Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Flow diagram

A flow diagram is a diagrammatic representation that visually illustrates the sequence of steps, decisions, and operations in a , , or , using standardized symbols connected by arrows to indicate direction and . It encompasses various forms, such as flowcharts for algorithms, process flow diagrams for manufacturing, and data flow diagrams for information s. These diagrams are essential tools in fields such as engineering, , , and , providing a clear overview of workflows to identify inefficiencies, plan improvements, or document procedures. Flow diagrams originated in in the early and evolved through efforts in the mid-20th century, particularly in and information processing (see Historical Development). They include types like models for organizational workflows and support modern applications across industries, including healthcare and energy (see Applications).

Core Concepts

Definition and Purpose

A flow diagram is a graphical of a , , or , utilizing symbols to depict individual steps, , and the directional connections between them. This tool maps out the sequence of activities, enabling a clear of how elements interact within a structured . The primary purposes of flow diagrams are to simplify the representation of complex sequences, identify inefficiencies such as bottlenecks, communicate procedural details effectively to diverse audiences, and support systematic analysis or planning efforts. In fields like and information systems, they serve as a bridge for conveying operational logic between technical experts and non-specialists. Unlike static charts, which focus on displaying distributions or static relationships, flow diagrams emphasize directional and to model the dynamic progression of events or through a . Key benefits include enhanced comprehension of intricate workflows, assistance in by revealing potential failure points, and provision of a reusable format for documentation and training. These diagrams often incorporate basic elements such as nodes for processes or decisions and arrows to denote direction.

Elements and Symbols

Flow diagrams utilize a standardized set of visual elements to represent processes, decisions, data flows, and sequences, enabling clear communication of complex systems or workflows. These elements include shapes for specific functions and lines for connections, adhering to established conventions that promote uniformity across diagrams. The use of consistent symbols ensures that diagrams are interpretable by diverse audiences, from engineers to analysts. The core symbols in flow diagrams are designed to denote distinct types of actions or states. Rectangles typically represent processes or steps, indicating operations where is transformed or tasks are performed. signify decision points, where paths branch based on conditions or outcomes, often with yes/no branches. Ovals mark the start and end points of the diagram, providing clear boundaries for the process. Arrows, or flowlines, illustrate the direction and sequence of flow between elements, guiding the viewer through the diagram's logic. Parallelograms are used for operations, highlighting where enters or exits the system.
Symbol ShapeNameMeaning
A step or operation that processes data or performs an action.
DecisionA branching point based on a condition or choice.
(Start/End)The initiation or conclusion of the process.
FlowlineDirection of sequence or data flow between elements.
Data entry or output to/from the system.
Connectors such as circles or off-page references link distant parts of a diagram, maintaining continuity without excessive lines, while annotations—often text labels or callouts—provide additional details for clarity. Branches from decision symbols use arrows to depict alternative paths, ensuring logical progression is evident. These components collectively form the diagram's , with lines typically flowing left-to-right or top-to-bottom for . Variations in symbol sets exist to accommodate specific contexts, with basic notations focusing on the essential shapes above for general use, while extended notations incorporate specialized forms like double-lined rectangles for predefined subprocesses or trapezoids for manual operations. For instance, in information processing diagrams, symbols may differentiate storage types (e.g., sequential vs. ), but core shapes remain consistent to avoid confusion. Effective use of these elements requires adherence to guidelines that enhance comprehension. Symbols should maintain consistent sizing and proportions to ensure visual harmony. Color-coding can categorize elements (e.g., blue for processes, red for decisions), but should be applied sparingly to prevent distraction. Diagrams must avoid clutter by limiting complexity, using hierarchies for detailed sub-processes, and incorporating clear labels that read left-to-right. These practices, drawn from efforts, promote scalability and universal interpretability.

Historical Development

Origins in Early 20th Century

The origins of flow diagrams emerged within the early 20th-century industrial efficiency movement, rooted in Frederick Winslow Taylor's principles, which sought to optimize workflows through systematic analysis of worker tasks and production processes. Taylor's methods, developed in the 1880s and 1890s at factories like Midvale Steel, involved time studies to measure motions and eliminate waste, laying the groundwork for visualizing sequences to achieve the "one best way" of performing work. Building directly on Taylorism, Frank and Lillian Gilbreth advanced motion studies in the 1910s, introducing therbligs in 1915 as 16 elemental motions—such as search, grasp, and transport empty—to dissect and refine for reduced fatigue and higher . Their techniques, including micro-motion filming and cyclegraphs, enabled detailed breakdown of physical tasks in industries like bricklaying, where motions were reduced from 18 to as few as 4.5 per unit. This focus on granular workflow analysis influenced the shift toward graphical representations in efficiency consulting. A pivotal milestone came in 1921 when the Gilbreths presented "Process Charts: First Steps in Finding the One Best Way to Do Work" to the , unveiling the first structured using symbols for operations, inspections, transports, delays, and storage, connected by arrows to map material and information flows in . In the 1920s, these diagrams gained traction in for visualizing process sequences, as exemplified by P.A. Amos's 1912 charts for flour and C.E. Knoeppel's 1920 graphic methods for , which depicted material paths between equipment to streamline industrial operations. Such tools were initially adopted in blueprints to chart physical workflows, supporting the broader drive in assembly lines and . Early flow diagrams, however, were constrained by their hand-drawn nature, absence of universal symbols, and emphasis on linear, physical movements of materials and workers rather than abstract or logical flows. Lacking elements like decision points or variability, they prioritized deterministic "one best way" sequences suited to repetitive tasks, limiting applicability to complex or adaptive processes.

Evolution and Standardization

Following the informal origins of process charting in early , flow diagrams experienced rapid evolution in the post-World War II period, particularly through their adaptation to computing applications. In the mid-1940s, and introduced a systematic notation for flow diagrams to visualize the logical flow of computer programs, representing operations, decisions, and data movements in a structured manner that influenced early practices. This integration marked a shift from mechanical process representation to algorithmic modeling, as detailed in their 1947 report on planning and coding of problems for the computer. Concurrently, in 1947, the (ASME) formalized the first widely adopted standard for symbols in the "ASME Standard: Operation and Flow Process Charts," establishing consistent shapes for operations, inspections, transports, delays, and storages to promote uniformity in industrial and engineering documentation. The 1960s and 1970s brought further standardization efforts to address growing complexity in information processing and systems design. The (ANSI) released X3.5-1969 and its revision X3.5-1970, "Flowchart Symbols and Their Usage in Information Processing," which defined precise symbols for , processing, connectors, and flow directions, tailored for contexts. In 1969, the (ISO) issued Recommendation R 1028 for symbols in information processing, adopting similar principles to ensure international consistency and reducing variations in symbol interpretation across global engineering projects. These standards laid the groundwork for later evolutions, including the (UML) in the 1990s, developed by , , and James Rumbaugh and standardized by the (OMG) in 1997, which incorporated activity diagrams as an advanced form of flow diagrams for object-oriented software modeling. Similarly, the 2000s saw the emergence of (BPMN), initiated by the Initiative in 2004 and adopted by OMG in 2006 with version 2.0 in 2011, providing a richer notation for business processes with elements like gateways, events, and pools to handle orchestration and choreography. Technological advancements drove significant changes in how flow diagrams were created and utilized. The 1980s marked a transition from paper-based drafting to (CAD) software, exemplified by the release of in 1982, which allowed for digital creation, editing, and scaling of diagrams, enhancing accuracy and facilitating iterative revisions in engineering workflows. By the 2020s, has introduced automation in diagramming, with tools leveraging to generate flow diagrams from textual descriptions, streamlining the process for non-experts while maintaining adherence to standards like BPMN. Standardization has profoundly impacted flow diagrams by minimizing interpretive ambiguity, enabling seamless global collaboration, and supporting in multidisciplinary teams, as evidenced by the widespread of ANSI/ISO symbols in software and documentation. However, challenges persist in domain-specific adaptations, where industries often extend core symbols—such as adding icons to PFDs—leading to hybrid notations that balance universality with specialized needs, sometimes complicating cross-domain communication.

Varieties of Flow Diagrams

Process Flow Diagrams

Process flow diagrams (PFDs) are graphical representations employed in to illustrate the primary flow paths, equipment, and major material and energy transfers within , such as those in refineries, plants, and facilities. These diagrams provide a high-level overview of the process topology, focusing on the sequence of operations without delving into minor details like specifications or wiring. PFDs serve as foundational tools for communicating intent among , operators, and stakeholders. Key features of PFDs include standardized symbols for process units—such as circles for and rectangles for reactors and heat exchangers—connected by directed lines representing and that convey inputs, outputs, and utilities like or cooling . Each major equipment item is assigned a , for example, "P-101" for the first in section 1, while are numbered sequentially and annotated with quantitative data such as flow rates (e.g., 50,000 kg/h), molar flows (e.g., 1,500 kmol/h), temperatures (e.g., 25°C), pressures (e.g., 1.5 atm), and phase compositions (e.g., vapor fraction or component mole percentages). These elements enable the integration of and balances directly into the diagram or accompanying tables, distinguishing PFDs from simpler general diagrams by emphasizing verifiable physical quantities for and validation. Basic symbols in PFDs are adapted from standards like ISO 10628 for consistency across drawings. In applications, s support by outlining equipment sizing and stream routing, facilitate optimization through identification of energy inefficiencies (e.g., heat recovery via exchangers), and enable safety analyses such as hazard identification in high-pressure systems. For instance, in oil refining, a PFD for a crude unit depicts the flow from a preheated crude oil stream (e.g., 100,000 barrels/day at 350°C) through a , atmospheric tower, and heat exchangers, capturing side streams like and while balancing mass inputs against outputs like gases and residues. This quantitative framework allows engineers to perform techno-economic evaluations and ensure compliance with operational constraints.

Data Flow Diagrams

Data flow diagrams (DFDs) are graphical representations that model the flow and transformation of within an , emphasizing how data moves between processes, entities, and without detailing control logic or timing. Developed in the 1970s as part of techniques, the Yourdon/DeMarco notation provides a standardized way to depict these flows, originating from Tom DeMarco's seminal work Structured Analysis and System Specification (), which introduced to facilitate clear system modeling for analysts and developers. This notation focuses on logical interactions, making it particularly useful for abstracting complex systems into understandable visuals. In Yourdon/DeMarco notation, DFDs consist of four primary components: processes, represented as circles or bubbles to indicate data transformations (e.g., a "Validate " process); external entities, shown as rectangles for sources or destinations of outside the system (e.g., a "Customer"); stores, depicted as open-ended rectangles or parallel lines for persistent repositories (e.g., "Inventory Database"); and flows, illustrated by arrows labeled with specific items (e.g., "Order Details") to show movement between components. These elements connect to form a where processes act as transformers, stores as holding tanks, and flows as pipelines, ensuring balanced inputs and outputs across the diagram for consistency. DFDs are structured hierarchically across levels of detail to progressively refine the system view. The context diagram (Level 0 overview) represents the entire system as a single process interacting with external entities via major data flows, providing a high-level . This decomposes into a Level 0 , which breaks the system into primary subprocesses (numbered sequentially, e.g., 1.0 for main functions), maintaining data balance with the context level. Further levels (e.g., Level 1) decompose individual processes into finer subprocesses (e.g., 1.1, 1.2), allowing detailed analysis without altering higher-level balances, with the number of levels depending on system complexity. DFDs play a crucial role in system analysis and design, particularly for requirements gathering and specifying information systems by visualizing data requirements and interactions early in development. They aid in identifying inefficiencies, ensuring , and communicating designs to stakeholders in and database modeling. For instance, in an e-commerce order processing system, a Level 0 DFD might show the "" entity sending "Order Request" data to a "Process Order" subprocess, which interacts with an "Orders Database" store and outputs "Confirmation" to the customer, while flowing "Inventory Update" to another subprocess—highlighting data paths without physical details.

Flowcharts and Control Flow Diagrams

Flowcharts are graphical representations of algorithms and processes that illustrate the sequence of operations using standardized symbols to depict sequential, decision, and loop structures. They originated in the as a tool for planning and coding computer programs, with early examples appearing in the work of Adele Goldstine and , who used flow diagrams to outline computational steps for the computer in their 1947 report. These diagrams typically employ a set of symbols defined by standards such as ISO 5807, including ovals for start and end points, rectangles for process steps, diamonds for decision points, and parallelograms for operations, connected by arrows to show the flow direction. Sequential structures represent linear execution of steps, decision structures branch based on conditions (e.g., yes/no paths from a diamond), and loop structures incorporate repetition, often via connectors returning to prior points. Control flow diagrams extend flowchart principles to , focusing on execution paths, conditional branching, , and concurrency within programs. In , they map how control passes between code blocks, including interrupts or parallel threads, and are particularly formalized in UML activity diagrams, which use rounded rectangles for actions, diamonds for decisions, and bars for forks/joins to model concurrent flows. These diagrams help visualize program behavior under various inputs, such as handling errors via exception paths or synchronizing multi-threaded operations. A simple example of a is the sort , which repeatedly steps through a list, compares adjacent elements, and swaps them if out of order until no swaps are needed; it begins with a start oval, loops through comparisons in rectangles and decisions in diamonds, and ends when the list is sorted. For more complex scenarios, diagrams in embedded systems depict execution in resource-constrained environments, such as a managing inputs with interrupt-driven paths for responses, using nodes for basic blocks and edges for conditional jumps to ensure reliable operation under timing constraints. Flowcharts and control flow diagrams offer advantages in programming, such as aiding by revealing logical errors in execution paths and serving as tools to communicate algorithmic to teams. However, they have limitations, including poor for large programs where diagrams become overly complex and difficult to maintain, often requiring simplification or into sub-flows.

Specialized Types

Sankey diagrams represent flows of , materials, or costs where the width of each stream is proportional to the quantity it depicts, facilitating visualization of balances and efficiencies in physical processes. Originating from a 1898 diagram by Irish engineer Captain Matthew Henry Phineas Riall Sankey illustrating distribution in a , these diagrams emphasize conservation principles by showing inputs, transformations, and outputs without loss except as specified waste. In applications, such as analyzing , Sankey diagrams quantify how from fuel converts to electrical output, with arrow widths revealing losses like heat rejection in cooling systems, often highlighting that only about 30-40% of input becomes usable electricity in coal-fired plants. This proportional scaling aids in identifying inefficiencies, as seen in U.S. Sankey diagrams where offsite fuels and flows are tracked to end-use sectors. Influence diagrams provide a graphical for under , using nodes to represent decision variables (rectangles), chance variables (ovals) for random events, and value nodes (diamonds) for objectives, connected by directed arcs indicating probabilistic or informational influences. Introduced by Ronald A. Howard and James E. Matheson in 1981 as a compact alternative to extensive decision trees, they model complex interdependencies in problems like or , where arcs denote conditional dependencies or . For instance, in medical decision-making, an influence diagram might link patient symptoms (chance nodes) to diagnostic tests (decision nodes) and treatment outcomes (value nodes), incorporating uncertainties like test accuracy to compute expected utilities. This structure supports quantitative evaluation through , enabling on uncertainties to guide optimal choices. Network flow diagrams model optimization problems as directed graphs with nodes for origins, destinations, and intermediates, and edges assigned capacities and costs to represent constrained movements. These diagrams underpin algorithms for maximum or minimum-cost , where conservation at nodes ensures balanced inflows and outflows except at sources and sinks. In transportation , they optimize shipment ; for example, in a from factories to warehouses, edge capacities limit truckloads, and costs reflect distances or fuel, solving for minimal total expense while satisfying demands, as in the classic Hitchcock transportation problem formulation. Such models, solvable via , scale to real-world where capacities might constrain flows to 100 units per route, demonstrating efficiency gains like 15-20% cost reductions in optimized freight systems. Among emerging specialized types, alluvial diagrams extend to categorical data transitions over time or stages, with parallel vertical axes linked by curved bands whose widths indicate category frequencies and changes between them. First formalized in a 2010 paper by Martin Rosvall and Carl T. Bergstrom for mapping network evolution, they reveal patterns like voter shifts across elections or species migrations in ecological networks, where band thickness proportionally shows group sizes, such as 40% of a moving categories between periods. Fault tree diagrams, conversely, depict reliability through top-down logic trees starting from an undesired top event (e.g., system failure) branching via gates to basic failure causes, developed in the early by Bell Laboratories for the U.S. Air Force's Minuteman ICBM project and later applied in NASA's . In reliability engineering, they quantify failure probabilities—such as a 10^{-6} per hour rate for redundant —by propagating bottom-up event likelihoods, aiding fault identification in post-1960s designs like satellite s.

Applications

Engineering and Manufacturing

In engineering, process flow diagrams (PFDs) serve as foundational tools for designing and optimizing layouts by illustrating the sequence of equipment, material flows, and operational paths in chemical and process industries. These diagrams enable engineers to visualize the overall process topology, including major unit operations and interconnections, which is crucial for initial design phases and ensuring efficient spatial arrangements in facilities. For simulation of production lines, PFDs integrate with software to model throughput and , allowing virtual testing of scenarios to predict performance before physical implementation. Additionally, PFDs often interface with (CAD) systems during prototyping, where flow representations inform of components and assemblies, facilitating refinements in workflows. In , flow diagrams are extensively applied to map processes, depicting sequential steps from input to final product output, such as in automotive or production where they outline stations for cutting, , and quality checks. A prominent example is (VSM), a technique that visualizes material and information flows to eliminate waste; building on Toyota's Production System (developed in the mid-20th century) and popularized in the . The benefits of flow diagrams in these contexts include effective bottleneck detection through visual identification of process delays and throughput modeling to forecast production capacity and efficiency gains. For instance, in an assembly line case study, implementing a flow analysis identified non-value-added activities, leading to a reduction in cycle time via targeted improvements without major capital investment. However, challenges arise in handling production variability, as static diagrams may not fully capture fluctuations in demand or machine reliability, necessitating dynamic updates or simulations. Compliance with standards like ISO 9001 further complicates their use, requiring flow diagrams to document controlled es for audits while adapting to evolving regulatory demands in environments. As of 2025, flow diagrams are integrated with for automated synthesis in .

Information Systems and Software Development

In software development, Data Flow Diagrams (DFDs) serve as a foundational tool for eliciting and analyzing requirements by visually depicting the movement of data between processes, external entities, and data stores within a system. This modeling technique enables developers to identify functional dependencies, ensuring that outputs are clearly derived from inputs without ambiguity in the specification. Formal representations of DFDs, such as those using predicate transformers or algebraic semantics, further enhance this process by providing rigorous semantics that support verification and refinement during the design phase. Data flow modeling, as exemplified by DFDs, thus offers a structured way to bridge user requirements with implementation details in information systems. Control flow diagrams complement by outlining the sequential and conditional execution paths in software, facilitating reviews and efforts. These diagrams, often rendered as macro flowcharts, have been experimentally validated to improve effectiveness, with studies showing they reduce comprehension time and error rates in tasks when kept concise relative to length. In , flow diagrams extend to visualizing interactions and endpoint flows, where they map data transformations and request-response patterns to ensure coherence. For instance, in cloud migration projects, are applied to decompose monolithic applications into distributed components, illustrating how data streams evolve from centralized to service-oriented architectures. Since the 2000s, flow diagrams have integrated into Agile and methodologies to support iterative development and . Cumulative flow diagrams track work-in-progress limits and bottlenecks in Agile sprints, promoting efficient in team-based environments. Similarly, in the (), continuous flow diagrams monitor feature delivery across large-scale programs, enabling real-time adjustments for velocity and quality. Tools like the () incorporate activity diagrams—essentially object-oriented flow diagrams—to model behavioral flows in object-oriented design, allowing traceability from requirements to while accommodating processes and object interactions. The benefits of flow diagrams in these contexts include enhanced , which links artifacts across the development lifecycle to maintain alignment, and error reduction through early detection of inconsistencies in or control paths. In the 2020s, evolving trends emphasize their role in architectures, where diagrams model inter-service flows to optimize via horizontal partitioning and incorporate paths for threat identification, such as gateway protections and encrypted channels. This approach ensures resilient, distributed systems capable of handling dynamic loads while mitigating vulnerabilities in decentralized environments.

Business Processes and Management

In , flow diagrams serve as essential tools for visualizing and standardizing workflows within organizations. The (BPMN), developed by the , offers a graphical standard that depicts sequences of activities, decision points, and interactions, enabling stakeholders to design, execute, and monitor processes effectively. This notation bridges technical and non-technical audiences, facilitating clearer communication and iterative improvements in operational efficiency. Swimlane diagrams, a key variant often integrated into BPMN through pools and , partition processes by roles or departments to highlight responsibilities and handoffs. By organizing elements into horizontal or vertical , these diagrams clarify accountability in cross-functional settings, reducing misunderstandings and enhancing collaboration in complex workflows. In management applications, flow diagrams underpin methodologies like , which emerged in the 1980s to drive process improvement through data-driven analysis. practitioners use s to map current-state processes, identifying bottlenecks, waste, and non-value-added activities, thereby supporting targeted optimizations that align with organizational goals. For , these diagrams trace the flow of materials, information, and finances across entities, revealing opportunities to minimize delays and costs in end-to-end operations. A prominent example is the order-to-cash cycle, where flow diagrams outline sequential steps from customer order entry and fulfillment to invoicing and payment receipt. This visualization aids in streamlining the cycle, accelerating , and mitigating errors in revenue-generating processes. Strategically, flow diagrams support by mapping potential disruptions and response pathways, consistent with the iterative outlined in ISO 31000. In compliance auditing, they align with the COSO framework by illustrating activities, ensuring and adherence to regulatory requirements across operations. Such applications yield benefits like cost reduction by pinpointing redundancies and enabling proactive adjustments. Modern adaptations integrate flow diagrams with (ERP) systems, where they model automated workflows for real-time visibility and scalability in dynamic environments. Post-2020, amid accelerated adoption, these diagrams have evolved to depict hybrid models, incorporating virtual steps to manage distributed teams and maintain in flexible structures. As of 2025, flow diagrams also serve as standard tools in reporting per updated guidelines. This builds briefly on prior efforts in business diagramming for enhanced .

Creation and Tools

Manual and Hand-Drawn Methods

Manual and hand-drawn methods for creating flow diagrams rely on simple, accessible tools to facilitate initial conceptualization and collaborative development of processes. Common materials include or plain sheets for layout, pencils or pens for sketching, and erasers for revisions, allowing for flexible iterations without specialized equipment. Stencils or templates, often made of or metal, are used to draw standardized symbols accurately, ensuring uniformity in shapes like rectangles and diamonds. These analog approaches are particularly suited to and team environments where quick visualization is needed. A typical step-by-step process begins with identifying the key steps of , such as , operations, decisions, and outputs, often brainstormed in a group setting. Next, sketch the using a top-down or left-to-right to mimic natural reading order and enhance readability; for instance, start with an oval for the beginning and connect elements sequentially with arrows. Iterate by reviewing the draft for clarity, adjusting connections to avoid crossings, and incorporating feedback from stakeholders during sessions like brainstorming. This method is ideal for initial exploration in meetings, where participants can rearrange elements in . The advantages of hand-drawn flow diagrams include low cost and , requiring no software or power sources, making them practical for field use or resource-limited settings. They offer a tactile experience that fosters team collaboration, as seen in whiteboard sketches during reviews, where physical of notes or drawings encourages dynamic input and immediate problem identification. Additionally, manual creation promotes deeper conceptual understanding by forcing focus on core logic rather than technical details. Despite these benefits, limitations arise in scaling complex diagrams, where hand-drawing becomes error-prone for large processes due to imprecise measurements and difficulty maintaining proportions. Revisions can be labor-intensive, often requiring redrawing entire sections, and legibility suffers without uniform spacing or consistent line weights. To mitigate these, employ best practices such as uniform symbol sizing (e.g., maintaining a 1:2/3 width-to-height ), clear lettering in uppercase (at least 0.16 inches high), and even spacing between elements to prevent clutter. Basic symbols, drawn per standards like ANSI X3.5, include rectangles for processes and diamonds for decisions to ensure consistency.

Software Tools and Digital Creation

Digital tools for creating flow diagrams have revolutionized the process by enabling efficient, scalable visualization compared to manual methods, allowing users to produce complex diagrams with precision and ease. Among the most widely used software are , introduced in the early 1990s as a product of Shapeware Corporation and acquired by in 2000, which supports a broad range of diagram types including flowcharts and process maps. , launched in 2008, offers cloud-based diagramming with intelligent features tailored for collaborative environments. (now ), an open-source tool released in the 2010s, provides free, accessible diagramming without licensing costs and integrates with various platforms. For specialized applications like process flow diagrams (PFDs) in engineering, Plant 3D extends 's capabilities to generate P&IDs and PFDs with industry-standard symbols and data validation. Key features of these tools include drag-and-drop interfaces for placing symbols and connectors, automated routing to optimize line paths and avoid overlaps, and versatile export options such as PDF for print-ready documents and for scalable web use. Cloud-based options like and draw.io emphasize collaboration, enabling multiple users to edit diagrams simultaneously with version history and commenting. The typical creation workflow begins with importing data from sources like spreadsheets or databases to populate diagram elements, followed by selecting pre-built templates for standards such as BPMN or UML to accelerate setup. Users then customize connections and annotations before simulating flows to validate logic, as seen in Bizagi Modeler, which supports BPMN 2.0 notation for modeling, executing, and analyzing business processes. Emerging trends in the 2020s include -driven auto-generation, where tools like Lucidchart's assistant convert text descriptions or code snippets into diagrams, reducing manual effort. Additionally, integrations with integrated development environments () such as draw.io's extension for or plugins for allow developers to generate diagrams directly from code, enhancing software design workflows.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] Flow Chart/Process Flow Diagram
    A Flow Chart (also known as a Process Flow Diagram or Process Map) is a diagram of the steps in a process and their sequence. Two types of flow charts are ...
  2. [2]
    Process flow diagram - processdesign
    Mar 2, 2015 · The process flow diagram is an essential part of chemical engineering. It conveys a process and the path of its individual components.
  3. [3]
    Definition of flow chart - NCI Dictionary of Cancer Terms
    A diagram that shows the order of steps in a complex process. Also called flow sheet. Search NCI's Dictionary of Cancer Terms. Starts with. Contains.
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Read Free Procedure And Process Flow Charts For Better Business
    for documenting process flow, the flow process chart, was introduced by Frank Gilbreth to members of ASME in 1921 as the presentation “Process Charts—First.
  5. [5]
    [PDF] flowchart symbols and their usage in information processing - GovInfo
    Jun 30, 1973 · Explanation. The purpose of this FIPS PUB is to establish standard flowchart symbols and to specify their use in the preparation of flowcharts ...
  6. [6]
    Flowcharting Templates | National Museum of American History
    To assist in these endeavors, they used special diagrams called flow charts. By the mid-1950s, such efforts had generated a new drawing ...
  7. [7]
    ISO 1028:1973 - Information processing — Flowchart symbols
    Flowchart symbols ... Withdrawn (Edition 1, 1973) ... New version available: ISO 5807:1985 ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] flowchart symbols and their usage in information processing
    Details concerning the use of this standard within the Federal Government are contained in FIPS PUB 24, FLOWCHART SYMBOLS AND THEIR USAGE IN. INFORMATION ...
  9. [9]
    APPENDIX A. KEY TO DATA FLOW DIAGRAMS | FHWA
    A Data Flow Diagram (DFD) is a graphical means of describing the flow of data through a system that produces, changes, or stores data.
  10. [10]
    Energy Flow Charts | Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
    Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) produced the first diagrams illustrating U.S. national commodity use in the mid-1970s.Energy · Water Flow · Carbon · CommoditiesMissing: history | Show results with:history
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Flowchart - Institute for Healthcare Improvement
    also known as a “process map” — is a visual representation of the sequence of steps in a process. Understanding the process as it currently ...
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Guidelines for Using Process Mapping to Aid Improvement Efforts
    Process mapping is an easy-to-visualize method for people to analyze and agree on the most efficient routes for reengineering or improving a process. It aids in ...
  13. [13]
    What is a Six Sigma Process Map? - LSS Online - Purdue University
    May 11, 2021 · The purpose of a process map is to work together to create a common understanding of the process and how it should work.
  14. [14]
    Let Your Ideas Flow: Using Flowcharts to Convey Methods and ... - NIH
    Flowcharts and flow diagrams commonly use brief text and graphic elements to give an overview of a multistep process, a theory, or comparisons (Table 1).
  15. [15]
    17 Important Data Visualization Techniques - HBS Online
    Sep 17, 2019 · This process helps the presenter communicate data in a way that's easy for the viewer to interpret and draw conclusions. There are many ...Data Visualization... · 4. Gantt Chart · 7. Waterfall Chart<|control11|><|separator|>
  16. [16]
    Creating Process Flow Diagrams for Food and Ag - OSU Extension
    A Process Flow Diagram (PFD) is a type of flowchart that illustrates the separate steps of a process in sequence. The purpose of this fact sheet is to ...
  17. [17]
    Optimizing process flow diagrams to guide implementation of a ...
    Sep 21, 2023 · Process flow diagramming (or process mapping) is commonly used to support quality improvement initiatives related to healthcare delivery in ...Process Maps · Table 1 · Discussion
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Flowchart Symbol Cheat Sheet Courtesy of BreezeTree Software
    Flowchart. Symbol. Name. (Alternates). Description. Process. An operation or action step. Terminator. A start or stop point in a process. Decision. A question ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] ISO 5807:1985 - iTeh Standards
    3.3 flowchart: Graphical representation of the definition, analysis, or method of solution of a problem in which symbols are used to represent operations, data, ...
  20. [20]
    How to choose the most effective flow chart - Microsoft
    Sep 30, 2022 · Make flow charts easy to read, consistent, use contrast, and use online makers. Consider end-user, clear titles, and avoid jargon.Missing: authoritative | Show results with:authoritative
  21. [21]
    Scientific Management - Encyclopedia of Greater Philadelphia
    Frederick Winslow Taylor, “Father of Scientific Management,” developed a methodology that changed the shape of industrial manufacturing in the early twentieth ...Missing: workflow analysis
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Frank and Lillian Gilbreth and the Manufacture and Marketing of ...
    Given Taylor's use of Gilbreth's bricklaying innovations as illustrations for his popular Principles of Scientific Management [46], and the American. Federation ...Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
  23. [23]
    [PDF] 100 Years of Graphical Business Process Modelling
    In December 1921, Frank B. and Lillian Moller Gilbreth held a presentation entitled “Process. Charts” at the Annual Meeting of The American Society of ...
  24. [24]
    Flow Diagrams: Rise and Fall of the First Software Engineering ...
    Drawings of water are the earliest, least abstract forms of flow diagram. Representations of ideal or generalised sequences for manufacturing or actual ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  25. [25]
    Flow Diagrams, Assertions, and Formal Methods - ACM Digital Library
    Oct 7, 2019 · This paper examines the early history of the flow diagram notation developed by Herman Goldstine and John von Neumann in the mid-1940s.<|control11|><|separator|>
  26. [26]
    A.S.M.E. standard operation and flow process charts ... 1947 c.2.
    ASME standard operation and flow process charts, developed by the ASME Special committee on standardization of therbligs, process charts, and their symbols, ...
  27. [27]
    Generating Diagrams Instantly With Lucid AI - Lucidchart
    The perfect toolkit for AI-driven diagramming · Create AI-powered flowcharts · Quickly customize diagrams · Optimize every process · Integrate with AI.Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
  28. [28]
    Flow Diagrams: Rise and Fall of the First Software Engineering ...
    Aug 7, 2025 · This paper examines the early history of the flow diagram notation developed by Herman Goldstine and John von Neumann in the mid-1940s. It ...
  29. [29]
    DEXPI process: Standardizing interoperable information for process ...
    DEXPI Process is a proposed standard for modelling information about process design, as it is presented on block flow and process flow diagrams.
  30. [30]
    Process Flow Diagram - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    A process flow diagram (PFD) is defined as a graphical representation that describes a process, its constituent tasks, and their sequence, aiding in the ...
  31. [31]
    Process Flow Diagrams (PFDs) – Foundations of Chemical and ...
    Process flow diagrams (PFDs) include major equipment, process flow streams, and utility streams. Equipment is labeled by position, and utilities by descriptor.
  32. [32]
  33. [33]
    2.2 Refining of Petroleum into Fuels | EGEE 439
    Simple flow diagram of an oil refinery. Crude oil is the first process, and it breaks the products down into LPG, straight-run gasoline, naphtha/kerosene/diesel ...
  34. [34]
    Structured Analysis and System Specification - Google Books
    Evaluation and refinement of data flow diagrams. Data flow diagrams for system specification. Part 3: Data dictionary. The analysis phase data dictionary.
  35. [35]
    What is a Data Flow Diagram - Lucidchart
    This guide provides everything you need to know about data flow diagrams, including definitions, history, and symbols and notations.Data Flow Diagram Symbols · How to Make a Data Flow...
  36. [36]
    [PDF] Chapter 9: Dataflow Diagrams - Business Analyst Learnings
    In this chapter, we will explore one of the three major graphical modeling tools of structured analysis: the dataflow diagram. The dataflow diagram is a ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  37. [37]
    DFD Using Yourdon and DeMarco Notation - Visual Paradigm Online
    A data-flow diagram (DFD) is a way of representing a flow of data of a process or a system that aims to be accessible to a computer specialist and ...DFD Using Yourdon and... · The Elements of DFD · Data-flow Diagram Example...
  38. [38]
    DFD Tutorial: Yourdon Notation - Visual Paradigm Online
    Yourdon and Coad method includes components for creating data-flow diagrams and also object state diagrams. Some unique attributes of their DFD notation include ...DFD Tutorial: Yourdon Notation · Flowchart vs DFD
  39. [39]
    What Is a Data Flow Diagram (DFD)? - IBM
    A data flow diagram (DFD) is a visual representation of the flow of data through an information system or business process.
  40. [40]
    Data Flow Diagram Examples Symbols, Types, and Tips - Lucidchart
    A data flow diagram shows the way information flows through a process or system. It includes data inputs and outputs, data stores, and the various subprocesses ...
  41. [41]
    Sample flowchart for a sorting algorithm. This flowchart illustrates...
    This flowchart illustrates the conditional constructs, loops, and other elements of control flow that comprise an algorithm for sorting, from smallest to ...
  42. [42]
    Control Flow Graph (CFG) - Software Engineering - GeeksforGeeks
    Jul 11, 2025 · A Control Flow Graph (CFG) is the graphical representation of control flow or computation during the execution of programs or applications.<|control11|><|separator|>
  43. [43]
    Introduction to Flowcharts - GeeksforGeeks
    Jan 3, 2025 · Advantages of using a Flowchart · Flowcharts are a better way of communicating the logic of the system. · Flowcharts act as a guide for blueprint ...
  44. [44]
    Who is this Sankey guy?
    Apr 12, 2007 · Sankey diagrams are named after Captain Matthew Henry Phineas Riall Sankey. Here is some biographical information on Mr. Sankey.
  45. [45]
    2018 Manufacturing Static Energy Sankey Diagrams
    The Sankey diagrams show the fuel, steam, and electricity entering U.S. manufacturing plants from offsite sources. Renewable electricity generated onsite is ...Missing: balances | Show results with:balances
  46. [46]
    Decision Influence Diagrams and Their Uses - SpringerLink
    In 1981, Howard and Matheson introduced the idea of representing a Bayesian decision problem in terms of a graph called an influence diagram.
  47. [47]
    [PDF] Influence Diagrams - Gwern
    An influence diagram is a way of describing the dependencies among aleatory variables and decisions. An influence diagram can be used to visualize the.
  48. [48]
    Influence Diagrams—Historical and Personal Perspectives
    Dec 1, 2005 · This note explains why the original introduction of influence diagrams, lacking formal underpinning of these features, has had only mild influence on automated ...
  49. [49]
    Influence Diagrams - ResearchGate
    Aug 7, 2025 · Basically, the influence diagram is a qualitative description of the decision problem. [27] The influence diagram shows the utility function in ...
  50. [50]
    [PDF] Chapter 5 Network Flows
    Network flows involve how objects move through a network, represented by nodes and directed edges. Min-cost-flow problems involve flow variables and ...
  51. [51]
    [PDF] Chapter 10: Network Flow Programming
    Network flow programming is formulating and solving network problems via linear programming, where any network flow problem can be cast as a minimum-cost ...
  52. [52]
    [PDF] Network Models - MIT
    The transportation problem is a network-flow model without intermediate locations. To formulate the problem, let us define the following terms: ai = Number of ...
  53. [53]
    Alluvial Diagram - Data Viz Project
    Alluvial diagram is a variant of the Parallel Sets but for categorical variables and often to display trends over time and phases. Family. Diagram. Function.
  54. [54]
    Using the Alluvial diagram to display variable characteristics for ...
    Jun 23, 2023 · Alluvial diagrams were first used in the 2010 paper Mapping Change in Large Networks by Martin Rosvall and Carl T. Bergstrom, in which they used ...
  55. [55]
    [PDF] 1 Fault Tree Analysis – A History Clifton A. Ericson II The Boeing ...
    Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) is a tool for analyzing failure paths in a system. It was developed for the Air Force around 1961 and used in the Apollo project.
  56. [56]
    [PDF] Fault Tree Analysis - NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)
    Fault tree analysis is a top-down approach to identify process hazards and graphically display ways something can go wrong.
  57. [57]
    Plant simulation software - Siemens PLM
    Use Plant Simulation software for discrete-event simulation and throughput optimization to improve manufacturing performance of your production systems.
  58. [58]
    CAD Modeling For Product Design And Prototyping - First Mold
    Dec 25, 2024 · CAD modeling is the process of using computer software to produce a physical model and preview the design. These models expose accurate product designs.Steps In Cad Modeling For... · How Cad Models Enhance... · Applications Of Cad Modeling...
  59. [59]
    How to Make a Production Flow Chart for Manufacturing Processes ...
    Dec 21, 2022 · A production flow chart is used to illustrate the manufacturing process of a product. It shows the stages, equipment used and quality control checks.
  60. [60]
    Toyota Production System | Vision & Philosophy | Company
    A production system based on the philosophy of achieving the complete elimination of waste in pursuit of the most efficient methods.
  61. [61]
    What Is Value Stream Mapping? | Atlassian
    Toyota's success and use of lean manufacturing practices helped promote value stream mapping as a modern best practice for high efficiency business teams during ...
  62. [62]
    How Process Mapping Can Help Identify Bottlenecks - Flowster
    Dec 11, 2024 · In this article, we will explore how process mapping can help identify bottlenecks in your business processes, leading to improved efficiency and productivity.
  63. [63]
    Throughput Time in Manufacturing. Definition, Benefits, and More
    Jun 24, 2024 · Enhanced Productivity: When throughput time is reduced, bottlenecks and non-value-added activities become more apparent, allowing businesses to ...Missing: detection | Show results with:detection
  64. [64]
    [PDF] Reduction of Cycle Time in Vehicle Engine Assembly Line Using ...
    This research aims to identify the Non-Value Added (NVA) activities in Station 2 and minimize them with. Karakuri Kaizen. The results of the Process Activity ...
  65. [65]
    Proven Strategies for Minimizing Variability in Manufacturing
    May 25, 2024 · Variability in manufacturing can lead to a host of problems, including inconsistent product quality, increased costs, and dissatisfied customers ...Missing: diagrams | Show results with:diagrams
  66. [66]
    ISO 9001 Flowchart Basics - 9000 Store
    Enter the purpose (start/stop/decision/etc.) of each symbol within the shape and connect them with arrows to show the direction of the flow.
  67. [67]
    Analyzing the logical structure of data flow diagrams in software ...
    A data flow diagram (DFD) represents the functional dependencies within a system: it shows how output values in a computation are derived from input values.
  68. [68]
    Formal Representations of the Data Flow Diagram: A Survey
    This paper surveys techniques for formally representing data flow diagrams (DFD) to remove ambiguity and improve understanding of requirements and design.
  69. [69]
    Control flow and data structure documentation: two experiments
    Two experiments were carried out to assess the utility of external documentation aids such as macro flowcharts, pseudocode, data structure diagrams, ...
  70. [70]
    Making UML activity diagrams object-oriented - IEEE Xplore
    Therefore this paper proposes a few small changes to the UML metamodel that will integrate activity diagrams into an object-oriented scheme, focusing on three ...
  71. [71]
    About the Business Process Model And Notation Specification ...
    Business Process Model and Notation has become the de-facto standard for business processes diagrams. It is intended to be used directly by the stakeholders.
  72. [72]
    What is a Flowchart? Process Flow Diagrams & Maps | ASQ
    ### Summary: Flowcharts in Six Sigma Process Mapping
  73. [73]
    What Is Order-to-Cash (O2C)? The Order-to-Cash Process Explained
    May 1, 2025 · This diagram outlines the nine steps of the order-to-cash process, from purchasing to reporting, illustrating the flow of a customer order ...What Is the Order-to-Cash... · Order-to-Cash Best Practices
  74. [74]
    The Basics of ISO 31000 – Risk Management - Riskonnect
    Jan 31, 2025 · ISO 31000 is a risk management standard with two main components: a Framework and a multi-step Process for identifying and analyzing risks.
  75. [75]
    Internal Control - Integrated Framework - COSO.org
    COSO developed the framework in response to senior executives' need for effective ways to better control their enterprises and to help ensure that ...
  76. [76]
    6 Key Phases of an ERP Implementation Plan - NetSuite
    Sep 8, 2025 · A flowchart of the six phases of an ERP implementation, including discovery and planning, design, development, support, deployment, and testing.
  77. [77]
    The future of work after COVID-19 | McKinsey
    Feb 18, 2021 · The pandemic accelerated existing trends in remote work, e-commerce, and automation, with up to 25 percent more workers than previously estimated potentially ...
  78. [78]
    None
    Below is a merged summary of the manual/hand-drawn methods for flow diagrams, process flows, or engineering drawings, combining all the information from the provided segments into a concise yet comprehensive response. To maximize detail and clarity, I’ve organized the information into a table format (CSV-style) for key sections, followed by additional narrative details where appropriate. This ensures all specifics are retained while maintaining readability.
  79. [79]
    [PDF] Engineering Sketching for Design and Communication - PDH Online
    Lead engineers can use sketches to communicate each revision to the client for preliminary approval. 3.1 Flow Diagram Example. These are the instructions given ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  80. [80]
    The best flowchart software and diagram tools in 2025 - Zapier
    The 8 best flowchart software and diagram tools · Lucidchart for advanced functionality · Microsoft Visio for Microsoft 365 and Windows users · Zapier Canvas for ...
  81. [81]
  82. [82]
    Lucid Software - Crunchbase Company Profile & Funding
    Legal Name Lucid Software, Inc. ; Also Known As Lucid, Lucidchart, Lucidspark ; Operating Status Active ; Company Type For Profit ; Founders Ben Dilts, Karl Sun.
  83. [83]
    draw.io
    Example diagram. Powerful features. Collaborate with shared cursors in real-time. draw.io has everything you expect from a professional diagramming tool.Example draw.io diagrams · Integrations · About draw.io · Blog
  84. [84]
    P&ID Software | AutoCAD Plant 3D - Autodesk
    Learn more about P&ID software and the Plant 3D toolset included with AutoCAD. Easily create piping and instrumentation diagrams for processes and 3D models ...
  85. [85]
    Microsoft Visio: Diagramming & Flowcharts | Microsoft 365
    Try Microsoft Visio, the best diagramming software for flowcharts, data visualization, and integrated workflows. Boost team collaboration and productivity.
  86. [86]
    All About Microsoft Visio® for Diagrams - Lucidchart
    Microsoft Visio is software for drawing a variety of diagrams. These include flowcharts, org charts, building plans, floor plans, data flow diagrams, process ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  87. [87]
    Business Process Modeling - BPMN - Bizagi
    Build business process models to identify process improvement opportunities and increase efficiency and agility across your organization.The Bpmn Process Modeling... · Top 5 Business Process... · You May Also Be Interested...
  88. [88]
    Draw.io VS Code Integration - Visual Studio Marketplace
    This unofficial extension integrates Draw.io (also known as diagrams.net) into VS Code. Mentioned in the official diagrams.net blog.<|separator|>