an overview of the genetic landscape of developmental language disorders (DLD), with an emphasis on the importance of defining the specific ...
  4. [4]
    Developmental Language Disorder - Cleveland Clinic
    Developmental language disorder (DLD) is a communication disorder that interferes with learning, understanding and using language.
  5. [5]
    Developmental Language Disorder (DLD) - The DLD Project
    DLD is when a person has difficulties understanding and/or using language. These difficulties do not occur for any known reason (eg head injury, hearing loss).Missing: authoritative | Show results with:authoritative
  6. [6]
    Identifying and describing developmental language disorder in ...
    Nov 27, 2023 · These areas of language difficulty included phonology, syntax, word finding and semantics, pragmatics/language use, discourse, and verbal ...Abstract · Outcomes And Results · Discussion
  7. [7]
    A 200-Year History of the Study of Childhood Language Disorders of ...
    Feb 21, 2020 · Conclusions ; delayed speech development, 1918 ; developmental aphasia, 1917 ; developmental dysphasia, 1963 ; developmental language disorder, 1961.
  8. [8]
    The 'idioglossia' cases of the 1890s and the clinical investigation ...
    ▻ In 1891, three papers described children with developmental language impairment. ▻ The term 'idioglossia' was coined to identify this new disorder. ▻ The ...
  9. [9]
    Specific language impairment: a convenient label for whom? - PMC
    The term 'specific language impairment' (SLI), in use since the 1980s, describes children with language impairment whose cognitive skills are within normal ...Missing: III | Show results with:III
  10. [10]
    Brain and Behavior in Developmental Language Disorder - PMC
    Developmental language disorder (DLD) is a heterogenous neurodevelopmental disorder that affects a child's ability to comprehend and/or produce spoken and/or ...
  11. [11]
    Phase 2 of CATALISE: a multinational and multidisciplinary Delphi ...
    Mar 30, 2017 · The term 'language disorder' is proposed for children who are likely to have language problems enduring into middle childhood and beyond, with a ...
  12. [12]
    Developmental Disorders of Language - Wiley Online Library
    Sep 5, 2015 · Specific dyslexia (“congenital word-blindness ... Developmental dysphasia: Relation between acoustic processing deficits and verbal processing.
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Classification of Developmental Language Disorders - ResearchGate
    Language disorders in children. 2. Child development deviations. 3. Classification. 4. Psycholinguistics. 5. Child psychopathology. I. Verhoeven, Ludo Th. II.
  14. [14]
    specific language impairment (SLI) - APA Dictionary of Psychology
    a condition characterized by impaired acquisition and use of oral linguistic abilities in the absence of any neurological damage, sensory deficits, ...
  15. [15]
    Developmental Language Disorder: Applications for Advocacy ...
    Feb 21, 2020 · Unlike SLI, the term DLD can apply to the language problems of individuals who have co-occurring conditions that impair cognitive, sensorimotor, ...
  16. [16]
    CATALISE: A Multinational and Multidisciplinary Delphi Consensus ...
    Delayed or impaired language development is a common developmental concern, yet there is little agreement about the criteria used to identify and classify ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] SUMMARY - RCSLT
    The panel agreed on the term 'Language Disorder' to refer to children with language difficulties that create obstacles to communication or learning in everyday ...
  18. [18]
    The Progression of Developmental Language Disorder Terminology
    Apr 8, 2025 · A 2017 CATALISE project resulted in consensus on using the term "developmental language disorder" (DLD) to describe children with unexplained language ...
  19. [19]
    Phase 2 of CATALISE: a multinational and multidisciplinary Delphi ...
    The term 'Developmental Language Disorder' is consistent with ICD‐11 (Baird, personal communication), though our definition does not include any nonverbal ...
  20. [20]
    ICD-11 for Mortality and Morbidity Statistics
    ### Summary of Developmental Language Disorder (6A01.2) Diagnostic Criteria from ICD-11
  21. [21]
    Developmental Language Disorder: Early Predictors, Age for the ...
    The present review was carried out as part of a Consensus Conference (CC), held in Italy, on the diagnosis and treatment of children with Primary Language ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Developmental Language Disorder: A Literature Review
    What is Developmental Language Disorder? Developmental language disorder (DLD) is a lifelong language condition characterized by.
  23. [23]
  24. [24]
    Developmental Language Disorder and Risk of Dyslexia—Can They ...
    The documented overlap between DLD and Dyslexia—estimated to affect approximately 50% of children diagnosed with either disorder (De Bree et al., 2010; Botting ...
  25. [25]
    Language and reading in attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder and ...
    Apr 17, 2024 · Comorbidity rates are significant, with 25%–40% of children with ADHD (Boada et al., 2012) and 50% of those with DLD presenting with reading ...Predicting Dld Status · Discussion · Comparing Language And...
  26. [26]
    Exploring the Psychosocial Experiences of Individuals with ... - NIH
    The social anxiety experienced by children with DLD has been tentatively linked with their difficulties in navigating or interpreting social situations (Wadman ...
  27. [27]
    Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD): Relevance for Clinical ...
    For instance, DCD and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) have a particularly high co-occurrence of about 50% (Blank et al., 2019). Given the ...<|separator|>
  28. [28]
    Behaviors related to autism spectrum disorder in children with ...
    Jun 20, 2023 · Previous studies with older children and adolescents with DLD reported that around 30% of school-aged children with DLD present with ASD or ASD- ...
  29. [29]
    Developmental Language Disorder | Reading Rockets
    Developmental language disorder (DLD) is a language problem. Children with DLD have difficulty with language whether they are speaking, listening, reading, ...Missing: authoritative | Show results with:authoritative
  30. [30]
    Dyslexia and Developmental Language Disorder: comorbid ...
    Oct 20, 2019 · These findings confirm that children with dyslexia or DLD are at-risk for reading comprehension difficulties but for different reasons.
  31. [31]
    The Impacts of Co-Occurring Developmental Language Disorder on ...
    This study investigated the extent to which co-occurring DLD in children already identified with ADHD presented increased risk for severity of their primary ...
  32. [32]
    Association of Developmental Language Disorder With Comorbid ...
    Dec 29, 2022 · This case-control study identifies relevant phenotypes associated with developmental language disorder in a pediatric patient population.
  33. [33]
    Heritability of specific language impairment depends on diagnostic ...
    Heritability estimates for specific language impairment (SLI) have been inconsistent. Four twin studies reported heritability of 0.5 or more.
  34. [34]
    Genome-wide analyses of individual differences in quantitatively ...
    We present a large-scale well-powered genome-wide association study meta-analysis of individual differences in reading- and language-related skills<|control11|><|separator|>
  35. [35]
    DCDC2, KIAA0319 and CMIP Are Associated with Reading-Related ...
    We show that DCDC2 is specifically associated with RD, whereas variants in CMIP and KIAA0319 are associated with reading skills across the ability range.
  36. [36]
    FOXP2-Related Speech and Language Disorder - GeneReviews
    Jun 23, 2016 · CAS & dysarthria (Prevalence of motor speech disorder is high; in 1 study ~25% of children had CAS. 3). Expressive/receptive language impairment.
  37. [37]
    Approach to epigenetic analysis in language disorders - PMC - NIH
    Nov 24, 2011 · Epigenetic processes direct the differentiation of cells in early development when neurological pathways are set down, and mutations in genes ...
  38. [38]
    Association between genes regulating neural pathways for ... - Nature
    Jul 27, 2021 · Thus, speech, language, reading, and spelling measures are highly correlated and often have common genetic associations. Moreover, speech and ...
  39. [39]
    Early environmental risk factors for neurodevelopmental disorders
    This genetically informed review showed evidence for a range of environmental factors of potential casual significance in NDDs.
  40. [40]
    What risk factors for Developmental Language Disorder can tell us ...
    We highlight preterm birth, maternal smoking and sleep problems as risk factors. These are associated with mechanisms that may interfere with a critical ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  41. [41]
    The effects of prenatal smoke exposure on language development ...
    May 6, 2022 · Of the 14 studies reviewed, 13 (93%) reported significant associations between maternal smoking or exposure and language outcomes. Despite this ...
  42. [42]
    The Language Environment at Home of Children With (a Suspicion ...
    Evidence suggests that there are multiple genetic risk factors, in addition to environmental risks, which interact and together impact early brain development ...
  43. [43]
    External risk factors associated with language disorders in children
    May 28, 2021 · To identify possible risk factors related to language delay in children, such as bilingualism, socioeconomic status, maternal and caregiver education level.<|control11|><|separator|>
  44. [44]
    Association between language and hearing disorders – risk ...
    The children at risk for hearing disorders were twice as likely as those not at risk to exhibit language production and comprehension deficits.
  45. [45]
    Effect of Infant Iron Deficiency on Children's Verbal Abilities - NIH
    Infants who are iron-deficient anemic seek and receive less stimulation from their caregivers, predisposing such children to be functionally isolated.
  46. [46]
    Disentangling genetic and environmental influences on early ...
    Nov 10, 2023 · This study demonstrated how genetic propensity for temperament affects language development, and how this relates to parenting.
  47. [47]
    MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories (MB-CDI)
    CDI-CAT ... Introducing CDI-CAT, a short, adaptive screening tool that uses item-response theory to select the most appropriate items for each child.Missing: DLD | Show results with:DLD
  48. [48]
    Screening school-age children for developmental language disorder ...
    The ALDeQ is a 4-section parent questionnaire designed to assess early language development, current communication skills, and family history of communication ...
  49. [49]
  50. [50]
    [PDF] CELF-5 Test Objectives and Descriptions
    ... (CELF®-5) is a flexible system of individually administered tests used to assist a clinician to accurately diagnose a language disorder in children and ...
  51. [51]
    The children's test of nonword repetition: A test of phonological ...
    This article presents findings from the Children's Test of Nonword Repetition (CNRep). Normative data based on its administration to over 600 children aged ...
  52. [52]
    Dynamic Assessment of Word Learning to Diagnose Developmental ...
    Jul 14, 2022 · Dynamic assessment (DA), which evaluates the learning process rather than static knowledge, has been found to be effective in diagnosing ...
  53. [53]
    A Review of Screeners to Identify Risk of Developmental Language ...
    This review aims to comprehensively summarize, compare, and evaluate screeners used to identify risk for developmental language disorder (DLD).
  54. [54]
    Bilingual English-Spanish Assessment (BESA) - Brookes Publishing
    Rating 5.0 (1) · 8–11 day deliveryThe Bilingual English Spanish Assessment (BESA) was developed to identify phonological and/or language impairment in bilingual and ELL children.Missing: DLD | Show results with:DLD
  55. [55]
    Spoken Word Learning in Children With Developmental Language ...
    Children were classified as having DLD if they scored ≤ the 16th percentile (SS ≤ 85) on the Core Language composite of the CELF-4. According to the test ...
  56. [56]
    Developmental Language Disorder and Autism: Commonalities and ...
    Many studies have examined any potential phenotypic overlap between autism and DLD, especially in the language domain. Numerous studies have found that ...
  57. [57]
    Differentiating communication disorders and autism in children
    Those with language disorders versus ASD tend to have impairments specific to only the communication domain, and language deficits are qualitatively different.
  58. [58]
    Full article: Differential Diagnosis in Children with Autistic Symptoms ...
    Jul 5, 2021 · Although ADOS is useful in supporting the differential diagnosis between ASD and non-ASD, this study has outlined that it appears scarcely ...
  59. [59]
    Full article: The significance of nonverbal performance in children ...
    May 20, 2022 · The exclusive PIQ limit of 70 is suggested for DLD diagnosis in the ICD-10. In the Finnish Current Care Guidelines, a diagnosis “mixed specific ...
  60. [60]
  61. [61]
    Identifying Developmental Language Disorder in Deaf Children with ...
    Sep 4, 2023 · In the past, research on DLD described hearing children who presented with disordered language skills but had relative strengths in other areas ...
  62. [62]
    Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities and Hearing Loss
    It is important for the audiologist to determine if hearing loss may be among the disorders for someone with an IDD and to treat the hearing loss accordingly.
  63. [63]
    Word Learning by Preschool-Age Children With Developmental ...
    Children with and without DLD did not differ significantly in age, maternal education, articulation abilities (GFTA-3), or the two subtests from the WPPSI-IV.
  64. [64]
    Non-specific markers of neurodevelopmental disorder/delay in ...
    Selective mutism (SM) in children is frequently associated with language disorder/delay suggesting that neurobiological factors may be involved in the ...
  65. [65]
    Selective Mutism and Comorbidity With Developmental Disorder ...
    Conclusions. This study describes comorbidity between SM and developmental disorder/delay occurring nearly as frequently as between SM and anxiety disorders.
  66. [66]
    Identifying developmental language disorder (DLD) in multilingual ...
    May 20, 2024 · In this tutorial we demonstrate, via a case study, that it is feasible to identify DLD in a multilingual child using the CATALISE diagnostic criteria.Litmus Battery · This Paper · Instruments
  67. [67]
    Exploring Assumptions of the Bilingual Delay in Children With and ...
    Testing in two languages can lead to improved diagnostic accuracy because children with DLD will demonstrate delays in both of their languages. The reverse—that ...Language Dominance · Participants · Language Ability Status
  68. [68]
    Efficacy of the Treatment of Developmental Language Disorder
    Mar 23, 2021 · The prognosis is generally good, as, in 70% of cases, expressive language improves significantly by three years of age and subsequently the ...
  69. [69]
    The Efficacy of Recasts in Language Intervention: A Systematic ...
    This systematic review and meta-analysis critically evaluated the research evidence on the effectiveness of conversational recasts in grammatical development
  70. [70]
    Narrative Intervention: Principles to Practice - ASHA Journals
    Narrative interventions are a class of language interventions that involve the use of telling or retelling stories.Introduction To Narratives · Principles To Practice · Contextualize, Unpack, And...
  71. [71]
    The Influence of Quantitative Intervention Dosage on Oral Language ...
    Apr 20, 2021 · Frequent, short sessions (2/3 × per week, approximately 2 min) and less frequent, long sessions (1 × per week, approximately 20 min) have ...
  72. [72]
    Parent-Implemented Hanen Program It Takes Two to Talk - NIH
    Aug 3, 2021 · It may be delivered in groups (8 families maximum) or individually, and it is led by a Hanen-certified speech-language therapist. The program ...
  73. [73]
    New IDEA Guidance Includes Developmental Language Disorder as a Qualifying Category
    ### Summary of IDEA Guidance for DLD from https://on.asha.org/slp-dld-advocacy
  74. [74]
    Dictation (Speech-to-Text) Technology: What It Is and How It Works
    Dictation is an assistive technology (AT) tool that can help kids who struggle with writing. Kids can use dictation to write with their voices.
  75. [75]
    It Takes Two to Talk® Program for Parents of ... - The Hanen Centre
    The It Takes Two to Talk program helps parents of children with language delays build language skills during everyday activities, using a naturalistic approach.
  76. [76]
    A parent-directed language intervention for children of low ...
    We designed a parent-directed home-visiting intervention targeting socioeconomic status (SES) disparities in children's early language environments.
  77. [77]
    We Need to Talk About Social Inequalities in Language Development
    Apr 20, 2022 · This article aims to raise speech-language pathologists' (SLPs') awareness about the extent of social inequalities in the language development of children.Missing: DLD | Show results with:DLD
  78. [78]
  79. [79]
    Reading outcomes in children with developmental language disorder
    The purpose of this study is to better understand variation in the reading outcomes of children with DLD using a person-centered approach.Abstract · Reading In Children With Dld · Oral Language ProficiencyMissing: rates | Show results with:rates
  80. [80]
  81. [81]
    Understanding the prevalence and manifestation of anxiety and ...
    Jun 15, 2023 · Indeed, social communication deficits have been found to explain much of the development of anxiety amongst neurotypical children [42].
  82. [82]
    Language-8: Developmental trajectories of childhood ... - FHI
    Jul 1, 2013 · The overall aim of this project is to expand our knowledge about groups of children with Developmental Language Disorder (DLD). We will first ...
  83. [83]
  84. [84]
  85. [85]
    Education and employment outcomes of young adults with a history ...
    Longitudinal studies have indicated that persistent DLD is associated with poorer literacy and academic achievement in adolescence (Durkin et al. 2010, Snowling ...
  86. [86]
  87. [87]
    Gender Differences in Language Development and Disorder
    Aug 20, 2020 · In contrast, girls with DLD, as a group, might be more likely to become shy and withdrawn in social and academic settings. These differences in ...
  88. [88]
    Quick Statistics About Voice, Speech, Language - NIDCD - NIH
    Jul 8, 2025 · 3.3% of U.S. children ages 3-17 have a language disorder that lasted for a week or longer during the past 12 months. Research suggests that the ...Missing: resolution | Show results with:resolution
  89. [89]
    Prevalence of Specific Language Impairment in Kindergarten Children
    Results provided an estimated overall prevalence rate of 7.4 ... The prevalence, stability and significance of developmental language delay in preschool children.
  90. [90]
    Impact of developmental language disorders on mental health and ...
    This study aims to explore the educational, occupational and socioemotional experiences of people with developmental language disorder (DLD) across the lifespan
  91. [91]
    Developmental language disorder – a comprehensive study of more ...
    Developmental language disorder (DLD) is characterized by enduring low language abilities with a significant functional impact.<|control11|><|separator|>
  92. [92]
    Prevalence of Specific Language Impairment in Kindergarten Children
    The prevalence estimate for boys was 8% and for girls 6%. Variation in prevalence was found among children of different racial/cultural backgrounds; however, ...
  93. [93]
    Deciphering the genetic basis of developmental language disorder ...
    Feb 13, 2025 · Six families had a family history of a neurodevelopmental or psychiatric disorder (ASD, learning disabilities/ID, ADHD, dyslexia, anxiety, and ...Phenotypic Data · Discussion · Author Information<|control11|><|separator|>
  94. [94]
    A scoping review of developmental language disorder in Sub ...
    Jun 19, 2025 · Key findings highlight the scarcity of culturally and linguistically appropriate assessment tools, potentially leading to misdiagnosis, ...
  95. [95]
    Socioeconomic Disadvantage is Associated with Prevalence of ...
    Aug 7, 2025 · (2021) found that the predicted probability of language disorder was 2.5 greater at the 10th percentile of Income Deprivation Affecting Children ...
  96. [96]
    Poverty and Language Development: Roles of Parenting and Stress
    A large literature on fetal programming has shown that low SES and psychosocial stress adversely affects fetal development. Finally, maternal stress is related ...Missing: DLD | Show results with:DLD
  97. [97]
    [PDF] SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY AND PEOPLE OF COLOR
    The prevalence of speech sound disorder in children is 8 to 9 % (NIDCD,. 2016) ... a voice, speech, language, or swallowing disorder as compared to 7.8% of white ...
  98. [98]
    Identifying Developmental Language Disorder in School age ...
    Oct 4, 2020 · Children with Developmental language disorder (DLD) have particular difficulty learning language despite otherwise general normal development.
  99. [99]
    How We Fail Children With Developmental Language Disorder
    Aug 5, 2020 · Developmental language disorder (DLD) is a neurodevelopmental condition that emerges in early childhood and frequently persists into adulthood.
  100. [100]
    Are Gender Myths Making It Harder to Diagnose Developmental ...
    Feb 24, 2023 · Evidence has shown, however, that DLD occurs at roughly the same rate in boys and girls (Calder et al., 2022).
  101. [101]
    [PDF] Global report on children with developmental disabilities | UNICEF
    In 2019, there were approximately 317 million children and adolescents with health conditions that contribute to developmental disabilities globally. But across ...
  102. [102]
  103. [103]
  104. [104]
  105. [105]
  106. [106]
    Effect of language therapy alone for developmental ... - Frontiers
    Oct 2, 2022 · This evidence-based study investigated the effect of language therapy alone for different expressive and receptive language levels in children with DLD.
  107. [107]
    Efficacy of the Treatment of Developmental Language Disorder - MDPI
    The goal of the present review was to systematically analyze the effectiveness of interventions in children with developmental language disorder (DLD) from an ...
  108. [108]
    Efficacy, model of delivery, intensity and targets of pragmatic ...
    20 Apr 2022 · It is widely believed that children with DLD predominantly have difficulties acquiring vocabulary and grammar, while significantly less emphasis ...
  109. [109]
    Language intervention in bilingual children with developmental ...
    Nov 25, 2022 · The present review indicates that there is a significant gap in the literature regarding language intervention for several key language areas ...
  110. [110]
    Digital Intervention in Children With Developmental Language ...
    May 23, 2025 · This systematic review indicates that phonological skills are the most frequently targeted language domain by digital interventions in children with DLD.
  111. [111]
    Predictors of effectiveness of early intervention on children with ...
    Jul 2, 2014 · Early intervention can improve the IQ of children with intellectual disability, and the earlier the intervention the better.
  112. [112]
    Predictors in language proficiency of young children with presumed ...
    This study explores to what extent child, parental and treatment factors are predictive for receptive and expressive language outcomes of children with ...
  113. [113]
    Teletherapy to address language disparities in deaf and hard ... - NIH
    Aug 8, 2024 · The specific aims of the study are to determine the effect of access to and utilisation of speech-language teletherapy in addressing language disparities in ...