Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

eDonkey2000

eDonkey2000, commonly known as eDonkey or eD2k, was a file-sharing client software and developed by the U.S.-based MetaMachine, Inc., and released in 2000. The application operated on a hybrid architecture that combined centralized servers for indexing and search functions with decentralized connections for file transfers, enabling users to files from multiple sources simultaneously for improved speed and reliability. It rapidly gained widespread adoption in the early as one of the dominant platforms for distributing , including , , and software, often involving copyrighted content without permission. The network's popularity stemmed from its resilience against single points of failure and support for large file sizes, but it faced intense scrutiny for enabling mass , culminating in MetaMachine's agreement in September 2006 to pay $30 million to the (RIAA) and other music industry plaintiffs, after which the company ceased development and distribution of eDonkey2000, Overnet, and related software, effectively shutting down the official network.

History

Origins and Development

MetaMachine Inc. was established in 2000 by to create a file-sharing platform capable of handling large files through a decentralized architecture lacking a central . partnered with in developing the and its flagship client, eDonkey2000. The initial release of the eDonkey2000 software occurred on September 6, 2000, introducing a semi-centralized model where users could operate their own index to facilitate searches and connections. Early iterations emphasized scalability over Napster's single-point failure risks, enabling file discovery across interconnected servers while supporting direct peer transfers for efficiency. Development progressed with version updates addressing stability and ; for instance, by mid-2001, releases like version 0.56 incorporated refinements to queuing and credit systems for fairer allocation among participants. Subsequent advancements included the launch of "" in May 2002, a beta initiative rebranded as Overnet to pursue greater via peer , reducing dependency. By early , integration of the protocol enabled serverless searching, and in August , Overnet functionality merged into the core eDonkey2000 client, enhancing resilience against targeted shutdowns. These evolutions positioned the network as a robust alternative amid growing legal pressures on systems.

Rise to Prominence

eDonkey2000 was publicly released in September 2000 by MetaMachine Inc., a company founded earlier that year by programmer , amid the burgeoning landscape sparked by 's rapid ascent. Unlike 's centralized indexing model, which proved vulnerable to legal injunctions, eDonkey2000 employed a hybrid architecture: dedicated servers handled search queries for efficiency, while actual file transfers occurred directly between peers, reducing single points of failure. This design addressed early limitations, such as slow searches in fully decentralized systems like , positioning eDonkey2000 as a more practical alternative as faced mounting lawsuits and operational restrictions by late 2000. A key innovation driving adoption was the Multisource File Transfer Protocol (MFTP), which allowed clients to download distinct chunks of a file from multiple sources concurrently, aggregating pieces for faster completion and greater —even if individual peers disconnected mid-transfer. This swarming approach proved particularly effective for larger files, including music albums, software, and videos, which were increasingly shared amid expansion and Napster's fallout; following Napster's court-mandated blocking of copyrighted material in July 2001, users migrated en masse to resilient networks like eDonkey, boosting its visibility and user base. User growth accelerated in the ensuing years, with estimates placing the network at around 1 million users by early 2003, expanding to approximately 2 million active on the core eD2k server protocol by mid-2004. The May 13, 2002, launch of eMule—an open-source client compatible with the eDonkey network—amplified this trajectory by introducing enhancements like a credits-based sharing incentive system to discourage free-riding and better handling of rare files, quickly surpassing the proprietary eDonkey2000 client in popularity. By its peak in the mid-2000s, the combined eDonkey ecosystem, including the Overnet decentralized overlay introduced in 2002, supported roughly 5 million users, making it one of the largest P2P networks globally before legal pressures intensified.

Shutdown and Immediate Aftermath

On September 12, 2006, MetaMachine Inc., the developer of eDonkey2000, reached a settlement with the (RIAA) and major record labels, agreeing to pay $30 million to resolve claims. As part of the consent judgment, MetaMachine, along with founders and , committed to ceasing distribution of eDonkey2000, Overnet, and related software, and to disabling the network's central infrastructure under their control. This action followed intensified legal pressures post the U.S. Supreme Court's MGM Studios v. ruling, which held distributors liable for inducing . The immediate shutdown rendered the official eDonkey2000 client and website inoperable, with the site displaying a notice regarding the RIAA enforcement. MetaMachine's servers, which facilitated much of the network's operations, were taken offline, significantly disrupting connectivity for users reliant on them. However, the eDonkey network's decentralized architecture, supported by third-party servers and open-source clients like , allowed residual activity to persist in the short term. In the ensuing weeks, many users migrated to alternatives such as , which maintained compatibility with the eD2k protocol via community-hosted servers, or to more robust networks like , accelerating a broader shift away from server-dependent systems. Network traffic for eDonkey declined sharply without official support, though unofficial forks and servers prolonged limited functionality until further legal actions targeted remaining infrastructure in subsequent years. The underscored the vulnerability of centralized elements in networks to legal enforcement, prompting developers and users toward fully decentralized or licensed models.

Technical Design and Features

Network Architecture

The eDonkey2000 network utilized a hybrid peer-to-peer architecture that integrated centralized components with direct client-to-client interactions. operated as distributed indexing hubs, maintaining on available files and connected clients without storing actual file content. Clients registered their shared files with by submitting unique file identifiers, enabling efficient search and discovery. This structure relied on connections for primary communication, with clients typically connecting to on port 4661 and using port 4662 for direct peer transfers. File identification and integrity verification employed 128-bit hashes, known as eD2K hashes, computed from file chunks to ensure uniqueness regardless of filename variations. Files were segmented into fixed-size chunks, with each chunk hashed individually before deriving the overall hash. Searches initiated by clients involved keyword queries to connected servers, which returned matching hashes and initial lists. Subsequent source queries for specific hashes expanded the pool of available peers, facilitating decentralized location across the network. Servers interconnected to propagate updates, mitigating single points of failure while preserving semi-centralized efficiency. File transfers adhered to the Multisource File Transfer Protocol (MFTP), allowing downloads from multiple peers simultaneously to enhance speed and resilience. Peers established direct connections to request and receive specific file chunks, reassembling them locally after verification against chunk hashes. UDP packets supported auxiliary functions like search queries, comprising a minority of traffic compared to TCP-dominated transfers. This multisource approach distributed load and reduced dependency on individual hosts. To address server vulnerabilities, the architecture evolved with the integration of , a decentralized based on the (DHT) protocol. Overnet enabled serverless indexing and peer discovery, with clients publishing and retrieving file metadata directly via DHT lookups. Introduced in eDonkey2000 versions supporting Overnet interoperability, this component aimed to phase out reliance on traditional servers, enhancing resilience against targeted shutdowns. Despite the official eDonkey2000 discontinuation in September 2005, Overnet and subsequent implementations in clients like sustained decentralized operations.

Core Protocol Innovations

The eDonkey2000 protocol employed a hybrid architecture that combined decentralized servers for metadata indexing and search with direct client-to-client file transfers, distinguishing it from purely decentralized systems like and centralized ones like . Servers, typically operated by users on port 4661 and for inter-server communication, maintained indexes of shared files and connected clients without storing actual content, enabling efficient peer discovery while avoiding single points of failure. This design supported scalability, as clients queried servers for sources matching file hashes, then established connections on port 4662 for transfers, reducing network flooding compared to query broadcasts in . Files were uniquely identified using a 128-bit hash of their entire contents, independent of filenames or metadata, which facilitated integrity verification and compatibility across clients during multi-source downloads. This hashing mechanism underpinned the (e.g., ed2k://|file|name|size|hash|/|/), allowing users to share precise references via hyperlinks that included name, , and hash for quick initiation of searches or downloads. Searches on servers supported matching on filenames and attributes like or type, using a tag-based message format that enhanced extensibility without breaking . A key innovation for handling large files was chunked transfer support, where files were divided into verifiable parts—typically fixed-size segments hashed individually for corruption detection—enabling partial sharing and resumption from multiple peers simultaneously. Clients could aggregate data from diverse sources, improving reliability and bandwidth utilization, with average throughputs reaching 30-45 kB/s in observed networks. To accommodate firewalled clients, the included "push" requests, where uploaders initiated connections to downloaders, bypassing restrictions. These features collectively prioritized and for content distribution, though the core lacked built-in upload incentives like credits, which were later added via extensions in clients such as .

Client Implementation

The eDonkey2000 client was a closed-source Windows application developed by MetaMachine, implementing the for hybrid . It connected users to a of index servers for file discovery while enabling direct client-to-client transfers for efficiency. Released initially in September 2000, the software utilized port 4662 for primary communications and supported for auxiliary functions like server pings. Upon startup, the client established connections to one or more servers by sending a "hello" packet containing user credentials, , , and client version details. Servers responded with a challenge hash for , after which the client published its shared files—identified by 128-bit hashes of their contents—to the server's index. Files were segmented into fixed-size chunks (approximately 9 MB for general files, 180 KB for audio), with each chunk hashed separately to facilitate partial downloads and source verification. The client maintained a local database of shared files and transfer states, implementing a credit system to prioritize uploads to peers who had previously contributed downloads, measured by completed byte ratios. For searches, users queried connected servers via keyword or hash-based requests, receiving lists of matching files with source counts and availability statistics. Upon selecting a file, the client retrieved sources from servers, then initiated connections to peer clients to request specific chunks, employing a rarest-first to request the least-available chunks first for resilience. Transfers supported multisource aggregation, allowing simultaneous downloads from multiple peers to reconstruct files progressively, with integrity checks via chunk hashes. Low-ID clients behind used server-mediated callbacks to establish direct peer links. Some versions integrated , displaying sponsored content within the interface or via pop-ups. The featured panels for search results, transfer queues, shared files, and server lists, with options to manage limits, connection limits (typically up to 100-500 slots), and file prioritization. handling was binary-packet based, with opcodes defining actions like file status updates and source exchanges. Measurements on version 1.3.0 indicated efficient low-level performance, with packet overhead minimized for large file transfers, though reliant on uptime for search functionality. Later updates, such as version 1.4.6 in 2005, incorporated Overnet for decentralized , reducing dependency.

RIAA Enforcement Actions

The (RIAA), in collaboration with the of America (MPAA), pursued enforcement against eDonkey2000 primarily through litigation targeting its developer, MetaMachine Inc. This action followed the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in MGM Studios v. Grokster, which established that software distributors could be held liable for inducing if they promoted illegal uses. In summer 2005, the RIAA sent a letter to MetaMachine demanding implementation of filtering technology to block copyrighted material or cessation of operations, amid broader pressure on networks. MetaMachine's president, , responded by announcing plans to pivot eDonkey toward legal content distribution, citing inability to sustain a lawsuit despite confidence in prevailing. The RIAA and MPAA filed suit against MetaMachine, its founders and , in August 2006, alleging the software enabled massive unauthorized distribution of copyrighted music and films. On September 12, 2006, the parties reached a requiring MetaMachine to pay $30 million to the plaintiffs, permanently cease distribution of eDonkey2000, Overnet, and related software, and disable the to prevent further . This settlement marked a significant victory for the RIAA, which subsequently dropped further claims against the defunct network. The enforcement extended the RIAA's strategy of targeting facilitators beyond individual users, whom it had sued in thousands of cases since for sharing via networks including eDonkey. Despite the official shutdown, decentralized elements persisted through third-party clients, though official support ended.

Intellectual Property Disputes

Major record labels, through the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA), pursued legal action against MetaMachine Inc., the developer of eDonkey2000, alleging facilitation of widespread copyright infringement via the peer-to-peer network. In August 2006, the RIAA filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against MetaMachine, its CEO Sam Yagan, and founder Jed McCaleb, seeking damages for contributory and vicarious infringement of musical works. The suit claimed the eDonkey network enabled millions of users to unlawfully share copyrighted recordings from labels including Arista Records, Atlantic, Capitol, Elektra, Interscope, Sony BMG, UMG, and Warner Bros. On September 12, 2006, MetaMachine entered a consent judgment settling the claims for $30 million, payable to the plaintiff labels. As part of the agreement, the company committed to permanently cease distribution of eDonkey2000 software, disable the network's servers, and refrain from any activities promoting or enabling copyright infringement. The settlement followed the U.S. Supreme Court's 2005 ruling in MGM Studios v. Grokster, which established liability for P2P services inducing infringement, influencing MetaMachine's decision to avoid prolonged litigation. The Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) also targeted eDonkey infrastructure, focusing on operators hosting indexed content for film piracy. In December 2004, the MPAA initiated civil and criminal suits against key U.S. and European users and administrators of eDonkey , alleging direct infringement and distribution of unauthorized copies of motion pictures. A notable action occurred in February 2006 when Belgian authorities, at the MPAA's request, seized and shut down Razorback2, a prominent eDonkey handling significant traffic for pirated video files. These efforts disrupted centralized components of the decentralized network but did not halt client-side sharing, as open-source alternatives like persisted.

Enforcement Outcomes and Debates

In September 2006, MetaMachine, Inc., the developer of eDonkey2000, reached a settlement with major record labels including , Warner Music, and others, agreeing to pay $30 million to resolve claims. As part of the agreement, MetaMachine ceased distribution of eDonkey2000, Overnet, and related software, disabled its servers, and posted a notice on its website acknowledging the promotion of unauthorized . The company also committed to cooperating with rights holders in identifying users engaging in infringement. Subsequent enforcement targeted remaining infrastructure; in 2007, the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI), in coordination with local authorities, shut down several public eDonkey servers in and elsewhere, reducing centralized coordination points. Despite these measures, the network demonstrated resilience due to its hybrid architecture, with open-source clients like —compatible with the eD2k protocol—enabling users to connect via community-maintained servers and decentralized Overnet/Kad features. By late 2006, had become the dominant client, sustaining activity as users migrated without significant interruption. Debates surrounding these outcomes centered on the limited causal impact of targeting software distributors and servers on overall infringement. Proponents of aggressive enforcement, including the RIAA, argued the settlement deterred commercial facilitation of and set a for liability under contributory infringement doctrines established in cases like MGM Studios v. Grokster (2005), claiming it disrupted a major vector for unauthorized music distribution. Critics, including technology analysts, contended that such actions merely displaced activity to resilient alternatives like or , with empirical evidence from network traffic measurements showing persistent eD2k usage post-shutdown rather than eradication. This highlighted the challenges of enforcing against decentralized protocols, where user-driven replication undermines centralized interventions, though no comprehensive longitudinal studies quantified net reductions in eDonkey-specific volumes. Legal scholars noted the settlement reinforced voluntary compliance by developers but raised questions about overreach, as the network's persistence suggested enforcement efficacy depended more on user behavior and technological adaptability than on shutting down .

Impact and Legacy

Technological Contributions

The eDonkey2000 network pioneered a hybrid architecture that integrated centralized index servers—operable by users or third parties—with decentralized file transfers among clients, enabling scalable file discovery without the full overhead of pure seen in networks like . This design distributed indexing tasks to servers while leveraging direct connections for data exchange, supporting peak concurrent user bases exceeding 4 million by 2005 and handling terabytes of daily transfers. A core innovation was the ed2k protocol's support for multi-source downloads, where files are segmented into fixed-size chunks (typically 9.28 MB each) and assembled from simultaneous contributions by multiple peers, enhancing throughput for large media files and mitigating single-point failures. The protocol employed MD4-based to generate unique file identifiers, forming the basis of the (e.g., ed2k://|file|name|size||/), which standardized sharing and verification across clients, predating similar mechanisms in later systems. To incentivize sustained uploading, eDonkey2000 implemented a credit system tracking upload-to-download ratios, prioritizing uploads to high-contributors and fostering reciprocity in a bandwidth-asymmetric environment dominated by residential users. Protocol extensions, including UDP-based peer discovery and to evade network filters, further improved resilience and , with clients like extending support for files over 4 GB via 64-bit addressing. The integration of the Overnet overlay network represented a shift toward full decentralization, implementing the Kademlia distributed hash table (DHT) for serverless routing and lookup, achieving logarithmic query times (O(log N)) across millions of nodes without central vulnerabilities. As the first widely deployed DHT-based P2P application, Overnet influenced subsequent designs, including eMule's Kad network, which combined eD2k indexing with DHT for hybrid operation and demonstrated sustained viability with over 1 million daily users into the late 2000s.

Cultural and Economic Effects

The facilitated the unauthorized exchange of billions of files, peaking with around 3 million concurrent users in 2005, primarily for , films, and software, which the entertainment linked to revenue shortfalls across cultural sectors. The International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI) and similar groups estimated that networks, including eDonkey, contributed to global recorded revenues falling from $38.1 billion in to $26.0 billion by 2006, attributing much of the decline to substitution effects where downloads displaced paid purchases. However, peer-reviewed analyses of the broader era, such as Oberholzer-Gee and Strumpf's examination of German data, concluded that had no statistically significant negative effect on sales, with downloads potentially serving as sampling tools that boosted exposure without proportional loss. Economically, eDonkey's hybrid architecture supported efficient sharing of large files, accelerating of video content and pressuring and software markets; a 2009 Dutch study on file sharing's effects across music, , and identified short-term revenue displacement—estimated at 20-30% for some titles—but noted long-term adaptations like streaming services mitigating harms through new models. Industry-led enforcement, including the 2006 $30 million by eDonkey's MetaMachine with major labels, underscored perceived threats, yet causal attribution remains contested, as concurrent factors like the rise of (capturing 70% of digital downloads by 2006) and format shifts explained much of the physical media downturn. These dynamics spurred economic innovation, with P2P pressures credited for hastening legal platforms that grew digital revenues to $7.9 billion by 2010, though without resolving debates over net welfare losses for creators. Culturally, eDonkey democratized access to diverse , enabling niche communities to share rare or region-locked content and fostering a of digital commons that challenged traditional gatekeepers in music and dissemination. This shifted consumption patterns toward globalized, user-driven discovery, with empirical work indicating P2P networks increased cultural trade flows and reduced protectionist barriers, exposing users to foreign works and potentially enhancing diversity—e.g., higher demand for non-domestic in high-piracy markets. Conversely, pervasive unauthorized sharing normalized infringement, eroding incentives for original production and prompting backlash from artists; surveys from the era linked heavy P2P use to diminished perceived value of , altering public norms around ownership in . Long-term, eDonkey's legacy includes influencing open-access movements and hybrid models, but at the cost of intensified legal-cultural tensions, as seen in ongoing debates over piracy's role in stifling versus stimulating creative output.

Ongoing Network Status

As of October 2025, the persists in a diminished capacity, sustained by open-source clients like and volunteer-operated servers, despite the original eDonkey2000 software's discontinuation in 2005 following legal settlements with the RIAA. Community-maintained server lists, updated daily, document active infrastructure supporting via the eD2k protocol and KAD decentralized routing. For instance, the Security safe server list generated on October 26, 2025, includes entries such as the Sweden-based server at 45.82.80.155:5687 reporting 31,043 users. Similarly, Peerates.net's online server monitoring as of recent checks lists the Astra-3 server with 3,044 users and 1,633,543 files, alongside others like eDonkey Server 2 with 196 users and 209,554 files, indicating sporadic but functional connectivity across global hosts. User activity remains niche, focused on sharing large or obscure files where torrent ecosystems prove less effective, though transfer speeds are generally slower than modern alternatives. Anecdotal reports from eMule users confirm ongoing seeding and downloads, with one instance documenting 584 GB shared in a single month as of August 2024, underscoring residual viability amid broader decline. The eMule client, last updated to support contemporary operating systems, facilitates connections to these resources, claiming access to a user base in the millions—though aggregate server metrics suggest far lower concurrent participation, likely in the tens of thousands globally. No significant enforcement disruptions have been reported since the mid-2000s, allowing the network to operate in relative obscurity, bolstered by protocol features like credit systems and to evade basic detection. Server operators emphasize security through vetted lists to mitigate risks from malicious or low-performance hosts. Overall, while not competitive with dominant protocols like , the eDonkey infrastructure demonstrates resilience through decentralized evolution and community stewardship.

References

  1. [1]
    eDonkey and eMule - ScienceDirect.com
    eDonkey2000 was released in 1993 by MetaMachine as a semi-centralized network that gave users the ability to set up their own servers.
  2. [2]
    [PDF] eDonkey/ed2k: Study of A Young File Sharing Protocol
    Jun 6, 2002 · In this report we describe the recently developed eDonkey protocol and ed2k hyperlink format. Built on the paradigm of free global file sharing, ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] The eDonkey File-Sharing Network
    Abstract: The eDonkey 2000 file-sharing network is one of the most successful peer-to-peer file-sharing applications, especially in Germany.Missing: history | Show results with:history
  4. [4]
    eDonkey Firm to Pay RIAA $30 Million - BetaNews
    Sep 12, 2006 · As part of the settlement, MetaMachine has agreed to cease distributing eDonkey, eDonkey 2000, Overnet and other variants of the peer-to-peer ...
  5. [5]
    EDonkey File-Sharing Network Is Shut Down - Los Angeles Times
    Sep 13, 2006 · The company behind popular online file-sharing software eDonkey has agreed to pay $30 million to avoid potential copyright infringement ...Missing: RIAA | Show results with:RIAA
  6. [6]
    Jed McCaleb: Crypto Revolution with XRP and Stellar - INDODAX
    Oct 15, 2024 · McCaleb collaborated with his partner, Sam Yagan, to develop the eDonkey network, also known as eDonkey2000 or eD2K. This file-sharing ...Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
  7. [7]
    10th anniversary of file-sharing, take a look. - element14 Community
    May 14, 2012 · On the other hand there was eDonkey2000 with its server-based network (first release on September 6th, 2000). Unlike with Napster, everyone ...
  8. [8]
    Download Old Versions of eDonkey2000 for Windows
    Select Version of eDonkey2000 to Download for FREE! ; eDonkey2000 0.56, Jul 5, 2001, 574.98 KB ; eDonkey2000 0.57, Aug 25, 2001, 571.48 KB ; eDonkey2000 0.61, Oct ...
  9. [9]
    Bitcoin Maverick Returns for New Crack at Digital Currency | WIRED
    Sep 30, 2013 · In 2000, as Napster was starting to implode, he came up with a peer-to-peer filesharing network called eDonkey 2000 that soon became the world's ...
  10. [10]
    Jed McCaleb | People Directory - CryptoSlate
    In 2000, he founded MetaMachine Inc., releasing the eDonkey2000 application. This platform grew to support over 4 million active users and became a pioneer ...
  11. [11]
    WIPO Domain Name Decision: D2003-0420
    7.13 The Complainant s public use of EDONKEY2000 dates back to at least September 2000, although there is no need to determine the exact date in the context of ...
  12. [12]
    eMule: A Decade of File-Sharing Innovations - TorrentFreak
    May 13, 2012 · In June 2004, ed2k had about 2 million users while eDonkey2000's Overnet network only had about 800,000 users. So eMule was the leading ...Missing: peak | Show results with:peak
  13. [13]
    Guess Who Else Has 10 Million Users | HotHardware
    Jan 28, 2008 · The largest P2P networks, such as FastTrack and eDonkey2000, both topped out with approximately 5 million users. Gnutella, fronted by ...
  14. [14]
    eDonkey Settles With Majors To Tune Of $30m - Billboard
    Sep 12, 2006 · In a consent judgment filed today (Sept. 12), MetaMachine, Sam Yagan and Jed McCaleb agreed to pay $30 million to the labels. “We are pleased to ...Missing: lawsuit | Show results with:lawsuit
  15. [15]
    Fallout from Grokster case closes down eDonkey - Ars Technica
    Sep 30, 2005 · ... RIAA and the Supreme Court ruling in MGM v. Grokster had caused it to shut down its operations. Sam Yagan, whose company MetaMachine, Inc.
  16. [16]
    eDonkey Is Dead, Long Live eMule - WIRED
    Sep 12, 2006 · eDonkey2000.com is now offline. However, eMule (originally developed as an open-source eDonkey clone) is still alive and kicking, so to speak.Missing: founding | Show results with:founding
  17. [17]
    eDonkey network shut down | TechPowerUp
    Sep 14, 2006 · It looks like eDonkey is gone for good. MetaMachine, the owner of eDonkey, eDonkey 2000, and Overnet has decided, under an agreement with ...
  18. [18]
    Shutdown of eDonkey file-sharing servers may be short-lived
    Sep 21, 2007 · Seven servers that were part of the eDonkey file-sharing network were shut down this week in Germany after a court granted injunctions, said the ...
  19. [19]
    eDonkey quits -- another win for the RIAA - The Guardian
    Sep 30, 2005 · Both decisions were driven by letters sent Sept. 15 by the RIAA to seven prominent P2P networks, demanding that they either implement technology ...Missing: facts | Show results with:facts
  20. [20]
    Performance Analysis of the Multi-Source File Transfer Protocol in ...
    Jul 9, 2020 · Some popular peer-to-peer file sharing applications based on MFTP include eDonkey2000, Overnet, and BitTorrent. ... peer-to-peer architecture ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] The eDonkey 2000 Protocol - Kommunikationsnetze – TU Darmstadt
    The Edonkey2000 Protocol is one of the most successful file sharing protocols and used by the original. Edonkey2000 client and the open source clients ...
  22. [22]
    (PDF) The eDonkey File-Sharing Network. - ResearchGate
    Many protocols have been designed for P2P file sharing, such as the BT [44], eDonkey [45] , FastTrack [46], and Gnutella [47]. Many applications based on the ...
  23. [23]
    eDonkey Bows To RIAA Pressure - Neowin
    Sep 30, 2005 · Over the summer eDonkey were sent a letter by the RIAA demanding that they either implement technology acceptable to the RIAA or shut down.
  24. [24]
    RIAA drops the dead eDonkey - Pinsent Masons
    Sep 14, 2006 · Metamachine's bosses, Sam Yagan and Jed McCaleb, have been told to stop users from file-swapping through eDonkey 2000 network. And there are ...
  25. [25]
    RIAA v. The People: Five Years Later | Electronic Frontier Foundation
    Sep 30, 2008 · On September 8, 2003, the recording industry sued 261 American music fans for sharing songs on peer-to-peer (P2P) file sharing networks.
  26. [26]
    EDonkey Servers Shut Down by IFPI, Local Authorities - WIRED
    Sep 24, 2007 · The creators of the eDonkey2000 client settled with the RIAA for $30 million in September of 2006, but the network has continued to operate in ...
  27. [27]
    File-sharing site eDonkey kicks it - CNET
    Sep 13, 2006 · P2P firm agrees to $30 million settlement in copyright case, becomes latest victim of illegal file-sharing crackdown.
  28. [28]
    EDonkey settles record industry battle for $30 million - InfoWorld
    Sep 13, 2006 · Company agrees to refrain from copying, distributing, or otherwise infringing on copyrighted works.
  29. [29]
    MPAA lawsuits target BitTorrent, eDonkey and Direct Connect ...
    Dec 14, 2004 · After joining the RIAA by suing purported copyright infringing P2P users, the MPAA has announced a series of lawsuits against server owners ...
  30. [30]
    MPAA Rejoices Over eDonkey Shutdown - BetaNews
    The network's creator, MetaMachine, is facing an RIAA lawsuit and said it was "throwing in the towel" last September. But an open source iteration of the ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  31. [31]
    EDonkey Operators to Pay $30M to Avoid Piracy Claims | Law.com
    The firm behind popular online file-sharing software eDonkey has agreed to pay $30 million to avoid potential copyright infringement lawsuits from the ...
  32. [32]
    Protocol Summary and Ports Range of Edonkey,Emule
    Edonkey(Emule) uses TCP and UDP to connect to eD2K and Kad networks. Port 4242 is used for login. If this port can not be reached, it will try other ports.
  33. [33]
    [PDF] A Global View of KAD - acm sigcomm
    One exception is kad, a DHT based on Kadem- lia, which is part of eDonkey2000, a peer-to-peer file sharing ... counting a million or more users at their peak time ...<|separator|>
  34. [34]
    eDonkey & eMule's Kad: Measurements & Attacks
    Since the demise of the Overnet network, the Kad network has become the most popular peer-to-peer system based on a distributed hash table. It is likely that ...
  35. [35]
    A Hard Ride For eDonkey - Bloomberg.com
    Oct 23, 2005 · Grokster Ltd. -- the record and movie industries' lawsuit against a file-sharing service that let people swap pirated copies of music and films.
  36. [36]
    [PDF] Ups and downs Economic and cultural effects of file sharing ... - IVIR
    Feb 18, 2009 · The main aim of this study is to identify the short- and long-term economic and cultural effects of file sharing on music, films and games.
  37. [37]
    [PDF] Peer-to-peer file sharing and cultural trade protectionism
    We show that online sharing exerts downward pressure on content prices and displaces demand from domestic content towards foreign content in countries that ...
  38. [38]
    File Sharing and Copyright: Innovation Policy and the Economy
    The advent of file‐sharing technology has allowed consumers to copy music, books, video games, and other protected works on an unprecedented scale at minimal ...<|separator|>
  39. [39]
    Safe Server List for eMule. Generated: October 26 2025 20:32:58 ...
    Safe server list, server.met for eDonkey and eMule, updates daily.
  40. [40]
    Emule/eDonkey online servers list
    How to Safely Use eMule With a VPN in 2025: Full Guide - SafetyDetectives ... STATUS. IP:PORT. 1, Astra-3, 3147, 1743342, WORKING, 213.252.245.239:43333. 2 ...
  41. [41]
    Emule/eDonkey online servers list - Peerates.net
    USERS. FILES. STATUS. IP:PORT. 1, Astra-3, 3044, 1633543, WORKING, 213.252 ... eDonkey Server 2, 196, 209554, ONLINE, 31.40.212.254:9197. 12, Pentium Pilat 2022 ...
  42. [42]
    eMule is still working! 584 GB "seeded" in a month. It's ... - Reddit
    Aug 24, 2024 · eMule is still working! 584 GB "seeded" in a month. It's nothing compared to torrent stats, but it is noticeable. Do you still use any hash- ...<|separator|>
  43. [43]
    eMule-Project.net - Official eMule Homepage. Downloads, Help ...
    eMule is a free and open-source peer-to-peer file sharing client, allowing you to connect to millions of users to download and share files with them.
  44. [44]
    eMule: What It Is, How It Works, and Why It's Still Relevant
    Jan 16, 2025 · Why eMule is still relevant today. How eMule Works: Understanding P2P Software. The eDonkey2000 network and the technology behind eMule.