Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Forearc

A forearc is the region of the overriding plate in a subduction zone located between the oceanic trench and the associated volcanic arc, where the subducting slab lies at depths typically less than 80 km.^[1]^[2] Forearcs form at convergent plate boundaries and are characterized by complex interactions between the subducting and overriding plates, including sediment accretion, tectonic deformation, and fluid migration.^[3] They often consist of an accretionary prism—a wedge-shaped body of folded and faulted sediments and oceanic rocks scraped off the downgoing plate—and may include a forearc basin, a sedimentary depression that accumulates turbidites, hemipelagic deposits, and arc-derived materials.^[4]^[5] These regions exhibit distinct thermal structures, with low surface heat flow near the trench due to conductive cooling by the cold subducting slab, transitioning to higher values toward the arc influenced by mantle flow and magmatism.^[1] Forearcs host critical processes such as devolatilization, hydration, and serpentinization, which release fluids that affect rock rheology, fault mechanics, and seismic behavior, including megathrust earthquakes and slow slip events.^[1] The geometry and evolution of forearcs vary with subduction parameters like sediment supply, plate convergence rate, and strain partitioning, leading to types such as compressional accretionary, extensional accretionary, or nonaccretionary basins.^[3] Forearcs are vital for recording subduction history, as their sedimentary records preserve evidence of plate interactions, tectonic erosion or accretion, and paleoenvironmental changes, influencing broader Earth processes like arc volcanism and continental growth.^[3]

Overview and Definition

Definition

A forearc is the wedge-shaped region of the overriding plate situated between an oceanic trench and the associated volcanic arc within a subduction zone, where the subducting slab lies at depths typically less than 80 km.^[6]^[1] This region forms as part of the convergent margin where the subducting oceanic plate descends beneath the overriding plate, creating a distinct tectonic domain characterized by compressional and deformational processes.^[6] Forearcs typically span 50–200 km in width and exhibit a seaward-sloping topography that transitions from the elevated volcanic arc toward the trench.^[7] They are marked by notably low heat flow, generally around 30–40 mW/m², resulting from the cooling influence of the cold subducting slab that inhibits significant thermal advection in the overlying mantle and crust.^[8] The forearc is distinguished from the backarc region, which occupies the area landward (behind) of the volcanic arc, and from the accretionary wedge, a specific compressional structural feature that develops at the seaward margin of the forearc through offscraping of subducting sediments.^[6]

Tectonic Context

The forearc represents a critical component of convergent plate margins, where oceanic lithosphere subducts beneath overriding continental or oceanic plates, driving a range of geodynamic processes.^[9] This subduction occurs at typical convergence rates of 2–10 cm/year, influencing the structural evolution and topographic development of the forearc region.^[10] In these settings, the forearc extends from the trench axis landward to the volcanic arc, forming a wedge-shaped domain that accommodates compressional stresses and material transfer between plates.^[9] The forearc interacts closely with the overlying mantle wedge, where the subducting slab creates a cold, stagnant corner that promotes hydration and mineralogical changes.^[11] Fluids released from the dehydrating slab infiltrate this region, leading to serpentinization of the mantle peridotite, which can reach 20–60% hydration in warmer subduction zones like Cascadia.^[11] This process contrasts sharply with the hotter backarc domain, where temperatures exceed 650°C, inducing mantle convection and destabilizing serpentinite, while the forearc remains relatively isolated from such flow due to its cooler thermal regime (typically below 400–500°C).^[9]^[11] As a prerequisite for arc magmatism, the forearc functions as a low-permeability barrier at the base of the lithosphere, redirecting slab-derived fluids and partial melts laterally toward the volcanic front.^[12] Melt crystallization in the cooler forearc lithosphere clogs migration pathways, focusing ascending magmas at the barrier's apex above ~100–150 km depth, thereby localizing volcanism and enabling the characteristic narrow arc morphology observed in most subduction zones.^[12] This channeling mechanism ensures that hydrous flux from the slab effectively triggers melting in the mantle wedge rather than dissipating across the forearc.^[9]

Formation Processes

Subduction Dynamics

The subduction of an oceanic plate beneath an overriding plate is the fundamental process that initiates forearc development by forming a deep oceanic trench at the convergent margin. This trench marks the surface expression of the subduction interface, where the descending oceanic lithosphere bends and descends into the mantle, typically at angles ranging from 30° to 60° for the slab's deeper segments.^[13] The dynamics of this subduction drive the initial shaping of the forearc region, which lies between the trench and the volcanic arc, through coupled plate motions and associated mantle processes. Convergence velocities, often on the order of 2–10 cm/year in active margins, further modulate these interactions by influencing the rate of plate underthrusting and the resulting stress distribution across the forearc.^[14] Mantle wedge flow above the subducting slab plays a critical role in forearc evolution, primarily induced by the downdip motion of the slab and modulated by the slab's dip angle and convergence velocity. In typical subduction settings, corner flow in the mantle wedge—where material is entrained downward near the trench and returns upward toward the arc—exhibits limited intensity in the forearc due to the slab's geometry and thermal regime. Specifically, the stagnant slab corner model describes a region of minimal convective flow in the forearc mantle wedge, where velocities are less than 0.2% of the slab's subduction speed, promoting a stable, isolated environment decoupled from broader mantle circulation.^[15] This stagnation arises from the interplay of viscous drag from the cold, descending slab and the overriding plate's resistance, with slab dips of 30°–60° and convergence rates favoring reduced corner flow near the trench.^[14] The thermal structure of the forearc is dominated by the cold subducting slab, which maintains low temperatures below 200°C proximal to the trench, facilitating brittle deformation along the subduction interface. This chill is a consequence of the slab's conductive cooling prior to subduction and limited advective heating from stagnant wedge flow, resulting in surface heat flows as low as 30–50 mW/m² in many forearcs.^[1] Such conditions enable seismogenic behavior in the upper plate and initial forearc crust, contrasting with hotter arcward regions influenced by slab-derived fluids and partial melting. The cold thermal regime reinforces the stagnant corner dynamics, as low temperatures increase mantle viscosity and suppress significant flow perturbations.^[16] Initial uplift in the forearc is primarily driven by the buoyancy of accreted material at the trench and subsequent isostatic adjustment of the overriding plate. As sediments and oceanic crust are scraped off and incorporated into the accretionary wedge, their lower density relative to the underlying mantle generates positive buoyancy forces, leading to localized rebound and emergence of forearc highs.^[17] This isostatic response compensates for the mass deficit created by subduction, with uplift rates potentially reaching several millimeters per year in active margins, establishing the foundational topography that defines the forearc basin and slope.^[18]

Sediment Accretion and Evolution

Sediment accretion in forearc regions primarily occurs through the offscraping and underplating of trench turbidites, pelagic sediments, and fragments of oceanic crust at the subduction interface, building the accretionary prism as the overriding plate incorporates these materials via tectonic shortening and thickening.^[19] This process dominates in subduction zones with high sediment supply to the trench, exceeding 1 km in thickness, where incoming sediments from continental margins or volcanic arcs are preferentially accreted rather than subducted wholesale.^[20] In contrast, areas with low sediment flux, such as sediment-starved margins like northern Chile, experience subduction erosion, where the forearc base is mechanically abraded and chemically altered, recycling previously accreted material back into the mantle.^[21] The evolution of forearc sediment budgets unfolds in distinct stages, beginning with initial rapid accretion driven by high sediment flux during early subduction phases, which constructs a protothrust zone and expands the prism seaward.^[22] As subduction progresses, this phase transitions to tectonic erosion when sediment supply diminishes or convergence rates increase beyond 60 mm/yr, leading to basal undercutting and removal of forearc crust at rates up to 1-2 km/Myr. During arc-continent collisions, such as in Taiwan or the North Andean margin, orogenesis intensifies this shift, causing uplift of the accretionary wedge, widespread deformation, and exposure of older forearc rocks through thrust faulting and folding.^[23] Erosional processes further modify forearc evolution by exposing and recycling rocks via subaerial weathering on emergent highs and submarine mass wasting on slopes, contributing to sediment redistribution within the system.^[24] Submarine erosion often manifests as olistostromes—chaotic deposits of lithified blocks derived from prism failure—triggered by seismic shaking or oversteepening, as observed in the Nankai Trough where upper slope collapses produced olistostromic units containing blocks from older accreted sediments.^[25] These mass-wasting events not only recycle material but also influence prism stability by reducing taper angles and altering fluid pressures along the décollement.^[26]

Internal Structure

Morphological Components

The forearc region in subduction zones is characterized by distinct topographic and structural elements that form due to the interaction between the subducting oceanic plate and the overriding plate. The outermost component is the oceanic trench, representing the deepest point where the subducting plate bends downward, typically reaching depths of 7-11 km below sea level.^[27] This depression marks the initial site of convergence and serves as a sediment trap before subduction. Landward of the trench lies the accretionary prism, a wedge-shaped mass of deformed sediments scraped off the subducting plate and accreted to the overriding margin. This structure consists of imbricate thrust sheets and folded layers, forming a seaward-verging stack that thickens landward and can extend tens to hundreds of kilometers wide.^[28] Further inland, the forearc basin acts as a subsiding depocenter, accumulating sediments derived from the arc and trench, often reaching thicknesses of several kilometers in elongate troughs bounded by the prism and the volcanic arc. The outer-arc high, an uplifted ridge parallel to the trench, separates the basin from the prism and results from compressional deformation or underplating of sediments beneath the forearc crust.^[28] The overall topography of these components is maintained in a state of dynamic equilibrium, where isostatic buoyancy of the relatively light forearc crust counteracts the compressional forces from plate convergence, as described by the critical taper theory. This balance produces a typical seaward slope of the forearc wedge ranging from 1° to 5°, with gentler angles on accretionary margins and steeper ones on erosive margins, reflecting variations in sediment supply and convergence rates. Deformation within the forearc is dominated by synsedimentary folds and thrust faults that develop as sediments are incorporated into the prism, accommodating shortening through imbrication and duplexing.^[28] The seismogenic zone, where interplate earthquakes nucleate, extends along the subduction interface at depths of 10-40 km, transitioning from brittle failure near the surface to ductile behavior deeper in the crust.^[29] These features collectively define the forearc's physical layout, influencing sediment routing and seismic potential.

Lithological and Sedimentary Features

The lithology of forearc regions is predominantly characterized by intensely deformed sedimentary and ultramafic rocks formed through tectonic accretion and subduction-related processes. Deformed turbidites, often in the form of flysch sequences, form extensive layers within the accretionary prism and overlying basins, representing deep-marine deposits derived from trench and arc sources.^[30] Tectonic mélanges, consisting of chaotically mixed blocks of sandstone, chert, limestone, and mafic rocks embedded in a sheared mudstone matrix, are common in the accretionary wedge, reflecting repeated episodes of underplating and deformation.^[31] Serpentinized peridotites, altered from mantle harzburgites through hydration by slab-derived fluids, dominate the basal parts of the forearc crust, particularly in supra-subduction zone settings, and often appear as blocks within mélanges.^[32] Forearc basins exhibit thick sedimentary fills, reaching up to several kilometers in thickness, primarily composed of arc-derived clastic sediments such as volcaniclastic sandstones and conglomerates.^[5] These basins subside mainly due to slab pull forces, which create accommodation space for sediment accumulation, supplemented by flexural loading from the adjacent accretionary wedge.^[33] The sedimentary architecture includes submarine turbidite fans sourced from the volcanic arc, interbedded with hemipelagic muds that incorporate both terrigenous and pelagic components, forming progradational sequences that record episodic basin filling and erosion.^[5] Magmatic activity in forearcs is limited compared to the volcanic arc, with minor igneous intrusions linked to slab dehydration fluids rather than widespread melting. Boninites, high-magnesium andesites formed by flux melting of depleted mantle peridotite in the forearc wedge, occur as dikes and lavas, as exemplified in the Eocene sequences of the Izu-Bonin-Mariana forearc.^[34] Instead of traditional volcanism, serpentine mud volcanoes emerge as prominent features, rising up to 2 km in height and spanning tens of kilometers in diameter, driven by the ascent of deeply serpentinized mantle material along forearc faults.^[35] These structures, such as those in the Mariana forearc, extrude muds composed of >90% serpentinite with entrained clasts, facilitating fluid venting without significant silicate melt production.^[36]

Geodynamic Models

Sediment Supply Variations

Sediment supply to the trench plays a pivotal role in determining the architecture and evolution of forearc regions, with variations in flux leading to distinct geodynamic regimes. Low sediment input typically results in a thin accretionary prism, where subduction erosion dominates, removing material from the base and frontal portions of the forearc wedge. This erosion process is facilitated by limited sediment buffering in the trench, allowing direct interaction between the subducting plate and the overriding forearc, often resulting in deeper forearc basins due to the lack of substantial infill. Such conditions are prevalent in intra-oceanic subduction settings, like the Mariana and Tonga arcs, where pelagic sediments and minimal terrigenous input from continental sources promote net material loss rather than accumulation. In contrast, high sediment supply fosters the development of a thick accretionary wedge, characterized by shallow forearc basins filled with prograding sediments. Abundant terrigenous input, often from major river systems draining continental hinterlands, enables processes like offscraping—where sediments are scraped off the subducting plate at the trench—and underplating, which adds material to the base of the wedge, enhancing its structural stability and growth. This regime is typical of continental margin forearcs, such as those along the Sumatra-Andaman subduction zone fed by the Ganges-Brahmaputra river system, where sediment volumes exceed erosion rates, leading to pronounced wedge thickening and basin shallowing. These contrasting models highlight how sediment flux modulates the balance between constructional and destructive processes in forearc development. Classic theoretical frameworks for understanding these variations stem from the critical taper wedge theory, which posits that accretionary prisms maintain a stable geometry where the wedge taper angle β—defined as the sum of the surface slope and the basal detachment dip—ranges from 3° to 10° depending on material properties and loading. In low-sediment scenarios, the thin prism achieves this taper through erosion-dominated adjustment, while high-sediment cases support a broader, thicker wedge via accretionary buildup. This model, introduced by Davis et al. (1983), provides a mechanical basis for prism stability under varying sediment inputs, emphasizing the role of frictional strength along the décollement in controlling wedge morphology without invoking complex rheologies.

Tectonic Parameter Influences

Tectonic parameters, including the age of the subducting oceanic crust and the rate of plate convergence, profoundly influence forearc morphology and the balance between accretionary growth and tectonic erosion in subduction zones. Older oceanic crust, characterized by its colder thermal state and higher density, promotes tectonic erosion by increasing the strength of the subducting slab, which enhances interplate coupling and facilitates basal undercutting of the forearc wedge.^[37] In contrast, younger, warmer crust tends to favor weaker coupling, allowing for more stable accretionary processes. High convergence rates, typically exceeding 5–6 cm/yr, further amplify this coupling, driving rapid prism growth in sediment-rich settings while accelerating erosion where sediment supply is limited, as observed in margins like the Peru-Chile Trench.^[37] The accretionary flux serves as a key quantitative control on forearc evolution, representing the volume of material available for prism construction. This flux is calculated as the product of the convergence rate and the thickness of incoming trench sediment:

\text{Accretionary flux} = v_c \times h_s

where v_c is the convergence rate (in km/Myr) and h_s is the sediment thickness (in km). Variations in this flux lead to significant differences in prism volume; for instance, fluxes exceeding 30 km³/km/Myr support substantial wedge development, whereas lower values result in net forearc thinning through subduction erosion.^[37] Post-2020 numerical modeling efforts have refined these understandings by incorporating dynamic slab behaviors, such as variable rollback, which directly modulates forearc width. In two-dimensional elasto-visco-plastic simulations, episodic slab rollback induces trench retreat and upper-plate tilting, narrowing the forearc by up to several kilometers through enhanced subsidence and reduced extension in shorter oceanic basins.^[38] These models highlight how rollback velocity (e.g., 2–5 cm/yr) interacts with slab length to control forearc geometry, offering modern interpretations that supersede earlier static frameworks by emphasizing time-dependent geodynamic feedbacks.^[39]

Seismicity and Hazards

Earthquake Mechanisms

In forearc regions of subduction zones, the megathrust zone at the plate interface, typically spanning depths of 0 to 40 km, exhibits stick-slip failure driven by frictional locking between the subducting and overriding plates.^[40] This behavior arises from velocity-weakening friction, where the fault accumulates elastic strain during interseismic periods of locking before releasing it abruptly in earthquakes. Low heat flow in these zones, often below 50 mW/m², indicates minimal frictional heating from aseismic creep, thereby sustaining high shear stresses (up to ~40 MPa) that promote seismic instability rather than steady sliding. The degree of plate coupling in forearc megathrusts is quantified through interseismic surface displacements observed via GPS networks, which reveal the slip deficit as a fraction of the long-term plate convergence rate.^[41] High coupling, where the interface locks at greater than 80% of convergence, builds significant strain and facilitates great earthquakes of magnitude 8 or larger; for instance, the 2011 Tohoku-oki event (Mw 9.0) ruptured a highly coupled segment along the Japan Trench, with coseismic slip exceeding 50 m in areas previously identified as strongly locked.^[41] Such coupling distributions, derived from backslip models, correlate spatially with rupture extents, highlighting how forearc locking controls seismic potential.^[41] Recent studies from 2021 to 2025 have advanced understanding of forearc seismicity by linking slow-slip events (SSEs) to foreshocks, revealing heterogeneous friction along the megathrust.^[42] SSEs, which release strain aseismically over days to months, often precede or accompany increased seismicity rates by up to threefold, as observed across circum-Pacific subduction zones, suggesting frictional patches with varying velocity-weakening properties.^[42] In particular, migrating foreshocks during SSEs, such as those before the 2011 Tohoku-oki mainshock, indicate localized heterogeneity where fluid pressures and fault roughness modulate slip propagation, enabling cascade triggering of dynamic ruptures.^[43] These findings, drawn from integrated geodetic and seismic datasets, underscore the role of frictional variability in modulating earthquake nucleation within forearcs.^[43]

Associated Risks

Forearc regions, situated above subduction megathrusts, pose significant hazards beyond direct seismic shaking due to their role in amplifying secondary effects from plate boundary ruptures. Tsunamis are primarily generated when vertical seafloor displacement—through uplift or subsidence—during megathrust earthquakes disturbs overlying water masses, initiating propagating waves that can devastate coastlines. In the 2011 Tohoku-oki event, such deformation along the Japan Trench forearc produced run-up heights exceeding 40 meters in parts of the Sanriku coast, highlighting the potential for extreme inundation in regions with steep bathymetric relief.^[44]^[45] Submarine landslides represent another critical risk, often triggered by the oversteepened slopes of accretionary prisms in forearc settings, where tectonic compression and sediment loading reduce slope stability. These mass movements can occur independently or be exacerbated by seismic shaking, displacing large volumes of sediment and generating localized tsunamis or disrupting seafloor infrastructure. For instance, in the Nankai Trough forearc, normal faulting along steep prism flanks has facilitated recurrent landslides, as evidenced by bathymetric and seismic surveys revealing slide scars up to several kilometers wide. Similarly, gas hydrate destabilization in forearc sediments, particularly at sites like Hydrate Ridge in the Cascadia margin, can release methane and weaken strata, thereby triggering turbidity currents that erode channels and transport sediments basinward. Earthquake-induced shaking has been linked to recurrent hydrate dissociation here, amplifying slope failure risks through short-term pore pressure increases.^[46]^[47]^[48] Mitigation strategies for these forearc hazards benefit from geophysical correlations and advanced monitoring. Low heat flow in forearcs, indicative of cooler subduction thermal regimes, often aligns with zones prone to large megathrust ruptures and enhanced tsunami generation, as frictional locking persists to shallower depths, allowing greater slip accumulation. This pattern is observed in margins like Cascadia and Tohoku, where subdued heat flux correlates with historical giant events. Contemporary efforts employ GPS networks on land and seafloor observatories to track interseismic deformation and early rupture signals; for example, cabled systems in the Japan Trench and Cascadia provide real-time data on vertical seafloor motion, enabling improved tsunami forecasting and hazard zoning.^[49]^[50]^[51]^[52]

Examples

Intra-Oceanic Cases

Intra-oceanic forearcs, such as those in the Mariana and Izu-Bonin subduction systems, exhibit distinct characteristics due to their development in oceanic settings with limited continental sediment input, resulting in thin accretionary prisms and prominent erosional regimes. These environments are dominated by mantle-derived processes, including serpentinization driven by fluids from the subducting slab, which facilitate unique geological features like mud volcanism. Low sediment supply from the overriding plate leads to minimal prism growth, emphasizing tectonic erosion over accretion.^[53]^[54] The Mariana forearc exemplifies these traits through its extensive serpentinite mud volcanoes, formed by the hydration of forearc mantle peridotites via fluids ascending from the subduction channel along normal faults. These structures, such as South Chamorro Seamount, reach heights of approximately 2 km and diameters up to 30 km at their base, with mud flows comprising serpentinized ultramafic material exhumed from depths of 15–30 km. The low sediment supply in this intra-oceanic setting promotes an erosional regime, where the forearc thins and recycles material back into the subduction zone, contrasting with sediment-rich continental margins. Recent analyses of drilling data from International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP) Expedition 366 indicate serpentinization degrees ranging from 22% to 38% in the outer forearc mantle, with transformation increasing toward the trench due to enhanced fluid flux, highlighting the role of progressive hydration in sustaining mud volcanism.^[36]^[11]^[55] In the Izu-Bonin arc, the forearc forms a narrow prism, typically less than 50 km wide, influenced by boninitic volcanism associated with early subduction initiation around 52 Ma. This volcanism produced high-silica, low-potassium lavas from refractory mantle sources, contributing to the thin basaltic basement exposed in the forearc. Slab rollback has widened the forearc over time by inducing extension and backarc spreading, separating the volcanic front from the trench and maintaining the erosional character with sparse hemipelagic sediments. These features underscore the dynamic response of intra-oceanic forearcs to rapid subduction initiation and ongoing plate retreat.^[34]^[54]^[56]

Continental Margin Cases

Continental margin forearcs, situated along the edges of major landmasses, are characterized by substantial sediment influx from adjacent orogenic belts, fostering the development of expansive accretionary prisms and influencing collisional tectonics. These systems contrast with intra-oceanic settings by integrating high terrestrial sediment loads that buffer subduction erosion and modulate stress distribution across the margin. In regions like the Andes and Southeast Asia, riverine delivery from uplifted terrains drives prism growth, while oblique convergence often leads to partitioned deformation and elevated seismic hazards. The Peru-Chile Trench exemplifies a continental margin forearc dominated by voluminous sediment supply from the Andean orogen, resulting in a thick accretionary prism. Rivers draining the Andes, such as those in central and southern Chile, transport thick turbidite sequences into the trench, where they fuel the formation of prisms up to 50-60 km wide. This sediment flux, enhanced by Neogene shortening and orogenic wedge advance, promotes frontal accretion and limits subduction erosion, maintaining a relatively stable forearc morphology under compressional stress. The region's high seismicity is underscored by the 1960 Valdivia earthquake (Mw 9.5), which ruptured a ~1000 km-long thrust fault along the subduction interface, causing uplift of the continental slope and a devastating tsunami. Seismicity patterns here reflect partial coupling of the Nazca-South American plates, with interseismic locking facilitating megathrust events. Along the Sumatra-Andaman subduction zone, the forearc features a prominent accretionary complex shaped by oblique convergence and post-collisional adjustments following the India-Eurasia collision around 59 Ma. The complex includes a wide (200-250 km) forearc basin floored by continental crust rifted ~23-30 Ma, with Cenozoic sediments up to 3.5 km thick recording episodic backthrusting and strike-slip faulting along features like the Eastern Margin Fault and Andaman-Nicobar Fault. The 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake (Mw 9.2) ruptured ~1300 km of the margin, with maximum co-seismic slip of ~20 m on splay faults within the accretionary wedge, triggering massive tsunamigenesis and subsequent post-seismic deformation on median thrust faults. Post-collisional evolution has involved arc-parallel subduction at ~43 mm/year, promoting the development of forearc highs and basins through oblique partitioning, with ongoing afterslip redistributing stress across the complex. Recent monitoring at the Hikurangi margin in New Zealand highlights dynamic forearc responses to slow slip events (SSEs), providing 2024 insights into fluid-driven processes in this continental margin setting. Offshore SSEs in 2019 exhibited up-dip migration over weeks, with peak slips exceeding 200 mm at 6-12 km depths near the trench, overlapping zones of historical tsunamigenic earthquakes and indicating potential for hybrid seismic slip. Deep SSEs at 20-50 km depths, recurring every ~5 years, correlate with fluctuations in crustal Vp/Vs ratios (1.6-2.8), signaling fluid pressure drops of <20 MPa and permeability changes that facilitate slow deformation without fast rupture. These findings, derived from integrated GNSS, InSAR, and seafloor geodetic data, emphasize the role of subducting volcaniclastic sediments in supplying fluids that modulate forearc seismicity and hazard potential.

References

[1]
Thermal Structure of the Forearc in Subduction Zones: A ...
May 30, 2019 · The forearc region of subduction zones can be defined as the region between the trench and the arc, typically in the region where the slab ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[2]
forearc – An Introduction to Geology - OpenGeology
Area in front of the arc, between the arc and the trench. Often marked by an accretionary wedge or a forearc basin. Related Articles: 2 Plate Tectonics · « Back ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[3]
Forearc basins: Types, geometries, and relationships to subduction ...
May 1, 2016 · Forearc basins typically develop along continental margins and island arcs where oceanic plates are subducting beneath the overriding crust.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[4]
Accretionary Prism - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
An accretionary prism is defined as a geological formation that occurs at the leading edge of convergent plate boundaries, where sediments and rocks from ...
[5]
Forearc Basin - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
A forearc basin is a marine depositional basin on the trench side of an arc, accumulating sediments like turbidites and hemipelagic deposits.
[6]
[PDF] RESEARCH To understand subduction initiation, study forearc crust
Such situations of forearc thickening and widening are globally unusual, because most forearcs lose upper-plate crust to the subduc- tion zone due to tectonic ...
[7]
Deep‐seated flow as a mechanism for the uplift of broad forearc ...
... 50- to 200-km-wide forearc ridge is developed along the inboard edge of the subduction complex. These forearc ridges did not form until subduction ... Widths ...
[8]
[PDF] the Cascadia subduction zone and backarc - University of Alberta
Over the Cascadia forearc, surface heat flow is low (30–40 mW/m2) due to the cooling effect of the subducting slab [26–28] (Fig. 2). Approximately 30 km ...Missing: m² | Show results with:m²
[9]
An introductory review of the thermal structure of subduction zones
Jul 28, 2023 · ... typical thickness of 100 km. Upon subduction, the oceanic lithosphere stops cooling and starts warming due to a combination of processes.Missing: width | Show results with:width
[10]
Transient stripping of subducting slabs controls periodic forearc uplift
Apr 14, 2020 · After each accretion event, a period of internal re-equilibration of the forearc wedge is marked by a subsidence period as predicted by the ...
[11]
Serpentinization of the forearc mantle wedge in subduction zones
Does serpentinization isolate the forearc wedge from the induced mantle-wedge flow system? The low surface heat flow observed in subduction-zone forearcs ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[12]
Melt Focusing Along Permeability Barriers at Subduction Zones and ...
Nov 17, 2020 · Fluids released from dehydration reactions occurring in subducting slabs trigger partial melting in the mantle wedge. The resulting magma ...
[13]
Subduction Duration and Slab Dip - Hu - 2020 - AGU Journals - Wiley
Mar 9, 2020 · Measurement of slab dip angles gives a mean shallow dip of 23.1° ± 8.0° and mean deep dip of 48.5° ± 13.6° (αd1), 55.2° ± 12.9° (αd2), 52.9° ± ...
[14]
Mantle flow in subduction systems: The mantle wedge flow field and ...
Jan 4, 2013 · The mantle wedge above subducting slabs is associated with many important processes, including the transport of melt and volatiles.
[15]
Stagnant forearc mantle wedge inferred from mapping of shear ...
Nov 10, 2020 · A stagnant forearc mantle wedge provides a stable and cold tectonic environment that is important for the petrological evolution and earthquake ...
[16]
[PDF] The cold and relatively dry nature of mantle forearcs in subduction ...
Apr 10, 2017 · In summary, most subduction zone mantle forearcs should be only weakly hydrated (<20%) owing to low water fluxes and short dura- tions of stable ...
[17]
The Role of Sediment Accretion and Buoyancy on Subduction ...
Oct 13, 2021 · During the initial phase of forced subduction, a low sediment density favors more sediment accretion than subduction. Therefore, at the end of ...
[18]
To understand subduction initiation, study forearc crust
Dec 1, 2012 · Izu-Bonin-Mariana subduction initiation encompassed ∼7 m.y. for the complete transition from initial seafloor spreading and eruption of ...<|separator|>
[19]
Observations at convergent margins concerning sediment ...
Observations at convergent margins concerning sediment subduction, subduction erosion, and the growth of continental crust. Roland von Huene,.
[20]
Subduction zones and their hydrocarbon systems - GeoScienceWorld
Aug 14, 2018 · For an accretionary forearc to develop, sediment thickness in the trench must exceed ∼1 km, an occurrence that depends both on the supply of ...
[21]
Subduction erosion and basal friction along the sediment‐starved ...
Feb 6, 2003 · [35] Subduction erosion along the north Chile margin was previously estimated [von Huene and Scholl, 1991; Scheuber, 1994], but those rates were ...
[22]
Punctuated growth of an accretionary prism and the onset of a ...
Nov 21, 2018 · In this study, we interpret seismic profiles of the northern edge of the Kumano forearc basin, discuss the Nankai forearc evolution, and propose ...
[23]
Cenozoic Stages of Forearc Evolution Following the Accretion of a ...
Mar 12, 2019 · Forearc basin formation in the tectonic wake of a collision-driven, coastwise migrating crustal block: The example of the North Andean block ...
[24]
Slumping and mass transport deposition in the Nankai fore arc ...
May 11, 2011 · At about 1 Ma an exceptional mass-wasting event eroded a large part of the upper slope basin, slope apron, and hanging wall of the MSFZ in ...
[25]
[PDF] 27. sedimentary facies evolution of the nankai forearc and its ...
Massive failure of the seafloor in the upper slope region produces olistostrome deposits that contain lithified blocks derived from older accretionary prism ...
[26]
Origin and significance of olistostromes in the evolution of orogenic ...
Olistostromes (sedimentary mélanges) represent the products of ancient submarine mass transport processes.
[27]
[PDF] Ocean Trenches - The University of Texas at Dallas
The older the seafloor, the deeper it lies, and this controls the minimum depth from which the seafloor begins to descend into the subduction zone. This obvious ...
[28]
Forearc Basin Stratigraphy and Interactions With Accretionary ...
Feb 17, 2018 · The basic idea of this study is that the basin stratigraphy is controlled by changing sediment fluxes to and from the system, including sediment ...
[29]
Proc. IODP, 344, Expedition 344 summary - IODP Publications
Studies of interplate seismicity have shown that large earthquakes generally initiate within specific depth limits, generally between ~10 and 40 km (Byrne et al ...
[30]
https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/133/3-4/753/5236167/753.pdf
[31]
[PDF] Forearc magmatic evolution during subduction initiation
Aug 5, 2020 · Subduction initiation is a key process in the operation of plate tectonics. Our under- standing of melting processes and magmatic.
[32]
Geochemical characterization of ophiolites in the Alpine-Himalayan ...
In some ophiolites, ultramafic rocks are only categorized as unspecified peridotites, or as serpentinized peridotites due to their pervasive alteration. In ...
[33]
[PDF] Tectonics of Sedimentary Basins
Nov 20, 2017 · Subsidence of sedimentary basins results from (1) thinning of crust (2) thickening of mantle lithosphere (3) sedimentary and volcanic loading (4) ...
[34]
Magmatic Response to Subduction Initiation, Part II: Boninites and ...
Nov 16, 2020 · Boninite forms by fluid-flux melting of previously depleted mantle in response to subduction initiation, where early boninites, ...4.3 Petrography And... · 4.4 Geochemistry · 4.6 Petrogenetic Modeling
[35]
Spatial variation of subduction zone fluids during progressive ...
Feb 15, 2022 · This is one of the largest serpentinite mud volcanoes in the forearc, spanning 50 km in width and 2 km in height (Fryer, 1996). ... 200°C ...
[36]
Fluid‐Mantle Interaction Along the Mariana Convergent Margin
Sep 5, 2023 · Active serpentinite mud volcanoes are currently restricted only to the IBM forearc; within the Mariana forearc they occur up to a distance of ...Missing: intrusions | Show results with:intrusions
[37]
Controls on tectonic accretion versus erosion in subduction zones ...
Apr 8, 2004 · Tectonic erosion is favored in regions where convergence rates exceed 6 ± 0.1 cm yr−1 and where the sedimentary cover is <1 km. Accretion ...
[38]
The Dynamics of Forearc – Back‐Arc Basin Subsidence: Numerical Models and Observations From Mediterranean Subduction Zones
### Summary of Numerical Models Showing Variable Slab Rollback Affecting Forearc Width
[39]
Slab Rollback Orogeny Model: A Test of Concept - AGU Journals
Aug 25, 2020 · Here we explore this problem using 2-D numerical models in a generic subduction and continental collision setting. Our results show how the ...Introduction · Seismo-Thermo-Mechanical... · Results · Discussion
[40]
Subduction zone megathrust earthquakes - GeoScienceWorld
Jul 6, 2018 · ... plate convergence in subduction zones, one might expect the stick-slip failure of megathrust faults to be at least somewhat regular. This ...Missing: heat | Show results with:heat
[41]
Spatial correlation of interseismic coupling and coseismic rupture ...
Sep 7, 2011 · Prior to the occurrence of the Tohoku-oki earthquake, subduction zone coupling distributions were developed based on earthquake cycle models ...Missing: strength M8+
[42]
Global subduction slow slip events and associated earthquakes
Aug 30, 2024 · Three decades of geodetic monitoring have established slow slip events (SSEs) as a common mode of fault slip, sometimes linked with ...
[43]
Physical mechanisms of earthquake nucleation and foreshocks
In the migratory slow-slip model (Fig. 2e), aseismic slip, rather than fluid flow, is hypothesized to be the main driver of the foreshock and the mainshock ...
[44]
Near-field propagation of tsunamis from megathrust earthquakes
We investigate controls on tsunami generation and propagation in the near-field of great megathrust earthquakes using a series of numerical simulations of ...
[45]
Effects of longitudinal valley slopes on runup of the 2011 Tohoku ...
Apr 1, 2018 · The most recent tsunami, generated by the 2011 Tohoku-oki earthquake, had a run-up height of up to 40 m along the Sanriku coast (Tsuji et al., ...
[46]
Structural architecture and active deformation of the Nankai ...
Nov 1, 2009 · In addition to thrusts, normal faults are also observed here, suggesting the instability of the steep seaward slope. These normal faults are ...
[47]
Submarine Landslides on the Nankai Trough Accretionary Prism ...
Nov 4, 2019 · The forearc basin has several young 3–5 km wide landslides that are associated with recent normal faults. There are also several older buried ...
[48]
The Influence of Subduction Zone Earthquakes on the Frequency of ...
We postulate that earthquake-triggered submarine landslides are a dominant mechanism that could have a short-term recurrent effect on the destabilization of gas ...Missing: forearc | Show results with:forearc
[49]
Implications for shallow megathrust behavior and tsunami hazards
Nov 20, 2020 · Globally observed correlations between marine forearc morphology and structure and megathrust earthquake slip, magnitude, and rupture length ...Results · Links To Megathrust Behavior · Tsunami Hazard Implications
[50]
SUBDUCTION ZONES - Stern - 2002 - Reviews of Geophysics
Dec 31, 2002 · The magmatic front marks the boundary between low heat flow in the forearc and high heat flow beneath the magmatic arc and the back arc region ( ...Missing: prone | Show results with:prone
[51]
Canada's New Observatory Uses 'Seafloor GPS'
Apr 30, 2019 · The new Northern Cascadia Subduction Zone Observatory (NCSZO) will use a “seafloor GPS” network to monitor long-term movements of the subducting ...Missing: forearc | Show results with:forearc
[52]
The slow earthquake spectrum in the Japan Trench illuminated by ...
Aug 23, 2019 · We mapped a detailed distribution of tectonic tremors, which coincided with very-low-frequency earthquakes and a slow slip event.
[53]
Mariana serpentinite mud volcanism exhumes subducted seamount ...
Jan 6, 2020 · The faults permit fluids originating from the subduction channel to permeate the forearc mantle and erupt to form immense (up to 50 km diameter ...Introduction · Mariana forearc deformation... · Forearc mantle serpentinization
[54]
[PDF] An Overview of the Izu-Bonin-Mariana Subduction Factory
The forearc is that part of the arc system between the trench and the line of arc volcanoes that define the mag- matic front. The IBM forearc is very narrow in ...
[55]
Comparative Properties of Saponitic Fault Gouge and Serpentinite ...
Apr 21, 2025 · The serpentinite mud volcanoes of the Mariana subduction system consist of serpentinites derived from the mantle wedge of the hanging wall, ...
[56]
Magmatic Response to Subduction Initiation: Part 1. Fore‐arc ...
The Izu‐Bonin‐Mariana (IBM) fore arc preserves igneous rock assemblages that formed during subduction initiation circa 52 Ma. International Ocean Discovery ...