Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Emergency oxygen system

An emergency oxygen system is a vital safety apparatus in , primarily installed on commercial and , that delivers supplemental oxygen to passengers and during critical events such as cabin depressurization, , , or high-altitude operations to mitigate the risks of and ensure survival until safe conditions are restored. These systems evolved from military applications in the early , becoming standard in with the advent of high-altitude pressurized flights in the 1940s and 1950s. They are mandated by international regulations and typically activate automatically above a cabin altitude of 14,000 feet, deploying drop-down masks connected to either chemical oxygen generators or pressurized gaseous oxygen supplies, providing a minimum of 10 minutes of oxygen flow to facilitate an emergency descent to below 10,000 feet where ambient air is breathable. The core components of an emergency oxygen system include high-pressure oxygen storage cylinders (gaseous systems at 1,800–2,200 ) or liquid oxygen converters, pressure regulators to control flow, delivery masks (such as quick-donning types for pilots or simple oronasal masks for passengers), and distribution manifolds that ensure even supply across the cabin. In chemical oxygen generator systems, which are common for passenger compartments due to their lightweight and maintenance-free design, pulling on a mask ignites a self-contained —typically involving the decomposition of at temperatures above 300°C—to produce oxygen gas, forming as a and generating enough oxygen for approximately 15 minutes per unit. Gaseous systems, used more for flight decks, employ diluter-demand or pressure-demand regulators that deliver oxygen based on the user's , conserving supply up to altitudes of 40,000 feet or higher. Regulatory standards, such as those from the (FAA) under 14 CFR §91.211 and the (ICAO) Annex 6, require oxygen systems on pressurized operating above 25,000 feet, with flight crew masks deployable in seconds and sufficient capacity for all occupants plus a 10% excess; for example, under FAA regulations (14 CFR §91.211), in unpressurized , supplemental oxygen is required for the flight crew when operating above 12,500 feet (with duration-based rules up to 14,000 feet) and for all occupants above 15,000 feet, while ICAO standards specify slightly different altitudes (10,000 feet for crew, 13,000 feet for passengers). These systems must use only aviator's breathing oxygen (ABO) to avoid contamination risks from medical or industrial grades, and protocols emphasize cleanliness, pressure checks, and avoidance of oils or smoking to prevent fires or explosions.

Introduction

Definition and Purpose

An emergency oxygen system is a safety device primarily installed in pressurized commercial, general, and military aircraft designed to automatically supply supplemental oxygen to passengers and crew through drop-down masks in the event of cabin depressurization, typically when the cabin altitude exceeds 14,000 feet. These systems are engineered to deploy rapidly, providing oxygen-enriched air to all occupants within seconds of activation to ensure immediate access during critical situations. Also used in general aviation aircraft for high-altitude operations. The primary purpose of an emergency oxygen system is to prevent or mitigate acute , a condition resulting from oxygen deficiency in the body, by delivering breathable oxygen at sufficient partial pressures to maintain vital functions until the aircraft can descend to safer altitudes below 10,000 feet, where ambient air is adequate without supplementation. This allows pilots time to execute an emergency descent, typically within 2-4 minutes, while passengers remain conscious and capable of following safety instructions. Unlike routine supplemental oxygen used for therapeutic purposes or ground-based medical systems, emergency oxygen systems are exclusively aviation-specific, activated only in response to sudden pressure loss rather than continuous or elective needs. At high altitudes, the of oxygen in inspired air decreases due to lower , reducing the amount of oxygen that reaches the bloodstream and leading to . For instance, at 35,000 feet, symptoms such as impaired judgment can onset within 15-30 seconds, severely limiting the before incapacitation. Emergency oxygen systems counteract this by providing near-100% oxygen, restoring adequate oxygenation to delay or avert these effects during the descent phase.

Historical Development

The development of emergency oxygen systems in began during , when military pilots encountered at altitudes above 10,000 feet during and bombing missions. German forces were among the first to adopt basic oxygen apparatus, consisting of portable steel bottles connected to rudimentary masks via rubber tubing, to enable sustained operations in high-altitude aircraft like Zeppelins and planes. By the war's end, these systems had evolved into standard equipment for Allied pilots as well, with the U.S. Army Air Service integrating oxygen bottles into fighters such as the Sopwith Snipe for operations near the in 1918. Post-World War II advancements focused on high-altitude , leading to the introduction of pressure-demand oxygen systems that delivered oxygen under positive pressure to counter the physiological effects of extreme altitudes. These systems were first operationally tested in on RAF missions and rapidly adopted by the U.S. Army Air Forces for the , which required crew members to use masks during depressurization for combat at over 30,000 feet. The B-29's integration of demand-type regulators marked a shift from constant-flow to more efficient, pilot-controlled delivery, reducing waste and improving endurance during long-duration flights. In the commercial sector, the 1950s and saw the transition to built-in emergency oxygen systems as jet airliners like the Boeing 707 enabled routine flights above 25,000 feet, necessitating reliable passenger protection despite . One early milestone was the in 1962, which featured an integrated system designed for rapid deployment in decompression events. Key innovations included automatic drop-down masks, first implemented on the Boeing 707 in the late 1950s, which activated via cabin pressure sensors to provide quick access without crew intervention. Regulatory pressures intensified after 1960s accidents involving cabin depressurization, prompting the FAA to supplemental oxygen systems providing at least 10 minutes of supply for passengers at altitudes exceeding 25,000 feet, ensuring time for descent to breathable levels. The 1970s introduced chemical oxygen generators as a safer alternative for passenger use, eliminating the risks of high-pressure gaseous storage; aircraft like the Douglas DC-10 and Lockheed L-1011 adopted these self-contained units, which produced oxygen via reactions upon activation. By the , this shift had become widespread in , significantly reducing system weight compared to setups and simplifying maintenance, though they retained fixed-duration outputs. In military applications, on-board oxygen generating systems (OBOGS) emerged in the late , first flying in 1989 on fighters like the U.S. Navy's AV-8B and Air Force's F-15E, using technology to produce oxygen from engine for continuous supply; however, commercial emergency systems remained focused on chemical generators due to and reliability standards.

System Components

Oxygen Sources

Chemical oxygen generators are the most common oxygen sources in emergency systems, relying on the of (NaClO₃) or similar compounds to produce oxygen gas. The reaction is initiated by a pyrotechnic igniter that heats the chemical to approximately 350°F (177°C), triggering the exothermic : $2\text{NaClO}_3 \rightarrow 2\text{NaCl} + 3\text{O}_2. This process generates nearly pure oxygen (over 99%) for a typical duration of 12-20 minutes, depending on the generator size and environmental conditions, at flow rates of 2-4 liters per minute per mask under normal and . These self-contained units require no external power or maintenance during flight and are strategically placed throughout the cabin to ensure rapid deployment. Gaseous oxygen systems store compressed oxygen in high-pressure or composite cylinders, typically charged to 1,800-3,000 (124-207 ), with pressure regulators to maintain a constant delivery flow. Regulators adjust the output to match demand, often using diluter-demand or pressure-demand mechanisms suitable for use up to 40,000 feet. These systems provide a supply duration of 10-60 minutes, scalable based on cylinder and , making them ideal for smaller , flight stations, or supplemental portable units. Unlike chemical generators, gaseous systems allow for recharging and are more flexible for extended emergencies but require periodic hydrostatic testing of cylinders. Liquid oxygen (LOX) converters, though less common in modern , store oxygen in cryogenic form at -297°F (-183°C) and evaporate it to gas via a for high-density supply. These systems offer superior storage efficiency, reducing weight and volume by approximately 75% compared to gaseous storage—but demand insulated vessels and careful handling to prevent freezing or boil-off. Historically used in early and applications, such as the U-2 reconnaissance plane, LOX converters provided reliable oxygen during high-altitude operations before being largely replaced by gaseous and chemical alternatives due to complexity and safety concerns. Emergency oxygen systems are designed with capacity for worst-case scenarios, such as a rapid at 40,000 feet assuming 100% occupancy, delivering sufficient oxygen for to 10,000 feet without in-flight refilling. standards under 14 CFR Part 25 require systems to support a minimum time, typically met by chemical generators providing 12-20 minutes of flow, ensuring physiological protection for all occupants.

Delivery Mechanisms

Emergency oxygen delivery mechanisms in encompass the hardware responsible for transporting oxygen from centralized sources to end users, ensuring rapid and reliable administration during cabin depressurization events. These systems prioritize simplicity, durability, and user-friendliness to minimize response time and physiological risk. Key components include masks tailored for passengers and crew, distribution networks via manifolds and tubing, and supporting accessories that enhance functionality and safety. Passenger masks are elastomeric devices, typically constructed from lightweight, nonallergenic plastic in a hue for , deployed from overhead panels via a drop-down . They feature an oronasal covering the nose and mouth, secured by an elastic headband with knotted straps for quick donning, ideally under 5 seconds to facilitate immediate use by untrained individuals. A prominent feature is the integrated reservoir bag, which collects excess oxygen during to deliver a concentrated during , supplemented by valves for , , and ambient air intake. These masks operate on a continuous principle, with typical rates ranging from 0 to 4.5 liters per minute (), regulated to meet minimum tracheal oxygen partial pressures as specified in . Crew oxygen systems employ more robust quick-donning full-face masks, often oronasal types with integrated for communication and coatings or treatments to preserve visibility during emergencies. These masks connect to demand regulators—either diluter-demand for altitudes up to 40,000 feet or pressure-demand for higher levels—delivering oxygen only upon to conserve supply while providing positive pressure to counter . Flow rates for pilots are regulated to meet or exceed the minimum supplemental oxygen requirements of 4 liters per minute (STPD) above 25,000 feet, supporting sustained performance. The design emphasizes a tight to minimize leakage, often tested for fit on diverse facial structures. Manifolds and tubing form the distribution backbone, utilizing flexible hoses made from materials such as PVC or to route oxygen from central sources to individual masks without compromising integrity. These components include in-line flow restrictors or indicators—often color-changing to green upon activation—to prevent over-pressurization and ensure even distribution across multiple outlets. Tubing is routed to avoid sources and , maintaining reliability in dynamic environments. Accessories enhance delivery efficiency, including static lines or lanyards that suspend and trigger flow upon pulling, facilitating one-handed deployment. Anti-asphyxia valves, integrated into or regulators, prioritize oxygen delivery while permitting cabin air if supply depletes, preventing suffocation risks. These elements collectively ensure the system's response aligns with physiological needs during rapid .

Operational Principles

Activation and Deployment

Emergency oxygen systems in commercial aircraft are designed to activate automatically in response to cabin depressurization. When the cabin altitude exceeds 14,000 feet, as detected by pressure sensors connected to the cabin differential pressure monitoring system, the overhead mask assemblies deploy from compartments above passenger seats, lavatories, and crew stations. This threshold ensures timely intervention before impairs consciousness, providing passengers and crew with immediate access to supplemental oxygen. Upon deployment, passengers initiate oxygen flow by pulling sharply on the mask strap, which disengages a flow pin and activates the oxygen generator or . This action causes the attached reservoir bag to inflate as oxygen flows continuously at an average rate of 4 liters per minute under standard conditions, mixing with inhaled cabin air through a one-way to optimize delivery. The system prioritizes passenger and cabin crew masks for initial activation, while flight crew oxygen supplies operate independently to allow focus on descent procedures. These systems provide oxygen for 10 to 22 minutes, sufficient for the aircraft to descend to a breathable altitude below feet, in accordance with requiring a minimum of 10 minutes for emergency passenger supplies. Pilots can manually override the system via cockpit switches to deploy masks preemptively if pressurization issues are anticipated, but once activated, the deployment cannot be reset during flight to prevent re-pressurization risks.

Physiological Considerations

In aviation emergencies involving high altitudes, the primary physiological concern is hypoxic hypoxia, which arises from the reduced of oxygen (PO₂) in the ambient air as decreases, leading to inadequate oxygen into the stream despite normal function and blood flow. This form of is exacerbated during cabin depressurization events, where the (TUC)—the period during which an individual can perform critical tasks before impairment—dwindles rapidly; at 35,000 feet, TUC typically ranges from 30 to 60 seconds without supplemental oxygen. Emergency oxygen systems counteract these effects by delivering nearly 100% oxygen, which significantly elevates alveolar PO₂ and restores arterial , effectively delaying or preventing hypoxic symptoms such as impaired judgment, , and loss of . For instance, 100% oxygen at 34,000 feet can maintain alveolar PO₂ equivalent to that at , providing critical protection during descent. Flow rates in these systems for passenger continuous flow masks are typically around 4 liters per minute of oxygen, which mixes with cabin air via a phase-dilution to provide an effective FiO₂, while the user's under stress may reach 15-30 liters per minute. Demand systems for crew are calibrated to deliver oxygen matching volumes to conserve supply. Oronasal masks, commonly used in aircraft, achieve a fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO₂) of 50-90% through reservoir bags that minimize entrainment of cabin air, but efficiency depends on proper fit; improper donning can lead to CO₂ rebreathing, causing hypercapnia and further respiratory distress. This partial pressure dynamic, governed by Dalton's law—where total pressure is the sum of individual gas partial pressures—underscores why low ambient pressure at altitude disproportionately impairs oxygen availability compared to nitrogen dilution alone. Vulnerable populations, such as children and the elderly, face heightened risks due to physiological differences like lower oxygen reserves or reduced ventilatory capacity, often necessitating adjusted flow rates or closer monitoring to maintain adequate oxygenation. For children, smaller volumes may require tailored sizing to avoid dilution, while elderly individuals with comorbidities experience steeper declines in during exposure.

Applications and Regulations

In Commercial Aviation

In commercial aviation, emergency oxygen systems are integrated into passenger cabins via overhead panels that deploy drop-down masks automatically upon cabin pressure loss, typically providing 1-4 masks per row of seats to ensure accessibility for all occupants. These masks connect to chemical oxygen generators distributed throughout the cabin, releasing oxygen for approximately 12-22 minutes to facilitate a safe descent. For flight crew, oxygen is supplied from high-pressure gaseous cylinders or liquid oxygen converters located in the cockpit, equipped with quick-donning masks that allow immediate use without assistance. Cabin crew additionally carry portable protective breathing equipment, such as smoke hoods, which provide a closed-loop oxygen supply for up to 15 minutes while protecting against smoke and fumes during evacuations or emergencies. Passenger usage protocols emphasize rapid response, with safety briefings instructing individuals to pull the mask toward their face to activate oxygen flow, secure it over the nose and mouth by tightening the elastic straps, and then fasten their seatbelt only after the mask is in place. This sequence prioritizes personal oxygenation to prevent , as masks supply each other in shared units but individuals must act independently. For pilots, activation triggers an immediate donning of masks by the followed by the first officer, establishment of crew communication, and initiation of an emergency descent to 10,000 feet or the minimum safe altitude, whichever is higher, to restore breathable air. These systems align with FAA requirements for sufficient oxygen duration to complete such descents safely. Aircraft variations reflect operational scale and design; wide-body jets like the employ numerous distributed chemical oxygen generators across multiple cabin zones for comprehensive coverage in large passenger loads. Maintenance involves rigorous pre-flight inspections conducted by or ground personnel according to standard operating procedures, including visual checks of integrity, generator seals, and cylinder pressures to verify readiness. Systems undergo non-destructive testing, such as pressure checks and functional simulations, at intervals like every 1,000 flight hours or per manufacturer guidelines, ensuring reliability without compromising component lifespan.

Standards and Requirements

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regulates emergency oxygen systems for transport-category airplanes under Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) Part 25, specifically sections 25.1441 through 25.1449, which establish requirements for design, installation, and performance to ensure passenger and crew safety during cabin depressurization events. These regulations mandate a minimum oxygen supply duration of 10 minutes at a cabin altitude of 25,000 feet and up to 22 minutes at 40,000 feet, calibrated to support a safe descent to 10,000 feet where supplemental oxygen is no longer required. Additionally, for airplanes certified for operations above 25,000 feet, oxygen dispensing units must automatically deploy before the cabin pressure altitude exceeds 25,000 feet, with quick-donning masks for flight crew deployable within 5 seconds. The (EASA) imposes equivalent standards through Certification Specifications (CS-25), which are harmonized with FAR Part 25 to facilitate bilateral agreements and mutual recognition of certifications. CS-25 emphasizes Orders (TSO) or their European equivalents (ETSO) for key components, such as oxygen masks certified under TSO-C99, ensuring they meet minimum performance for flow rates, fit, and durability under emergency conditions. These specifications require systems to supply oxygen maintaining a mean tracheal of at least 100 mm Hg up to 18,500 feet and 83.8 mm Hg up to 40,000 feet, aligning closely with FAA flow requirements to support international fleet . Testing protocols for certification involve simulated depressurization scenarios in altitude chambers to replicate rapid cabin altitude changes, verifying system activation, mask deployment, and oxygen delivery under hypobaric conditions equivalent to 40,000 feet. For chemical oxygen generators, a in many systems, performance is assessed for oxygen purity exceeding 95% and consistent flow rates over the rated duration, with tests including , extremes, and activation reliability to ensure no hazardous byproducts or failures. These protocols, outlined in FAA Advisory Circulars and TSO authorizations, confirm compliance before type approval. International harmonization is advanced through the (ICAO) Annex 8, which sets baseline airworthiness standards for oxygen systems, promoting alignment among member states to avoid discrepancies in global operations.

Risks and Safety Measures

Potential Hazards

Emergency oxygen systems, particularly those employing chemical oxygen generators, present fire hazards due to the exothermic that produces significant heat and pure oxygen, which accelerates of nearby flammable materials. The surface temperature of generator canisters can exceed 250°C (482°F) during , with some models reaching up to 500°F (260°C), potentially igniting adjacent combustibles if improperly stored or deployed near them. Oxygen released from these systems further intensifies fires by supporting rapid oxidation, making inadvertent activation a critical risk in enclosed aircraft environments. Oxygen toxicity in emergency systems is uncommon during typical short-term exposures of 12 to 20 minutes, as the duration is insufficient to induce significant hyperoxic effects in most users. However, prolonged or uneven exposure to high oxygen concentrations (hyperoxia) can lead to lung irritation, including tracheobronchitis or pulmonary edema, due to reactive oxygen species damaging alveolar cells. Mask leaks or poor fit may exacerbate this by causing inconsistent oxygen distribution, potentially leading to localized hyperoxia in some passengers while others receive inadequate supply. System failures in emergency oxygen setups can compromise reliability, such as blockages in delivery tubes that restrict flow and cause pneumatic , potentially rupturing components. Chemical oxygen generators have a limited , typically 4 to 12 years depending on the model and manufacturer, after which they may degrade and fail to deploy properly even if not expired. In gaseous oxygen systems, moisture contamination can lead to of metal components like cylinders and valves, weakening structural integrity over time. Handling risks primarily affect ground crew managing high-pressure gaseous oxygen cylinders, which operate at 1,800 to 2,200 and pose or hazards if mishandled, as oxygen acts as a potent oxidizer promoting of contaminants like or grease. Rapid discharge of pressurized oxygen can cause severe burns or eye injuries to personnel, necessitating strict protocols for transport and servicing to prevent accidental venting.

Notable Incidents

One of the most significant incidents involving emergency oxygen systems occurred on May 11, 1996, with Flight 592, a McDonnell Douglas DC-9-32 that crashed into the Florida Everglades shortly after takeoff from . The fire originated in the forward cargo compartment from the inadvertent activation of improperly packaged and shipped chemical oxygen generators, which lacked safety caps and generated intense heat (up to 500°F initially, escalating to 2,000°F) along with oxygen that accelerated the blaze. This led to rapid smoke propagation, structural failure, and loss of flight control, resulting in the deaths of all 110 occupants (105 passengers and 5 crew members). The (NTSB) determined that nine of the 28 recovered generators had activated, confirming their role in initiating the fire during or shortly after the takeoff roll. In response, the FAA and Research and Special Programs Administration prohibited the transportation of undeactivated chemical oxygen generators as cargo on passenger and cargo aircraft effective December 31, 1996, and mandated enhanced hazardous materials handling protocols, including and suppression in Class D compartments. The Flight 28M accident on August 22, 1985, at underscored limitations in effectiveness during ground fires and smoke events. During the aborted takeoff of the 737-236, an uncontained engine failure punctured a , igniting a that breached the fuselage within 13-22 seconds and filled the cabin with dense, toxic smoke containing high levels of (carboxyhemoglobin >30% in 74% of victims) and (>135 µg/100 ml in 80%). Although passenger s were available, the overhead distribution system was destroyed by the without discharge, and cabin crew smoke hoods (15-minute supply) proved impractical for rapid evacuation due to donning times of 40 seconds to 1 minute 40 seconds. Of the 137 occupants, 55 fatalities occurred, with 48-54 attributed to smoke and toxic gas inhalation rather than burns, as passengers resorted to using for rudimentary . The recommended introducing lightweight passenger smoke hoods for toxic fume , storing therapeutic oxygen in fireproof containers to prevent exacerbation, and developing cabin water mist systems for suppression, influencing subsequent improvements in designs and evacuation procedures. Helios Airways Flight 522 on August 14, 2005, illustrated the risks of gradual cabin depressurization leading to undetected . The Boeing 737-300 departed , , with the pressurization mode selector inadvertently left in manual position after maintenance, causing the cabin altitude to rise progressively during climb—reaching 14,000 ft by 06:14 (triggering automatic passenger mask deployment at 18,200 ft) and peaking at 28,900 ft by 06:20:21. The flight crew failed to don their masks or recognize symptoms, becoming incapacitated after approximately 13 minutes due to prolonged (>2.5 hours), resulting in a "ghost flight" on until fuel exhaustion and crash near , , killing all 121 aboard (115 passengers and 6 crew). Forensic examination confirmed non-reversible coma from brain as the incapacitation cause. The Greek Accident Investigation Board highlighted inadequate crew training on insidious depressurization and recognition, along with poor checklist adherence and ; this prompted mandates for enhanced simulator-based training, revised standard operating procedures for mask donning, and cockpit panel redesigns to prevent configuration errors. Garuda Indonesia Flight 421 on January 16, 2002, provided a successful test of emergency procedures under extreme conditions. En route from to , the 737-3Q8 encountered severe hail and thunderstorms, causing dual flameout at about 9,000 ft during descent; the crew executed a 25-minute glide, attempting restarts (which failed in ) and ditching in the Bengawan Solo River. One died from injuries, but all 59 others survived, demonstrating the reliability of emergency procedures in supporting crew performance during prolonged low-altitude emergencies and weather-induced power loss. The Indonesian National Transportation Safety Committee emphasized pilot decision-making in , leading to FAA advisories on relight procedures in heavy and reinforced for glide scenarios. More recent events continue to highlight the importance of these systems. In July 2025, a Boeing 737 experienced a sudden descent of nearly 26,000 feet, triggering automatic deployment of passenger oxygen and causing passenger , though no injuries were reported; the incident underscored the need for rapid crew response to turbulence-induced events. In general aviation, a June 2023 Cessna Citation 560 crash in was preceded by known unresolved deficiencies in the oxygen system, contributing to the crew's incapacitation during an uncontrolled flight, resulting in three fatalities and prompting FAA reviews of maintenance protocols for oxygen equipment. These incidents collectively drove aviation-wide enhancements, including FAA prohibitions on hazardous oxygen generator transport, adoption of smoke-protective hoods, mandatory awareness training, and integrated to mitigate risks in both fire and depressurization events.

References

  1. [1]
    Aircraft Oxygen Systems | SKYbrary Aviation Safety
    The emergency oxygen supply must last a minimum of 10 minutes. Provisions must be provided in the system to automatically deploy the emergency oxygen masks ...
  2. [2]
    [PDF] Oxygen Equipment Use in General Aviation Operations
    This equipment is the first line of defense against the potentially lethal effects of hypoxia and carbon monoxide poisoning. It is the responsibility of the ...
  3. [3]
    The science behind emergency oxygen | Feature | RSC Education
    Oct 24, 2022 · When a passenger tugs a mask, a firing pin is pulled from the cylinder. This action triggers a tiny explosion that produces the energy needed to ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] AC 25-20 - Pressurization, Ventilation and Oxygen Systems ...
    Sep 10, 1996 · AC 25-20 provides guidance on compliance with FAR Part 25 requirements for pressurization, ventilation, and oxygen systems, especially for high ...
  5. [5]
    [PDF] Onboard Oxygen Gas Generation System (OBIGGS/OBOGS) Study
    Oxygen systems, as they are currently designed for use on commercial transport aircraft, include passenger oxygen for use in the event of a sudden loss of cabin.
  6. [6]
    Airman Education Programs | Federal Aviation Administration
    Jul 21, 2015 · Pilots may experience hypoxic hypoxia when flying at altitude in an unpressurized aircraft. With increasing altitude, the molecules of oxygen ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] Chapter 17: Aeromedical Factors - Federal Aviation Administration
    The term “time of useful consciousness” describes the maximum time the pilot has to make rational, life-saving decisions and carry them out at a given altitude ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] A Brief History of Flying Clothing - Royal Aeronautical Society
    As in many aviation areas, the Germans had led the field in the use, by military aviators, of oxygen systems. The. Zeppelin raids on England earlier in the ...
  9. [9]
    A History of US Military Aviation Oxygen Systems to 1945 (Part 1 of 2)
    By the time the war had ended for all combatants, oxygen had been permanently accepted as a necessary part of the life support equipment required by pilots to ...
  10. [10]
    A History of US Military Aviation Oxygen Systems to 1945 (Part 2 of 2)
    Feb 5, 2008 · The first operational combat mission flown using the new pressure-demand oxygen equipment was carried out in February of 1944 by the RAF ...
  11. [11]
    The Allies planned for a 40000 foot air war in World War II (WWII)
    The Allies planned for a 40,000 foot air war in World War II (WWII): development and testing of the demand type pressure breathing O2 equipment used by the ...
  12. [12]
    What was the first commercial aircraft to have a 'built-in' oxygen ...
    Dec 26, 2017 · One of the first airliners to feature a built-in solution, based on liquid oxygen, was the British Vickers VC10, which first flew in 1962. On ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Passenger Oxygen Mask Design Study - Library Collections
    Appendices contain a historical overview of aviation oxygen masks, information on oxygen systems and mask assemblies, and flight physiology. We present evidence ...
  14. [14]
    HISTORY OF SAFETY CARDS, Part 4: 1960s – Mandated!
    Mar 3, 2023 · In 1963, the FAA proposed rulemaking for a host of cabin safety measures, ranging from improved exit signs and markings to mandatory evacuation ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] NTSB/AAS-76/01 - Library Collections
    Mar 3, 1976 · The Douglas DC-10 and the Lockheed 1011 aircraft have similar components in their chemically generated, supplemental oxygen systems. Both ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Aircraft Oxygen Generation - DTIC
    Feb 1, 2012 · Many aircraft make use of an on-board oxygen generation system to provide breathing oxygen for the aircrew. Compared to historical ...
  17. [17]
    25 years of flying for Air Liquide's oxygen generating system OBOGS!
    Dec 1, 2014 · On the 24th of November 1989, Air Liquide's OBOGS flew for the first time, onboard a military fighter aircraft. This special date is the ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Advanced Oxygen Systems for Aircraft (Systemes d'Oxygene Avances)
    technologies (17), and today "solid chemical" oxygen stor- age systems are used for emergency passenger oxygen on many commercial airliners. A typical ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Passenger Oxygen Mask Design Study - Library Collections
    ... aircraft oxygen systems within an environmental control systems working group. ... Chemical oxygen generators produce gaseous oxygen using a chemical reaction.
  20. [20]
    [PDF] CASE FILE COPY r- - NASA Technical Reports Server
    HISTORY. 15. On military aircraft, liquid-oxygen con- verters are now standard equipment as a source of breathable oxygen at high altitudes. Liquid-oxygen- ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Unlimited Horizons: Design and Development of the U-2 - NASA
    oxygen system, and a pressure garment. Primary breathing air came from a pair of 2.6-gallon liquid-oxygen converters, each providing gaseous oxygen to the.
  22. [22]
    14 CFR 25.1443 -- Minimum mass flow of supplemental oxygen.
    The quantity of oxygen required is based upon an average flow rate of three liters per minute per person for whom first-aid oxygen is required.
  23. [23]
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Chapter 7 - Aircraft Systems - Federal Aviation Administration
    Electrical Pulse-Demand Oxygen System. Portable electrical pulse-demand oxygen systems deliver oxygen by detecting an individual's inhalation effort and.
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Advisory Circular - Federal Aviation Administration
    Mar 3, 2008 · SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS. Gaseous oxygen systems may be a higher pressure system with the oxygen stored at 1850 psi or a low pressure system with ...
  26. [26]
    How do the oxygen masks deploy after a cabin decompression?
    Apr 18, 2016 · The masks are deployed automatically (typically when cabin altitude exceeds 14,000 feet), or can be deployed manually from the flight deck.
  27. [27]
    [PDF] 0 Advisory Circular - Federal Aviation Administration
    At 18,000 feet, the mental deterioration may result in unconsciousness, and the time of useful consciousness (TUC) is generally about 15 minutes. At 25,000 feet ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Hypoxia an Invisible Enemy | Safety First | Airbus
    It is believed that a safe time of unconsciousness is somewhere between 90 seconds and 4 minutes. TIME OF USEFUL. CONSCIOUSNESS. 20,000ft All unacclimatized ...
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Low Flow / Optimized Flow Oxygen Systems for Passengers - ROSA P
    Sep 2, 2025 · Abstract. The OFOS study evaluated SpO2 values and oxygen flow rates via FAA-approved phase-dilution passenger oxygen masks at simulated ...
  30. [30]
    Oxygen Administration - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
    Jan 22, 2025 · Oxygen therapy is a critical medical intervention designed to ensure adequate oxygen delivery to the body's cells, supporting essential functions and ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] Health Effects of Aircraft Cabin Pressure In Older and Vulnerable ...
    Major findings: Vulnerable senior passengers experience moderate hypoxia during flight. While previous research showed around a 4% mean drop in oxygen ...Missing: children | Show results with:children
  32. [32]
    Air travel and children's health issues - PMC - PubMed Central
    Medical oxygen should be available for these children during flight. Oxygen therapy on aircraft has been recommended at altitudes of over 2135 m (7600 ft) in ...Missing: populations elderly
  33. [33]
    Focus on Protective Breathing Equipment - Safety First | Airbus
    PBE, also called smoke hood, is designed to protect the crew members from smoke, carbon dioxide, and other harmful gases while they are on flight deck duty ...
  34. [34]
    [PDF] 1. PURPOSE. This advisory circular (AC) updates information ...
    If the flight involves operations above 12,000 MSL, the pilot in command or a crewmember must brief passengers on the normal and emergency use of oxygen.Missing: protocols | Show results with:protocols
  35. [35]
    Types of gas cylinders in Aviation - PPRuNe Forums
    Aug 16, 2025 · 1. Passenger Oxygen Systems - Passenger systems are not cylinder-based in modern civil aircraft. Instead, they rely on chemical oxygen ...
  36. [36]
    Aviation Supplemental Oxygen Systems - CFI Notebook
    Generally used on large aircraft in an emergency to provide a 10-minute oxygen supply. ... Aircraft oxygen stores in high-pressure system containers of 1,800- ...
  37. [37]
    [PDF] AC 43.13-1B - Acceptable Methods, Techniques, and Practices ...
    Sep 8, 1998 · This advisory circular (AC) contains methods, techniques, and practices acceptable to the. Administrator for the inspection and repair of ...
  38. [38]
    14 CFR Part 25 Subpart F -- Equipment - eCFR
    This section applies to installed systems and equipment intended for flightcrew members' use in operating the airplane from their normally seated positions on ...Missing: commercial | Show results with:commercial
  39. [39]
    [PDF] Lavatory Oxygen Installation Requirements Aviation Rulemaking ...
    This AD requires installing compressed oxygen cylinder systems as replacements for the chemical oxygen generators that were removed or discharged as required by ...
  40. [40]
  41. [41]
    Deviation Request ETSO-C99#2 for an ETSO approval for ... - EASA
    Whereas devices defined by TSO C99 may be either self-contained or be connected to other aircraft sources of air or oxygen, devices that fall under TSO C116 ...Missing: systems | Show results with:systems
  42. [42]
    Requirements for Chemical Oxygen Generators Installed on ...
    Mar 11, 2014 · SUMMARY: This final rule amends the type certification requirements for chemical oxygen generators installed on transport category airplanes ...Missing: TSO- C69c flow
  43. [43]
    Chemical Oxygen Generators | SKYbrary Aviation Safety
    The oxidizer core of an oxygen generator usually consists mainly of Sodium Chlorate (NaClO3) mixed with <5% Barium Peroxide (BaO2) and <1% Potassium ...Missing: equation | Show results with:equation
  44. [44]
    None
    ### Summary of Hazards of Unspent or Expired Oxygen Generators and Fire Risks
  45. [45]
    [PDF] Chlorate Oxygen Generator (Oxygen Candle)
    The use of chlorates or perchlorates as sources of oxygen dates from at least 1930 when emergency oxygen supplies manufactured in Berlin for miners were ...
  46. [46]
    Oxygen Toxicity - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
    Extended exposure to above-normal oxygen partial pressures or shorter exposures to very high partial pressures can cause oxidative damage to cell membranes ...
  47. [47]
    Oxygen Toxicity in Critically Ill Adults - ATS Journals
    Feb 17, 2021 · Numerous studies in laboratory animals demonstrated that exposure to an FiO2 greater than 0.7 over 3–6 days can cause death from progressive ...
  48. [48]
    [PDF] national transportation safety board - Federal Aviation Administration
    over the percussion caps that start a chemical reaction in the oxygen generators; lanyards for the retaining pins for the percussion caps ...
  49. [49]
    [PDF] SPECIAL AIRWORTHINESS INFORMATION BULLETIN
    Jun 19, 2017 · than 10 years and impose a 10-year life limit on all 117042 series generators. B/E Aerospace, Inc., also manufactures chemical oxygen generators ...
  50. [50]
    [PDF] SAFETY STANDARD FOR OXYGEN AND OXYGEN SYSTEMS
    This safety standard establishes a uniform. Agency process for oxygen system design, materials selection, operation, storage, and transportation.
  51. [51]
    Safe Oxygen Servicing | Safety First
    This article explains how a fire can start in the presence of oxygen and highlights the safety precautions that must always be followed whenever working on ...Missing: pre- inspections
  52. [52]
    Hydrostatic testing of aviation oxygen cylinders - AOPA
    Sep 26, 2025 · Hydrostatic testing helps prevent failures that could result in oxygen leaks, fire hazards, or an explosion that leads to injury or loss of ...
  53. [53]
    [PDF] In-Flight Fire and Impact with Terrain, ValuJet Airlines Flight 592, Dc ...
    Jan 4, 2000 · ... oxygen generators, this report provides some background information on the description of the chemical oxygen generators and the guidance ...
  54. [54]
    [PDF] Report on the accident to Boeing 737-236, G-BGJL at Manchester ...
    The major cause of the fatalities was rapid incapacitation dueto the inhalation of the dense toxic/irritant smoke atmospherewithin the cabin, aggravated by ...Missing: 28M | Show results with:28M
  55. [55]
    [PDF] Helios 737 Flight 522 Accident Report
    The sole objective of the investigation is the prevention of similar accidents in the future. The Accident Investigation and Aviation Safety Board. Chairman.
  56. [56]
    Accident Boeing 737-3Q8 PK-GWA, Wednesday 16 January ...
    Jan 16, 2002 · Probable Cause: "The NTSC determines that the probable causes of the accident were the combination of 1) The aircraft had entered severe hail ...Missing: oxygen system
  57. [57]
    [PDF] National Transportation Safety Board
    Aug 31, 2005 · As a result of the flight 421 accident, the FAA issued Special Airworthiness Information Bulletin. (SAIB) NE-02-28 on May 23, 2002, to all ...Missing: oxygen system
  58. [58]
    McDonnell Douglas DC-9-32 | Federal Aviation Administration
    ValuJet Flight 592 crashed due to an uncontrolled fire caused by improperly carried, unexpended chemical oxygen generators in the cargo compartment.
  59. [59]
    Boeing 737-300 | Federal Aviation Administration
    Helios Airways Flight 52, HCY522. Hellas, Greece. August 14, 2005. On the ... The direct cause of the accident was determined to be incapacitation of the flight ...