Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

European Rail Traffic Management System

The European Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS) is a standardized framework for railway signaling, command, control, and communication that replaces over 20 disparate national systems to ensure seamless , enhanced safety, and increased efficiency across the continent's rail networks. Developed as a major EU industrial initiative, it enforces compliance with speed restrictions, movement authorities, and signaling through automated supervision, enabling trains to operate uninterrupted across borders without the need for system changes. ERTMS comprises two core subsystems: the European Train Control System (ETCS), which serves as the primary automatic train protection mechanism by continuously monitoring and supervising train movements via onboard computers, and the Global System for Mobile Communications – Railway (GSM-R), a dedicated digital radio network for voice and data exchange between trains, trackside equipment, and control centers. ETCS functions at varying levels of sophistication—Level 0 for unequipped lines with no ETCS supervision; Level 1 for spot transmission of movement authority via balises with lineside signals; Level 2 for continuous radio-based communication replacing most lineside signals; and Level 3 for advanced moving-block operation without fixed block sections or external train detection, relying on onboard integrity checks. These levels are defined in the EU's Technical Specifications for Interoperability (TSIs) for Control-Command and Signalling, ensuring standardized performance across member states. Originating from 1990s efforts by the ERTMS Users' Group and EU directives to harmonize , ERTMS has advanced through key milestones, including the 2005 for deployment commitments, the 2016 adoption of Baseline 3 specifications, and the 2017 European Deployment Plan targeting core network corridors. As of November 2025, deployment remains partial—covering about 15% of the Core Network Corridors for ETCS and 61% for —with the launching an accelerated plan and a 2026 ERTMS Deployment Plan to enhance rollout and achieve full by 2030 on priority lines. By reducing signaling differences, lowering maintenance costs, boosting line capacity through optimized train spacing, and minimizing accident risks via automatic braking, ERTMS significantly improves rail's environmental and economic competitiveness against and air .

Overview

Definition and Scope

The European Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS) is a unified signaling and train control framework initiated by the to standardize rail operations and ensure across diverse national railway networks. As a major European industrial project, ERTMS seeks to harmonize and communication, addressing the fragmentation caused by over 20 distinct national signaling systems that hinder efficient . At its core, ERTMS encompasses the integration of signaling, train control, and communication elements to replace these legacy national systems, with applicability extending to both high-speed and conventional rail lines throughout the . This scope facilitates the creation of a seamless , where trains can operate without interruptions due to differing technical standards. In contrast to traditional systems that often necessitate locomotive changes or operational adaptations at national borders, ERTMS is designed to support uninterrupted cross-border travel, enhancing the overall efficiency and competitiveness of rail services. The foundational principles of ERTMS are rooted in EU Directive 2001/16/EC, which mandates interoperability for the trans-European conventional rail system by defining essential requirements for subsystems such as control-command and signaling. This directive has evolved through the development and mandatory implementation of Technical Specifications for Interoperability (TSIs), which provide detailed, binding technical and operational standards to achieve these goals across the EU rail network. ERTMS primarily integrates the European Train Control System (ETCS) for train protection and supervision with the GSM-R system for voice and data communications.

Objectives and Benefits

The European Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS) aims to establish a unified signaling and control framework across , enhancing safety through automatic train protection (ATP) mechanisms that continuously supervise train speed and enforce movement authorities to prevent overspeeding, signals passed at danger (SPAD), and collisions. By standardizing equipment and reducing the need for diverse national systems, ERTMS seeks to lower signaling and maintenance costs while promoting for seamless cross-border operations. Additionally, it supports environmental by optimizing train movements to improve , such as through precise speed regulation that minimizes unnecessary braking and acceleration. In terms of safety benefits, ERTMS targets the highest levels of on equipped lines, with ATP features designed to eliminate human error-related incidents like overspeeding and SPADs, thereby significantly reducing the risk of accidents attributable to signaling failures. The system's cab-based signaling provides drivers with real-time movement authority information, reducing collision risks by maintaining safe distances between trains. These enhancements contribute to overall railway improvements. Economically, ERTMS lowers maintenance costs by minimizing trackside , such as eliminating lineside signals in higher operational levels, which standardizes and simplifies upkeep across national networks. It facilitates the EU single market for rail freight by enabling operators to run trains without country-specific retrofits, supporting a modal shift from road to rail and boosting the competitiveness of European rail transport. This standardization also reduces certification and training expenses for railway undertakings, fostering a more efficient . Regarding capacity and , ERTMS increases line capacity by up to 50% through optimized headways and virtual signaling, allowing more trains on existing infrastructure without physical upgrades. It enables trains to operate across borders with a single onboard system, eliminating technical barriers and potentially supporting speeds up to 500 km/h on compatible high-speed lines. The (ETCS), a core component, underpins these interoperability gains by providing consistent protection standards.

System Components

European Train Control System (ETCS)

The (ETCS) serves as the core signaling and control subsystem of the European Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS), functioning as a cab-signaling system that continuously supervises train movement authority and speed to enhance safety and across European rail networks. By replacing traditional lineside signals with in-cab displays, ETCS provides drivers with information on permitted speeds and movement limits, thereby reducing and enabling more efficient train operations. This system incorporates automatic train protection (ATP) mechanisms to enforce braking if necessary, ensuring compliance with safety requirements defined in the ERTMS specifications. ETCS architecture is divided into on-board and trackside subsystems that interact to deliver precise movement supervision. The on-board subsystem, installed on trains, includes readers for detecting trackside transponders, radio antennae for wireless communication, and the Driver Machine Interface (DMI) for presenting information to the driver. The trackside subsystem comprises the interlocking system for route setting, radio in-fill links for continuous updates, and the Lineside Electronic Unit (LEU) to interface with existing signaling infrastructure. These components form a distributed network that supports the overall ERTMS framework, with data exchange facilitated briefly via the communication system. Within ERTMS, ETCS integrates by providing ATP and movement supervision through interfaces with sensors for accurate train positioning and braking curves to model deceleration profiles. The on-board computer, known as the ETCS kernel, calculates supervised speed profiles by processing movement authority limits (MAL) received from trackside and comparing them against service brake curves, ensuring the train adheres to safe operational envelopes. This computation prevents overspeed and collision risks, with safety integrity levels maintained at a tolerable rate of 0.67 × 10⁻⁹ failures per hour for both on-board and trackside functions. For with legacy national train control systems, ETCS employs the Specific Transmission Module (), which adapts ETCS interfaces to transmit and receive data from non-ETCS signaling environments without compromising core functionality. The STM handles specific transmission protocols over the train-track interface, allowing seamless operation on mixed networks during the transition to full ERTMS deployment. This modular approach supports gradual interoperability while prioritizing the harmonized ETCS standards.

GSM-R Communication System

The (Global System for Mobile Communications - Railway) is a specialized variant of the standard adapted for railway applications, serving as the dedicated radio communication backbone within the European Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS). It enables secure and reliable transmission of voice and data between trains, trackside infrastructure, and control centers, ensuring across networks. Operating primarily in the UHF band, GSM-R uses circuit-switched technology for voice services and packet-switched GPRS for data, with enhancements defined in the EIRENE (European Integrated Railway Radio Enhanced Network) and MORANE (Mobile Radio for Railways in ) specifications to meet railway-specific requirements such as high-speed and group communications. GSM-R provides essential functions including continuous voice group calls for operational coordination, such as shunting yards or emergency situations, broadcast calls for announcements, and one-to-one telephony for direct driver-signaller interactions. For data services, it supports transmission of ETCS packets, including movement authorities from the Radio Block Centre (RBC), facilitating train control in ETCS Levels 2 and 3. Additionally, it accommodates General National Communication (GNC) for country-specific requirements, ensuring flexibility while maintaining EU-wide standards. These services operate with low and high reliability, supporting train speeds up to 500 km/h through seamless handover mechanisms. The network architecture includes base transceiver stations (BTS) deployed along tracks for coverage, base station controllers (BSC) for , and mobile switching centers (MSC) for call routing and mobility handling. Onboard equipment consists of radios integrated into locomotives, enabling as trains move between cells, typically spaced 7-15 km apart. Security is integral, featuring SIM-based authentication to verify users and devices, along with encryption for the air interface to protect against unauthorized access and eavesdropping; voice remains circuit-switched for priority, while data uses with end-to-end safeguards. Spectrum allocation for is harmonized across the in dedicated bands to prevent with public networks: 876-880 MHz for uplink (mobile to base) and 921-925 MHz for downlink (base to mobile), providing a 4 MHz duplex channel. Optional extensions include 873-876 MHz uplink and 918-921 MHz downlink on a national basis, as per CEPT decisions and Directive 2016/797, ensuring exclusive railway use for safety-critical operations.

ETCS Functionality

Operational Levels

The European Train Control System (ETCS) defines several operational levels that progressively enhance train supervision and communication, transitioning from limited or no ETCS involvement to fully integrated, continuous control mechanisms. These levels represent the and communication configurations that determine how movement authorities and supervision are provided to the train, enabling across European rail networks while allowing with legacy systems. Level 0 serves as a fallback for ETCS-equipped trains operating on lines without any ETCS or compatible national train control trackside equipment. In this level, the onboard ETCS system provides no active supervision of train speed or movement authority, relying instead on the driver's visual observation of lineside signals or other non-ETCS means for safe operation. An optional end-of-authority warning may be displayed based on the last received information, but there is no enforcement through automatic braking, making it suitable only for uneqipped areas where full ETCS benefits are unavailable. Level 1 introduces intermittent ETCS supervision through fixed or switchable balises placed at specific points along the track, such as at signal locations or boundaries. These balises transmit movement authority data to the train's onboard equipment upon passing, enabling the calculation of a supervised braking curve and maximum speed based on that information. Trackside signals may continue to coexist for driver reference, and train position and integrity are determined by conventional trackside systems outside the ETCS scope, with balises providing localization; infill balises or loops can extend supervision between fixed points for semi-continuous coverage. Level 2 advances to continuous supervision via radio communication between the train and a Radio Block Centre (RBC), which dynamically provides movement authorities without reliance on lineside signals in most cases. Balises are still used for precise train positioning and to confirm , while train detection and integrity checking occur through trackside equipment, either within or outside the ETCS framework; this level requires the communication system for bidirectional data exchange, allowing for more efficient by reducing fixed block constraints. Level 3 represents the highest degree of ETCS integration, featuring continuous radio-based communication with the RBC for movement authorities and enabling a system where trains report their exact positions and integrity directly via . Trackside train detection beyond balises is optional, as the onboard system supervises train integrity, potentially allowing for driverless operation; this facilitates virtual signaling, where blocks are defined dynamically between trains, significantly increasing line capacity by eliminating fixed track circuits. Level NTC (Non-ETCS National Train Control) accommodates legacy national systems (Class B) by using the ETCS onboard equipment as an through Specific Transmission Modules (STMs), which translate national track-to-train information into ETCS-compatible supervision. This level ensures seamless operation on non-standardized by bridging the national system's capabilities without full ETCS replacement, maintaining safety through the onboard ETCS while adapting to local signaling protocols. The ETCS levels are designed to build progressively upon one another, with higher levels incorporating the communication and supervision features of lower ones for — for instance, a Level 3-equipped train can operate in Levels 2, 1, or 0 when entering corresponding infrastructure. Transitions between levels are indicated to the driver via the Driver Machine Interface (DMI), requiring acknowledgment in certain cases, and higher levels like 2 and 3 mandate while progressively reducing the need for trackside equipment such as signals and fixed blocks.

Modes of Operation

The (ETCS), a core component of the European Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS), employs distinct modes of operation to govern train behavior under varying conditions, ensuring safety through automated supervision or driver responsibility. These modes define the level of automatic protection provided by the onboard equipment, ranging from full intervention to minimal oversight, and are activated based on available data from trackside systems, train characteristics, and operational context. The primary modes include Full Supervision (FS), Limited Supervision (LS), Staff Responsible (SR), On-Sight (OS), Shunting (SH), and Unfitted (UN), each tailored to specific scenarios such as normal line operations, degraded infrastructure, or non-ETCS territories. In Full Supervision (FS) mode, the onboard ETCS equipment provides complete automatic protection, supervising the train's speed and movement authority using a dynamic speed profile derived from the , , and track gradients. The system continuously monitors the train against intervention curves, including the Most Restrictive Speed Profile (MRSP), Emergency Brake curve (EBD), Service Brake curve (SBD), and , applying an emergency brake if limits are exceeded to prevent or unauthorized movement beyond the End of Authority (EOA). This mode is automatically entered when all necessary train and track data are available, enabling optimal performance in equipped territories without driver intervention for speed enforcement. Limited Supervision (LS) mode offers reduced automatic oversight compared to FS, activated in areas with incomplete trackside information, such as simplified speed profiles, where the driver must adhere to national rules or line-side signals while the system provides background . The onboard enforces a dynamic speed profile with relaxed intervention thresholds, applying a service brake if the mode-specific —typically 100 km/h unless overridden by national values—is exceeded, but allows greater driver flexibility for operations like following temporary restrictions. This mode ensures partial protection during transitions or in partially equipped sections, balancing safety with operational needs. Under Staff Responsible (SR) mode, the driver assumes full responsibility for train operation, with the ETCS system offering no automatic speed or movement authority enforcement beyond a basic maximum speed supervision up to 40 km/h (or national value V_NVSTFF). The system monitors a predefined maximum distance to run with zero target speed, triggering an emergency brake only if this distance is exceeded or an unexpected is encountered, making it suitable for non-ETCS areas, shunting transitions, or when position data is invalid. This mode relies on the driver's vigilance to prevent (SPAD) incidents, serving as a fallback for in legacy networks. On-Sight (OS) mode permits low-speed operations in visibility-limited or potentially occupied sections, such as depots or during degraded signaling, where must visually confirm the track is clear ahead. The system supervises speed against a dynamic profile, enforcing a release speed near the EOA or Supervised Location (SvL)—defaulting to 30-40 km/h (V_NVONSIGHT)—and applies a service brake if exceeded, but defers obstacle avoidance to . This mode facilitates cautious entry into restricted areas while maintaining basic automated limits to mitigate collision risks. Shunting (SH) mode is designed for short-range, low-speed maneuvers in yards or sidings, restricting operations to a ceiling speed of 30-40 km/h (V_NVSHUNT) without full movement authority supervision. The onboard equipment applies speed limits and triggers an emergency brake upon receiving an unconditional stop command or detecting an unexpected balise, but allows driver-initiated movements over short distances defined by the entry location. This mode supports efficient shunting while preventing unintended extensions into mainline traffic. Unfitted (UN) mode applies to ETCS-equipped trains operating on non-ETCS lines (Level 0), treating the train as unequipped and limiting speed to 100 km/h (V_NVUNFIT) using national data, with no automatic ETCS protection or display beyond basic speed supervision. The system relies on external signaling, displaying only essential information to the driver, ensuring safe fallback operation in legacy infrastructure without ETCS . Mode transitions are triggered by events such as entering equipped territory, level changes, trackside commands via Mode Profiles, or system states like , with handover procedures between Radio Block Centers (RBCs) maintaining continuous safety through automatic or driver-acknowledged shifts—typically within 5 seconds—and deletion of prior profiles upon new MA receipt. These transitions integrate with ETCS operational levels to support seamless progression from lower to higher supervision as infrastructure capabilities increase. Emergency modes include , which automatically applies the emergency brake upon exceeding movement authority or speed limits, requiring driver acknowledgment to resume, and Override, allowing temporary driver bypass of restrictions (e.g., for SPAD recovery) at reduced speeds (30 km/h or V_NVSUPOVTRP) for up to 200 m or 60 seconds before re-engaging protections.

History and Development

Origins and Evolution

The (ERTMS) originated in 1989 amid efforts by the and rail industry stakeholders to analyze signaling and train control challenges, aiming to overcome barriers in the sector following the initial liberalization measures introduced by Council Directive 91/440/EEC. This analysis was driven by the need to facilitate cross-border operations in a fragmented market where diverse national systems hindered efficient across . The initiative sought to create a unified signaling framework to support the emerging single European rail area, enhancing safety, capacity, and competitiveness against road and air transport. Formalization occurred in June 1991 when industry representatives from Eurosig and railway organizations including the (UIC) and the European Rail Research Institute (ERRI) A200 group signed an agreement establishing principles for close cooperation in developing specifications for the (ETCS), a core component of ERTMS. This pact marked the transition from conceptual studies to structured collaboration between manufacturers, operators, and regulators. Early evolution accelerated in the mid-1990s with the formation of the (EEIG) ERTMS Users Group in 1995 by major infrastructure managers such as (DB), Ferrovie dello Stato (FS), and Société Nationale des Chemins de fer Français (), which coordinated demonstration projects to validate ERTMS concepts on high-speed lines in , , and France. These efforts were supported under the European Union's Fourth Framework Programme, which outlined a master plan for ERTMS development including validation tests. The policy foundation for ERTMS was solidified through legislative mandates on . Council Directive 96/48/EC of 23 July 1996 addressed the trans-European system, requiring the adoption of Technical Specifications for (TSIs) to ensure essential requirements for subsystems like control-command and signaling. Complementing this, Directive 2001/16/EC of 19 March 2001 extended similar interoperability obligations to the conventional rail network, explicitly incorporating ERTMS elements such as ETCS and the (GSM-R) communication system into the TSIs to promote seamless operations. These directives shifted the focus from disparate national automatic train protection (ATP) systems—such as the (TVM) in for high-speed lines and intermittent ATP systems like Indusi in —to a harmonized ETCS/ architecture, reducing technical barriers and maintenance costs associated with legacy equipment. Pre-2000 developments included the standardization of , the dedicated radio communication backbone for ERTMS. In April 1995, the UIC-facilitated EIRENE (European Integrated Railway Radio Enhanced Network) was signed by 32 railway operators across , establishing functional and technical specifications for based on adapted GSM technology to support voice and data services for train control. Initial field trials of commenced in 1999, demonstrating its viability for real-time communication in operational environments, including shunting and mainline operations, ahead of broader integration with ETCS.

Key Milestones

In 2000, UNISIG finalized the first ERTMS technical specifications, known as Class 1 or ETCS Baseline 1, which established the foundational for the system's signaling and communication components. This baseline focused on basic train protection and continuous supervision, laying the groundwork for across European rail networks. Concurrently, the initial specifications (FRS 5/SRS 13) were released, providing the radio communication backbone for ERTMS, though full TSI adoption followed later. By 2003, the introduction of ETCS Baseline 2 brought improved functionality, including enhanced mode transitions and better integration with national systems, as reflected in SRS 2.2.2, which was accepted by the in 2002 and implemented in subsequent projects. This baseline enabled more flexible operations, such as hybrid levels combining ETCS with legacy systems. The first commercial ETCS Level 1 installations emerged around this period, with early deployments on high-speed lines like the initial phases of the Paris-Strasbourg route, where construction began in 2003 and testing advanced toward operational use. In 2006, ETCS Baseline 2.2.2 was standardized for hybrid level operations, allowing smoother transitions between ETCS and national systems while maintaining safety. The same year, the ERTMS Users Group, originally formed in , intensified its role in coordinating deployment strategies among infrastructure managers. Additionally, the issued the TSI for conventional systems (Decision 2006/679/EC), mandating ERTMS/ETCS and on trans-European networks. Development of ETCS Baseline 3 began in to the system against evolving needs like higher capacity and digital integration, building on prior baselines for . That year, the first ETCS Level 2 deployments went operational in the on the high-speed line, marking a milestone in radio-based continuous supervision without lineside signals. In 2015, Baseline 3 Release 1 became mandatory for new ERTMS projects via Commission Decision (EU) 2015/14, introducing refinements for greater stability and interoperability. Revisions to the TSI that year enforced ERTMS deployment on TEN-T corridors, prioritizing core freight and passenger routes. In 2016, Baseline 3 Release 2 was released, incorporating provisions for (ATO) integration to enable driverless or semi-automated functions in specific modes, enhancing capacity on equipped lines. By the end of , approximately 18,000 km of European rail lines were equipped with ERTMS, primarily ETCS Levels 1 and 2, according to aggregated deployment data from member states. In 2023, ETCS Baseline 4 was published alongside ATO Baseline 1, further advancing automation and compatibility with next-generation systems like FRMCS. In 2024, EU Regulation 2023/1695 updated the TSI to accelerate ERTMS rollout, mandating full equipping of the core TEN-T network by 2030 to boost cross-border efficiency and safety. This regulation ties ERTMS to broader digital rail goals, including FRMCS transition post-GSM-R. As of November 2025, the launched an accelerated plan and announced a 2026 ERTMS Deployment Plan to enhance rollout and achieve full interoperability by 2030 on priority lines.

Implementation and Deployment

Strategies and Approaches

The implementation of the (ERTMS) relies on a variety of strategies designed to balance goals with the practicalities of transitioning from diverse national signaling systems. These approaches emphasize phased integration, economic viability, and rigorous validation to minimize disruptions while achieving seamless cross-border operations. Central to this is the (ETCS), which forms the core of ERTMS, supported by targeted upgrades to both and . One primary strategy is the 'clean' ETCS operation, involving the full replacement of legacy train protection systems with pure ETCS on newly constructed or comprehensively upgraded lines. This method maximizes and capacity gains by eliminating redundant signaling elements, such as traditional lineside signals in ETCS Level 2 deployments, and reduces long-term costs for infrastructure managers. However, it demands significant upfront investment for complete , making it suitable for projects or high-priority corridors where legacy systems are obsolete. For instance, has adopted this approach on main lines, aiming for pure ETCS deployment by 2025 to streamline supervision modes. In contrast, mixed operation overlays ETCS onto existing national systems using Specific Transmission Modules (STMs), enabling gradual adoption without immediate decommissioning of legacy infrastructure. STMs serve as interfaces that translate Class B national signaling data into ETCS-compatible formats for the onboard Driver Machine Interface, allowing ETCS-equipped trains to operate safely on non-ETCS lines at Level NTC (National Train Control). This hybrid setup facilitates incremental upgrades, particularly on shared networks, and supports during the transition phase by permitting dual-mode functionality where trains switch between ETCS and national systems seamlessly. Such strategies are essential for avoiding service interruptions on dense, legacy-heavy routes. Migration strategies follow a phased rollout aligned with the EU Technical Specifications for (TSI) for Control-Command and Signalling (CCS TSI), prioritizing the (TEN-T) core network to foster pan-European interoperability. This involves sequential upgrades starting with key corridors, including retrofitting locomotives with ERTMS kits—modular onboard units that integrate ETCS and components—and trackside enhancements like installations and Radio Block Centre (RBC) deployments. The approach ensures synchronized progress between infrastructure and vehicles, with EU funding mechanisms accelerating fitment on critical paths to create 'hot spots' of full ERTMS coverage. Economic approaches underpin these migrations through cost-benefit analyses conducted via the ERTMS Business Case Model, developed by the to evaluate across core network corridors. The model assesses deployment scenarios, factoring in reduced lifecycle costs, increased line capacity, and benefits against initial CAPEX for retrofits and upgrades, demonstrating positive returns for prioritized TEN-T routes. To address funding gaps, public-private partnerships (PPPs) are employed, where private entities finance and manage ERTMS installations in exchange for long-term operational concessions, as seen in select corridor projects that leverage EU Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) grants alongside private investment. Testing and certification processes ensure system reliability and , utilizing ERA-approved test centers for comprehensive validation against the (SRS). These centers conduct for ETCS components, simulating operational scenarios to verify compliance with CCS TSI baselines, including baseline 3 and emerging baseline 4 features. The Agency for Railways (ERA) oversees this framework, issuing certificates of conformity for onboard and trackside subsystems only after successful interoperability tests, thereby guaranteeing safe integration across member states. Backward compatibility is maintained through dual-mode operations, where retrofitted locomotives and signaling systems support both ERTMS and protocols during the overlap period. This transitional arrangement, often facilitated by STMs and configurable onboard software, prevents disruptions by allowing non-ERTMS vehicles to continue service on upgraded lines while ETCS trains operate in full mode, progressively phasing out national systems as adoption matures.

Current Status and Progress

As of November 2025, the deployment of the (ETCS) across the EU's (TEN-T) core network stands at 15%, consistent with reports from the end of 2024 and 2023, while coverage remains at 61% on these corridors. This progress aligns with the EU's TEN-T , which mandates full ETCS equipping of the core network by 2030 to enhance and safety. In November 2025, the launched an accelerated plan and outlined a 2026 ERTMS Deployment Plan to boost rollout toward full by 2030 on priority lines. Country-level implementation varies significantly, with frontrunners demonstrating advanced integration. aims to equip its entire network with ETCS by the end of 2025 but has delayed mandatory ETCS-only operations (decommissioning legacy Class B systems) to December 2027. In the , ETCS Level 2 predominates on key lines, supporting efficient cross-border operations. leads in coverage, with all high-speed lines fully equipped with ETCS, contributing to its status as one of Europe's top implementers by equipped kilometers. In contrast, Eastern European countries such as those in the and Balkan regions lag with less than 10% national network coverage, reflecting slower infrastructure upgrades and funding challenges. Equipped infrastructure and continue to expand, with over 30,000 km of rail lines now fitted with ETCS across , including more than 7,965 km on CNCs as a baseline from recent years, and thousands of locomotives retrofitted for compatibility. New installations adhere to the Baseline 3 Release 2 standard, ensuring enhanced functionality and future-proofing for hybrid operations. The European Union Agency for Railways (ERA) 2025 Interoperability Overview highlights this uneven rollout, noting 61% GSM-R penetration on CNCs but stalled ETCS progress on several corridors, such as the Baltic-Adriatic and Orient/East-Med, where equipping remains below 10%. Beyond Europe, ETCS adoption is extending globally for interoperability, with mandating its use in all future rail projects to align with European standards, deploying it on select high-density corridors, and integrating ERTMS on major lines like the Haramain high-speed route.

Challenges and Future Developments

Technical and Regulatory Challenges

The deployment of the European Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS) faces significant technical challenges, particularly with issues in Baseline 3. Compatibility problems arise when Baseline 2 attempts to operate on Baseline 3 tracks, leading to failed tests and delays in cross-border operations. Retrofitting older fleets presents further hurdles, including the need for precise to ensure accurate train positioning and speed measurement, which is critical for ETCS functionality but often requires extensive upgrades on vehicles. Additionally, the radio system, integral to ERTMS, is approaching end-of-life by 2030, with increasing spectrum congestion from interference threatening reliable communication for train control. Cost barriers exacerbate these technical difficulties, with high upfront investments required for and . Trackside ERTMS deployment typically costs between €400,000 and €1.44 million per kilometer, depending on complexity and existing signaling . On-board or upgrades for locomotives range from €200,000 to €900,000 per unit, driven by rising component prices and customization needs. Funding remains fragmented across member states, with national budgets and EU grants like the Connecting Europe Facility allocated unevenly, leading to inconsistent progress and reliance on project-specific financing. Regulatory hurdles continue to impede widespread , including delays in national migration plans that lack synchronized timelines for ERTMS rollout. Varying certification processes across member states complicate with Technical Specifications for Interoperability (TSIs), resulting in prolonged approval cycles and inconsistent enforcement. Decommissioning timelines for legacy Class B systems are set between 2025 and 2040, but uneven implementation risks prolonged dual-system operations and higher maintenance costs. Human factors add to the complexity, as drivers require specialized training to operate the new Driver Machine Interfaces (DMIs) in ETCS, which differ significantly from traditional signaling displays and demand adaptation to automated supervision features. Legacy system operators have shown resistance, citing operational disruptions and the steep as barriers to transitioning from familiar national systems. Supply chain constraints further contribute to project delays, with a limited number of qualified suppliers for ETCS and GSM-R components creating bottlenecks in procurement and installation. This scarcity has led to reported cost overruns of 20-30% in several implementations, compounded by dependency on a few key vendors for specialized hardware. As of the end of 2024, these challenges have resulted in only about 15% ETCS deployment on the Core Network Corridors, underscoring the need for coordinated action to meet EU targets.

Transition to Next-Generation Systems

The European Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS) is undergoing continuous enhancements through its Baseline 3 framework, with ongoing maintenance releases ensuring and reliability across deployments. The latest iteration, Baseline 3 Release 2, incorporates prior updates and maintains for seamless integration with existing infrastructure. Future developments, including Baseline 4 as an extension of Baseline 3, aim to bolster (ATO) capabilities, particularly at Grades of Automation (GoA) 2 and 4, enabling driver-assisted and fully automated operations to improve capacity and safety on main lines. A key aspect of ERTMS evolution involves integrating the Future Railway Mobile Communication System (FRMCS), designed to succeed the GSM-R network after 2030 and fully replace it with timelines varying from 2033 to 2044 or later across member states, including coexistence with FRMCS until around 2040. FRMCS leverages 5G technology for broadband connectivity, supporting data rates up to 100 Mbps—far exceeding GSM-R's limitations—and facilitating a shift to IP-based communications for enhanced multimedia applications. This integration will enable hybrid ERTMS/FRMCS configurations, with ongoing trials in 2025 testing interoperability, paving the way for rollout and supporting advanced features like virtual coupling of trains and predictive maintenance through real-time data analytics. In November 2025, the launched an accelerated plan, including a revised 2026 ERTMS Deployment Plan to enforce harmonized rollout obligations and achieve enhanced on priority core network corridors by 2030. The European Union's roadmap for ERTMS advancement is supported by initiatives like Shift2Rail and its successor, Europe's Rail Joint Undertaking, which provide substantial funding—such as €245 million in recent calls—for research into digital rail technologies. These efforts target a 2040 vision of fully digital, automated rail networks that enhance connectivity, sustainability, and cross-border operations across the EU. Globally, ERTMS serves as the foundation for international rail signaling standards, with over 50% of worldwide investments occurring outside the as of 2021, including adaptations in countries like , , and to suit local operational needs. Non-EU European nations such as and have integrated ERTMS into their networks, promoting harmonized cross-border traffic and influencing standards in regions like the and .

References

  1. [1]
    ERTMS - Mobility and Transport - European Commission
    ERTMS is a safety system that enforces compliance from trains with speed restrictions and signalling status.
  2. [2]
    European Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS)
    ERTMS is a single European signalling and speed control system that ensures interoperability of the national railway systems.
  3. [3]
    FAQ on ERTMS - Mobility and Transport - European Commission
    ERTMS stands for 'European Railway Traffic Management System'. It is a control, command, signalling and communication system. It is a software-based system ...
  4. [4]
    What is ERTMS and how does it work? - Mobility and Transport
    ETCS (European Train Control System) is a train control standard, based on in-cab equipment able to supervise train movements, including stopping the train, ...
  5. [5]
    ETCS Levels and Modes - Mobility and Transport
    The levels and operation modes are fundamental concepts of the ETCS system (European Train Control System). ETCS Levels. Level 1 involves continuous ...
  6. [6]
    Control Command and Signalling TSI
    Different ERTMS baselines, as specified in Appendix A to TSI CCS, may coexist together in vehicles and trackside equipments: ETCS baseline 2 and GSM-R baseline ...Missing: date | Show results with:date
  7. [7]
    History of ERTMS - Mobility and Transport - European Commission
    At the end of 1990, a group of infrastructure managers with shared interests (ERTMS Users' Group) created the initial version of ERTMS as we know it, intending ...Missing: key | Show results with:key
  8. [8]
    https://www.era.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2025-09/annual%2520overview%2520for%2520interoperability%2520-%25202025.pdf
  9. [9]
    https://transport.ec.europa.eu/news-events/news/commission-launches-plan-accelerate-high-speed-rail-across-europe-2025-11-05_en
  10. [10]
    [PDF] A single European rail traffic management system
    Aug 2, 2017 · European Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS): A major European industrial project which aims to replace the different national train control ...
  11. [11]
    A single European rail traffic management system
    ERTMS is intended to guarantee a common standard that enables trains to travel uninterrupted across different countries and facilitate rail competitiveness. III.
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Memorandum of Understanding - European Union
    ERTMS is a major initiative to harmonise the automatic train control and communication system, ensure interoperability throughout the rail system in Europe and ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  13. [13]
    Technical Specifications for Interoperability (TSIs)
    The Technical Specifications for Interoperability (TSIs) are mandatory. Appendices are fully part of the TSIs and so, are also mandatory (ie legally binding).
  14. [14]
    [PDF] revised ERTMS deployment requirements (Impact Assessment)
    ERTMS refers to two systems: o. ETCS (European Train Control System), a system able to supervise train movements and to stop the train if the permitted speed is ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] The ERTMS/ETCS signalling system - railwaysignalling.eu
    4.1 SOME HISTORY ABOUT ERTMS ... ERTMS Key Management GE/RT8403 Issue One -. December 2011. Railway Group Standard. [R22]. Interlocking Principles GE/RT0060 ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  16. [16]
    What are the benefits? - Mobility and Transport - European Union
    Increased capacity​​ ERTMS makes it possible to reduce the minimum distance or time between trains, which increases the network capacity. The precise scale of ...Missing: line 50% source
  17. [17]
    [PDF] FOSTERING THE RAILWAY SECTOR THROUGH THE EUROPEAN ...
    Coupled with lighter trains and higher loading factor, ATO can lead to energy savings between 20% and 50%. Also, ATO coupled with ERTMS/ETCS deployment, will.
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Training on Interoperability and Safety ERTMS
    ERTMS Benefits. • Infrastructure Managers. – Increase safety, higher speeds, higher capacity on lines, potential maintenance costs reduction, high reliability ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] European Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS) - HAL-SHS
    ... ERTMS system provides an increase in traffic capacity of nearly 50% (cf. ... ERTMS on the main axes to benefit from the EU subsidies and increase capacity.
  20. [20]
    ERTMS® Benefits
    Reduced maintenance costs: With ERTMS® level 2, trackside signalling is no longer required, which considerably reduces maintenance costs; An opened supply ...Missing: economic single
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Safety Requirements for the Technical Interoperability of ETCS in ...
    ... European Di- rectives on the Interoperability of the rail system. Figure 1: The ERTMS/ETCS Reference Architecture in its Context. 4.2.1.2. With “ERTMS/ETCS ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Specific Transmission Module FFFIS
    10.6.5.3 The extension is transmission of button events from ETCS DMI to STM. ... 13.1.2.4 The Specific STM Data View Values transmitted by the STM to the ETCS ...
  23. [23]
    GSM-R | UIC - International union of railways
    May 18, 2022 · GSM-R is an international wireless communications standard for railway communication and applications. The GSM-R specifications and a set of ...
  24. [24]
    Radio Communication | European Union Agency for Railways
    GSM-R is a radio system for railway operations, providing voice, data, and communication between drivers and traffic control, and is the data bearer for ETCS.
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Evolution of GSM-R - European Union Agency for Railways
    As long as a future successor to GSM-R were to operate in frequency bands similar to or slightly lower than the frequency band of GSM-. R, and assuming no ...
  26. [26]
    [PDF] ETSI TR 103 333 V1.1.1 (2017-02)
    GSM-R thus has been granted a EU harmonised frequency band, the UIC frequency band. In addition to this, the band 873 - 876 MHz paired with 918 - 921 MHz has ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] CEPT Report 76
    876-880 MHz / 921-925 MHz for GSM-R; ▪ 27.090-27.100 MHz for balise telepowering. Commission Decision 2006/771/EC [6] as amended [7] on SRD harmonises three ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] GSM-R interferences and coexistence
    Jul 13, 2016 · The frequency bands 876-880 MHz and 921-925 MHz (R-GSM band) are harmonised for railway communication in Europe. Adjacent to the R-GSM bands are ...
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Subset-023 Glossary of Terms and Abbreviation
    APPLICATION LEVEL The different ERTMS/ETCS application levels are a way to express the possible operating relationships between track and train. Level ...
  30. [30]
    [PDF] ERTMS/ETCS Functional Requirements Specification FRS
    Jun 21, 2007 · 0, trains equipped for ERTMS/ETCS application level 2 shall be able to run on lines equipped with ERTMS/ETCS application level 2, 1 and. 0 ...
  31. [31]
    ERTMS® History
    In July 2009, the first adoption of the European ERTMS® Deployment plan marks a new milestone for ERTMS®. For the first time, the retrofitting of ERTMS® on a ...Missing: key | Show results with:key
  32. [32]
    20 years of working together in rail: The EEIG ERTMS Users Group
    Jul 26, 2015 · This European Economic Interest Grouping was founded on the 1 August 1995 by DB, FS and SNCF with the aim to demonstrate the concept of ERTMS ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] GSM-R Implementation and Procurement Guide
    Mar 15, 2009 · This guide is about GSM-R implementation and procurement, based on UIC's experience, and aims to offer the benefit of this rich experience.
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Transferring standards: lessons from GSM-R in the railway sector
    Sep 20, 2008 · The UIC set up two projects were used between 1995 and 2000 to develop the European railway communications standard (GSM-R). Operators and ...
  35. [35]
    ERTMS - Groupe SNCF
    Mar 12, 2024 · ERTMS aims to harmonize Europe's rail signalling system—a vital step towards railway interoperability and better network performance.
  36. [36]
    Government approves Dutch ETCS roll-out strategy - Railway Gazette
    Apr 14, 2014 · The government has now agreed that ETCS Level 2 should be adopted as the standard train control system, replacing the increasingly obsolete ATB automatic train ...
  37. [37]
    None
    **Total km of lines equipped with ETCS in Europe by 2023:**
  38. [38]
    New ERA Report: The Railway Safety and Interoperability in the EU
    Jul 8, 2024 · Interoperability and Efficiency: ERTMS transforms European railways into a seamless interoperable network by enhancing operational efficiency, ...
  39. [39]
    ERTMS Unpacked: Technical Implementation and Operational ...
    Jun 30, 2025 · Migration Strategies: The transition from diverse legacy systems to a unified ERTMS environment is complex. It often involves “overlay” ...
  40. [40]
    State of play - Mobility and Transport - European Commission
    ETCS was deployed on the whole network of Luxembourg at the end of 2017. The Netherlands has already finalised the deployment of the sections planned by 2023 as ...
  41. [41]
    ERTMS business case on the 9 core network corridors
    Jun 27, 2019 · ERTMS business case on the 9 core network corridors · Second release : executive summary · Publication metadata · Available languages and ...
  42. [42]
    In graphs: Europe's uneven ERTMS rollout laid bare in new ERA ...
    Oct 17, 2025 · Fresh data from the European Union Agency for Railways on interoperability in the EU shows Europe's ERTMS rollout remains highly uneven, ...
  43. [43]
    The State of the EU's Rail Infrastructure - Transport & Environment
    Jun 24, 2025 · The European Commission estimates that completing the TEN-T core network by 2030 will cost an estimated €515 billion. ... core TEN-T networks ...
  44. [44]
    https://www.transportenvironment.org/articles/the-state-of-the-eus-rail-infrastructure
  45. [45]
    [PDF] Second Work Plan of the European Coordinator
    Figure 30 Mediterranean Corridor ERTMS deployment status ... - Belgium, the whole network is expected to be equipped with ERTMS by 2025. Class B.
  46. [46]
    ETCS - Infrabel
    The target is that, by the end of 2025, all trains in Belgium will be using ETCS. Between now and then, we need to equip the entire infrastructure with ETCS.
  47. [47]
    [PDF] Rail Network access challenges following the deployment of ERTMS
    The Core Network mainly includes the high-speed lines. • The Comprehensive Network aims to ensure the connectivity of all regions in the EU. • With the revision ...
  48. [48]
    ERTMS: High-performance, European-standard signalling
    Aug 6, 2025 · A European standard. ERTMS promotes interoperability across Europe's rail networks, making cross-border traffic smoother and more efficient.Missing: IBC | Show results with:IBC
  49. [49]
    Australia to adopt ETCS in all future projects
    Aug 15, 2025 · The Australian government has agreed to make ETCS mandatory for all future digital signalling and control systems on the national network.
  50. [50]
    Australia to adopt ETCS for interoperable rail network
    Aug 19, 2025 · Australia to adopt ETCS for interoperable rail network. By Railway Gazette International19 August 2025. Save article. Please Sign in to your ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  51. [51]
    Rail Communications Standards | FRMCS - ETSI
    UNITEL, the Rail Industry Group has indicated that support of GSM-R products and services are guaranteed at least until 2030 on a general basis and beyond 2030 ...
  52. [52]
    ERTMS: what is Baseline 3 and why are rolling stock lessors ...
    Jan 23, 2025 · Europe's rolling stock lessors have warned the EU about not pushing for Baseline 3 upgrades in the ERTMS rollout. So what is B3 and why is ...
  53. [53]
    Onboard Integration of ETCS Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3 Systems ...
    May 21, 2025 · Odometry and Sensor Fusion: Accurate location and speed determination (odometry) is critical for ETCS, especially as trackside detection and ...
  54. [54]
    How Does ETCS Impact Legacy Fleets? - EKE-Electronics
    Enhanced Safety: ETCS minimises the risk of collisions and over speeding by providing real-time speed supervision.Missing: prevents SPAD
  55. [55]
    FRMCS moves forward - ERTMS.net
    Jul 22, 2024 · IN 2015, GSM-R suppliers informed the rail industry that GSM-R will be obsolete by 2030. While they have committed to supporting GSM-R until ...
  56. [56]
    Construction Costs: Signaling | Pedestrian Observations
    May 15, 2018 · But contracts for equipping the tracks for ETCS are being let, and the cost per kilometer is about €400,000, or $500,000. The higher cost quoted ...Missing: implementation | Show results with:implementation
  57. [57]
    EU audit shines a light on ERTMS challenges
    Nov 15, 2017 · With an average cost for trackside systems of €1.44m per km on these two networks, the auditors calculated that the total cost of deployment ...
  58. [58]
    [PDF] ERTMS ON-BOARD DEPLOYMENT - ANALYSIS OF COST DRIVERS
    In the “ERTMS business case on the 9 core network corridors” published in. 201910, a suite of target values for retrofit and upgrade costs were set based on.
  59. [59]
    ERTMS implementation costs have doubled between 2018 and 2022
    Apr 30, 2025 · “Retrofitting costs have grown from 450,000 to 900,000 euros per vehicle, and upgrade costs have increased from 200,000 to 400,000 euros”, the ...<|separator|>
  60. [60]
    Signal – The ERTMS Newsletter - European Commission
    ... environmental impact, boost energy efficiency, and improve safety. With a total 7-year budget of €25.81 billion, including €11.29 billion designated for ...
  61. [61]
    European cross-border infrastructure projects urge the EU to ...
    Jun 26, 2025 · They warn that redirecting EU transport funding toward fragmented ... (ERTMS) and comply with all relevant EU standards. With a design speed ...
  62. [62]
    New TEN-T: extra ERTMS deployment deadlines, unclear vision for ...
    Apr 26, 2024 · Simultaneously, the deadlines for the decommissioning of Class B systems are also revised: decommissioning should occur at the latest, at ...Missing: timelines | Show results with:timelines
  63. [63]
    [PDF] ERTMS roll out from a train driver's perspective
    Such a level transition is announced to the driver on the DMI ETCS and the driver must timely acknowledge the transition by pushing a button to prevent a brake ...Missing: resistance | Show results with:resistance
  64. [64]
    ERTMS E-learning Course | European Union Agency for Railways
    Mar 24, 2025 · Discover our new e-learning course on railway signalling and ERTMS evolution. This free course covers section blocks, interlockings, ETCS levels, and radio ...
  65. [65]
    A big data analysis of learning and retaining the new ERTMS system
    Nov 2, 2021 · Furthermore, procedures, driving skills and communication will alter. Many train drivers will thus need to be trained in driving with ERTMS.Missing: DMI legacy operators<|separator|>
  66. [66]
    [PDF] First Work Plan of the European Coordinator - Mobility and Transport
    The work plan includes stocktaking of ERTMS deployment, trackside and rolling stock deployment, business case, funding, removal of barriers, and operational ...
  67. [67]
    [PDF] Interoperability Overview 2025 - European Union Agency for Railways
    ERTMS deployment on the CNC network had reached 15 % (ETCS) and 61 % (GSM-R) at the end of February. 20236; a substantially greater effort is needed to meet ...
  68. [68]
    Automatic Train Operation takes to the main line
    Jan 30, 2018 · The ERTMS Users Group subsequently devised an operational concept for main line GoA 2-4 and this in turn fed into the development of a Unisig ...Missing: Releases | Show results with:Releases
  69. [69]
    FRMCS or the Future Railway Mobile Communication System
    Mar 15, 2024 · The Future Railway Mobile Communication System (FRMCS-5G) is the European railway communication system that will replace GSM-R (2G) by 2035.Missing: post- 100 Mbps IP
  70. [70]
    FRMCS | UIC - International union of railways
    Sep 19, 2023 · FRMCS is the future worldwide telecommunication system designed by UIC as the successor to GSM-R, and a key enabler for rail transport ...Missing: 2030 100 Mbps IP
  71. [71]
    Future Railway Mobile Communication System (FRMCS) Solution
    LTE broadband technology is introduced to support up to 100 Mbps data transmission, enriching railway applications, such as intelligent management ...Missing: replace post- 2030 IP migration ERTMS
  72. [72]
    Trials of FRMCS, the New Railway Communications Standard to ...
    Apr 30, 2024 · Trials of FRMCS, the New Railway Communications Standard to Begin in 2025—2026. Curated by: Gert Jan Wolf - Editor-in Chief for The Critical ...Missing: ERTMS hybrid rollout 2035 virtual coupling predictive<|separator|>
  73. [73]
    UIC FRMCS Conference 2025: tackling the challenge of ...
    Oct 15, 2025 · In the future, FRMCS will go beyond this foundation allowing higher capacity, supporting automation, enabling predictive maintenance, and ...Missing: ERTMS hybrid rollout 2035 virtual coupling
  74. [74]
    Press Release: Europe's Rail launches €245 million worth Call for ...
    Oct 7, 2025 · Europe's Rail Joint Undertaking (JU) is pleased to announce the launch of its Call for Proposals 2025-02, with a total EU funding of €148.2 ...Missing: ERTMS 2040 vision
  75. [75]
    https://www.criticalcommunicationsreview.com/ccr/other-news/113399/trials-of-frmcs-the-new-railway-communications-standard-to-begin-in-2025-2026
  76. [76]
    [PDF] 7. ERTMS deployment outside Europe
    Indeed, regardless of interoperability, ERTMS brings considerable advantages to the railways worldwide: - Increased capacity on existing lines and a greater ...