Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Facesitting

Facesitting, also termed queening or kinging, is a sexual practice involving one partner positioning their buttocks and genitals over the face of another, typically to enable oral stimulation of the , , or , or to incorporate elements of dominance, submission, and potential breath restriction. Predominantly featured within contexts, it accentuates power imbalances, with the seated individual exerting control, often augmented by restraints or specialized apparatus like smotherboxes or designed to immobilize the recipient and mitigate strain. While empirical data on its precise prevalence remains sparse, broader surveys indicate substantial interest in BDSM activities, with up to 47% of adults reporting engagement in dominance-submission dynamics. Notwithstanding its appeal for intensified sensory experiences, facesitting carries inherent hazards, including suffocation and , though documented fatalities in consensual BDSM practices are infrequent relative to other risks.

Definition and Terminology

Core Definition

Facesitting is a sexual practice in which one positions their , genitals, or both over the face of another who is typically lying , enabling direct with the genitals or for stimulation. The receiving may or hover to control pressure and duration, often incorporating elements of dominance or submission depending on the context. This positioning facilitates , , , or non-penetrative erotic , with variations allowing for full or lighter to avoid discomfort. The practice is gender-neutral and can involve any combination of partners, though it frequently features a dominant —commonly —over a submissive one, emphasizing power dynamics in scenarios. In such contexts, facesitting may extend beyond stimulation to include breath play or , heightening psychological intensity for participants. Empirical accounts from sex educators note its appeal in promoting intimacy through vulnerability and control, though preferences vary widely based on physical compatibility and .

Etymology and Synonyms

The term "facesitting" is a compound noun formed from "face" and "sitting," directly describing the positioning of one partner's body over the other's facial region during intimate contact. This entered English vernacular primarily in the late 20th century, coinciding with the documentation of practices in specialized and communities, though the act itself predates the specific label. Synonyms for facesitting include "queening," a term evoking regal dominance where a positions herself atop a male partner's face, often traced to erotic writings emphasizing power dynamics rather than mere physicality. "Kinging" serves as a gender-inverted counterpart, applied when a man assumes the dominant seating role. Additional descriptors such as "smothering," "face riding," or "oral servitude" highlight variations focusing on breath restriction, rhythmic motion, or subservient elements, respectively, though these carry connotations of intensity or fetishization not inherent to the core act.

Historical Development

Ancient and Pre-Modern References

Practices analogous to modern facesitting, involving oral-genital stimulation with one partner positioned over the other's face, appear in ancient erotic art, though not explicitly termed as such. Frescoes from Pompeii's Suburban (c. 62–79 CE) depict scenes where a straddles or kneels above a reclining man, facilitating mouth-to-genital contact in a dominant posture. Similar motifs occur in other Pompeian brothel and domestic erotic imagery, reflecting casual integration of such acts in elite and commercial sexuality, without evidence of fetishization or risk emphasis seen today. In ancient Indian texts, the Kāma Sūtra (c. 3rd–4th century ) details aupariṣṭhaka ( techniques), including positions like the "" where the woman kneels or sits over the man's face for stimulation, prioritizing female pleasure through controlled positioning. These descriptions frame the act within broader embrace classifications (samputa), emphasizing mutual arousal rather than dominance or asphyxiation. Pre-modern European and claims of specialized "queening chairs" or institutionalized female-dominant oral servitude—often cited in online narratives as medieval or ancient customs—lack corroboration and derive from 20th-century fabrications. Medieval birthing stools have been misconstrued as sexual furniture, while harem accounts in sources like the Encyclopaedia Iranica show no such devices or rituals, highlighting how anecdotal modern lore supplants empirical history. No peer-reviewed evidence supports widespread pre-modern facesitting as a codified or furniture-aided practice beyond interpretive readings of general .

Emergence in Modern BDSM Culture

Facesitting, often termed queening within contexts, emerged as a distinct practice in 20th-century fetish subcultures, particularly aligning with the rise of organized sadomasochistic () communities. It developed from the sado-masochistic emphasis on using the submissive partner's face—, , and —as a means of control and , substituting for penetrative intercourse to heighten dominance dynamics. This positioning allowed the dominant, typically female in femdom scenarios, to dictate the pace and intensity of oral-genital or oral-anal stimulation, reinforcing power imbalances central to play. The practice gained traction in underground erotica and fetish literature during the early , evolving into more structured expressions amid the post-World War II and scenes, where specialized furniture like queening stools or chairs began to appear to facilitate prolonged sessions. These devices, designed for comfort and restraint, symbolized aristocratic role-play, with the dominant perched as on a , underscoring themes of servitude and elevation of feminine authority. By the mid-, queening integrated into broader subcultures, paralleling the of the 1960s and 1970s, which fostered greater visibility for alternative sexual expressions including female-led dominance. Its modern codification reflects the democratization of through print and early online communities in the late , where queening was framed not merely as a physical act but as a psychological tool for submission training and . Sources from this era, often self-published guides or niche periodicals, highlight its appeal in countercultural rebellions against norms, though empirical documentation remains anecdotal due to the nature of early networks. The term's cultural ripple extended to , such as the parody "," which popularized the concept beyond insular circles, albeit in humorous form.

Techniques and Variations

Basic Positions and Methods

In facesitting, the receiving partner typically lies on a or firm surface, while the sitting partner straddles or kneels over their face, positioning the , , or to enable oral-genital or oral-anal contact. The sitting partner supports their weight primarily through the knees or thighs to allow the receiver breathing space, often hovering rather than applying full body weight. Basic methods emphasize controlled movement for , such as subtle grinding, rocking, or thrusting of the hips to vary on the , , or other erogenous zones. Communication via non-verbal signals, like hand taps, is integrated to adjust position or pause if needed. Common positions include:
  • Forward straddling: The sitter faces toward the receiver's , aligning genitals over the for direct clitoral or vaginal ; this allows and permits the receiver to grasp the sitter's hips or thighs.
  • Reverse straddling: The sitter faces away toward the receiver's feet, facilitating alternative angles for anal or enhanced clitoral access through hip rotation.
  • Hovering or one-knee variant: The sitter bends at the knees to or places one knee down for partial support, reducing smothering risk while building confidence; this is recommended for to modulate intensity.
These positions can incorporate under the receiver's head or the sitter's knees to optimize alignment and comfort without specialized equipment.

Associated Practices and Furniture

Facesitting is commonly associated with practices emphasizing , particularly in femdom scenarios where it facilitates oral-genital or oral-anal stimulation of the dominant partner. It often incorporates elements of breath play or controlled asphyxiation, where the dominant partner restricts the submissive's airflow to intensify psychological control and physical sensation. These practices heighten dynamics, as the submissive relinquishes control over breathing to the dominant. Variations may include reverse facesitting for anal focus or forward positioning for genital emphasis, sometimes combined with restraints to prevent movement. In some contexts, it overlaps with smothering, a aimed at temporary air deprivation for effect, distinct from mere positioning by intent to overwhelm. Specialized furniture enhances these practices by providing structured support. A queening stool is a low, open-seated positioned over the submissive's face, allowing the dominant to sit comfortably while enabling oral access through a central aperture. Similarly, a smotherbox secures the submissive's head in a padded enclosure, often with neck and arm restraints, to facilitate prolonged facesitting sessions with minimized escape. These devices, integral to modern dungeon setups, originated within 20th-century culture rather than ancient traditions, despite unsubstantiated claims linking them to medieval or artifacts, which historical analysis identifies as birthing chairs repurposed in myth.

Health and Safety

Physiological Risks

Facesitting poses significant physiological risks primarily due to the potential for airway obstruction and restricted , which can result in suffocation or . The weight and positioning of the sitting partner's body—often involving direct contact with the face, nose, and mouth—can fully or partially block oxygen intake, leading to or . Medical experts note that such breath play activities carry a high risk of serious injury, including , from oxygen deprivation, and death, even in consensual scenarios. In contexts, where facesitting may incorporate elements of dominance or prolonged smothering, empirical reviews of fatal outcomes identify strangulation and asphyxiation as the leading causes of death, surpassing other practices like whipping or . A 2021 of BDSM-related fatalities found that while overall lethal incidents are rarer than in solo asphyxiation, the physiologic mechanisms involve from impeded blood flow or ventilation, with contributing factors such as , drugs, or partner miscommunication exacerbating risks. Facesitting-specific hazards include uneven causing excessive pressure on the underlying partner's head and , potentially leading to musculoskeletal strain or , though documented cases remain anecdotal rather than systematically studied. Additional risks encompass exposure to bodily fluids during oral-genital or anal contact, facilitating transmission of infections like bloodborne pathogens (e.g., or C) if microtears or open wounds are present. Prolonged sessions may also induce petechiae (subconjunctival hemorrhages) from venous obstruction or elevate , mirroring patterns observed in non-sexual suffocation events. Despite these dangers, no large-scale peer-reviewed studies isolate facesitting fatalities, underscoring a gap in empirical data beyond broader breath play analyses.

Risk Mitigation and Empirical Evidence

Empirical data on facesitting-specific injuries remain limited, with most research focusing on broader or breath play in contexts. A 2021 literature review of BDSM fatalities identified only three deaths linked to partnered consensual activities, compared to 22 from asphyxiation, underscoring that partnered breath control, including potential facesitting elements, carries elevated but infrequent risks primarily from unintended . asphyxia alone accounts for an estimated 250 to 1,000 annual U.S. deaths, often due to airway obstruction mechanisms analogous to smothering in facesitting. Peer-reviewed analyses emphasize as the causal pathway, with no facesitting-exclusive cohorts but warnings that full facial coverage exacerbates oxygen deprivation beyond partial . Risk mitigation strategies derive from safety protocols rather than controlled trials, prioritizing prevention of unconsciousness or positional entrapment. Key recommendations include establishing non-verbal safe signals (e.g., hand taps) due to impaired verbalization, limiting session durations to under 30 seconds per obstruction, and maintaining constant visual/auditory monitoring by the dominant partner to detect or distress. Furniture like queening stools or smotherboxes can distribute weight and permit quicker disengagement, reducing full-body compression on the airway compared to direct sitting, though they do not eliminate risks. Pre-activity health screenings for respiratory conditions and post-session debriefs further aid causality assessment in adverse events. No empirical studies demonstrate zero-risk facesitting, as physiological limits on oxygen intake preclude safe prolonged obstruction; guidelines universally classify breath play as "edge" activity with irreversible potential outcomes like from even non-fatal episodes. Biomarkers such as elevated S100B in frequent participants indicate subtle neural , supporting conservative approaches over reliance on subjective . Practitioners attributing to experience overlook first-principles oxygen debt accumulation, where empirical fatality rarity reflects underreporting rather than inherent harmlessness.

Psychological Dimensions

Dominance and Submission Dynamics

In BDSM contexts, facesitting serves as a pronounced manifestation of dominance and submission, wherein the dominant partner exerts physical and psychological control by positioning their body over the submissive's face, often restricting airflow or movement to underscore vulnerability and obedience. This practice, sometimes termed queening, emphasizes the submissive's surrender of autonomy, as the face— a highly sensitive and identity-associated area—becomes a site of enforced intimacy and potential sensory deprivation. Empirical reviews of BDSM activities indicate that such power exchanges hinge on consensual negotiation, with dominance reinforcing hierarchical roles through acts that symbolize total capitulation, while submission derives arousal from the thrill of yielded agency. Psychologically, the dynamics evoke a profound trust-building , as the submissive must rely on the dominant's restraint to avoid harm, particularly in variants incorporating breath play, where intermittent asphyxiation amplifies perceived and endorphin release. Research on practitioners reveals that participants in dominance-submission exchanges often report enhanced and stress reduction, attributing these outcomes to the structured release from everyday burdens for submissives and the fulfillment of caretaking imperatives for dominants. However, specific data on facesitting remains anecdotal or subsumed under broader breath control studies, which highlight masochistic pleasure from vulnerability rather than inherent , countering outdated pathologizations in earlier psychiatric . Variations in these dynamics can include ritualistic elements, such as prolonged sessions to induce —a trance-like and detachment in submissives—facilitated by the dominant's modulation of pressure and verbal commands. Surveys of communities suggest that facesitting's appeal lies in its tactile immediacy, blending (e.g., enforced oral service) with , though individual motivations vary; dominants may experience from embodied superiority, while submissives report relief from performance pressures. Longitudinal studies on involvement affirm no elevated rates of psychological distress among consensual practitioners, underscoring the adaptive nature of these dynamics when bounded by explicit boundaries and aftercare.

Gender Roles and Motivations

In heterosexual contexts, facesitting—also termed queening—typically positions the female partner as the dominant figure, straddling the partner's face to receive oral stimulation while exerting control over his breathing and movement. This dynamic inverts traditional expectations of in sexual encounters, appealing to participants seeking for psychological intensity. Empirical surveys of practitioners indicate that while men overall report higher interest in dominant roles (48.3%) compared to women (8%), specific practices like facesitting attract subsets where women embrace dominance to experience through power exchange. Motivations for the dominant partner, frequently female, center on asserting , deriving from the submissive's devoted oral , and deriving a of regal akin to a "" . This aligns with qualitative accounts in literature emphasizing control and as pathways to heightened , though peer-reviewed data on facesitting-specific incentives remain limited, often extrapolated from broader dominance-submission studies. For the submissive partner, typically male, primary drivers include erotic submission, the thrill of vulnerability via potential breath restriction, and fulfillment through partner-centric , fostering and cathartic release. Gender differences in these motivations reflect broader patterns: women report greater stress reduction from participatory dynamics regardless of role, potentially amplifying appeal in dominant positions like facesitting for amid societal norms. Men, conversely, may seek facesitting for achievement—altered states of surrender—consistent with higher male endorsement of physical submission elements in surveys. Same-sex or reversed gender applications exist but are less documented empirically, underscoring facesitting's flexibility beyond binary norms while predominantly manifesting in female-led heterosexual scenarios.

Cultural and Media Presence

Representations in Pornography and Entertainment

Facesitting features prominently in pornography, particularly within female domination (femdom), BDSM, and lesbian categories, where it symbolizes control and oral stimulation. According to Pornhub's 2019 analysis of search behaviors, terms like "lesbian facesitting," "BBW facesitting," and "femdom facesitting" ranked among popular queries, with women exhibiting 34% higher proportional search interest compared to male users, and Millennials aged 18-34 showing elevated engagement relative to older demographics. This data underscores its niche appeal, often tied to power dynamics rather than vanilla heterosexual scenarios. The practice entered wider visibility through the adult film industry's expansion in the , with retrospective compilations documenting scenes in vintage that emphasize smothering and submission. Modern platforms host extensive video libraries dedicated to facesitting, including POV and smothering variants, reflecting sustained production in specialized studios. Depictions in mainstream entertainment remain rare and indirect, confined largely to erotic thrillers, indie films tagged with the keyword on databases like , or abstract arthouse works exploring taboo sexuality, without achieving the explicit prevalence seen in . No major productions have centered facesitting as a element, likely due to its association with niche fetishes over broad appeal. In the , depictions of facesitting in commercial online were prohibited effective December 2, 2014, under guidelines from the Authority for Television on Demand (ATVOD), which mandated the removal or editing of such scenes from videos to obtain approval for distribution, citing risks of suffocation and harm to performers or viewers. These measures stemmed from the Audiovisual Media Services Regulations 2014, which expanded protections against "harmful" content in video-on-demand services, though the specific list of restricted acts—including facesitting, , and —was not enshrined in primary legislation but enforced via regulatory compliance requirements. The policy prompted immediate backlash, including a on December 12, 2014, where over 20 participants publicly simulated facesitting outside the Houses of to decry as censorious and disproportionately limiting expressions of female sexual agency. Critics, including performers, contended that the ban ignored consent protocols and safe practices common in professional production, while regulators emphasized empirical concerns over documented in isolated incidents of during similar acts. ATVOD's enforcement ceased after its functions transferred to the British Board of Film Classification (BBFC) in 2016, but the restrictive guidelines persisted until 2019, when updated (CPS) obscenity prosecution guidelines—following judicial reviews of landmark cases like (1993)—clarified that consensual depictions of practices, including facesitting, would not automatically qualify as obscene or prosecutable unless involving non-consent, lack of safeguards, or intent to deprave. This shift effectively lifted the prior ban on such content in UK-produced , provided productions adhered to general standards against extreme violence or exploitation. As of 2025, no renewed specific prohibitions exist, though all remains subject to broader requirements for age verification and content moderation implemented from July 2025. Outside the UK, facesitting encounters no targeted legal bans in most Western jurisdictions for private, consensual adult participation, where it is treated as lawful sexual activity absent or ; however, resulting harm can trigger charges under general or statutes, as seen in rare documented fatalities attributed to prolonged asphyxiation without intent to kill. In production, restrictions vary: the permits it under First Amendment protections unless deemed obscene per (1973) standards, with no federal or state-level specific prohibitions. Countries banning outright—such as , (with partial exceptions), or —implicitly prohibit depictions, but these apply universally rather than uniquely to facesitting. In the , varying national obscenity laws (e.g., Germany's emphasis on under Section 184 of the Criminal Code) may scrutinize extreme variants, yet no member state mirrors the UK's former explicit regulatory stance. contexts involving facesitting for payment face additional hurdles in nations criminalizing sex work, such as most U.S. states or Sweden's , potentially classifying it as if non-penetrative acts are encompassed.

Controversies

In facesitting, where one partner positions their body over the other's face, potentially obstructing airways, obtaining explicit is critical due to the risk of asphyxiation from smothering. Empirical reviews of practices classify smothering as a form of breath play involving blockage of nasal and oral passages above the , which can lead to even in controlled settings if not monitored closely. protocols in communities typically require prior negotiation of risks, boundaries, and safewords, with studies showing that practitioners emphasize active communication to mitigate hazards, though the physical mechanics of facesitting can impair the recipient's ability to verbalize withdrawal once engaged. Coercion risks arise particularly in dominance-submission dynamics inherent to many facesitting scenarios, where imbalances may participants into overriding initial hesitations or discomfort. Mixed-methods on encounters reveals that violations, including unintended escalation of breath restriction, occur in a subset of cases due to miscommunication or deferred agency, with repercussions ranging from psychological distress to physical injury. In non- contexts, facesitting has been documented in as a coercive tactic involving smothering to exert , distinct from mutual practices but blurring lines when is ambiguously negotiated. Legally, while BDSM advocates invoke (RACK) frameworks, consent does not invariably shield against prosecution in fatal outcomes from breath play, including smothering variants like facesitting. Forensic analyses of non-natural deaths linked to sexual activities underscore that airway obstruction mechanisms, such as those in partnered smothering, often result in involuntary charges when evidence of foreseeability emerges, regardless of prior agreements. These cases highlight causal realities: the recipient's compromised respiratory control limits revocation, rendering pre-consent potentially insufficient against unintended or .

Empowerment Claims vs. Exploitation Critiques

Proponents of facesitting, particularly within sex-positive feminist circles, assert that the practice empowers women by positioning them in a dominant that asserts over their partner's and prioritizes pleasure. For instance, articles in outlets like describe it as showcasing "women in a position of power and over their own sexuality," framing the act as a reversal of traditional gender dynamics where the woman directs oral stimulation on her terms. Similarly, Essence magazine promotes "queening"—a historical term for facesitting—as a technique for women to "domineer" their partner's face, enhancing confidence and agency in heterosexual encounters. These claims often draw on anecdotal reports from practitioners who report heightened and autonomy, though such assertions lack empirical validation from controlled studies and rely on subjective narratives in lifestyle media. Critics, including radical feminists and health experts, counter that these empowerment narratives mask inherent and physical dangers, potentially normalizing non-consensual or risky behaviors under the guise of . feminist analyses of , which encompasses facesitting, argue that such acts perpetuate patriarchal violence rather than dismantle it, as women's purported "choice" to dominate often reenacts male-centric humiliation tropes observed in , where performers face economic pressures to engage in hazardous scenes. Empirically, facesitting carries documented risks of asphyxiation due to airway obstruction from body weight, with experts noting potential for cramping leading to unintended full compression on the face, causing , trauma, or even death—evidenced by broader data on contributing to 250–1,000 annual U.S. fatalities, many from suffocation methods akin to partnered breath play. Legal interventions underscore these concerns, prioritizing harm prevention over empowerment rhetoric. In the UK, facesitting was prohibited in commercial pornography under the 2014 Audiovisual Media Services Regulations, enforced by the British Board of Film Classification, due to its classification as a "harmful" act risking serious injury from suffocation—despite protests framing the ban as anti-feminist censorship of female pleasure. This regulatory stance reflects causal evidence from forensic reviews of asphyxiophilia cases, where malfunction or miscalculation in oxygen restriction leads to fatalities, often without safeguards like safe signals or weight distribution tools. While sex-positive sources dismiss such critiques as prudish, the absence of peer-reviewed data affirming net psychological benefits—contrasted with physiological risks—suggests empowerment claims may overlook exploitative dynamics, particularly in unbalanced power structures or commercial contexts where consent can be coerced by industry demands.

References

  1. [1]
    Power and Pleasure: Understanding Queening and Face Sitting
    Aug 1, 2025 · It involves one partner sitting on another's face, commonly for oral stimulation and/or an exercise of dominance. Queening, however, takes this ...Missing: scholarly | Show results with:scholarly
  2. [2]
    What is Facesitting and Facesitted Techniques
    ### Facesitting Techniques and Positions
  3. [3]
    What's Wrong With a Little Suffocation During Sex? - MEL Magazine
    an oral sex position also called “kinging” or “queening,” in which a person sits on or over their ...Missing: definition scholarly
  4. [4]
    Kink Statistics Statistics: ZipDo Education Reports 2025
    May 30, 2025 · Approximately 43% of women and 54% of men in the United States have engaged in some form of BDSM or kink activity · 79% of BDSM practitioners ...
  5. [5]
    How safe is BDSM? A literature review on fatal outcome in BDSM play
    Aug 12, 2021 · Fatal outcomes of BDSM plays are rarer than autoerotic fatalities and natural deaths related to sexual activities.Missing: facesitting | Show results with:facesitting
  6. [6]
    We Asked Two Experts Just How Risky Face-Sitting and Fisting Are
    Dec 11, 2016 · The hazards are strangulation or suffocation, bloodborne pathogens – tiny living things in the blood that cause diseases like hepatitis B and C – and exposure ...Missing: empirical studies
  7. [7]
    Facesitting 101: Your Definitive Guide to Riding Face Like a Pro
    Aug 22, 2025 · “Facesitting is what happens when one partner straddles the other partner's face, often for oral-genital or oral-anal stimulation,” sex ...
  8. [8]
    Facesitting | Kinkly - Straight up Sex Talk With a Twist
    Jul 26, 2023 · Facesitting is a sexual practice in which a person sits or hovers over their partner's face. This is often done to facilitate oral sex or analingus.
  9. [9]
    Sitting on Face: 5 Tips for Sitting on Face - 2025 - MasterClass
    Jun 6, 2022 · Face sitting is a sex position where one partner mounts another person's face, bringing their genitals into contact with the other's mouth for ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition<|separator|>
  10. [10]
    A Guide to Face-Sitting (AKA Queening) - Cosmopolitan
    Jan 19, 2024 · In the Victorian Era, face sitting became popularized amongst those ~in the know~ with the advent of the 'queening stool.
  11. [11]
    Oral sex royal: queening or facesitting - Deviance
    Queening, also known as facesitting, is a sexual practice in which one partner sits on or over the other's face to allow or force oral sex or rimming.
  12. [12]
    facesitting - Dictionary - Thesaurus
    facesitting. Etymology. From face + sitting. Noun. facesitting (uncountable). The sexual practice of sitting on a partner's face to receive cunnilingus or ...
  13. [13]
    FACESITTING Synonyms: 10 Similar Words & Phrases
    Synonyms for Facesitting · queening · body worship · oral servitude · smothering · face control · face domination · face suffocation · face grinding.
  14. [14]
    Cunnilingus. Wall painting. Suburban baths, Pompeii. 62 to 79 CE ...
    May 19, 2024 · I was in Pompei last year. The brothel we saw had pictures of various sex acts depicted on the wall. Our guide said it was like having a ...
  15. [15]
    Erotic Art in Pompeii and Herculaneum (NSFW!) - DailyArt Magazine
    Feb 10, 2025 · Archaeological work has revealed that the cities were full of erotic artifacts such as statues, frescoes, and household items decorated with sexual themes.Missing: facesitting | Show results with:facesitting
  16. [16]
    Sex position #134 - Goddess (Cunnilingus, face sitting). Kamasutra
    The man lies on his back, legs together, knees bent, hands on his stomach, only the mouth is working. The woman ceases to her knees.
  17. [17]
    Indian concepts on sexuality - PMC - PubMed Central
    Indian sexuality is manifested in our attire, behavior, recreation, literature, sculptures, scriptures, religion and sports.Missing: facesitting | Show results with:facesitting
  18. [18]
    On fake medieval devices – both torture and sexual
    May 24, 2024 · Queening chairs were not for getting head, they were for giving birth. So jot that down. Friend of the blog Lindsey Fitzharris has a bit about ...Missing: stool | Show results with:stool
  19. [19]
    HAREM i. IN ANCIENT IRAN - Encyclopaedia Iranica
    There is no evidence for the practice among the early Iranians of taking large numbers of wives or concubines and keeping them in secluded quarters.Missing: queening | Show results with:queening<|separator|>
  20. [20]
    Sexuality Articles - The History of Facesitting - Amazines
    Feb 27, 2012 · The Chinese also adopted the art of facesitting and queening during court sessions. Usually one very long tongued, trained male slave was used ...
  21. [21]
    Queening – The History - Sexy FemDom ~ The Beauty of Control
    Jan 10, 2020 · It was written many years ago by MsWicked on Fetlife. Some submissives idealize this term as it connotates the utmost devotion to ones Domme.
  22. [22]
    Royal male: A brief look at queening fetishes - drmarkgriffiths
    Sep 26, 2013 · Queening is a BDSM practice in where one sexual partner sits on or over another person's face typically to allow oral-genital or oral anal contact.
  23. [23]
    National Face Sitting Day - WhatNationalDayIsIt
    The term 'face sitting' originated in 1662, during the Restoration period in England. This was a time of changing social norms and an increase in the popularity ...
  24. [24]
  25. [25]
    The Queening Chair: A Deep Dive into Femdom Furniture
    Its suspected origins trace back to ancient civilizations where powerful women used their status to command sexual services. Historical accounts suggest that in ...
  26. [26]
    Exploring the History of Femdom
    Nov 6, 2024 · In the 20th century, Femdom began to emerge more openly within Western societies, especially with the rise of the sexual revolution in the 1960s ...
  27. [27]
  28. [28]
    Ultimate Guide to Sit on Your Husband's Face - Lisa Welsh
    May 23, 2024 · What is Facesitting? At its core, facesitting is a sexual act where one partner "sits" on or over the other partner's face, positioning their ...
  29. [29]
    Our Guide to Facesitting & the Power of Queening | Fetish.com
    Queening – also known as facesitting – is a BDSM practice where the dominant partner straddles the submissive's face, often in a sexual context. Whether you ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  30. [30]
    Introduction to Facesitting - Oxy-shop
    Jan 24, 2025 · There are risks associated with facesitting, usually more than what is obtainable in other BDSM scenes. The first source of concern is breath ...
  31. [31]
  32. [32]
    BDSM 101—Facesitting - Relationships - EdenFantasys
    May 30, 2013 · Facesitting involves one person sitting down on another person for genital or anal stimulation. People do it for both the sensual and the BDSM aspect.
  33. [33]
    Face-Sitting with Smothering - Consent Culture
    Face-Sitting with Smothering refers to a specific sexual practice within BDSM or kink contexts where one partner sits on the face of another partner, ...
  34. [34]
    Femdom Smother box - CollarNcuffs
    A smother box (or smothering box) is a type of dungeon furniture similar to a queening stool. It may be used in facesitting, where a man or woman acting in ...
  35. [35]
    Smotherbox - Stylefetish Industries
    Crafted from premium materials with plush padding, this facesitting furniture features an innovative adjustable cushion system and integrated pump for perfect ...
  36. [36]
    Erotic Asphyxiation: 10 Things to Know About Safe Breath Play
    “EA is truly very risky and may lead to serious injury, including cardiac arrest, brain damage from lack of oxygen, and death,” says Janet Brito, PhD, LCSW, CST ...
  37. [37]
    Rates of Injury and Healthcare Utilization for Kink-Identified Patients
    Researchers found that 3 deaths were related to partnered consensual BDSM activities. For comparison, 22 deaths were related to autoerotic asphyxiation and/or ...
  38. [38]
    Sexual Masochism Disorder with Asphyxiophilia: A Deadly yet ... - NIH
    Asphyxiophilia, a dangerous and potentially deadly form of sexual masochism involving sexual arousal by oxygen deprivation, are clearly described as disorders.<|separator|>
  39. [39]
    Queening Chair | Kinkly - Straight up Sex Talk With a Twist
    When someone sits on a queening chair, it's easier to relax the pelvic muscles which can expose more delicate and sensitive areas of the labia. Queening chairs ...
  40. [40]
    Choking/Strangulation During Sex: Understanding and Negotiating ...
    Feb 5, 2025 · This paper examined whether and how Australian adults aged between 18–35 perceived choking/strangulation in terms of “safety.”
  41. [41]
    Chronic elevation of serum S100B but not neurofilament-light due to ...
    Nov 2, 2021 · This case-control study aimed to test whether frequent choking during sex influences neurological health in young adult women.
  42. [42]
    Does intentional asphyxiation by strangulation have addictive ...
    Sep 4, 2020 · Intentional asphyxiation leads to cerebral hypoxia, starving the brain of oxygen and inducing hypoxic euphoria, but carries a serious risk ...Missing: facesitting | Show results with:facesitting
  43. [43]
    Bondage-Discipline, Dominance-Submission and Sadomasochism ...
    Apr 5, 2019 · The roles may switch, more parties may be involved, but, at each point, power exchange is at its essence. ... BDSM context: The physiological and ...Missing: benefits | Show results with:benefits
  44. [44]
    [PDF] BDSM Glossary | Pink Kink Podcast
    Facesitting, face sitting (see queening): Practice in which one partner sits on or over the other's face, typically to allow, or force, oral-genital or oral ...
  45. [45]
    The Sexual Science of Masochism and Submission
    Jun 30, 2020 · Most practitioners find masochism and submission an arousing experience that allows them to play around power dynamics with a trusted partner.
  46. [46]
    An Evolutionary Psychological Approach Toward BDSM Interest and ...
    May 20, 2024 · This prevalence is accompanied by a shift in perceptions of BDSM, including the declassification of sadomasochism as a paraphilic disorder.Missing: facesitting | Show results with:facesitting
  47. [47]
    [PDF] The Impact of Childhood Trauma and Personality on Kinkiness in ...
    Having your breath controlled by your partner, e.g. by facesitting, smothering or toys. 20. Being made unconscious by your partner, e.g.using a bag. 21 ...
  48. [48]
    A guide to face sitting (AKA queening) - Cosmopolitan
    Sep 10, 2025 · While it possibly has roots in eastern culture, it's highly likely that no matter who you are or where you're from, your ancestors probably sat ...
  49. [49]
    'Queening' Is the Oral Sex Position You Need to Know - Men's Health
    Aug 5, 2021 · Queening is actually the same as “face-sitting,” a sex move where a woman squats over her partner's partner's face and lowers herself down so her partner can ...
  50. [50]
    [PDF] Gender Effects of BDSM Participation on Self-Reported ...
    One such study suggests that women who engage in BDSM, regardless of role (top or bottom), feel empowered based on the exchange within the relationship dynamic ...Missing: facesitting | Show results with:facesitting
  51. [51]
    Could facesitting be done by a submissive ? : r/BDSMcommunity
    Jul 7, 2024 · Yes. Acts aren't inherently dominant or submissive.. I had a partner who would order me to sit on his face, he used to love it but he was always still the one ...Facesitting in BDSM and Femdom: Control, Trust, and PleasureMaking facesitting submissive : r/BDSMAdvice - RedditMore results from www.reddit.comMissing: motivations | Show results with:motivations<|separator|>
  52. [52]
    Deepthroat & Facesitting: Up Close and Personal - Pornhub Insights
    Nov 18, 2019 · The most popular facesitting searches include “lesbian facesitting”, “bbw facesitting”, “femdom facesitting” and even “facesitting fart”. Men ...Missing: trends | Show results with:trends
  53. [53]
    Pornhub Insights – Facesitting - Dominant Female Boss
    Feb 19, 2020 · Women are proportionately 34% more likely to search for facesitting when compared to Pornhub's male visitors. Millennials between the ages ...Missing: trends | Show results with:trends
  54. [54]
    Best Of Facesitting Volume 7 - TubePornClassic.com
    May 1, 2022 · Watch Best Of Facesitting Volume 7, this classic and vintage video is a good retro of the entire porn industry.
  55. [55]
    Vintage Facesitting Porn on our tube AllClassic.Porn
    In this section we offer you popular and rare retro porno on Facesitting. Every clip you can easily save on your PC for free.
  56. [56]
  57. [57]
    Why are people face-sitting outside Parliament? - BBC News
    Dec 12, 2014 · Hundreds of activists demonstrated against new pornography laws by sitting on each other's faces. They say the rules ban female sexual pleasure.
  58. [58]
    Face-sitting protest outside parliament against new porn rules
    Dec 12, 2014 · Sex workers and campaigners have gathered in front of parliament to protest against changes to UK pornography regulations.
  59. [59]
    BDSM and fetish porn legal in England as obscenity laws overturned
    Jan 31, 2019 · Face-sitting. Fisting. Humiliation. In 2014 laws were altered to ban pornography created in the UK from showing certain sex acts, sparking ...
  60. [60]
  61. [61]
    Guide To Pornography Laws In The UK - Adley Gray
    Dec 26, 2022 · This guide is meant to provide you with an overview of the current legal situation in the UK regarding pornography.
  62. [62]
    The Complexity of Consensual Non-consent in BDSM
    Sep 17, 2025 · Empirical studies have demonstrated that BDSM consent necessitates an actively engaged agent, with communication structured through pre ...
  63. [63]
    [PDF] CONSENT IN VANILLA AND BDSM SEXUAL ENCOUNTERS
    Aug 15, 2023 · Abstract: This mixed-methods thesis examined the consent process, consent violations, and repercussions of consent violations in BDSM ...
  64. [64]
    [PDF] Intimate Partner Violence and Women's Health
    Includes unwanted exposure to sexual situations (eg, pornogra- phy), verbal or behavioral sexual harassment, threats ... smothering. Often victims of ...
  65. [65]
    [PDF] Kinky Sex Gone Wrong: Legal Prosecutions Concerning Consent ...
    Feb 5, 2020 · smothering by a plastic bag; (3) mechanical compression of the chest; and (4) exclusion of oxygen by inhalation of another gas”. (Shields et ...
  66. [66]
    Non-Natural Death Associated with Sexual Activity - PubMed
    Aug 22, 2019 · The present study provides an overview of cases of non-natural death related to sexual activities as well as recommendations of how to handle these cases.
  67. [67]
    Feel More Empowered In The Bedroom By Using The 'Queening ...
    Aug 22, 2023 · Facesitting or “queening” is an oral sex position quickly gaining popularity. The trend is just what it sounds like, domineering your partner's face to take ...
  68. [68]
    Queening is the empowering sex move every woman should try
    Aug 14, 2018 · 'Queening' is a hot new move that's sees the woman sitting on, or straddling, the face of her partner.
  69. [69]
    BDSM FAQ (Frequently Asserted Quibbles): Part 1 - Feminist Current
    Apr 23, 2015 · Feminists are accused of “shaming” whenever they attempt to analyze or critique any (male-oriented) sexual attitude, preference, or behavior, ...
  70. [70]
    The sad battle of feminist influencers vs BDSM practitioners (2021)
    Feb 25, 2021 · The regular critique is that no woman can volunteer degrading and violent sex, and any man performing such acts is an abuser. Any documentation ...Missing: facesitting | Show results with:facesitting<|separator|>
  71. [71]
    Why the UK is banning porn studios from depicting a bunch of sex acts
    Dec 4, 2014 · BDSM content, female ejaculation and facesitting are severely restricted (contrary to some reports, spanking isn't categorically banned). Porn ...
  72. [72]
    facesitting (FACESITTING, 2009) - TheBody
    Jul 4, 2009 · The risk of HIV would be essentially nonexistent, but depending on the size of the hooker, I guess there would be a risk of a broken nose or perhaps even ...Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical