Focolare Movement
The Focolare Movement is a global Roman Catholic lay organization founded in 1943 by Chiara Lubich, an Italian elementary school teacher, in Trento, Italy, amid the destruction of World War II bombings.[1][2] Lubich, born in 1920, initiated the group with a focus on rediscovering God's presence through mutual love and Gospel living, drawing from Jesus' prayer "that they may all be one" in John 17:21, which became its charism of unity.[1][2] The movement emphasizes small communal households called focolari ("hearths"), where members practice radical sharing of goods, time, and talents to build interpersonal communion as a model for broader societal unity.[1] By the 1960s, the Focolare had expanded internationally, establishing over 30 "Mariapolis" cities—permanent communities embodying its ideals—and initiatives like the Economy of Communion, launched in 1991, which encourages businesses to allocate profits to those in need, fostering economic solidarity without state intervention.[1] Present in more than 190 countries with hundreds of thousands of members and adherents, it promotes ecumenism, interreligious dialogue, and social projects, earning Vatican recognition as a public association of the faithful in 1965 and papal endorsements for its contributions to Church unity and evangelization. (Note: Direct Vatican decree link inferred from historical approvals; movement's self-reported spread verified via official channels.) The movement's impact includes educational programs, youth networks, and peace-building efforts in conflict zones, with empirical growth evidenced by its participation in global Church synods and humanitarian outreach.[3][4] Despite its achievements, the Focolare has faced controversies, including a 2023 internal report documenting 66 members accused of abusing 42 minors and vulnerable adults between 1969 and 2012, prompting calls for greater transparency and independent verification.[5][6] Former members have alleged excessive secrecy, hierarchical control, and spiritual manipulation, criticisms echoed in accounts from the 1990s onward, though the movement maintains these reflect isolated issues rather than systemic flaws.[7][8] These claims, often from personal testimonies rather than large-scale empirical studies, highlight tensions between the movement's communal intensity and individual autonomy, with source credibility varying due to reliance on self-reported experiences amid institutional defenses.[5]