Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

EU-Alert

EU-Alert is a Public Warning Service that employs technology to transmit emergency alerts to mobile devices within designated geographic areas across the . Defined in technical specification TS 102 900, the system supports delivery of warnings for imminent threats such as , severe weather, terrorist acts, and crises, utilizing device-based geo-fencing for targeted dissemination without requiring user registration or data collection. The framework for EU-Alert stems from Article 110 of the European Electronic Communications Code (Directive (EU) 2018/1972), which obligates EU member states to establish and operate public warning systems capable of sending geo-targeted alerts to all mobile phones located in affected zones, with a compliance deadline of 21 June 2022. This directive aims to enhance citizen safety by ensuring rapid, location-specific notifications, complementing traditional alert methods like sirens and broadcasts, and accommodating roaming users through multilingual support and compatibility with to networks. Implementation of EU-Alert varies by member state, with national adaptations such as the ' NL-Alert serving as early models, while others employ hybrid approaches including location-based alongside . As of December 2024, assessments indicate persistent gaps in full compliance across the EU, underscoring needs for improved operational strategies, inter-agency coordination, and resilience against challenges like cybersecurity and network evolution to . Despite these hurdles, the system's deployment has demonstrated potential in real-world scenarios, such as rapid warnings during floods and volcanic events in adopting regions, prioritizing empirical effectiveness over uniform technological mandates.

Overview

Definition and Purpose

EU-Alert is the standardized nomenclature for the European Union’s public warning service, which employs cell broadcast technology to deliver geo-targeted emergency messages directly to mobile devices within designated areas. This system enables authorities to broadcast alerts without requiring individual subscriptions or network overload, as messages are transmitted via the cellular broadcast channel compatible with 2G and subsequent network generations. It aligns technically with the Wireless Emergency Alerts (WEA) framework used in the United States, facilitating interoperability for multinational threats. The primary purpose of EU-Alert is to provide rapid, authoritative notifications to the public about imminent or unfolding emergencies, including like floods or earthquakes, events, industrial accidents, and public safety threats such as terrorist incidents. By leveraging , it ensures alerts reach all compatible devices in the affected zone—estimated to cover over 90% of modern smartphones—regardless of roaming status or data connectivity, thereby minimizing response times and potentially reducing casualties. This capability addresses gaps in traditional media dissemination, where delays or uneven coverage can hinder effective warnings, as evidenced by post-event analyses of disasters like the . Mandated under Article 110 of the European Electronic Communications Code (Directive (EU) 2018/1972), -Alert fulfills the EU’s legal obligation for member states to deploy functional public warning systems by October 2022, with extensions for technical compliance. The initiative prioritizes causal effectiveness in crisis management by integrating with national alert infrastructures while promoting harmonized message formats, such as the Common Alert Message Format, to avoid fragmentation across borders. Empirical data from pilot implementations, including those funded under Horizon 2020, demonstrate its role in enhancing and compliance with the EU’s broader disaster resilience strategy. The legal mandate for EU-Alert originates from Article 110 of Directive (EU) 2018/1972, the European Electronic Communications Code, which requires all EU Member States to ensure the deployment of public warning systems by 21 June 2022. Under this provision, when such systems are activated for imminent or developing major emergencies and disasters, public warnings must be transmitted via publicly available interpersonal communications services based on public mobile communications networks to all or specific end-users located in all or specific exposed areas. Providers of these services are obligated to distribute the alerts free of charge, in cooperation with competent authorities, prioritizing technical solutions like for rapid, targeted delivery that reaches users irrespective of their domestic or roaming status. EU-Alert's scope focuses on enabling geo-targeted dissemination of emergency notifications to mobile devices within affected geographic zones, covering threats such as , events, terrorist incidents, and child abductions via variants, without requiring end-user opt-in, registration, or disclosure of . As specified in TS 102 900, the service utilizes technology across to networks, supporting multilingual transmission through unique Message Identifiers, Device-Based Geo-Fencing for precision, and message types including primary alerts, advisory notifications, test messages, and post-disaster guidance, with delivery achievable within approximately three minutes via two 93-character bursts. This harmonized approach ensures interoperability for roaming subscribers and consistent terminal handling, while Member States retain authority over alert content, activation triggers, and language (typically national), fostering effective population-level warnings without supplanting national responsibilities. Alternative transmission methods, such as location-based or dedicated applications, may supplement or substitute if assessed as equivalently effective in reach, timeliness, and by Member States, guided by the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC). The directive emphasizes accessibility for all end-users, including those with disabilities, and clear, actionable messaging to mitigate risks from hazards determined by national authorities.

Historical Development

Origins in EU Policy

The policy foundations for EU-Alert emerged from EU initiatives to enhance cross-border emergency communications, driven by the need for standardized public warnings in response to disasters and threats. Technical groundwork was laid by the (ETSI) through its Emergency Telecommunications (EMTEL) group, which published TS 102 900 in 2009, specifying EU-Alert as a cell broadcast service for delivering multilingual emergency messages to mobile devices without requiring user registration or network overload. This standard drew from national pilots, such as the ' NL-Alert launched in 2012, but lacked binding EU enforcement, leaving implementation optional under prior directives like the 2002 Framework Directive (2002/21/EC). Advocacy for a mandatory EU-wide system intensified in the mid-2010s, led by organizations like the European Emergency Number Association (EENA), which since the early had lobbied for mobile-based alerts, including backing a 2009 European Parliament Written Declaration on disaster information via mobiles that garnered over 400,000 signatures. This culminated in the European Commission's proposal for the European Electronic Communications Code (EECC) on 14 September 2016, embedded in the Strategy to recast outdated telecom rules and prioritize citizen safety amid rising migration, , and natural hazards. The EECC introduced Article 110, mandating that member states establish public warning systems delivering geo-targeted, free-of-charge alerts to all compatible devices in affected areas, including for roaming users, to bridge gaps in national capabilities. Adopted as Directive (EU) 2018/1972 on 11 December 2018, the EECC set a transposition deadline of 21 December 2020, with operational readiness for alerts by 21 June 2022, marking the first EU-level compulsion for such systems despite technical readiness in standards since 2009. This policy shift reflected causal recognition that fragmented national approaches—evident in events like the 2011 alerts inspiring adaptations—hindered effective response in a borderless union, prioritizing empirical over voluntary compliance. While standards ensured technical neutrality, the EECC's focus on cell broadcast and alternatives like aimed at rapid dissemination, though implementation variances persisted due to national sovereignty in alert content.

Key Milestones and Deadlines

The European Public Warning System, standardized as EU-Alert, originated with the publication of TS 102 900 version 1.1.1 in October 2010, which outlined system requirements for disseminating alerts via Service in , , and networks. In 2012, national pilots like the ' NL-Alert demonstrated practical deployment using the specification, sending location-targeted warnings to mobile devices without requiring user registration. The EU formalized the mandate through Directive (EU) 2018/1972, adopted by the and Council on 11 December 2018, establishing the European Electronic Communications Code (EECC) and requiring member states to enable public authorities to disseminate warnings via electronic communications networks, prioritizing technologies like for geographic targeting. Member states faced a transposition deadline of 21 December 2020 to incorporate the EECC into national legislation, including provisions under Article 110 for public capabilities. The core deadline arrived on 21 June 2022, by which all member states were required to ensure public warning systems could alert populations in affected areas using mobile networks, with alerts supporting multiple languages and device compatibility where feasible. Technical refinements continued with ETSI TS 102 900 version 1.3.1 in February 2019 and version 1.4.1 in June 2023, enhancing protocols for integration and message formatting to align with the EECC requirements.
DateMilestone/Deadline
October 2010 TS 102 900 v1.1.1 published, defining EU-Alert technical baseline.
2012Initial national rollout (e.g., NL-Alert operational).
11 December 2018EECC Directive (EU) 2018/1972 adopted, mandating public warning systems.
21 December 2020National transposition deadline for EECC.
21 June 2022Deadline for operational public warning systems across EU member states.
June 2023 TS 102 900 v1.4.1 released, supporting advanced network features.

EU Legislation and Requirements

The European Electronic Communications Code (EECC), established by Directive (EU) 2018/1972, forms the core legislative basis for EU-Alert, with Article 110 specifically mandating the deployment of public warning systems across Member States. Adopted by the and Council on 11 December 2018 and entering into force on 20 December 2018, the directive required transposition into national law by 21 December 2020. Article 110(1) stipulates that by 21 June 2022, Member States must ensure these systems enable public authorities to disseminate geo-targeted alerts via public mobile communications networks to all end-users' mobile devices in designated areas during imminent or developing major emergencies or disasters, where such alerts are essential for safeguarding life and property. Article 110(2) further requires that alert dissemination rely on the service, as defined in Technical Specification 23.041, or an equivalent technology ensuring delivery to every device in the targeted geographic zone irrespective of network subscription, data plan, or roaming status. This includes transmission by providers of number-independent interpersonal communications services to end-users in affected areas, as determined by competent national authorities, with optional supplementation via other electronic services or internet-based mobile applications provided they maintain high data security standards. Member States may evaluate alternative systems for equivalence against , guided by BEREC (Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications) guidelines developed in consultation with public safety authorities. Supporting recitals, such as Recital 293, emphasize broad reach: upon entering a , end-users must receive an automatic, cost-free with instructions on accessing warnings, ensuring visitors and transient users are informed. The framework prioritizes emergencies like , , terrorist acts, or industrial accidents, aligning with Union-wide goals for without prescribing uniform content formats, which remain under national discretion. Non-compliance risks infringement proceedings by the , though enforcement varies by state.

ETSI Standards and Specifications

The primary ETSI standard governing EU-Alert is TS 102 900, titled "Emergency Communications (EMTEL); European Public Warning System (EU-ALERT) using the Cell Broadcast Service," which outlines the system requirements for delivering public warnings via cell broadcast technology across European mobile networks. This specification, first published in earlier versions around 2010 and updated to version 1.4.1 in June 2023, mandates the use of the Cell Broadcast Service (CBS) as defined in ETSI TS 123 041 for efficient, geo-targeted dissemination of alerts without requiring individual device subscriptions or network overload from point-to-point messaging. Key requirements in TS 102 900 include support for EU-Alert on () networks and all subsequent technologies such as , , and , ensuring while enabling high-capacity broadcasting to all devices in a targeted or area. The standard specifies message serialization using a protocol buffer format for structured content, including identifiers, geographic targeting via cell IDs or polygons, and multilingual text up to 1,390 characters per message segment, with serialization ensuring interoperability across vendors. It also defines serial numbers for message tracking, with a 16-bit value incrementing per event to prevent duplicates and support cancellation or update mechanisms. EU-Alert messaging under this standard aligns with TS 22.268, which provides service requirements for public warning systems (PWS) in , , , and , including primary and secondary notification tones, vibration patterns, and popup displays on compatible devices. The generic service name "EU-ALERT" allows national customization (e.g., "NL-ALERT" for the ), and messages must include mandatory fields like event type codes from predefined lists for hazards such as earthquakes, tsunamis, or . TS 123 041 complements this by detailing CBS channel management, with EU-Alert assigned to specific message codes (e.g., codes 0x110A to 0x110F for primary alerts) to avoid conflicts with other services. Additional ETSI technical reports support implementation, such as TR 102 850, which analyzes functionality for PWS reception, including battery-efficient processing and user overrides, though these are non-binding guidance rather than mandatory specifications. Compliance with TS 102 900 ensures alerts reach all active devices in the broadcast area instantaneously, with no user data collection, prioritizing and over alternatives like SMS-based systems. These standards, developed by ETSI's Technical Committee EMTEL, reflect input from European regulators and operators to meet EU mandates under the European Electronic Communications Code.

Core Technical Standards

EU-Alert Protocol

The EU-Alert protocol establishes the technical framework for disseminating public warning messages across European mobile networks using the Service (CBS), as detailed in ETSI TS 102 900. This protocol enables authorities to deliver geo-targeted alerts to all compatible devices within specified areas, supporting threats such as natural disasters, terrorist attacks, or emergencies, without reliance on user subscriptions or data connections. It integrates with CBS specifications from 3GPP TS 23.041, ensuring compatibility from networks through , and incorporates Device-Based Geo-Fencing for precise targeting based on device location. Messages under the protocol are categorized into types including Alerts (with severity levels 1 to 4, where Level 1 denotes extreme threats with no user opt-out option), Advisory notifications (EU-Info for non-urgent updates), Amber alerts for missing children, and Test messages (such as monthly system tests). Each alert comprises up to two 93-character pages of text per supported language, transmitted within a 3-minute window to ensure rapid delivery. Language support defaults to the originator's native tongue, with optional additional languages indicated via the Data Coding Scheme as per ETSI TS 123 038; user equipment (UE) displays messages in the preferred or detected local language when multiple identifiers are used. Core parameters are adapted for EU-Alert: dedicated Message Identifiers (MI) from the Public Warning System range (4352–6399 decimal) signal specific types and severity levels, with Level 1 using codes for mandatory national alerts and higher levels allowing via settings. Serial numbers track message updates or cancellations, while the handles and language tagging. Transmission occurs via broadcast channels from base stations to UEs in targeted cells, with no acknowledgment required to minimize network load; UEs must prioritize EU-Alert reception, triggering distinct audio tones, vibrations, and pop-up displays even during active calls or apps, though without interrupting ongoing sessions. The protocol mandates for users, ensuring alerts reach visitors in host countries using compatible devices, and includes provisions for embedding URLs or phone numbers in messages where national regulations permit. Compliance requires network operators to support page scheduling and manufacturers to implement alert prioritization, with specifying dedicated alerting indications like screen flashes or repeating sounds for accessibility. As of the 2023 revision, the protocol aligns with EU mandates under the European Electronic Communications Code, emphasizing reliability over voice or alternatives due to 's resistance to congestion.

Cell Broadcast Implementation

Cell Broadcast (CB) implementation for EU-Alert utilizes the standardized Service as specified in TS 23.041, serving as the primary bearer technology for delivering geo-targeted emergency messages to compatible mobile devices across , , , and networks. This approach broadcasts short text alerts from base stations to all devices in designated cells without needing phone numbers or active connections, enabling near-instantaneous dissemination to potentially millions of users in affected areas. Unlike SMS-based systems, CB does not congest voice or data channels, as messages are one-way and repeated cyclically until cleared, with delivery times under 3 minutes for full coverage. The EU-Alert protocol extends standard with specific message identifiers (MIs) tailored to alert severities, such as dedicated ranges for Level 1 (extreme threats like imminent floods or attacks, with mandatory display and no ), Level 2 (severe threats), advisory levels, EU-Amber child s (opt-in), and test messages. Each message comprises up to 82 bytes (93 characters in GSM-7 encoding), structured with a for uniqueness, geographical scope indicators, and data coding schemes supporting multiple languages via variant MIs for local display. Alerts trigger device-specific behaviors, including priority pop-up display, audible tones, and vibrations, overriding silent modes but not pre-empting ongoing calls. For multi-language support, messages may be transmitted twice within the 3-minute window using different coding schemes. Network operators implement through dedicated Cell Broadcast Centers (CBCs) that interface with national warning authorities, authenticating inputs via secure protocols like IP validation and access controls to ensure only verified sources trigger broadcasts. Geo-targeting employs device-based geo-fencing (DBGF), where reports location to filter irrelevant alerts, or cell-level selection for broader areas, reducing overshoot into unaffected regions while complying with EECC Article 110 mandates for location-specific delivery. Activation occurs via operator provisioning in device settings or over-the-air network commands, with support embedded in mobile OSes like and since 2012.
Alert LevelMessage Identifier ExampleUser ControlTypical Use Case
Level 1 (Extreme)National/Extreme per TS 102 900No ; mandatoryImminent life-threatening events (e.g., , attack)
Level 2 (Severe)Severe Threat allowedHigh-risk hazards (e.g., wildfires, severe storms)
Advisory/TestAdvisory or EU-Test /opt-inGeneral info or system tests
EU-AmberChild alert Opt-in onlyMissing children searches
Security measures include serial number management to avoid replays and integration with Common Alerting Protocol (CAP) for structured inputs, though EU-Alert prioritizes CB's simplicity over CAP's full XML parsing on devices. As of 2023, ETSI specifications require CBCs to handle up to 1,000 pages per minute per cell for high-density scenarios, ensuring scalability during mass events.

Integration with Mobile Networks

EU-Alert integrates with mobile networks through the Cell Broadcast Service (CBS), a standardized one-to-many messaging mechanism defined in 3GPP TS 23.041, enabling geo-targeted dissemination of emergency alerts to all compatible devices within specified cells without requiring individual subscriptions or network congestion from point-to-point SMS. The core component is the Cell Broadcast Center (CBC), which interfaces with the mobile network operator's (MNO) core network to distribute alerts generated by public authorities, using protocols that ensure rapid delivery independent of user data traffic. In and networks, the connects to the () via the CBC-BSS interface, specifying primitives for message scheduling, distribution, and cell selection to broadcast short messages over the air interface to () tuned to CBS channels. For (), integration occurs via the SBc reference point, linking the to the Mobility Management Entity () in the core network, which forwards alerts to eNodeBs for broadcast; this supports Device-Based Geo-Fencing for precise targeting. In systems, the interfaces with the Access and Mobility Management Function (AMF) to deliver messages to next-generation NodeBs (gNBs), maintaining compatibility with prior generations while leveraging enhanced broadcast capabilities for larger areas and higher reliability. MNOs are mandated under Article 110 of the European Electronic Communications Code (Directive (EU) 2018/1972) to provision their networks for EU-Alert transmission by June 21, 2022, including activation of support, which may involve software configurations or upgrades to ensure coverage across to infrastructure. This requires UEs to be pre-provisioned or remotely activated to receive EU-Alert on designated message identifiers (e.g., 4355) and serial numbers, a capability integrated into major operating systems like and since 2012. Security protocols, including IP validation and access controls, prevent unauthorized broadcasts, with alerts formatted per TS 102 900 for multilingual delivery and vibration/audio cues. While provides unconfirmed delivery to cells, integration challenges include ensuring interoperability across MNOs for roaming users and fallback to location-based in networks lacking full CBS deployment, as permitted by requirements for equivalent geo-targeting. Compliance testing verifies end-to-end functionality, with standards emphasizing minimal latency—typically under 10 seconds for message propagation—to maximize effectiveness in disasters.

Implementation by Member States

National Rollouts and Status as of 2025

As of October 2025, EU-Alert systems utilizing technology for public warnings have been rolled out in several member states, though adoption remains uneven due to technical challenges, varying national priorities, and the allowance under EU law for alternative methods like location-based SMS. The European Electronic Communications Code (EECC) Article 110 mandates public warning systems capable of delivering geo-targeted alerts to mobile users, but does not require specifically, leading to diverse implementations. Countries with operational -based EU-Alert include the , where NL-Alert has been active since 2012 and integrates the EU-Alert protocol for nationwide emergency notifications. Spain's ES-Alert system, compliant with standards, became operational in June 2022, enabling rapid dissemination of alerts for and other threats via across mobile networks. has similarly deployed a public warning system, integrated with national emergency frameworks, as part of broader EECC compliance efforts. and employ mobile-based warnings as their primary public warning mechanism. activated its nationwide system on July 1, 2025, with the first test message sent on July 10, 2025, supported by funds to enhance early warning capabilities. Other member states lag in cell broadcast adoption, opting for alternatives or facing delays. Belgium relies on location-based SMS for BE-Alert, while Hungary uses a similar SMS approach. Sweden plans to implement SE-Alert cell broadcast in 2026 to complement existing systems. Estonia allocated €3.7 million for a cell broadcast system, targeted for operation by 2027. Portugal maintains a location-based SMS system pending upgrade to cell broadcast. These variations reflect practical hurdles, including network operator cooperation and infrastructure costs, despite EU-wide standardization efforts via ETSI specifications. By mid-2025, fewer than half of EU member states had fully operational EU-Alert cell broadcast systems, with ongoing pilots and procurements in others to meet effectiveness benchmarks outlined by BEREC.

Variations in Adoption and Technology Choices

EU member states exhibit variations in EU-Alert adoption, with differences in rollout timelines and preferred technologies despite the European Electronic Communications Code's requirement for geo-targeted mobile alerts by October 17, 2022. Many states faced implementation delays due to network upgrades and regulatory coordination, resulting in incomplete coverage in several countries as of 2025. Technology choices primarily diverge between (CB) and Location-Based SMS (LB-SMS), with CB favored for its rapid dissemination via broadcast channels without overloading signaling networks, enabling near-instant alerts to all devices in a targeted area regardless of user settings. In contrast, LB-SMS involves querying device locations before sending individual messages, which can introduce delays of up to several minutes and risk during mass events. As of March 2025, 11 countries had deployed systems, 7 relied on LB-SMS, 4 implemented both, and 5 were still developing their solutions, reflecting preferences based on existing infrastructure and cost considerations. For instance, utilizes for efficient area-wide alerting, while employs LB-SMS, which allows for two-way communication but at the expense of speed. Estonia exemplifies a choice of LB-SMS over , citing easier integration with current systems, though tests revealed significantly slower delivery times compared to CB implementations in peer nations, potentially compromising urgency in time-sensitive emergencies like . Some states, such as those using both technologies, aim to leverage for immediate broadcasts and LB-SMS for follow-up personalized instructions, enhancing overall resilience.

Alternative and Complementary Systems

Downloadable Mobile Applications

Downloadable mobile applications function as supplementary channels to the core EU-Alert cell broadcast system, enabling authorities to deliver expanded content such as maps, images, safety instructions, and ongoing updates via notifications. Unlike broadcast methods, these apps rely on user opt-in through downloading and enabling location services or notifications, which restricts universal reach but allows for personalized, multimedia-enriched alerts tailored to user-selected risks like or industrial accidents. Adoption varies by , often serving as interim or parallel tools during EU-Alert rollouts, with integration potential for follow-up messaging after initial broadcasts. In Germany, the NINA (Notfall-Informations- und Nachrichten-App) app, operated by the Federal Office of Civil Protection and Disaster Assistance (BBK), provides nationwide, location-aware warnings for hazards including floods, storms, and nuclear incidents. Launched in 2017 as the country's first population-wide alerting tool, NINA complements cell broadcast by offering detailed event descriptions and behavioral guidance, with notifications triggered by the same national warning centers. By September 2022, German network operators like Telekom confirmed readiness to pair NINA with EU-Alert broadcasts for hybrid alerting. Austria and parts of Germany utilize the Katwarn app for geo-targeted disaster notifications, covering events such as major fires, , and evacuations. Developed with input from civil protection agencies, Katwarn supports cross-border —enabling German users to receive Austrian alerts—and underpins the EUwarn system for interoperable warnings. The app's location-based push alerts allow users to register interest in specific areas, enhancing precision but requiring active use and data connectivity. Other member states employ similar apps, such as Belgium's Biwapp for registered user alerts on localized threats, often integrated with national services. These tools address gaps in broadcast systems, like limited message length, by providing verifiable, authority-sourced follow-ups, though challenges include variable download rates—estimated below 20-30% in some nations based on data—and dependency on device and availability for real-time delivery. Efforts like the Pan-European Mobile Emergency Apps (PEMEA) project, initiated by the European Emergency Number Association around 2017, aim to standardize app interoperability for cross-border alerts and emergency access, though primarily focused on caller location sharing rather than public warnings.

Location-Based SMS and Other Methods

Location-based (LB-SMS) enables emergency authorities to send targeted short message service alerts to mobile subscribers within a defined geographic area by leveraging network-provided , such as cell tower identifiers or more precise positioning methods. This method differs from , which transmits messages simultaneously to all devices in affected cells without individual addressing, as LB-SMS operates on a one-to-one basis, allowing for potential where recipients can reply to authorities. In the , LB-SMS serves as an alternative or supplementary approach to fulfill obligations under the European Electronic Communications Code (EECC) Article 110, which mandates public warning systems capable of alerting populations in imminent danger zones via mobile networks, though the EU prioritizes for its efficiency and universality. Belgium employs LB-SMS through its BE-Alert system, which automatically registers users based on address data from national registries and disseminates location-targeted messages during emergencies, such as floods or terrorist threats, without requiring opt-in. Similarly, systems in non-EU contexts like have utilized LB-SMS for volcanic eruptions, sending alerts to phones detected in hazard zones, demonstrating its applicability for rapid, area-specific notifications. However, LB-SMS faces limitations including potential during mass dispatch, dependency on active subscriptions and device connectivity, and privacy implications from location querying, contrasting with cell broadcast's and resistance to overload. Beyond LB-SMS, complementary methods in EU member states include multi-channel alerting via voice calls, emails, and integration with traditional media like radio and television broadcasts, often coordinated through (CAP) for interoperability. For instance, some national systems combine mobile alerts with siren networks and public address systems for broader coverage, particularly in rural areas where mobile penetration may vary. Emerging satellite-based services, such as the Galileo Emergency Warning Satellite Service (EWSS) initiated in 2024, aim to directly broadcast alerts to compatible devices in remote or network-disrupted regions, bypassing terrestrial mobile infrastructure. These alternatives enhance resilience but require harmonization to align with EU-Alert's core, with ongoing evaluations emphasizing hybrid approaches for comprehensive public warning efficacy as of 2025.

Effectiveness and Real-World Applications

Case Studies of Deployments

One prominent involves the ' NL-Alert system, which has utilized technology for public warnings since its full operational rollout in 2012. In its inaugural year (November 2012 to November 2013), NL-Alert was deployed multiple times in response to localized emergencies, including industrial incidents and public safety threats in cities such as Meppel, where authorities issued alerts to evacuate or , prompting varied citizen behaviors ranging from adaptive actions like seeking shelter to avoidance in some cases. These activations reached millions of users within targeted areas, with evaluations indicating high penetration rates but highlighting challenges in uniform response due to factors like alert fatigue and message clarity. In , the ES-Alert system, compliant with public warning requirements, has demonstrated effectiveness in real-life scenarios by delivering geo-targeted messages during imminent threats. For instance, activations have included warnings for and security incidents, enabling rapid dissemination to all compatible devices in affected zones without requiring user registration, thus ensuring broad coverage even for tourists and non-residents. Post-deployment analyses have confirmed the system's ability to provide immediate, accurate information, though social latency— the delay between alert receipt and action—varies based on environmental context and public awareness. Lithuania's cell broadcast-based system, implemented in 2012 as a multilingual complement to sirens, has been activated for events and emerging threats, such as drone incursions near borders in 2025. These deployments integrate with national protocols, automatically notifying users with compatible phones about risks like storms or aerial intrusions, with tests in 2024 verifying siren-phone synchronization for enhanced reliability. The system's use in these cases underscores its role in rapid alerting across diverse linguistic groups, though foreign residents have reported occasional gaps in comprehension without language options enabled.

Empirical Evaluations and Outcomes

Empirical evaluations of EU-Alert systems, primarily through implementations in member states, have demonstrated high user satisfaction in controlled s but revealed limitations in real-world geographic accuracy and response consistency. In Spain's ES-Alert system, a 2024 on involving over 50,000 participants yielded a 91.4% positive rating for the alerts, with more than 70% of respondents reacting within 10 minutes and a response time of 1 minute and 12 seconds. Urban and tourist areas showed faster responses compared to rural zones with lower technology penetration, though self-reported data limited precision. Studies on cell broadcast performance highlight spatial challenges, particularly in dense urban environments. A analysis across European deployments found that 41.8% of individuals in targeted alert areas did not receive notifications, with reception probability varying by mobile operator rather than device type. In France, where cell broadcast alerts have been operational since June 2022, simulated tests indicated strong potential reach but emphasized the need for multi-channel integration to address coverage gaps. Overall perceptions remain favorable, with broader surveys of ES-Alert users reporting 73.2% rating the system as "good" based on real-life activations for events like wildfires and floods. Real-world outcomes underscore both strengths and hurdles. Latvia's inaugural test in July 2025 confirmed message delivery without persistent notifications, aligning with design to prompt immediate attention. However, during Spain's October 2024 Valencia floods, ES-Alert notifications were issued, yet critiques focused on systemic delays rather than technological failure, with evidence suggesting early warnings could reduce damages by up to 30% if disseminated a day in advance. These evaluations indicate excels in rapid, area-wide dissemination but requires complementary methods for optimal efficacy amid varying network densities and human factors.

Challenges, Criticisms, and Limitations

Technical and Operational Hurdles

technology, the primary mechanism for EU-Alert, encounters compatibility challenges across diverse mobile devices and networks. Many older smartphones and certain manufacturer models, such as some devices prior to recent updates, do not support or have disabled reception, limiting reach to approximately 80-90% of modern networks in compliant countries. Additionally, reliance on and infrastructure excludes users in areas with lingering or coverage, where alerts fail to transmit reliably, as observed in tests across several member states. Geo-targeting precision poses another technical obstacle, requiring precise cell polygon definitions and secure key distribution to mobile network operators (MNOs). Inaccurate geofencing can result in over- or under-alerting, particularly in densely populated urban areas or near borders, complicating cross-member state coordination. Integration with existing national systems demands standardized protocols like the (CAP), yet variations in MNO implementations lead to interoperability issues, with some countries reporting delays in full network activation as late as 2024. Operationally, EU-Alert implementation has been hampered by uneven adoption, with only 11 member states fully deploying by March 2025, seven using Location-Based , four employing both, and five still in development, breaching the 2022 EECC 110 deadline. Coordination among public safety authorities, MNOs, and alert issuers requires robust governance frameworks, often lacking in smaller or less-resourced states, leading to testing shortfalls and unproven end-to-end reliability. Cybersecurity vulnerabilities, including risks of spoofed alerts or denial-of-service attacks on broadcast channels, further complicate operations, necessitating advanced encryption and monitoring that many systems have yet to fully incorporate. concerns with location-based alternatives exacerbate debates over choices, delaying efforts.

Economic Costs and Implementation Delays

The implementation of EU-Alert, a -based public warning system mandated under Article 110 of the European Electronic Communications Code (EECC), has imposed substantial economic burdens on EU member states and telecom operators, primarily involving network upgrades, backend infrastructure, and processes. Costs typically encompass enabling capabilities on mobile networks, developing alerting platforms, and integrating with national emergency services, with estimates varying by country size and existing infrastructure. For instance, allocated €3.7 million for its EU-Alert system rollout, including hardware and software adaptations, reflecting the need for nationwide coverage upgrades. In Ireland, the project has neared €1 million in expenditures, including €850,000 contracted in 2024 for advisory services to address and technical specifications, underscoring from extended planning phases. These figures highlight that while leverages existing mobile infrastructure to minimize marginal alerting costs per message, upfront capital investments for compliance can strain public budgets, particularly in smaller or less digitally mature states. Implementation delays have compounded these costs through prolonged advisory engagements, repeated tenders, and opportunity costs from deferred operational readiness. The EECC required member states to deploy functional public warning systems by June 2022, yet as of October 2025, several nations remain non-compliant or partially operational due to challenges in harmonizing standards, securing vendor contracts, and testing geo-targeted alerts. Ireland's rollout, initially targeted for earlier , slipped to December 2025 following a year-long pause for expert consultations, inflating advisory fees and delaying benefits like rapid . Cyprus experienced a major setback when its 2022 tender for the system was cancelled in May 2024 amid unspecified procurement issues, further postponing deployment and exposing vulnerabilities during events like the 2024 wildfires. Estonia, opting for despite slower transmission speeds compared to peers, projects full operations only by 2027, attributing delays to infrastructure retrofits and regulatory approvals. Such delays stem from fragmented national approaches to EU-wide standards, including variances in telecom operator readiness and the absence of centralized funding mechanisms, leading to inefficiencies like duplicated testing and vendor negotiations. Reports from the European Emergency Number Association (EENA) document persistent gaps, with over a decade from initial mandates to uneven adoption, resulting in preventable alert failures during crises and heightened economic risks from unmitigated s. While empirical returns on early warning investments can exceed tenfold through reduced disaster damages, deferred EU-Alert deployments forfeit these gains, amplifying fiscal pressures via ad-hoc responses to emergencies. Overall, these hurdles reflect causal tensions between rapid EU goals and sovereign implementation variances, with credible analyses emphasizing the need for streamlined to curb escalating costs.

Potential Drawbacks Including False Alarms and Privacy

False alarms in EU-Alert pose risks primarily through human error during alert authorization, technical glitches in the cell broadcast entity, or cyberattacks targeting 5G-integrated warning systems. Studies on analogous wireless emergency alert infrastructures have shown that spoofing attacks can enable unauthorized dissemination of fabricated alerts to specific geographic cells, potentially confined to urban areas with limited resources required by adversaries. Such incidents could trigger unwarranted public panic, overload response agencies, and diminish future compliance, as empirical analyses of alert systems indicate that repeated false positives erode trust and heighten vulnerability during genuine crises. In EU contexts, while no major false alarm events have been documented as of October 2025, the system's dependence on national authorities for trigger decisions amplifies the potential for misjudgments, akin to operator errors observed in comparable deployments like the U.S. Wireless Emergency Alerts. Spatial targeting limitations in further contribute to false alarms by alerting individuals outside precise hazard zones, particularly in dense urban environments where cell tower granularity averages 100-500 meters but can exceed 1 km in variability. A geo-located survey from the April 2023 Cannes tsunami simulation trial revealed significant inaccuracies, with up to 20-30% of recipients in peripheral areas receiving unnecessary warnings due to irregular cell geometries and signal overlap. These over-alerts, while not intentional falsehoods, may foster fatigue, reducing attentiveness to legitimate broadcasts over time. Privacy concerns with EU-Alert are mitigated by cell broadcast's anonymous, broadcast-only mechanism, which transmits alerts to all devices in defined cells without querying subscriber identities, locations, or logging receipts—unlike location-based SMS alternatives that necessitate mobile location center data collection. The European Digital Rights advocacy group has affirmed this approach incurs no inherent privacy risks, as it avoids personal data processing compliant with GDPR requirements for emergency communications. However, indirect vulnerabilities persist through reliance on telecom operators' infrastructures; misconfigurations could enable incidental metadata capture of device presence in alerted cells, though EU regulations under the European Electronic Communications Code mandate safeguards against such retention for non-emergency purposes. No verified privacy breaches have occurred in EU-Alert pilots or rollouts by mid-2025.

Future Directions

Ongoing Harmonization Efforts

Article 110 of the European Electronic Communications Code mandates that EU member states implement public warning systems capable of delivering geo-targeted alerts to mobile devices by June 21, 2022, using technologies such as to support EU-Alert. Despite this deadline, harmonization efforts persist to address uneven adoption and enhance across borders. Technical Specification TS 102 900, version 1.4.1 released in June 2023, outlines protocols for EU-Alert, including message formats and delivery mechanisms aligned with the mandate. Ongoing standardization work by ETSI's Technical Committee EMTEL focuses on refining EU-Alert features, such as device-based geo-fencing, silent alerts, and default device notifications, as detailed in the 2023 activity report. These updates aim to improve precision and user experience while ensuring compatibility with roaming users, facilitating potential cross-border alert dissemination. The European Emergency Number Association (EENA) monitors progress through reports highlighting implementation gaps, with some member states like allocating €3.7 million for a system operational by 2027. Efforts also integrate international standards like the () for better transnational coordination, as discussed in the 2025 CAP Implementation Workshop, which reviewed Europe's public warning systems under the EU-Alert framework. The EU's Rolling Plan for Standardisation in 2025 continues to prioritize emergency communications, emphasizing for disabled users and real-time text support to achieve fuller harmonization. As of July 2025, implementation varies, with several countries yet to fully deploy compliant systems, underscoring the protracted nature of these initiatives.

Technological Upgrades and Expansions

In response to identified limitations in location-based systems, such as delays and during high-demand events, several member states are transitioning to technology for EU-Alert implementations. enables near-instantaneous delivery of alerts to all compatible devices within a geographic cell without requiring individual subscriptions or app downloads, supporting multiple languages and operating across to networks. allocated €3.7 million for a new -based system in 2025, with annual maintenance costs of €500,000, targeting operational status by 2027 to replace unreliable alerts proven ineffective in tests. achieved a milestone in July 2025 by sending its first message, funded partly by structural funds, to modernize warnings for faster dissemination during disasters. initiated tendering processes in September 2025 for a nationwide public warning system to comply with EECC requirements and enhance alert precision. Expansions beyond terrestrial mobile networks include satellite-augmented alerting via the Galileo constellation. In 2024, the for the Programme (EUSPA) contracted GMV and partners for approximately €5.5 million over four years to upgrade the Galileo Emergency Warning Satellite (EWSS) and Emergency Alerting System (). This initiative, set for full operation by mid-2026, leverages Galileo satellites to broadcast detailed alerts—including hazard type, severity, affected area, onset, duration, and response guidance—directly to smartphones and IoT devices, particularly benefiting remote or network-disrupted regions while integrating with the Copernicus for data-driven enhancements. Emerging technological integrations aim to support multimedia content for more informative alerts. While current EU-Alert standards prioritize text via , 5G New Radio (NR) Public Warning Systems offer potential for high-speed delivery of images, videos, and interactive elements through channels like evolved (eMBMS). Industry trials and patents, such as Everbridge's 2020 innovation for -enabled multimedia alongside , demonstrate feasibility for richer alerts without compromising speed or universality, though widespread EU adoption awaits standardization under ongoing EECC harmonization efforts.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] ETSI TS 102 900 V1.4.1 (2023-06)
    The EU-Alert service is based on the Cell Broadcast Service as specified in ETSI TS 123 041 [1] and shall be supported on 2G as well as technologies beyond 2G.
  2. [2]
  3. [3]
    EENA publishes the Public Warning Report Card
    Dec 16, 2024 · The Public Warning Report Card reviews the technologies, strategies, and governance models employed by European countries to ensure compliance ...
  4. [4]
    The majority of EU countries are still not complying with the EECC
    EENA calls on the authorities that are not complying with article 110 of the EECC to take all the necessary measures to implement modern public warning systems ...
  5. [5]
    EU-Alert - LINKS Community Center
    All EU member states will also have to set up a public warning system to protect citizens. EU-Alert Implementation by member states (status Oct. 2023)
  6. [6]
    [PDF] ETSI TS 102 900 V1.3.1 (2019-02)
    NL-Alert has been implemented as the first Public Warning Service in Europe which is additional to existing services like siren systems, radio and/or television ...
  7. [7]
    What Is an Emergency Alert System? - BlackBerry
    4. EU-Alert ... Adopted by European member states, EU-Alert is a standardized system for communicating threats such as severe weather or security issues.
  8. [8]
    EECC Article 110 - Everbridge
    Article 110 requires all EU countries to operate a public warning system that can send geo-targeted emergency alerts to all mobile phone users located in the ...
  9. [9]
    An emergency alert system for Europe - HORIZON2020 -
    EU-funded researchers have developed the foundations of a new multi-channel public warning system for natural and man-made disasters that could help save lives.
  10. [10]
    [PDF] Common Alert Message Format Specification - GSC-europa.eu
    The proposed structure for the alert message will initially be implemented in the European global navigation satellite system 'Galileo' and the Japanese ...
  11. [11]
    L_2018321EN.01003601.xml
    Below is a merged and comprehensive summary of Article 110 and related recitals on public warning systems from Directive (EU) 2018/1972, consolidating all information from the provided segments. To maximize detail and clarity, I’ve organized the key information into a table in CSV format, followed by a narrative summary that ties everything together. This approach ensures all details are retained while maintaining readability.
  12. [12]
    [PDF] ETSI TS 102 900 V1.1.1 (2010-10)
    The present document defines the system requirements for a European Public Warning Service using the Cell Broadcast. Service [1] as a means of message ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] PUBLIC WARNING SYSTEMS
    In 2018, article 110 of the European Electronic. Communications Code made it mandatory for all the Member States of the European Union to deploy a Public ...
  14. [14]
    Public Warning – EENA - European Emergency Number Association
    This allows public authorities to quickly alert the population and let them know of an ongoing crisis or imminent threat.
  15. [15]
  16. [16]
    EMERGENCY COMMUNICATION AND PUBLIC WARNING SYSTEMS
    Emergency communications should ensure effective access to emergency services for all, including end-users living with disabilities and roaming customers.
  17. [17]
    [PDF] PUBLIC WARNING SYSTEMS
    NL-Alert, based on Cell Broadcast technology as specified in ETSI TS 102 90039 went live in 2012 and has been used more than 300 times since the launch of the ...
  18. [18]
    The European Union Adopts a New Telecoms Code
    Dec 20, 2018 · On December 20, 2018, a directive establishing the European Electronic Communications Code (the Code) entered into force. The new Code ...<|separator|>
  19. [19]
    Status and pain points in implementing the new telecoms code
    Jan 11, 2021 · The European Electronic Communications Code (the Code) came into force on 21 December 2020. Member States were due to adopt the Code in ...
  20. [20]
    Public consultation for BEREC guidelines on how to assess the ...
    Chapter 1 sets out the relevant background on ECS-PWS' and a detailed description of the task provided by article 110 EECC, focusing on BEREC's requirement to ...Missing: Alert | Show results with:Alert
  21. [21]
    [PDF] ETSI TS 123 041 V18.6.0 (2024-10)
    [32]. ETSI TS 102 900: "European Public Warning System (EU-ALERT) using the Cell Broadcast. Service". [33]. IETF RFC 4960: "Stream Control Transmission ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] ETSI TS 122 268 V17.0.0 (2022-04)
    This ETSI technical specification covers digital cellular systems (GSM, UMTS, LTE, 5G) and Public Warning System (PWS) requirements.
  23. [23]
    Our Committee Emergency Telecommunications (EMTEL) - ETSI
    The TC EMTEL is responsible for the capture of European requirements concerning emergency communication services, covering typically the four scenarios in case ...
  24. [24]
    [DOC] C1-214406_rev1_v3.docx - 3GPP
    EU-Alert Level 1 Message Identifier for the local language as defined in ETSI TS 102 900 [32]. Korean Public Alert System (KPAS) Class 0 Message Identifier.
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Wireless Emergency Alerts for 5G
    AMF is responsible for the mobility management function and UE registration in 5G. The CBC interfaces with the AMF to deliver alerts to the cell towers ...
  26. [26]
    From alert to action: Social latency of citizen response to Cell ...
    Cell Broadcast technology is recognized as a standard for public alerts by bodies such as the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) and the European ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  27. [27]
    Public Warning Systems - BEREC
    A single Union wide database of means of access to emergency services that are mandated and technically feasible to be used by roaming end users in all Member ...
  28. [28]
    Cell broadcasting system starts working in Latvia / Article
    Jul 2, 2025 · On Tuesday, 1 July, an early warning or cell broadcast system began operating in Latvia, LETA newswire writes.
  29. [29]
    EU support provides Latvia with a modern warning system! First cell ...
    Jul 14, 2025 · EU support provides Latvia with a modern warning system! First cell broadcast message sent. Ministry of the Interior. On July 10, 2025, at 8:00 ...
  30. [30]
    EENA Update 20/08/2025 - European Emergency Number Association
    Aug 20, 2025 · The latest innovations in public warning systems that aim to reduce delays in public response and improve outcomes in crisis situations will ...Missing: rollouts | Show results with:rollouts
  31. [31]
  32. [32]
    Estonia picked a slower emergency warning system than most ...
    May 16, 2025 · Estonia has opted for a significantly slower method of delivering emergency alerts compared to many other EU and global countries.
  33. [33]
    8 recommendations to get the most out of Public Warning Systems
    Jun 21, 2022 · Use both Cell-Broadcast and Location-Based SMS.​​ Location-based SMS (LB-SMS) makes it possible to send alerts by SMS to everyone in a given area ...Missing: 2025 | Show results with:2025
  34. [34]
    Keep up to date - BBK
    NINA warns users of emergencies and hazards all over Germany, such as severe weather, floods and other relevant events. NINA is the first app for alerting the ...
  35. [35]
    Telekom is ready for Cell Broadcast
    Sep 7, 2022 · In the future, the technology will complement the existing warning apps NINA or Katwarn. ... Some EU countries already use a warning mix of apps ...Missing: downloadable | Show results with:downloadable
  36. [36]
    Civil Protection: Smartphone siren and more - with NINA on board!
    NINA is the first app designed to alert Germany's entire population in an emergency. Commissioned by the Federal Office for Citizen Protection and Disaster ...
  37. [37]
    Katwarn - Warning and Information System for the Public
    Better be warned! In the event of disasters such as major fires or floods, you have to react quickly. Download now! katwarn ...
  38. [38]
    EUwarn - Wikipedia
    Since EUwarn is based on Katwarn technology, which is widely used in Germany, and is roaming-enabled, the Katwarn app can also be used to receive EUwarn alerts.
  39. [39]
    KATWARN - Apps on Google Play
    Rating 3.1 (11,588) · Free · AndroidOct 24, 2024 · KATWARN is a service app for transmitting danger and disaster warnings within Germany. The app provides location-based notification of danger alerts.Missing: Austria | Show results with:Austria
  40. [40]
    How (not) to set up a public warning system - FSFE
    Nov 12, 2020 · There are three popular publicly financed apps that can carry official emergency alerts to their users: Katwarn, Nina, and Biwapp. All three are proprietary.Missing: downloadable | Show results with:downloadable
  41. [41]
    Pan-European Mobile Emergency Apps project (PEMEA) – EENA
    A pan-European call for applications from countries and emergency apps who want to make public safety history.<|control11|><|separator|>
  42. [42]
    Emergency apps can now work across Europe thanks to new initiative
    Apr 26, 2018 · The new PEMEA architecture will allow emergency apps to connect to emergency services across borders. April 26, 2018 - 2:30 pm.
  43. [43]
    Location-based SMS: The smarter way to save lives - Everbridge
    Reliability – Unlike a cell broadcast alert, an SMS alert cannot be disabled by the user and it is more likely to be delivered safely and be seen.
  44. [44]
    Localised emergency alerting via messages and apps - BuildERS
    The key requirement of the directive is that all Member States must be able to send alerts to people's phones in the area of danger. The directive also ...
  45. [45]
    Public Warning | Public Safety Solutions - Everbridge
    The platform seamlessly combines modern mobile phone alerting capabilities with classic communication channels such as email, voice calls, sirens, radio, TV, ...
  46. [46]
    Early Warnings for All Initiative - ITU
    A law adopted by the European Union in 2018 requires all EU countries to set up systems to send alerts via mobile networks by 2022. ... Public Warnin​​g Systems ...
  47. [47]
    Galileo Emergency Warning Satellite Service is underway
    Jan 24, 2024 · EWSS is an upcoming service of the Galileo constellation, which will be disseminating alert messages directly to the population of areas threatened by a ...
  48. [48]
    Citizens' adaptive or avoiding behavioral response to an emergency ...
    Jul 20, 2017 · NL-Alert deployment in its first operational year (November 2012–November 2013). Underlined deployments were used as cases in this study.
  49. [49]
    Lithuania introduces drone alert system with sirens and phone ...
    Sep 5, 2025 · A two-color alert system featuring sirens and mobile notifications will warn Lithuanians when Russian drones cross into their territory, ...
  50. [50]
    Message for U.S. Citizens: Test of the Lithuanian National ...
    Nov 13, 2024 · Concurrent to activating the sirens, Lithuanian authorities plan to send text messages to cell phone users about this warning system test.
  51. [51]
  52. [52]
    Spatial (in)accuracy of cell broadcast alerts in urban context
    Nine European countries choose to develop the cell broadcast (CB) solution, which is one of the emblematic tools for alerting people in predefined target area.<|separator|>
  53. [53]
    but why didn't they save lives in Spain's recent floods?
    Nov 15, 2024 · Early warning systems have proven that with just one day's notice, they can reduce damage by an impressive 30%, amounting to savings between 3 and 16 billion ...
  54. [54]
    Mobile industry drives adoption of cell broadcast for early warning ...
    Jun 10, 2025 · Cell broadcast (CB) is a highly effective technology that enables immediate dissemination of alerts to mobile users, including those who aren't local to the ...
  55. [55]
    The US tech behind the UK and European emergency alerts ...
    Apr 23, 2023 · The UK test saw problems with the text messages, alerts not being delivered in areas with just 3G coverage and a wider problem with phones ...Missing: obstacles | Show results with:obstacles
  56. [56]
    [PDF] Global Coverage of Early Warning Systems DELIVERABLE 2 ...
    Mar 21, 2025 · In addition to emergency alerts disseminated through mobile networks using Cell. Broadcast, a CAP gateway added to the CBE will allow other ...
  57. [57]
    Government to spend €850,000 for advisors on delayed emergency ...
    Jul 30, 2024 · A Government advert posted in April says that the State will pay €850,000 for the advisory services. Their roles on the project will include ...
  58. [58]
    Ireland's new public warning text system delayed by ... - Dublin Live
    Jun 25, 2024 · A new public warning message system costing nearly €1m could be delayed by up to a year and will not be rolled out until December 2025, the Irish Mirror has ...<|separator|>
  59. [59]
    How (not) to set up a public warning system
    These clear benefits made the European Union decide to base the EU-Alert system on cell broadcasts. As a directive, this has to be implemented by all EU ...Cell Broadcasts · Warning Apps · Conclusion
  60. [60]
    What the Cyprus wildfires reveal about Europe's emergency warning ...
    ... Warning System has faced significant and persistent delays. The initial tender for this system, launched in 2022, was reportedly cancelled in May 2024 ...
  61. [61]
    Strengthening Europe's public warning systems – EENA
    It took over a decade to get modern public warning systems mandated by law, and still, we are witnessing preventable failures today.
  62. [62]
    [PDF] What does it cost to build an in-house Public Warning Service front ...
    THE TRUE COST OF “DO IT YOURSELF” (DIY)​​ Public Warning Service (PWS) are systems which government and public authorities use to alert the public (residents and ...
  63. [63]
    National emergency alerts potentially vulnerable to attack
    Jun 20, 2019 · New research shows that hackers, working with limited resources, could send fake emergency alerts to cell phones in a confined area like a
  64. [64]
    Public alert and warning system literature review in the USA
    A systematic and comprehensive synthesize is needed to understand what has been studied and their major findings and identify practical lessons.
  65. [65]
    TC EMTEL Activity Report 2023 - ETSI
    In June we published a revision of TS 102 900 V1.4.1 that specifies system requirements for a European Public Warning Service using the Cell Broadcast ...
  66. [66]
    [PDF] PUBLIC WARNING REPORT CARD
    Dec 9, 2024 · It requires Member States to implement systems that can send alerts directly to people in affected areas via their mobile phones.
  67. [67]
    [PDF] 2025 Common Alerting Protocol (CAP) Implementation Workshop ...
    There will be a presentation giving a broad overview of. Europe's public warning implementations under the. “EU-Alert” mandate to employ mobile networks as an.
  68. [68]
    Rolling Plan 2025 | Interoperable Europe Portal
    The Rolling Plan for ICT standardisation provides a unique bridge between EU policies and standardisation activities concerning information and communication ...
  69. [69]
    File:EU-Alert Implementation, Jul 2025.svg - Wikimedia Commons
    Jul 16, 2025 · You can copy, modify, distribute and perform the work, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission. http://creativecommons.org/ ...
  70. [70]
    Estonia adopts new cell broadcast emergency alert system | News
    Aug 8, 2025 · A new €3.7 million cell broadcast–based emergency alert system will be completed and introduced in Estonia by 2027.
  71. [71]
    Government expected to tender for upgrade of country's public ...
    Sep 8, 2025 · The Government is expected to start tendering for the country's Cell Broadcast Public Warning System. The system will see Ireland operating ...
  72. [72]
    EUSPA awards GMV for Galileo Emergency Alert System upgrade
    Dec 16, 2024 · This four-year contract, valued at approximately $6 million, will enable significant advancements in Europe's disaster response capabilities.Missing: technological expansions<|separator|>
  73. [73]
    The 5G (New Radio) Public Warning System and Its Characteristics
    Aug 9, 2024 · The 5G (NR, or New Radio) Public Warning System (PWS) leverages the advanced technologies and high-speed data transmission capabilities of 5G networks.
  74. [74]
    Everbridge Awarded New Public Warning Patent Enabling 5G ...
    The patent pertains to a multimedia-capable platform that delivers both traditional text alerts using Cell Broadcast (CB) and multimedia content ...
  75. [75]
    Multimedia Public Warning Alert Trials Using eMBMS Broadcast ...
    May 13, 2020 · This paper analyses requirements that need to be fulfilled to support multimedia warning message delivery in the 5G System and describes trials ...Missing: integration alerts