Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Rationing

Rationing is the controlled allocation of scarce goods, services, or resources by governments or authorities, typically through mechanisms like coupons, quotas, or priority systems, to distribute limited supplies according to non-price criteria such as equity or essential needs when demand exceeds availability.^[1]^[2] It serves as an alternative to price-based allocation, aiming to curb hoarding, stabilize societies during crises, and direct resources to critical sectors like military efforts, but often at the cost of market efficiency.^[3]^[4] Historically, rationing has been most prominent during total wars and acute shortages, such as World War I and II, where nations like the United States and United Kingdom restricted food, fuel, rubber, and metals to prioritize wartime production and prevent civilian panic buying, implementing systems that issued ration books tied to individuals or households.^[5]^[6] These measures temporarily ensured broader access to basics amid disrupted supply chains but frequently spawned black markets, where goods traded at inflated prices, undermining official equity goals and favoring those with connections or willingness to evade rules.^[7]^[8] From an economic standpoint, rationing distorts incentives by suppressing price signals that normally encourage conservation, substitution, and increased production, leading to persistent shortages, reduced investment in supply chains, and misallocation as administrative decisions replace consumer-driven choices.^[9]^[10] Empirical observations from wartime and controlled economies reveal that while rationing can achieve short-term stability, it often prolongs scarcity by diminishing producer responses to demand and fostering underground economies that erode trust in formal systems.^[8]^[4]

Economic Foundations

Definition and Scarcity Principle

Rationing refers to any systematic mechanism for distributing limited goods, services, or resources among competing uses when demand exceeds available supply, a condition inherent to economic systems rather than confined to wartime or emergencies.^[1] This process forces prioritization, as unlimited human wants cannot be satisfied by finite productive capacity, compelling societies to select which needs or desires receive fulfillment first.^[3] In essence, rationing emerges wherever scarcity prevails, dictating that not all claimants can obtain the full amount they seek without infringing on others' access.^[11] The scarcity principle, foundational to economics, posits that resources are insufficient to meet all human ends simultaneously, requiring deliberate choices about allocation. As articulated by Lionel Robbins in his 1932 work An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science, economics examines "human behaviour as a relationship between ends and scarce means which have alternative uses," underscoring that scarcity necessitates trade-offs and opportunity costs in every decision.^[12] This principle holds universally: land, labor, capital, and time remain bounded, while preferences expand indefinitely, rendering rationing not an aberration but a constant feature of resource management.^[13] By imposing allocation rules, rationing elucidates the true relative values and costs of scarce items, as individuals or systems must forgo alternatives to secure them, thereby highlighting marginal trade-offs. For instance, in pre-monetary barter economies constrained by natural resource limits—such as finite game or arable land—traders implicitly rationed through negotiation and exchange rates that reflected scarcity's bite, revealing the subjective valuations driving voluntary swaps over abundance.^[14] Such mechanisms, grounded in the reality of constrained endowments, prevent overconsumption of irreplaceable assets and compel efficient use, aligning distribution with productive realities rather than illusions of plenty.^[15]

Price Rationing Versus Administrative Rationing

Price rationing functions through market price adjustments that rise in response to scarcity, thereby equilibrating supply and demand while directing limited goods to users with the highest willingness to pay, which approximates their subjective valuation of the resource.^[16] This process transmits accurate signals to producers, encouraging expanded output and substitution toward alternative resources, thereby minimizing waste and maximizing overall resource utilization without administrative overhead.^[17] Empirical observations from commodity markets, such as the U.S. oil sector following the 1981 deregulation of price controls, illustrate accelerated supply responses, with domestic production increasing as higher prices restored incentives distorted under prior ceilings.^[18]^[19] Administrative rationing, by contrast, relies on non-price mechanisms such as quotas, vouchers, or enforced price ceilings to allocate scarce goods, artificially suppressing prices below market-clearing levels and generating persistent excess demand that manifests in queues, shortages, or informal markets.^[20] These interventions sever the link between scarcity and price signals, disregarding heterogeneous consumer valuations and compelling allocations based on criteria like first-come access or bureaucratic discretion rather than economic value.^[21] Consequently, resources flow to lower-valued uses, fostering inefficiencies including underproduction, as suppliers face muted incentives to expand capacity amid capped returns.^[22] The divergence in outcomes underscores price rationing's superior efficiency: it aligns production and consumption with revealed preferences, avoiding the deadweight losses inherent in administrative approaches, where suppressed prices prevent mutually beneficial trades. Experimental evidence from controlled auction markets confirms that price controls amplify these losses beyond neoclassical predictions, often through heightened misallocation and reduced trading volume.^[23] Empirical studies of regulated sectors further quantify the toll, revealing welfare reductions from curtailed innovation—such as 25% fewer new product introductions under Medicare price constraints—and broader supply contractions that compound scarcity over time.^[24] Administrative methods thus systematically underperform by overriding decentralized knowledge of values and costs, yielding net economic harm despite intentions to promote equity.^[21]

Historical Development

Pre-20th Century Origins

In ancient Rome, the cura annonae—the state's management of grain supply—formalized rationing practices to address urban scarcity exacerbated by population pressures and import vulnerabilities from provinces like Sicily and Egypt. Initiated in 123 BCE by tribune Gaius Sempronius Gracchus through the lex frumentaria, the system subsidized grain sales at below-market prices to around 150,000 eligible male citizens, distributing approximately five modii (about 30-40 liters) per person monthly to mitigate unrest from speculative hoarding and harvest shortfalls.^[25] Under Augustus in 18 BCE, distributions shifted to free allotments for roughly 200,000-320,000 recipients, funded by imperial taxes and naval convoys, reflecting causal links between supply disruptions—such as droughts or piracy—and elevated food prices that threatened social order without such interventions.^[26] This mechanism prioritized urban plebeians over rural producers, often straining provincial resources and incentivizing corruption among officials, yet it sustained Rome's stability amid recurrent localized scarcities until the system's expansion in the 3rd century CE. Medieval European societies practiced rudimentary rationing during sieges, where blockades induced acute scarcity by severing trade and harvest access, compelling lords to allocate feudal stores through hierarchical distributions to prolong defense. Defenders typically divided grain, livestock, and preserved foods into daily quotas—such as one to two pounds of bread per person supplemented by beans or salted pork—monitored by overseers to curb hoarding, with violations punished by execution to enforce compliance.^[27] Empirical records from sieges indicate failure rates tied to duration and initial stockpiles; for example, prolonged encirclements exceeding 60-90 days often led to mortality from starvation exceeding 20-50% of the population, as seen in cases where inadequate pre-siege granary reserves amplified vulnerabilities from poor prior yields.^[28] These ad hoc systems relied on first-come feudal obligations rather than markets, revealing inefficiencies like unequal shares favoring elites, which causal analyses attribute to decentralized authority limits absent modern logistics. Colonial responses to agrarian crises, such as the 1770 Bengal famine, exposed early centralized allocation pitfalls under the British East India Company, where drought-induced crop failures—reducing rice yields by up to 30%—intersected with revenue extraction policies. Company officials maintained fixed tax quotas at 30-50% of produce value despite shortages, exporting grain for profit and prohibiting private relief imports, which exacerbated hoarding and price spikes tenfold in affected districts.^[29] This resulted in approximately 10 million deaths—one-third of Bengal's 30 million population—primarily from starvation and disease, as verified by Company revenue logs showing collections of £2.7 million amid collapsing local economies.^[30] Absent effective rationing or redistribution, the famine underscored causal realism in scarcity: policy distortions preventing market signals worsened outcomes more than the initial harvest shock, prompting later parliamentary scrutiny of Company governance but no immediate structural reforms.^[31]

World Wars and Emergency Implementations

During World War I, the Allied naval blockade severely restricted Germany's access to imported food and raw materials, exacerbating domestic shortages that necessitated rationing. Potatoes, a staple crop, were rationed starting in April 1916 at four pounds per person per week, followed by butter and sugar in May, meat in June, and other fats by November.^[32] ^[33] A poor potato harvest that summer, combined with the blockade's effects, led to the "Turnip Winter" of 1916-1917, where turnips substituted for unavailable staples, resulting in widespread malnutrition and hundreds of thousands of excess civilian deaths from starvation and related diseases.^[34] ^[35] In World War II, similar acute shortages from wartime disruptions prompted widespread administrative rationing to prioritize military needs and ensure civilian survival. The United Kingdom implemented food rationing on January 8, 1940, beginning with bacon, butter, and sugar at weekly allowances of 4 ounces each for bacon and butter and 8 ounces for sugar, expanding to meat by March.^[36] ^[37] German U-boat campaigns sank Allied shipping, reducing British imports of essential goods by up to 43% in dry cargo by 1944 compared to pre-war levels, which rationing mitigated by enforcing equitable distribution and averting immediate collapse, though it temporarily boosted nutritional equity through controlled allocations.^[38] In the United States, tire rationing commenced in January 1942 following Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor and the loss of rubber supplies from Southeast Asia, with new tires allocated only via local boards certifying essential need, conserving resources for military vehicles while limiting civilian mobility.^[39] ^[40] These implementations demonstrated rationing's short-term utility in crises, as blockades and sinkings created supply deficits that price mechanisms alone could not resolve without hyperinflation or hoarding. However, they also induced long-term distortions, including the proliferation of black markets where goods traded at premiums—such as meat and sugar in the UK and US—undermining official equity goals and diverting resources inefficiently.^[41] ^[42] Empirical outcomes showed temporary stabilization, with UK calorie intake maintained near pre-war levels despite import losses, but at the cost of reduced variety and incentives for production evasion.^[37]

Post-War Peacetime and Ideological Applications

In the United Kingdom, bread rationing was introduced on 26 April 1946 despite the war's end the previous year, as a response to poor harvests and global grain shortages exacerbated by export demands to aid reconstruction in Europe; each person received 14 ounces daily, later reduced.^[43] This measure, alongside continued meat rationing until 4 July 1954 due to dollar shortages for imports and slow agricultural recovery, illustrated peacetime extensions of wartime controls amid supply chain disruptions rather than active conflict.^[44] Similar patterns occurred across Western Europe, where administrative rationing persisted into the late 1940s to manage reconstruction bottlenecks, though market pressures and U.S. aid via the Marshall Plan accelerated decontrol by prioritizing price mechanisms over quotas.^[45] In centrally planned economies, rationing evolved into a structural feature of peacetime resource allocation, reflecting ideological commitments to state control over distribution. The Soviet Union, after brief post-New Economic Policy stabilizations, reimposed food coupons in the mid-1980s amid chronic production shortfalls and misaligned incentives, culminating in nationwide rationing by 1989 for staples like sugar (1 kg monthly per person), butter, and meat.^[46] These systems fostered persistent queues, with urban residents spending hours daily waiting due to output targets ignoring consumer signals, contributing to an estimated 10-20% drag on labor productivity from time misallocation.^[47] Cuba's experience post-1991 Soviet collapse during the "Special Period" mirrored this, with intensified energy rationing via scheduled blackouts (up to 12-16 hours daily in cities) and food quotas slashing per capita caloric intake from 2,899 to 1,863 kcal/day by 1993, as oil imports halved and domestic substitution failed to compensate.^[48]^[49] Transitions to market-oriented reforms in Eastern Europe after 1989-1991 demonstrated rationing's dispensability in non-crisis peacetime. In Poland, the Balcerowicz Plan's price liberalization and privatization from January 1990 ended coupon systems within months, flooding markets with imports and private supply that resolved 90% of pre-reform shortages by 1992 through emergent price rationing.^[50] Comparable rapid depletions of queues occurred in Czechoslovakia and Hungary, where hyperinflation subsided and goods availability surged 2-3 fold within two years post-deregulation, underscoring administrative rationing's role in perpetuating scarcity under planning by suppressing supply responses.^[51] These shifts highlighted causal inefficiencies: fixed quotas distorted incentives, breeding black markets (e.g., 20-30% of Soviet meat via unofficial channels), whereas price signals in reformed systems aligned production with demand absent wartime exigencies.^[52]

Forms of Rationing

Consumer Goods and Essentials

![Sample UK Childs Ration Book WW2][float-right] Consumer goods rationing allocates scarce everyday items such as food, fuel, and clothing to individuals or households, typically through quotas or points systems during wartime or economic crises. In the United States during World War II, sugar was rationed at half a pound per person per week starting in May 1942, reflecting import disruptions from conflict zones that supplied over 80% of pre-war needs. This measure aimed to preserve supplies for industrial uses like canning while ensuring basic civilian access, though it halved peacetime consumption rates. Similarly, in the United Kingdom, weekly adult rations included 8 ounces of sugar, 4 ounces of butter or margarine, and variable meat allotments valued at 1 shilling, enforced to counter submarine blockades that threatened 20 million tons of annual imports.^[53]^[54] Such systems often standardize allotments, disregarding physiological variations; laborers required up to 4,000 calories daily for manual work, while children needed nutrient-dense portions scaled by age, yet fixed quotas frequently underprovided for high-demand groups, fostering inefficiencies. In refugee contexts, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) sets a baseline of 2,100 kilocalories per person per day for emergency food aid, derived from average adult requirements but adjusted minimally for vulnerable populations like pregnant women, who need an additional 300-500 calories in later trimesters. Empirical data from UK wartime rationing, however, showed average intakes reaching 3,000 calories daily through supplementation via victory gardens and communal meals, correlating with reduced obesity and diabetes rates in cohorts exposed prenatally, as lower sugar access—capped far below post-war norms of 80 grams daily—mitigated long-term metabolic risks.^[55]^[56]^[57] ![A basket of fruits and vegetables sits in the foreground of the image. In the background, there are shadows of soldiers waving the American flag. The text below the imagery reads "Food is Ammunition – Don't Waste It".][center] Peacetime applications, such as Venezuela's price controls on staples from the early 2000s onward, illustrate supply-side distortions: domestic food production plummeted as farmers faced unprofitable fixed margins, elevating import reliance to over 70% by 2012 and precipitating widespread shortages by 2016, with basic goods like rice and corn intermittently unavailable despite oil revenues funding subsidies. These controls, intended to curb inflation, instead incentivized hoarding and smuggling, as evidenced by black market premiums exceeding official prices by 10-fold, while malnutrition rates surged, with child stunting affecting 13% of under-fives by 2017 per regional health surveys. In contrast to managed wartime regimes, such administrative fixes often exacerbate scarcity by suppressing producer responses to demand signals, leading to caloric deficits below survival thresholds in uncontrolled segments. Historical patterns across France's 1940-1944 occupation and Soviet post-war famines confirm recurring black markets and nutritional deficits, where rations delivered only 1,200-1,800 calories daily, yielding anemia and vitamin deficiencies without supplemental foraging or illicit trade.^[58]^[59]^[60]

Healthcare and Medical Resources

Healthcare rationing involves the allocation of limited medical resources, such as treatments, organs, or intensive care, among competing patients, often prioritizing based on clinical effectiveness, cost, or prognosis. Explicit rationing occurs through formalized policies where authorities deny access to certain interventions, typically using metrics like quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) to assess value for money.^[61]^[62] In contrast, implicit rationing relies on indirect mechanisms, such as insurance coverage denials or waiting lists, which obscure decision-making through price signals, administrative hurdles, or capacity constraints without overt governmental thresholds.^[63]^[62] In the United Kingdom, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) exemplifies explicit rationing by recommending against National Health Service funding for interventions exceeding £20,000–£30,000 per QALY gained, effectively denying treatments deemed insufficiently cost-effective for conditions like certain cancer therapies or rare diseases.^[64]^[65] This threshold, applied since the early 2000s, has rejected dozens of drugs annually, aiming to allocate finite budgets toward higher-value care, though critics argue it undervalues end-of-life or innovative therapies.^[66] In the United States, implicit rationing predominates via private insurance practices, where denials affected 19% of in-network claims under Affordable Care Act marketplace plans in 2023, often citing lack of medical necessity or prior authorization failures, leading to delayed or forgone care without public accountability.^[67]^[68] Historical precedents highlight the consequences of ventilator scarcity, as during the 1952 Copenhagen polio epidemic, where over 300 patients required respiratory support amid limited iron lungs and manual ventilation capacity, necessitating triage that contributed to mortality rates exceeding 80% for those with bulbar involvement and untreated respiratory failure.^[69]^[70] Delayed access in such crises amplified fatalities, with survival improving only to 17–40% through improvised positive-pressure ventilation for prioritized cases, underscoring how rationing without sufficient resources elevates death risks via probabilistic allocation rather than merit-based denial.^[71] Proponents of explicit rationing cite cost containment benefits, as in Oregon's 1994 Medicaid reform, which prioritized 565 condition-treatment pairs on a cost-effectiveness list to expand coverage to 100,000 uninsured while capping expenditures, initially enabling broader enrollment by excluding low-value procedures like certain transplants.^[72] However, empirical outcomes reveal mixed efficiency, with Oregon's program failing to sustain savings—Medicaid costs rose 36% from 1993 to 1996 amid enrollment growth and utilization shifts—suggesting prioritization delays rather than eliminates fiscal pressures.^[73] Critics emphasize drawbacks, including reduced pharmaceutical innovation; cross-national studies indicate that stringent price controls and rationing in single-payer systems correlate with 20–30% lower R&D investment compared to market-oriented environments, as revenue predictability drives fewer novel drug approvals, evidenced by Europe's lag in oncology breakthroughs behind the U.S.^[74]^[75] Implicit approaches, while politically palatable, foster inequities, with U.S. denial rates disproportionately affecting low-income groups, who face 43% higher claim rejections, perpetuating access disparities without transparent criteria.^[76]

Financial and Credit Allocation

Credit rationing refers to situations in which lenders, such as banks, restrict the quantity of loans available to borrowers without raising interest rates to equilibrate supply and demand, often arising from imperfect information in financial markets. This form of allocation deviates from pure price mechanisms, where higher rates would theoretically clear the market, and instead imposes quantity constraints to mitigate risks like adverse selection, where riskier borrowers are more likely to seek funds at elevated rates.^[77] The foundational theoretical framework for credit rationing was articulated by Joseph Stiglitz and Andrew Weiss in their 1981 model, which demonstrates that in competitive credit markets with asymmetric information, increasing interest rates can exacerbate adverse selection by disproportionately attracting higher-risk projects while discouraging safer ones, prompting lenders to cap loan volumes rather than adjust prices. Moral hazard effects further compound this, as higher rates may incentivize borrowers to pursue riskier actions post-lending, amplifying potential losses for lenders. Empirical tests of the model, including analyses of loan default patterns and borrower screening, have confirmed its relevance in explaining observed lending behaviors under uncertainty.^[78]^[79] Post-2008 global financial crisis examples illustrate credit rationing in practice, as banks facing capital shortages and heightened default risks curtailed lending to small businesses and otherwise viable projects, even when demand persisted at prevailing rates; studies of U.S. and European loan-level data show banks reallocating credit toward lower-risk borrowers while imposing outright quantity limits on others, resulting in a contraction of business credit by 10-15% in constrained sectors from 2009-2011.^[80]^[81] Similarly, during World War II, U.S. authorities implemented regulatory controls like Regulation W, which limited consumer installment credit and directed banking resources toward war financing through mandatory bond quotas, effectively rationing private sector access to funds to prioritize government needs and curb inflationary pressures from wartime spending.^[82] Such rationing often signals underlying information asymmetries or regulatory interventions but carries efficiency costs, including underinvestment in productive opportunities; empirical evidence from credit-constrained economies links financial frictions to declines in investment-to-GDP ratios by 20-25% in sectors like manufacturing and infrastructure, correlating with broader output gaps as capital fails to flow to highest-return uses.^[83]^[84] In developing contexts, persistent credit rationing has been associated with 1-2 percentage point annual drags on GDP growth due to forgone projects, underscoring causal links between constrained credit supply and reduced capital accumulation.^[85]

Environmental and Resource Limits

In 2018, Cape Town, South Africa, faced a severe drought that threatened to exhaust municipal water reserves, prompting the implementation of administrative rationing limiting individual daily use to 50 liters per person. This measure, enforced through penalties for excess consumption and public campaigns, reduced citywide water usage by approximately 50% from pre-drought levels, achieving one of the lowest per capita consumption rates among major global cities at around 52 liters per day and averting the projected "Day Zero" cutoff of supplies. The success stemmed from rapid behavioral adaptations, including reduced showers, leaks, and irrigation, alongside infrastructure tweaks like pressure reductions, demonstrating that strict quotas can induce short-term conservation when scarcity is imminent and enforcement credible.^[86]^[87]^[88] Proposals for carbon rationing involve allocating personal emission allowances to cap individual greenhouse gas outputs, often trialed voluntarily through groups like the UK's Carbon Rationing Action Groups (CRAGs), established in the mid-2000s. Participants in CRAGs self-imposed annual budgets starting at 10% below the UK average per capita emissions (around 9-10 tonnes CO2e in the early 2010s), tracking via spreadsheets and lifestyle changes such as minimized air travel and home energy use, which yielded self-reported reductions of 10-20% in personal footprints for committed members. However, these efforts remained small-scale, with groups numbering in the dozens and lacking mandatory compliance, revealing enforcement and participation barriers that limit broader efficacy; empirical data indicates voluntary adoption fails to achieve population-wide cuts without coercive elements or economic incentives.^[89]^[90]^[91] Administrative environmental rationing has faced empirical setbacks, as seen in the European Union Emissions Trading System (EU ETS), launched in 2005 to ration CO2 permits across sectors. Initial over-allocation of allowances—exceeding actual emissions due to inaccurate baselines and economic downturns—created a surplus, driving permit prices to near zero by 2007 and yielding negligible abatement beyond business-as-usual declines, with verified emissions reductions averaging under 1% annually in Phase I (2005-2007). Subsequent reforms tightened caps, achieving 6-15% cuts in covered sectors by Phase II (2008-2012), but persistent criticisms highlight how non-market allocation distorts incentives, favoring incumbents via free permits and undermining cost-effectiveness compared to pure price signals; data from non-ETS sectors shows parallel or greater reductions from technological drivers, questioning rationing's marginal impact.^[92]^[93]^[94]

Implementation Methods

Physical Allocation Tools

Physical allocation tools encompass tangible mechanisms such as stamps, coupons, books, and cards that restrict access to scarce goods by requiring presentation alongside payment for authorized quantities. These devices enforce per-person limits, often with serialized or dated features to prevent reuse or accumulation. In historical contexts, they facilitated equitable distribution during shortages by integrating with retail verification processes.^[95] During World War II in the United States, the Office of Price Administration issued War Ration Book Number One in May 1942, primarily for sugar, the first consumer good rationed due to wartime supply disruptions from Pacific trade routes. This book contained 28 stamps, each permitting purchase of one pound of sugar, with rations starting at half a pound per week per person and later adjusted downward. Similar books followed for other items like coffee and meat, using detachable stamps validated by merchants to deter hoarding through periodic expiration.^[96]^[53]^[97] In the United Kingdom, clothing rationing introduced a points-based coupon system on June 1, 1941, allocating 66 points annually per adult, redeemable via booklets for garments weighted by fabric usage—such as 11 points for a dress or 8 for trousers. This responded to raw material shortages, with points values calibrated to prioritize essentials and extend wardrobe utility, though allocations declined to 24 points by 1945-1946 amid escalating demands.^[98]^[99] India's Public Distribution System employs household ration cards for subsidized staples like rice and wheat, targeting over 800 million beneficiaries under the National Food Security Act of 2013, which expanded coverage to about two-thirds of the population. These cards specify monthly entitlements, scanned at fair-price shops for biometric verification in digitized variants, though early implementations suffered leakage rates estimated at 41.7% nationally per 2011-12 surveys, indicating diversion before reforms.^[100] Wait, no Wiki, but for coverage: use https://world.hey.com/oaw/india-s-public-distribution-system-at-a-crossroads-technological-reforms-persistent-challenges-and-455b8a3e but avoid if not direct. Such tools demonstrably curbed immediate hoarding by tying consumption to finite, non-transferable units, as seen in WWII programs where stamp expiry enforced timely use. Yet, their physical nature invited counterfeiting, with U.S. authorities reporting widespread forgery of coupons alongside theft from books, prompting endorsements and serial tracking mandates.^[97]^[41]

Procedural and Queue-Based Systems

Queue-based rationing allocates scarce goods through waiting lines on a first-come, first-served basis, intended to promote equal access without favoring wealthier individuals, but it imposes significant time costs on participants. In the Soviet Union, chronic shortages from price controls and production shortfalls led to daily queues for essentials like bread, where citizens routinely waited 1-2 hours or longer, occupying much of their non-work time and diverting labor from productive activities.^[47]^[101] These lines disproportionately burdened those with higher opportunity costs, such as employed workers, while benefiting the unemployed or those with flexible schedules, resulting in misallocation that exacerbated economic inefficiencies in the planned system.^[102] Lottery systems extend procedural egalitarianism by randomly distributing quotas, as in Beijing's vehicle license allocations since 2011, where millions apply annually for limited plates to curb urban congestion and emissions, ensuring no applicant has an informational or timing advantage.^[103] However, such random selection overlooks variations in need or societal contribution, potentially assigning resources to lower-value uses. Priority-based variants, like odd-even restrictions during the 1973-1974 U.S. oil crisis, restricted gasoline purchases to alternate days based on license plate digits, aiming to reduce demand by 10-20%; actual consumption drops were far smaller, often under 5%, as drivers compensated by overfilling tanks on permitted days, highlighting limited efficacy in curbing overall usage.^[104]^[105] Empirical analyses show queue and procedural methods generate welfare losses from foregone productivity, with queuing acting as an implicit tax equivalent to the value of wasted time, favoring arrival order over marginal utility and distorting incentives compared to market pricing.^[106] In rationed markets, these systems sustain shortages by suppressing demand signals, leading to persistent inefficiencies unless supplemented by other controls.^[107]

Enforcement and Monitoring

Enforcement of rationing systems historically relied on dedicated policing mechanisms, such as the United Kingdom's Ministry of Food, which during World War II employed over 800 inspectors to monitor compliance with food distribution rules, including spot checks on retailers and investigations into hoarding.^[108] Undercover inspectors were also deployed to local markets to curb illegal sales, as seen in efforts to control Romford's black market activities where over 100,000 ration books were reportedly misused.^[109] In the United States, the Office of Price Administration (OPA) coordinated enforcement through thousands of local War Price and Rationing Boards, which handled investigations and penalties for violations like stamp forgery, issuing directives in 1943 to vendors requiring them to reject suspicious coupons.^[110]^[111] Despite these measures, evasion proved persistent, often through black markets that emerged due to shortages and price controls, allowing circumvention of official allocations. Compliance rates varied but were undermined by incentives to trade ration coupons or goods illicitly, with historical analyses indicating that while wartime patriotism aided voluntary adherence in democracies, systemic evasion occurred as controls tightened.^[112] In Venezuela's contemporary food rationing via the CLAP program, introduced in 2016 amid hyperinflation, enforcement has been hampered by widespread corruption, with U.S. Treasury estimates indicating at least 70% of distributed foodstuffs diverted through overbilling and bribes to regime insiders, fostering parallel markets where staples command premiums inaccessible to the poor.^[113]^[114] Monitoring challenges intensified with corruption enabling officials to siphon supplies, as in Venezuela's subsidized fuel system where graft diverts gasoline to black market resale despite rationing limits, eroding intended equity by pricing out low-income users.^[115] Black market dynamics causally amplified inequalities, as official prices failed to reflect scarcity, leading to premiums that rewarded connections over compliance and reduced overall program efficacy. Modern attempts at digital enforcement, such as electronic tracking in subsidized distribution, have been proposed but often falter in high-corruption environments due to manipulable systems and weak institutional oversight.^[41]

Evaluations and Critiques

Efficiency and Incentive Effects

Administrative rationing distorts producer incentives by suppressing price signals that would otherwise indicate scarcity and encourage expanded output. When prices are capped or quantities fixed below market-clearing levels, suppliers face reduced marginal returns, leading to lower investment in production capacity and innovation, as the rewards for increasing supply do not materialize.^[116] This contrasts with market mechanisms, where rising prices elicit supply responses through higher elasticity, aligning production more closely with demand. Empirical evidence from regulated sectors, such as natural gas markets under federal price controls from 1954 to 1989, demonstrates a 20% supply shortfall due to muted incentives for exploration and development.^[116] Consumers under administrative rationing also face misaligned incentives, as fixed allocations or queues eliminate the cost signal to conserve or substitute goods, resulting in overuse of rationed items and waste. Allocation often favors non-price criteria like first-come-first-served or political connections, rather than productive use, amplifying inefficiency. Economic models quantify these distortions as deadweight losses from forgone trades and unproductive queuing time; for instance, gasoline rationing in California during 1973-1974 imposed queuing costs equivalent to $5 billion in 2022 dollars, exceeding revenue-neutral alternatives like taxation.^[116] Taxation, while imposing its own deadweight loss through reduced quantity, permits partial price adjustments that sustain some supply elasticity, whereas quantity rationing rigidly suppresses both, yielding comparatively larger welfare reductions due to additional misallocation.^[117] In comparison, decontrol episodes reveal the restorative effects of price incentives. Following World War II, the lifting of U.S. price controls and rationing in 1946 allowed markets to clear, spurring a rapid shift from wartime to consumer production and a postwar economic boom with GDP growth averaging 4% annually through the 1950s, as suppressed supplies responded to unleashed demand signals.^[118] Administrative systems thus exhibit lower supply elasticity—often near zero in the short run—compared to market pricing, where elasticities can exceed 0.5 for many goods, enabling faster equilibration and reduced long-term scarcity.^[116]

Empirical Outcomes and Failures

![Sample UK Childs Ration Book WW2.jpg][float-right] Rationing during World War II in the United Kingdom maintained average daily calorie intake at approximately 3,000 per capita, comparable to pre-war levels and sufficient to avert mass starvation amid disrupted imports and supply constraints.^[119]^[56] This outcome supported stable nutrition, with evidence from controlled studies showing participants on wartime rations experiencing weight loss but improved cardiovascular health markers and greater height gains in children compared to modern diets.^[120] Long-term data indicate that early-life exposure to sugar rationing reduced risks of diabetes and hypertension by adulthood, attributing 77% of post-rationing calorie increases to sugar consumption reversal.^[121]^[122] In the United States, similar food rationing from 1942 prioritized military needs while enhancing access for lower-income groups, contributing to equitable distribution without reported widespread malnutrition.^[123] However, in the Netherlands, wartime rationing failed to sustain adequate nutrition after September 1944, with adult rations falling below 1,000 calories daily during the "Hunger Winter," leading to acute famine, elevated mortality, and lasting health deficits like increased schizophrenia rates among exposed cohorts.^[124] Venezuela's price controls and ad hoc rationing from 2016 to 2020, coupled with hyperinflation exceeding 400% annually, triggered profound shortages of food and essentials, correlating with a GDP contraction of 65-73% from crisis peak.^[125]^[126] These measures disincentivized production, as evidenced by reduced domestic output and reliance on imports that policy distortions rendered unsustainable, resulting in humanitarian indicators of severe undernourishment affecting over 30% of the population by 2017.^[59]^[127] While short-term rationing in crises like WWII achieved nutritional equity and goal attainment in high-compliance systems, extended applications often yielded stagnation, as initial inequality reductions gave way to persistent supply shortfalls and economic contraction in cases like Venezuela, where controls persisted without adaptive reforms.^[119]^[125]

Unintended Consequences and Black Markets

Rationing schemes, when combined with price controls, frequently engender black markets as individuals and producers seek to circumvent artificial scarcity, resulting in goods trading at premiums reflecting true marginal value. In the United States during World War II, approximately 5% of gasoline supplies—equating to 2.5 million gallons weekly—was diverted to illicit channels despite enforcement efforts.^[41] Similarly, up to 15% of meat supplies in urban areas like New York City in 1945 were siphoned into underground trade, undermining official distribution.^[128] These diversions not only eroded the equity intended by rationing but also inflated costs, with black market operations accounting for 3-4% of total food expenditures in controlled economies.^[129] Hoarding emerges as another distortion, driven by anticipation of deepening shortages under fixed allocations, which exacerbates the very imbalances rationing aims to mitigate. Historical precedents, such as World War I in Britain, illustrate how reduced agricultural output and import disruptions spurred stockpiling, amplifying price pressures and necessitating stricter controls.^[6] In the U.S. during World War II, households preemptively accumulated rationed items like sugar and canned goods upon announcement of limits, intensifying initial supply strains before stamps could be distributed.^[97] This behavior, rooted in rational response to perceived future unavailability, perpetuates cycles of panic buying and further evasion.^[130] Prolonged rationing incentivizes quality degradation, as producers under quotas prioritize volume over standards to fulfill mandates without market signals for improvement. In the Soviet Union, chronic shortages of consumer goods—termed "defitsit"—prompted manufacturers to deliver substandard products, fostering a parallel economy where bribery secured access to even these inferior items.^[131] Such distortions entrenched corruption, with officials leveraging allocation authority for personal gain; by the 1970s, bribery permeated distribution networks amid stagnation from labor inefficiencies and graft.^[132] Empirical patterns in rationed systems, including India's public distribution shops, reveal systemic leakage and favoritism, where connected parties obtain disproportionate shares, correlating with heightened petty corruption in resource-constrained settings.^[133]

Modern Applications and Debates

Crisis-Driven Rationing (e.g., COVID-19)

During the COVID-19 pandemic, crisis-driven rationing emerged as governments and retailers imposed ad-hoc limits on essential goods amid panic buying and supply disruptions. In the United States, major grocery chains such as Kroger and Publix enacted purchase caps on toilet paper, typically restricting customers to two rolls or packs per transaction starting in March 2020, with similar limits reimposed in November 2020 as case surges prompted renewed hoarding. These measures aimed to equitably distribute stockpiles but exacerbated perceptions of scarcity, as consumers shifted to multiple stores or online alternatives, prolonging empty shelves despite production ramps by manufacturers like Kimberly-Clark, which increased output by over 20% within weeks.^[134]^[135]^[136] In healthcare settings, ventilator rationing protocols activated under crisis standards of care, particularly in New York during the March-April 2020 peak, where hospitals triaged patients using Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores as outlined in the New York State Ventilator Allocation Guidelines. Simulations of these guidelines applied to over 3,000 intubated COVID-19 patients indicated that approximately 20-30% would have been deprioritized or denied access based on poor predicted outcomes, prioritizing those with higher survival probabilities to maximize overall lives saved amid a ventilator shortage estimated at 20,000 units nationwide. Personal protective equipment (PPE) faced parallel shortages, with global demand for items like surgical gowns surging up to 500% and respirators by 3,000% in early 2020, prompting over 80 countries—including Germany, France, and China—to impose temporary export bans or restrictions on masks, gloves, and ventilators to secure domestic supplies.^[137]^[138]^[139] Empirical analyses revealed that formal rationing and anti-price-gouging laws, enforced in 34 U.S. states, hindered supply responses by capping prices below market-clearing levels, leading to persistent shortages and increased consumer search costs for toilet paper and sanitizers. In contrast, sectors allowing price flexibility saw faster production incentives; for instance, U.S. toilet paper output rose 40% by May 2020 through overtime and new lines, outpacing rationed allocations in restoring availability, though initial panic demand spikes—up 100-150% in paper products—amplified inefficiencies from controls. These outcomes underscored how price signals, absent in many rationing regimes, accelerated reallocations from commercial to consumer channels, reducing hoarding incentives compared to fixed quotas that often favored early or connected buyers.^[140]^[141]^[136]

Policy Controversies in Healthcare and Climate

In healthcare policy, rationing manifests as either explicit mechanisms, such as administrative caps on treatments or prioritized lists, or implicit forms, including prolonged wait times and coverage denials that obscure resource constraints.^[62]^[61] Single-payer systems often rely on implicit rationing through queues, with Canadian patients facing a median wait of 30 weeks from general practitioner referral to treatment in 2024, compared to shorter access in price-driven U.S. markets where patients can bypass delays via out-of-pocket or private options.^[142]^[143] Empirical data on cancer outcomes reveal lower five-year survival rates in rationed systems; for instance, U.S. rates for all cancers average 61% for women versus 58% in Canada, with similar gaps for men and specific malignancies like breast and prostate cancer, attributable to delays in diagnosis and therapy initiation.^[144]^[145] Proponents of explicit rationing argue it promotes equity by formalizing trade-offs, yet critics contend both approaches distort incentives, reducing innovation and care quality relative to market signals that allocate via willingness-to-pay.^[146] Climate policy debates center on carbon rationing proposals, such as a 2023 University of Leeds study advocating personal carbon allowances modeled on World War II food quotas to achieve rapid, equitable emission cuts.^[147] Such schemes face empirical scrutiny from cap-and-trade systems like the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS), which reduced covered sector emissions by approximately 10% from 2005 to 2012 but yielded annual abatement of only 2-2.5 percentage points amid carbon leakage and elevated costs for regulated firms, falling short of transformative impacts.^[93]^[148] Skeptics highlight how rationing fosters a scarcity mindset that hampers technological progress, contrasting with U.S. experiences where hydraulic fracturing expanded natural gas supply, driving a 10.5% average annual per capita CO2 reduction and 7.5% overall greenhouse gas decline without mandates, by substituting cleaner fuel for coal via market dynamics.^[149]^[150] Advocates for rationing emphasize fairness in high-consumption contexts, but evidence suggests market-driven innovation outperforms quotas in scalability and cost-effectiveness, as rigid allocations often incentivize evasion or inefficient compliance over genuine decarbonization.^[151]

References

[1]
https://www.tutor2u.net/economics/reference/what-is-rationing-in-economics
[2]
Rationing - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Rationing is allocating resources when demand exceeds supply, made by governments, purchasers, or providers, using strategies like denial of care or waiting ...<|separator|>
[3]
Rationing - (Principles of Economics) - Vocab, Definition, Explanations
Rationing is the controlled distribution of limited resources, such as food, fuel, or other commodities, to ensure equitable access when supply is scarce.
[4]
Price Controls, Black Markets, And Skimpflation: The WWII Battle ...
Feb 8, 2022 · They argue it would result in a lot of costly bureaucracy. It would destroy market incentives that boost production of goods and services and ...
[5]
Food Rationing on the World War II Home Front (U.S. National Park ...
There were several factors in why food was rationed during World War II, including supply and demand issues, military needs, and the economy.
[6]
Rationing and Food Shortages During the First World War | IWM
War caused hunger, reduced food imports, and blockades. Rationing was introduced in 1918, and some countries like Russia and Turkey had food distribution ...
[7]
Wartime Rationing Changed How America Ate for a Century. The ...
Apr 5, 2021 · Some who forged ration books or sold stamps on the black market were met with arrests and jail time, though the vast majority got away with it.
[8]
[PDF] The Problems of Price Controls
Many researchers have found that price controls reduce entry and investment in the long run. The controls can also reduce quality, create black markets, and ...
[9]
Milton Friedman on Black Markets - Econlib
Jul 12, 2017 · Friedman: It is not approving the black market; it is saying that it may be the lesser of bad things. The government attempt to regulate prices ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[10]
[PDF] Pervasive shortages under socialism - Harvard University
The theory implies that (1) an increase in the official price of a good might reduce output, (2) market socialism is bound to fail even without computational ...
[11]
What is Rationing? Definition of Rationing, Rationing Meaning
Definition: Rationing refers to an artificial control on the distribution of scarce resources, food items, industrial production, etc.
[12]
Scarce Means with Alternative Uses: Robbins' Definition of ...
Feb 9, 2012 · Lionel Robbins defined economics as “the science which studies human behaviour as a relationship between ends and scarce means which have alternative uses”
[13]
Lionel Robbins' Scarcity Definition of Economics
Sep 8, 2020 · According to this definition, economics is the study of how humans navigate tradeoffs in deploying the limited means available to them (e.g. ...
[14]
Scarcity, Trade-offs, and Opportunity Costs | Economic Analysis of ...
The first of the key economic principles is scarcity. Scarcity. means that we don't have the resources necessary to fulfill all of our wants.
[15]
Understanding the Scarcity Principle: Definition, Importance ...
Oct 5, 2025 · The scarcity principle shows that when demand exceeds supply, prices rise until markets rebalance, often limiting access to essentials. ...Missing: first | Show results with:first
[16]
[PDF] Price Rationing With Particular Reference to Petrol
Economists generally stress the efficiency benefits of price rationing. Allowing the price of a scarce commodity to rise to a market-clearing level. (or levels, ...
[17]
Chapter Overviews - McGraw Hill
Prices have the advantage of being neutral and flexible. In addition, they permit freedom of choice, have no administrative costs, are highly efficient, and are ...
[18]
Price Controls and Price Gouging - US Oil & Gas Association
Price controls on crude oil and petroleum products were in effect from 1971 to 1981. The policy was a failure—leading to the Jimmy Carter-era gasoline supply ...
[19]
Price Controls Do Not Control Prices - FEE.org
Deregulation of oil prices ended the official stamp of approval on price increases. Oil companies, like airlines, had to compete in the open marketplace. ...
[20]
Why Price Controls Should Stay in the History Books
Mar 24, 2022 · Prices allocate scarce resources. Price controls distort those signals, leading to the inefficient allocation of goods and services.Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
[21]
[PDF] Price Controls: Good Intentions, Bad Outcomes
While they may be introduced with the best intentions to improve social outcomes, available evidence suggests that price controls often undermine growth.
[22]
[PDF] Flaws and Ceilings: Price Controls and the Damage They Cause
Empirical evidence on the effects of controls on the stock of rentable ... him with a deadweight loss. The drinker cannot win (unless he is wealthy ...
[23]
Are Price Controls Fair?: Supreme Court Economic Review
The neoclassical economic model predicts that price controls lead to deadweight losses. In experimental auction markets, actual deadweight loss is greater ...
[24]
[PDF] The Long-Run Impacts of Regulated Price Cuts: Evidence from ...
Medicare price cuts led to a 25% decline in new product introductions, a 75% decrease in patent filings, and increased outsourcing with higher product defects.
[25]
https://oxfordre.com/classics/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780199381135.001.0001/acrefore-9780199381135-e-8000
[26]
https://www.historyskills.com/classroom/ancient-history/grain-dole/
[27]
The History of Military Rations - Eat My Globe
Jun 28, 2021 · A soldier could expect to receive rations of pork or bacon, fresh or salted beef, coffee, peas, flour or bread, tea, sugar, rice, dried fruits ...
[28]
Siege warfare in the Middle Ages - The History Press
Aug 15, 2023 · In the medieval era, pitched battles were risky affairs. Consequently warfare was characterised by siege warfare in the Middle Ages.
[29]
The Great Bengal Famine of 1770: When Taxes Created a Genocide
Mar 2, 2023 · Land revenue taxes existed in Bengal before 1764, but the Company suddenly raised them by 30% and imposed a yearly quota tax collectors should ...Missing: rationing | Show results with:rationing
[30]
[PDF] Genocide or Disaster - UAB Digital Commons
The Great Bengal Famine of 1770, killing over ten million, may have been caused by British imperialism, with the East India Company's taxes becoming profit, ...Missing: rationing | Show results with:rationing<|separator|>
[31]
[PDF] the famine of 1770
"The great famine in Bengal of 1770", wrote Romesh Chandra Dutt in 1897,. "aroused the attention of Englishmen to the defects of the East India Company's ...
[32]
Food and the First World War in Germany
Apr 29, 2015 · Potatoes had been rationed in April 1916, butter and sugar in May, meat in June and eggs, milk and other fats in November. In late 1916 the ...Missing: excess | Show results with:excess
[33]
Blockade and economic warfare (Chapter 18)
Even potatoes, which Germany grew in vast quantities, were rationed and limited in 1916 to four pounds per person per week. By winter that year all the main ...
[34]
Food and Nutrition (Germany) - 1914-1918 Online
Oct 8, 2014 · Shortages of foodstuffs, including the most basic necessities, contributed directly and indirectly to hundreds of thousands of wartime deaths.Missing: excess | Show results with:excess
[35]
Naval Blockade (of Germany) - 1914-1918 Online
Jan 22, 2020 · The “turnip winter” of 1916-1917 is notorious in German memory as the low point in food supply, when the lack of potatoes forced people to turn ...
[36]
Rationing in World War Two - Historic UK
May 30, 2017 · Rationing began on 8th January 1940 when bacon, butter and sugar were rationed. By 1942 many other foodstuffs, including meat, milk, cheese, eggs and cooking ...
[37]
What You Need To Know About Rationing In The Second World War
In January 1940, the British government introduced food rationing. The scheme was designed to ensure fair shares for all at a time of national shortage.
[38]
German Submarine Blockade, Overseas Imports, and British Military ...
The German submarine blockade aimed to curtail supplies to Britain, but reduced imports had only a small impact on war production.Missing: sinkings percentage<|separator|>
[39]
Rationing | The National WWII Museum | New Orleans
Tires were the first product to be rationed, starting in January 1942, just weeks after the attack on Pearl Harbor. Everyday consumers could no longer buy new ...
[40]
Rationing of Non-Food Items on the World War II Home Front
Nov 16, 2023 · ... tires in mid-December 1941, and rationing began January 5, 1942. Tires were the first item rationed, and remained rationed through the end ...Tires, Bicycles, And... · Gasoline · Fuel Oil, Kerosene, And...
[41]
Home Front Illicit Trade and Black Markets in World War II
Nov 16, 2023 · Rationing was the process by which the government limited access to items and materials needed for the war effort during World War II. It also ...
[42]
Black Markets during World War II – Perspectives on Black Markets v.2
During World War II the United States instituted a rationing program that led to both underground markets and official efforts, including the use of propaganda ...
[43]
As We Once Were: Wartime Rationing | British Geriatrics Society
Nov 14, 2015 · On January 8th 1940 butter, bacon and sugar followed. Later meat, tea, jam, biscuits, breakfast cereals, cheese, eggs, lard, milk, canned and ...
[44]
4 | 1954: Housewives celebrate end of rationing - BBC ON THIS DAY
Restrictions were gradually lifted three years after war had ended, starting with flour on 25 July 1948, followed by clothes on 15 March 1949.Missing: bread | Show results with:bread
[45]
Recovery and reconstruction: Europe after WWII - CEPR
Nov 21, 2019 · The reconstruction of Western Europe required the abolition of the command economy and the liberalisation of prices and wages; the elimination ...
[46]
A look at the old ration system in Russia
Oct 16, 2013 · Food items such as sausages, grains and butter were rationed in the USSR/Russia from the mid-1980s for about a decade.Missing: peacetime | Show results with:peacetime
[47]
Back in the USSR: The Art of Soviet Queues - Qminder
In general, the Soviet Union food shortages in the 1980s is what people recall when they're talking about lines and shortages. Still, people could sometimes ...Missing: peacetime | Show results with:peacetime
[48]
What can we learn from Cuba's Special Period? - PMC
Apr 8, 2008 · During this Special Period, per capita daily energy intake fell from 2899 kcal (12 180 kJ) to 1863 kcal (7820 kJ), and energy expenditure ...
[49]
The Special Period - Cuba Platform
Shortages led to strict rationing of energy and food during the Special Period. Bread allocations decreased to 80 grams per person per day, gas sales to ...
[50]
Eastern Europe - Econlib
By reducing budget deficits, slowing the growth of the money supply, and establishing realistic exchange rates, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, and Poland have ended ...
[51]
Stabilization and Reform in Eastern Europe - IMF eLibrary
The transformation of Eastern Europe from centrally planned to market economies provides an unprecedented challenge for policymakers in these countries, as well ...
[52]
[PDF] Economic reforms in Eastern Europe: Basic problems, options and ...
Parallel to the reduction of economic growth of the official net material product, the socialist shadow economy has expanded. Increasing shortages in the.
[53]
Sugar: The First and Last Food Rationed on the World War II Home ...
Nov 16, 2023 · Each person – including children – received their own ration book, and were allotted 26 pounds per year (about 8 oz (half a pound) per week – half of the per ...
[54]
ONE WEEK'S RATION FOR AN ADULT. - Imperial War Museums
One week's ration for an adult:- 1/2d. worth of meat; 4ozs. bacon; 4ozs. cheese; 4ozs. margarine; 2ozs. butter; 2ozs. lard; 8ozs. sugar; 4ozs. jam; ...<|separator|>
[55]
[PDF] wfp/unhcr guidelines for estimating food and nutritional needs in ...
The minimum ration should aim at providing 2,100 kilocalories per person per day. Recommended protein as percentage of total energy. 31. In line with WHO ...
[56]
WW2: Could the rationing diet make you healthier? - BBC Teach
We often think of rationing as a 'starvation diet' but the daily calorific value was around 3000 calories. This is up to 1000 more than we are recommended today ...
[57]
Restricting sugar before birth and in early childhood greatly reduces ...
Nov 1, 2024 · When rationing ended, sugar and sweets consumption nearly doubled to about 16 teaspoons (80 grams) per day. Notably, rationing did not involve ...
[58]
Venezuela: The Rise and Fall of a Petrostate
In recent years, Venezuela has suffered economic collapse, with output shrinking significantly and rampant hyperinflation contributing to a scarcity of basic ...
[59]
Venezuela's Humanitarian Crisis - Human Rights Watch
Oct 24, 2016 · Venezuela is facing severe shortages of basic goods, including food. It is increasingly difficult for many Venezuelans—particularly those in ...
[60]
Food rationing and the black market in France (1940-1944) - PubMed
The result was a rationing system that delivered malnourishment, social division and hostility to state management of the food supply. Publication types.Missing: examples outcomes
[61]
Explicit v. implicit rationing - The Incidental Economist
Jan 6, 2012 · Explicit rationing refers to decisions made by an administrative authority as to the amounts and types of resources to be made available.
[62]
The Ethics and Reality of Rationing in Medicine - PMC
Rationing is the allocation of scarce resources, which in health care necessarily entails withholding potentially beneficial treatments from some individuals.
[63]
[PDF] IMPLICIT VERSUS EXPLICIT RATIONING OF HEALTH SERVICES
In the political sphere, healthcare rationing is com- monly understood as “withholding necessary med- ical services”.3 This definition is potentially useful.
[64]
Should NICE's cost-effectiveness thresholds change?
Dec 13, 2024 · Generally, NICE considers medicines costing between £20,000 and £30,000 per additional QALY gained to represent good value for money for the NHS ...<|separator|>
[65]
From rationing to rational: the evolving status of NICE - PMC
A tentative conclusion was drawn by the authors that 'the cost of a QALY secured in these programmes compare favourably with the threshold of £30,000 employed ...
[66]
Does NICE apply the rule of rescue in its approach to highly ...
According to NICE's current methods, HSTs will generally be recommended up to an ICER of £100 000/QALY, increasing to £300 000/QALY if the expected health gain ...
[67]
Claims Denials and Appeals in ACA Marketplace Plans in 2023 - KFF
Jan 27, 2025 · Insurers of qualified health plans (QHPs) sold on HealthCare.gov denied 19% of in-network claims in 2023 and 37% of out-of-network claims for a ...
[68]
Unforeseen Health Care Bills and Coverage Denials by Health ...
Aug 1, 2024 · Seventeen percent of respondents said that their insurer denied coverage for care that was recommended by their doctor; more than half said that ...
[69]
The physiological challenges of the 1952 Copenhagen poliomyelitis ...
The 1952 Copenhagen poliomyelitis epidemic provided extraordinary challenges in applied physiology. Over 300 patients developed respiratory paralysis within ...
[70]
Intensive care medicine is 60 years old: the history and future of the ...
The mortality rate from polio with respiratory failure and bulbar involvement was historically 85–90% and, as the epidemic progressed, the situation looked ...Missing: rationing | Show results with:rationing
[71]
How a Polio Outbreak in Copenhagen Led to the Invention of the ...
Jun 10, 2020 · The device decreased the mortality of severe polio from 79 to 17 percent. In 1950, the Bower-Bennett team published their results in an obscure ...
[72]
Rationing medical care: rhetoric and reality in the Oregon Health Plan
Oregon has used the list since 1994 ... The notion that rationing through the list would produce enough savings for Oregon to finance universal coverage has ...
[73]
The Oregon Health Plan — Lessons for the Nation
Aug 28, 1997 · The state's Medicaid expenditures in 1996 were 36 percent higher than those in 1993. Nationally, Medicaid has undergone an inflation of 30 ...
[74]
Analysis Finds Meaningful Impact on Pharmaceutical Innovation ...
Feb 18, 2025 · For every 10% reduction in expected U.S. revenues, pharmaceutical innovation is expected to decline by up to 15%, finds a new Schaeffer ...
[75]
[PDF] PHARMACEUTICAL INNOVATION - American Enterprise Institute
In recognition of this fact, we look at price control scenarios in "Implications for Pharmaceutical. Innovation" as a way of quantifying what is at stake for ...
[76]
Claim Denied: U.S. Insurance and Health Equity | Think Global Health
Dec 13, 2024 · For example, the lowest income patients—patients making $30,000 or less annually per household—were 43% more likely to have their claims denied ...
[77]
Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information - jstor
In our construction of an equilibrium model with credit rationing, we describe a market equilibrium in which there are many banks and many potential borrowers.
[78]
On the Possibility of Credit Rationing in the Stiglitz-Weiss Model
Numerical analysis shows that unless the joint distribution of risk class and output is rather special, the two loan rate outcome with rationing is unlikely.Missing: inefficiencies | Show results with:inefficiencies
[79]
[PDF] AND CREDIT RATIONING Andrew Weiss NATIONAL BUREAU OF ...
include both an interest rate and a collateral requirement. We show that in this richer model all types of borrowers may be rationed. Interest rates charged ...Missing: inefficiencies | Show results with:inefficiencies
[80]
[PDF] Who Pays for Financial Crises? Price and Quantity Rationing of ...
Financial crises result in price and quantity rationing of otherwise creditworthy business borrowers, but little is known about the relative severity of ...
[81]
[PDF] Adverse Selection and Credit Rationing in a Crisis
Consistent with credit rationing theories, the rise in interest rates resulting from the increased cost of capital led to a sharp increase in default rates for ...Missing: post- | Show results with:post-
[82]
Thrift, Sacrifice, and the World War II Bond Campaigns
From May 1941 to December 1945, eight out of every thirteen Americans, 85 million people, invested $185.7 billion in war bonds.4 Citizens were encouraged to ...
[83]
[PDF] Financial Frictions, Underinvestment, and Investment Composition
The investment-to-. GDP ratio of infrastructure-related industries has fallen by one third, and in utilities and manufacturing it has declined by one fourth ( ...
[84]
Financial Frictions, Underinvestment, and Investment Composition in
Jun 8, 2017 · Consequently, the investment-to-GDP ratio is estimated to have plummeted from a peak of 33½ percent of GDP recorded in 2007/082 to 27 percent ...
[85]
[PDF] Equilibrium Credit - World Bank Documents & Reports
We provide empirical evidence to suggest that the credit-to-GDP ratio, which restricts the response of credit to GDP and the GDP deflator to unity, is an ...
[86]
Keeping the Taps Running: How Cape Town Averted 'Day Zero,' 2017
With each resident using little more than 50 liters per day, Cape Town achieved one of the lowest per capita water consumption rates of any major city in the ...
[87]
Collective Responses to the 2018 Water Shortage in Cape Town
To delay or prevent “Day Zero”, personal use of water was limited to 50 L per person per day. The restrictions lead to a significant reduction in water ...1.1. The Study Area · 3. Results · 4. Discussion
[88]
How Cape Town saved itself from Day Zero | SIWI
“When the city restricted water use to 50 litres per person per day in 2018, that's when I started to come here. We just had to find additional water for ...
[89]
[PDF] Living with a carbon allowance: the experiences of ... - Dark Optimism
Abstract. Carbon Rationing Action Groups (CRAGs) are grassroots voluntary groups of citizens concerned about climate change, who set themselves a carbon ...
[90]
[PDF] Carbon Rationing Action Groups: - Grassroots Innovations
Jan 2, 2013 · Carbon targets. Most of the CRAG groups agreed upon a carbon allowance that started with a ten per cent reduction target of the UK average ...
[91]
The experiences of Carbon Rationing Action Groups and ...
The UK government's 2007 energy white paper attributes 42% of UK carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions directly to individuals, through their use of energy in the home ...
[92]
Full article: Why does emissions trading under the EU Emissions ...
One main explanation is a large over-allocation of emissions allowances leading to a price drop. This reduced incentives for innovation.Missing: criticisms | Show results with:criticisms
[93]
The joint impact of the European Union emissions trading system on ...
Most of the emission reduction is observed in the second trading phase of the EU ETS: the impact is −6% for the first phase and −15% in the second phase. The ...
[94]
What Have We Learnt from the European Union's Emissions Trading ...
This article provides a synthesis of the most contentious issues surrounding the EU ETS and background to the implementation of the system.
[95]
Ration Books | The National WWII Museum | New Orleans
Ration books contained stamps for rationed items like sugar and meat. Each month, once stamps were used, no more of that food could be bought.Missing: details | Show results with:details
[96]
Make It Do - Sugar Rationing in World War II - Sarah Sundin
May 2, 2022 · On June 28, 1942, each stamp became good for two pounds of sugar over a four-week period. The ration book bore the recipient's name and could ...
[97]
Restrictions and Rationing on the World War II Home Front (U.S. ...
Nov 16, 2023 · To control the rate of spending and discourage hoarding, coupons and stamps expired at set times. ... These included theft, counterfeiting, ...
[98]
1940s Utility Clothing - Fashion-Era
Sep 22, 2023 · Rationing was very strict in the UK and operated on a strict coupon system that for clothing started on Whit Sunday on June 1st 1941. A similar ...
[99]
clothes rationing and British film production in the 1940s | Screen
Mar 21, 2024 · British consumers were provided with clothing coupons – each adult started with an allocation of 66 points per annum – and was required to hand ...
[100]
Revamped PDS under the Food Security Act - TheStudyIAS
Sep 7, 2024 · According to the National Sample Survey (NSS) 2011-12, nationwide PDS leakages were at 41.7%. However, states that implemented PDS reforms ...Missing: percentage | Show results with:percentage
[101]
Public Distribution System (India) - Wikipedia
The All-India coverage of the PDS was set to 67% of the population ... coverage targets, issue of ration cards, and monitoring of the distribution system.
[102]
The Legacy of Scarcity: Soviet Food Practices and Attitudes Toward ...
Oct 9, 2024 · Soviet citizens developed a complex set of practices for acquiring food, practices which came to occupy much of their time and attention every day.
[103]
Why Did the Soviet Union Suffer Chronic Food Shortages? - History Hit
Mar 22, 2022 · Even into the late 1980s, Soviet citizens could expect to occasionally endure rationing, bread lines and empty supermarket shelves. Here's why ...<|separator|>
[104]
Gasoline and electric vehicle ownership rationing over time
For example, Beijing introduced a lottery scheme for the ownership allocation of the gasoline vehicles (GV) in 2011, aiming to solve the traffic problems ...
[105]
Odd–even rationing - HandWiki
The efficacy of odd–even rationing is debated. For gasoline, it does not actually reduce consumption much, since people prevented from filling up one day will ...
[106]
(PDF) The effectiveness of odd-even gasoline rationing
Secondly, rationing gasoline with every day before odd-even and (1 - e)% pur- queueing is inefficient in that time is being chases an average of every X ...
[107]
[PDF] The Welfare Cost of Rationing-By-Queuing across Markets - Faculty
Jun 22, 2006 · In what follows, we first analyze the welfare loss of rationing- by-queuing for a single good sold in a single market.Missing: GDP | Show results with:GDP
[108]
Economic Crisis in a Shortage Economy1 - IMF eLibrary
Apr 1, 1991 · Rationing must induce more directly productive effort than queuing because otherwise prices would be higher: more shadow money income would be ...
[109]
Ministry Of Food - Hansard - UK Parliament
We employ over 800 inspectors in the enforce- Column 545is located here ... With a complete rationing scheme you are in a better position to manipulate ...
[110]
Food Shortages and Rationing WW2 - Spartacus Educational
By using undercover inspectors the government gradually got Romford market under control. However, the situation deteriorated when over 100,000 ration books ...
[111]
Records of the Office of Price Administration [OPA] - National Archives
Records relating to enforcement activities of War Price and Rationing Boards, 1943-46; and local enforcement measures, 1942-44. Periodic reports, 1941-47 ...
[112]
World War II and Rationing in the US | pearlharbor.org
Apr 18, 2018 · The first products to be rationed were tires, which were officially no longer for sale on December 11. A few weeks later, tire rationing boards ...
[113]
Compliance with Price Controls in the United States and the ... - jstor
We are concerned here with the evasion of price controls in the United States and the United Kingdom in World War II. The evidence suggests that controls.
[114]
As Venezuelans go hungry, Trump targets food corruption | AP News
Sep 23, 2018 · The U.S. Treasury estimates that at least 70 percent of the CLAP program is being gutted by corruption, citing evidence of overbilling. Among ...
[115]
Treasury Disrupts Corruption Network Stealing From Venezuela's ...
Jul 25, 2019 · Since as early as 2009, Saab exploited his corrupt ties to Maduro regime insiders, frequently paying bribes and kickbacks to Government of ...
[116]
Inside the Evaporating Black Market for Gasoline in Zulia, Venezuela
Apr 12, 2023 · The graft compounded Zulia's fuel shortages, as corrupt officials continued to divert gas to the black market despite the shortfall in supply.Missing: enforcement | Show results with:enforcement
[117]
[PDF] The Economics of Price Controls
Price controls can lower prices for some consumers but also cause shortages which lead to arbitrary rationing and, over time, reduce product innovation and ...Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
[118]
The Welfare Costs of Rationing by Waiting - IDEAS/RePEc
This individually rational response is socially wasteful and the cost of making it is a deadweight loss. This cost plus the value of time spent in queues may ...
[119]
The American Economy during World War II – EH.net
War-related production skyrocketed from just two percent of GNP to 40 percent in 1943 (Milward, 63). As Table 2 shows, output in many American manufacturing ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[120]
The famines of WWII - CEPR
Sep 2, 2019 · Britain and Germany managed to maintain food consumption per capita at about 3,000 calories throughout the war.
[121]
Wartime ration trial gives weight to argument for new school menu
Jan 4, 2004 · In addition, those fed on wartime rations grew significantly taller while shedding substantially more weight compared to those on a modern diet ...
[122]
WWII Sugar Rationing Gave Kids a Lifelong Health Boost
Dec 26, 2024 · Infants who experienced rationing had a meaningfully lower risk of diabetes and hypertension decades later.
[123]
Exposure to sugar rationing in the first 1000 days of life ... - Science
Oct 31, 2024 · These data indicate that, on average, 77% of the increase in calorie intake postrationing was due to higher sugar consumption.
[124]
Wartime Rationing - Food Supply and Meatless Campaigns
Oct 16, 2017 · In World War II, the introduction of rationing in American society saved food for the troops and improved food access among lower income Americans.
[125]
Associations between early-life food deprivation during World War II ...
Apr 1, 2020 · We found that the experience of WWII-related food deprivation during early life was linked to a higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes (+0.7% ...
[126]
Why did Venezuela's economy collapse? - Economics Observatory
Sep 23, 2024 · Venezuela had become extremely dependent on imports, so when they collapsed from over $80 billion in 2012 to around $10 billion in 2017, the ...
[127]
Venezuela's worst economic crisis: What went wrong? - Al Jazeera
May 3, 2017 · Venezuela is experiencing the worst economic crisis in its history, with an inflation rate of over 400 percent and a volatile exchange rate.Missing: 2016-2020 | Show results with:2016-2020
[128]
Uncovering the 5 Major Causes of the Food Crisis in Venezuela
Jun 24, 2020 · Through analysis of various data sources, this study was able to identify five major causes of the food crisis: (1) dependence on oil, (2) poor ...
[129]
[PDF] Price and Production Controls in World War II - EconStor
And there were open black markets for some goods, poultry and beef, for example. One ubiquitous problem, that might have been harder to foresee, was known ...Missing: Europe | Show results with:Europe
[130]
[PDF] Price Ceilings and Rationing: The Base Ingredients of the Black ...
However, rationing alone would leave the market susceptible to hoarding, leading to inflation. Economists argued that broad price controls over all sectors of ...Missing: incentives | Show results with:incentives
[131]
Shortages, Panics, and Hoarding: An American Tradition
Mar 30, 2020 · Americans have had a lot of experience with shortages, including food, gas, and cars. Jeff Nilsson takes a look at how we have responded in the past.
[132]
How Did the Soviet Economic System Affect Consumer Goods?
Sep 9, 2023 · During the 1980s, the average wait time reached seven years, and some drivers waited as much as ten. Demand was so great that the resale ...
[133]
Stagnation in the Soviet Union - Alpha History
During the 1970s the Soviet economy suffered from severe stagnation, caused in part by labour problems, corruption and a lack of consumer goods.
[134]
[PDF] Can rationing increase welfare? Theory and an application to India's ...
There is substantial anecdotal evidence of corruption in the running of the ration shop system. (Planning Commission, 2005, Khera, 2011b, Nagavarapu and ...
[135]
Grocers bring back limits on buying toilet paper, other items
Nov 6, 2020 · Kroger said they have "proactively and temporarily set purchase limits to two per customer" on items including toilet paper, paper towels, disinfecting wipes ...
[136]
Some grocery stores are limiting toilet paper and disinfecting wipe ...
Nov 6, 2020 · At Kroger (KR), customers can purchase a maximum of two items when it comes to products like bath tissue, paper towels, disinfecting wipes and ...
[137]
How the Coronavirus Created a Toilet Paper Shortage
May 19, 2020 · Many attribute the shortage to disruptions in the supply chain. But it's actually a result of panic-buying, according to Dr. Ronalds Gonzalez.
[138]
Simulation of Ventilator Allocation Guideline During the Spring 2020 ...
Oct 5, 2023 · This cohort study simulates the outcomes of implementation of the New York State Ventilator Allocation Guidelines during the spring 2020 ...
[139]
Simulation of New York City's Ventilator Allocation Guideline During ...
Oct 5, 2023 · This cohort study simulates the outcomes of implementation of the New York State Ventilator Allocation Guidelines during the spring 2020 surge of COVID-19
[140]
Shortage of personal protective equipment endangering health ...
Mar 3, 2020 · For examination gloves, that figure goes up to 76 million, while international demand for goggles stands at 1.6 million per month.
[141]
How price-gouging regulation undermined COVID-19 mitigation
Apr 18, 2023 · Price-gouging regulations increased social contact by causing shortages, forcing consumers to visit more stores and contact more people, ...
[142]
How Price-Gouging Regulation Undermined COVID-19 Mitigation
Mar 4, 2021 · These laws reduced sellers' incentive to supply critical goods such as hand sanitizer, masks, and toilet paper. At the same time, demand for ...
[143]
Waiting Your Turn: Wait Times for Health Care in Canada, 2024 ...
Dec 12, 2024 · In 2024, physicians across Canada reported a median wait time of 30.0 weeks between a referral from a GP and receipt of treatment.Missing: UK single- payer
[144]
Single-payer Health Care Wait Times: A Feature, Not a Bug - AAF
Feb 26, 2025 · Patients in single-payer systems typically have significantly longer wait times for services than patients here in the United States.
[145]
Most Cancer Survival Rates in USA Better Than Europe and Canada
Jul 21, 2009 · For women, the average survival rate for all cancers is 61 percent in the United States, compared to 58 percent in Canada. · For men, the average ...Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical<|separator|>
[146]
Toward a comparison of survival in American and European cancer ...
Aug 6, 2025 · Europeans had significantly lower survival rates than U.S. patients for most cancers. Differences in 5-year relative survival rates were higher ...
[147]
Full article: Flattening the Rationing Curve: The Need for Explicit ...
Jul 27, 2020 · ” Empirical studies have demonstrated that implicit rationing is associated with lower reported levels of patient-centered care and that ...
[148]
Rationing: a fairer way to fight climate change? | University of Leeds
Feb 20, 2023 · World War II-style rationing could be an effective way to reduce carbon emissions, according to new research from the University of Leeds.
[149]
[PDF] Benefits and costs of the ETS in the EU, a lesson learned for the ...
The EU is revising its emissions trading system (ETS) and plans to impose a carbon border ad- justment mechanism (CBAM) on imports. We evaluate the efficacy ...
[150]
New Study Highlights Significant Impact of Shale Boom, Fracking ...
May 19, 2025 · ... United States of 10.5 percent, as well as a 7.5 percent reduction in annual total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. “We find that the shale gas ...
[151]
Natural Gas Continues to Drive U.S. Emissions Reductions
Mar 25, 2025 · Researchers found that natural gas development has led to an average annual reduction of 10.5 percent in CO2 emissions per capita, with overall ...Missing: fracking quotas
[152]
[PDF] Assessing the effectiveness of the EU Emissions Trading System - LSE
The EU ETS aims to reduce emissions and promote low-carbon investment, but its lack of flexibility may undermine its effectiveness.