Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Eddy current

Eddy currents, also known as Foucault currents, are closed loops of induced within the bulk of an when it is exposed to a changing , according to . These currents flow in swirling patterns perpendicular to the magnetic field lines and can generate significant heat due to resistive losses in the conductor. The phenomenon was first observed in 1855 by French physicist , building on Michael Faraday's 1831 discovery of , when Foucault noted the increased resistance to rotation of a disk in a . Eddy currents arise either from the relative motion between a and a or from time-varying fields in stationary conductors, and their magnitude depends on factors such as the conductor's , the rate of magnetic flux change, and the material's geometry. While they often represent energy losses in transformers and —mitigated by laminating cores to reduce cross-sectional paths—these currents also enable practical technologies. Key applications harness eddy currents for electromagnetic braking in trains, roller coasters, and vehicles, where they produce drag without physical contact by inducing opposing magnetic fields. In non-destructive testing (NDT), they detect surface and subsurface flaws in metals, such as cracks or , by analyzing changes in . Additionally, eddy currents power in furnaces and cooktops, where rapid heating melts metals or boils water efficiently, and they underpin metal detectors and speedometers by sensing conductivity variations. These uses highlight eddy currents' role in modern , balancing their dissipative effects with controlled benefits in energy conversion and inspection.

History and Terminology

Origin of the term

The term "" originates in , where it denotes a small or swirling motion in a turbulent , such as the localized created when an is dragged breadthwise through , giving rise to secondary circulating flows. This was borrowed to describe phenomena because the induced electric currents form similar closed, looping paths within conductors subjected to varying magnetic fields, resembling the rotational patterns of fluid eddies. François Arago first observed these currents in 1824 while experimenting with the interaction between rotating conductors and magnetic needles. He reported that a suspended magnetic needle would rotate in the same direction as an underlying copper disk set in motion, an effect he attributed to some form of induced action in the metal.

Historical development

The understanding of eddy currents emerged from early 19th-century advancements in . Following Hans Christian Ørsted's 1820 observation of the magnetic effects produced by electric currents, rapidly developed a comprehensive theory of electrodynamics, demonstrating how currents generate and laying indirect groundwork for comprehending induced currents within conductors. In 1824, French scientist conducted a pivotal demonstration in which a disk rotated when suspended above a revolving magnetic needle, revealing induced motion in metals exposed to changing magnetic fields; this effect, known as Arago's rotations, represented the first observed manifestation of eddy currents. Michael Faraday advanced this field through his 1831 experiments on , where he showed that a varying induces electric currents in nearby conductors; notably, Faraday observed significant heating in solid metal cores during these tests, which he linked to the circulation of induced currents within the material. Heinrich Lenz contributed crucially in 1834 by formulating , which specifies that an induced current flows in a direction opposing the change that generated it, thereby explaining the resistive and nature of eddy currents against motion in s. In 1855, French physicist provided the first definitive demonstration of eddy currents by rotating a disk in a strong and observing that the rotational resistance increased significantly compared to rotation without the field. He attributed this to closed loops of induced current within the disk, naming the phenomenon "Foucault currents," which are also known as eddy currents. Late 19th-century progress included American inventor David E. Hughes' 1879 experiments, in which he applied eddy current principles to sort metals by conductivity in metallurgical assays, marking one of the earliest industrial uses. Entering the , eddy currents gained prominence in through the commercialization of in the 1920s, enabling efficient melting and forging of metals via controlled current induction in workpieces. Following , eddy current techniques advanced rapidly in non-destructive testing during the and , with innovations in instrumentation allowing precise detection of defects in and industrial materials, spurred by postwar demands for reliable .

Theoretical Foundations

Basic principles

Eddy currents are closed loops of induced within the bulk of an when it is exposed to a time-varying . These currents form swirling patterns, analogous to eddies in a flowing fluid, as free electrons in the conductor respond to the induced generated by the changing . The generation of eddy currents is governed by Faraday's law of , which quantifies the (EMF) induced in the as the negative rate of change of \Phi_B through it: \mathcal{E} = -\frac{d\Phi_B}{dt} Here, \Phi_B = \int \mathbf{B} \cdot d\mathbf{A} represents the , with \mathbf{B} as the and d\mathbf{A} as the differential area element. This law establishes that any change in —whether due to motion of the in a static field or variation of the field itself—produces an induced EMF that drives the currents. Lenz's law determines the direction of these induced currents, stating that the currents will produce their own magnetic field opposing the original change in flux, thereby resisting the flux variation that induced them. This directional opposition is a direct consequence of the conservation of energy, as allowing the flux to change without resistance would imply energy creation or destruction. For eddy currents to occur, the material must be electrically conductive, enabling free charge carriers like electrons to flow under the induced EMF, following Ohm's law I = \mathcal{E}/R, where R is the resistance of the current path. Basic familiarity with static magnetic fields and conductors is assumed, as these provide the environment for flux changes to induce the looping currents. A qualitative example illustrates this: consider a flat metal sheet moving perpendicularly into a . As the leading edge enters the field, the increasing flux through the sheet induces counterclockwise eddy currents (viewed from above), generating a that repels the sheet and slows its entry, per . These currents form closed loops parallel to the sheet's edges, diminishing as the entire sheet fully enters the region.

Mathematical formulation

The mathematical formulation of eddy currents is grounded in Maxwell's equations, which govern the interaction between electric and magnetic fields in conducting media. Central to this is Faraday's law of electromagnetic induction in differential form, which quantifies the generation of an electric field by a time-varying magnetic field: \nabla \times \mathbf{E} = -\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t} This equation indicates that a changing magnetic flux density \mathbf{B} induces a circulatory electric field \mathbf{E} within the material. Within a conductor, the induced electric field drives free charge carriers, resulting in a current density \mathbf{J} according to : \mathbf{J} = \sigma \mathbf{E} where \sigma is the material's electrical . Substituting this into Faraday's law yields the expression for the induced current density: \nabla \times \mathbf{J} = -\sigma \frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t} (assuming uniform \sigma). This induced \mathbf{J} generates its own , which, by , opposes the original change in \mathbf{B}, thereby altering the total field distribution inside the conductor. For quasi-static conditions where charge accumulation is negligible, the enforces steady-state current flow: \nabla \cdot \mathbf{J} = 0 Combined with \mathbf{J} = \sigma \mathbf{E}, this implies \nabla \cdot \mathbf{E} = 0 in the (for constant \sigma), ensuring that the induced currents form closed, looping paths rather than diverging or converging. These loops, perpendicular to the inducing \mathbf{B} field, are the hallmark of eddy currents and arise naturally from the rotational nature of the induced \mathbf{E}. To illustrate field penetration in simple geometries, consider an infinite conducting slab of thickness $2d occupying -d < z < d, subjected to a uniform, time-varying external magnetic field \mathbf{B}_\text{ext} = B_0(t) \hat{x} parallel to the slab faces (infinite extent in x-y plane). Boundary conditions require continuity of the tangential \mathbf{E} and normal \mathbf{B} at the interfaces z = \pm d, with \mathbf{B}(z = \pm d) = B_0(t) \hat{x} imposed externally. Inside the slab, symmetry dictates \mathbf{E} = E_y(z, t) \hat{y} and \mathbf{B} = B_x(z, t) \hat{x}, satisfying Faraday's law as: \frac{\partial E_y}{\partial z} = \frac{\partial B_x}{\partial t} along with \mathbf{J} = \sigma E_y \hat{y}. Solving with the continuity condition \partial J_y / \partial y = 0 (by uniformity) confirms closed current loops in the y-z plane, with field penetration governed by these coupled equations under the specified boundaries.

Diffusion equation

The magnetic diffusion equation arises from combining Maxwell's equations with Ohm's law in conducting media under the quasi-static approximation, where the displacement current is neglected due to low frequencies compared to relevant time scales. Starting with Ampère's law in the form \nabla \times \mathbf{B} = \mu \mathbf{J} and Ohm's law \mathbf{J} = \sigma \mathbf{E}, the electric field is expressed as \mathbf{E} = \frac{1}{\mu \sigma} \nabla \times \mathbf{B}. Substituting into Faraday's law \nabla \times \mathbf{E} = -\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t} yields \nabla \times \left( \frac{1}{\mu \sigma} \nabla \times \mathbf{B} \right) = -\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t}. For constant permeability \mu and conductivity \sigma, and using the identity \nabla \times (\nabla \times \mathbf{B}) = -\nabla^2 \mathbf{B} (since \nabla \cdot \mathbf{B} = 0), the equation simplifies to the diffusion form: \frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t} = \frac{1}{\mu \sigma} \nabla^2 \mathbf{B}. This derivation highlights the time-dependent penetration of magnetic fields into conductors, essential for understanding eddy current dynamics. Physically, the equation describes how magnetic fields propagate into a conductor not instantaneously, but through a diffusive process analogous to heat conduction, limited by the finite conductivity that induces opposing eddy currents. The propagation speed is governed by the magnetic diffusivity \eta = \frac{1}{\mu \sigma}, which quantifies the material's resistance to field penetration; higher \sigma or \mu reduces \eta, slowing diffusion. For typical metals like copper (\sigma \approx 6 \times 10^7 S/m, \mu \approx \mu_0), \eta \approx 1.3 \times 10^{-2} m²/s, meaning fields diffuse over distances on the order of millimeters in microseconds. For simple geometries, exact solutions illustrate this behavior. Consider a semi-infinite conductor occupying z > 0, with a uniform magnetic field B_0 suddenly applied parallel to the surface at z = 0 for t > 0. The field inside decays as: B(z, t) = B_0 \operatorname{erfc}\left( \frac{z}{\sqrt{4 \eta t}} \right), where \operatorname{erfc} is the complementary . This solution shows exponential-like penetration, with the field reaching B_0 near the surface and approaching zero deep inside, demonstrating the diffusive spread over a \sqrt{\eta t}. In (AC) fields, the time-dependent nature introduces frequency-dependent diffusion time scales, \tau \approx L^2 / \eta, where L is a . When the period $2\pi / \omega exceeds \tau, the field penetrates fully before reversal; otherwise, penetration is limited, affecting eddy current distribution without altering the overall diffusive framework.

Physical Properties

Power dissipation

The power dissipation due to eddy currents arises from , as the induced circulating currents encounter the electrical of the material. The total power loss P is given by the volume
P = \int \frac{\mathbf{J}^2}{\sigma} \, dV ,
where \mathbf{J} is the eddy current , \sigma is the electrical conductivity of the material, and the integral is over the volume of the .
In cases involving thin conducting sheets subjected to a uniform alternating magnetic field, where the frequency is sufficiently low to neglect skin effect, a simplified expression can be derived by assuming a linear variation of the induced across the sheet thickness. For such a thin sheet, the approximate power loss per unit length along the direction perpendicular to both and the flow is
P \approx \frac{\pi^2 B^2 f^2 t^3 d}{3 \rho} ,
where B is the root-mean-square strength, f is the of the field variation, t is the sheet thickness, d is the width of the sheet in the direction of the induced path, and \rho = 1/\sigma is the resistivity. This formula results from averaging the squared over the cross-section and applying the time-averaged value of the squared rate of change of the .
Several key factors govern the magnitude of this : the material's resistivity \rho (higher values reduce losses by limiting current magnitude), the geometry (notably thickness t, with losses scaling as t^2 for or total losses in fixed-volume laminated structures), and the applied field's properties (strength B^2 and frequency f^2, both quadratically increasing the induced and thus the currents). These dependencies highlight why materials with moderate and geometries optimized for minimal loop sizes are preferred in designs prone to eddy currents. In contexts like and , eddy current power contributes substantially to operational inefficiencies, manifesting as core heating that necessitates enhanced cooling and of devices. For instance, in transformer cores, these losses form a major component of no-load iron losses, potentially comprising up to several percent of input at standard 50–60 Hz frequencies and reducing overall .

Skin effect

In conductors subjected to alternating magnetic fields, the skin effect causes induced eddy currents to concentrate near the surface rather than distributing uniformly across the cross-section. This phenomenon arises because the changing magnetic field induces electric fields that drive currents, but opposing fields generated by the currents themselves limit penetration into the material. The characteristic distance over which the current density decreases to 1/e (approximately 37%) of its surface value is known as the skin depth, δ, defined as δ = √(2 / (ω μ σ)), where ω is the angular frequency of the alternating current, μ is the magnetic permeability of the conductor, and σ is its electrical conductivity. The skin effect emerges from solutions to the magnetic diffusion equation in the quasistatic limit for time-harmonic fields, where the magnetic field H(z) inside the conductor satisfies ∂²H/∂z² = j ω μ σ H, assuming propagation along the z-direction perpendicular to the surface. The solution yields an exponentially decaying wave: H(z) = H₀ exp[-(1 + j) z / δ], with the imaginary unit j indicating a 45-degree phase shift. Consequently, the induced current density J(z), related by J = σ E and E from Faraday's law, follows J(z) = J₀ exp(-z/δ) exp(-j z/δ), where the real part represents the decaying amplitude and the phase term accounts for the propagation delay. This confinement becomes pronounced when the skin depth is comparable to or smaller than the conductor dimensions, effectively reducing the usable cross-sectional area for current flow. As a result of this nonuniform current distribution, the effective AC resistance of the conductor increases compared to its DC value. For a round wire of diameter d in the low-frequency regime where δ ≫ d/2, an approximation for the resistance ratio is R_ac ≈ R_dc \left[1 + \frac{1}{3} \left(\frac{d}{2\delta}\right)^2 \right], reflecting the quadratic growth in nonuniformity with frequency. At higher frequencies where δ ≪ d/2, the current flows primarily in an annular layer of thickness δ, leading to R_ac ≈ R_dc (d/(4δ)) for the high-frequency limit, though exact calculations often involve for precision. This elevated resistance contributes to higher I²R losses in AC systems. The skin depth depends strongly on material properties and frequency: higher conductivity σ and permeability μ reduce δ, while increasing ω decreases it proportionally to 1/√ω. For copper (σ ≈ 5.96 × 10⁷ S/m, μ = μ₀), at power frequencies like 60 Hz, δ ≈ 8.5 mm, allowing relatively uniform current distribution in typical wires. In contrast, at radio frequencies such as 1 MHz, δ ≈ 0.066 mm, severely confining currents to the surface and necessitating specialized conductors like to mitigate losses. These dependencies highlight the skin effect's negligible role in low-frequency but critical influence in high-frequency applications like RF circuits. The derivation of skin depth aligns with the magnetic diffusion time scale τ = μ σ L² over a L, where for fields the effective L ≈ δ sets the penetration limit, as explored in the section.

Proximity and shielding effects

The proximity occurs when alternating currents in adjacent induce eddy currents that alter the current distribution within each , leading to greater crowding toward the surfaces facing away from the neighboring compared to the in isolation. This interaction increases the effective AC resistance in systems like multi-strand cables or closely spaced wires, as the from one penetrates and influences the others. In windings, such as those in inductors or transformers, the proximity exacerbates current unevenness across layers, effectively reducing the usable cross-sectional area for current flow and modifying the apparent depth. Eddy current shielding involves the induction of circulating currents in a conductive enclosure or sheet that produce opposing to the external applied field, thereby attenuating the field penetration into the shielded region. The shielding effectiveness is governed by material properties including electrical and magnetic permeability, as well as geometric factors like thickness and the field's ; for instance, at lower frequencies, greater material thickness is required to achieve significant since the skin depth is larger. This principle underlies low-frequency magnetic shielding applications, such as modified designs using conductive sheets to block alternating magnetic fields in sensitive . Mathematical models for proximity and shielding in multi-conductor systems typically employ solutions to the magnetic , approximating the field interactions by treating the influence of adjacent conductors as small to the primary in each. These solutions account for the coupled electromagnetic fields across conductors, enabling predictions of variations without full numerical for simple geometries like cylinders. In transformer cores, laminations are employed to disrupt eddy current paths between layers, thereby minimizing inter-layer proximity effects that could otherwise cause uneven distribution and increased losses.

Engineering Applications

Electromagnetic braking and damping

Electromagnetic braking and utilize eddy currents to generate opposing forces that slow or control the motion of conductive objects in . When a conductor moves through a , the changing induces circulating eddy currents within the , in accordance with , which produces a magnetic field that opposes the relative motion and creates a drag force. This drag arises from the interaction between the induced currents and the applied , resulting in a that acts against the direction of motion. The magnitude of the braking force can be approximated for a thin conductive sheet of thickness t, area A, conductivity \sigma, moving with velocity v perpendicular to a uniform magnetic field B, as follows: F = -\sigma t A v B^2 This linear dependence on velocity indicates that the force increases with speed at low velocities, providing proportional damping, though it diminishes at higher speeds due to skin effect limitations. In , eddy current are employed in high-speed trains, such as those using linear induction motors, where electromagnets induce currents in the rails to produce deceleration without physical contact. For example, systems in high-speed trains apply this principle to supplement , enabling smooth stopping over long distances. Roller coasters, like those at amusement park, integrate eddy current with metal fins passing through magnetic arrays to achieve precise, wear-free deceleration at the end of rides. In , eddy current dampers serve as inertial devices in structures, where moving conductors in permanent magnetic fields dissipate vibrational energy from earthquakes, reducing building sway as demonstrated in experimental setups. These systems offer key advantages, including non-contact operation that eliminates mechanical wear and enables smooth, vibration-free deceleration, making them ideal for high-speed or precision applications. They also provide rapid response times without reliance on hydraulic fluids, enhancing reliability in emergency scenarios. However, the braking force is inherently speed-dependent, weakening as approaches zero and thus requiring supplementary brakes for complete stops; additionally, the process is energy-inefficient, converting solely to without recovery. Historically, early 20th-century electric braking systems in elevators, such as electromagnetic drum brakes introduced around the , laid groundwork for modern non-contact variants by using solenoids to engage deceleration, though pure eddy current implementations emerged later in industrial contexts.

Levitation and repulsive forces

Eddy currents enable through repulsive forces generated when a time-varying from an () electromagnet or moving permanent magnet induces circulating currents in a nearby conducting material, such as a metal plate or track. These induced eddy currents produce their own magnetic field that opposes the original field according to , resulting in a net repulsive that supports the levitating object without physical contact. A classic setup involves an -powered coil positioned above a conductive sheet, where the oscillating field drives the repulsion for stable suspension. The lift force arising from these interactions can be approximated as F_z \propto \frac{B^2 \sigma \omega A}{1 + (\omega \tau)^2}, where B is the magnetic field strength, \sigma is the conductivity of the material, \omega is the angular frequency of the field variation, A is the effective area, and \tau is the magnetic diffusion time constant related to the material's properties and geometry. This expression captures the frequency-dependent behavior: at low frequencies (\omega \tau \ll 1), the force scales linearly with \omega, while at high frequencies, skin effects limit penetration and the force plateaus. The repulsion is modeled using image currents or direct Lorentz force calculations on the induced loops, emphasizing the role of field gradients in vertical lift. In applications like trains, such as Japan's system, onboard superconducting magnets moving over conductive guideway coils induce eddy currents that generate repulsive magnetic fields, providing lift heights of up to 10 cm at speeds above 100 km/h. Eddy current bearings utilize similar repulsion between AC electromagnets and a conducting rotor to support high-speed rotation with minimal friction, as demonstrated in experimental setups achieving stable suspension in all . Vibration isolation platforms employ eddy current mechanisms, often with permanent magnets over moving conductive plates, to dampen oscillations and maintain precise positioning in sensitive equipment like optical tables. Stability in these systems stems from phase lags in the induced eddy currents, which arise due to magnetic diffusion delays, creating a restorative damping effect that counters perturbations and prevents oscillations from growing. This inherent damping synchronizes the response of the levitated object to displacements, reducing acceleration and ensuring equilibrium without active control in many designs. The phase difference between the driving field and induced currents provides velocity-proportional opposition, enhancing robustness against lateral or vertical instabilities.

Non-destructive testing and metal detection

Eddy current testing (ECT) is a non-destructive testing (NDT) technique that employs to inspect conductive s for flaws without causing damage. An (AC) applied to a coil generates an oscillating , which penetrates the test and induces circulating currents. These currents produce their own secondary that interact with the primary field, altering the coil's impedance if defects such as cracks, , or inclusions are present. The resulting changes in impedance are detected and analyzed to characterize the flaw's location, size, and type. The core principle of ECT relies on the complex impedance Z = R + jX, where R represents the effective (influenced by eddy current ) and X the inductive (affected by the opposition). Flaws disrupt the eddy current flow, causing shifts between the resistive and reactive components; these shifts are visualized in the impedance plane diagram, plotting X versus R. Different material properties, such as and permeability, trace distinct impedance loci, enabling differentiation between flaw signals and background variations. The detection depends on factors like probe design and excitation frequency, with analysis providing quantitative insights into defect depth and orientation. In applications, ECT is widely used for inspections to detect cracks and in aluminum airframes, ensuring structural integrity without disassembly. For integrity, it identifies wall thinning or pitting under coatings, supporting in oil and gas infrastructure. metal detectors also leverage eddy currents to sense concealed metallic objects, where impedance perturbations trigger alarms based on the target's and size. Advancements in multi-frequency ECT enhance of layered or coated materials by exciting the probe at multiple simultaneous frequencies, allowing to isolate flaws at varying depths and mitigate interference from surface conditions. This approach improves accuracy over single-frequency methods, particularly for complex geometries. However, ECT faces limitations in materials, where high magnetic permeability concentrates the near the surface, reducing penetration compared to non-ferrous metals; the skin depth further constrains detection in thicker sections at higher frequencies.

Sensing and measurement systems

Eddy currents induced in conductive materials by an alternating from a sensor coil alter the coil's , enabling non-contact detection of motion, position, and environmental changes. This principle underpins inductive sensors, where the proximity of a conductive target modifies the , leading to measurable shifts in the sensor's electrical properties. Such sensors are particularly valued for their robustness in harsh environments, including high temperatures and vibrations, without requiring physical contact. The change in ΔL due to eddy currents in a nearby is approximately proportional to the material's σ, thickness t, effective area A, and inversely to the d from the , as given by \Delta L \propto \frac{\mu_0 \sigma t A}{d}, where μ₀ is the permeability of free space. This relationship arises from the mutual coupling between the sensor coil and the induced eddy currents, which oppose the primary field and reduce the effective . For speed or , the dynamic variation in d or the target's orientation modulates this change, allowing measurements. Linear variable differential transformers (LVDTs), a common type of , measure linear displacement by detecting changes in the between a primary and secondary coils as a ferromagnetic core moves within the assembly, achieving resolutions down to micrometers. The core's movement alters this coupling, producing a differential output voltage proportional to position. Eddy currents in the core are typically minimized to reduce losses. These sensors are widely employed in industrial automation for accurate, contactless position feedback. In automotive applications, eddy current-based inductive sensors serve as crankshaft position sensors, detecting the of toothed wheels to determine engine timing and speed with high reliability under oily or high-temperature conditions. Non-contact tachometers leverage similar principles to measure rotational speeds by monitoring periodic changes in caused by passing conductive features on a , offering advantages in precision over optical alternatives in dusty environments. Additionally, eddy current flow meters assess flow rates in conductive fluids by detecting perturbations in the from moving charges, providing non-intrusive monitoring in pipelines. For high-precision applications, eddy current combines with eddy current sensing to achieve nanoscale surface profiling, resolving electrical conductivity variations and topography on conductive samples with sub-micrometer lateral resolution. This technique is instrumental in for characterizing thin films and nanostructures, where minute changes in local eddy currents reveal surface features without destructive contact.

Energy and induction applications

In transformers and inductors, eddy currents induced in the by alternating lead to significant power losses through resistive heating, reducing overall . To mitigate these losses, cores are constructed from thin laminations of high-permeability material, such as silicon steel, insulated from each other to interrupt current paths and confine eddy currents to individual layers. The eddy current component of core loss is given by the formula P_e = k_e f^2 B_m^2 t^2 V where P_e is the eddy current loss, k_e is a material constant, f is the frequency, B_m is the maximum flux density, t is the lamination thickness, and V is the core volume; this quadratic dependence on frequency and thickness underscores the need for thinner laminations at higher operating frequencies. In wireless power transfer systems, such as those adhering to the Qi standard for consumer device charging, eddy currents play a dual role: they are intentionally induced in the receiver coil to generate usable power via magnetic induction, but unwanted eddy currents in nearby conductive materials can cause additional losses and reduce efficiency. The Qi protocol operates at frequencies around 110–205 kHz, where the induced currents in the receiver convert magnetic energy to electrical power, typically achieving end-to-end efficiencies of 70–80% under optimal alignment, though misalignment or foreign metal objects can drop this to below 60% due to eddy current dissipation. An approximate expression for efficiency considering eddy losses in thin conductive receivers is \eta \approx 1 / (1 + (\omega^2 \mu \sigma t^3)/12), where \omega is the angular frequency, \mu is permeability, \sigma is conductivity, and t is thickness, highlighting how material properties and geometry influence heat generation over useful power transfer. Emerging applications harness eddy currents for precise energy delivery in manufacturing and domestic heating. In electromagnetic forming, a high-voltage capacitor discharge generates a pulsed magnetic field from a coil, inducing intense eddy currents in a conductive workpiece (e.g., aluminum sheets), which interact with the field to produce Lorentz forces that deform the material at velocities up to 200 m/s without physical contact, enabling complex shapes with reduced springback compared to mechanical stamping. Similarly, induction cooktops employ a high-frequency alternating current (typically 20–50 kHz) in a coil beneath the surface to create a changing magnetic field, inducing eddy currents directly in ferromagnetic cookware, where resistive heating occurs via the Joule effect; this method achieves thermal efficiencies of 84–90%, far surpassing gas stoves (around 40%) by minimizing heat loss to the surrounding environment. To minimize unwanted eddy currents in power systems, engineers employ slotted conductors, where longitudinal slots in busbars or windings break current loops and reduce induced paths, particularly effective in high-current applications like rotors. Ferrites, materials with high magnetic permeability and low electrical , are integrated as substitutes or shields in high-frequency transformers and inductors to suppress eddy losses while maintaining flux guidance, often reducing dissipation by orders of magnitude compared to metallic .

References

  1. [1]
    13.6: Eddy Currents - Physics LibreTexts
    Mar 2, 2025 · Eddy currents are currents induced when a conductor moves in a magnetic field or when a magnetic field moves relative to a conductor.
  2. [2]
    Eddy Current - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Eddy currents are defined as circulating currents induced within a material when an electric current experiences a variation in magnitude over time, ...
  3. [3]
    History of Eddy Current Testing - NDE-Ed.org
    Eddy current testing has its origins with Michael Faraday's discovery of electromagnetic induction in 1831. Faraday was a chemist in England during the ...
  4. [4]
    The History and Theory of Eddy Current Inspection | Quality Magazine
    Oct 10, 2024 · Eddy current testing is based primarily on the English scientist Michael Faraday's discovery of electromagnetic induction in 1831.
  5. [5]
    What are the Applications of Eddy Currents? - AZoM
    Oct 8, 2019 · The two common application areas are non-destructive testing (NDT) and applications that use the principles of electromagnetic damping.Non-Destructive Testing... · Electromagnetic Damping... · Sources
  6. [6]
    What are the applications and capabilities of eddy currents? - TWI
    Uses of eddy current testing are described, including crack detection, inspection of tubes and wires, material sorting, weld inspection, ...Crack Detection · Tube And Wire Testing · Condenser Tube Inspection
  7. [7]
    [PDF] Quantum Mechanics_Eddy currents - IDC Technologies
    The term eddy current comes from analogous currents seen in water when dragging ... The first person to observe current eddies was François Arago (1786–1853), the ...
  8. [8]
    Eddy - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
    Originating mid-15c. Scottish from Old Norse and Proto-Germanic roots, "eddy" means a whirlpool, linked to repetition and turning in meaning.<|control11|><|separator|>
  9. [9]
    André-Marie Ampère - Magnet Academy - National MagLab
    Ampère became one of the first people to measure, rather than simply detect, electric currents by using a device of his own invention, quantitatively described ...
  10. [10]
    Arago finds new physics with a compass (1824) | Skulls in the Stars
    Mar 24, 2018 · A demonstration of what are known as eddy currents, which can be done with a simple copper pipe and a neodymium magnet that fits easily inside it.Missing: origin | Show results with:origin
  11. [11]
    History of the Induction Heating & Melting Process - Ambrell
    Dec 27, 2017 · English scientist Michael Faraday is credited with the discovery of the underlying principles of electromagnetic induction in 1831.
  12. [12]
    Fundamentals of Induction Heating | Technical Books
    THE FUNDAMENTAL WORK of the Englishman Michael Faraday in 1831 led to the discovery that an alternating magnetic field, generated by a wire coil, can induce ...
  13. [13]
    Lenz's law | Definiton & Facts - Britannica
    Oct 7, 2025 · Lenz's law, in electromagnetism, statement that an induced electric current flows in a direction such that the current opposes the change that induced it.Missing: eddy | Show results with:eddy
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Eddy current
    Eddy currents are loops of electrical current induced within conductors by a changing magnetic field, flowing in closed loops perpendicular to the field.
  15. [15]
    978-1-349-17365-5.pdf
    found until eddy currents were recognized and understood and Lenz's law applied. As already noted, Arago was one of the men who discovered that a piece ...
  16. [16]
    History of Eddy Current Testing - Evident Scientific
    Eddy current testing began largely as a result of the English scientist Michael Faraday's discovery of electromagnetic induction in 1831.
  17. [17]
    History of induction heating
    Practical induction heating has been used since the 1920's. Growth in the induction heating industry expanded very rapidly during World War II.
  18. [18]
    The History & Evolution of Non-Destructive Testing - cicndt
    Aug 28, 2024 · Around the same time, Eddy Current Testing was developed, relying on electromagnetic induction to detect surface and sub-surface flaws in ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Eddy current nondestructive testing
    ... Post World War II developments in electromagnetic induction tests. Rapid technological developments prior to and during World War II. (1941-. 1945) in many ...
  20. [20]
    Eddy Currents and Magnetic Damping | Physics - Lumen Learning
    As it enters from the left, flux increases, and so an eddy current is set up (Faraday's law) in the counterclockwise direction (Lenz's law), as shown. Only ...
  21. [21]
    Faraday's Law - HyperPhysics
    Lenz's Law​​ When an emf is generated by a change in magnetic flux according to Faraday's Law, the polarity of the induced emf is such that it produces a current ...Missing: principles | Show results with:principles<|control11|><|separator|>
  22. [22]
    The Feynman Lectures on Physics Vol. II Ch. 16: Induced Currents
    There is a simple rule, called Lenz's rule, for figuring out which way the emf goes: the emf tries to oppose any flux change. That is, the direction of an ...
  23. [23]
    23.2 Faraday's Law of Induction: Lenz's Law – College Physics
    Lenz's law is a manifestation of the conservation of energy. The induced emf produces a current that opposes the change in flux, because a change in flux means ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] EDDY CURRENTS, DIFFUSION, AND SKIN EFFECT
    There are several equations relating the electric field, the magnetic field, and the conduction current in this material: the Ohm's law. J = σE;. (1) the ...Missing: mathematical | Show results with:mathematical
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Theory of Eddy Currents for Nondestructive Testing - ucf stars
    Using Maxwell's equations,a relatively straight forward description of eddy ... The induced voltage can now be calculated by using Faraday's Law dt ...
  26. [26]
    [PDF] Diffusion effects in eddy current nondestructive evaluation
    ... deriving the classical skin effect equation are presented. Page 33. 20. 0. I I ... J - a E. Using Ohm's law and Gauss's law the continuity equation can be ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  27. [27]
    10.5 Magnetic Diffusion Laws - MIT
    At each point in a material having uniform conductivity and permeability, the magnetic field intensity satisfies this vector form of the diffusion equation.
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Eddy Currents, Surface Impedances and Loss Mechanisms
    The objective of this section is to describe the calculation of the surface impedance presented by a layer of conductive material. Two problems are considered ...
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Eddy Current & Hysteresis Loss
    To calculate the total eddy current loss in the material we have to add all the power losses of different eddy paths covering the whole cross section. 22.2.3 ...
  30. [30]
    Understanding How Laminated Cores Reduce Eddy Current Loss
    Jul 7, 2024 · Lamination thickness (t): The eddy current loss is proportional to the square of the lamination thickness. To minimize the core losses, the ...
  31. [31]
    Eddy Current Losses in Transformers - ADS
    Eddy Current Losses in Transformers. Townsend, Fitzhugh. Abstract. Publication: Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers. Pub Date: 1900 ...
  32. [32]
    10.7 Skin Effect - MIT
    With the origin shifted from x = 0 to x = -b, this field has the x - t dependence of the diffusion wave represented by (8). So it is that in the short skin ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Chapter 5: Skin Depth, Wire Impedance, and Nonideal Resistors
    Jul 29, 2005 · Of the four approximations given in this chapter for the ac resistance of a round solid wire, which equation is best for use at both low and ...
  34. [34]
    Skin Effect and Surface Currents - In Compliance Magazine
    Jun 29, 2018 · This is because the skin depth of copper at 60 Hz is about 8.5 mm, so the current density at a greater radial depth than that can be no more ...
  35. [35]
    Skin Effect - Circuit Cellar
    Sep 29, 2022 · The skin depth ẟ is given by Equation 1, where σ is the conductivity of the material, µ is its magnetic permeability and f is the AC frequency.
  36. [36]
    Proximity Effect - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    The proximity effect is observed when the current carrying conductor is within the effect of flux of another current carrying conductor.
  37. [37]
    Skin and Proximity Effects of AC Current - Technical Articles
    Jun 5, 2015 · Proximity effect, the alternating flux in a conductor is caused by the current of the other nearby conductor. When an AC current flows through a ...
  38. [38]
    Proximity effect - Encyclopedia Magnetica
    Proximity effect - an electromagnetic phenomenon causing non-uniform distribution of AC current in multi-turn windings or nearby conductors.Explanation of proximity effect · Skin effect · Dowell's curves · Calculator
  39. [39]
    Eddy currents in multilayer coils | American Journal of Physics
    Mar 1, 2021 · This article describes the methodology of the proximity effect calculations in multilayer coils and contains a description of this effect in ...
  40. [40]
    The Enclosure Design Guidance for Magnetic Shielding Applications
    In general, the greater the permeability and thickness of the shield material, the better the magnetic performance. Additionally, the smaller the effective ...
  41. [41]
    Introduction to Practical Electromagnetic Shielding - LearnEMC
    Even if the field is slowly varying, losses in the conducting plate will cause the eddy currents to dissipate allowing the magnetic flux to penetrate the plate.<|control11|><|separator|>
  42. [42]
    Analysis of Shielding Effectiveness in the Electric Field and ...
    Eddy currents produce this alternating magnetic field of opposing orientation inside the shield. As a result, as frequency increase, shielding effectiveness ...
  43. [43]
    [PDF] The Proximity Effect in Systems of Parallel Conductors and ... - DTIC
    When the spacing between cylinders is very close, currents on adjacent surface.s of two conductors tend toward equal values with opposite sign; for example: for ...
  44. [44]
    [PDF] A perturbation finite element method for efficiently calculating ... - HAL
    Sep 1, 2009 · The developed perturbation method offers a way to un- couple FE regions in eddy current frequency and time domain analyses with high frequency ...
  45. [45]
    Magnetic core effects on the high-frequency behavior of transformers
    Proximity effect: Currents within one conductor induce eddy currents in nearby conductors and further increase the AC resistance. Eddy current in the core: ...
  46. [46]
    [PDF] Drag and Lift Forces between a Rotating Conductive Sphere and a ...
    These forces are the basis for eddy current braking,1 where moving magnets are slowed down as they pass by a conductor, and for linear induction motors,2 where ...Missing: mechanism | Show results with:mechanism<|control11|><|separator|>
  47. [47]
    Applications of electromagnetic induction - Physics
    Jul 22, 1999 · During braking, the metal wheels are exposed to a magnetic field from an electromagnet, generating eddy currents in the wheels. The magnetic ...
  48. [48]
    Simplified model of eddy current brakes and its use for optimization
    For example in an electrical drive train, with a traction motor for each wheel mechanical friction brakes can be replaced by eddy current brakes.
  49. [49]
    [PDF] Finding the effective length over which the eddy currents form
    breaking up a solid piece of metal into thin sheets in order to prevent excessive energy loss due to the eddy currents (similar to our cutting slits in the.Missing: formula | Show results with:formula
  50. [50]
  51. [51]
    Eddy Currents and Magnetic Damping – ISP209
    In both cases, it experiences a force opposing its motion. As it enters from the left, flux increases, and so an eddy current is set up (Faraday's law) in the ...
  52. [52]
    [PDF] Eddy Current Dynamometer
    The amount of braking force can be precisely controlled by varying the strength of the magnetic field, which is typically achieved by adjusting the current ...
  53. [53]
    [PDF] Safety Considerations for the Design of Modern Elevator Systems
    May 25, 2019 · Brakes are the components of biggest safety concerns when designing an elevator for obvious reasons. The braking system of elevators are not ...Missing: eddy | Show results with:eddy
  54. [54]
    [PDF] N87"22223 - NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)
    This paper describes a new type of electromagnetic bearing, called the. 'Eddy-Current. Bearing,' which works by repulsion between fixed AC-electromagnets.
  55. [55]
    [PDF] Chapter 29 – Electromagnetic Induction - Physics
    Induced Current / Eddy current levitation: - The rail and the train exert magnetic fields and the train is levitated by repulsive forces between these magnetic ...
  56. [56]
  57. [57]
    [PDF] DYNAMIC SUSPENSION MODELING OF AN EDDY-CURRENT ...
    The innovative form of transportation using magnetic levitation (Maglev) that uti- lizes magnetic fields in order to create suspension, propulsion and guidance ...
  58. [58]
    [PDF] SUPERCONDUCTING MAGLEV (SCMAGLEV) - JR Central
    When the onboard Superconducting Magnets passes through at high speed, an electric current is induced in the Levitation and Guidance Coils, causing them to ...
  59. [59]
    Experimental verification of an eddy-current bearing
    It consists of fixed AC-electromagnets in a star formation surrounding a conducting rotor. The bearing works by repulsion due to eddy-currents induced in the ...
  60. [60]
    [PDF] Design of a vibration isolation system using eddy current damper
    May 10, 2013 · This article describes the basic design of a vibration isolation system platform based on eddy current damping. It is found that at ...
  61. [61]
    [PDF] Modeling and Analysis of Eddy-Current Damping for High-Precision ...
    In addition, induced eddy currents ensure the stability of levitation for step transient mo- tions by reducing acceleration of the object and synchronizing the ...
  62. [62]
    [PDF] Experimental Investigation of an Eddy-Current Bearing
    A single eddy-current bearing is sufficient to fully support a short rotor in all five degrees of freedom simultaneously. 2. The bearing provides inherently ...
  63. [63]
    Eddy Current Testing - TWI Global
    Eddy current testing is a non-destructive testing (NDT) inspection method used for a variety of purposes, including for flaw detection, material and coating ...
  64. [64]
    Basic Principles of Eddy Current Inspection - NDE-Ed.org
    Eddy current inspection is one of several NDT methods that use the principal of “electromagnetism” as the basis for conducting examinations.
  65. [65]
    Eddy Current Testing: Precision and Reliability - ibg NDT
    Eddy current testing uses electromagnetic induction to generate currents in metal, which are then used to detect flaws by analyzing perturbations.
  66. [66]
    Electromagnetic Testing (ET) Method for NDT Inspections - ASNT
    Electromagnetic testing is an NDT method that uses electromagnetic fields to detect and measure discontinuities in industrial components.
  67. [67]
    Eddy Current NDT Basics | UniWest
    Eddy Current Electromagnetic Testing (ET) is a Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) method using electromagnetic induction for detection of flaws.
  68. [68]
    Eddy Currents Probe Design for NDT Applications: A Review - PMC
    However, single-frequency ECT has limitations in identifying multiple test conditions. To address this, multi-frequency techniques have been introduced, ...
  69. [69]
    A Review of Inductive Sensing and Imaging Technologies in Healthcare
    **Summary of Inductive Sensors Using Eddy Currents (from https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10606476):**
  70. [70]
    Development of eddy current microscopy for high resolution ...
    Jul 16, 2008 · We present a high resolution electrical conductivity imaging technique based on the principles of eddy current and atomic force microscopy ...Missing: nanoscale | Show results with:nanoscale
  71. [71]
    [PDF] transformers and inductors for power electronics - Electrical Connects
    Cores are laminated to reduce eddy current loss. Essentially, the ... where Rs represents the eddy current loss in the core and Ls is the self inductance.Missing: P_core = f² B² t²
  72. [72]
    [PDF] Practical Transformer Handbook - Irving M. Gottlieb RE.
    Figure 3.1 Core losses in 0.014 inch, 4% Si steel transformer laminations. These design curves sum up hysteresis and eddy current losses in the much-used core.
  73. [73]
    [PDF] Overview of Core Loss Calculation Techniques - UTK-EECS
    Two common methods for calculating core loss are: Hysteresis models, and Empirical equations, often the Steinmetz equation.Missing: kf^ | Show results with:kf^
  74. [74]
    How Qi Works | Wireless Power Consortium
    You need two coils, a transmitter coil and a receiver coil. An alternating current in the transmitter coil generates a magnetic field which induces a voltage in ...Missing: eddy efficiency formula<|separator|>
  75. [75]
    Wireless Power Transfer: Systems, Circuits, Standards, Use Cases
    The efficiency is largely determined by the resistive coil losses and the coupling factor between the two coils. The coupling factor can be calculated with ...
  76. [76]
    Review Advancements and challenges in wireless power transfer
    Jun 18, 2024 · The end-to-end power transmission efficiency of the M-WPT system can be defined as16(Equation 11) η M P T = P o u t P i n = η g η t η s η r η d ...
  77. [77]
    [PDF] Electromagnetic Forming - Fraunhofer IWU
    the induced eddy-currents can form a closed current path. In case of electromagnetic compression and expansion, this requires a closed cross section geometry.
  78. [78]
    [PDF] Induction Cooking Technology Design and Assessment - ACEEE
    These induced currents dissipate heat by the Joule effect, generating the heat for cooking directly in the cooking vessel. As such, less heat is lost in ...
  79. [79]
    Appliance Science: The hot physics of induction cooktops - CNET
    Jan 12, 2015 · As the magnetic field alternates, this current flows back and forth (which is why it is often called an eddy current, as it swirls around like ...
  80. [80]
    6.4 Eddy Currents and Magnetic Damping | Texas Gateway
    If eddy currents are to be avoided in conductors, then they can be slotted or constructed of thin layers of conducting material separated by insulating sheets.