Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Business Process Model and Notation

Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) is a standardized graphical notation originally developed by the Business Process Management Initiative (BPMI) and maintained by the (OMG) for specifying, modeling, and executing business processes in a way that is intuitive for business users and precise enough for technical implementation. Introduced in May 2004 as BPMN 1.0, the specification evolved through versions such as 1.2 in January 2009 and 2.0 in January 2011, with the current version 2.0.2 adopted in January 2014. BPMN's primary goal is to provide a unified notation that bridges the gap between business process analysis and execution, allowing stakeholders—from analysts and managers to developers—to visualize end-to-end workflows, including sequences, decisions, and interactions. It supports three core diagram types: process diagrams for detailing internal activities and flows within a single participant; collaboration diagrams for depicting interactions across multiple participants or organizations; and for focusing on message exchanges between roles without revealing internal details. As an maintained by , BPMN has been adopted internationally as ISO/IEC 19510:2013, which aligns with version 2.0.1 and promotes interoperability in (BPM) tools and platforms. The notation incorporates a rich set of elements, including events, tasks, gateways, and data objects, enabling the modeling of complex scenarios while mapping to executable languages like BPEL for automation.

Overview

Definition

Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) is a standardized graphical notation for specifying in a business process diagram (BPD). It provides businesses with the capability to visualize their internal and collaborative processes using a consistent, intuitive set of symbols and rules, enabling clear representation of process flows, decisions, and interactions. According to the (OMG), BPMN is a of human-readable notation that describes the of business processes while also supporting a formal mapping to execution languages such as WS-BPEL, allowing models to be both analyzed and enacted by technical systems. This dual nature ensures that BPMN diagrams can serve as a common language between business stakeholders and IT developers, bridging the gap for process design and implementation. Key characteristics of BPMN include its visual and flowchart-like design, which is intuitive for non-technical users such as business analysts and managers, and its flexibility to support modeling at both high-level overviews and detailed operational levels. The notation was initially released as version 1.0 in May 2004 by the Initiative (BPMI) and later adopted by the following the merger of the two organizations in 2005.

Purpose and Benefits

The primary purpose of Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) is to provide a standardized graphical notation for specifying business processes, enabling consistent documentation and modeling across diverse organizational contexts. Developed by the (OMG), BPMN aims to support by offering a notation that is intuitive for non-technical business users while capable of representing complex process semantics for technical implementation. This addresses the fragmentation caused by multiple proprietary modeling notations, promoting and shared understanding among stakeholders. Key benefits of BPMN include enhanced communication between business analysts, developers, and executives, as its visual elements—such as flow objects—facilitate clearer articulation of process logic without requiring deep technical expertise. It supports process analysis and , allowing organizations to evaluate for efficiency, identify potential bottlenecks, and test improvements before implementation. Furthermore, BPMN enables the creation of executable models that can be directly mapped to business process execution languages, streamlining and reducing development time in systems. In practice, BPMN is widely applied in industries like for documenting requirements and in healthcare for modeling workflows, leading to reduced during requirements gathering and more effective process optimization. Organizations adopting BPMN report improved alignment across teams, faster problem-solving, and better support for continuous process improvement initiatives. However, to maintain , BPMN intentionally balances expressiveness with , which serves as a by limiting overly intricate representations for non-experts, encouraging the use of core elements over advanced extensions.

History

Origins and Standardization

In the early 2000s, the business process modeling landscape was characterized by a proliferation of proprietary and incompatible notations, hindering interoperability and communication between business stakeholders and IT teams across organizations. To address this fragmentation, the Business Process Management Initiative (BPMI), founded in August 2000, established a Notation Working Group in 2002 to develop a standardized graphical notation for business processes. This effort aimed to create a single, intuitive language that bridged the gap between business analysts, technical implementers, and end users, promoting consistency in process documentation and execution. The BPMI's development of BPMN spanned over two years of collaborative work, resulting in the public release of BPMN version 1.0 in May 2004. This initial specification introduced a set of core elements designed for visual representation of processes, emphasizing simplicity and universality to support both high-level overviews and detailed technical models. Key contributors to this phase included prominent BPMI members such as IBM, which provided leadership through figures like Stephen A. White, the chair of the Notation Working Group; Oracle; and other industry leaders including Sun Microsystems, BEA Systems, and Intalio, who collectively shaped the notation's foundational principles. Recognizing the need for broader industry adoption and ongoing maintenance, BPMI merged with the (OMG) in June 2005, transferring responsibility for BPMN's evolution to the larger standards body. Under OMG's stewardship, BPMN was formally adopted as an official standard in February 2006, with the publication of the BPMN 1.0 specification, marking its transition from an initiative-led project to a globally recognized framework. This standardization ensured BPMN's integration with other OMG technologies, such as the Business Process Definition Metamodel, while laying the groundwork for future enhancements.

Version Evolution

The Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) began with version 1.0, released in May 2004 by the Business Process Management Initiative (BPMI), which introduced a foundational graphical notation for modeling business processes but lacked formal execution semantics, focusing primarily on visual representation for analysis and documentation. Following the merger of BPMI into the (OMG) in 2005, BPMN 1.1 was published in January 2008, incorporating minor refinements such as clarifications to diagram elements and improved alignment with emerging standards, while BPMN 1.2 followed in January 2009 with further adjustments to notation rules and minor extensions for better usability in tools. The specification underwent a significant overhaul with BPMN 2.0, finalized and adopted by in January 2011, which expanded the metamodel to include executable semantics for process orchestration, introduced support for diagrams to model interactions between participants, and added XML-based interchange formats to enable across tools and platforms. Subsequent updates addressed errata and refinements without introducing major new features: BPMN 2.0.1 was released in September 2013 to correct identified issues in the core specification, and BPMN 2.0.2 followed in January 2014 as the final minor revision, consolidating changes for stability and conformance testing. As of 2025, no major versions beyond BPMN 2.0.2 have been released, with the maintaining the standard through ongoing errata resolutions, conformance certification updates, and integration with related specifications like the Decision Model and Notation (DMN).

Fundamental Concepts

Scope and Metamodel

The scope of BPMN extends to the modeling of business processes across varying degrees of complexity and intent, specifically supporting descriptive processes for high-level overviews suitable for non-technical stakeholders, analytical processes for performance evaluation and simulation, and executable processes that can be directly enacted by process engines. This framework accommodates different model types, including private processes that capture detailed internal workflows within a single , abstract processes that omit proprietary details for external communication, and collaboration models that illustrate message exchanges and interactions among multiple participants or partners. At its core, the BPMN metamodel defines an abstract syntax that structures all BPMN elements and their relationships, serving as the foundational blueprint for consistent model creation and interpretation. This metamodel is formalized using the Meta-Object Facility (MOF), a standard from the (OMG) that draws inspiration from UML's modeling architecture, and it delineates key classes such as (representing the overall workflow), (signifying triggers or outcomes), Activity (encompassing tasks or subprocesses), Gateway (for decisions), and SequenceFlow (connecting elements to define execution order). These classes form a hierarchical package structure in the metamodel, enabling extensions while maintaining semantic integrity. BPMN supports three interconnected levels of modeling to bridge human-readable diagrams with machine-processable artifacts. At the graphical level, Business Process Diagrams (BPDs) provide a visual notation for intuitive representation. The interchange level employs XML based on a defined , facilitating model between tools without loss of information. For executability, BPMN mappings to standards like WS-BPEL (Web Services ) allow processes to be transformed into deployable code, ensuring align with business intent. The boundaries of BPMN are intentionally focused on the orchestration and choreography of business logic flows, emphasizing sequence, decisions, and interactions while deliberately excluding broader concerns such as complete system architecture, detailed data schemas, or user interface designs. This delimited scope ensures BPMN remains accessible for business analysts yet extensible for technical integration.

Basic Building Blocks

The basic building blocks of Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) consist of four primary categories: flow objects, connecting objects, swimlanes, and artifacts. These elements form the foundational graphical and conceptual components used to construct BPMN diagrams, enabling the visual representation of business processes in a standardized manner. Flow objects represent the primary behaviors and states within a process. They include events, which indicate something that happens (depicted as circles, often with icons for start, intermediate, or end types); activities, which denote work performed (shown as rounded rectangles, subdivided into tasks or subprocesses); and gateways, which control the flow's divergence or convergence (illustrated as diamonds with specific shapes like exclusive or parallel markers). These objects capture the dynamic aspects of the process, such as triggers, actions, and decisions, providing the core narrative of process execution. Connecting objects define the relationships and pathways between flow objects. Sequence flows link activities in their default order using arrows with filled arrowheads, ensuring the logical progression of the process. Message flows, represented by dashed arrows with open arrowheads and a small , illustrate communications between separate participants or pools. Associations, shown as dotted lines without arrows, connect artifacts to other elements for contextual linkage without affecting the flow. Together, these objects establish the process's structure and interactions, adhering to principles of directed and undirected connections to avoid ambiguity. Swimlanes organize the diagram by delineating responsibilities among participants. Pools are large rectangular containers that represent distinct entities, such as organizations or systems, and can include multiple internal lanes. , horizontal or vertical subdivisions within pools, group related activities by roles or departments. This categorization enhances readability by spatially separating process elements according to ownership, supporting collaborative modeling across boundaries. Artifacts provide supplementary information without altering the flow. Data objects, depicted as rectangles with folded corners (for inputs/outputs) or document icons, represent information exchanged in the process. Groups enclose related elements in a rounded rectangle boundary for logical clustering, while annotations add explanatory text via a note shape connected by a dashed line. These non-flow elements enrich the diagram with context, such as data dependencies or clarifications, ensuring comprehensive process documentation. BPMN's notation principles emphasize intuitive, standardized shapes—circles for instantaneous events, rounded forms for ongoing work, pointed diamonds for decisions, and lines for connections—with variations in line styles (solid, dashed) and icons to denote subtypes. Colors are optional but often used for emphasis, such as for positive outcomes. This visual consistency facilitates universal understanding among business users and technical implementers. Prior to composing BPMN diagrams, modelers must grasp these building blocks to ensure accurate representation of logic, participant interactions, and supporting details, as they serve as the atomic units for higher-level constructions.

Diagram Components

Flow Objects

Flow objects are the core elements in Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) that define the behavior of a process, capturing what happens during its execution. They consist of three primary categories: events, activities, and gateways, which together model the sequence of actions, decisions, and triggers in a business . These elements are connected by sequence flows to represent the logical progression of the process, enabling clear visualization of operational dynamics.

Events

Events in BPMN denote something that occurs during a , influencing its flow by starting, interrupting, or terminating it. Graphically, events are represented as circles, with variations in border thickness and internal icons to distinguish their types and subtypes. There are three main classifications: start events, intermediate events, and end events, each serving distinct roles in process lifecycle management. Start events mark the initiation of a process and are depicted as a single thin-bordered circle, often with an icon indicating the trigger mechanism. Common subtypes include the message start event, symbolized by an envelope for external communication triggers; the timer start event, using a clock for time-based initiation; and the conditional start event, represented by a lined for rule-based starts. These subtypes allow processes to begin in response to specific stimuli, such as incoming messages or scheduled intervals. Intermediate events occur after the process has started and before it ends, affecting ongoing execution; they are shown as double-bordered circles when placed inline or as smaller circles attached to activity boundaries for localized effects. Subtypes encompass message events (envelope icon, for sending or receiving communications), timer events (clock icon, for delays or timeouts), and (lightning bolt icon, for handling exceptions). Boundary events, a special form of intermediate events, can be interrupting (thick line, halting the attached activity) or non-interrupting (thin line, allowing parallel continuation), enabling reactive process adjustments like or escalations. End events signal the conclusion of a or , illustrated as a thick-bordered circle with optional s for the termination type. Subtypes include the end event (envelope, for outgoing notifications), end event (lightning bolt, to propagate faults), and terminate end event (no icon, to immediately halt all activity instances). These ensure es conclude explicitly, often triggering subsequent actions in larger orchestrations.

Activities

Activities represent the work or actions performed within a process, forming the executable steps that add value or advance the workflow. They are visually rendered as rounded rectangles, with icons or expansions denoting specific characteristics. Activities are divided into atomic tasks and composite sub-processes, allowing modeling at varying levels of detail. Tasks are the simplest, indivisible units of work, depicted as a standard rounded rectangle potentially augmented with icons for specialization. Key types include the user task (person icon, requiring human intervention), service task (gear icon, for automated system calls), script task (hash symbol, executing custom code), manual task (hand icon, for non-automated physical actions), business rule task (grid icon, applying decision rules), and send/receive tasks (envelope, for message exchanges). These task types facilitate precise representation of diverse operational elements, from manual reviews to API integrations. Sub-processes encapsulate a group of activities into a reusable, hierarchical unit, shown as a rounded rectangle with a plus sign (collapsed) or expanded boundary (detailed view). They can be event sub-processes (triggered by boundary events) or sub-processes (with capabilities), supporting modular and . Boundary events may attach to sub-processes similarly to tasks, enhancing their responsiveness to interruptions.

Gateways

Gateways model where the process flow splits or merges based on conditions, data, or events, ensuring controlled branching and . All gateways are symbolized by shapes, with internal markers specifying their logic: empty for data-based, or icons for event-driven variants. They control (splitting flows) and (merging flows), maintaining integrity through defined semantics. The exclusive gateway (XOR), often unmarked or with an "X" icon, routes to exactly one outgoing path based on exclusive conditions, such as if-then decisions; in , it waits for one incoming flow. The parallel gateway (AND), featuring a "+" icon, enables simultaneous execution of all outgoing paths for or synchronizes all incoming paths for , ideal for concurrent subprocesses. The inclusive gateway (OR), with an "O" icon, activates outgoing paths meeting any condition () or waits for all active incoming paths (), accommodating partial branching. The event-based exclusive gateway, containing a circle icon, defers decisions to subsequent events, selecting the first triggered path and canceling others, commonly used for asynchronous routing. Flow objects interact to sequence process logic, with events triggering activities, gateways directing flows between them, and boundary events providing contextual reactions attached to activities for dynamic adaptations. This composition allows BPMN to express complex behaviors while remaining intuitive for stakeholders.

Connecting Objects

Connecting objects in BPMN diagrams serve to establish relationships and direct the between flow objects, enabling the visualization of process logic, communications, and supplementary information without altering the core behavioral elements. These objects are essential for constructing both simple and complex models, ensuring clarity in how processes progress and interact. According to the BPMN 2.0 specification, there are four main types: flows, message flows, associations, and data associations, each with distinct graphical notations and purposes. Sequence flows represent the standard progression of activities within a single process or subprocess, depicted as a solid line with a filled arrowhead pointing from source to target. They define the normal order of execution among flow objects such as events, activities, and gateways, and can be either unconditional—indicating direct succession—or conditional, where a on the flow determines whether it is traversed based on conditions. For instance, in a approval process, a conditional sequence flow might check if the exceeds a before proceeding to approval. Sequence flows cannot cross pool boundaries in collaboration diagrams, maintaining the integrity of individual participant processes. Message flows illustrate communications between separate participants in a collaboration diagram, shown as a dashed line with an open arrowhead and an optional label or envelope icon at the target end. Unlike sequence flows, they connect elements across different pools, emphasizing inter-process interactions such as sending or receiving documents or signals, but do not dictate internal process sequencing. In models, flows link to events or tasks, facilitating the exchange of defined payloads between entities like departments or external partners. This notation supports modeling distributed systems where processes depend on asynchronous messaging. Associations provide a non-flow linkage between flow objects and artifacts, rendered as a dotted line with an open arrowhead (directed) or no arrowhead (undirected), ensuring that supplementary information like data objects or annotations is tied to the without influencing its execution path. They are used to clarify context, such as associating a textual with a specific task, and appear in both and diagrams. Directed associations indicate a from the source to the target, while undirected ones denote a general connection. Data associations, introduced in BPMN 2.0 for processes, specify how inputs and outputs are mapped between activities, events, and data objects or stores, visualized as a dotted line with an open similar to directed associations but focused on movement. They enable precise definition of input/output transformations, such as assigning values from a data object to a task's input set or vice versa, often using formal expressions for mapping logic. This feature supports process by ensuring across elements, particularly in service integrations or automated workflows, and is restricted to choreographies or orchestrations where execution semantics are relevant.

Swimlanes and Artifacts

In BPMN diagrams, swimlanes provide a structural framework for organizing process elements by assigning responsibilities to participants. They consist of two primary types: pools and lanes. A pool is a rectangular that graphically represents a single participant, such as an , , or external entity, in a or . Pools delineate separate namespaces for message flows between participants and contain the activities, events, and gateways specific to that participant, ensuring clear boundaries in multi-party interactions. Lanes serve as subdivisions within a , further partitioning the process into sub-categories based on roles, departments, or internal units to clarify responsibility allocation. They can be oriented horizontally or vertically and may nest additional lanes for , but lanes do not create separate namespaces like pools do. This partitioning facilitates visual separation of activities without implying distinct participants, allowing modelers to depict internal workflows efficiently. For instance, within a single representing a company, lanes might distinguish between and teams. Artifacts in BPMN are supplementary elements that add contextual information to the diagram without directly influencing the process flow. They include three main types: data objects, groups, and annotations. Data objects represent tangible or intangible information, such as documents or databases, that serve as inputs to or outputs from activities, often connected via associations to indicate usage. Groups provide a visual mechanism to cluster related flow objects, such as tasks or events, for logical organization without altering the underlying flow semantics. Annotations, depicted as open rectangles with text, offer explanatory notes or comments to enhance readability and understanding of specific diagram elements. These artifacts support comprehensive process documentation by highlighting supporting resources and clarifications. Pools and lanes are primarily used to assign and visualize responsibilities, promoting accountability and collaboration clarity in process models, while artifacts enrich diagrams with non-flow details like data dependencies or explanatory text, aiding stakeholders in interpreting complex workflows.

Modeling Practices

Diagram Structure

The Business Process Diagram (BPD) in BPMN represents a process as a directed graph consisting of flow objects as nodes and connecting objects, primarily sequence flows, as edges that define the execution order. The root element is the Process, a container that defines the scope and includes all flow elements such as events, activities, and gateways, ensuring the diagram adheres to a hierarchical structure where the process encapsulates its internal flows. A valid BPMN process diagram requires at least one start event to trigger the instance and at least one end event to conclude it, with sequence flows linking all flow objects to form complete from start to end without loose or unconnected elements. Constraints prohibit dangling sequence flows, mandating that every sequence flow originate from and terminate at flow objects, while gateways must maintain in their incoming and outgoing flows according to their type—for instance, exclusive gateways (XOR) ensuring exactly one is taken, and parallel gateways (AND) synchronizing multiple paths. In multi-party scenarios, boundaries delineate participant scopes in diagrams, confining flows to within pools and restricting message flows to cross-pool interactions, thereby enforcing separation of internal logic from external communications. BPMN diagrams operate across layers: focuses on internal control flows within a single , emphasizes message exchanges between participants without internal details, and integrates multiple pools to depict end-to-end interactions. To enhance readability, best practices recommend organizing elements into —pools for high-level participants and for subprocess subdivisions—while limiting complexity by using subprocesses or separate diagrams for intricate logic, preventing overcrowded visuals that hinder comprehension.

Practical Examples

One common practical application of BPMN is modeling a simple process in an setting. This example illustrates a basic sequence using core flow objects and a decision point. The begins with a start (depicted as a filled circle) representing the initiation upon receipt of a customer . This connects via a solid sequence arrow to a task activity (rounded labeled "Receive "), where the order details are logged. Next, a sequence leads to an exclusive gateway ( shape labeled "Inventory Available?"), which evaluates stock levels. From the gateway, two conditional sequence flows branch out: one labeled "Yes" to a task "Ship " (rounded ), followed by an end (circle with thick border); the other labeled "No" to a task "Notify Customer of Delay" (rounded ), also ending in an end . All elements are contained within a single representing the fulfillment department, emphasizing internal without collaboration. A collaborative example is the loan approval process involving multiple parties, such as a and a , to demonstrate inter-organizational interactions via and flows. The diagram features two horizontal pools: the top one for the "Customer" and the bottom for the "Bank." The customer's pool starts with a message start event (circle with envelope icon) triggered by submitting a application, connected by a dashed message flow arrow to the bank's pool. In the bank's pool, this message flow arrives at a message intermediate catch event (circle with envelope), followed by a task "Review Application" (rounded rectangle). A subsequent exclusive gateway ("Approved?") branches to either a task "Approve " leading to a message end event (circle with envelope, sending approval via dashed message flow back to customer) or a task "Reject " with a similar rejection message flow. The customer's pool includes a message intermediate catch event for the decision, ending in appropriate end events. This setup highlights how message flows enable communication across pools without merging processes. Error handling in BPMN is exemplified by a process incorporating an intermediate to manage exceptions, such as in a processing scenario leading to compensation. The diagram shows a main with a start event connecting to a task "" (rounded ). Attached to the boundary of this task is an intermediate error event (small circle with icon on the task's edge), triggered if payment fails (e.g., due to insufficient funds). A solid sequence from this error event leads to a subprocess for compensation (expanded rounded labeled "Refund Previous "), which includes internal tasks like "Initiate Refund" and ends with a compensation end event (circle with rewind arrow). The main continues from the original task to an end event only if successful. This boundary event ensures faults are caught locally, invoking reversal actions without halting the entire .

BPMN 2.0 Specification

Core Features

The BPMN standard significantly expanded the graphical notation to include 116 distinct elements, enabling more precise and flexible representation of complex business processes. This expansion encompasses advanced constructs such as compensation events, which handle error recovery and rollback in long-running processes; ad-hoc sub-processes, allowing unstructured and dynamic execution without predefined sequences; and call activities, which invoke reusable subprocesses or external services to promote modularity. These elements build on the foundational flowchart-like symbols to support detailed modeling of exceptions, collaborations, and hierarchical structures, ensuring the notation can capture both simple workflows and intricate enterprise scenarios. Semantic enhancements in BPMN 2.0 provide formal definitions that bridge the gap between visual diagrams and executable , including precise rules for process execution semantics. A key addition is support for multi-instance activities, where a single activity can be executed multiple times in parallel or sequentially, with configurable loop characteristics based on data inputs or collections. These definitions ensure unambiguous interpretation of , such as , , and , allowing diagrams to serve as a basis for without loss of intent. The specification introduces a normative XML Schema Definition (XSD), known as BPMN20.xsd, for serializing BPMN models into an interoperable format. This schema maps the metamodel elements to XML structures, facilitating the exchange of diagrams and their underlying semantics between different tools and platforms. By standardizing serialization, BPMN 2.0 enables seamless tool interoperability, such as importing a model created in one editor into another for execution or simulation, without proprietary conversions. BPMN 2.0 defines multiple conformance levels to accommodate varying implementation needs, as outlined in the () specification adopted in December 2010. These include Process Modeling Conformance for creating and reading diagrams; Process Execution Conformance for running models in engines; Modeling Conformance for modeling interactions between participants; and Execution Conformance for executing those interactions. Tools must adhere to specific subsets of the metamodel and serialization rules to claim compliance at these levels, ensuring consistency across the ecosystem.

Execution and Interchange

BPMN 2.0 enables the definition of processes that can be directly interpreted and run by compatible process engines, extending beyond descriptive modeling to support runtime orchestration. These models incorporate elements such as process properties for variable storage, assignments for task performers, and correlation data to manage message routing across multiple instances. The specification outlines execution semantics in detail, describing token flow, event handling, and activity lifecycles to ensure predictable behavior during process enactment. A key feature for runtime support is the non-normative mapping of BPMN elements to WS-BPEL 2.0, which translates graphical process definitions into executable web services orchestrations, facilitating integration with service-oriented architectures. This mapping covers core constructs like tasks, gateways, and events, while handling extensions through BPEL's variable and fault mechanisms. For interchange, BPMN 2.0 specifies an -based format that captures the complete metamodel, allowing models to be imported and exported across diverse tools without loss of semantic information. Complementing this, the BPMN Diagram Interchange (BPMN DI) standard provides an additional for exchanging visual layouts, shapes, and annotations, ensuring diagrams render consistently in supporting software. Tool conformance to BPMN 2.0 is governed by defined compliance levels, including Process Execution Conformance with subclasses for basic (core elements like tasks and sequences) and full (advanced features like and transactions) support. Open-source engines such as Activiti, BPM, and jBPM have been evaluated for adherence to these levels, demonstrating capabilities for both of process flows and full execution of models. typically falls under modeling conformance for validation and what-if , whereas full execution demands engine-level support for dynamic invocation and . Despite these capabilities, not all BPMN diagrams qualify as ; abstract or high-level models often lack required details like formal expressions for conditional branching, mappings, or resource specifications, rendering them suitable only for or communication rather than direct enactment. Achieving executability necessitates augmenting the model with these runtime-specific annotations as per the specification's guidelines.

Advanced Topics

Sub-Models

BPMN defines several sub-models to capture distinct perspectives on business processes, enabling modelers to focus on internal operations, external interfaces, inter-party interactions, or message-centric exchanges without overlapping details across views. The private process sub-model provides a detailed, internal representation of an organization's , confined to a single and utilizing sequence flows to connect all activities, events, and gateways. This view encompasses the full operational logic, including decision points and data manipulations, and can be designed as either —sufficiently detailed for direct in process engines—or non-executable, serving primarily for and at a chosen level of . Private processes emphasize self-contained execution within the , shielding sensitive internals from external . In contrast, the abstract process sub-model presents a simplified, external-facing of a private process, omitting internal sequence flows and activities while highlighting only the message flows that interface with external entities or partners. By collapsing proprietary details into abstract activities, this sub-model defines the observable behavior and service contracts, facilitating planning and partner communication without exposing implementation specifics. Abstract processes are particularly suited for scenarios where organizations need to communicate process boundaries, such as in service-oriented architectures. The sub-model extends beyond a single by illustrating interactions among multiple participants, each delineated in separate pools linked through flows. This type aggregates or private processes to show how entities exchange information and coordinate actions across boundaries, providing a holistic of end-to-end orchestration without mandating the revelation of each participant's full internals. are essential for modeling distributed systems, such as partnerships, where the emphasis lies on inter-pool dependencies rather than intra-pool mechanics. Pools in partition responsibilities among participants. Choreography, a sub-model introduced in BPMN 2.0, shifts the focus to the observable message choreography between two or more participants, represented horizontally across lanes without depicting any internal processes or sequence flows. It employs choreography tasks, which specify the sender and receiver of messages, along with optional correlations and timing constraints, to model the protocol of exchanges from a neutral, global perspective. This approach is ideal for defining peer-to-peer interactions, such as in electronic data interchange standards, where the goal is to specify contractual message sequences enforceable across parties without assuming control by any single orchestrator.

Extensions and Profiles

BPMN supports customization through profiles and extensions to address domain-specific requirements without altering the core standard. Profiles refer to pre-defined subsets or integrations that tailor BPMN for particular use cases, such as simplified notations for non-experts or combinations with complementary standards like Case Management Model and Notation (CMMN) for handling ad-hoc, knowledge-intensive processes. For instance, integrating BPMN with CMMN allows modeling predictable workflows alongside dynamic case management, expanding coverage to variable work methods as part of the Object Management Group's (OMG) "" standards. Extensions enable the addition of vendor-specific or domain-oriented elements to BPMN models, primarily through an XML-based mechanism that attaches custom properties to standard elements. This includes embedding Decision Model and Notation (DMN) for decision logic within BPMN processes via business rule tasks, where DMN tables define rules that BPMN tasks invoke during execution. The OMG's extensibility features support both process model extensions (adding attributes or elements) and graphical extensions (custom visuals), ensuring while accommodating specialized needs. The provides guidelines for creating non-intrusive extensions, emphasizing the use of extension elements and attributes in XML serialization to avoid conflicts with core notation semantics. Extensions must conform to these rules by not modifying standard BPMN classes or diagrams directly; instead, they leverage mechanisms like the ExtensionDefinition class to define additional XML attributes or child elements. This approach maintains compliance with the BPMN 2.0 specification, allowing tools to ignore unknown extensions during interchange without errors. In practice, domain-specific profiles and extensions illustrate BPMN's adaptability. For healthcare, extensions integrate DMN-based privacy decisions using security labels into BPMN clinical pathways to enforce HIPAA compliance. Similarly, IoT extensions, such as the BPMNE4IoT proposal, add elements for events and interactions, enabling modeling of event-driven processes in supply chains.

Comparisons

BPMN Versions

The evolution of BPMN has seen significant advancements from its initial versions to the current standard, primarily driven by the need to support both visual modeling and executable processes. BPMN 1.x, released between 2004 and 2009 by the (OMG), focused primarily on graphical notation for descriptive , lacking formal execution semantics and support for diagrams. In contrast, BPMN 2.0, adopted in January 2011, introduced a comprehensive metamodel, enabling precise definitions for process execution, and added over 50 new elements to expand modeling capabilities, including detailed event types, data objects, and interaction patterns. These enhancements in BPMN 2.0 marked a pivotal shift from purely descriptive diagrams to models that could be directly interpreted by business process engines, facilitating better and . additions included diagrams for modeling interactions between participants without a central orchestrator and conversation views for representing exchanges across processes. However, the expansion introduced challenges, as models from BPMN 1.x required migration to leverage the new semantics, often involving manual adjustments to align with the updated metamodel. Subsequent minor updates refined the specification without altering core features. BPMN 2.0.1, released in October 2013, addressed ambiguities in event handling and other clarifications to improve conformance and implementation consistency. BPMN 2.0.2, issued in January 2014, further clarified the for interchange and included minor corrections, such as typo fixes and updates to normative clauses, ensuring robust serialization for tools and engines. As of 2025, no major new version of BPMN has been released by the , with efforts instead centered on conformance testing through initiatives like the Model Interchange Working Group (MIWG) and integrations with emerging standards such as decision modeling (DMN). This stability underscores BPMN 2.0's maturity as the for , ratified internationally as ISO/IEC 19510:2013.

Other Notations

Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) is often contrasted with other process modeling languages, each serving distinct purposes in business and software engineering contexts. While BPMN emphasizes graphical, business-friendly representations suitable for both modeling and execution, alternatives like UML Activity Diagrams focus more on software design, potentially limiting accessibility for non-technical stakeholders. BPMN's design targets business users, enabling intuitive depiction of processes from high-level overviews to executable specifications, whereas UML Activity Diagrams, part of the Unified Modeling Language, prioritize object-oriented software engineering perspectives and are less oriented toward direct business process execution. Empirical studies have found BPMN and UML Activity Diagrams to have comparable understandability for users, with no significant differences in effectiveness, efficiency, or satisfaction, though BPMN's flowchart-like design aims to enhance accessibility for business audiences. Unlike UML Activity Diagrams, which lack built-in executable semantics and require additional tools for simulation or implementation, BPMN 2.0 incorporates formal execution semantics, allowing models to be directly enacted by process engines without extensive translation. In comparison to (EPC), BPMN offers a more standardized and graphically efficient approach to . EPC, originally developed for the methodology by (formerly IDS Scheer), relies on a textual and event-focused that often results in larger, more cluttered diagrams requiring additional elements to express the same logic as BPMN. BPMN's graphical notation, standardized by the () and adopted as ISO 19510, supports broader interoperability and tool support across vendors, whereas EPC remains closely tied to ARIS-specific implementations, limiting its adoption outside that ecosystem. Studies highlight BPMN's compactness and expressiveness in structures, making it preferable for complex processes over EPC's function-oriented, event-chain paradigm. BPMN serves as a visual frontend to (BPEL), which focuses on XML-based for web services. BPEL, an standard, excels in defining executable workflows through structured XML but lacks BPMN's intuitive graphical interface, making it less accessible for initial process design by business analysts. With BPMN 2.0, direct mapping to BPEL is facilitated through standardized transformations, allowing BPMN models to generate BPEL code while preserving semantics, though not all BPMN constructs are round-trip compatible with BPEL's block-oriented structure. This integration positions BPMN as the modeling layer and BPEL as the execution layer in service-oriented architectures. BPMN complements Case Management Model and Notation (CMMN) and Decision Model and Notation (DMN) within the OMG's "" of standards, addressing different aspects of knowledge work beyond strictly structured flows. BPMN is optimized for predictable, sequential processes with defined sequences and gateways, whereas CMMN handles ad-hoc, case-oriented scenarios involving discretionary tasks and dynamic knowledge work, such as legal or healthcare cases. DMN, in turn, focuses on decision logic through decision tables and expressions, enabling reusable decision models that can be invoked from BPMN or CMMN processes. Together, these standards integrate seamlessly—BPMN for orchestration, CMMN for case handling, and DMN for rule-based decisions—forming a comprehensive framework for modeling varied business operations without overlap in their core paradigms.

Certifications

Available Programs

The primary formal certification program for proficiency in Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) is the OMG Certified Expert in BPM (OCEB) 2, administered by the Object Management Group (OMG). This program assesses competencies in business process management, with comprehensive coverage of BPMN 2.0 for diagrammatic modeling, executable processes, and related standards. The OCEB 2 structure includes a foundational exam followed by two tracks—Business and Technical—each offering intermediate and advanced levels, resulting in five certifications total. The Fundamental level evaluates basic knowledge of BPMN notation, process modeling principles, and business essentials, while higher levels delve into advanced modeling techniques, execution semantics, and technical implementation. Exams across all levels consist of multiple-choice questions testing BPMN notation elements, the underlying metamodel as defined in the BPMN specification, and practical use of modeling tools; they are proctored online or at centers via Pearson VUE, with global availability in multiple languages. The program aligns with , released in 2011, and continues to be updated for relevance, ongoing as of 2025. Additional independent certifications include the BPM Certified Professional from BPMInstitute.org, which requires passing an exam on , notation standards, and improvement methodologies. BPMInstitute.org also provides the BPM Specialist Certificate, emphasizing hands-on application of BPMN alongside complementary standards like DMN and CMMN. The Certified Business Process Professional (CBPP) from the Association of Professionals (ABPMP) covers BPMN within broader BPM competencies. Vendor-specific programs offer targeted BPMN validation within proprietary tools. For instance, Bizagi's Certified certification involves exams and practical assessments on BPMN notation, metamodel conformance, and process execution using the Bizagi suite. Similarly, SAP Signavio's roles-based certifications incorporate BPMN modeling proficiency through tailored exams and training modules integrated with their process transformation platform. These programs, including OCEB 2, are supported by training from partners and online providers, facilitating worldwide participation through Pearson VUE for exam delivery.

Value and Training

BPMN certifications provide significant professional value by validating core competencies in , enabling individuals to excel in roles such as process analysts and architects. These credentials demonstrate proficiency in BPMN standards, enhancing credibility and positioning certified professionals as key contributors to process improvement initiatives. According to the (OMG), which administers the primary BPMN certifications, holders of these qualifications are equipped to participate effectively in BPMN project teams, fostering better alignment between business and technical stakeholders. In the 2025 job market, BPMN boosts employability by signaling specialized skills in demand for and roles. Employers increasingly prioritize certified candidates to meet objectives in process optimization, as these professionals can evaluate and drive in competitive environments. An survey of certified individuals reveals that 79% report producing higher quality work, 79% exhibit greater ability to mentor and support colleagues, and 76% demonstrate increased competence in applying industry standards, all of which correlate with advancement and job stability. Training for BPMN certification is available through OMG-accredited courses, including intensive 3- to 5-day workshops that cover BPMN fundamentals and practical application. Providers such as NobleProg offer these in formats like online live training or onsite sessions, ensuring alignment with 's curriculum for the OMG Certified Expert in BPM (OCEB) exams. For more flexible options, online platforms like and deliver BPMN 2.0-specific courses, often with hands-on exercises and exam preparation modules tailored to working professionals. Effective preparation emphasizes studying the official BPMN 2.0 specification to grasp core elements and notations, supplemented by practice in diagramming tools like to build modeling proficiency. Candidates should prioritize understanding BPMN 2.0 execution semantics, including process and , through resources such as OMG's exam guides and practice tests. This focused approach, combined with review of real-world case studies, typically requires 8-12 weeks of 1-2 hours daily study to achieve exam readiness. Regarding , certified BPMN professionals contribute to higher project success in process , with recent studies indicating that initiatives can yield an average 240% ROI within the first year. data further supports this, showing certified experts drive 79% higher quality deliverables, which translates to reduced rework and faster deployments in process-heavy projects.

References

  1. [1]
    Business Process Model & Notation™ (BPMN™)
    The Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) specification provides a graphical notation for specifying business processes in a Business Process Diagram.
  2. [2]
    About the Business Process Model and Notation Specification ...
    Business Process Model and Notation has become the de-facto standard for business processes diagrams. It is intended to be used directly by the stakeholders.
  3. [3]
    [PDF] Business Process Model and Notation—BPMN
    With this, the primary goal of the BPMN specification was to provide a notation that is readily understandable by all business users, from the business analysts.
  4. [4]
    About the Business Process Model And Notation Specification ...
    Business Process Model and Notation has become the de-facto standard for business processes diagrams. It is intended to be used directly by the stakeholders.<|control11|><|separator|>
  5. [5]
    BPMN Specification - Business Process Model and Notation
    BPMN depicts the end to end flow of a business process. The notation has been specifically designed to coordinate the sequence of processes and the messages ...
  6. [6]
    ISO/IEC 19510:2013 - Information technology
    In stock 2–5 day deliveryISO/IEC 19510:2013 provides a notation for business users, standardizing business process models, and is identical to OMG BPMN 2.0.1.
  7. [7]
    2.0.1 - BPMN - Specifications - Object Management Group
    BPMN is the de-facto standard for business process diagrams, used by stakeholders and precise enough to be translated into software. Version 2.0.1 was ...
  8. [8]
    BPMN Introduction and History - Trisotech
    The latest version (2.0.2) has been formally published by ISO as the 2013 edition standard: ISO/IEC 19510. Over the last few years, BPMN rapidly became the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  9. [9]
    What is Business Process Modeling and Notation (BPMN)? - IBM
    OMG's BPMN 2.0.1 specification has been published as International Standard ISO/IEC 19510:2013. A hand interacting with a flowchart. The value of BPMN. BPMN ...
  10. [10]
    BPMN Tutorial: Learn Business Process Model and Notation
    What is BPMN? Business Process Model and Notation is the global standard for process modeling. Learn BPMN 2.0 benefits, see BPMN diagrams, and start a BPMN ...BPMN Examples · BPMN 2.0 Symbol Reference · Camunda BPMN
  11. [11]
    What is Business Process Management Initiative (BPMI)? - TechTarget
    Dec 11, 2023 · In 2005, BPMI and OMG merged, with OMG assuming control of the initiative and taking over the maintenance of BPMI's efforts. In 2011, OMG ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  12. [12]
    Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) - SAP Signavio
    Early 2000s: BPMN was introduced by the Business Process Management Initiative (BPMI) as a way to unify how processes were modeled across industries. 2005: The ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Business Process Model and Notation—BPMN
    THE HISTORIC DEVELOPMENT OF BPMN​​ The BPMN 1.0 specification was released to the public in May 2004.Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Introduction to BPMN - Object Management Group
    The BPMN 1.0 specification was released to the public in May, 2004. This specification represents more than two years of effort by the BPMI Notation Working ...
  15. [15]
    About the Business Process Model And Notation Specification ...
    Business Process Model and Notation has become the de-facto standard for business processes diagrams. It is intended to be used directly by the stakeholders.
  16. [16]
    The Origins of BPMN: Interview with Stephen White - Blog
    Oct 7, 2016 · Stephen White talks about the early development of the modeling language - BPMN - Business Process Modeling and Notation.
  17. [17]
    About the Business Process Model And Notation Specification Version 2.0
    **Summary of BPMN 2.0 Specification Core Features**
  18. [18]
    https://www.omg.org/news/whitepapers/Business_Process_Model_and_Notation.pdf
  19. [19]
    BPMN 2.0 Symbols - A complete guide with examples. - Camunda
    A comprehensive resource for BPMN 2.0 symbols. Learn about BPMN events, tasks, subprocesses, messages and more.
  20. [20]
    What is BPMN? - Visual Paradigm
    The Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN) is visual modeling language for business analysis applications and specifying enterprise process workflows.
  21. [21]
    Learning BPMN Events - Visual Paradigm
    Start (Single), Intermediate (Double), or End (Filled Outer Circle) – the outer border of the event may be a single circle, a double circle, or a filled ring.Missing: error | Show results with:error
  22. [22]
    BPMN Activity Types Explained - Visual Paradigm
    Learn about BPMN 2.0 Activities. A BPMN 2.0 Tutorial that explains the use of BPMN task, sub-process and ther types.Missing: rounded rectangle
  23. [23]
    What is the BPMN 2.0 Standard? - ProcessMaker
    BPMN 2.0 is an open standard notation system based on a flowcharting technique that is used to model business processes.
  24. [24]
    Types of Gateway in BPMN - Visual Paradigm
    ... Event-Based Exclusive Gateway icon has only a single circle within the diamond. When used to start a process, the Event-Based Exclusive Gateway allows the ...
  25. [25]
    BPMN Gateways: Understanding Types and Best Practices - HEFLO
    Apr 17, 2025 · Also, all gateways are visually represented by a diamond shape, with a distinct marker in the center to indicate the gateway type. Exclusive ...
  26. [26]
    https://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0/PDF
  27. [27]
    https://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0.2/PDF
  28. [28]
    Real-world BPMN 2.0 examples and answers to common questions.
    Below you can find lots of BPMN examples of common modeling problems. Regardless of your specific project or your industry, there are a lot of common questions ...
  29. [29]
    Error events | Camunda 8 Docs
    In BPMN, errors define possible errors that can occur. Error events are elements in the process referring to defined errors. An error can be referenced by one ...
  30. [30]
    [PDF] BPMN Conformance in Open Source Engines - Uni Bamberg
    Mar 5, 2015 · With BPMN 2.0 released in 2011, execution seman- tics were introduced, supporting the definition of executable processes. Nowadays, more and ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] Bpmn, cmmn and dmn specifications at omg
    OMG's BPMN 2.0.1 specification has been published as International Standard ISO/IEC 19510:2013. CMMN is a graphical notation used for capturing work methods ...
  32. [32]
    BPMN 2.0 - The Extension Mechansim - IMIXS-WORKFLOW Blog
    Mar 13, 2019 · The BPMN 2.0 extension mechanism allows software projects to extend the standard BPMN elements with additional attributes and tags based on a simple XML ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] A Systematic Literature Review on BPMN Extensions - LAAS
    Nov 2, 2014 · - Conformity: determines whether a BPMN extension complies with the OMG's recommendations. An extension is considered conform if it is ...
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Behind the Scenes of the BPMN Extension Mechanism - SciTePress
    BPMN specification states that “this type is not applicable when the XML schema interchange is used; since the XSD mechanisms for supporting Any-. Attribute and ...
  35. [35]
    Integrated privacy decision in BPMN clinical care pathways models ...
    Hence, it is essential that healthcare stakeholders ensure privacy protection and systemic compliance to personal data regulations such as HIPPA (Health ...
  36. [36]
    Improving Comprehensibility of IoT-Driven Business Processes ...
    To tackle this challenge, we have proposed a BPMN 2.0 extension for IoT (BPMNE4IoT) that incorporates specific IoT modeling elements. BPMNE4IoT enables the ...
  37. [37]
    https://www.smartsheet.com/beginners-guide-business-process-modeling-and-notation-bpmn
  38. [38]
    New Capabilities for Process and Interaction Modeling in BPMN 2
    Jan 5, 2011 · BPMN 2.0 expands the capabilities of BPMN 1.x Process and ... Half of the paper covers new elements in Process diagrams, including non ...
  39. [39]
    Latest BPMN update - Camunda Forum
    Mar 26, 2024 · There's a much faster working group within the OMG called MIWG. This is a group representative of the BPMN vendors and can often agree to accept ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  40. [40]
    [PDF] A Comparison of BPMN and UML 2.0 Activity Diagrams - UFMG
    Some differences are due to the fact that they have different target users of diagrams: business people for BPMN, and software developer for UML 2.0 (this ...
  41. [41]
    (PDF) A Comparison of BPMN and UML 2.0 Activity Diagrams
    We compared undergraduates (freshmen) understanding of business process modeled in BPMN and UML 2.0 Activity Diagrams.
  42. [42]
    [PDF] Characteristic and comparison of UML, BPMN and EPC based on ...
    Event-Driven Process Chain is another notation that is used in modeling, redesigning facilitating of business processes, as well as controlling and organizing ...
  43. [43]
    EPC vs. BPMN - the perfect flamewar | ARIS BPM Community
    Apr 15, 2010 · BPMN is more expressive than EPC concerning control flow structures. This doesn't come as a surprise, because BPMN was strongly influenced by workflow ...BPMN vs EPC | ARIS BPM CommunityBPMN vs. EPC revisited, part 1 | ARIS BPM CommunityMore results from ariscommunity.com
  44. [44]
    OASIS Web Services Business Process Execution Language TC
    BPMN is an OMG standard for visual representation of a business process. While a BPEL process can be represented using BPMN, some BPMN models cannot be ...
  45. [45]
    BPEL vs. BPMN 2.0: Should You Care? - SpringerLink
    BPMN 2.0 is an executable process modeling language. Thus, its relation to BPEL becomes an issue. In this paper, we propose a positioning of both languages.
  46. [46]
    Transforming BPMN into BPEL: Why and How - Oracle
    BPMN is used when designing and improving the business process, whereas BPEL is used when implementing it. Different requirements exist in different phases.
  47. [47]
    BPM Certifications - Object Management Group
    BPM certifications accelerate professional credibility by validating competence and expertise in our industry-leading business process modeling language.OMG-Accredited Training · Certification Exam Discounts
  48. [48]
    BPMN 2.0
    The Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN) is a graphical notation that depicts the steps in a business process. BPMN depicts the end to end flow of a ...Missing: visual orchestration
  49. [49]
    [PDF] OMG-OCEB2-FUND100 Exam Overview - Object Management Group
    The exam is 90-120 minutes, multiple choice, costs $250-$260, requires 62/90 correct answers, and covers BPMN, BPMM, and BMM.
  50. [50]
    Object Management Group (OMG) certification testing with Pearson ...
    May 1, 2025 · OMG-Certified Expert in BPM 2 (OCEB 2)​​ OCEB 2 exams enhance one's ability to analyze and model processes, identify inefficiencies, implement ...
  51. [51]
    https://www.bpminstitute.org/certification/
  52. [52]
    https://www.bpminstitute.org/product/bpm-specialist-code-specialist-certificate-program-bpms/
  53. [53]
    Free online training and certifications | E-learning Bizagi
    Evaluate your skills to model processes for execution using the BPMN standard. ... It is strongly recommended to have work experience using Bizagi BPM Suite; ...
  54. [54]
    eLearning Courses - SAP Signavio
    We offer a roles-based certification program, where the exams, training materials, and curriculum are tailored to the responsibilities and tasks associated with ...
  55. [55]
    Top 12 Business Process Management Certifications for 2025
    Jan 9, 2025 · BPM certification also helps employers define job objectives, evaluate candidates, assess employee performance, and motivate employees to ...Missing: employability | Show results with:employability
  56. [56]
    OMG Certification Programs - Object Management Group
    Candidates can either self-prepare for their certification exam(s) or may select a paid course from our growing list of OMG Accredited Training Providers.BPM Certifications · OMG-Accredited Training · SysML · UML Certifications
  57. [57]
    BPMN Training in the US - NobleProg USA
    Oct 2, 2025 · This training course aims at helping business analysts to learn to model efficiently their business processes using BPMN as well as resources ...Missing: employability | Show results with:employability
  58. [58]
    OMG-Accredited Certification Training Providers
    Object Management Group® (OMG®) has vetted and/or accredited our list of certification training providers and their curricula covering our standards.
  59. [59]
    The Ultimate BPMN Course - Coursera
    The course concludes with best practices, advanced event handling, and strategic BPMN applications in banking, HR, and compliance contexts. Whether you're a ...Skills You'll Gain · See How Employees At Top... · There Are 14 Modules In This...
  60. [60]
    https://www.coursera.org/learn/packt-the-ultimate-bpmn-course-maxcy
  61. [61]
    How to pass the OMG BPM 2 exam on your first attempt? - eduMAX
    Oct 2, 2025 · Allocate 8-12 weeks, studying 1-2 hours daily. · Use official specifications, practice exams, and BPMN modeling tools. · Focus on high-weighted ...Step-By-Step Preparation · 2. Know The Exam Structure... · 6. Exam Day Tips<|separator|>
  62. [62]
    BPMN Certification - Everything you need to know - Get Certified
    How to prepare for BPMN Certification. There is an excellent study guide available that helps you prepare for the exam. In addition, you can use this BPMN ...
  63. [63]
    BPM Can Yield 15 Percent ROI for Most Companies - Gartner
    By eclipsing the 15 percent rate of return mark, BPM projects will deliver results better than most hurdle-rate designations, and Gartner expects this to move ...
  64. [64]
    Business process management (BPM) ROI
    Sep 7, 2017 · Of the 20 companies who responded to their survey, 55% had returns in the $100,000 to $500,000 range per BPM project. You may be thinking that ...Increases In Profit · Roi From Reducing Risk · Roi From Quality