Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Energy conversion efficiency

Energy conversion efficiency is a fundamental measure in thermodynamics and engineering that quantifies the effectiveness with which a device or system transforms one form of energy into a desired useful form, typically expressed as the ratio of useful energy output to total energy input, often as a percentage: η = (useful output / total input) × 100%.^[1] This metric applies to diverse processes, from mechanical work in engines to electrical power in generators, where "useful" output depends on the device's intended purpose—for instance, mechanical power from an electric motor or light from a bulb—while losses manifest as waste heat or other unusable forms.^[2] The concept underscores the principle of energy conservation from the first law of thermodynamics, ensuring that all input energy is either converted or dissipated, but never created or destroyed.^[3] The maximum attainable efficiency in energy conversion is constrained by thermodynamic laws, particularly the second law, which accounts for irreversibilities like friction and entropy generation that inevitably reduce output. For heat engines converting thermal energy to mechanical work, the theoretical upper limit is the Carnot efficiency, given by η_Carnot = 1 - (T_cold / T_hot), where temperatures are in absolute scale; real devices achieve far less due to practical losses.^[4] In direct conversion systems, such as photovoltaic cells that transform solar radiation into electricity, quantum and thermodynamic limits further cap performance, with the Shockley-Queisser limit setting a single-junction maximum around 33% under standard conditions.^[5] These limits highlight why no conversion process can reach 100% efficiency, guiding the design of more effective technologies across fields like power generation and renewable energy.^[3] Enhancing energy conversion efficiency is vital for sustainable engineering, as it minimizes resource consumption, cuts operational costs, and reduces greenhouse gas emissions in applications ranging from transportation to electricity production. For example, high-efficiency electric motors in industrial settings can reach 90-95% efficiency, converting nearly all electrical input to mechanical output, compared to incandescent bulbs that manage only about 5% for light production.^[2] In power plants, combined-cycle gas turbines achieve up to 60% efficiency by sequentially converting fuel energy through combustion and steam cycles, far surpassing traditional coal plants at around 33%.^[6] Advances in materials and design, such as in thermoelectric devices that harvest waste heat, continue to push practical efficiencies closer to theoretical bounds, supporting global efforts to optimize energy systems amid growing demands.^[3]

Fundamentals

Definition and Principles

Energy conversion efficiency, often denoted as η, is defined as the ratio of useful output energy to the total input energy in a conversion process, typically expressed as a percentage: \eta = \frac{E_{\text{out}}}{E_{\text{in}}} \times 100\%.^[3] This metric quantifies how effectively a device or system transforms energy from one form to another, such as mechanical work from thermal energy or electrical power from chemical energy, while accounting only for the desired output form as "useful."^[3] The concept applies across various domains, including thermal, electrical, and chemical systems, but always hinges on distinguishing useful energy from losses like heat or friction.^[7] The fundamental principles governing energy conversion efficiency stem from the laws of thermodynamics. The first law, which embodies the conservation of energy, ensures that the total energy output equals the input, but it does not guarantee that all output is useful, allowing for inevitable transformations into less desirable forms.^[3] The second law introduces irreversibility through entropy increase, prohibiting any process from achieving 100% efficiency and setting theoretical limits, such as the Carnot efficiency as the maximum for heat engines operating between two temperatures.^[3] These laws establish that while perfect conversion is impossible, efficiencies can approach optimal values under ideal conditions, guiding the design of real-world systems.^[8] Energy conversion efficiency plays a critical role in promoting sustainability by minimizing waste and optimizing resource use, thereby supporting energy conservation efforts in engineering and environmental management.^[9] Higher efficiencies reduce operational costs, lower greenhouse gas emissions, and enhance energy security, positioning efficiency improvements as a cornerstone of clean energy transitions.^[10] In environmental contexts, efficient conversions decrease reliance on fossil fuels and mitigate climate impacts, aligning with global policies aimed at reducing energy intensity.^[11] The concept traces its origins to Sadi Carnot's 1824 work, Réflexions sur la puissance motrice du feu, which analyzed the efficiency limits of heat engines and laid the groundwork for thermodynamic theory.^[8] Carnot's insights, initially focused on steam engines during the Industrial Revolution, evolved in the 20th century to encompass broader energy policy frameworks, influencing standards for diverse conversion technologies amid growing concerns over resource scarcity and environmental protection.^[12]^[9]

Basic Efficiency Formulas

Energy conversion efficiency is fundamentally derived from the principle of conservation of energy, which states that the total energy input to a system equals the sum of the useful energy output and the energy lost to various dissipative processes. The basic formula for efficiency, denoted as η, is given by

\eta = \left( \frac{E_{\text{useful}}}{E_{\text{input}}} \right) \times 100\%

where E_{\text{useful}} is the energy delivered in the desired form (e.g., mechanical work or electrical power), and E_{\text{input}} is the total energy supplied to the system, both typically measured in joules (J) according to SI conventions.^[2]^[3] This expression quantifies the fraction of input energy successfully converted, with the percentage form standardizing reporting for comparability across devices.^[2] In time-dependent systems, such as continuous processes, efficiency is often expressed in terms of power, where power P represents the rate of energy transfer (in watts, W, or J/s). The power efficiency variant is

\eta_p = \left( \frac{P_{\text{out}}}{P_{\text{in}}} \right) \times 100\%

with P_{\text{out}} as the useful power output and P_{\text{in}} as the input power. This formulation arises directly from the energy efficiency by dividing both numerator and denominator by time, preserving the ratio while accounting for steady-state operation.^[3]^[2] For instance, in electrical systems, input and output may be quantified in watt-hours (Wh) for integrated energy over time, convertible to joules via 1 Wh = 3600 J.^[13] Efficiency is inherently limited below 100% due to dissipative losses, which convert portions of the input energy into unusable forms such as heat or friction. These losses stem from irreversible processes governed by the second law of thermodynamics, increasing entropy and preventing perfect conversion in practical systems. Common examples include frictional dissipation in mechanical components, where kinetic energy is transformed into thermal energy, and ohmic heating in electrical conductors.^[3]^[14] To ensure consistency, efficiencies are reported using SI units for energy (J) and power (W), with alternative units like watt-hours or British thermal units (BTU, where 1 BTU ≈ 1055 J) converted accordingly for international standardization.^[13]^[2]

Thermal and Chemical Conversions

Heat Engine Efficiency

Heat engines convert thermal energy into mechanical work through thermodynamic cycles, operating between a hot source and a cold sink. The first practical heat engine, the atmospheric engine invented by Thomas Newcomen in 1712, used steam condensation to create a vacuum that drove a piston, though it suffered from low efficiency due to repeated heating and cooling of the cylinder.^[15] James Watt significantly improved this design in 1769 by introducing a separate condenser, which prevented cylinder cooling during operation and thereby reduced fuel consumption by about 75%, marking a pivotal advancement in engine practicality.^[16]^[17] The theoretical maximum efficiency for any heat engine operating reversibly between two temperatures is given by the Carnot efficiency, derived from the second law of thermodynamics for a cycle consisting of two isothermal and two adiabatic processes. In this ideal reversible engine, heat Q_h is absorbed from the hot reservoir at temperature T_h (in Kelvin), and heat Q_c is rejected to the cold reservoir at T_c, with the efficiency defined as the ratio of net work output to heat input:

\eta_{Carnot} = 1 - \frac{T_c}{T_h} = 1 - \frac{Q_c}{Q_h}.

This formula arises because, for reversible processes, the entropy change over the cycle must be zero, leading to \frac{Q_h}{T_h} = \frac{Q_c}{T_c}, which directly yields the efficiency expression.^[18]^[19] Real heat engines, however, cannot achieve this limit due to inherent irreversibilities but approximate it through specific cycles. Common real-world cycles include the Otto cycle for spark-ignition gasoline engines, the Diesel cycle for compression-ignition engines, and the Rankine cycle for steam turbines. The ideal Otto cycle efficiency depends on the compression ratio r (the ratio of maximum to minimum volume) and the specific heat ratio \gamma (approximately 1.4 for air), given by

\eta_{Otto} = 1 - \frac{1}{r^{\gamma-1}},

which increases with higher r but is limited in practice to avoid auto-ignition; typical gasoline engines achieve 20-30% thermal efficiency.^[20]^[21]^[22] Diesel engines, using higher compression ratios (15-25), yield 30-40% efficiency, benefiting from more complete combustion at elevated pressures.^[23] Steam power plants based on the Rankine cycle, involving boiling water to produce vapor that expands through a turbine, typically operate at 30-45% efficiency in modern setups, enhanced by superheating the steam to reduce moisture losses.^[24] Efficiency in real heat engines is reduced by irreversibilities such as mechanical friction in moving parts, which dissipates energy as heat, and heat transfer losses across finite temperature differences in heat exchangers.^[25]^[26] These factors increase entropy generation beyond the reversible case, lowering the net work output relative to the Carnot limit. Improvements can mitigate such losses; for instance, supercharging forces additional air into the cylinder to boost power density and allow leaner mixtures for better combustion efficiency, while regenerative braking in hybrid systems captures kinetic energy during deceleration to recharge batteries, typically recovering 60-70% of the braking energy that would otherwise be lost as heat.^[27]

Chemical Fuel Efficiency

Chemical fuel efficiency refers to the effectiveness with which the chemical energy stored in fuels is converted into usable thermal energy through oxidation processes, primarily combustion. This efficiency is fundamentally limited by the fuel's inherent energy content and the completeness of the reaction, but practical losses arise from incomplete burning and heat dissipation. Key metrics distinguish between the higher heating value (HHV), which accounts for the latent heat of water vapor condensation in combustion products, and the lower heating value (LHV), which excludes this heat by assuming water remains as vapor.^[28]^[29] For hydrocarbon fuels like gasoline, the HHV is approximately 46.4 MJ/kg, reflecting the maximum recoverable energy under ideal conditions where exhaust gases are cooled to ambient temperature and water is liquefied.^[30] Combustion efficiency, denoted as \eta_{\text{comb}}, quantifies the fraction of a fuel's theoretical energy that is actually released during burning and is calculated as \eta_{\text{comb}} = \left( \frac{\text{energy released}}{\text{theoretical maximum from stoichiometry}} \right) \times 100\%.^[31] This theoretical maximum is derived from the fuel's stoichiometric reaction with oxygen, assuming complete conversion to CO_2 and H_2O without side products. In practice, \eta_{\text{comb}} approaches 99% or higher in well-controlled systems but can drop below 95% due to factors such as suboptimal air-fuel ratios, which lead to incomplete combustion.^[32] The air-fuel ratio, typically around 14.7:1 by mass for gasoline under stoichiometric conditions, must be precisely managed; excess air promotes complete oxidation but increases heat losses through flue gases, while insufficient air results in unburned hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide formation.^[33]^[34] In broader systems like boilers, overall chain efficiency encompasses the entire process from fuel storage and delivery to heat output, often ranging from 70% to 90% depending on fuel type, design, and operation.^[35] For natural gas or oil-fired boilers, modern units achieve 85-95% efficiency by minimizing stack losses and optimizing combustion, though older coal-fired systems may fall to 70-80% due to ash handling and incomplete burning.^[36] This chain efficiency builds on combustion performance but subtracts losses from fuel handling, radiation, and convection, highlighting the need for integrated controls to maximize usable heat transfer to working fluids like steam or hot water.^[37] Efficiency in chemical fuel conversion is closely linked to environmental impacts, as incomplete combustion not only reduces energy yield but also elevates emissions of pollutants like carbon monoxide (CO) and nitrogen oxides (NOx). CO arises from partial oxidation of carbon under oxygen-limited conditions, while NOx forms from high-temperature reactions between nitrogen and oxygen in air.^[38] These emissions prompted regulatory responses, such as the U.S. Clean Air Act of 1970, which established national standards for ambient air quality and mandated controls on stationary and mobile sources to curb CO and NOx from combustion processes.^[39]^[40] Post-1970 advancements in combustion technology, driven by these regulations, have significantly improved both efficiency and emission profiles in fuel-burning systems.

Electrical and Optical Conversions

Electrical Power Efficiency

Electrical power efficiency refers to the effectiveness of converting electrical energy from one form to another, such as alternating current (AC) to direct current (DC), voltage level changes, or frequency adjustments, primarily through power electronics devices. These conversions are essential in applications ranging from household appliances to renewable energy systems and electric vehicles (EVs), where minimizing losses directly impacts energy savings and system performance. Key metrics focus on the ratio of output power to input power, accounting for resistive, magnetic, and switching losses inherent in components like diodes, transistors, and inductors.^[41] Wall-plug efficiency, denoted as η_wp, measures the overall power conversion from the electrical outlet to the usable output of a device, calculated as η_wp = (P_delivered / P_wall) × 100%, where P_delivered is the power provided to the load and P_wall is the power drawn from the wall socket. This metric encompasses all losses in the power supply chain, including those from rectification, regulation, and filtering. For typical household appliances equipped with switched-mode power supplies, η_wp ranges from approximately 80% to 95%, with modern designs certified under standards like 80 PLUS achieving higher values at various load levels to reduce standby consumption and operational heat.^[42]^[43] Transformer efficiency, expressed as η_trans = (P_secondary / P_primary) × 100%, quantifies the power transfer from primary to secondary windings while accounting for no-load and load-dependent losses. Core losses arise from hysteresis, where energy is dissipated due to magnetic domain reorientation in the iron core, and eddy currents, induced circulating currents opposing the magnetic field; these are collectively around 1-2% in efficient designs. Copper losses, primarily I²R resistive heating in the windings, increase with load current and can be mitigated by using low-resistance materials and optimal winding configurations. High-frequency transformer designs, operating above 20 kHz, minimize these losses by enabling smaller cores with reduced material volume and better flux distribution, often achieving overall efficiencies exceeding 98% in switched-mode power supplies.^[44]^[41] The development of practical transformers began in 1885 with William Stanley's design, which featured closed iron cores and improved insulation, enabling reliable AC voltage stepping for commercial power distribution and marking a pivotal advancement in electrical systems.^[45] Subsequent innovations in power electronics, such as the insulated-gate bipolar transistor (IGBT) introduced in the early 1980s, further enhanced conversion efficiency by providing high-voltage switching with low conduction losses, reducing overall system dissipation in applications like motor drives and inverters.^[46] Inverter and rectifier efficiencies are critical for bidirectional power conversions, such as DC to AC in solar inverters or AC to DC in EV chargers, where η_inv ≈ 90-98% is typical for modern silicon-based systems. Efficiency can be approximated as η = 1 - (I²R losses / P_in), with I²R representing conduction losses in switches and filters, alongside switching losses from transistor transitions; these are minimized through soft-switching techniques and wide-bandgap materials like silicon carbide. In solar photovoltaic systems, high-quality inverters achieve 95-98% efficiency at peak loads, while EV rectifiers using topologies like Vienna rectifiers reach similar levels to support fast charging with minimal harmonic distortion.^[47]^[48]^[49]

Luminous and Photonic Efficiency

Luminous efficacy quantifies the efficiency with which a light source produces visible light, defined as the ratio of luminous flux (measured in lumens, lm) to electrical power input (in watts, W), yielding units of lm/W.^[50] This metric is inherently tied to the human-visible spectrum (approximately 380–780 nm), as the lumen weighting function, based on the eye's photopic sensitivity curve peaking at 555 nm, emphasizes light wavelengths perceived most brightly by humans.^[50] Traditional incandescent bulbs achieve around 15 lm/W, largely due to significant thermal losses outside the visible range, while modern light-emitting diodes (LEDs) reach 150–250 lm/W as of 2025 by more selectively emitting in the visible spectrum.^[51]^[52]^[53] In photonic-to-electrical conversion, photovoltaic (PV) efficiency measures the fraction of incident solar power converted to electrical power, expressed as

\eta_{pv} = \frac{P_{electrical}}{P_{incident\ solar}} \times 100\%

where P_{electrical} is the output electrical power and P_{incident\ solar} is the incident solar irradiance, typically under standard conditions of 1000 W/m².^[54] The theoretical upper bound for single-junction PV cells is the Shockley-Queisser limit, approximately 33% for an optimal bandgap of 1.34 eV, arising from fundamental thermodynamic constraints including blackbody radiation balance and the bandgap energy E_g, where photons with energy below E_g are not absorbed and those above E_g lose excess energy as heat.^[54] This limit assumes radiative recombination as the sole loss mechanism and perfect absorption for photons exceeding E_g.^[54] For electrical-to-photonic conversion in LEDs, wall-plug efficiency is the ratio of output radiant flux (optical power in watts) to input electrical power, given by

\eta = \frac{\Phi_{radiant}}{P_{electrical}} \times 100\%

where \Phi_{radiant} accounts for all emitted photons, including non-visible ones.^[55] A key loss in white LEDs, which use blue emitters and yellow phosphors, is the Stokes shift, where absorbed higher-energy blue photons are re-emitted at lower-energy yellow wavelengths, dissipating about 20–30% of energy as heat and reducing overall efficiency.^[56] Advancements in lighting include organic LEDs (OLEDs), which achieved luminous efficacies exceeding 100 lm/W in the 2010s through improved phosphorescent emitters and exciplex hosts that enhance internal quantum efficiency.^[57] In solar applications, perovskite PV cells surpassed 25% efficiency by 2023 via strategies like anion fixation and Pb passivation to minimize defects and improve charge extraction, with certified single-junction efficiencies exceeding 26% as of 2025.^[58]^[59]

Measurement and Applications

Efficiency in Devices and Systems

In integrated devices such as heat pumps, efficiency is often quantified using the coefficient of performance (COP), defined as the ratio of useful heating or cooling provided to the work input required, which can exceed 100% because the device transfers heat from an external source rather than converting input energy alone.^[60] For instance, modern heat pumps achieve COP values of 3 to 4, corresponding to 300-400% efficiency under optimal conditions, due to the incorporation of low-grade environmental heat alongside electrical work.^[61] Optimization in such devices follows international standards like ISO 50001, which establishes a systematic framework for energy management systems to identify, monitor, and improve energy performance across organizational operations.^[62] As of 2025, ISO 50001 has been updated to include enhanced AI integration for energy management, further supporting efficiency improvements in systems.^[63] Compliance with ISO 50001 enables continual reduction in energy consumption by integrating efficiency into business processes, often yielding measurable gains in device-level performance.^[64] At the system level, overall energy conversion efficiency in chained processes, such as power generation, transmission, and distribution, is calculated as the product of individual stage efficiencies:

\eta_{\text{system}} = \prod \eta_i

where \eta_i represents the efficiency of each subprocess.^[65] This multiplicative approach highlights how even small losses at one stage compound across the system; for example, electric grid transmission and distribution losses typically range from 5% to 10% globally, with the U.S. averaging about 5% annually due to resistive heating and other dissipative effects.^[66]^[67] In large-scale systems, these losses underscore the need for holistic optimization to maintain high aggregate efficiency. Efficiency measurement in devices and systems relies on standardized testing protocols that distinguish between controlled laboratory conditions and variable real-world operation. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) fuel economy ratings, for instance, are derived from dynamometer tests simulating city and highway driving cycles, providing a benchmark that often overestimates real-world performance by 10-30% due to factors like traffic, weather, and driver behavior.^[68]^[69] Dynamometer testing measures vehicle power output and fuel consumption under repeatable loads, enabling precise efficiency assessments but requiring adjustments for on-road discrepancies through factors like the 5-cycle method.^[70] These protocols ensure comparability across systems while informing regulatory compliance and design improvements. Advancements in smart grids, incorporating artificial intelligence (AI) for predictive load balancing and fault detection, have the potential to reduce system-level energy losses by up to 15% in pilot implementations, with broader applications showing 5-10% improvements as of 2025.^[71] AI algorithms analyze vast datasets from sensors to minimize transmission inefficiencies, such as by dynamically routing power flows, with pilot projects demonstrating up to 15% loss reductions in microgrids.^[72] These technologies integrate with existing standards like ISO 50001 to scale efficiency gains across industrial and utility systems.

Practical Examples and Limitations

In power generation, combined cycle gas turbines represent a practical advancement, achieving thermal efficiencies of approximately 60% by recovering exhaust heat from the gas turbine to drive a secondary steam turbine, thereby maximizing energy extraction from natural gas combustion.^[73] Nuclear power plants, however, are constrained to around 33% efficiency due to the relatively low steam temperatures—typically below 300°C—imposed by reactor safety limits on coolant conditions, which reduce the temperature differential available for work extraction.^[74] In the transportation sector, electric vehicles exemplify high energy conversion efficiency, with overall drivetrain efficiencies reaching about 90%, far surpassing the 20-30% well-to-wheel efficiency of internal combustion engine vehicles, where much energy is lost as heat in the engine and exhaust.^[75] Regenerative braking further boosts electric vehicle performance by recovering 60-80% of the kinetic energy dissipated during braking through the electric motor acting as a generator, which can contribute 10-30% to overall energy efficiency depending on driving conditions and battery state.^[27] A key limitation in all energy conversions stems from the second law of thermodynamics, which requires an increase in entropy for any real process, inherently prohibiting 100% efficiency as some energy must dissipate as unusable heat.^[76] Beyond physical constraints, economic trade-offs often limit adoption of higher-efficiency designs; for instance, in renewables like solar and wind systems, pursuing marginal efficiency gains can escalate upfront costs, influencing deployment decisions based on levelized cost of energy analyses.^[77] The 2017 Tesla Model 3 illustrates these principles in electric mobility, attaining drivetrain efficiency of around 90% through optimized permanent magnet motors and inverters, which minimized losses in a compact, high-voltage architecture.^[78] Similarly, modern horizontal-axis wind turbines achieve practical efficiencies of 40-50%, limited by aerodynamic drag and mechanical losses but approaching the theoretical Betz limit of 59.3% that caps power extraction from an undisturbed wind stream.^[79]

References

[1]
Energy conversion efficiency - MATSC 101
Aug 31, 2001 · A simple but powerful definition of efficiency of a device that converts one energy form into another: It is a number between 0 and 1, or between 0 and 100%.
[2]
Efficiency of Energy Conversion Devices | EGEE 102 - Dutton Institute
Example 1. An electric motor consumes 100 watts (a joule per second (J/s)) of power to obtain 90 watts of mechanical power. Determine its efficiency.
[3]
[PDF] Chapter 4 EFFICIENCY OF ENERGY CONVERSION
We then use the knowledge gained in Chapter 3 to show that there are natural (thermodynamic) limitations when energy is converted from one form to another ...
[4]
[PDF] Thermodynamics Fundamentals for Energy Conversion Systems ...
By virtue of second law of thermodynamics, no power cycle can convert more heat into work than the Carnot cycle. The theoretical maximum efficiency of any heat ...
[5]
Solar Performance and Efficiency - Department of Energy
The conversion efficiency of a photovoltaic (PV) cell, or solar cell, is the percentage of the solar energy shining on a PV device that is converted into ...
[6]
[PDF] Energy Conversion Engineering
The energy systems of the future will be cleaner and run more efficiently than the ones in today's conventional power plants. NETL is investigating the ...
[7]
Chapter: Appendix D: Definitions of Energy Efficiency
Both of the measures of energy efficiency defined above would be termed first-law efficiency (derived from the first law of thermodynamics), being based ...
[8]
Heat Engines
The efficiency of a heat engine is defined as the work out divided by the energy in. In 1824 French engineer Sadi Carnot (1796-1832) wrote and published a ...
[9]
Energy Efficiency - Energy System - IEA
Dec 17, 2024 · Energy efficiency is called the “first fuel” in clean energy transitions, as it provides some of the quickest and most cost-effective CO 2 mitigation options.
[10]
Use of energy explained Energy efficiency and conservation - EIA
Jan 12, 2024 · For example, installing energy-efficient lights is an efficiency measure. Turning lights off when not needed, either manually or with timers or ...
[11]
Learn about Energy and its Impact on the Environment | US EPA
Mar 13, 2025 · Producing and using electricity more efficiently reduces both the amount of fuel needed to generate electricity and the amount of greenhouse ...
[12]
[PDF] Sadi Carnot, 'Founder of the Second Law of Thermodynamics'
The first important theoretical development in the Réflexions is Carnot's proof that there is a limit to the efficiency of a heat engine which is independent of ...
[13]
Energy Units and Conversions - UCI Physics and Astronomy
(E = P t). 1 kilowatt-hour (kWh) = 3.6 x 106 J = 3.6 million Joules. 1 calorie of heat is the amount needed to raise 1 gram ...
[14]
15.4 Carnot's Perfect Heat Engine: The Second Law of ...
(b) Friction and other dissipative processes in the output mechanisms of a heat engine convert some of its work output into heat transfer to the environment.
[15]
[PDF] THE NEW ECONOMIC HISTORY AND THE INDUSTRIAL ...
... 1712 when an English engineer named Thomas Newcomen produced the first working steam engine. ... In 1769 Matthew Boulton wrote to his partner James. Watt ...
[16]
[PDF] Heat-to-work
First modern steam engine: James Watt, 1769 (patent), 1774 (prod.) Higher efficiency than Newcomen by introducing separate condense. Reduces wasted heat by ...
[17]
Biography of James Watt - MSU College of Engineering
The concept for the breakthrough to improve the Newcomen engine came in May of 1765, over two years after Watt began to study the engine. Watt later described ...
[18]
Heat Engines: the Carnot Cycle - Galileo
Efficiency = TH−TCTH. This was an amazing result, because it was exactly correct, despite being based on a complete misunderstanding of the nature ...
[19]
3.3 The Carnot Cycle - MIT
A Carnot cycle is shown in Figure 3.4. It has four processes. There are two adiabatic reversible legs and two isothermal reversible legs.
[20]
Otto Cycle Thermodynamic Analysis
We call the ratio of the volume at the beginning of compression to the volume at the end of compression the compression ratio, r. Then. p3 / p2 = r ^ gamma.
[21]
3.5 The Internal combustion engine (Otto Cycle) - MIT
The ideal Otto cycle efficiency is shown as a function of the compression ratio in Figure 3.11. As the compression ratio, $ r$ , increases, $ \eta_\textrm ...
[22]
Theory of Otto Cycle - Gasoline Engine - Nuclear Power
A typical gasoline automotive engine operates at around 25% to 30% of thermal efficiency. About 70-75% is rejected as waste heat without being converted into ...
[23]
Thermal Efficiency for Diesel Cycle | Equation | nuclear-power.com
A typical diesel automotive engine operates at around 30% to 35% of thermal efficiency. About 65-70% is rejected as waste heat without being converted into ...
[24]
[Solved] Rankine cycle efficiency of a good steam power plant is in t
Jan 24, 2021 · In a good steam power plant, the Rankine cycle efficiency varies from 35 to 45 %. Download Soln PDF · Share on Whatsapp.<|separator|>
[25]
Engine Efficiency - DieselNet
It is evident that most of the engines had average combustion efficiencies greater than 99.5%. [chart] Figure 5. Combustion efficiency histogram for 1998 ...Engine Energy Losses · Combustion Efficiency · Thermodynamic Efficiency
[26]
[PDF] Defining engine efficiency limits - Department of Energy
Since friction losses ultimately leave the engine as heat, there will be net reductions in oil and engine coolant losses. Frictional losses represent a larger ...
[27]
A regenerative braking system for internal combustion engine ...
Feb 1, 2020 · Further increase in engine thermal efficiency from 50% to 60% is possible, with precise control of operation boundary conditions, such as ...Missing: supercharging | Show results with:supercharging
[28]
High Heating Value - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Higher heating value (HHV) is defined as the amount of heat released by the unit mass or volume of fuel (initially at 25 °C) once it is combusted and the ...
[29]
Lower and Higher Heating Values (LHV and HHV)
By definition the higher heating value is equal to the lower heating value with the addition of the heat of vaporization of the water content in the fuel.
[30]
Higher Calorific Values of Common Fuels: Reference & Data
Higher and lower calorific values (heating values) for fuels like coke, oil, wood, hydrogen and others. · 1 Btu(IT)/lb = 2.3278 MJ/t = 2327.8 J/kg = 0.55598 kcal ...
[31]
Combustion Efficiency - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
A combustion efficiency of 100% signifies complete conversion of the fuel's heating value into heat.
[32]
Combustion Efficiency - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Combustion efficiency, defined as the ratio of heat released by the fuel to the heat input by the fuel, is generally high in FBC systems.Missing: (actual | Show results with:(actual
[33]
Air fuel ratio - x-engineer.org
The stoichiometric air fuel ratio is around 14.7:1. This means that, in order to burn completely 1 kg of fuel, we need 14.7 kg of air.
[34]
Combustion Efficiency and Excess Air - The Engineering ToolBox
Excess air increases oxygen for combustion. Combustion efficiency increases with excess air until heat loss exceeds the heat provided. Stoichiometric ...
[35]
Furnaces and Boilers | Department of Energy
Although older fossil fuel furnace and boiler systems have efficiencies in the range of 56% to 70%, modern conventional heating systems can achieve efficiencies ...
[36]
Boiler Efficiency - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Typical boiler efficiencies range from about 90% for the best solid biomass fuel boilers to close to 95% for oil- and natural gas-fired boilers, Table 3.2. The ...
[37]
Boiler - Efficiency
Boiler efficiency (%) = 100 (heat exported by the fluid (water, steam ..) / heat provided by the fuel)
[38]
[PDF] AP-42, Vol. I, CH 2.1: Refuse Combustion
If too little air is added, the probability of incomplete mixing increases, allowing greater quantities of unburned hydrocarbons to escape the furnace. Both of ...
[39]
Summary of the Clean Air Act | US EPA
Jul 25, 2025 · The Clean Air Act (CAA) is the comprehensive federal law that regulates air emissions from stationary and mobile sources.Clean Air Act (CAA) · Air Enforcement · EPA History · OverviewMissing: incomplete combustion NOx
[40]
Clean Air Act: A Summary of the Act and Its Major Requirements
Sep 13, 2022 · The Clean Air Act, codified as 42 USC 7401 et seq., seeks to protect human health and the environment from emissions that pollute ambient, or outdoor, air.
[41]
https://www.monolithicpower.com/en/learning/mpscholar/ac-power/transformers/transformer-efficiency-and-losses
[42]
[PDF] Power Supplies: A Hidden Opportunity for Energy Savings Executive ...
May 22, 2002 · Power supply efficiency levels of 80 to 90% are readily achievable in most internal and external power supplies at modest incremental cost ...
[43]
Efficiency Standards and Ratings for External Power Supplies | Altium
Apr 14, 2021 · The reality is that the most common low-cost AC/DC converters' efficiency is in the range of just 80% to 90%. Today's technology can ...
[44]
Transformer Losses and Efficiency - Technical Articles - EEPower
Jun 16, 2021 · In this article we will learn about the four main types of transformer losses and calculations for finding the efficiency of a transformer.
[45]
History of Transformers - Edison Tech Center
1885 - William Stanley makes the transformer more practical due to some design changes: "Stanley's first patented design was for induction coils with single ...
[46]
IGBT Inventor Awarded the 2024 Millennium Technology Prize
Sep 6, 2024 · Since its release in the early 1980s, silicon IGBT has been a popular power semiconductor device for efficient power conversion and motor ...
[47]
6.5. Efficiency of Inverters | EME 812: Utility Solar Electric and ...
High quality sine wave inverters are rated at 90-95% efficiency. Lower quality modified sine wave inverters are less efficient - 75-85%. High frequency ...Missing: rectifier 90-98% R
[48]
Ultimate guide to utility-scale PV system losses - RatedPower
Dec 20, 2022 · Inverter losses For utility scale solar projects we have string and central inverters. They usually have an efficiency rate of around 95- 98%, ...Shading Losses · Inverter Losses · How Agrivoltaics Affect...Missing: rectifier 90-98% equation R
[49]
Designing Vienna Rectifiers for EV Chargers - Avnet
Jun 24, 2024 · Compared to other topologies, Vienna rectifiers boast higher efficiency, lower electromagnetic interference (EMI), and a simpler design with ...
[50]
Luminous Efficacy and Efficiency - RP Photonics
In that case, a light bulb with 15 lm/W will have a luminous efficiency of 15 / 683 = 2.2%. Even an ideally energy-efficient white light source could then never ...
[51]
Luminous Efficacy - The Engineering ToolBox
The required power to a tungsten incandescent lamp with luminous efficacy 15 lm/W can be calculated by modifying (1). P = Φ / η. = (500 lm) / (15 lm/W). = 33 W.
[52]
[PDF] Energy Efficiency of LEDs
The energy efficiency of LEDs has increased substantially since the first general illumination products came to market, with currently available.<|separator|>
[53]
Radiative Efficiency Limit: The SQ Limit Explained - Ossila
The maximum possible efficiency for a single-junction solar cell is 33.7% with an optimum band gap of 1.34 eV. This limit depends on the solar cell bandgap.
[54]
Wall-plug Efficiency – electrical-to-optical, all-solid-state lasers
The wall-plug efficiency of a laser system is the total electrical-to-optical power efficiency, including the power losses in the electronics.
[55]
[PDF] Light Emitting Diodes (LEDs) for General Illumination
fluorescent lamps also leads to a larger Stokes shift, hence a lower wall-plug efficiency. In principle, an LED phosphor does not then need to be as quantum ...
[56]
White Organic LED with a Luminous Efficacy Exceeding 100 lm W ...
Jun 14, 2017 · In this paper, an ultraefficient white OLED is discussed based on a newly designed thermally activated delayed fluorescent exciplex host.
[57]
One-stone-for-two-birds strategy to attain beyond 25% perovskite ...
Feb 15, 2023 · We report a one-stone-for-two-birds strategy in which both anion-fixation and associated undercoordinated-Pb passivation are in situ achieved during ...
[58]
Affordable Heat, Efficient Grid - Building Decarbonization Coalition
Sep 19, 2024 · If a heat pump has a COP of 3, it means that 1 unit of energy provides 3 units of heat or cooling: it is 300% efficient. (An appliance claiming ...<|separator|>
[59]
https://www.fluxim.com/research-blogs/perovskite-silicon-tandem-pv-record-updates
[60]
ISO 50001 — Energy management
ISO 50001 is for organizations to improve energy use through an energy management system, based on continual improvement, and helps to address their impact.
[61]
What is ISO 50001? | Better Buildings Initiative - Department of Energy
Jan 25, 2019 · ISO 50001 is the global standard for energy management systems, providing a framework for implementing an energy management system (EnMS).
[62]
Overall Efficiency | EGEE 102 - Dutton Institute
The overall efficiency of a system is equal to the product of efficiencies of the individual subsystems or processes.
[63]
The US Energy Information Administration (EIA) estimates
Nov 7, 2023 · The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) estimates that annual electricity transmission and distribution (T&D) losses averaged about 5% ...
[64]
Electric power transmission and distribution losses (% of output) | Data
Electric power transmission and distribution losses (% of output) · Electricity production from oil sources (% of total) · Electricity production from renewable ...
[65]
Fuel Economy and EV Range Testing | US EPA
Jul 18, 2025 · EPA's National Vehicle and Fuel Emissions Laboratory (NVFEL) tests new cars and trucks sold in the US to ensure that they comply with federal emissions and ...
[66]
How Accurate are EPA's Fuel Economy Labels? - Consumer Reports
Nov 14, 2016 · While the 2005 analysis found an average difference of 10.3%, the new analysis finds a difference of approximately 3.1% or 0.8 MPG. In the new ...Missing: lab | Show results with:lab<|separator|>
[67]
Vehicle Efficiency: Road vs Dynamometer - epa nepis
A previous study indicated that vehicles consume less fuel (higher mpg) in a test run on the current EPA dynamometer than when the same test is performed on the ...
[68]
The Impact of Novel Artificial Intelligence Methods on Energy ... - MDPI
Early applications in smart grids demonstrated that AI can dynamically balance supply and demand, improving system efficiency and reducing energy waste [2].
[69]
[PDF] Optimization Of Smart Grid Operations Using AI and Machine Learning
20% improvement in voltage stability and 15% reduction in energy losses in micro-grids through optimized EV reactive power management. Alshdadi et al ...Missing: 2010s | Show results with:2010s<|control11|><|separator|>
[70]
Natural Gas Plants - 2018 ATB
Combined-cycle natural gas plants typically have efficiencies ranging from 50%-60%, and R&D targets have been set to achieve even higher efficiencies.
[71]
Thermal Efficiency of Nuclear Power Plants
Thermal efficiency is improved if the heat input from the steam to the steam turbine is at as high a temperature as possible and the heat rejection in the ...
[72]
EV vs ICE: Surprising differences in efficiency, cost, and impact
In fact, for every dollar spent on gasoline, only 20 cents of it is used to move an ICE vehicle along the road. EVs, however, operate at about 87% - 91% ...
[73]
Road test reveals how much energy can EVs really recuperate
Mar 24, 2024 · Data from Green NCAP reveals that - on average, an EV recaptures around 22% of its driving energy through recuperation.
[74]
12.3 Second Law of Thermodynamics: Entropy - Physics | OpenStax
Mar 26, 2020 · Recall from the chapter introduction that it is not even theoretically possible for engines to be 100 percent efficient.
[75]
[PDF] The Multiple Benefits of Energy Efficiency and Renewable ... - EPA
Typical assessment criteria include energy savings, economic costs and benefits, and feasibility-related ... illuminate clearly the strategic trade-offs among ...
[76]
Model 3 drive unit (motor, inverter etc) is 5.7% more efficient than ...
Nov 11, 2017 · From Tesla's coefficients, RLHP at 55mph is 12.14hp, which puts energy over the 301.26 miles at 66.5hphr, and drivetrain efficiency at 76% (66. ...
[77]
What is BETZ limit for Wind Turbine Efficiency?
Nov 14, 2022 · The Betz limit is the theoretical maximum efficiency for a wind turbine at 59.3%. The common efficiencies are in the 35-45% range.