Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Flow coefficient

The flow coefficient, commonly denoted as C_v in imperial units or K_v in metric units, is a standardized measure of a device's capacity to permit fluid flow, specifically defined as the volume of water at 60°F (15.6°C) in US gallons per minute that flows through it under a pressure drop of 1 psi (0.069 bar) for C_v, or the volume of water at 5–40°C in cubic meters per hour that flows through it under a pressure drop of 1 bar for K_v.^[1]^[2] This coefficient quantifies the relationship between flow rate, pressure differential, and fluid density, enabling engineers to predict and size components like control valves, regulators, and orifices in piping systems.^[3]^[4] In engineering practice, the flow coefficient is determined experimentally using protocols outlined in standards such as ISA-75.01.01, which specify test conditions for incompressible and compressible fluids to ensure consistency across manufacturers.^[5]^[6] For valves, C_v values typically range from fractions of a gallon per minute for small fittings to hundreds for large industrial valves, influencing selections based on required throughput and pressure control.^[7] The metric counterpart K_v follows a similar principle, with the conversion C_v = 1.16 K_v.^[1]^[8] Beyond valves, the concept extends to other fluid dynamics applications, such as orifices where it approximates the discharge coefficient (often 0.6–0.9), relating actual to theoretical flow rates, and in turbomachinery where dimensionless flow coefficients like \phi = \frac{V_m}{U} (axial velocity over tip speed) characterize stage performance.^[9]^[10] Accurate C_v calculations incorporate factors like fluid viscosity, Reynolds number, and piping geometry to avoid over- or under-sizing, which could lead to inefficiencies or failures in systems handling liquids, gases, or steam.^[11]^[12]

Fundamentals

Definition

The flow coefficient serves as a relative measure of a device's efficiency in permitting fluid flow, quantifying the relationship between the pressure drop across the device and the resulting volumetric flow rate. This metric enables engineers to assess the capacity of flow-restricting components without requiring detailed computational fluid dynamics simulations. In essence, it captures the device's ability to convert pressure differential into flow, accounting for factors like geometry and surface roughness that influence real-world performance.^[13] Commonly applied in engineering contexts, the flow coefficient is empirically determined for devices such as valves, orifices, and pipe fittings, providing a standardized indicator of their flow-handling capabilities under specified conditions. It originated from practical requirements in process control and hydraulic systems during the mid-20th century, with early formulations emerging in the 1960s through efforts by organizations like the Fluids Control Institute to address inconsistencies in valve performance evaluation. Standardization advanced in 1967 when the International Society of Automation (ISA) formed a committee, culminating in the ANSI/ISA-75.01.01 standard, which defines the coefficient based on water flow at 60°F (15.6°C) with a 1 psi pressure drop.^[13] This empirical approach relates the flow coefficient to fundamental fluid dynamics principles, such as the discharge coefficient, which adjusts ideal flow predictions for actual losses in orifices and nozzles.^[14]

Units and Standards

The flow coefficient in imperial units, denoted as C_v, is defined as the volume of water at 60°F (15.6°C) in US gallons per minute (GPM) that flows through a device under a pressure drop of 1 psi (0.069 bar).^[15]^[7] This definition ensures a standardized measure of flow capacity for valves and regulators in systems using imperial measurements.^[16] In the metric system, the equivalent flow coefficient, denoted as K_v, represents the flow rate in cubic meters per hour (m³/h) of water at a temperature between 5°C and 40°C passing through the device with a pressure drop of 1 bar (100 kPa).^[17] This range accounts for typical operating conditions while maintaining consistency in testing protocols.^[18] Standardization of C_v is governed by the International Society of Automation (ISA) through standards such as ANSI/ISA-75.01.01-2012 (IEC 60534-2-1 Mod), which outlines flow equations and testing procedures for control valves to promote uniformity in instrumentation.^[4] For K_v, the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) standard IEC 60534-2-1:2011 provides the framework for sizing and flow coefficient determination in industrial-process control valves.^[19] The relationship between the two coefficients arises from differences in units and is given by the conversion factor C_v = 1.156 \times K_v.^[20]^[21] This exact relation allows seamless translation between imperial and metric specifications in global engineering practices. Testing for C_v typically occurs at the fully open valve position unless otherwise specified, with effects of water temperature and viscosity normalized to the standard conditions for accurate comparability.^[22]^[23]

Valve Flow Coefficient (Cv)

Formulation for Liquids

The flow coefficient C_v for incompressible liquids is defined by the equation

C_v = Q \sqrt{\frac{SG}{\Delta P}}

where Q is the volumetric flow rate in US gallons per minute (GPM), SG is the specific gravity of the liquid relative to water at 60°F (dimensionless, with SG = 1 for water), and \Delta P is the differential pressure drop across the valve in pounds per square inch (psi).^[4] This formulation allows engineers to size valves by determining the C_v value required to achieve a specified flow rate under given pressure conditions.^[24] The equation originates from Bernoulli's principle, which equates the pressure energy loss to an increase in kinetic energy for steady, incompressible flow along a streamline: \frac{P_1}{\rho} + \frac{v_1^2}{2} + g z_1 = \frac{P_2}{\rho} + \frac{v_2^2}{2} + g z_2, where P is pressure, \rho is density, v is velocity, g is gravity, and z is elevation. Assuming negligible elevation changes and minimal upstream kinetic energy relative to the downstream velocity through the valve restriction, the pressure drop \Delta P = P_1 - P_2 simplifies to \Delta P \approx \frac{\rho v^2}{2}, yielding v \approx \sqrt{\frac{2 \Delta P}{\rho}}. The volumetric flow rate is then Q = C_d A v, with C_d as the discharge coefficient (typically 0.6–0.98 for valves) and A as the effective flow area. The C_v empirically bundles C_d A along with unit conversion constants (derived from standard tests with water at 60°F and 1 psi drop) to normalize the relation as Q = C_v \sqrt{\frac{\Delta P}{SG}} for water and scaled by \sqrt{SG} for other liquids, since density \rho = SG \cdot \rho_{\text{water}}. This adaptation ensures the velocity head scales inversely with the square root of density, validated through standardized testing rather than pure theory.^[25]^[4] Key assumptions underlying this formulation include incompressible fluid behavior (applicable to liquids such as water, oils, and similar fluids with low vapor pressure); turbulent flow regime with a valve Reynolds number Re_v > 10,000 (where Re_v = \frac{948 Q}{\nu d_v}, \nu is kinematic viscosity, and d_v is valve size in inches, ensuring viscous effects are minimal); negligible kinetic energy changes outside the valve; and constant fluid density throughout the system. These conditions align with the simplified Bernoulli application, excluding compressible effects, significant elevation heads, or heat transfer.^[4]^[24] To illustrate, suppose a system requires 50 GPM of a liquid with SG = 0.9 across a valve with \Delta P = 4 psi. Substitute into the equation: \sqrt{\frac{SG}{\Delta P}} = \sqrt{\frac{0.9}{4}} = \sqrt{0.225} = 0.4743, so C_v = 50 \times 0.4743 \approx 23.7. This C_v value guides selection of a valve capable of handling the flow without excessive pressure loss. Step-by-step: (1) Compute ratio \frac{0.9}{4} = 0.225; (2) take square root \sqrt{0.225} = 0.4743; (3) multiply by Q: $50 \times 0.4743 = 23.715, rounded to 23.7 for practical use.^[4] Limitations of the formulation include its reduced accuracy for highly viscous fluids (where Re_v < 10,000), necessitating correction factors like the viscosity factor F_v to account for laminar contributions; however, the basic equation assumes turbulent dominance and does not incorporate such adjustments. It also presumes the pressure drop occurs primarily across the valve, ignoring minor losses from upstream/downstream fittings or piping geometry, which may require additional factors like F_P in full sizing procedures. The model applies only to non-choked conditions, where \Delta P < F_L^2 (P_1 - F_F P_v) (with F_L as liquid pressure recovery coefficient and P_v as vapor pressure) to avoid cavitation or flashing, beyond which flow becomes independent of further pressure reduction.^[4]^[24]

Formulation for Gases

The formulation for the flow coefficient C_v for gases is based on the ISA-75.01 standard for compressible flow, incorporating an expansion factor Y to account for density variations across the valve due to compressibility effects.^[2]^[4] The standard equation for subcritical (non-choked) flow is

Q = 22.67 \, C_v \, Y \sqrt{\frac{P_1 \Delta P}{SG \, T}}

where Q is the volumetric flow rate in standard cubic feet per minute (SCFM) at 60°F and 14.7 psia, SG is the specific gravity of the gas relative to air (air = 1), T is the absolute temperature in °R, \Delta P is the pressure drop in psi, P_1 is the inlet absolute pressure in psia, and Y is the expansion factor given by Y = 1 - \frac{x}{3 F_k x_T} with x = \frac{\Delta P}{P_1} (pressure drop ratio) and F_k x_T the valve-specific critical pressure drop ratio factor (typically 0.6–0.8). This assumes compressibility factor Z = 1 and piping factor F_p = 1. Inverting for C_v,

C_v = \frac{Q}{22.67 \, Y} \sqrt{\frac{SG \, T}{P_1 \Delta P}}.

For choked flow, when x \geq F_k x_T (approximately \Delta P \geq 0.5–0.7 P_1), Y = 0.667 (2/3 for isentropic flow), and \Delta P is replaced by F_k x_T P_1 in the equation, making flow independent of downstream pressure. This formulation extends the liquid model by using Y to correct for the nonlinear density profile in compressible flow, validated by standardized testing.^[2]^[4] This assumes ideal gas behavior (valid for most industrial gases at moderate conditions), subsonic upstream flow, and SCFM at standard conditions (60°F, 14.7 psia). For non-ideal gases, include the compressibility factor Z.^[2]^[4] For example, consider 100 SCFM of air (SG = 1) at P_1 = 100 psia, \Delta P = 10 psi, and T = 70^\circF ($530^\circR). Here, x = 0.1; assuming F_k x_T = 1 for simplicity, Y = 1 - 0.1 / 3 \approx 0.967. Then, \sqrt{\frac{P_1 \Delta P}{SG T}} = \sqrt{\frac{100 \times 10}{1 \times 530}} \approx 1.373. Substitute: C_v = \frac{100}{22.67 \times 0.967 \times 1.373} \approx \frac{100}{30.1} \approx 3.3. Step-by-step: (1) Compute x = 10/100 = 0.1; (2) Y = 1 - 0.1/3 = 0.9667; (3) \sqrt{P_1 \Delta P / (SG T)} = \sqrt{1000/530} \approx 1.373; (4) denominator = 22.67 × 0.9667 × 1.373 ≈ 30.1; (5) C_v = 100 / 30.1 \approx 3.32, rounded to 3.3.^[26]

Experimental Determination

The experimental determination of the valve flow coefficient C_v adheres to standardized protocols, such as ANSI/ISA-75.02.01-2008, which specify procedures for measuring control valve capacity under controlled conditions to ensure reproducibility across manufacturers and applications.^[27] The testing protocol uses water as the test fluid at a temperature of 60°F (15.6°C) to approximate standard conditions, with flow directed through the valve while varying the pressure drop \Delta P across it—typically by throttling upstream or downstream sections—and measuring the resulting volumetric flow rate Q in gallons per minute (gpm). The C_v is computed for each condition using the liquid flow equation as the basis, ensuring the pressure drop is 1 psi for the defining flow rate. Tests are performed at multiple valve stem positions, ranging from 10% to 100% open, to capture the full range of operating characteristics.^[27]^[28] Laboratory setups incorporate calibrated instruments, including electromagnetic or turbine flow meters for precise Q measurement (with accuracy typically ±1%), differential pressure transducers for \Delta P, and resistance temperature detectors (RTDs) or similar for maintaining fluid temperature. The valve is installed in a straight pipe section of nominal size and schedule 40 wall thickness, with sufficient upstream and downstream lengths (at least 10 and 5 pipe diameters, respectively) to avoid flow disturbances.^[27]^[29] Data analysis involves calculating C_v at each test point, averaging results from multiple replicate runs to achieve overall accuracy within ±2-5%, and plotting C_v against valve position to distinguish inherent characteristics (valve in isolation) from installed characteristics (including piping effects).^[27]^[29] For fluids other than water, the measured C_v from water tests is scaled via viscosity corrections; the Crane method provides an approximation as

C_v_\text{corrected} = C_v_\text{water} \times \left( \frac{\mu_\text{water}}{\mu_\text{fluid}} \right)^{0.25}

for moderate viscosity ratios, accounting for deviations in flow resistance.^[30] Potential error sources encompass turbulence-induced inaccuracies at low Reynolds numbers and cavitation at elevated \Delta P; the standard mandates a minimum valve Reynolds number Re_v > 10^5 to ensure fully turbulent, viscosity-independent flow, with data correction via the Reynolds number factor F_R if this threshold cannot be met.^[27]

Metric Flow Factor (Kv)

Definition and Relation to Cv

The metric flow factor, denoted as K_v, quantifies the hydraulic capacity of a valve or flow device in SI units. It is defined as the volumetric flow rate of water, at a temperature ranging from 5°C to 40°C, in cubic meters per hour (\mathrm{m}^3/\mathrm{h}) that passes through the device under a differential pressure of 1 bar (100 kPa).^[31] This definition ensures a standardized measure of flow resistance, applicable to control valves and similar components in process systems.^[18] The K_v serves as the metric counterpart to the imperial flow coefficient C_v, which represents the flow in US gallons per minute (GPM) of water at 60°F (15.6°C) across a 1 psi pressure drop. The direct conversion between them arises from unit differences: K_v = 0.865 C_v or C_v = 1.17 \times K_v, accounting for the factors of approximately 0.227 m³/h per GPM and 14.5 psi per bar.^[1] This equivalence allows seamless translation of valve performance data across imperial and metric contexts without altering the underlying physical characteristics.^[32] Standardization of K_v is primarily governed by the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) standard 60534, particularly Part 2-1 for sizing equations, with harmonized European norms under EN 60534 ensuring consistency. Testing for K_v mirrors C_v procedures but utilizes metric instrumentation, such as flow meters calibrated in \mathrm{m}^3/\mathrm{h} and pressure gauges in bars, to determine values under controlled conditions.^[33] In practice, K_v is favored in Europe and international engineering projects for its alignment with SI units, providing an equivalent performance metric to C_v while promoting global interoperability and avoiding imperial conversions.^[31] Historically, K_v gained prominence in the 1970s amid broader standardization initiatives to metricize industrial specifications, coinciding with the initial publications of IEC 60534 in the late 1970s and early 1980s, which facilitated its adoption over purely imperial systems in metric-dominant regions.

Calculations for Liquids and Gases

The metric flow factor K_v for liquids is determined using the formula

K_v = Q \sqrt{\frac{SG}{\Delta P}}

where Q represents the volumetric flow rate in cubic meters per hour (m³/h), SG is the specific gravity of the liquid relative to water (dimensionless, with water at SG = 1), and \Delta P is the pressure drop across the valve in bars. This equation assumes incompressible flow and turbulent conditions, providing a direct measure of valve capacity under specified pressure differentials. The derivation of this formula stems from unit conversion of the imperial Cv equations, preserving the underlying principles of Bernoulli's equation applied to valve flow resistance. For precision, include piping factor F_p and numerical constant per IEC 60534: K_v = \frac{Q}{N_6 F_p \sqrt{\Delta P / ( \rho / \rho_0 ) }}, with N_6 = 0.865 for metric units.^[34]^[33] As an illustrative example, consider a liquid flow of Q = 10 m³/h with SG = 1 and \Delta P = 0.5 bar. Substituting these values yields K_v \approx 14.14, indicating the valve's capacity to handle this flow at the given conditions. Viscosity corrections may be applied for non-Newtonian fluids, but the base formula prioritizes density effects via SG.^[34] For gases, the K_v calculation accounts for compressibility through the expansion factor Y, which adjusts for density variations across the valve. Per IEC 60534-2-1, for non-choked flow without fittings, the formula is

K_v = \frac{Q}{N_9 Y \sqrt{ \frac{ x P_1 M }{ T_1 Z } }}

where Q is the standard volumetric flow rate in normal cubic meters per hour (Nm³/h at 0°C and 1.013 bar), x = \Delta P / P_1 (pressure drop ratio), P_1 is the absolute upstream pressure in kPa, M is the molecular mass in kg/kmol, T_1 is the absolute upstream temperature in K, Z is the compressibility factor (≈1 for ideal gases), Y is the expansion factor (0.667 to 1, based on x and valve recovery factor F_L), and N_9 = 2.46 \times 10^3 for metric units with t_s=0°C. Alternatively, using specific gravity SG relative to air (SG = M / 28.97), an approximate form is K_v \approx \frac{ Q Y^{-1} \sqrt{ SG \times T_1 / (P_1 \Delta P ) } }{ 27.3 } (adjusted constant for bar units). This expression derives from the compressible flow physics, such as isentropic expansion.^[33]^[4] In critical gas flow, where x \geq F_\gamma x_T (typically downstream pressure ≤ about 0.53 upstream), Y = 2/3 \approx 0.667, reflecting choked flow limitations. For subcritical conditions, Y approaches 1. An example for subcritical air flow: 5 Nm³/h (SG = 1, M=28.97), P_1 = 500 kPa (5 bar abs), \Delta P = 100 kPa (1 bar), T_1 = 293 K, Z=1, Y \approx 0.97, x=0.2. Using the SG approx with constant ≈31.6 for bar (adjusted): Kv ≈ (5 / 0.97) * sqrt(1 * 293 / (5 * 1)) / 31.6 ≈ 5.15 * sqrt(58.6) / 31.6 ≈ 5.15 * 7.65 / 31.6 ≈ 39.4 / 31.6 ≈ 1.25 (note: exact value depends on constant; standard calc yields small Kv for low flow). Compressibility factor Z adjustments are included for high-pressure gases deviating from ideality. For accurate computation, use software or full IEC equations including piping effects.^[33]^[4]

Applications

Valve Sizing and Selection

Valve sizing begins with determining the required flow coefficient to ensure the valve can handle the specified flow rate without excessive pressure loss. The process involves rearranging the Cv equation to calculate the minimum Cv needed: C_v = Q \sqrt{\frac{SG}{\Delta P_{allowable}}}, where Q is the volumetric flow rate in gallons per minute (gpm), SG is the specific gravity of the fluid (1.0 for water), and \Delta P_{allowable} is the maximum allowable pressure drop across the valve in pounds per square inch (psi).^[2] Once the required Cv is obtained, a valve is selected from manufacturer data with a rated Cv at least 10–20% higher than the calculated value to provide a safety margin for variations in operating conditions or future expansions.^[35] Selection of the valve type significantly influences the applicable Cv range and performance characteristics. Globe valves, for instance, offer precise throttling with linear or equal percentage inherent Cv curves but typically exhibit higher pressure drops and lower Cv values per size compared to ball or butterfly valves, which provide higher Cv capacities and lower pressure drops suitable for on-off applications.^[35] The inherent Cv curve—describing the relationship between valve stem position and flow capacity—guides the choice of equal percentage characteristics for processes with wide flow variations or linear for constant gain requirements. In pump systems, the total system Cv, including the control valve, must be matched to the pump curve to prevent excessive pressure drop, which could lead to inefficient operation or pump overload.^[35] Manufacturer catalogs and sizing software tools, such as those provided by Emerson or Swagelok, offer Cv tables and calculators to facilitate this selection based on fluid properties and system parameters.^[2] A practical example illustrates the application: for a system requiring 100 gpm of water with a maximum allowable pressure drop of 5 psi (SG = 1.0), the required Cv is approximately 44.7, calculated as C_v = 100 \sqrt{\frac{1}{5}} \approx 44.7. A 2-inch globe valve with a Cv of 50 would be selected to meet the 10–20% safety margin.^[35] However, improper sizing can compromise system performance. Oversizing the valve—selecting one with Cv much larger than required—may result in instability, such as hunting or cycling in control loops, and accelerated wear on valve components due to operation near the closed position.^[35] Conversely, undersizing leads to insufficient flow capacity, potentially causing cavitation, flashing, or excessive energy losses from high pressure drops.^[35]

Use in Control Systems and Piping

In piping systems, flow coefficients are integrated to determine the overall hydraulic resistance of components in series, such as valves, fittings, and pipe segments, enabling accurate prediction of total pressure drop. The equivalent flow coefficient for components in series is calculated using the formula:

\frac{1}{C_{v_t}^2} = \frac{1}{C_{v1}^2} + \frac{1}{C_{v2}^2} + \cdots

where C_{v_t} is the total system flow coefficient and C_{v1}, C_{v2}, etc., are the individual coefficients.^[36] This approach treats each element's resistance additively in terms of its inverse squared coefficient, providing a comprehensive assessment of system performance under specified flow conditions. Within control systems, flow coefficients characterize actuator performance in closed-loop feedback configurations, where precise modulation of flow is essential for maintaining process variables like pressure or temperature. Rangeability, defined as the ratio of maximum to minimum controllable flow (often expressed via Cv ratios), typically exceeds 20:1 to ensure accurate control across varying operating demands without instability.^[37] In applications such as HVAC systems and chemical processing plants, Cv values facilitate flow balancing across parallel lines by adjusting valve positions to equalize pressure drops and distribute flows proportionally, preventing uneven loading or inefficiencies.^[38] Additionally, Cv is dynamic and varies with valve stem position; for instance, in linear characteristic valves, Cv increases proportionally with opening, while equal-percentage types provide logarithmic changes for finer low-flow control. Consider a piping network with a valve of C_v = 30 and an equivalent pipe resistance of C_v = 50 in series. The effective total C_v is approximately 25.7, calculated as C_{v_t} = 1 / \sqrt{(1/30)^2 + (1/50)^2} \approx 25.7. For a water flow of 80 GPM (specific gravity = 1), the resulting pressure drop is \Delta P = (Q / C_{v_t})^2 \approx (80 / 25.7)^2 \approx 9.7 psi, illustrating how system-level Cv informs pump selection and energy requirements.^[36] For advanced applications, Kv-based models predict aerodynamic noise in control valves according to IEC 60534-8-3, which uses valve geometry, flow conditions, and Kv to estimate sound pressure levels downstream, aiding in the design of low-noise systems for sensitive environments. Similarly, the cavitation index \sigma = (P_1 - P_v) / \Delta P, where P_1 is upstream pressure and P_v is vapor pressure, quantifies the risk of cavitation by comparing available pressure margin to the valve's pressure drop; values below 1.5 often indicate potential damage, guiding trim selection in high-velocity services.^[39]

Discharge Coefficient

The discharge coefficient, denoted as C_d, is a dimensionless parameter in fluid dynamics that represents the ratio of the actual volumetric flow rate through an orifice or nozzle to the theoretical flow rate predicted by the ideal Bernoulli equation, assuming inviscid flow without losses.^[40] This coefficient quantifies deviations from ideal conditions and is essential for accurate flow predictions in constrictions.^[41] The actual flow rate Q_{\text{actual}} is calculated using the equation

Q_{\text{actual}} = C_d \cdot A \cdot \sqrt{\frac{2 \Delta P}{\rho}},

where A is the cross-sectional area of the orifice, \Delta P is the pressure differential across it, and \rho is the fluid density.^[42] The value of C_d accounts for phenomena such as the vena contracta effect, where the fluid jet contracts downstream of the orifice, and frictional losses in the boundary layer, which reduce the effective flow area and velocity.^[40] For sharp-edged orifices, C_d typically ranges from 0.6 to 0.98, depending on geometry and flow conditions; for instance, a thin sharp-edged orifice plate yields C_d \approx 0.61 at high Reynolds numbers (\text{Re} > 10^4), where viscous effects are minimal.^[40] In general, C_d varies with the Reynolds number according to empirical correlations like C_d = C_\infty + b / \text{Re}^n, with n \approx 0.75 for sharp-edged orifices, approaching a constant value at high Re.^[40] In relation to practical engineering metrics, the valve flow coefficient C_v (in US customary units, representing gallons per minute of water at 60°F flowing through a valve with a 1 psi pressure drop) can be approximated for orifices as C_v \approx C_d \cdot A \cdot 38, where A is the area in square inches, linking the theoretical dimensionless C_d to empirical device performance data.^[43] This connection bridges fundamental fluid dynamics with applied valve sizing, though C_v incorporates additional device-specific factors beyond simple orifices. Primarily used in flow metering applications, such as orifice plates in pipelines for measuring fluid rates in industrial processes, C_d enables precise calibration of meters without relying on broader device characterization like C_v.^[40]

Flow Coefficient in Turbomachinery

In turbomachinery, the flow coefficient, denoted as \phi, is a dimensionless parameter that characterizes the flow through compressor and turbine stages. It is defined as the ratio of the axial velocity V_\text{axial} to the blade tip speed U_\text{tip}, given by the formula \phi = V_\text{axial} / U_\text{tip}. An equivalent expression uses mass flow rate: \phi = \dot{m} / (\rho A U_\text{tip}), where \dot{m} is the mass flow rate, \rho is the fluid density, and A is the annular flow area. This definition applies primarily to axial machines, with meridional velocity substituting for axial in radial or mixed-flow designs. The flow coefficient non-dimensionalizes performance characteristics, enabling the plotting of efficiency, pressure ratio, and loading on universal maps independent of machine size or speed. Typical values for axial compressors range from 0.4 to 0.7, with high-performance designs often operating around 0.45 to 0.55 at the mean radius to balance flow capacity and aerodynamic efficiency. In turbines, similar ranges apply, adjusted for expansion duties. Central to similarity laws, the flow coefficient facilitates scaling of turbomachines across sizes while preserving geometric and kinematic similarity; lower \phi values indicate high-head (pressure rise or drop) operation with reduced flow, whereas higher \phi signifies high-flow, low-head conditions that shift blade incidence angles and influence stall margins. Paired with the work coefficient \psi = \Delta h / U_\text{tip}^2, where \Delta h is the specific enthalpy change across the stage, \phi aids in predicting overall efficiency and stage loading. For instance, a turbine stage with U_\text{tip} = 300 m/s and V_\text{axial} = 150 m/s yields \phi = 0.5, optimizing blade angles for nominal incidence and minimizing losses.

References

[1]
Flow Coefficient Cv vs. Flow Factor Kv - The Engineering ToolBox
The flow coefficient - Cv - is based on the imperial units system and is defined as: the flow of water through a valve at 60 oF in U.S. gallon/minute at a ...
[2]
[PDF] Valve Sizing Technical Bulletin (MS-06-84;rev_4;en-US - Swagelok
Valve manufacturers determine flow coefficients by testing the valve with water using a standard ISA test method. Symbols Used in Flow Equations. Cv = flow ...
[3]
Understanding the rated capacity of full-bore ball valves
Rated flow capacity of a valve is typically expressed in terms of some type of flow coefficient, currently usually, Cv and Kv. They are equivalent but differ ...
[4]
[PDF] Flow Equations for Sizing Control Valves - Integrated Systems
ISA-75.01. 01-2007 includes equations for predicting the flow coefficient of compressible and incompressible fluids through control valves. The equations for ...
[5]
[PDF] The Use of Control Valve Sizing Equations with Simulation Based ...
The following equations constitute the fundamental compressible flow sizing model presented in the ISA and IEC standards. Piping correction terms (FP, xTP) have ...
[6]
[PDF] Tech Sheet #CVR 403 - Fluid Controls Institute
Flow coefficient calculated assuming laminar flow, gpm/(PSI) .5. CVT. Valve ... These equations are simpler and more accurate to use than the ISA standard 75.01.
[7]
What is CV, and How Do I Calculate It? - Belimo
Jun 30, 2021 · Valve Flow Coefficient (Cv) is the flow capability of a control valve at fully open conditions relative to the pressure drop across the valve.<|control11|><|separator|>
[8]
[PDF] VALVE SIZING & SELECTION TECHNICAL REFERENCE
Actuator Size. VALVE FLOW TERMINOLOGY. CV: The Flow Coefficient, CV, is a dimensionless value that relates to a valve's flow capacity. Its most basic form is.
[9]
[PDF] Fluid Flow Instrumentation - MST.edu
The flow coefficient is found experimentally and is tabulated in numerous reference books. This value ranges from 0.6 to 0.9 for most orifices, and the ...
[10]
Flow Coefficient and Work Coefficient - Concepts NREC
Flow coefficient (Φ) and work coefficient (φ) are quantities used to characterize turbomachinery and are common means of classifying stages.
[11]
(PDF) A simple method for high-precision evaluation of valve flow ...
Flow coefficient is an important performance index associated with the energy efficiency of a valve, and an effective method to evaluate valve flow ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[12]
FLOW COEFFICIENT PREDICTION OF A BOTTOM LOAD BALL ...
May 15, 2019 · This study analyzed the ability of computational fluid dynamic software to accurately predict the flow coefficient of three bottom-load ball ...
[13]
Control Valves Sizing | Emerson US
In 1967, the ISA established a committee to develop and publish standard equations. ... Calculate the required flow coefficient (Cv). Control Valve Sizing Videos ...
[14]
Discharge Coefficient - Valvias
There are equations to convert the discharge coefficient to the flow coefficient, and diameter is a parameter to introduce as the flow coefficient varies on it.
[15]
Control Valve Sizing Standard - Electrical Engineering Center
Key Concepts in ISA 75.01. 1. Flow Coefficient (Cv). The flow coefficient Cv is defined as the number of U.S. gallons per minute (GPM) of water at 60°F that ...
[16]
Measurement Standards for Determining Flow Coefficient ... - Cashco
Aug 19, 2025 · The flow coefficient, commonly referred to as Cv, is a standardized measurement of a regulator's flow capacity. It defines the flow rate of ...Missing: authoritative | Show results with:authoritative
[17]
A Comprehensive Guide to Kv and Cv:Valve Flow Coefficients
Oct 28, 2025 · Definition: The Kv value is the flow rate of water incubic meters per hour (m³ / h) that will pass through a valve with a pressure drop of1 ...
[18]
Cv and Kv Values | Valve Flow Coefficient |Sanitary Butterfl
The Kv value is defined as the flow rate of water in cubic meters per hour passing through the valve under the condition of full valve opening, with a pressure ...
[19]
[PDF] Application Notes Kv coefficient · Valve sizing - SAMSON AG
Calculation of the valve flow coefficient KV. The procedure specified in the IEC 60534 standard is applied to determine the valve flow coefficient KV.
[20]
[PDF] international standard iec 60534-2-1
Flow coefficients may be calculated using the appropriate equation selected from the ones given below. A sizing flow chart for incompressible fluids is given in.
[21]
[PDF] IS/IEC 60534-2-1 (1998): Industrial-Process Control Valves, Part 2
Flow coefficients may be calculated using the appropriate equation selected from the ones given below. A sizing flow chart for incompressible fluids is given in.
[22]
Control valve Cv to Kv Conversion Calculator - Automation Forum
May 16, 2024 · There is a conversion factor that directly connects the two: · Cv is about 1.156 times Kv, whereas Kv is around 0.865 times Cv' ...Cv to Kv Conversion Calculator · Control Valve CV and KV...
[23]
Control Valve Relation between Cv and Kv | Cv = 1.156Kv - Inst Tools
Sep 28, 2022 · Control Valve Relation between Cv and Kv · How do we get value 1.156 (Conversion Factor) in formula Cv = 1.156Kv or Cv= 1.156×Q×sqrt (G/delta P).
[24]
Cv Flow Coefficients of Gate Valves - Oudian Valve
Jul 23, 2025 · The Cv value is defined as: The number of US gallons per minute (GPM) of water at 60°F that will pass through a fully open valve with a pressure ...
[25]
[PDF] Control Valve Sizing | BBP Sales
Valtek control valve flow capacity (Cv) is based upon the industry standard, ANSI/ISA S75.01. This standard and the corresponding measuring standards contain.<|control11|><|separator|>
[26]
[PDF] Valve Sizing Calculations (Traditional Method)
Select the valve size using the appropriate flow coefficient table and the calculated Cv value. Page 11. Valve Sizing (Standardized Method). 636. TECHNICAL.<|control11|><|separator|>
[27]
What are the Units of flow coefficient Cv? And relationship between ...
Apr 20, 2023 · According to Bernoulli's principle we expect this to be inversely proportional to √S, i.e. the denser the fluid the lower the flow. Since a ...
[28]
What Is Flow Coefficient Cv And How Does It Determine Valve ...
Flow coefficient Cv is a standardized measure of a valve's flow capacity, defined as the number of gallons per minute of water at 60°F that will flow ...Missing: origin history
[29]
ANSI/ISA-75.02.01-2008 (IEC 60534-2-3 Mod) Control Valve ...
ANSI/ISA-75.02.01-2008 defines test procedures for measuring control valve capacity and flow coefficients for industrial process valves.
[30]
Control valve flow testing and wear mechanisms - Valve World
May 30, 2022 · The main test standard for control valve capacity flow tests is ANSI/ISA-75.02.01-2008 Control Valve Capacity Test Procedures. It details ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[31]
[PDF] Control Valve Coefficient Testing - IJIRT
Control valve coefficient testing measures the flow capacity of a valve, relating flow passage and pressure drop. Testing uses a flow test rig and measures ...
[32]
What is Flow Coefficient (Cv), and Why You Should Care
Oct 13, 2015 · The Cv tells you how to properly size your valve so it has minimal effect on the hydraulic efficiency you've engineered into your system. It is ...
[33]
A Comprehensive Guide to Kv and Cv:Valve Flow Coefficients
Oct 28, 2025 · Definition: The Kv value is the flow rate of water incubic meters per hour (m³/h) that will pass through a valve with a pressure drop of1 bar ...
[34]
Converting Between Cv, Kv and K - Neutrium
This article details the equations required to convert between the resistance coefficient and flow coefficient methods (K, Cv and Kv).
[35]
Flow coefficient Kv (Kv value) of a valve - HAWE North America
The Kv value is therefore a parameter for the selection of valve sizes. It can be converted to the flow of air, gases, steam and also other pressure mediums. It ...Missing: preferred | Show results with:preferred
[36]
A Comprehensive Guide to Kv and Cv:Valve Flow Coefficients
Oct 28, 2025 · General Formula for Liquids:Kv = Q * √(SG / ΔP); Simplified Formula for Water (Most Common): Since the Specific Gravity (SG) of water is 1 ...The Kv Calculation Formula · The Cv Calculation Formula · 1. Control Valves: Kv Is The...
[37]
[PDF] 12 ENGINEERING INFORMATION
- the fluid is water within a temperature range of 278 K to 313 K (5°C to ... Valve flow coefficient Kv (or Cv) is the flow of water (specific gravity = 1),.
[38]
None
### Summary of Valve Sizing Process and Selection Factors from Control Valves Basics - Sizing & Selection
[39]
Adding Flow Coefficients for Valves in Series or Parallel
The equivalent flow coefficient K v or C v for two control valves installed in series can be calculated as 1 / (K vt ) 2 = 1 / (K v1 ) 2 + 1 / (K v2 ) 2 (1)
[40]
How to Use High Rangeability Flowmeters and Valves to Increase ...
The real rangeability for a valve is the ratio of the maximum controllable flow to the minimum controllable flow, taking into account valve precision and the ...
[41]
Flow Balancing Valves in Domestic Water Recirculation Systems
Jan 28, 2019 · Review flow balance in domestic water recirculation systems and the types of balance valves used across multiple systems.
[42]
Cavitation Guide for Control Valves - TrimTeck
Sigma is the most widely-accepted and precise cavitation index used to quantify and predict cavitation in control valves. Simply put, Sigma is the ratio of ...
[43]
Discharge Coefficient for Nozzles and Orifices - Neutrium
Feb 11, 2015 · The discharge coefficient is a dimensionless number used to characterise the flow and pressure loss behaviour of nozzles and orifices in fluid systems.
[44]
Discharge Coefficient - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
The discharge coefficient is defined as the ratio of the real mass flow rate to the standard mass flow rate, reflecting the efficiency of fluid flow through ...
[45]
[PDF] THE ORIFICE PLATE DISCHARGE COEFFICIENT EQUATION
A universal equation for the calculation of discharge coefficients of orifice plates. ... Measurement of fluid flow by means of orifice plates and nozzles. ISOIR ...
[46]
Jun 97 | PDF | Fluid Dynamics | Pump - Scribd
Cv = (38.0) (Cd(A) … A in sq.inches. <or> Cv = (29.9) d2 / (K)0.5 … d in inches. For example, a 12” full bore valve with a Cd of 0.3 has a K value of 11.1 ...<|control11|><|separator|>