Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Elastic collision

An elastic collision is a collision between two or more bodies in which both the total linear and the total of the are conserved, with no conversion of into other forms such as , , or deformation. This idealized process assumes no dissipative forces act during the interaction, allowing the objects to separate with the same total they possessed before colliding. In elastic collisions, the conservation laws enable precise predictions of post-collision velocities, particularly in one-dimensional scenarios involving two objects. For instance, the final velocities v_1' and v_2' of two masses m_1 and m_2 with initial velocities v_1 and v_2 can be derived from the equations m_1 v_1 + m_2 v_2 = m_1 v_1' + m_2 v_2' (momentum conservation) and \frac{1}{2} m_1 v_1^2 + \frac{1}{2} m_2 v_2^2 = \frac{1}{2} m_1 (v_1')^2 + \frac{1}{2} m_2 (v_2')^2 ( conservation). Unlike inelastic collisions, where is not conserved, elastic collisions maintain the relative speed of approach and separation between the objects in their center-of-mass frame. Elastic collisions are rare in macroscopic systems due to inevitable energy losses but are in microscopic and idealized contexts, such as and gas kinetics. Examples include electron-nucleus interactions, collisions in ideal gases, and experiments, where subatomic particles behave nearly . Practical approximations occur in laboratory setups like carts with spring bumpers on air tracks or steel balls in , and applications extend to slingshot maneuvers using planetary for velocity boosts without loss.

Basic Concepts

Definition and Characteristics

An elastic collision is defined as an interaction between two or more bodies in which both the total kinetic energy and the total momentum of the system remain conserved before and after the collision. This conservation implies that no net energy is dissipated into other forms during the process. Key characteristics of elastic collisions include the absence of permanent deformation in the colliding bodies and no conversion of kinetic energy into heat, sound, or other irreversible losses. In the center-of-mass frame, the bodies rebound such that the magnitude of their relative velocity after the collision equals that before, preserving the total speed of approach and separation. These properties make elastic collisions an idealization in classical mechanics, particularly suitable for modeling perfectly reversible interactions, such as those between atoms or molecules in gases where energy dissipation is minimal. The concept was formalized in the within by in his and contemporaries like , who analyzed collisions to establish foundational principles contrasting with typical inelastic events observed in daily life. Intuitive approximations of elastic collisions include the impact of balls on a frictionless table or the high rebound of a superball dropped from height, where is largely preserved.

Conservation Laws Involved

In elastic collisions, the conservation of linear is a fundamental principle, stating that the total of the system remains unchanged before and after the interaction. This arises from Newton's third of motion, which dictates that the forces exerted between the colliding objects are equal and opposite, resulting in no net change in the system's overall when external influences are absent. , denoted as a \vec{p} = m \vec{v} where m is and \vec{v} is , ensures that for a system of particles, \sum \vec{p}_i = \sum \vec{p}'_i, with primes indicating post-collision values. Complementing momentum conservation, elastic collisions also preserve the total translational kinetic energy of the system, meaning the sum of \frac{1}{2} m v^2 terms for all objects remains equal before and after the collision. This conservation distinguishes elastic processes, where no kinetic energy is converted into other forms such as , , or internal deformation energy, unlike in inelastic scenarios. is a scalar quantity, and its invariance in elastic collisions implies that the objects rebound without dissipating mechanical energy through non-conservative internal forces. These conservation laws apply under specific prerequisites, primarily that the system must be isolated, with the sum of external forces acting on it being zero to prevent any net that could alter . During the brief duration of the collision, external forces like or are often negligible compared to the strong internal impulses between the objects, allowing the approximations to hold effectively. Mathematically, conservation is expressed in form to account for directionality in multi-dimensional cases, while uses the scalar sum of individual contributions, providing the dual constraints necessary to fully characterize interactions without additional parameters.

Distinction from Inelastic Collisions

In inelastic collisions, the total linear of the system is conserved, but is not, as some of it is transformed into other forms such as from deformation, , or . This category encompasses a range of outcomes, including perfectly inelastic collisions in which the colliding bodies adhere to each other after impact, leading to the maximum possible dissipation of while still conserving . The degree of elasticity in collisions is quantified by the , e, which is the ratio of the magnitude of the of separation to the of approach along the line of impact. Perfectly elastic collisions have e = 1, perfectly inelastic collisions have e = 0, and general inelastic collisions fall in the range $0 < e < 1. In practice, perfectly elastic collisions are rare, as most real-world interactions involve some energy loss due to factors like friction and material deformation. The outcomes of elastic and inelastic collisions differ markedly in terms of post-collision motion: elastic collisions permit full rebound, potentially with reversal of velocity components, whereas inelastic collisions result in either adhesion or reduced rebound speeds. Inelastic collisions predominate in macroscopic scenarios, such as car crashes, where vehicles deform significantly upon impact.

One-Dimensional Newtonian Elastic Collisions

Velocity Formulas

In one-dimensional elastic collisions under Newtonian mechanics, the final velocities of two colliding particles are determined by the conservation of both linear momentum and kinetic energy. These collisions are assumed to be head-on, involving point particles or rigid bodies with no rotational effects, and occur at non-relativistic speeds where relativistic corrections are negligible. The notation used here denotes initial velocities as v_1 and v_2 for particles of masses m_1 and m_2, respectively, with post-collision velocities marked by primes: v_1' and v_2'. The general formulas for the final velocities are: v_1' = \frac{m_1 - m_2}{m_1 + m_2} v_1 + \frac{2 m_2}{m_1 + m_2} v_2 v_2' = \frac{2 m_1}{m_1 + m_2} v_1 + \frac{m_2 - m_1}{m_1 + m_2} v_2 These expressions apply to any initial velocities in a one-dimensional setup. For the special case of equal masses (m_1 = m_2), the formulas simplify such that the particles exchange velocities: v_1' = v_2 and v_2' = v_1. This velocity exchange occurs in head-on collisions between identical masses. When the second particle is initially stationary (v_2 = 0), the final velocity of the first particle becomes v_1' = \frac{m_1 - m_2}{m_1 + m_2} v_1, while the second particle acquires v_2' = \frac{2 m_1}{m_1 + m_2} v_1. In the subcase of equal masses and a stationary target, the incident particle stops (v_1' = 0), and the target moves with the initial velocity of the incident particle (v_2' = v_1).

Derivation from Conservation Principles

Consider two particles of masses m_1 and m_2 undergoing a one-dimensional elastic collision, with initial velocities v_1 and v_2, and final velocities v_1' and v_2', respectively. The conservation of linear momentum gives the equation
m_1 v_1 + m_2 v_2 = m_1 v_1' + m_2 v_2'.
This follows from Newton's third law and the absence of external forces in the direction of motion.
The conservation of kinetic energy for an elastic collision yields
\frac{1}{2} m_1 v_1^2 + \frac{1}{2} m_2 v_2^2 = \frac{1}{2} m_1 (v_1')^2 + \frac{1}{2} m_2 (v_2')^2.
Multiplying through by 2 simplifies it to
m_1 v_1^2 + m_2 v_2^2 = m_1 (v_1')^2 + m_2 (v_2')^2.
This holds because no kinetic energy is dissipated in an elastic collision.
To solve algebraically, first express v_2' from the momentum equation:
v_2' = \frac{m_1 (v_1 - v_1') + m_2 v_2}{m_2}.
Substitute this into the kinetic energy equation:
m_1 v_1^2 + m_2 v_2^2 = m_1 (v_1')^2 + m_2 \left( \frac{m_1 (v_1 - v_1') + m_2 v_2}{m_2} \right)^2.
Let P = m_1 v_1 + m_2 v_2 denote the total initial momentum (conserved). Then v_2' = (P - m_1 v_1') / m_2, and the substitution becomes
m_1 v_1^2 + m_2 v_2^2 = m_1 (v_1')^2 + \frac{(P - m_1 v_1')^2}{m_2}.
Multiplying both sides by m_2 to clear the denominator gives
m_2 (m_1 v_1^2 + m_2 v_2^2) = m_1 m_2 (v_1')^2 + (P - m_1 v_1')^2.
Expanding the squared term yields
(P - m_1 v_1')^2 = P^2 - 2 P m_1 v_1' + m_1^2 (v_1')^2.
The full equation is now
m_2 (m_1 v_1^2 + m_2 v_2^2) = m_1 m_2 (v_1')^2 + P^2 - 2 P m_1 v_1' + m_1^2 (v_1')^2.
Rearranging all terms to one side results in a quadratic equation in v_1':
(m_1^2 + m_1 m_2) (v_1')^2 - 2 P m_1 v_1' + P^2 - m_2 (m_1 v_1^2 + m_2 v_2^2) = 0.
This is of the form a (v_1')^2 + b v_1' + c = 0, where a = m_1 (m_1 + m_2), b = -2 P m_1, and c = P^2 - m_1 m_2 v_1^2 - m_2^2 v_2^2. Solving using the quadratic formula v_1' = \frac{ -b \pm \sqrt{b^2 - 4ac} }{2a} produces two solutions: one corresponding to no collision (v_1' = v_1, v_2' = v_2) and the physical post-collision solution. The discriminant simplifies such that the non-trivial solution is
v_1' = \frac{m_1 - m_2}{m_1 + m_2} v_1 + \frac{2 m_2}{m_1 + m_2} v_2.
Similarly,
v_2' = \frac{2 m_1}{m_1 + m_2} v_1 + \frac{m_2 - m_1}{m_1 + m_2} v_2.
To verify, substitute these back into the original momentum and kinetic energy equations. For momentum:
m_1 v_1' + m_2 v_2' = m_1 \left( \frac{m_1 - m_2}{m_1 + m_2} v_1 + \frac{2 m_2}{m_1 + m_2} v_2 \right) + m_2 \left( \frac{2 m_1}{m_1 + m_2} v_1 + \frac{m_2 - m_1}{m_1 + m_2} v_2 \right) = m_1 v_1 + m_2 v_2,
as the coefficients balance to recover the initial momentum. For kinetic energy, the squared terms and cross products similarly confirm equality, ensuring both principles hold.

Coefficient of Restitution Application

The coefficient of restitution, denoted by e, quantifies the elasticity of a collision between two bodies and is defined as the negative ratio of their relative velocity after the collision to the relative velocity before the collision:
e = -\frac{v_2' - v_1'}{v_2 - v_1},
where v_1 and v_2 are the pre-collision velocities of the first and second bodies, respectively, and v_1' and v_2' are the post-collision velocities. The negative sign ensures e is positive by accounting for the reversal in the direction of relative motion during separation.
In elastic collisions, e = 1, indicating that the magnitude of the relative velocity after collision equals that before, but with reversed direction. This exact reversal, combined with conservation of linear momentum, leads to full conservation of kinetic energy. Substituting the post-collision velocities derived from momentum and energy conservation into the definition of e confirms that it equals 1 for such cases. The requirement e = 1 is mathematically equivalent to kinetic energy conservation, provided linear momentum is conserved during the collision. For inelastic collisions, where $0 < e < 1, kinetic energy is not conserved, and the post-collision velocities incorporate e to account for energy dissipation; for instance, the velocity of the first body is given by
v_1' = \frac{m_1 - e m_2}{m_1 + m_2} v_1 + \frac{(1 + e) m_2}{m_1 + m_2} v_2,
assuming the second body has initial velocity v_2.
This parameter was first introduced by Isaac Newton in his Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica (1687) as part of his experimental law of impacts and remains a fundamental tool in modern impact mechanics for analyzing and predicting collision outcomes across engineering and physics applications.

Advanced Frames and Examples in One Dimension

Center-of-Mass Frame Analysis

In the center-of-mass (CM) frame for a one-dimensional elastic collision, the reference frame moves with the velocity of the system's center of mass, defined as v_{\text{CM}} = \frac{m_1 v_1 + m_2 v_2}{m_1 + m_2}, where m_1 and m_2 are the masses, and v_1 and v_2 are the initial velocities in the lab frame. The velocities of the particles in this frame are obtained by subtracting the CM velocity: u_1 = v_1 - v_{\text{CM}} and u_2 = v_2 - v_{\text{CM}}. In this frame, the total momentum is zero, so the particles approach each other with equal and opposite momenta, m_1 u_1 = -m_2 u_2. During the elastic collision in the CM frame, the interaction effectively reverses the velocities of both particles relative to this frame, such that the post-collision velocities are u_1' = -u_1 and u_2' = -u_2. This reversal occurs because the total momentum remains zero, and the total kinetic energy, which is the kinetic energy associated with the reduced mass \mu = \frac{m_1 m_2}{m_1 + m_2}, is fully conserved. To return to the lab frame, the CM velocity is added back to these post-collision velocities: v_1' = u_1' + v_{\text{CM}} and v_2' = u_2' + v_{\text{CM}}. This transformation yields the same final velocities as derived directly from conservation laws in the lab frame. The CM frame offers significant advantages in analyzing elastic collisions, as it simplifies the dynamics to a pure reflection process without net momentum, highlighting the collision as an exchange of relative velocities while preserving the magnitudes. The total kinetic energy in the CM frame is \frac{1}{2} \mu (u_1 - u_2)^2, which is conserved independently of the lab frame's total kinetic energy. For equal masses (m_1 = m_2), the CM frame reveals a simple velocity swap in the lab frame, where the particles effectively exchange their initial velocities. In cases of unequal masses, the CM frame demonstrates that backscattering can occur for the lighter particle, where it rebounds in the lab frame if its initial velocity exceeds a threshold relative to the heavier one.

Real-World Examples

One prominent macroscopic example of an approximate elastic collision in one dimension is Newton's cradle, a device consisting of suspended steel spheres that transfer momentum through a series of nearly elastic impacts when one or more spheres are lifted and released. In this setup, the incoming sphere(s) come to a stop upon collision, while an equal number of spheres on the opposite end swing out with nearly the same velocity, illustrating the conservation of both momentum and kinetic energy with minimal dissipation. For equal masses, this results in a qualitative exchange of velocities, akin to the theoretical prediction for one-dimensional elastic collisions. Another macroscopic demonstration involves a superball, a synthetic rubber sphere designed for high elasticity, bouncing on a hard surface such as concrete or a lab floor. When dropped from shoulder height, the superball rebounds to approximately 92% of its initial height, corresponding to a coefficient of restitution of about 0.92, which signifies that nearly all kinetic energy is conserved during the impact. This behavior makes it a standard tool for observing one-dimensional elastic rebound in classroom settings, where the ball's vertical motion before and after bounce can be measured to verify energy retention. At the microscopic scale, elastic collisions are idealized in the kinetic theory of gases, where atoms or molecules collide elastically with each other and container walls, maintaining constant average kinetic energy per degree of freedom. These interactions underpin explanations of gas pressure and temperature, as the elastic nature ensures no net energy loss, allowing random thermal motions to persist indefinitely in the absence of external influences. In nuclear physics, neutron-proton scattering serves as a near-elastic example, where low-energy neutrons collide with protons in materials like water, transferring momentum with high fidelity due to similar masses and minimal excitation. Experimental measurements of differential cross-sections confirm the elastic character, essential for applications in neutron moderation. Laboratory experiments often replicate one-dimensional elastic collisions using air tracks, where low-friction gliders collide via magnetic repulsion to avoid physical contact and deformation. In such setups, velocities are measured before and after collision using photogates or video analysis, demonstrating momentum and energy conservation as the incoming glider slows and the target accelerates accordingly. Magnets provide a contactless interaction, mimicking ideal elastic conditions by relying on electromagnetic forces rather than mechanical deformation. In reality, truly perfectly elastic collisions are rare, as factors like air resistance and slight material deformation introduce small energy losses, reducing the coefficient of restitution below unity even in optimized setups. Macroscopic examples like or superball bounces achieve high but approximate elasticity, with inefficiencies arising from frictional heating and vibrational dissipation during impact. Microscopic cases, such as atomic gas collisions, come closer to ideality due to negligible deformation at those scales, though quantum effects can introduce minor deviations not captured in classical models.

Limiting Cases and Special Scenarios

In the limiting case where a light projectile of mass m_1 collides elastically with a stationary heavy target of mass m_2, where m_2 \gg m_1, the projectile rebounds with a velocity approximately equal to the negative of its initial velocity, v_1' \approx -v_1, while the target acquires a small velocity v_2' \approx \frac{2 m_1}{m_2} v_1 \approx 0. This scenario behaves akin to the projectile bouncing off an immovable wall, as the heavy target's motion is negligible due to its large mass. For a head-on elastic collision between two objects of equal mass, m_1 = m_2, the velocities are completely exchanged: the incident object stops, acquiring the initial velocity of the target (v_1' = v_2), while the target takes on the incident object's initial velocity (v_2' = v_1). This outcome occurs regardless of whether the target is initially at rest, effectively making the particles appear to pass through each other without altering their individual trajectories in the center-of-mass frame. When a light particle collides elastically with a heavy moving target, the outcomes can involve complex rebounds depending on the relative directions and speeds. For instance, if the heavy target moves toward the light particle, the post-collision of the light particle can exceed its initial speed in the lab frame (v_1' > v_1), resembling an effect due to the high relative approach . Conversely, if the target moves away, the light particle may continue forward with reduced speed or even overtake it under certain conditions. A trivial special scenario arises when the initial relative velocity between the two objects is zero (v_1 = v_2), resulting in no effective collision; both objects maintain their unchanged velocities post-interaction, as the conservation laws impose no alteration. These Newtonian limiting cases hold accurately only when all velocities are much less than the , approaching relativistic formulations in high-speed laboratory frames where energy and momentum conservation must account for Lorentz transformations.

Two-Dimensional Newtonian Elastic Collisions

Vector-Based Approach

In the vector-based approach to two-dimensional Newtonian collisions, the initial velocities of the two particles are treated as s, \vec{v}_{1i} and \vec{v}_{2i}, which are decomposed into components along the normal direction (the line connecting the centers of the particles at the moment of impact) and the tangential direction (perpendicular to the normal). The unit normal \hat{n} points along this line of centers, while the unit tangential \hat{t} is orthogonal to it, allowing the components to be projected as v_{1n,i} = \vec{v}_{1i} \cdot \hat{n}, v_{1t,i} = \vec{v}_{1i} \cdot \hat{t}, and similarly for the second particle. Under the assumption of smooth particles with no , the impulsive during the collision acts solely along the direction, leaving the tangential components of unchanged for each particle: v_{1t,f} = v_{1t,i} and v_{2t,f} = v_{2t,i}. This conservation arises because no tangential is imparted, preserving the tangential contributions independently. The components are handled as a one-dimensional elastic collision along the line of . The post-collision velocities are given by the standard one-dimensional formulas: v_{1n,f} = v_{1n,i} \frac{m_1 - m_2}{m_1 + m_2} + v_{2n,i} \frac{2 m_2}{m_1 + m_2}, v_{2n,f} = v_{1n,i} \frac{2 m_1}{m_1 + m_2} + v_{2n,i} \frac{m_2 - m_1}{m_1 + m_2}, where m_1 and m_2 are the masses of the particles. These ensure conservation of both normal momentum and kinetic energy in that direction. The final post-collision velocity vectors are then reconstructed by combining the updated normal components with the unchanged tangential components: \vec{v}_{1f} = v_{1n,f} \hat{n} + v_{1t,f} \hat{t} and \vec{v}_{2f} = v_{2n,f} \hat{n} + v_{2t,f} \hat{t}. This method applies under the assumptions of point-like or spherical particles with no frictional losses and instantaneous impulsive contact confined to the normal direction.

Derivation Using Momentum and Energy

In two-dimensional elastic collisions, conservation of momentum provides the vector equation \vec{p}_1 + \vec{p}_2 = \vec{p}_1' + \vec{p}_2', where \vec{p}_i = m_i \vec{v}_i for particles of masses m_1 and m_2 with initial velocities \vec{v}_1 and \vec{v}_2, and primed symbols denote post-collision quantities. In two dimensions, this yields two scalar equations corresponding to the components along the x- and y-axes. Conservation of kinetic energy adds the scalar equation \frac{1}{2} m_1 |\vec{v}_1|^2 + \frac{1}{2} m_2 |\vec{v}_2|^2 = \frac{1}{2} m_1 |\vec{v}_1'|^2 + \frac{1}{2} m_2 |\vec{v}_2'|^2. These three equations involve four unknown components of the final velocities \vec{v}_1' and \vec{v}_2', rendering the system underdetermined without additional geometric information about the collision. The missing constraint arises from the nature of the interaction: assuming smooth (frictionless) contact, the impulsive force acts solely along normal \hat{n} connecting the centers of the particles at the moment of impact, determined by the impact parameter. Consequently, the velocity components tangential to the contact surface remain unchanged for each particle, as no tangential impulse is imparted: if \hat{t} is tangential , then (\vec{v}_1' \cdot \hat{t}) = (\vec{v}_1 \cdot \hat{t}) and (\vec{v}_2' \cdot \hat{t}) = (\vec{v}_2 \cdot \hat{t}). The velocity changes occur only along \hat{n}, so \vec{v}_1' = \vec{v}_1 + \delta_1 \hat{n} and \vec{v}_2' = \vec{v}_2 + \delta_2 \hat{n}, where \delta_1 and \delta_2 are scalar changes in the normal components. Projecting the momentum conservation onto \hat{n} gives the normal momentum equation m_1 u_1 + m_2 u_2 = m_1 v_1 + m_2 v_2, where u_1 = \vec{v}_1 \cdot \hat{n}, u_2 = \vec{v}_2 \cdot \hat{n}, v_1 = \vec{v}_1' \cdot \hat{n}, and v_2 = \vec{v}_2' \cdot \hat{n} are the initial and final normal velocity components, with \delta_1 = v_1 - u_1 and \delta_2 = v_2 - u_2. Since the tangential kinetic energies are unchanged, the total kinetic energy conservation reduces to conservation along the normal direction: \frac{1}{2} m_1 u_1^2 + \frac{1}{2} m_2 u_2^2 = \frac{1}{2} m_1 v_1^2 + \frac{1}{2} m_2 v_2^2. Solving these two equations for the normal components—the same as in a one-dimensional elastic collision—yields the standard results: v_1 = \frac{(m_1 - m_2) u_1 + 2 m_2 u_2}{m_1 + m_2}, \quad v_2 = \frac{(m_2 - m_1) u_2 + 2 m_1 u_1}{m_1 + m_2}. Thus, \delta_1 = v_1 - u_1 = -\frac{2 m_2}{m_1 + m_2} (u_1 - u_2) and \delta_2 = -\delta_1 \frac{m_1}{m_2}. In vector form, the final velocity of the first particle is \vec{v}_1' = \vec{v}_1 - \frac{2 m_2}{m_1 + m_2} \left[ (\vec{v}_1 - \vec{v}_2) \cdot \hat{n} \right] \hat{n}, and for the second particle, \vec{v}_2' = \vec{v}_2 + \frac{2 m_1}{m_1 + m_2} \left[ (\vec{v}_1 - \vec{v}_2) \cdot \hat{n} \right] \hat{n}. These expressions hold for unequal masses and fully determine the post-collision trajectories once \hat{n} is known from the . For equal masses (m_1 = m_2 = m), the formulas simplify to \vec{v}_1' = \vec{v}_1 - \left[ (\vec{v}_1 - \vec{v}_2) \cdot \hat{n} \right] \hat{n} and \vec{v}_2' = \vec{v}_2 + \left[ (\vec{v}_1 - \vec{v}_2) \cdot \hat{n} \right] \hat{n}, showing that the velocities are exchanged along the normal direction.

Collision with Stationary Target

In two-dimensional collisions, a common scenario involves one particle striking a stationary target, where the initial of the target \vec{v_2} = 0. The incident particle has initial speed v_1 and approaches such that the line connecting the centers at impact (impact line, along \hat{n}) makes an \theta with the initial direction. After collision, the incident particle scatters with final speed v_1' = v_1 \sin \theta at a deflection of $90^\circ - \theta relative to its initial direction. Since is conserved in elastic collisions, the speeds satisfy the conservation laws. For particles of equal , the final velocities of the incident particle and are to each other (\vec{v_1}' \cdot \vec{v_2}' = 0), a consequence of and in this symmetric case. The particle moves along the impact line with final speed v_2' = v_1 \cos \theta. These relations follow from decomposing into and tangential components, with the direction exchanging velocities for equal masses. For unequal masses, the outcomes depend on the . If the incident particle is lighter than the target (m_1 < m_2), it can backscattering, with deflection angles up to 180° for small impact parameters. If the incident particle is heavier (m_1 > m_2), it continues nearly forward with small deflection, while the lighter target scatters at larger angles up to a maximum of \sin^{-1}(m_2 / m_1). Exact angles are often computed in the center-of-mass frame and transformed back to the lab frame. Geometrically, the deflection is governed by the impact parameter b, the between the initial of the incident particle and the target's center. For hard-sphere particles of radii r_1 and r_2, collisions occur if b \leq r_1 + r_2, with \sin \theta = b / (r_1 + r_2); b = 0 yields (\theta = 0), and b = r_1 + r_2 a grazing collision with minimal deflection. This links to outcomes. These principles apply to phenomena like shots, where equal-mass balls follow the final velocities rule for aiming. Analogies appear in scattering experiments, though processes like are inelastic and Coulombic. Experimental setups such as air tracks verify these behaviors precisely.

Relativistic Elastic Collisions

One-Dimensional Relativistic Formulation

In , the of a particle is given by p = \gamma m v, where m is the mass, v is the velocity, c is the , and \gamma = 1 / \sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2} is the ./University_Physics_III_-Optics_and_Modern_Physics(OpenStax)/05%3A__Relativity/5.09%3A_Relativistic_Momentum) The total of the particle is E = \gamma m c^2./University_Physics_III_-Optics_and_Modern_Physics(OpenStax)/05%3A__Relativity/5.10%3A_Relativistic_Energy) For a one-dimensional elastic collision between two particles, of total relativistic and total relativistic holds, while the masses remain unchanged. The conservation equations for two particles with rest masses m_1 and m_2, initial velocities v_1 and v_2, and final velocities v_1' and v_2' are: \gamma_1 m_1 v_1 + \gamma_2 m_2 v_2 = \gamma_1' m_1 v_1' + \gamma_2' m_2 v_2' \gamma_1 m_1 c^2 + \gamma_2 m_2 c^2 = \gamma_1' m_1 c^2 + \gamma_2' m_2 c^2 where \gamma_1 = 1 / \sqrt{1 - v_1^2/c^2}, \gamma_2 = 1 / \sqrt{1 - v_2^2/c^2}, \gamma_1' = 1 / \sqrt{1 - (v_1')^2/c^2}, and \gamma_2' = 1 / \sqrt{1 - (v_2')^2/c^2}. These equations must be solved simultaneously for v_1' and v_2'. For particles of equal rest mass (m_1 = m_2 = m), the solution is an exchange of velocities: v_1' = v_2 and v_2' = v_1. This preserves both total and total , as it effectively swaps the initial states of the identical particles. In the special case where the target particle is initially at rest (v_2 = 0, so \gamma_2 = 1), and the rest masses are equal (m_1 = m_2 = m), the incident particle stops (v_1' = 0) and the target acquires the initial velocity of the incident particle (v_2' = v_1). For unequal rest masses, the final velocities are obtained by solving the equations above with v_2 = 0 and \gamma_2 = 1; explicit solutions involve substituting the expressions for \gamma_1' v_1' and \gamma_2' v_2' into the conservation laws and using the relation v = pc^2 / E for each particle. In the low-speed limit (v \ll c, so \gamma \approx 1 + v^2/(2c^2)), the relativistic formulation reduces to the Newtonian case, where is p = m v and is (1/2) m v^2, with of total and total yielding v_1' = v_2 and v_2' = v_1 for equal masses (velocity exchange).

Derivation with Lorentz Transformations

In relativistic mechanics, the of a particle is defined as p^\mu = (E/c, \mathbf{p}), where E = \gamma m c^2 is the total energy, \mathbf{p} = \gamma m \mathbf{v} is the three-, \gamma = 1/\sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2}, and m is the rest mass; this is conserved in any inertial frame for an , ensuring both energy and in . To derive the outcomes of a one-dimensional elastic collision, it is convenient to to the center-of- (CM) frame, where the total three-momentum vanishes; the velocity of this frame relative to the frame is given by \beta_\mathrm{cm} = \frac{P_\mathrm{total} c}{E_\mathrm{total}}, with P_\mathrm{total} the total three-momentum and E_\mathrm{total} the total energy in the lab frame. For a typical setup with two particles of equal rest m, particle 1 approaching with lab velocity u and particle 2 at rest, the total momentum is P_\mathrm{total} = \gamma_u m u and total energy is E_\mathrm{total} = \gamma_u m c^2 + m c^2, yielding \beta_\mathrm{cm} = \frac{\gamma_u u}{\gamma_u c + c} = \frac{u/c}{\gamma_u + 1}. In the CM frame, the particles approach head-on with equal and opposite momenta \mathbf{p}_1' = -\mathbf{p}_2'; for an elastic collision of identical particles, conservation of and the invariance of the total energy in this frame imply that the magnitudes of the momenta remain unchanged post-collision, but the directions reverse due to , so the final velocities are \mathbf{v}_1'' = -\mathbf{v}_1' and \mathbf{v}_2'' = -\mathbf{v}_2', where primes denote CM-frame quantities. This reversal preserves the elastic nature, as the total squared s = (p_1^\mu + p_2^\mu)(p_{1\mu} + p_{2\mu}) remains under Lorentz transformations and equals the initial value. To obtain the final lab-frame velocities, apply the inverse Lorentz boost using the relativistic velocity addition formula: for a particle with CM-frame velocity component w' parallel to the boost direction with speed V = \beta_\mathrm{cm} c, the lab velocity is w = \frac{w' + V}{1 + w' V / c^2}. Step-by-step, first compute the initial CM velocities: for particle 1, u_1' = \frac{u - V}{1 - u V / c^2}; for particle 2 (initially at rest in lab), u_2' = \frac{0 - V}{1 - 0 \cdot V / c^2} = -V. Post-collision in CM, these become u_1'' = -u_1' and u_2'' = -u_2'; transforming back yields the lab finals u_{1f} = \frac{-u_1' + V}{1 - u_1' V / c^2} and u_{2f} = \frac{-u_2' + V}{1 - u_2' V / c^2}, which satisfy both momentum and energy conservation in the lab frame. This process verifies that kinetic energy is not a Lorentz scalar but contributes to the total energy E, avoiding inconsistencies like superluminal speeds. This approach excels over classical methods by correctly handling regimes where particle speeds approach c, such as in high-energy particle accelerators, where Newtonian derivations would erroneously predict velocities exceeding c or violate ; for instance, in the equal-mass case with u \to c, the incident particle nearly stops post-collision (u_{1f} \to 0), transferring nearly all momentum to the target without accelerating it beyond c.

Hyperbolic Function Representation

In , the hyperbolic function representation of one-dimensional elastic collisions employs \phi, defined such that the v = c \tanh \phi, the \gamma = \cosh \phi, and the normalized \gamma v / c = \sinh \phi. This parametrization leverages the hyperbolic geometry inherent to , where rapidities corresponding to collinear Lorentz boosts add linearly: \phi_\text{total} = \phi_1 + \phi_2. The concept of was introduced by Alfred Robb in as a to describe relative motion, providing a more intuitive alternative to for relativistic . For elastic collisions, the center-of-momentum (CM) frame simplifies the dynamics, as the total three-momentum vanishes there. In this frame, an elastic collision reverses the individual momenta of the particles, equivalent to negating their rapidities: if the pre-collision rapidities in the CM frame are \phi_1^\text{CM} and \phi_2^\text{CM}, the post-collision values are \phi_1^{\text{CM}'} = -\phi_1^\text{CM} and \phi_2^{\text{CM}'} = -\phi_2^\text{CM}. To relate to the laboratory frame, denote the rapidity of the CM frame relative to the lab by \phi_\text{CM}. The pre-collision rapidities in the CM frame are then \phi_1^\text{CM} = \phi_1 - \phi_\text{CM} and \phi_2^\text{CM} = \phi_2 - \phi_\text{CM}, where \phi_1 and \phi_2 are the lab-frame initial rapidities (assuming \phi_1 > \phi_2). The value of \phi_\text{CM} is determined by the condition of zero total momentum in the CM frame: for particles of equal rest mass m, it simplifies to the arithmetic mean \phi_\text{CM} = (\phi_1 + \phi_2)/2, ensuring \sinh(\phi_1^\text{CM}) + \sinh(\phi_2^\text{CM}) = 0. The post-collision lab-frame rapidities follow by applying the inverse boost: \phi_1' = \phi_\text{CM} - (\phi_1 - \phi_\text{CM}) = 2\phi_\text{CM} - \phi_1, \phi_2' = \phi_\text{CM} - (\phi_2 - \phi_\text{CM}) = 2\phi_\text{CM} - \phi_2. The final velocities are then v_1' = c \tanh \phi_1' and v_2' = c \tanh \phi_2'. For equal rest masses, this yields \phi_1' = \phi_2 and \phi_2' = \phi_1, meaning the particles exchange rapidities (and thus velocities), analogous to the non-relativistic case but derived through hyperbolic addition. In this scenario, the total rapidity \phi_1 + \phi_2 is conserved, as the post-collision sum (2\phi_\text{CM} - \phi_1) + (2\phi_\text{CM} - \phi_2) = 4\phi_\text{CM} - (\phi_1 + \phi_2) = \phi_1 + \phi_2 when \phi_\text{CM} = (\phi_1 + \phi_2)/2. This hyperbolic approach circumvents the algebraic complexity of explicit \gamma factors and square roots in momentum-energy conservation equations, offering computational simplicity and geometric insight via Minkowski diagrams. It proves especially elegant for modeling successive collisions or multi-particle chains, where repeated linear additions of rapidities streamline calculations. Extending Robb's early 1910s formulations, the representation remains vital in modern particle physics, such as analyzing proton-proton collisions at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), where rapidity distributions reveal boost-invariant features and facilitate invariant cross-section computations.

Applications and Extensions

Quantum Mechanical Considerations

In , elastic collisions are characterized by the absence of internal excitations in the colliding particles, ensuring conservation of both total energy and particle identities, with the interaction mediated solely through an external potential such as the hard-sphere model for contact interactions or the for short-range forces like those in . This framework treats the collision as a event where the incident evolves under the time-independent , leading to asymptotic solutions that describe incoming and outgoing plane waves. In one-dimensional quantum systems, elastic scattering is analyzed using the S-matrix, which encapsulates the transition amplitudes between initial and final states without delving into bound-state solutions of the Schrödinger equation, providing a unitary description of probability conservation. For higher dimensions, particularly in three dimensions, phase shifts—arising from the partial-wave decomposition of the wave function—quantify the deviation of the scattered wave from the free case, enabling the computation of scattering observables. The Born approximation serves as a key perturbative tool for weak potentials, approximating the scattering amplitude as the Fourier transform of the potential, which simplifies calculations for low-energy or dilute interactions. Central to quantum elastic scattering is the differential cross-section \frac{d\sigma}{d\Omega}, which measures the angular distribution of scattered probability flux in three dimensions, with two-dimensional analogs like \frac{d\sigma}{d\theta} for planar systems; this contrasts sharply with classical predictions by incorporating wave-like phenomena such as around potential barriers and between multiple scattering paths. Unlike classical trajectories, which follow deterministic paths, quantum outcomes are probabilistic, governed by the modulus squared of the wave function, leading to effects like the Ramsauer-Townsend minimum in low-energy where classical fails. In the context of relevant to , extends these principles to relativistic regimes, as seen in electron-electron collisions described by , where the elements are computed via perturbative Feynman diagrams without net particle creation. This formulation preserves the elastic nature by restricting to processes that maintain the initial particle content, bridging non-relativistic with high-energy applications.

Macroscopic and Microscopic Contexts

In macroscopic contexts, elastic collision models serve as useful approximations in engineering applications where is nearly maintained, such as in for analyzing ricochets off hard surfaces. For instance, when a strikes a rigid target at a shallow angle, the interaction can be modeled as partially elastic to predict rebound trajectories and velocity retention, aiding in forensic and safety assessments. Similarly, in , elastic collision principles guide the design of compliant contacts in robotic arms and manipulators, where flexible joints or bumpers absorb impacts while preserving to enable safe human-robot interactions and precise object handling. These approximations are validated experimentally using high-speed cameras, which capture trajectories and velocities of colliding objects—like billiard balls or robotic components—with sub-millimeter accuracy, allowing direct computation of values close to unity. At the microscopic scale, elastic collisions form the foundational assumption in modeling atomic and molecular interactions, particularly in ideal gases where the Maxwell-Boltzmann velocity distribution emerges from repeated perfectly elastic encounters between hard-sphere particles. This distribution, derived by in 1860, relies on the conservation of both and during collisions to explain the statistical spread of molecular speeds, underpinning kinetic theory predictions for gas properties like and . In molecular dynamics simulations, elastic collision rules—enforcing and energy conservation along the line of impact—are applied to hard-sphere or disc models to replicate ensemble behaviors, such as and phase transitions, in computational studies of materials and fluids. Transitions between scales reveal blends of elastic and inelastic behaviors, especially at the nanoscale where (AFM) tip-sample interactions approximate collisions but incorporate partial energy loss. For example, when an AFM tip indents a nanorod, initial contact mimics elastic rebound through dislocation dynamics, yet and introduce inelastic dissipation, reducing the effective and complicating pure elastic models. This partial inelasticity arises from nanoscale mechanisms, such as atomic-scale shearing and excitations, which convert into heat during sliding contacts. Elastic collision models extend naturally to three-dimensional generalizations in both contexts, treating interactions as exchanges without deriving full tensor formulations here, while playing a key role in by preserving total in isolated systems. Unlike inelastic processes, elastic collisions are reversible and do not increase , as they maintain the system's accessibility without dissipative losses, aligning with the second law for ideal reversible dynamics.

Experimental Verification Methods

Classical experimental setups for verifying elastic collisions often utilize air tables to simulate frictionless two-dimensional motion. In these experiments, pucks of equal are employed, with magnetic repulsion facilitating interactions, in contrast to Velcro attachments that produce inelastic collisions for comparison. Velocities before and after collision are precisely measured using photogates or high-speed cameras to confirm conservation of momentum and . For relativistic regimes, particle accelerators such as the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC) in the 1960s provided key verification through elastic electron-proton scattering experiments. These high-energy collisions, with electron beams up to 20 GeV, tested (QED) predictions by measuring scattering cross-sections and proton form factors, yielding results consistent with kinematics within experimental uncertainties. Early SLAC data from 1968 onward confirmed the point-like nature of electrons and the spatial charge distribution in protons, aligning with relativistic conservation laws. Modern techniques extend verification to microscale and molecular levels using laser interferometry to detect minute displacements and velocities during collisions of microparticles or atoms. For instance, interferometric methods measure interference fringe shifts to quantify elastic rebound in nanoscale impacts, achieving sub-micrometer resolution. Additionally, simulations with software like LAMMPS validate elastic collision models against experimental data by reproducing and in atomic systems, such as argon-xenon gas mixtures at . Verification criteria focus on empirical checks: total momentum and kinetic energy are conserved within measurement errors (typically 1-5%), and the coefficient of restitution e, defined as the ratio of relative post- to pre-collision velocities, approaches 1 for elastic cases. In two-dimensional setups, high-speed video analysis tracks scattering angles to ensure vectorial conservation. Recent advances as of 2025 include studies of Feshbach resonances in ultracold atom-molecule collisions, confirming elastic scattering cross-sections in systems like fermionic mixtures. Challenges in these experiments include minimizing and air resistance effects, which can introduce non-elastic losses; air tables and tracks mitigate this but require calibration to keep errors below 2%. In relativistic and microscale tests, or thermal noise further complicates precise energy measurements.

References

  1. [1]
    Elastic and Inelastic Collisions - HyperPhysics
    An elastic collision is defined as one in which both conservation of momentum and conservation of kinetic energy are observed.
  2. [2]
    8.4 Elastic Collisions in One Dimension – College Physics
    An elastic collision is one that conserves internal kinetic energy. Conservation of kinetic energy and momentum together allow the final velocities to be ...
  3. [3]
    Elastic Collisions in One Dimension – Introductory Physics for the ...
    An elastic collision is one in which internal kinetic energy is conserved in addition to momentum. When both momentum and kinetic energy are conserved, we can ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Collision Is Perfectly Elastic
    Atomic and Subatomic Particle Interactions. In the realm of atomic physics, collisions between gas molecules often approximate perfectly elastic behavior.
  5. [5]
    [PDF] 13. Collisions, Impulse and Reference Frames
    Since we have just shown that the relative speed of the two objects in an elastic collision is the same before and after the collision in the center of mass ...
  6. [6]
    Newton's Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica
    Dec 20, 2007 · If bodies are moving in any way whatsoever with respect to one another and are urged by equal accelerative forces along parallel lines, they ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] Chapter 7 Linear Momentum and Collisions
    If the mechanical energy (usually meaning the total kinetic energy) is the same before and after a collision, we say that the collision is elastic.
  8. [8]
  9. [9]
    10 Conservation of Momentum - Feynman Lectures - Caltech
    If the x-components are summed over all the interacting particles, both before and after a collision, the sums are equal; that is, momentum is conserved in the ...
  10. [10]
    8.3 Elastic and Inelastic Collisions - Physics - OpenStax
    Mar 26, 2020 · In an elastic collision, the objects separate after impact and don't lose any of their kinetic energy. Kinetic energy is the energy of motion ...
  11. [11]
  12. [12]
    Conservation of momentum
    In collisions between two isolated objects momentum is always conserved. Kinetic energy is only conserved in elastic collisions. We always have m1v1i + m2v2i ...
  13. [13]
    Inelastic Collisions - HyperPhysics
    Most ordinary collisions are classified as inelastic collisions because some of their kinetic energy is converted to other forms such as internal energy. Links ...
  14. [14]
    Collisions in One Dimension - Physics
    In an elastic collision kinetic energy is conserved, so you can write out an equation setting the kinetic energy before the collision equal to the kinetic ...
  15. [15]
    Momentum, impulse, and collisions
    One way collisions can be classified into elastic and inelastic collisions is using what is called the coefficient of restitution. It is the ratio of the final ...
  16. [16]
    Elastic and Inelastic Collision (Theory) - Amrita Virtual Lab
    Inelastic collision: The type of collision in which only momentum is conserved, not kinetic energy is called inelastic collision. Most of the collisions in ...Missing: physics | Show results with:physics
  17. [17]
    24.06 -- Elastic versus inelastic balls - UCSB Physics
    In an inelastic collision, some kinetic energy is lost to permanent deformation of one or both of the colliding objects, or to heat. In a perfectly inelastic ...
  18. [18]
    Elastic and Inelastic Collisions
    A high speed car collision is an inelastic collision. In the above example, if you calculated the momentum of the cars before the collision and added it ...
  19. [19]
    10. COLLISIONS - Home Page of Frank LH Wolfs
    Equal Mass: m1 = m2. In head-on collisions, particles of equal mass simply exchange velocities. Massive Target: m2 >> m1. The projectile simply bounces back ...
  20. [20]
    Standard Collision Examples - HyperPhysics
    For a non-head-on elastic collision between equal masses, the angle between the velocities after the collision will always be 90 degrees.
  21. [21]
    [PDF] 8.01SC S22 Chapter 15: Collision Theory - MIT OpenCourseWare
    Jun 15, 2022 · There are many collision problems in which the center-of-mass reference frame is the most convenient reference frame to analyze the collision.
  22. [22]
    8.4 Elastic Collisions in One Dimension – College Physics
    Conservation of kinetic energy and momentum together allow the final velocities to be calculated in terms of initial velocities and masses in one dimensional ...
  23. [23]
    Collisions in 1-dimension - Richard Fitzpatrick
    An elastic collision is one in which the total kinetic energy of the two colliding objects is the same before and after the collision.
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Two-Body Collisions and the Coefficient of Restitution
    The coefficient of restitution is a dimensionless, non-negative number that measures the degree of elasticity of the colliding bodies. As shown in class, the ...
  25. [25]
    Surface Collisions and the Coefficient of Restitution - Mechanics Map
    The coefficient of restitution is a number between 0 and 1 that measures the bounciness of the body and the surface in the collision.
  26. [26]
    Novel approach for measurement of restitution coefficient by ...
    The coefficient of restitution was introduced by Newton [32] and describes the ratio of the rebound and impact energies of the collision partners [1], [5], [16] ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] A note on coefficient of restitution models including the effects of ...
    Despite the large amount of work in the area, the intuitively simple ap- proach defined by Newton [5] of the coefficient of restitution as the ratio of pre and ...
  28. [28]
  29. [29]
    [PDF] 12. Elastic Collisions
    We know the velocity of the lab in the center of mass frame must just be equal to minus the velocity of the center of mass in the lab frame. We can now find the ...Missing: rebound | Show results with:rebound
  30. [30]
    Newton's Cradle | Department of Physics | Virginia Tech
    Newton's Cradle visualizes an elastic collision by allowing students to see the mass as a number of balls, and the speed as the height the balls travel.
  31. [31]
    Demo Highlight: Newton's Cradle - lecdem.physics.umd.edu
    Jan 7, 2021 · The collisions between these hard steel spheres are very nearly elastic, so nearly all of the momentum of the incoming spheres is transferred to ...
  32. [32]
    Conservation of Linear Momentum and Energy | Harvard Natural ...
    Newton's Cradle​​ Conservation of momentum in elastic collisions between suspended spheres.
  33. [33]
    Why Physicists Love Super Balls - AIP.ORG
    May 22, 2015 · The Super Ball has an almost perfect coefficient of restitution and does things other balls do not. Baseballs, for example, hardly bounce at ...
  34. [34]
    How High Can a Super Ball Bounce? - Activity - TeachEngineering
    Oct 3, 2023 · Students determine the coefficient of restitution (or the elasticity) for super balls. Working in pairs, they drop balls from a meter height and determine how ...
  35. [35]
    Kinetic Molecular Theory - Gases
    Collisions between gas particles or collisions with the walls of the container are perfectly elastic. None of the energy of a gas particle is lost when it ...
  36. [36]
    Kinetic Theory: Atomic and Molecular Explanation of Pressure and ...
    Figure 1 shows an elastic collision of a gas molecule with the wall of a container, so that it exerts a force on the wall (by Newton's third law). Because a ...
  37. [37]
    Neutron-proton elastic scattering between 200 and 500 MeV. III ...
    The waves show large systematic deviations from current theoretical models. NUCLEAR REACTIONS , MeV; phase shift analysis.
  38. [38]
    Neutron-proton elastic scattering at 15.7 MeV - IOPscience
    The angular distribution of neutrons with an incident energy of 15 7 MeV elastically scattered from protons has been measured in the angular range between 180° ...
  39. [39]
    Modeling the Interaction of an Elastic Collision between two Objects
    Aug 6, 2025 · Physics undergraduate students researched the interaction between magnets during an elastic collision of two gliders on an air track.<|separator|>
  40. [40]
    24.12 -- Elastic and inelastic collisions on the air track - UCSB Physics
    We see that in this type of collision, the relative velocity of the two carts after collision equals the opposite of their relative velocity before collision.
  41. [41]
    [PDF] Elastic and Inelastic Collisions: Air Track - Mississippi State University
    May 29, 2019 · In this experiment you will investigate collisions that are (nearly) elastic and others that are completely inelastic. In each case you will ...
  42. [42]
  43. [43]
    [PDF] Notes on Elastic and Inelastic Collisions - UT Physics
    In particular, when the external forces balance each other, the CM either stays at rest or moves along a straight line at constant speed. The forces between ...
  44. [44]
    Particle Collisions in Two Dimensions - Mechanics Map
    Instead we will need to look to the coefficient of restitution, and set it equal to 1 for elastic collisions.
  45. [45]
    [PDF] 2-Dimensional Elastic Collisions without Trigonometry
    Aug 3, 2009 · This document is intended to introduce you to solving 2-dimensional elastic collision problems for circles without complicated trigonometry. It ...Missing: formulation | Show results with:formulation
  46. [46]
    Two-Dimensional Collisions
    An elastic two-dimensional collision is fully characterized once the initial velocity, $v_{1i}$ , and the scattering angle, $\theta $ , are specified.
  47. [47]
    [PDF] arXiv:0705.3328v2 [cond-mat.stat-mech] 11 Sep 2007
    Sep 11, 2007 · Moreover, if two colliding particles carry the same rest masses then elastic 1D collisions merely interchange their velocities; hence, elastic ...
  48. [48]
    [PDF] Introduction to Special Relativity, Quantum Mechanics and Nuclear ...
    Dec 15, 2014 · ) moving in one dimension can be subjected to a force F(x) that ... 2D relativistic elastic collision, equal masses. Problem: Find the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  49. [49]
    [PDF] Introduction to Relativistic Collisions - arXiv
    Relativistic inelastic collisions. We shall consider an inelastic collision between a particle 1 and a particle 2 (initially at rest) to form a composite ...
  50. [50]
    [PDF] RELATIVISTIC ENERGY AND MOMENTUM - UT Physics
    elastic collision makes the particle's speeds after the collision equal to their speeds before ... while in the ultra-relativistic limit γ ≫ 1 and hence |p| ≫ mc ...
  51. [51]
    [PDF] Lecture 12 Notes, Electromagnetic Theory II
    - The K' frame will be the center-of-mass frame and the K frame will be the frame where ... Note that we cannot derive it using an elastic collision like the.<|control11|><|separator|>
  52. [52]
  53. [53]
  54. [54]
    [PDF] Light-cone Variables, Rapidity and All That Abstract
    May 22, 1997 · Relative velocity Rapidity is the natural relativistic velocity variable. Suppose we have a proton and a pion with the same rapidity at pT = 0.
  55. [55]
    Optical geometry of motion, a new view of the theory of relativity
    Nov 30, 2006 · Optical geometry of motion, a new view of the theory of relativity. by: Robb, Alfred A. (Alfred Arthur). Publication date: 1911.
  56. [56]
    Quantum-Mechanical Theory of Elastic Scattering and Cross Section ...
    Jan 7, 2019 · A quantum-mechanical description of the theory of elastic scattering and a technique for determining the cross sections of particle ...
  57. [57]
  58. [58]
    [PDF] Evaluation of cross section of elastic scattering for non-relativistic ...
    The present work shows that to the first order of Born approximation, the fundamental theory can be used to calculate the cross sections of all the three kinds ...
  59. [59]
    Smoothness properties of the quantum-mechanical and WKB phase ...
    Aug 6, 2009 · The phase shifts in two-dimensional scattering are subject of a current controversial discussion involving their smoothness properties and the ...
  60. [60]
    Modified Born Approximation and the Elastic Scattering of Electrons ...
    Jul 1, 1970 · Phase shifts and scattering cross sections are calculated from our potential model using the first Born approximation and a modified form of it.Missing: mechanics | Show results with:mechanics
  61. [61]
    Annular distribution patterns of .357 Magnum fragments in soft tissue ...
    Therefore, the type of collision when a bullet ricochets from a hard surface with a flat angle is frequently defined as partially elastic. In contrast, when a ...
  62. [62]
    A Study on the Effect of Structural Compliance Placing in Soft ...
    Oct 14, 2024 · It is shown that while applying compliance to the protective propeller guards (bumpers) of a micro-quadcopter provides a more elastic collision, ...
  63. [63]
    Application of high-speed imaging to determine the dynamics of ...
    Sep 1, 2009 · We use a single high-speed camera and image processing techniques to track the trajectory of snooker balls to 1 mm accuracy. Successive ball ...
  64. [64]
  65. [65]
    Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Hard Spheres
    There are three equations governing the elastic collision between a pair of hard discs: (i) conservation of linear momentum, (ii) conservation of kinetic energy ...
  66. [66]
    Atomistic simulation of the measurement of mechanical properties of ...
    Nov 24, 2017 · Mechanical properties of nanoscale objects can be measured with an atomic force microscope (AFM) tip. However, the continuum models ...
  67. [67]
    Colloquium: Modeling friction: From nanoscale to mesoscale
    Apr 2, 2013 · The physics of sliding friction is gaining impulse from nanoscale and mesoscale experiments, simulations, and theoretical modeling.
  68. [68]
    [PDF] 15-7 Entropy and the Second Law of Thermodynamics - Physics
    An example would be an elastic collision between two objects ... Reversible processes do not change the entropy of a system, while irreversible processes.
  69. [69]
    [PDF] Fall 2025 - NMT Physics
    8.2.4 Two-Dimensional Elastic Collision. This experiment uses the air table and two steel pucks of equal mass. The setup of the equipment is similar to the.
  70. [70]
    d-2 two dimensional collisions on an air table
    Elastic collisions are best obtained with magnetic pucks, which exert on each other forces of repulsion acting directly along the line joining the pucks.
  71. [71]
    [PDF] DEEP INELASTIC SCATTERING - Nobel Prize
    The earliest MIT-SLAC studies, in which California Institute of. Technology physicists also collaborated, looked at elastic electron-proton scattering, later ...
  72. [72]
    [PDF] Measurements of Elastic Electron-Proton Scattering at Large ...
    The SLAC 8 GeV/c spectrometer is one of three general purpose spectrometers built in the 1960's to perform electron scattering experiments in End Station A.Missing: confirmation | Show results with:confirmation
  73. [73]
    Measurement of Young's Modulus Using a Michelson Interferometer
    Oct 1, 2023 · The bending of the object is measured by measuring the change in the interference fringe. A He-Ne laser with an intensity of 5 mW and wavelength ...
  74. [74]
    LAMMPS - a flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials ...
    LAMMPS is a widely-used, open-source tool for particle-based modeling of materials at atomic to continuum scales, also known as Large-scale Atomic/Molecular ...<|separator|>
  75. [75]
    Molecular dynamics simulations of collision-induced absorption
    Aug 6, 2025 · We pursue simulations of collision-induced absorption in a mixture of argon and xenon gas at room temperature by means of classical ...
  76. [76]
  77. [77]
    [PDF] Measurement of coefficient of restitution made easy
    Jan 7, 2006 · Introduction. The coefficient of restitution (COR, represented by the letter e) is a measure of how elastic a collision is.
  78. [78]
    Ultracold Molecular Collisions: Quasiclassical, Semiclassical, and ...
    Jun 25, 2025 · Scalings are shown for elastic collisions and inelastic collisions with positive threshold energy (endothermic reactions), negative threshold ...
  79. [79]
    [PDF] Experiment 6 Elastic and Inelastic Collisions
    Oct 19, 2005 · In this case, all of the kinetic energy relative to the center of mass of the whole system is lost in the collision (converted to other forms).
  80. [80]
    [PDF] Collisions And Conservation Of Momentum Lab Answers
    Common errors include frictional forces, inaccuracies in velocity measurements, timing errors, air resistance, and imperfectly elastic collisions, all of which ...Missing: effects | Show results with:effects