Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Reactance

In electrical and electronic systems, reactance is the opposition presented to alternating current (AC) by the inductance or capacitance of circuit elements. Unlike resistance, which dissipates energy as heat, reactance stores and releases energy in magnetic or electric fields without net dissipation. It is the imaginary component of impedance, the total opposition to AC flow, and is measured in ohms (Ω).^[1] There are two main types: inductive reactance, which arises from inductors and increases with frequency, causing current to lag voltage; and capacitive reactance, from capacitors, which decreases with frequency and causes current to lead voltage. The net reactance in a circuit is the difference between these components. Reactance plays a key role in AC circuit analysis, filtering, and resonance.^[1]

Fundamentals

Definition

In electrical engineering, reactance refers to the opposition presented to alternating current (AC) by inductors and capacitors due to their ability to store energy in magnetic or electric fields, respectively, without dissipating it as heat. This opposition arises because these components alternately absorb and release energy during each cycle of the AC waveform, effectively impeding current flow in a frequency-dependent manner.^[2]^[3] Unlike resistance, which causes a voltage drop in phase with the current and results in power dissipation, reactance introduces a 90-degree phase shift between voltage and current, leading to no net energy loss over a complete cycle. In inductive elements, voltage leads current by 90 degrees, while in capacitive elements, current leads voltage by 90 degrees, creating a reactive power exchange rather than consumption.^[2]^[4] The concept of reactance builds on the principles of AC circuits and extends Ohm's law through the use of complex numbers or phasors to account for both magnitude and phase. For instance, in a simple series RL circuit containing a resistor and inductor, the reactance from the inductor causes the total current to lag the applied voltage, altering the circuit's overall behavior without additional power dissipation. A similar effect occurs in an RC circuit, where capacitive reactance makes the current lead the voltage. Reactance contributes to the imaginary part of impedance, the total opposition to AC flow.^[3]^[2]

Historical Development

The concept of reactance emerged in the late 19th century amid the rapid advancement of alternating current (AC) systems, driven by the need to analyze non-resistive opposition to current flow in inductive and capacitive elements. Nikola Tesla's demonstrations of polyphase AC motors and generators in the 1880s, including his 1888 lecture on AC systems before the American Institute of Electrical Engineers (AIEE), highlighted the practical advantages of AC over direct current for power transmission, indirectly spurring theoretical studies into phenomena like reactance to address phase shifts and energy storage in circuits.^[5] Oliver Heaviside played a pivotal role in the development of related concepts during the 1880s through his work on transmission lines using operational calculus, a method he developed to solve differential equations for electromagnetic propagation. In papers published in The Electrician between 1885 and 1887, Heaviside introduced impedance as an extension of resistance, incorporating reactive effects from inductance and capacitance to model signal distortion in telegraphic cables, which laid the groundwork for understanding reactance as the imaginary component opposing AC flow.^[6]^[7] The term "reactance" itself was first proposed by French engineer Édouard Hospitalier in the journal L'Industrie Électrique on 10 May 1893 and was officially adopted by the AIEE in 1894. Building on this, Charles Proteus Steinmetz advanced AC circuit analysis in the 1890s by applying complex numbers, enabling the representation of reactance alongside resistance. At the 1893 International Electrical Congress, Steinmetz presented the phasor method, and in his seminal 1897 book Theory and Calculation of Alternating Current Phenomena, he detailed how reactance quantifies the phase-dependent opposition in inductors and capacitors, revolutionizing polyphase system design.^[6] Independently, Arthur E. Kennelly formalized impedance as a complex quantity in a 1893 AIEE paper, further solidifying reactance's role.^[8] By the early 1900s, these concepts were integrated into emerging standards for polyphase systems through the AIEE, the predecessor to the IEEE, which adopted unified terminology and methods for AC analysis in its technical publications and early standards committees around 1900–1910 to support growing electrical infrastructure. The formal extension of Kirchhoff's laws to AC circuits, incorporating reactance within complex impedance, was refined by the 1920s in network theory developments, such as Ronald M. Foster's 1924 reactance theorem, which established key properties for passive networks and cemented reactance's place in circuit laws.^[6]

Types

Inductive Reactance

Inductive reactance arises from the behavior of inductors, which are typically coils of wire that store energy in a magnetic field when current flows through them. According to Lenz's law, any change in current through the coil produces a self-induced electromotive force (emf) that opposes the change, resisting variations in the magnetic flux linked with the coil.^[9] This opposition stems from Faraday's law of electromagnetic induction, which states that the induced emf is equal to the negative rate of change of magnetic flux through the coil.^[9] The voltage across an inductor is given by v = L \frac{di}{dt}, where L is the inductance in henries and i is the current. For a sinusoidal current i = I \cos(\omega t) in an alternating current (AC) circuit, where I is the peak current and \omega = 2\pi f is the angular frequency with f as the frequency in hertz, the voltage becomes v = -\omega L I \sin(\omega t). This results in the magnitude of the inductive reactance, defined as the ratio of the peak voltage to peak current, X_L = \omega L.^[10] In AC circuits, inductive reactance increases linearly with frequency, meaning higher frequencies encounter greater opposition to current flow. The current through the inductor lags the voltage by 90 degrees, as the sinusoidal voltage reaches its peak before the current does.^[10] A practical example is the use of choke coils, which are inductors designed with high inductance to exhibit large X_L at high frequencies, thereby blocking them while permitting direct current (DC) or low-frequency AC to pass with minimal impedance.^[11]

Capacitive Reactance

Capacitive reactance arises from the behavior of capacitors in alternating current (AC) circuits, where energy is stored in the electric field within the dielectric material between the capacitor plates.^[12] When an AC voltage is applied, the alternating electric field causes charge to accumulate and dissipate on the plates, but no conduction current flows through the insulating dielectric; instead, a displacement current—arising from the time-varying electric field—effectively allows the circuit to behave as if current is flowing through the capacitor.^[12] This displacement current, as described by Maxwell's equations, simulates the flow of AC signals across the capacitor, enabling energy transfer without direct charge movement.^[13] The mathematical expression for capacitive reactance X_C is derived from the fundamental capacitor equation i = C \frac{dv}{dt}, where i is the current, C is the capacitance in farads, and v is the voltage across the capacitor.^[14] For a sinusoidal voltage v(t) = V_0 \sin(\omega t), with V_0 as the amplitude and \omega as the angular frequency, the charge on the capacitor is Q(t) = C V_0 \sin(\omega t).^[14] Differentiating gives the current i(t) = \frac{dQ}{dt} = C V_0 \omega \cos(\omega t) = \omega C V_0 \sin(\omega t + \pi/2), showing that the current leads the voltage by 90 degrees.^[14] The reactance is then defined as the ratio of voltage amplitude to current amplitude, yielding X_C = \frac{1}{\omega C} ohms.^[13] Capacitive reactance decreases inversely with frequency, meaning capacitors offer less opposition to current at higher frequencies and act nearly as short circuits for very high \omega, while approaching open-circuit behavior at low frequencies.^[13] This 90-degree phase lead of current over voltage contrasts with inductive reactance, where current lags voltage.^[15] In practical applications, such as audio amplifiers, coupling capacitors exploit this frequency dependence to form high-pass filters that pass high-frequency AC signals while blocking DC bias voltages, ensuring signal integrity without saturating subsequent stages.^[16]

Mathematical Description

Formulas and Derivations

In the analysis of alternating current (AC) circuits under sinusoidal excitation, voltages and currents are represented using complex phasors as v(t) = \Re\{V e^{j\omega t}\} and i(t) = \Re\{I e^{j(\omega t + \phi)}\}, where V and I are complex amplitudes, \omega = 2\pi f is the angular frequency, and \phi is the phase difference.^[17] The ratio Z = V / I defines the complex impedance, expressed as Z = R + jX, where R is the real part (resistance) and X is the imaginary part, known as reactance.^[18] Reactance quantifies the opposition to current flow due to energy storage in inductors or capacitors, without dissipation.^[18] For an inductor, the voltage-current relation in the time domain is v(t) = [L](/page/L') \frac{di(t)}{dt}, where [L](/page/L') is the inductance in henries.^[19] Substituting the phasor forms yields V = j[\omega](/page/Omega) [L](/page/L') I, so the inductive impedance is Z_L = j[\omega](/page/Omega) [L](/page/L') and the inductive reactance is X_L = [\omega](/page/Omega) [L](/page/L').^[17] This derivation shows that X_L arises from the 90° phase lag of current behind voltage.^[17] For a capacitor, the charge-voltage relation is q(t) = C v(t), where C is the capacitance in farads, and the current is i(t) = \frac{dq(t)}{dt} = C \frac{dv(t)}{dt}.^[19] In the phasor domain, this becomes I = j\omega C V, so the capacitive impedance is Z_C = \frac{1}{j\omega C} = -j \frac{1}{\omega C} and the capacitive reactance is X_C = -\frac{1}{\omega C}.^[17] Here, X_C reflects the 90° phase lead of current ahead of voltage.^[17] Reactance shares the unit of ohms (\Omega) with resistance, as both represent opposition to current in volts per ampere.^[20] Inductive reactance X_L increases linearly with frequency f, since X_L = 2\pi f L, while capacitive reactance X_C decreases hyperbolically as |X_C| = \frac{1}{2\pi f C}.^[20] This frequency dependence is evident in plots of X versus f: X_L rises as a straight line through the origin with positive slope proportional to L, whereas X_C falls from infinity at low f toward zero at high f, with negative sign convention.^[20]

Relation to Impedance and Phase

In alternating current (AC) circuits, reactance contributes to the total opposition to current flow known as impedance, which is a complex quantity combining resistance and reactance. The impedance Z is expressed as Z = R + jX, where R is the resistance, j is the imaginary unit, and X is the net reactance given by X = X_L - X_C, with X_L being inductive reactance and X_C capacitive reactance.^[21]^[22] The magnitude of the impedance is then |Z| = \sqrt{R^2 + X^2}, which determines the overall current for a given voltage according to Ohm's law for AC circuits, I = V / Z.^[22]^[23] The presence of reactance introduces a phase difference between voltage and current, quantified by the phase angle \phi = \tan^{-1}(X / [R](/page/R)). This angle indicates whether the circuit is inductive (positive \phi, current lags voltage) or capacitive (negative \phi, current leads voltage), with the value ranging from -90° to +90° depending on the dominance of X_L or X_C.^[21]^[22] The power factor, defined as \cos \phi = [R](/page/R) / |[Z](/page/Z)|, measures the efficiency of power transfer in the circuit, with a value of 1 indicating purely resistive behavior (no phase shift) and values less than 1 reflecting the impact of reactance on real power delivery.^[22]^[23] Reactance also distinguishes between real and reactive power in AC systems. Real power P = I^2 R (in watts) represents the energy actually dissipated as heat or work in the resistive components, while reactive power Q = I^2 X (in volt-ampere reactive, or VAR) accounts for the energy oscillated between the source and reactive elements without net consumption.^[21] This separation is crucial for understanding power quality, as reactive power does not contribute to useful work but affects voltage regulation and system capacity.^[21] Phasor diagrams provide a graphical representation of these relationships, depicting voltage and current as rotating vectors in the complex plane. In a purely reactive circuit (where R = 0), the voltage and current phasors are shifted by exactly 90°, with current lagging for inductance or leading for capacitance, illustrating the quadrature nature of reactance relative to resistance.^[22]^[24] For general circuits, the total voltage phasor is the vector sum of the in-phase resistive component and the quadrature reactive components, yielding the net phase angle \phi.^[22]^[24]

Applications and Effects

In Alternating Current Circuits

In alternating current (AC) circuits, reactance plays a critical role in determining the total opposition to current flow beyond mere resistance, influencing voltage drops, phase shifts, and frequency-dependent behavior across components. For series combinations of inductive and capacitive elements, the total reactance X_s is the algebraic sum of the inductive reactance X_L = \omega L and capacitive reactance X_C = 1/(\omega C), yielding X_s = X_L - X_C, where \omega is the angular frequency; this signed difference arises because inductive reactance opposes current with a +90° phase lead, while capacitive reactance does so with a -90° phase lag.^[25] In parallel configurations, the total reactance X_p is determined by the combination of susceptances, with total susceptance B_p = \frac{1}{X_C} - \frac{1}{X_L}, yielding X_p = \frac{1}{B_p} = \frac{X_L X_C}{X_C - X_L}, reflecting the net reactive current division between branches where the sign depends on the dominant reactance.^[26] These combinations enable precise control of circuit impedance, essential for designing amplifiers, oscillators, and signal processors where reactance magnitudes vary with frequency. A key phenomenon arising from reactance interactions is resonance in LC circuits, where the inductive and capacitive reactances balance such that X_L = X_C, occurring at the resonant angular frequency \omega_0 = 1/\sqrt{LC}; at this point, the total impedance reaches a minimum in series configurations (limited only by resistance), maximizing current for a given voltage and enabling efficient energy transfer.^[27] The sharpness of this resonance is quantified by the quality factor Q = \omega_0 / \Delta \omega, where \Delta \omega is the bandwidth (full width at half maximum power); higher Q values indicate narrower bandwidths, typically ranging from 10 to 100 in practical circuits, which enhances frequency selectivity.^[28] Reactance profoundly affects circuit response by enabling frequency-selective filtering, such as in low-pass filters where capacitive reactance dominates at high frequencies to attenuate signals above a cutoff (e.g., RC networks passing DC while blocking AC noise), or high-pass filters using inductive reactance to shunt low frequencies to ground while allowing higher ones to pass.^[19] These principles underpin tuning circuits in early radio receivers from the 1920s onward, where variable LC combinations adjusted reactance to resonate with broadcast frequencies, as seen in tuned radio frequency (TRF) designs that improved selectivity amid growing AM broadcasting.^[29] For power factor correction in AC systems, reactance imbalances are addressed through added components, though detailed mitigation techniques fall under measurement and compensation strategies. Consider a series RLC circuit driven by an AC source, such as one with R = 50 \, \Omega, L = 1 \, \mathrm{mH}, and C = 1 \, \mathrm{nF} at f = 159 \, \mathrm{kHz} (near resonance). In steady-state AC operation, the response settles to a sinusoidal current at the source frequency, with impedance Z \approx R at resonance due to canceling reactances, yielding maximum current amplitude and minimal phase shift; voltage across the inductor or capacitor can exceed the source by the Q factor (here Q \approx 20), amplifying signals for applications like bandpass filtering.^[25] In contrast, the transient response—triggered by sudden switching—exhibits damped oscillations governed by the characteristic equation roots, underdamped for low R (ringing at \omega_0) that decay exponentially before reaching steady-state, highlighting reactance's role in initial energy storage and release versus sustained AC flow.^[30] This distinction is vital in circuit design, where transients must settle quickly to avoid distortion in audio or communication systems.

Measurement and Compensation

Reactance in electrical circuits is quantified through several established measurement techniques that leverage the relationship between impedance components and phase differences. Bridge circuits remain a foundational method for precise determination of inductive and capacitive reactance. The Maxwell bridge, a modification of the Wheatstone bridge, is specifically used to measure unknown inductance by balancing the circuit with known resistances and capacitances, allowing calculation of inductive reactance at audio frequencies.^[31] Similarly, the Schering bridge measures capacitive reactance by balancing arms with resistors and capacitors, providing accurate values for capacitance and associated losses, particularly useful for high-voltage applications.^[32] Phase-based measurements offer an alternative approach, especially for dynamic assessments. Using an oscilloscope, the phase shift between voltage and current waveforms can be observed and quantified, as inductive reactance causes current to lag voltage by up to 90 degrees, while capacitive reactance causes a lead; the tangent of this angle relates directly to the reactive component relative to resistance.^[33] In modern practice, automated LCR meters and impedance analyzers provide comprehensive reactance evaluation across wide frequency ranges by applying sinusoidal signals and analyzing the resulting impedance vector, often achieving accuracies better than 0.1% for components in electronic and power systems.^[34] Compensation strategies address the disruptive effects of reactance, particularly in systems dominated by inductive loads, to improve efficiency and stability. For inductive loads such as motors, power factor correction capacitors are connected in parallel to supply leading reactive power, counteracting the lagging reactive power drawn by the load and thereby reducing line current and apparent power demand.^[35] In large-scale power grids, synchronous condensers—overexcited synchronous machines without mechanical input—generate or absorb reactive power dynamically, enhancing voltage support and grid inertia, with capacities typically ranging from 20 to 200 MVAr.^[36] Reactive loads in power systems, exemplified by induction motors, pose significant challenges to voltage regulation by consuming substantial reactive power, which causes voltage drops along transmission lines and can lead to instability during peak loads or faults.^[37] The IEEE 519 standard mitigates related issues by setting limits on harmonic distortion—such as total harmonic voltage distortion below 5% for systems under 69 kV—since harmonics interact with circuit reactance to amplify distortion and exacerbate reactive power demands.^[38] Historically, early 20th-century wattmeters, like those from General Electric around 1910, often utilized external reactance coils for correction to ensure accurate active power readings in AC systems.^[39]

References

[1]
None
### Summary of Psychological Reactance Theory (PRT) from the Article
[2]
[PDF] Electrical impedance - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jun 27, 2009 · Reactance. Reactance is the imaginary part of the impedance; a component with a finite reactance induces a phase shift between the voltage ...
[3]
Impedance
### Summary of Reactance and Impedance in AC Circuits
[4]
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/phase.html
[5]
The War of the Currents: AC vs. DC Power - Department of Energy
Tesla believed that alternating current (or AC) was the solution to this problem. Alternating current reverses direction a certain number of times per second -- ...
[6]
[PDF] A Glance at Circuit Theory Development - Padua Research Archive
Mar 25, 2021 · Ronald Martin Fos- ter published the eponymous theorem on the monotonicity of the reactance of a lossless passive one-port in 1924. [35]. This ...
[7]
Oliver Heaviside - Engineering and Technology History Wiki
... electrical engineer today knows as “Laplace Transform Theory.” He also introduced the concept of reactance, i.e., the “resistance” of an inductor or capacitor.
[8]
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4765570
[9]
https://phys.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/College_Physics/College_Physics_1e_(OpenStax)/23%3A_Electromagnetic_Induction_AC_Circuits_and_Electrical_Technologies/23.05%3A_Faradays_Law_of_Induction-_Lenzs_Law
[10]
[PDF] E15a: AC Circuits with Resistors, Inductors & Capacitors
Jun 19, 2019 · VL = IXL. (18b), where XL is known as the inductive reactance and given by the following equation: XL = 𝜔L. (19).Missing: X_L = | Show results with:X_L =
[11]
AC Inductance and Inductive Reactance in an AC Circuit
The opposition to current flow through an AC Inductor is called Inductive Reactance and which depends lineally on the supply frequency.
[12]
Capacitors Explained: Blocking DC and Passing AC in Circuits | TDK
Displacement current explains AC flow: Though dielectrics are insulators, alternating electric fields cause a displacement current that simulates the flow of AC ...
[13]
Capacitor AC Behavior - HyperPhysics
The frequency dependent impedance of a capacitor is called capacitive reactance. This calculation works by clicking on the desired quantity in the expression ...
[14]
[PDF] Lecture 2: Capacitors and Inductors
⇨ the relationship between the voltage and current in C looks like: ⇨ 1/ωC can be identified as a kind of resistance, capacitive reactance: XC ≡ 1/ωC ...
[15]
[PDF] 2 RC Circuits in Time Domain
So for V (t) = V0 cosωt we end up with I(t) = −ωCV0 sin ωt, which leads the voltage by a phase of 90 degrees and increases by the frequency-dependent factor of ...
[16]
[PDF] Frequency Response | ECEN326: Electronic Circuits Fall 2022
High Frequency Circuit Analysis Procedure. ➢ Determine which capacitor impact the low-frequency ... ➢ The input AC coupling forms a high-pass filter which should.
[17]
[PDF] ES.1803: Complex Impedance and Phasors - MIT OpenCourseWare
We are going to use the exponential response formula and complex arithmetic to understand the notions of impedance and phasor diagrams for electrical ...
[18]
45. Impedance 101 - Galileo and Einstein
The impedance of a single leg of a circuit can be written as Z=R+iX where R is the ordinary resistance, and X is termed reactance, generated by inductance and/ ...
[19]
[PDF] Chapter 12 Alternating-Current Circuits - MIT
In Chapter 10 we learned that changing magnetic flux can induce an emf according to. Faraday's law of induction. In particular, if a coil rotates in the ...
[20]
23.11 Reactance, Inductive and Capacitive - UCF Pressbooks
Example 2: Calculating Capacitive Reactance and then Current · Strategy. The capacitive reactance is found directly from the expression in X C = 1 2 π f C .
[21]
Real and Reactive Power and Power Factor
The real power is $P=I^2_{rms}R$, which is dissipated by the resistive component $R$ of the load; The reactive power is $Q=I^2_{rms}X$, which is stored inMissing: formulas | Show results with:formulas
[22]
23.12 RLC Series AC Circuits – College Physics
Now, using Ohm's law and definitions from Chapter 23.11 Reactance, Inductive and Capacitive, we substitute $latex \boldsymbol{V_0 = I_0Z} $ into the above ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[23]
AC Ohm's Law - HyperPhysics
If an rms voltage of Vrms = · is applied to an impedance Z = ohms, · then the rms current will be Irms = A. · If the phase is φ = degrees, · then the power factor ...Missing: electrical | Show results with:electrical
[24]
RLC Series Circuit - HyperPhysics
The phasor diagram shown is at a frequency where the inductive reactance is greater than that of the capacitive reactance. This would occur at a frequency above ...
[25]
[PDF] AC Electrical Circuit Analysis - Mohawk Valley Community College
Apr 22, 2021 · Also, reactance and impedance are introduced along with phasor diagrams. Chapters on series, parallel and series-parallel RLC circuits commence.<|control11|><|separator|>
[26]
The Feynman Lectures on Physics Vol. II Ch. 22: AC Circuits - Caltech
We would like now to consider an interesting circuit which can be analyzed in terms of series and parallel combinations. Suppose we start with the circuit of ...
[27]
Resonant RLC Circuits - HyperPhysics
The resonance of a series RLC circuit occurs when the inductive and capacitive reactances are equal in magnitude but cancel each other because they are 180 ...Missing: LC bandwidth
[28]
[PDF] 15 | ALTERNATING- CURRENT CIRCUITS
The resonant frequency for a RLC circuit is calculated from Equation 15.17, which comes from a balance between the reactances of the capacitor and the inductor.
[29]
From the President - IEEE Broadcast Technology Society
... tuning for maximum current (or spark).” With slight refinements, this concept held as radio broad- casting established itself in the 1920s. Most stations ...
[30]
[PDF] Transient Response Series RLC circuit
The circuit shown on Figure 1 is called the series RLC circuit. We will analyze this circuit in order to determine its transient characteristics once the switch ...
[31]
[PDF] Calibration of Inductance Standards in the Maxwell-Wien Bridge ...
The Maxwell-Wien bridge circuit has long been used for the accurate measurement of inductance. For measurements of best accuracy with any alter- nating-current ...
[32]
Measurement of Capacitance using Schering Bridge - Electrical4U
Apr 29, 2024 · The Schering Bridge is designed to measure a capacitor's capacitance, dissipation factor, and relative permittivity.
[33]
What Is Phase Shift in Oscilloscopes? - Keysight
Frequency · Capacitors: At higher frequencies, capacitors offer less reactance, leading to a reduced lag between current and voltage, altering the phase shift.
[34]
LCR Meters + Impedance Measurement Products - Keysight
Complete impedance measurement solutions to meet your needs from LCR meters to impedance meters, plus test accessories for various R&D and manufacturing ...Impedance Analyzers · Benchtop LCR Meters · U1700 Series Handheld...
[35]
Power Factor Correction - Electronics Tutorials
Power Factor Correction is a technique which uses capacitors to reduce the reactive power component of an AC circuit in order to improve its eficiency and ...
[36]
Synchronous Condensers - entso-e
Mar 25, 2025 · Each synchronous condenser solution can deliver more than 900 MVA of short-circuit power and + 215 / – 150 MVAr of reactive power. The startup ...Synchronous Condensers · Overview · Examples
[37]
How reactive power is helpful to maintain a healthy system
Dec 20, 2024 · Reactive power profoundly affects the security of power systems because it affects voltages throughout the system.
[38]
519-2014 - IEEE Recommended Practice and Requirements for ...
Jun 11, 2014 · This recommended practice establishes goals for the design of electrical systems that include both linear and nonlinear loads.
[39]
General Electric - Watthour Meters
The voltage circuit in this meter used an external reactance coil mounted behind the register (similar to the reactance coil as used in the early Ft. Wayne ...